From 3da2867010ea9034ee53e022220e5a8bc8958a71 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bob Coecke <coecke@cs.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 22:36:49 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Following Ross' suggestion, emphasised open access.
---
NEWPROPOSAL/FULLPROP.tex | 21 +++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/NEWPROPOSAL/FULLPROP.tex b/NEWPROPOSAL/FULLPROP.tex
index 9f0f99b..3af54a5 100644
--- a/NEWPROPOSAL/FULLPROP.tex
+++ b/NEWPROPOSAL/FULLPROP.tex
@@ -957,14 +957,14 @@ with industry.}
\paragraph{Dissemination.\!\!}
\label{sec:dissemination}
-\bR personal opinion : we should be bold and say Fuck the (journal)
-System. We will publish only in true open venues like Quantum.
-Nature can go to hell. \e
+%\bR personal opinion : we should be bold and say Fuck the (journal)
+%System. We will publish only in true open venues like Quantum.
+%Nature can go to hell. \e
The primary means of dissemination will be by publishing our results
in leading journals and conferences, with a strong preference for open access
venues. (We note that in computer science, the highest impact
-publication venues are conferences with published proceedings.) We
-will target:
+publication venues are conferences with published proceedings.)
+%We will target:
\begin{itemize}
\item Specialist quantum information venues: \emph{Quantum Information
and Computation} (QIC), \emph{Quantum Information Processing}
@@ -975,16 +975,17 @@ will target:
Science} (LiCS), \emph{Principles of Programming Languages}
(POPL), \emph{Automata, Logic and Programming} (ICALP), \emph{Tools
and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems}
- (TACAS).
+ (TACAS).
\item Mainstream physics journals: \emph{Physical Review Letters} (PRL),
\emph{Physical Review A} (PRA), the \emph{New Journal of Physics} (NJP), and
- \emph{Communications in Mathematical Physics} (CMP), and the diamond open access journal \emph{Quantum}.
+ \emph{Communications in Mathematical Physics} (CMP),
+ \item \newt{The diamond open access journal \emph{Quantum}.}
\item \newt{Our own recently
established diamond open access journal \emph{Compositionality}.}
\end{itemize}
-The consortium members have a strong record of publishing in these
-leading venues. Other venues will targeted opportunistically in order
-to achieve the most timely publication of our results.
+The consortium members have a strong record of publishing in all of these
+leading venues. %Other venues will targeted opportunistically in order to achieve the most timely publication of our results.
+\newt{However, as strong supporters of (diamond) open access publishing, we feel strongly about publishing in the latter two, as well as the other open access journals.}
\TODOb{Is this still correct?}
\bR We plan three annual workshops, which will
--
GitLab