diff --git a/NEWPROPOSAL/FULLPROP.tex b/NEWPROPOSAL/FULLPROP.tex
index 6c5f51b97da1e0e1f9206db4d70f0c1d310c1e07..a4477a4d70c8887758a4d911741ebb18aed89025 100644
--- a/NEWPROPOSAL/FULLPROP.tex
+++ b/NEWPROPOSAL/FULLPROP.tex
@@ -957,14 +957,14 @@ with industry.}
 
 \paragraph{Dissemination.\!\!}
 \label{sec:dissemination}
-\bR personal opinion : we should be bold and say Fuck the (journal)
-System.  We will publish only in true open venues like Quantum.
-Nature can go to hell. \e
+%\bR personal opinion : we should be bold and say Fuck the (journal)
+%System.  We will publish only in true open venues like Quantum.
+%Nature can go to hell. \e
 The primary means of dissemination will be by publishing our results
 in leading journals and conferences, with a strong preference for open access
 venues.  (We note that in computer science, the highest impact
-publication venues are conferences with published proceedings.)  We
-will target:
+publication venues are conferences with published proceedings.)  
+%We will target:
 \begin{itemize}
 \item Specialist quantum information venues: \emph{Quantum Information
     and Computation} (QIC), \emph{Quantum Information Processing}
@@ -975,16 +975,17 @@ will target:
     Science} (LiCS), \emph{Principles of Programming Languages}
   (POPL), \emph{Automata, Logic and Programming} (ICALP), \emph{Tools
     and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems}
-  (TACAS).
+  (TACAS). 
 \item Mainstream physics journals: \emph{Physical Review Letters} (PRL),
   \emph{Physical Review A} (PRA), the \emph{New Journal of Physics} (NJP), and
-  \emph{Communications in Mathematical Physics} (CMP), and the diamond open access journal \emph{Quantum}.
+  \emph{Communications in Mathematical Physics} (CMP), 
+  \item \newt{The diamond open access journal \emph{Quantum}.}
   \item \newt{Our own recently
   established diamond open access journal \emph{Compositionality}.}
 \end{itemize}
-The consortium members have a strong record of publishing in these
-leading venues.  Other venues will targeted opportunistically in order
-to achieve the most timely publication of our results.
+The consortium members have a strong record of publishing in all of these
+leading venues.  %Other venues will targeted opportunistically in order to achieve the most timely publication of our results.
+\newt{However, as strong supporters of (diamond) open access publishing, we feel strongly about publishing in the latter two, as well as the other open access journals.}
 
 \TODOb{Is this still correct?}
 \bR We plan three annual workshops, which will