From 5689066860406ad73b2c1203097dc3e6850da139 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: William Waites <william.waites@strath.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 11:36:00 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] lecture 2 and assignment 2

---
 README.org          |    11 +-
 cs101-csai-lec2.org |   381 +
 cs101-csai-lec2.pdf |   Bin 0 -> 353348 bytes
 img/neglog.png      |   Bin 0 -> 15926 bytes
 lec2/entropy.py     |    29 +
 lec2/example.py     |    37 +
 lec2/letters.py     |    59 +
 lec2/republic.txt   | 24919 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 8 files changed, 25433 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 cs101-csai-lec2.org
 create mode 100644 cs101-csai-lec2.pdf
 create mode 100644 img/neglog.png
 create mode 100755 lec2/entropy.py
 create mode 100644 lec2/example.py
 create mode 100755 lec2/letters.py
 create mode 100644 lec2/republic.txt

diff --git a/README.org b/README.org
index c66d6c5..2fb228d 100644
--- a/README.org
+++ b/README.org
@@ -24,9 +24,14 @@ Mondays 14:00-15:00 RC426
 - 30% :: Assignment 1 - [[./cs101-csai-lec1.pdf][Yak Shaving]]
   - 20% :: Create a git repository with a file, and share it
   - 10% :: Put a transcript of a session with the Emacs doctor in that file
-- 20% :: Assignment 2
-- 20% :: Assignment 3
-- 20% :: Assignment 4
+- 30% :: Assignment 2 - [[./cs101-csai-lec1.pdf][Probability and Text]]
+  - 10% :: Write a program to output random characters
+  - 10% :: Write a program that, given a character, predicts the next character
+  - 10% :: Write a program to output a sequence of characters
+  - 10% (bonus) :: Write a program that outputs a sequence of
+    characters conditional on the previous two characters
+- 30% :: Assignment 3
+
   
 * Topics
 1. Yak Shaving - Software Engineering Tooling [[./cs101-csai-lec1.pdf][(PDF]])
diff --git a/cs101-csai-lec2.org b/cs101-csai-lec2.org
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..210472f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/cs101-csai-lec2.org
@@ -0,0 +1,381 @@
+#+title: CS101 - Cognitive Science and Artificial Intelligence - Lecture 2
+#+startup: beamer
+#+latex_class: beamer
+#+latex_class_options: [14pt,aspectratio=169,hyperref={pdfpagelabels=false},svgnames]
+#+latex_header_extra: \usetheme{strath}
+#+latex_header_extra: \usepackage{tikz}
+#+latex_header_extra: \usepackage{pgfplots}
+#+latex_header_extra: \usepackage{filecontents}
+#+options: toc:nil
+
+* CS101 - Cog. Sci. and AI
+
+** Today
+
+- Recap of assignment 1 - git
+- Probability and text
+
+* Assignment 1
+
+- 74 students have attempted to submit the assignment
+- of these, 72 have actually submitted the assignment
+
+*This is only slightly more than half the class!*
+
+Marking will happen this week.
+
+If you do not do this assignment, you will not be able to submit any
+of the other assignments and you will get *0* for this module.
+
+* Probability Distributions: Definition
+* Probability Distributions: Definition
+
+- Support :: a set $S$,
+  $$
+  S = \left\{ x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n \right\}
+  $$
+- Probability map :: a mapping
+  $$
+  \Pr: S \rightarrow \left[0,1\right]
+  $$
+- Condition ::
+  $$
+  \sum_{x \in S} \Pr(x) = 1
+  $$
+
+* Probability Distributions: a Fair Coin
+
+Consider a fair coin$\ldots$
+
+$$
+S_1 = \left\{ \mathtt{heads}, \mathtt{tails} \right\}
+$$
+
+$$
+\Pr_1(x) = \begin{cases}
+\frac{1}{2} & x\,is\,\mathtt{heads}\\
+\frac{1}{2} & x\,is\,\mathtt{tails}
+\end{cases}
+$$
+
+$$
+\Pr_1(\mathtt{heads}) + \Pr_1(\mathtt{tails}) = \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{2} = 1
+$$
+
+* Probability Distributions: Two Fair Coins
+\begin{align*}
+S_2 = S_1 \times S_1 = \left\{&
+(\mathtt{heads}, \mathtt{heads}), (\mathtt{heads}, \mathtt{tails}),\right.\\
+&\left.(\mathtt{tails}, \mathtt{heads}), (\mathtt{tails}, \mathtt{tails})
+\right\}
+\end{align*}
+
+\begin{align*}
+\Pr_2(x,y) &= \Pr_1(x)\Pr_1(y),\qquad\forall (x,y) \in S_2\\
+&= \frac{1}{2}\cdot\frac{1}{2} = \frac{1}{4}
+\end{align*}
+
+*Assumption:* these two coin tosses are /independent/
+
+* Probability Distributions: Fair Dice
+
+Consider a (fair) six-sided die,
+$$
+S_{d6} = \left\{1,2,3,4,5,6\right\}
+$$
+$$
+\Pr_\text{fair}(x) = \frac{1}{6}, \qquad\forall x \in S_{d6}
+$$
+
+* Probability Distributions: Unfair Dice
+
+Now consider an /unfair/ six-sided die,
+
+$$
+\Pr_\text{unfair}(x) = \begin{cases}
+\frac{1}{5} & x = 1\\
+\frac{1}{10} & x \in \left\{2,3,4,5\right\}\\
+\frac{2}{5} & x = 6
+\end{cases}
+$$
+
+* Questions
+
+- Can we quantify /fairness/?
+
+- Can we distinguish /information/ from random noise?
+  
+* Entropy
+
+\begin{align*}
+H(\Pr) &= -\sum_{x\in S} \Pr(x) \log_2 \Pr(x)\\
+\Pr &: S \rightarrow \left[0,1\right]
+\end{align*}
+
+Define: $ 0 \log_2 0 \equiv 0 $
+
+* Entropy
+
+\begin{center}
+\vspace{-2\baselineskip}
+\hspace{2ex}\includegraphics[height=\textheight]{./img/neglog.png}
+\end{center}
+
+* Entropy -- Fair Coin
+
+\begin{align*}
+H(\Pr_1)
+&= -\left[ \Pr_1(\mathtt{heads})\log_2 \Pr_1(\mathtt{heads}) +
+           \Pr_1(\mathtt{tails})\log_2 \Pr_1(\mathtt{tails}) \right]\\
+&= -\left[ \frac{1}{2}\log_2 \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{2}\log_2 \frac{1}{2}\right]\\
+&= -2 \frac{1}{2} \log_2 \frac{1}{2}\\
+&= -\log_2 \frac{1}{2}\\
+&= 1
+\end{align*}
+
+* Entropy -- Two Fair Coins
+\begin{align*}
+S_2 = \left\{&
+(\mathtt{heads}, \mathtt{heads}), (\mathtt{heads}, \mathtt{tails}),\right.\\
+&\left. (\mathtt{tails}, \mathtt{heads}), (\mathtt{tails}, \mathtt{tails})
+\right\}
+\end{align*}
+
+\begin{align*}
+\Pr_2(x) &= \frac{1}{4}, \qquad\forall x \in S_2
+\end{align*}
+
+* Entropy -- Two Fair Coins
+\begin{align*}
+H(\Pr_2)
+&= -\left[ \Pr_2(\mathtt{HH})\log_2 \Pr_2(\mathtt{HH}) +
+           \Pr_2(\mathtt{HT})\log_2 \Pr_2(\mathtt{HT}) +\right.\\
+&\qquad\,\left.
+           \Pr_2(\mathtt{TH})\log_2 \Pr_2(\mathtt{TH}) +
+           \Pr_2(\mathtt{TT})\log_2 \Pr_2(\mathtt{TT})\right]\\
+&= -4 \frac{1}{4} \log_2 \frac{1}{4}\\
+&= -\log_2 \frac{1}{4}\\
+&= 2
+\end{align*}
+
+* Entropy -- Fair Dice
+
+$$
+H(\Pr_\text{fair}) = -\log_2 \frac{1}{6} \approx 2.58\ldots
+$$
+
+* Entropy -- Unfair Dice
+\begin{align*}
+\Pr_\text{unfair}(S) &= \left\{\Pr_\text{unfair}(1), \Pr_\text{unfair}(2), \Pr_\text{unfair}(3), \Pr_\text{unfair}(4), \Pr_\text{unfair}(5), \Pr_\text{unfair}(6) \right\}\\
+      &= \left\{\frac{1}{5}, \frac{1}{10}, \frac{1}{10}, \frac{1}{10}, \frac{1}{10}, \frac{2}{5} \right\}
+\end{align*}
+
+* Entropy -- Unfair Dice
+\begin{align*}
+\Pr_\text{unfair}(S) &= \left\{\Pr_\text{unfair}(1), \Pr_\text{unfair}(2), \Pr_\text{unfair}(3), \Pr_\text{unfair}(4), \Pr_\text{unfair}(5), \Pr_\text{unfair}(6) \right\}\\
+      &= \left\{\frac{1}{5}, \frac{1}{10}, \frac{1}{10}, \frac{1}{10}, \frac{1}{10}, \frac{2}{5} \right\}
+\end{align*}
+
+\begin{align*}
+H(\Pr_\text{unfair}) &= -\left[
+\frac{1}{5}\log_2 \frac{1}{5} + 4\frac{1}{10}\log_2 \frac{1}{10} + \frac{2}{5}\log_2 \frac{2}{5}
+\right]\\
+&\approx 2.32\ldots
+\end{align*}
+
+* Entropy -- Really Unfair Dice
+What if...
+$$
+Pr(x) = \begin{cases}
+1 & x = 1\\
+0 & \text{otherwise}
+\end{cases}
+$$
+
+\begin{align*}
+H(Pr) &= -1 \log_2 1 - 5\cdot0\log_2 0\\
+      &= 0
+\end{align*}
+
+* Normalised Entropy
+
+$$
+\bar{H} = \frac{\text{entropy of a distribution}}{\text{entropy of the uniform distribution}}
+$$
+
+
+* Normalised Entropy
+
+$$
+\bar{H} = \frac{\text{entropy of a distribution}}{\text{entropy of the uniform distribution}}
+$$
+
+Recall entropy of the uniform distribution is just $-log_2 \frac{1}{|S|}$
+
+Notation -- $|S|$ is number of elements in the support
+
+* Normalised Entropy
+
+For our unfair vs fair (uniform) dice,
+
+$$
+\bar{H}(\Pr_\text{unfair}) = \frac{H(\Pr_\text{unfair})}{-\log_2\frac{1}{|S_{d6}|}} = \frac{2.32\ldots}{2.58\ldots} = 0.898\ldots
+$$
+
+* Normalised Entropy
+
+There better concept of relative entropy of two distributions,
+*Kullback-Leibler divergence*. You would learn about this in a course on
+Information Theory.
+
+For our purposes, the normalised entropy will do.
+
+* So what about text? Choose an alphabet
+
+$$
+S_\alpha = \mathtt{'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz\_'}
+$$
+
+(by '_' we mean a space)
+
+Some light pre-processing:
+- make all letters lower case
+- ignore punctuation etc
+
+* So what about text? Probability distribution
+
+Choose a letter at random from a text.
+
+What is the chance you pick =e= or =q= or =' '= (space?)
+
+- Support :: all (ascii) letters + space
+- Mapping ::
+  $$
+  \Pr_\alpha(x) = \frac{\mathrm{count}(x)}{\mathrm{count}(\text{all letters})}
+  $$
+
+
+* Letter probabilities
+
+#+begin_src
+a 0.0654   b 0.0124   c 0.0214   d 0.0311   e 0.1061
+f 0.0195   g 0.0144   h 0.0547   i 0.0604   j 0.0014
+k 0.0043   l 0.0316   m 0.0196   n 0.0586   o 0.0633
+p 0.0145   q 0.0009   r 0.0483   s 0.0537   t 0.0783
+u 0.0236   v 0.0078   w 0.0177   x 0.0013   y 0.0164
+z 0.0004     0.1727
+#+end_src
+
+* Normalised entropy of letter probabilities
+
+$$
+H(\Pr_\alpha) = 4.095\ldots
+$$
+
+Maximum entropy, $\log_2 \frac{1}{27} \approx 4.754\ldots$
+
+$$
+\bar{H}(\Pr_\alpha) = \frac{4.095\ldots}{4.754\ldots} = 0.861\ldots
+$$
+
+* Pair and conditional probability
+
+\begin{align*}
+\Pr(y | x) &\qquad\text{probability of }y\text{ given }x\\
+\Pr(x,y) &\qquad\text{probability of seeing the pair }(x,y)
+\end{align*}
+
+\begin{align*}
+\Pr(x,y) &= \Pr(y|x) \Pr(x)\\
+\Pr(y) &= \sum_x \Pr(y|x) \Pr(x)
+\end{align*}
+
+* Assignment 2a - Probability and Text (10%)
+
+Write a program named =assignment-2a= that takes a file and
+prints out a letter   according to the distribution of letters in
+that file, e.g. 
+
+#+begin_src
+xgb21195@cafe:~/cs101$ assignment-2a filename
+e
+xgb21195@cafe:~/cs101$
+#+end_src
+
+* Assignment 2a - Probability and Text (10%)
+
+/hint: use the Python 3 built in/ =random.choices= /function/
+
+Note:
+
+#+begin_src
+random.choices(population, weights=None, ...)
+#+end_src
+
+- =population= $\rightarrow$ support
+- =weights= $\rightarrow$ probabilities
+  
+https://docs.python.org/3/library/random.html
+
+* Assignment 2b - Probability and Text (10%)
+
+Write a program named =assignment-2b= that takes a file and a
+letter and prints out a following letter according to the
+/conditional/ distribution letters given the previous letter that file,
+e.g.
+
+#+begin_src
+xgb21195@cafe:~/cs101$ ./assignment-2b filename e
+r
+xgb21195@cafe:~/cs101$
+#+end_src
+
+* Assignment 2c - Probability and Text (10%)
+
+Write a program named =assignment-2c= that takes a filename and a
+number and prints out a sequence of characters according to the
+conditional distribution from 2b
+
+#+begin_src
+xgb21195@cafe:~/cs101$ ./assignment-2c filename 25
+end usanve n imemas hely
+xgb21195@cafe:~/cs101$
+#+end_src
+
+* Assignment 2
+
+- Your programs *must* be named =assignment-2a=, =assignment-2b=, and
+  =assignment-2c= in your git repository
+- You can write your programs in whatever language you wish. If you
+  use a compiled language, you must include a binary that runs on the
+  CIS linux machines and source code and a Makefile to build it.
+- You *must* make sure the programs run on the CIS linux machines, if it
+  does not, you will receive no marks, no exceptions.
+
+* Assignment 2 bonus (10%)
+
+Write a program like 2c that instead of using probability conditional
+one /one/ previous letter, conditions on the previous /two/ letters.
+
+Call this program =assignment-2d=
+
+* Materials
+
+https://gitlab.cis.strath.ac.uk/xgb21195/cs101-csai
+
+look in the =lec2= subdirectory.
+
+- letters.py :: definition of "letters" and a functions to get
+  distributions of letters from a file
+- entropy.py :: implementation of entropy function and example of
+  using it on a file (for letters)
+- example.py :: examples of using this function
+- republic.txt :: Plato's Republic from Project Gutenberg
+  
+* Reading for next week
+
+The Game, Anatoly Dneprov, 1961
+
+http://q-bits.org/images/Dneprov.pdf
+
+
diff --git a/cs101-csai-lec2.pdf b/cs101-csai-lec2.pdf
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..10c4148d90f27f7ecdadea95f79a4d372175ce3e
GIT binary patch
literal 353348
zcmcG$cT`kM@Gv-tq7qdQlxRT7!2!uhP*7%wL(T{T4jCk8o&si+FgRoph9o&jMnI4u
z%77#R$qrd^X8YoMzwbL|_nh6cd)7bRn|u3qRduDVuCC&S=3QlhTY|SKZ*=#59iY4=
zc18G#^FupI85v3;B-+W={m~T>NwF(`|4|AlV;tPkZdZhq9W33^chOeP)@VvOIm*ZG
zZfHwKO7Ec>tv2;W;d9kne4CFDP2T<a+uw|@2r6*W)_<T(f6>cWdXn=nX@oO($c=|d
zklj`!X#`g)e2Pl{dR6$hXRi=>1}k51zt}X-P!vAxJ2|TCRmXn7lo!6Y=0{J^USeZ!
z@cMpMdM!k<UUhV-Z;5VJz{l-5s`J|W1l7!0rTW2>iYd>UXFi|Z?j}2wS}}W@(f511
zCq`j34SrR}S>~PVRWb^mI~$Z5a|>hwb0^5NQ^Q4GYt?8lsSW#MIB%2M=(O|VTT_#M
z$IdDLlyXiu^Rm-GrPO;di_71f)R0r=Q`Xtv;r-+2GoyA6y}j@4_}i#3b(i0Dxx;Ov
zlod|$_gqunbq7|Ub1t7#qYY`|owjzESa=;#*zfD`dD`Hk?qj_dcVy>&^?k<NUcJO2
zUBuL9liT^YDblDt>|x}hpvosT)(^sEc_Tuc998*|tCha~vKlUjox^p*$m$<LKWJX$
z(jKgOvPx<+qfWG7UG5(!N9iV}f3-c$DxJSjwWYH2=(EA<-ew?7_SJ9#CECgQU$KB+
zkVtQd{BN?=@o_<45i-ztXot3PrxZeYJaj*P^T5&47ELLnkFf@lzXcZ+qZGQ2#@Ie`
zzajybq!d!bxIflJyD2$4x;Q(boxod4Ath%AXE&6Kr4;~p7ww6$LTjri0+4E!kL|C(
zA*9;>qf58M#f62BmFfRpmlj8cBZohiS!f*`Y2<LIH@&gT$W6Nsn-^<FZ4K(GpFgR9
zd_eN8f&IVy7kt#kGSH<*4ucUGqIqC2Zq&I97%Z6o6q@qCS1HIl2`B!0#f{R$!(jjO
z>hF}lugF}%l%jv3DBw=O>IdK+D(}lq{yYJLCA22CUiH+v^cV(XZ8*i#lt-&X0}C!L
zpA>(Ze}0l07JR)NCEg^+cpdy~ENc{N61;3h1q-(FoUtl9%04rAGaG&i7My389hrGC
zdx8N5bHipapmkDtQ83tjUHm`MxaZkOGFXZx){b>OO9FhWmYDhAd`8YpMebP`44wU8
zyfr}|kp7kzaf4c9PX{ciz7QUh{*0)$Hbw!yhtnL@p9yQpq5-Qg<V8ShR+s@FaK8Ey
zb+n7SXBiJ(;Mk=@<oC%{Zm)i&a*(0bnDOkD79#+1;2d?y)k7jo#(z)^TGw3;YFlcZ
zud9>6u8e=#Yqgg%naHYKh`6)eUw^n8vEkGs?{qMZcAL>4hXog+nct@u$|iAj$Q_yI
z9a+g1t+%F8wmyIafGc+2@d~Khy+aT!6OV1j>ef~G`@LC=4=m${!J<hUQJdvQ^ZNPL
z^L578ELdVmc%Q0Cf#`g*(d<6kHb5@cOx|ia@G@7#*7%N(v}FE~)%bT`w^8MqhFq$1
z5QJ5sv8B9M`$37z^OIvHB?ZW%?Yfg@%S$YU`&|`(v}5Z8fM$ratrL<_nee>op%tO|
zB|#$H(b!vlntk0LBe4b6{|tVH!7e4G`vhvN8GL=(M2ZPC(Z(|!B{U{u#kh%d@{h(?
z?!sWgX-N4aN%^B?N5Z;G{ssVIWn6=F=8y6dYTbm`UvtQ%FGOtQn0qZi6p=qLz}40r
zRb|Bhoh(|n)ZF(yk#B~V7ee9kc!}obF5lq?{^<y8ni@3_?ruN4#@j^52!A>-6V9fM
zmlFd3Lt8A+*~l1DHvC{Sbg&5qdyh@m4;0tL@uJYa2dV)Mkb>(#PvA!>VSSAw6&aHS
zuhGJHP4?<h!0HqD1I!OKEVxksj0P6cDFx{3Y-DUKsjUU5((y<P=?i=#)C>l*CPnh=
z;sHd8|NC#FNi|COaM|t;J_Prj8+<79-vBr^@1R}>xAgg~40_k)5CDe=6!pO!E=N>e
zcol-K+|=Vm)!9)3UYYLcnxQMFRHlT8$@zBxOa8v+4+u2U!#^gtx0e13^Dn_`{}D`d
zenWuPObkcQQ30RvttWie8oj%cFRzU!^fLL9!8GxNb$?u-U{eCRa!%-uHomqSnBiZ9
z5H}<LTWl1)+kITv{<wzk2Q}Q`M)HvzGCE6W{RHq0F{B;%!EFJ+%wxtxlcFXI;WexM
ztO2_Ix`g$*qp|tMRAj&hCSYil`wpLw`TJMp<Clgl+70pIfv0qFyNW``vPt46@+BuT
z0)gi%;sk|=u@P!yu=o0S@xyay-y4XdJzFtBVt?$B55vF9(MDHhA>|{KH{b{Tx+ePr
zI{$)lAH#X7<3?F_=#G#T@B^9c^3&O_xFnOdGC3GbHI`H(Z*74SjQD7So)aO4Tcra}
zaw$H&ysMGmu7i`~IQ<v=vAkoWNo#iimw?R!3FK50+*=|LX80URt-rX6-1{CFKx~i8
zMSca!`&Y#v-*l`!MwS0Ae7EnfzNs1DA$JC;Y8G7gf3yli`j^qrOG1e+?gemk(Z>%u
zz_kJ<L%%x+>(j?_)IL^qpoxY5XO!7U4nb{}>oC}K(XqP6Wg{Wwudj!j`u);}G!}BA
z$FPZz8Pt->*aeBPkSx2!5ydg2+1Rc8qqay^O*}9Y0>^fXeDUNd2VN8h@QA{|9D*LK
zww~YZKOzMkEt?<h=;mA6;Fk9E79)kLxAXm_`|1L2K<pZdCgBO6wG6`B)+6+{`#A#e
z$fLdDGMnv4VEc4q@pEH`J6vsl7v$dFvjVT_FECb`vBn+7IdHYPdp(gCBKpzzO;*<W
zmRrx?hlsujJXoE}%y?Fy3eN0kR*A5_+cpZ^K;E<^uGT3a)?=P2Y%TV$=?dn*8tB%<
zhoE<j{unoE42fyrYW)Ep6!Q6B^AhU`-WQk&qS;7ijcv7{&hh1Yd;q?0EGd$>T2A)4
znwGIS3l3zJf4YvcW;uda=daW%c@ak&Pkw;04m~^_pTl@=wOk)v^k4tr-rBQ<-rbit
z7!Q&?$Gm(df9$Xr-hUL)CLaul9DB19lD^)@XD)3E?V_e_?tNN26U$F)mk!0bw`e-c
zKm4IxU5tk%AC1>H)tceyY};m!Fykdz+7RmCap1&k4}1&F4>a<Pk7$Sq=-ox}sK>QK
z=56aauC;+JL5Z1LHl1JFw17^1>j^NQt_l1V#GYoGx32n#n>d1IhDRlH&4v6`Gb1di
zHvfI|&F09vj+%Ik`CJ#1Kia{o3mg7?cX!KKVU`C4cK7-O_`wF9Job`C;6$C`WMa?!
zm;CjxSWMZVo3xhs(Y8|s*rXM(NjoQ|Vs26*U-{*a=YM!thBW_vbnm?%dN)5d&a&+1
z{oeku!<qCEA!VS*n&rrT_Q?GGkvo?!Oy=lsto8I@NkQh0hyNT-rq?na+}68%VPiHO
z%?IIEn1mnfaB*q8QjgXAw&Wu>t_X3?vB=#X$Cz88-mmTZcF(joBsmjUTc!ctwsT5g
z{(-3z^Ki3%>|bl7CzN<8XSEHaWqacwoiz0QgbZJgt~7y1e#{de_q(~N4TI6fl4|(_
zjyBCx9WFD^MY1Q$4TGKh5egrCygXhI0*PbG*e-(b1kH>1((+doD7k^cG}~msPnrLQ
z?6?V=b%&fK)D#3i=>Nt<xCR6lF8m#fm(idO#aQISfMd8I{oqv?4*Gq?7T0_j^I;+H
zo0`{`#E}}E0~+9`+kqz8+K4aZ_*Gg(rtOjo=pI=@Hj7C*8okEhq!RhoT`5Ntpa!s{
z)}1OdsE$hN<q0F}#~TwSyRmrh^KEsyeMzT>L;S}+LYE-AI6jydAZIdo$m*pDB=KuK
zz5<yTSXaZ-@}j4PFEJhPCwSj*SM_N8&7Pm%C+w?=D!s}FkWafoC?W6+9gHx<5Zo29
zf4zsqh;LA`M#PBYybTW^E#WCuKuq};OYiYEIba#H%4M!m>G2c2c~r1^JY2vxLD0)w
zaRTgaWte0ywl4GP*Gy0-WHf)jdQ<U)JngW%{ZJj%2O!9|=^eEM<1L-)IU^^!&b4t<
zKl3nu2{YGI5SoW=B^}=@mt<9q@l?y-+NI~Mj@dE^ciik4)jj%-<-%0tBU@_6Q;s2-
z))9uK)yHy<CWXe)QagHoH=2@z)A&-_)~kIhF2WkMHimP@K(Zt{I5JuY>&<nwADhq+
zZ!PX))g>ItpA!|)L-|glY>VDUCxLLKcF0k#mDNbPeY@<x%q5ikc~@nh;FQ~T1B|Le
zgj#38b3JV2*7Ps138D;#tU@4d*-XTpX0I0Ei1#|0uswwLrD6I*p)F1m|9E$OYV47_
zg*O@#KMm17;N_NNf_I$I!4Y~ysO|uH6-=(kY_cZppQ+hHl(i^(3{{<6<f?<FOBmuO
zN`8zuxYSu=o?Aje?}CJ)G|p>xs`nSmJ~??FfM?+M*7L4LAXaQfS#CUdZve>pEu3v2
z;{wJF$Lt6~kNVc)5_-Qw`chZ1p}{aC2;s`z#ovPJuM7Auf+K<sKPn*meM#LNJplic
zl)iNPOB6XD0*co{RP0rDjV_~QUfY$OX9VAJ@(^(WydQm|vyOxGGx8SFQ?c_rjgN#;
zuX6!oe~n)r)~b7Ga9N@8y`v7KVS@yBo8;_lBeb0&q+Y8DC2WT;XB5i%2e*l`YmmAY
zY*go-m{Y!!u}mQJ;OYwPi4=furE<UM&xk9RcJGUxWdS?~uwzzpswYIP?{|%*%*uaT
z&lydF6npsevf`;+ra-oKhsnChukju`^co=I=O*&nDsm*{v9<1hJXpDaEK_vN0Nk?1
zOxE$-lUu)J`K0^v189v(fqZJJ>z8z&bl*k*f`frdGc#oPP>3vc!L#hr69DG7>GX#L
z2G>6>oFYFpA7|Mg8wy%#uAj)+ym1TZZL9Vn&(L?$Y@m@0?7k9<49rwVQ*8NSX#};H
z3-*Izv@l^|g!I7(PwM3C@2_vxz9u_$uG5MG*`y#(A11}E-<M7Tp~1}>FZ+clD9}hy
z-*(H-5#fjwvW%C6)o1eOdYoX$IH2fgx}<Ff7Oj9&Kg`j&so(l`!EMV}&}<L-2%bp)
zi@4f!o6s}I*N+7_Gy3tS%Wu_jnwCqYU=<3u7sU22sa3}okfMr5`yEWU_r0bcDT0nr
zn%5BYSklwFxmjdg2|rv7igPsaxHg>xu}kN+`qiOGiUNxn>K9T!y-8Y;wl9WDfCELb
zXrGVsA{Bi`DMizWNo^eD#tH6yd`uZNd|d%QOQ<0hhXOB?)0Yvy^eMJ~m8DwOP8}fp
z)>9ufx+798@tTd>YjNd-4$wZZo8?}8Jj5|G5*w-niR*sg`}}y8$c#Teqiln>oQ~tG
zN*?j28g<ueSPDIwAarND)@a<64of8aSdOf&<H4+NkF%XotlF7h21g5$IRyXicWQyZ
zm@?wrEuw7VDF6#C9I&3eC|9F$)mM+h#<c<RyNUYo9^rR+^=~wb^*wtIxt}bFM8*u|
z+vCq5!|&uUjLDLCEj7o21Th+rG^U^8o%+sj)1{jn;s8f5JaKcn6%%0h8$@7`(zLd%
z@BA@Fw(jR~h;JRHTLF0s7b8XL8sramoQL%iZt^pL0QFesa&_?<a`KDcPj$q#o#TNH
z3|A0Q3Ddn_>Q~|L+1b&^W8-I)*mvH2UYOX!Q|PDjp6q#?cYbtTexeUJe5U;1S=ved
zIoTFI(YrlmzHoFf>%3o8T6UWb9QfS~EBE4Yvu)Gk^Zgn2EhbpKAVk_k=Zql?rkRI~
zO1MDB@!^1dIwVkQnl3{#l1JRu7C`LY5fHmXchvAvq9)+FC@C95FFify<ivg&2()M&
ziF0~QOqd-WcjZO&cVaVl^n8QX!0GUj2|i1XC?lpi5uJIHZF_GB;<W{i9g)k{?^eV}
zS7#c`-*L1zR9N?v5A4N5)}+0Kpa{4Og07`hA|_pH`Fi^9!#cn}P5ij+NUnU2DhQa>
zD(&PPcF*fx(*pjYgrC@GS-NkVDAbh6{sD!poja=a{3ZMX1q-$@th|1)>j?XEN0=ca
zPSk~#|L6{`4RU$hM77JM`z@h59{`dNFLNkT4pv7qYiktRj_3@g?orr~TH$JYx!ypM
zR}hVD>*n&}!-fa#75WFS?RxsZEJr!ljJhq)c`L(Uy#holSKm)J-NIf`N2imwt*>PN
zc?Gf;#(04$(tfG6J)^HUsn+>xhMEI_)-8b`4-yy27FrE|CA<)uK5M>+JO51>coblg
z+J$I|WPxz=wL(`Y_rfoEgOIK@w$CYMKwG^XMIJe;{0tD<W9W-V4m0U}$6n>sm7+l;
zu|WH2G--A-p<B<bd2v2KJjxbQx=b@XRS?1as6RD)B_YG)?BI382!R^S3plNv=+S?e
zBF44SAIm|;$80z!*E~vl?1GE~pKL|EJn-MCRE|pG;SooVzxB0)!KNgC6H;$*km>te
z|3~IQ(Nv@F)(vaAlQ0X%jBnTKa(=6$jf>?0rt&?HeI?{EB<CZO!jBrKZAfj)_RiY@
z(C#Cgi%e#X*(=rkUL}MWDXq8ESj9nMJa=MxTTtfIJITj!?n44qf#X*{&YcBrs1j+O
z6Z9Op{VY+^a4yiX5_QZbxqVlRe9Ip;Ew#86n~kdFba5qc+)E%Y*45n;$>nGJ>^%a9
zkd-0xtAiaLl&)lyCtNBLJ#w`3Ap#E+3?JEI{&A?)FQkU+d__DvUp}q2T*3i4p@FD@
zNcp1&ZgTBC&MKt`)bG;IE^C!ZCpk((K7p{_elcLXMX+qKA@(W)O=^{nS*#V>Cmj=o
ztx6TSXSjQAz8|rdJFScI+Ip06&~XBY{B5zEs(J5fTFtiaO(b<d++uTXB00k5Tf^nw
z9a2!Bk(-S?>uNNA(<$z3{y|-SE+ow?c%siLLmKa-FD`JqrFNH|z4JlUHCQmU7JlZ5
zT%rs|Qutz&{=@+Qa06b3G)|J4&iLUC=lgMUF(x+JN7B0pa-bsb(9FM4drFgEL^S~Y
zY|=4Vl2_Cn&x1_`vVyn0aI&T>0YzLKCkzG-iKFJ{d{-YW>bq`a38c1MierbtE_Nj_
zXaBI&)p<eWTx+WG1b$G$%<i(%T#{H47g#t%{zJ|*2{j2_;C_So)dI_OZcz{&WhH4+
zXIeLy44rDce}LrRQncHxi<eyEbdr7TudSWg6J`VY&MtunPoCO%2CNWw+7K9KuPnaI
zKe4av9_Jh}kC@W^%x40GBy@Sy`Q82JvywOg?>knY$N~6Vbe2Reoa5oFWz6_$6L9mM
z+PMayQS$R2RN|Y=qTx_5Gdp<?Cnl{$Oi^nPQo;EyK`h}CD(Zf2v`ZpdJ^tvm1YCJA
z1$u}_J)G`56ouIssIkk!VBvhqxFptVAGp*JIv?O0>mc~zfXmXpXg#emMk4a+{x<#t
z)}G>vQ)aV|qI>g+J|ncDfbe@`@0vKQeu_VLwGcB>T#`b}0GnO+X9!6k+V`e<(4mI8
zsZ9m^qU%J7NdiF|DCxO)F)s7X8pQA|&17jK?9wFzS7r$xw?h*!c14{kAY*GhVsDaT
zZ^OJd4Y3q0r*`|LZ!{)CqnQlWL<(s%Xn-F~(hZ8z0=s$7X}HlpmfVVMl+?$~(!vxR
zR;>fSv;<=Lb2ofU+T;%Ah(`(YnZHltlWxOc9TOl2vP+S#m0dLIwcpfVHr9_#hry!u
zL}y<jjq!241{Yrt!{wJYI=IS0J>@kRVZl#b<5n&v?LU{Y-_p5tvu|v?V!Nvi9IRZK
z{dA~&Zruy|*?tI@NN+14=EwTRf%tHlI4k7P+BPb6CFsB_RF||mC#p(tpO^V_66AZ%
zWoVckE#2DLU$*OEuao>8HSKI3!4JZ5w*=<7LPIG_3#u5>{I>pt(#@~{YFNr6(aXka
zz81`vYDTQww!;Yk@y3({R~+wXK;w2lnU9=Fm2;E%k*OhI+(*{ADedimpgm{8)4=Py
z_3dM>TjCvLU8exCc9&WX|4DmS{>B>UD=|^2l%M9v&+q4nTuuZT%q5fYZuqkEYF&a}
zvK_$Cl*ONjO~)L;S;5Xm20NEgR6-ncci(1dpctzZc@KlV2@=o<mgAKbd*l?ARK!CD
zdxn}-Fx=h0iQRstmoW4O26MU6n-(Y9XIr}4%XktN9QA=eCS6XZ&rpm5q?h%>_!oDL
z(<gLX1|P#<5<z;sX+^!}FFC6mfQTe+5qe&1%$A8Q2{nSOZ|@hgC_+yoee)tQ4F>y7
zY`49yX7q6V=Wm;PHX!Tk64{%U(_ClbU-3bpKk?u)Od)|$R-4dcWcB;U))`SX5R(+A
z^XJBU-&A;_9R)-^B|l)V9pL5d`}w;kNVl$&c0S^7=1QmG?~b@Y7$hFs_2hExIGZbX
zUUHqMqWNSB&T^^Y8ftNKOJjRXeCm_quGtR&&nRQk69YZU*N6E<CUvkUfZpCF4c(#Q
znCl@9NM9@hVfmb^@17<vA~wRHH@F<vT04>p=5YsP_cIu4tb*`3v+WPg&wFVn6F3yW
z=q~@y{;Q0id=Dnp71mpU7}m4kvO9^h<mG`aAZUs2(TIYu#DFZ(0{2RMUzO0E1neb7
zznd_a?!<cIA6@KHEl+%4Hx6-MB1$FTS02FjyFY`R>e>TqfulQI;Pa&Y3#CBW6cS!M
zQ+pEi0cmyp(Q0)h;L0=9*g}U3753=Ul&hmBM*Gp)!0js*TEZD=uMECr1>V2Id3k?Y
zKJy{2Yyo9R`8cUK?99uCR10;f%Sx_8aD-6pd(NQ3NQsUeOcu>KxQrzY17qmDkcW!N
zKOB41uF|_nPV}mz|H`uKF5u>;40{^+Kv3PvR{aC^d1c;s07yGrW&L#K<v&-|>>^(h
z#W-RPcUOxJDCWn>`qMTQGPi|qyBjbto_bu=OWmIlLO(O`QpR(<6$EiZFx#a@Q}foh
zwwbLF_bj!9IT32kuFTT9QUM_qO$97wRmmW+NIPz!rO+UfcIQnETj=VCU1{OgIst$0
zfdCylB@{>%UuAuf#P#~BKymNSP8W04DW!<PT8#Az+A98gAiK;<r?$rNa$-NLJy8++
zg6Oc*jcM50b}1Vyu-A^xVzK>Mz}>(U>Jbk2h=|<66rasU7Sq&%nU${1G%v5&X&HD;
zN%ApUyT;l2{@hMo$QcT<<ysSXG?wNm1N=E#!<W?Uxr{1Qg3JwOTkw&Sf8dS2;&ro1
z&k-MgofmMA$yY3%#ZfOCDzESCbYGb#>d;RP$M$}dl|RxT7w7O}BlNx&aWY^iiq0GU
zymM1MXF-w4-1x~DOO3&&gHhIav2?I^PDP$_TD7{zjf#^EQWJBH^FQ+Gaye*Fvr#dO
z&hoRBw9?{6Rm%CRiK*<C#CQ3<*AK0u?@~!W&Jo|iJ<N+!oLH|PteqAd*&z1WXlSSb
zy7pdOV*I*v&yr-hH8Yh})$vqv<)R_lccFI5@XCNr45rQTBtK;i9a_~QId9jH-V<ZU
z?CnJ>o<-B`nT<3ay+dSwsfdG52{70+lQK<>aA7|a8@-xtS_$dm1)NhQBkmPi-y8U(
ziJw{^29kROPIc{9+JE<RKU5wtUPvXBjOB{nHDI7(3hkg=3wLlGa!X0F?Ol@Y@sMl-
zVtG*If9dsE#;<SgSr#|!U)4=0W6i9$96OlLn|31Z{3*u`$j9&m7uD~7&`kDZOV<tR
zo&Od@@3}CtuEj&>T{sneYKCs2WLjbI+0U2P{eShFs=2YS5f~H<Ee@}!+rHVH4Vvkf
zw;X2^FYj=P<~dhdJ|N?$_g>zqoanbLAx}3PF4Pz;R;Yz9H*ah}eDjR`7?$}(kz3#Y
zbYA9!)uS!(mWTQMPYyQ^wDHe~qfe?g&1D|1_oNwo{YY>pn(MF^?dsKpt@XPdE-?+=
z_d0T<uAwsuKQen6MSkISwr(eT)=ldn!>4k$tHX@2sYomH)-`#_M!3laQKUWOsh50^
zhOEz?7qOqbq2+N4T}L-V){O1yq)O+hJmmQdLhlN*0Z28|`)w#~H^4hw91yDmFPNXI
z1>FxLmclzK^lb%+?NlbXYwGhhq?J2jY23u=e9r1$p43+HaM_g;s~jiDozWSOOF>@h
z0INgFKz;{6>zOs8F~2Hy>)&J`iK7RKUXSPP165cI@K#%MQ{VM-kZf*ESzkoU;uz3F
zpOEnZu77HN^QBy_oyD#xcn6;IwIzknwID?AZPZlW!OB%IqF+el#;23F{J4~ge9UfG
zRfbH$br)r;(|-MNi@#hsn)G8)YB(gV8=ni%_l+gN(<siNrP7deb!W#uBBRFsP$XyT
zn6Sx$)SzeL98%k!h)sV+ywP}}s%WX^zM5UgM{u=M_}IA<p6jhqT%(ANTdW0#nm|Ke
z8yhJ~shExg@?}Bls+u!sBd?EqM)>8Fx{GOs+Gy#jH_VNj=-oGm%Sobgr8E8=Z^TnS
zEm?bS!TsBFA4QWABGkBIF?Do%Lkw@>9Xp<P;%D!D4;Z$*<SHeMK)k9mJp;@h<Qe!T
za(rv#7ZB_j2R*d`xLU<Jjd^k+7t?RfS8}>|Io?y?vo3#a>=a(VE|=i$jl++W1XwV8
zPbQpY>+$z4UtVnye6U9cZai*6H;pfm+x4Pr42!Yp1W`*I?T*YnAi$iUr{Z?HL;m23
zN3?6!-n32B@zafj)GG7F$Tp-lzEGa~0cY7xy{KL1EKdG6Q7d`kL7C1D1d}}{az%Rd
z*JL&Yy3%ej`R9XZ%pupkNH0V*4+t24usH%3uxN@e%-D6{Dj8r3vYBd&A=MqOI1K*-
z@2GYb2gLMgXyG||sL*jc=;%k<dlv|z4{$b@bkRnSDA|%yTf2_x4%Zv=>-2C*8eiwo
zaW03_WRYCAqDdkD*yGX}uM<R-a5IwMZtUwBFZ0W~JZ?;8=;P2Pl%R3gZ9zf^xNi&{
zb&b24vU@K9cw1ljYIj`ig&=q)(kovTJyeA(R@+V>YUAJq8Z0fOfoE$pX3>~QxSBT>
zh1Uw7O+d$u-@zl-TH?S4A@TM0aAPAK*I5<as8l3NET*&Aqyhe#V1|yHGQ=ZeFi#}2
zfaQ>b{4CciIbLX2c>6@9Q($*L**}n(k61z{1hk|JxsgEdq40cUshF&+s~eFL1srGw
zKM<oxPzvjYCJK)!R|8M3sR-$@xERvY59Hv<{8SK&=x}ltvP-5PoPWUm7=tTwy#5~T
zh0D#|D(M4F$1e{ECA;M6xSL~Sv|Y;R7avW(itVhZ+Qnc<{H4)Ax;i+#Z%%P{`Eymk
zKb6r;ctFg7Y8~7|^KQau;6b@ivH4FBX86Uz6H)lKpe8)iCnO&hlg*TmB$`?ER%_!y
zVCBlZ%DB}Pw6Ipkjkxpot`*3%Ax9IRh<~`Cqzd$joXZk~-aFxUX`*j_#ij$!fWw0z
zkL26MR*76BeeL*1<W{bGIAasW8y6N4$^SJl9od2<4JE_($-zbSuNTpn1;X6=TW!3=
z@>lh*mEgt!U?NV*-x%hSCWszo@)9!xu5=A5<D{gtZ>{sz{+hb}@j;;)NC#D}7!`p`
zq~m2E2KSZ{Ex@OY+7%!dG|whC;3K#~%w@?Sh!!B@Wz(X0Is+5g6}W;jZ$f4SuKo7D
z1i2#tswjICTv@_X0>fN0DO_H1aX7y1^j+*jdvIm!-ZDKE6pq5#uv?;iS2w`s_d>}c
zW~YL*A#>FE92AipBVl9DAgu2o=Ki=Az(e0Ij=Z(g2K+BE$1%RZZ=#L3)sOEouc(jE
zZb36Z9fSRdkU2N;1v<{MB!(0c8|_HJi#m<qby{u~8K(cSa(q#LP?sFDS;k8=3dly%
zA(O<CPo2hMzVDFRWumdn#>Xl^*H&_u8<Z2&zXR8t>+LyqYmAi7KrjYmzsX08x)JHm
z8rgEMttAI8yOupPRR#~`l&<*GoA&SR>OoQkIE3WPt>1C^WtM@|LfYgXFDWW0x_~sz
zL)?$JijJ#5j?o?B;ec*eRnZU>TROE60M82%??S$Oz^RSLoZi{28{UviM_Lk<#=znS
zN~8!i)DUkl%d#qv+E7lo8$}Iq6aXLH4z`n0UgFi^H$bs*TTxpxN9T%_s2sBiFlLQ`
zLZn>{1(+GNJgbzXN+?;{$@nqNjrvwyeo4yeOq;&y2T?tIYg<Y8U}*r(iH#L}Dk9_p
z;FmOoIVe7C<@7N(!Zqt5GvEQsJM-1PK=tKK0JS=3UmIkCqN{s?aN%v9ySZ@}<n?i$
z0!00|2(^!Lp9X6LxQRyS?>q>q7)<;Q`K<WmNh`kKx8k)YVl&{TpEJ<In8vN00n{Iy
z<JBNEHxY{l_eSQ7D7=J{ouDBlF1BkYITZ<<yhVb|cJ<6kQVKGPgEyMgDm2K8V!a-t
zUq&xvaCa6hhvX%uj@^3m`ZF)uSMGN-X+?aIu6kzQIZ7%|c=i&8l|RUV2k=+9Bf%)2
zYdrR>)iNfsh+7LUD<_t_m&v=1$A08#q>Jk8VU!b#YBtP94##4KT4ffKoGN)h<%ueX
z<jp=`og4lN3K93D_8A<tEk%G`lsMt^B0v-^)z4i2)GB5t%vXm8^}cxVoAyf6Scy>#
zrjy#;^SHR<M`F4p$GH@Z+dKoxK*wmtLSjhmpzh<eS(=LOuf}h8PGu0zI={imX!5Cd
znWw-<#2uB@Y=9W(@?T<A@P%~OGZ+$h$zzpPO;0&oFI7KrtSqC3zT5TkYgVWTUNoh^
zSPRvdBl6<!0A*c#RNK1lnsE?eecXeGm@Cxtk$2NkdzPM+KO*;?(X4Sncyt>mdT=IR
z*PG4e)5Y)fj}*EhK2yqMKh#fXJllyK93ALQ6Bbc#I~5J@D85>L1fQ##T*hG~R``gx
zi0sVRMeBcx(IWVh(ZdQaD5BwNrCeKw@Hy!}=I>G0E)w4uWc$r&U99b9MYxnjr(4ir
ziXCD|wH?AoNk6x**Lme1-E^oRKYAOXCY#-0o=Xle#xa~3RMIvLg@cRa8*lOl*&o+(
zUY6D)lnff5Brr5(8Pk=Py?dH(jw=HT5~=vXpjNu+$GROKps2sjtvlf}r9dSz*{c@L
z8~<D@{kN#tBW34t?rDEV^4V;*3+q|oZ0&=(uUOJ&3(l_vo84B$`-bI|(fk84L$L0R
zU`qvN)}vP}DH@B(AdSUPpaLBV4Jkn?E9v;z9HR{j4r!55I{gd<PJs%)E_Zz<o9InC
z3p?jmDdHY1S85E>d)i<MOn6hmb{!UAmwXZ=<zbk~-bEN}Ai!HBELfuS!3kJX(%>u3
z6b;7+aNjj6`sD00)bMoxZ?OICiHY9LGXNf^NI`H%cQg3ueMuxc_yGC|uJR%mUW75g
ze(m3C_dely&lsfYL@p_Wz5XtI0w(c<?C#?0Fk0A^H00~67Jg8!@nmz>cXEdaF(p`V
zCj7Qjuv$+bfOs(@jH=+l&;>GBDxp__tV|WaQP4?X<_JD=iU|Xkxdu39Mo<z++mdzX
z|5;_=ui`DMW{@2SwmQ$NPX<Z`Og<`J1dlqmd3C_!$*j8|C!!Fgssq5?;nf1Ky3;Oz
z4-}&2P{E^nWgqZkT1}6vv<%LBGv3#MaWQJ*Es{^G*~y*|bCKpGFz{3IoiNPSAWJY%
z!2J`zzQ$@#Ul28XQ44ROb;-^e<aS*ilA$R#ecE04wd(_&MD9XgiDt<`@9De>x~v{r
zm7Wmu^t(b}SXjG)*x(7Kr^1&Q(ro%5F`o?UH=VYWpc&AepUcB9(PBAY<RV&M-KH9t
zS`6ey6?8oT*%X*M|N9=B+l-+XLvXK7Q4P#G2LE3SNxn*_99X2e{TC59^Bg03eb4fq
z#fdiU2-AYS8zzQg^q(FUGrw$jQI8cw$a;R69KP{Hg>zsQiUQ)Pxl!?F^$HE4Iad(q
ztQJ9U|0?U1XD9b$fE#TiS~1Dgn!>&BLVUnpMcZjvu;}17|AVN28%<hyUEE7c&KQfJ
zfOvu&N{#6!X`#c(UbfwM0zb7Ub2Hbukr!1!&x_hSd(7K^Mh%U28y1BvL?B4fJOi^I
z+;Mt!{?gO~)G=8HCm}H0rg)m>FSO)hN@zRzJICC@{0bhhthdQTE^--sOF@2c!iimC
z{BI7`<!Bxd-?Kll3MY&I0546pxC)RPGE1m>UMk>#P&2}zde9InK-u1ZAB0w-hpd_w
zge~MDO8Bic@tP$_Kk7I(iiL1OZ{R<n)Qq7YlyMZaiU0eXi+4u&Z~H9@|5C7*C!@N&
zu(q-qlEpGB7IKU>zR!R`4|or0YKiV44elxhe(M$Y;%l0Cr-b2k>-7`Pni<b+(LBU@
zL|Fwo=>j8sU^e_!##uaaM53HWSG)A`_&Dl5Zl=zf#q_JB#nscJC?d;j^T2tL1CWlG
z6*Ik@E+hW%8?6PJ2PHkaA`%?R>XxpqW*VDjS~Bs&GKml6#hI}}*6x|1+;NMKuWP{9
zl9;5q=mpC)^^(&tCbi^!ogv+s^!&`$+0`;r-`f8xQ_q#7pvW%Kz@|0`?sAozNI}O0
zj!Vojn2G~UP}}E~_65G+6_zaX@e@BfZcWUmNQZT5UuYD`F2P@@Z;SWIAI-gW*x7X>
zX-1&fePQpSp5Avj+hON(ocVO43fN9wvX^y~@EWJm!nc?1uT~|G$1oVtii{N%6oGQK
zm2x#1O>9Ilh#(#`b9NQMi3y<&C&ET{Bz>sO{BPaBHm;Nv6(v!d{<43pv%)=itCLVN
zvEV3nb2$qs@IhzS=7APEZvWA{psU`MhK3j0dfV5}kqY@JZ-Fve5e*Tg>?g0vXmZtX
zzWp^FjF#whUKFv1K22@?Y+-6~KeK~;$E$2w_|T8<4btp~kv(}QA|&~8+;MSH>>P=s
zr6|0da9`Tl3|vUx9pzzdqrfV1^PUwlQu$RD?kB{(LUd*uxG-H5WhiUXdE7oQcjcqw
zZ4X}JQ}PK=lfB4tt+-8vyhGU-*qNb}r<G{6)VE+`%|vyk!R96_b?`R)<knK+#{3O}
zyBltZytw1m^-oV;Row0aVK1hCWMKQfO{WE+H{QniNGrnQi3NGP*ca*|TKEFCZ^_Sh
zwKScXUPJuPjp4*|KW_s*qq79Qvz^aS9$kE|hxci2dhFPeWMLrFEiIe&>Tx_gz+)#r
z{S`CWUXp;;wTgJKnU`_UYlxzmi)7<;-dJ`}7|t+AsSOG{K3{q!ksYWMla=yF@@CSb
z(FvFC)%$LB(WFeJ=#iel-)|nJif#2SzIQ2(2H6zDwy6795Ppqw#4}cU`XwG{QdZ;=
zonDuIL=N6cqz(=Ddy)}R2<rbj5u;7THY2pBM8{_;nG%=2W!@_M0s_jp50hdSedUXP
zcj)37El64D1izLn>1i`>*5d>f2zf;3e(<402sXdpa1*t*`fIqQR*5&$Xgpi0;b+*%
z(vyY4K#(kbzEzvAAFO}LZFShT<n{9rUBKZk1`t<)n7#CJC7Tu4s@<<A+**D0cT9uc
znJt2s7~*O);k)QS=>0{N+UiBDXJ$mWwJa3b;~egBTvOJ@mC0;=)1HSQJC)ZM;q)%k
z^JzhlX*u5WqB7Xfc3emgmB_mLXgl;qt>I1EUztW>v$M19YRz|5{giS{eocuRQ)~{s
z<txoV$LmbzAsQr-+bb#n|5K5<`8q;@3#U)!m=%P|WFQeHcrJ(R2fFJonqICQy)^~}
zUr4USPvEnB<#va5mwRB+ZoT__DR9lP*Nr(9_E>U}vq;WmN?u~?y#4BMZy$$`(yr6Y
z>~lh|v>TVL&J+9d85b0?Dn_X%qw0`|vFqp|?|_&pZbRQaMSg2=K%1}S=`TetBGjRS
zzaB2CT<B`ow4bN9i@TBe!9)pBr1PvMz*(}j=XRjZBw||&@5>;ROmEr2%>(PCrxol2
zHl)v%{G6yvg4G0aydP4Ma-3Wi45}%JQ2Uw%UzEL?6A`@CD0`bCPbh;hwQM4JNVD$%
zZm^uB&~q>$^?+x1WcaHmsBpMrMQs?zlUZw0SI%Q1I3BGc)|P%wg%_zrf@?2=`|8?6
z{TbwEL$ivn=}3FE`)Da2q16z~au+E&3zS$SUe2KH5@GU)(O<gy$o0m;74%%L2ii{d
zO@R3~CCM(ug2I=mWhp6{Eraj6W)<+#&;H7j<S65}<UYAC=W2F&&EEJ~S}|pedboS5
z*CrsU9nf~J>6I>Msm1jkt990I0T$WF8nm4sQ-<fI@Yxsh-wV4%ANLV@zu&{zBvBB0
zxtM`yUJ$W+uNv2;bWJ91^Pyhyb=}afs2_C($KLUl)u~uw;08G9+T}21;7bsrvdm>v
zr;T1Ba8l*&rr$aR<b>I(x~kYby<O)p(<>%9$i<6<-U)4drvQKq%*4ovtEBZMQQhxN
zWAP1#kD7SKSa|6q4=Nlx%ha=a9Xg|_u-WU{F8I56mpuj7p}iAx?jc3JicbCjHjQ}z
z03+p-iZm?(t`^Mo5Ys!ZrzN&~H9cuP6jJZ7jdidE+Z2{c2XB|R#ig=iUI#v9N3w&c
z)8DhT>=b&=ra}SW@iTuz2N{*eC!h<x<AWDG>!P!OSdP!e*d%yI8U4`Q1|~zo!@Dfd
z@f4uM?(ttrR5cC>kTt4FM)RV$9>hAB0zS2!;zg;{j_OAr#qa_C#Jfdb%utUM9MtxB
zR`l5<1@18grSZis`KdUdI%^2M4|;AGN6>09#sWg$_!HcXK($h<MY$KJlbASbQm#2d
z17~DH=rt3!y(*ov4eHb%mV2q|;c2_{a6s_jBvcB?0dfmbk#}#)TF1dl@yGNpdH^07
z`4SkaYUoShfcSroUkBJ(aZ$6j8ujZ=^g;eA?J17LNs7#kO%O*wl9}88_Yh8tXvd{O
zl%LQ790t@;s^gk#bpR?htgvY!r)d$Wj}s7N%0yl?>F+a|W&{pyuKKA}MN}H1%=uqV
zptHAU7)szC4O;jMrSsIT-bvNojs?f6pbi};_4dJvq^1VeZe#-zmkPZdbN?M|WO6%1
zM0F8*wN!B0_NvkkDy{uW!HNM3b@2yzom#3msYPy-otgv0`Hy;kX*|}h;S}-+S@UFU
z5+`lfN5*_M-D3{&d{q>@m0r{8+$pifjp9{zgXX<Fp69Mw_*U99<wOyU)Fv3}d<+c*
z{m&32<1Xo)fi>U*JiI+yJ&n+F_wh*Cr4Bo^T?032_Qp+)4TvF$h5(abH^Ag1l4DO(
z1t{%AfCC>2=;D6_mW<uzMbS6!fK|D7LaQ1sI$jm(Md(kPhkU5vl<RNd>Ay?7BHddz
zt%2cIC}c2DRkSn-iqAkwFZ2P38d1jeAA^S$;4zpP$&bjy*p(@5pci7$q+^xfYF~5%
zHHR@-YZt)GN^6$Cm;hDaafpKL>B0^-3Zxfff7-;NAS(g`?!7U3tS*o~K`yj%%Bbp3
zX8f@+Y`Em#j{Ha{X%Xoc17RyP)fVmRaPEH@%clSFJjjT~B{zp+AS+6I4RLRlk9a}+
z-nnDaJN1B79;<G+-`984bpw@3xsb7eOeHEd!A`8w5NN=Q8U<IotB?UD>*FECT9KK1
z_kF=|S-~ExE&LW0;IuEH*XCI`@Ecir$u9s%Kz(mx%@^S^A)-2+`LIRV-nC~S-PL<T
zJWzrc1^Fg+KH}A=pL>~aE`y${tj1!MFt|qwWJHbcLx0vH_Y%n+pZpzx%Ra^(D<a@j
zS+(8qx*#%qpe5|3BiWk4elvIe6LK-!+dJLpL{dc(6Z<-$_W*dQiC#rPsji%e0(gfH
zMobADj5gXqZ;TU`JQt#|Wb9H>oi!al7Y&*cV%1v16Ej?;Iic6GT~QBzPvc419W)^Z
z16g4s6i6P+C25%;T8(5$rf_^he4{LbqW~QRQZf*KTzQD2=%Ec)c^?>^xktqKv2d{i
ztuY|`vb^#M;;ctqoM{TY^lc0&0WK@!!)q4Zp^2ldK=sKBAAik@+5*gZW%#WSJ!Inm
zCS1&zE`!tY1Fl2!ffVCovbK`<UMImz*Q2vKT)v4dg~V77Nkar=BS(bLLl(SC-ZYIG
z#VvV8pR<-n^f}ehm}QoJuq#2VgGewk`&9y8{G;^}?kJoMxXMVGuz6l~>UF3WEpRf1
zK={CQ?hd$*wYfy=;zQp&E4$<TV}$*jq0zx&DEr^IM;E^o3tuc>2HG7rmmA5B%G@n|
zMid#gX<I}@@uF-IRZgT@;9f=dPYkzU>TbEOYT+?L6<<QRiCvRd5Q(4R)NS?CSr9=$
z>X;3d-qnw`&TV`swepQonh0X5v1X^AqXy(%0foTrx^JHrA2W*!m8n2-(HT9VBDtGW
z3RoM)Z64ANV%U-ZkNHZA_ys}17Khop&`;o_IGQxCN6Vk>&{F#{r2PelETnPZVGe{*
zZMDAWZA)|3`6^l3*Un>^X9pdw^VXPqj5q}FPp`;W);YRd{0K$JIzIyhwDK)y6qmH{
z6pPIT$j?udY;5|yT782$8r7xO3WxVp!;|H?wt!a;!6knm&mRMdL(!q;z>!fSer?{V
zfpVij6YnEfG00o|86-BvA7D+4>O>hcMn5Ux7^U2}QDM;}zwcvH%PT)gi3$<Vb)0Dp
zObF}y=%K`Dh;1%vejI)#Gwn6sQrDWbBKdf?D7FV~7zWT4e&){$Wcq#C*Uy40JO*e3
z^H_@;lhgI0pVjsZfgTsf9)bomp}K<?0B;uDv7mBV_p70GcS7JuT!`yjpyB(AD$V0K
zk#gr>rN$;Wq3%>ceLTD1i%~lddwy;&6i|Zj)1v~1id?{2hc2_z=08b2R=KJaq@)-J
zYZ4p#fGa)F$e6_wxxd+6=N9yr7#zP!l2@Hy`iM(G+Oj9*YPv$+FTSzij;E#$9-CxU
z;P(O9LFV<ig_{TUW<(V|X8^gx8^87)NRnr(n4FT&{@VY9ysT{pg&^_^EVkiKdDmK6
zq>`$gUY7?va+zmK+7qyxzn=hY!-oZS35oR4S?T?IVa$uE^KAhbpD~~a;OH>H>=B~3
zKFs7BlSSsv>uDd&GkOZ_78+av8ZX;$AlHjJO<`z9ny$;GFu_Gmz3IAKu7wyVBDjbH
z<>>GUVe}x4uUhjM;jw0`!*=cV0)k#DUnM|_7n=br(9b00-l7$-cWSnXk;FN^Hc%?p
z!j@z_YKTA{Z*Po+*4~L6)S>CKi%gTwY88`9z<s0}1-vsd>Ey)-b-M{l>9O;rxAhVS
zImK6<65>af!=#Lj(sZ3t0eBJflxfJ;-?<xkK2a6o=F6F8Tb4}{SuVO4J4FkH1t)TZ
zY+If?O#V8vXt+ROsJ3LfES-nk8=1$>XHF~@e|{SOGxKoDBUAXykCDth`^;P+ub%<#
z-eqDzYy+uVogntZdC^6TD1Nj~l8_INI7%@7q{)BF>n9udhF3nq?mLSukX!P39S)__
z)U$l%*^+B<BUkvoskygMjmX)yT}7<cU#vLK7(4Rui|5r2liH8{t(M82u@_&2&UjXN
z(RMZVPvY8Kuk#C5sXU=`Res$yRWaV4U_D?v`sm%mii#1ZpKD~|^n~0dtJq0p0~5~(
zF^-A$%gL?ujUke)!5X#w*S@}ZoIg^^Med}!-7YwLU{?^&Lp)m*9`0QBP7B{@I<B;6
zHqS8M`Fit=XW2pxOvCJ%pQUR>y^YGW<n_tMhbsBhlM9}H%bh)sKhFN-pOmp9vDLm9
z-)bny=*C-G`#-f_F8cZN=2j<W&{QHQo|;sD&+Bl5u9^)mURp+Lb*<eI{l;wRo!@Nk
z{a&*4a$+-m*F@?x`$Gj^>QE)`+;`$m7nz<}F1Qn4(>>)7b2tTKXM8gaT7z~U7mz)Q
zN*8m1rF8hTK7ug_pq_wgAq9)$x_8j2(R&5-lAe1H^_76SJkZ<-x{Uw*RbLNM=-@Z#
znQ^56O)$d8eFUJH7<^O+oG!>VJ`+HJj^Y0Wt{7^A12wl`2(;=Q!vslN&~yA3(n+x_
z2>O+R<7)kXAsv^egH$FoV&MQ>H9&a>D%XO&znlhvP<Rbhi^0NTvxZMXUCvM$I?SrA
zR~DcGC0!6XIP@GSQ-nP`ZqI}|oFO2f`U?VSgR2BRjj#!*wh1cQ9s&P@i9#^Q+j<M2
z)nCe>U<E)xCbt*7z56xmJha>bB#jVw)N-|hQmtorP*2VRT0lA%l&iuNCwf1Fx97C+
zVN}64G%jB!hxxN)gq;bVreo@2g8f<>|MDKT|C5vE>k$9#0x&`2p{j8%+k+<n@+0me
z*V%!qw=V(!8=P8=r+<`yb)`k!rQtAJqX#KmwcTSjx;yrqJwRK7$*Q2$fl}lq_!U}I
zf_`=x$_Oi}4Z&Ne!2*Lp8~{eZrq2vm4f`t?5Ln!1hQ?yjFP<J-0G~y_<ELQ_Dh8~0
z3vSjo1>e{I9S#w1I36a|=tZU@l$(3Ox7MUJ%?l69TbiJUXws1Cg@^s8o6?RSYBhTv
zLg+*r^Mj6M1umey<k5hi!SIc(6)^O+8u?nISK{u$?+YSdf)2!nbN}E$+M7`F<^9Rg
ze-!B_TiY_><A_gsdw`(?Q5R9Y*T^vAx0bBf>P~i=4YTa6Rj4o1u7_(fYEwvA@K3pT
z(8foqQ@wuiHf^UtlifX=lX^5-{j~-g+WH6Gyc^NBHWan$#-f0NL>G7e<j6WC3NT*(
z^B(hXS9_1p1z4~o2LB-Tm3Dtbjb6=6xO|?b)QyCMd$Yh4$jQ~PVf&6U0^!&C5R1Fx
z8#`mqq4pS7X-h(nBHBoBdMFn2ynpP<5vY2M!W4n-C_QAwC`UZj`;VhsJO#|cC=0|K
zm2+RkK@SmBo!vxwdmX(x>HfS<?a{A%@v=I$8VC_VwC@l6$k2Dj>mj0Un*uFmJp^fU
z6f3+c@TP7JC?#<iT9u8Odkj>>HEyb8aC^mE7J&$I(?9T}#)&}HuhgeIM>{+Mxjpv_
z2_*+rWNk+VdtzYKxqTUXW*T7*GLj5?hbuUA<wp3-<rQksd;_XG16O5M;3wqe5RvIE
zyjEMHIlB1rpt}(mt1+lIM|VPW#p{n0xX?{@3ryA1SQr++p?mBcZZ=_hRV-S}?8@LH
z0atBr>K?*tWUJl?B#X#@tEB-2d}}S3UOL$wyW$(oON2A~=Ro1Y;W8JVMj5yfh368o
zM@-4sOFK^iHAbnmWX9{fsbwd?P%!+plu<c9(V>4L%KW&TeI1i40fJ3%_dGLpQgt8n
zqBLPv$LJUI@w$PH`Z)Ff`d)9T+k=Len(ayEXiUr&5^5L$mcmP1F^Mz5U(JUakTml&
zVlWNP^}Iwe5fpe%0gu^rXUkd~b@AzA&!IZ-G}+Hfem)?E13MR>=I*~?E-3X@I3#|8
zqHt&k25ZnLOQ$>f?>mJj*Yp044cUM)QQ3Jg8;V{>K*Qkxeg3~g;Ev{*?AE_SP%q-Z
z$Nz?aVmy;Q_;;uVIIX|IFJ!yOH-BNlOW#3F#Gq~?<LpOdgaC3Fm@v3b{%-V_*8i<-
z`M6Yqm&oaL7g{8^vyQAId+_gyfUiZEWy3ejLO>Tm%3aQXae{{{jhH%3+@{14h|NJC
zIcO)TW52Tox(#Ge_(5JJoF|(jWc)jm(|)1tvqvmJ-<JAu8Ste2LQsC>;`SpzNonl_
z?3Dm9m#clmaChj)aojxUQ3Tvn`m~~*7HH+(X9wCFOaU6mk=tfd?Gb)~9<rbkY(yU)
zB2uiHu$wIm#7`qX6`p()n`WNmcm7g_F;&h(Tv9dLbgg%RXD9G}a72Fc#j#=5+V)xb
zR27`loHTmK&1MF&fOZ~YRI1?GI7iY4q&ZJet3D`!z*W^rT9BUxUagcM+WOU#ml#wN
zTrY&z<0s0rt*p$ys{8<%PCb9F+aX6EX*S5!05`)!92kLoW!#E0s`c?%a+E3POaU5@
zf}FL+WFtB?@g9>v9bf$I-U$aCduw&@5oQ$}xcHsY{{Z@YU{P%)gQZ+N#HS*b^Y(i9
zaq~<)AWCpEV-uU4_T++k*ocsX4@jBeXz*Z%+!Y-!6q%jAOQV&`GV&Qo>}*dUHnY<L
z{bXU49^R)wZ(v*&(y`pc1d-w|CBXe9<7GWJx0CFajW`VOl3cb=-cW#-HgcYNN5?OX
z@mV%Dkr=C&6tK6MixG()bs0uZC+^mixuN51ZNfBI{NO;h*)}Baf7Kw*K?bkH>Kwdj
z-;b<Ty95gku<gV$&Hvz|5+NplzlJfpL)>n!SZ;pmobj3rY)b!M{so5|a(KPk*#1BN
zjhEv;xANcL@A?1rZ@j3uS^E6XpLG!x5fQod|M1VcEYt+J80&j-ZQsAME<%Ii4$ZYF
zbzqLM+<JKFL8!H;*{jp)1#Bu`z9lf&H7+SWFwN5EEye2Ppa$5#l5b^JKTCa~#TLVK
zTg%uabXsw-r1ZVh5<`Z*cEO9A%J=xG&=rcGNSZ&NUF=C?sBiQp3;cGH2Ib5VeEL_w
z&%IigKlc*GILc1SR!6+_3tHaql-y!{0fj36-~KsLc(JBXQ`|fY>&8ASfT1}pBSCZa
zbN=pFW(Q#eELiL*(>KJ$!1v(Vo#h(!)Ttf@*g%ZIiPaMrO4x$3L~x}-94OXC-U0uG
zox@)NjjXUUsJB4VVNWrSg-@YCOki0lZ5dJloQd#AjD<xJ3|3|GzIpPGOTpr}M^()i
z3yIp304mHfE@48#vY#gSD_a5t-91nE_34o+pG(#6`0t}&DQizLViSw7;;+&W5x@B@
zrKT673kyPv0n%Xg^Z3D(+^Dd|3+?}io`Ol;c`xWO>Q=_n$MdHCDH+T&RJdcJqGROH
z;)UVWGi|+zO%Z31mtYp+XNXrC+L~MyWooPDqPecWik|pq;7N@z8Z117BbjXCt*Y3~
z$e+1Y=dcYE86Ny00QL~8K`o_frod-=T&_dIEk#t{h0}oClG_dv#>&<NgZ-++q3xA|
zw`12J!c4i5lMQI6m+naU`cK^t(Ga_;)ZZ)L{rN)+t$_W>yG{XC^T^7Qa7GkUFiBty
z6(Ib5Wo*fNMckQ-u?#82K%z<GfpzCKl&Csk&kVmi$9e1e@1V25adam&lngO{EzCKQ
zj`-uvsvGwBfg~HnofX>m5-<g6N@DiXD&bms`ajhZiIlDP$BWPKoMPGX&0%G56|wHD
zV(?sZ@4P#8FY)KIhAZb!t%*_7pN2hBvSe<lOqkHEnBgXdTp|0x$a&{3?S~4T>MJ3c
zVV}Vr%9&?VB0-D@XDlQa3#K!~Pp6ce9*E!gc&61>r(mY!bBZPn+`B*J`z7w6HPp8*
zm-QJ6NL@}?&NaV{H+eM}nb~ExK4UC_cy4vEO*@M^??x*wa+JC2x#};4@2GPure~i(
zj5d2u@qMZ+P4a7w7@MRn=T8fgDC>9ii$^*A*V>y;bzRK5grO}T7N{|$+QQ{FbX<)6
z*`w3Vhjc(dDlla7{$|cYepc$(2M@D~_IhT7?w;dh?lX2svVEs{7k<HgzVqaaw}6@Z
z!Jh@ao%`k%srQXXf9d%DA1qyEKvZ25UO>8ANeSuh21R;75CrLNSURM;8|khkq-#M+
z7U@#DmQY$crN3R@@Ao}*XP$Xx&dfRYju>~<5GgP{d{DB(=02rE*WbEnJ9fS{{OcCX
zL@nZoh0vB`Czo#1GS?$*fJY67hG8&q<PClSb=G#Geus~@(_YhRa?TdFG3}=Gvd%+-
zkms_l6tBqhzi*OZb89Ztc-7LgV<39>oI33%kHdKDSlSqA-&&R1GU!f|_9Hjla9SX8
zDqIbg?&C2T2h(3HX>v$K*1Zot8GS=LSW?nF{r0DLGXIdTRCDLb<@!xmYsojza%3ea
zM(jQdd=5)qLG}06yExXtzJ84R+msV3iQ&mkt!HxZ`7hBZjK?1kL^d$bSbehCJ+;G>
zFzCv~ODJ{M7>4!qA^5a5M!MtH15>WEGCZ!^)n(>WQt_iPs%MA1Mx@C3J}z##?^i+s
z*bTpbk>D_0PoF<cl3%N5Yn{T|2})y9DXED-PcsF-zrrTB003v)v69UO?&Eo2zZA?*
z#e02qmAqD2$s+ykzCcCVKx+9q?njkqL*;9gfVUdl6RV{av@G>Gv3#6s2jy4(Wv;b;
zN5ihs8P}P%skYpX0UPm_iyBW^ch`d20q3EUY2BJrn_j|hH|3)}W6~qJf7j<t5tDKN
zor+Z<N51w2-Fmkr?UTUkY)<AnhNx$p5*ceEQ`Q0LcX);py<ZAy9sL?=#uT5}<sM#)
zdXgGkfAnM*y9!J!w)*@ot^ITk^N}^cQA~i(l}{kvZLCPjxI_0APg<s~+vE3i4Z-AG
zZD-~Rg7X|1fb8JqLi_sfu2gj#?;>m8m1I5pqphFcJ>t*&QFPgUzWJGQpi&+zq-tZD
z&*{4Oz4Pp1jZb#%QOwRs!C7F;KSt5YtUV&u_nh?C%mT7(6(T9fO`b@xL&!YcQq6^@
z=j-N2Kt1k%v-mn-n<&_|)Np#0@x_{cihuHccN!=eDjeF<xJ-+eet!{f3CZ74NMF=j
z9Phf4H+G7KeZ-eGIY$stD+$>6l+_MBpynGvdXv4w_yL)*_#KoV*BZj##Gx<V;evc8
zHVK;UJoWs=ir`!7@V&_U!KZWv(tVOI-6}FD9WGCI1(XvYmvo$tv<dCD<i^vh7yoa0
ztwMWj=$T;~i_wAVh18*XPJf|*nAMX6TqeSL=}5MqIs&Th5)cYCj!B>hQF;bw4&`}>
zdipDAA}rd`HHaP<$R)P#%M%R<@+1IfsL<xj1;I8CTCZBBcB6h{33r%KAOUK)fs4sg
zgLU=aK(3zVPs{-`+H#TpxL`uSk6Wm~Wck@6Z#`uUY=kgO`X3|b@H~v}5B}G<W9o0`
z$Uj~HW(M@!x}Yo`+8(K(9HcLUBs$W*d<eiq7`98U{7$G}UD3hS)|vjXe`OA=+xt)6
zfm+F8jX{ko5rTw&dE<9!Y*;ZYI_}&`#oQ)-T|5+wS-OVATR~i1m#-0^sEO~g-;Kv|
zfVb%;7<S&Xg!pa9<L^+6gF3T>Shxxn@ij34HoSh65RIbb1J98CRZWu@{s#jOzl~yU
zr{$ZLRRcDqNT~lhW-7xKjWK;qF$~HjyoxvG{|@T0X3O-8w-ol|R?hB5M~s7S`gKmx
z^NyS3(rG1Pf%C6E$>oQV#lvM5+pn$UOvHd6BT#n*79iyS$Vqc1kY@<=6jA&L{&}D+
zG=21sW)(7}Nc>k=JnxX?#wjcyPkF_Ulk!dai@-ZCgbJ?+!O~=i=WZHIb1yqoHD|*A
zJr(anL5PgfbYz~2){?RhwEPaM`wMl<ZMuf1c}L|M3m8RuSU3STVznfTKx_x*bb&ww
ztaVkCcl_t_8u@+>r6nZr4KA6@Sr@VJ8Ll}*u)7PI_|K}CfY%&<%psBk3ywRuF-u;F
zmdENdulf$Id`Z%*3yiiV9>{Ucg|8rp#)qsxV~fj%<+>N<5cInWu8~X9J0>}p;20<n
zsPR-b6Lfi^-M4VatY|BSMT`ZoAvUebg25$qII2@AiH`k=wCA0MeZ=A+ImxAvZ+!8X
z;S8mCycuNceYwuCRCK|&Fl2z<hs?*ykC}5Bu>40_l1pw7*%=!aoo3&Gkcx)%`b53;
zlJa4WJxNCcce?z@t14-uZ3*~B#SVH=sloyLGYTreeLo3oV%m4+wTLl;i0duH!(<=i
z^NSxveLe8EMug#*waRXL{2R+t1_+uX0e>Mf)kF8Z8<$9|xdhCTnk=prSM;#AhNZ*J
zoOH4>7#5I6!4dIlA@H?^Fq{Pa7#3<Azz?DbTO>72!I+lbk$w{C>yyic;jOI`iU2)u
zo#&<BX#~>?D=i*QHa9LGlTJEkSeE-%`Xd-kes6WSN&h7SfHv?GDFWj$e;uQF{7F3s
zbUlg19=fGQ{k=>6?sT|%#@bs#q`AIgVZZf<aqMBfONS)^5U~$^KnNKajP*6DNnd#U
zce_7xY(s1dGMz`=>^IPp&PIMB8MlCc>2doR>QIwDL@A030f^CJA_`LM>7!(<fM}79
z2j!^2@kX{swCg?Lk2MEEoYs(HDhcDc2;oukmy@71D#Bkfw$1V%|MlFEYvy@~h-%r-
zJl2NNx)wa@j~@(-EXF?^i^_K|{xG~i?KGmO@i+cw@N${ms~<gcgsw9)?9Cv5x+EhP
zBAWEu?awFW3XFnnQ31{QJbCNkdk*G{@p)3><8$9Z2bWEw@$dzdZaWhVe}boBJi=Ig
z-!lQ>D4%tEZV8E)_xhq}*DmmY2IK$~&W7z}+*v?L7F45Q;12bv3y;i?0GTgvyk|%q
zWutmd4}cEl5rN+!Bd}+nm8+v`QSV^D%W?IZ^dEhO?Op3-!UB3)77m%XRi&RHBpS-o
zwFo`f261|_t4tsNvs2Yf<PO#*N^Vtj1nl9y?wrLG>i|3k5@z`<@F1IM0FYtFobGvx
zsc9l?>B$a>zLDb7gl7($!+0K~l>c?sZx5|}n;n1)CI|cwgI;`j{h7y+rNckAIDg+7
zB5lXkktUuQ5av3F1pmH5p*}rOdQ-aRr-Y}toJPSP3y3($rM0Rhq*363_us$*NNY0K
znzo4?q@KQdHc2l{AkeiQz7bG==tV;g{SI5h^7J9|pDdu&!*B+iWFNavH%H6AF4S<S
z_8aCP-a+;I9~;wKM{V&A|I7ZR@^CcFtnowojzfnU^2Y$-ret5cFxX>e@uM<xN0*XD
zpkolsGvDuaBKnPSSReDMe#iL3Q>??@aV_yNr}W~_K9HsDEdc_*^iX#)PT<<~80aRx
zqwe(c-+gg=Zq1oQDZG<-EdwWiwjvDGgR278eZ#|pD+Q9v0Mlb=BgoVDwttYh;{6L3
zwbyuLkM~PbG5c%}{%g^RkbFC9NQ>nE9ok3F<;Av*Ul_&ZKYG4>*LXIFM>Xq__N11V
z37Z-RO_O*8cd1u%)&|2K<BFM74D&r2^#g7Mk0uHZ#rgR7&Y<U#uW0s*?~GU;^Nzq3
z-$rz@;oc>d9I^0hs5?3X(B+_2a@1wn=sdY8{1KJmZZ}18;STxfdKF}6Y+|m!+|j@^
zlIEh}`%(2k2qxE+p6qe?-WpOvc~^0?lVHHP=+|V89&`P8N$_<2BYBm}?&PS|3V{dR
zf3{l8;~zx`e(vdeHX&t~c(duQn-_lNI){Jxt~TQ-;9;oA@U#6Dd)~n|>yn0=<H5kA
z>*?!&;#64vGnV}<hLF!&_!ZC(Pp!ATm#>d(S3eb}!G0L#I6<jU0D7{SkIxx^$p=>#
z!<aF}#`(20mzy7AmK3_!2ugH%K*d)dIA1y*2uUjDTxC1iSwPh5Y>%51(mminxg^%g
zxWVmxtshzGpZi>rqwTsSwJWzdpg0*eGNrZBk_E#~#R1r0nvO)G$m?<*q_gq7Rs1L(
zZQjw9i%Cpi^K&biW&(L>t{?6xMO;&y8VV=iR-BxwlSVvS3SZDq(<)yRJ?|f=F+Qy?
z<<|&OrZ0CosxH6-aL{~>86ko1TWjcmfyLo4kx|FQOggYggvg#x!v3xAM!B``mkV$*
z>{*6f(=sIN0F3scgLKGo(sZNgcrzf?=ZMYsp{MBfNki+qO;8DBygYlsv7Pdj>RPBS
z8lX9e2i8<Q0g`jP=C%(1)R1$mF==2q4{|@gi_PV6_3ncF>X{k^^(b|XkqOZoq|`67
z#*8$<Elv8lDWpzY#MSLX|Fus0W#XC`P!4jw{Cnohv1NfDD;T0fduU?{aqVSj5HLhR
zP(~7ufAR-Q$UWa60m>+{-Q7i=4(onP3wJ&T{`<(aTW>=dXH*|?4V=7vxZjmOTwZzf
zBJt3Hf-+e4pH^@6KZj{sLdx~M&`~$9X36cn*4U)3H@rZdniwyR#pxK^7K0^cHq7*5
z**d!L5RPBkl+6^9$1Hs1g2T%WZbe2j7T2i4XQprav;Ah*{ZA#xlkzu5xfdRJ2^GC(
z&JoxM*ZKZ7!3b_VdU)zu`0qfdcI@T!*c$Y0DY!y^mQ)V0tNj~FMnGG7ox})B(<TOI
zG(fe!gS>>WMIR?SJGIX~eyCJMM(R}!^v72qERbq1OogSRW5xY+3rVY|y!#Tawb4~8
z2uJR%NPXhI&(T5l=cTVBAD|so&#w2jucpm*FBZ8HTBNlth27_^5RT+Ld~aIk-y}#!
zZIb=&F?k__Rc{=9ZS(1Yl7{a?^aHX=F!sY#;3n6kkRLc<z{tScF`gh{eI#BPy~1|T
zYFNzea{>-q`s$nSyTM~Pq_ezy_hzk$RLtixkEqv>x-=I5;!J1cU_eDv>Axwb!}r*X
zGPM^R#nqdSe2nwCG?q88S}u>oUx=+NoAdpgOw9G)5T)y_@jv~LOdqp(P5$n(o^sG!
zxO@~f<}rh<qv2qD&obV6ebMnQ@0TN9#9X&u3aR=s|0J!bZ>k}7mqWuxH6!bcy8M-S
zcDlBfA0|%t*8XaNWkU#hbVIzgJ?6CZAoet02kCP&?uYx)dAXUn*>kEvZ2RzWOlt-C
zH>gvctc-2F^GB}FAY@`^_f5VPeTn(|W)Qxk_cQoyPwf?;Jmby9LrkwfT`P`{zf%u<
zJDuv^Iy#MwOdZyaVsQCB9E?iJ`M@2KCkCskD$guD>H8c1C-j0P))K;vh2z3^@uXOB
z7~UjIXv|8m!VjYl$?4i>o5~^d)c*rEXfMwp5wwVc<&(TmtP8AEbNm?M>(i>}q<nBC
zSt{`0m}v))G5;wTPX?|tUpySPr)qzQ<Zf1{eCO;$^~nh6{A8TGx+?GuRGnA6>NCcB
zl1b><;So}dw=$>bC=w!WNKmePpv~ni5WVspo~WV-t1Ak(z2-=OAydh^$FKRTGPIm_
zvtaht+&8_cQDivq?25c2Qm7l1U#MBP^sRy8BmYB*kU%drmqW=16F8Q(&mMi?0pCkM
zd`@6b@ShBIBEwLh3S2p7=D*UrR>D^fb$gJj?7AlT1=S$Q$*V3u5ACLxWQ0`s934d+
zLOmF%xB#09o;3AoX*SGhtd0*BdD?ce1iA1yx-PNP#WlMo8WuAHp1x%#GI*CkhKLC8
z5$>~w0T@`z2n;^}A2m$9bw*nle`#0T%GZl&{te5q2N7^^G6NS=m7&d05L#u8vhzhg
zQ$vo69r5>|Pa%Cx%eDwGz{3>oYgWu@qK?_OjuO4$Mn}G$@A?)UosPSgDpY~a-k$8`
zM~FB|Pc_qX{MSM}pygET&@OqMVh|MWNHRZ<kyowg{I~mh%dl+c-<(Xqo(SERo@s@M
zCAi^<!vl5K8Eqz!@b}+#YsVE#p-6ynGVoeo&8{W%bCX{xEKSDCF@V~N3h=|h^s9<!
zxeJTRG%dsRJp41uR+yTjXod3k_HeDE0Yw3YqR<O=qs${WB)jh~5wTNR*j^+LW9e!6
zKgJ*cuSL?);m#uxkTTd9)32Ws|N4ju=f)tO*%(QG!$ba|z<=B&p#~}EIlRpneR90R
zIs1a>Jn&nxndh)*_J`)R{vUqn&=yxbuBK^$x!RKP$=QdaueP|}XsoJ}ea$F<{lqSN
zc-*3=h-*E5N%j%Hd`;v`BKxf>s?&!45aq59_;~Bb#pE9;=SW$K6M13f?A3#iXmr2~
z^;$Z{w42S8tm&<DUJgFF>%H~lRne^?HTMzfbNPFf$#u$6j=PJudEuvS6qFTb^cNp2
z_JrZU5;6Vi_FUCxH&33q;L8`n_ampqG@rCR)AFaZ=WSn{dZaCh>MX6!V1n!HVPNfq
z#DM53Wjr{rnSr#$O8ENp=JmC>V&uv??P4#>Ag<gTiJRw=q0_~!!XD5jhHPxi!VV!s
zgh{~#46HWHOdk^tGnK=$becVwzb*s{XPveVe&{|<7E4&n->KVQP@YtoPDO|;od8_2
zq;otQe4A!o?foU)c>hfnh{G306|_aKcKMB;`wtsvP-WWx|81pzYRcSOeg$1;)EQXF
zoK#j;Vb@_p!7x%+bLKyu3WnRl?sGcFh}3U$0uQXDPRg<Z)J_+u`zqS{O9726^T6Z2
z-h*b!HQqjm|F0lI#eXoS$vwE%_xe1P4@sLD+w@!-Jh~!Rnv`@<f2-wPjd)(>&ltDm
zk{8{bA=Yq31TI^LE@r#ResxZs?+c*@4vx|WIO4WgH;HRKIKMvjXzsnZ{3EZ&?XGnA
z0~z$~00lt73go6F0{ej!aVxvh*BUM)uW{JKP7_0pur04wZ8!7B1KIvMAj>&4e_F%t
z`7mnplVN~D`DKSt-C_71IzT`zQ_6oflV?lQH-0DLz}Lz5W}A}xn7G+{hnKYts&81)
z@hH1mO9Y+|&~Z&avL54(3j@#RcUt*XUrEsNEf@up7p2sWuSNVfRxJf7xYPRJ&w!ik
z>LM4x=6DnLMNI#1{IL6*(O21oYnSfP=V7WS{UAtf{!U`2MjWa{rK#^6KUbeBp3_<R
zUxGy*Y<Lk0iJ5WqByVa^G7*RCx56N2#PQY{TEXZBB@ecgC)VVX=V?g>qfQH%Dr7n2
z-J_aKt1ez%!S7+;nG=`?ZCe|tQ&`(+kJ0)qZS6Jm*)za?M1c}L*w5}jWnkXrZ=q?=
z!`306LOv}4;}1tn%%UOR_rZVjppgn;1#iPw$hfB8<8IFR?s{_OJ$a|Pm{4BAt7R|o
z^~@6PQJ!uR?LQ8=abLdZ%KK<}Dt$&>!T2NEX3JqC6~A=RGaR4UB9gSgxee+ln52LG
z$p5D$iSmyB@h#>iydobYl28&}X<M6~)*0~Aj;95}tv!y>;a@>6*8*wR%qaz?vOL!*
z#?QO=y1uKTSQcr&#OcvDpWkl8=t2}AY;bCe!uOox?L}RN)*BD+>X&A{AL3BAC?ym%
z);=5lU=+2>5pKuB`e@t7)2^E!ZDx<k{U-8XZcSc>LPGJpz_`MLv#wxI*s2?s8^h51
z0i$+HV8_d19-fYn3lDs%xbTjACbXM6iiSSy&NDWb(1?+T2;2maxrT{4)!t;D1y7oq
zQ~pV`3}a^fnKML6TT&sNY<MV6RLs>VpQ!Ls8^Vl}kbLtBxumyok)~AOFjxr#An+zL
z-7K*MTT_b5ghTjy&#Mwh;@dD8&7LH~gA@^`FkBLg%A^&~qvzNj?zAF3YGwkhJCVs#
zGpMNq0Glu#|0xB<%yc(d99<^qWx^?aI+VA$t*$^KZ;thHEg5ABm?s_Q!$W-$VX^%v
zN~IOuT9tvZ1Ex`^E(V}Ei-&V7!aMFc&>y>a!kbF=QPC`8xb9+phV$ndI?D)?Ukq~u
zJr?ZF|1AzAZzg9pHOB3d29fZjU;ze(zY4#M)kdl88qCL-JjIfGsNF4v_z*}eJtz|K
zm4%B^iAUsuB(J=p<DjYUa-rqRNC;7>Wa3G$G7UIIXW(o`05LF4Cg@KqC2u{xd*DSq
zUJ0i__ps$16h~d?g$^cm=D+Jap(A)AHH=lksR7q@dpQf`tDEfirHeyQG|A;lE`~=A
zdEKzFht15#US8e4xA}p-kDoWkj)UNf%w_~)U$}nqh<x4yn=7Dn1va<1t2a-7w&X5i
zD~Nq0I|$IXk?i^s=rG3pN->fc;rhmjz{_ut1jXK|<w>0#&igv0n*HYFQY({XHE~(r
zDCD82mnghGD?O8WyYURMuBNcP=3V1Rry9Z%;VZ+gb~=<dww(by;B%iNX@dJ#PqJMM
zviPaPD1?#3Y|qKvdN9HC0Cj6qANjLmrvQ1iyb0?0y?K1>x(D>vc^P-<JTyr&l<x_S
zI+<UnvB)+iJ3RldJ=?U?;CAa!mXny9ELxbCaCrtS>^^xuYk$ry2}lzqk*j`c7sF??
zfXzdW6eN!|P1OIEe{+}fG(~sv&`>Luf#vl_{yk#<z9|JJ{IKyA=(5GHRz0_WP7`aI
z{+`u!-~FL8e}y1<hqLNf`4iIX!`-v5S=Hpx682JCI&D}8N1e}832&QQAVFu{4U;Nm
z5Z+wFmOK^<ZHC(Q`E-K1!p>y!{noXb{{=Q4Va<3$=xu4<hi<MHtw+msi++?$sVS~<
zcS-Ko1$3$CjXtX3?-3!;zm|U%7~V-v5Rc(D*iYbQG0_v|Wh;cy<TDbhWopKo|3zr#
zk{C?1_Q}XJ95+x#J#WGmgy|jeeQR4VF)AELgOSr-mM_6!8;>X~R+RAMX<iT;GPLok
zxT$<YiW7jXE{!;UR6S+6w=}oM_K!Tap-RjTwP;OaizMdp{Ff_FfL^4WZ7>R3!3SnJ
z`~zu8Rw^SScakd!z$;Os3GXpTke4<xP^z(NWn^0_aTK|gusD;^f?|qv%-|6d0c;|8
zI2V0*Lnxc(xa~%82|q87J5@^=#Ti|Rrwy5Z6Wvc#3(OvID7v07`{~%VQ0R<2z$J;z
z5APVm!>KC_pBFPbjjhmN?r<1>T0TRe<?HHQ?&Iz+Ysy!YM+}^6yON)6v_y~?RGqx~
zK0gCwGXP^ngcQ{CY72fQQNC|8dOUwump5g&`Fmk&ZxU<o8->{Z?247qI}s#iReUI-
z2P06$b)T#^UiYA*ud1DnwsE;~Pm`rVVY<2BOw@$aMEbhiC_9~aWd!XGye~VuYGtG&
zQpA`334wBku*$hk%oNI|1qFE5-vw(#cZ)!GS_NAap`6Jb?8rU{F>2@N!(QB^b(8KL
zXY-GjRBiWv<Cch%ZTOA94WO&}OZQSCFhmH|vR{3+bsuK3NHCioR1(5QDe3>9oipl{
zTp~b4`--Wrn*rrvn@tnvi;Wy{kwjA7B-bDKO-xKgY6V_~F6la!p&f3d%hpGpdI%ll
zR#WzS64ysn^bbyCg72Od$~l9p6M;FOJnhv2e@B=i){YXkC%t>qSg<)z4QDG4RV$hk
z)pY77{das>TKlK;k%=X!D{S|t(^~sYKrqzZjok2I|9;MYoxaHVjr+H6i2#ISd1b2i
zOCIt5VR|4%$mM;>`w@Mn%RRG;?6qTe<<OV@YCF6=1?FD|3r>eYsoa%m40N+rQcnv`
zy9)m@HlKMoU4~mGG1189CNJ2RIMGF3e{E{G-Mg^t(flxoM|-Y7PHQc~0DACB6HQfz
zum3knsPB4Yzqtt7IUFO6Je<EshT*C!HB*tfo*1yEHKv)}XraAY)4TDzBUg@0vg3Dp
znX4Y$CO9`~VuTE6`K=%b-w*^79PAj_U{)kio=q`l{A_(?h<vt&rUuK_YV&{NxQ!c5
z%tqklXmlJNjR}~EfuEjdU|?@P=7Z0q+)n3D|2yia<p4s)w;Chrgi7*g)1-(0@zzFz
z5$Sl3dDd#xM5G8uX?~lShaV|O&qZBt9=iUEv7J{%R^=OL$<^fBwm5NsFx{lL3L_|z
z`_`Z}^ufPM{H0<`mN11HLMk)Z)~~)?eC<8QNjli6o+7HZe(GiDK5?A&M|DdjPsFF;
zVGm<PG^hEmxk{!oF<rO$U#+*J5%tj-Jb#ugUWh!_dMYg59-b@UtyhF-(I|5M$IGE%
zwzyv|p8t&3{bQ|ex%TzW&=ltT+Nt1$%o$~+L{c^sleF~T28;z5`?7;Kwu^HTcTd!!
zI%AaKEd_O@(D}iRAY3|a|MnWHrg~x0a?a*tcZy3yKQ?(C98~d?Dl^q-hOT~VS_ELj
z^8&PEYJkEIVYY;7#gt8@oJf&&>M4+Z38jj0i4HP`*`jw-EjJX1Hd#=uqZbTIle$Yp
zCuJ1B$n2pVjI&k&J59oOQ4i0}Y;P;j!OQ>|_00V=*^171%|s<|cY|rK;BDOTjUF+{
z_MwzaMd#l+=0S`{3L@M6kQ+=u5;1t$2ll%sabHcr)0`~Fd)PqovL=r1+>!m&OJSc(
zI6dBdYEIm&`w96+j~P69a~(9q0a{fKYnCYwxr>+QAu9w=%wK#CA$jpyTI!g&S~;K0
zHo~w#2v@)V3OKoY*S$r5XM=IW{q|0jTn|~>P4-sasmAZ|Ex+$JwxHaz75S?1PFIoM
zkK#A{|KBWh$>q2C6SSv94ui(@$hRVJa=%`k{+<+`agFq9<twNG#@ffgaa%{ECStaG
zo#gI_IAI|0Ix~ChA=Fw~g7-QFwLLlYV1Pqc<=cj4MoBDt<?L8?bq;iHPMhgm*Y5Op
z#ZzWxol;Ad4mPv<yXT|*dH+Vx$(%wr*kSL&UAW}&Vc2O9h1+csClY#Y$)oTM2<yY!
z5{;gx=fyiTa4lDDgcW(9A;={FI%9DOOLyFqh^n9zm4VBVQp%=k%cbKEb1S$aocJsL
ziq+07rsA|qW(gpOH%>|W5IwtlHWC<?cYdfqrP5sB_WId;Qt(fHiNzpi<Uz-DvyEh>
zFNAE5GWVTKnWcarx_e-wgYo=XSwQa2J}eaDI_I1i4wgA?8lENWM6H~gywC4NiU!Rj
ziHvrpFF0<8_dHJfBTQ3}0rEfCiz++QTV@i4gSHPaw&^<Ifb}0r>dA-e>1vo+?f%0U
z%3$AzK2OO5F`Kzh1@Qd_xe5F*w7m115w(_N%81npO~yOXFOX;7D{S9<dRbuHM+xde
z*(uxJSh)#p?iT+S#U_!1GXyeyM{2)_TG(+f229v-B5CCFym#D&?3`|d9X;|V3fwWA
zw*3pWV|XNAecV%oMQNG&&qsmA-h(isyw%@q^)I&Q|E1e+{T)TSm-w#^lFoBT_>nm<
z++ZZLTRlwJinZn0=bsY+@MVZY<Nvz4=1j9L{4+&HpfM5E5!ukVo!&A-oDEe1AuO|h
z;*-F31Og^hYU=dDc^6mA2zW7JOcy4>0`wm23U3?G&u68e2tn$#sH4G^8nf{%hC-`*
zBv<wB_}2;|=u9F7pMRF}6c4C2`0lvVr&C3X-eAnMJeg%lyx&gueQAt6oEQt7v(7gJ
zvp(LB3XSRzn)K+?LIv27fRAndCh*L=7vG&(%i;f>yRSFK?$AJi41vbpK%S8V!8OqD
z{N{A{*`OLGXZHyFXH<dDUFNN>UIIS=3WeYvt1RrQ{u__(6Y2iK#cwUUS7HvIN;Q-S
zS2M%yFj;si;QXe8!%RY_zFn<JaA8nIk-b!c0@t6lX)T<_F{cB6T+}=<0>%FvgCp`L
zkVfc#Sc;EOqvRp%P#^ghm)t+QD+)8lz!Ua2c-W@Zl70kh*!obyL9HHWI`YElOL6s*
zRQ5hEK8C+OHd_%8`jCsgXtBFO09UM+c3q`{^)W`biS&mn1<*T;5t7|qVr+!VYvbAC
zVJn3wko&j(E`}-C@0XvZBJ@G6P><grbiV9XLLqNy@cGp1Q_D%1c-F$Bl5E2}d_>m@
z2v6A^x`R+og}_z?k!VeK<;GO0uvG)OWlIG7b*=d!0%@I;q;bO~0e0>_uP*<Z2d>42
z@bB4_vFt73zz2BA1@x`%9#-g|`V3W$>zi)N_tj5SXsKDXFG$7ZVl*P!iXgD(FL-w&
zh_|z*c%O_iVLIZjF4LgzBc^SDI5+SdjnhM!j-+hM`&EJ2`^}E)$)cq+P+4)GYu{u{
zwToxW$pD822m?X$srb2igXft;w4ZFGRj;qGM^g@f`!^olh{`xm-0!Jy4)NkUnddq2
zV$Qltjsez=uh@!09_0GC2|aZQL4j~#qH-cdr;+R6F}qJUWBy4r2%O&$=Vxt;&--LJ
zK7fc^2V7JeKi7?F*BR!%+emAiZWXcprMh<pGj{pIoN%1MJ=r~KA#9Zf4{1tAV&O>q
zdWT1IdSigza?5ajF6I@hTv|!W1TRvON=_+TH2Q@*DX*MiDlIt_)W01{Ul}P1=N<Jr
z#5j+?7^wdB;XgcGP=EbMl_%=>IFvVr?gN3Ul<r|>HUNUO+e)EYBWib+wO<H_3DtUg
z9++=PJ5yq4FnlOqE>E^6QS!;y=vTfMdA&g7@m|Y%;z<du-_b4LbT=D+$)Pp$E=^hF
zGCKOnn#UaejdJMcbnDn*?M$<@d>Tyg+LGOPcWLYNR~Buo;lw@>;fZ8qlG+8v`-v-h
z4-4FT<o+jqy(c-o*KHqy*S;I(%=?;-AOpg}_MW0n?3L!s>ekn0;$=M_o{tCy#GMRO
z-$oMqNc?KJOP`@-J?r+TNfSM;3STE0JQW<CMC|VN>4A6Z?e#=%5rp@tD;O^_ay|^D
zV}BR6n*HPzGR%NEr0g|#{VIGy{L>=iXf8N=69vv30D7nZTf@7g;rhDYI(sUO>@Rl-
zVXnbv<!797ppgz@qtBK(RLN9y7#Igbd0sH5Sjq56pMTpA60r4mHDP?$#aNaf9Ik6U
zoPw`yW-tSyjE2>wD4XoCm?gAV@=TJOuG%(}9`~gmbZ#*5YE>SRnGiwfL)c#H4?SL8
zo_;|Z%(<eQPVe|7MxDQ8d<^5Etul(&Zna31Bkh!62w|`uW)rsFyZe@V9Ba$aGkW>#
zZ3H>CU{Bj3Ia0furm|6`m0T6*uvR}%j|Ef)G~amcpL()8FHcx!q{UJ{h{asvn_v=X
z2pAZ-g7Bt0)g4~dPV+b-1ucc`?HX^m2{4V$SS0Vn`Y8bQ14G37T__trik!yl%GV2)
zzwaIn;fQ3lOP%I)9UE@#xqjJAD^HwJYJcvM34veIfzI4`{oOidt(B#ijh4%uoTKiu
zmv(QJTicq=V@lO$s%j*k32C*Hg_;M*S-1}Sc`Ilz|HYdsOmlbaMmr}1R48SV?Z!ij
z!z@y{owg)w_GnLD{ZJDO#^j5F4R(9H@X{&06HUcsR@dUL?b0r`i}SpW6>gVGshT+6
zJyD1$+bf~TYy-$}LYsrw%id*#=X_&VD?Zs|IN<WM|CF44dRG(>+*4-?R|iG}@z?9+
z36oJaT<wHL6|a*>Uy?1Wep=hZ!*tB6q`xo8#|!|4Os2|d9jH5j9|c#X@_%T{o{h=$
zWP!)$l*df170jMk=Y^TOd1F6{6dkLETNyc>lgvG+e(H{5-1sf#xtlO#amq^uXW2sh
zDaU7+dq__$6=An*cx~~TuWObim?!W2cD~4~>HUE1rAmmQ0GkVUvKx6-1asBb?|TO4
zjo4z&j=E(r{(v6j=(@5_E`MmAIpXRgAZnOYQ?D|`pp2XElk1l~uw?0gp@j?owZcpu
zEtm6CeC5iD48M?7WdyNuKrd%9{`=i*gKO$$y+nhzVw5{ZM1L6qsRQw&9PfDH$P41a
zQGxC8MQSQVey!ZlPn4eYyV}dqO8hxc7|5qy`>}(6O=m%$M5{}3>LJ%2pZT*(iF@1n
z)(Jl8A3Lt#%aNM9>Mc&2hrcfObiYER5t-dxC~Bn(ojCo+MKUqJk-+N2{eXTJx9=4{
z2j$QfGAV^5r@n(epQlEE#+H5<=r)oZ8?=42Tw`DQDD4t(5>y89dXjmyUC$Y>ApN@i
zfsyhT!nj(nG}+W|BhNdBe>w`UNIG>TQX~XqD{~sr6jD_SdD`y|aLhV~oOH)XT+E}8
zqOVk)$IQ93QA@dP!|a-GP=Zws84l#XNGW{^&M>(`2Ka>SC9Jr!9)Ff_63k)oc`BmN
z3q=$4Et%9kVa<w-h;2>pFQ*Z%a2SGz(e5~~H$P_tPq%HP1eN=7jIN<tmt--534vjq
zg^UfigFL=S07<AoeEo}jEylFbZC}VH$C~aPM@fMjTXdCw8AtN5UFkYLMI-N@bDM(v
zqS$lN#E261%9-D`%(K?bH*>bui?r<zO-InD0P;_-l_nQOiGjudnMj^^db~FlmX4EM
zpT?wXqzl^vwhP0-*Z3!-znibn9lsA$9}bpZ#KR7idxMb5Q~5vnhRAdKXHobYc!zKD
zH*|-V5#V8^)FX@IoWqZTZ~>F^f)p&rQW8m1neM;b>YN!Y?67y_wl=TXz=W-8`Y%%Y
zEd%sfjuT5IBksUb`(+VzoLpRLcXuq(`LF;THXGANWWZ85>r%E}I?W{=_lEqJxf}!W
zD(rcEA8!%u$#`Ayg097KuY&<^w~PDUZfF9IF|KOSJDpzz4|2bra5qu&5NC<M)$_pQ
zX|^*6X6^dNPIZd?kB8C^{ANEq>h8Od%;)`dtMm6*$t>f}Ro`AdV;DEAJ{npuQmvsl
zRY=E?nGRNZHQxTu^Kt;C-_Twsi!cL!$Xhmc{tD2s>vUAr>be}vEeCH6zy^Z4J6^3$
zF2eVqaqkHBTp{v#CDXSxW0&VBcbw@cwaZw?&ja2eat_~;c>1-PJ+Y`AD4|tyC@S~m
zgO6RCTAEwP&kHg-FEcDJJmroL@m8t^2RL9GVSE8B%#f)co$XZ$1?SxmufC1twwi8<
zUkJl2fs*7HiR&5GefgE*Q2ux8?zUcJ&$I8vmSY>Am*SpdU*%K6pL$-EK#`*2v@)Tk
ztL3eYC7E5fJx?tOE>kX+(Q-tx*oGAB0PxynS&KRzj%n^-?(qwp^JimdG#l~w&BU(I
z%}JCl?nK#c$-EITArIfDKI?zm;#TfjHJYZ7Hru*fxjULS_M7x`Dpw){r|!sbq6r=f
zJPmAtJsK}LN7(h`eA?TkqP-`5GU_$0#>;QHJv@oV!tJ#Gp~oa&5tEBlnDVQ&n|HE>
zWYR~@GNG~JuCtrALL`so`$|<duynLef^|f7{_y7mFj!EWC<XD_jJv4R2l5)SC2@mn
zPYXIi?}1b(6SWq6Su>%OTqDqH@_Ygs$_gIM0MDUyL;Zo_<mJBlb}*rPjmc0v1)FrG
zBt7q#S_W%_d#5P8c-4vT)jr*b{yan%2T&NatNTl+ko2Yw^i@<A>cK^Yhc2;FEIAm+
zVN^BNHKjMP!fVIBcyH@^K*l#O61KzU-bG0JhA(-Zu2oQaf9E)`!S5b5TKbIPK(*Zx
z-<igW7f?7HZyp7!-a6)L`yw_x=5SUZ#;AaPG%+@|f~}96ouk0O*agBKlZiJU8Y5}9
zwRd@ACZF|5PE3s#870wwePazxAGkFX6}8Goqb%N`im0j)@Td}-3TvjZk3eTF#0{B*
zwU4S@MX1o);~NvWl5jIYMxt5_(jrVp<6|p{e2sx^y&13S-|w(J4vqOI+P>K~;8%F|
zf{_yI6Q8Rm0s$`{Y&Zx#DG8kAhAbhA4he+8!Ez}H_~Am))*Y(89D=Lqvl}ulKv5X?
z#}kEBV}tQhnpJ#!4ZKIfFn617Ez&l^Ca(Vma?Z!;h)!Rz;vkA<3@=FPFdk)}zFerN
z->XY}&`fA8#kTdA9V>G-`P`A@L1gRBdmZya_@*DTX|4#dRo*28AF$s}{{Fy(Z+5LB
zkoyw4so_RF0C^)foxp~&_$Je(0S)Age2rG}AcqW(hkq~tThdcW-juDhhL6Frha-p;
z(aA|FS@s&z|JL-}61=z}|ADL%4?|FTc334?9^LE*TfieBy|DN<j(U%`hrOtxMufKv
z3RJQ}k$>J?(*0^7WYS-TpBSDX20OH+%f(fStE?O08!lS>iCqfCe($H#`Nf1UWu-dp
zv-&~nBEH)Tc!?g^Fw1&Uu5o@*Zcpw{HYuR*MS#y`pxtROHN=|CH8IVTfds&XlFSOo
zA0aovgH|M!UgEXmOs%qb_OeZ(RLh{d?D3#*fz34wN+f7+c-z@*9E+*N?+D8OI%>%h
zeA||wj(JP3b6*YvU5A&ZAF3%tI(Y6xJz-t9M6Fp)L*PYl=0&t%8|U7tH^cHA{VM;c
zuaL)5w+@SyCVqEv^kZh+ceb^qxVFn5`gwhr9@t!&GZYr6IJxd2h-&t85^&XPKnDH1
z0|y+K9JLiBKMa2uwKO7agxx+P2ZCBMWTt|K(@YSdpL{rLck4$bCN|ceGhLVi8_qmC
z(Bnxk3F}+-PyxnV8MZc)eeS=cj@q%&#Wi&m`nka=IITDf2Y4Md#<4%6tbm9xfXsBH
zF-Ap>?twv?xZ)_@3-yTABawDio;)6lISGU7$5k>mYL6M?Caufe8(U7kg*|5~kGs0J
zX2TyhLk7V|A>VTmDcHi-nK52oqXYxob75^W$%4f)PQ-ekp9lFCImisXsOL7or|_v^
zi`nnXaa14p*9<bx5rMh@hGzOh<<#|wE}s6B-RJGfrIao-HST)VkjM3qy$)q<E2+!%
z)w^qJGR+ZAIx;FY9nr`RWBxH4Kp{>}$ZJ#H@1XNWb6AT*jj(8Ky=vI%Iy5PSXk5CD
z@Z@799XfH;s<DP0Ktze%7`0=14uzir!1B8pN^#EWcZ_zWe<n1k9gbS(8TgRTxU98{
z!<DNO#W476h2Q-sAw~MEg6}u?^F|0#&;%4W{1us|x+R?i^+)#wP@)zNqzF65p{a<y
zEr@oqvy`Gtu=wS>P&C{l0Yoa>fr2$9lKM$5VwNUeeZl&LW@iUDoH!1h{3Lxl<g@n}
zmJ*k69K{NPKyjg3yhUD7UX;<dd?ihqj##xU{mP80ILy!SxYo}z1}|{}3{L5>OeqkW
zLNnDna0@|wCjsSry_JgkR?8$?y)6XlS;rJfjDtr0ODt-|JP9_2RfqkbUaNK=H>jNw
z_Km`{+5^9VS&DimjAeH%^*Ho>y>A_S;3+w0q^GZnBfkoFaM`X1%P0}}vmpS-4CIuQ
z${MEO_1$1I424BB&a2i7x?Xl>`&Pb!V#<eLW9e_hQe<sWdzMN2(1hWyEECG}L1<NZ
z4L6g)@7+!24WAvIj>XKLUC4Zz#%gZg3yN(Wrp5G7@cJ83soa!126G}$tt!hg7K1nK
z#Y6~^0b;BCOV!`aYktliMsizU4egJ-hFZP8SVuF%z1E3?MB+)!KjLlAv`&}i7&&fI
zk{IxuAEu+e;J;zDcq~LU{hD^{YCn|uDT<E}DJUWAchP<f-tYPIycB978C}V-iZqI-
zm$4tTgi6H>uVaz=YZf&$n;F#&ht8+)eyP@xF&|k(JtH^Lz~wsOB~iHa8UERL%Ix#u
z#Au{5$V-^4{>4vZZ7tJB6`ndI0A9&8Wafa>Z?5x8b5Nbgt?K7twghMGJ5=qEDB|s+
zlZULuI}P%+aDVnN3CAavJ!j~Ee?(&hxl%6MA*2$gvi!UD!|$zR)%aVDI;`w9hbP6P
zOIPdMr_lH3Qu14-%qDs$08|`Ru-2R#j#JJ3XNW3ST${ohrMRBjVg+G;E4!hMUjp+o
z!<A$TpQ3=Czc#|sqKhZYkDQW3^fxO;XnwqliOg$Cmlt~Ck<p2XaKM@>NlbT>u6n~C
znEm9YOh;U9oOP!||D*W@VEy53FghDoC2zHmhi$a{7<T7bzdRP%>WFLv$ynWY47cUE
zv39=Hchv-#Tyc7&3e6;vN_ykL9pU+BCD3OHNh`kTRNm@LkhYtcTdC@E<?HkUN%Yt7
zd&g{LM=Z+%wtk{Coz-3HqVfdku(&uXkGA{H)8MKH6{*~$Y?777_AE~1@)aCbH1fYy
z{Y6M42D_|It{9~|$ecO{viT{}u9p)@?e4p>sJB{6e|xQt+DxQS0LULdIAkk1B(Exb
zq=ZH`2$EIB$83363`Y{5H6bN){?0V033N7fkG)pV8)q6#5@Eej->Mi9G2p`uKZZNu
zE{iP`+!x^?{Z?g!dN}%~LMQ;U+#C(9a-_IQGpNsyRF!KCsX`uKYLcG_9dYW1sZIeE
zdf~UCZQsg$7-h>9?o)s9R>|vEfeUlM)p(IveAIg1929Gy<u7}W`FT>2057O`%fg~n
zg>Us`sRB#M$TeSN^)tFx=A};SGxcf2eSd8s_Es!6De$?xNRa_AeLJ0UFKT$jHmYbx
z19pkfkpa^m_US6Ra5_KT;8`UMX87Oe`iZrb{q<$IbElh*BT;aOF?s@xe=KvKtDEuW
z<q)0?&y74>_ia#K>-2xN{S@v#{Uu(!q)p+KX*cUL@`&bx*B?o58T>)litRl>j3@R>
zb1&yjT7wX0_?^vjGS;$gReGH>oACaKiSV@^VNHO7Vab%oHpZH7eG2Q#%aec$gJiZy
zu4wnq<L|_B>qUYs3x0|-y2_sPq7oai=@=6)AhY~^nIIZuc_!kJj}9QwN_@YsuL$F-
z7sHa#|D-+H?u-=tbH4{Wp)@fCkJ*7mtf-p!?R#IBUQ~y@mCl#bbHS932ZlMBs#|gJ
zKYs@a;*z{y%M`<+{ll`ymR2QNWAWaXw>NzHK;AC7Z$DkYRMuMuDNEXwA$9RvQ_gT#
zw5n_9FgBp#8}VT6&G>QlzPrYB5y6HtbS}<E?T>nxq8&G1oAcJu+n^0+R-a?j@C_mD
zBNZZ{iE)f+O>OIAwXi<oYwbIi&DKIe9{7hE2<&MJZqq&IBUgtaiM5%jDQfMRQkP<}
zxU{Gf=YFdEES5c6y(8YS*e?A&1zYUbVoKFD$Zhu>{&1guIfZfS2_NWr1YEX-m^<}1
zCfFWD!f*q<=iu{+s@QzX)S_d#gM6Iy{jJCt7ZU+q<ck4~E^9`?oGesDR}_HVGb!3?
zybF1$+@PPf53flqlavl;)yXQYCO7v~|22qsq0b&A(nW~RTuAKAI^rHcanl~FxF~$t
zs3-`f31Jil1YtZk*r(L>VW3r8h$<oWw)M)kOoD)3r7nHZBdct6i7}l@qZ@|bEsdqi
zRj}J2bsY%lmxU`fO6iU*J1PfsQIj|zyia2AQcx|kestv7K^8gyr(#+qa|R;N&<UZF
z-jg6G4Ta4(d8GlrhffQY-Uz*AY|)WyGa<;VR|!B%S%H6^<y%>|V?L7^Z)Rc&$fqU5
zwO*f^f!vIgEIw|5^Xq5t^H6Ln;KD0nw{KLafVd^?wi!rL*HtP$PiY@!#k19b@=_Wx
z%5!l}#aG=^*}bSMB9dY7H!CDtf4^p?U~ixYmes-dGW8*h)m+S-F24BX=MaG}T5a}f
z&Pc*)`qv7kp2z?}qzvwcZ!@K8(UHVSn4MNDG*Pw|7T*c=9b49sLAmdfHqihxI0iYL
z*#^7c`!I(<$W~|_=*ZMB=u($dxY|shahi{>0a~m8832wI|911w83KeJWwnHnvNZ~S
zsDcwJyTU@St*#jv+mQess33l;+l!#&X}D%gh`c3ZuIRw)m{~JM^u6K1)7U=tuJ9Yw
zUGm>wjivPb`ccyh#GBf921Ks=K)^0%*;<-d?34twa~khOU2;Jseqm+u2L6@tVEr?t
zL^a&GW4e_KEPcA)A>Y`qlTWbI+PEVEhf1&Jo*R4<MAr{T=$ywnjYinRmS>t^53Iw!
zuwEoHr;2&6qko<z{q@3!f|AUDXOZ{!1;N!A3Se`VmFrS960NU&*nSA5S9_hb)e-Zi
z3L-^ax7r?3?oyTokJi{TCC~qf2$c&+SsDH_z>)bIyuIRjKlw^4MnVpsPN}U`bJcrt
z9B24XC9zwlcY*0z&)~Wbx&_S3+nqy`&~U9>4d@)&Sks00vA<g`{mSBe@Yss^@bZSF
zJy+4LE_fZeHrqOY>|dYYUI*=L_b*%$a2dxb&*{8zKCn$?7wc&Id$KC3qV9}l`N@0l
zbvI@&s)68Sy!emjXn+c4=bW?|A**D3=9k3Y;UZnHxZ3y3GBxarA}mog(jqUD6c1;~
z4Zdlg|HIBIkFk%92_Z2)v&~6ejuQs34mB}8HL6+F=DA~q)xCZnJ|(5Ww-1#o2pcLy
zdfqP}s=bgYCy`rUQFeN(ZXn~7Ls+nU7>j{Z;@2DzS@X`>6l0nSsQ>f^{_9ot2zpjS
z$|f7QPMcp%J9)L`MTS{T{m8>DJJiocPJ%O-AS$`@veQ423IOxatUMgXpq8-tq;IkH
z7S$8j4U9SYWNDx#H51|ZTAPX5mnlnM=-Pso17ht%;om6QM>5#Y@iQkA`jc;iTsKU}
zX8+X|qNqDSrg5MCm01+i`mg8#iVeyrZ&p>HGm`$e8!AGo5m2!rM{_c+Klu*Gb-J03
zjW55V@H1fhfofK;Kfc-=dJ!<ZK)Oa3%cY-Y;9NwjSqA^{0vZ5NLG0}DwVw-o48|mP
zm2EG)?GIm}HzOXSAj>g|{pm)OX5&)^OqdQ3pMuh-EXCq;nVehlA+REVl<-mB-+XS9
zP04k1<%L|fHj!Nt-y4}-5#Mh^?J6?8yzZOi`Y6iA&b`4i-3xwM{X7WU84r4qip#W;
zDaW*7?9wo*ax(H>@)>H<`!hyimG=gzRO2iqjPHF@D>&QR{9YhPFgsEMNUXjwz=5A^
zmel{u=)x=`V;%PSy<*#~lj#j+H~ZyN$sX>!$s1$mjS#I{vvbRraK5u)is0FJ3-4uM
zDbn@nW#%&@cKWrq%AwLVkJDaTYTQ}U(qS%}{P3w>O_67CqbPykC%9&90W}igm;{Vf
zn2zJQvTH%CQ6fHX-UQjc@}x`&eCo*D#C5o~Gpuw%PQ}SV^r4W^=OFV&b^pPWdFvQS
zr6!D?(P!Euv|c3XH6v`*el%lqQCiP79*s4^)Zg>?s#iLGbix^r5cb^;>Lyrzh2^M@
z&1Gz5iJY=BGk1|Ry>or{uH!%eN0u1}Mbg=Q^Nod=uE9ypumz+0lI?Nb^#_+qCuqFx
zT=o?|tCmnx$@KTI$Q=2wZ4JG2ccEZcDl_vmLGV?KgF2;^zHPu2Rec7QL-+91y5oQ!
z^*z&bBAif19k(2qmmHa&${?2rI?$v0Oca;0$vJJquIihLI8SS$z6=O-S{SGFF66>D
zyc&L`K6HXi9?SUy+aeGLzDmXzSrN}v1yyP>oZ`IUWZ4d{=ME*AY5Cp18fI@A3^Qkh
z5hC}=ZFsg?tQs&Ax!mj1t}I`t_*|OPzrSdbK<w@Bf;khSf{IL@TIE+A&(VxiC{}*a
z2K2(RHkm%TyrYG6ar57MPK-x2O=Jk0H@*s^Y#NJ*DJvrOj=doGc0BPeL#`n@Il3om
zfum_%NbM#!l1INB2YiL4KV<$z%Z&0l@-rvby;#%Ux#+(2Bs^IM6R(sU{dT;;w6AMO
zp-TS5pfPCK;GWw0mOq|!zuQ<^O2^MztPt7nt?MjTREf}qb!bH}Pjvm)TGXbR&#ASX
z+ix4&E!7ve?2~B?(N~MMQlzGWi%?_zB2^Ze*@soz#Vo)`pNeENRdwK+krflRa%7?8
zn@c<~?sB#<F&TRCru|Sjyn_&^ao_5NTKtomiEz<E_EFViZ;1kfO-#@-MkBzz9`7p&
zuRHZ_)jgM)-SGe*R<rEFv6N6ac-h_3&ph4kl=j`81(d~VYjRqr76^8kjiR!=>)Tus
z_^bRQV=0Gd!J>^V?LdBI+Ew!l>Ea=p*+Ib4CnMp{H?#}>lZ(<dM3weG(rH$}?B<kB
ztyVL!PoF<ZYL!81u$QiUZ}Viyh~@OzXJ3EJve9M-)|%r-u#}<dlr;*buIRzHmlfpi
zzy5}TQL630%yuVBoEDa1b&YLY!ux8@?f1p;x)kRRf{slbjxRmX+0izrW9MAoralrv
z-W3|4;v%2-i&JUjvFK^~hI_;T@qlR~_dpe<_Li3&)N%=HGUW}+7_QGhE3Qg74|yyt
zS|!@*R2HS%nY^F|?&nnS)uhMk-sq~*uo$1NYuHQl1&&(sXU7a^W$mY`OvRbtP-Wjo
zL07{TYHPDT+8<>(z4mnbQYPYwHt~o4Q|$PLn7^fu=0h3GtgX87Ye;<O3v#e}lDB!f
z-hR$pn6~h-+Y78oj#>_>^=^*|mJW?Hv|v`N>c7EE#wBc;*uKQSI=)Id%rXj_K(tYp
z(A`MJ9YBGM?TZN;<ZjqmAd+tNBpdT|SKgw|?G_^<);+q3II{^}8va?QHd)mt^<lsm
zH=6P>cDzGvN-0NNoXHn05X@;&^4zfxq#zy-Q~PrCnuJIHGDs-4%16C*GSv6DC(ui1
z)_J-HU_i`TL)j#BWMlMadrFtd(Q<>Fr&DR4${MihTQ5Rv&hnL@Y;np5+cbP;wUdX>
ztk1(kRkii#vprk@g#*4{ehYcOgeAThel0}UWE*G;!6E1%r45tJ?X~hmJ>uHdjOR9r
zcT<Rl7X$2ud_MFO6`cKIVVupf-|I=+thKx3!Q;1NyS3jDTtks+@%pe1ETJY`d90Sf
zt{c-H!+71rD77!(S~6CFD!?kbo8r*gvZy%{_y;|$nU$Zo<A03(byQo;_Xi5&6pFMs
z1ZZ)mc%Vpew_?SLL(yO%IE7N26qgdLNN|b=65QQA1d0}K(L(LH>GyZ<`}fPN#fr?f
z$(}hg`|R`Cv&m5-o~G;9lq4ylsl5Vf9laWt@6cxoQ{P%JmKLIh6}*E2Zxke-!&Q<?
zjYHLBof==ij``IbiIHG?&oF$&G6JG0f%|X9Sv*-Hm-bTM_B%0Yx6aGl5=+zxH(tvv
zM}+e53wBe<2MW8}8Jy6@Wx)ki3JL$fRt$g5z9;0>i}NwtA6NAN#=5CN{737uhbTNh
z@1}-^Wy~+J=CD5Y4!p-uxuM&wUtJ8>X8t9xAwf*k)Cm;|ysY>OJs(S*IV;+8i=X?^
zo*^I>B~)u9Gu39CZk5ywpiS?74rHjt_f>m7^vapyL>1Nyt59>?Z4cS)@8(NK?yLVS
z8#S|yEjm<LdLrdmTr#qpx;a8Sq^0_&7Q1{}NsZMltxYjMUO=mtQIA2zMuw<msnc25
zVL^fGCyz%=qWh=tgzJQ2H*?EHqh1|frRTk+RXeJd9@x<lljnV4E-Vasd|~u(mou;0
zqz#mARnrX6@UCGGRF5+o1W=W8d?Lkf`xRk*f9>(nYM{JTNMvadF+MC<>b3F=8x^|;
zEZOGrQNIbZZriI?O2!#brB4W|5~%7bF?xcJT|59kG|+w_t#~M3M|tA|L?$S3Sh#7k
zUtF$d-}r~&ac4)>A5<Qu!OaWystnM4NeOLx4SdK_ao=uen4JU|dQEjAXiTB*ne~og
z5?_pOmdituquMB8&1@Xbu0qoQ^OY9H6a+Wi*&X~*)Ifv>y#F>WXPsZr@mO)%+zx@H
zP~fi9YY`R5t}5@t%;GEM8Vxe2RQYWa_)g{jR{e-^`29MFZcG=?<Idj3+=tq#-00I|
ziU!#7kGz3_pyJZjHPP{QpMlx)Q^=?CHS(P0VYmUB;5I<7^{w2#wnvhYKd;G}Gnd5l
z<rDIY|5B@UNx9W{`|Pe`6`y{oHfaI`t~;Y_A2tINS<e3Y=YzZ;0(&mS##`(ZMqC}S
z+%ELu0+ipxjQkH>opZ7(LZ|`0Db7l_#>7VP?H<s<4>d+r-m*jufMUnBDa`SyI=Pxr
zH8u<2eG*9#AWKJH{F}GVEj@$C(Blm=_v~isdtiTTsw2S|A3$~8knBra*1?<H+mANA
zpnok<oeWM`>Emb?E@CS@Iw@KtAae2d*BlNH$=SooN%ffmleH%HFI3_(^{%U7q^Crw
z(QRv<Hx7u#TPD)blV(6*1{+wx!(q~B<s^HzO2%Gw*=qBGPb;D&XrM7DjDL^&qPLHW
ztYaw5YpJ^`;#6I>Ga@d`9-Rbj0rLjJ2F?J@Y+C*2+@f8z8$zOlckO@$e`VMk-Rnp*
zL<$MPpX8OOk9c$_*adO)CrwT&G9vs9!ZSLSf!^e*W>~D=6m!S2m#L+I{4%qY&`BhS
z7*Z<e=nM8?bMhuY`CgmZWJqx*V1G#-;4#5y+^wpA?z^wMUS{_l`ll`dDKYT$wfLax
z@F+u0rmv3}DaG`Yj`_hM(qi$tLthvALz{eR5A28E#rSX2HxF^+r@sr2@;%SaCe8f{
z5@i1Fmd9pR@r*&MjF9s1d&<by96wJ8pA4;P@~0tjx(~xSO<8FZzVykle{4{fH-a(t
z4`^cT`Gm^S*qvU)QT{h+_Tg#QkZ)2@*0W0IJ;NRuYUY%|U|lukh|lwe+0%kn8uL1c
zSYkAblJK4Nq7E<;vuZ8(C1BO_yis$hvO4G21e2y68RC5p1`@gwg^?~55@CJDbhTFP
zwaf5u<bcrFiI48qvf(7jDt3cEnQPq15XmF^qwxj9fw@ql3DraU(>k%oe0zcJSF!K|
zt_3OJ3))M*o^+uY;$+$`_O;8j<;JSoFPu%knnbq=jJBLI=2B;(#BbW|AJE6L@kn~&
zmA^^XA-)hN)@~VCgX4Y(hVP8cxAQ@C(^IU?2Oe&XrTt33p397F0=qN1X?{NQfCe}W
z#J4)Jyy|Q?HWZejO&E+3AGP9PeKJ$hAw+-E^4i#b{?trto!?)|MAQ?$=ON2DoSXyf
z7g8CNCu~m{a(t1(;&cB{6RBROOJLmUu5dgeq`iKA5l2Wl`l8#>`gag6A3`mgMoNCh
zfY9)<w71D~vdSOGkXLwcJ6NJCXPpypLPNjRlHrVExT*aU*cHrJvh9@?qbx4kV)<}I
zr*6(-DC%NGEn2)iq1D8ec9Y`tfEVDEHTK$a<8PJV@N%mwimwo}_oi1*C{%yna9zA!
zQF@Ixx>H<(H*a+O$*e5beYZ*&pBhM@n}OQCNH3h>y2+|unuGCmkEp}m;wjG?k-`DW
z{l(lRX_SzKrAw9coS9y|O(7&syK5XdXy8LFIc;94{|1<{0qqw8c@zAi(~hfszB*O7
z^cygdAi|dyZT42#*&@bJDlSD$zSzJWKT%gZX}$dJn<@jq4U&{oC|UEyZB#?p>t!$&
z8#^&DjWrP9g7A4*N9%#(buvR-OKzE`teXa;3vc&PmfC?=es}})(Eq!RAk2FHXHU5W
z0x8|w!Qs){ud(H%^V)8y#)!u}uox9*U`V{35lD-Z%yf}l=X;zdf)ZV|U)Y(bZ|~2P
zH~PdCknQXmeY$L<^n6`5#`^Et#dE<3bm!%0nHIpf4d*=Z3Ku|l8vA{XK>qPQeQ5Sv
zA1HbG=o#>ppE4p!Wgi}dN&bE>I0j8>Y?;@y7?3d&NPoX3<TXSASWb8+a!u2$+d{sd
zUL-XL8l&@fk`?*PPZPc}T4vwc$d<o;ILudT4dd!qO2Ie@J*KLz_S}RQU~1i<jC^D@
zCN0aN<!N4fJ0^7H`IqB*Ib4<^TCEu{iBVf|R2Ectuz}F$MPu0BK~^$BoytcF%j5>D
z;-%#zXEOOuIqwK20XmX|!;eR+g_$e9dq`UPEsJg>SKF?Zovlty9BUZLqS%-Qxl(~l
z#tsxGnaftNbUh0T(Y4_B=dAS1pQAU@>97zSeSTuy%E7uhzt%qm^ZMgjzCbx!iRi~Y
z=IGFbVm=A7zHLv%6KA~^*R|uXQFtyo?B*XtDx(rp%hH1)dN`4Av)E#rZuMt%${h=6
zWG^a*>ab87O2~O-p|n=ra2pE9nP#Xs{i$86ER$nC0LS8(m`Nh{&K@?IP4$~>FL^=T
z-y&O7^WE?DYiV=Hgm3EFpcWqtxfqJF_P%|2r7tL!#k-{|1(I%8`sL&M38L#)^91$M
z4gdOJZW?sm$$i0|^XlF2rAP{YejaD$r0f9ekNej&9vk4AkC<xp9IiUaiGiAt8?`tv
z85ivK$OUMtQ_q;k)+0Lcyj(i-XwXEiyUbz6S*1k@IUGZs{SK0d2N{T?ZDG({Un9RT
zAkn+59xrBnO(1wh>V5~296lUdvO_M7gJj~~p&lV#vz3h83^@h-nRWoe>sM5ha5H9Y
z2Zn1S=P4N}Q-Ya6z+FnUjKpgfRpy1e_9yq|TCirTK^)Z7i5)Pwo=-V%eBadc&${7n
zn4T&}+Ng<9^eaRB@K-8zt_xn>EwA~7H}kSu4($=HzHe%+*~@eIAB{inkkI4csoxl#
z*xuTN><PSpC6DZ0jS^DRDmYxQ?te?<!tEDAdDiBhl9XcOF@%)EVGTxt@7h8KuAH*u
z6fT;DgN4tgKuTC-sD(bz1IUF(>MQ$lz@*;2JOnm%pr}{Cm2d$+cdJIWoK^yVhpm1U
zJf{o{9c~ZwrSL%VHNh&(msIO}RdfkKYRk%~1v#ctDYfL%$-4Nh69_6?6A`4JJ80NB
zlDhGZwm8Q5@tKN_R`g?aRC+OeSDc^%;gwJY%&K75%`@HVSD+@(6exmgODT;1!*4h2
zO5&wE@KDD^5&MM8bd*S7HHu2GJ9iyFmd3SikNgAQIFzrbH*$M(D5{Dp`3PQKo_O%&
zS&0x0({h^WzWVo9O-422QB5GH=RM@ruN($&4n;~EPep(cW@BXLwjazd#X(n|+t6>N
ze0GT9ytTm;Gj_QHU)c?t#eAP*JK&HH@3f)T?44=h!w11bA5BP(c9IvIBuwJ>;vC;y
zJH7Y!w8>WfYS*tNk(BBL?0A{2I&~Xd*JyffKG?4r60<zjiJbO!gp}4|5BwbJDR?NE
z#kZV#9`w$l4mBq50aVFrYB$KhZ`}mDjt8-71GHJI<ZR@OOIg+z$>_aX^}&)$7n*P8
z3@S5+BDV0U9hxAUN5kafG)+MRV_Y8LYkDx1sj7jD-Avdc9h=tTXp^r9ag;B$khZ&H
zHXds1EnJ!rQrgw-Rqp99sf~+rb3$CVKlK<!ngCG2Ca>%WifH)hr*$Bb8JyM11#04~
zw3ueM4|tZHWTv(d6^6Qas^@GhGK}$eX`G$f926JdxFG{fFObnt(g=j8{No2Kr?E98
zhPr;Gyx92MDR(fns=Fg_B0VuA9mYrdvozxvM4lqX!Nw{QC%XGMj@$j0m%AM>g|6At
zCRCq@{p^*?+viR0YyMu-pw&fS7oeHOy<^CfdYo`J!qhWsyv@MRLlC9q;U&`A2<X2$
zGqxBZi*VRuKK`tZxWrG)3#rTvo^k}re4Tjh4vATm=Np!|>v<d;NA<)5)eL}Kb!<W{
z<g`fNa{ld<(GnuIWOFZC4v`7V8o$Ld=0$NaSM$t`fc)Z8%w@-^Xy?s-CuA^jzB0T&
zcQiXAC>D5;#fxIob+I7Hj8vv-p&=2%m5nteS!#QMvVTZ?gw7qJ3^!5C^8GtQa`D?}
z{LzZ#)l^iSW$VNA4W@ArTR<Q-dA^i7F`o_5#ZLNn)%RXyJj~yBpO|b%ed6;_(!2=d
zsuJMR6g8AXoc8KcWuKVigZ8-;WZ-;$u~jr_#)y)1Q)yDp{ax0d{(hb5U4QO5U^3=5
zi_DzQ4#;v!x7fp(wWc>T=(F?RQo8BZU+n#yF(xOV31qVKg9LliDR&Os=y^J@vOkCT
z!cCm{z?4cq5FceP;CZ;7Ysy}C;jZ9PVuav7Q{<)JP72YL4A)3%w21!@>_)m;*Kx|d
zh4-{YSvd%Qu<FPjlh|#^a(bZtt;Tm=&mQ<*BA}Yjt>Qxl+X$|2?wcQt0EleH2dITj
zME#`}xFdHYA%D}kXJR$|DTncr4u8vbV>r${8?hQLO7bISZ`wUdqMUX-GR19-TUqYi
z3Il3w_SvYpVO@+{`07+C<f~{FPDRtpSY6hOnlk7q6=VP+z1%H2VMO{hWv<Xijy1*i
zTd(`|Q>*Z<dFSX4Rhh`K`(Vg~`%@lkQZXwJLLNJy(dmJ)$b<a5*XEVbw3h6+Yk(ur
zT0YHMjETt~jfJC&7h>K?C^8+hr7jexI8uwE`Z|Xh1+7Ai)`2dfLu>^<jOY;Pvog20
z6q2|C&?b0oC$kNyMQ3|%s~PzeRb@BHsd_wS??fV*9=?Q?K|qLLju<i_mOq6XVuV;y
z2pDN&IVM5zX9%gGz*yzrM<&4Mi~Nvk&Y@FQ$N;y6D<;>OZ))19QJm@Q0X(fLf%ZNv
zz;a|*M!-A2@%vVCP4}}4Q~og%ePRelALuf`(hbT*564xLq0Ql_I()V=03zigOcYOa
zlrCCW$9fU3hEHi?qr+0MG6mmz6Tc?NW0bw|RtvYq_bOJMG#qg{Dh<hnco|XW^4bm5
zs`eZgG|#jvk;SS!9V#k8c)HAfdNBO6hXp%aH02f9oS=^<_CQofz{ve-`<9m*8H&$y
zNAa&f^b6XOpCrhHr#oqZLMZ#vv~?;c0f3v|Wm90hOd8;sq)`Lme4a9?^om{D+X5Oa
zU;firN*01lx&|dbY9VX+Q*}3fxk4z%&)Jn|%p-u05NURSQAA(+rGTREs1Pa}LpuMN
z2m`FQr+g>!;yJ6+hQbSPkpmNDQqr@rK#O!MbTjOCe3OJ8uj-|s`kK(2OiYUzYf(zj
z5m5t7gHN8Lgy%xu3?C%}d4{sDQF6ar+ZE_B;}9)j2X>U-h0*mKsSkuVN@nR0Lux2d
zV-HhvmXif#Y}%oH_L&&-(o=Yshc49xgl8J$cVU64R;n-sx|2M@LQu-=-?yHuLYvdl
z)vtsay4L4e1Mt1AWp*A96v{eP@Y*4=9e^EBI>k^F$9SOa8;A<cz~Fk^V-3uj9;nFl
zm$ode-vbXj#J#>F&~r^9fJrNJ-C;DpwZtX?GKqx|qg!u8Yp>m%>-eDwPo-jQtY3!f
zRGpuy-?s#Q$!l6Ez{uTU9<Y`Fc;^dA3S`D2Fb&QQ3tGuhF+1ief30~RxqVPEtZM6@
zoK(pVi+}&F&sD4%21@#D0>sX@R%X<gkwKDz&&STZ3fLs*I@jd{3N=5O0{OWy4Gz0)
z^n%pw8Iu63xz1PLr%C>uO4yBKPRq<W4>Q)U&A6Fi&;F(!-QTruIqn{`V`M)x_kG94
zx9?wn+-rNdss}0$ep%T1Xvqmu%KIB;e9KL~48!crOGHt_uOuErbRg^~TB9v@>>Ug=
zbIhb4PkMx){+4;_K<>=zPddc0n18%-Q{a&p%XEw!FQQr^+>Dvqn*#Onw%F`S=&T-y
z8dI;cZsMrCvk{pFtxY=tt>6Bzj%Fl$qejP#2I={s$xmI<rVF{W3vIbKHIF>8q%FYO
zv@Hj4!J3|w`+nwYw@mJ@oCBcvI4}h7->hI-=U#l=j|_+2W)VR=2vB2~FOd7T0N)fU
zkBrs2)f@hLuFlk}MeI6NYBuhk;XKcIh-`$lVvz<@9n2Pn1*r&<>Wn&I85<Bn)EH^%
zFK4c}CaKo)Y^aBF-RbZJEL4!W?!d-j7k=Xc)ZK}rFR&}cyse1FR8rUjYhUyz6+HZB
zbU7w}4+~(od20u>z`f+NVEiw)nws}$`ThD@ouUr}G4mvOkcyNAt%@o-?gQnnR!XEv
zyjhX=O8uq#7_HL8G614EQv(=~^NmJ*HX56&i8(fbT%Gu61Jf{0Z0{xHKWxRAsv4E{
zeInRB9qxHqz{)MnI&fs-jU5$Xz39rcmw+76{WEvd5z7AU1)0;>fUu>W+&ty1@l#;~
zKVug}YQ5H!1Qg>GzRyCE<ry0MxuqNn9q4v0Ga?cdYuL3mmB1eK5e=P_Cq4WLVx_(4
zLa#xa?9AcQF+SLpYwbP~dTa+tIu5$<sMIq7LNdJeStqJJyB;>RKI3LTH6xRFYFq+8
zo&t%vSyoc-yrde{3{l@ezDA#jY`i=*GmLKyoSd(TXT)v+HqH(Fs1^M`)w9Db6ES5l
z?OoC;;?ZXfA$ft+E(m398V6EtETc<criQ}9#a|A>ZdWU@rpbRO?11NiHtwFQ^Q?m*
zkk$(7Z=}VEwGOr$*<hVUn3~L(a-mm>>+X&RE9#|0$)*bO{PaMT!T9A_6j$x2#!nAN
z{%;xjc8GU;OTC%mG5lGcCDiE~Cd|C6ANu2$ccz?xF@A3umOs8))*^QSc6>GLM4k*_
z&B@EOaBvGKdQ?&wLf~81!X6&@;GfqW+iUTeR86YMgEi6s&Kh0DA_U%QGW}k9PQall
z;>xnv1|s~=QKzw*iFHem1-m5ea<^#*)31EwS47)$K9#`%vhOjx9>q$4=8aYUES8Kt
z?l2U49qV4|Lgo4=nd*d7^%;Q%E4=;ftS1Lm0;suhGsE2WEurGR)Kv0%4FqoGrZel;
zrJDdwl>HC#R7`Hn$;8r2EfD`XwiZw4__tk+F52{eHd#)&hI?5Ut*!F~?}m6d18qm^
zuKlvN-qxyPwbC5lBvI<Y4V5a(V}7rRO+0m!jm1dI(iM~``8j4|orgl(kDC1*_`zsb
ziWz6e*l#l|UTdhn)pF0f#>^}JAf5E-_0_5L$sv3S`RErm9H<!bN5*m`GTSd3%>5H5
zt(j`_Es-yY8v#;%QVK2{j;#EP>&IoBz_fs<56mf{YLMEYq`9j?coTqjrOnaUO^=&d
zTHwWS!H^L(ind>5jqk;Wtw(T9V-A#_+ud0Cyo7+%f#13{=JHbxWU&m&`RMGRH8#No
z&cWIFM+&<M+{jEh*YwMv?-0_N{+^3Avqsaw067-VQtBmhF${tzdtEVA&j?aAg%(-s
z;==qMI!JS-I&>G<qQGLTpCH)}(qV!(>gFY`SSzEo6+7v69YQ~*ectE9jGe|#sdA)N
zZ4Y`2=*6*^RItBe$qeGOuEb&b@TKNQvhkENkQwNh!DJ|Z2Y33czs|C!m%*h$ermS8
z=_$9DrGx*i)9=B`1C(20`g<C2H@x)&DB(r_Lv+@YXCsCzQy?0s@2`pxjHJb@c6YyW
zJ=^6ET)^?FO%axF8-5ZWF@_f9uIr|TI-cyj`Bp6h^og%DMYI7fz`36W>c3fGt9t1s
zV{=$cT~Tsli$HGj^`MDQm)|D5X_F`~f<$%VngQKZL7j9n3~(xuqCNEhk;8aj2%sWw
z3dA~DU>~lbpUIM!6gMoV51Voc3>{H6z9Kz{rGR9N9(b}-eedw%YHJBGycunV6r6Iu
z&9zpGU6pIkX>;J#v%VTk*k)#uf-TUiTXURzdR~a}sq*%e+7ZufQu@Wd>eFvDs~;f2
ztfM~WwYdp~G*5bL#FYD7rb}rKvZrZE6zU4RD1$&$G!YwNa#W;0KQ?{|!joj<$kc}<
zm0FJ~!6WTB({343;mHtjPN=V|D!b_33>7>IlgLk{r+#IxGDis9^zktHG-($5;!W~~
zUwq80D`Y@$vA7>44!;uRXc2`BsLM6!FuZ^dj#WfqW(|5wBGVu0Ddo8YNV~oJ$*sSk
zj*Fs=d-AGC^OSwg1$MW)YWvAoZQ6<<yHeEe;et>v=tI8ER@&{~@4Qqilc4Ofb6j%6
zkTt#X#}vXZRF(4dk8-8WUQ@r>)Wbzx;K!lKup`;|{F?9VyTLZ*fZWS)p?_V%{ynCo
zve82t^^yeB&B5|#Tc>#tiwK&VM{I(R;tQEAvs#waGX7kjP&z=NFHX~7wI4V@f2kSE
z2(1@O;;HQQDuC^AUrq7cWB|nUYDrEHR?cLVu>}Bgxv@ZOJxAO+0?WOi%7T35)obmA
z7KNEMh%7?~3JWQx=ex3KB=O~CE7FyiTAw$F2)k?l&P3^L{W+0IgVJVqjr^s$=2W2S
zuK)rg&W=<p+IH2-$B);BSOhk>C*&8Fn`QwwMc&5qTntTM=U1xTh|etEAr=L?uG+p7
zD;-V2us)WhR;HYH40vvGC^k|e4O82&WEU8Rf=hXF15BP_MY2S+gLAPTl=*6og8V28
zj>OEK^9iNMq;MnjU4ZA?9Hdq7H75y)1K-hP@1&`-hsh(Ewlg>1v=>0xem*v+ZMp%X
zJXkNthU5OHjhAOPXVP=GTNLfBtm^^7nkKEdA_0@>3`w5n(ffLXa%Z*=D0ni`5&1k1
zlllC^rG>U}nq8#*IFzSr(%k;*Y?%JiZ3FHnt?YznB`-g7Mc;)l>;3P7%_XGXAzwCq
zu*Ns6&FG9^@6mI+`aZ?sFD%&zYns$w_*v#Q+B?|zp{gN>sVH}L?G)Y~ReiZ*WyudD
zHxPEq(-+nBQ|Z!XApf1M6Pty6EfIxrA{=csrAAaX${^e0>Y3PD96jZ#+<S%8X5mmN
zi1Bgc;DINy%x&77%QKL-N+Ox`7qe_WhSanTO!R%pc5GL_Sd6SE#xb!}{spbc^oSb~
zN~ZO^KfPI|+f`R=2gpoAXCbxOn^}^nsm?$~NZ2YI&ZCa+-;-^cBcaC-c4XE0DTq$o
z{x`+zh4O{${G}pJZIG6xpK)%*bmMmus;(h!8QM!3lY<^1-kAJcr#Q`52&<b1jTh`P
z=D(;~gH?Es$GA&zKTqA^Ys(vVD@vpd3;s=||K)jU-|O+EH*-*Zvii5>kW$9@LgaR^
z3hK}91s9#~!{-$`UxVLw&M}LECiH@pviPa<2W07zRd+A$%f+ZJTsfr=0#3WrN@b22
zi*{Hgr+!JNUuceg<LbIuJ!gEVwlh|q-&>HLtoBa9LFM>6QGePy4;MED)*^nn=$}>P
zFtER*eB06#!9W_rH;x_d<hMZm+~>Wl?B)7wV|t~gj)ACfT}D;}rY&hGDmrwr@!j?#
zI|lELL}Fjo){ZXSrwqw7hV7XvT0y!(ZOZ1*iw+Eh*UXot)*%(Nko5iCCa6$k@GPNG
z`mtY<N;;r;>>Cu%asUKn6sE*``Y^Bz5|DQ?IV^&MLppy(WAR-B_^qIV14ENzO0X=3
zV<?3w2|)zm9N&4|IY_2ik^M_RqaC%>jcjnM=X<SkY{m31Q;EOU$N)lR^H=Y$8d*g*
z*PkyYI5^d*`=r0@b@S@<yNt0J=N-KNa)p#%^Jghp0LZi#wnb8ZW>c)$f5E}&6VqO_
zTq8H6G#{q=U(T8;sHr4KX4KF7ajE62W57Q`_r2K91jMc)o_$>ZQi#Z^pA_Y9_!&;N
zIxC7Z8E^Uhql<5!igu@dK{!zs^M!fF{rC>|Uk(s0#G7HiZMy%t8=pD;ag{g8Kl*Bq
z;oX#yS9%OY6+??vmd94Y$GH9goG;rH$vh(Oc<iIM-6VMfcP;*xOqTd`nL#tu9&9-~
zZ>AZZB>qp<15aRn#dCTB=tBB;JNNWA|1vTkalB(ghy+zw(LkJz(P22uBsh@_9|Tja
zU{NkR|A-hQHs=*Vb!P^tW!*~Y0G#5vpy;wHvpC78y50K8ec!No*CN9H1}gI=CpE^l
zTsK1WG35SOpg>4k#&g+yL|<-8^wd;Ew-Dh!X}wB@sex|elxivKY6W!0TRUV7>o_=c
zQky|KBmHDPR)9Wgy%dx^1GZGvt{0yuEvvtBeJD(Z_GvygMU27w)6-pFoK`H7^lM_D
zf5nvk|NaXYNgWvSX{QnXV!fRr95+C=i_MH&r!ynQrZxZf7n?h;Mp5$-&y4hKe!<6%
zUl9__cGfB)+E|e8DYCXX9pL$tAY5#9v(f6~;?C)xA3S)ahT_<)-4^1>LhP3>tf!hS
z8`46guOja9AC~cB%k2fY!`go-ax|N!T72vRxG2K0Y0ud)C-WF$KrNdS-M6g=?RF2a
zC6^xNd6mwsnYIz_88<8XVCC(%LlfjTusCoUK6CztWUN>rR0yF13-(pZ4*J-?O+uvV
zEG$2Ib%}qUvo0yE4t=C#b=WYw?30fdd!*{6CRkm%%No>(AMvB|_~~8XNhzhC+|w~H
zHGGgL9ZuAG$n5upfDQa+mhY$$Q)0GutEKTj<k@nURiVA!|99(GPjZ89?KxY(H|9eu
z(kiwgxUml_*`35?G2kcToi3{i;-CVAQH1fK8=ODEqNHfUC`?|Qn;k;m8F;0dSO;u#
z5svyrzFHTMBiVpHcS3v`B|_uWZZZ;D;zIDT&4aUJ2%rqgmkVczJ;ZAOV4D^Gn9z(A
z>Bk3;9{%q=T9^}<El)m(cS?k9%M7{R66qV<LW+X_ry`UMF=~b-A-7=rzYoa!W1vLo
z09hA2oBvnF19fA;LnAu`h4~3}FQ{M`q(W&iTaJCzu>1@c6~KV{=-p7P6NP#1P)CgY
zpN#o!B~+@z@~x&ML+FKicu*wfUn4+*%LBki@jpp6SSCSA^E%Y4<f~qR&1lt!NAp*`
z*s`2_|I-&n5hMoXMC6t)kFAWILWr@w$XB6<(IpKZb%(K=E5VPtpyT`XxjY_Qo{Egh
z|I8l#pWd_!dT%wi|MUL#+Yv1{|NC#AJ&omr;d_G{KhydTnoBXo>v*9eZPgQ=Yw|0P
zm;(f^7ZocQi2G?5SHD_)#|!8a1S|Aa)CW8SKBZ8Q6(KN{9*j*jrc|$Ke|Ms@Nc;Fi
zYFN9$uPJo7&QmKPvr?Grr5MM;wUyB&W%{?2V3$qCORk%+|IDQYy1&VO>l7~vE__q?
zF@cQWkHTlf^6tfANS94fk7N+Yl?v<@k4<DHL>D%yGb$n3FsYzgINHg3LBZg|A18mL
zN9W%!IB7m<+PmdzV_**A$LeVyO<)-Sb|f`_9N_lRRzGEBOS0r^MLkec6UdSNf8Uy$
zBy?t+wMzX#n=b!Es^|VO(yV*-kM}=PMM;U8uQS1HR>x+`Qa8el_vNXUPc)E6e92%H
ztO9LI_;1i5C_s>LO${4^{e=$K5ry}zQ^i~z;3yW`!^?w+0)aDS@nAZ<j^jF_igW1y
zWX?n5!bn7YbjHkJ1HedI{-+HlMok?5lUca+vua!IZKA2v*3$^Sc|BX=|I@?-*arwT
zY1&Z8@MaSz+FV9NA024?ZwwSWipM}FwP=bp_h>X<cScrzh!y3$USI}Z8DO6LDBDbY
z5qx65<uiYDW~sg1nD)y1L>+ll_4t1pmea=OfrL2>s^lb|#(8NXI%lU+{%6{JBF>SN
z>#3-jL5-F2|Kw;Qev=>#Kg}IRds1Qf{<Cl2K+<qzu@J%j|BV;1B;FCk`2XwgV8oLO
z3dfEkY-|sc&T=#i_c{6@eyAN&XjBG6#IC*#i&88eItgG5O%1PklFf;+-pp1ske16;
zaBFzROhL%hRT9l0361iRzG+Vof|eJBiYZ>0lmQx;?&j-at)AeVkfwq#<?4vM?C(6(
z&#C)16@#Rg-ojnpV4rNz-C#I(`^0Tc3gsE7LWNz9t(v{i#kUh-)}Na<WdiH0%s~@S
z%@cEnX8J*bOt161<VB?z+<g<=0FbS*?>t4ALa57`A#>9747_lC!N^z>+0hBr1ZG(V
zFOw*QE)(}3^^Inwykf>AVD})mWN#tBB_#)@v$+7jAP1?ujxI%q`*WyB`^|b+RAHZi
zk!ya6dNYtOUZa%Ha+86AxN}Gk_$maP3#|tAJ+kc#b^Pu`{w+2wWN&q`^I-bqVjopR
z9vgNKw;C6wB$)s6V|dUjr{m6a*NaRp=h+I9)&P;GXyATr41VVtB7(folK#^C?Ex}a
zTupfLm(A<78;$>Fzd+FwBn3Bj^|R36RvSQ<JlSC*-&KjXrvt<yFvg1gx$FhWB6G`|
zZfn_&koB9IIDCw?P&n}X_{sN2MgP@)o|~rj8q@&!2Dsmq2|NSqlycCV>!A0Wn+<+_
zd+7)QXi3QP&o1ONWrJoERu%`%Z*%#xLAS%R-`_M(JO?~dds8voFH}EYfmVf&##rRf
z8moqm<pK!{tA@zV2eX8RS=$>cNx0}6DdAHO?I_q5ndMUNA%SB*x@xTC@neq;PC9()
zFB2Ql9Ju;n(F$UJpa<UXyLJw5H%xR&9YynASF#<@Gv`08p$F~4Cy)1Yk8_{@-aumO
z@f>x1N<$|_)-9C;dS8<eFlT~Zk)9?SxtjCL!f|F~h5{M$mb!0}m)e8VJSd3bpRCNZ
zhA0mox_C3@TgEB~h|2b}(W%{x)>#%XT>DkPblj@>o=lSZ(-UCM<UBV9cNV|g=I+v~
zBZm7D)V|lJHKKqaorG9;%!}DNQ>=)VBEMCt+}SJM&>N)Plhw{qqF(a(?%=Q^GspL!
z+uqUF)zphrhykKq@5PjjrZFDyDNqV2DWE4=p2uK&$;<hPwPEN3y~FPC8x1_Xqh;wJ
z*k!1Y0httCCMY4#;S)OD_}MJn(5!NhwQ#BH2d>wQTQZ@S0n1t4a5fJTYEC{|=j$Y;
z^sD!<@>BN2<*3&$J^xv|Qh=+eLGFc+#%g%FC(Mmex(uF-wqyfey=?Y+*p46$CoF@l
zz6Ta!e*CHB{s?e2zP+8aO*#CPB`!sN@^0SWNUE(nFKn)^Abffe9S9?oNI<jQ-jSm@
ziYS;A3c=0Fx3JvDhq>ve%FoDO?NIXw5YA4~7A7`_*WH=4!+pS3U|JGP69o8;P5sXC
znfl%E%maBhMae>XCKwbT1U_w6j5usF88f^;u_AjR)8}3w9J{vjl8Ch<W{EH03hHZy
z+f*AjHx%XB)b7ON<NU6kcAD~gh1J9j@2{_k5p)goiJ&#9wBVy`FI(J8p5HUu5ZJXb
zEq#sX?=|)uznR<BD<uS_IsbnL%bpXRQL(bU^B@nR1M=>(9YyjN$S7-LDe=~nvkB+n
zByU51u3;GH_B-Z%qk@Q`F)vaLUrh;7Uki9uAN|7qQ0nH;&6^QhwbS&wvmV~}GAj<9
z{giYUt5Nx?B(@zXCh^}$(bnQ892mv=Bi;-sX@bY$P`Ue07iZj(QUG5)zMuWwwD5br
z(RFh&@WiM8L|Wuy>D)97;A3)K1~oCj4`5iM_}tW{W6KXgqZH^TGzrDC{C1Wv+24qK
z^&ACp^SRxN-v1|UmkSzfr_dyFXh}BvdBsyC@dD#lK@h!n`yd9!JZg{jeCO>r-w)70
z-iVq0or-cEFeogaaBKP@=ohkYq4ph`1$w%2UHO!{^wqVrT`I_Fg;<*GauEG8k7wq`
zQf>k0>{>|dk3J7>IG^~ICJwsoJ9i$aRX6L&u02!o?EB4A=AfVKcP?L5fT<qOduM;Y
z!TGVItKRfOXxy*wh;GL$UhM;{PSWt_5YHJL4rAY)LlTg<N+|cQFy5;xuV&Y8rJ5tF
zgpD$;N`qv{H-eCsjg|`FjLq2h21l~-l(X6FQd3nqxz<6*7&^5;yf&@CaSd$s0Px3L
z(6|tE)Jl$!>&a*}=xthqw7@8BDt)-}(J~+H2hio$+x}iXg^@8x^yJHz-)7V2Eta3<
z#G)&u+yANMuHXmOf5ZEvAh&03S6m2_N&V#Yp0~L;1rjmh+Rv`K3yA_7zi1V;1?#lX
z5rG~9E7}20AGEWvz@hIXEq!!GV=AoTo4s{k5SEv-{fv8NK<>ZUne?i)QkNwCYiT`M
zwB=~qt2b{n1xu6_a}<%}Ix%H1X56+|f9vhG#izcdfT!U`g=P9D_!2#jJ#fDem0QJ!
ze(}!E`9tG$9DP+p9w&V+KT>06!kwKzm{cNS?1=^*7SJX~4l((HJ@^GNI}L22gMoL_
z?)w_Rcn_uumOB-Rmua3Hf#$p$kzkL<A~mAZe82ad!y+7f-D{tHk)+2^`1o|)ghwM{
z#ET6WFcQm`dr(k=YQ%Jb8rQ^d?_bcPl}st`WA3MAhE?Z%Bm4aebr<!KJUj|t@afQ0
zp^OgA)Pi5hADq}#Q|oYqoy&K4;hE?ssw*yXC4#=`5W)d_tD4WYrp1oZg67G0@@y)=
zy14O1lziZ!JuIsOc&f&Tbj+rL2+`U;3P?mQTa{m3mJy&%TKp!oOoH@{B7zqwNs|Y{
zshDEj{y7*>G??{IBfpM*t>si@yO+XpnA7NY`MVYhX@4Rw)IC<U_7^i>*J^3g=zsQ7
z1jF(kt0J_lJ{@sq5bxP^7wng1J;P2rH*r&R&oqP4_vvx&Vyn+0zkE|4V)%1{GKX?A
z#w!#S&jJ;Ov58a>zp@DsRqqY3KsQExN9wwJ-qr`d<SGU~{!@W}jkT#2O}qoOR!92&
zwXslj6OHm1AJW=4#<>aO2j+zKNWbk{7ec-)pjAQS^)H;Uj?HWX20vbCb{=6TYK~i;
zf)ihvL1)^8I&eiV%Aja3J!5;9(Za&%`B2hCbB+nI``GyYL7bRE)nP)678@AQNLL6d
zn_{_#tOY<Zp5z4yl9QSoLb%*ri*3XgLKED@Xp6fad5nw?;ER$XczO<+1Raxke&=;_
znI!bZ_#29F9L!rqJ<BB1prCY%v=q9zz90GHHB(_airx$_>k7H6zJoJvfOD7g0c&HL
z$F1z^bwDR-MXVobH(K{m_~@E8NuTXDksK1KpXz!qL|LYYmunlGMJ@X`2+PcH9i4Ih
zhpp)qeOzf{03StAhAx%`I6X><O{KkWpd<mA#`(n-O(HxAgAS{g9D(?l=g@W0nO_qf
zke)!><JQ~YKWF&W2fe9g(ITq<Cla@*6{b!1M#P>7`I<PQ<_qpC_^zEl@VfpgD1!AX
ztzYyzgod(b2C{Q2By#}mq#@mP(mSz?m`t)0@p7E}ZjaNeck`7;P(&Oo%;0&6AV$Ty
z<f@aX#WUsSKWCKt5~1XQ`l^VcN*2$nn_0EE##za9=)kj^@y!yP&I?{606*;QUg^bk
z9vxkJ@R7!1k1Cj&n#Vveg6=ji5@f&oxvB6^c&&W#^w!cbTI^Z=bPLqCxQd<$uiYU8
zS(gHqWU2I(EifB9udS7tC6z$cUopfkhjw-R8M1*{y}RMoBEvkb=aZ(TZTcF-LrpCX
zaPSs6{6QT3RXsase(JBxp(CMb1*G=ZQz3W(F~+(iow<ZMy!+h(GzODl;P@&7EtvuH
zP|i1xzlJ}5>wH`65fB{Rkl5|!hlGOf-36Mt`8->dQsqPAqK~9XnHF1@+FZgjSz%9+
zO4bXH3qMrNKf3OJwIf`hBdMArF3BWaaK0XU`-uw#_J|7_Il-+M-fzX}44>xWQ{6Zo
zTcv6JW9Et!A}9Q_xqfDs6^N4O9ZsdgTfglvdBa-}r>I~(ISICU;#zH*;3|XvsB;Jk
z1BpkFza2U_3wineaSmrZcFIT)1ytcg#Ee@5r9XxJv5uBK@e9>c`9}2w*{2IEQ2FgX
zHtqIq;-#>DR8`bmLPJe4*aOag?(|9pDvprn4QYPu|HXpIbx9GO{pWyqd#dxF!0XDM
z0(qy?sYp0FeXH8bOj1F7%Y{O-{}4OHV37fouH<K@*dt)6)zC})*lVpnWKPI}g@G{q
zkIi8awihkJ5BJbeMYbdL4B<AKYqRPW;(a~J%2%tp-q9oQR}2DW-lLM-<uEBU=NBS;
zNGTlsvc~2tWX3C}d5Ql6)+Cx$0o>3JHJ+4sk{I>Q<JK?k%sYxeP5%BeE5x%@N=B=L
zbQ*_;6YP?*heD)CatY}uU~BAB#bvzh0EvC%Og=cNCFr^m*P^l3%{bT|j+S{h^K~=v
zznfJqUvP9g{D++><?6P5>KYhOwdC0;sWiaI_|zEo#T;*Vpj7UVyJLv^%Lor1VJRB7
zVSD-fQ)L4q7rOJ2lycL<KQ3ixBcCF@CmT9M;}8luus^j%N^df=uNM0ekw_19!&nO=
zono)Mc46&OP5H1^G#K#y`;vOl+sh#7{uq$aF4C}btU0_MZ;m`fM1Sv*X^5UapeU-5
z{9rXV4V0!b_~Tb(mnX!0UG}M3@A(tA)c5n`mxM}sG!0+d{X!qn*TR=??%i)bFocl2
zGC7!iRG`{9a_2ekA<LHy@;gN$M8Novt+a46<j35}gT}>BoZ|&$Jl%s*bjY*f5WG`o
zkC-)%RPDB9%b|al4P~k0_op&{6+9wT;;%d0XBdy(qz?V3x<Kv+Hx{QyYE9ep1?lKY
z<mG}mT3cwdMH@wY;vM2;tlopI@PwE*M{K0brF<fFbbz|RNDrpCMS8n9C=uK>!kxL2
zQ=w~2^F?&nvtCBmy@AEx0?a8@SC~;Zi<l7RaGTqr$T``dEyQ)Q`(UROO*ZL<5Y3q)
zTqp1ybECk{C1XWt=Kr(!iRUe0gG}C*;y+%aD@|0d7eez7xtEgThXIGo%gVD*Tu}Pn
zT4KqwfM73dy|1JcP{h+N9*YSG&0^TJ_CYaVP?BXwtY>k;;eMi_Yc6?~{IaWFv71m7
z#npG_Ik(Ox{-q8F46Aak{tSNLbZE%6Z#unG3Rsk2aTWr2TFcwfA#tr2ct1Xi6q0hc
zfLlZfcRofcDdJjkGJUz^S3Id(AqWz{!LWNS?I#NodekoF&_2O%_JN~i;Nnuvv)ECl
z$`Qb^d0ygbtuVW+@sxh^0p_VVoOKl8`gGGJ5`f`+<<s>gXjdP2DF78Sdo{q8t!a2P
zFEnW`wd&B}pKftTG<Hjxk%;^K{5d1b!Vj)Sa5VF~P6DReu_MbLcXN7vZIkiCRyy6-
z000A~)-1bbStlEWNp_B|%an0qMdE&7&ts#FK81c>5mA-ulXQ**DJe46`@4se&}($A
zQN%0EpVtFtzyMlxpcF<G*+`JFe0J~&R?sQPq2ziHDL)cdN48MgG)xjDcLa&qqItx)
zLT)WvRPnmuUfrD6_!10IL+%f%DE5`X(t{6)EVAdy-xBvOgU-m5?phR52^PqyAfd2V
zZysEpg*%&8tf<Zl1^)|UOg!@Zr2P5gA(6Bu$nrmmoCKh`z?+00W5p7dD&U%3292kI
zv6R6-UW_Pw3XSz7!bWfq^dV0c-I=CT5lw_m9@VIwtwyEJDD6B2&#ziJc1R@%P4?S|
zx1xVT|9akjZITXW_uncBz=lE4{(q<zUEL>Dfk*83tSlibJzCv19TeTdBvqA!Np{FT
zG)9SHt0Q-eYjjkzgmqar_P&3QZ2!epW?D(y#m$W8$iL)K9KSYbdqtla=8A8+XsRWG
zQS4axtq^Oa%F`nKBS8OQiB%^d)~ZsH-O=6jszV|lJs|V*mA7MJM|b{)dVh2!FcDd{
z$ooOCN>bOcW)A~C$d6}k3X{qQoQJX{<L5t^1Yj>+Rr+P$Mb<_(DmssuD&d<ndWfmt
z^JkR}A1vA`kdB%-U#R-1Dqy8p%%vb-A0Mgm`yt(_ku=b?J#)v16Bxf8{<Zb9f<d95
z>BXS^uW05+x<Ev}EixdXMQ&WcIMV716w#4h4l88~g81D2-FY>4s4h2cA|smwdh+hL
z4D&w@woJadDDy@<=vVQDDPsO1LEXs3jvoXXiQ@to4gD1Va;v6tnj^EoQ-{634ia=g
zv;UDtAMd4({j)kFuL?JE%m650wv3$xztZw;UsFFJedgbOEc;U?&nKf?9jGy}W@Rh4
zs_9b+D^NpxhAwN_9}?L?;XsVa`8>ZH3y&i0O_eM1kHidkVkW<+JS+vh5)3t_5uP*D
z2K%>IclI#r`28%zYTaPj{1FPmSuyc1%*jvkQQogMwzlupMV!kmc&U%))ZTV2Y4lrD
zsZD25V3?*iZ8yK%$$QBrfEwOEvJeAcaO#iX>eXf}bG^1TMjd2rBX2&tB5(FTf=Kv^
z`2Ee6{Bz&L%V@s`38f7&Y<=T9<3#=`Hb24|DQOn=_kGZI934DXcR@Dy2qHfN&M23g
zFtRziEs#1a>$ac*dn5?*T;9p(U>79AEL~U%R?X|CpIJpz&pb17@iY66q%4oYXg?#C
z&>Ab~q`0*(E|P_=w~a*|XkPo9{-6}lD~U1en%2{eGhJgPU@i`8-a9nop;d2_Kj)Z?
zwBipzb`bYy?*%vT%OfwKSzj~$320akU>ThFY2IU^{Q~PeAHx>Th>iM8+D0(G(5l(7
zSoR8Z<57F=Oh@VA^6Qp=4pTir%RV?^l4FKfVf(w}D0>u$`EA5z+MVOoQ)c*bVM_Gw
zDIW(0BJyvrSXyIMz`FD%Ie_22oZyT=I?VhpuEy_Y0}gO2Oogv~5%rN7GnfMfC&|iv
z9PEK;t}S9c;!gCgTeR@eQPV{X1QIYE$|iyuoZ(-mG_lu=pVa%Nd-5Yc7(b!C*)Xb;
zA|^KrM4QZNI*9Dg>0<NHhZwsFT?1I!zn{26II;8VUCYt~%y=qDxuqgQ4ENlwalX#k
z;_&OnOYknNG|v{9_S$&gkFd#cos01k%)}2Y>rRT)x>bMPS-@+Al#Gu7%-5O!^HQrL
z7Gvm*6%T|TgPc?XRwYw-S0rYD0^aic3kQp=n4~r9%dH&e4Ocy@_}7Q4`AZ$<ds)@d
z(LsBmDmE?~S?_kfXo25&kuPEhDuWqjE$9k`S!aSzHferKVrS%#GD6IuL{aQb2i`@z
z?9!Riyt@XHHo`s1!G76QbiU5s^m>IE^Ada_<bu?CJ!rLms;N4-9cMX`#;S~@wHf&`
z^cVR6D-1jK*c0A?PuCkGWLl1f^Ec2AH(aZY@$Om^xZTaS5u`)MhS}75iXl}*cwqNb
zS*}UW&tAE5{R#WD@f5RBa@5wAal}msjhUI!1CHc>inqjO5&(&i(7eol{^C^~mYS5V
zguGW>I9p)RLsT2V(XuU9<sQ3#wm&Q{hZtDaXZ~fGugg4Chv<Da+K;|Vo}YS_2P&1#
z17#o0mjeopq%d1AZO_(s1rcjD?-LE4Vw$d9d>5dndBfs#%v32qt!8aBZ>%(d;)j3c
z%dKQLz*Y}_Ro`X`@bv1lVfzm3z_Fh06?U<U(CU#d&j@#*LPl|Sj12r<bmd0|WC~;0
z?b-s61!lw3t<8r-{_QThI>086yvCj}(|PZc<nXGnS#lcf!+^_-DHE`)NfWpxn)~v0
zWo=D%Wx51yV;IBz{}RM-xfv)z&y-xb1yo9oh{pM)a)4vT5xg72Nl=h{Fa61eV_GVx
zp~+&ESlM_MYXEm4kDEkl#81aA;y!Kxl-k1Cqj{)&u7e8_iofjwT<n0*VK~hr%Fr$U
ze7^1rV>!PgxlG*;)djC-^L3m@2eC46d(?YybPhS)#P!E)Y_#Y4UV$z8{S%w!L-_}7
zE@yeJNQ+d^(;GTQjHQyd<auT)h{jo#vU=&s|F3tMCxRL|6C8JPDkhFmWSx94Uxyk!
zy!D^8k_4PtcVQR73Z>Sc##i&u!#wVy>Gw#IdsPpldJmYv<fZR6_}9}OMmg?<6zr~F
zPz)J0?N!jmcxH{kl0mHpv<Qm<Ym(srmtSuy|I24G|LhkJM;qY8+##KgZjE^{?up5u
zV)4I7&N6`Mnq9$dUhomt4T$aA-U6aZ8f*d#B`{B=oSK}DmWj(@t?h>gL|rB<^U!)v
zGeg#u6>d0SPVzP0+TV3_v>`#KW}hqtxLHYi&afJca^%EJ4T7(fY~1@2!KH!#-V}i&
zsb`q@`lE$jK;LbTW(bAn-~AF-q}IZ31}m_iN}!^wtrJ+5G`Ol}SO{H!T_h{y9c-}k
zeF4G7%_@3C*fw~P(|<%{p{ZbA0>*zP?j<CK3{bK;ep80B)<Et*$acLlre3I{SX@Cr
zFne*4zyB?o-+iGk0TgbTqpYx+?v^anjllmb5lG93QJjcFLFwOA%$<c6FN--iARoV8
z;OadLO1#SzTh(3w%FLZ1m&=7UIX_Kvf>CtajCh`r^%6yGG>n){$7w$$<WbfXsbvyv
zU~UdbwK<~Za|#3O1N+u?)#g`K;1tL{O4s{37av3pOBhm$2t#2{IT6DD#2$en$^Zdt
zM9#vy>bOVhV7-MX#OE90P=R|<Hbb@WBkbkeaC)Uh<}iEsWj<hwX~z)BA}ED~vSS8k
z>!x}+Gi463M8pXKv=L-S*2Rh1-F$hVfJh@w-8AY;8V$bgR-bmjZ$-Jfr~LC?*xO}O
zLvx&bWdBB;O7v4D>Gw>r)d>EcM|wa3PM*DIlMYC)D=!&`eD7~jl!LMYS)7;%&NgWr
zB#Y2<WYmtdV#Z#TukR`Yrt*v;T{5GVqdn^<I(qj0JB<9@5s~(jRUdj*Pyl10lY<PE
zgp^|2V6jie578fOlvBEhBD#FgYc&nvm-Q~Kpwe#fQkK%VQ=yXzuRB$b1Fs_$OwT}*
zt-V6$??%^u$AONb$Lu5Zex>LlXW5ClnHeTU(1aKRXxHpu^S1Hh(QV-cYLcPUD)3^C
ze9>Z$V6jy?jOSx#y^QV?DkWfvq&V-<u;&AGw4AYwAdk}(!@b!Pz!9C<C>ff_cyG%0
zw$CM%dSjzw*i1}nhB@+K|2Fr3tfAg8zDF2EnVa3=qzn;tMA}X%EFiz)0&-g8R2|*(
zrkIrRP#y0&y=83R$^D~c)cMk5#wIr`+GS+s4tF$%IWV2wDATyf+FYpF^?sQz7A;Fu
z>eKG_nIW6}CL#@t@1?3fNkeQN84!DTTZ82drgG_28opj!?YY@CPr^mceaq7F)5{nE
z|F=ODMm8&{_t&V0@wqw<8x}3rK5o*R^AJ(@9P%a!xiXXsG7xxklcbqCui|wtM-c~O
zmY7E~k*WY!tB$;xDy%Ztuy<$JFx7Uf^me*|FTNpq>K!Wp15MA;Jwmd)8fF6Y?3>|!
z4yu&i0Y%D2=K(+Z<R0>=CC@(uQ!1?L!?t%}v8^>c&);VCzx%hT;rr5N2b@Ri)5L;`
zOQ-kj`(H<>b*p`5L%!_aq5(JK$k)r3(XEO7>D+RU*?elcs<)M;SzmR&`u6ef+~!`^
zw)+kjaUX)7NN1_TtWqWkRw3hUA?ZJz=?Buf?a#Xx>x!42feO5E<%YuroAOiLXe1WV
zL=UmX$kh4%A@#sb&f6V6ylut~*)@LgNWg1)?+-~I9c$GO$&F&jk}Q>E>@43EB{Wlp
zOziFO1t1Y&q|m2FSp#^MIhxUkSk3F95giJ~3bZU|r~so?VTv`G)M0K1d0)*H<>4xK
z3Yz?;ja)<NkZ9vRc=UViC0yz$+en=rJsV~`GL8>)Y~ekkur&(#e~5d_sJNPDVH6MU
zPH+tb2=4Cg?(TyP1eajJEkJO0hrr+v!QEwWcY-^7ljr35)?Mp8Yu$6!{c-2d)UNKX
zs@+{xZPmMD;_9_2hmF&Xj$NpoF)m;VB-Yz&0&1|0?DIcJ(roo*cA#FdksuH>4&jMd
z;{xLN5>UFaj5-1xerx`Ak?^$Q;)GK{8)K2?Deo>>{mz)s^FshWpTuQvuSJ>eKyRVS
zE#f8t>E1K~GM!cDn4!6+D&xBm86d49pJ9XWMJMn$1`0@>f2F%~N}jy0)Jq-Q&;Z$H
zy^jnzr;~ZJLeaeAb9x)|P;%BIVKsPXe^uFgzqq(KV5*-u(~VD1Sm~M?zgYXR4%rg6
zm`{dsA3><fyRZ6y7dkoHndlSNN>#bszBNfibI!h2(`WVJS*etON`4PSZ^WPI1PF#2
z#Hl}+?1$%88Whz_<o--VZYs4h)_FHV9rMoV`b&|lzfxbHe0j@unE6AIC(H^{h3UJn
z>L3bPh<lV<LoEeR0OKuEP5DpI#x$BODGy<R!KNm}a2-2}eU3Lx6+F@Aiyg7GFsSn9
zR4H)vO=V}zJ(VcIA$6KF?!z=z8Iq96dFtl?&WR~B|CbQiXipC^;m6hoP&7HWB#0;3
zO>Cy1y$Ib+zn~+(UcO10VI{8}-8ru8%THH(EMb~uPHT~xiuhD?P~?HMMe?t-GZVpP
zQhGaEMB|R@uo9()e07}epexyM9E5bEX>tvr@G&nADv|H}FeH_cJLBUO^%bWJy#^+|
z-?~;}^0o4l!-5UEUxIUm@-lyYIgNZ==w0l_mIvwAdARO<HOGIs)FOuEv;FlgW#`S1
zsf^L@!{=#8zgVo)aBj+^oP-|lxF0*kn9q}dL{>Q70(sHO{hUjQ<O#H|lD~mI7nO_O
zO@}WB{3U+YYlMKhyz*{O$^<#3im22uTa?Zyb-$?IZXebY1XVilk)#LK<!1y9!~=fs
zW^(s&47%N1GGymhrGu7Gz5#Ywn>$*hB<y3JsM^YX7|QG*?TbCN`XwKvY|5GClTK6U
zfD9(1u?X;HP%%pRqN6{j;?eE}^!AlpBK|^F)hB0UzU5M%4sd7+HTTExDII+ity0Qc
zGZs+)R>8K{=6(_lNI2nc@iez+fo2EKD&6&&Huj@D<6UV+-vvRVPVN{KvoI<3mUT(y
z)l$Z1gi_Q_QUuSw-pT{hr}E16uOfvGK3|&mqRJV<%MHiBEx^=0mcX;G5X-@)cm$Um
z0F+!U;b_<J<$1_QGwCca@TVbjh?#G5>cj-2O5E-?LBu19Ji`Lw`dL(0*04Gz{Dj?Y
z_szQV!0N2#qfcA+2(wD>2Po^|Wj!0GP6*(G4e0rtT_*;fS&@qk7J)DJ_8O$l_!3gQ
zW{|P?jf1$oI+jnNAF5wF8{Pbs#6#E7!1ym1zEdqveMcm1A`q+d!h6JJD6no5k#`Sk
z*p$*ky`f8ohiiCuBxGUgvumqc=M(12&hP1#uZGif;j6wBtX=O+OVK0N3D=dl*RG=U
zHV{_wRbY|O^MRH6!}P1d)mxd^wa9^x?Z=Cfgs2g;&Pi>`J5Cn-dEocH3E%3o?Luhr
zhh7Ksm2|jd=Os)YrsW=itMa2f)i$xTT$hJ$AJN^FB6Y&L)A#8Xf7~N>>b)ZsxU(}v
z4ZoJ6+xnFg?>)_1Bs0T;$PAn8?9<!f5^_qAUz4EP77QsJRS|%<eN0Nu$+JRJ`qh|Z
zFkncot@7-%;{G+;q*BF*3?d=tIypX=mN0IvVz~RD86k|ss~gcYCY5RB!l7f(t$nDj
zvj^{Gw;+>H#ingeHHZ>=3@M+ds&se(QXRWyS@4TWR<TqH>_!qMT!E>9EnG|AiygRs
zXLaK!@C>#ljO!oiRDPq-xyy_Jq%PS(yEGD#6!!2@Ue(wUP%qOc6nb^s7mIH>l?{oT
za4BthhlB5gqu7S##$WP64c@O5r3%h1B^<V)w+Fv;TY9!3^<=^TW}p$glo6X8h604;
z)4e*vkPVZX#^h5o>Rb6Q?L$J1G!btI8J4lW135k!F9Gf|e6UcrRq0l&OG!R<#4>G2
zXJVj?BjtN2^;aiFp3l8uiNwrMB>%>t9lMe((#8CZ|6TRz&tr_oa?>_B-;0!~N^^HX
zC&lcy8_xV~u6^Ky!=A%DUpQX+&^a!lcXD)nBzLwI4gApAREAbi&)!=GfutVt@xd<w
zR2hJd&DQBqa206-;=r4IE|C=)1-$Nb4d%67%vqVxy-?M*60M~4bNmP}wN?jxduco`
z+N@HB^X5sy!JH6ku$V7Bi1kM{z;Cm4t0^>QL^@m6iq_qrO&boV&`Dm3CyXNV%`daT
zGvl$xU3}kg+5z7}sO30s0bLObuj+VPZmG#dE8SA_ree-Pywc_bm=arUncdNa__58E
zh+P9c+32IaOrR7C$Lgk(7|)<<XoSh6NvTof4ksFF4vzR<1{v2<aCK9-V+p1B4Uj}B
zen)o6;Y~I+#^TMxLs&Y<VZ(pK_v?qPY9-zk-gPI2lMe^g_^3EA6)DeI>(0t;a#kMU
zHqMB~uv)Mod!Z98C0F1O22vzg?rD7++V7wIbECd#mGbpE>fh?qDmR>#pW>SLRHKms
ziR(H}Vt(F^_f9j1@mOqWdNC1O&H@Z1e$_i*SX2U-(A(rvg{s3xcpBzKLwF#X5bN+j
z8UNxSGVpbkYsEILYkZh`t+@rm4Qf!FzOcPiPt4c9)O-9x(Q&i91sqGIMMdSg;Di!m
zCD(7#dH$S+O2c6`!dl$9iZxd3w&G>vk6%~tgS^mgw0}Qu@KJKs*x`_0{_5qNxGtqO
zu!4)vx>yi8TAgz(baV&Pt~T&5%RKPG0NNUt?AY`fhK*A<9trOA3@RK)tnYwZ?h%p}
zdOKIQznTt3n26hoD{RO~*5)4k^X6>8Z%(6sXJNKDwDk;2*Pj)x`kOutc$V;*C7cd8
z)19;+Halff`!35UyCb32T$7h?YRHl}%?*inkEakoPS$Nar#FgKG{QQpfr1RUjLuAW
zPrw?Iz~uMuy3{_VhW+jm60QBdc?h*imV*QHQHj;<s2#sF-rmzJfBO0xR?ft$Stu<|
z$ZP<Ky$6yxn0x)L)^)Z-pLmFa1nI2rPzzop9TV%dEvUgLx_~5;NO-j^g7dz0&K7U#
zk>DY|g;cxz>wap0#K$+Y3~tpwmA1IP%zsBfj6%d+;JS7_ZkrqOfo$wwy&#exJ2q6|
zHntL4GnNV*F*zlf>K&)d$|##y&@2P*WIe3-*078FU=Uph9t38{pMPp61q?Xqw=vwO
z5_3333Fa@8H>Dx%KbNy^X_Er=2S24+k)JF3>e;vYIX~M`tk-zVoiUg8?g_ii?OoYL
z8J`B+G>0~`8TEnoU<`gV%_*LZPnEs)8e3$SALrF4m8d*c9OJ)ZWpqETzVW!xAg0@T
zCcV}gV~5_U*V6uYb=1@omam-a3yCUYX-u@t8{wYEy3^5&XWZ^<78pM84eU=?Z4s)z
zwQ{r!26LV($Dl22%66KI1dDBLXpbAGvY6NF9Q0;s#8!3<iMg5#Pp7RsHU$K?w|xAf
zsX)<UZ1)7VZF_V1%apHt+IqfLYpAs9Mu=rRaqKs5UJzterqn>FMrdbq-=M3sqKn$k
zN&kL7-^HP`eJW>dY0!~0Wj6Z*c&ZdjYaq@EgDsTo{Z0zNM8?Z-Qi`CtOEG1DHJM&d
zow;Y)r!CMBUSfJ{V~m<CEqSH>9e7KdWURl|iHD_m$(KVe&3j<{nwVJUq`2yiXU?v_
zNud9SS4&7|0NSl#`?S{1c~cHLMr<W#<-z&6OH1Lb24n%KZYSSg;8xrFP-D)`OQAgQ
zPCdQ`xP-jop}}0Cbw)kpFt7Z$yp#xtKI(lsQl+(^tlCjd6S%I{7ihNM16KGP3Y~WN
zrFRVOE+qT(195meR}lEsU$49>43*o>a?KogYXi0YvkiDWPq?O95KG5mqlpuS-=@@P
zO6;SS`a0>)Pn~I)IKjOl@K;wZCD+WH6TmI9s8@ViVX^t%Z&W$DQ3Wi{NU^Cjb2^Yc
z6j84p+5x8Sfrh56yWJI}N336-S+21(=B8Co3F}fH;z+v=JK=`G^=Aj$Kdv04yHl$D
zDm~vG2jm@$w#-!WHG@U@!q!kbu05|8W7k^ZTn?AzzGu&!D&8)AyD3>KO^Bs5Dz9<+
zRMccdlQ|lLHf&o~VVTm9!#Hj7`yMla__<PJt^O^PnZi!uH=cS`hwnb`u@Y~(Ykn|_
z<CQvz5yY)s&`(|BL|_4msbpdjmcw$1n?f|T^<wE<2R{QhZArATki!_|r=8*wY*gbs
zLdEl=rhwE%Ay;O2`Ko2=oGUFgKg9D@8K%DirU}iY@>OZ=+MWrI5W~dr3RkJW0vx^`
zheOJ!p|MS+ZvBPHlbbc~py&P&7Ki7t%F+<cS1m4mc1=3CA+JwTWzak?-*lF9F_4-@
zgOJH*p_c;+grxjot&%VE%PFHfqUq0rveU1;Oh2M&u|FlgJB9fDkY?7#fe@8yk(vNX
zKxiWJv|=40L1?6piLT?<n?uAaD^R~);9<`IFyL0qXkujqzArq02q>@Qq;XFF7ro%=
zK#gP$A+5xNi>&p&0(~W-0nL2{!e(+mR-sZfm$TY<!~?>hH}84xtX3pxBjb^KjtDu7
zz0=PIQ0*j~Xa}?;&?bQ(ni!YH*5dt>zZ?LeOL0{hz6^3TiP<$d-50Y|@!}#|xjom6
zP+TdfF?>0=b_*o~bnd4Ws4`quCK3b47whIA1@5hixmHVlUwK1BiRuG?Aqn{-I$SJh
zHU#mHcr*`toT-^-v{fJeJop^2hZ#h<{E@9t|F`42zGaBiY=bbIt3KUff6&D?9iyFb
z-hXMJto0^9#AM|6w@Cp?jvTd5GC}I7x75hyDtijYlk-n$wL>s}AK3ov<8WO#<guK{
z*}Zd?8z`^#51fdDZuy6T{T6f4W|FbjN}TXJ$fH{)ds;~Iu(Q^2Un?9$uqPh@ccFu@
zlBkQcdSwWecV&*JM2o8xfgU^nmbf7;DRBD6#>NDRE>77d$7%^xCw)d%?P&nfc)H9x
zP5%I^txQQOER$}Jw+^scj(y-tPXnSQM=2Y%d&Z0Nug&+PHm=dzKkJdJKH?(N%6Dzq
zghMW{o=jPgKMXu8HSF6G4t4<#2;SVB<8DG!3h5j>9z(_gqg#$9_i|Tm$jXl}IxgF}
z692r1hr7XMCK>AqkpVZVooR`?`Qbx;SHt%CZr|ZT`tvgReetFk<r5|(mDN_<oh07l
zR?zEdbg6pFPpJQ6E<?@*-a`o_u{3VHH#dQ2OF`I>Z+trFQU3ljz4JytM9-JM1s-qU
ztP>GtI{aLwBl5Gycvg6N3n`Mh(R}lD6WAwtELchu&e8;a6$-$>Medc`BOd}TW$ocS
zo@rkPoQLG8GO$z-u70t*rV;L=ekzgYAre7C4%;k<$7T;9dsR>a8uY4s63=gGDOPkz
zX8o<Je=A`Bk?f~41joC7M~Ab#YbZ!&T<&@F8cGfyCQdZ}5&_8=m^R#e-aa$d{@j13
z1yMU!{~-iWJnxC<!?>oQ@iHAsn7He21#*t>PEAqMmnLl#eLE0M5irD4$Z%~!IpZ##
z1(T@p%~ZvLU9H>Q{ibIFgXxPQeqqZ;!Qy^)XP&g(q`t(eagpgz#gC?sRjE=C#o1k0
zPzB;BTqj7inw4hLY}oqLZ>rY>*=T!MSNgyPtmsPZzl}m6+O?VYET{GJM9a!BP-n5S
z)@1iA4RB!9Z;(d)t|Z{<)cI5zgc}A4&mGq)l^C84d{Xy*wmJ<s(CA75XOHQ0Un4g_
zTK#-dsqH{j!P`F+WD*5&Sx;K|spxLf<3SAznY&99f4mso{E>a!0qDB6p5M4H3SupE
z^W<ftX$4k)T$piSl{n~i^!#PkIdlx8)C0+n%03Lk^R0iAvjXIVjwbn@mt+2!m+jF>
z_;~0(a)Z&$^8%C_gV~`@KA54@SEs}EW$w_&k0Wue@G7$G=YwVWO|hz1Ani>8aPK)^
z0aQ>~&s;6p&q5kuz6lAL(I)T8h0T~K-gun+0ziwfRgPXDCywqT>jSN_oGS@7yB$4|
zV74`9lgCMehP&`PMc(?rVn9jcOYU2k0WY(24c12FN)!YQNdX$qt_J&4x=}jsaD^#P
zM%rJWo}2CpV+2G3u3S!p@4wa@Zlx6*trgXPM?@XL#gFxOh1C&5gOY-tuc#vpmAnBC
z%sCv?$;*b_coh_e+|6zE>Gheb$&!BlJL)7b=wX{RYItqW8E?Sh7MT?a9oQrmtqAJi
zYFkI@mwh(dHP^M@8B4Lbjy17Oi80MGDuGX><GMI)-RBIC)+$|kLMqZq*Y_zA6?zkc
zcUkCbjAP?Mnwf<G-`EJmyYf}N^9-h3cx_)@6n#N!{q+iqM)#W7eih=^v?nAYt1Uaz
zJWDwTry3O%<ZEqwGQU-r#49uTOO+JujL0&;eg)pMhKMB8$h292i&svs>4}UN<=yz*
zhPy>HVU7}~m&8-Psd^53x{1jMJ{{Uh5MoFE_YC@aZX=*dua)>aO(KC3UtI1|4lh-P
z8IJ2RpZLAl<%Ui5EU&CNeG-(FG3SK1<QKXEZ0^T5QMshFm|hZZoShuxrjGpG<&YM6
zcICkPLdLc~Z$68kCqH=mW~MFt6va!F3F>6!8B?9EHb-@N`nly@4FAo6@m8nwCjJ1&
zOJX_>*$Ha(RE-AovNV^AS?kjf>?M(ZcaV^JMp$7TM&ekx_A0NyvmTrKRE<6I%6BW1
z%baj}4btDWczfmfI-U*-LYuJq%!3=1Ydnn#Tg|@nPIQC&npD0`%=tY%wPmOX9kIHc
z$C#)JhOY$y%JP+?G%m8#yWy;6-==zY{DKpwG&59vp_b?*06|Zwh@dvybzsQG!sl)^
z-*%p$(uiwo@~cBIl!zxZhlDDF@q;J<?s?N=+7g4`%mlSAz3@wtqzq36wNCe-(%?dq
zyb7qF(XjRf+w<fL^J4?+dc40IQ6>$<uf68XtdKcXt@6VfGJhk-Pf21;lLG<^1>8LN
zZ!g#owoZyJu4{yYiAr8W4;o7G8!^C;QZlTt#~Ir^M@&BxdiQ#g)%Lom)uxo5`x1vc
z6W=vm>{|D|z{9SDf4Q-M@wCc>cUjadx-CRR9ECVoH5*eS?sFH9W8UwdG(?CzPJcv}
zlze2hQRUo|6k%TxXXMH88Mb2uEt*uHX<gh`W_`-B&I8l8hN+4WyIx<kD=9e}4FnyB
z9j}~KXt5ZaR0qxi9#dDm&C&UDgT?d9uARIX4mXCpg<zGN9>+U(7L2T$y3~!IJLtPJ
z-S_bl0eB|maHl5z$XL;%rFCmLSp!|)$qzfVX$trolLq`dQS8xo!wxTWs^-!@cJr#*
z*nhmSI%8tZTyplcUrpg-VS4d-^G_AD`@BQV7}X-}>a3i4F70|8Nm|s}U1)9)_K_+m
z${dPSv4pU3W2yqZCi{o1&7me5d9B!i1P)oto|sE9XBjVvE1iWzz8@7|l)P)o%N(-O
zI7OXrG7JXMNUuT~w2x#qW^?zDi1}5s_eX}C4S&9Y_FUHHFCy#}O+`?ALkX>Crx-=3
z3H8gz0`uEcQoBX}U|EoeR_4PfP`tX<SQTNV=r%=mqypza0D1VFs#y*<D*1d)njqmp
z+5#tr8*lo=)HC#i_I77Ek0c1-EJR7VWEH!QBc2WDT=V}fn}&V9h*^85-^<KA%+hy?
zQ<>%-msO^#O~uv@<4HRB{GI(DipE`v5g<!N4^WN+V>)?j|Iituvw9AvN&$E+0prAe
z<hd6$5#U}6W<PCk&^-^CNBW$iW7O)bzWW#_Np)$6j!o-ObAAK)#C<XYE`5p&!ye8S
z<l{S<l{CULjDglEwg=kPSs$KrB&j5C$UGQ<kNfS5U!QS$S)cR*Uln$k$Cy;+z2Duw
zsvF<zMMb{|-qPFD%N3}0Tw#<loHz4TA$C1?$<K_!`0xh<x-nYMUMH0Lw5CojKyJK1
z*<1h~WAukEl>n}k;V(MRN6Wd(zwjf)T~Rta<qxukB2ijz?@WfspCvcNK$N|?<L}PS
z>DvZd<l9KcI)hDe0nX(u&8&$g)pFkH7mU4-kfN3a+_264tS*ICe0Pp{J}p;843~WH
ztJc%K2*cUAKx_BCFES81V2U2rP_cN7vGGW=4_|x$1Je6XF+IKuan4+<cg~gPUQiI+
z*RDq0dsX$04=n!rkXHnDco0cf>oP`JpMBAHoi!<Yl4q*}n)yoR^A4FiXB7Sbr|G?D
zq+PtRz{Y5MCfSL7Ex#a>54hjox1M~K3mXD#y(0d$mk+u5HdKon{q$JRSD<QW<-s|*
z;Jlc5{lv3_;nOm45>Js2*-Csi;BS*_6Y)0Md4|@Yn;oib(+VizZQHYOjA6ia?pi$Z
z-9Rv$vli-Be|g4eov6-ji4x5=3H+4|2&9mJu|<9kN(6NGl|X#$t%_6J{92g43pEiz
z#qs7j*l_=*{-RH<*u0I9O%Wubjc<<o+q%0niLp%mE)+0<2^k$sDby|mURI-E;;@{X
zOZkTl<vttkb5k}R@T;^L*<7}(u%#OHX@3?+nyN|rC;%D7NGf9AYpnFlI74dMLRvKD
zq6o||(o54#q}rl{h)g>r!~Ce-d(`<5O?Z0vTO#$NYksC90;Hde1w2=U-C8_K<iiP+
zH|rd&&7P|z&-wt9<s$%c&3wu6i2#N#kxDH(R~M3T!jFsOU*iBsIl$z_T}8-&M}{xu
zR!t5p(+{lU0hj$Hg_-Za{@Kh$)`IcrEe!^B&(Y!jIlL#17t+C0(dqIhR7@g2$}qq`
zlmZfP!k}4iuSq}&{paLh7^6DZ5!J8mt^GMvuSN(8SqqgNZADvJY*P*-2XMfn6SKNC
zcbCXVKFNqG1v5-PTsx-Q(&Fn|F=!@EDzUE{<3X>~)J^_5P?#T;0$|!am>V^FgZ2}s
z@$MI1k9(&q4{n9-0e8jiJQP72{D>$B3j6|K9KkS`5YJbnZ}M9W-U}o(y<8apYSago
zS)4+Sgw1mpcyJCHzGJ{;biODHTQSz95=-Y3mgYTo4qIf{mf_**2g7=~e3kgqWc5Qx
zk9w-H0OOx?Xz2hQ;QPLgNv9;{jcOv$ic~%_{i{6BXXjf>|A6Wbz6o$`@agq~i2$?o
z$a-aN2FN6fj96(BriVvs+DUZ&SJF?z{oO>g_L9DXxe?n8W3hSMFvhP3%_|!1LJuMu
zYt%H;=xXWO9i={%brEp@M&k`3A@_1UxRoA<dYHxJ0_e7^gdiLPNDnm$^tF$;FW>Nt
zUk@!`)E$%aPD%nmXLKN+3E@S2g<YxXu~z!TH_vBBXOIP}>P`?Qu6FNu`$-?cP}Tn<
z2%!FI;#$!ovr(V4zpE+i-&?u0qa2lI(1>bU<t}<Yg`3X);`@G)g#lOIh%ei@!C>(u
zJJ=U;CDL}CLiMW(KVC`fR4MhOl2dUI|LRln;oZ6@&#Ycb5OSM)3`aaFDhWS`o`tSn
z31WpsbGOnzp<g+u$F|P83R;y^Y7PqKUg<mK?}`?-^9wSg&gp6y?zg)Oe0-IGM|4`j
z998yN<tLwtu0*m|n7*Dyiz9Kaloi#n!&Hcnc!g*5l!YtF6lL=3AqXzw@0NMmM!#9f
zs#v|>=irzTs4EC4x5vNgbi8CfGQUz%V-PDL(PZq(4}T*-bb5*&Z@-t6aImY{?LHL0
zT2KUP_0^oO+7{!f4%yME0e<{w(pq}b7@@`5P5`(881#P+##1B`%OA09D~F5ESY)A}
zRyxvr<8<Y7H?0I)UqNiufljbgsOq=P2?c^~A~7~&e})21e+c^K5hk)yhM7qubV)41
zfgDz#!(-E8_p5~SNsAtBWd`5pup<4R4Bj3I4afVL1*+0YAiOb`LJo}|n!rM4NA3M+
zoE2Nlc5@mS%$~kTal8Q_$wY@u(04BQNu{F>TPgwXsZqW`T`8bf<}W)9+@Y@-XKX)|
z#=jw|{zQ}IVeF`e+_$!mz$yX2n_PE-B7krR$1~j^`Q8w;;WR}(ITicEjrdyDd>?^X
zB4|a`_&alwYT1w9PLK~_D17$k5KS9>L}jk4dx@ed{sf8sr8hOc%OQTv)R}-x?Jt-_
zv=nW7B)X`vpl%uF)2(swp|<LhFy0=Nv=#>epz{phUR#9xaoj|3ZGKFc%}$e+>hllo
z@>RfL-FUeWlNum+6)80A^+gRbqfc@6{#3ZFN;EnbHL8ExUfO|zwld{6-Mn^c=g2;i
z1}Hxy)-~JeCR;;DaANpEfl|X)wQ{Xp11I?9Rs(j|QkR)(=X@_JR9UNK8O1^QBQKtc
z>bdct$e^aEUU*8dwQQ4O#XM^tSe2n(tVQ(JR{5-*XNlBwwEN=C&q9OS%(tXyA0PQV
zO`Tm#fwYY=qd6TqsXP<@RzTp<d7%yi^19<GnZH?JO$<65TQ^$R5Xp9)wr2jxC=e?e
z56$>;o)tOl&#Dye|Mx$<;ujGQp6zO6D}bdt(9O!s=?~;=Zja2)P4R)^4<IOr%&KSw
zumRdqaB=cc{MQeeRoc!GXyr!1D(z?nw34*4aJIBU78XYSOT=qwR7=4b`~kIVPv<uS
z`ACA#QHzJeWOnl$$SH!86;3ya7On1jO{KxH-&MbgnLF<@wLGqr|C8)A9Ay2Lcv95u
z%iA3md&F;Qw%=gvP}zMK#?9Cs+&uS3<v3SMy_sLvgqZbYrU<c}?7mc~$%P+0gvu%H
zLjo%tG0;i7Yo)gocEqstnb0&*OvC1+Vu6I>LG}nHy}ish1hgdhR`>+)2K7efhI~wb
zY5O*N?c^U(qwm3;?JQl8O;#9h#))_>g7mAhZ}81AbP@9>m{>`iELWw|TtIv)6%%yF
zI8}YHpW0%3c`>b8WwqkBZ!TY?8n~y`@w6jP9MyTxU9fl8w(r#2yWBl(^<)^>sRp{b
z<w|7yrA;@s-{;@F`}(k;lwb8#1%;07o=C$qb^$->7u7iZ?QP`_-AT<}ro@~pM8@IS
zjYtO-%Cyl=q(%UeH|_p7yhHuks?w>ph;~E-g1xw2nwsI;q~537t%<SdJ_nlS*Ba~9
zq_p|l1hGzXxuG30imvlG-W{2vud{jTIiEJNXam$DaTqJrEl^$8O-*x`wnaZ)`ay0&
zvY6Lc%`=02>-XGh>ytZK77IPy)M*n!=u)(0K&Gx^X<6}ZiFUJ={c+IgH$s4z`d+Dp
zjsvHqXntxwi)akVXtxOD2)=6@3FW&3$CEN1rL=h6!;XtdheA@5T2jA-z7JbxpYxzq
zJrOsJ1Gum6)RkYL2ogRA{HM}!aQ>&#@qFO@Unt!m0Q>>7^O0#G6HXHcohPv$-{}+X
zetxjC6Gj{}>*v&8NhI56!%EG?E#=b%qGstcsDtUZWD!)fOyYyHp>aOngqB{u`!HZ7
zh2Um=cn7VP>?D?&%sP(${831@dZqpB)hNffD#TVc%dy6aA&7(K(mt;!FCnvopuvO}
z{V9OIwPicw1F}3DWOd@xTTOt_`!^P-=_~{D+eTo3wns%$MOiziL?jYqZ96vy+K;(D
zS|JffMwDSU$sIwFBS{WkeTVX%Cmfh?T=z9|t5;UcmOj!X6$M3eu;|1SCAtl5&L@>h
zC7_5QiOS2`Xs`NE_$qq+MjA)r7@$!k*L1MC&}KpcbhS|aI!zIQ+W48>0yR`UP^w;z
zNGa7<(J9eQaTP(prkh6a%(Jn<kJz1LN+g1c5THOF3#=Ax@Sr!_Zf`}#^L!6IEqW3f
zL$n?|$T=$6u=*{(`Jt;GPX`jnXFEJ<5AlUNea%uI_!XwcQ2TteS$sdf%`K&R$DGIm
zduQQP4qp^RjglZNFvc<Oc*cFrSa#m>ZrFJK@v-2vcj?!K&lNHL$947-YV*%tq@csW
zv^f^SXk81BX*AM^yh3K)<8z7$=q2G9r|t-l)j1^0)zFDJ`PbCv9lZ2B=)`{N*4ntf
zE+>_I$9M}C<Ir|SbG>IXKDIA;v4<G&{;tVrw%;GhhjE*%4w}8Hyl3Bg7K^C3T$tv(
z1~=ZHq;Zz+kJpYd<N7|dKKJaL9}O9&LASVN$l`>Zv&Z`J?2SM23biS>q*AD1b1tp@
zJXcSI3H>5@dY0TMc6=6rX`;K@XT*ajn}YHxdR)Y`Y139Gt#BcmB_Q}bq==ZHiH-h=
z2!#0^{nzXHV+YmGJPe$?tev4Z{5~Fo^aGN0-(rb73Fftwg*j78o=Gt!p%%%4Nl{cz
z!1MMOIFHqjfd8}!PPYHF2@bCRg-xg{sr>wa+Ig#Uw?JmS$vgH&hV$z>Tp7=LPhU7=
zz0y%Q=4(#TNf!nx63q;!=gD1fKrOPd*mnwzH>m~1wghYiJ&1*b2+W@($qv~R8`=vC
z0&UbfR01qsPjk5R45knvK6u_Tf$O_%TYr(-{wD*RRu)0HE{4WNrkgxG{Yv;DB+Nn&
zwgS>{%sju~h^J;3Zy|DFj7pIGwceF1!<o*omJ!;T&TL2By`wkT&#~R-AKP0pz1G?u
z>6_&pd>Pvyq9_fx&!hrUc8G;S_SXA$Ze_9{i{HjfYth50$=@gexNwIwS7OI6SMF&$
zae!m^FgS+0-H5XpoDgX^OX}r8CC59bb2I}~IUR9z?(eJ=WW=KG?B5Yse?z}puJN!M
zC&Z=gu?5P8g|ba{w!hdSKjuZF;yKum<dO0i<s@>Sq{WvRT^;)z=842x^x1&L=0%;S
z#YUPO=8i>nwo&-LZ3X`~t;YMGt;WO6@jv%u+6vCoqL`5G^F5EjkLm1{Z2zDZQ9Jn3
z)ZL(&n+eeSL{23Q=+_)Q0nd&x7&JsA+H?N)EobAk5#1;O%H9phIPGmbZ~t}Dcc^w0
zg<(`MlB}sbo1ShR*Asyt7;o~k%<Hv-gHKIJ#8HIJURt)IOt?CYG)a)pb=9C)-mVkg
zod6p?=5?xKS836dfMB?E`vr!?5XBU0d+l5`+swTKy<PPJ%XQX<k&&XGA6%QNSaY?n
z{q3Ufx0qHvn-^G>T;1uK(&vwoFZ>={hm%EOB`ut;7Ig8dwGciv6`0q?mdq_Bm-bTG
z8>gnc(~f*VH6;8YMTqJ*17%dFkQ&vWiC}rw(<a#j>nt#ttW71=Xlh9RoBhqkd*0RZ
z4|PQf37Vfmu~DywR=-gd;b6tVd18a~oPv};Vz2pxz{;pD&Kcu%l;Kj8Ya`ER%wYBh
zanc~D*SarJEyOKpDwBw9@2L{e_d=Gf=9;6AQmZJ5zv~j~{h;b@u*`}604n))(!Qp~
zWM*HSwa5LPY5G%uu}))jukshP5z<2GFIEXsLfyk^gN<uhUqjtx3>g_IBG~%fVfIEo
z?^B;j`P@(jBwE$IsrC)X*&Pb=p4BkiEnDxoa7;it=)>coAl*G)ry1&E82>nu*JQdF
z$sM*}-oZ49uT<DR=Goz-$u4IK^U?lv4KJ9dtM@63vK(eOTu1+tC-(;Xo;h`2Po`!0
z`^D<-YTVP9Y-}yb6t{F7>u)kP6_ZBTLd%OljEYXQB`Ty_rbI{iN0xTjt)&hZa`>-4
zpSbzG3iu+O8n2eUx0Y4&+Uz;o?aXsMvYrH4pkO1d{4fYl{C&EX9}i5c98^S?oj%;{
z`r8UE4{~})KN|)%V?9HxD7G1Mb3umX4ao*M913ZaH2V((mCee};1iH<13Q9j(z@6n
z(e4|pJJV;9Rg+Ok<cAN?<tdG56YJcJxq0j-BDLb6_FJ>vUoS%KgSoNr4zLxgFv1Sq
zm%D8aiUCj(jzVq!X-eE5{?n9r|2HF1Z6%FAgMvMseOrtzsrCmzX_~m%P-N;dLxd>e
zH7cb<k}^1OEyePUKnq;Shv~?zrk&Zt&RGLF^<~6&aWZbhR0fv5<IL)|g*~>k1B9Yi
z=HATKg{<-X&mZw)ZqNA^K_sP0a}rakzrOVf<ReHi)a-UD+9R>Fa3?zTpY)LT7d}((
zz{}O8#t@FfG1kQy3_vU?rgXD|m)WS^&`_D>2<-FRUNvFrs#`lZ{BY6VX8fhO#h`P`
z+9q1=#YZ#g9o;p1H|ZDKXeoak;}{jP#0L^P1bj)FQf6Ay3^pINcPPph2%f4*@9}Bn
z5mZ%bw_N6EP#vx7g)G)VmDW$s)DoR_Q$gFIgKycU>R3pI>8|T)z!H>jagYm1#(0SM
zhvQ;+Me8gJbKy@^HQ@$U2T>XcuD!eymM6|1CVDgtj$zHC-BOLRj@x)eK^y1KKI}$l
z=Q~$+cKV=OiQxCD3vl`>hu~Sv0^EUS0FT5BBMq9mof;8_Wrm!95jsuuQI3|5ciogo
z`g<9DU`Ll6bp+jDP%{a7ceuDzYS;Dp2VL#$C%VVBqhZc3=aYm|VAxwPmwVeN!2vLO
z{A8(XsXY=b@31Y68~VGs)B7-7jTbL$0-Vy`@ojzr;tu+NHar`{{#N7mt)_gKU{EZf
z9RsD|W`>thP@Yj{3eB|-R}u8KA_+%c$?AT}g{f|;;e(yICzj`X&ue0!6BOyP!Q_c;
zfWZVYk+bYCytK*bPoA$d`@%nR@&qm?G3IMerDr93jk!Z)x8!rV+DR(BSu~f@hhHAf
z%b*^kMfB#<%_eG;9ukJKV9k}IRu%*)IS8y;svAySlxT*cC3UR*u?OH|qFnDi6_!Xo
z#lP)85v?uS^!{BN)D`=UL<l<fE&uu(_q8>jI#6WyOvyqO4?SC{O3A0%0m0+IT`TIK
zC=Y15-)JFN!(L=y`^N{r?w2gDWMIViQg=J|0d``}T6}BwE+6jCql@(Y^M-JgWZjsm
zC4Aik$H4bVHmD>W8{YAw_x8Tp8Mjp08p{Cj<Ig?h8G*O=_AC!#XEN`}-MHZo1^d3s
zbeQe&jH_kNJ&(K7qZ2452Vx)+L(L*U2M*60wRLmS2SO3O`SRhvG0^{}ujAw4{-5`C
zI!f+fUewM<$W)Q^7v__-fbYHzJ6NOny87h1T-F>%{fh3X<>T3{T9T7mz6E`<r+}+u
z<fouFm{8>Kk3(<*B$3}`36Zv#t>LDnT?_G&`&_8TwKY729`;sc0+$D3Z_m4k0<*J~
z>O94$@qgmiCUNQ{E$j$J7U3_$gOIj&f97w_Z%q!CUnn92syQ9~MrB=(K2VclP}ZH}
zJ!)p9)#x&_(h)RfE<V`kCFXCQR2kP=6Nt<;TG>TQJ;O|o;crb<Y}U}|y*Fr`R?jeJ
zH)v9EmT%~FYc3mR-MYPf0`I*JmV3N^D6ftotlpWztgPC^wTwQum_f9GK@rroBjKwd
zt)!u!MjF(X4ex61N#UxZzt&+&S^DLaNBDcIT8+t4(<FXNy}YYwTzo(X!SxY0q}(?L
zCFPt&D#hnx_IzR0nyeqb^fz(kt1#4gZKu#KC3+nX8>O3K+ys<HEZ=mEP&{-#sdpvP
zi6_AYS*?ij=vBo&*bd$EpleIdO9lVR0fo~l=@MB)@K5C-)aIDvn^ydZw_8O%yYPMs
zARB|8EN6Sxvf4%XFZ&1R{x$5u0<+BP_l(n6obgVR?o3ZV(J+>L)Z2rKnHj#{IJ4-o
zVFzGViq)R>AKIYDi5<xmXv*zPmSk*n6jAM!qb^h6`kUMWMd+_J{5x|kgyH4qb_ihF
z%T$4H1>N5ZdVh$y`XVoXsb)t18(ekGr(lY38c_XgQZ5m}_}--&<aKGl%$w{zqs(-f
zJx9bKp3gXWeDVCOO<S<t0);Tc!T*azNcyZ#$nA|Ve0h)Ri*d`qZ()C|W8||{nV|#D
zb_be0T`VkEkDtPyj+=@ArZuy0+GU2ahJ?SNHZyQtyp;@m#Q88LBxfj}zPrSSU!mR!
zC=op!K)z7A{zK@_xA5!$%I6)Ij6ZqA>RrUTv*z{2Q7ZK1*A3HpI%8-bJQbXfRty_v
z1r>E>X}B75_w{Z4l-k3GH!XKhzWswHG&H`5$gPYYLjliD`YIL@9KFO>Mm$%f7-<wo
zD?ko|`RO+QoG&y{vz#U>`?hWd?v1^(SC6=9z5HTV3-#v|+~i_T>J)Fxip5=w=7mqT
zP=luWR5K@f+aq60Pk)}f$-OYdTZ<xm@OLjcLARB5kF~aFwrMOBbHq@n4nPaQ+MJB#
z4UQIjW)7Jka-b<(TIfI1%>o2wvNECN1dZqz7W(|AbnV!GdAv<?Pi5>Rg+$df#ultP
zaSBtFgXuA<SB?kQ-1}EqHt1eF5&5BJ@u63nx~1Ix9Ti_-<M3ll{?k7|T)}@VCGoKT
zug1bE;D5%#Ba^9zW;Qn~6=|uT{^`KqP#`r(en!-s2wc;1KK|7wn{Qvt826Fm@q{Nn
zJ3aOjiK>gBT1cWL4bhoYL62_ioUN%tB14Z4dh{TOAoHai%L&nLHRe@Wg`~=90#SWo
zDswQ;`qPmWYm#(+d>5K!yQ}Pz9X}uM6tr%>yQ5hf)YN{5?1DuMRtX0$tFnSgm5xrD
z&b8C?U1imPx~r~;V9ilwZv1rxuy^IBFP5*)+Z4y>VV{*xHG4a~SKDFqwcd<#lCoq(
z{jprqs3@x5A=0gmqkBnO^^9_nb3WWE6<PZuKQXLksj4H<*h}C0m*px{M=@^L=s~{Z
zSX{Dc#D2CuaG#@1`axcov3jy@(0-iX^4I<XZJxwdzPaTlYKBz;Z#_JcGv}retP4?(
z5G%EMU7f@wTVWO1FDmRN$!O(i^k3B8D^#`;KiUz?S$7P6MX;eqycIwv+xlI0^@8gY
z^Mg{aQ6$2<7nS68uWrk;tmo0arQY3j-@o6L!?O#oUb<Qjd&ulVW+=Z=JWaIt38^L)
z_?ttrcZ`nx>`*f^uhpxrxB+L4`=)mcV=IxqB+J{Ie5GFjvJ3g>a@9JX^s{s(B?8%z
zDL?m-KA|SfP34TS;*MCJ&|E7xua}FlWZo4Ufn4aS89_x|U1%w3_NXO+*dZ~WSr+k7
zua&<A8tWg*j;!4g_ifTj24L2RF*9y|s7f-!Nt9mR*)usN3-pWS92w-2YR#4WBC2J~
zB{jkD+gT%szZkECT`~%P?tta(K-XFP5p4oGKC@mPVa6+5Cd$~5k}31TDF6)qe2P5u
zByG=DQW;-F+a?)^0mC1TkZxPZxkE3z`SeYI$znqOuymNRBsR36?*4SFHf@5wGgtP=
z@{G73+fH4WlKWm~eL)_hi$&;d%`c^UN9F}WRS*0D{eaVqTLX&=5{om$H~(oOyd3|H
ziSY6K&%02_bn)+Mt1T=C(_uAW#cW^SF~ThVc;<RySB=n?nA2|ZbS=K&cma@20nKe{
zOZ<-WKJkfR3fl!1W=v+YSH1(g_VztiUaWW_o~%W}z)yRG%Sn)q^y^Ag-(ySdT;N_Q
zWhHGa#T0%wt(|6)X~RBSIegnXF%`+rv>x)l!a|N6G30OB#DwF)xcdFr2OmPAw%!?9
znz*M`r_Srl?>OE67GNDv_0+E+*WS6_l4u=q@&pN6*EcSXXWi*2Q)M>ZRTy$DCF=$7
zy*x1%JH2z)g*LZe8e)7uisi#lC1qYyS=Y6#ZaJI<y!mBZHApwSe+Mv9wyC6Pt$>@n
zoJ{vH>d8|>81G^%>*u$;&>Bez5P|CLke}bL9o{pHtomG2GC2D!YbUCKXHfShCLQ*w
zgSqOvspY8s5xr^Mly*i|X@e@<mo{|f;)EYKPG0^P>Xdx&)r+iVzf@NdnzWRN$0byo
z6;OYw8q4lACKovX$C;g#pmx+$jqu2?7dj{+gAWbYc*N%jeA<tVsFM}HYDN%|WBeYh
zmv?Su{u-D$Q^x<9yg!>e>4$q2vMe@x^s)j$8cfO4vAZLnbfbLA5b7t}PZ+?)n_I2J
z+?sAQ>|3m`r9vV`$)YiM1k|OIG6W=LQ;oXh{K7%7Xe<I68Dn%X2J1(Lw(wa}PPlQc
z>vr4U`zhcM1oD;`4{zDGk|AnfyMzPTv519rz1<>5E}XB&6}-44WgrQ{dU$SPd&E!u
z36qZ&`^;v9-6G*co4p0LcCADeLXlTK^1bt<`r*-MEx4=4r_g6RW1IbKG{H7afbf-O
ze9Yb2k3lD$w&+GowgI<%Vt5TY47`UwkY`3YFC)A~@#tADvTy})P^&g$H^Pn|Uwk?%
z-Z@VsKyT*6@{~Rhn{sM6_c#KeeBac2i_rU3djWr;z)&KQY@7wBjO9<o)ScG}is6>3
zSm@cth7VV&x(h8PB#_U%t~^^p`%gS#-IfBIVGbP&FR|pZ1H7fHi)C{0(UsG(=w6$!
zW}tC15%2UKmbKO*+%Dc6H%goRr?K(<Hxo)uKKB2)v1tl8gGEtSpP6{&L-w~iof#9F
z(U+LRnwvwgz>x@Yb-2{~-K;7$21#2m=a_kQennn>etvR2IEXDKpHbu$BM)+DVgBxH
zV0-U3*BJ<QusxhH5T8+tOvFdKGtTL9e$s9BlAkK0`EDUpS%km;NdWJ{((B-^#_+w)
zPzdB+K~B}vpnuJ52O+>3Bf{xby{UCHL-^GwAQ1L=E;N<tgaT$>yDv|^;0hZV8zEcc
z-65--Ilj|3Z8Li%n5Ot9!V%$GcWk|60!yWvjO4NA$Tjk*QH3Up;Ncg^z2TH>N~F-7
zk->Qu`rPWun#CLcsT>(?=rAFNz=t<W-Zk)c;#Nq=@6-$)*#;pOwdh^~%O3U|?2_vC
zXNbIKC3z&8opfqj=SQ1>)#A+kn?R>;6&gJ(7f7SljLu6HYsR%BCmKIpyxwQ$eWp_m
z_>GKw)}N0AlG>CmYv~HcKt^b586jvOKbwElSN7EK4hgr3{6sEn-;c&c+{9)&Hhd4j
z+$&aiX==z4Ib)#&akQ<$GOhf~BU(XlUdJoo6`~&&ci{XX>S*&hJk-ziN#(wucvtxr
z1y`P5fH$L#?e0^NvU5%+S@E!QQwS?_>0me3cPvp?>7I`VcHx(E8Bg#;SSoq{jqdRL
zr=#ZP{$J>hmXb3L+n>b<RCSEZpUQ$3@gh+zdED^IqVA&hzKnLPG?ZA_J8K-PXG#P!
zZxd9LuKOOJtatCd=X$6KTQbrM6M;0OxBM18ky5Vsx^R(HZ|8o0c)W6)4CE>J_4Tas
ze6826_fU#@pkaq8Sz;LOHZw74%v3fXuffPm@yV0R;Jp(Z_r4HH6<N^xhdhqAABy2B
zYh5%9#|Cl1<Pj^ke6HsX0icK9??ECvUAhlYd@_5jn>NvouwUdR!svS16<c-Ph^cV&
z$x{l&mx<ZPF)ot~yNbOBDRG?-t;{2avwC})O>7iH+zL50>B^&a=ptCT6dRSk3O>e|
zU-e1Yp)FzBFK7@nM!a)!agxkgKi?+>1sxrj8&OfjfA1xp({bSMGlSM6v*XJx;T3Wt
zMlP#J#OMXBSj0Bl=~e(Dw4>f`mBq1H^<W|*lrbti-o9Un)MG@HSEr^Q-1MbMDT(fj
zjJhn>)fd|bZTJk4SWd{%FIAQU848+a!~y)p;ph@vQn0q8y%s5g9<-e~1p`ta$%@Mb
zzhPxeP@R_W%5#(TVt(;i&?6=>sdA3>0AIJBDm3)!t-9My3##WdxdYisoW#VykvZDZ
zQ^XN{b^U#+3s6=iS30W<&&C`|YCDC4Qz(XbF5LF~rEyw_PPSsRL&|bk5}NG-VmMBX
zD7)V<?Hw}(0;f=DgCznm-j4bQ@SVDG*&cBtBijW|NnSqI*`01OKFZI}n`BAOS2+Zf
zMlkL)s~ocD9^B^TF_k5xbDvGC3`}2xjP&?Rb8wuXl}C$EkgmlpNmkdKO%>a6^VQn#
zqikI=L&iTFJ+m@8aI|}MBe~R1vtLi!Owg!$674rWv{%=Z+Fy`_5DXFgr<SvQ;QCKB
z=iui0pS#FpA;_i!X87$>6bU$AC->yCKZ*g*QECxW!!CVl3K{AAj1PQoI~`0F8v5mK
zOc?C_d>8vkN42hMh9OBZ$twX1J{7HjD=!@~Sa*d5+k4dSuSsoVs^@I2`Im-piBiih
zs8<daOu`-Q#uRDo7oLfFqV$uj&CEWH!A&4%PorMr59D347YOwc<_83q4w}o`H~5O2
zu9Xzg=T7fEY>0!KZ1iS2??eex-nb309EfP{FF525)7!D=m44W+sgJ2)8ac~^0{QZ7
z9TIp&=jbun&M`6iQ6Zw#GHle-MX@8O6Q(1R6>w0kwfFHR3*r>#54b3z6UPb}i>Q1?
z5C0IHD0kJH@LDv7?>HG{e@g1w^cjoV;ccHKp}6|aoG2YL<+viauje<kU5lWQkwYS0
zh*+hCzAQu7jnL>kT9z|om#Xxm+aA5$4ZNL!kC-Q^;)Z}m6#{&9kY25*{m$afO{roR
z)GNbT{D0Sa?EjC})AV++qF~ikF}Js}03x$$c$fqK!N@t8*;pa7>eyLAcJ{eBKOnQp
zTG`py0x39oA+Wd|&|THaO~Tp9#Tj4)08;QGvr0HSI=gAOm{~yRNm_Z@Sy-vdh(jnU
znYlYqu(AE=Rn`A*tN<GuH_wNE^yU9OR^Vg>$?MDP%8RQSW|6KwsG>Hk4yAyKLP`qL
zs=Qa-9?vjA$pDTy8kq*}vnZl3s@WSh>_u1_(HsA@0ckpt#pJ;*`eZBi^z;{%uNi@s
zN{Mfiem@(wcCaVspZPwYx&X#F#s$X%Uts^oH(mVyk}-&6>HsKT+)z+ZfDJW~6PaRI
zwP&tXy0iq3HRlf%6enJFsA<qn@zQBI5FN-5Bie4gpc1K-ZSO!JX-UO;ZXyj0RkcUK
z3I%n<=M4>|J1%An1vTe>0RvT+6Vd?{bp3W49?Dec4J7S|ZvX|V$7j{}?*6{>a!f!)
z==uv`Q)j3D^rcVd>d1(q;99i-$aSl)x3@Qu0BWMUMI#Hce5Rx{p2g>`^$J+}cCZma
zjz7+X8%4xn{h6w!qJoMQDlgF0hU?6v{@(v$kX{O&gsfurFh|Ju6by=ouz!&{x^~vr
z&+sC|!<)UDF4rg>%ixOsH$hc3!Ru>gCirSP@Z~Z$nNF$gMkTWPT<dli@<Mrm=ME1%
ztgN*MrMdn$i`#?Awa*&X*48>JtW!gL8D=n0&(YxhwN&!JF3;EYC6=te7?Yp(I+;Aq
z+=5lLwa)kVI!r3zY>I!xbZ1Oqd_ZQiS5QzmSJKv=3#{>bkp-SEHrn7J_ePKhEL@C}
zLx%2F6;PtDo4b&)Ta6Fw$D8BD*Zcbi5_5v(CWrZYi~cBlfSK`dT=)kq2u(`9+F}uS
z4&?s=r6OR7;34&vkTp-heZ~3*%AVhgc={LF-BlV09rO}*+#xKqKFk2Aov`f=>$6KU
zTnI;TH{;ynYwN!t`RR@MUvT>4RQI2BPvf(b-<JO(yDm-tf*PRqe+B4v^sxAg4P4zE
z`pbdN(d}Oj&icIn=5-~>BK#}t*Xy_#7^r;{*|DRPCW3#l42_q6u@1lN-$2ytij`)M
zYvjudJk$e0!==ya_WMF82$*z9Z0;AX1_kwuGU$z_ACU1EynYP-oAvOqiS%#Q!=@|T
zzu?1Gk_LZvj@>^6pDQO1zasppvE}ZjYyFacxZOHiWrzPwHz-i&K>Jh8t$~+J|2OMm
zF_$9jAIVSGW~lI{{}Jbrhb?#DPu(8B#A<1O_*;mYefVGcly<a#3z>8eOZ^Luhr;~j
zS{qFj|Cg&T3tig3Aiww^=RZyMB1D$j`xk6N8#5*Tr}bU~$P>o?VponbhyKlQqiFp%
z1HfIu{4c1_OZ%^2^SliI3dW>t@^1zfVX}W&WIL05|4S_UQiAaBOWuY&Q~vwvcI~j~
zf9uZK;QpU#awQ=qCRS8Zij9eB^EjF-Rmp{D?;)@a|K{w@Nf;FqQfJEu?(UZ|<o+|0
zlWf$~KgY&uWa7!RwY8a#*K~M%*hK%B3`vP%I=k~~M@ht4*W>9(I)}kRH}zaQ$A2Yq
z1C|%sKb{Szu|}U+n49N#ZAM!3$2HXj<{E4bK|wUV*J<MDy05P<o8RMbxwY}GHY}{y
z!=yyJk}0r6lM(G1JpL;Z`X4)XdAd8d$?=wc;^F3=o142ylp(u6?<cSIPft%@^zWv5
z0No<@BUHx`{mK2B!mwu4?#U%&*d6ekCl;dL@{0FtpjB!X{>O3yX}LRmZ;tJJY|YHr
zOnZV-x2>*HviH}XqWG;5AxiwB(`YmP(*61<@^deKEJx^Z!6Kg7q^pD08;wnv`hllO
zwioq}?5`CS753+wy`4VShjY~iYhC^jS9o-EWRNsJz_lm&+Q-QBmGY0qrq1iS%S?7d
z)Cv{uk1h@$oiNuF1Pb9G6C(asx=59v)N4-kpcTa*Rnh-r==jgRg72e)|0utm_o&D=
z>%(ncATca7#Gs}w^dB_p_SZ;r2LBQqzOwwfZ-TN1_kY-X%b+^C=3g`k0Yb1qa1FuT
z-GVy=cL?qh+(~c=?ry;?xI=JvcXx-4+no*1d+MC}KUMd=x9Wbo`I4H=npwSiwft6h
zPY=`^U;)234Rr9yZ>J}CV*j~cm0cwGQPbsf;y>58Ckg?N4{?V=|BSbv;FSd(cS8$c
z{zK60i2i8HxC1o92e3*})7IqKjkZKlJ^Vwk@)x(*o#km3XZn}Fm*z#|jJC8-)&J+Z
zqv*|O3xs6KKhINk@Ce+|K2=;!*CPS1P+H4i6V>mLS}8vP=7j_2h5$$8-zyHhaL8=H
zkan~MDZ$`B*FpB{)IXX&!v1GGKr6tp5IKgA&jgnGieOps8Gno)k_4+@W#g~mj-bb?
zGf~6m`P8(qQ?RXmf(~!k3|}}@HO;CBIv$G}{bz!G6_s^r44w!2<b)TNvv+O<K0b7(
ze){JI)Mz=XTgNsB?SHPbdrTVNg8H}c{&@gpL#3bk2SEA&BbPq`@2CDru@D;r7QDKs
zIIU8A<2|ZdWpf|Q=U-x{3$X!uP!c++!@=}6Hs&0`eR$Z%)BdaSLjTsBPw=xH`R6)z
zwlm;yaWkdupKF#nrX{b|1Du*~V4HS!#<7z|a(mUUC;JQXS;YEzC`3TV{?Pm{B*ZFz
zu~{chCsnh7F$Ob?w$!Il9N4kxI!3e?24+%J?PwF~fpw@C%mH@iUAtQk66s8@a|+W0
zxR+g`L`%)|%&L7$48Dw?UUq~IdbAH6)MI!NTi8%RK&%MpQl6h+;_U9qBMmC`m46fU
zBDQnKaTK?Xqu*(MLIPsCvAOwS(FvyL>I#w(^M!~%Ai2>Ny&9+gTo*-R0b(STa^b?=
z4t|8qS%K9ECMIXldzzvGJ+_xw{Uodf^=)7fUe>jH=Oy$sC$dS0^YX}28GvzBfRX)Y
zG$&V-(36KPh2QGSKBt7p1wE#erG>qM09NhnETqrk@%DN$L<<i3nURHm%B4Y8_<G&9
zP`KwWG>q+E05l0f8lfmN;sdjcBD1rz<9ptp5{7Y|jR+t%U9SZrAtBX7Osmhk3q9SE
zqSMO&!@f%x7#K9UUZpY`Nvo)+2n+k=<{Fur?pbUwPm^eXjw41Sh2H~wu{7xnLe=Z~
zb#vjIkYd&d`=?HiixBKnYnYr)R){5H8?TmJ!+0OB|LC+M;ILUQ#^q1$^`()=^qHNP
z!}p>*aBln4y*w#@AC-iJL{?Vz?(%Sds(602-Tyxp(@s&VHJ>=sv)g=&P!wR~+El&W
z?pYsYDHHeoRm&5%3utG4<_S$PU+4)7lXJ?XQW6#H6EsS-ns^>S<2n9-33a~R&9x$=
zZPI#btFg@VTDR>*0*`3}W2O81LV#4JWrQag=cWcyQP6Q+yhhIR`e?Yg8f~|SuvyGS
z#l+ZMK*m=`i(xqIHm=UpH4Q|!jtzGPF9Ubmd|?Ir5f107_A7>YT(i#80NeVyg=w?}
zHcXH~?s<c0k30BZOcN3yl(_L~#g_8U260mXkGOxvRI@f|;DE(Bkd>5_09G9UomSgJ
zDaXKf>F~H+e&KRXEi7=cvR;*JXHW0@mwZP>O%4}{2H)`E^70Y_8sWYj|B=q|XaT%!
zyq-(#?dt%{EL1M_SPx;XcR1wme7py6c|#IV#0ZF8YUtNUFfPVz@272{;!w_Qc+6N#
zPEI!HkF}VuK0MmGIK1g9{8Gw2te6hQd5w+IngeJLoO+&g@^4<<)_CU^7dKt@Ha0d^
zhby~TX74O-4{89iFZTM?!+ZoB784o68G2e-RYisCL0R`4zt#nO{Uc?HAf!>;R5%KF
z;@&uIk6FNzhhVb?ap#C<Cvv+w0NgDuE}j?F@|<0zy`2_{kdXtgkdB6iMuz8RBc5LG
z_VSR^eCE&f^>uaBG(!W%Xp6eW$3U1@JIe^dx#QFtwSVMur8VpAzT4Yd$UEc04<bL@
zjkbQ!1=CC@CMAW-Y^ngr#lqqu-~k&P4(rWl8A61|h0nx$%(x);>zGT_aC5(b7x5jm
zGYW_{=H}+6pFbZT-^1+%AO<Sfy%G~gE0Z*tUQuU-?_j|bw*yYTzzA@$TZ2i{4rjOD
zJOg%?*L75Vz^3E(X4Nb);IV8PBnI9Cqc3ULuF=qA3Q9^sgM-aro$I>M10GZUEXGX$
z*3{zo_Uf2dr_CpdRHi_opwI&aAKyw>_iQ6dM$6Uswq!%GNG|vhRoh_l;w|(mkX1v@
zsIkM*0=w}@`cMidA|`{N-6`-9xAQr(QtsQGti^i!yPd2s;Puh@UI}xLQVn0iuoYmM
zLyXUagvCWgu~e!Io{w(w^5f&VGI6o7)m4p3oMeJeCEve>gM}kJHqO>Ob!S;D*5enj
zQUDGVR@N__pjiis4|af`^U4n%`*MsH9-rraQdv8N*(|oE#&N#a?99<4(-W8W6paqN
z(?83~z7MBzcmKjX2S!nA)`Kplwb2pLX|=e%uXWrVw=B1|W`t}QIM7IgjwxK1-avsj
z>-wN#7{Dsi_X!vK)4`;jtY%Y1nDn}W*uDKi5dg#(wBQkh0(by@GQa%DLQI@}!?>2=
zB<B_tA3u{N62=m#EEJLx_I+LbZ(li<90c&lCfBt<QUrXSg?r4?uUt22l;~?tpiz-|
zY2Y*hkNjYU9VuoCh+DPe{&cD5PKG}kwHjz#h8LIJM$m1%$<@);*7lT8LZTn$BS~dS
zql0rUuyJM|rNQ?&yvlR{Am_s!Wd|$pKQouMy1KfuG9V2M3$RWj6x$pjvEU8%O>P9a
zJQ%~u$hIzt`3}H?#pl!K&u!NC>=YCQ)Y}F&EU~b%fNP$Aje>?2iqG2&h;z%+!?EX8
z!*Zb2lH2(ppv2V)ajRNBr50z%t~%x5l|3Z#xZeWd8DwN+IK=h!b&*h<n^tK2%E3m{
z{i@*-8zfYm!lF-{fEAiAU4Fc*SzT>m%VMLVDl!^QwO}cQ6!|RpWN9Nt^fCglH-aJ}
ztezwk6nnra*|Ne}vo@OY*6{$%3V{!BJ@Xz?017^sDXXii^YaHB%6eBw5{rde(qN(5
zBHhS@s=}Yo{sJRlRw@JS25Fl>a&a`8facDZYV)2Bo~*XVh#RO6nKfIi6YNlz;CO-e
z+uhdDv8K9usZ7t`-(O^YxSxOnKm}~i6T${M0|*7qh)+a6_8H92N8r|sb)BoZd{zS;
z_f?b$!T^H6scR?iehV^LcZSSC34U~68i+A_CbtCg?OV~>`L>ikiQMrPn@zP5=`v@1
zu>Ra#oU|k6W@lGrHL^4i0nWAi@Eu_7EQSG>GTIEr&&0PiVP$%j&eW%XO^|pJ@81Uw
zE16z3b;L;cfNUR5jAn@x78cGcYXQ&9^b{$&%Cj1Y_yks-s5s$5*VzRDg_E0j4HAGt
zFxuVqPz4=>+*>7)pY@5dC9|Y7Fe-25_dSK*KSOE>PgrwxF-V>jP+37KVP_ezoE=*6
z&S1!9;@s3itD^7+fGX#2pAq(%IMs)Ty9KQ2AT{`B=WBB|whQ`5?Jfj)d@5$}8`uW`
zr#m3^QBJQ}m*!i20|x~FT#Hp~2|!ob);qV^H!px9r9Phe)^SFSH71c7thwRQ%HB$>
z9))3fD=AvNaA?mYziiC8Ve&ipXJnK;xl3wp#Ras=v;ABF_WfgLXOhPER3|@ThJZ8e
zFLXf0T|<0*ec$N<Cy>Z<0FvP2!XcsFcaDn60f_J_6&VlDQePj`220y>tWCgEGuAUB
zt6(i?NUjRt9@nt1`3ewFa3?1x7_62Hn!DOMox2j5p1DWwCw4(Z07O1+`ZiUhDiKSC
zw7k&yNL^Hb-8d(t@JG`pQV?vTP5>?9vD+D`udh!6m8un&+$YH8n`bv(-sWJ@bjzw~
z%Fuun_!}UpGF+#El9InxS3_>62L=wBwM|1Bnbd$@Y`n6q%gI3mSbzd?(z&|2(%(aS
zkTf4p<VRf#7f$vqKfOmv$j<caR2Ef(*#(H6msM0$Bu~U-x7h#=nw_kU^t4eGWtpDK
z3tL&1Bgh{B-d=e%I6W#x1z`;aTpR%cRcj+e1w4LN+u6B}>`d_KlHTE09|a-GGjb^H
z?9LK|3|rolS09#rM#bd7_reGB;PEoOTDbAM2f!}6ve7N_J^VKRohFU$0kEXVxXMN)
zEp~L54wtL8J`NH@V7r`qdkdwrQtma^QQ3KB@H02-!D<>ASJWu?UeRx#U)`CA(G8fg
zS7Pp|lQBZPy*t87E;xY~Ab5j#5D-g2NJQ=JRCz6lx6k+CR9(!~6yFO$%9LGhe{6mJ
zjj69ZF>Z=kEADK$I}_wG)Cu_BxJDuvG0I(|H6jY9QY#8RfJYKqV>5pGL66J~4tBB|
zQQ-K^2C=_ZDXT`bUV6T*Ac><9ARWMsCL?>`BgT8Y>M81`+C=cC64SDq?qNUHGk#Gx
znW0|lq+rf?exePEVt%*zC4<}N{Bmgl@V-XI;p7VytSa+FfR0i>l@XGF_pnzY^m?HW
z04zd~o_2J<rQ7Y<pC2lgS>ETTQODP=k#quJ=+|JC*Rt{X9RtT?kA`|b+>W0A?fG`B
zwBK#7l_^vXyx2d0wZK_y-LcMiq@e44>Ww?umGLv-zhR`QG2J$sRsft|IGK#}G7vdJ
zmBUVI9dlIP5h~i+1bh_em57Z$IMXp(1h#m7Ek#jIK>vSHKFz|cg=^N~f+!>nng2o$
ziqh1>Y@fEmN%$nqW3Lbx2ml1!dR9rFum1cX+xj4x9O`2jiTlFPdcKAor|7(Ir+|Ac
z;p?A#St%ySrK!rOJj08Z9YsmDe=zc8{mFXgshX45qbsNLZeu|T8{im&b8kjZK8D3A
zImI=Aj%b3oGT;7nkp?r?SJD3X7@h?ucxfg2?|dr|u-(-@ixkM34BTQ?I00ZLEaiR=
z3OH6Pfq*WwWUEXg&px(5NR}P1@){h`-4LaelPU*&L^anxsO=?|Z7(x^j{lMadkY+j
zu|kDp7BRzRHKdxKW5G6T-CIp3#YwB;F%C%LO<FR2&p#t?#7;{uUoD?!J{h={<pp7*
zzX8XHd($U(9i4MQjNg$_xy*~_0UONH_VS#LZKY=S%@VP-{qwZXL5k)+&(!DxhFi5>
zo5kEmTWxzt7~`34EFtO6jpKVb>{V6&wsHxx0KDg)hlH;=!}=kVH~^`v>~jv2p-4l5
z0&23(A_=QRFIpczv<o{$W@`f`tOeqQ$eoMZaiqSusXA;mC%}Fs$3cR_*~B8M_74Dx
z6@Wz4Tz47aEpGnVKKgtEgT?@vdpGcDzqa+7TPISqGs@S`H~f^&<;6_p)_w3q6dArD
zpaLR1v`|2hJUs5LqJ1K~G|YoCi-%-wTHv@TG^BDduvK89iba`+Nf!Pf;Wf^6jy;r%
zF9K(G@D32Y6Q@qCKX0*m4`}tH-dCtx!`EQuiKS2Pr|6z9&FtwJuTHbN&Wmgs+iTP!
zgBM>oX;N9A#?Jt_I=ae}q<J@-OcR~weZwr6gl}k+*Sek>9BH$%xZ=i-D$MeIX0DpH
zVoKK><Bc<;vH+}1CCI)pS_Bs2d7m(pQ@Z*Hop*+*xpW$ici$0TeFq}@0M+T4N_x8<
zb@{&9i#rA%<F(XF4H#aSdD-UbCYLlc<YJQ2P-SEz6yn$WoENC7<_NhIHQw4!YJ#Wc
z(y!{jg*^qp9|;7Qb(3>gmG!ptb)MB{td-WlDH%XLpBW@BT%<?d0GWhSRTY(AIPB#B
zdIKL=!6@nXZ=$nEvC3jcxm6&B15ZuW41_+c1BO=LQUlnbo5lG|9~(QVwzf7tKAv1Y
z2eda?SYMymxFOM3s%GhE@*}?@!&k)OWM(r(PDyiEAJ9i!Em_%!cWuMNVU0(z$T4$s
zjLyGrJY`0(jQ8#*d*kzp7!brE03Y)wIvNED=%Mzhv_WDqo%>_{eLuoej`!Hwot};=
z^TmQH4B%r%18}FbpKhn=^|~}#kS3nb)#7K7QKI@vvp}>+3OXA&CTgyy*J^z2v<6S!
z1)Nb`ua2neFY0-j85tXn<9Z|#%lB>}JWSTBomegWmzUA0Sb8*?!5DAJ{bn<6nCo29
z#pO0c>+j=L$@ne^FgH)-O*7LS`6is^HY_Y04atuFuK^eos#4zqgc5SoJUH0d6B_4y
z8-vs+!#04h8?%K!sp>5*NQP229}@wL!d3o!;{%QZ?(XjAo=WQK5?Y74oH)^Hjn_^S
zf76z6k6Ok|nk{^kb@?FDaG?MU>3pTx-qq#TI2RG5HYh`o02odt3xAO!M^;XB^!D#2
zU>lWjLA<40((r-TEyYzHsikbPyN{5);&<XIAQz;xl@uXL+bJrwJ5CenibGOD_g9NQ
zt6MR%HKbqxiFVG20is|=pJNzX5D)e4m(h-l)|h~}M8i7+A!<i1u(i`N*7S|Bhkh7e
zDtmmg`f#Pa%QQ@)QE6*{D+Ko^wIVeNT}@d$qYn_{%xo)pBt(_n``xfrqpWB}6nd~M
z^HWOD<lPRfpQ+C$p_b*J8~M`$aUW}AEU*S-RB6)W%^i6--?OCUd<IW`e)n}gd;kdY
zZb5*xbi@VZ;;!ql$x`zhX3(Ky&1|paujUdtx$nZ!v$kf~XQSo=aOTn7@!R=lH0+I#
zp}+`L0}fnt(6hc63jxH72viv2zTa;d%b$&@;%a6`UB^l4zEJ~fG;FcB!r@K)0&SQO
zcTHE-4QV_N2ZqfEuhc;tCekzc`?9RY4^hF*-1yV?(j99OTqrU@_<`tj#9+npog%Dm
z(mkiF{yP{Zji_~a2KdP^A49{qDZ0-uf0tLx{VuyfT@j3Fay05Df8V8)Hi_{5>iSJg
z{ZI1O;FMn_a*8y5VbRQL!u`@xdNYaiAn(`v$7V3>q@UeXlTL#IX9JC!mcuzh%ru(w
z-4AB8o8`fF9bJS_#?NRwcADWIVxm;#EU+VQ03wpocr4h=`mYDF0ks!WG|hSY%uR6s
z(slkCJG2z@oJXCplMrm57L-_KMtF}d<lzkONcJ*Sm39V4h!KBlJ?trvh+w7F1p<yO
z2PdqKzpkXIHae*PS(%#VF-}rVpVsLVZ7I*<bce~@(H9`NUE1;HsPAPum-m$WIGMIe
z$<3f!!{frsPQU<Z16pZKuH5Ly2dsVrvJ%-qHAK_LrfxBtwfdInShu}Sz5hTLh`0<<
z<d5#(NPYy%;FtY_;KIFR-SdH=&L)dZD^R~}jj+YZ^_fbvg|)DTrI5E$chPgcR82sr
zxQnyQI?Hyg!PP5K`(e!b^#CHGkGZV`GVO|j>5q%##ve*@>ZS0~)MaO)0A|@4(e`Lo
zacim@G)mAM2s|m;@S-@<0AxD~eFUqL!(Gl}a&)8!2vGiN*`i(tkdqPa`}x%boN$c+
z(xjI;#Z2s*0Dc+9bzt6kr)h55OwLY#4<S<Xe)>RuVGrAB8lz|%yxaw6tYT@<K^PzA
z6A#+Oo^WYlbr%qT&pkw7;zT#XkBQRK7=)PwtH$f%j68Ab>aO|4NFH{SOCWToJXz*s
zxOJ5=zYw{w4*S0Fx`-Yu8Glnq9U3q@ClN;3ms7*;?vDQc%o$RiJO!e_=N5zxF2r|4
zsAz??if>;A=Z@~7u%n9bGsew!N|u8f_A0v8%qo4ib9uEY&qUEUjY~Qp0iO!2U185J
zyfV`J(Ihxj1mMp090#7s5&blYTZ4L}x`qdEFg(Wf1}CN~g>n6}<M7^#YP)=P0jxlp
z*`Cui$CV6%uf=yMyP!b{+LA4S?&n20YDl>Y2pY};3;<3Q3HK@5+8=WZ_nb~l<64dp
zG@My3bHfLEiWp8^{Gh;8SQ`N@cXW2MnjoS7kmkYO=x<f74G>yxE}JxJjp(YV<NElX
zO$+{cXg9O5eJ`XUzz6J<kH98jn;d;t#0@S*pRRZR!>fOIa}883p|YdyK~dX6fOWsN
zB1qBnX(RK&BR@DyM5?@T=yVT=rGKoxqv67;YiFEgrs2)1RqN;Md7)h)MVRukk(AcZ
z)0M}v>v08;h0?`Oh-#bnq4s~3N%at}vv0I$`bzWG!<kivdxIN)aEhXsSvnWX$gT1$
zPh^v3<*M9i-yxK*o@s#5BT&T$KlDzDa+M_*Y^q;5#wz8?(3UvJZm2pF(Q+Z*OgSu@
zA*u$K%3^aFdf?Yzy4?ekc=Btk+!PBFEKMuY1>?r+wv>liHY{~SLlrPBms-evrAYgW
zxyP_t&MZ?TbljinYSSaLrd}qHQ%oUYC_GS6nF4gX0>O7NF9L9sDb<`ON%Hh}4{}Y&
zumIAlWqAjX5BnEaq1ZA&Q7Ji4!O}tO{@|qZRNcL#Njh$IpaeMhpyP&>UrIWJ4odW)
zOAY0wJ=ZK8Vc2^sP3-$h)Ga$}JgymU00<JQsBtJkQ@ATskHs}m3RJVbZtl(aMn34A
zqL%+1cpv`aj;Bv%qboObqaR#~sk$(@><#_MFw-b?UAdiAq|r^HQga2O&Hg($Wfe;K
zbwMQ0H>D6<)&Vd)!-TlIt$YA?eS6jiaDLnMx$42Caf9532Z$`}*sdeIgOp{TfL%o4
zVAKbzRV^Wtnx<)lxOvpoO->1$`|d+iE07D-u8FuSwZm!|G%At0o;yGF_hxjXMK_3<
z_}ceem*FTbR7^rqcp&-PrqFE6ix4TQ<-Fm@o*yo593^Roo!2KJCAb1c@=BTlh0_2&
zdjRl!Z>&jo>|6{~rM`)u0=|1I^fV2(nGFDXKd_^10I@GqZv>=NeLbBGCHyEwC0^-w
zfmM36D!BCHNRk{d>rmNf`0#_}*5cPd4zNrfuX67;d!c*g^kQ%c@Yk9KrEEKCTUc>v
z;mW;%S}#-<L<4Dc{xR`Te*+6U>HGWK0ABSQz%kh@%Ask~7Tc!PQ=S0nCm?Vv<6{)a
zf{tx*1k(u^SU{Gh&A2Y=%W0^ZKpUM0gEWDe7DC%WTTQa$V3%(xv2N(RIXmOtoIh0N
z9F!c?#{nOu4;I?%i-J9-)4CX%pnCvJ6&|1hVimHyN7#2I+;qRDR?~6>r{ct96D6@$
z_NVA?^x8nA>5{79%bk_VOG*f0lt@XN7M5awm64jqb;^<v!lc<_o@+aAYT}cS77U)o
zN9=zuN;5=OqQq)lCIv2v`JpX=Vyf$rt*-IN_f*M@5CrfaY@vkle=&g0(pa1x^<=`0
zPpC^m?hF9^2Dz5UsR9E1>WHdIOIsm3w2y)lKdNDxb#j8o;Sx~?!0Sz;CNomXSGR!m
z^u!OIJBV~*V(P!Lku{AdfLKoU0-VOHFKV=Lc@uz34vjmz1VpD?d7ug=&3M-}im|M7
zTGTcyzu^r!PN0e>!Q<TzJK)eqY~WlbzPMy1+X^uFmG!i1U1hyiWr3~v((9J4^_g??
zHUJ&M*O|~F(%IwHbl$Z?5NM|b%^rE&2s*_sZ)QgGD@wWFUEee8vp>MTvZ#*hH`@cu
zSIPGqmY=)W$;fDUA<5O8))P>OfPYR>IR8^+3FHo*cEiwxVuC|10aOz(P~I3c$8v#W
zIAwc_{%S7e7E05>M9NsLcb06E<`@MC%-DLo`>4LPZE4NhokOYDQa`#6=mTI4Eo{WN
zaFSQi;s9tuRv@?kTbc2h3|!NcqH&@vWfx+!dz8pJAil3qOr{~*0Gzxn<pv*=Ihv|_
z_wil5n%S^Sj%KcfE9A|!^p)02>SB&aJ6$}c50{$edwTNBrc2uW5wEVU00}aNpQA)y
z{nca6Md_MmwTA`W*<wyBy@+{IenTB<ct!7kQ<ZUw^XH}-$#8qEBh5Zw2u6Yy75hZ{
zyo`M6ykWm1@FS4*V0SwC#?Rlj)*0-1p0uoQU;xxU_52>)v*|MvV&>H9<J?KBe&oMz
z%ZfNYf~nsuQFVjY-uBpR+On3vn*ktYE@3nuc_$DsQD5rvy0|~WVm6)FPV-y>oy;1g
zF|)9c0EBWjY_;{(OZ3@H*WTlMGq7;5;*F#>(>fiX9ly>QVlCa;o~msI<S@&dKte{)
z%0>*ub3rHq-F`E^+Sm;sHLtn(@h3DMo9m_dIAbsxH5RACfg-JZ;baVN|IiScGmsn<
zfAv>W5jZJDDC5Nb=JKT9{1Ml7Z{88d3ng81>9V+RI*V%bSi3PH)$BseebH8~r^}80
zL|B>O1_Y#auYp{R)G&}E(pmZYQ@LpX2;}j+`XUk?8!L>xRQw2!fMDs;wXonelFr9E
z`($Wf5Xk%4q4mE1d@EX<82UX1N`>xMi-c7tLuY4piy6Z(-t)&}i*H}yf>i0rpnQ`s
z0G4<`!Y1M&;Bm#DmtJ=oejNznqbI9m0ZK3sa5<vG!~f{_MlRoPu>$oT8=bT)-nvR~
zL3|liz^(%oCQFDs*DF8>{NeuI@=>=+&BD--<gtGN1LbAd>;I#0Z^WT;quHmqxp^&j
zjTwk-&o(&Hde<MN4<)lR0$HMNJl6vtKo7+0D+>!Lz3XpMXdoaU@SRqEqHDWF@GTmD
zHLY^l?27@)K3q;(p@Gb*>&^&)p?#Jrkki=kMb~lyvK*;yXT9vUThY<c3-W|#=jX25
zDUPWwd--=q4Z}-IkHWNi^j4f|Hrj0<5a?*JAvi5)IzTySI*rFYkx!G8?DQVUdbPK=
zM@2<RNlJF?XJuw$OoSZSsmjU{yf+y8Ep}!2RBingNMk&Vr#)`0u0}*eAfcg6-BTP5
z6x99r@dL>Jcy@>4>NX)S^Ik33j^{`<<mPM~9GIJ$QaHS3-PJ}rXUQhMBGzbjt8;4J
zUA@0K@7xOITfBdx+ZIkBFjb=2pKi&N2bA#@sa5p>yS;R<91GXi*_jO_H?p&{spM;t
zCxJv#Cok}w3N>|g-tz&*tF2ngu@<T=3lZ2-*oWKw(%|hRyr5|yd#ai>N|%>(kCY;P
z)y@0(9mv4m3u`)l<-I>??};D;Dv^!`A1zkX(Wq2Trqr#9Rm#?Yl0H1TZ-1w?JvG(U
z`-@6A3)9onq4C{DdV9r6r_oVR0?-3&GCWlW=8Mpl;=bN@q7Sn^aie=u(9(wSEpCLF
z&z5fjB|_v>R2!^&b9}_4q`apcALD4XABSTaw3fUd=G*wBQn~5?YayQ_2?GoJac~Tf
zqdMDdhC=Lz!-|TE{n0FcGL+L>pdxXpqRJ-f(SY8{tYxOAkv1b>psg))SLfTe^lSN>
zn;SR)Z1XxCr~r9ZZZ59tka~x&YQ;(iZb{PjwQ+Y>u`RM6Nu>_}W{q2n1C^5C8b?<P
z*o8LL&hBpBiwXI)<t8ALV`Fdc{&=&!J(wi&R32Y*1;L3^ew`M|o5uEiEyEwr#?B5{
zNxe6)Ky=Sd{ObfVly(7HT3RUk$$rDZ#K}_amK=W=7#Llp-rnAOIZe*O1V*D~pin>x
z5#r68quCVP?zH*f*o8Rjo3qWen;ic%&&Qi4=SM{e%M~(*X5Dt1sHi8*Xz5&eCPFQ$
zONO<iy**Rl;bxb|%e0TwxpMh%h`2a7M?mJ>^@MsQc3^MOaXE#@-DO;$OdE}v=yC`|
z8|<89pLK^Eq<swJl{-$b+R67N;%HDykxComcs+p+5(b{3KE(sMbjQcx#84cDye)6j
zqg3vvI%03+!Mg#*;Q$LwH@C*LwB;YKA$aZ%7!B<gRcB{_F1+qQv4NO`1S}jJP$ux(
z_|Vl<e65D~_Wfu}Y;5crc6)B6%D{a2{!*MZP>u;C&dgjwN=uI=Xq$+%^z`-ZXth1p
zx4e;;7p^4Ma^d#sTVz32u+TB_@oYM6Z_8lOgusc`Men5L*x|mpIhUSr0$nAb_;sQi
z-!nNX%2p<%r@MQ*ejhQI{r@l||MTKYD3D0xy<bI?V*QK=4}Un89h{Ve4OG9RD*_q4
zz@a9m(@gQ~z2%lCz?%T2Os|lsG-|B@lM1dL8OadX-`fK!tX?5c0LkyedF2ByTFv?n
zrdO}R32A6b)N3pexlaDxoNoige88CLX>fE1sA^cM{l2~)#;f)9>tD%NuZ%60-OfWI
zB4iB=vZZse0Y?x`E*}rfRovIzoeR`myng-K&tFwlmD}}lp~46epzgo;H-hzu|L*#X
z^Iyu!pDVoo(-Q9g%d&D28y)BWRY=arK>uIAc5vAG8Xj0<Tl!<Z6#{Gef3e*Ee+ZZZ
zE5ombVq>BHZO{MZ#Z)#{rvG|J29^KQk<BR@DPR?jT?3)1QmQ_={(5TTgT4uThuAtA
z+3l4(3bBaIM295~(;w=wv7PTr*hAq=dxZ>pgB?XxKCvT9E1|N|MQBE-!N!?+vD<sP
zXQx9F!zGi*dPl5><00dL_LNxpRO-zP>=p?VySnMW899EBz|1z)BHY`s%<@*smW?h|
z<jwkiE_DBki@=fn+t6rF!k&&;Uh_di%QFpGxh0nwMp48s8-$QcHQDQ?`q-2hSz5BK
zJib1A#|ih?W&Jb)9h1N|9D<I3Af)J8NdEnF%|dvAcVmK8a;|L%C76(KtGzsa*2k!~
z!fNI3a701YB?+23mOwDaA9-%dPh*u^9}3Yswak}OM`M;wx+;|{zd#Wn31xo#i`{Rf
z=k1E?C2zlM84V}*_Vq0(O|fe$2wsTOiW6aZNM^|6SF37iN<`||h_727O=(N$b<Zos
zs!5#rR%bZIAN2XDlZ@N_1Cv@N!rX)G>(}`j56%oN3$n&=7HG*&*hv=e!hUPE?&XfV
z!4*}vaR?Wh@(o5$*)c7SN>!>>XJs<v4n;1CH}D<4hdce6>|-I*)Z1F5yw*F@MP2^t
zk_P>jwp%!5b@i_CEZy+lR1*DNLhqVp!EoM9b~PfD245>@`D*IQwwD+lUYAnXX`SHf
z;1F6{lXo>kOh3u#W20RIbO-ys&p?hM?CE6w#+}6*ZK8kbHA7(6>Uvsq$ERyCAU$&Y
z${8X*LnXbM!B+O2V<tti2X*4zsE(4*?<g{}%F`NE;;b7<gw57WxZr6bk2|;OeMTQ5
zd!-QDk-$t(V;+nFKJx)&T^Q3a@p&(ll&*^e;^NLk(uPl}Kk(L6poypoh|zQo?hh_o
zHKU5irwrxm*0MHrYr`z6y4Um%vp}X1f1DC5(LyOnK79U!`=z5hLw8@XA{PVx@_4=)
zp6LzNpYa~p>bFElUWQdwntdk@giNb`!lFXSFoM+Qb!LZ4xr2vLI%TqzfBD4A*gdQL
z$;r0qxb^Kr=Vk&Y%W_vZ4^-rM3^QUssr+b>rE|%`>W53p`~<pjxN)$W8Zv2>`$oSn
z?-9X-SJ~q6WS8NW&iZlS6GHRrJ^S;OkGjf_Leh(i501g<TH4+uJT-Wg2oscuCq-_h
ziTl-w_pjf_7|#5Q>H>E2f3#g-`G4}7tC9q`ZxYag>|m6~DMCq&J7-)%{aar?b=_-d
zsCR>K1jKX#cgGFo2j3vu!{s<q*dnRiA20J`P&B-}9s=ifsz7SD*a@=VW<RMzbo^3-
zR?+-xes(b`@}wDt!;e+-FyFhIa<Re$-)oUiY%v<{S0S`2RyZQE%vt_q9d+GqS6*TC
zCY*meK!*duV#GOtAdFr(KDAx8O5IFRbGbN{*Hmh<w0^XxP){gXWPC1RkB6H2yhBS$
z1NbV&&7oegW>vEG@)YT~w+IWj!TC_?dANB+Xr$JtE*uuta9;GV3oeN;{U`p8ogU(3
zf&C1E2}w*rOu@2m0_zx1c~_X7h5?Z}6TQ9E`YggIK4hQ(y-o`6Ml3IkVn*(ryUyJk
z3(^ojGQtANBc0=}0310SLJE7+z=bd5+$1#QLfB*Csr+*-Rfk7*9v9;C0~OWG93NbI
zfBK33ZS;+RSX^TGaqmJ{gSetyad`78bk;CcVb6x^hZalIJM%_`qHm0#e$(GXD*EI&
zuT$O+$N7lTec@&+DiZAMy19v77SPcZ-~lmrp{Ur9<%oa^`dg>)qZW75`=Z`sgh1ww
z1QC&6h>*S?GC2H{!oAey9<1?0q*Lq+6-Rt_c(Vy*T2_^>pyYD4><2Vab*A#4`T%E4
z(x`$njzpaSO`Fhbcq<D9RbP~;)*N~S_Gl;S%}vFpFvNveZt@a49%v$JvM+ie9r+T>
z7S$gKpnb(ggT{7x{)k`sh16NmcB8`RzL5xJ+`*W;lXt}Y7OZsNweR{jI7S73EMd8?
zBxE-+T~^`(^%ncX2v22?U{d)C-k6=oEiE=>gN)ofD4|dmt^Uc{t@=kK$k3}V+>v_p
zTfC19)9gK(PgT<5P2<Ul3Ath4F`u{ePs8G$MVs687Bv^WR<n*0jQ^$t|I(X?mHof(
zO|+>j@xOYHpq=R(UApgNQ~$KtYiC{g%9kPP6J3eC*K%Am4dbx(g+Dk*jri2kf!CAs
ze2~Ww6;K232sLss@yIhJH581(Q7m|KYGlZG&!54g{#9{W8i6c63RZpF*hU0XO~!A<
zszLe;c?m1#bMj+kpix>MjmBE>`+B?(QjS-YcA?Z0=wGl>;?OQJ^n7k{LW3V76~3SA
z@!TmPqx1F$QK6CsS(Hp>k9TVBC2snO^;TcIF%Lg2MQ;SnP7Yq3Rr08vn?wz-2cCz!
zF@{EInivN3#EfIeNtEx?(T9@aH2e*igUm4gK-yPubq+T!dz+~jCp&7E_l5(NA(}N@
z$O}RIU4GGw|C(Z#`eJ8=f<+^~W<HuhJ()Ot<aeqrA{Q?YT&%^6E2sh*%MncP*d3Fh
z%1h_TajcMWSW*ON#n^(F#JvLkA@u2r{?`zy7#U+ds|0tAwGtzI7IqGt+BcZ)23xwc
z=-x_wXR9a;M&%WcVY=nnrLHhg$PtyVd&Z{9DeqeJZ6A(HF_+quA0nqDHJ?Q2^J{+f
z{#}g@Ol0iV-<bTM+9@4KyXFOxM@|SmESN8xdBG@q6+%eVz*Qqv5l`4>8k?(3!^#R3
zcDXMNCFrN$1RKM!v$+z-wR5e|T4#rs-62Ubp$U;9uA#u##_SfEOt#HK`Np7x%r_&H
z*i2l!S^t*`np&V=F03>AwtFgFGrE2g@`kaXP3$iTD~Ac_%C<WZ9E&<U`^qyPlHZzD
zvkH!gXF-<ir?O!|TYgHj@`AR%f<8ON=39BnRK)fP6CL7@4J0OO1d-B!gw#{4G)HUW
z@Q>A479uNLg#y*01VnP!p+d|Ci7VzmNDT;)1Y*cl(#a^N#8ijPue(Hyw)R08|I{@u
zaXWkvs$`t<($vzdX3=#n?YS4`{IzRHco$@j&+iHQhT{j&!$j{7^20=OOE4=X;oa}@
z@}Jl+MUA3lxQC_cyh;3NAO|1u3P*U^+(amRq@;UVYmLg#Whw5)l)$93x|($6bTze4
z?l-RET#l0)=;X#y$^W8kjQ{f1Ff%K|e-9QFq`+NFfS2P>jPVBoqVvLDH^5ocUsNJ4
z&*Ax1lD}sfM25q-JQh*?uA56Uf`CESQKr9px*OpV`O}ronx2uA+C*Z`(!S%z$KW-p
zKktx*W)@pbFE>?3Jg0$|<L@-@j;D5m?WwT%Xw*Fz*()XgXoOMh!ug@x@?ZYU?ZBU#
zb<-jI!*{HjuK8LO#3#b`O&n%Uy|!S;jA3$ocyUWaO5>pf8@ZqaUSgNpG<NT<y~Hhr
zo9cKk>GCY$Hm*F0*6l~K@3{ub2bb!R55)SDV<y+}?Ax%?0>=FNS&?=DW`tYkC4bGw
z>NaMLqQ6bxU=!Oaq!%WCRpM&Rhx~v*_l1&vGK3<3DehHS`>UxEI0cMz<YEc#z3;ZX
z1kql)Z<x^7kH)tk%%dGdkpk@f&40=&pPoB>gRe$PVf)mn`mvm^#1d{{4=4sUw>~NK
zE@{<!$9{m+oUa;0E)09AL9R<XAQR*DF6z%-aQB>QqWDixdZE-HnFKuUmp6$JD~l-p
zo%*#RqRDF`25fLDSZ5hb&DM_>2?rfJm@t0zz8YWAiR@MXep~cV-ms9!OR`wPs)CV2
zp4lwi)IZqY|4zs`Lq<mQrQZK0XmJ^R%}x(;!&<RXtz*>=-NT4G$1UnZ<Y|Hj?ECs3
z2nj&{czX>z8X5dqHh*2gn(^I;(J%ZdGf(~xn^;}H=M&U?ypIE*78|dB&BT=U<m0D!
zszI~O8z<g!Qp~^_BfPgO;gVUrD`vidV3;(X{1;(l`rluI{-=RCE8Bl>`4^S{S4*9E
zoPnU|JZL{nKb}9S)y&*g+;Hx2kg;~~EO2*MSyY@=AC1I*7Lf(z#D11fYYx*V>if$|
zXU)Js2^L45y@1!GXq~Fxkcfi*)cQ7zZdZwwmIwvXU+rH$6_0c5_nN$&wYcfs7-49=
zDB2b?qWe9<QJzx!{$7WJgRL5ACjE+vt_h-i$2-*eZ#1%`)rzhg69HrDlLps){D-h7
zNeW~vZLHWa&a`m+;fle<j<A*`+P;(3hl|4vQ<r)Yy{G|iJ?ZdGw&8>z!pbgwAz@}Q
zG7TPThMaQga60G9*>anmVt)#P2HnfT91XTz!l;7W3*~RYC{$ch4NSU08Hkz!eA~s5
zMIl3e>0I?ASY+>|C=kBiH^&F<7Z+#-e(}oJbmV!Puc>r_TQRt1P`YNJhB{o#g5@=)
zT^z`LA;e<k<IGAnlQ%Ju*r@P(x|4=*P~hw9kVT=w#S&)A>08~ORqd)$pRGg=BD3c|
zs03Qkl{4U|e!Pn5D%~aB_wV%k0-?LeA?euQj?q@YCIrXs!oNd>I^G(h)euOQR#F5r
zN@eLR3PI1IoMumE&Z&O5V?4)x90=o$E?Q)mjQ9{t3Bh`M#H38n+Il=^Q~m4Mk!}1<
zIu3}E5-l%$glM`y+5`FRM3iLv2iyx}9mvq|sufX;U*<Vh+(Gr`obDGQ-)=~spbGob
z2Et!an?x#!-pPJaL$Bi|H~!<G@F(d<t<;YaLj&G>*oojVqb%Rz-%Tf0WtYUC(u4E+
z)1a>z32$m4o^l3e2DBpX#V>nCXiyZ0yqS&N)GYa{l@oYtitCKepaeQ2kczbkDHbt%
zZPvw}8i_}?q;Qz=pvYmU&YDaO4*HKAxJ&23+Le&LM4Qwf$!4dv)N__v$r!j9lC#3O
z7%bN;9D&xx)6VOKmGZ?RK}Q}X#2k+%&B1UJCul2JD7X8UG|>e5pl6LIw>Qtuy68tA
z@6w+ffPw|g#8{Q_B=3)UhgH1tN2HK{O2uG$TR;rquFP|Od!vzd59w<9?do4t?0-LC
zyu^cmE(7v*7Vl}LKhe_xT?B+pY;1wn0rWugfPXZQo`LD5E5N7!qAh@Gza=&+%Hpu{
z0&V>2=6>XtaG`^~p3FQQgNUgUenn_s*lC81@2mIj!!cbY1!BqchqBm}ux4auC(T0y
z{?W7H1l1c<Wu&1IDm`i-;_^`>BO9ocpUK1e5RiJk?}gBNNrECNlf<Z~Fd{K}T*OHt
zY@<6PU^~oxei$P7C9fomrmdi)>`jT2Ao?%e^{u;x3*x0_8Js1>b2-l-RYjfp;39I)
zvW>;V{mSf5)F-1;#mM>biQTVHL<(yCud_ZXJ)T!?z-c%$ygtk}&^DosOP`wMGi^C$
zS7uJy8yJ40Bnlm_Qvx-56e`pAe4>>+uL5&Sxd<T9k%;7M>9M2V<`b%(I;|1vc*K4s
z{@q3LQNu}ignTUlf|$Tc_O}nRiW^aMkC6=KGT~k-b!q@aHpq*OZi84f=4-t^oWV@*
zI}*}ppP&6spRHKb2#JRLWQp_<j9Ne23Qx4^;dvi@h`}gUk5-|-hRaO+@|!O+aa1lN
zi2!#3iCYcs;%(ySyFSjo9_xXx3YC3ien?!&lpkB;gEEpZ6j4^Fgo*k_WKec~okDMO
zaDNm|eh<m@14pT|EJ&U?7gR1U{ukXWq!ous1Uc8{`!~Y$O1L^P$vFs43<1In0uEfL
zsL5Rf_`G;-Q%gJMPe*S9^SMS(<eHoX29pz`CjC*FyX`{XV{l{{I?QU0%-3L)CL*R;
zs+mfow^S?IR@NWQ?H{4>D}9?xuBs_)xF~O$RIJ*)X@1zWIkmKx*{;WOx3>SG{;tYU
z8XfhZ7=5~C!j(s!maf@PG0)X(O~0wWVU)ONnMKyzYv(TMW~w7ZTFoPK%XkT=##4i4
zz9PzTqA}OfefqNO_&4aZJM9mSX>K8zAiQ76aY+eHL7ad*B0L0{m%3*0)Ok{8IdM&j
zP5n;2gS%9d@9|MXlyl9F+M1Ne<iOVrDR;w_iNsW-5!0G?#WUUb9*@PEmO96t%2W9M
z($j^TjfXopC80(WZpO!)kU#$tx(uvV6wSRZoRaC;%ZX(9MdLzl*N<5Ji$hn2!l(Ij
z%!~vsez?;1m5IHBsagv5pdxwYHbn!+rtS`_Wa0MfVrNseCd}twg9K7qbqGM%^G@z_
zxnteE`O&BMDE#=bDHC0&pGgVI6ILa0T+A4g|9TzI@4&5QgsgvaGhY8f{xSGdqC1ig
zQ`I|uyg_sFN?zQud`Q+j{vAPvnQW(DM1sS&{?Q%Zv;%0D(L1=w1KB*v;`q~IJ4AOV
z#dYIuHJyJ&wr2U{ME!&t+FZ+x{rQX6JdXcPN?Rku%nI{N`_v^q^m^kmP=<^7)a0JJ
z7G-Wcp|(07!^L<HzviyJ{}ZA#6uA_Q_i5>!obhmRw*lw8+|CAit)`fyXxV{$a{C0z
zHd|ti+)n!$e3b}0Y{ti?-Im(2<08;7K3Z<n>m<5soyppK-}IKau*b~`j5|=i71iYz
z);pj2t1YbvO}xh8i>G(A2FemoL`}mtIt>_is4gP9h<~P@s&iWY96fQY%G6F#BTk0r
zDtj{zU$cskR~yava2RO+dO%z}ok2LdHD7-{@oD&5Ey`U?Q)}OoYkMlz!U@jG0?5>Q
z*r^U(4<F%NP6VcN##0X7e+ID;m+WuSF6xRiSE1e?&o_0ex@G@jN16YnAsId0e@?0Y
z_l9y&W!Y+h1<s?Tg+I&@0|3rs;@FoApzf($ize<WcZ{(dvJs+wo%TOZ9?|xfv!OH&
zoU~*?8bcgOj~!vZMa8EYS*N&`XL?aDf?S%$Ij5W){w`taLUkA;91l!x#ktbDe^*|?
zIInGb^gOrg;=qKLVo`r20j<0n+`Q<CT=F8?g_~_+gM8F!sdL)OB!DIOkn|A42h9gU
zfcYIg@L23z<z6q)&~$Tdeb<d(ayMMU*L7$np&{IINM~+UJ}^mR?)hX*R+Hvd>sI4h
z;rTtRi#-v2m@GlE8@jK+>8(+Ui5G;Vg2K&BIDz7>KJxD`1h6c4Ua&c0Uz!6RCQUUI
z#!8Fi@8+D|$bI|11)4MKuYL!G`JUl=MWI`1#{iz<N1XH*S?lTWj>9XV=m%pZTpOmI
z@Ooz}({K)=ak$Q*sBOjG1}0(|T-GAK-OQ@*9nB*-6?DsrFzVTf91-1TAoud7+<YkF
zZ;Qw!mZ@gR+qcG{_7{1=Tc!TyK--UXl~C;rqq-wi?CJOGv?jfN9I8k~;TKmre!G{|
zev@B=KFzxRTERsdHO-vX;UDOXVfqvr#aZzE%bQZg23c2zI=+HMu0_N?Ze*{wQ=g?i
zWNl<V?S(K~U91K#_y(|g)?`jMdGjX5&Ap1|=S?^Z@P*;Zl`Z<!{^g5V0>@_;9N)IL
zh(9aWML)$3f3$u*vx@x26q&#yoDZ5s|3|ejUqj+=sWA>56?MWEG=Bth0)GRPH5^E>
zIq#y5m4J)9w>_qwg%!nZ>Co!IUO&Q2dVWyA1-uf_Xj_^2o;<Cc(Z=Lg8yg|$9Qhs1
zT-2T4rYf|C@A#);ZQxrJfr!VlSft4Z9TnEYlJ6UPo#`k!!-bF@8n7hP)rFNaP0~|J
z=eA1}*^z0kw&A7D3Pw}H#w^^yJl*;rWYkk$gKfg-9B8ZEpZuwI+p%*2RQ&i>%gP6#
znF^gu((dG0TMm8WM%WQY4+{{%GOz`m%*GC1E0`wFczS+pvraCozW%<jX~4iz>%i=H
z9<4DZ*9J>QElMg<M3769Bq<7ME!v-qzLgTE_%Zb&mBzT+1h+t>2vR}lD!^pQvxxJN
z38YAD%i+!^i1r~~B3XKyPz%LvXVEm6Y7bjyBL_>uf;LJ`2Qs!uI?|LPp%kH`>VED6
zWB`ZM{M%qq)!Shw<|M1e{M73BT&as1X1L;p%Sz>9-5n+>H+~a3(K;Wmo7ruvVurcg
zP05%n9;Z)(gCVgADD^QUX)L~IQgOKXNu+-}w!*`ZNUuCJX;?#3@^ZcmzO7g6?auG6
z;JZv*w5`3`E|iGbK|FciJl(~)DK9V~gv)TBBAc<D6EpCKyu8b(S(9fmN$QBAlG0{H
z;w#~f_c{<dbGGP8cf^KAiX3?Z@8^65A4%Jy+kk0ttaWckz13ShHqjCVB?6hK1>vs5
z!+Lm?JGY^&Otk!O*&pVA>vjkH`10@n-Z1@dAAtf6^uQUaJ0mV5%p%vK=TCdRz$mfB
zk80J5H;a!CWc>~)6N`xgKM6v~`tf-^K3~vT!$3(J8Foji$+_kdLM5x982uCqCu=i&
z-9Ot+D*coKK0&G9xqQFX=OzjHluKPBi9r2PW5L{D3=@tV6nKE^7`QxO1Wn5F1{;(L
zxh3%_m}lo5v?O`!J*Qi7C~%@bd@y{-A}R5hhKEr!0x~~5lT%8;=llCd{o9Fd_DSxs
zRi#79Neph4^(qs~TgPdV`*kLTm2aJ0hHNPZ^ZVX~Nc4mTRnoE#Ox`s4oyZl(s<4hK
z)freY&$R|3suLA0iMJuaqlY4@9_RdU=KQQ9snl6n%SdP#BsX&N8e|sKO_<A;nNh#`
zp|ITxm9?wff!L66>Ika3;Y{!ilUjwoX6slqKZ)ehgW_jQseZcP_Fij*j~4+fp;Mnf
z8Nis2`q88b2kZRGpSn^G)^IJsQ{qLJuTT7-81FB9#oaLUa2Va_Gu7SnzDz{Xu}_Dz
zkN(G?ZA`idij)xijvcRk!2ZSNmnbI41NGQ+SLF(wDwK>@&J=1uUp-;6L^(YB(OzEP
znngTfd9HfxHz7{OYRJ9>*;@&ah685A-xxBFVCT2eb*5qnXf@{y_oL^gt0!EXpacva
zi0ryz<SFfP(K;Xach+idVn;y)yFM&8L$jE7Ae)6#H#^_wC;@r3qm^SsfB@+mh6Msz
zH2UNt-(}S>a&7v0p<lxw$Mkf0<A?+np`Xw_?VG#Y*ttgONW~T7Z3ToG9y^cgkDb7`
zO_v5oR1lhpvFvS6Fv}>dBIJ2pPL4?aj;iJ6w}?Qd{4o5QzT9U!UwyZ=fk?EpF8eR8
z7wBpCKawQO^#6U7U=Rpdf%`cgm&UIj>5$^huZKaP3(D`jhUqCj%&<UK$)69mpy+5Z
zGPfEdLah|y=bv?IygW~0#n*z==4&;{4y6htE;Cbo$&w^u2EKuVRZ&Vy#koDEvUz8c
zdf0MaAvL8p_D*hYEDzl9j`e|$q?jN7fhA(zySu~6Xj0$wjj`{LiQg<T(DAMu-0@C_
z#sB<PFH5n>RD&C&T(kI~yHweskjC_TuVL`d?NWG&CreyK1!<%w`j~zJA<^#C?tzkt
zLYII<2SzbvC~dSupaX-w2mT^*<n)N?FF#n|g<IS*EGF{~9lu8M54Nw$ezh_Rf=un|
zF$Bty<s?FhZD2fAx0E{v8tw*1G<nVI6{Yz@AM~r0G0V|n#=iXaO_X;ZqD37rIHzL%
zRdYfp;F@ks_fDae+AYE~rT_<up}aFdt>C<IXs|{oflJ?gu{`6eQL(_2|A)tFfeNi%
zj8d}R$<fRjIE#0Ags4p@+S_kJ7|G>jp@QH9>WxLr(zHW4^Fm>MNmAt_-gq-E;Z++a
z{B%U$?)>avp?zKa9b>#HQaGj=`Ih<J4hjRqXxHDdS0;5_^HIeLiP_q4YP$yPqGZ_X
zo}M1#?F75^k=VbR`UPFbHyS@%^s9fE`fh)gadl!ztkZWa+e((cNFLsFwy=3x#eM^s
z#>|QFFG2-`JpYGKu>#*V`|r)BlnnNBlhA?hwljg<%RC@CRAY7pia~g`SF<DO=5KC3
z09l8brA7UZUp`gI#poY8r5P;^G?qawc>k#Q$%YXqvUVD%{MI;Y#29i6gXru}!8eZU
z@0GhP*rQJP+a~vp9&`GKk-{Iw(b6KBD8#IluNc71oaY3qu@T`t@eqY`U%JfFrM@Ar
z3|0Q!{^89pQfpN=d~sPS|7w*<*7Mo=L^ufsg=9D}l;A<r8#W@<dpxbM;V`lmw6Prp
zsDO#8nBL-WvS@FH590e3%ajBbl^h&ZmiQXTkx^g8;rjG<rhjqL6@10)d_>-m_shc*
z#0Cw0`9g{%q4+UkD?q&54`O>K*V!Y=zt_A;b<naVX_jI0ldlKE5+$5T2)}5~%2#L1
zep_eiZ*8>0Sz5_{+i#11dhri`eQkT)+u0|y3q7V5_1@bVadfbhLZ&)!#himko2b0-
z_5y>gLVpCSzYe~qqdYe_qg==yU5EADdFipHDR**~BMfo=f<!sEza|dagj#%cK1d6O
zKx+)Tj7QQxk@mQu4;oHs&WAp)I1o#h+$dd={M}BkSG%ycorZd6(`vlR$pL+%s@hNf
zTMvWvu23PfK9N!>P5k<B2e!b_C)U>w2XYk<#uFLxx9t+*v@w4cHWzdwzp6GZ&m|>!
z;MSfFNZizP_<OTkj}LRhP9*8&+zEeeU`<dvQk(s(CPoz*y$3YIq^dF1nk?#uVpqor
zux@g98(5nM4dsP}29n|jOMeYgfEgl`=wXYMi;^Md+47>!BTM`XG}Ki(WnouoaN;c~
zmA4xCQxM>bWi`1KL|25$BOvL>*_b5gSZ#Etrb@%2jkjRgCVVdQH=R+m$CyQY6?4tz
zv6@qYXBZB@_I;HkykHM);_~BtiC^<*?rZIjW3&3kR#+*BqI>tl6_bYcpkjv;gI=98
zqwaKquMTk6nvXPN=UMDG5IEkuUjL>p?Eh0;*#2LAAK>8S`v4&w*%Tv}U#o~&SAM)p
z|HLo8Bk*vQ;yzRM5h6nl_&&h2*6?~#f>l@Sny~11t_W<(v!F(vlTeg7GCDOF2B;5B
zDw=`&y>ZmpPnMAD?v2v>E$8DTW+_Z4^cJU*d3;Dg{hgnp)PPTAN$D5Xnmm6h>v!WP
zn5jslakHQAi`H>%KJb4SPhczNnItMSuqd2dTeEz0VlKpHQo)@fE4(`{+^oUMztv2W
z;kD%RpdfO<7W65hCay_DavF7dV>7!iTTJC@fKPd8Bvo}k+8{Q4b!vwzgMMEAbWUH|
zzQ|~zKNWutp*=w3gkAC1+{0OsvS{i5qU;@mENi<h(X?&b)=t~Dv(mP0+o;S++g4TD
zwry70&b;~c>C=7gJ#XCZZ~xf)$BI}HYsZ|=nsbgZ#~7e`jI#imBF=L!n8oR!;o?d*
zX{>VfT@5qMMu8Vn<c{tlY{V8^?J1`kimAdCt9b1g>pQ3Tm+MbeVA%o~QLL6B*()+(
z5lUK)9zuFnEy7SwGB7S3EvKbk&*j^Sgpx5DD>JIaNorlS$n3mK9cd>*Dc^0O7!)tP
zB8hX35o}hD4D)_Cp|Juty&w5(C{s?XSSOET-$#On{X#&%V7mF1%ywI<6CBYH!C91h
zYX^4pRy~}vIPi;6TtT|v6tj%iQTXH=X+Cl|S_c#q_sKDc2rPeDb<YxK6!~SP0W7p#
z``pt&PqmEK9JD4>+%YJug?Ir;dn|38x$c5BHTYb{lI&?bFy5fC)P2lG+#RedjXYFn
z7-V*>&?r#xSz~IH1da=%<lm@f0W(R*(ehNqLh;{LX85aqcsLA<?CTq4x#EgL=fZMw
z)DuGB;nxMsq}A85Mn1&K&E9!K0?1U%ZKa@_f7QX_6JNUUS@s9_tc<MH;|g0(+{3T>
zsr-y6Dvz(f9&|YKcTac7D3Y880!tgrAJ=b{iF~pl2@+`L0#Bhw$TSD-BV#*j+sEOl
z%6L`MPJ?<&?JI5r4SpwPq?f$0uV9NlnN2@7H#pV}yadV0vwsn3o@kPdTCjWc)5U*F
z<^uM;7aYcEW@O3LMRy<%x4XN3MC8wgL$hXixQU8%j-U7h72RbkT;#Yt@zZ5_v>q_M
zw2CVNvEhUGrNzIw_}PA&Z{8zFO8!G0euE?b?X|_u_V3g}>)-C1aK6(TCrTg~Y72{A
z_)8d@VZgMvEO6c<Vz#kdj(=BZAD>9+c_vLk*MLF8IMXDR4!9(mz5(ATU4?~FC{B>L
z_!FfGZqjUkEDt3x%o3R!$BR$P_j{|D7UtK}es?8n)B_z3Q&Q{}P8A!@ij!|qks8YY
z6AYIfuiU#E`=8$|;PcX6wfLEv%uI8T_a{WgF*Yqm`Y)9E=(VB8lU{nM?M)~u4n2(E
zR9%*tUbKRDxqIv9AJ_*1N_`E9$S!BD`b#81L2|Gz;K}1tR9_-iC~0?bjLPdUb-aL8
zy(Qld)3ugWCDe&_UVCML{Wzho&tnmAxmc0;?gc9S!m4I!dkZzDuFeq*4{%QR=)DP>
z#|9F9Cw*O*{MUfHceWZ|Ug-*2K@+iw86lOihFbKCvgW5Q)_7?j)u$3z&Y0MuifE|D
zfFP>z_|;8r!bReQIZK<cc3#)XnWQW#;ERMe>5Qd)qN!4SwQ4R)l0DOA3e%NiWR*Xq
zotJiaQ0cj5yFsQfp$KJHI1My_w2gxcNYakViMM60%zla`%S}%d(^XYbGVr#*Z%rmR
z@-0N8&!a1z3~Dp5esZW~t9bVWf**8i63XEGaNBiQMN3VDXQ3}FX1}(3=QHa%8V2Sh
zy($W&ZnBi$pnY9d`fNEhVMt~B4=0=cb`)jT`p;qADTGUO70%Nh<_Ix=V#L<y#yRfc
zjZY&_=7^8xggc#m(;{z3GAe~rLTm`#M*gI^p}u-b@yquZp3)`hQaskVzmm8@dwtge
zS&Yl)oTvMuG=;%esQ9ww&tOfH>VaC2SA&z>b?$(<fo;|x;2xKFpyk`f)9u=CR2uyu
z{GTWwT>n5}Was)fw5-+sS6Ej+24gF6$bg0cw>Pb9wH(^w!wkD7S4m|>H@dvNDy403
z%dt0MLBPq$MU})MAfksgLhqj&^$=>2MVl<6?aEq0YfDiyL5PmCqqk%G@UGo&Yt1Zq
zbvJ)qX31AU&L()SzN_ScP$#5DgOa0%ZyaVPYz__g)Jg>J{%MkRVEP`Ov>8(M9-tv}
zaUQRn{PLCJFSSVGo>Vk$$i<Mmj&kgbwo5*ea$W8yP_s+ouq;Wk)U~fnPyc0tz3Ewz
zwAh5DA@}NfzgyO~P0hs1!F88PL&_^t+B=qIIuyv>Vk{NW?@XKyY94aq34vw`El4js
zM=pVV_k$3LOH%^#n)uFCa=rml0vC^DekTM@i`V3^1Cc@~p-hXh8tdos;-m@p+c%Yi
z?rhPk@nMd<{pziqPyjTHm&^oTGDqcszGo4dT{VlHas&^=6a}2Bc*K$D_nFI#Pga4n
z9};|Fa%1Jf?ExL#<EI$<yO>(h$ol7O1(aDk%~%xC451_%tD#^LQ$1qPyluW*bOdv*
zT#1~627gz1gTYzDnw|OhXms$n!-kLRjL$?b(IRPw@Xd@&;5*q!Vhvu(p!|}U<Jpzl
zf!4%vqQfFvHAJQ@+=3sr%W8<?DJ|7WTrU4Zf)hskB-lgWN%tOaCf!+{QHskldzp=!
z7;B~XWW^fJn1I!r>bi14VuE+?X_!tCV@?T=X~6mlC~>Yknk4DRxy!v^>FSWeoJ75X
z!n8NXUwCm#fW-n_wynR?p2tE|7wfOnx6x-4l&4^t9a@@=m)^*L4UcC)VG-<-nU|(H
zV4al^A=l2l1kIwxQj!Wss0lexZ{Vv-pJ9dg#0%(0)JBsa-!dV;V1C~iid784Hlx#H
zO9{*ARiF@A!X|5;`);F6?(}ya99dO*|M%mah3UV-b^jBN<7E0bx)SwuyEQ>1-(%Xx
z>J}P>M?cRpl82<SM4DoFWx_e$0ODR61152)&#uNTKt1uKm~Ao4wH~kc(L~m&F4Z66
zlq`f3z41EJl^Vw|lyWdCYA6jDtZ$Klq_f`TV6iV<*fH&G`?YVEnSWU+V%=EYDNK<;
zO-Xj0m?|qXO*KW@U|xcD6C%XPhmdClE&WK`1sH-f^<vxga7l!rI%WJQlBG2L#XOj_
zzFLORIs1EK$S(VriI)c9{>aGzo`f0~L2R_A(l%tYRDF4+QAc$&%i<_YCr%E2$W!}u
zVgV_?Y`Le15{Zrsi)kVWBAUR&m=mj*zBYN`%tWbcHcN(VC8ut9i!`<vt`8k$u|0<2
zXWQR65=p_|l`6d`*Hwv1LjWiYeE%nFGkUlB$Z@ko8GhKDTh6X0k3)7ib+ONRV}fj~
zHCUupV6g`a2WEKo4>Hb~xfTrgo4-m_z;U-rb|0mZRn6YXW>MNU1i%L<&r{csYA%g9
zhx5kg^*NUcC${Y#*ycD`VuOD`k!76PwO^!#ZONnV(a!n#Hi(n{q-|U9BN}-W6w2wL
z!B2O>L^X85%b`v?^S==rRMXHhgCHoM?YzpUL{zHPcX&d?Je}z?%Z7_E$u_9~pYuiy
zal!m$Ti#L*Nc?4j!3L<tlNIgfrvR_wo@-QP)3lnGA%q}WJKy9BD^5(kIEi097^1i`
zQY){iZVI?cXvk-#_57n-@&i)oDL)iQ+PnFomC6g4AD%~o788apbwF`v*Qc|iz$EBu
z>OIh&?2j!S<^VM>OJ_INpPv2}F4Z@s7ES5>ayosqW5XD4wT)Ouje*T5UoZ^VVM%AC
zr`#<Cc#aN6IO%=sNah5LGnLmeV=l)RZVe(Ik35G$kbaWdcR)MG)5W11pJk|89v01k
z&7C{xR<?A|0AHTl@=>(ZIYUDLV<^P2y;`?IbGSY#8#j4uak#6x;mh;swXKGka!>&b
zM~&#A12L!%vj3)E7m@GG15nwHIEP?%jXS@=kFdnUnryz;4yFU+NW;D3e<j@o)=vAi
zF8lQI(E+AcJn82@B;EgOXX1Y*9RToeQKFpJzRgSTXdf*QFtnvA<E=~OO0xCVc9%|x
zkt8iephDPf{e3lB_~CYe!Y5pql0K?huP(H;q1}mgy~yIt4zNA9SV(#kFihB}NCHm`
zTLTVH=3(djIbd)3x7_c}P7jP03y23A29@%WwTUN|Aye6ufA2UEv)*uCXP#O(74uP1
zSE+%`ljmV9F&AV(5%=6<bg>Z**JzzTIc~)2kl7Fnx2)QlaWpP|Saoaj#&*jKbkup<
zc_q^h|8c+>s+bBg<RH+-4S_FdbzrrVdKHJU92G^B1~dlc|7G5sAUz@(3YA*1?PVi{
zH`-%lAuJwD2X41yhT8wZ*j5D+h;mwEL;>qV3u5x4PaV8bN!4tA8#Wg-3*|!z6DwQt
z34Gonxu*@vU}QxEfFjl@_bykRvs5Zd2&r`_+qxJ5CuN`k7PAcP&5gFmaPt&;^)5A=
zYZ^GWdRj~K*9XO;CZp}g);4(ZCdXvzs|sp8<@lR>0=hq{7`M1k=|(R>m&=hcT0neE
zGFEF{qT>~Wg&dO5nV$BnDT=TTzPHRyAP3R8Q7Km+e{T2XrppXx6Qz)3K(9MKM>8Tz
z9};ltlw(Vz)8pH-xDK+Baj!?4(KG#Zf%S>{P+c!7uSm!nEvt?(m=p+o3`}A~kbcqE
zwO?0Qf8IKBF5;mLriBCUpu`5rE9JBjDz|61+qGN2<!vpuB*fZY!1lwk2#20_vVSv(
zG5J3Q-am})|2+fh|EzkhXCchQQ$%$k&P`X=s(Zq8Z<ikOe>OoSu-X1HT>rKdv!RsV
ztior{`?eIjB^DzfkXCm9he43AGAF~98q)bMqs^)k2d-D2>66vi5#l0GzRzx7?FRND
zWU{rnR*GnG)GS6XS?y5%*R+u(hvl2IQ41e~{}^qKk|ziqn~HhIF!vpR#6`y!s}DA~
z3|cvI=Wfa|jzy(Moj!OqcTh`VcHj1~>@wW>@axvf=*w!n9LqK6<z(kf9yLDLcxmLw
z#$6shDSqyQ9ups0X4e?Igs6L#`3U0vK)BU);^Loi#KoTdO~h|Cz%lrDz9P`l6C>LV
zyI3uRCQl_lGzt4w0wxmwK0(&B*q2Jr6m*_-hUJg}B$K$Rm6%`=;>KwtvbW47S}`%a
z!y>l#dPq)e>bMu4r@ARoS!R}Yf5s~rULd6?YCgAd@QF=}%=;3?ws=MloiQu}8UT<3
zx;s>BJq@$CC6O=B6vD^(bO{1R_LA-ppHE4)3hl_YiOkLt5~DK+AI+Eid=~8u<>i&;
zJE4Cs%ZFW6UPT+n>xz1BobV28sv)yN&)jIXj{tNI&`Glf3{oX>kaMsNP>t@AS3e<I
zUwF<$Q<xa~>sP-GmIo#73zFH1k=v}ZHI481xvPa7G@pn>^-j07Vrf~S&(eN^9^Y)=
z|J>|<iBm5WgF)^<X{=MIs4Bvq;H$PnCG84Y>>;4%6L5rPJq3wEF-F}qXg0x#<W37m
zb+``!3o3*}NoY4z$p3uAsR>TBo~0dwmLi6xadQ%6qm1xggP0Sd7!^7ZkAkbbXQ*#{
zJiPgx10t93C@Jv+?tw?`E~p2CzR{xGd(_JYY11_OL+1~>k(X=2zVKrB4L#Hel9h=Q
zE@<@Fywhh>T59viTmwWkl@wgDL4(5Qc1|v1-qkm&b<E<*N<wG8=_R6RvRjyb+spOc
zZ+CZ6c`l_}4onV64Kt8;JooJNtvu@;;xDKa)Ia1B3)??5#vK3mYiX0}|H*4T`43(z
zB3wJ1PV~hBJQv)Go8)@a-3*1Ty3JWPq3K{vHig)x;Th6!0eO^{PYRWlYfTe()=4!+
zv6y9Tu>|cn#0rksL;%);SN;^m)s@`qmG%x&(ngcNeRf(E&zvIp+Fa&L5V0!dPf&_#
z2tr>O6CTI)>&jIVFM}Ww_$lPd)eK?KDH%l12<D2_@>f;7RFf#rP6k>Nx}##+v{Eg8
zEdb$z+$Pjr^oB1v;o0KN`|qwYd%JPQM)xP5)#J1KfC6cLEeU7^CZueY)Z`jTTwdr%
zdVcGr(Z~Cqmrt}9gDiCG*jrn5!+8zEh=}T;R$XzE)t>61+A3zzqW~id02r(pIjbTI
zMgk9y2KirpW^`@_b@J0a8%&6+z?KiJUx<QT{SJCxRH12uPNf21dc%<T6--uIOl46}
zRSEn#=drpaouZv9rev1s^b+AK5WsKF4Y)6FMoNs+jXrm-iJ_HE)9yfm;Rd7kMCV1p
zp`3TTHj*nY1Z8-@zmRYC{ewJ!ekaB1bWBVtMGp2;RRb#=VaGL{L+4VndG|_HkiqRc
zhvIR<Inm4qHX?=O-2mf?xtUEO)J2cfkG?jIJ`%R86&C3^aZTs7R<PhC^nv<CVa;c_
z7_^V?Ltk#hpWlJA$0434Grm&fj}D#zj@nm*>YQFiAD4R%#75$EgiiqF!pH(Zq?N7}
z8ZEE<yn0uYRT_TjJv}2R12YS@nIs|fnxp+2i-hqIv*^&PUFaZ2Gzv(H?Ixevk#qT0
zY{{!=&$%?N$EDd?TCi1GEn%qvqoQEgEAMZ&qs2HlojC#Q2fD^(lqG|dlI;HAQMOn2
z7sVR28ha)0mq<21s`wz-<I@eE@rMT-7bmtg{}Au2|IjJ0vvB_3;}_qc*u3DsOwJ~N
z$#nWMvp?>gK)|YZM3u-8Qi78?%f<E-htUuF?9CthrLr*=2oe;tvPaL)zs*|qck3V!
zj#2%L66umUOQ0Z&$>*hmW_}T;%`Dda`mw?D-7%Mp&%O12wsQw-O3Wg4*!ZEBrK3Sb
zUr0&~X1KZ`IdOWxyqmFS<cy+#nGZq1H=^g63@M9h9%TiuqI8+mKE0W39#O0>+2&%F
zF{7$AiLntnXS%j~0_@r4zF3E7xMvs&1;%41{;s<`Ct1h6b74<(Pw{V@-6?P*X+U=A
zn~LsKM7TkRBFkdq{_&ei9c?R_Rx$;ovT|1zyyTElCY?>Kk1?+Qo*g25m`l#c(c-Tl
z2JH7Ke*o!&Q+FVMOCjA3XJr+;;LW{NR>X_F{?&=2sC*)o|M{b0GLWJkDhPjs-8T2u
zoujiBA~Ye$QB1DTc&wxZb*<#mcw1Na2b~+R`D)XdX#dq!l7A`<W2Wym;4ZTZ`qY*t
z12(5xJ`pvy1fMAkLWLHk5tA9or^T$0mS68s(+nY$E`y1J-K9MTR<u-~zC!KecG;y~
z0%Vete;ju5VicfQHlaRQVpnO4Z?b3XO91y-JR}lBXx&d3q(?A5%Te;%IB7#zM}4j{
zbgsZh8=4~aUS()jI41v&^_cAO^v3hb%w0T!4lrK^tcz`Ck3*)-Tnsqrhx25M>>tOw
zNoAXOK@Nudb922cD0Pg)!dFELcn2bkn|5eWjIyi|Vj<5Gh=^gId#dSP>BGAB>idnh
z1eV8B!^kg`zgL^2sPb)6V7+@0w^lTrC`6)&hc%<;vsTBimb^X05#0SxLHrM>0z2ow
z!(I5#Af|&XY7QCZd9&2m0}4`i5ClII=Q`+@qa$~-;-UF?n((?{m)EukO;E&}HsNJ`
z+q%0HtwTpWHzJ9nOA>3~Ktq<r1sA8Khy@-<S>$TZ@!_NX26xlh9{kL|Hov17v4Hrl
z;iX*^UYbP5Mnc*On87(XL1fo)|7l*zsYaOsT$2_)Q;${E0AH*qm~MQ<Wwh(gT~4KH
zY~<EfuSF>a;!hShE~GOym!8JmYR3xNg>J-TS>6u_e;lpByIkL!R3?x?YZk1JbU*&x
zmlTB2KduvZi|THgfL?j6DqeN;x|-+)zCzQigEtCF37)MQ@8jDVT@BM~HKse?ddpy)
z6aqP?%K-~yQX)Be;FH(oMkg&>!}^*iv8|9GQq>?I;_#p|-#-@76<5^_{R_X>ubbSB
zEQRvn(Dg~EJr>2wJpI^FPJ|+u#f5N+h^l?z3N^enE*?db?9B+qGO5`6Zq_?AtJjY%
zepcMSUh~5NQQ9A&1rRv987MVsl1k1O{!XIG2_*nOL4)k%T>xUGGFvdLA??h<b<*df
zpwV^+DORw2Y}ZB4-*J5dOJ`2T3I#hP>qLQG`^5jLw>um$!=)zO9WYWu%A8eCa^6Yl
zIG_b1=}eS{4M$mM>prQKL{}*W+P+KXQ1(}?AW4q7*8D+t?kd~0ee>N7@_p3J<m3l;
zAVEAvh=?aI6wccplE$C(z+*H5Hmq%iW||igS4!vWcX#~qh!o}0@K|hcoeuYy3)3ov
zLb&}CA5^~V5pNk7uhyo-cgYyQp$`}KSme5O4D+p%%Kdg3h~d^{G0hO9a4LDGN3h5z
zLSKCMm^$osUaY|RMUA?Jpv&LkU*2Dv()KueFuzofh(2314H`rs=o2516IywG$@o3)
zaXjnk`G@%b9^C);Y5u=8_LPgC|L#1WG@gN!NsyQKr_)i1R?xG6)b@IuB-hz+6De$d
zee8T6;x?3WbGieUz|ernmHnFu@9E2w#2_Z8E(1!88IU#FdnS_9JZYG|)B+%COXmh1
zpSIT1?nc$(a$N7XtG{qYu?4`64SzTwrNAK@R;N=^VsNY>h{Iz`Be$zC##s|lrpmsj
zJ&SPxd24y$xK`EVmGmz-o&0!X1#zxT(`O9wf<gn!y%fDZF>(v+XEwU(rcbQTEE|gU
z{T}Gn$cOG9N3bPWb;lM&pDnKr@yEF?f>mjpUCPe!Y9#01HtQ<=^8pVsbgm0&x^OIG
z^;zmr1DS-(Oki3~Q)ZXVh_J5d2Re{uo@OgmVTvh^!4JN#6EeFll8PXN0>dWoVf{#3
zx@NjmbEezIGfIBxhHVDI>JsS@eX#5`8lITxO*I%&zjsokir~_ujlE>&V*^dK+<o(p
z+A>Wy1{1{P)Bp?@wpy4^Frg=tB{vx@!${p*_xt0#3Cm{EIcF(Od<olZ4=v|oB~umQ
zDavV1mf<_Lo+oQgzOgqs@;kKGI5cL*J`z=Y!v!5TcV1u|vn1WrnP>g|Y{Pe_3c`Z-
zB%JT*7%pxi!<n4j<Z$`ifBE{_jV6JsyqZVdUdHvuCxMwP2X?fwsLV*(vbITGN@i=S
zZn@Ww4UZmNJxeFnGgQ8sS43tAtv?(MQJLWIL`Lb*g%d<eRtiK+dvnwSVd#G}4v3UO
zeLtvc&NIIN|K+CD9JE+P8HiX<$tPpcRk*ZrIhxY2`m+Vna1Pq7On$j*HVPHf#hgAe
z95*HZTyb+bN$bG3Qr@>L+5k^gL|&3kD>4<s{r0IxBjsI@2JF~1W}a`s=nT3(&`-lO
zCmxTVS5ILbwh0t|;$VCM2N6KaeJXEHDu5UGi^SG{P_1AA{A2O{@1R;T|H^}||B(ky
z5ob57yI@dm;FN-?oOO6}3$~=cLMW)u^`0+cE{fJ&FlYIQ@=J1VJP5XZ<iir-4G+AA
zrpWTZQoNh~YZ}mNP4n|Zy<U;2S^jll{L;-%tn!`<;9T1n6H@LCL|Y7z8Z8^0kUYTh
z$a#J+V(&(w-i@)EMAxc<hN^(q{++LtmN*#Y6RGE_`={I(U#;bG9}G>j1BwNDPsFC6
zMeAtXN#oJIH_ceE6Xum<iKL-b<QiTDZp9f5$zQj_f95#XL$C_l@k4r&Pd&0uC5cKN
zUIBDzx_&`P=aG42#E7dJDFSob*Z|6Do;#zx7zWaHWhE7qwVTC8S%hlrcke5|?`63I
zFPUWEQ?Ah%TwDLimi-+++UcD=^T~)Csw{`>NH#ujjKuGoffx8CB52GkmdI*h@nU9T
zPv2`pnRR{?tTy^HKdKeHSE<9POT-q2uwQZ$T1^OE^$(FCa$-ac_=cEb`-mE*o!B_e
z2$OmC)x+Z@f+Dh=G;b^xFAUGMV>R~UhlWj%XKl9fcHxYaS0f+oOr4Z;)XHNIinnf!
z2S6EKS_jr|d&?asK=Wd7IfIc#6a{yuas|w>OU3Q5?ud57i^iRr5_LTME}kF#VK%Nz
zsj1bs3@1A6?U@5--5}molQPBr@Hfc-I6PdG^e-}$j6Fg4RB+yE5OnR|vuV3Q0a9lW
zn;94Lhko{$l+H3mQ8bER4GW0xhF;WC#mb`ikjsNaaj0YmKZWNfCINXpO)}lza(;3h
zr81etQSW3^csa~0iAgji-$8HAfJ8+A_odQVHo|u5C!Vq6G0iX=`8R4hV7yL-`OF}@
zyAsZG-XQb2U4jWnG7jpRj<;DqcWl)DTA;A<9}a)^f2iO&S^td+Uj2W|b_7Np(IgJr
zK`ZBlmvo`YA;!_I3)79(pObyOA#ms<q4$WZ<VA=mlbIh)c2FjQ(IX2jlg^z{-=n=s
zq!UX@#ue{GNJUbsS!5Oto~%dC`Y#)or(mytZVy5aa%04jsIbqo&@h>!nVOa+1?{Mo
z<|p*lU43u=v;EnFVGc?Tkz&&&8goqQgOjOW!jU^ZF~9G!j4}nt7qHa2?WarQ)Zf&e
z{zMJ<Nx}XHg_;FAA|zuc%diA1N(e%koZ%V2un6_sV#0Mj9fdB1Iuh{4EHA2hHJl=<
z6Oc7xVLbfcWc`|9IX1*K^b0gxRc0P0swHf0YvZDsR*g1qPm>uLB<;;?xp#GVm|C%~
z@9}LTzXC7G$IgaQgW57vGL#w-gLOP8pU8~0wH;RwHfsbl$6W-$IE{)<Q5Jw<>Gk*N
z6R#ViHB=YAzzoMZ2cdTgVzV^84%A-k@coNmp1^<H=on(%M}_0sfIY+&0-~Sfl!nes
zFc`?rc&JWtOWYVk%`G8yddKsO>8O^RjY_f|CF;847Z;{N%Y&OWrs<ztdhf1mrP(Sb
zI6$-=#-^(za-I9iHiswCLb0KYwp|oJ@|F#+R0t?LUHzTFt7U7to&O59^j0t>dn025
zFSms%b-L4y950|v$Fr5tzRTM}tl9qt%51fw?6#y*{%z*D!rW8xCZe`^GWf%4)dOpu
zZ0rgO)4F^4Y?8c*acK*NGwj#S-N5nTeiP-ksJH(eurc19s{TE&O88UTJ>VALM&6>Z
zH?nYs@>JCR;d<75+DHeX6*i(5KG<h9n1zkDbsT5ZhiR+_X{h>e34j;CJac{SG4Z@v
z@N%!@4rzViZQ2iSejk)Idoj~k(3`&IrHdJ#mNEcAI7m^H2`SJF@-wR0$-4jJ<fcV6
zfl7*0-YH#W=H=XaeD%g_t1I(62sBGtw7KDl%bzO|1eQ9HcSB|h!tu8`=T{J=W~Mdl
zU<%pL2WgPp^2jBdU31b2c828>Y+5~%CQ2kHhAgf~lwt2z>#$a2n>?XJx<eYpl9IJW
zP&^gtr4%#186}5l6#rrZ#XCN-2ha^LaMd4u({&l^TgVK?;D3_jVEeB_+5f+dIZn3!
zy)no3ZN~gRKL2OF^`e%X{XRQV=b6U!iXNHMvo08{N#lcCpdZ~HeVuJW@II8(+5ik5
z_{is*FX?(@qf-M5D$Ygkb%Yn*)P#2tl{7YOk>U`v@inCw)N^!@FxnW6;mB@o$c>;D
zeHF+Ajv@VikVBHgg{WeSqD6FCZD9oR2i~jXv#NYA)W$qaF_bPo1Dhe-v4;zUH$g&g
zpyTf=&X5z>LpJvwdPD&s;FDPt?ERZ)WWEk`GI)q51n~e7QCVr{S|UkWPFM?OC=7lu
zEoxYFC<t=`Hn^!xZz1`9g@FD%W_dxGgL_9EnJL2N*(6w`;+ZJgfDJZGB{399S`3<k
zK?}QjCZ+~qu_p4k<^CPILX<V?5Tad5ix6miZnts^Loy?Ac_u}mBy}uurC2P(0GuQy
zHfaeMUafngXO<<8DO`vR)INZGV?R)Te?G_}Fm<x9%z?B47VRj8C<;V{e34+2Q8-3e
zs0hdd&LO36bSP^OQx*8SC;>zg>9th`1xZj~5>kadC>9yog485Ej<`ewvLyZ{a+WbV
z(!vfD2oYMJB?HLVF<l!<7WXtX4tOvs*!+k%y2%ccL(p3P4p_bgBTq%=brBYxfnYG0
zp*Pd;LBBypA(Ea1g+8pk7E40eQyHre)s}O1V)s*`cdx?CNobR=!KmP_P#+&xADY2v
zKt)eE5*on>>rhl47o2P~P*-$kXMq=G99mN1o}y~**DJ0vE#Pd}``wzky|aUtVXI>m
zgSI00s39Z1mU3SEMC@mLa!d6wt5EcK?$z4UzT4cA(QZST_+%Bjw|4=KE6R@^@eyED
z8$;)*aUk*ZQnypj0oXwORaq}{(v-h<gp^+k^P%gA8tL_~pG(7@toX~-oWd4Y;svj&
z+s$ylvKArt_)it|Ypmlwsu&XHtE$Z};M0N`+6uU<?0>DlG<BU~<ky_GzTO+%w){br
zh+$U$mO!s<QKiAdyyncEuxkq#D$ovN$>?WHD=LnEx;uKrVQ8;>_&ePE_pRnN0g`8{
zN0r8{m&Q!+H2+xj++P^Du3m5D-0GSSKnLNQfrH0a8>W^df+au1aO?p`ZmZlccurff
zOATICd60<XmJej^4dcMw4U&aDWyRt)S`kT3uo^idTiMI~h1fPS(pX9`t#@?1TDiMH
zZmgl;{0)Z~D%bOvdPy{{5A&b-K~{y+r^^m9WVp1DohH?1EIpN?UH81kJ$m;(pdrcn
zfrIg6Et;H1sp-;`C)aDCB_z(4dB=#S=FUp?Ye^5)JQ|*$+ORyLWBWEKkZuuwdn{MW
zS@Ei7Z`Kj*sA(UkK}aqB6!)oTlYBKV?hR)YIh7w~I7P^36QVR`rGGlBs-@jeG+An1
z$W}bmdw-!j!R5QAR`=r@py!kytl^CF2z(k{(OBp|%E(RL+#2V}Wj8a|fcGa>7_ON#
zI8LtrLja~Qc`fnwhM#+gl#zoMaXTJ(?+}$-Kb?CHKX|zVZ|_TcU4(Nv?ZHwZRM~~&
zR);>L!@HGSUkPn56KTqip6N@Q@O@`*KL5_qe!FIYOaRt>*<04YtUu}x_wKSS_Pcqn
ztyr4)O8tuMO3)uv`EgwG3*VK&k$n)kf+l>$i%1qjGpXQED<%DgTDRW!*4X3IBlq#*
zXH%zz+2ZflyKB%dKTiAgv&`IzzfBoiDa-n6cV_DBca72-KQSrqM&D&Z@8vTqZ#z2M
z-jN+^U`cI=f2*E5y(Bu`@w*bS&nKU~*;Dd(X=ZHIgZWGP)CW|1`FXPR$K%Y^S7NHD
zcqPYe_GXR+v#_w(zOAFkykxZK*Z`91w++3B9>3m+oIY&BVqaEWb!_mH>JekWbK`u)
z+?F*?Wo7-rJuIt2|EUQ32kjXE=f6R?Q2k#D1S~xeX6g&`+?R_+?Y2-e{Vl<nzccCw
z^o-mGKR-lit+HBxfAt6Swn!?Wb;q-j1Jfco08rz}z@>!jg2e*ZVPe&ZVucD&+yEO>
z`~s`@+fr<%qpwt7`0_MM`4(V5*a^rjRg(<rxhje<PC8^lWpN21{djV9e^h)g+gTR}
zzR)KKp9P6=-*5H%K<hVh_-<FNZJ1@Y;ok<qnX*J>GH9;1^G|g_lS+2L1l?ZUDJVSW
zjxjo1_jp>+N+590Q0HI6j1TN`FSD-$MC7?EL9+l_=!3OcqAh3YJZb2NnZN7o{EkeL
zTYrdhy_bcR0c;8T)y6GOoTwYt%eEin+POh~m)revWqpqv5*uD}TZNNbsBnepYy1W4
z;ApwY#t01VxiB@D(stmQ<@=0X(bVhd61DSiRf1bNVYw*s&F7cN?&KFL&25m%Se_4g
zWX|2CP8F77QNp^!uJKN*6s7fX;$=Gfb3MY7moQa;#z2LEuH@pYQN0|g_N}{`NLqrb
zB73D6dbwh(Zfx&ljN#<D;Cej9+&c3hkJL|<bkg@NsnE0E*lQu34T+pi(?uX0na~l4
zua6OLqpx@QWXR9;R>5X50`%h4!S=)vFk2Q2eCP12FT1zfH1w>kb??K0lvIc32itoJ
zBd&mOCIkA^bM#!29lB%@0vxLCwIzv#@wlz3Z?nUB;ua<x8ioxjrwWmqxZtQRom+)T
z$bqosPCR*yhjk8(h6vZE?X&L4+e+aNeBt6$_YZ-|@n6f3|4B;V;QTkbgEX0c&G(0|
zUeIV6Rv_)&9#0P=^3WwEi^t$OIpdOl9jUD&AFi{$Is7exXG52yigah)%J`bF-_K@h
zAd2}Bw=(-Lrl-4wp(u?|Dq0Aw7_ifvstNz=`^Y!bvwX~%<D2O@e`?4l2)bAIhxT8S
zA>|qbNony|0N=>gH!)%T8yhBe>cd|AMaz<bilmC$<RDVrY{EjSpQJ!tS9GGBtSYBV
zw|>8VuwQr}PcG2Kluk`S4R``UX?9A2mWvG`a+r5rf1LE_C~G%mE;ikqV+$_2_*KxJ
zFDB*Qy8kwq0;&mM&@o6T&QO$E#b}m+h^`ZX7iXy{2O{WW<jB;CDOFRh?O)kc?Y&~+
zn6!wS>Mf^vQK<)4w9MCEyew&KD<5M3&#=KOg+TYXWd+dXL*~hY_Tghenfxi1mZBpr
zg~^*Pfqh>`1A~Cbwo$3Q<B8ngsON8IbWry-6|Om}dGwTE$xLZ9Avmh-puq@hs0}K=
zmNEap6qs<|(tHeD8{s6nxf5Fq9jzLYt1fLXY*s?IcJzi!lP-h|4M!``-sjVRr2Z|P
zwwSAlXS5WA!xVvy<V^6LG|M(5n$`MKtBQrLh;4edKNn#{FiVx5`cP7HLSDf>|89X_
zQ<PqFp43z?!y*EbQ>1W5f2FH0d&BJ`Iu89Yx<k7S*XO{2Y!7<cWen(cFN;<USLW<U
z@7!I$nQas>TF41PQwVM26Z)zGF@}KzXJ2&V&|Na6f}gIr?Bc0q2-GQiZL3KW^XW>F
z)*G&>Rmo4*JB|!L9P?z$yt@2-8zwVsi0S6USN&_S5uwT)&mzs>jS22OFp{#fPkql}
z<#Pb@mY15Q$-#GN4?Gjd^2ah?gRX%8=G$mqWYmvcergc*r!RgZTD2tU;)pf(S#!$z
zs~F-gQJ^J&)^`UE>o4IjOMXMEtC>lA8_enK@syL1qRK1=mb$?$k>^3`7k1|)h7i0J
zONF{&L1@9`x<|Uh;xo={)f6XC1?Sn?%X0IOAS6q)ZXWQ|=Y3Io%<=;6x5Q5S4@t)P
z51VCd>|Fo%Aezd5g2vZWz^wFtb=qxDaBN!9yWsguVv`{<_sQVbF18h#lGvn}^SIEc
zY@+8-1qcW&z?~JD2+CPyR+U@MVyNn-@){wUoF&l==lg8#Kg4F*8&8Z5J`A>Nru3@J
zXQ4FN^#EFIzjkVPl;&vQsLw+;Aaf``H)8%;qYBa9>+x8a2}1aeL?EOq2bsYL48*dD
zHzl7Mas5Q+LSdDXzMqSh<6>MFSa0x7DiT|lru7?LKU$B*_*^zBNes}b*F$8pF+<BI
zNqtFI^kDn(*fp8jfojYz>v5`WDd|IXO(~w1Tuny%y6q3^(QKm;WA7D4XsYP#E}fHZ
z;fufE=nJ0uXd(G?>}mbtud!||trj+=A43b`iv7_;LFUAI_^<g!lmh>OMHjcZ=VCV`
z5^F*<W<(hnYOgXQ!9zJi;|){tnS&ADB5KAIJR1*_>AG+KUSG>NiW$-HI6TFu{@V6T
z5%XDY$V;Z6S_((3^rUT^_(;l>gp}iZ>k)ZlEM6|#D1@AV-P=o2TI*SANQi2AJjrxM
zx9ywHn&A1OGvse_G9e1S?Vsm}Ci>F!#><&kYs{UBY1^aYjNUjwSA&GBv39&A8NdtV
zBLRxme~%K@Z~o=~cS_Gp#Lfx$&-Ran2*3sS-}))vRObJ@@_m6F@E>RP|G6==X)#Wr
zkZl2^v(wmC&V7Ha`^~j{TNT^tq<;UTx3(W|Wz?FhzefglK5-$}8{xB%c#>-a8|#P!
zlvT%~(v#wYV&(^+_bdSK*yWiR>`T&GSewd@^z?`h_w*q2OIg_19f(>$F#%cw^S>~K
zmwIpnB^jw|^XbSXKfb_mKxIFZDGiN{WJYcXf7dr|ekuM2!o!=iwT1Hk+J;F9K>z|Z
z*1@HH`Vus?&7Oz_3h55Dx!Ay;kekec%D}?PfKHtR`qCla?OuR7#J8ab`f`Bf<jGj&
z=0vfww*F#wc4}}wC@AFsxU)F37qK=pmvA^kaB^aEW~{IN;>Jo($HkucLWIBQw)hlM
z`gDgbm{M2&y1ae*Du1s1{N&MqzrMop|N0u7z!#g`1RA<Mk{34%p@2}23;22_&w{I(
zhy}Betp*B#`*JK_!2-prny>}BZHYUQ|KcXp7I%C6ilWZUz|~p<!o!Ew;`+h|S;6}H
zSrieQSY7`omO4KvIWV?9F!<(+`x8HngQ?X~*{$_Wf74%gq1$%oYdDSB!HLP8biwHP
z*bD1R>fQWfTK>5EASDaWh921JXh`1d%U)baNQXmMK^p^uU09pKjY3$Q0s}%=970|G
z>I>EW;Cu(D&hhmL^`-RZSH0ZC7Z(;#54-_bV~dUT0KQ3LTE?Yncp?uAb=B4^d>2TM
zCT>DINds@NAf{Db1uw_#`^(uoD3yfU&lwOa>(ZAUJlN^I9+PI{l1sD1OR{716vl?x
zAbue|cn7xu1zZJesUXgS@yi!&p<#r+ZD%kYS%|LvL+$kP;OSP8G74sbfuOeN2~$*V
z0hJv}tCFu6F34;dh$TbL6Hx*ODn<DvSlYELbmW3nCUdz{kF_(;(#ezDpf?^5Vk{z6
z>?>I9ktiHXOc>|=@QZUdS=lnju$D=|;#oc4uGvf8ebx6Hy+t*KtAVB%NR&A2mFK^?
zktNaw=Ot9x3dd?2Uv$*q<_)^x<sm$Fc$YnS=pA>UOx__&OdihT4b(8WZPgcRWA0A8
z!<z9WL5j2Hy2i}m3)J<<qT5-YATWSzNF<N-)Nc1GfmcZ0eYAVN1SxmS$6toiF_;WP
z%q+i<!`;~Kp4~pnse^X_nS-VQ!RvKEU)kIkg1w#i{Ptz_p!ldMuNg2~Mf3%Yzbi}z
zGXQmJM26FXs0!UoXqi&3!sLSC;~p=h0Yw;co*xJN^3Cj@9Mb9S)26fpMp*jos+-=Q
zM8{3qkHU6HnD4@G-^F768w0+;1F+l4s8n*v0Z8e|)el0_y#&lncO5V+eiB`&LpW0q
ziz?=Up$nitW^lHLK$j&O<~(G(y(HTl9edk9;SpQZm`#|6&kx<9=Vkd;4ieENtH@6m
z{GheX=UHp;^o~W^!}hKIRCR$8mGlWjs^`)(;sDg035mJULQRx>tNX>!jG<+9?B=cn
z3#ssbko9Ihc>4Nl`Q0@iLI$nX*^oja#{AZDgc>bkhF3|H(A9>C8?AHf<U2pA!B%?k
zDzSIzpc+_bcoZ3j+5I6Cb%Tya#V-T4Dh)k;g9r8FPbWw6y|LLS2i)<3+@pM7Ki?Rt
z(A8|U0vDyCQaQ8*RkziuTLsZpHX#K>EDuU?ls{eIPWF`}nc#?fA{I>4B7)2l511E>
zw@C{SUDBS-TZ<<?*oGEFJlhQe05I#Q=c0_Hz0f8<I8``~qWg0lv!7DsgV9RL>)9wi
zZ*8kTt^dl(8L8YzrMEUllkGt5)EFu{XV+&mb31oouWCsZ1p@XnDbT_vX%2j2PPTPY
z3=G7!q%i?iO3koRTRvrxL2J8JGcWtdG$pC@4EFY>u58IuuWAU(3Slu>6LqaKAz$j-
zDtMsO8g3xfXI9R#sL;yUMTohbkDVWKy<+dwi&$Cn2Pf01`Zx_nE<UbX_e}m@C2zN)
zKq6|%sXw_fgQGm*5UqMmFimh}4-UmI_;{)x#A%gn{)Z?x7D*iSh5AmxEEI#_;1Eu>
zMBG#kX6Sd@QF&)`DloXGw_fBcSf+1z=+svdN{q&t?Y2xv!0c=y7a3;ITx_~DiUTs`
z);-r<!oFxkElK$cEj-eH@61jfJFSbSD{Qtdo=vsZ<<ld>Cf&Rx`(w6$dS)dJs*s%S
zv)GA@fWN$!kQiIxu*qmoE?_o<#gfEbkWVl^Nle&s*32b80DBvBgUErn(~Z^X(=2<}
z?j&RM{H=>5Qdg@@gRPcl;18w$$zkggY4n4`WVV)VV1!Hlb_xw8*D@WZx$?MdR!O`3
zuT&%6_9#pD6Ti`oU9CSt6+uFPfuISb1froZYR2TB3KzLgT@v=#?S$Bo?)+?6*V(|y
zwlLhaJ-fX|Ow|j<XkJ1UZ#75d+S6O*HJA%04FlAn7|9Sy!W~sJ*+JpR<@FSfj2r_}
zE$NqWaALn_wB%(bdfO-iH~THVA@BWSBHe1vqN&`|lh%vZQW_NQ=$!Qn%&(Bkk$^);
zIy_G6yvI!gwq&HkywIabC7vfTn|<LpJIGGsD*`RfxFvGp>|2$jX(}2BFF_*AA(KOu
zc}#*vuNslm(lx=T8GetY+<8D;3G~h*w;037jr;yx%X`#L)9dy1pupK{+Cmg8F7-z+
zV)H7gx`>8J;0Tp~I(cpC;oHi~0Wa)^@|hlkxlT(bS{j=}y)|%x4lOm4M?m=!!u(~*
z`V4s84SZc7-n*b!7hn+bm_5a-`_+d0>hD7x;Zs?}Q6AVl+n1lO*|rwdylYL;T}p+A
zU%XR&OYk}$#r9k|olu#stnZQq9asHphxwHQQH)hqVU>bZCHn@GE%N%96D<ug+_Qog
zNSWV5gFtE`bAP+kyYxy%bpA*vgL`{1y4-U8(9nBlx?v#GD`E1XD9K>b^w~rb0okC1
zUfc`e6r>GQ4(vBBgZlw>MajI~u6q-S+Ah7Nh1~o*+jI!TjV?%VjTcr~xE*aRELu+t
zi!r)$C_L)dq_$hFcM)n&$$p=x0V9C7_SY==HR`(xrf#>n1vRMUqK={Aw8P8(lp$%U
z9Qnd=ybcjOZpj>DBL~X78n-eL&cRCsDZoPzKiOgEl+dKVit@q?S_hjNAJrePhz%)*
z@)Vc#>BTSH|F|!SDs^HED?PgItRlF0%1(_?G8v$|LM$ZEs8{p6mNKP9be1jZAdKT^
z61XZl@Ytb+n;+{ATlN#n9+H9VkP=RJM@Rd4BUr)x>H0+@Q<#t}0^ZV6*Db$4CY$UV
z_~1AGd-$x(4b_IU*!0;KMWy<);bx;xmwe_|`s<kZeg8Z+x}lINBCzOLi$#s9?ys#H
z`B}>a6+St<hD=gV(fVVbR?y)2MwTKJwIk$?lK3uZ+b4jIjY-wZ4gjg+XN{>Vae^>L
zghojp)FNj`&t-}CR-caM)f`YIvzDAxa~X5M&Eq}#ZYOUu2{f7QHUN$T3CHUMn`a@a
zd0}vrL609_=0n>YgK2r;(0WgrUs)|TKf>0&d~W5o-N-<~?;b=aULCVUT7z~NvJ0{8
ztos#fy+{pF1~{6}`(5};H*YXLJ<@jMp(o0)OIj0Y?GGb7ys9WE;>I;bgXkTzY4I~r
z_E|$js856Tlz(D7AJq!~-Q#a`3GgsbJm%raYV;;%;n6&mD;Fu#W@jv1gXUG^skJSf
z>ve<7I)*5jy#;>?mZ`EI%|x=bkh2@}j5f-&w?vBQ^PWClX;-_O$J4H-b)dH3Gr%wv
zg)rk_8^IcMA(6{_j)hq9N&@`SG+wk@0pCx9ksQ^oJv!vLmca%Kx<((8)K?hxQ+RD4
zCSD2#ddaR8zEDFTcHbt<8FvG7>!f;3xv)CdkXubGO$fM*8Z&;E?9bSd6cv&6O9m#_
zD8dHU_HhzQ^JyaNmhSW%1X@5}#T_qI^cPJ2-IGS!%+}>5;a?k)Nwqbqnl7eOt#4s}
z<jU&`kJRNv(W=Uh_vejVps_K*#vTc6q!Man5!4YG*1nz}xhl%e4cX5aadKmoZ7Dkg
z+0OxK(MwGs7qqx~C~ll9oOz+5M}xnJtYH?N<p}JMI=3qyJMFUnrYJ4y&A(cTwKv<r
zFbk*}8XUZAu0m20M7IB+*+oPgaX7bwYrgH(wI-Da@u-}LO5%e@e;al5spH$>RgpbF
zF2c5^tcopBN#wzfamcK;j`epWzmM4;5?K){6Doag9{aPBhU7M@`2y@}g_D|)1w&`O
zMEEmt67yZM2$VU#<v^U&b49ICDmdfF*T(73%pk&#7O^?=OdOD<UO6&FnTvhH?FF$A
zaAc)+YQdXrn0mzS5FidswjF4438~*GRqZkd)$BJaDE?h#@R!KREmo2JlX!=WjYP+;
z^txad%wsQqBC+$J<maiDbYt{;qPCdAR3k=9y7)Tc5zbeQoQ{3GzGB>aGG3u185t+~
z(Y39qJ|ta{r~!EM)410Iq|Eb0vbmMQIAE603-%vHrG>=Ku!gmCSrq63=0pzYrVQE~
zea4*V&%dPnf{b32$6Y<@=0BiA#}R?}IdJq9>PE8A^v~&$Rq@#}qOx{Z{AxH|2ILll
z;5BD0J@eB8gSU<zJ-v)IB}t%6r~7$V{+7dZo~((x_lRdEHjD*HUjEgd6^1+`C`q^w
zUYw4LNQgRgS9HOS^p-J|7TD4na-Rhdw}*;>y@=Q(I!i2g=LeCbM!C66t}Rtkb&UD2
zoa3dG3$rTtote|FDBdm06jp+FyG>{o=<rd1GrQP1el+auYVHnITfS;w1NW>J5{Dhi
zGkX5kZO7r?RZ!cwdjaCz5Dxt12tG61b;!q0OV{ocYohhb@u9N^tIFnAyZ&oaM!;$!
zhgZd#X>#X0@lUJuy*U{2Q7Ygf2A=a#1Kp?`H!il<4V?F6p;7Q$guhh~KAm03xy>9~
z1oa24MCx=bER3PrR?5TfYKo|w+U-W;gN%Z+zMmAlh73n3c&13gyAO08rv*OAYFY_M
zSv~rO$y8a;8W}VX@H|AwPa;9cS>kcLM=EB`7IUY2_DL7|$|;AXN_<Qt5a#$d1Z7am
zyQwg&CW=cv!38=D7D|66HZ`jJ@iErD-l|gK7N2gwez*ShWX*m8!Nb1_pu`YZ0ycbF
zH78K{5MO}gVU4<Q|4p@HGz%F~o5}T~>JilvSbUBiVqtUz(67^fvM*3ki?0QzN{RIa
z_sWPsE|2jy^0`-s0+vf7d+a!+1vjW&jjF!TT@eeDnXmNz@}gkjyd*8Du5;*U?jkv~
z4}ynv|K3STWPJB8Z?y@`Xm55o(f}?}FPNP{9^q|Ks?j0D3Ig2Oxm$dpxh}Vn9DQ2f
z(r?IEguO0t;zk42gQ@0mxy;7Wp==boQWuoSYA0VW(7H<C^y18r!iC{-&Zttmv2=mR
zHVUenE7#;K6Jh*BXN)6koyaAqmy;UbQLJe(V-}Q<JB5hfAv=S{NAhmFAo1$ICvtg5
zvpcWv8&7!#QO*;f?fK6I99xbb`@)#|o*eWxG&%@X3vY5WT_M|?<NJzj(D6T|v)nMP
zUD2oI<<Vlva<kcl(I!X}9|upu8<GWvZ1O1DbB00=>dt)nQ!lHXnX6@niT0E;$g#`y
zJX#`<-`-KKaJSk!+L@ek(-A@KLW^0LU<x;ryy}6Qx+{3w<ch=$=|Z;QfnDR|yOENI
zPO{B7^@%#-9dy`zYzz#3x^XA;(uXLL-ppf!d5*jiX5ys@dJMaTYLmn7VD`2>W|U<q
zvTL>S-AJ&PPnY(O)aCd>hD7#hAqzvr9)qUL{e^d=9A9>xz~NzaMT{>BQmC~U;Z&>O
z54m`tp5ACI(jU7*Q}L;}Qm?w%oP>}Il1=VvOnC(8?^$CCthbl_EEDm1zc=i#VBst!
zsQb{VoPr%xx2_&5>P{aZq^zKjS+^7PyccTlb4V!T(L{%k5uTnxP*09-3`6{DyeCND
z{bWN7xr@$w1Ngj`BSZd{v^r2$DkdiAY(^J`PtZ=<ug7N*kO=y<xP~&^5mRWo_G~db
zYvZ7p*-f_dSm6_E)ub5@WmgP?d!8$*mfOvVS+=vKGX|*1Fw_CIDmvR+!^9-qI<pu?
z%Q(a{jla$8@SMgzZX1Q#;3=(6I}>Q#Z?0G@rE><8SO{qru@hl`(SzP90rPv1^4Ywk
zK0jf63h|4K8eb>Z!}(nwjx(Dwv89xFV9PZ**b7j79{nYLbW-YF;rdh`V1eGNfOio_
zvxM$59no%;3FV(WZqGJ);Up%MmEZkhbA@nB!(ClfOWJ`-P&-2`mfVssOqb>U2Ajo!
zR`lW<%@<(t6XW~eo(U#lz6hqbXZ}&RQU$hsZRo+ikpFD@p-v4MCw7m#<BCwe6V^@2
zUNsZ+nuO~$6KiQy3g{oUhC^#bnaLTmq3h=2`DGAK8`>RuhQdFu=jSI}8u-cnTSh>)
zc1yr}coB1*F)3|U#c|{yr^VKN6K7yL52^ks{;`^<n5ev0&;7NI%M<6Bz%^|_hZ3Sc
zT%aawkUy64$6VF8SHr&Hx3T-*l5#wJhE||2?4m==H8tG|?f#_#JEkCKKJV)8u-OKu
zvZd`J;z&CE>G)}m{!y=brKAMPG8tZ&;AmOUO696zF+kIn!3UL!tf1mxP~JY`Dma!j
z#5UuTo$h>oyD$iM2SHPv@<A&Bhyu6TU{0s)H7GtgK_@z>x=SRz<ksTC9taBFn$TR)
zZwo0RC)_hKAO|=Bk^aonlt;K=RO$R*-h8fo{IYBm?P~f-_@OiU<x9CC)5m^B)o56B
zauxp%08>D$zpy9prtNsW8U1se!3>S8xyZO7?$(rDBEGhtxoDAEb3mR)9-Nt$V$MQ@
zN=hvVPPNu5^w<lw{tN4`7SjcUR+!SuJ!PYd@7$M$SCkON!)hl1^J3+0k`2ls0tEX3
z*whYayFV|xoR^8VMj36Q5tmF00MH1V_MNZJ=#znrd*a6zY3PBtY<&@8r2tB(!C`0m
zZh{qo_JhlsHY*eUOV*l}$lo_dVw9i)#tw@pl;UjqAAUGxJ;@%nVg5r$FgFkQ0)N56
zMi`Cm4^LUi5{gDV<vbgw2$x%yr|EfOqh>r-B1L6}b1A0~sSohMMhd$&kz$Li$d7==
zJ?>`lr<r)Ah`%bu`yj_$Q==T^YJWCnkWGK&o9{nKtw0(U2_~A`+{!yJeOr;pE#4<o
ziO$-Z#;Z8&&wM#r^y1A34T>oq1t1#maDG@Hr7&;)=KArO0H6NpXO5J*lGj~5!e>Or
z7uT=_4<#~yi)K)|jNxh)1d|hOHVZy0i;c80&*|?TrqOKsnol=}9=rQf`KrgB=Dd~Q
z&DV^6m_tQP@hYELXehJ3k!k3t4K+mRIWwgiLtzIpRP3++O*mp}m2GSj&R8!$*uO?B
z&DYZ$%!mPlA?VSaU-8*WjQR(BZ3t{RXPUjA%Nv<Blde~kr+xXH5w#QShJY$ngQ}-a
z3<;RkjBqoJm!7W9&Wcq%slHdpp&xJb6i3p?17%XQ7!BzBQHi(1s$07%sLU@8wR3Qd
z%pv{d*N=Kwx_!HQD=ds4@+*)OR}xUP)%I5@wCwbqSv~kzJb1lr>x53&XUj&T6?H$J
zpnwf~zd*jN4ZA(p{cEqEKlX2qGMWjW_EhEC%{`~KZFJD2%1G^xJ|!Ap+Q=zUlE7cS
z&d{W0?cy&Iw@Y4d{suS)bw0dkVi&Pe3Sz9Zz;h`y`k^ym&UM$FKVn8|Dx;?CMK!@r
zSV%%^?A-4@ByHJVc-|C1vH>eIK<wctn2Yf%)kosrh~h@#S&YuQ;GJHTXq^w6czVI7
zUb0Rw`WF7^#gGOPWKLDgHRIyadK(23RXi_~Y7B7c=q%Xq^ot$ujO&O`ute+2ZsqS|
z&~e?K)!@jktM~FB4YO!KknoE}{DbLAMj;xq&VO5Rdi{-`FM!>EgG@HaD02nWnv||(
z%q2qC%6^W~Tb-4#BHVHuP7g@JHTs?1AIm^%sHZ_BR?ty91^NhN-gr(D#o^RQv~OTD
z&^a?hh9Z9RItA5wF3?1!h_(&iKgDNxDVVDv+i6kQ>QpHUf;PrtFh{fk9YiaxOa7g^
z81GSosXW%52@^^xA#G0^UZvcN>u++#w<h`e`=lN|a$2<N;x0n*Q0?#@(%K)}U?H~Z
zz8tF=p1+1e>@W7C*r~^_ojAZZE>>JQJ^4Y4^P>3DM<uRkeGeVfBvp?(+=I^c`55U8
zCR3a$pD%z$-7D#Vs_4*gs_#U^kwylLaaSNhH9AcV8)dhwZ5ppL3S@8M@sy5~v2ZVP
z5W;eD|J@cjkoTL8pMCO-ty6%o5eC~KlLFyjsG+e<S_fI-_?M<~%bJytP$f-%@<Ec~
zO;FSHjBYJljeFKJ!h=XJ$x1jArxB6x0VB_xM#ySIeh(`JQ4d6sjcNY7u41}y#m6#2
z1??`d9@{Q_+8kS=$T8Hh+z9?;x<(P$=85skd3yEcZ~As`i^%F4;G^V~WFdb^@DLVh
zCl^!ntr+Bc8+DPhpa-_}9ow1Cc;d8_*beHq$9Wnm5*884a55cJSx<js2>>1#Z%$k*
z5fNAMSZn*^AW7xwEh9g6F~mMzq$-4vK4>+%8FH32y&YL4biSlg=q2YL?nrv{Q(N|Q
zy3@_R9@N-RRD<rnKCWzJFznrE6u-(nb)cb<m-sEsn%L?|x|X-lW{l-7>S;Oh1L^KW
zQ#to_cXgZ$PB*B(dL4z2qhB)Egng9{eFKF1i-7yj?|Ozv2YY8=@oBM;`(S;a9pOME
zS$DB78*w@sz@o(pSWDyT;K9mbgdcgWq?NX?bCs-~KVc2nG;gK$GbD~~{X1({`GCH^
zho&=IGCbcXjJ5V>8f!xyv~+QhhK71SQO*kFPe=;fA>}v>FH@oLn0`<lOvwMtbOTF^
zy$)9z{LC^HuslSwk30M{<S^8I33FY<%j;G6ofvLWyWR>MkzzEFb3P^M$KnRI7f4__
z!XXYiktxZDoI~bv4QyYe(F&++fJ#M!9^a)x&zF9I?ve>kS^Y|DG?m{oc}37O5@psS
zL(U$R!}1GT9Tc`f3o;ImIeTSRn0HS=+*EhmH#^q8j0KGgPg`;iG5+TKkz&>`04A4`
zE6*mb2DJ7vb=ynEO5jt@v{qLFx^bk^3x<tv{Z^lR2MmaIcF2?H=3QSZ=^Vbc*ImM3
zpEopDe(_fp5cGW@S|Js#x~fD;((*AhC>O?|T|LRd2ksb2p(Rp&<JAj+?yc&>Vi4`C
z=gS0*NAj|7bS&_$#2cIe!}t;&3c;&QpJ-n%ZL<1a+Lrr)#A)GGVTFwG75_lY+=pZR
z8nL)NYSR}3P?#Q$5^F^wN~dYV!{{vmE-9x7EJUll?n#rpLnDK*A|ekn8DSNfe&~N9
zX}X6Ucb=dOyF7<Pnf611)J&Bi_~>z1AB|2@`29I(UWhSVQK*G5v+A@9>z1sY8-S{&
zhvbH5YSD<YMu4^$pBkZjy#LTe&{mE>r_D&bZoZ_#V-?4oq8<Sa)lN+5!ERYY5${rN
zCIyKe4;z3hOm{$b4Da@;p4w=h<T|w`yfT~L6m!@}?(zrCh;>Zvifoir#2-2_9)`*(
z=1ATWoYP(N5RjBKM9&2SMd}ahF!uj|5}bsfukWEBqvHqQXqyKG9p!3Ac+4}l2j{V3
zG@;`=Pa4(YK}(jITv6`maI;$X4Jy6WrNyg^bw@vMp1A&=XtJxPwmM`0X7A3vs>o)f
z$~Es0AQE2^_-0<Y9d878>B(uT3o6gTlWR^`Kz>(y@4;;bvosCR55@~+tl}=p2{OII
zc%*R3Z6pTCRoWRjQE2y-@d{=vtC@`>OIV-}a!2u+IA1Cv!l%th9Medj)D>-y;GhWK
ziE^^vB2;l~r5XaIkT#dqfzJyO#2wfaezoRE?>eH8vkzgaTVTlaW3ZJpD0)3MEdw@L
z!ezuWjaGe4+&8|Aj6Nim8;{>{_aJ}T8(jCxO{UaPNLApT^%gQiK+H+2B0-~}NsSgj
zmxz2dEZ*uZ)N0k_@o4D6ia#f9nJox@a_+)+`GJ6l_pfQ+7<tr=plc44RTuM0){fvR
zyHr_c@E3Elp^?+Kr>T0QCbzZ3<;c0UveMAOqT<fAn4BRh)^4|*;ZRcg7^VRGJ@(|0
z|GI9r?)J1vaV^UKT41n9CV+}_;<k%gV%~gRm5n~I$d|q*$a3&UadpaRJ5}e8)84EZ
z!gaPzz~5qB;JUNuK;uO7pl8!>W@Kl#s}a`G=7kT{-C`s=6=$-4Ccq?gCG%_-Kcyez
z?sx>G6WbNvw7FZu=Q|Pv2g!Y<FTswATKNZ_-&nJQ`k(l9^AhtdGI^Eo;;w)RX|LY|
zykCdZ`K$z0<(y9?Z!E4c;tf~*^&<N$j;g8tb{@F>$<TG;6FsdVZ{mwmU_*-7M^y)0
z%%4{aZBD){EL0RNXgLH)9PllnJ>nIQzh#~YztnSCpb}i&o@?vOu``2b>Uwent=EPY
z?js<7!lW}v;uX&-e?P$xe>wj#dIjXlZ`rWS9Ry7RBU!E&oK<aeGfa*Qy7cgMG3gsX
zt0kURf*iIGRhU@DAv2f|ri^nNlyltIZ_#qFCs{Tu6|_rvWIxT=l4E2P8quu;cW3l_
z9Mq0&M$wV)fd<Jaip2s%FuW~sz4m!ak4Rb0@|LM-JdnQD8%|%db#(AAhU!Xh)r^PN
zrLx`N8=huYY?qsp0PeR)Fio2uj6_wU?ug-k-2>&6#YNEc5H}>W3;&SW7Us|tO9bg0
zx#6}lxgX|XU`BYaFRO4;PVx#Q4bYI)SjFghWqyTn-|61_&V#QXyn_fI@1ns6O^k>J
zO${`n^>E#wAYC6!_(pwV)PgiQgkCnO0&i~j;4Lx`=Y;jw^}{+TV;hfSES@RSE2h7V
zlgtBkgmk&neNsP8`Ou3Z1fx>Hq^hVw^{#z!0b5WZm$ClzF*Aa4)Qe<s-RQX{*@b+0
zkvnqLV`Q~Ao6D=~GY-bsD?vL+a6NB#X)LO%qBeGLQl|G^sGEBJVsR}=i&fp|TMFi0
zp>81;@d`6}kcVq%HY}-QdzX5H=?Q;Y7lRiG4Ae20yIEF1S`nJS;CFu3Bj06ALTx-k
z;a)5H(`?Q{)uH$eC1w)ND#h$!^-Y8q{Rg=)Zt@I_*;LPp`6hf)8s=~xhkKB|PcAu%
zji_I9*NG2(tEV<Q;FG*x2$z+wDtjVHk_w;vXt3()WZ~wz;%pNt^!_Cp72&OxW77n4
zxM7;2<_i<rRwR$zq@Rz=Msr7yWkm~{UbiX5MDv1Td5eQ{^SN6^w7<NS3kzN{$Zi24
zYoJ=-bf!-=r9h@5OjQShY@;g!_h%jcMqjz($L<OfPE-R&8>@1zZ9y}_0c*jRy-+nv
zV^(b%(U@54DOP6NrAS#!Yfb?Ht*cra;|aCl$z~@;7sLA331Y)oP@HqwI!77T8RXkF
zxm;AOLt~}O4ywJ7A5~SPWM`eMB6LoM+b0HYm&BjM@6aletSK^i-P%p<mkobDHa)Hp
zeG2<XGF<NG_LRciwK@V+0#VSF{r>2Yr<n(uuYNk!5oh}i?1#mE`1QJ>CUirx-%Fw}
zf~r1~`fv*cn2x`x)1HR>_t(TmtyE%|!gxrC-8E29f%(egCrm^hj*(?FmHAcOOJth&
zzu#c__M^8lnea%3LW1Oq-k$r=Vc2AXZm}UEggH@1lkMMda`d@iJ@GM=aN~}~$ia<<
ztn`!c>uI2cRftSVh8(Z4&<vLlINFL+*)|M7=kI=Z8&TR2?0m%#j|H!pPhpPWR>i-5
zZTs3&GVCPzYO(&@l>6aJGD9RJ05q@GmCaupt6GU$?w-`8-z&wzL&l+;Hg^VAAkiC?
zdd{HO)X`cw8-76R_cXfDkUv99%mgPxAcHamS<OibP?PiGN-N5fT(|-o6@|3AXLp3*
z)<BJejR5!>2C`;P1zns0Zw?D+IXnPzs&BEfxe%YJ=~6qyk{mkLeE(+e+1?j|_UKsk
zKe!3M55Gn_#tIAm&f_kW(CJ%i#my(D18_j8<LX)*sE^q}8+V+l3*qR?V<jYI{eIAe
zJ{~RZBSPd9Ng%1EC(p}9QxXBi*4gIKM0teIWYUHnSO(btHFzVoktS^BzHv+0Wn>UU
znC^k<2edZjT-WBLs)c2eat->)a6`gg!Adf@>bdKyl<#<Gb!07Sa<m$!uEIom+*@d@
zLxA+NO{*Wss}c11DXt+RqU~O*%^>4yySQkG<5v)X+7C!OZmxpYm52$VLZTnc6@aM2
zkZXPKH{Fwp@Kbpd<gbYGEoW8Eq-$XOprDsKE~3Z)vrSOLqHM=Li8K<^1rc8fVO{w)
z$fz8aK%b|OnmLNS#8q`Kg+=)lIV~GGqO_w503%r5Eoh<GJ_z<`O#C=7CPQUSz9QOo
z#`?lWM>T;%R<C3EvD>qA4GaJ>`cNRhBZ(p46l#Frg7{o}<&2h0O~Y(V-mkW8TtR!~
zV_UYTzpaRTxc`*8U*3}h>Ee-8UiVI1cU%rD3gr%5-wsF$JN6qyKk(~=F<>-a#RCWK
z@Tg`*&h))@=|XBROE0-E4Z4BqaNw#7%r*m<9e2c*(^@e;E&dFmUwnUpAqflyC_Foq
zWP0TrLspK*8K&qY1G<R$Y^C)NI*xyeb5HV5QMU~*Ilnmvtf6F+efl&i-R7Y^sRwZW
zAeTk2GUx_!`8xrTQ|;gfT6(;l7fo%YdpGU3*gPrTTp%t|4)e0k227*DarZ2&%CDA8
zPs@Zgwoq+tmVAjV=9M4ML=qyl6nD+7yn7FDFk9WauV>l(aIN#7a<=N710y4Mx5DGQ
z&rtI0oFJWrL0R64k%3Q0?<9nfr;a(~8}|r8T5OR*gB4{%)X93fz90+<BSHi`V3VcX
zmTT!AgM&2B1|?pzffwaF@v@52A|dQbMM3?f?rCEZi=zPp4V7l@kp@6A6r-NQ30}<=
zN|UE(S5(nL9)^?EH8F0R1=XPvyu62s;mL#Lc^J-*F99MDG1YR*k9aHD5pCSSObZt|
zN$;v?_`108E%IxA`3X}|HH@jZ{|q@~sprH>v~JFYdNu*Iz#@RHt8_s~c{dM$;VFY&
zwX2jLjLQJs#uzRe)ofr(kWim+*23}qzTcz-B=3QteSK9Q{w;`10G}yic*r@gHjup+
zgJo;ka63$Psr*zNn&=&CUGk2&!0v}-b&llDxM!#zAT~;Ui`lJcYgDQ~_AQu^=3r&-
zA+<=^;(x7K$3u9M8gY5V)fH*nVzHGhmwOgyd8}=L=KQln-o@~AK7)3gPs>k4BP3t$
zWI3_wRUN`lB;xC~fJL{Kkp2dvy-2fpLQF10J7=1xsLh&kwUQ*PgMdVSefy(AlI(#t
zM?kQRjHJD=UjJ!3H=2BH>BU)O)1!&P`3igm!B(Cu9VJkpJpZ2D8y&BgOtI-1V{1@`
zBxcZ~CqD@(oz@>d$TIBu65;cxtBdu!2m6cGiTu2sJWpYroV4z?!jqp1EAdjRWa)h)
zR2ynaUKS<I@Mhqwms&Ju{HMt8v5GS&P0hWTrni@7Ke#HH-3{4hP|Mr~(}g=~FScyp
zm@x!>PuDY8rI|wgT6pOk^gh=kq(29ObYyZFX`LqX9u@UD38;Ipo&vKt4Q~29p$8s&
zW`p{GgForU+{Tf`YmliIg?=Kg4A4Xnx+(ni7wwbbRH|A%B@;|zy?+%_28UQS21%xY
z+&ie=WP}XCy&h3mA6@|(r1IKG^k951KOKR^ByfhL$l|O+k1SI84kcDe8qFyea}O|t
z2%)idr;?p1&vsOV_>lu_j{4!@VcLOJOvr@-3Ctf&#IITSn^kpNv*-A@?77_&LUXq|
zFPwD3Ijv5yQlc1QjWd1%Uxv^my2|H4Vv=(q-KSx0_B~QXs&g4?4rpN-ekpb#1IOwV
z$875rmEUs++#mC*kAC?cQaoXPn<=_1#75E3M4~WSrOFIB4OH<S{qr*B@}prht){oP
za_@Xlb8<`mfHVjXY~NZmU~@2i>SnmdI#@^yx}d0RrEjko?Ds=l`AJv28Q+BUfWLGt
zZRjK*oOiB0yOehL#w1l~`O?r+whcs(dgE5zOt=S1W2+m{d`B468UZ!QUyDp9etO4~
zT%C|#C^5z<QO64Oa~oyq@0H(;5y&CTay;2u9-z3x{dCFDYq4}8@BxuQ@>^@yWywa|
z*d2URY#uE72p0{x8$ggz;1}W7T5Aj@vGJkzLqp$196GP;N7t1w!RJnOOmyMNCGcIs
zTw_J1&6i3gBdz6bS5u3H%+SHL2Z5P>)>j3JLz%_43Z!pUrZC0IZD?a#%4|JMFY|K<
zm`!RC7sW}AB#eA0KDhP1<vi2-i?7`7QXC5RgeVGu<|;cpU(B{QQK{ugt>mc$D|tY<
zBti!z-SrJuK4?Y=EYY>8!7A60d0kSXC#J6>a@cDd{1HH6DBic>sMZI^eL|a<8}pFA
zMN)oL@*wA+gw4!3t&2S=i&1W9Rk?*S|4@LsM^5J|?9?6d+@*M$vSAUjv(SQw4GU9M
z>g1BTTbU9Q?BZs^5%LMREZpzm*3>DsdCjxUN?Y)|!#1j(V!7fGy(w({(rqK2mu)Jl
z)vecOk?Pm<_#G}q9uZ~aqA?My0gtsBdw_WyVEhxs%ag15i;~3$b(=iN6JyNnQ)Q5g
zr<r!ed63@F07&r`)y0Bw55FIuSt7$^ck?!?75Wj}a2D*5+@X~UV+-|`)Sf$*OUpG1
zlDp0Ril&xGE9E4a;&v2VroN{hnU2QHY1~Zfa+Hg|9S3ydL-~du%=G<zKf7&l|A0y@
z_<}DDnEQN2zOx;z2~#l!8UG$NEQ12xaL^uWV5qXHKM+v6nP%>7^hx39!v9c^3jtQD
z9$YM?ipb!6Uo>2pD!saI=91$U4&dLFV}Pj(k|AAWl>9~Uo#)Vw8Duho!-LQSqW)2u
zB#32`Kb6FhZvk?3F~_M_Of@i!Zju;4;H}CdbaUC6&2IGvQYWRNs$>j(R7_>o>Sy@n
zw;J7Qr@}!havmpHZd;rXCAjx9OJ2k+H<hq#cw+ldpeu3waKP?r=b}e!+EjA2tUaQ^
z+kHIMm@*Pv-E9bizO<^%#%SeBb(|vGS*bN>K>;{`E}zoQRG~ZD6FMRH#N4JBJ9XHV
zd^6NT=|KmmrGA*8n_2SWWGu5d-350|W701@g72livec=^JhA*KjUc#xp|Ie$b(Bx9
z8{q|z#jmRqW#rfhB?-OLV(!65KFb)jpz;Ud7!Jpe(Gn;2$(3I6dA+f7a;;>DpfDvS
zz<gg!Y<(G?iBXjlNEmZmr0Zl{mYLIE1MkBc4qrTJw5#v;D&+tZW~6C=O(C+2bIOwQ
z-zDx#hemP<X!knf(!qXR62A()^Ldt@jDZlO>%ah==H7wmwiX#X78U;xDez6!J5_A5
ziIj^(2@xSFoQkj|Tva_k5)a049WzmcY?8*ypC@jtE7k*u4kRO~B#&C6zq1iE+Qr(E
zesOZR4}%QP0pR-pXb$|V*h4#sFAV!b8RQ#KrhvJmwgL~@DZ&HOe4hFVl0r7rq%L2C
zvaqRBh$9%)i0B-|KANtt(vc&h3S=__1Eci6w|n?ikoExINU=MC0~!fwi!z!=u_s$g
zo_d6qmw!+=ltQkig4!EJ@(sL&tEZd2t9dsLObL<ZjO`?0xuI-d8DqnfULd=ZIIP9g
zb2JccR3Ux*j&mI8rX38}1A`S-bwY2I9T5nfiT)iDY)SC8-tX>gt#3j`*D0odLpA>@
zwY{$$K<4Dj4qcn*325bk0&X2`GVutJfJgLslE04w{ZM6=)<~K_B_3&9F=xGnHb~XY
zHL;GtEZ?-Pr=wyh)jD`XYfD36$%7G1%F<m;Xg}pjINJN8NhQ73GNOo&+|}smD<q4y
z9wYLC+Ub;(OBJ`StUqra=}6){LC?w*rHF<6>x^lKyMHytjMZ!?1w_08$%L|dt(U{R
zQs{2(v<Xu}V2b?qfVn%5M@tqJ6AR<%#Qbw(D;Z_HPs%uM8)B*1&lPgRd!sjU>B>f=
zT`$}qvG@5{0!ZbU9cX-jO|6&Qs3O7414#-4{WHHmqwWXV#awD`N<6n@Ec;Mq@!S7A
zT$-90#z$a4rvlV!1ISC(f^e2e6T)<l*?L_;H(vYDIKaeWZ+(YhIfeUy8u}2DArUPq
z3MRK>(pn+H#RYj+5Ks<km~<|v-EfrpO+3X}EKDP)YzX=s^rHS*dCvXTR_qJD<Kk6;
zeT(-M(Q~Li)*MwmAccCZ6sAGF=+-b*Ecy+lg{@uZrOvL3sENH^zx*OKz1Wtmh>)RT
zUBFqWhTIioNoIkB)#Mi6(Ss2#aGi;{ST9X5k51YuvOhixqFd=cS<`{!ur@%vb03U{
zg$e660Exw!X8N<lE%cFEvIFTPF*$lkv*i-}Jz_arhWnb72vfp!{+FA^emg}J4I~|Z
zaEAgF-2_nO48DY!26SZ+$x!M4?0n^i0aa%(RGs5AS;)Ap@3*-~%6$Ox5`I;QNolIg
z>m4On5jW5JR5RLJ->8oP9><_!Ss2%suaLzOsAA1cd^Q42m+FI@MHTiZ-n^>av+gag
z;<)_FK&vm`@uwkl;;KED?HwD{-B~JSH_Io(;IZ$|kD^5wtL%|8JG5OWH~bG@9^x+_
zZjA5qiRo4W@yY=ccYm8wpg+#l@JVB$(KQOWGb5M_VseVd)v-K2QoOMvCif;HR}{OM
z&~W8U*3|Ny3tp86y|gCpKGpVyn(veexNBpODrV;iR>*w|u}QxK<Fh{Uh6btlN`-_`
z&}i#on^99kDG`KQmeWk^V<jQDOikj4>6?&BHJ&oq?qjX^rwrsUFSJLK3i!jDp5Js<
zhLd21xJv7xJyT=1DQ-Cn*R7Wr9j)b-SPrFdCO-K0#1oeN_<{Vauz36s{EQCGrq*;S
zgh*d~rCKw^_;kTjl(#b<R(gj&@#ovryB4@_I){Pa$>}A9n0BR-$Pk`Qt0fw;3p*Y1
zEI`MJ2;`}*H8w5n^&*>ArK)6%llG%Q*E_~Hg0D8gR^fC??v%HX&-pU~e%uqdWYe<=
zr!2c-)c;mk5GhWttV99$WcY&XWi%{FCrJ5dO$$+D8-iPDz}p8;qQB?<TxbY0{7y_>
zoA=LcO$JeKX;RgOglJUaov>E8?y@}%kn%gRbG!?fME(Qx<CE!;mgqn-;+;C#XRo7w
zy5LLj1|Sy+i-3}dCBD}`W_n~=S0|{ZK*-1FkUQn-{QGCQLm2?Y(Rqc#Ps$nL8q%WN
zOUOB_3%p^c1$t`0KDzDTS~_@SMStrC3|mnj|Dy#O2^(nubhHY?-)S*QS`sMTe=5Fq
zu4Hd7TKmS@7>F5dh9C_6h2aQIuVKb7|G4ZdhhqZgA&D4}S0VJf`-5&2I{_|xYy|Mp
z<?zUuw&NcDle>X-T?EV)$q8*%ad3R>9gn9Z;b$N^-?8NMCXC)A_tv4r(YqA1MuhNs
z!G%gzz0Fr7wCaP(L7!=hP=)*z#1mfh-Te~DNdF<AqHzVx!nJjz`D3;N1!y#)lyZTb
z2A?>s!QZ5tgm$TtTL?P}hqPV7$e$(Kv|MCHp?;1ZPM4(vKL$E<a_q8gGqHs=|1h{e
zfXZi*%=}`3_W<WzM@`*)o$dAhR8%Z;j;CCr!tgwmqfx-}<TN8io>Lt6`^*#E3%kGy
z?z}4OTH_YYO#bY3{)*fsxjR^Hgu6uZ;-sj7&~SQYzTkBaOo(4{8>bcHki000KW8Gf
z-ezrkY9u~75GmRoa9eluGkzPR5z(&3W<kk_^?A~Vuv<1~tUD6*wIPRiwiMKo33^oN
z&#;)`SH7fc?QcEV`w`Pc^pr0Y@1_hb(mWBoVxE_3{vKGnH11O&uE)4Q@JI`H;@9`n
zDVrTOjz6w`gpHRB{u_KPbIIfY;<|<Y0Gg4JSJH0yw^!nC--qoZx(s<2=&e683B1EI
zdA3#RCwADLFY-$u`@paQUR+Q6T*8kh&@?>o95M<~FOO%NFmlRkKSna994+p=dKvlX
zI5!UDb^8*mO{2564X0$dL;YD^ZRnHI4rYm44%@ldBIx_s38wo@U<jUr$N7<QDMRV@
z32}Vv6&4C{0c7Hmm&r7WDO#*+Ix{g|to1>N@P2~P-J&cglX{e9NgpW+M|a(s`*1?<
zu?!N-2UGOJh1+c8T9m?!?<FQWBd5lbh}So$m)xOKsRsc^61g2^O1bpXz~E9)0tW7D
z>;>hSS(iQwA{Znbf%17gU$#>p(w=V?l^NqV%e(XJb5;T;f@Gc<hh&+3daYzsmP-bU
z>oKJuHB2WxbpX8m_*tZPF7Hbb?M&on$UW)hPzKzJGy5m6rY)^C*3A0rLFR+b6)f^1
zs-CtrE*7)O>=`u521`KfRud%3<G|{pEqxODMOTkR)`J!X{I7;xDoX+S+zwg?Omb@W
z{G<yv5p=~K7Qit|CFb6Y4&w%H_2fCxi#TmDIn87+wuT0LK+rCsHTF5@bu3$XE)jZ)
zV2b(BRO&C>K=<<By2v_4VY99!>bCoW#`$C0=*lsGuh}kR!_|G*EB4$#Ryo&`)Itg~
zJ>hMXtqnPtK9lLQ2X1AAgyn)>D#z0;-2Ivp-_>yQ!iV*U6sZq=MD-!Qi|1|C(=$;=
z4vpkfWzoq*^o%^A&FsPaRQ&wl>QNLGo1^po{`1X~>cbYIT*8Ra#&<P(l2x#wc>hVa
zyZVieG0iA;KA?49sb6q5Et-7??EWz|t;>ev!e+?PCd+!&+6+peP=Kd-PZ9y6V{3;z
zuO_0LF}Ao39!J}%(&x7Kj0^d;7oBl=*vxw#X-gcz;cF+X@RC%aJk?aCc}`8MyX-F7
zc@D%bS&qKHgLjh{!Ypj^%G*3eIpik^&TINTvLuw9yF}vi?jjoA6IH{b0faN<DsIs}
zE-w??8cIg+?FC&QfqY+fN|0FkQOi_wHraukf-mc1@BV3HYV?;DpfM<r+zg+r{ckHK
zY^97o9TW;U(zidhjSVXpJGbB6WwRyH1$!?7MEht_c#s+bYV7n8Uqp8mJGVmi2xmai
z9jtRbDU~NH(1h@p^$P5$cHX)GD?u_--f$jZwRqsnjrCFS-{fsC_`}$)J};iT$79^v
z4nG_^ihP<-Jlx(BH;`FcG1tqvT#TWSm>9>74XURUqPdblq_2~m875mkZV%pmp762Y
zfS2^UjhQ>3Q`zTe<mKl0yJ9_{*Mw2iaEW)d9G+~DRlY{KpJV;oY(?0E7}tkvZl1hf
zli9!t)7~oi;o_NM_kQ$XByoHRIDY0<dP1P|raXK{)#%ov&ZlPZJN@SC-1rlJseWrB
zyxg!l4sC(jIRzq({|%mnl@JpfTgP7lR`}#>s~GK-<gH=ssD9kjL4lU;GE-<x@7e;s
z8s!9_Su_p@K%#GiV6;zBHK978=cMt=pbC8O3bN!L3!0vQsmr*T4O>8u%3Ulo!TS{q
zMN@_3(M(CL7ke?qF-Gc<cS8=Xy1NJ3XlbkIJQ1iKTS^0Ni$a@jkkxVW2Wz_+QtphG
zp??usKuriD`rr*ADfL!0>pqFjW2yw8-Q|;ebvf8$xP9dkh67c;mxLA@=6<=V>a?Mz
zOaiM{9}~)K*%A-)25~;0fXCfBk}PV1<fLOLolyS7i3~hjnt%8ED)Ibso~wR2;%jLJ
z98uv<IrqB%eK1Ht^Hj!ec2Wq8WOUmGP^U!1tBgv(eq^QS66`iJDCK})>dKkXr0${*
zShGL1&W&k#V9xT9mA-ls_$i|ecba|a;dbh?oZBs3XdxV`6ua`uFg>#J#~^fcKrgZT
zO7@j$3y}1q2?J@Z4iR#sPKghGLffzStz`kd^sYwS2NzLTWseF>{vy!k>MS56@*uOT
z!Pa^Cc9BO;4HgIp0^0BtrNp?eFl_Ie0Y8VbOG7*zN=os#wts}iwioF6wexVjVt=PE
zUIf-do!L-&T7T%HcwmxZHGqrz@p8NP6H*^_9l!z5dUMTGRNlmi@Yq#)?Q}USjyrcc
z5Z!(i;!FH-zJg#~3YBBvf5+S`o|RX@bIp*X$n6~GTu0f|Xn{Z-SUI8pqO-q;1WweC
ztxftP(AqM3pMZM$`9eafGE}RwQ(JzDYzzv||DX(;g{#<MS99x^kU0t=!+9lmbJs5)
zfc~fCq;lvsp5dCUc@wI=cQRR0+Piu%r^Q7|&Y#Dopj^$D9cZzLHUC&tCcQpja8-wY
z`)24OP74mUWE7c{N=fc54W02Lk~HuhT$t!gvDPz(rLjPTWf3ABhXG9%4c;3yy9pFX
zsHrMp^EPZ~AUNqlTdB_GiguMcJD02W9vu_v2^!H|j&B~Gw7Di&?UWnr>aTFBmA#*$
z&T9BjCxn>$Xk=k$DjBw)#+^w+{O{HkMn%SZe4S@+=|UCSULEp#w$V6k2W@Y7<cZrJ
zeJ1MwoSVYv_sn+Ns|KC|fJ7WC<lc*j3z|ko?X+<}6e8Yz4%!grp>FWk?0brH6%jj?
z0b%eK=H*hh?}cZ>!()((VMr<Px;GnD_fH)(Hz^#lECIc4&ubMm)}Na!RixagU@Yx=
z_2)6y5K_<Zv<7|8nhbA(LUS>Ha}^<(A4@9GP{pZG^Yp&fp<E|*=tfHtprd<uoZ2|2
z*F0fHL6Bz+es6*F!6`7#(k`lkf<BJ-TcUqHA%2JB_c*)`sisNgw?5%6t2I+hTF8FR
zf>$qc)CGCD`nImonc1NOgFO*b&Y)#DTMRia`72L8_%=s@e4WUiX?n{P_)vdDu09+W
zFCGj~CqqWPI$l_1?;=6OKn1g2ydAs6G>nd#ys)t)6PvcpsY}{*LT=<^k-r8z)Y9m%
z>T=y8h^6Nq>VWscnej8Bi8VOYAohn`Mz%V1$$AI#8-<%8W-?>#jbuijq7yf3XE<oZ
z=pCHCV$FMo0aWmayl+2Aq~{egNVPKy%+q0SJMhVbHny^tlVO%I_)PafU-TbF+h$>l
z6u?AZR>vDx!@=r7J3?*2K({`c62AHtTL*D@n`%yp;i*^?&xQGAs7=)ZOD_&vQGKo-
zdk}#@gIz0`e-4FJjn}6G^kd=oC`kU7;@{B3g!`$%6R+@-0x%8ses=z``!2MvU)&)Y
z)9O4bW$pCaCPzGJLckw#al_N^m8o<Y8^%`JP@P#p9Ib(-(|kJ2pFV<(Z*}CJQOb?^
zH+jp%(--rs>oq5OUQKCK{*~gqGH8)|a+6=jP*S<5Am-XYUwo^lzn|oR8u!6w=+hg7
z;qj@7aN~wE=;&6U1z{zy8w?{%h@u_WK1Rtw(f6DA6%SEXLJ)Nl=a+&h>L6oUy8L{A
z+;5Zn1!>%4kOY(viV-*u(|_S=2RF|w;7pbcRy<^9aj67f+=)|OKiUXoyQBkQF@Ok$
zY6;kxUCJv?xggW=;v=U|Dx=NmN=buaJv0bPc@1d;jA>L?nC!<%)$#?Y)Q`=sl%)%)
zrObOm=@Xjcw-YD6$I6jyHTj0FdEh&^HeFl&Z$MZOY993<brLKO)T-lQ1<6U>VKA@C
z<ws`|b?K*@qkMKy#n2(L2Q;)}uyf)JFQ*ydBV-3~h@8Fh2gdoFnA-)IzjTmz8LUm`
zEq+peJmBl8TtX|sP$dti2EQY`jt$LWw4DSKhRy6&c9Y9NHQt+_kPK7Wf*ZZW*-L|B
z*ZR{5%Cm>}%&wJYDXSih$r$+HhihC8lqh)sC@I)ii2-|zlCL-C=&@`=)qZRjT_o}n
zz*xM{jS2pRd7k4*J&L<T2=9;-OO6AFEumbv>#T(XY2!)GU^xqrqYQ<;R9uR~%d?Y~
z`NB=`GNE|h%wE2+tFsn;7`AvKG@k3Sw1jJcr(%p1{A)@<B>xu|@3bTg!^P;fZQHhO
z+qP}nwr$(C?YC{)cJEy^GY8*)6RVPy<Oy-C)f|6TUY0Eub?M(^nN?2CNOvGs=<J-<
z$|KJLPl$1qL&i`8mQs7rnQhoh8XYvN9V%Xf>`RtV86=6MPdka8)AAR+o#j4BqRfR`
z0}9<4(t$;M53v<-iepqo1ZFW2)ss^KCTA`{_y2Zk+j#o?6&E(-oAFbK@T%Aw<zlb&
zarHGXj@1nk=B2NSMn^y21ZxV)oj^|-9HAHBzWzkifSb3Yh-b6SnHQf#Gq*PN3~g$2
zbvi=wB;F6<X=ajT=<U9SxJ(CVhf367FYW*sBI=K+x@%Ucm3w1Z<*|Y#bS_v!!sMET
z<zxymyT1qmWZfP2AeG$_zWrs$#50_e@ZD2TVO{MmeD%eRNC&~DQqZv@(|V<UASzyy
z)B6|3Bw_+&GgR_A%o|8>n<VPMC*i`bvt>2<XQkOygf@3HSk9kUrcK-tHSz0t+A&yi
zU+-KwLvjYq^F>kERs+Y^o9_&DP&d-{u}4^3%>-CLj$3Bc?3qwa=RREWl4eeP?+p^g
znNlk#$T#gLYq_*B05{GSdXQ5rcYh$v-@3fZ#-d)_A|l>;5$C}gljY8PI`4e+7)>W>
z#R5k$rxA#65U3T>xtn6jQYZ)?LR#Av{=tXuQ#lB+WMIN|F-K&r#?INdm>-%^EAP11
zc?4P;gnTDLAQzTmNada`LShl%2>BH22dnv5i1OB74<y!jT6ts)ix@G|LEt(DRl{hH
zE_!S!g$E|ch4clD=dcSkbA=JeH)O}UhT{dEzBe+&Y?5*R@!@zcv=NHXR$~DbDWD1t
zx^=cqG{;oe^kR(5-f1Vn-c>zp@6kD)Fc|gSnik7#JAQV{iO&X=Pzb}6`NQtw6xqFd
z%NW7i6)mO&UUP{D!S`2*kQcXwxn3(<b93hYxc08H@W^Y2t*DBVd=Wv<Azq6!o7Fh=
zi9Q{WWs5-{#>NP261Zo#z;QL?#PCfFY$_*<sZqR_c_2OSrVPJscvQiGC$}+-P4Il4
zWT%bS#<<%StsBZX7a9v?dW0%ChKf~Ae?9<m&5}~vAQ*mY7<#eN7{|<?E{HQCa1gEg
z>Fv}dIDZpUVwEyhmB^#VpcmWe-&!EQh!Z51qzPhxoZj_^q`~^J3l8~+F$h9ZHiFl|
ztIt5pb0glKPg=~|P^D+WPl8cGESHytcCMlGDRmry-Splx<j-lA^s8RpFN2j51JylA
z%)|?wXuBmEMWjEJ#=0l-!yDc1FTMbF=o`Shyk-s9TNAVRZd|aL5TUs%8v#dcnCcxc
ztqwN#D~~a6H~V61dOX3uogp1?{&P^Y#z@|H3_2Lf!O-tJ_H!aX*7M9=qPqM1rEw&m
zSG}i-n)eQB+1`%mVYS0;aejb65lDrF^s(};1`JMD9FNXR-8>!|OLqI6X>+}?7k&S1
z*Fc*FXhJYRk~Ib?K{B+q%UqjzE?{}o-4lGysKOV|hwbmo(%poLBi_CW&(Jw~E2L0K
z;`#VxcqFd~BF@lt&32k4_mba-10?8#kyu*4MPd>@#e4Q1L)B02g^bctdoO?x2$)MX
zjgrq1E;MZYdmm*#eU@u3+#69O582z8jcW-9WcZuY|K&4My8egSb!?@kUiO0eMsjss
zzVcD>kzQ&RFT)q2z>t>9O@7QZ5jWZ8DBm$M+(QkBz-rPM4DKz(A=SB0L+DBHMi+eu
zO0nAX#%%@hZ_@Q<pf8HFUIC3xshL|cA()5AdJEQZycu)9ie1vIz=l6T{M+{N!D0$R
zpgA0^lVHuGA$6;9jesNT$+%+G-EiQsaL2*U7mp}=Rp5lX2^R=Zyh!vGo?2(C+X=La
zO0alNil1H2M>&eLilv0SJe{HH-}Lyc3(R7JE?hrfgGu4KmtDJf3p+0j{YjW`ezoF`
z1dCkmV%~(?AQQtPuPw-C7{u^Dp0d!H!|TMrUq3NmytLpUR1B-6xCc5$-vnP`l><5%
zC@5;2)W^WXH>zqKKkqkHYgY&{y|3EcMAlvs1Jr)snyIe|=R>@XKDga;#}?OvQuR`r
zmnEA$sLKV%Y|ELD=1qVUA%#maE>ypKLv#8_ye;xV)=a2Mwyql_el&*oSJ{j^$R!P+
z;bz^X-ECkP0(r558-prjKuJ@4b&=BGB;><LKJ<ve#Vt{AP5e;6le<9AX-pzX#ufD@
zqqxPwf;zrXa&~S%{h+|28TQMU7u){qE;LVWM5(Sr9pAb_{9$y&k@bhOpyHa9Cm~2d
zIi_4_=1q728IcA-6DDULMs9f%`>2jhWJB7ho^2jYtzt@wa?SI@?%@TiGpwv9?S>H!
z!g~SOfSBC0g|!v@3tFXJ$iS545wt?O@TijyYn3yR_q>5WZN8V^Y@?kL`uFVf@mR(C
z@{>Dyhg04*%G%0{mj;9?V4cTx-buKuCS@Grj8UKGPlaqI3yIFzIU#)~MDL3k-Sfyn
zP4i(-7G+7yg*^^*UA7^@zDWGtE+9o)RhymHd?x;biGf|v5p2bFLQZstM?bvDb5IKu
zgph-HaSq$k>3Elh_Zbt?@vInUi=z*Zw}PeNPJU27O>-md2~X$e;Ngy`dr=N%u(?Iz
zd>Z^hcGHtL5Uf;VN@FOlG;d(RL<S@j)&-9>=GD|BwjgdL_aHnUg3XenuNs)bgTIt>
zd%uzDocp7Rh9EFYzL`liY5O}iwBeiQ?tnd?JI9(cNKWS57Xo0`7V{1xfsjoJggf6G
zGzsI<9#nV<Yy3<Gpy648B7c=>(2)n;NT#Ku0rB{KIxdZOJ2r1jb>vA!EUwjQ3b@CF
z)Dg(efPWfWrAXwLAeRTlw;?SXu9+T4UvP-~!t=F`J6R`8Y|A@L(0n`bvu~ACg-Os#
zUY3~AYA>~ZQ!~5cqkZ!7Nd9>nCWdfaCINC{Cpa;LPaDVk+3Z>xHQjmEAo9)&d_>Nt
z7bf71c-wv@)AL&X!6A@Ml^2lzq7y*5OzZGp$~N4rHQCZfmrs+88AGN+J*@_V+n;S&
z>q*fElafNXZp&1u;}Mr031q*!nWNp((?eCSgKMIA)QL*gKF`eQk?FwnSk2~u(}&_&
zP(HnBXbt<P()?1&Xam}DY;wh^4ufA5{B0?v$T0i{!m10s8_j3d)7#`y0o${}h&GB%
zw=!hVv87(h;f1_B>=_ucl(=)z2XHuHSpEL~Tgv-=43&^05{NEc>TSjf6WeW&C-8R}
zZ(Ib$ei}Z>zqTB15UgsNI@1#=!6H@GhcFjV53V-^`5pw3JV>|Rf0J7?u+1B}_x{NA
z*7L%oM-rVxr0;iDe?B<)(0@I?<}6h|z0z>{ddwNohwGEL6Wjvd_$TWWb?rPl^)p`&
z(aHgsZ&Py!m1-+6?XejiHv!a|&RpSmbl=j$EV6K`M^FH_3AUPsGZsWho&HrkSA9`S
zHf3SmfgGlNkF4Eb<#x*X=+ptPkr}W=$xZgfc?(;ERa;{0F5jiSCDIgt1mv{d-Wl2~
zw|1W}kznCq`HZ*R&vgr@fgmJx$&wYoa8Lak_)qGZ0ixE)+8Tqn4L;J7$vp_%hmT^W
zZJdq2^e1&gO1WuMlp-_2b|R~$<wughQ?6UaTG;yBOlp95X<a6?dUB=tn2u6LM%*ib
z{RS^gL=%dTOmoRAt=KkU>|4>Vl&vRHiTRlzU~>OOsz-ae*Z?=L@=k;OX$C5DC1gnT
z>sB1h<-+_BhsI<kz^TGATIJ=t-U!WIPNRj=(36={NFW==tcNruP#4q685R5A4#U6A
zJ8~p_=(VAd3Hl9021R8wpJ!hi>;~(ju{6rn0oAfwO;#u`h<#}>B<8VUiicSnHR|1u
z@|8V}C;t6!`MsuNhDgTX%3f@5h+DGIqR7nE<0Aa7g#PY*zrTy8`3J3)*6k&{c81%9
zYmMI@Yo0z6{#A4*z7BM*5qPzbpfXUcBh!uA_M{im%=z*7Uj@F^ejYNXk}pqtO;x<|
zlt|5KJ?)8&(f}RBzcV!Ns|fWMVp%sBVuqi&NN)p`l?3;WkUdc-0D1D-prWy|8*1gU
z$1|%&eZA?Hp7H)q=>TaE$Y6_cqm5Yx+G8Xk31XQK8p!cJYN-7K$O;bgW&qxYKmt@+
zaNaB)fkM>RpfJW&PC*Wh^O}}=vSM!$SSZu7QJc}l(C5fq^&>eoU^kBWUU2BAi1Tb|
zoVRNbvfCv4CYvLU`I8rzw@d_@j43q2ZKd)q1yv$PAlSPjwC0Wnxi^3k3+|l0L~l?u
z&C0n}i4(a}e^EM)w4Soo$-%~{@&yKBqwyE-P<bj!Le)6WGH;e8$V}5>Qxo*q0p=^J
zJU5Jr?ape*=6u>yD>GcJvW)JDrFi*(2E;szpEv<wXedaN5Kdpwv)9-?ND2JpRI_~u
zDs>Q70#}E_Su;wrt5whQ#k6Q_)qv}3&H>_`IJVIsSHR9f+uC>>b)&SSY$ajYU@y3q
zz>2}RuiKu#h=E;+gX0aS87Hqr*fdpSjCGJ`lFz2Uk$K$p7=@zOFPK-J9sQ&8tSFhO
zx0DYeHoWo-NuV+gE2>dYBkh)>?u-}JU%`rGu_k*%KF+4?0P8ef!W>I@KG%q9(l=4$
zqsom+s0<pIEzeE&S&jZFOybg@-oaj<eJhiZ0xG)ZaqLW)&^uV+I2=?l_*tNh5<+4|
zt--%$$DZuW@|1{3v&h|zDY5{S87uvPmbi|}8&K@qH>Dpje`^#XvX)vfg~spj)l<F5
zaiOS|EW3>BouLz&g+b}5;$g#VQBNINn($2}oJ`$;peN}GKHV`iiivT1e_Bai)skV-
z?K?S8o-DRHZ(GNlLuENJ+a!sY*%H|{XyXzHyFgec5?)(b=1ZL^%LE??wA2%wLmj?N
z`ZKF%mp6X(d>kT=cvlT#)inx#2g~Ik>jtfgHkkvmh~dh3CbRT3Eo581Yuht3P6b@Y
zYGtX^=G*1u9XXVe^rRLrWo#$|$MiClY2%|(`EWq%`WS7oB2n)CeC1h0fd?&{e*#z_
zkUZ>*_?F{_6>nop=hj?m5G&vwr6`*ouN+hiGPGR#eWS#*66QYi0ZWRyzf=-lt|qop
z%dxiYp1(tqawMkGdWh;oN39vuX9N+B2hoN-_nOQD!>=FK1b<)iPU#K~V|>Txe*C;t
ze;n3%hGz@vDPk#S(*_w0z2JlOVb4D0Um>G6=L%D#Qt7#)?b!Rs|8^ru#Pw5FbW2ng
zu7ZWi&PkZv#2QXe+ke8Dx#L0i?&m-LG<Lkisq*g!EyS~J7Xi}RHldo^T=t^UP|h6G
zjLv;Z;krT?J(nsqAQtCH<~_;Nmv;<4^QR8wl&}m}3&?pur@kn?kzh7KRbz5#kCVuz
z$uD=hibA22D5M!SZH-X-=;dSEC=E~%()2I2>OwTkGMI%ziM^Zd{q{>ikp(Krtv;2g
zR>krk1+g-p@-mk2k@1DgmZqYXwIO3?(yMBRjt3FK1~@^k^Arqz2)=LV7YIA1@!3W5
z1ndWkVzcJfM=!d5^Kgsm2GC${F-bFAQU<3@bX~8m*Jr1{d4A=apMQr~>(jVv`HK2p
zQ5uODHA|^zvBjTgmGL)LP~X(L{X(4r8_Z{Wj$Q)bxCUQ!O6zSMzGuZ|4FgAL`E+^z
zMvrfH?AuM^OV4}DIyc47nXwbO!w~`S{o|9nxdR_53Q5-WGQUcq<3i)gky`s9m~azG
zH7NG;M5e2F8twcOxo}6Ji~2HDDG_V+He#QcnA2B@VDJuVE*qCqUklCC(;K_YSbc)#
zZ%Bd0O?$+Gw1exa&GF%rG#+qmxFb-y5kBXQK_fyLir%esq!ue?hEKnEdvw%Br}j=7
z9{HCFbbtutDp$N4fw8*NH^D>2I3$zcv%nebDSJx~wRb$VxFvMtq6^#9fJ}kk0XFq=
zbA(Tqz!Dpr7JsvcNVu{*`00ODK(eFqGD8Mas-0vXzmglLsl3~`(%kW0C>_uYI)}g#
z+%7q?4mt7UH3Q|IFXkh)v-h*WS1gjMYDE~UHQ!#zqCueRrlOg{^e#6mMKOv{s4CJX
z0)ZY+bSY!YYTh>Q&^2AfY5xXWK0YwAeMC4?YMhl)-K5=id9(d<C?ShU@(`X*Mv;y1
z!28=%rHGJ|G7Y3giw2z-_xBQyZO7>yamh68Qc08<gOt{(yA{+z2RV*-vWlJiU1B)#
ze0+Om@Z9uZkKo*R(-pYygjvHvduRtdt_Ck<bNKu<yOBe->5RSbQ*J7}xzad^it+&Z
zf?2Asl-1pUU-RpQE5*^NR`k`^qN>KBg<I#dj)eKHYim#>4DAJOn-ske#Hx8*gyju*
zw=6a%!WgRcPvR4XgRt{)febf?N=anw@_2;5C~m)$aDAour%x#(n^~QHy!wFiApw>3
z+;B6{3+W;7p5;93s{@6ZN1=)wORiDH4kQdn=F0LDe3HAZ-ds7eu7Q8HPfG~ORINdr
zSNehDC7_p!-Hivpo0a2GJEx~--)t*NW~79`D|YE0KB}%%y)i&3Ow)eOuRsa@KD$HO
zc;_;FccFcP=~I}fiz7B!^3zM-;9Ii5-3Tg^mZj{W6Yp1xpo;3yL|p64;qUu6>*DI1
zIGu$z=sP9%TNpUaDu9IWyTJ-yJ$J8Q>Bx(&15#|7cR#f?tYW<>C;{2l06;*$zn&SK
zYt@4_qY%?Lk9KZx<E;i_{N-!F(*|w=K2*famHHK%3{%|-TxnJ8xU%lC(2Bb%w6cf3
z9^8rk{daW$4eODfHn&2>Bl!CO9!<?i`A(RPVOBbr6Xe<0j!tnvL!_KVgGlY+^K>Bk
zemsIdZ=oDImJ~YrwEc>S@OV3;0cqaz$RQnwUZJ*1l*Pg^kO!R<i!AGUiQeZ>V}oCN
zU~5ib<BRuFVxZU}xOQlQ^1{Xxf73dbvi*mq>T6lmH-4~Ke9FjX!m@>myaz~1MJY5k
zqB3+%$DCg}?QcR~H2GE2=z@zO04}Maqv+eJcyioyMlvdYmJCP~%L58M-?<V<<engq
z=uu}B6_Ss<531PgJ^XWWUDM57%(#gPKzT~?SbeY3F|6I;Thwt@JYFdC*5izqX)lb!
z7(w#J+`3=BHAt43NU7~em6fE?r{oW0{Etk_A2DM~5&-!9M0sSg7GAqOd_aOucr}M?
z2bzJCalQqau{)efHIP+j-8xO==qed8=x`G;(2XZ`tk0$rz)!r)_Mk0~iTWgJxr0c?
z;RxhjHbklRO8A!Pxe58X<lv8=caByO8{LPSl7yiVt17~<s1ds$@$UpXG(VdF=E_Km
z^o{3|;zqJGoYWva$wq=NXv0PsWMOKpkpKUsPQ41tzUug`-r4&RPJs&hMMHRn7#e$a
zwtbOBExAGzJ3I5AK7H?5{s3X7!mDKV?}2wbAHW0cgE<5suqMPWgl<+cjk<S%3R9&j
zkUUTV-(Lm%&Bv_2Om6q2;2cjytF7?<oLoj7I+~Q?lSIxZ+ES0@976-V@P5r}N3t@B
zOarxIn!1HDF!|=4IJua5bUQc(MRhns<1ptXrh%d@T8{ph5Q<@>*qUPou(F^`f3^4{
zBNH7ziX!<)Z*=-8JPd9EE{fWmJ!kQ;hkk5^NC{vS=lhozQL8Wg%yjiVAd>HukW90H
zzA8tlga<$&pC99la`#LRU&Ug-`H@l{HYYS&PnMnmvU`S4Hrnf5hRu#@QhSSeBuAW}
z*ZPo%e`jSCJ}jMYJsR;VST{rN$b|39MJ+1nq>#|xs6B>v8=9w<Q<@Hi=%ugc#ny?2
zU*qdpXeVSQ9kPt;PqtY0lPa%%k%CnZj!Z`E73ry%GueTs5CZ}x8bd8L)TxOthNLzi
zNtoY2VWs3)`T6!x>JPo|zo5@u1G7etH6(803ST@DOggIcD03|kv8o4*>AGVLn#wzZ
zHFZcbQNN3RN-}Aq(~lLPj1adKc}#%-wf>c#AUc988FmdN&?-_c+YZS^H?`bcc*PgL
zl}*%-M}Fc0v2v3C#7Ku2(LrlC^$TbVAEin|?%{z43}r}>R$%~#gCr_~`2c1Fc465o
z=pi$znDKSBMVRjN1z^L<?(@+e`)?M&Y;C(@?u&n~S-oPUas+2(f_8&@$BK|Ni6KJB
zrIUSWc%CoepB8o*Q5Yte6PEEGjnY@B3UymJaQs>mziqi&S|=$=<O42C9~Ri`xK@al
z$2fno8;%<ukkS9W8b6asXsm1P@Wn-)tAYWRP+_4i2IX<MqieBx!(o94a=t2$KSdFw
zofC><W2t3V{~@a3OLQHT;S?#oqb69_8%S6X)Dk8z7sq-0vwD^9^8@fiF!SOUzq6v1
zw<8ikrw(pxXua-L2zWsv{)fo92f?kL!23RevZjb&L@T{sxrlfuR{&J|Xp-C8x9E2k
z8a~y^S06q5`Rfk9bRrF!`{s)4jOD|x!J~JZq+SF6YQ0{lWpO~z4W9gud=iU@#=V47
zbRUgH&1LJ^I^AKE`lFlxVeVP1-qMp-7q(;0jf-7OGIyE>6FE%6(FeZY;K5v1FnG==
z9-yy}yj9ng?-ZnfcuF*zTyBc>TJU_0ub5y5@_Y|JE-wTB?VzpXeCkB~#*E_tg1<zp
zd+SSzMIOpsVHa7fsSe5d#1-*HB7x=0@G8I-Yqlo`ntubKv+J2FlTC>@sA6brT9=4V
z$sRTm=wIO;4YezKh2+{f5OWF+cyElP<P(C3$N$7s82N38Ym|m^Zk!(MBdgFI(Pc<2
z`3skn9lIfgS6$>ZZtHXupT-Zct&8J|TNNJtDfsw4o<-k8<Kjy}k}r&nV*eHbThl^G
zrNCe?c<{9g)&>zQ*=diB5vV<yA9L<Y(SWgAr6#SAAtp^TlHlC0lN_L?)=!+XnYt5E
z{aqU6A3;!Ecwt{_Wiaxh*T#mw=)sFacypQtTc7~e-PmF@iVGg~AO{iTznPRE4VyZ2
zN2a{$H6S|4iTo7z7n`2W)FSJqi)^imW!}5Pz9%2Fb<*rEaxpvWq}+gl0Oe_)dRQ5c
z<C-&?_DlYdRdw%Cbns*(XBt=M#EsPe?=0WZJtu}IF1FRPA~?tp$aMi3>w>nrebmwM
zb(|IpJ+6_?t3=&__4-7WguRlxi*UJ>;o`l2^TYUM=%3cZUNE#j90IZY`6Vy|A?qgr
z?!&-ebNqR{IWDbI0-cIu`imtGN8c9D%`DW(HI}6@Jj}@-W7-VbIWPdtx3|C5ERj0$
zk{9CBXTI*CMmFa0FY+R6x&B11Y>0~>h*+1sM53Sj-W?Gj``4-xIyma`d?%K3j8!{l
zi=PTnJ)nh@_UgaFuFhe=u{&C#G(+&;5M0UV_kf&rI=B*614(SPcgR-KbPhu0*eZA$
zk_@~V-m74(-#0GvA@ZDj^wzADu^zd)=unTo>ko2tjMIf3l6HJr;jW%4sG2*?S0p2~
zmM+(bdVyH}D-^E+MT&J2#Sl&^$i2+62yjaf9iy)vQYzVpLe4D`4`$_=Ls(HFJIS|C
zX-WNYLjE=z{ox?sLt>&{qMador8*!mUI(X~2@~!x>k6uZY;pMOACRtT;H%qZe(e>T
zwLX?i+UI}BdLmZONLzJ#`+IW<H|k;#4r5HNo<omwdKPF}HOf$lml*SIW6;;qzY3+3
zSJ5l(Y|@h=s*|o8P52wh(F($8;w=`q?WW{sWnAbyog`}5CV&d8xpYpxNU_<4J~@Gv
z2lcD$y@hOUr~1RON>Pf=J<_XBALHU&&r*A-7WwK+JwNc3rBN$b_&8KsTk;<n#e+HF
z#_9(lX&azU+Gw}#`tD|I&B2)6j5>vNn33HlI=UZua?IKm1n5`?^p}^%`lZ>SzYz}p
z4)hN48<e-xJ4G_GggTqYW#vM@*H`X0l^lh*%@F^E=l=^_F?T@hQR)`!$|f=_(+6PX
z{^QWdM|A8m|AaXqj+QWzk_%MwH`Z}B@UXbn9h{gRWy(#j-(ruNGN_zzHJ$H2YnEZY
zV&rq!7$=|wn_1ZHHikN`+P7cr;RH2Q7IZoqBx}H>R3d*oWKanDg|flQ*9~gfs%3z<
z*39UwMz5txwQZ!iDoWYMCpX(`$pgx7zfxx>3*sH^?l_DfbmXA%QxJUnHQBBoVx4}?
z$vkkZiPBp{BxqPmY1`CP!5<%Bib(9!w}K~V4S)n(WFm&OQO?a&6OjWNZyYJZH&4k}
z%FabLhYu@Yc^MR61j6rDXlE|EKeN$nY-HOj!Un;}GwfzcF>08B;auzkjc7lJU^YYc
zl*08Wx`{6X;Zw|7<>UU&hIJozZL<0pF3k8-=NzF1`9ubJW2wFrzB(-mhpwFXSg!mR
z(95QQn`%}QW)xV!)a%xS>Lq9y;2kAk{1sQ_*qrV4xUKlU&V6DR8&nRQ5Ug-i@yu=-
zU+6W9Y|6mXs=jhmo7>=^njMV%E2}m5^TXjM6r8X99u4d(Qgz=4?HiCg4@EmPd`zrx
zMWFW3_BMuvS+6hlONZG1NjIM$*WVRaXrLOI7*|W;3u~ze+4MCLDYmA*N*sp5!*s&E
z0P{vpu~<)Yy^`b$!4~kcKlu(fg6<zk?C}vQuG*BSQsQlm(GQ$BHiEpKdxEP);Xi4n
zERuKOPGLtT(5P-Ak(Q6?OjPCUAsGbgb_)5=sks;t0aPq<d&!9`h?ZHumKQdcI99?&
zwE#S0>>=QccTw<Eo$x7S3aM=wFXlX#p$l9~^phb*S}#49N(Fj<9}KHXlVTm|;NBv1
zkHAwurUEPDi&FxsL!7VU*@yrUs3aVIU*?K9q?QJWi%$v`BEzflu)BU??=8DZP!~Zn
z4WE-J{26xf$=1XI_1LcMt8L%=ALT{oJWhCbHtH-_tyf!1I9%z{AZe$ZMs`4hPO%Oq
zt>#~k;?R+We1q&v>Ley<78pYQIRIUx<R8rEZ1%q+^;SL8DQ(X?O~KHEjsfDg{lG-O
zh(i!(qAMkci(Vk0iLc!EBrzr>3}m6FvZVcP{wYm?4qdEGUsVbh>Tus3yCleNRoj&=
zx$TpFLfLI(&JfS5T<cM0uvBYOBR-Bgt*S~+1w5CN6*-OC2Qjm~YGUJYI2uOBHT7Lo
zrjATyWOb--(zaWmr&8YUBZ*%b?}MHGeY=P|x)wKHwn0Abf?R)FJ3BInD5AhMrJQ#M
z`S02h+y8mFh5+FK$nDJoOJ4ob!NT2Ijh_5$9=StQ68DI3V$#GT2-G1*1)ye*N?KfJ
zOj)yTTrK+WJmxQY3)S{JZ|uPCX)1a2E1C)3r49oHK!@)~?MPK~*ri^f#cjpVgR^|v
zmcx42b6>BNgP(5(3wDKPGIs>0Q$UJutgaTHHUDP!7oya+Ux50r7*%ziT%Q!g?Vxy2
z1acEaRI)eKs#;dkHS@nh2nzi!k<KbAMxzEX;y>OZqk?}Z-2m#|rQG-4`bWKj6`r&l
z#1Dq@%QCwL8E?$+Ao$E8UnO}#6z9J?b=FePHSj)7?6Thbbb2)1Z0i<3z?Wdw&@1Mb
z*8!m&J2}Nyo<-tlmmx>sAj9?5;t-4XdazGPbHEGvo+|F5R0BhPo6B4%671av7f4yO
zGYb?}m;ghXg2wi7&T(VaQ3|u^D6u17?q|7+MmnZ|fu<0emYtsz*Jl7`#|q9nrTe^`
zRq<d-^Nc^OVTTCytSqpR%RpkNO{eh|qCdn6VP?GVzz*HOb7%ySKM1^$5PUAol_bf|
zEUKESG2c_j=pFN;!Za(A!5vrF7x4vu(NfG}&jwrc>}nShY)a5}N}1uqC#9Rs{jv+m
zKqzh0?VhIK9G#y#-AD=}AHAB=(aUHDquj{S%XNTMJaXbTecRoh6qSP4*A?$aZ0L_5
z^r(33;0E1`AQWQ7_jrhS>MGb^oi2gUtG`IB@y-<cs6(e=(s&w0SDoWG5V3^;`wH7P
zbmKC$SE}mWLG-9Pw3u;DNODqFa|-PYa5V5HnM=EmY|w3{c@8zdj^^)pRNP{)rd+Ae
zvXgud=rLv~B$|*8LoCqj8crh;M%I@PO-vnxZDk>_k=ms#HzpMT$_4c2=U<Tztt-Pn
zh!%sLW{(#{S_}a95kyxWh%sQ*yqmGiJ6VEILGbN~w1Cow3a%-lt(rJV9JVK-QZOL-
zzoC&mXhNqfDw+C(_p0)JA}m!rOb}5~X2-4Un1uz33jfJ4Km1Na0#teSPijNl{;7}D
z$!p0Mmi(K_OrzC*!T>Z{(rZX7219l-bTKMwL|nRI-fPqI?6hPmo`VQQOSijF(1UyZ
zwlwF%?;9^_r64$l>*N!=#+(vcE!%`Cp!vJiGX1i*N9nL&ldUs$EX_*bLmqWMERTVI
z(D$^=-pl}3zncGVJ|%YKPK<74m=x-3X+?0dbCNhs^4gPk_br@}t!IPPwENyFzb_3F
zt}4RV-q-;fTk;lr4Zf1D9jk)|>8ov5^1_K!Y`JE`-7R?IaW_^7fI0<CD)odTRnJoL
zV#?}-RQm5W*9+Fwr(dT=+;Q5EUP(voP%b5QFpzEh%n=)tGbhu*y#$o7m3~hClHrQY
z({M6&&)V(cvE~!BdMmyaHeV^Z8}gI{P!jTXw_0DqyV!S)Rtp5~s8jldfWiYU7Ew5x
z_aTj)wPTv+Oft3lC;u~oViX?}`7fz_#J!Q|_WKy%hqUNgwXPv_{-Erjl^JFf2F<@H
z%Fh(8y>V-mPG<NIoL(zYD(Q!6cf#}m`7S&!;UQL=)gDal@|a(P;oE;*Oj-HZmeC-X
z@L9!Tb!1(An!){!z$QbG*aQVL?<=Tr@$m3&JJx_w$G2Y=@1W%EFrYmr`_kV(g^ll+
z2Ir;6G@WF<6O>9)B9i860a@P=8?*p9zUA%kvsvyeDHYpXMs{*>L27a&;(<1T`X*B`
zUq${=qaoyq%A2yrJtOO{h!h$sN5EyVlvuV)YW=FLSwq7DVyCuithDz>>25OG3AJEY
zV{v$pmUj4T#Q5PT%5HONvOfgLQY$i+2KrGd5!I@M6#H>nSW~%zkY!XGiszrp0Qydr
z<`)hP`Fmn*d=v!sEd(6`nP#?h5u<(f`NLTV9SGQhJ4_`5I>9CR<y9D%GM}WE2@0#K
zNh}$=%6Aay3NOLcInjVYqdtyHv*lug8h}UF+mScAt=6C@sK!5pG>o>nS#vv`J{zjU
zQ3^ygV}WDWVM4;5A2@8}O(Jp4Py;;(0AY0H#lP}K;l5k{Ub5l15my?;vP^>~<VpTk
zRee5-_+2pj^Xc=_!!nm(9~TYuDT)Kv9%dB&1!EkP$<glQP0{d%q8v=9TM&{mqQ74C
zaOWsfBNLa7@F^S&{`P15W2~Jc7?F4~=IkMVSDx8m`)S_wCZn@N(1dw>#EQ&u5e(O8
zVb(x2($M54-Wx&U|0eD;ciwXp9c#beGA0TFDlqH1^qI7VHwN#ZN5L4NBTz6p%NwP^
zl9qDV8#92xQ5vv=%x-W><3z=bzf{3?-@`leZN?_73z2o!kg~xKc>qJUkE#0TM5MRL
zx5CJAZ9Z2SR)v$F)D<H-DTzr;N*4jBp(x!~Szg>}1Bc=>u<Q3gX#;&_d>&19=H4Fx
z(hCo1nV$4W06go7CXxJ8MtD%~N_1XC+ac~r@QI<2qSWwT3aKAZ=0VD5(3dJjLU%0(
z_%pI7(@=R35cEv1u?w1?wJD%eli6DVJNrG9=U77~=J9o6sp+j_xshUK65?}%%pa2u
zl=_^XIJ{j(TbM>bc@q)~+4CA|w7&i3Nd$~%?2A!2LSo&pDrJVmPtAq%w4Y8Nx$M?I
zPOK3|<u9{YLwH;FQA_+KS@i-?7h!axvSX97DAY?I-MupG+WNF$9XFw|!mlPRRF9jF
zuSDVSfFSXzGi=URmOm%-Ad1KV!f<G@Pi<;~P%lNXEx11-Oy!4B+BiZ&t*uAN1S4=e
zbH|DcCm^FmTvdbMuT+6ZvpL)p6Y&z->s5tDR{;d-R7-5g$qkI6Syy(#!o5tkcV2#r
zn+@PZ)GoTv#Df6_Bhwg+O?;Yrp1!5cWE}zjr^>Ct$pblB_LmPFbkUGMn(0ZkYPr9!
zZ_dlqe>xQfgO<lXvr*@gq|dNfKa7V!HeE5Tw{))5gGo3oahz&_Sxe$@q+A)NFJx%7
zeQDzE0Ip0I`8u@@J)z6+x4YR}%qfER0_CL)LpvKmV0`&1<PHE|wjm{iCV#Rzp01i4
zQYM7qxP_FTkmf<MdSoI;NWf}HfD!>gnnAt0mWtf!7iDIam^s-R6av9mHr_Q!f_CA=
z$vb4wNbFkQg9YI+^LyND#~LGA%;;|+)_thiCk?c(8O_zCdAq+UNnB@{%74pGBa$15
z4=*MHx<%2Q^3L3*#H<5NQeq_Sv-mq=|D#%y;#zMd2_2Pg>qnlPYMLDy5+F;%pv(@c
zoj)%sgv<vk36YF|k9vQNHOF7^?`9bQu)d_VVhT9RzMF>jZfBh6ciw19xXaxVivaHL
zMJ!3-&juxUL?KZr4(L}92q<3DFS4$hZvoCrxNyXX)6*&4zQK~+gYjyjwuLyyD2}L{
z%4XmBd#+!!a?|e_K^TsI)FzemTejPrBB+3|$e|-<_rGL>s)WSL$pu(r!@D4fc35Xi
zF=x3+WQXDSJJ7j;WP%ILdFC%?r+o7J1aa_!DkznJ6|sD9B`h;=-|M*bajI_}?*0A)
zf5swiwIr~<-GY_H)65%J*5t=FcJ3vypZH^&E#TWSD7e;nKcIyM8X3k7;b<(B<gtL<
zxo#l1^k?OH3ddKTQwNCynxZ^iER6b_lt-HGw_f14h(v9F+Z2SFwSBLY4PL&FMT0F>
zn_4sV);fYIiA@Z9QtKpOP@B~CLv4O8+*iFEl1TR_1s4^}@FU?l+;6TOiy2?Nw;QpX
z{iLA8@1{CdP>^jJSSsDv(+)c=u=@#wrD}xiculHBYJ_1|O`2v_yXs)u8VT?kkaX*I
zfAy9Fa2aAbHmbz0CzrYFwoicdG?7^XA_dTuU#@>68HN8H1A<|q7*=MsRJZ4`Ls_&p
z=uyQ9M__vzDp}D|T~dJSp(PyKqNrp1mGMV*rX<q@hRB>pNB*s<>r8l9o`=En3BjQ|
z?4aTSUP3%*Zrzwqx@@D5BE*oitaIx#))zPbcULzRY`S>fXf9E+VG)iHF=>gG9%#gG
z^?OyH<h&D}Q5MUJ`Wx54XY8}#Gtna(;@#{&2^`9q3_C*4-2jEt&6)e6dJ|Knw^g4z
zLl7pe1wQi+oseu8EP$z#oX~|l*~>yPQlGhabXaFfvB?B*^r9HH6&T<?t4<tc{JKtT
zoKBitkDy?AhBgkO;q+h|2u|IrPsemXl+abZ=G%$sg+4hi(e=`WaoCXHE82w(9A0kz
zyd`wjv%JEAv8FOx*8S1<Nzz%{=J_SNt{Y^fT*@oeg%GmC&&Yh)!qFLvzh4*e_h;NS
z-*`0l*`AjHihtw^%rniBno_xqIiQ+nvdnuB=)-5?pHX#gVtMuKgWVmv#i%diTtO^L
z7n5z&@Q~|marXI`<4@Mbv;yS6RHz%qQ(a#QNQkY=oPqE>pE8R-?sd0X+QPp`&F}nX
zZbv(`*ZBG5Qo(&(`~s$c{u<ijpCG6GBnU$D=}_lDYG7yL@yzN+i`Ku^)S9P$s`ey!
z)@H0|Rm5=TMF4*00Kh_Ny@8rMkEob%Ml7UUxz=7skgMh4wks)olT>U&0vr0OnHVov
z+CQ{l(jRN#q^bu*;SHmAU0qNmH=^6{uz9Th)}3{eLR1kFH<$HL9=e$4WOLgSAl(NU
zRI+f-RwsCROctjPoU89Acgi6fbtIE^Vu@qkJ%ue5xMN_o!~A4HM(t<tlLH#uSSwM3
z^x%MEjB;LI@vJd(MuiuN|6i0vU4P@G@4aF?OLggS?~4jWGL~GkK`}+h46;OuvL`34
zN!i5?qY7hDv;{7rfYFP_Kl6iQmP?)g&rO(`y%-DwiRQ!X4}7H)ui9>=el}riUYuG}
zvu?aOrm*_t0GGA{kEG*y>|K6=*2o5(@`0xOF|W`?ivXk;t?Q05p6&l9ZfLnKii8(O
z|7xaOz!!A;A@t3Bl37Y$)brawgxPq2@kA}AM}Pp;pI^SFKTGnKjchD}jw3Pe=A9w_
ziM}y@Rgg7zccWO`Y{}+3+oGZ9JP$7ILt_u>k|Gf7GSN)(QKNd+4&gSg(1Smc5pSPO
zRSCiKNu`eh8!YsG%}Or%P_CvfH&+h<pm)o8m63VH90Tk(Xd8O#xriuaQ<znKFlb<V
zWoNweKO8NYO=C1`)qp&iE*0W0j<T(5Db*p5p#%mbQsEq&MZaJNuXzxC#+)?>VENJ&
zSkwwGXn`=`$<Qpf$N~hYr<k)vXK+Vm>U-oH#a@G8ZzgbXa;fVUi7HA>4R1nv&=R(f
zHfi(ass|?mFe?j^;_A1JtE1P_{VrkaUecf(UfA^O1^7wd>$K|^Ev;hj!o_J!JwCxb
z(|}rdW8EhT&=i(}s2H!dW+jGiT4y3dH;;GnX;v*Id6lN(zYJ%`SPZ5|+35?(wa@5e
z60RUEH2)1S@dILN7X^ZaQ?>#h1+W{Lp)^}O+c#e+`9|&0UcABsG1`@wsneqJXfQW!
z4-lRtCmgKpoBS2XVRvfL7&x3>vbMuhT#eSLwC2U-XK5l0`Hu<h8?dR<Z~A+Pwo=80
zai(2Qni#DJrjyoW0zfEa<2SMt1T3VkM&SNTA>1h{{O3YB8OiRi#_is^rFD7tI9&LI
z9IY@j#0yzv7?&Z*K-S4B-qdcHvM}6zZE6L^Kk$djGJk+a4lOL=9fzo?dQGxgFADNS
zj-IZ~;&}vk@07JdE*J^$6108`R*zt{A|HR99fJIIkLR~^XtzF<hhc_F$+Gn8#3J+E
z4~~Hr9JJ77nRHZ(Jo&L(RD*lW&bKX6gcb8)N$b*agXW)G<QO1ii#XHC5n3bwN$!?_
zc}4Rn+sW<U1Om?}f=S}c=-K|tp&{V`Y=tFg_%R>j1e5s6oS<!OKC!B4wO)8qx>gyW
z!a>J+-Wf#NGiG3ocW50Ja3Y}S`Fln{H(V}@hr7uwDKaqHWEH!HabYvTjSTRB!VGWJ
z34kWZ9HcoiACr)>wdM`O>o6`0Fokr1=minw7EMSTB2_s?<DZM=sOmJK3AV<+S6S|w
zzKfYkxB971_L`ST;RZtpU}`*aGxZ(>V(;bI=}8H3M|SAzlxqa!Yv0axHNvR)o_gh_
z(POo`ce-+l$%kok)_+5r9Ti=9>0j=Gf|rb<#5t1ySLIh!&n*8O$OIw@Jc^>Tnz&A_
zv73z+MO_apJoCaX&*tLeF8>LiLMATAy-nh$WB*_5lC*-B5YdCO75pZ+2FHHS{HNF^
z`wKR#I$W`!zATiggb3r~AuSI%&;)FTIFl>-rRke?C6ZwjyZU!bB+oIehbYBrOw$?z
zCI9&W1OT~V91zqXJ1G<{Gt8jdF2Y&Eg%RC?ZIS%7Nfnkhj|<vF6D^36d-0iHVQHDg
zvDzjJBaf&c$9GX=+M<?Us=|t{h%=m5#S>mVHjM454QBGYn_eIx%DS@bilIfZyoLfW
z&&u-w8bv)5f-Ghto!Z7XztY3G@NoOl+)E%V6n8}mi^pesq;5iu=X`Wi3?1PzDY8lN
z%93C3(359JEN4Jsi-tUH`9@_wp~sSvg{^s8wn(hv)o1;ImPLF4gw4Uir}5_MU7*#c
zgyjk+2@TCy|FjyTTwCU%xizy;lCrRBM7!j)H7(}E-MVzoTc|_eQmf+wrag`b(93eY
z80r`#FKG!@nuxD#Qg3io3o|r{K_54TptR#ESx>mD$eq1Ex4}y01f3IYJ=gI+K;aw{
zkpQBVD=$^@BBV*ESLy{+{$r6-HIr*4aL{yccFmHQftGJUIoF?LRyNs6z#qcC3YNBu
zr_s;JD(6Kf8I=rGW3IwO!Nx!{PWM-d$^MU~Zg}$s(L!%5Fs2b%jvfXLo2JW_qlv~o
zVfqTtn4(my`<3}lkj`?KndKF8j{kz5uC<tCPk3kg=F=J^N*J9hx|~Wx+dJIK|0IGX
z!kiC%(^%CB`{1vrnRZNrUy_^nd)lo)!{DCyuaP`v2zV8^wrIZal*lkId!@)f;?0p_
zj-t4qJf)ydIswL*z(jU5`28q6P)`Z$Df=t;i0NNRB$E58p?BO}$UivBbv)lNIShA^
z6ppPPxQML_(ZH`mz4f{dILMn(Gl&ITn4ZIw$yOYp?m7@lmmkU1|8!S7&8-pveEj?r
zJP+wuP0#qv<J!zS3(Mpp6V=>n`PLFZGtKd7)*<j5+2)P9H<9)=(JvE4umJt4;_)T&
zUN?_S$yD}3gUbtIsRwNI6NLr-@C^RB1m{j>PLitzy%lBCp+k%d{^R{I9r4KV(wGHi
z?>u|8%nQL3@F1%?x*EYiS5L$Ifb*f$&1R#zw=h9LMwydHr4Y55PrprOik)Y#<g|ha
zWZ-N2$YcE<&q%K?-&2#h-d>fUcE79o23W?|SQu1lW0(v!xfORK2YQIrQ^@jVs9}&O
zO%f~2l53i+;wP*JIJC7;X>v5>V(*RlS9~XhmimgQ1a+kA3z=cJ5uA*Ph04-fSV|W!
zkQ~b?$tgO=wzH$l<Qa;0wM3$7r)s5%*Gkoh`x}|@SqcMM=~S^*sE1vq3WiCI3eVba
zKoh&wblSr7{(}F(TM3?%cPjYcX5tx4E4pCCbC0JAQv>0<(^s#shm6JTx?pvC=9VT*
ziD1z-lpiJyooeg}M(MPxt;)B=8i|&g1c`1Ys@WS8joOwdrCpWxon78JzmQ%tl^Sx{
zg0TeXt`llMR@Mf<Zr=#b6i_u>iU$6S(gYR?%^d?2@NHfUwuEe6m23j(_%b^~Drqz}
z-4dxy@H$SJmO7z8da%;K*+-LsRdMH_mO@yt=HyiAHT^39+_$iBF0mJA!h6e+(!{rp
zg^hj2i)Sg2)|vCoNXy3}!XtdQfcZmxy`*iYCUhbWoxZ+}KTNqqyV+BV91?=W508m?
z$PeCpdL8~3A{=PFc)xP!2#h4(v>@yMg6CZ0iqTmG^9O9u{d;%SNh*4;)R1zZq<}Fo
zCkIKuJl-T_RWoog{NI6O@PXb`RlVrzje9G~=}auJ!QXYE(P;K=$x@x4ElG6$okCSz
z(s${xb=h7Nd4}sm=oABA%ipu>V@W0HXSPWt;Z4KnP>~OFKHpe|DmwW2g#4Fa^{tL<
z8bLG_n~T}aD0B!@4ut<7bNsbtdrYehMNXv5%3tX>l#(~y2lyHfgOTH0CBDMlZL`E^
z!9Gdl*dY&<Vs`=LPE&U{@b~iW({?@s{b(?__hwO5a6!|FVo9UW?i(6n=I3+BARDnW
z5Pq7~>t(?r2W9RRctFDyoO7!a;t2#^2O}k4A>~9}x5nyr_os_ay)fTrgSfW!-<A|O
z_x9r@_&OXK|K>AKFAU$O;_<kIRGq%n!p$a{!TQ>0R}Tt&^JQowhgtGwwO}^)(2Cq=
zB(KEP!QOBdxnn>GF9u|`xBeIMYIBWp22cjRpl*uw`wk|+Wf5-sv4zTowfErk%*5><
z&u^Bv5d{WbwGox8cD)4s8DeY;T|8SiI;j()#Ws#+v!z>GCH2!P5H4F;GpIO<-WkFP
zZh`RfAu)+QWl*f|qz2Nq->c9L%}Dx-!2>Th4}<TPI_3OC#td*Yzl$C?fcyTTJ(tpA
zW(=s1=#@%_s74^0H{o(SMwwL30uIA%HaOyjtlw5Lrsd*^I{*LpCV%a<E17=8YJJ+y
z+((YL;t*KR4S%BpqA75Roo{_qOP!>Nr;#qWoqQrCLpa_<|DhL<OSzaGPw2qt6{mI@
zioY8@mN!tt*OZZ=Ek)>UrthO>xt6`*r9w}@S3WnriVkWv9}7?zrC?XNp2n1cE8Ji8
z<i0Rw<tB5>+9Cv!Xrx!8u$J|ib%^2V?4+e8<EX-Mczm>FL0f|QygmRHWz*O=iZ^E#
zb=U>xcFdkRR?CnPqCz7+U?asXv~u&Uj7*hvJRxz*ms=`cw}b|jtpZtLm4jvCJ(Q0w
zWe8h@YrnEmx5fLQwG(7;-zSFA1?%Q6hLVB2h9>UvH%QWqk?BIR6>fZ;kl+xdvWF1I
zdL>|qaJE1Wrua6PjHrB|MNLiS&fl6F2cMP%B%5X@k>jrWiOgo|Q>r!{qQ&-bz4#Pb
zGc=m|Gw+usDUoM=;Ueg*#9%zhMDA`T&s_LRVr+mtZCLom1LA&EE4c4QMRIEKTX~F1
zJMKo#H5Gy30vnn%(jH|NNp&^2!?{x5&aGC0uAwFRFN{J<e5-7$1bu!c#H0i+`TVAW
zXbCnbD#6pR7JzE?!i{OD9cehd3NphW%9jV;cB|4k<oQ1g2c^_1_xyiOtV!;q*FASm
ztEs3P)bq0nmo!W;oki6q$tG|lGpxQg51q@2+e!nF9jRebK2v5}#&{YX-V2g}*r7!2
zsK~pzu87vXC0+kKdp)r~<&8%?1JJoJG{;4=OCEQ9Iu1iKPR97BcCX7NlPmpm&djkf
zwSQVFd@s9$8K<-+x4@P*9>KFW%+*h3*-5gF1^9)QlIhYrrdm&s)M<So5}SB(jxJ1-
zCv`lCMH?GQJZMYLBGOLsvvilXu2)W9W13fJ-8O($_4zh^d4jcO0%SxZK8(9zUD?`P
z=ougJY;jd$3V|fi4TFR_iA)kaTjVNZ{I{cFaRaln&`TWjO}Oj7)k#MB3DE$|jaHD}
z0LXZ%q5AZC^$(Zq-5LJz6MQI9r?~HfR0ak(A6;%h=I^X!XiqpGl@P;BLUdhl`co+~
zZ9VUcR%Th6ku2St24Hh}3A-UoXbl?f(q_PbZKNLFysiHYwAw^+$uM8|kml+hwJemx
z3`5El!N3v7r?BXM84^-tuPl+Yx$`^=Z_F|K#+S4(zr=`aS+EwijG~E@ksHji-)LC@
z8*A?ENQ{%sCJtLH6ua<qJl^Q!x8#y2H+<x(Y6M!eT2oVJgF(W~2RoyV{<p8FQmBkw
zA!(k4DN!~;e_?T+#xJ|{#kR<0j@r=oL;}I|tR9&$j~h=<@G+z9Po3mc;H+bTZAi_s
z+pt6a(Smgi$rgwhVQ(N41d(QEW$eD8o*@p~m5dr8Y<UELb@e&U+2!16PR><Fo0T>O
z#Zu9a6tGz?4-2P8{F(mPRp)snV~VT(_OMOQAKwJc0ohxOCu=Jb@AUj$DAS*)F5-1M
ze)1KrFe!(>K&cjuT5X4zWc;IvMONC!L&+8xANA|GD(++{E+4TR45y5QIdJ}~Xg4o1
zn3gJ2pQ);QNC>&-t#ixe^XNti2v~Cw+%G%f0LQ-1Cvpzp%3%|anD|!aJir^*uI`D@
z4MiwU5SuN{^#C;*HSsef;uTv4_ST=KGI3Y;>o)g(1tGcyH;nsK926F_3v2&kmS;Gh
zS{kZdeP3Upm_?k2%DMeF+poanBj`a*+FAL@PX$iBfn3vyr^LcDFvVncvv|qwcAtTi
zPmyiX8JoL%bG>gKeF4)7toHV$aC@CC;=ur>RKl@w;o0+Ml;b8QSHM}Azps+xx~f#P
zvg!?~cWOXx&M&Y}UpOkECIjIWSbkQuFTUfBel;G+6Hh!*u)}4u#y#TJ#HQkJfl`o3
zO{|SVKGOsxAW1V)@ui%<wsaW)Az}K<^?zAohd*Yac7P!=VPuj<V69pXeM+6aw7~4N
z&pL~!_{GW3TX=8Qe-0-cRN6&*0CG5a`=F1~AM*0x!q-f|G9o~-;U%IwZ7Mt5p%|2L
z2QhK8(-%b94pvj8co#Y!Fl)$;D;O^o0UeprN4@mI;9Fy9AO9a$@4zDr6Cmr3?U{FM
z+qP}nwr$(CZQHhO+veR(PHyt;f9OtEr>dT!Zi|EJtbvC~nHM?NDLN>RWM(3z5lQ;A
z)Vcv)r6(VR#DJ~XRaUS4V9_RJhyt0F;fVbX5eFXZWGZH##LTdvXfA^x=)jS)&3-m;
z4&RvCN-HT-?Qf83xSG~BPWSPSCwCJbklo}1&)DyyfBc^p8wJX-t2^SwO#ZoAH;Xa?
zxPB3+CIZeLIuo=-s3*)!<T3DVl7<rzfhyYs*?>q5(X-yvWW!+SRp6SzT0Py)2;gLZ
zXYsfCWJ1)#m%~79CX8W0HyF_r8Y|;Fso_G2d<la6cqR+}rT%Aa(C+s<+?ia?5&v9W
z!J^Ovjn1n%e(c3Nf?kJOOlY{-)0iR&#5b&WP(Z{~f<R|QA|2&p{nsO*W7F#g4DJ*I
zf!eEM=X!E9_y_VyEi)Qdv)4ay=HbitL;yQhU?@`Pwpw4N!rgQ=z0pX_R=SO-Zujip
zxoI?^-;qQbnXqwvuUuU9ZiV?U7R>tp*?^Fayb&Cmy-|F{1QOlyK4)g-Zdpeq2Br&_
zWhWwjmGgi^=(HtonzaOmel)A;Nl?A>g~vYwaMxiWigg^b&npkvF}TU^(*_?(f`oUU
ztsK0d6NRXbH~Ncb-Y#}v8Sx*9*AYsop5h%A8va98_;+oZiei-kQr-|1fp4T8Ka4yP
zz~H3!fOjU37c?n)o9z}0*>>Od&oBGHLgJTvX$OW-m&9n&p0*Y9AP6!^DR0N3`KH#Z
zpSPnvnUm<+PsD(F*cLoYi(oVPk9W-h)NjhNVLAulKxc7v=h-94(C!R}^PwT0GL*R*
z)&UJo*uMCxP~)PXnAYthI4-7}Mq^p}f0?Jr{qHItC`#s*wO$1{Vo@)A!t#OA=jw0P
za<k5r4*zXaK9=FK=n$=I;Si`P)q~Hr75TZ`FDvN#mOnYRdx}1DG7UPIu$m$1{+HoF
zmePTpS#mBMLq6)b^FIBG@l^^o%Q7w@sb8xyG)xKz-MLs1i_}oh7!wIC))N?VLKA>J
zy4gyEl(r;oZ#n4wbD)zO?|1#|{zyv7a{J~1jIcVWLU_&DBhNAwXW}6WPjOX#blXx@
zVN{)l<t6g~^yA}X09Ayw3-?z}RDNU9LAq44!{`zq1|rKs=%dY%+|h9|YvpB+Nms}3
zppCt3ilQl>XKbz)-67b9sAj-18qSQ7$Q$#(z+KdU@LC#g9L5S;&QodY)r;2p^mR#v
zqzqU>k+#ga6AxWCoKR0c42SLLf%w~thpLSFt$#t%go3A&r#0cuf3;?B!)D!N4IRK=
zL1mr8c1#*W*<&!@YRvf$9{EP2-&gO4`!OTMU@Mf8HK%OkQdH@kdlnmAz-T_%8}^`V
z^9P*a=1L7HsT!_*p?W<}A;PbW)+x7@^1eQ)L3%UPW1`Ed<r(!>hX)HxWThyA@KA`+
zP&q$IVlT&j%Oh+Yq7N=P@-;?Sz7T@)&44>MTYB>z488?A(&%h1au~`#@zBYzu|wI_
z*&09+R-xsqFj$=EgY<31z!qrxXUMAnQ*Oa8-NtLEsgXmA!FJj__=2zplWkBS<5eg6
z>b)M<@FOHtY0T>367&~6WeH|&i6&ZZwj*ldiMzCrITnXr?l~DVqSdY}s<JD3U3$k+
zFEhU{lAd}<7B|L>`3&4Ph9D`48m!s>XC)USa5mpuz(Rn^aT*kYNH|QVBYHrbqHLg;
zIZ(zz?wt_VJA#ZhkwV)u87hx%*)*WZ(Euz;SGGR!2+?k$RB2u-l9NGTRVfh!1i2XC
z_y{UWO3_S6;5C{90wnIK?@oIUYXo(?oWNedGUMZ536_MFDAGWA8lW7Fi6J`}vp7rQ
z)RF2bCEWYedJY<`Oled?QHXajA4n2Hf>lXdKo6_OSTIYllf`l$TV=A_G@+HR<s~l6
z+V%#cB;Bt>ihs#+6v=(2fEW&#^Aa|`J?lb?+YHl~zk<GRKX%0X0QgEYz5KyDz92PO
zGAM~3xYl-bCcOarO)QP`C;eTn#|SQeCA)y7H61o7R41@}vpTg)#es%20l)s<iH~5y
zpyq5fq9~loZOqZ1L+Ex38r>6+05POwn~A-jS|)hXFf3hEvl{_q$57qpjiMq;rW?0e
zMXbCi|GSBgx8h3qqS@rGnh3R?AShs}<jR6on=J}60d?LXV#bGm=5TO`dU9~z)C6mY
z|1CVj0CgBX;1u)BjQd5ZvX!!bee8OqbgE8~NCS&~7zPJ@ON8)qo9r{)R(Gg@V-mtp
z!Z=G=gKsxt2z6<rlx>GkN#S%nYn`>5P*N4!6rGRpjMOqK40v>cXV`rmSbrD~in((c
zqnbFhd;s|}20P?no1oCm7HqanVKg&R2fFItCKcJYj4h!jxTcC+&P?|Bha;+YN#`_f
zsQR+i^`HDG)25E8zbB;VSMpc#2&$L%U@Sa;A6$SKhque2b%ol_irNgEHL}=>3AIKW
z#+WrQck)>WqfK=siW7``ACG$Ef>bqI^Z};a_|!*{SrU~0zkZ??r9hF#5ugS#VTfQN
zE%mFR(3NSuwu^cGB9w#fcGN5L1iYYbKOs@i%O;*?o(rY{JP~`O;5NU66_jl`n3zf+
z)?E8UU&yJ8;M)dgMDSpLe@RlX-aaA8D<usZqIKLsSi;4IRkDqz{>N{#7hZv{)8x$$
zDCa_?igg@@<_e#s)s{qY-#Hg|e}DF<r3beur?H-TX^e+xrZr-9a+=xPH|gc(P8<H>
zNuzpJ$)Aw4_jNo>d+mMqPo*}hyUK=Qf)gZnK4$H$VxX((p_lAY*l;OrY;iXHYxdLK
zo`!B@L-LJ$D5KLETEFKLINj70)eIqq_7qtCeT2v|ydlv7sZ(OE1dk?5l}+>~hE`-@
zD)m`dfsOO)3V9^A1M(M|+b3v5h{9I3-zQ_7H+ouvG=k%NMXx#&HdJWr8$rZB4BHdi
zh>L#KOPY_X2bCg6Z-ErT7K>RK<okohg0&w<<Qzxz?QN4uZg}qit1`Y9`u-&4id2ZI
z-tpI}?Pl<auTJnay8H%R7j-wWL%+T%Q*YFqO)ROH!ZRQI?1xg(&F4XB@{|g`<W^yI
z`B<y#<exCdbb6l*eGTgKMb<H$B^=5wT=rBlmu00qorZz*WMibn;1am0;h3}@pE2C*
zG}a);kH=^{Y^BC}Nu9#6;Mi@41y2VhcoGm++PiJAaB_AWRT^{rw=R=xZg+Xg)|ugl
z?A5E9DIcehF)87Pb7_3xZ<~^lbWHz3Kf_nNb)U?=&b;otCN|B?zj63&gd2Z{+rrnP
z{Q<sLNF3)%6NwPTl2pRxQ1E}<%!3%pS0g}qRhd&^ZO0;_1#Nr;4emLN{W!B&5rwFx
zV($*<sww@h-SS6C=J!1QnI^$S|FTFCApN+q+(*`~H8vT)A^)%6t)qXc*DS7!K4kM1
z2h29kd~Ka)<lcw9MgQrfv)p`8XP!y8ht@j92=POlK7Vf}2U_@u@$T68Y?#bEy0_1J
zu*2>?)OAA94C{T`$KaGmhnNjp3c3B_`}}&0*ELr1wZdw+inZWpHazVt@TRbl5vjAh
zp$^=(p;Nk~*ER`&ixDR^v|swS%oYZ0LTOnnFU6d5Y+U@^(8+dOfHkzMBrpsh!O0rW
z$A`tQM~YCLvzg-CG$~ghf=McI?9?e`5~?s_uZ8m`Y!7!8LSAsi@#MbaA|AE6`V9yI
z<X#{7RMPOi<Ufu4)D&u|z&7J&)GV3egwWShXsiRjbsvkaoh}Y-Af;h2iAIw7(xW^$
zIrQI(R4iY-<3SN_545*2%aY9T|9sfc>4lV(2b>ktd2~hz)mt<J)9VDveiScj-P6e_
zgkzKdx*#?JBB{vhE8j+O;9E)R@U5uBmP-35=FBs`XiNKAZ0j<iX|C>sG#aB9qxU_a
zinA93Y=llxqF2Kjv4SdK(OHJd>PAUA7Y6!wfKDW}g(9|<IiUwHgd<K@%j0Wy*8WQ>
z_6vnMzlKNk*n>cVNv}nC^j~eSy3p_I>Mz+ss%>g^kR4X2(kb>`l<NoKBDyi|&wmAu
zZQAm#j@pF0MHocr)*x}`))mAS&Q0wd?z#KhFUXVYIJTn9IWzB~;((?3aqMW_tIq!b
zSimV)>6jY|l=t#Wk_CXb?vMF_n54rjt!$>F4lMwltD1SCgbBM>b2n;^%d1oB>z~h7
z;#bpoNh?}!ioNE)7uKD_zn&}WoPa$3>^*o(TNQeqL<#MkDH#8@I<hW)Fk$fjZ{B$1
zy0(9j_~Hi!1%WYVj|}MN1F)w&NCOt`5;(i4Q#HANi{;7KTq=un#`Oz|5c(ci9&|(5
zTy{d-0``;baYU>Z{KJ(JB(Ei<?V@4y+I-rkhTTy+A8%Y&CES9$a`c`KHvkmBGcMP_
zweFB|>;w~@=+H91>36S~=Jo(bcvv6Z;|*%VcnygQG9S;0F*cNF$=6V}_mBJhQgw|=
zr&ZC`cWFg*eN_u?-d+#@v^;t#k$xhly|rMWzIaW8`CXVd^QaTe{$CA~E>?XkS076*
zL)Tjdd#4%V-UZ<*gl-f{9h30a>}=?I%zBRQ?j>V&tcC*I*U*_$-o1&kJ){C`6+~Ni
z1!%{n{BTc0dAWw%MBJ4C8qW%uL&p7yu41OENKBGe9z>~&dTRE$&;-h%ay;`E^5%+;
z%&f^pbKolKzcl}M?muz~K+}kJK};(H{dLNcEocfltmjM(WTs_spXS*OOWUOUT37ax
zX~}Gkv?&_!lZ@P$4#stIl$aP5(yCF&+zS%nO9Czt>9e$(_@kQPHkqZ?z@ahCbe#aG
z5V7;@0eamWu`!{sD!9nGXg%;-L>GRS@(R<kkRbXy2E}LEuOEZrix2aK7nIT*!zSox
z2XWIXJhy7wL^)ud3MTqt%(Vejd@*cahbZL7>_f<-v;03seL#@<(#+bm*QA#CPr1BC
zEnbBNxUs*l@RVlIPNsi#yIdh_qW*e+q}!)ni{;LGf$=7V*v{n*rOK1vM_Kfk?%#(@
z<up0Bn;mjToe$}C_RUrVp>h<nONHEN|1H_Fmx>^c=BPk}Ws1RqaCv)i&BwUZmi|^u
zoCnX}u$18eASQ<X0;me4I$S$qsc8bhd>fUaWq@Md;kTaWFdlRQwmwUN4Q%`-(TR5I
z(JTVXWolMcOc=GcC==EFaKZ*$5xNQxNI<P_+unb+SP3MHoT`)*<880w`>FRgHT{cU
zn;+d7GWM;-KB$5%TVIeOw@OnF9dkQ!#0im){g+3T9ikw=g3ZcOInRn00n|@NbwJhO
z+Rz@=+sic%)XN2KDG^4M45txd_n6A=Bp_rfYpoo7<=w1Ih~I}>y{xJaXvGe5Xq67G
zz_*h^*af2_cU3M_IgYLt+g#F02eMkpb948&+)G<*hCCSJRQ}eh;9ENGrkLw-kb#vP
z9!84H1$2DB@of8G3i^IhXkWKNqotoNbOD4h>b#q+r(silfJ(U1dy%JO%)@+!&vMXH
z#HC16vtVvaH$T5k%ZM(idDLdVwNJi&d)hYJfxxl+E+*YqrJmkRA>aO2m}m|rX3b*Y
z8=VP3ghPSfs4t!1y#Td9rZYoc!BoK%1kHbm!!~k3TJL0z-t$o9j53ctWq(p{2ouEy
zz}FgqGtr}<a*Vqe0CMg+vazVbcU!omxL<I(oz28ZuYgKSnrDiEBez5F92lQ8q=Kn?
z$4C2>8vDzf`sS47Ily7&35Q;m6z!Tjri%alfx)A9u))P&=nGXmJITcFh#OP0i!6>o
zZSLh{*z`*%#IDYZ1DYX>ye*O0B%Esxv<KW2r0jB^86qt&Ev4~STHCI~yE?PavvpXN
zXBm8do6v>I{eyc<F3{L#!SP<$6N{8&^!Px(nU;SqbRYMe&8@@x0yH0+Q=Zn&#$>ur
zT7@s?f}BF=-NB{KyJXWq`t)X`h(p#$67PXlS(c83aR~VH(G&`aM(Aa?cZ)kjJ2=EZ
z#^R~d!?CXoP+`(6xj_%pur+j4mR)vI3Mlk>1;#_v8F5q2N(RYhm$YKaL1hDZ*#QkK
z%m2;769k06PYwtQYOin=4U!5nJ<gl-5=rl@Wr9gkRMDzyHEY7xCrEiqG)cUF{a0h9
zr~uE|-a!J?s3d8RoX2sr=>BrzGyWRB;KB?9nby|`nGZxiyxCNAYZ1S?SG2^>qkt3)
zo*Z@dS8A>WG73#o<R#^m!VBe_ZUeEVlsw1}Yh=+b)Eu9p{GK#nY30*49#RHkv9CQD
zCyFeA*&u7x#wURz(SH-v7__}zN1Ey$c>ciIg3nv=e^j?Db{6EphVB&^miR$$9-G%`
zCSz4>0?1y~DV~4{0N;LJiZH6TY7tRU<Q)r#C^tp#TkZ(4N|F4a`K0V)-H}>)2gD16
zcVAq{G5XG^b=C!DZe6G~?{8=IOQ8489=}$YPm5p3{k11x8tCEp{<jJ`6qlp>g<5C(
z@Z~j$1WHfKNPy6MrnZ*Dmd7Jicf26Lq?k$5a=An;Obb%!9qef=o+YZ8B7U=Ho8O<Z
z6(M?&)=VH#87Z3@NH;$d>d$ftT572n9qKO$Qzj2u(unZ{a`5c!P}(aEHd?(Sw^1*t
z&JQLxyHxjPe*a9~lmI(G#J{Nwrs#K<68qWe+bK1QDchT11+A+<j#iG~eO)8|FP_G0
zY_*nGim&III-sTagi&X48EU{~npP(KiI;inAvkTY!!<kB1C$%qbClCwS#)hH)yI1d
z9R@hs6PdJ`2zpS)8A;W7+Wn2pE6bNQ%9f<?z>|2Y*ykUsIMa>6n(#AejC7XGtPh1<
zlv2%BNkoRFa7!Vq)Hyt_Ep<i8op`sccHp=+OjkuujbQ5R1bV`KlL+F+3R~1VMFtp+
z`!YPK?pXSqG8uwa<uS>L0NrqzB1j1nG$L)I!hSIG3|>1{guy+#5sYefhXA|9ZAOu0
zH~*{x`k}#CAA>KXjC%xMUGZskpVMo?E;ez&i<=IexVzIGP*H#b!Oer+%w;q!Q518r
zB#JZd!Nhh<dh^M$H-;f+4#C&EIX`O-`K{1z&oU4a%47G99p#GO-C%dt-4SEbVd32s
z_m0|Z-t*~$Y_P;Ya*bpRep4O%m9(_RB%lGAx4w;4tn`2e?m9MV`FS&Pknw9C2r)!~
zGRPL~>c*f~bs`{@qd6%ec^|_CHLp%f*v%h}LXwmF;3@=&61fb)S?R_7ycz!IxNg|@
zJ8`_HqXbRWKT_|=OP&Qa!pA<JZR^xYJQJrul&2waKvQ5hC|yKd@a?%49VGt=-q}Af
zP=l<5H&t`QxX$Kq|CBS5nrRIxiyz&>B-e~Q4*zI0UWj^+WyQj9<bLQ%$RDw_wugd3
zZZ0ezWI;zZ9er=`a|Vm$_rPH1=)&k_yZ3^q`d+W$q`_oVb>KBuc0?g3RL$ho$-83l
zJYwB<l#%Y;M=xO9aA&~j50!y^6Q=z*wz&$gI5?ZCPz+P<Eaic@ajEX-A^AiAUS0AB
zt<g%**Kt0}E-ro7J7W2tK4)~JlHU%7hO(A6T}YW{m?wpcHmifB4%<~EK{{?v_L*_3
zTBQ&%&nw<6o4RuUyM5|$8#E*~YYo80umiIR)?ao3XT@zno410!a{32?P|S@PliW_~
zhpLj2F%Oz(!I=Z3uYzUrA@35dcpN}qC|>fa<!8l<>rlw23T1u(aJk6oKVh3LNjFdY
z4juaXGactrz7qz2nZzYfxMY29Y{6X^B`v~K-W8tAyAjBqa(*aHJdA5=jch52L(|x7
zGnZ8MO^PlOWyr4~6Ag<rrU3>9V3#yPNq-{Sre$n=#YZ+*BAd!49AKKxAO`eyhVn?|
z@bAmoKCIU7=hPluL<EPuba*vb2+|WFZjzGU2=iZEBfGo<`6<MtA*DoJ-Gg%jzgg(h
zGBUqi2xh*J^kU6r707Sy&$&b~JHzLV!zoE8raQhdzs^ZG4?;URF>z^c>duQB7rV*e
z!k-j+IKJ)OsU|<AO*47dNrm&gxY~s4AG2X2VN!Nd)U>PL5`=LlA=Cbtzd@u9`!elz
z<ThJ=M2BsJX4P-qSd>H3h^6!nt$uYNJ1~)SW}nNlSD3$$EAcJtI=uAF2lC&MtSe)5
zNnZb~>lUmp44um*9sd~_Y}*TrA;E#fqfo)B@zzt~!=O+}0(%M*H4uCiH>Wp`S;tI9
zH2%7?shQ|^gu`*BxNQd*aD7c*?g!T`B-*T7#T)smDaV|hsoV!p{Y;41)vAEG8^sE}
zw6N<~p5^IBGIax-2z!cCF^`w!FT^>Faj&L+bD8Bl!^U43Ypv@{C|bCMN15ek+gbnz
z)72^0vO{%}@;;x1%#1|Dh7D(+IOLHNh*&~b+qh56k^rEC)%9n8Y4k6Sh9|-4hF~$R
zD9^2;uld6{Acb3O!$S+=e)4;1$6AZkck5xS{XPqCOp$D^3`W35ucB!-vPA)!l^+)D
zi%ZYq{t&C;h{tJE^H*1oix8IFQIcL)0kSmCQ$W~*IcYi{F@e;HUzKcNVgIq&s%dhF
zY2WkRV8m|C(tzt|6O=N_!Ws}?Hw!?GXx5(SVo>W>ZcSr3CMa9SO9tPr_H*PG5I3G|
z4pD=LTbZPMv!UWh_vcFO)Kd^@+VbzMfHW~i^`uIt@Hy%Z#8T{O_d*0}(#4}~*u|$m
zZ5e$<Na`RP5tfjNc-``U+jZDTC?p?3!KagM?Bh|aPD{9zk=GaNfi2V7nMD{G{%E9A
zdZ5>OU35|Z-LEJ{(r5BedM>!B6QXmq^0v(4N&R>=@i@J7G0?^u{OVLNiZb418a+~J
zJ6P()?dZRO<+ZCR)KjE>S5tHsQ$y~~j#D?OS9{Y<!Tc4#Wwi9$pj~sU^wV&|k13%O
zS;d!B5I%U45=S9tvTBdxR>~P6Y<9mRrF)%86U}@WaD?;^c^g5Losf7%I4Rqsh>9ky
z05?M#m_RFHfSqms!0zDg!~6!Ie|QUYi>{}b?7`s$P;z$K98)}DQQpTtk*0^I?^C0D
z_kwVG>BPCw`L-szqdxe;bLK9DeA(c7L6=#8aEkGfmh-@o+!gmDGcb;cyr?f>N>6o6
zSbrXY#?2FHgcQOB61~i(pT2_oir1`sJQ@n{TkH@>M<%gPK?HtN2zt=Jk5Rut57|%i
zG8+&lyWtlO>s@FGqAtQ|V`GiZ590qY;j7@eBQ=oA1K#@{Mpg7Ee|n)DU#H<Acj;J7
zc*LU^xQi$3_10@F9;(Wjru>C=hgGgYwEBG;a)5C*{vM+q7o9HpNx*>_BE|!CXxA1v
zEvxAAjndp8f6BcFs&JYo9JDY0070w2HAP1S9F3Mwr(!<>EzFt1eJB>x%PdO^)%$&f
zr_>Y4+`EsPSR>0&y|R&|KeP}g#9h>&&mWs0xcAsJDcr)P0?~t)M_jf6+?Oxg^L=XA
z8l&<dCyJ2cnw-LWA4;*CYiI9<C4%8kqqPYa`|Y}ta!6-+xQT8%nGLGh?BZ(Kc<puq
zuZ)^LaH$En_y&Is+}M_n-#tUlPu-+_rhG}iN|0z0BU(1dX;_@ih|d;{oQT~&BZJPj
zOW-DPY=_T82w_r8mFk^$X|`m3-KJ_Sc@#0GfBixs@*k}tfn;a?y7b??pdWINd?8d$
zmj@Hn=#_BDZPx3jS>^NJGxoMdS~e(<rOL&2J~ew->j2c1j))LL?6Eh5O>03-@nFU3
zjEPxE{!>6!2AN5(`F4=ixO1=wCn*<%wtLgP&OI4MBtD=Zmckfolt&s01#z|sG)H_J
zZ#Al5vkEmuks1i=c!HLSf=8fR5i=nP4(*z3NlRb*!hFmS-M%}(&DUbqTgKjpwY4sb
z##d9{xP;EF<{qoH#sX@ysN?k$G_gk7QPPOZH7RJg_xswTp_Ab)2!MoAtg&Lg4p_6%
z9i(ULm5=GKP|xv<C06p*_26Bw61^#2Mf2P-MI-^R1Fz^(tJKHxkaY;<m)OBif;Rnx
zVWVrcEoU^w$ChZ*xj6?&$%4X}B8&bj?7`DViAknK%!?h{J5vE34W!$hd#RgZV&DvX
zp~f^8tVrSOtXsb_WvuHnWd;yNGOT0plpajU!0w2jBmbmpm8&^XKG9}ACx9Ou#i@;>
zP(CBUI@}L2Llr)cm~uEs90Zl}?FpZFag|-w*-}S%fJ$I5Gl2q;Kil$W!BVb;E|6#9
zmwm=*w#>jL<t@+#Gb&f4;JSifoFzvQ1L;d$xUm}k71GNhEoSdH)H)5xOkb<Q10JL)
z{vPJGiXS8XQ5KGP@l@D_*V(&Z<DrE^%S$j!uYmUGc5+<k&j)e;tsQra)cJ&1zzn8!
z`DgxGDC}IC<Ji-bv==c2{P@{xG6r+rTIcRl`6}771C&gf+5$B!$2L)9j|D<60-xIW
z)}wj%31uy+a*Cj-+`3^cBveIRkaCpv4DHKT{ksz8*t47#)nDiXzgqv9xaeP<YN>K7
z9g^M0!%ib{(Z+FrzRVpIL`UegsBFa5le&vTLefumJ@FYq2)Z96tXdf)qih+J+Ok7E
zn}I=ylo0WSiKg`9KqL9wkrc`XbRa-YHQH@eLn9%~$=GW$e<%r;0n{q`iz;n_q4XiK
zOz)H^T?min#vL>DPR|`Qe|%xy^SuE+_23%@x%HIftoks=icwCpuEIqnnG06kGWHQ2
zHgfZ$4Z>-ebf}z&6;XPUVvOQD2uwe8BDaruneMWUW`q&6Wng{z)p#!)&7<^4S<JS1
z9jKxx5LNmIZcp6AbC!OSYRiukO9zVJRc#=%N=Y@?zq4CbsFtGZ{9Z*&iY%S2dOGnu
z>3GG=TAK;n_loN$3N5=Knv~&V=j_K^x6+(TsGr(U)qyr*&39xeSud8_U#}BiQci@F
z0S3{DNiv1zSGW@&5?xe^(fRURG|UyhFy9Zh_0#9}oFCwXPI=|ajfc)7r-p7E$KzH=
znt2HQ903FYF-8v#(aZFtk&!U(GaYe`+lN+}=bV<NH4Sn|qSG^=#8=XAX<W`WC{dSY
zWgqgyKKm$1pFS@38#E?N(Sfbb@J{%Xt2GA|Ob)B?Ymg}G*9#=1eCq(>WN{srha|Fy
zvUA4YXta?(KngYD+Ox@O^hoyxp5mQ4tISZNemjb}0gp0*1ld6<%N}1%g{tcVFIm``
zX$LcxNOOYRxOPk<^r1O_Q#4Affjib?&Z@kb2BgF8AtK?DV?vs5{wvC=yTO#;7T0uC
zuI}&>3YKB-viy)TMZUn~qbRE*zrf(;`e7Fdiep9D8EUzYJB;@Ixtr^Ya5Ck|`vHXY
zHyPuBSQ6As`w~x(SWi#ZLxEAhS4_J-M(YH)A{(H&6FVWDQQOON{O$YAVufh)EKr1Y
zp0!*~xXlOQ#Y;)?Z(l^NZ&P<JZ6Hirt~q;Wyq!$_7zec+<*zJp41iX)ziWTl<!OJ#
zf6qd}xo0Jx7`9=qu{Rm7MyDJmx*lmhN)B1JX+!Dv>0QQE+-?gh19*DIe5CTYv8}WW
z;?o9K;lN$yRWL!|;DC@t96eZD&+s}(Zn-3g`;T&pv}mX7q@J2=>By9VQ@vzti=tBi
z@TA3~O`F#$%~?t|vP<yGAOAv48N^fROXaefsXNEdRThG)Gm=K0=YjvNC93XT57gQW
z9BpLUrDx0r4vklux-yinfxsQCo>Qj#vZ6PW&DOZa`vQD&=rLd0t(z3S+Dub^HmF`J
zB0DxP5Lf%9&-*9Ob&^>Idf4H8O}Qy>oGx3ng;hf5K`m}^Z)%Kr9f;^AubdNOO=5|G
zmqMm?S^BmLgcn;{U>T$2t$DbT77rnruPjg{EluqeKS}Ai)c2f<+Jzu;_`cnNUdNW*
zl=*?eRhKxVQy!f709pWe|Iz`&FdI`P?ay~L`F%$WO|6MIj(zW=N%=c`KyNt)tp}hv
z^3u;{xj;iOQ!_LJ^)_Ww0QXW4<L26~)S>?8qeBj=Zby>WC3GhQ07>tHOfq4h69qAx
znE1pldcAXTWz6X9Ua_gnr%YNsu!9)<e(;Uh=jLTMl#gx-+WTSrMwU-!gtz(;YkmkI
zA+-?Q+ZDuvBsS1L_KTxvM9MUg6gH1JTxp7}s#X0{#rBDLv*flV&=ILUYqX5R>e`)F
z*nk&}-p?qOZ~w*jSLC_7zL{c;v%0S%V~&r4?8D$(o184@)s@=~jH}}@IrO3(;d=$6
zro<lrj1aZdF$eJ}^=JSlFxgOF7AhVhn-nU|P={@UT14f5C%<_eXMWAScW)U$f*C$_
zZ_9_w15?;fQiYIpf!dlryUpd%8%TBkdefVluNv4~X4T$_i<;>B(lLdXQPJH!2c9hn
z0hAwylC__DAvUn*h3>`5VogfnJLb`*{M%ic1{>hK3p`-(M0R-Au}JH~3&|=4F+eI{
zs1Hi$V*W0{67vhOu!-=t)*%}Lb1_Q*l&96*Vy(Hnb|jNe;BdU{vb8I`qE)#@VMYkN
zkSwmBcLFMIx`scx+c(O*8vrdKW`-jha-P^5H=?Egdvk%jE(icOlG_#s8Sv%`6ey73
zQT^~HdVhC5l}QjVb5@{=fzHv`>%F=Oi)(oPv&go2V4U+Cj-KhNP7c#F(GSY3OKDK;
zwwplhl;spK@(M#Q<7JxTlkrNQI#tybo~GDrlu;`>C0!VinJp%)9N}iP`P?Yv9l2S(
zItLBa6M$jt_TOUN$mmy8c9bG^^v%G<=9+1Jw||Ubo`dswoov6P7?rQT>~Qw%%m0$O
zg+fN0eki>5jMpt7&D%u2i?g6Y>xyae9fUeinZ^sRh{ozBZia~sIKn0BWeD(3$oDRN
zSh;5=V`8}_5q|h@=~!nyNZ-0ymnLfXnPke5-izR-xzUO^o|i$wqM;^|H4SGGkEqnf
zr`#JcmuJi*%23Y7K8=Ld`U)nX&eXMyYyj;6Q!UeqCLI)@qHEMO`y-o=52<DW_7E)7
z#1gDwB~=z(XKCfxI|t>p4EM+$>qGXkVcwyr<Jpl|hkb?2i19t*EOqDEJ*X{Ng+z>z
zzzbUMZSLJ)<qY@_hnrG2gzd5GYbMifMLP6IRD%NRHRO8ODObT=ggx`K))#BR3eyyP
z-@g2+Qx%=^GsWovsYB1bJ65svG~F%Fql5p1xdsT25a=bq1-;1v-W0*!xDpC)1TBQy
zJq~#`)%7w)Q6U;65fPK+uYmHGb%an9``zJF*qU{%PXFJAv!~KMFe%X$cA@#jt=a9E
z8_gtQsrxxjpQd>#%&<Mm#Nk7D4q{X1*ngLX(Gax+tRCyXRmaD;mF#r6#iy=z>U}XI
zgU$*eKUU>cqybsc)Ug^FQiV7l++?`e`pjQvbC7pG&?WvmNoC8QN-RnTv|CKmb}u<@
z;Tn<jugKy@jK8BP^e`6Hs-D1zv@@VyqZmGNZMK{{qtl$>aKzX>X|xN5UPq#8%6W5(
zF^JKGpU@;duwV^nC=ZZ_sUMS<v-SO3Gm_eAG2g<%!OrXUw3@r6G%=NfaIGL%SL#yV
zOK~h6JYkNQP#Fb__-;3<z!S*#mj7f2S9DEA@P)yeNqyRHthIhz)75j{P~tH8U4CU0
zv+=K(Zqfk~CCHR^*0^;@|M%4OLS4zfiWO|0#>@$D$#@uDNoHJr4wB7_bUKgM#dl<P
z?0?QGCPSO7aL^73O&$*h%Q|UTxi6D-SEFje?wRS~_dRb8O2hh;fFAxE#~qeL3$dXj
zz#Yk~j3h<LCq=UxV2mOF8fWP?9wTI!1D}V|#*Sv529+kye?2ziXdfq;yW6{^{Askq
zmVWxO#kW|8Ct<|u5~UHs{We$S1&G!uO#@t};9c9LuzrPB0d^i-BcJfYCIu5b<ak4|
zq)Q!Owd7o|tn^1`x-;1B?ESFVmE3Q|2Ew(B&|)Y3*8U!g)Hv;pK+i@YiX#+=1@1=&
z_-|NNt;cQV12>v>KYfpjG*9P5sXiL&J>gzvjDHsk=1v$&vd_@);^7@_A-QK})vWu{
zRw2XC&z-cdTsvB7V*tt+si&p8*DH7^Miqod?w>LtR?Sb)GJeU=%{!P?)`Z_#qrLkx
zI}JXKzer4hjNq#OET{V|klOT9U@{Tz32HHeBZMrs4`3FQ$thJDz`pY@WeW7*&#m1&
z@GprOAS)Jk1gc**_`M_)aCofL>17|PK^HclN%^wt342*1Xa1Z0#c=fUO*|qN!_1WQ
zLofuhe!(xHfUnWwd0MNxvU$V?^wgP|bXIzYfV=rI8-k=K1GZM_Hw!1tIXQT$F%xBy
zX9&7N0=nxWN+izHSCM~yD-fqWLTY*A-WFn1qg;-D*r_@TzlRN#`-KPF(R2M*@J$AC
zHkJ3h*l4P?{cw6oS68x161FN-)MkkZdE<blt$cwU>8qD&XT?sb&(jrSMQLB~FE#vW
zxgoAgJIQ{7l|AFbGby!HtQ-DKnV%}=uKlEOl2BX$yQf+e#83;o2d8(_xce9-hGBW&
zgbs8O)B3^Oh~5+!9-Rq!=4oiDr1aLj7hOQ8g1|jUdV($L!6y%tLkrycIAX%K2*Jzh
zvKf6+$$4RLE$&pN9on4~ld?wD<-f@QEPjjyf`7`jC!nR8#PFZq@}s$qi0l*$z!CPY
zrIoqxV%k|3o^*5?;0xRU*F-Tu2&Ly(!BLFgqC$wUkFm3BkL$Jx^#D93)C>~2i-AX7
z^@p@*)>{kPQAdF?Dnl2;q+TtM3FT+i++aop1j%>qFAjx;jg|m5AA&t`4JTOEv|-`^
zP#2k0lSEAFh~;^FSo<&GE|)Ki8_)t6p%v}7O&@K=(1#xSo00;Y0CU$eHPlrZ^5;4J
z@^gpg?tx1na|gwwxw`zj>b4*&;LeUmWgk^)K>e!xm$NqeS&-u>TAwJ~LeUJ{6&BXC
z{n^}ziiYmC(WL3`_Nq7Q<GN%~9<Cfta}m&ND2=5(*6+CNKTr+IEfsg{0{zgmwO)_O
z#K!JG{ENRb!sJKcggH(myDilg+<mO#+dljCAfUHP9<iG&4@}UUj3qd_O!vF}9NYG|
zamQb(?FN-f!!ytdjRctc7Yuw-1~KxeY=RWulxeb($0A0IuofHAsfrKKknSA=p7}lZ
z$)_uPgwzR?rDZq}6Wb+&jaZp!zfVUxa~J)79mD;i`$HSXg7T9cA+SlD{{<B<Ne^xX
zq%;?k5lC6Q4PfSk;1p{%vUu<Ubq-`P8|9{{MZ+Q)%<+7-dsO`_{m|sxHr(2$JO>T=
zY@=n|W=Lk+sQy@7E#9Kt#8KW9u+_oH`Ixe0oe=}{;`#}Y8kiZm+heIWz^xv*wQunn
zyH#|UbOR;w8q{RT1^gauuCOMF8{4?bt^k%6L=*mxiWR$B1?uw<9uE{_*AGZc_A6GJ
zKPTXB_Wxx#04Xn}G9W0pT#{$3+xf0VDL}(o9FV@0btWGwb+T=EyyB^A??M%>l88QS
zA%7-dQn*_^zo8@!_5=~maQPHvf`-<2oKZECemX^xS@E38rFe*Et5unM;p^;fP&4~~
zfLPUUhn|3X0ZAt;ps?VBb~kH_FBplcga%y9vMWC0qc~~{w)#v06biqbnNo7LJnu5M
z_|db{C(xTd;LB5k&Ynrs^7C4J+H2LMb>0WDZ-=3x-0+;L#_fS`Dra1yw<hp^mc1A)
zR?Dvm1$FpqOxM0=Th0qGmYGW%&(2(pcWW+Apo50Q9s~oT-k^&wesjR;7)mM}5>kR_
zR-L2s;8A}ob6zWh*fLYLlqkIY6IpG_+k5_CfT5G6-`sq_o9IgqE3Lec*_o4A+^#+)
z1~omxh#cF;y9C6vw-hG47Yo8;U_BSN6)zSK2bwNTOs8>KQ=)37V!9Uw;!ymUN)}H~
z?Z&C!Ln)CFe-0qKm)A=u=>ddFhu~LS2yX`58pv5u$!+O}dR09Ug#*5AMYREMISlCu
zPn|MW!56&&FF-KaHj$pHL52~Pe{#qfv6VpNMgkOz)n9Jv9sL;hJar=>lb?%l(R%C1
zyUY>)68v0*EKHAL#W8Q_1bVn&muA`U4}DIQCT7#*!>z+Gp0b}4CkxKpP|e*dp+_6l
z>F|#0))pwKCK<tz>9GVy*Hw$oS*VnBDp@(26vpqEz#J#k1s!#<UCfou6ICJ;jQozX
zfZyZiE)t(dCq_K1uE}7|?7>2R!zcC_A+A=Hxb5T9fi-WsYRe|mj%M8}ML-sdb<!<;
zJcD)tEtw>A4MCHQ_B5rGkBj3LsOdN<f`iaD7wI+Ah1X!q2Ao#98UIP!^=gTEr@mpi
zL|XP2c>cZxYC_VkyCcEd?0>a9^AMjGR7~kwV!kPDq1es&*fR*keY^h|LpZ39twm?Q
z$vM-R+h;0|y}E4H&eq@$Jr+k9G+5`F%<i<frHFpS&M~Yu{1QX83K6;q2^a+_#~a{6
zjQ2mtpmsbZx$q-o$gM2?+C?BvqeEVF(?NknJDHFu1DsNKXY}vWU=NxBoyNH<VV$PC
zAJ{?C-rZ%bt2wR`bB0^3{C6iP@u8LTmv98vfVEM76j_nvpHJTclFnCIvLJ?S!AvrH
zfhEw*)utE1V>wkCoR<$0%U#RngUYM;{_uYt>((_8;V9IkN=6!<Egf}-5l+E}k3fn#
zS+S5oJr?qlhw0Q)Z4t6CF6VQHcMm+KmX>VvRZfy1BUJd++5`o<(;a-jtal=(uss{%
zu{S%KYQ6wK6Q}6Jc!2jI>-3<8!sz9xhbq+SL)X!3A73lrW(;l=(rk}2DBm4d8Za|v
zWxHbHS;giHl!#;hgWh1Kee^<e5OOcWnh$r-G0UK*;-p$blek)}o$$QwIe<@eXyUGB
z;zuW??^qah6O;?f_FrBn5$se~<B7j>iDa?ETUjM}hW0+HP!}Z}R@<?`H&Kc8UNLOg
zEkQQg1W@k(cIOV)Ji0gm_-ncGSq6X-^_s6U3EhvX)b#g|fx$rEdY7c0+?1t7Ual3y
za~8^|Q>xOs_<f<K73;#bcv2|MjDm4&6v4}TI{w6VS3EyVnXYioyZa7T{c?)`kd9i#
z+ZQ^-t~@@-Fx+te9Bt%)TE{T1ogwVuX-T#e9`UcI$yUoFJZkQXj6wg>iZwGt(Y_h4
z%d|-m#x8-QpF2QaK#Zw>gn%7xdr&E;Ci&4IBW{zwn{;`Ylc^rJ-F{<U!|xTjvPPMR
zH?v_Bg+Ndv^&zEVR?%@*IHmwYXn!vX#At0`^h{u9Z@77eI}3nwLJ5Eur-yGONTx9}
z0+7CsVy&+=jG{x_{V{(hh$)Lb4881<>5#4p($74M9YjuB#D(|9P?sv*qAq)Np$T`^
z6oA%x8>kKgPb4#ta%a@IZpqL~5jEa{gDv=>qsz_MStcU9$$ctc;c#(5H{76({M+7+
zVZvu6wz_9^(UsL4S@!&`6mGAV*U^qr$JG8Q`c6eH{7hX$v;wpW_dc6%ik4pNyL2(w
z#9-E<b|LRGCkiIfdFT`+&c;a<9<*xWSNda@VSt1#>uUN@y2NFTOo-mSt+*;m4#~wr
z3tQf2@k-!78-y<5Q3-I{K@u-btgO3v=+hCvOhZFf{ukrEGcSk+MHv4eR=gl-7saR_
zzF_m#>)96Ky0&JbQFl$-D$@oA)m#Up;2?z8mGGq}!|z(;+paVKs?~++zN#|#ASEkr
z?8jDQ1*<31G5K$Qhuh+(ITwo|2&S)1+!w-?JX(yIG0}i6#jc*I*f`44(icVZfIc~M
zeB$%m;&p_|V*vxO1Mf@2%mJMYKJzNEJl-`dI_R7EO94+m+pvS_O68+gN2#D4h=^&I
z&zT1pmN@85(QP*V|0o$9`?-x40nXF?*Cna+i?^iHacliI7#sp*AgVf{#ov4$S(r3K
zHG;XNW(y61C`rnsG~?e9Tc#7XEHAZUO8Xd$f7{hy2cOqK@q>0If)Fb>AN0M9;vpz|
z?LItn>ie?jN20BHB~9TKA)@BfT$(8A9|b9i;eRboiS&-lCmo#N`t6GDRJ({Q>1%a-
z`qwGpZZRpGx%9kx11Uw$TTEDyF8L|YyUqp!SqH5CbIn(7hdfv!iIAk7Yr6`4`O+@N
z{fj3(7m%a;NEn$+NFjk%br}s4px6&!;|7@pcL*laBCJ8Vz@Y9HOOyqd*a$mpMQ#Rq
zV^&dO#m8a!0cI&%LJ<q6Y2Q~xSxS3VATfRa{xLuy`$}lMfXuMcv}orvDy09Lh~@9^
zyB1S?IT(my*wf7aTj}UEz1I-bcSIUWkB=!2Kz^)1Rx+txJ3T6Fk)sGUu~UuTMK5-H
z+*}rLRLLh<CgPZ$RnC?4HsKmVd(Vt?i7vSc>vrQIkyu@msZxq2hg{LAs@JAnE_v(G
zuB$-S9!Sme11XknXAe@|=^JL#c!OgjaBFAZPE}6}e78%BQo6CP7s6qU1F-r;Bux?A
zY1t0}iKv-RkjPhBYm9R#+hl==gGVyHtRLrV_mJVx<sj6F)SZ%a&FU!rz-Bg^)+EvW
zJhU|`$cS6v9*{14?a)8F-S<@cERGUtD3}Lbaebf$d3(LzaSVYA@ahZnnc5DYYteEA
zavpQL1Pr%3`Lc`1=G5=#y*Rr-7}*nRsroojCwXxv*p9Ux6<ok_f%nv;rl8OjLThXQ
zwz6nlM<*jiI#KRLCk%LKCY^uzX8f#Hy_KHV_etE$?uV?f!I(Umv_Hrhbh3q^^&c81
zX(4Z>S3bN$;2m-vy!ccA!BnQH<9<#}feKy#h*USG_?M-3L7{IM4>w;deWzbjQV^Sd
z;jU%ftsxD@h{%>UJ*vTVlygJhcnLKh$VgxCT;mT8C0TNksgS~3E33ztv2!{m)-bBo
z%YlDkUk-&9H+XdZnY>vM;*TL1GceJEdKwt#^T{I0w?Zwj=H80OoNdPd-**HRYX~&Q
z1StAKHlY3aPp_IF;T5`*EX2nf7%w+U$+~N;(Hq1kyO!O_{hNp=X^Vl4rRgqz7;}JB
zkMaw&WI1mEU{|RR6pRYl^!cn?rWcVqDCHSR>m@amFR4Hn4K5<Tx1g-Nx5;qCyWZ2Z
zC&u2FE!KDXoSa-bIKNHC_*os&;ryAlcTLD}WV8;6W0&|;cr!S+#Y#K|*6iuDLV<vF
z(K9#9O6!`gin-9Sy-tl`$7I!jLZG<u)IFoGv~l<(ew;1lsYhzL8#ml|VvsmAm3=z(
zl`G-KA6{u_-VJO+X%J1lsh*75AlH(6yyz9^Y`&F;TSxZ@7e#mX2%p0CI~0~uZ8hB9
z&ynAN3q9w;0u!!_T*s^?JyctEnle#TD81n30(V<ZvIq7~4@%a&4&lyIsgmNGSpdFb
z1rmUjxe<5V8x@Y(f%Wai-(7}sy^v^qh8zP#8piRYgQz26SkZI@J`_IL{AN-?0kI^`
zp3}kO%Ua~{^|`b|N|0lq;-P%Iy`7d1_QW@PU#6vu)!psA4Iy+ytu#o@S<g(%P^Z3s
z|F)i*a{lI9dc%J>?l?WPKO{nEhatBZ__)1B*V5}ej00&HeAf!_g3Uk0-YVDhP%Yh-
z_(1R}U+jz36}_DT6ebAE6sGVvitW97hf_20CP@%e^4uOmWaRG6XDn@ajc^Zu#Pf0(
z@Re&;792K!>Z0$<^z<HsC-|be;M2GmJO@6&UTJJt64=qWD>jk-9y<Ax$-dqCirR{v
z77Qjp|LAoIh5e_LbeKhl5<ZxeV3M7}g?|#J6B%m$7MGOxuAV91o2`IO|4d+Y?BIa*
z$wYukKC8vq&PUkZ)OnS;AQInflM`I?wF<w+Fe`eCR~-5m^_10S@}V+?T}jS{^?0=v
zZMQec5BEZF;FaIaiTmlZ>8hTW3-9^wvIceG0yJeQRtpO;U>%zY3egv<Ag&${Dlf;h
z47wgPKU4zjT!93V!5+Yx4L<T9&*IApvv{$}q}W}KKjS?~aMx6EMlPi*-38d~t6{0{
zVMD0-dEx|4fa3ev6&MC8Yk5DXHy-caGtTC!rejfc3skwHY0k#ZfPT)FKR}X%r%bd$
zL~cgjVM%mgDK{GpHs96D8cN~SvO#(CER{^6Vw<HPQ`dgZJ31sT{Zl1+E#Ce;-*5zM
zH>Vdkd->-xD9Tb2We*SJ56>t0f&PR;s_WO%6COJh?0xE_>0cpm=Ik|0=v>2=jj^rg
zHuj<S-OMp)S@j-KgHLofd&hncgUC$Z%m31pTxdSt-5$_$1{l2fFTC3y>;K4_n=6ke
zEqIw3l`X^F()GSmr;w1*&nt)%`A$|yd46p^!mvi3;(OY<h9iz*ghd1(a)*H*z<TjC
z&mHLfQdB#DZiD42=@>(DeF$K{poWw@KC%i|!^8Zy#DyQnXc+zV4svd)Wjr3@eMfP+
z4B&~e$2J|OeK{PrbZxz0rrpp2Ck;zLDHNWkxQ===uo)_@r$cs)D?<37kJ``Y*lWDl
zAgJTzW$t}dD76mSF^|VT+{RJMc5h-Q`H`fuPMCx6N**qmPU`tiwoq+dpdW6950#Hv
zuO|TFp=ySUhVzGNPTp0XlMX>g-4d>Qo6R-_sR9AVks3<lkp$`v5iJ}4W$=1phqaZD
z3h!z(I{@vH*8$i=iK<<=GzREr_HnU;s{xV$4NNr;M|D;C>p-T%DKT+LDF%7K5U(be
zEDT{RcxaQ-j#U&`t6=c0pdljD>=<_c-B+;tO*UGrv<U_U=@=~Bttud{2~DE$yB5e1
zkF3zO`F=MYysJvB*!?3P0{(JJud}Un^t;z99<!h>rV!t*qFW8I)ZEaUOA)Y_K-rxA
zh8qoIgyNirBBLBQ^>4JVIgIGOAYWpM+uLq1ML)XzZPlrRmKx~SM&14!ubg^ZHM?}o
zW$gEzrOJ{|aSj)!0EqcCX7B7t_jMZk|L-_&#hs9xx*kC!s>vuL+?OEs1#c-7XjB>_
z&ysD~Mk?~PnMPt8L&kG+L6up*t+;jFzT*ana+HcT@fHU(^48fB=eo9~8oCJc9In5c
zxEiXGMz5iub|ycCGBap12a_tD80!8zFdKIL-zdQkGSt2-^A+^Ykf?L`4Xsif<Zst@
zGN2eLH(xl-BfWjc7l&u|-)F7<r?A2h4gRq}4ZZTb+bsEGp{b9RiVIF@2Bm(g6T5?|
zP>lZ$#{^8(_C2G0R0eQJZOpxvwy;p1(i>S-u|FMj)r@{lsWv!lu6@{`i;lo322HdE
z8{w!Ww&yL6{>7x)ma<m9`gZvs1?APa>~0?08OY$SXpJH&xLCf0*dC-AA#C>8J$!eo
z$=p&^U`(m<E(PiGC?&-p)5$NC_JepKKx)Tu#I1ahy&;pNYrIgG=fd}xc|n>o&2ZIm
zfUXz$rBIsfs%WOwIKS>>|9zDXrA*Pt)2MugYaMat`=){CHR=cI4jEm@<`e%}Wgmq4
z_h~M|?QahA0=JS0Jun_?)saD~BX8R-b|QCTG=t*$d(3hU3(w9S<dQd%k#e|Bz-1<1
zSR{nG7O{5=a1Y8IieHLa%s@!|j=CuA7{npC-|~XLXi25a665mWoVRgu7Um=FKqGo^
zY%az4$A0*AD-qVwS0B6;IASy9Z(p2*NvJol5T>N2%0?Bi?4HMZtcIwWY6@W7gR4S7
z2z5{3Sm>U(gLvp>Rcd=HAW5kjJ`4`EK2B~2&-*vK?|E?S<^CXIp5*BsyGRzhM69wo
z-z;UFhFo3Iq75((8(0+YRPM>>vE|FlLn15kpxgdCZz~whTU+$`tZcZ{)@(p^_;9Sf
z+Ys!IqzQ(&zri~`hdP+L!SpuD1N>MZ)iID>t~SRpYKxC;-AK`;aSv#IPH4N=&u(sn
zGdf+I*^lNw89McyqEsHnX+SyQ3u^2~D2ipR2HFcZqFF$#Q8Fm?g0fLP6D!?_sTERb
zT4l~K{wVDD|F5faYOVxelx;Yf9ox3e9ox2T+jcUsZF^$dwr$&)<lufU=l+PU>guZ1
z%MOMGkIeqvlzXPN>YaiUL?{)fyV+jg2Wnso;l=t@$RKC@pAP5@`@_M2hPS+_P-ZFv
ziVa&ijN3@BcFE_!{18*chGw-B=Hj-|gj$8ZYHWSi-q(F0)u>cDTc+#@?}4jAscYVf
zV$jBY8USy`WMzqp&YbcO0XGO)8I4^ZzE@4pDc)jqv~_79_mTpBKEz~kJl;J)^b_r7
z^h00hti<Pi-Xhrj*$vfhjTzx$3j#I_bak1F>oGHrGx+Uqu41mLKK$jAquh>un}aYp
z?R>b9rqcD)k+Yz&y#2#$^Sa^dWJ|hxYM&8qZMT{N6Grq>yEhaljFI~N@mJ<p*@7f-
zdl#ShCYZxk_`rM(3_J^H7T5dS^be=&&2!1+sDE@#h3IdZ6A?b$0mg{?m3Pvl8v+`<
z|6&J#ofbu-Ddn+A^KAU7L2CxDKS5VoLu%hq8B<I-QLM%4iJF*r7V|NBwPB+(ZxO!l
zeD=X<$1^^Jn5D(c;I+&kZ2W8F-t{hpe*i2*iTlpE;%M^o<fJW!SYeB?=Kb$=J$KAJ
zM>fM5S{q#)bp^7QGevSv#PN-hzjmr?tX(k3fORW&1@@`s3+f!V9zEX}1Iw88E|zbO
zj{+lC#VMbDsTKV=ZsU#`W#b^;j{-(3gzH^*ALB~}-#CM|)K7?MgJ-ZZAG~iVU_!F{
zHuP%b74E8eCguPx?VN(yn2EA`6;{4Mvz?FPq71}k{1r=X_(bwg`^lR=j^V#WV15;h
z4|sQw%<-hHt`hghD0W&xVqb2*v<T<$i1NmreD%C2Z2m6_5a_t3yIWCF;-{sViL;o+
zPy0Gu%U#B-@}82EvJN3^-B!+>j?9mw=|6EAngub~U@MRmYqGPMY0)bPdkKwomy~LP
zY__^<Hls+-VZ=w&HJD_gy-;>i*9blI(2`h$mp!0o27?&4(9;wH=LD9a*5wz0^l*c9
zCbcf?iw1nmtC<z8YBYP5m;Ccm@|(ue%w*gquAngMTa4J*W%%N^B?&P<dG;!5P4dty
zC27iJWe%N>Oqfk&CeNb_YSX$BHWrc>f<E<3te<OA9X<FNk1-tRAo<$h$r~B=AXR-G
zd~1Yk%=w_?*51~5$S_zp+&=?-TRjxCAP$9b*XV~&#)0u^lG*coY;ivts7s8y6-<&d
zpZw5|=joY6HB!7|336-mqt4j4ZN~{yEdDTzFl+%jSvR=dgl)tescWX<DY36{AJ3+5
zGmoe`)k@ym)2OH`yDg!j25;#_(4cn9v3lZcNVz)yT3&7jIQ%XRmG;2x%*t2)wG#xb
z1WD2ZiQ5|6w9zQIpNM{9zBx^^6w;u=lUR|q4u8eci{H89IIJWj7xb`)_Qd?hc{$BW
z4)9g*-ZcRhpBn`c5o6z))@E1izapN=voEeLAVCTaeQ*_xV`Hl&L?6)=1|}Xr_TN&v
z1Uk$ngUgW}ammiEg9R5N8Q&_&^iB}%`7SjEyPzMVi83codNI-FUw7*9M882F2N#b;
z2i*Rup^)yWeh;Zz$%-o12ln6vdo3Tb+*UyI&ZE~33ZxFM#$x$ucPwjtsAS#HZNg?f
zXc=K{Pk-X-(f!W3;-_%Cm~_6!#@uk+E*W}SITqFisHY~>NUk_=?d%x91E~vvr%(dX
zgr`D_S471oC)(I7F8}0|1mQ!t&YE*Gn#D{Z^+Ae@UwVO-CQ_yKq_MptRB<auL`Ba_
z)8?1f$Fcq#&2m5SsYLp501*8$KF?luxo+|*);iKuS#Ya|e4=+Ws8EcxEIY1MCkaG?
zulTsxPP+jkXlZZ0UHKdy41HsE(XRSQta47q6teLZ#SQx_f2q*NaEbYuA&z~wfSx!N
zg?Z3L2Y+ov4$%Go*xtx)nB@C##b@gd-a^=2n0Vx1I!VL@SXW70md-Yg9Q`rctYvIB
z<9q)2Jj`LH7<Q$#ZlvZW=2hh8Jq;z;p6^{~R|9xmzMMxL`7}52W=GSWM79Z_&exGx
zyYf7lK5WQg!V{77)LF42jVVN=2M^_!awl*20(4X=|L$T(4(+-J?-TbqqEJ(a?8ATf
zmpeqf_zhc9^u@(L*4p4yv=XxN^sL4XGF$OT(+;T#W5M%zGfLQQe7j3hp(@H&(j*Yp
zvAiPw@-tC@q>w6X<Y_;F<hw`;u_B%PotW2D40J77(jV)Yy!!8y>Wew?3iv=s8Y0S`
z^B&(nMNC`rH`9Q#hpt`t!_|<cS>*QCWw#$+lmD9CW8s$j{1wV+T!jy%4=DkULaVUY
zkGJey_r;vkDBE--XuY*-KVN&=9ixC95`NOCU`DJqudz0|weVVn++A<f9XgPOQ)^&t
zE0wiPJ&e1mGWmPM5ylojC3vzmVSpS7?qBCQ`ZPbG&IeR(v-h}{&Gwktw56>;JR=;B
zA5ApZ9j2a^kd24$i_o+^`@}?^x-Asi-(!`FAg8_fa?cbgmt!owlAz|u*&O=pdyjia
z3`13`UsKY_8m;23+7$3gG#{41tfxc>64Of#=73k$Z0DtjR9G`eJzBr`^{@N3_K;H%
z<?b!V7Fr573s;apqr+k=z7t1OFpR7aNqO%j?WmhNY(&nh7@uo#%&TI}59;d!g9P&9
zzK&_);2vBoR()5`m)eJBgDL{6=F*$!c;4LCS1=N+YW;W8lPq7o{DPW}W=1BbZ%IPh
zxCPLzdg9xDu6z`5Pw?>&fgOFP;<qG1n|P#UrK)O`Zvl#o%QI8zQ7u~ov$+FaI#h!M
zJ~;Y}I$AY5DGR=HL}$Yh#^9;khU2tns?sJ<LBB(pmFm?OlU1wA$|aELgC1HP)U|e#
z_J9v?oR8zKIZ>aQ`_4X={SV0dqq6HpbB1qvu2n%Bh)gNN-H@-fnpO7I|BLk$fbgN-
z;Cg}k&zGhl%#QMX@kfNm*#VEe1QXxs4TLtUTPSdA7Y(2^BdSHdpOUR`V~Yi*%~7Ha
z=aM0|Y2C>5`w*qbhz&jwj|@F}R8_W<5yRQP)%N*4o~R{fb$t&1mqp^6OeSpUN@2Vn
zLHLis-66OKEo#(MNLVLPQQ^ZXh-3L<H#-R>3L+2EA2~NvdE?PacZq*9JN%q(OAk)v
zWiO@L2G?wnLN=cJKGc&m6@V6q2GgvBAVJnB?htQFOvpkFMt$mix^>%Apl$=jc-^3H
zPhsXy0t_20*7x*9!OF7u>ZrMH<!8b@swquBGZk@dMgCjK>$m>C)_p$pwO{m0he?Lw
zhq+`?=(9LXWv1Zx0ilR}U<^0hZg+>!f{HwK@7JnvPGB{D`fLJ7NeqY8W%RNrS?`Zi
zA`H2@w~uXOpoS<C;)_$?Mmz%qn5V-x%#4>7&R^)Dh6Z$9HK-zGwb*I^LzR%fL>|NA
zLquN)>nWy9JvW`Ivu{0|Kyz`S*e<`4Z^3d%spmbzx$XhiaF=e?Gt6sFvx(*}KAtFI
z`ewz!`o#-pzGmDluLGj5WVI<6a02QYX&Ep!@z#4P@kd1|tVcQ_G4y7HF)H9dsdPFR
z@o6RWno4v+`z-R3Z~_8d$lL{vIkerWE`>~XQWQOZ<;EZRFe2AfObS;77;lt7MN$VS
z=d1AW#+Ek%(%=2!yhf4|2fF1mh#5UQ+OV-?%eIQYJxmY(N}`kJ|KqB@Lrp`>La>))
z|ISHj?Dy{nG8gz0lO7xD%SHyKuPG%WPYWJYo#Pb@?WPqpv2|e|a1)B*_SU@(|NQT*
z0HO()#5C?;Gy9(GjKc`S@LNi4+#`%*08Sg_PpEW>uucO=oFW)9qodwt?V`^-`tOoG
zJ9)3|nqtnb<_+PrEG-ljuzoR@ZqN9GjDe1BKSz4+*KT*lr$hl@+dPCOF5l<zxwq@i
ze#3t-?Kxa9`$SnzA3dbq;{EyxYf?s$i^trE;wh<HfnMjJ_n1P>)XR$nvS~BEN8w97
zmuUBK%s@||l$C4%UuDQz^M#mei=`8@z!f8Rf1v~iHuRO-e$*xFRIH-R-7bFX1o{v&
zLT4#5KpE9VKGSY$?q!q2>yq#SUEnCl4AW4%FK44H5xoln`R9bc0U8)18rNt#;WNWo
zUPS;l6;H>Z^c#$mwN0M^THLheMpgJ;o!}|D-p<Lf$jXD%X%k#7Q}!H}(K?Lt&=IrA
z)<gZ1MMa|DhAW`V_^v1X1YiaRgS|`_{2udV%22cJs)5<{&~k(FxqXoauY3G0h-x4V
z`xp}N@&@IRTq|ptRuyp<9?C=_UwH;}>$LZ<y>6f0s}YwDi?&$6V{?$x?D_#uv-IO+
zZ|sp*+fhVpaQT1J^w_qBkOXT7uI-cRHS_(Qf=?ts|3^^%<w!Exy=GL<WD^;_(AY&4
z_yf8lCRwI~tYgOs_-aMLfGV|$Xoc3uVh4{uuhjutMPHK=e<#wp3ijw?K0|R3Df==!
zsbPR~L{wbNaOS&DCp?NO^(oRU*!wEOF9JR|StS`vpo)teL(hAi8<cmrs-12T96^#{
zAbK&Ea;52rFtW!QHesh-*Fw%3Ski`EtEb?V5pT)REBEebQ4+zFNhICY0LtImDZItk
z2s576Z~whppNmrushT+(#oegpV(_`f_^Yc20s5}!qGYJ$^*W(26EE&8@mIA%bWXbs
z`Bh*X^e~aBE{v?jZ**)#nM5YYR>OxG*Hw%_Q-G(-a`d!s|DSS0g~N!ya-#YTP@7j)
z(}$f6VWJ9>Ng-0PH?SpPM8Rq_0n>r-30@y5W{A%fqU}*s_<}QF?7;y>^fp`JRazL&
zs4`X<TUX(w9V%>0{(?A3$o(S0pA<}hSJ#JJG+v1AP@9216gSPxFc)J*u<@fMXh%Ja
zg`ddHUk#YfVt`G$<_-AwQiI89I$Lw#dfmG>gEoNgqhoQg4f1=Eu}*96+HB9JmPAUd
znIN)3+nEB8G@JJ8)m(mzt30*(trzQLWN|t8*S5i-;mSNF4Opztecp;wJFrk9$ycis
zEN2e)J{R|!J-I8entyvlFnKI}NfovtrL{-*M42V+{r?&(Kf-AU%fgX)M!_IFn2THd
z&>6x^30}IC@s&!?UjnHD6nMQnZRG9Vcl>*<v2`=DA3S@L6({QnCB|&`W4`im@DrH5
zY^uu%C~_I0`UnMT1i`LCc6P45miMZtq{qb%r`|F-xdYfon`vc;89O^awqD6zllGUJ
z(o{HJ)f^KqaAuZ28d^QXsj0BsfaNI)7KE%Xzwbil=){#@HIQRzS^t1f6x`w0Uj0Mu
ziehtFWDso3yb~W0Q|`%VmUZ$WJ>6&~-hZkl*L!yPNHNnM=?W=zJM%i6L$9L@cls?u
zb}a&fUT_UjTr7c<FWml(>iH5TIKN;et)$L;H1agaEwJ-GNsobH`aSqMwFvE&`_()?
z_s4V&9m^OpnGXJtNzxq4T|D?PHEP<YH1%Ie6nOo3%}Iqe<T(|1;TBSmUIwyo<cl6$
zui5lp3yJwTp+q_HZ_umIf#_$F<pfMn>EOUJ6DD2PdecXXCY-Iam^(Yn<!e5vHE7Zy
zb#-}z6M`%SoxC(Uk%`nyo}|x|wSZ#W*8}rH^2JFmG%(@1lM_pn#qv~pQ2_LFzYHoL
z31Pz>Rh;Yw?~=MwTssM7W(8BUQ*eyaKi+zj>DZtg>SaPzQTlx;Hb#c(Q8s{4<B(~n
zD^&4e9Q1%N-p$18@6Q$?M1*EwNcjdH2lB^EpDz;4<#px>_80bji^+Ls70NYd%bqMr
z_YmSVL@UFn%5<B=?WvJfb0_M=on!Iah|srQhOzXwZZ%y$dRfvs^BQ<-vLX!QS<_(0
z1F(V2mjdefPHyE7#de7ME|L&Wt2Mb+o{o{As0ZWQ0tSZC3J0~IRsqC04TJPWp&^W|
z{qpcZqtfBBPz;Tk`(ilN2>I~9mMjulFQ+?wm~^Mjwrn;b{Y78hXJpJVA!U>Rqt%*;
z$R-7(jK&mYh)=KU&+R4jK>&I9imK-^D+SRcDZumZFoDahBfsoLnfo6+ifX+P5|a%(
zSiRABKp73s6X!J>O5lnuWc0rOg|}*oTFZ(Q&xWVc0GO`L6qm=*&z00x>g=V|XY2f!
zwio6cA6eO(H$i|>{cE2sa;deCXGJDz#*U1vIKt0&cqam+33BsKp}`o(sx?ji=9d;@
zJ-n40NY&2S{@TRZZZhTOLBtrXb>+cFSYzvAej<2{6VWz9$G^JN4yu;xBOpU_Nd8;o
zAEdO7i!s^1Bxx(^C}fRk7}|g;oT7;E>gwI@Vf)!}I6#{n>#-59H97=6<nntlOssJT
z)GMU+S^%vOyU66I3LwhCa%u*<4euj>W)EiXHGwD#l$#jtfc?iAY!#zwx+Yz)mCl@!
zoEvn%C6_(&DZ!+HX07{`GO9Q0nRtTk8W=1pqylyoCr6SUtRrq*ny%9r&gs3)gJo2b
zZuNv}K_<yr53hPz<d(ZljXV#VZ<UbD*H8|V$9_+t2_m3CHtpRtrlB(X4Z~BpAtaTo
z10wMcRjreA{+plZwuMPjv1UZX0}=Z>Yj(>B)&NvMtG~fZ4Y6)TU*7ujAD((~=F3xZ
z5q9RVuK@v(*6KgH4M%yb12<){3+<`nH9Taby&mYy30cjJ+=H|}$kS!Y$#FRZFf%(z
zC~M!VR6G;se_4pEobe~-{}gDKo040`%RFW>;Lm^=uYboC3ATAgt<W^Pl@S+^oY9U+
zFrfuwiJqVQ(jAWs)?KGI+~}DGZ%;u9t8sLLM;U&BK3gp>Ig@UHMG}&`3A(?h+L!d$
z1oBT=D@ll2g?zgogZ}-{Ji89raJ7bLR(^2Q_J0oL!sjZ!9hoB)TcXsDJpSb#@q!hJ
z5Tbdj{XhTxXX-MJs|S9=ExsZdjhli&pYZonW=q_o&UC12w6A{skYQH3`({~m!*4P}
z6ERTpLZ#a&n$N!6s~N~(v5WYpG?`;aYECF<!m>uKM0x>+kEe{M@CMkz-SnA0Z|Xk-
zz(SMH5;-h&Uy{CI8;Y_D=ZsU`(xI&kl77O<2WT>y29pr@=AYTSPKex-o$2uFn|w_r
zsx(NJ%M|%1ZSxEv%80;`n(|U$#LV=@C6P&aOY?KicqHO@p#vV|hwV;gFkHQ3PiV@T
zELCScA-@%X<!D-4+@U#+X-N>YnGX(qLDv@H5qZeFq1oSYnTjolA}-67>5lV>Cs}7q
zdZgRj2DFEuS!w-Vrs-IB*IqQf^1@RXI6g<zcOzp6sTJX@FwYJBBo`jKhe?6(3dhfp
zpJ_SSLcD3^6;9HlNN!e;qLQ$Z<S=w%M$Sp^hsrkft66fYUiLn9d`r@jEBY~oImwSS
zpcU5!4|z`^VvEZ}ZRroVXlY765bd*5f0~Q})=<Y?_Eauzitg-2;U&q}{><!h+4A5H
zKG)LE%NTCb+2wh(E@J?8hVspFrN0gwSd2LVNYrZaG{FL$_PT)gU=v|(%SCS0x<-w3
zj<aVDG#$y^-QnCLh>&tNOVlbW0#usY!TRE&bb{RhC1soB7IgWJjmWof<IcZ4Zt^i;
zK7FRVHnMU|+A2bui#w1QJt^fDyLY>Hw9w#=d_ze6<85nImMPMbmHp04((2#4Q*-ww
zS8g><?N-P?!wq+5pA7-AEx;vTMqO4L=4lhc5HNuG?)`l$5G&;-z(a7S0svHfuFw+g
z9WJG^vym8QfdCmnJ$d@U0hfG3hWB0jO~S7hVdP}*DvVvN6ThJ)zAOhjDP^uc4yy4K
z&3t?_`+02kmXgJ>&74ZgX84`nH=0#d{t5};Kv(?A{aFc2n#(!s-WY}84@VEXQl&R<
zGjv(QjU>*e##zhl$>X9l@a~Re@zC#vl5gyT^Xx(4pXpqGHzc(_&5c(T+h%?-nT3wT
zK~Hz{Tj`>%KrtgTi{)8B_EDb9HwqmBTT)P=!UbuAl;jy;fSQL9o3Q-6J#aQz3sfpI
z6&Bj{leJ?HH!{PHFc+HV+^~ownyz{?ZQ31$+)<!obp|Yf31+iM=wC<f`J&Tt(56af
zh#`N5No7w6>lndoN@sWr&?N$pH!XE~L<slL|L|GYg^c9C>0l(z^Ep|O^Wc~Fpk}KO
zBhJQg>L>T+L{AA|Z1rMt#GlF{S6T{m60-RGu_1jnT{hf?C~Zz>w4MSX?{vaeL<nML
zK4XV69CrbV5a07pTam=HLS2?n|5Za$ovUSL9+(6Mn7v*lHCUkYNO($r0n%i8U7*J@
zq;X3w&H?K3Rc<5=%~R8u=n@t-VKC&Oj1q4S^;3rnB&(5d+_99Rha;40>B3zKVfkVD
zss`J-`>)%;5~|O6G=BW7K49S*a2${HPPh3c*xY*Klb*f-USQ_}3;*51+nhNp(B|6~
zKVX5{&T<_4Ox~3WTLaN@!{dQ=$=AnGuZ+74XJZx|7zxv|0+k){=ZW%`+wY6D^fVuX
zdGWKy52+8OM$8{b2<rv~_Dj$|rE(ERjtgrB<ek1&Zjc8q@HGMdO{Dcmy9abvY#VMh
zp$p!dV58(?#$|Dw+Q6$TynsAY&b=*iOPI(Ew2pn+`>XlIQUlpNkz8UL8l0}E0?=6B
zs*L+<k^0x5RkmIGg^B{Ex&u)x>w>E)xAc9{K!QVHMZF~5oAn{_s;+~%ILa+fm_PE$
zuTzDRT|g3H&*b5^smOX50t?XXntuSLSXg}}^X;Kq`UAf%OD#grz_MXH&*~WZF{-5?
z50wdT8m<Q-775#7Jbc4}e8WfkKw63H()Tj^zuULB>3scBc^=K!6X4zG=S|u*I~E+d
zDbZ;(9TDT(Ck`B+bRR&FBcyv}u0u_o{fg?6eUUiHy)e?2S|Wq|YJk?1Z{`0elwO<=
zhH@?Hq=4ICG{`;s^NbO9I{iDDoTC_)rZ9{1qDx1f`JGNQT|@{j+Q+jWG+q0tA!#l{
zo4m*cVY)kq*;v6CYcQn}<0+;ISj(1Ak;<@n*HmIi4u}u@?xr9bFU9O*TLa#BwSIkp
z<T@jR*$XB3ne4B1_Fq1Y$>A1%gXcrCRR-F_o^^3aA2$QB)|oeif)lFRNe$MQW5G%w
z0rd#uiyCo-wS0STNkgZdonc>CpT-C_7;fndXMDSd6;ifG=vQ9%l&-?G6Qh-z^}BlF
zh9?I1pTfp-xdj>gzz)`*0hBTkR-KLMqB~B;lXOk<W85JT8iK#}^4UUI`tGLJEdOFr
zS0R#np3KE5zGj!i7ZWCTWs-ri*UuJRpin2ysK3yfQ$oZa|G}cvW&d+~-XOhpqqy5X
zb)NQ0A@)mS8Gd90VdIobw@hY~^*kU~I}z1BCTmVBaatYW!ONr=lkej>cViDK2<eV*
z)Y&F)S7ZkshLj4OV48L(%P$s|UrB`}dCnAyb*_{32{?n&1S}U(bC)%B+o$N!h|DR2
zyHpn1A{?*^`Ti+==1=$dOvAYN9Ru4?2N2_JRGEc^;E}r{H1NmbA0JD|qRWeg{4wOC
z!wBq7>}CF|2Ca4;q!7z0;c8iS1%A8VP-{dw>tP7FUv9v#g(k?wejBchn0OcF{rG~4
z)QfZLe<htjM%K(NO)q~-JndP@7?oLW=0a4}+>+|8PC>8or->AW04GzY84}Iyi#z!*
zXvd!`6~oSXKsPhaoc)MG6X@xMC6BlsFJi#n9q*FhRWeP`2bmpxGPgdDIgI0SyIiMX
z0AC|bw*3^=A=0Z01A{a*bI@a(*qUlw`T>FxFpKY_G;g=cV1ktVtaFKL#1qipow84U
z3@O9O!cYjW!&R~R4z{6wX$8^twx*plb5o-urPuKzCt?CVP+oh^Vi@_$s(BlWStXYA
zWi7y&p(HRW=XA1YDA;kQ|0Y<{d^G}xqqBwKnIvs<7cxna;IG=ghRf(#o^FE;G$AOL
z^Ska3!Nd+d?`d4Q%{6%FbO240J{=e$Ro;>7^S9<NN2l%GD9pZEH+Z<~J^J_%5l~>>
zh)fBBg0tsL)-0UsZw5=Qm=0P@&M?xpNh*W_Q#5DI2r&JKz;4mgi>Tod$AnR~)!_0=
zZTU73D#Zu;Zf}&5DvHBaYBQY^Z}!j|L@TzyePq5X=RH}PcL*wBsh0r?B>T*tTW7a!
z){4G(sM+3l(L;t^{oCjZ<vnxRX}r_5G3DLeNlC|bRIjBAqk^yZpamxd#~MhrWa*tP
zNi5$I9>#W^A9Dc-$Q10Kc8Il8C`&x1%VEIqe$2D9+fgfGb#RenWVK&!1^H5~peIJ$
zvTFV^2-wU)Hmf@BgmN8`W!U=`mfFCC`f(C-9*CZ3WbUBtDi<01;!_svZ#GCR*f8Bo
zm%!K=Y49O;d-3f~u}OGNz?k{;#PUi3?830;S(>InWc6X=m!uR4xt6(0+ac!y=IuXn
zQNCBHF6+WzIZ*K-!B~P-q&Mf`?XmqdG9TfKbt7(dR(w`SXfACmQt<od#1V2p2qKg3
zge}?vbkg7Yr2)^zWwYdMy(oIW`c)4#>2E%|SG!_#0o_^zhCY5n3}>GGC_HY<24yT*
zln2n&rih}E#x%zBGvr>;Cr*bW5aZba3E5yI)uc#VVdPC@y%pYf?u7y0;7(VIb3hYK
z<Vw!(6l-7|t^3P;G~_1z?O3%^KWo=8DtzDqTs#Bbg)Gg1WMAlObV8+`@5Z0ttiT2a
z9z77vhKv@`mrp?p@k6Oz3Ny!}HYf0%poO1KgJ~4IpmRp3Bq)i*mCKCBJSo2KC<i;1
zoB=%)pmzIl&4$MkgjW%$kn<fw<5p!o03eCjZV1gk;Z74auf5a9tY^n!C}C@|J!Z+9
zBST_T_#+i3%Z<qc{3Obq6rxv@n^*i~su!U@G2bj*RfGY!X&^2{Iucdwaa^o3o<$h!
zPQ(PvBEX(>rAC30`hgXUiw?koV$JYFPRuK9C!KO*VZSDL)?xWEw8|yC(P6nQ9T`a6
zZ<PQlY#f4dMG=lD%8LFBgo-?p(jqc>Vz(q!FZ`t=Vov<zD#q_p(r#sh@rv+cPwh83
zM+c#HdzvSD<5j2ZhL<Yt8KKUpK!O*L?=3*u?wKD9Jv);3+of|ARbBou`G~~t84fo2
za;)5SE{$bGm*L#fKoXdB$I&sV^_D?W{WEm|_f`g;bb+3MBI~L0V<<a$=L)d-HKB*}
zwcLh2qH$WwC2lZJcw`1yGYKK|9&Ez2GPgOQq2S3Kt{eh7fT+2*+G7;N|CBY+f`t>~
zF$(Oe3Xsz$p#%C@s{S!Y{yUow!Vbkls4H8(2bMNdXg_S~f=4aF#B)K+J!*_&-=C;0
zUS=l#QK1T2<`0*bwx6iV4kIq98n2M=MKU(eTIw6{bZgA?y{l|f6o;B2tAzg^i@VNq
zfgD;}yBagPAn9k!SNU#~WQ|f(zL2bfz~7LhPS<+;l=EAe<mi0nX3lkWKNtwcGF^1?
zM#6(+eG6}Sp2JK_WU1H&SBf}%SJXk(71l(c{b<CEbAWSMNi+3PEorcOF)QR8pcd#1
z`;FH+UMhx8qF~JTx%2>H#c+TwL)$yLU-QLEd?$q}Md&*dYCd-4n0bd1mY~*0sgzBq
z@IM0Iaz}7ArR!24oPAW&f@CJ#4Ry?{XSuC>wjCJ$>BPBSy=t1LotqUu^dR2ws*99~
zQ7^+iUY6>8V=qZ*`u?nd_4qgX0EO<XM+1boZR`Tau#<%z^;Spvx2L?Ri^?d${!&R{
za?t@^pn<`|NCz`$ow<~Fk^DQOY~{idJf#*}&qKPdc0av9iob=lDDP(WE*4jW8B-k}
zCSKpjWYvBN{-PXTlv^~Jm7B?0ysr2s2bG9OR+XMPjDS?|l}qF|+A>$9RFDlP@A5<_
zvQLDB;(85U{QZ`17wLM#hGTV>8*u?Vw;9XI_f)NTkT4HOG0rrMsCqOeO4d3xOu~cs
z$cfF84ANWw4yMc4<xzS1abaFvAW@@M<P3$3iP^<QP-Wn9M;+J6!9Izyo#S^sKQkgE
zv+{!uSpht*;Hkpph9*UE*Y8rqM+rNEq)qW9V17ZwK_@n&Xz!Qdb^eEALd)rq96Uks
zB6fZj9FaPW4^ns`Wn-O*AlojW?PNB;OR;K^jbKx#-yL43bjDdRzb{zm1vxb35i-lU
z{TBMvQ{)x?{jsY=X)WdN;q7+@EOc^<s{EQyAhxNdw3-Jb@dEiK1=v`zPKJ7J(Jb5k
z`5A8?^47L?tyVW+=Wi!x;qQp{J%6IR<qPG)$EPm%7zjkN5VQaajvqSq^Jn@(Q6H8A
zbu-93;UqEi-1di9T&zV=1RI>3lR;rJ7fJeE;-#u+&~Gi@m~3It^+rGJt5}CMHS1sd
zdkKxi3_L^!#*Nd7OrE9HYup(5CJ@xKEPgAF*Z+dIQ6Vi3eTF^XRFP3hlfB7{0ZW!(
z6(=$7dulvJ5m2`%RCo<_Wzp?SYa^lOQw`gikHGrjvui7(redo~2gYD&LDB6k%I|#X
zoWkEk>(_`11|!hWiM{~FKkciG8I6K#6k_qSo1=yStH#8f{GTq1TlN+xyEeTicP@GT
z0^yv7w_M1-JA{e<qT)=2a++GS3X41^AQT;%OzA~Hg{;RRv({p@W^i$Eg?l^Ig?s>z
zMe%=$tj`u%wmQ>1f#TKetUhp`pNzCy?unY0b{r}O%Q8K=3LXsaHP9cMm*{c^jy}@Y
zXgFlG*+KbvCGX$XJ^9#28JiotpoXgm>A;xf?@d++kZjMOKW#8m%`E1q#pgp+>n0e2
zu~I{M8O@4#MmdER;29G&1n4HD=}(o^IUZ*tjQ0HNcSsPL48kZHnaNeOppVzy*l--s
zhOrJDJ~hPR5U^YudX08My&9WB$2FX*5QW`#{F*DK9QY>R9zN-*!0E+L{~R!=iagZ|
zQv%B%IbbM)2Mz$j`6A{?TquGtuu3E3Z8)NG(A|x3T1(3RxJ!r_SB9OG!<r}m(ni#a
zq}X^eqvZ?eoKSp4iWMt0A#~uYE7bL`9v}J}jwnC-kGYQ>HAhBi4e+=BXz)UmubHkX
z+D`Xd2y9<JBe(W3nBMsW)$z(C_xmB$+2lSs6q11%QON?vUX7h3MgkX%qfKsA6@jK>
zc?B(iMe+N1%+pV3u$k?T_!}aQyr0p*55sGRqvnJDO->Yd7fFosNNO;_1RLC2eb?S4
zX0Jz#VC6lnc^$&Co*eqPy_9rO$Y}4%V1Mf6V*1!EHw}DuGd`c~yQl^|AwwiWRGxBh
zW*3%pv1S_XL|h`^%VJorv2;lS)mKK1CIV~6USonP|K5Psg2Sz4W$cSH4bq_hX*vSO
zbbJl>Tz>7c2Npr@fQ_AmjHsVI78$_zZoia)d7X}LXoJ;!9<-Ssf@?M6a|U)@(Uhr;
z@U>+b&-BPYMhb4#eew=lz8_H(eeiTQJ;VfR`zA6Fwo@k1?(XmAhCHOgaXz5j-0rmV
zr{|X=d|)*$tz@=Oyi81$3B*>w4GbmA{@J42e*x;{zcvbGZe(+Ga%Ev{3T19&Z(?c+
zGcYzFFd%PYY6?6&3NK7$ZfA68F(5WMH3~0GWo~D5Xfhx)H#9gh3NK7$ZfA68GaxVu
zFHB`_XLM*FG&eRjFd!fxARr1aMrmwxWpW@dMr>hpWkh9TZ)9Z(K0XR_baG{3Z3=kW
zY`J5QX3e%WTDFZY+qP}ne9E@Fj4s=@?JnE4ZQJ)fd*A(i_w2Zlf7ZkpW6sQs%vh0R
zM2aeOLZ<e{0C9Ue7dj?-Ms7kO8-TeJz|%;@$j+Hg%EidW(u9zak(r*6kpqT{(A3hz
zh0qvaZfOU@@IM%NBU=C=gNmGts+tPT{~y#8VD|4!DLXTJLe75^n7TUrhr|uw<ZNkg
zM@aeqYETh60gO!T?QA^%4VAZdu`~e?Qi|9+csf~{TeuK1GcvIds#*a4Po;$aqerOd
zWN!udhg-<i#lqgnnNU|(m(s$;#le}Ifx+C;#lqE?-o)OP!NL{b<YMGv>0oc}WMpP(
zV#M$t8oK|X`3FVy-zA8<+SvT7Ps;zT`0oz?J6i+ruPP~(0p_kYMo#}7wsaP^^Z=MD
zTDq865Skg;I0OFe|2LVCow*HwkdEWuJ~ca2fRl}-9YE3E+0x~IW{Hl8ll8x1suq?e
z)^-4AXF?Xve}w>crvIfWW@ln=YH4RqsN!N|XKLhR`hOh%3M(2}+PSEDIsgb6|L=1B
z%Vzq&ww#fRlcfit4&y(I#Pm<%KjS}NdjBP-;^Jg)4bZSOb+P#WG71aZdk}ilv2bz`
z(lN6$6EZQeu@N#cGP3&qZ@h`ClM}$s<zE}+pI-iBn_2!dGXQ`GzyxM(+1`XF*eWeE
z-K7pQcX(1%v!e@q1%SEMuW&_VeFlLc(m-8#ZsPqj;rat8NAZ->0cvZf{oopn$l}Ce
zb6}zAVwLSA=Mz>eveSV+L0JuSb;eH{OBqgrIONan{#wDn3C7=Z23t%9zT@Lwn5l!$
zcR;8nF&)5$x{J(Z7dbyu5+rJ7_>4IRol6GRV?5|Y>31qnO*RNG+ME>=q1~`#OX+yp
z>wc%p=$nF@7`PA)6se5=4O+;CiM)%+_edW;K~#0a{6a)?8!8SkEBBn0x7G$SV?Q1z
zh|TvxuJilz2P*CYn3;qrC%;iBE~zny))M+rl|SQD7$i;R<|SbcL%!mB=vh}%eZoQ|
zJDA+nB9b$d7CK>mmi)Sw`MMh>jg-5uCPK5FrIo}En<{vyyJlw~bp<^vJuPsfAM(M4
z4{NMDdKWTE@;N8!XJ#ac9(-c-f#j|}cOUCEb-iH<O|Szf6-=q{)ctNJ4j*YvpX$RD
zYo?^On8Y|Ydo;GN_SH7Ll(n4p5Aq5Xq<B3>z}N4BmeU%fp!tw>SeB-K;pb{eKAlnP
zuaIa94%_k|@4w%%vmvb92((Exa)IXM!oqe=m4BI2y}7NR5s8SXioP1jrN~1b;6V2<
zvGxqa#tGhc$!|8%ril!v@`1u$<>tip{3(uJov<vssYJfxaeAruR4o?%lInuPdj@3h
zYRvIOU3S)TC@z<5Aiit44k?4oJObg}T~ji6JOv!tnBnW-LD?Tvg`5V!kVE(D<4e)m
z81Z>*EcN?JSK;OuXG5BPzK}6g^=Y9^WN2zFX{`Q5ZrcSRy6B@%-IgH`x2p~+8clLY
z<V3Uo1<ys?uRI5-JM{Tdq=~DV6_!E;Y)r;R1R<jitRqT3Uc>(E&hbsT5L*zt4AvrU
zIh8VMlt&LF1Cf8+Z<=iPg5obE{zVqI7g%1!a$|I-uO3{`UU-?*xuT}f451CgXBh$x
z^6`m?AIUVZY4Ae^<#OWJ7gu(OdmC^LB0+PR8WaK*2svFN-tUjCB`Rdo`GyL~!JNqY
zOEUT;l}@~$;TVm|5bhJbgT}-34KKdSz1VuUqA6_}+)EZ5DdLxh{>pbYfcY+jBU8BN
z5duQ2tS0S??gVaF6v+2LgyBu<-F(&Dg1XYU>gyATic;v8N~v#5J#KTsg_n<olzi(*
z^uiMqX|R(jHKvI=qImP~Cj%7t-E$S?isy<#x>aN=WtbduQAlxR{NRgsVeR--mv+rJ
zJ9vS!czxT^mcRA(`$8DQja4xLT^Z(5PsBc<n%Y9fOjpOzKS8ZeO3hV{1s|pI(RISw
z6Zi>~k5dK_0y9T<JmN6-T#qB>yQ}`&L&9=O0*pW(l3>`q?<JS2rcqUN`Aa4NE#uJX
zFwuqyKm>`2Is)1Uf|t0a(Ve+1p3A4OzlCi>9l!nN>0V|K6vY!Dz))sT-WR(G&ET?(
zsFCB2A3F|qROsrndCwZDqBpe!>!QSOZ_lXyINqAD>UMl}W)wPlvt_MWH~ygxKCnNo
zq(?_wugb7q<pO?sxDOOt8B4dWE?n5JV{1VfZVg<CAAK))i(!Lr1q0m)H}*BFdT9pD
zU{KN6`wh05>`D}}Xt~`G6^tyhk2gk-K$7KpY;pT5OGeF%FBGp@_bXf>X?c2g0Nq=0
zj3yfop}+<FQ!O!g!h{0mDoRNnMA;(iW_<tZ`el}o9WXz#G2^l$l|gs><!i*tzH(DU
zzs0SVXukrz+l;%p>8YRK!w9b7<YZ{J@w)?_i00!PNY0xs&uq;P?+edED6kJrAr~kI
z!rQX6%fzA37g158s0%at_sl#KVn&XUNdoNFpG{Fl{=>8_f2sXkTXb_8_x86Sb1xDt
zMCVlZ%#~=|h(@kItPuNR-JH%kwvQ^==@GhMXVydH?IFf9i4UT<hqIlrnH^;)hu_3s
z1<GwdD#1C;nOxZVD-Ih__hIAj`)ReH^;a=^O<^_D+5#7A&q+i~8^MIrj$GKcQXYv3
zH_=^|NZL_XB2K|@lD<(;ta_*}Ol=;8y>=?;{!6}6Wf97edGQ~~YnQq^+VhvY!CDNs
zcbuyRUo1cp<HDRu41jfg=f(mP$9NSuOp|WCa-;`sTy1X#FL%tzWDw=~u#-BCUgKn^
zIAHyuL`3w{L``7HgN&a|vzU}o5earS6-b)v8102K_J^G)8q<gqSYGhVS#d%z7!4W^
zhknx+AQDZ-_q5Y+mJxUUJ?^yaA-cH+rP+?%cnY8b*^djJ)0OYBeldUaJMRo@D~_TS
zqB6LPqllVhz1c2Ag_l+8HdFx~9)PE-oroBnq6~ML>$yv`p}szQM=Wa?FHWV5HH7a1
z*P73DApxD^&Ag+c-ZS7E{01tO{*72(PO6HjD+CHU_3h3Zp@5IIj!C>C{K3mKCbJzE
z>3m%iX0foHF;GowkKu9gfG5XbkYxn2-=LRS9p{9S*H?_0NJ@78v3O#6HRp&M?*??~
zCN>qRG+2f8%W(0s%|*fC49TbL>qiGdqfFJbC~5TTX9Khg8??fpk^t}9;QT%`(`;rn
zo}AE|K-F4zXN4>H_sz7WGn1OYYCYmYxywA4eke{Y(W=5qRn#yaN}Q~Wpd;n`J{Yf&
zbyA&Y&Ph*aJBm)Q*D~zg)QJa-{&?Yo!C72P+mv3L$b0S*9t6+NfczPD^)Y3-pQj{f
zS&>&O8-fsri%sK5O6zlT^_tYiaW>i*D%$w~v%!hm=Lt#PP4YkzrAnx2auUnMIV?-P
zQ%Ny<JqF`$*`tLZh{>MI^1j_sXX7%7TnA}3&2+g2O%d8tyIB{0@EndhN;RQh9JH{b
z<HJ@uq6Z~=D$>wWYM~Zw*N|N;N%pc*r)GJz`j7Qj8Nq|1wAf(&M7xfVirVNsi>OKG
zR3V3*n6{HVKNnL{;9}s%@&%aa88yP$>vTAA8wAGUNooM72P&=_S7HI_ZoU{!)i;_V
z!!`<f<<J%`rBeSd<u=_l85U(fc6@G(L&7KT!5&$;m$H-W+$jzLi9&BT!D}Y`Q3aG0
z;b~n%b>h<}w3EfZ!Sqhjm%*iWYk-VlZ7l3AlJ#DW5E_VbCP2<);K*cTOByQmio0+H
zOY|ZaPY=q1Ah2^jgU7HYF$9f&c7mgl@4~ET$kJ430f`QjFU4+n2kFNNs%iYF{E`li
z0`_Pk*JCrI6;HwetIK*<t=P?`QE*3K=MeH$PIg1`!CH(a>Ts+jIdI;%w5cn1G;&{~
zpAR`#og}Aiwd5S_mHir@SaG14ItyQ9Z7^Mk^-P5)fk^eQMo;w({wd;Tqu*Hy47KH@
z;#w;rueRosp}fB+Q@MFQTha^?-7w!z%BwNMM}2h>Fbu6kK1pVp6cx$}z>M071o7&b
zPv=VtxLibNBKX&XuToa!8665&sWuZ|U~58W&ozn|S{NSRe8Do}A0Xjb#Ixq`cLy-g
z+XXPrLWxKLeZJ;z&%B-d*^BosJ~F=H=Y`UUv~%c=FNIHpCX2SefbXev^ej*!3)W5B
z34IoirRbE8Z<Io*_#0DgUo22Q%~Q-|CVIl#OERa&wWzAMv1c?rOaVJ_MKn%e;>Nz?
zjsR<S<&<@G#?8XeS-jw*=GsL~QKJO^fMDgYfBrIvRbb~M+|PC(CuqCz|DiG|Zk&ri
z(`xAJKAbUQdPt_?98S7&TN?|68?~mi1qAytJx_7b?J8XL*T3{L8AGhG2UFT0GDJe|
zYEY4z3ohBpbgA7{Jh-7!t2^!Swi4|%vxCl-8<2r=ocQr(sa5eqR6`4GSzHf+sm!t>
z@;KT(bo0aL{u*=WQYT#!Ex0U#-)+R@BgDRNngnN!U=`xnmG~k^@``X{6a2~gvzPwD
zT*$DblMdmu)gc&4$y3V2w6WKuyLsvi^{K77B$6eO5z!5<?jAkU@vDxAKGFgYi_IAJ
z!0vVB3)7~4BzG*~uJLgGs3W2dMKdj10||J|_66Zt0->^{2uFX?$u}uU*5B2B+%KR=
zseljKYf8SS0!J+b-xw-gxc^q>Y`LRu9W)l3GwMDIei2D_rOOv6;Hv89D`+8gtl60+
zxW}B0T`=QQ;N|7^gw6`}8pZWjE`GXPPao@>6Hm2B^qiFhE^#lz1aoo-i+8du<=`v{
zDh3T8V|<6P>CyXF>pAyaIS)bskvA)xWG{qPmAccr6%nudhvd)E0fcAaq7-i_1R73$
z+nx|wRM;ia9C*n?qE1!vje#6NN11(L+^cOE^~vpbg=}h4$71T8yjOxr^%Jan&fFUD
zU*r3JN8NSBQSz8w+&X<Z;-CRb>W=9S*8PjoDfyBc3bPn8yPl7L&hHqp0uotIbsd7U
zk3<U!ZD8}dNaoW@+oF!Ax6v&YWZTu9c#c{I)(8OQ???^u1=`ud_;&D4?4x`aH=hN5
z#7|5NxP9cVQS}QzK;0iVX37xCyyD3X;e|<*6bfc`>Yl%YVrT`#wtu~>I~ZT<9Q@9e
zE4&PWe9=~=#mG71=$vJJM#b<v&o%}0yMeTjEw5PWCrZ{Zr;O(Mk~w(BL;){@JDEoE
zKsZfb-~QJv-|6)8sT}F+{6#*9IOp4$t8$gCwN$kowPPkTJOx5|lBjUu%}$+j6QNE1
zssO)bG;N4=e*7jQ>%-kL2F2mw6*`Kah6#8o8J4M!K(JOmv~0V`^9I+yauom`6g&33
ztx(Vv`QKcPra7c*4l8~$s_demPix@HT=N2jLT%aT;RA<cCSTwsqLQC?z*fMDxJmPq
zUJViYpQ0yHiK&e(i^Ysal<Bjk$Uh@7gEu@jShXi}sy;U}hBD@6+xdwM<g>|>Q;^0d
zs(*+^n7rE0#5m*t{GC8Up-Boy<21Uo7j5crHZTAVR)yy-w`a#JFqJ$BXtXfT``cr3
z$+PS&{3Z4-MD_A3dlylJKj#i5f~14$ca>y?u5GO00v_Rt!mU$Kar+I)$CFk<v~L0V
zjSSF#gue)cdy}L2knbTWhv;uB_E1A&xtSa%RPpRtl%^}N7dGJ8uMc2y`HgBJxU7ft
z_V9>lM2FiRoGfG=vE$uPA;tqty8?SLKCt_HvA2liW11u0t5W$lPLR6gxn@sd+r5~$
zzQi<W&0m-G;dok`VoYoE3!K{3jwynW5>t(p1pO`HhqIIHqtt*}qWZbDz@b~?<>9H$
zc(ZWZd|6f!Lodp0bS?AY;yBLo%?ZXKOs8$vf6=sE$0H{Nm3p!t|L*u!T~;CaEsXsV
z;p@Qm!x}#W+Xmd~a2m7!3(1c*BV!?sD7{^646*FSi;?%fCTZc!f{Li0^cNb13$i!{
zf_8@$GD~bM{oM4S_w%BzhM(502D1F|7u8QCP-OX#Zwu(}wfVBFBd{Vk60DQOTCa@`
z5imi;ztctu0}&#Ne#0Z-^soBCZ0!#nr3-q<#MAEI`Fd;yL%TomyNm~j&QV9L_4lLI
zodm`88R6eq_gy8Wx<U;DhlZ9F$%@e|Of$6kb=z8xT_TD0OXc>84X)7(@h@kv-U>6#
zgFnzXw)ltf@eHTY^SA{};b3j{^H2I#&Jhf$*r{i;BXGBR;_gncc<iMJp&?xzizk_7
zL{)m{0`%$TdAUtV?&<GfDfq0_paLF$u4I#5V+59`rdec`r$;92XI+@wEPSdLydG1t
z$J1_j5d?n4I5_P!zXmBCnNaBQmew+PhQnJsA5`7wVM30@f*%b@dpdk#%k2j%L@~I_
zER*JgLIos&X3S9au1|1#${kOR;Nn#D31mTHH9rBby@%ZZ?Q5!-doPv-2E~cx)7gD`
zW>$Aq!ei=K*|}AB*N6dqm|EujmNIt&VWTnn=rAI7+8}45Q|vKNl*qP-eQK^J>^ua0
zkZ@N?h#=PK2xf<IEgYvDg~1<I+gf5RSeXgbVwO-rl=00G;#|t3J`YhV%6~+8FrNa)
z=24N?QEc_GQjbs*VDd<`J8#*;)`oh0j!jkP-q5A)>*=^^C&a<yL6A28;PG)YQv>Iy
zM-&9YtWC9=ofS-}t^IHby37Gd{w7bL|81n693Qn&i3^2(Z@h|O%KuA@5kWjBTQ%^C
zBsS^Wunh|#U*jZK&=kl-1a)u;O1b#aA6zY%ELNG!*zQa>eAU~2n|DCa+{FlM;uK9q
z&qy=mY$H8*(^4M_8D%O8L<`fhiDY@|<)anbBLSPAQ}Ze!21<~opmEpCjX1WG1#w96
zgAEBb`w)hVM7Z1HjZ0N+Xa%`Uxn)f2Z&0fNnFuvQ#Ey;$)M?(t+aO0>w@E*_0>v$S
z^a|yvqtw|`K)AzSPA!KMo*OEa?m1h#xnQ&e^^aukYQCO(tkqo=gd@6w&Wt?M8ikY7
zhpUIPm8d(Q-sbUzppK_7;8VK+poj~P4!mPR^uL#tKMa_1y#bnnw?H)+=n(I|_(tcL
zv1=&&s`7kPaa+I2WHgu3IK=jbz%ivkbX^5u+DZMc{aYjQptpHUTglRHRjju-O(_a;
z7<qTmSu{?*KXo4<v(WhQhtxqEa4f8oEODRYp(Ymlm;#O$2{lD-`Z*RJS)bMG{?3Bb
zMcE$^68>tkzOo|U#5Dy0A4a|ExGXPLkIo-P`iYkI-9PBVI(h4G#K#I9B@dv#7jvlz
zEm_7Ola8%yXePt2-6W8)u7ZpU+uea%<U2BHC`J~?dNb?a)n)y<vFCOqoqL*XD(797
zfPwI+{w<)EHP47hMb?5!OxfQ!%|oiQS-e*(QJBEV;PFAB%M()$^d0`J(NmL@QAtQM
zahreA>z2<&uTth<J@PduCh$rFGK&LJp}2Vj3V&M<jF8?XU2_<Uub06ka!H#ZJl<LR
z)-a_7C$i)pa40giF$5At*1ER0HoA3cqEo-JKe<=ZU8Vw1$Eu%qd<&A@JtBg&MoP74
zT5G+&!W)z|w>~O*sQ|yRa?sJ*4md^Ua(yY`U^Unxb}X$wE+=r*UPV@?3SY6Gz$3iO
zAGDx*Jzdbf1%I8VEWM}YBHQ!P`KDN4VXSYk5QrG<QT}LHr5{lT;c^js`m7sxJEq^p
zsE?dtUJ`FLkH|7!<R<)-4rtGaQfn@>7OyX=B|#8V=885s&)~e4a;ym8YWHT%()X<t
z6*7Xh;!0<h=cBhs!|DnIPTN4wKi#3A3gl=IfAelVO0+&>?I(Gv2q{|u&1t|$6`af`
z#n8-MsrwXb&FJ|l`Q$3KDf7Ypp2>G555A|xOnpZwcVl%&QgXd<fs_?AL|pdvEW6eR
zr))HGjr^MN!6u;$1{*YswU6Nxz;wn`N&6gH7T;`#(kP6Lazn?1Zlb=^TA<40cV;o@
zKFz`x{!f)y8v88$ICY|pbO}AoHi=jMH?Ltcyh>pOW7O6DLL9V);Bh)Bs0hz{jXqI~
z%)EZPzw_JBetk;)utM+7G)3;@f{kZX0n<V_#`5K&m=ZM0q|_ci0Es*r+@)}2)P@8@
zaL_tyZ+Y;W#{euefXsQC=?b1G6DWuHv7;LnUucwiVA^{>c#ov1Uq>ZIg;kzkV-WQ*
zZ71w2nlRLzD;F-I?H?E(&$GUey#{Fo_xNiT@|m4Hm(XtGZ=9Rz%sO1kfSKTM8lG19
zXSK|dNdpUxGZ=<flweu+sg){4Z4VophJr@rPZq2;#1L@i_eOKA!ImIhoDNFgDm6fQ
z)dkN-ODB9h%7))*g{sXKE)y9Akr;$5aymOH=4=SFB~KkqqF{^-<f;7pM_cZwIK><9
zohrxg7qG2FSMZ}>4M&gF@-Jjcr;1xn;p2(S{U}RDZNK;N(cca8(=hamKr5Fi#&$S&
zlUpN(92W!evmBll#oSlRM@f{?(-2Iw`>$037-XrNz~Vt&gCL=FNbKKfGEIOdX7m&z
zVdSh$IZ)i*7wXi`f-0-XK#h0Utn!k-&S%h%^XUYMXhjsuU92Yp_HIj{Y2$sDe_vBA
zOKE>-uY7Ntcj0_i0i`;ui9gE9zPI*mW6t%y&_ov9jqrY#(mBwNZh<?lqwXika-*-b
zhGq~~UBvmpCYW<STHXd(%P6fNJhDtm_fNCm4ijc!&vMX%Bdc@KD<|JWIsur!sB?Y<
zFBRDPK)Vyo8cDhLe70Fu@7Vdm;d(i7b|m*YF`~Y@-LU2#9un^BKU>lG1^1~PYwoJ#
zVL}Bw5f2*ZdMITq_+lKdG~l3MbTm%tlm!9hb&|>PdQq&5Nbes`LGfV53BcP+?!S=_
zS*5!V@$y6#_en?%r~;#X$22i87*(@3Kb7S2EK@|teLaS|eFq9uVV!T2S(u(O@A|Dq
z_g&(t2WZ^mXv6!xy9LBoo8s0%NS-dMG@qhuD{a3$Te<j;sxh*C1x{8jv{uwrim*yn
zdzqT7tg#^$eaM`aV4qtqWeQ@><1doFBXgjZhjzU`Fm3_N&SS2kui<AbtJEC)qH`<Z
z{#@bU-);qnwX<n<JP4CYb?Wc!eWttKgvYKu9_d?dl%OaTAcAYW)<e-a8!`(VKDS(1
z(`{buHj7lPz(UnZR_dGnrC(Jrw>pQ-56~-;_r?6PR9SdCJR&&E;6b8O(1KWRO>KU^
z6A=;auo8Ot80$<-F4#{V9aJE(4WpK+=j^hBxP%{@ojpNf*+d2zL)i}g*1Q-yX^!bO
z@hKA!s7Yvlel2-_LM(<z!TcQSH@t6nk==@Rk3${^KAFSp{j?n?Z8nTjTi8)gE~U}A
zOBCV3yw$YrJjq?5Z&TDE+7)olAS*VGlt8*tvE8dT<lV3pwJ93ocs1yI^Mj%l9tYct
z{&QA2o3)93v45N5K$0?(*$AQrqKAxF!+8bb?zh~OOo2-R3<vXeS`;Pg7|_f!d9W>;
z0(auTAY`05ga1MiuuLG<X;<1E<)}2JGh?FXN4_fjZU)X}_d2u*<U%$kP+1bQgpMY<
z5|8E27NxNLc@)ykCa$~Na;&H?qhle=!?3?12>He$Dj%bSEfBY(WHE{fUa~VK{yDR8
z9DVb2b9Z>Eu@W#JQhSyfK*yC_h|LfB2;{Wz3@E3hWVIz-`Zx_?Xp7q3jMJnPq6^eZ
z<^5yw)@%-=Gf?r~A?nPX3>!LPG2~O{W!4q#;Kvc;H+f1z5g95rO<5JClGbeLFokZ`
z6RlMhYl?Jof|<cae`c9oM5&jB^V<PJ4q{uV2JqZF{ij$ik}x)vhp}EfKm*gj4W8}?
zBZ%zFS|p+34q0UG@DdTja|a3qF0BUX-ha8RS_br|X_%8UB1gBMZe?<HrdXc+ef@9I
zgfqT!XB(3_>~Xl_TL9UYP8P5=iy1IGRp-~yb%B9&v|?ugW=3?bPO+#w`wJp9c$+j?
z*Vog`*gdk4KTm%aC-Ju4+*+t9siHbbFa@RWW1~9oTVpjEYkv+5a*|>Xb^&CFszz=0
z{YX#6PwS+(a!7md1MXd+-6TQ#kICN_!AvT%caMtF2AKE3Q4MPC&{bFvBG|HT-&G(S
z!kp!%c4S6?nBH}`N1XMedMGZKb<xyz5nEfJeV+-+J9s6rHN%c?YA&4M-20l}S+EKh
zs9#c5gfKjGJ(bDhYN*%2cNREc*THxfj~Z!Et2(F8f-k?$+9}UyPD<sx8WZ_0Xbcu@
zzPz&T;>DvRrS6!{{aP{_lyP{RSH_=qAa`R`#<XsN${-^Ws4+Vi<cd<if_JNB@fbpl
z<L{q3-l{QC_-aVYXYKL1%HQH<z=I->%WTT9#Fn7CSDTH^N-?z9w}fQdx@9Y`)*`Y5
z<+XQ1ydp@RV(UUHs(&Ld){Mcv?54I{fQt&>QjuU;rVHg7t9t+kqS~lSFcjS8f+knW
zlN%P$h%TTA%AgGZpE$QN)2D5f)tEF*d`Avr7jWJNJ0X&ePV^0+>)oR<&JoKN8L*1%
zgZg=Q7^OCW&Haj6D(`3Lr)TtDZcbS#g*>7&L<@3P1lqJpZ_Rqu+7J=0p+txEtc<fh
zfji;JEcgbk(3o@O!?%$o%^*du?_Z)3UvJ`uuffIPX>Y`#3py~1>5_k_5kDZetwAz&
z4uuHTwaFBbb(U-)xEH0!H$zk=khfFaq_^&vl=wSXFVDZ+X1466>L5?}_J=!ZR{$ns
z){)Et22yg5i`K04Dww!n_2EsE%2hv4b#5|-?8ll!7HJPZ7xV{weN~j@QpO&AzIMdX
z_D$KVegGY2Jco~wd8IzH7k)>L@^A_kZF%ms9En3|QA@|{4n?`^ggfu-#|N~MH<vHD
z+~3;kF_*;smz|C{Ga_Te^$ZaxrilT!JgS1e@+Lr}U6_?*m(Dl{;R369;()v)R8&G8
zBAF%{+l4H`Y4HhL!!vSA4#%lxG3jc?L&nX#{$93=E->T+_Rvhg7+^Ub*Nhc`a#}Nh
zz%W2NxP3bbz-Zm|zpuQ|pZp{dN$I{n{B%9g<21!;C#F^wG%=LV4a%v(vN&cuJ$O=p
zhsVE}MBwV7dw^Tr;p(H^I_e_&urKghY1hWBj)~cJ%<<WQq?x^M{V3TGUV;oRsP21%
zbF9o~-Q}nWcne2`uL!J9Xa86qdJ9+S&2w0+M<1-+Nu%nM<%q&?8ut+=e=d>h4HzGl
zJ2d0IsSg6>g2mceeP`t@{+K_fY7oFh)HvvKfhl=@@xir3hhH2BjhWrh!7ljvdT<fT
zC#ze_cixi=g1^Bbf)yMl91!cwy!^*yke{hR-xDq{t48|iA&OTg`5rYm2#U)z2ZT&a
zw9oKS1p*TGQk3(=>+U%{o%TWLz4B-kfq>|)kWxqxmwzKv%yCIgNLGGj1jE4mRy==z
zaLV``R*+8D+7)Ws>@*bPZGmz_XMdt@T&J+e&Q1()4%-8Yi6F(hVJ20PK~fM$7~s>U
zAG#vD<kZt4who$9346D^w;0Z)qy+<gw^B=cotqYy5%I@i`<O_fl`rvKUrC8B+WKP@
zJZZ1uw`ubzNWUB>JIo^KTIk>*(a2THVb0oij*!e*vi_X#%YZXL#QsI<@K9^<<C5}4
z)Nz}1?t#)<DY6;ng~G}{i^dTw&6OUz<DJgOB`M6oDLl2ax~1g8a&~=!y>{f$<dv&v
zI`+-kKU52T4ftFLk5_*6QYUm}hQfD{61(|%_>BYzhfcaUB+R<ouzUl71F!hyuB|NS
zW1ERY^*HHgYtVOerJ8D!9<}-Ftr{0zKpe0F4lh~@LQ|90IXWM!;9rNFWAPOuD7OF2
z6ur98hyt>{ShLV3xzEhv83;5Y4CPEjJ3VF9Au^UE-1m?$5yH9xOhp(0U9aU6%+TB_
zDn7OM<CUMc5Z%#b8Q230xbF+hyoqaIGhm;L!b$#cU;+=a6SS^sA8MXyI7i{>>}|)a
z5&23{^Mt$!akqF63}kJW{iN9U^NAH*&rq%mPvRJ7AL<cv#yK{WTS4$UZX|TLZ{U(I
zoe$kGAt1hOGGeiz3AOv)<L*7FpoBXqOe<m8e9w0tc(!nUs1FeJgSNw(NyUV^C<YOn
z54cAoO?ifE1Y^cjT?o<P+NbtcvdQRZ)M>ylSM31{(MXe@{2nh}|4Ky;m-#z7gA+^7
zAh?sdL|NS=!r9tuiYUxhU}yw_9kZI5pm`)pV8Lqw#J_8@g>)~iQReAmS@Z($dmA1%
z*<y%19Ka{5M_5F?bIpj@#^9zm(~hsOndiJJE<h+Qh2vpJw`#7=EU}ZKd=uO>J)>U>
zSL2!WjPM}V`2}#>1*b;%MoQ%frmR(-^-X(KQrD(}oILPn!7ZvBLN_Z}oP8BJ#@M=)
z4CBSe20A`@LhWQu)jhXlM>ga+7jmv=nw`XJv{_zu0~6uTalJCh{;sj?4-Z;CBp^FS
zgPs!&M2FUjDgibYVoF4l&Z6JYhk1DiB@sa`8ECFc;LnOLDE61@4{n}O>#HHl-eJPT
z$T)ug8~+1>=Yl+N)h;YrH_qf*j0vV-Xblp$#o>QV>fQwEfiBIQNThkY=O+$_B5CEO
zSq^M4e&kvNX-USi-ELX4hkT-ByT!G0<Yd3}fpv5BFwyq$;dw)Zrc+U&lz`Tq{#(by
zJ4H3LVnpV#=hN?A|7a*Cw|+V8&QJJDnGRfA=JIbl?q?HYA(R@$NmkM#dV)yYMmR$t
z><j1-jjzm15exitg%z{Tt&)d)oBBp+!sF8JC0Jj1G~=rt&9;VkC`)MooOV+AXxmGU
zbETSba?*!qM4hZMS&#yK0v?&Ft;=4~;zQn6>L7nrSi6;@^PFwGVqLcUVH{e9KU`Dq
zc@ps;&e)zh8pP&oI>Od9ZR{!G*a;o&O4fFFY-|B9<e|2+3%)FOZhFa!2(+UJ)|)X9
z39R!^#Uy9u^lyo+mjbO_SLr`E$bxSPY7jydUDaLqKWe(>c%se~$rgr$D4E|%PZBkx
z@zAG(6uNGOp<c5%QvV#;D1nI0M}@a!Mi_VpL5OIkCTBU|omvLT=y8%;Ud_nct$`L7
z)C1PB&yl1PFDn`LsZ!{jVyHbY4K#wEA+|&yCR$M`FFqmz48MyDK&PITsx~FuG|>E>
zLmP@DHEa<*yUUzC@8>c0Q-~y`=bGBn_*lp<8M4P)$32|PChic7Q?tKAX{hHacpUa3
zn;0%aRTm7MCD-!@;eUNPq3szQ(!>z??qmDuri|t-Q;8f5cT%*H%@dBqJ4bYeHDt%e
zf|~oj1GSHY$s)^gzM;^4?9Ct69A`2t`t=U<7%b6Qc-gP2zt_<1>t=a7E;1+R?O1&}
zQyn9|;JyHEKp|e!B@bs{S96RuS!xo_=+1xTJa)qj=R$gpbUd=HEegx+;{JlGT|})#
zcX}Qug;uGIc-ZPMZ)A#?US0-0O=74AtH&%Ymu+cG3pO9BoB<7NJN1F+@fsSSS|X}n
zD$G8_jK+PJ>F=bBAxd;=UQa%Nk`y>R+f7Yc<KNEUnAf&q*Q1$(bCM(YdS0m7wI2V4
z=Ioq90KGIE=xDoU#=6Qfy!8TenM2_ZXgpR)v}}}@LO_vnGi^3$BhEYK-Q^JzO`)$|
z@IX$^uP^p|>#QzY9k%u4{@jTqZBL{Ss((QJ>|nT>CN+PHB<awPD#epK>~5PUt==J4
z1Yi2*p6vqXX>+`yttHY)IZ39t9RU}S;I-Fi2g!d+xB1HSSIC!;9q~!slwXf$Vu-XF
z(LZhpG)Rx8BWvK9o=zW~PK5{}`0~}1;W1h=#M>iMqH`{7&`Va0p^44I4*=%AT(UZY
zB%9l149$xF5tw7<R%{Vp`u<v+bGP6)@_xl~6y!rpcx2*3lQy?ULnAqVQz1{h29MeP
z=}XY)W@!Q;{8AsYhbg|=)YnVrn)}m!c>~{t@pllMvV|0SSa-C+Mxjq+f&p7Z7W(cr
zX~_ldRkl2)4Et{ZI<MxM_f&Mgn9TeUF2SYgtHevYGJm^D1HSX@Oi%8hSL`bU5fTXR
ziaU5vjZL?M?8DQF4X{5`=+Q@mF&FKk=NxZbT+@e-eVZQ20m+OrpLl#O2_^r^ajY|O
zksXsZBkJoHe=Vm7Y$}YifgkMDY+9TdVY~;?Q9V!pQfBwIRyu7RyA`hr0f93EiO!Qp
z5FKoBbzczTck)eD!}LH3tG=?@^bfXb{tuv&yl}fGH(#unVaw0AfLKHk;|-!-(+Rd?
z0!^b1IDCBFV;ApaMmTtHi!ZsI`o00XWSTRXsV%H3+1`qTjR%7t@_@;6QP4e&q_HKc
zpke8#5(D=S2}=Te9;M*A@BV}_UKtRv{p<6El%Z>!d4)oS9R?+H>f!x`mRDu#i9$O~
zySzEU)pgC%ajaAgg3(3buG6}1{~C5>lcvqfx4FhZnFKHO5T20A=tAB=6-MkH6TPOL
zr_ppG1JAZJ&4D`1r#r)GZ6}px#w*^tJStzXuSYHZi4rI;kiBg4v9%9?R-A<bCA4us
zl8xzLC#~r{e1aL>p*#s?wj_(gcRTX2n*9J={W-Vy1nqs$0~4mjBTa`2y8yQwi;6+8
z5PjTj@S5iQVZ!;K%8Lr7@gUTRZ?b%@!byI`Pcyy?&z}C26!Ym<JfW8$QnE<ifdIr#
zo0!6%cbMon;@7B*DfQ?!Gsk`Pro=?=r#atfLO(+mFi3CIOufG_?yx&p(#`xNoyn;B
z;<309c`7TaM?6ke0=_sY8rT3vK)Ju^O9MulMkqU@x6!}Li~4anb47lY7w%<ZaBxgY
zif#Dh`j!c<&F~rGk-8v2;!x}{ydsY2>Lg>6G2435vlR9Bol~8Q-p^bK5@m+GI;-es
zl+6iP!SiF(XIrwIF2%Dj0S7b6&%5*do&xDim1=a-ho0HzV`g=FKx<vIup`d-9G(@b
zkfw&cYOc(IHTU)}f&NKm*bs%|AW`@z*J@u*&f(<bJ!GcPlwc1c^v(&JC+_9ypQG5Q
z;0PyMbs;MBmhn#Jhw)3Zg<4Tb>b=-5GW4DmZU4|f@^1S9Mt!-wjwuUPQ6jNp0VyOd
zNY}G^P;Xue?z9XYgx~u*v61$3!Ewv3Oy8((;W>@xMqQ&ojh*?M5nRsN1#{s0m(ct&
zKz2IgrZR8=NC_9b&tQ<c@4D&iR2)ctOc;vXETHJY$93M8|JsqW0Il7AaIU&=lYGUm
zyem0kh9UgAc?pI0YAohBw5cXTr-dnOYgsP@=29nv2d>r^@^>wwwu-5qJG`ESp(_`C
z-l}Zo6Ki1PtU;LqsU{~PV&F>EbsEBwjVQ%y?m^u*Gp0Tm#xLl-A<ADNIj!zr#i%=#
z?e41$5evi7n;KZ>fS5&)4>%ekAdf#)Vz>KZ3N|1I^l5b?ZW{GRjK-$)46-^wXjcm1
z!W&SJU`mzq?e^*9w={S<X#<kmxj{2I(@QvPHeF9xy@9_Tf@*ejl-_@UU4Y4;?roeC
z6`JTK7Hv8ST-dSsD;7tidoc8PI{EAN*P{a+M_=L3+c~FoQI`ICjC8K<0l8#y9w551
zHq%i+!>B;-s*D&G`|Hc$P)qLQD<9ejoHL{@J3d_`ibhK$Ln%ktOz~)8yTsdEo$M#{
zeL<oovX(X0hr_Uk#O)aKrr)e~-9ED2HX{;pQUv6AkvP0{>6t+>%g;@FQIo%ituolh
z^~yYn^d-a#9bT6|dTnbJ6UTx(CahuZcedTmICfY7BQBtaSVHk}PjJK|v=A{G%M^#;
z+1Od*;bDVt^1~1Z2jheWcc7Mw@;{TD%$3TT`R0E%-u?Qv9OwUo{Qhlaq#OOTG21z7
z83^5rN@B_~@^@kMZ!p^xFm|4<XJ05LI8yE@P`fkKKyDnsf$}XYOJ#$2aV(=DVoYng
zGyHFR7g)hvTu3h8?%_mg#VK=*`h7HGwukQ6G-h%4+87*$hdv@{;|W59R*0AG*5chQ
z0^MGVsBzIIu^e-*#MZ2Eg1p2x@MTDU<P*tKJT^x`<hf1Y?=$HP?ohhKTyBp2_qY0h
zkN5FxKpw^o6CuSil=t|nP}RsZ7Bnj+vgN8-4yzLE){YRw(@}Sb3eU-+)11nFHbZMv
zf8nUsO`X^`Rg!<~HuepjyQ3$XDUYL}ZymXdKeE5KlBwtpoidqcxtqfG2_ku~mEMO5
zBs_q4towCP9dVBfOmA-kWOgOObZP8^DnTKL^(?;p^3Fy4ZPa1jCFaecR=$4!YI!HI
z5;<hH*-f?*gCqcMZ<T_kfp9JS@9H3_v6RBoep}7mdwb(BXvbw<-g$Zz#(r`OVf%^L
zW1dd6vo|%v9qcjD+ep?d(Zq9r%kO!!si#tNgXlo58@(I<?14w&)cCLJ4(bK7Gky&?
zzo65}vDm58p=0B1#EF7D?e#i*#)h?bJ3^H^g2ZMsPg#f^vimrYR&{eU3>=!yu8Fjh
zhGrhD9q%ca8u2;IyF4yA*lH_VCV!TZblx9StYCRoI5ys1u%K#3^WPgMH@v^r0~#pf
zI#qO5oIC~QHZRTnX|X9h78Z=qWrZ{<sFZLqeVR<8PD_y77?_~@U8Z#CPm^3}e9Pr{
z&u#ORNgJE%GB2h+#D~KY#hIKeNHA=XM4NoqyC=H<dU|K*Z15ND{NLj<Fn0O^{$&vs
z4#(Q95*b#L8V*v*BacVn;Bv*alIr0#bt!?^{B@VoEKm@&U{<{eI}o9_oa_$e*|a}c
z;P5KC&w`h~BZ>1N;?CKd$w8;pJ??{?f;=XTXAkkvAI5(g0xDseY?<*cyy|L=r>Jtu
z;ySU}1_wm&3WN}&u53U3yuiwLz`*6l$U$ri^ppx)yhUz6Dp_C*TiX-Yq3}jsMmCaJ
z20Zf{jd@~ysHJ7s?F_T1M>Ox{pUVesD_x;PK-FMV6WnT`0~=WzDt{<iouLR8O$eJA
z#4mHW|8Nm#Kp;)saYJr`aqOlf&RQJCk*@RegQS{^rZ2z|c#q8>M^qW`t@n7+tq#I0
zt^P7jV)3*rs!eWjg1Dtp7-v#Nb&NM-{xwn$RbQvS@^DVOn$+^ImmAwu{&Mpyo^J`T
zVDsN4uryd+)iG$_GE3WSK{ivs#MHVM3YV_!1y-I=BRXqvK;*o<xwz`B%tYr*Y}O=>
z4L75>#GUQrS`*a#v_7yi*b&-CS!;q#_IeDXAZ1Sv&4H`zk`1??&<w!KGEKf4BxgH`
zIBTd19}#H*Bl$M<2lam|Li_(9OWIKE%Q5)yb~0>z_2-E#Ozl6?ezzXxbnzGoBkJ#6
z8%aGYkb+)AN(tW(yL{DMLR#S$>EMf7>FL*$h}4>)jg!NFk0+vKn>YUT-i0d0o^d8Z
zP+t!?U^H-&<jT#s3Qn6+H6+&%g1vZ>ygk*?_(n1#U89%J?EL~BJgLKxoUi+_lqVZ&
zpOL!TH^3$B#@)eRjay<4b9=4-v$qW!&)0W&Q-BJRtbqytO*#R1tOoibNvBfxUx_$5
zMY2bUlu{it=$)+WfO$|4Lz(#$Qlrvhf!LsbQm;qEZcy21Wbi3PPrvyBL@iRP(wjXl
zBTTdYZeOiskHEP?=+^EJXBt*Zw$+#)an*;<$4ob)HR{0}WKW%Z@P{(Meil$~D;_H7
zbS$9^8*#64Hik6=Y48o74*CRIxYj4kLs*AcPWd$)NJNvQ+=wJyW-GsHjGH9lWIaJ%
zD2;;Q;~__Ykd*tPP~rLKEVZPQ$M=50h=Ox3-|98`u6E2k1%tl!nRmZ}#->%mJM4YD
zqaek+_ku30ie{iCwNY$u%X{a!IPZ%V>$?^+!b$ggdIMKv5Qb>H*+>5=5$jHEM#ab7
zN=n+SH7*%P4zZLOgpRYONM=3}lz<$hX&!F{YXXUkPsm+<!gZ0adAz*l`sz=e=Rg9}
zqt@&V)+z<HQna%_r+GqcbHGtwyzVJs+8`v`b5Of5`S$0Tr->{-N9T}N<8bZhEv+0P
zE2Dq6My);$wnBI(_?xcY^F!;@JTHXbgOSV(Ukp(aZ<-~$46J$KA{Xgh6)k^<_MP#>
zLYvm<ooK~Wu`e0$EIRD`@)b>JBej%Ok-I5dw1*#=%MzB<qN<Q{hRgxNWzVp!eLM-d
zTfWgxcB>1)?C+q?w1Law$NJCcysw+t%nYkE_Hj550OmOl84fxSU9dA?0vRlG&duVc
z1ob0iv@!lWoL>t?N<kv?978pDb4*Z)sREE<q<39jgD&X<#bH`f_?Vu~*%;mlC(Fg3
z=IhRsZfcTMX?Y^~lLfFjbu;i1g|J>^L%3|OiMhe)v*bgz)u0%aqVu+}y$&}o`uvoy
zz9trVg#J!?0=ukOMMZW~3sRRBtx<n8NmyI=$&^t=33Ksc^eKfa62f98w{wao{o#?m
zA&1HLB4ULcOfhzHS%P8GD`zT?{Ad<y*Sxk=TKuXr7^shAIUY!S49(dF-`|l+K4lN$
zNoKuPp!+dVtr}=*Xz??*qM9u4YCA}BCNOkzl}!^DMV3#^m0gn%_*`=f2iFe)2&>`s
z2;lUlWE6!he_7_3!%nMJ(0n&2C@7ak<u#A`UfuhA8S+wS6S$rKk)$rWND6|Ngy>^k
zZ0r<6gfNw1wg?vvdc@A3^%0P%L?MXg!k$n$gU=Py)l#E^SS<)n1J{liE?H-_A@jHN
zx1c6Fl4RX){p`?3b0!ZJaBQhGQ(B!0@a=WCo_|^<nO&hZW-%>t^FO774SYZdV$_QC
z7M0-f8LY-9CKlk!Oht=z>Aas-uSJ1Kc$QWOFQKFcwKq#UDD&~0{~N8hNcwYNDjc~v
zFHluON<+3Ia5oINrQM~)H;VHd{dGc0C!d<4vEH!IwD?;OqaPO+vuy<F$N^#v0@8=8
zObpI7i%*BrQ5g-TT)tWl%>S+0$X|q6L^!&u0a_PP1Nc>AvU%Zqnu^lgQBR8rlf}Xb
zIBRQxyUCFd7Hm}^rwiL!CtL+;nMVMWRh-i<042nfjI}uWcW+qjF_2xrw3~`9UdKr!
zTL2v%!e^DTHYr7T|Ij>$mSV?nJlq+-|5kwHOTs)*t%gg|2Dz$4yo56l9(Z3x8Gr1#
zk(~ajgalpbEu5?9{5NXIqWY5mW}YVo9S1E2qGWL(?SZ?s11yB<saLV3Sd`ddbZv!t
zioVBrQ=V2}IA&d{RhGdI)xL<<P-=lJS8Ohxsp@R~o<AW{|DS>+-AHtZq{xc=bEgo!
zKiZ|#9UJv_@wohk^jvf)n{9BMC9`kVZRjW;&X}-%&%b%$vwNJ^AP-N~ml1({Py!J;
zpqbi&5xVEyAhWEf+OUoEd=&rqgI}OzhqMs;hj6&atUV@H<4D)UMM~X}-AJAs+2oA_
zC%gudlK@A`MTokbnfsSJeW@hbk{^q7---jhom$O<6;BsGQ)j6Ukt1@$UkK^7EUD)M
zAje`{VZ3=#Z^k4m6GbiiLZTw#EoP73u9Ss4r_{@<bOqQjvz{-vk&=?~Zbfb*+q3eA
z<aofBVG&x+Mf3W-0x6<)<GjK+n$4bDjKa0US7T67%9poB&NiM!hC0DbXy1>t`y0V^
zFbWUq&1SpSY{CP)1l{~+fGCF}kQ{(TNQ$qJR~>J<-BTV=jw+~b;VuL>si)T7Y)o9^
z>g#Bx2<)Wtt0msLzSIbMVDrRcm`$Gr)x+&p$9%;b|42jcwG~XZd};*u8n-)=>y}M>
z1C?(&X|EeQ*h)Vj=}sou-fW_9mdiSSY8Iy6T=(xc4e<(G$V*~ScP}zRDU$zm-I**E
zAG-dr>dp81z7@a(KB9crJh#5s(VvOdF6H)&#!ygQQe<M!PXFEou&Dnj78-=!X7BpI
zbn>NsnZ%3_|N2Wm<KOnno=?2xMBf6NN`mI|tB2~{0OUfTbo86V^#|<I@DZ;fD5hFd
zjaoiM^l=Jh<sOV}c-y?Kc&`tw<<n=gm3*QRsPf!hSUyBHofckq2m$Jh&<gF<=VOaH
z==-Jujv;c0nA~=>kGXfn?xo*(19z`K{_u0JAKbl|d!mu{`u<NyL_gG@>1{`-bx4?@
zxAO92C6NZtDVix4+8pe*@$@Db-ZETay#M_w`2@;rOib=}$%X<n^_OkD-QXrkSuTHR
z7O=bU;mrU_E#>DMvH0uY^)yvJSHLj^pH<H&J-e2Zm156^xFc9mywxE#L`(Tu0p<|~
zT^Fugq6w}eWb|Y0PpDq|K(C0PMw(Z6#SQcAf$$TPP$6THW%S&K(D49O&-&5vj%bBg
z*^J~PSw(NC6{Py(XzXPLb+;=*ytYkV7!N($f#|2X(od^JiPI+I3YIz&WPaJOKv8zr
zfQ7&r5K$d}+LQGHxB1BYS?Uwb&@Y>x*m65Y-X*wSzS2D6hONhJG{7bFK!Oe0tzigO
z={I!Im+1`M#O5imia$yx<`T<=1FwP5h$u>sjWa=QrQ|d`tzm^x^Kz!;g|xs=@GAff
zj;NI<qflHS{LaWVCfA_%K#POVXTRbT{O2E1-htCE*2sQtAMaDPAO+=_bn%$<DWyLY
zT~n#%nel310ea)g7WvRy#|<q60NQaNkKx=kz3l$<&*A$-DBWgRi;T`$_C7p>KbD;S
zUBkODz!Gv%eJrcIdK1K%xgQI#qwz2IPn2*wUMz=i{CEDcHzhi_+ShK40F)No@u^RY
z??OkE=%!!^ok*{Z!jIYg84#swEVMf6f)^x96#A6cm!egFpWJxk0rg(^CYv_O4lYT0
z(Q?<30GP6CSF^uHO^CQRSL|I=^d-T+R+UEP+L|iny@im+qHm2I3RUTQ<t;#K$pW90
zv>)QmMzU2Y8q|7Y4vpj#>QS_}!(493t#vSc4Tc)7&e?6GpSZ*c(V@JnOjSyw6t5lv
z*Ilk1bh^*64>I3hElD$;)837&;H;XT;y`GCtb{GAihF|DgTO4}`2ie=JxJRGc$nkw
zN-gksgb32Ovp27ZOW^seTt882jpUEg!0en7G7J>K^O8gg<OB~2ZHltC5rV_c%Vfw~
ze4Sj^P|`S_d+ZVJ;SCMENKEP+$Z@!xw!7jM7VrewWz8J5`@FR@)RcWnUhK^k3eLI$
zao1!s(;_D?j*$bpzqM)HA1-uGY1k*##FZ_v_VB%GkLe2CH*M#XbL`-Bzpyboe|?XX
zAAzgVuPK%+Tb+`uI^OY~h;x)r{zwh0nl~*ubt_SmNx%h@4+_2*kw$O}@#v?ER4?y+
z&razl4miai3F>C*uAe;@&ee)2s18bFqFH$7u;ET=f@k;N4CCMQA<h9e#g@+05S`9N
zhLko}tTG%~#1Q&hmceUW?iWbNQIjp1b#3%2dIGMVq2#KM>s*UUoII-pmu|3f3+yde
zsZxmGZ9G1GfW4|7WTkyaEmJMR_(M}fr|?4HoG6}VA9FUNWU~~@nsn9nIvL&sNtgTQ
zHMeCzquawBV@4Z~)SB^*UuJ}KM_8AVd~!oUo&H$ke`2{bW0(ku25(MvrxN4j=Gwz(
z+;zQvgFklk_GQyNm=D#FJ#yrmBaZ<7XiY_FIy=BH8^7spRL<mO?M`?zyNK7T<R#S3
zv32H8FHzCeMecy9+t#VSZ#X5JQpj^ODYfb|hozoMtvB!CUkTcts*dx;H7Dp33GW{=
z)g61Oa~;SAA6R`<p!|G<-XPfbrOz9om?l7lR)0_R9MvyFoF4LRqso<wsu++WR;ew|
zDJ!5-%Y@kqWm1J)-aLi{My6|Gf$_Ln8Ls*AE)Vs7a*Wp}b1>A%PW&bd;O=m?DS|E#
zHQAk+W*64jQi4uZZ{W4Z#c+8G9nOm^WG0Ufc?L@GDO!n_hVI2(hT49gThOyF0NUj#
z(+=@uY!L>o@X)ELlq-cNbF-9MFjINP${~<ig|ksnZWd05byP<DLqy!sHu?W>@eaD8
zFkQ6ewr$(CZQHhO+cwU&ZQHhO+gAUbn@;DuuTZH<jkz+{U@ewpSU0w&2X8^Y$Tp)J
zoC4`-{yNMaHt2p=>zL3u8(=5AUBF$d`KFJM@|UcX(D(-x`tvmyvX!9`5~|L48BMJ#
z;HT>}w0-`HJYK_U<KT>_jsga!Wp0i(=n-fwp+JV*cdU}elUBM-*vTN(z7hUNGttUb
zPKoP@6-_z)o00zP%!IGSg6w_1bqa@ceD`#4>v%k(Ro)GmE}E<lMm<D;Bl{5}m37)v
zrp#u({~dZ=7~Yz|GGT#=?9tE)&E3g<N-IF4nXNqJ7A-?*UGo7KjCljuMq-TpKWcY$
z?I3}&Lx0lFuqb862L(!2kP_XT8U&LL9CQYkYr93tn*lpd_fY)v@@(Ny3+CBBsftnY
zF{6%*H)Sk&irx<8kAWoTmi_^tk{%*i3*>SES8M=||I8N`0*ybwuYx7N%!}8K99qiO
zn&TBqrSX8UwqRYLmGE!O%qW8YG$%j)J3*giTFCC8=o0nS{wcJVGSn+{jx>q~`98S`
zmsJ$Nv+%rs_uMlvW1xkj#zT~(rHT`X;zf?rXU4NtQlMVLW{XUGi_~U@eM=qjxP!OE
zx^Riggwk-kTivxPm_uwtD;e}PTp;MT-u+Q0-B<S9jC$hBQpL{(ugSxf@HKDGCfMOv
z!}deeS{zQ}vPBnnMGbXc)&7;mk3K4keh^AT$35B^o3C%f{MhqV$8Yh@+K+GwRM;;Z
zMDQj}`}TfbaIQD+Y8^qEM}bg-RO!t$tNPU0979$V9M1{VjSb47S|Lysr8|&fWuUJf
z`XNV{bKR8j8WwgA3<^^v5b|iZbju~hbI_7wtx7<$WPbqMg`FBd<0du-Nnw>#!967R
ztk3vuFptp1<GB-3WHy`_?IpzvYpeS?z`7iRU2g(A%V#iBOfAf*Y|s_z2=sF<6d>V(
z5;TbTMV}@2RWq+t6S@5H@K0gmJEp;T={8L#S?>U)T^M|I#Z$NcCSZKoJvK2~g&1u`
zru|YHk)9pY%uv65qo<0b)A8B=?5FLiia3&L3MN4liMdQ554<|r)>mypIW!?EhpFv?
z9BH=o5h*$G)|gTA=TYblv)acSM*sfY&Gkb#ner7sLGkx%bk(vZVd*{rc#9(J{f_Ye
z)YN3I@vauH@pW#n3DTW^0d8*is_7Dvi@o~yrD+UL$>#;)zbra__zjc@@WDNl4D>E{
zn1RI4M$PsHa*n<-@4p!aJAl4gE-F`m`&<-i_mn>D<$2cOZR7)3Jz^S@n4To0jK`-=
zV0&rfwTCQID8ICEm8qDgBLApSA96+IO<C>0gxNNUHp~RyRf+_ujN&4nTSV!LB6gZ&
zl_zZ<rN`yMqW^C2d&81?+TB^=NdW1R3KFl?@ID0`<-CkM)s+{+19-NeI&@tea9-5X
z3?SI<hY!;%(v~)mQSQG<`DI-HYB9fGu%6PhZJq8X)p<7D{Zd^NI!v+ztmpv072IvF
ziXH6_fFZo%@Px=rv)d@mo@7oIqXAAN;yL8qrJDRgcl@0@K&lJqj{;6_%ExB-xT5en
zDr`<l=D|(Hd%hyB78&(dlZAlGA&o6-%9}}qRI9j`5K=MlBuS_m%HY_>6bbS7tkozJ
z>#(+CppQ=VMl9V~S+VQ_une&9mJMxlW^eSkY%rHX5-cMzka^+%-k1uc(b}x00}j@t
z%sXkT;-eyN?8B-o(M*Sd<^J*@)GVA^gMl2PbmNN8DZBDT4z~o~*pV6Jz0Bc%nO|E}
z3d!hH4yaMyreF>1Et`RDgJWAv@^O`C>h_tSfXpg6fn2Fl4OcN!(RMR28LiiA!31&A
zS%I2{?@4yOAiel>aakO}frWndTcRWbz1d*v(*FJ!`*d4Sz<Yd4a%fZ^{sq9e0o{g@
z%W)Cb;&W~skV|$6GLBnQ24V%114>E`I;7%1-~J)bjG7psmpbcF@WH-LuQ|CYfPw9{
z+9OpsEquA$(&4rp`-&YfhwVLT!)6PxV^CrfJz^7?3U1F|j`mpk-h~%3%XYzSR4r+8
zLb~uAxF>IoC{P<6r@M>jn3AO(Z7fAi%vboL5!lhKYs}cek(WIfqheP-CTu3SkpXzk
zS!P{%{XpL7f>xjdPud%OOJ0tUm!vy{Kvz6doKbm)6+44-MbtY8-pxoY6}x<-s46un
zrjDgYJBXEkxClb^<<ndAF>B+us@d7$B+K)c0m^`FyBkUK<oOfFkDqOv69%6p1OSV1
zd2g!5`k<4X-r<x~5VWwo_-h}DIE?{$(M=Bp7UT9<+lzUSKSiu8sRJoGpWz5LYNMER
zX%e<8B5;}I0c%0ws>X6xzy?8kUBGJOaNv^DP5am=2G=??l!gdruCINmD{2KLdBr@9
zNoaeyXD<2bXmZcs<9OxZDxWr7x1%z5_p(!!x+~eKVjLg*dPTO$GPt_4s9M`P&F6wW
zXL|J%uQ*u>*cn?Yxxb-0yMzXclq*^9DxL;pHwt>A8`Sj~a_i!~m!Z9;>L0Go8lz=J
z{hpiUgjYvRSP_{~q1Psg>mIhwZMk30rD|#}q_$tjpP7jwUU2rd&9>h3ia2DJcd%??
zyMt)03vs5opMg~_aSG-#ByD`0?q{Y|t0OKl$g+Vs_SR{{&o`@lmfF*tWxtz_T@G)j
zth|u7h->|K(L!e^oPT!$3%nS_CC8u3l9@O=v5L*>v~iIUN!rY_EMF5c{W%<z*<Pgq
z#dO8cb5!{k?)a-znM)4Lh0?84{jdFB@3kJ~WO~1gb>Gcl|BjNmJ3`NF|IS3$xa$UO
zx73jR!@Jl$<(j*mE9X_-g5a3SWmqto2{MPyMqw3J_T&@THPS0t$8)k~`BV+I*dvJp
z`8D16)^NI))e0ihYHO1j7|$u_1iAW6HxKy<n8gHMpzDwx`?MKDve*zjKq>_bElk><
zXV#I?mN#HmM$N2I*ev@C<z9-Z=Yk>_3A(%9--F!8bM%02&f+e`MBS^B>oK$RPT8VK
zAx+U}b}s-rKTJo6AObREz^t*dLQZiZp(8wrj_>nk!N_BsAAlu9GE(XhK`2pWbv4Q>
znx;g*1YGk!C8*sXva|K6?k9Kq?3q4MrTcu&EI+{9^KYcg4Y=eb&@aL-;uZ~6{4DTh
zK|fi6YO4ffm>S{vHuK(Z)9xk|B>4Y#ZWIhU5LSxhxgrFo<{iR8q<30-JWU(LU!J3N
zcC7dprL^^wUP!hdo_!p~Nd25r|IZ6B%AuQ&b(CH|Kdic^hhPP+(mUr!^0l3^KT7t*
zyVD%}i$Dpz@MnsE^6@I8uFycSS#a&p1m%T|DgLHq0Lj5xH69(=)$U_}mLiOG1(f}N
zh<h)HqD$|Pvobtd*m=d#w>M`p&~v^}TGL<GA5p*!hLA*$iSQBN2n?UQNBHa#Ru3K_
zp<6`HuPFQQ&*+dv?0xWy*;!4myU<x~A+9mh<Ye6j^S?FoK)2JHo*eI`WK_&t7RQBI
zI2L?^qA<c+p@<!e)G4s{5A^y;oL<{YARh-%OhMSNr$FX}9-;q+BII6}U(~!r^x-sb
z#26UUFSEQ*!b#2{-}AjjbRl|SB{{VhGRW0o@pqf}4QyZBBGNQB-g@`{7C<pduXPGt
z2*~8!9F8uUMB~XRZ&r_mjBwnMW`ZW)=Y#8<`S=E1<f6pmfDbnJdS^ti^gPqT9)j!K
z@DZtXNKyS{6CsOn*oXC~U0<n1@ej25F9a~_fN#C1vphmTAgc=-Mqej$^m!~a0$Wpu
zR>UV<d`rEEJ8Ds2KQ*VRXX2#@DwXE~AkQ3LB6Fg&qP;Aw^6J2O&cYK%6^rhBp?w2#
z=AdW?hmMIAZc_VA3L2M}YWQ3U5?YSN)HeNl0_z2(oUwtzLk`;AZ7hEiVwOiHu<-S|
z>~Go33gJ@}QRHD|jh;60;xN(P-(dsO0n6`fDZv&O0m!D~?oHkMezpoU3R<UP{<im-
z>A$Iv{U=6oI}5FAWMc3zmDn1@y_(3?ki!7Y;KoUwzfjh?8GYZN;F#7T0#|aWl1#lK
zf4f`|Ka^{JfXe~K!_6%6KISsco|XX~VG!ljTRO$p1FBM6(QlH2rEkn)GXuXVMDoBA
z2i7yW#SA;?spKX&pNiBeY4Nr6h=mDCp5z|3OCTvZ>EB-^iYm@Lohmg!1DOsk&&!^H
zjx#neOQ$+vWO0+EwrQj|u8w#bUY)?%7;NMPdGo!2$!xGPV{ePu{<~UI#0<F^fK`Ao
z_3Ac!S}=G|K9KWr2;zAY=;pOm$S|A#(gGx*{O)F8u4oVq5;5@JRBubwmBDDz#h77<
z1TPI?y%WfaT&ZCL3>h`3Z%*)k`j?CwSVm-r1{XZ=-Su87%qA6$Zs$;QVefzs+N=>?
z!~%y{H~V201$EK3nbx_(zz<-(_zGX`9-m1oS>u+s5qfBwboh&RE_c(KTh?~%<f}2_
zF7O;&nJkNKlT}Z*hpB4|;`P-*I^+XmN-rC9z+hf=$2EzyzdCK|xI|RP90{-1Nt98X
znH#8-NE(iQ>l^3mhtCz<)b+Zv<uUEPo2j=nJX(-r>i*>J6MRN`?gZf6D))RgL(Dhg
zBL#7-l_;8S4!9vWlT_8!*uc`65cM+#O2rL&tp_vau#J?vGfZrW0lEl>kWxyR5ao;r
zlwnQOffuDa!ksK(>>9yC(D4mG08a^*LyjwKcVelnlj{7bQF6~0bCKFv`~SdKERrf~
zM3_7S{PaBU>*eJ=VFqa=k!>5bRs*Bb?4k>jxL@~p$(~$a@)sH+NH}rNtQq$;%O+hn
zpKHC@NcI@W{$gw<p*YdTFlm0+iPkd-aPS;>S#LgCmV|H5_gyChjY(yd$w;(jljF_s
zxt<7xgJPEMlkuS;D<&Y_+M1DpcJ%02aVgOZ5_$s5iksCsw;iDnlhRllP=`NywC1O-
zq$h6V9+=P1Fm;ih8jJl)EY8D`2h6z;R-$zUF_|$!oC;8`qZ=>;Si_YPaSR;<75CQC
zzXfjIg_iYN@TprB>@<Vlh7&$<Um;bwC;?g??v$&G70O1TqowRcK|b@M=W;v#1w;&T
zPI-3T-|uPL(XiWy!8hs9C<{O;*6+<42ZaKlw@2->TU9+gN5S&CmcxpVx%Ib-{@D<v
z^3eTijY-+`NH9&i9^-ba_?Z^zlKKKq0TbDao)nFWzzrvkhR1WiDkJbt-lq%)cX*;g
zn7!>}-Ay%H03syHRf-?PQSWDjUXy?*MinOy%qtZ}AooL8LjH)awLKJ6IRZo((Am1o
z0{S?x;mhPt1#g4kvV%qQP34}99$US<JY<}ktI@8*yE<W5_AnM(0#DT)gW8kw4BETr
zFc;7AZIZ?`DNqd-Do=HFz@H@d^lIJaK3!R9wX4KEN^g~FqFQ)}erMfTp`5kHL+Zof
z$gV6nu$K-@UYRCO=y(u|HZ+iU(3YG9j&E@b6#79G&rUK6IN`<CtVz}IJS7<-nO!{=
z14uz+)s6xYPy;JKblhKpSjmrM0J<2k3^&Xg|6D9bRiz1yvo-wvy^Ml~)ec^pZvn8?
zOmrGJ6a9timNyaCW4FL9+uTEbBOt+MvdQ7lhF<gm=V|eu?`hM&2Bq;fQ1#2a#I4IW
zkwZ>vcBEvqM&seYMV=2E;i84u1n6`+q+ajWj4T=6W0a^6RnkaM5Nq7Y-3cFYn_b2j
zZU@3sLnv;KQH1YkEG=aT5EQCSD=r=&=(1qQo#Y=$!!zBU4d{};sU#+I;b;zSn35Ia
zG{}Q-rqM}w&RK1{(OWqIV3W8s98wPDXe1E5`X5*99%x#dV&xh+I+Q{gEA%O(sVqW|
z)whjBV#-2T>;vy&^lD0*t{J$^oUF~5EMlbrh;2CL6Mss;Ai+j!MSWx^lv>$J`%`|~
z0YGn;N%`-D>R|4q7b%>j<^K67DF9#f@1d2{X_@SvFSk<uONcEGM1HJ5RyM6(J3T75
z{1V;y-))U4?!Z1I<G+c*421SzQBg_})jCCB{>N~!u-ZhQ9XA2;(em1e9x;Ivh9m}L
zO?!s2bRTX3mqwYw2(X=1w%>V*Dz)&+e5@d<t42U9pSn-93ZWN`QpYUvH9H%&9+Ji;
zpH_zY>6vXz^4Mr~|2`HNM?z#Hbn&1ZTD#8=!SjX%X`I5|cXt4RHW6>b{ZH1;F4hut
zH=dAbIGdG#e1kc)mg^SdE?t9bPlkesvh>UqpwZh@0$JZBN=NaBi~4NK1b%;SbT)kC
zDKgqr&~Rwzs>xLEPD*ygb!GhDK3?f#M~1BCdxM8bBH`T-;AhU{rz9x<Vsa#HAj9ed
z(a6lBjl<OtXYXer8e!C?T!k{~7|Oy7S3rMNW*h3?s&XL4Y#RAacsK8vlx1C_AnlCT
zJ&%t`KkW~_$QxldpBVA%r6SMuih1@kLwCe5qXdwuwJ7V7=y-xVwGV}gU%w#9*u^fM
zDbrEk{_1^2>nl;m>~3>RcS{4xLA6~mg5RLBezeR)vgd@JXJa6qU<vao09TA;oR-B?
zxAliWqnOhhLkae%S+1PuiynbGuH3Qq11e?wPtjTp0`F?Mmt4mw_sPiB5;i;7Zbg5W
zLTvY@fH#kKDVv@w<tYH=e6E6Kd+D<_clnq6>dH;NX;-}=qk7GBW@_RwbZk;R+g+Pb
zhP|jEcJpH{(uxeBAG3JOfqO6BAuucNERx4e0SO#1*ClL1d)9?E%U!?6Mu@d%&c7%W
z-ZDS0Ub{~MT8b(7wMb6`y5m%mb}KSbJ$#qXtKEv?VLFHVd|l;-VN*8ENK3%p@dDBj
zIp9u|3~!+!1f-cq@HlrO^m4UFnwN#FaGc1JEGeK&BiIf_Mb{(}PF7%^4WxSmAWYuE
z+}7o+vZ14(#E%s(nHAw(m}<_*wpKsPMDn$~KGXqlGdwMrH&}~^#TX@E2PkOV0}W05
z<lJ4k<M<%Y)^@l`aMswW(>$_V>`BpDJx8XP=*3kMU{9?^JQ`2I%%K?&&a!T*!oq%z
z&+qszvcW1cN>5u?eZiLJlLc@r{m79ALG0%w6Synfuk+cGK4b8!wKn~f-Zqu$_8Z@W
z?$V|YaxfYs?fU3{kYLO}NV&bG6CXoee~wUcY5#CGJpJI++cBd;rrshCiLQcCWK;-b
zGWZE%d-OLJf_Rl4dPHOIBY)H46AL<viU@ibF0<Vh;PsQ>>>q0lz2`$f(IGsk6e5vj
zaW={ow$OvVBaKQCuco&wyx@K!VMn#RvZyW*D_DZzC^pchYwYJ*S+~s_@OP;Oj-%5|
z#9j0Bm+y%rmc5^PCczFFaMR9}jr_y%ev@0^vAjPS$}oh{Z?2=Qs2r62itE6!;pBLv
z8h{n{gCUTl?r_v*u;8Z`UgRC+6IK&UV2WbLK?b?DL<zRU+<ZhnQ9EV!{-#Q0WImZo
zaG}SvdOXVSn1ol^orN`a2smm>e37u2F^tA_>;`j66<qmaEhb)GK!bNc;@m|+JC1-|
zseJk%3hV=_cS@r+l%)qs;nR!lrGD&kzddudw9#w6GHF{E+Al@7FB%PrV8-S(xjjWz
z%av$kf4a4sc?`88kM*>4ajb$k6<WB;DAdWjGWCVaD&*JLMzqLvle6ZteS|FDp@O$T
z>%!6pTKMg#Wnp*}tCO839<tvw<TrqC4kN(17UJCMLv=r{E4PJ0W=H9$H@MoBXmQx=
zms^o%Qi>^3FNPa6g1OqOmcB5s^1W4>b@LG1<duH}_*?IvqJj#Je8OG+ack*fjMhws
zKx(_%k`i?T_t(IJK)OE3vkH8A6`7~%Z<xO}>;*qttjtYF$mnksPL>hQA<5#$`;LiG
zv-kX&7X$@Jwp1QSM$dx>M!^hn1t5zmu{iY-s>yE;2jn({D)sg8F^qe|C--;1Th(@x
zgNH<qClGaCG|3A7L-<*<k0Ag0-jj#$y-oNN9Z(B0I7FJPA~8xhX;(w79(UFIqrt+J
zhsZ!q=RB=EdBS1ff$KLL_!ZH3diHqn0*fPS2ks6Ck;(nQvihq>b99RD8jx-i*9i8T
z3fct#X(p_`v754RYAL=$T1=H)-06Ny^(A-~lN!#Ij^iLS)(tfck?+IRx+0DmyG234
z0~(dy`VxhL7==o4pE2ehv)@QO?Au%Ia_em4q>FPz31*3^EF0zHagfUAJ#R<c4_vCR
z?^;5K_Ar+hVhvmjhQKFUa-;W(KNP12{8aE(h|p+4mnE|o_ChFr=#XYs30m!3>f&XU
zJ+q-*Ai^(ahFXNIqGv2%EHa@^2aPn>fvRZR7_v5*8H0|UVnQAQa5qJwJhjmj57{cN
zp1r;Km!i(&%<hAw9`o00Q7hApvP=jk39!4WO+nBhJNBH+H-46nScl$)B1FUVZ@*Kr
zgb6q`Gj3I^^8}uPBViwVydJMso903}hym%oXQ%kwE3F+AE9lp#7VIyrzqaf*9Zo+J
zM`M?Z@<9naSS)|@H>;;dGg1z91!#H|T&rajD*zpEyd%EBVZ>r2rY%nN%viy>RUG@E
zo1ZpaUuqVCe_lBPG()D1${2&|t_#TlSW`?u#s?KqJjIWE8^}hfCpzufI;db=kBe&#
zbXL(xeN7L!<y9lzjher;I@3fOR4j^ORN?4#C=PbIgkQ~(us~DW$!4*mAw&+E2hj5Y
zO;t%Ap&vIA?$9ES`Yurd8?%A_!Z&dM>uAuZ5ON=PCWyrY@ok8V=83!ou3k}7yZI{^
z`T?RM3e-=iAW2bBB>J6iOJdmEYX6lexq=-ytXknappXC|D9A0I^TGtbuc%Xf$NkWk
z@Hw08dWl?7N;t(I9B{S#!O~k^THW}RqS(wC=k(d958DB-^#6}zV^XrItVCfmZbZET
z!G?J{Z~g5>-?l3-{mCRil{&z=Ky71h1EQJT`-Qno`}#(V(HJj(6dh%rmsc!dsB&{2
zCZZZ5DBUF{?IAbbr)2HK0IG2H$G!isWL49el)L_MKF*-&z~JNoCawU584zYOpzz6i
zWbY&S%!Yt&I`foleo=NyxuJnZ<kf{oNVkHq(eo@QN8m&VdXTT`^(W2fv8H5Z$VRUy
z>WCKs<(6WvTC=0HU%+OJFO`(uTJ&NF3Re(%1j|ewp9~L86+%(LQJ9}GXhE=z4D)(L
zY#Ef_Q?XDV4e0?CE7o1TRnyYfr0YcPR#}E4r|^+Q{DLJK=sBBs`IE2gD3|Fn{f2P|
zs=mxU2O{0GTpgyKHa5d}2#-oTv7h?eoZ*ozv;Z|wP0SiE8T}cVi(Z$aoSpmwXiC=<
z?3ZfvQNT)KOkzsQPB1uZ!*%2gMedN$8yI_hnl!neB|8!o(h|3lA{o<Z1-+8SLfs3R
z(hnHaex~^^+sTWoU5W+b@L&sy6sVs}-$Suc(J+QrM@cqdG+|?k)J9~5Jm^j(wxVA-
z?Z{ipbX*zA5x*@_Ead~Y!b6O$7Tj1`J;F6WN|5xEZ~c>aWxrnaYx1GY^D>0&kLJ{w
z+IXEhjn^6B4d~0eQyA*aC$OaFX{Cz1hbgj!W`FA>7!yxTUH&KuL8&`U8Jj!@feC6%
zb3JQuSPu_8_VJt%70}T_ty==qjHKOSGr{u{rN=n|Ba^+gKd3S_r(1U1D-+zD5Lajg
zp9Kr;M0sW|4JSLutQB^FIUX{`^`b?4L1h+{RdT*2<FiR<2l4$BCz8qYKLdiU1g0dK
zjO4;yT~)TwWR#(Gfj&jXwrkK9NMSt#9yGBz5B9rdyUfA->``cuHXK-6Dw9?{T%IW(
zY)GH+Xgo~Gx>yM1h;t$gyB$Waw36W7t4vV6Z4nnIeR8YqnftH`j%tbiZ&fI26N@C_
zI)8ZlCEuX)-J0{Rzi1Ss4v02C66hPTe~F0_=M}L`a-{q4eFsnL@P-hO(><s1sm9&x
zyPK8qIIbz9aliNvSylJF*pN?F?|1wOe;?6KfiA>9D>LP#!;g=@FB-$T<LGr<FYK6>
zj|Nqj3<(pA4FF#rzn4&oySaop+XRI{lA{6Q4FdvN{eVd`TRMCy#8&!)m}VBN%usMG
zAERA$JLlu}pJ>PMeW*dW>9Ac>Vq8XO3Ijs<FCLy_rANV&zpQa!NN7S}sbId~&Nzuf
z>fQ)3=^S0EvRNN_oFyYG*9Vs>m<?SrKQUi4Ri6v!#A(?sD~9XqM6uYSp$|LOqB7mx
zfvvS6h9q#$^kHH4$U4ykkP4yZjH)q6y@U0=;Dn6j2o=KQ1T}a%IQQ8p1WmB5C~N3M
zf?hf5b{!59P7_j;ON1sKA9)V%5_4E!e;Uh1A?drsgKp<V%h;2f_w~bAWHa;-;op7z
z&vR7D;4PZtjTOolw^h5a8LpF2!XlsoR-9+hqCr(*h_0DA9Yw>)>=<W(08yNpJOE%r
zI(G!`mwIQZ{f<nLlvRHLZ(%iz=#oUiDNeDjs&5e){Tgctbj5rMamMd~W?2ue-0UC1
zlI@kTeu&qaQPt<qLcy1N-c$Po<Kky5wX4uFxM!g4M;46?pLXTbZJV$UMoQjBpJADl
zYjeo!*Lm5n+MzSX`Jk<)W|WsYq+aRs5L2MNbZ~&!taJ@JdUNnom56MXaJu+u8^Bxp
zYDU^yIR*PJ(Ogsg#LzxJGC$mLb}Nr3(IeJ0&v#4-*Ef$^olgslez=f}Eqg3S!J#%)
zG#w}Smu3YA$?h@%m%)1*o7yl^m^VQINpzN1$Vsgmqp-+P=%yf8Q%qv<m_a{s(<2tr
zdlE%`y&3oR5pN?6I8T9*&@MK~`wpaEkF1+wXRQGkQ=+h&+ATA_Y}<3f2j~&QJd&&~
zTH^XZ&FRG)9^R8UpO4i@1waZp=WcsH6cs3?%Aq8<@j=38{DmUr5SgLrQNtJkNBmjI
zQyv4aw@U=4gq11&jt7GHGT7#3CL&L$z^i$~@5p=N6YSE4M_H8AHppAs62*RwfbXbu
zTcg-6GXA~QMD>0y9cW405x9VgAQf|ZR^HhI^P#V;TUG`^j@}xo!6f8SE}gQL7;U$(
zN&a>EQysEaqm|22i1lKc&OxXgTRBgCl7TnFd*K_5)T8Z3W-eEE3IH@M3cac1wXEPk
z#kixPW-G5~Qyu-`OiP$fsFmo0wdtoXjYVUo<LL;u_QgSYKu(%=5~z2Qi?rEeqBuHQ
zJ`D!#HO7YUZ~ohvfw$O;p=X>dXO?NLhVf7%R@n2Rvhx~QI9JKk65O#aNLe$%?x-jL
zZoo`KmgemI(3ngt3}}TpEd@lEg(Mcq<J3h?T^Mr8jRp1m61dtME;bWL880Z$>g;e7
zMOR?|&?HNEqrR|V1wqlv9R8O}#3wArS~A<RmyD5`4a6FNEL^@~Vh;ZiNrARa1<@s&
z#E7mJ6hb2LPM0BuUPwd=&X`%;=%^Evkh}=d^~h_sv>h(A2G60b{CVgBAr$enVa9c9
zb6g_(1Mut-<*=k|{~jd^4aFxhoz#WBk{`S>5@!GTucF<Y$Us`EOkMW*qs96;fJvH3
z1*zMbO6a!4$ODn^@6G&#)y^A3N<ibPmG*ATo3=m*Td+Mw`-E>^={tHyr^zD-vta(Y
z>^T93jocEiE6?`pVIx7?mH{5Dz2ifp1;=`$mF2j>N$zu_$fO3So$_lI&R>m(Da7E?
zq%rD0V1TiE?ri}(MbA(?m#;bI?xd0cmvis7;}}Juy+9M*TaJ`QzI7~Y>@!|GYx1C9
zLr3~&-~Yv4S#uJlV!p-zJNJYti)cX0Pi-SY(gqwY;<}AG%7*M9wu{{BNc?4!c;Se<
zS_6Uyh%Bp_b+7S^gJbxpQ5>E?D+aj2UX4OtwDI)zD@w+{O2Z!(hae}JmQpI|wUHii
zD%cS+)&WMJHEf#5<qoh+UsX<C_*u+~E@#{RorhUcc&A0Qzru#HLpjBiRH=9+H&*vE
z`(@4*?t9x$21A-Qei*s&Q>pSp9qC)YlOwY~Oy~}Prvd8#@UXsggiUseNofA6y(KoA
zz8MV!RsW;^g0u9)u9r)SrP0nZIn7J~8^qm0wY=Ms0S1rN^j<TrVs_k1fqeN^>9lnI
z;rTg?6C}35vQo3=)~y(cqhk!_Iya74jmnSBfvC)Pg<Sy_jdw@CUQFJ08X~IX1y-x2
zTWbaN(<%@yTWJ%hIEvmOEqKMyFeg%(A+GVggY`7f{+Cr&fy;Wiyso8fIIfSgqQi+A
z@RZ2ByLRn6#NuyZ?-O%y?T$QhH+mHthx$PO!OEE_OC#Pf$O^hgmyUohV_T5gRMu<e
z<`->W6gi7F3Z!%FT+5UfJF<d?E67wk{vs;J5%KuiRk0YhJgUh-!oIEGbq?O^VcLXR
z*V~L$D+{(h5nr|o|0N7Jd}iu3#Qh}I$)?H$g9*lrA6hCx3RKQ5lMD9>tYM~_n(Uj4
zRX_52m#Gtu?4dX;El)jGK^ShIv`8JJVfR*V4ZPUHEWv!5EpY+OQWf>!`DqJH!ZVa9
zUQ5hI3Et$>1fip=1QluM7ts4aRRsB_629a8nN1AJFfv05{kqv)4hrWqYzqLi!BBYE
z^duvu`2BLYY_vOYfuv1gk6T|D?i}5u%`Y8=vn2|W9v%bZ`#<%EJ|sF&pJ`)JoyS1i
zFCdiSNd_W6{q%vj*_uHzCs}NDEdZEr<1+M2P#l@dKyL*AN_uo5mx{xexFk+g6tO^D
z9Y<zXX_sB_+zY=NZ!$5Ce>Vcjz<VM20ACIufSM?DK+D%q8ynuRSRHkW*&6oNb5_k?
z2#eR~+SRnH8xDL&ax4FXQ%I)qZ_Eh~YPj!9qmA#{Zm7=2KX!ryDnB)mkSKK)BZ|WF
z2#S~9uT@6b1jUKzlrjUSfIy>OA}NT7=N=D%yY^>Ja5DVEe{%>UVW9iJy3o=Z-c*Gz
zLe++hFU>GF2avX_#6uz-pZi5{10j%2vwi>Kt|1y7P|D>sN#;Bs8Tyk|D$*dTddFX@
zwwu9c&$MGoq=g%_%5j{Ra;Dz@IKp}vMmmm-+7d^<Y-g~Y8KCF@$i*l0$cM$@7)XjB
z=dU!Q(x3ZwWTQl94z~g=*XfB|gf~h+2H9OxF92Ex#C&g)-V*bblRe_Wkl8gOfB%Gn
z9<%~GtVo*Si7zZ|ohR-CfVVo#CpFyKyqr7Bf3OgBj42Tgz8)y!1C%W!^qISn?<K2-
zF5(9;4n$lS6dQ$HEoIIuC12th1I<_$1qtZ>wl+0uN_8?0IKjI#*H01(>C!z20kQcM
z61L|Bffq_4Y`<5ZCQgM3Gj-yzu45(N`{v%^2`9|j)58wIOUB`7f<KflI!8esdftuF
zl#xKgj;TvHJP3el+rIk!1K&&lctfYBP+P(anv=Z0nwpN<D&b$?p=TCU0)Y{xU_f~Q
z<{3I*aezcEOc!sbrjrZ@GM1B=5^CtY;>WI&R|v>lbquTq-)vmjq}PfQ<$Tr|5;Deu
zr^Q0Sy^0PC%O_7&6ODYkm@mH=f|o9{2KMFK0c1CE2+OZ&>3QIE0sb)MP6-v7E%N&R
zqLpMG*WlZ{nrY}9!}0!AMj#U9rU<_3KuVru8C+(jxDQzzX)eSrmkkPw()A6PeD>JE
z&fW}sNki>0Y7`hB?z?iCZJ#TMtP~{s9XLWUp_A4k*(t+}81!tp*KZmeS5ZGjq)nqs
z4o%47Z`8pYQ@;t;^=vGPk(5#6y1BITs)!q8r*@?KQF(L6Eg2CW@@^{ua<XCzBU#wT
z=f#AruYlJ+wBhDJcCO}#wbX-}hkJiQCt!5H;mztPaZk~8vY{{qjOy2q50h)o$vt@k
zOK$z@yYT;%m-n}AVF&$Sj^k`DRpGAQY|$U|7k)4MDS&reXFeq3F_;X*Qa55diTGq(
zpn4Zx^%sAh(YvbIoXRBuZyjKSSc?bS3h6KI{NZGt`eC}dYa0Q%27N^g3LT&SNUC_A
zoTa;P%u4QYBJZ|H%Q1IIjW91eGa7o#KE}1~JPs1r%34E=Y&^f&Jk6(Y;kA6}F(nWo
zw0!W|;%l@`!(0Pml)2@JqMt9mJO|Lf*7BpnC+m9Wg+>&Yu+&Y3vA0ln*RprNG|!Zr
zMEPBF3+ty)D!}h5U|D}t+mPnPEuF(dkos)LFNeV~Ua5gTM3Zy{+138*Ls&rnSlSPd
ztD}mff^MF_RQIS~6Az^6UB8y8u0zfIa-;J=uYBI=hiFZeoXvOkNK|*yFf1rW1AQ7I
z2sdI&UJ{e7fpFs_U<jEl)V&d+gQXXE*3<vDWZ|vZ4rAieO)o?pPLepY;P*@G1SUg7
z^n{+EV87$O_>SlrxUlFM775l*8Mw0|_6s{w0(k=9QT&vPa_|Xqk8Luj;e!Yh3yTp@
zEcP+@n?x1a4UO<$=f=H!h8OQER{JCU!d&w){4-eeMRAqZW9aD!jUfbst9%kn3hE0i
zw6%{ITq}Mr(7EtbH<5fuOa@|kp;?drbaZS?NWuzXnH?Cp$1^8T$1HvZc%Jjy+mPJ)
z8CH3CCFpIXcU)Vnp%l&$^X@CSK)gc`YHpw5C_@0`t|LTdFES#GL7j~a?@pVl7Rk$T
z%xnMH0Sj8m0ulv5_ASF_a4H{s;y?YRPm|iCM$%aZrd&oc`(0vs?m1q=Tzblw1Zet~
zJo;s`z-Dr}=S9yzLQNo{S$46G_lig@CJE}GYY<?bQmzQpJQJDm_4Ebm*8n&`$G^$o
zikL8VpaVe~>d|iNQgMLlf{oPdeub-K`wE(`Sha&acx<eYyj~S}CZ34z;hfTD#rgB6
z8gnsb1;*ejB%r%4;zU;kN31v|H6YC?5_GW(<c=I-wJ6AZTV`!k)9LfN`o1`M1Vv~o
zf&Z@T^Ei=2;GQ0{`fTI{yJbGa5K^_o^^19sSmYhtygKGA?>pzFtXO6S9uWSxM6Q5s
zlHRwf4+3{bfFPl(27AJgD5qTqm*P0;xchkEqpNxTB&h7+7$_vY!s9RkKA#t7umR+#
z7Z%46xc_Y5uh&whl$)F{h!S&K5c!EX@ii0sKxnVgbgKZJi#T=J0z*U`mSXxnCoTkW
z{1{ptb1`9ZWWme1<zo(ohx!u%>UWavTt7xFN|ZS$p0F(0)LVh$1Jj2PW`>t%-Np9y
zb#K*=%u}~IcPwYP9OYw#0qlK@5O7WWdI6DJp1C=o6361X`Ut~<kGc`|&2qvcd^i6<
z;&<hEDP`KKr?C}um}*hSh^<uRl>|ZTCrxcP9@Bsv-SA^!neXAYJp_fDW<h1R5vFx*
zRm}YF<IrtpX}eZL3J70E^b(%f;5g``rxm$nL^Ri}#Z!&6k4C~`Te9_uN*Q0eZtdIq
zn&o+p@?{3dl63MfPbCop<-b8y2mZ7%t?qmqXrJyA_d0d8#fS8UQ-sCaXHo+L==USf
z!^c7tO`)Az@D(rnysmgp8;FT?xphA*cBF7!;%%g!QU~M=%HW`DcbngPIQ$&76kPZT
z7lm!>cLGM|H_U|XF~qiYII*P5&3vtZ3-cWS`tTWFGOEf+EUTJ%u)D)i6N3a%s&g@f
z1<X5(h13W$uOuAPIQO7%ztG6}R~IyF#>MZk7zKS2Ux^B+4)RLFYZ_whAXU0~68tA{
zGfyOatn8cr>8rkD(swQ;#Bi(08b4F?b6ng*v{bZ&da3)9O4*ap&ZhVHkHfgc!K{lf
z)&d=!d68U+F5y7<Z98MiOcqP*yGxnlZ1wGw2E{lB&M~vxPs8wd%4~Q95Kw)4p-OcZ
zM<ylT%D4y(U`jV|4maOs%lNey#fjEEUa}%6?xy+bH6MQAi&Z5W;mFgYtO=`JA#f9Z
zFK(oOC@x_T5D^FWd??M{N)p7c%A%xWp8o1zlVRmr_Mm|Bns1n0HJ-L=7m{MPET~!&
zyT`S#YWiX>k|l~dy}x@ICK7(5dN89Sdf;7Lv!a6eE@xZFscBBF6JHfAb{;)?zQ>FH
z$j(}LKVE1vj<H>c<<4WYgDZQ~j;6b}5rW`7M8%pE&GeafO?gt$>C7IRNk`GYX{SH)
zzmnG;bPu<=k(ubfm{6Q4w#5UTUf!-(jX^eqm_$7by>KGL9yfKmaYTMr(7@z$WpO4l
zvwVORNtdC*mWai5xu_gI@vJ@-bbri}?IzKFECkXbLY})2QMoHJIa5bhgQbWxx905Y
z;)M{vU7SBdV=dY-GD1w$50My=^*pA+>xHZ|m+05*O<(^$XLeMSLC<U@fyRTNu#Daf
zPg3<lJ39m^2ng_gRY3SnH`$?bngVC#ueu_r>+Nu!pEyK$k*l|*z_OASJ{w^!t)iGE
z=$!@{MS+5D*YqgpS2I2t_7ccLQRYpL0B^j_0Sh<z_nrBY<cxRj(fQm$%GHZIC$DF{
zn6-BObltOeT?-q(v?Ipprh1~g0nU76U{BzQ5P@Bt^U;8XiEw+wt3JSajh~5xp`BF_
zE2FF35FLg2df+oLM~-=}5^T@qXGeu4c0K7$73D{f$p_8fe7!kogo^_~9+J#)I$tuo
z>NR*uVx4%H+ZzE8sd$B0ko(cGQ}9`EzH?)&`8^=9sjN*;<r{SHk6zR#GFrgwu0jK_
zAIaF@UAaRs%5}=m1K6{|V&?3VEe)+F!SR)?-Jo-<W&Sc<6@ccJM@OtJhC2Nm^^o~i
ztNfw-ov362zdJ|Ei7wuJLn8crMxQ~BiFjReLZHp14hzP%y$P~%%Bz6?ZaU<7%!&V3
z<3o__Y`p-G&>_Iohx=0pbzpQ8?neRDKu)uya?B1!A{BF=j)ctQ!f0X6GW(EC<g37K
z5;*4%DR!Ohn~?|_W^p8#jov@lIa5H9sbyds<-PX-w#1fc#?gS66loF`{7PTqEilfU
z9Cc_T@!`L*{6&GyMr}da+Q)d0zz5}d9mjZiAaZeZZ>e)8h2Px?M5@$#pIhrB9i=Lj
z2N<QXy6SZk)ire^BEcjZ4%{u+rkrIo@dPA)=LXn`UbTfhDUNIelET_`k3^^2G^dJ=
z0rF+(aM2$Nz0Kej5kj^(z^CRywgs}WPq)Df#mkz2=nENK&3swcJfMfW+Y7L9_c>)R
zR?O;+v6{QVmU88K=4%4v!^i(P0Q_b-b&c&ee|U%iobg}tPXu0Nvo!G(bi^ez*J$rr
zs+@PKbUF1qex3-2VU6rEwVtMTHtA-Xyys=<lZ{WSsMIgLJXn2nd4;!;45#4l6EDu2
zxu%-KI+a>19QeUjxVHPSDEIA>d^irS{cbT(EUBW&^*#|xqy6cYKTc1ZL+Bw`R}zki
ze?5eDb?QF*oNbUTc@X^V*C8{-Y5$VezFvYHh%tP^cBOR;1*#MKcWQJ>jO$vwePl~z
zd3k#xiV74y-zu&Ig1{xpYHtly7SWgW9SP<fqvdjflwj)22$a*zG>K`21eoTWL(h1e
zQO^YPJq{Rp^gru?bO%l_Q;6O2W1oVzoo^j9md?u=&V6mkkEda6z<V`SV$szU^zwA;
zvpI+aETxs)jbSH{Z6kiJUHAquq^4>9O)n5yzl0b9Bk5fCh_`r|!C>Rrm=<YvQ$5MM
z1o0Sb|EGP;46H~$zg|E-h06bXR)Db>281v}rA%v${vBd~zVn=#00qPW@nLXyK?T)r
znM;MeVZ_U;?>>2%%yh$dxQhOm(+`(k*L<ew?&zKKwPDW^krNk|WWCM@J9S>*A=X?#
zVc6SnU3-GJnzoe07&|8b@$do;9)2b5(6=u!W225_(nc(C%)6(sr2=;hRAi4iqnlfh
z&PXkOVGdE+!XTj5uXm99O2@4ghi0zF_`#Rx+m<UHjXqANm1zGWL0-pK&<M;~CLTcU
zc~dCkslt43Nk>~Rhkag~bO(!s)Nm?5@%}fubAHZlo<*Dt#M$d5RNt{Z!#{?G$oHn3
zo@BA|Ue!8WCq)S^7~Ls)k>Q?$-WLAZN6-<8AcB_JI7ku4l>9-?SzR9BMru}_sXTn%
z@rugSy3&0%_~LisuP{=ei+HyQ%UI$G!9Z~qRkG60Vs5D8rah8dD5ys$cN!^tqvqA{
z9I^>JDgND6tB6S_rQ5@4PeTZ}xp;tOpQLt>M;Z`-CB|vctAJCEfo9U2V0%U9VL+E3
z(4_t6vW2P+8F6I<{wnMHB9I^G(34W-?pwT1@bafJIiEb+dGHn#KuCQ1ooOR3@PE2V
zHix)<ZWY2Cm0LpIYqlWianBJmjn>cCD1jlJDfr>_+91VZtVU#5Hk9COnvPxACrWK-
z*1ZAGZ$rev0SX<aiv0VoN?0*K@R{BkT_VD^_145J>ZU$$b{nu{V?s_x17!8MluG1}
zhYSiqzi_2i@IH~qV@0!*`(7=A=h{3egb(RRu3=_El@s5-k-;~^HL26@b8lWm4}77S
z5w9rje8VTzqnBe=Fb)*yGU6Pe%XQY5B0`EA6nAl5J&tP}CIzU(dF?i}jH9q)FlGF9
zcvOfj_aPcC@O<8f5@5VZcQ1IqR;x5;*WMqQ``q*;_+hq^5GtyQP>>bqe&=0&E=i2h
zQvMZb^N|WUf4w;4l*I21bHR3n)W*5#>M^iLMjuU*`5(-7E>qix%<Tw?R$j-B#wkde
z!d<IbGivKG!aO=9r}&*~776gu-+hFy3wq2J_}i(>W`fH%e3?P4Nr{@#%c7S==y?Ez
zuZV6Z*Ms>zaOJw$-Xs_*8R5E>SO3KMh5*L~uIg!+#eJN+NKBQSwGHC?C6cvPD!TbO
z)#m(euu0rRZ|d)6Q%b9Ca{ZvTzuQ}>#jfIp%F#OcI|0U8O9rxeXnfjP=Xqm4(Sw3E
zFai3*tVm_D*^QqX=pY<(%DV<5)^9v#3KFNa_GbrNycX<yxT`}U|LtWaBEwFgCn3oK
zG}ndPyqlpGpt1W3YFnMy8j})}+G}MK<N7|=CEFki3P9Lze9R64&anR1Ip-Bu%ch4>
zneDGVdfO*NTx^4ZBoDZP<<Ws|oq-{7R<TV1&BKFTHqZTnA-e$K9P2A1?};n5E5c8#
zMWgbii2@(m9)3R9;HBsl?V1&W9dWLfbID;@KeTmb7K@KG;d@{!m<p>c_1vSa&>r<<
zlW$Y3wUKSFmW3f8>K$Q>Y(J<ApZQd98?{jtW^6LbG`_r(-ASHsgedgPJ8R5!gz^2n
z$0aLrJo?4*mAlD-h`9Yd#)%P(6dbV&trxj%G{qSWg!8AKGLc8@Jzzt%t%!b4dh2>e
z%=;WD!B^2|B8;Ma21_}m;&GKOpo+m})y<y{$RX`ybVT40Qm%Dgj5oJMeZ(P<a%XAh
z%;Gb|81-S?G;A8`3SN8^4>c%^dpj|<V;h^2<1D-wd&VF+1_(em+J6-+n^~hp^t2V+
zMFJT$MRfB$VtO6n$ka6Ml<StTVaQd)?U%P$-*!$&r4k>ge5@I{>Vd47QGHZ24~Y;Z
zdYhVkOw3KyA)|;zG*vqH`ZEQBdrV1+Pjg=dOOve^F8pG4Q{`$xEX;)g-eK2&B_(mC
zwG63c$URUsz6og*s^y_ZFWuTF5mY#bN^L30<7l1i&OHttMQ92POts#XQ!P1U%jZmg
zjwtqV%neTP3)lpnsv9OG<<D<0dZZ5yn9O6mw<LQ~YJ!J4L~`D?f*8cEmr#Y<Cs$*J
z%K-rjF%`=}a<OjG%e#j&5bhA17T6@Cqs@g{0<FSRy0J`m$}J9z+bObm3Wh~!N(l0F
z&|A&+Z^kmu>ndzJ<I;a=JG$e2Ccje`hFS);Wjce=CdGvrsF%G!j~27=#v&Y{_2ZpK
zyK8;=>SB*iIRkwP#Azx(tD+=0rS)OAHh8x{xuI`K3eU~Sm|-kKv}KSNVh}?Yw}g0Y
z76H0Wui?uF@uePCe+?}Lj<*XJ$OEk#=mE<5aRaAL$B6EBA4u;}e&3`O-bp<2uh#F;
zHSB!`rFIBk1*Abdt+Bu@3ge}wt~+MjTQ0s=Ral|==ZU)$gTj{t4TpWsct0Ph3PH2D
zLux@chae=8{rq#H2N<b#hE=m%EED$ii;LdzmFLt!;((?wR~HMT?k43q?pNhWRRQnn
zFe3;<%cj7AXE^okzuvDbU@Gln5578=uzvv~<}4DUqc^W%%s0H9Z8LDfGhMQc0<B(r
zs8upJrut5_6^AzCa!y!m*ynyV`{w5>+>GFimD2__-j9R~ZhgY8LTcao%1$Qz^I+*Q
zJ$D#rPFv{PWf>QN80<*zRo-F170>QEs{1pxYRyuPeGgk~5okd{u{@G6a-K&h%=3St
zrlTb`uBS4PkKfSjd0bH;M_t7DSrlTqxfQwt19WODI?~A8HMaIqnbI;wcbT%E3XckI
zaT(RnYhs-6+jSHSsc8{dha7#Q1r$j#McD@jk5n`$ao_^#u|5w_>|jQbtD?yPLS*%r
z7zX)9m-x?MyQhra8$m={<V|9G{7SwBE8&yaDwj7|Q#tg}EZb<6+s?AWEUDZ~OBRC=
zFy&y`)-b!6)d@A+#;)-l8Jp_+xE$m_A*TI2Vh#%dSAgjN@lim?Vs`|AL|clbd|Bh7
zt;p)n?``q3Ssz|TQn)W|IJPs~UUcGou4T%E(yXk5B^^dneUelCU-r*vvSi(0_#>%d
z4|V|CASxl4YRAbjwtw!YKeK@hBWORX+`}ZUE-Hqz*qh@}EG&#R92wk4)V)zs?wdJ#
z<0=Tr&w6A|$H(IsgXqa45@c%<WtbxUH5siW%_106cNkTiRR0&9ZaZ*75pHpT`PD&S
z^k*F$odTPgXm;#5TpS--jFnz1%)<EK7v3K<$@GIcU#liCoDx=_hzGx{{NK5o)T}pw
z>$?cb=wo*stfQb^en&t2w+26)o`GO++|q2w3isH98ZUjEB_gd_0fVp%KqA%|txR}X
z*TrgM#W%VE7w~h|r!xic^^sdr1<CxcEbmidAM=5yr2F<yN^ewY^zpG)KHH)8KFJ&4
z<7ctyJTEdmvvfVs5<b$c)G?m7YcPgACUe$T)S#`3jBB2oNEY6SqysFnrLdxfiJ^Yp
z(*gM|#P!w$+kNntLx=5fq^-~7m~`4SBck1rP0cDYxf#xxmcLh3anIAYq=~FOK$q;1
zZ7e~9*Bv6jsAEbY{hae(gg{I&mSft0{~{dc(gzau#WrM)3SG{a3K&HH1GQN8#pCce
z%^3{3DT>8vcy^uYv3*G6Q5tL&#wy5MUZa)K`T9R*>>S!m;G_xS64;^*CniH?R;x~3
z`e~`zVj1nqk6N1LkPX4M^r^gP!FAE_A47B4XgMK0Q;hs#^b1VQk=+a+;kO!;qO5(W
zZ7KG;$RGx0jE+8{MJ`hvf<dQy$%Q?$nUQ6;X>>9L-D<xI5`d8$P?PXI{D8!;-=^PR
zQj`C^e7!E!_I_}0=a7G@;!?)N`GowuLeSD`V=uTl5~tWv5jauhc7ME>+)LNrij_FJ
zuf8%xs<eIo-)Xq%!?0Q9zoAeV7qz)vUEW%vY7cKqZ=UV&_D^9K_r67~P}ixQvu&$r
z7Y_^G!;n`C12`cES;rWHrix_3XDGq6%0GFXeP9UAViUUh6bw%AxiEJKGXH4qMW#8}
z<nz*fHx?2nepoZ5d&^IF57vfBLLOfu0m?DAQLo?7RTC$UXG+zup!-QoNybZgb-Lq3
z_OB}Sd?eRP5xi?d9ObY+PG^bLB`R)D@BV+{_;5R;B$?qU4oS`=<fsY!-JXwMJ<zLF
zi4MJPX7Zn$+P@A(L75?YFDKv9x;@wd$WuO4DNU93b;A0x?nr4}4x9(qJ}IE$Q%p9Y
z)Rwg`wi;Yx;O$ndDn?3unz9^*H}ah-y)iJcSkCN@SM_TUp-5t@WqI0#Mst3Gx|4Ys
z!QpQZL8H|GFw{R%uZr!K+Rhb$Xtd-?CR*MtT@A+(E}_S|6l`YY490^Vw*<ek?r1NA
z8{n02&}U)N<QImz&;O^ZbK0(i;i7D8Cl%YaZQHh8v2EM7ZQHh;%86}t_ZWTi{ZFy6
zFh_4pfhpNm)7cII0$+=veRH9v5vj41upp-woqF?L!k-L>X$I1Vs{#+$^OtaE(-Oqc
zC~%kmYyc?}!oxg&&Gg}a`(Un|R(XqLFXG(*1PMRm>{fv~>@}I^q`hp--jBs++1u9d
zuf0&k>;&Ol@?SL)bs}u6R6bp{eOe0C19<TJi9RFKCaB)c_s%!z@*bw<K+~0lw;F{P
zlOP@)b)weY?MmQ$GNEtJeTXlPk1{2{){ALqmxww$fnN|CEY|)pCZQQy@eDB+@kAMl
zJL5P1hENAJ2DNM^X?7~NiDpdx42XuMq_luU3mK-TKn5sC$fyqAdh@kyP{GuwKQ$;@
zA0+iKf?%XiCUVR93gIe$*!NrR(j&9GBbOUycieO@i{%zQV=Z;k!oF9~9mp3`ck!`h
zRl)5zYh0VKs}rRU4br@DL*s02=EG<!{MbS>z@qbM)=ME<t>42esIAWBZMWnQUYORY
z@F6Cke88AJcPTSMdrcg8>jw(%Kz>O2dZ;{y3J2xF?$0lzH@)dd^p#SQlm2L=mg^RN
zYwZ#lORt+@M_!YgU~pb-pp5wXcHiw7!{8$P&|Ju0gEePn2g)g$#WZJ4wQ3a;$7s@w
z)NB$f!0ab~cCx=C_zP6%ervu-5<3k^^SE<!I@2<WmF0JoWH$skdecD6Iwi0JkB+&Y
zpBgcm0tY4psccyHSO;f`Sv8X&DC-ii>Vm_I&z^aoS*r_y#{^rO54lynUn|WDW7AcR
zn<X>WNN$4i7nqGm-d*xGH`X+yuO!=96*L8i=*+SP|2=^5o3}=cM|k<FEXxdHOli>x
zxmE9MAwx5~b0X1C)fIBmk{%v#h34$ov`^R>EkDROt6=NqXgAj{?j_SC(vhm+#m{M~
zKIBI4_fcYn&Czfd`1~73UzOP5TI}XEEX_c%g9x8+rfRa8P6CIQJ2oP(r<(e+(w%rE
z?Yl9~1|#pirFKMKNof^cl5=vq8_)sS8VpmRR*~Km`{hByo4&fovhx`#7BF)3Xt^6~
zcd9$jUhCnX3~HN*ON^(7+^fyBA%|j<*Rjj8sc!1G%7j0m=h=MWo4n&>A;t|6n=<b;
zEkiCS1O$V!kvC_RJD$}Z)!y9Oqb8``_&?MTwBjsS_6`|Z-gY>IrEHn?UtZB1d~dHu
z>DN0-Q0!Euk;f?YW8@@<LOh*z5rQ^3t=?rREe%KG+vw@zoL(Boya9yqndXLrf`F&K
zO*-l<=;)h;K(|lm2uORk=iV=}&n@^UYh1qC=)Idj2Y?@MZZU9vg88@h6LxGTzL5wp
zmmOZ(2T`pzZh(XQQqOt8LR-AgT93FTbmuc3eTjtxqmU6i_^f?f<kNIFFJe+Bu`CG#
zdy~lsc!Tjk8E=U1)mQmtOqy$f^(6Zbr;v;Cj<DTp;eG|<uWhaig(Db^r6Zizww<x%
z*gT9ypv{8AQinYgj&9|pQI_kj>dCZ%KW|{N5Q9~nllWJOyj(`hk6tSL?6u1uK&~Fn
zS7e2{&W)O``jLD}>|h}K_}O0^EUs*T;{PBgEJ3$nGJ-r}TDsmQZ_YfBG5&z&i_>+%
ziQrCg(>w&b_$k?es}Fo_&oXoo%%zrDl8qp&a#RlRV6mvmFK{Yj?!&Z_!N!ic))U0-
zjkdk%Q$E+;&hz~P@7Zf(X_#|#Z+W1#%?+BMCZ4QI{Gfc2|BcD^a{F@zhI17Q@!EpR
zf3$7d2tSY0+lv<NHw)aHHK0WPBY3KScDJUa+pXcKoVDJG4;Nt6W`^V^yOcoaT>AO`
zYHp(C(Be+-Ux#N*Kr*c*WuI<Z&6v-AZW7K8s7ihmH3$X=ip<;!21qbf32v%{kc9lL
z)f(=1C(Y{RZ=(IMTtL~dGdcfN#^=Xvu?OxQQV$>?vy#NR$lq{Tf|_Jj6j1Jc!uv;y
zSzDG3UHdaxc@i=}AS%PVV1QvPDyyy(eE9HVGqQ!XZ=g;|K37qprhBj0Q*MzMH%Y9N
zwDVr?FAAq#O(8id)-2ZOljq(auICs&NR-rxzZ_ML@kA`HDRJ?nO($&a-<N%;owI@;
zfT}%_EwnvP7@Mz7#?@QiQ+<Zh<D=s%=*m9BC@)xhnLQBl<BP5FdvP1;xvxdUy8{B!
zpF!5$<$!QTG`)aVH^#74w>&3}EP8*A_1&r5<?DTSz(f@vZxdz@4u$_GFfN%XzEt0#
z(@OsdtiC+_UH}#5G+1y2Xg=e(-OB9?O=1(~q}>|WKMK{sdX*JvT#A0uUNb?~BW{>o
zFaTKt+uUj`wS#)o>e3}6s5lI1diMJL&d-?*Z4Ain%dx8Ok!a^&U{f(G0h{WE@oS-o
z1rI-)bl<x3+9#BP$kusX_t&_V#<=xr6HqSKws)2ZhH7QF_t<lDM|*I945<CV>M2gq
z-=x2JCHos?wMq2A_mA^>yu(@qjo$FehZLrmxtTRkupR2uq(JgvFAC!avqo(BY@8=U
zl`Ql*O~rT@y7X8!rYO~|*N9bHm(&7YRc#i{z}|oT-W1bSJw4FT3wJOTx<PWPuRZKt
zKFWc@QLtwnG5{Jj&<Msit3P!c=dkxmyMbnLk+B{OuuY5a5l!mAm!Efz^V};XXyb(q
zFbl3aK8Gh%*_m#FB|Ww4cBR%u99TZND``T79C3EF%!j69n=bhfUv=B4LzS0c3u6~O
zXz!Q^U(5YT=FI+d>|Le2;^~cPYl6cvw6`q;mMd|b#8j^`R6!Ok<_vbIp5fWKz8hHE
zQ%=yaLgV3v@F70LghVE;h9(|yhzMlqIUC-aJC>7=XYxyUFeyQ4OP;_nM$e%tt~TrN
zqNt``85Z}~ItBZ0bO>kMGV+-^p#+bPvZ<nipP2>S&{;_hHC)bZsfGU4Ofg5NA|2PF
zXE_pit!>{#+`#dZHs4|Jgf`^Cik0&NltQ1;TmXW&HH^G?C)!;(@Y^d|h<SBbS7MFp
zC-koBH&k)4!_o6Hw1IS7u%WKR(7;u68yjw4a}jnBgNf6(b4)QreUC>ln7x0tXyr&o
zKL$YDofbt~svf#zMB~q1WpP5i=dDhqfiu)t7;7k(UIx;)8?38j?%A8pLu2<v;aI+L
zy$p=SHl8}a&9}AuJvBpqRPwEzib+w3V1mk1RIiq<MZ<|c>+YjgzRJW|T)o|xi7%IX
zeyw3Kj67z2rHo2C)Gr}($cp+wO&~uAI4;G?OYICeufeM5_P6&CUl#z+kB=)J19v4#
z1mlwKfYTQ2+_0<<3x-FgnBv!l;Wf-`TW;S+R%J!}8<Is9H3oyAugv{5Wop*n#wHvE
z6f7Pjv|G)<tP0aaS2Yash9fw~Y}=JC39t4lR3~jj<^XK9wo1UhgT%FZaPJ$(!^kA#
zbg)%0Zo3ReVQKCwj&o=KPgIk7;<J@HN|<?3`>>0w$w1KcWSS4pYk4A~*jjaS3wRY6
z69-b$m7_>Vd!GQ$8kwS|yi_n1azOkTTyhV^t>K}I43w=u`w)J!l>)Z%UigSXQ)wZ%
z)m<oCg2Di0v>-LA=knmOY4A(RM#KhSE<Hf9v>_W>J-NJ8yR{)uuuh?W{`Kyzx+YR_
zzKY@Ep#M&iGGXoT-91+1*Fgr%BEV?Na%)Dcrl>xHXbEFp6?sEK1jec{!(eJFgzq^c
zLq#I9<LhdlqVU&+Hccv(f**@F6mWA_uf}P{6^_y94e3`klsT6G>c8E}Os*bAx9h{E
zJkahireT;_Vcg(XOUbv_ONo9VSLUPB=_jA|%*)D}8<7)lRuKJaeYTi7!6ArP=Dtj0
zW?~q()T<Np4_fh1*dnjvB#t8^h<tJVnnotXE?hMWEbYl`0TI&tFl{{aCV&{1*D4gn
z(A4T8eqb-Ph-`O2iu>^01I(pp7n+!h0cT-&2zr5~Ux2qLrQ~r7gB2mIhHHZvGQQk4
zIE7RSv2=987c!;|E~pN{{4O0vF!NcBs#`g>@}}T=N5}?%wm5o*O>P>yc%P0>_<X=v
z!Py=C(qrE2INlGy*aGr1Wf5DezYt=_Y>(}6EJmcM1ABuGh)obFT+hfk3*zIWD7U~7
zO2D{#G<B8LayZ9fv?SAd1_K5*nb$?&AAzstZL4&QUKhf-GD~g~J?%iP53v5D49{K&
zkDr(L{rZB$m{y|WTjf~0vn6z6mXt=XbJgdRCyQh<hUTf$5%fQ%eBz$T()XhZEjivE
zEgx>3u%j{sY3^~pKzHG{j|7k)D$$4ygMu6KtnSX}LD7vsUIaY$p?4{+2IBAuFJ={X
z%-W;Ko^#4&_MTs2I`uXBTSHGpX-#M(nsTIw<|aK@(Lvao3vl_j&Q5zeQcMg~f<<ts
z1qX85IudE|R)Q$A*s-<-5{&Gi&7U<&xKPe^<~#~ClE<+xEWeW67Qp6g36cz#<JTB#
zcR-o2exLFjiQI3_G_@?rDaU+*Fcf!!W0Angjfsq}vh-OZ`!K^cqw5EQlTt7i-%eTN
zbBwG6&j>dir&8eY1I>vpodeb!|KeUMnLa->mc&=8%_C85Xr6xp8(GY6YRmc9i4)MB
zA@<D7*v}P^^$=poY?{6Mx*9~KgR>B*>h1aXJLF?EZe_k8G-~{^fuZ7g4ZO#E?kZiw
z(j>rPC3d2iFo8`z;Jjm4R@5Igo~`q+d9E4cSg+m;&|~dIr-gy=cfN22qzhd<(m}S}
z-Z@7?YIp9j5H_2;LTiCT4+H&uM={s&=@A_^c!<x#yzj&prAmh&DTo;VVpMAi1t_H-
zDL5x+KluB2X<}Inz%nOf;^|DYiY!dsd-)>T^`@`^zevvdIX4A_7p{TX>}zuKF~N(O
z#Eri_npstlO=2+sUsl!NAsh!JR0rJ4eT!}9uh>Z;h*N!dT2o=Q(8HKnJ+1C$o1MnS
zWh=kIF;Nb?o1gg_#5Wgi{oMYLx`+u8dCSL}KS%OBhSs5t@h$U>{Hq+!IX1>jchGF#
z`17kv>Vcv2()ums98e5vgs*?IvNfClf2pF4)OP$XW_tW(@-RHjRkClbADN*-=U5OE
z;H67+Sh-!~{f%50i!B_L*wpSl*R-?d-#i*bARaR72qk^(ut|TAzx@S#yn92Z(u6yj
z8TVxIW%81NU*+OL)>z@<k#(cuD%ZL=aU-?!BLFno&CN=PSFxvzm1zK_mkN7yT=t8y
zvY^1LZ~TEm4Go1uj9K7u{W4^RsJ=5`%W(snlotV*o{HJ~MHt*p0{pjMHXcH7Xu;)V
z;>jI*dmP12a>L3e+yQ1ElzG+7<3^%Voq<mD4NSGq{mZ{wq$quymUqvuypc7)b)1%*
zYsz^CjqF5*Yfjm0PFy{&*R!p>1{w1n>Ffp*3+4D{BkmN36GqOTXfWmVT94c+ZzO;D
zQ{24WiHv)`hs1!(tlk@hCHH|;;OFK!&l2-g(JRy-F)-DR#QcNiEMVMwm!MS%GT{;l
zA8e7KZ%n&>nT8Ja$3E$=JMNmgM}t+8Vl6+a1HoPuYY<Bsi5J7nV1fOU?y4qaTCTfN
zfJgj=J%rxDi$6?t^hJT{-_>c$BvYVCQ;f@&>L$v*1Jn1*23@WLWKW9yBb&+4jZoyM
z3v?sxm%VK-iv4<ePh-D{6!Sem__4k8`XTb3z^qq|F;g&$Rtr>I{1_O(oy$o+-nQMU
ze$<RhioWvw=^KH8!H6t05lD=>4k|>NCG2`bL$2@ceeWZYy#Re4PL^{lFY!`$z6ix0
zOd_S(+~*c?v9j#HZ5HpV&oX!aOoTF+pb|rJlj+s&Wowio|L3*rmNElTad!t-1)|`)
zbgF;CtRVvG`%v@mv2_Pdc)kW4-(2<b{lNNp8XS1Ytv94RS7#!7t0emW9&B2pTeD7S
zP;*iB+>+z8p4l@jhCe`h@sR%Oc&tqtFUENz97?#8Ay)e<*X$G!JL0b&EfDPj*3))7
zx&jFL11~jn<@EMu|Jplav!t^~InULfL$q?i%uXr72;w!axb^|vms%J4H{DaPICO&G
zF1F>U0vY!hB#UdpHqz_=6D-RSs~CzFg8HMEo#!BX80K8oM?H>?EOvfes+MDQB0hS4
zE}<gs&h*>-R0NPsTyCS%*M}}gyR)74AICFWr>_?zk6?F5s@;sXTrHxWN|kwzxMyEs
zB*R8ikW0KH!}KQ;X70TDUKm6nsv<RXqeaT`q7Dd=dXfX1xYMRaCTyjj6NMJ&`rXg9
z0yb{v;GK6eKC-~PU=HhUVprk}%Qd$jKI|f;2bCY#n>&!!6ly_D*F{(b4K!#(Fk{Iv
zBUcN#$gq&;#+uE7*&{`q7~=L5sf$^tnQ8d-L8C_DH4izZO9|#~ZQ@;so!yM`z~{se
z!Cxr28glf$l>GEu|FFOGuDkljAl2Ox&xwt3fZaI4qsNND&!6iGg5S(~i-yqK*;{q`
z1~@X-zX2?)dPCpFe`#j?&xtSHu=}a+M<#+WjydJka|)Pk9HQf`<G{j#PNM&cG1fKH
zJ(FEWUsTwWV|5J$-OwB{ecTWRS5E(5OY-&)_u!{&t2vd#svv)csmxWN$rGogG1wpM
zC{KbjY4&X`ve^(jEk8@(PH$?*{A%6hA=OXZfN%%pxO?Z5U=N0=sn{m6RC+~nR~UL^
z0B)@0zK}>C2B2<BkzL#A4~}ko3XOAZV-BE-LZ`Q;V75W4mMfW5`f*sT*tl#f=ofjL
z{{Cn>N6mG3pVQvAQ}!g-T2eVqP!3Ou*l|dETo~ZC>(!Sb+e`||scJ3?<8sHtvls@j
zF#GU~`!uzx-?hny-olxH6h$H-r*tTC)s|UhWiir;?C6V*vm@hk&1XDzWp!ajauERM
zB-rk-?FwdcW9Gvz5~LwK94NgOe_C%-qieMBI-QWlFf8Z#REd<<0wHQ|A<|?MZAuG^
zd<l(NRgzjntK8Xi`saStjKQFx@KIK)F!iLeRoVV-Lq_Y)N>l!P5JO5QR#2RveeQmX
z+64g#TPB7fE1yc3z1^Mmfhv9b$L7nQ5Q*s}1}p|3FRyHV8l7DeYGMIOhk`q^isRL2
zdXq)uXPB7P2)WJ4c<0Z2VdC!EGuSjc6)Rry53V}=c~;K{^%H8$*~%vlnlIKZ$^<}2
z4zFhhgiL9TAy({vwuRJ&3kr#5EoO|5lFbOzH#iW0%{C-SAJ=7Ql11^VD_MK}_t}ok
zsB$0I9Nn=NmL@UXH>g=0>0~b4M-E_6zmQ;0aEZ%1Nqvh{@%yG5aeoOCuFIe(Pnt^n
zyBLy$+E86j(JTKo&3Q%efLbC}?l`Wr!AiLu@XLHsDs4jdQO}-|79v|;jh&ufIJwgW
zqGYFLyZe&QEO0n6u!)M;r|ntJ#mYokFS(JW{Ih@#NQ3SW5r)};LeenAtJ>@x!W=-c
zAvtwSFiwwkC*Fdjh%FVbRMn!s(b}>3YY^SCAyXq~nkKFGYmNLc0<r7JDk1g21!`^W
zs>F}d_M#KU1VPwcUClWt&HcVs7v9*^%=jC`Sd`%-hSSA;K}D08wv>60;5ql0x<l=l
zg7^oN|A|ylh|7ysG>QBeoZyHESsAY?Kw-`Y6GF@{pBHr+IGpBjL&Z8_Tl0ponSa%W
ztzIrZi*eg3Y&A$EGh-uuVw}h0{;5>(sb1@;l(iQ3DDGC^`O03B5w*8unZ=w#*?&=K
zke`wgYgWubG`>(U3golPaHtf~=xH1*Je0@PtlZ#W<A6PWX1=|cDH2R~66{G7`m8){
z(yUL=Cv<tG=7qj;8{0yzQfs5akJ8`RlF@X2Mzc5Bo#Wb}G!`sPNe_o1Jlg#|m&4}U
zi7mpo{CPHO2!E-^>P69H-#NeX9n45rS)mEkSK9qCnoRLB86O58ksc8R2t%iLj1*}C
z&oo8174&$47lk35-z#*8?q3S+Af+C{zuC}XUEnya7q3{RpwN`){_}JBE~&4?Evazz
zoe?QnNNZ~GVW>uJ&Hdu6#MkPB0koh8RKX8zbcxqbwokGv?-Kn#&Hqw(aR?L<FXy5o
zpB<IvSNA$w`x#eZC^i+E9jc3(39VSD3(c(3A8h}qPf>JI1b`xLksSHFmBJA`WU>pB
zKv2m(Eq_G7kB{?lVA{P@w$Y^tAv|(R5*u_8qsFePSoKKtQ8XDHVA66n5Zbmpeog67
zfACDTlY<kQ4oVENl*|qYAiWXDw1I_#crYcBHOuJmqWoDm5YeQ>wLvSgFrLW%`M+bi
z*~;t~ifAj7$s5XMqZ2b9KlM&}+JSji;w&Omy>yts>YPoD3`U&PaNyxQR+;S1+B{MD
zi(B)b+F>+HW9G_u3Ysvto^Fe26*@?{4Dy8#4mv_1?K!S$mC*_e0>K4#XY0Z#Tmgi^
z&H=-xq)T;?opPz0Hbjg8srQD9lNKe^KxiY#^d<ICd!5SMr@9iUa9EkNSy!_f`^`nt
zy;uKO$cZs8oR2?K<QdC=3fb{G{T|ZQjLntSn#)ZeoKX4OwzDS^_DGs$D~Qg9=IN#8
z`E~lkw7F7zdfYhgQ_cdO2`-I^o-JskcoIc$_JxNGlat8+-;`svVYG$Uy!b>$Px)WH
zXV0(ZqAGbD@355EYrX;VLWP<@WIK)OFU`Zt&Wrphn0#C^M$&E1C!kf@9)n7dvsPt|
zEaN~;1rWulHlO$e<Dnwy6m}W_W-2p3_57*yh{h7}sbyIvokv-iM!)^yQ~x#vkSDNP
z^ro+-Ni4+3LtoOddH{d<gNu3uf+Zu=UTo>rXRUu7R^R(0+^5!xG)KQ+t+G6532ox9
zLL@7suBmkEpG^g~YL*HEJq#6cyi02CKJO5)y)YYQ#M|~(tF&e@jqQQ3ojqcmbda0U
zsV9FBht-4+NFNZ6FR*E@7Ro1wUN`)<Q0Fz{^2dNgkk~HUy$Zi<p3pLxf)n`eIipl8
z)*c7gmPsUh9AtI!pz0bY!CH%!TDnYSx~_4^(+D#gEZ#h3PN~xhH&lC-=VY0GM++;;
z;>r4S-=nq>Uy}sy?Uk7gXE|SO_@-a(+^$QK=E}cS^<a{mLD8WTfnyY)Y$3UB3HA^%
z0_`JvTrFd|?O~^nQp*t6$fq;vo}wL0h65+LZbID+-jsfI#&c-X%p>tPM4tN&tvTfK
zIr~jB;fjY(Ts6uuYe}1KdSN&7Q?B)H8@4=nG3?j8bWoi1Z+9VB;V+nnFkLG|CO1A?
z{RN+>Ewo}1QZ$T#L6F{FQFC=bSEj^<y`Ik#It3!t^;?+~n5!M{Aty<@@1K@df7;jP
zQVJ4_{5-^oRmCG?%){&?L8}+$4#630MsPh|yuVtc_JIzE_ZNX7Ow4RvGCQVVOH%vC
zt_-<i2kY=k=R(gtJk0^EpX=k0AjyKZtEY-8@?HZN>5UhF)A9kIGXs>CwDbfQj4v6g
zj>&uMBQnPByTg`^+}8p8btQNmxXh1DP@vr-z4YPvwFyxm?f1i?`mZ+BuB(sTr*ZP`
zqYt!L<9$}acm4F;?BHwr#@Zc@Oh7ioa}&C4Z`4~ySEM?J8<CHkrCzz>n(lb#o|0y1
zaK$4o^%qq)Bt?}$(+T>>RU6^EkV4;fQRuF3=J|p|q=M)=hRd_f8d1nd_Bxx=4a-91
zLdFCSZ*QN{W<kDRBKE<d?f77V+>A$8TY|l95$w*>w*~+G0pPnLEmC+Xmi1s$#r<IU
zmBq!I@ERZY4+;)_E4;;_7WB1rwQMHR5}38Ic27F$yX6ClV90F`ALtba{}E?r{?yzS
zL)N`1-DA-O^tHg!H($FEVsz0!dw%>t|Ap(JBQP!{ta>zp4Ju<+3iYf^VQ=U^dWh~}
zdCbs`+f#iG!0;|kwE2LBHSqPxZ%|wV!i6L<+G7T*8Mb~jocO<cK6q&J#m83Bv%xjF
zxoQ`;q65(2m5@p}*2BKpTomkW^RZ&I#}JaaryzHsT%BCuyZR==9|8@?M{g|m{;83E
zXaintm~LxYoomHSGZs!pT8so`Ql0GSh-7B&Efc|#rpQ-(@FO<X1^w3cvI3SGzJKPA
zqQ~(08*;70Pb~6j*^#wFCBk68aiQ-TEu+N>tnlpGJjB6r1`!q!l?7pzZqW+j^v2Wp
zm5@59E90-r4X|9@-<bM??(0@~futtrPNui@uZ6!1tup*UnC>U+{CpPZG+8)X5Ht%m
zsFxe-?JB@;Qp|55eo&?dMu`&v(1ssEZOcnf{e?WoiRbiV>eb_5J;z%p%*#UBGDsJY
zq%Z0S<+jr07z9|qo$?sSJH_Y9lA$L2*;7@uhbN%4Nf!Z>hLOO~jbsyeCjodXVnXOs
zsE8Pt>Ksa@G35@^n3%>`j5sfD-j&qjOtP$3LmY`U8Mk!Gn>XWo1?H2iL<>f0QN7Y6
z8QS5tI1g~2)Kd3NUS?>2-EtQLM6^Ec+AjzcxN{YOjO+`{ZU*+(V|A&o*pd%yrt+Xi
zoOXf{7%|YpmT#=bj~dP3yfh}RVMp+KHRX(VMK(%^+;Zgk_%O}Up49*DKo9d;nterW
zPx936Um=BU+SVyRDcOPx`3?pe9H@DWBt&r#Wh^V_W3HJ!3T=b{e2JSnPGUEp5C$HO
zN|U#}%8f$88<#gpuo`l%<Uv&^v#wo~&IAzNjy~Xr1@#DQb#$zF(b=EWU1^Kef_x|C
zUW@SqGX8NdEf|mHEtEBZ>vy!|M#Xqpb$p`;RNt~JQeJ}JCZzd~;B+FI_LG(1#Rld^
zR8)HoR;Z<xZPOXgL~kQLv5WfPi$kAhLn3d=`E4g-SuFxC)Nh$3+jLp*xZ>0eNtL7w
zbjq*rvy+|dvl7Zd*|=2^Z%oj_W(xVs2G+Z53F5#~eKE8b(i=Vv?_xEtF+&g1y)6bM
zDXxWF54SV=OOvVL-B`oOzL-l8|LLz=Bf6$M64toWfg{;u1bf{7VLI48__(*{9>Vik
z(6K`!is$O3|9kU=pUybeyxf8^|KUY5X(hX(0FUd*tZXMD3n#6QEX9pi3gDE56yJoZ
z@-pb&XH=BiKO_7!Id})Lr#iry(-2b2f~D`H!J<GY^YD^hDnbY4flTh{$}(ALQG#IT
zZ=ulbJ9;^VdLBqtOaZzc>&Sq~6d_bsa%J_|aN<_6Q+ah@RG%@jhDCsoI_Rdo8&D;q
z|I&7Qv8Eyb3*kL9=XhGr`QRvQ9^(NN?Li1L(7wG6JslFMWWFOLXMWAJyi(l(SuYh(
z!KH@M43FJz5`iCDRBIb}2Z4nr7>H8Xl+Jf7Lz2;RosSK4Ihbb7TcE%v@&u=)l(ndq
zD`H$=?vB}JpJV6MhuQM~bk#h^m}wds_S!L&NHy!i@G?^4h7U+GT`zu9FqjL76*%e+
zp|#@BW$52uXL|0B$fxhSm6Xje!;~=k^w#3(FaG{Bi+7<oAb}=RgK+5VVw+jzj=tEM
zhJMdi-OTsNn5UNEG-f&3u$hnjrV@R#!-&wg`AjCXO+a2%uC7u25v0hxyeeCm>`%E$
z&Md$d)$MEDW9jB!)$Pp+@>47+=bvrr7wB=<@+!eHn2wi7UQ5)pt7)Tr9Q%oh=PT=P
zmahWLKf^0H3Qtx6;Vv4yUW?}(Bn2gYHPx|!gY9?5XOz)7t7R=GYC*VGC-^8NdKsUL
zSnK!)C>%6gQDG{N)pMoJkX2b+We>P-m~r?Ns1iD9`GTvIu@vuevYqEIaBuyg&gQj3
z-xSe9bQQ{Ly0jFpgEZQ$JpC?n#e~%9?Y<|WIp5Sop%RrR8SGuYG4MzgQRSxJy`ZSf
zBEyEh)6qbIZH<!fla&vxD%dMdybngtR39fm!=r_3d*Vo_aj1P}wLKZGo$x{X3WZj!
z`U%`>qU6@{YQ7JEn=gLg?Bd$B^iGf|i-jntHZRep!G?FW(e>dIfWr{V!D3`w4u<CO
zJA1pd9q(iZ3IYqIycGe2?E*K#QORadD(y*Yv<EIRolgew6@?CuWVjO&8<7QI2GkFF
zHE(P|zQ;u^>CVB6BUaJF<1u>Kn^`$avW?2~47Gih)qp|TsI^S1zF2tbdbn5a!uf=K
zk|@2Z=bCIA_JZ4DH7Qn1o`dUJ+1pHR$4P=r9GN&9u)ZPGM$xPc<#?XlEAE@f3Q(?t
zHaCS?xdHyJLy;_`#<ZdhA0_yHb`~P*1`(DIr<U#%=^BwyO?DPejIMzyV!%k6s@=}@
z&Mpfb3WO4`EdRHeq;Mjfu<+@bhwV3<FbQ~6OdgbwvVv1e1u-xjXZxrcZrHU<j>O-s
z`708E`T*L_gk4GS08$`mV9f5d8S;;HA6Bc)%1dHlJ>eQS(oW~~d|dZI@LT1S!Wq4l
zz;>Yo%hmpQqzF6qFW#*x$ZmTRF=(KG$RwM~yHlE^z8zb?%-0tYW$nf^(ESGk9~3*;
z?{rJqZbl-4Ieq8XPBXuBl~?6$`{gcS7_=hCpI8(Mj)}yIX>GD7<Xbm0;Vg6K#DQA5
zph}jSpKa6&eUe!qp_+vk#(*W%p0b-zxUae>`0=ZxcKrl*XVpcaQ-*->PAc$0yd+^+
zl9A2<C{<Du1JYU#O*1TQv8hPuB{)Z~VL2An--z{Lp?OlYvdb3JWZcAIga5MV$miam
zq0PW!`?%(Ku<NKq*mael#iw~8%bJiEtaLkkS;`GIOZ-CMj~SXLV1YGY+PKTj2IC+j
zq4s^Iw|0^*&D&N}x0zAlxLV`#{P9^7K=KeGL4Qxvgx?MIbWlKfJ}8dQj<S9c*WL@c
zKouyUYL*D}eX^);o+PF~7aABg+k-C+N?u#{Yi?{|YYOBnCQYuL#@`Y&A62D}+->0)
zfE7dyRqSZhO({^I4xm6_Nrp9aiu5k95}D$br;@t;O!1fbQ$Qd$v}P80uNvq~D-aRi
z=>A4eu7F?A#53S%T0W1`!<fj^3A=1wr81TEF-!DAl^m6nV*EJd=*N%YHw>E=IgJ0U
ze(y=q)zZyiX)@MHQlD1|$1=v&)z2UX%zRy|{kQXbIP$dg$>R)DZEo7&S%17cm95#c
zwSV}W^6fZd#stYm|7sAex?<vgIyCa~C_#1Lq%?J`?BSb8usw#j@E`L5iO{&Mu2<ch
z(>qU5_|T*Wlr;<z9R#2M=3nmB=(Ew?{UxKZEP3w&9foyCc@*)BqJBBLgjNv;$tKGA
z^qDRi*eE-|178~ZTx`~IrXWXBX5k!n6^f-jaZt%YJosr7?j7?3x7908+jZC_BgvuT
zQaCQwv!MvJUr2(?k`DmJI<Qo<@yb9ibY(%lc1OeK9P)a!@kk3!KE9O|8@LS;&2=H-
zi(izG!RZpubgJsb&NPMHxfbbLWtCL_H4dKI;h=z_|4w!3^;MOs2nejY(8QxeFqU?R
zSO6SLx*t+2hc4~_=O4{bxlQza;kpR1oPYnxc)52Xm!H+05Wrp#Yz?M@WA)6$nl%8k
za4dKc;9cStrDann2`Qf627ibRKy6<y1;n<>s}4o2AV@RK<!{8*ROx`lNlGop{n9ja
zct}sF4(hKFm7zR~Yv~v_tQr^Sq@#Ql7L7z(42P}G7_^@+FS>&GxdEC=EO;@n3k^DG
z4}hT4K0YH6JR{ATfeDvg)H2%(gv6k>9FD~L)q~Y6ymD9aT6S3(N1?Ybq*O<^>V|x0
z7!J}#RmMa*>j=Cn#^MFgIv>SPKS#;g9amRcHnTAip8CK19`sK~<7Hv7MxFU1Yxtgw
z>NJ+16LK2D`?x_mE~Y}I9<3~SNz#GlT&^+!Lb#EZ<4$xr%9>j@?UDv8;`hUQ`7-aS
z)gUxN;V3pbiBVGj&5Ez#C;^0Us&e0mDwurxs(#p)^EuPBzNvk+*k!FkrQ|giRm5f{
zSwj}OAe5R2oJpCG7Z_xT!}&{MrK*<={<MJb)Lc~MH4vH?=p>HU2ym_qk4huWG=n_c
z@7`1MqnvdnCsQ4%c%ntvdRf5iFWq^Z7Z<R3ROh<78aj6voYR(7WOPp~#VZ6fAm>?r
z#|esOL{I#8zr9z#hI_PiZ=#^4Zo6ihvP}JUi*DM3l?dXe?IBB23x*6BDph^yv^S_f
zUB8tx@Z@zE(?I2wRrXiAN;3b;gZux1TCDeiyvzG1B796FZpOD8W=^0MiVPSWB2{Nq
z9i7fh=Pn()t{})CsXr+<R8XZCG(dB~9o*cn`o=vwnFG6)y;WnnVXrRBtp=akQkZ)F
zUfqf1E5g#b^q}|PyVn7?CLkv;YpGtF=Wgv;N{1BIXNSwV=n<H0SaJ4^e9yfK2@1e4
zl2@eIloi73)EpvOp{C>kw9D&^cU5SwTGiE6kao8Eyz7{73Ka5h%W$2by*}zJQ&J(0
z0qymE6Lcf-*d<y3GJHKh(ok)--=upqs72AQz?}_Zj3`mNm@Dm}$nNZOj~B6?w{S!r
zgDH!{XB8%Ek3I`L8=H4MKk!5pL7m1;B$iF4yduyNp#Lulyq$d{dY~qkn?gEo-xVCh
zLixxV7~Gi<XLv$R^uHT2`>}nx&xYMddX1EuTxGDGDaY4yiCG=5k%3_lf*tS>=?iz&
zHWB|2DQALmwW^&VORSRgo^^AgNIZ#k%XfukIiT_wV8J$m4{xLoR|J2#etAXTbdQ|;
z^Wm%-OQir%K(D_S6m)|Pl>p=nGV13_jEjs{BShlN@<60Y2McoH9IDZqA$=QfHaCAJ
zNI(`;!KenTiswTrW1Felqp(|$KyiYNzn3fPkQpaVamFYukf@MY<LqqZ+QHOB{Q2JP
z|Na%WLa~wT-OIjtjkN7@yp8g|9OkGNn<}DLpevITJP0PA51Fm1VM6~Uwcv#UJ)%^&
z0!l6!&2&Sm3Kg|pY{twno4_DM!u(0BUuY2*#fO(AkD*Fn^O6OTIs%G^$*4gG(j6D%
zP5d7vF-QnfU3Jh!IfGAcj99Z(J1C=uuczFFPr*A2U!EW)z>$2o_XQh|o~^I7g^k2;
z)PobJxMsJ{d_n=O*UH+?5{ut#5{-$wMG=jNR!-WKlgNsm*8fB{m?rzt2}_qO#O3x~
zeT;veedqlyM3jhpo2r(Q4IQ^xl{|cNsHnZWEG`!50_1HAezf>m$0FJR3sJM9hOw|%
zA3dHfiZ%wq=H)Wqe9B7@E@4OWA#l{iQ95oSDT(pS97$Wk7b$;csk4>2G%~nFGa0po
zDT18hy^i0HB7bg{SK70eW=hLaO+qvj#LN@y?ZXNCNiA`18o@xP!)d*SBEGZZkp8CG
z$n5i@Q3c<ns=e(aYfIW;i1k$Zj?v+j*V&=sfFEsgcKco*TeQ5wCRp@6MeLa2V;sOR
z-iX9pIqxQqc1x{H;l)>#R^-N&`>-8{M{QdA;pu2u9m^9Rl(9-XEEX1N1OnOviC0CL
z9}6GChv6i{0*f{<rdId^O^N6YrWMP4gdi3VY9R8l2uKw6TIFD{t~i2{z-0Z!B&1w$
z%JTiFVqt9O;i`?l9wwATyY&~zN~;;*$g}vHUp+*9bqfj-Z^(6FYg$e4NqFRRC>_nk
z=bd)bG4|*W0b`R(_5_R;fj_BIKio=fO^wo(MsLjj%fsmu%X=83c0V@9RQKZ(^k-d>
z73nsBCwQfxOBn)ri%}DW1>Tyiku}>e-gpr+E!G3PL@_dwY-4g>idhNm7Y?p&WYe^F
zBjPcc-uk$<gMBJ@yA6GV*zv9MB4}P$#N)UfMG{nrnq{$h2X;5RtE_#!>RY+EjLQS*
z;`{DxT4z2UpG`E>{o6R_PrJWCuGa05WD<#@iXGQnxn8<bOxIVnu%4s%4L_1o7c>n^
zr7Q%u(06)`IO8T7Y5oLVhO=vBy%>1jNYP&tO{cz8QNZ*c028_BpE|zRu6#E=VcbN0
zVto#2B#NH`r%uce^D!J=gcg_!#R$xqmSOyh;F5>wZWfxqPl~)I^1a!F)NgrG&lEVC
zde8mi2|7^>5c<~}`HcD7H{Li@EHR&+soK7s$kOkw%%zVqn~p5{F%?NwCCf)iPh5XG
z*p*={7|~g17+MT4#S9+l+xHFq!=G9l!Na3U3;I(`wSoEzy4jel|2zmv<VJl6{0&?n
zn@hhhdQVi#*!^RH>BSieLyKdrn1A{KtUp&z*`7c#b9Q0PbE3H>&3Eg(uKaLt9Q>|T
z-`uk!k%K>$vzF6%!Pu4+mPWQq_TF|^(M*v(o;RDvR}m=P=zp5#DHmVk7I?r=j=FtD
z?}STGN~|cR&c6T4Mp|>mPHYvId-EvO`T&Q*%A~>4Ea!z6ownj{L_te;#tn(RM~te$
zX@j1IB!Lt}Efv0f5s|kAS#6TOEfVu%Zi^9R%U8?x4b_)55dfsonom?xUx_<d_RIeO
zi2HgVBKasP9m=rbd2^q`gEfo=!xuDhYHJ#|rvW15NN1A5PzS3z=ydBI$@~&iA@zwP
zvK01>WeIZw?d#}#$OCc9lhkLf;>PT5FKbVh5S-RpS|1H1(SfZvl4vn|KW)I__5Wy6
z$Mh-zf&eynVOG-ZvV9d_3A>Mg13~DG53SO1mEi;B#rT?=LC+w<YtO)9hX#FBe@mou
zBbflx-3IhsR#IosCV?_gVbtQ?8SWTTTEI1;A)x=3q4{Sr_1H%$6gghPKKxb^W%^F)
zxPden89{sA-@tNE-~Z`OSp?~?tu6}*`}y>rR!+-%VB?0Vkb>ZOkkvUnwBoSG30m7z
zew%*rzUz5Td)*SMm4%uKKjw8b{YH=IOd3>V|3|`sn;D&QA+zTbbo*{3{2s<G@lulz
z;K=<Y8MyXSzDQbEBU_SEE^9pS(P~zwp`g>NdHl_|+cFCc0XdtGcmQr~qt@)8J>npi
z@W7pHDNUV2%#`)#1ZtY{B(yqq`cdfbz^mEV)>sq!4WEm%F<lD7uV3qQq{U(7QTla$
z`x<5Y<T%29DTcLU$v5tns1mohFGM|}e&u_4Opt?IsrP)O4pihFgI?!j#J|5KT_=PT
zH|ppl2;E$vkfBc5bI3^h!fBe3#DoNyBLH!=#Zo_<aCUVLZYqgdw>~cV_c>20hOp{%
z-c8F&)WP0p@5kn1<Ru>YTt(B`_#pxKAUtJV7d3CqFkf73ob!qW-4D7)C+i`GChRv=
znpU}khCp1O&#PJ_x<YA1Ico>8E^Z2Ng2m_rcw?chu_7D15Bdj$mM>;)d-D$37fi@b
zq{eYm(9yofC9(lYuL9VlbLuP)QN<5+_)>@SzSgAX5&pkE-&5B4r|HORUp=}ihOJrh
zv*7H}LiTAVwU`37U){HHC+6N53s$H^{hgN+pf_yW+IFdprXV}7oJsG#qIXUT-e}Rv
zkA%n+`gy6Q6@3l<Yj<M5{hf_PS5H}7C^+koY}-S^K<)<Po8Y08pU@JEb`>3lx9XuA
z`BK?_Jnb&zE(5+}&uzGqeFbSAU!VH{q^_093%Cu1!#m@VCYZ8U2>~>@f7?ot9r)rU
zBl69OMgG!^CPl3XsXvTERe~=9hNO5Y-;5oGuOSnyzt;pWn;>3hDT_2WGhTi}bf-AT
zT_>I)D3{x~vNwFUxS@4uND5ZvM*kYNb7A2#==bmbi^F{vE|w|u;^OiGJh^<bMKEbF
zOS(XsnZlX&mZ=fY#x&-dcy!aA?1PADa4?VE!`lgi3aL1uENa_ULVVv0&|+2hACWS>
z(N+mlA8du-b2&N6wtxu)MxaV&dO`JOBUk#e*=qp(b5JaBAY(l*SgUrh4<nP?!N_*5
zKw{@t*v{iW3gNk>L?<XO5}dz?|F;8v&C&ktfNmwSbjY7y26SrToGN(AtJR#j`~S!t
zxR2df+P`K#0Ue9d9+lT>x>R!S%_%H|UsEY}UrBl#(j_0vs=rjA8;>x8Xz91B$v(F|
zihgzR_gkSo!cv1q#XC!pZ25lC1d0owtEg0`F}oloSPI%M-5^Z05KtH$EGJ^0q#s$A
ziu)}Ra9$bXk;PdC`tVjYbsPG3%|jFpt)hdkCdzP5SaEBa)2j^3xTahO)20$oBdh#1
zW@FE{7}Bs?w`6<p2p7KBFymUt(pODv^AFUiJX8Hi4Jl)hA2cLNPoo(U3B)Jn+Gy^9
z^=ef^QIY(=EbNpx<>h-nqhCm0k48LjWmfX1KNHhk_nYjgOgHE3ihaZRg0*=<ZE8*D
z$NC3_OlrEeR60=qf((Fq^z747IEIb<5@MJMq1yj3=OeUcW7pn%!!_cH7uwqj#vK1)
zQtpaL!dmGhyg1Di1cjwpd|tE6=TD6219!Ir(C`)S2kZ!JXXA`~41V+)mYE0D$QaE%
z^Zh?jP+x^Exky$aLa3F`jHYSj25fUT-<Ocek(_oE>|}0HLue*TZxGa91JB3>hPv#L
z4e@ya0rcd=$2;^qvlXI+--UR~k2Yp9U!Xi>SUfPU^3KaA1~figjt%o(vR<w(&PT2q
z-f+Q5uBxPv5XcKhn?Z5vBL(fpSxZZtDxQx|<fI-!(UnZF@iluAr0Mc6){6R&&f5MA
zr4u;krrmh5#}SoW-^J>CnrVA^P-c4#{N)ssW-)W9ixwQ+Mnx=Jr7m_k;)#@z)Khj0
z5(uh}SaIbttP}jsBnlf8k@B)-j^KvySYHTZ5IKbb@-~Udb=E`U>Zq_Y%2u6}@g?u4
z0q%rT&W+3wYIDmO9i)R=sc`@^;e3RiT^<W)$g$vL1B60iR2JNt!wd-O7_V(vw$F{s
zM@lP*44bqUJ9-9Nh2}b5$9zX$qv}R;%#={+pwHI>sgYn>2#qWmK}aRZ5L!#pUwV<3
zjWo;h?gI^;*mI@TX7`zMv86qATKn^)L1YE#HGXBo;c*H@jr5{smZa3h)|fXe7~_-G
za|!sVnkv?QBC`?cM_u+v&ypl`Y}L({q)Se#w_qb!)!3rQ*DIdUi)$Bd7s9Rm!vM$t
zT616Mszui5g>8S4Hk-TUaefG*Rqlu)bua)4!%_2o{7rIb3Aa~4dwlE1tI2P!hQ_PS
zGU)%^K9|oe%BA}AGvb8WY&KnHmMyJ*F}92|2Dd_Oty!`>?MZcym(XLjX|Q;OLdQdV
z=GHR&eE3-uR3|P?8?9cl7WMgE4?bqBoQIoR`%J*3bwtyi@=jLAz<+wWoILP#%{eC0
zDq(LjyDD*PPA_3v-PWp<MfK)U=7g}bV&cLY#h!9fC7PqYvQXwU;5`5v|KQh<${hYS
zE)H-3jkF7<Og2J2JcR~_5-&~!fDV2Hz{ikH%D%X{h-6AB$fPEFirH;k?M|rTM#4ir
zeoMjJWv9C?J1cMm;l5w(=9+tv@%~+`x*!cue3$fdD^vI&r?frI!a!RwPR#)lu~JRk
z;@xw&n*gY$^r;Rf(lcV2Lt>Yd=x-TuNwf@s^`4Qqw@;s6K1rm|fO$y$QMZ9X<JMvI
z#d&((iR7Dr?vv@4rTF?RVHxWxz__v|gx<ayS0riqm!I)}02vrhV+v(%WOH<KWnpa!
zWo~3|VrmLAFgPGEAa7!73OqatFHB`_XLM*WAT~KS3NK7$ZfA68G9WcFHaRv5FHB`_
zXLM*YATSCqOl59obZ8(oGC4UnARr(hAPO%=X>4?5av(28Y+-a|L}g=dWMv9IJ_>Vm
za%Ev{3V7OdcVloaz_w*<+qP}nww-*jZQHiZ6WivAofDfU=3LBsGw;?+^`G8YYwg|L
z)zwW-tfWdWZ02BMF5zJBO3%!|#6u)(Yi{Xm?q#fMZ0|y^Vs7bXYwS$K#KgkD#KZ~1
zO=JczbtN(}w*=V3F#Z#yU~Fej#Hb`CDKDW)`~Sq6nOpojRodRdfr#th3}$YQ|Ha~N
z?(70^uqUGW-y+mR&gRBu4)(TQ|As0!xB^VgiKs*!9KD<YmR7DrEKJO-L~2&%|6ME5
zKLv@DoE@yq|G_Qn=4$2O>_Vicr$=Sw>gwpi!^mg}aJ6zXVK8;DW3+NJcXl;)1volb
zIvZO6OpO`;i-!K6H2*+R|7QsjZnn1nYLx1KD*o>l|1(|F{9k2K{eQv$7YTr;xtS8c
z)zpf}!r0cu{NH|QS7Td%sj$7JtvM0Xzg_C~X6DYe0DE&K2N!_rKUayKnTzc|Vro_Z
zQyY787Z)P7f5Xh}&Hh7D+}_l|3}A0br0QyHZ)WUl_TP?wg_Vo}_O5DPj{mLu&+Yn`
z&HR6Cd1F^+fG3eI(?2$e`5%e@82>fX{|`A;S7!$sb4`GmtJVL_C?ewEN#sM%#==fS
z&%(h%#LUdjNyN;=%;NVy@uqIh&gS;6|2ioD=;gm`3&1}X#@yV~+!SVG)xnfE)H*XK
z%e4`+U~EQAtE(4$%^Y)MNb#E3<{Sb;^cPLdg{jZawA+t)6^fU%E>K4&-3RwXR4x}5
zyCW-YFPmI91;2<=sl6`rDav}Vn+rkaWcpYt#F0Q=-`5%jPAI{?3)pfR@I61z(tIO)
zkt0GKso5|#)O}0=hv>z*vJi1A<7fN@=<hUOeWt^1lp*J0wKT)X((MItQMxSvdwSQ?
ze&0KN_TVhs^zfxfuxL$E0B8w2Ch{Ll{zrz$Y2w;jmKS2$yKo6}iz=@L1?w29h4^Go
zLg-}0#+fUk(7<M^Ug9^ID^mv=UxHy;bVa-l?lTJ}%-3fd=9apf_pPce5=VUW{Y5-u
z1}x(_aQS7uWJNpOkrz@Zv6YuxX;C;oIGyq_QscbCnS1-o^ssxZBa41&><hWpzSMZM
zWFKO0)KdS^Zt<BW-;pYGW{d?08oG9l<48m)f-@s_TboiHK`jIR{Vn_6(~Ya6ul&<w
zKTa)<IZAI{-(Cdyj(A-2dW8sS<8VPQ$woCHbYd@l?dk~`ehcQpCQ`F|LV~9Qc4`x`
zex9|+xv|V5yyp<)Q~{E48R{4E2^}1T9Vfia?P12lgFeZavr3-SBo=wE!!*;TY60Hz
z_EMua8DizcMPnxlpCe4dw~hs9&dP4%J_h@7?;%9V3i0PV{+IK$9~_b71Jj7`;@|JM
zMZb<m`80;elYmwsCD(YJQIeEW+EpkPxLfxvE?8N8AXr~P1V2-NLY4#-#t-1lo(H@2
znM}A>3NGjx-UvoQJ0~YpK*6LSu0&sN(k4CIDwvXn2%AXKFmTWU#}G)C$#3I@s@(_1
zJ+e{Jh{#Ejk#M$8En7galq6uU_Tktl;t`4pPz9sni3R2>HVx=#X(d}*p*t@Ks^@Xx
z=LP8I#M_Mt9;0Z46noO??%bk^qCDengQ2mP@JGE0t|to1WWaF^TECZMuhv)@Rk4Y$
zCd6ALu)ibDRjXdzq_~}@m=`p;Y6>4C6gTpS&VH;9G+I`-ZxiAJmy4@Ad0X6<EZbmc
zca*q|hm6#TQDDkAJWg8VuSQBPs@{Ld^07x4%SMiI-n%0!&j#?2KxBbjloL}whuaxE
zq8tbNS38Za!js#$4W2^;?z#%8pjIx4*JIF=i)(n#PgqSu5Uu6R%>~fzTFgQaQYc~Q
zkeu$^IJXSnI6%mH*j6r8`~w2+oAu_0R%%aycCt%fF-}KYeIYQ<l@!~*7n<cD3Gc>5
zslmLG--`1*1rnxo?FSLC1vUFR&oqkFJK)>0Wh1&61QYXh4R`&G(vd=ZUp}fgEj6kH
zg2>{{9`a@2L*a0<E=9d>?^2M(3vG7iGK^%iy!COdI$Z(;<|~`3kV_)ck`7Yhe*Hco
zd>Tf#9d~M?x<oV<g2nyjOmo+?`BO5$q3!-ITzcYArg4onh7Nf`k?YLY%rd?mIYk%x
zm7cb221QJH#+!nV8-kmw<zl~PscAm}9b*)_@Kd36rw&F(b`Rwrt=in_cHAcIeeiGz
zf3?9fdLS<x>(AL_T%Yq&@T3;Kh|6SfFo)?xELZ64HT>6%X4ni$CayGAbRVxnuj((t
z=#aD8*b&GnWT-h*{(AH?D5UJm)N30DtFBqBZ!8qtJC^_(JY(8>W6WCavT&B@O}$?2
zRoS)k$|f<+gjIXW5)R|mmmUs*CDPMyZ_Mn@DfB$G0ncwJQv*$bZq?#G%^k~qD|H7A
zmVtioIK*#-rSoW*ICmQp^hOpz2Aafe8SVwzJ8>pe)oe<~?k~zY$PCvA{ZiUMuH}Ht
z7Ggmpm-ZWrGTdAZCG-#e5@o~!d3=P1eMkYK%8tLw))?yUC3jJ0Sb1x*_2}Z><Q4==
zTQPb&zG+%rCQ9nl=jJ#rLnJrXzy^m{MHtMu((6xj4ZF`Vh?sbfg*3*3_OrqR{ducW
ze95LvRSISFJ5fpAF-L?9@o3J3!sVG<f2F@<b{qu?jb%E)j?z-Gc_`~b!PM`ZIDH88
zjM7sJby(J25{$y4pBur&*p5wD48+>ESbn+rmwa2jW@^?Y$?AGfx)S<&17l|?#+0!y
zLlQSGADb+A8mQ3uuRwDP>AHN(ksvMFnqDAA@~|7~tLUCaAkHcgL2PMPm7AYBnZRBg
z+|_sdJWyxC$SViQCp2`wHprtgu`4FdQK0!ah_zF)JaNzt<0KY9vX?l$)^ETX+5iPu
zpK=oRBkvNgSGEcTRtty^ZGjp(+51^G8aQp|I)&rv50ipAF`7MgtGN<9p1aoY4&688
z*OH)iy@Bxd9yAPMuK6?v){t<-6l9K3)i9rc`=n6g_Gip!E#GY0I;dX5cb)xF-v5P_
zM1T*}Le+(Yxm5(2(UNfxG<q(}g{WVXbFmxmQvA~eoaB)U5kx#~zyaR^Bx2F~k_D1I
zY5I;VwXK)BsiJu5y;r*UAeXYb)`pKt=sdiVFH+cekh(BveSr9W%9_Wa7zytRN*OJI
zN44D}Z<DMPTrANt2WBIA6ESLk1OtHcICWVhxe%#D*s_Rx&+CHkwy-<vV5&*hHC*1X
zJ?E-0_t*d3MZF{mqd;#%cu~h9cRGr`iur-B1X>3Z{!qJjkCyalZ#f~}o0955khJK6
zuE&s7SP|c+&nxIq=L8$Ff8&<FZrg%@0)0eW-GtLq%Z^2AmTDv)r1xVC2*2EDVjTAF
zR}An!KA$bTotZIAZ9v4fR&;!0TiLdy;Os9B&L@1-s5~VOwb9Hkj6$<N(}#BX<QMU^
zpnTU3&Yuv2kV6Ouw!8QyF5y0Liq7v>3<_8}G7_6@Pl{l8_}M0~&}C4QQm~ggY6(s?
zjsX{$Z`b+y`VR4~K&cE=D>eMJ+FIK+IS{KjtyWZ%62cjvXqq$a9Ratw$!O`p_k{3c
z6!v`J9YkJS-F1oK+cMRcLrn{NpK7q`iV@4}ZA4A$Txn?xp&qAU(}c?}v5n;h9wWRi
z<XR58>-KrLVq{mT*F01~^EFb$Vi%&U*$$Mk)Gn|Tqj^SC5=>;gYk*Ev$p)n)MtdHk
z#gQtQ6zjr-s}(raDZVsxR*U8bSvOhNkv22Z5gO7S-5<}nO6?>l_V>@<N;5e9mJHCB
zKhNOnB*xAou9j7sv7d;e97u!fFTGauDb)@XJdKAU+x?yvKKhqx=zE4`Y`lz%7Yuak
z*{d%)ibiko{gvIXSm5vmiNW4-3&Z7Q?@>MRhvt<2%TQhLixc?kK*9{CQfjIhT9icm
z4J4KJ;N0#%s8-u-OiTDr-^AE6vAZQ4JV}dRqBdmOAWYf9=L1Eo_{1vmgahZv*7V55
zuaF<2eaB~wy^*20=mU<H05K-p+24X3lBtMzXI*F?1d^fSQt93b*AtO;W%(r{;x(vV
z;QHw6JCIxE-fCur8(YjO++`JpoxgdyNTz<djc~51b>-R83dp|8^#+aZqI5NFV_#8i
z`EjG&=_z1-Co_#Ow|w3kYIz|76+1)ZkW03`@<_nA8}$U32Sn3WnV5AFl?~HItrBYG
zl(#a&`7RiniM>k2)N{TO@gI-{R6PocJ#=aAZ+UtX1-vR8x-XQ4(WfSIR0{;hpPpxC
z?r#cTz9Q+DRVSv_i%O{7PT2*0-zD-*It<G9oECeTn1Q%NxA7rHpf0&^0tUz4SUMCp
zCJ5n-<EY*u?w)lUWKI-nTWuGGO>`Rt_6vW`DM)W(2oW|Z=)o{>8&ds^#1!Q2NvgN4
z(Sjm!lEJ;xO(e7!5q;u+Sxd9b15i2QB1f3@Z?|UWnz3grwqZdq33v3+%C2yC{~SyI
zBprS+C*v#-OY;c?1BiwAINDOWOtb(Z8L>oO&3-FFD&YNqdA2<vzs}&rxizzhN!H^)
zF;ITHzdA`{pS0G0IaVNGvnR(_Y%NM6D#(tVXpL4M&vviOFl2#KGEpGW`U)*KcI-d|
z`D_osx_4_l&ig?RMt&DLQ*imLM+oG2cJ}&c+t(pbe1hMMu9=4_BQeA7*a<yWNXbAP
zOG%GVZZ$KV{<1oQQC@?9#iit?9Fa!~Y<SBZ-z{%MSKI5HEqe|`lpIKMm<#58YHjeN
zJXCXJ->9X_p?r&B{16M?#eV$dhu3p0tV4ePu^^>;Ejh~>pXjX%X^NLg=e>9z3?WSZ
zd_Aezr;jSq=P`zVM|+4_7W&KDiZ+B{ZPuIRiB#iK54)=K3iMSHpuHdTpipPt51Aj8
z8u-PPy*kQMbV@Cii)bz7!=K}tb`P_E`hvfcmf8bnFk2~|3_2G=EBE(rW;2!a6(_AA
zS!z|%^Y?|4B_OQir`<5uOxgnXXq-B>{o|=a1@SR_DTT`xMF5<Jv-43`N5U50=!I#-
zK)BtC`(QE?lrsm;0n;4Da0ue=LXotcp(@J*r)1atG~GM>xJ#Rl?|DHB+V*@eq|nNG
zBv&8Bo$IbbTxG{BP$_1{C0!%LmJCp}hNOSJTQqLdRBJ_uY>`l&6_#YQvFzfoACi+G
zt5I1$JO3Ui>q`xFWD2NF0G3U!AEgF^(vo_IX$47&T4i%sZo}8oSPRE}O+P@~5g#~f
z(1&Eb?I#j;)Zo`)2t4Souuo&-cT6uLv;LIutvQXHB2FOKbjQ~(;_OQ}myl83g#v>p
z1>e!B>UO`p8A&DvVlB@WM{#6rR%8WLOEIy<6Q!YpvK=3Qw%p+zi?Tpx4*!TZINiHg
zE#0M5l`&AUtm||fJ@z!xLD7eAi40p*B>kB>bTaH|biEuPwCzT5T7-hGrRn}-6WurP
zc_GGvbdhT+`4@Bxxydj1w)&Yd2!Xi7T<uozlsEfQk4XEq+aYyHd<YKIrZ#-Dv+0i_
zwjel~_N^P8cYB_Xi<E7*74z%Udc}s$22S=k>p0|);ii|ea2%*Kp6Zq3781lL$CJHU
zMrPwmil;0ytM854GD24zC$sZfQR|VZKX}UOhc)_T@&fL#FbNhAS@eLL?0r!IY#FYG
z!9C$tm0uAwBpMmlp2KBViEM9pz$aP2W{zw|0t*(#C8HC+{n4RRSE4IRWQGv3g~4C~
zQ*yVzua)_u=L|6c3>(#eaBwh{)Yb#V@kV1!7brEd&jZ_+=EhGxtyD8PenJ^faE3Yx
zciJO^I-y%3Mq$g(?+BLM1NF^Xlhm<+Q!~A_M3WuX^jLq*hPJkA<yGN0X@c0;3S!9?
z8mKu~J!4HjMSYSxQ#cFDSdZ?*O@MJkQKE6G?+6~D5~>k?oh5C&S!6wx<X<std7=p_
z)2?`^zG-eGK1ItNfIK@{J(WT<$)B6U>AyjrbWOIJA{NZCmDH36f_EEbDBtx?nghHo
zTKG$EWw-Y!sEQizh11yn(bzS{K);ubex?xbb5n~>C=&Tl!(HKJgL-mx4GMWCG-~kc
zTTM73smd8Bd!D^WL15w(awlzpAWy_9p<$XJmQ3Za6vG0B=`q|M48osmdv$H}m~l=K
z7)kY~yW)O38gWfODTX>lR8An2xDG9cJ9AxY6ZG5?geU7qoi9;fNT-D8pHr27f(&Ce
z+LsL6VO+8vnl=GNSM5`y=02hl_UGyX6&dODDW3I+qYtolw0z682N{yWaB<Y+Z-XZ!
z+DIm69e(^Z>Y-29-y4rAF`(rvVN5<u?^r+~sj&`OwmR<ezsi?^QlYl+bf0$~$j~TS
zmgKkhf5f~zR|1mJIKTtpFaz*mpS)|PG%<zbtq{x%MSj!8w=`F=XlWQQTFAzN&6&Pb
zOF&@cSW!=t+zjIX#Se~J>TSjMVVmq};5zBVKy!SmU9EyB3RcX1T&E1{IBk>PFCSzr
zu)?tc4fuu=JV-}6X4M$_4OT3dQ^`@TLk!dpHW-;T-KE|6zNii!X_nvK@h-BCiaf5n
zryZ+6vwa~B>@Bib#OM8*23D$UyLKSX1}s;vnLKu|u=(t)I`pen5**EQ-2zX<3TkD%
z{+V*zX+&D|wfnR(zG1_sK@xkx<?^hmwA*%<lP-C{d<OsQ=$p|rQAV6y_s^Olwd-?|
z2-~Pv1XAP?apHp*phw$tg{FD(D>zV|R;Ri9c$5jEy%w>WfYJ{xS*inbhaF|L6kDju
z=3dflW&%&Mb^gb04bzz@)a~8|r-#yan2po4I!&67X76&=JMg!+T)Q-{BH8w^<c#!;
zr!LRhdc1t8FuF%&+8S?QJVyVV&f`{2Fg_fP8M{1p#)nd(Oqhhjou?wRfr6d37QB5s
z2^7nR!RAoVtM@6={W@3OdRQUuJTn93t4K!&ssts6rTKtU2_Pzk768iprxJlRZ`ufl
zzc&|wZ)Gdo@JNZOgFY9>MY2J4MHumGXymQE!KL%%t=1_=8b}urv$bTqtA7~3jtlrP
zw4MXq3(cwrEoFw&a=TOFkGt!sS`Z*ASwyr67JbxoaS+i!HV#&lFAaF4b4xBXC#&K&
zPhQOmp2dEqX!66gIZcJ@&;&dsF_Wu5PNe2%bvI+LX0XQ0Iw@ti-e)%J6XpeH7UhUx
z?F?5Q$=^;Vg(DZ!T4=5#b5q`?O$+UY0eiyiM>s})ye*yP*YZay$DB1SFKi^OZNmv+
zl=$HH)VE8@<-T8!!N_)vAHeEy^)%Tk`<|<DHc!}lmr)@2XmvgzJ1=!2j!l*OuNqo4
zk^-0s1SwPFt&`>m5Q>XRWoytUUfNZaG`l`&KqvOQ$$9P$h2LSa!G8iRq4MphQ6TyH
zWweOEq5I)<0V8>kCc6?vk8|?I>TJLbab_JiN`pOPN?kA(S%k$}bhDZdey^BQI2O0>
z=eUV3CtL%INrbqOrz6DkBfFI;Ym}+Ul5ILjU{+Y_Np3n1In#+0OhL`gRjes(vAJ-;
z*mP)0&GE(5aBZn_Itq5X5y%}@`G1<4go=*=Erc5ebome};g_5*QyFX*R5JAL1K{pN
zo!$$mkH91ERE<*4ng$)9UP%`==00D1tuy`!dSnvCH=HSzFSI5j&rRSS%??!SrxTXA
zUNS}-q5T$0uymiFS|mXZfCnlFmg9shQ(=xw>5Qzonf}iN%kKau9xC2p5u-c|kpsM?
zHc;jP+}3U00<UI}Pf7gue)Bfet?~SJ>;6`=mwiy8&*&;#V7eZ&lQXJt)(sgg;TF^k
zJ%rilKe77XYF#3-S4&Vt3HCp6n%QO{tNbktloO}~54+coj4!_{zy@fQtxA;Zyk)i9
z$$E`C3v2V=F&<tNLAT4FkQ#@4b&0A<2NF+=_J2`aj1Z)!eMg5NbW>nbTuYO5z#I)i
zZbg5dNg`5bF{a@WWs+N2wOF%(%HR#$V5liq>EB4`oEK$vy4+m~wZ5D!Q<{xyk>^i#
zP)coo^~F};Mw{aSz1hGf{=Gvv(Z-(pmVCz2C0?t;O0zW^aF^X=bsISshD6tK1=IC&
z{3CZUoxVlhYDMk^B{`k80E~j{esH;kXSU&%Xukrr2M+jY!5CTv1(uk^6nV3c7nMT@
zFemUccD^!g6oJ#sPK@=T2Fu4RC9;}1)ER+3m~%;HM9zgThu(hje|)|m{y<`BN}<4f
ze^fXw_8eZ83~%Or|L$b$C2@-Jf{#96=8I74(CKv|_5Levve@mh7XMZr((=gr(vYJm
zE1^2Oc~F%c>3PpDuZ>oZTjwbj12ej6sgwBB;i+1ZK?13-B7;8ZCp8dS78z3ou>nzk
z<eDTlhZds$N6ZcOtudyV72L?7!Y=?ifcM^6S|>FjPu9O>UlURF=AbVuo1qH&bs~>(
z%&sjj(3bAC29@#`d7>9)bwwr$_5twMyIJSj8|Leyjya;}53A6jsG<&>OmFE-!3L#U
z!x@ZVuG=>-_<&G_6YphCbx9D^{vti#1DUsI4%;wi<orC9j&{e(KmIiY86+n~<e{pi
zRAB&r;(4-#hPN!@?_-7VjRiFS7`^lvjiFMQ4~rHIQKu>Ms(-YPHPrW|R2r-;HY*z6
zANG>*M%ENPjHCpZU)znb^|NI<SOY0gL#lV!OFn_}cfIMD`oTl)BP4I=drpxXah~S1
zFWd1xBqN)$vOjR*3kGSh+3-rOzz&wADn)wU+6i_7VNb)9qwLk@bg<59<DfKk-8zJ`
zelV7z`mM5Ff+=Oxl(5<rIG#2TQHFcEI?MbkQ|Xd=V|$Ys?FqSR&XOe85+W|LPOx>d
z=cZwHV9ViuOcD4+!9HA?hW6Bou0)jsvpPYz<Zz5hOXFH8tU{>Eoid1G(D+eg7E0bH
z!cRqPP96|3;^b;nU>Pz(6Jwk{2T$V11sWE#CE~fR-^WIQ=}%u>M)h(~IqH$dIlLs>
zP<-mt>z8gOT(tU%Y~3=Ye__l44~F$8=O^OlgyN|3LdS_;f3}?N;2}V-r9!5On>TQ@
z2fe8}I*bz)6&|SiTl51RA4t)NMMkfM^yGl8;=0o!o^nlrmvp3u-^y?Wl&9T#8?0EZ
zbn4QGS4eNN-3dcmX3cu7(Lgpw&(kY$4s&)RecL~HIGU(@X)nug_6yaiD1esICH=?>
z75wVW&mDgGe44rJ_4}K(d2=tO9SXIIMj!CBVe;%7gD8H1v*2TWxyusMI$`2X<yrq1
zIEFh;yR?AvLWjjSE*&5iuZW%wT3$~e%_nPu35FJ_cg!v5vk!!ha99A(=KjF^C%u&T
zfDiB#vV!Gi{pv7*_@knH)_!?tx9r^k4|3`L#bz#Emz6y-`h)@LI<md#FBR-7uKXEV
z+9S~;Zju5neO!AsE-WW6xVS@QNR~s^B7w-MxoAUW_wdt!wqJPknAUK*JP4!5)UIe4
zwWelA_ni4D+=(S7@Y3_nj%-o7h4@D;vF_!ttv=LOG7#l0`mX#b#}YbxtP%-&X#xj9
zeLhPfK5JGvnzDB`!!jpj{%!`ADNBrRUSe8)MEPxiA6a)CsM-AbEq{Eq(~FG}K8b(u
z=(ZRYBux_&{+n!KCtZJ818j56El1gMuiO6z*l}Suvc^H$*Nm_|?)$4<w7%8+@49>F
zS}~`JJ6$0K*)K-)2GVXLwhPCVOI?K1Cnfe>VjIuy9y(H%m1L1*rg8+^&))sQ@kkAe
zS9Gp`-5e*~*8U3es-%F8t<Bv+hd{RaG<$@lNG3MTuYo+~OzgjzC>Nj5%Fo!{Gk2Mn
z4|<mhkXCtP*mbY~ux5?IL++cWuNF*glykthWV>cm63HPqzWQ$)eH9A`Q`&qjO@+Az
zC?JCy?#s-qOV(JJF~V;NuZcxigYp5zbOKPk&NJH>R@ecysP~<p9?3`|dt<?_RtOB(
zi7EkwL%p6WROtDLZS|6_3l5%F;kU!>F;gTMj}bZ}M*w4+Ar&*I9?+hS4IP4s(3MLH
z^1F18q~vU#4no)HvFI!3?b7HKPIhQX9o`g4zEbn0l&@=ssT<;baOM_!GheEN{~LGZ
z!f%xybZl#zvk<u61&$lp3D%Ws_54v*3iYy1mPoQ{7fFUgzx42;>5v9vDgUeyKm5@r
zuP&djE5)>({f?NSLMjF!&Y5$LZW;4XN-n~sy&9_$%io{w)Bq$tFVP3JKi1QiZik{{
zSp52~)3#Z59LKcflE_+I6yyRTfIu?!S_bIN+9jCq>Lj`zm3>weH_z)a_VL!G4~;WU
z)0x>6C{-4{ED!<ExsRLKd`LMB$zM~()F7N-YsBTF5~1xa4D6D%(_#B10(OqPV<mJ3
zjd_~ZZ<yj!*6KO8FyjZnaV}oVTvhgUz_CpvVxwVS4EmWG1LL>+RKnq*L5PG9WHD^m
zSdkE#@6c>?uEGaqtr#QXNt~Jj7QT=Lt;sCWQ~jpQ2m-Is*h9+^hFZ~^$H+7J2E29<
zMM&gq<#)LO7Y-}%(Nz0pFGNbYUH!3&@L)O!dslN&l_8N%sj4zM5_QPx)&&v;ts#^p
zdz+<)AGL5r`>*rhD4VNAJle42{IdDGSBa`V!3s}1^``7(wW0_FH0(#qV7%#vBokaR
z<PST8P1)nq!DIsVUJ!i5od!*v8H5Zxy(7b_z4`vPnU%1@>9<q#6y&zrpG(Kf7H1^3
z{*#TrMriwVKrCuUIw*X5tV)piF)azueG+B=N;SPDc-z=<!0Uc~zAqfUdZn(fzX#<D
zMR-$`I=oFVvI~Nqb@W$9=ccPJUTH*_2Rz0j>;z8rt_R3`t)}{f+*lPlfPE3;kDhMp
zKrK+Vd~mVNVs{y3DyZ(^%a-FLwF@^-QiSwzIRVu~;Z!|CmAivLuxcyVViiwbbPQQl
zmT0<TQ3bGa_(LS~<#I(89(Pk}7?m>oB~7yAs5pXu0btRsNX7GJ9)=u1F5<}<k)Y<<
z%95Qt!fyeSRl>bZU~i2*uhyU#nP%x5c;jTe#ufh}(mS_U6#)Yi4L3cPDFH*?LVGgi
z--Ht(QmiRX%nVw08taf-mxuw7L{Mwzst&uy$WhzWy&;5PUwr0g(2Gr_XY-|eq^$>*
z;yoH}cF%)GzTofZcy>!YGdUC6VJh+{UHb^Ycen@_>Bsa<t!cOD6Ix^4giPhW`!27X
z<6lb1)WP)cwV|WNE=xx{Hf6buV+m7HD^%&|s0N;hztk5Muw2`Hdj8hSCXkWBF`|2?
zTR`HTq=i6uD~+Wzv8~bkS(Tjr>z{4?uu%kMf49Ve57QK^(Ed`#8&Rxk6G<JiN+Kr9
zO&*HKTZse-rG9YzWqT(53M#Qx&!3mkBGimqywh!(rc?mph!;FrMMM1rj7ot#hxlzD
zfu`u#>$4yogd0ZEj*hyk?}lvCTiUfZr(P96yRqL^$2dIHSz0r9;g9X+p=$!-7W@%8
zByx22&Oh2pMbf>)s9_BuV4`=BN`$s65byD4-evAZe=h~E*S45`2+^qd9k#<+{_x#n
z*YMzxChttqCI(0jvy-&7vq`+qD$q2_)|`<{D_91gunh@=*Sf{P7^|w*CkcU(thNoR
zVD+h7imxH2Id0Wm2^EDftqm8~TQ>Dc7-yx_^Rm3<fyx*W+qq$z3%>DMHAr0&0i_hr
zq>zsB2NbZJC;0_mn|#wvY7+OxkD!;C!T^4wD(30KEo<RKifL_}9OehGCOY0ZPMRjW
zZ@b@P#Jm}~KvdC_VM(5?q}%}0ruZS*xZVfS%phvQe$Vt0C&`IHaLDnW0jWwpP*$<d
z&}pDCMLVuPZrpv3L(Duz$eSC<l4PM$o6e`taX#be{~JyMTs!C0tvK>ym#G$TRp*y7
zwaxNuHXr>7058)h2aYpmJ$8mgyCu>I=j*%9QG!d#9k6)r{c@{;=Vp-|luH{4M;ktd
zy~;(A_@4jOlwZg%6*ge+V<*%)nDeHI>9if|UisJpPKnd1`4q|($d)@UCz{F2AGz#|
z@0@kl)72fLbKt_t<T(VXc8U@0MUX~2=ALi|R(afzsD9HbDM|j<y}oz;%{nA*Q#7*Z
z7aYGu%=<R(C;%zfuDMqU%MLTgIR>)mC2UjLv5ihZB!g7ZNm(CAc4?!9*wB}>d@~!i
zfC%MG!3_?Be`YR$aniSr+SO3CIfBb)hY#EMi>*G2>-t76Lk#<UjHwD5RK9x{D>}vu
z!B(a7N*-BF#P&c~{PFhVi2tK|r{!>U0~3)yN2AA3!kJ&l7fjk1N&Z|Q)0eO?ul-ej
z#-jE{Z2HRjnaV7SBRy|a%Ph5zLI{N_Gs>2GwgzSnAJ`8M8y3&M9Np7QS_7aljwM4F
zDNB~T{wD0ivF^bt>$gxjyXFyPbd~+}a8+49ZkITko_*t0mQEXo!KmMk5UsC=#qVfi
zrvh2o+xa8bAx}2Ft3+lK;UMdC{zuLAf~$~)y$2tj5Q8nS(!#IL^Yt!N%w~$AD;IfO
zKa^qYw}_-SeQA|QzUSS}Gx>TdWj#~4$RxKfKPjdbMhNJNS_E1coG=aa5`s*KBxYjm
z6tGx6Ji}M1aEaCr*yU`)Z|P3MA12d=TUN3RWsLcB$fWq^7^ifokn*hs=p+iyMZ&+5
zm*pdvdxo*J!(~%-0K2QuR^v$_OpUo*41E0WHJ?8ui`fusRGY|*_qvq^csr&*J&j4{
z<Fu|ie;L~DYSAeR*|jrLPsLsq6Z`yiN%uhvos_if#1qxL;Hj?C+0Kj9VvAneNDQ6|
zCdaxya=ClpGBGYonn@k_BmZ~-vRwXxa#wj#!nN(*Cq^TCvE3t!os31}T4p+0Z(9gx
zT}h=V##j+6;a2|Y+gD3@h9M2W+EJp>@tiKGfz5^>^gv0$tP)BnUDwsAI7#!MbEH$;
zB;C?94PDkK$Fl%2&QTo4jNLJ4E=R0U^stP`c<rY>k<cg7xbHBZ1b-N-lph&1v~9?_
z3`WxdAuEFx1d^iwp9DuyXzAhCi{7@TB}F3=!;n+9ChJ<sKx$yjC#6uI6;kj}{p$_d
z#k!@}U48(Il@mnF6(0*R;5u*%MbCD%XK<@zb&6>W3?g8);}v)v)F+8&w)?HR>*kp8
z*4bCJJ1WQK>FMOP>L?`eaE^tQgy{)}W#sH8mnk8JtdLP4w;{<rI&$;LG2=~9vnKY3
z5R$v*V7-)4oTfSkpXJo#Em7tSO_1KwMz;9=a6fjS#;*2#quBgauA=JFYJKrg==M*U
z^AAd+Fb<&tJsD~rfHpfYTrE0bbuGlNH#HMIvy!?-4K)D`#4yqMIOd~(Sl9B^$bQ_&
zipEK}GD<o-*`d;2%0l%-Q(%-9WQ@)zOS3ag8}O><>mD3C-16u@8vBcdm&6YAr->WO
zY%fR1u2_(AqV0gj{T}1R?o?AnP2<>ysG_X`%>aT~l1?kvU5}F|b8#zsFnyK=N&P0w
zs~T(T@Q=)896>pax*gO`mjX{b8CVxu*=-JIJkrP38UGf9{*(rMYky+x7`i<8mCM;i
z`P(TTN9~>sue2&+Pz3JQK@HrnTe&=`Uw+dX+`P@oq?TrOAVHqo>|LieZnJ$}5tdJm
zz6>j>&Z+^fq5o>&ILSDe#~#uZA$az9n1L#G7|94*cs876qK*0hYOa{p?>n8{&9d>-
zWl;e6wmQ1yuoj2}qUvS5VpIxTKKUVHXP;~`k+ew`KWYBj>WEKYg7OP$8S?n3R8F7c
z03*$k-#qwjYN;JD-NI}=P)fKDB0c8N?j)wt#WH<J!{1MVtm`sTv`ED}mQpUvDF#&&
zC{_hCRxj1ZqU#1xMt2)u>m2^H!Lcy?E=mO~4&cwIf4me8P?UuN`OA@;=Y#+<r!47(
zYO%j*-_?=lyRO4kVC#o##+w`=HVB2Ks}w|v)_tWmF3WdrIYL}A$r0zV-55fF0uP%%
z(K=b%>uSt<ab>fLN6qd6*B{pSf^039j!^BvlIj~Z2PrLJID;uh=OFB%=ep&uHF>S#
z)`bW<F<J_6@k_eUoV4K3*-H!C({WXNx?8y@;E$ToQ0TAKf&}$I5v=t?XCh`d`J6%o
z%F}qIGLNy+88|0maTt3*?$dpLIKI+d7KCl;czC+7_E<ft!M){g?2ZUpbN85_{7f1}
zc08tyn*K~*jYq{<53=`H=oFN#4*@?-<ZI3US&K`P@FvOFlC<P-{IhJva#WJrZsXEz
zru+F3I-+fXVN;QuGKoZagE_*W%HSD-5!b_Bw^5i%kY3Nf2*22^G_Ui^ivc_OowCVf
zg?Jf}zA5;Aw`+OnMgB91L-R9-PH~&%)(5-jD=zn#x9S?r7xOgsF#xxQHv6U$qj6Ir
ziUrp9@D|7_ZN-gRH$_)6JQ+$1h$&~P_aQ5a_fh{eTdVK+O2!)<>^bk0CVa?j|M|V>
zB4_XFx0MUFs=^~IqEuvOdszN{Cl5%+#Z;K|Uw{=KX$H`oGYmdcQgeXfFVcf9-Ns{I
z$WdN+<`>H3i~_6#_qzw`3=2XA_P*8@c2c8JPcGb&+MPb*!F&C!Qt*8L$7g|}QnnXK
zsMpowFmG-8by(8Hq5C+?9xb%Damlyq$P7VOmh!a>EXwJh<8#N1iXatM40e+;VX=Wb
z!@Hkr3suc5dTGKQKu4vSy2#@yy9z7`095aKySY_4&Jv|mkPJ4^8-kmC4fAqVOe|%=
zzZE3abWf*y`Bek!@A!z-vG-dNmCAxyA?9$vQz+(EgbY`I&oU9D9p*hJ!xg(uXpnM(
zeA&6w$sn?N{!w@|EI)GeKps>fw@=Q~W%*RKt;B0f1c#e#<>Sx=5;Lc95TD2Z!Hju9
zTGzX{7~wvl#=f&QxQ#Th`qGU>hbh_RuK(SH4D(oAt!$i!@#w2{`q#tsQ;;7=bcVyU
z9L(w3?_akN`=VKQLBeb8xG!-i(xShHhhZgo195b3!?UJanWXfM?BjuN6f>qQsfRI7
z;MP4Z=$gX3bK-HKM5bboku&rGZ39Nfbp09r=B=XLs$36>2hi{j$t&cA`VZPlTkliu
zi5c~yMBZN1<G1!;Iz%ts=DB>Hs{P`sg#89^IUt2w@p84bTkHum%*S!H4bIxw>jQ`#
z1YBckXiL*D40~+*j&SgU2)`p&b_gV%UGgFDJ^obaOaWcU!G;0l7g){MtUjS8=21-x
z=v-<teNFJ>c}ErrYd4p2^d6r|a3V3ezD)BN$Oxn8rnfaCC1A5`62c+HRTEn&6?Cub
z9nRw^7b@q5^L;)N$SyY>f(!bK1O1P`lLh(LaN%666x_i_J0F(BPx@5QgGP-L$A{vo
zeJS^W$I5i-=fp-EXP@<9E%TgjIHelZu0c@#QF7FSOn)-({oNMl;k#RX0gS;FU+S2i
z4Q1uG+OnfSpoJgc6unUG6VzT(-|F~b7{{OF?P&Zfk+-(t4)sDLEGqH#B~E=M3cRl8
zW`XPr9kIYE`-g2+l3iaEJDa>m;DC94<qV2$BlDEuRAlLjxYX=K7l+mLOF>1B)IOyh
z61IB#;B8XJeHOEnr`?EsW<q>JYelLm!~~V+%R4mx^f(8DlhaaUWzpC?Cgt-~whYA;
zuHZ6LYT*!1+Z7hvT9HZfBapTe6*@pQMhQ;xYaK*tB#%6-y@J~NE5g?k0=`JayY#hs
zvF=5{ZBsUSCLcInP->Z3apSh8+s~siIKmjpFbz&87T_X!k-erZvGs11p+8XQ;70Ye
zZ4B}~bsR?o)oJ`Wu$R=FcZ-%`=Lckzw@=GgCoF`f2in5WfuZihEG9*P4QG>c;l|IN
zbT3x5rHv<laN_4ZF<J#L`Lc<k?o})I^(S+KO%X&{)FU<%gD_Yl(|pDexk!JKl@3t*
z*8Ck}xd>zOt2aAyRb{SGGZ~o`LBb{Rmkn|$-<R3m*8^!`z(+eu_@(6$_Qw?Qo@(go
z<JO77-y6!nZ3|v2F=8HLFwXgrY6uA1MkWm}7sPL*1Kh|tWF;`drKxPWnKq8MsW2bj
zo68vr6?iS*LmktM_*dE(Ol^3R8)F-7!@TCjq?uMf&IFZ*+}^MvA6@GZ@mbg+KvL@=
zj^j?HgHxU<<$!cxi#jd_Q^$<B>&lUc37!YaZ1B|ULP&!P&sV3ba$t6OrKh`sxN^{a
z)2|^}S#@!y^+V!nkGgb9L^u-4I^@AAPui&axYGK%zP?m^eN)0g%eg-XTw$j8l`7p8
zd;CpTZ!o)WkGdzw1_|PnG(gFO05J#ENu@sxP(ap-(*=9fi&~Al*drJVg3wBcJmyYC
z$NKB*MA;nAsAI7NoOt36FAGY6EbjcfAsdbLnY({KKfFq?3>N%<8n|gyyI`jg9CQ5N
z)+<uns&qqfSaRM=@>^eZcu?hdjqc%U7&mzC@DD&m&_V34G-+3ept?NVtd|iS<sUM2
zzE}6*JIFAKu)@tn4X=!^g%CDOT&zhQnNM)F{@gj^{p6*y4xxvK<olCei;#O$zB7?k
z1h3?pcsW-ahX*gzgKozTK}H-vkj*PWYC17`Yc80x-x>Xth=>MfZy|#J`pqfkT`S7Y
zDe08Mt@<R@<1pcIXB_!?Rz0_7#;v2G<?wCtRV8FwEC?n!H+!Kgr89QMwl#6n?)~wZ
ztW;(<_7ZW5O*@XqDWKicvGlfka`;;Wmi)qncUtXCWWY^OrZYo5jD8G4p&mBe>#GeP
zC@xfAF!|Fd?QwF|u#ofX3l_-B4tx(q>K~U;Af?$ukSG0}3UAIBE7_J5wOfHOc0r{5
z+8Ug=?%G9S^T_@L%ivwr*Ry+a9t`zfs<|Ik%kJ+?`!iR}3)}~Fp%?u3J7vXJOj}u>
z>*46!PP%kb>pH(yLL(mN?<{|cUTk_b0Wjo10j=jafJ|G40_u9K3E(*ZIY7q0oXp1L
zapOSLyoc?|1Ec<2;{Xqr%VaWDki*>^r{KU0MzYUvBXm5Oal_mG_QulZ48LE;Djjab
z5pD9|J~9s}C@r%C(a|$T=)3%cfK>40gTAL0koIMdDI_YscbKq~p8Hdn)+HsvJlQVI
z_fYkHgr1wk3Ic@%#?q5S79e|e!Mc$Iq~gA?IZ7(GI0ViOL1Gdx<IBhe%3F?x8c;$i
znSII9IF+6f%}Btt2#Xg)a+nQOO-5^da(3`;Mt%D6EG9t3!#E9Zp*ZLs7z`ODLw2*R
z$etcQ^84Y5I&O?9iY%XUqRgMVUfz3OpGkl-tVHX45LKz~x;Ub4SY=023tAu!8se8{
zC3HTm2N}%=KdP+1N)%s*Z%X}_kBgq~0o|<n2eZmzs!0%GXYH7@F#lDvdmD#28VZy5
zbDlLehi$y<CoDToqbSsRPhJBpwgtg4{VIuH6y$B~{Peujmr<dN8I#srdp_|z{{;w^
zh_no}h(?aE?SO<|E=?Cddv;~by4usmMQM!Q#Q96WC1;vMY^Yq3ySuUyy6nMh=N(`e
zre^TRS@vN>K%=wM>=7ej29BN{dx|S9nODMXQkEz%BJUv(Z{xf@nYp3(o($gJY{)bq
zf~MixXL)ReSo`HPmPk>9qtu@v&XYc_I8g*VGYRfVdgP55{JkkEy74j*N$Ip1%p2>@
zVSa_W;Pp3cCF-$pcP3Gcr7I<08lf=2wae-&SsTVb#9P?cNN%+3lXKHw&{)zjZH2QU
z-Id_O?ONKxujsS+9`744B@m7L{%t|${)%`?FeKE6Ns$G^XzkkoBRG7T{41JzQCvTX
zursF*Skt3UU@Z|m%aV|89g4t-O$#d+=O9L}pfoIGudYfg0S5?)?T>=egxl!&iXDW5
z!d0GaW=hB_$z&*<KAc?|bUdl@Ya^d-gY5#9mD7|ne3=`y$@9G72DL@v%s9{Lg(sVr
ziAqL(Cg>VJ$hwxPL>#8R*eN!94O$T<?&6@_g@P;9aJh?v`<G{XE~*v#M_^IWLjCE~
zl8Zi}C*bbS$q2Fs7XjG*$0Pz76OS!P!J6J)iFV<<u=h1ygz+zR{>^F8B47yoP-Tlt
zn!LHpQR#e_q8?h@R&$zgpB_@vQ{z!cp5(Zx3?EQ?z(-DZZ6;~Hd987+bpAMJNVpw#
z9ttZPXd9{JFPjuf?ykc2i8BzK&JlFY8_&z_B9)&Tc%e#>+sb6FY~`qc3I><_Hk!M}
zlqR{o7ytlroMjH^nRCulq;OYOBy2~Xmdzj|veF?jz3^`?wO`?*$S#xTpku>T#l45V
zF|z)qe$n|@&nGcfaphem#pbKJHz><Egr&}95<7({`sIB09*xf0=P8B#%3NBge8_Kx
z7VSjG=$xXh&OAg|T^?nrJ<ry<#~)Gs*{uj8<t@_67ve@^-c7TG!24Xw6cfp+d*UJn
zdZ+E@Qrk{TwOOC{=?oxOokzgE+`8V*1uIp(8DlyBS5;7a_f}sWqQw0i(L%Z%X%XEj
z+ib-=7q~fyR=CK!c0%&=u0gCMHG)oZ84&HwI&51C3X+_r+Hfs6ueu^i><azv(Ao}{
z8kB#bOqYj^<9-ooM3=vmcT=8)cQ3HiP6LkRP4<lwonr`d(D4BUQ6`Hc_0U<nh0<u<
zR&`hlE!*3S+;iwEE{DX()#UGZYdJ+^)*wu7vXgB-fGU<#*b{HuN$#|jQqoS$@4J?4
zPJ6RD-*d>R;fF#!k1p9|`xQL+l<!jC<7q1Ol?CaQw#w~=);J!lYR=`+F7#4`-Ngi@
zUsFLj5nYzl7B7sO<oearAO!Hq2lr{LAuMe*l^V5mw@-o>B3`_7Yg*rRp9^?{vH+*O
z$?h(T2TG*Gv@MuTg#pwpjfHr(puD+93qXA@YF+wRlP$761^S-8_=QB~lk}3J$RXaD
zBW*z<IoU{0dQmvg%?f#hd3R3QQLuN$)<hQuA|<QsF<D^%IRv&K;dd|G4e_g`yft~Y
z#?j_Bflgm+OF%V7@HdV<vOWz94-~@Gqtb4@uEQUgI0P3;eLXM^vTWw3M6W_#n~hHp
zZ|r3(!s5;N=0cqk<s_1TS?m~M#|%$>6ljPo=6eRXov(Uthg-U)*W#{BhK(B>RxFbV
zJ^Oj&E;Nw3{%uG$cqzN_+Ev_*$xbtx^xvsWhd(c{gOoqLhh!322%q~;682+}KT(~g
zW@q|gnRmf@dnB?v=ag^lCXVuAN%KcbJz0WvXO8GaYlC*c>28+b?{QO|VVf7_(lW>K
zT^?FruHP+h?Cy+bpRYC)K)p|Q4`ZNHQQR=^$)J|g4{9|$Hc~69VB*tho`ud5q|y5=
zYd4LL<Dyr?pD5a7W@`{mI5)()BiW!>qQ$MO;IP|_Xl1|N+G%xbw=B`w3J7dq4cz9o
zE#K(Z&?uX$_Jsr+9uL4JCbKa=f%*2G5O$dyAd9e~XW(0XK@BY_5>cO(s~HSq>nE4#
zhy)8`9t5IWH_LXwd!WUIcPoWV;7{Z%7#mr)OZmUUHdDs%@IGGdmVd&VVsC=E%yl1K
z^xwJIxU^yJ5$v@Xet1?~7Crk>k0_jfdk?RlT=O*vtxDKDvY%4Qe@?(_b!MZ_ii@^;
zm}AZNVMZE*v|T+KoJZ)tE5gxssHoA7Q3Wa;e(-vd>@HjIAPz;(bd}i-=F>M@4szE=
z42;ys4q_<wlU~vZ2YL(~F))9<l1Uxvd>STJ1INSdG=dyG0;OpBi2=R4Y<Qj$?=*ZY
z)gyGzEvdrdHagSx(bc!h2OJK>nTEDd8?q<@zyL0cK_}=5df@@Dteo~cvLbA5&i7S1
z1h@6dSiD<3*Co^;muyk9I1Va(-wDmj*{-2p@!WiiYNw5NFL%`GcTy#Ia&>)Nv+Skc
zH9D}5Ufp_q5Q`?YPP7aJzrcT65VTZva}A|2iV=>IwAW_yB4`(`2_J^GwS3!mbs($v
z%oc2JpN?8INZH7c2x%LN?z9=drH*wXU(PL|QfOY37%9Xp7=W?aLNPmWje!Fd$b9y{
z6a?w--}Z%Ins;s?T5(ZGn@}h<K{;fTNd~^=z<Z3l{jz==F3SAT<Q|Nu`y?5cTnv_e
zVs4UHS_takZeN+5e%|9B_g-cExSRN<vve?_us|ZGtDc`xjt(pf_0C(8_el;=-LzD4
zpHc%$R%{tWgwWp5f#@E>_Z!kj2#!a#WSkXR5{b2QgmYWv3jZ~Mx+kD<PuRc|5BeO}
zs^Uwr4;<h6TVn@R>8CY<BIohha?_3s9Zr+bloqkpmCJA6F@-|4@#2MDEc!eQ)k>Wm
zk@Twfym`eh83^0{@3I#%+x+<j9|~eY_3c8dpu8VeQ0JP>v<3ahZyuQmSR0KcBv9uQ
zx8g_y;#Q{NBK`vH@*Pcq*Sz2%B-G!o_qKLxEx`i`UsHXE)?0?X1-Ao_o($Af(T!zL
zVN<JupuAuMT~A6Ckf`+p_8g4}=2vj{am+zzXZap2!_+C-1UxC$5IEC~u|2n(nZ#}*
zgL+T?k~=3Qd@$%;WR~VhWK7Y<^ZM;FYgXmXZ^1Aoc6r7J<ds*)pz%IfkyzUtgae{j
z)gl$1`FEHr9uNK-ZV)~xP80&rpJ*wQMwb?*If@&96Xz+B7OEqgP2#Gs+`y$<Qwp+U
zcHUu+ZqWSWY0gVxRb1WpbsIL)#m^s|Hh&zrHsh}d!@jYIt0t*nizV!-SdD`@vr+;D
zg@T$I)6SV5%kdf=Ldj=&xp&lfIeTO8y+$B%!L#(vkzlJjz_2sdmW1m}utXe-2J0j0
z$Wj|-OokUuGS?|H{lU7^%?%y`#hlHOtGEcu89$E?K5MhE-~%(7a{jK100Zw1dwWmA
z2Z}3VbjZw{Tw$zb;apePgd~N^gy1{-T-aHEDM>)cvA<;3jTILC4yGrpAq^lb9)szp
z!5JAk+A?>_2E$2~NE{z%3JUcL)&i^R*L_vvGu!AqRWL}cP!(X$J3cHGn(kN05j}qh
z5XLXLSiE)dws{w2cM%b^yrPc8T^`@f_$gfbw#PYhHsvUslNwsqss*y2y@+KXjbSU5
zL30(@pWKep3|$F605aP3B0C&xR?#+CGir7FR$>@h8m7CFv}v8a>K!+W%hbj*OJRB+
zE}C}g!TZb?r(%KRb2$=h%bE53yX%I7CoVJlIceV*q!VYAo(CMt(Cg`wV*Hpu14TMM
z^D$(@-hD&Ee6Va>)~8>90K^?<rW*ab$u70)IQ&I&MBWte(S=9PDRkt)JNbF4Em24C
zs<rLg`S1uc8a?qfB<3Ag4)M~Tu5_1;PxuQ8yq}EuV^TZW$Tt(h>;@5y*@{&%SmbTM
zWn~gg=MTxETwGDi6^s|cdau&ysW&6hhq6d`;>0_<dCgDTJ-4lH(?@8r47FF{x-@XL
zCCy))snlYjsFvq9{k73lm=T_$;K<$4wpRnHr@GsD{uA(?O*cZq-eo)i<-i8|>pD^8
z1nRebQO|AEFAu58Le{#-^-pa&){D3X8u!$2Sxa0e=JJ<h?K^Xy9oID}fnX5gg@J+`
zxA2?<la=Bi3xLsYhUVPNT<dE5LgwD$$L0o%U)v$7Zr1`-hq>mSq_zsAXM&&skw7h9
zHXI_HZ`%^8fFPx$erAlDfcQ&L=iX&XLv&b87c-w9M+?D(>)r1Z@|rP?!vfWP67o#(
z*sedO`Vj`pE7LT!Z?z+W$%`yN5<0(;RnNyxDk2o`^k({@nBT)=J)hkEusi(*#zmMW
zvNen*p{8MQ#&R4<6M=%&RSS3y3xfVm$TwZj=z?Y|W~s2cfEB+Ll3P5e{JvONLi;P_
zIMF`fWhF0j1f~8*We)Qwf$l=lO0<XlkDd!Nx97vkh0i-B_(W*<kQ(N|1ip^T{$&WZ
z!L75|2?`Cy3g+3k3K;oP`-(fodD1fZhwT%2WmYH)uoC*x3gf(58#^L}hpf^OqkbYQ
zDj;Apj2w37Jm13-@v=!lv&-FiKc53!+K3O5ve>>-nBn)iZU737-~Zy`owh|$lpxDx
z?Pc4xZQHhO+qP}nwr$(CjlMOyUQT^P#>mVW5jggR-$60i<}RwfZsn~Y&$_^XYAK%y
zGzS#@BnVN;>~$qT$~tBs-_{6vo|yboHolbC!kRz6h2RKd#g>%V^h^K-bijz}k%(9`
zE&P*ex<j9rMHl!Zi2^cb$aY{F#I4>B3kCCj`gG39EqqY<c9uSK*76;~)76F%RCr$K
z0*P`}m`d4JP5e=I_53lA`VfQqe`bSP@;^3ogQTjziM{4HWZ3&vv8o>hnsLVj7Qrj@
zS^o5Pk_N@^r)K4Vrt7uUfDF)>jW6rG^BSfp#DOLMCKV3ZLKl`yPL&%O9DO5B>{_cf
zC6BR8HR-&Q&`Artj>x#U(2`2-SZAe5+rVS=(>C&11g+i_$L8E3trHrK(ePJBMe4%`
znci<GLa(sf4V_(|Api$UVVmT8u3B8i0JtwHs~AVsac|3N&UsH*BXe!iZ?*iwjKZ%H
znxPrWoR|^Q{c_MBAa}AYSt^<XH!vto`d#e8M)5)3`LxW-aLmLsv}eF1E5_QeE$7AU
zC$xCKj76GHeB+)3jAo$Hm7|a;P4olBFO1*q#=b!ZP2S<n&^i0q==E>UyqCQ_ONzXe
z>heE5Bt)8Wh;~yDHH5lWvu0G+qlLJ&OAaSM%Oa%_nn`c{B?R-miXegKY6pCnL|&7c
z{0(2ik+XvbOGoC5os-H_J*9|bzbfBO4-APJom6iozFMmXoz$3&0L)>eoHkbUkTr~2
z=SLg;l2bK9&HmC#=}BU@aQC*NXLdzewPyd0InBUi-UMl4YBfVupt$d>Trz5Az*tQG
zf&ePb!6t!<`GUO%T9uJ4zed!x88$iI@mJy6bs+&LWZo}4=qQ38&Z#=k>$kNl@iq@3
zB#<cVWTep+ucyQb7)X4|+y<%CNR=w${>wd}Y5Uf9mxiTxB+L=BZRqStYVNT5gqcp2
zQ%W?c)U??3fP)S?;w_~Qa^=OC`noK3=+hOw!%w%usX4>BJ!PTnyO0RRYYG2)%YgD?
z82r5WCz~uV+RxHJRrk7{YsbQ=JfR)Y+q8C(EX1i{3LZ`9i|5K%Ou|);I!j5RZ5$ka
z+b;NeveKo1vLmK)!A;kJDSKTUXntoXjl=JRCELz{H@9mPXOtFz^O}q$E3C@PkPC(k
z{a(w_LzrJrJy@fFQBi~Nh-_sdT>`4O?)u#~f~`DqG9!_B%6vV04Sao|XkeiVyGs<a
z9m@|Tc)~ZHJ%-E01g^pr+pP1T6IxW|-@n3RPCOG-p;~YwLu}mLwd3KGm3Pk6q*Q!j
z7ET1#$oM*q%!I?EjEQ?O%5uolrye8k;(v#_e<TlECi6&ai5at6Cw=tNoNnMsLcHC0
z4_s6D#wA(&mpfPbq&}!3nV^c6J((W;Ry#3R@dr}2GT_zOo$f|=1Mx$yF3d_{{l5N+
zj|z>v41mcE6L<|lyb>&&msmF=LB<W)fX2dBzh%ph9ru)V2+-L$`6l*GJzGZX3J}Q1
z@;(m}c*lzRtYE|<PCpzMfpgqp_>ybt1;TC(LM~PsVww2TgkA?f(TPZ9C7Z1!<khQ{
zSUqtuS?1%?GI@~grjSzdRfl5WyP~(#nqk75!K?J=vbH~a9ZGIpY@nlcCrwAzopuDI
zx4Z!K%r#=~X!zy&BWB^9r|Qv*Mx^~E7O738J<Z(i`7B#&J7$A0*z@zX3o-iriklab
zu0hfKJYD!F%+y?V%-$C>ek9uGMWuy;Ity6JNK|7DyujpYNNYBe{wKyEAj3@n&j2ro
zBRzVe_`&P61AH0?Fa##Z1~X*3Up4(5S<3Qk#jP09tw!cL5DTlHKNAm)@F|5cr&qQ0
zx+cF@kOtR=7%p-53i<~#E7ZL?`I8D!?Lo~d&{{@yArxR6796W8CyUqt6g0jwYp(+e
zz?Whge$$kmi)$YS6bo>;pHU44Bg13M0)t$xHt61%9I5oE)^{(r2Hzy&lw@U2dQAIr
z%~u&mf90l;NZC&Ea9GQ+D-K;uk#!qIv&*XF<=ZmBlEjg2(H4F>liT_hc033RFLK1;
z<*^Swmaw(H<DS8wK6TIs<F9oM=p@}&=#sBlKZ7N2RbeaZy-7=S{Rmgk1Zu0@6m#7Q
zUJ8)Yf{|mGu4|P#=vzt-(S~RWWr3Tj<?bN*6lGzE++#o>?u^B)zNmD8M9qk^kGM8C
z%FzWt5@-g2A~P(~ti)jLLWq-unuoKDt(&S*lq`RE(SO_=%c^lz3e!6d7Tjigs1qcs
zdR0d<`e)%VA<FDtJt4p=SClv$=15B~s_&Lmp1I^1Ud&H8)SCm=`38kp14lx6l=!(1
z+npNkO5SlYRaTM)x2xPB5o(ofeY^W}(U7PqjMq3<+P!uX0iZ|xiF`Yjhlx=gEAV0p
zPgjMG!WT<=xYxudtp@;_t&glsX5Tw|UV%V-R!V33;IH>#3`TN{CHXYHW4)6@iT<WN
z8WOcm+;L(1V}2_-0ls&0)ceXw!QLAae#y(owLHNXmT9C3o)}BZ%)YH?#VJ~|IN3&o
zxPGH%D4CxSyw5_nzj;iDx+>fvguJfgzS=w#6hLk33`P?96OEn+o87MMTq}PevxVVT
z=|MQ>7H4;cc{?obpFsPMh5b+UozV2OKj}6sA5-Qc$|qFgTP54Yv+d+^Zls$|X7;y_
zC0^wwQY-{-LN|-V13{vxzAH$w5&+nMHBIhB3j77#E@_d_MNG`<kdo9~Q3^8yVWRK_
zS83XX$==;zNHO_M0F|5>k#Hd+_W>RaRL8`}k~j@M@X|72N?oW_NClNaw<On=rN=$5
z2{@`6*W70?6l_flu$l@<cZ3NJU+509yKW@otAYy_#md}MQ*>+Ol&5<s2Ls(hRJQDv
zeUl(LGj_2;r%?ZXjk`O@7Nz76&_86M)`xwKe*g`(K{m&Xd&3~<?0?&*aetg6l1p`N
zQ9<1h23ii+Xd1T%aKfSvq+nzWpEmMhF;L&%VFJ<sKFz+3Uej?aot;S<%AMUaFN|lj
z8gz<j$^P~Rf4!usYh`rmL-O<go_9Y6Ft2w~14^hD#mCwW7&X(>-ym65wD8=fUz-05
zbwCqr8^QD<f9n)8lw^rzj^(hqPPkjnU3Cr*Dt;GvGCq$$aB>recRJ{9NrK&qf#ao1
z-8)KM3+GZ(!-7hCidIH69I7xPQg+KzO`PA~JidPW(~MUtHd%g&eAobq5<$tiFW`(x
zFhL1}gE2#cJCQ1cd0&anR(@ct!c>P`3_a(9;Ur(AMNzU9+1-a<#?ReMDr!{42k0aq
z#dq6U2A)aW2!d67zSTHMhY=yYH!~TCjKnQ6NGvXDcUm<WL-MP-YqB^{P!McQjBYB^
z#yLhR31Pp&DGsQLI)mGXR$2CCq(yN70*#Ou>HUyWaQ;97pJPG~*dW(*HqFHUT|fR5
zfdcSmq@Qyf2eKs~D;@d+6I2GS+($8w-)jcuv>Fa5NQu8a^(>c*cVrehey-DRVw`3K
zm7eVIL4Na-eq!+^ZGjE^*DZ9`@A6lzKxDj^)dsoI_VI>aNGSCr_O&|zi#|km3&sp6
zHqrUHdN{LV=W1W!J-c~klKqC~&(4SDgr=1KJ+dmg-2tJ20QYAfE0$zrt7nl$Dts}*
z7yWn~`DHH@!t;F|A+EZbV;OK#YhrQ$q%UNeF?g<MFaq2k97ADopoqNLNQIco6GtCP
zfd@qx{~%VpAZZuHs2{#y9+y#-Qu)@AHmBA46L!i*5tV(@gGxa)$&UsZahv?zq{}`H
zU?>(Q7FW&fr2d;~@uXR^;oz-DB90MwuL}n=dco=D@YX^i5N#f6vpl@ewde%~yIaDZ
zA;cbD^tWdFHt4j4b<odTYHhF80yX=+?>>-ZasQ$B@QZE-&-qfc*B*+ynlpxTO$#i-
zbIA<;@9@j`gz9Nlb+4&v2Oa}q7;%H?LM2<*m!5MORAqd}9AY8qicmC+`lJ@d&RG+a
z0XP*{4H9R+Q`#S<|MdAv>zs;pT18aR0{sBjvj&`W_)7|?0Jbpw=F@a?ND2`}h-;XW
zhFu}x=#lDJo5l|BD1W!}juUg)*w}73t;{c#ywKj3=~yi})m1X-TT*qol!CF=V@Zez
z@%{WR+2O5HQ*ZJ+?E(|b+39z~rq5HcX+hb%K%<DaIE!4vO-DumZ(l0#kn6^i^lCcM
zIm^pwZNU+C-TBCDtNtb6vpl3c{6L%~r7;3@@a0_ndF~PX)bk~bnX|Pf{`|k6X1*tZ
zFdA1Dx%h~g_tvxRtiU%Ulj;iKDn?q3yFi3E@V4P`FcA(NR&7l2GLa(pqhGC;y);M7
zOKb=~<1oOWXJ3ASV(lNtS`kco9!mvo|6;pDd#p%^s{X~aXYB&3J>D_`j74!dx+%j5
z8wqcQHNVUB%(=Yua&_P}Tf-MkTh;7ui)SGuKK-Nz9(xIGwSlb0L-uj$Bd5`U;FCYO
zk%x>x-{B<t2u8xtsAC<20bB$iL|yqCC!5@ZcRF=LpzX=}3J!6a2+OgeRF$<lc^AGI
z^NE)i(4ZZVST`vi^Uz9IBmLxS5ZgC=8$QYgO3>~m$z^)dHT)n!{b*ajec&?44|_fk
zsF9}=dg2d~^|e(l!0(@-5)F+Wu9Hc7Zr@Z=Y=MM~@Uei1hWu+aQ$cjhb_~=h^A#&=
zH|`ne_{R>V`1I;u*V*?g2$40|A)Ke8K>xKjScccZRd{BFr&(g-RUuQUgfF8?j?nqr
z)^c^)6C@Md<gs;iAeU@;5e7l`x$uB$fl4LA#zR(j{V&3&$A{jzZSA2qH{CL2h$IPk
zc<q>7Ml8H1XF<Z8r)rQEkPwm|pJhEE7w}%T=9SzMOE~A;@YA*6n<yXixH)>2b^x}{
zkQ<40OWijeX^g$s!P?OD5`%~RVDALPweRcZjz33M$W>N5T*9DfFi;u<)<_H*D%J@N
zFt5R@SKb5uCrR;llr9t!*prX?Z^6a${|5SWx5!ZI{Pot$+tmV<tZ?~w2v=xw2Z5Jm
zlt1fVimxWcEY5nbILF_Jq^#Nh{YA9A6MuEb4gS|`a|Zb5fEg=I!cjEfxAfP88T(1$
z4U|-vP0?=VVgzBRpR^&ap14q9l()UfoG^_l1OE8jZsBK^JQelsTv<Jq<eFQfAYEbJ
zY0IO-j82qAT8LDm%CfmHd63Ksgt-F=4qp_0&W|o-F~Ky<_X5jU;SY$VG!?pL+>hWs
zi_R2A^5|Ss-yY29RvTc@cR5S7G=)3C5dn}2Rqoc>kdywrL5ItJD_`t!H-IFGVcPt#
zyvJ$f-bsK`r#?$~v+?k`ohqEpq(HYwa<begUCC(vBVa~`kT;`5b3UM7FJvdJ$@2{j
zRg}hvmv5%O@p~fA?ToT9KQad^J&>c~yp4A|upN+$7))Vn79<oN9rfMZDGn+#c7?6W
z!~=VS^*yu@z!pv}aq$UvqUM$iG!R^zjE-;yS;GluGk^$$w5O57ZK%5$6@+HaT|d^<
zx|#f^oq`#EqmP|G$I(<opsX=ljCqwzwv1);kN5aRd!94!4#FEApk~d97gy&QlwK-)
zzI*lo>?Y~%h^K6oLg;9;i>!@g5q~VfDJbGWwQNvq=5C=Nq^e5-TYwFVA}hl!#RF5a
zl*Bo63(1llv~F@98qaG&eXK=wB#;pNph`e(d&qb~Fw(tMqAt0$#h^Vdyms94DF?@8
z;{cpSMymh1oY)SqTR<B<8U#>CB}g3&{b669eb5pO?UXQ;q`PU#^i(zxc<TT?*h(zO
zMo@2Y=XK{!i9U}62YFJIu2nG0exhbIVXgCdFxau_{{oOLt8^YPM=sdgJHbF<J0Ru+
z`bBv+&(}1(Ktk8*<UJQXYQEzaJ`q`G6=xDnpc(Sc+^`y1T;1C+Gzin+ZW=ikzr_uz
zrAa$By{_pqxs3okAJ9dPi(Dug>aY;C04Nj<Mee;nIA-w;1N(bc9R04Q0l?>GV^N7)
z0(|mXZiPY`iyBZSH&&SwArOY^AjQyJk~Y^v55jc^xmUT*Ghpk&Ad}rcW0czva6QKp
z5Zho~?KrSsqd=L^gCyJ2?bMj!ok)Y=X*(s~ZR=+VbLtE|NC|o%am~uDS^Fyr=yH;R
z=NB%PzcBnnz!4EyU`j01Z#RV&tM7a4Z~q5gJ&;S3S$$x=P{8aF5^2~LBq0tfmL;N0
z6{rxHJ|hCvHWZX}!i^KAe&KQ-xWx4Dj$vYZcZWPMl8hXOF)TTi8HYAQGQwcqT&4bJ
zB4Gn*OsmFRh03}xAgJVQgw+n2YTKXo{rRacW4CaP+jViTb!cJX#%1wx{*M$0_f(ys
zNjErZhQV1H^2#sg;=AWwG;?-xT<xkCkM9J`4}PggF_y=%I9`UmU@8Bf%t(t(61OUX
zQwz~tt%4%v=j&Bh;<a$v)+?AtfkO$Zes53?ncxqN5z*6<=b-DL=R1FinqehQS=8S{
za4EhVD<zE7Dl^9|w7C8H!flq8wmk>%UhHX<Kd@Gte7>oA#W|gGHgO(ec2#3pk0k<F
z=5{3(F2)O{_G6D}{9B=8niNw|WQrtaT^jZ3B*%$|>^F6}4d9!@a4?svy%$}=IF29(
z{r@SZy0{BT1$>(a+FIi6m#GH`%i7<&!jOfAl<QKw3zk4rO;Paq0Zw#6%Z97$UN$!>
z6FCQ!9_yoFK8Yr4>ZM;2Usn*=NlOiyjk6zf-AZ#Vp?+#ZRR`Mi90AEddD^M1{thZH
zyOc%J$+hX_LS%u`P^}Id9~yE)E7c1F?KzqubKzB8%S}SA3W;-l1hEobmR3sfMjHbJ
zbN=Yo5G;FfI@p@48oIdZzoSz&&=gUo9|Bfb9oEVP|CwijF8O~wKMj2Y;zq;NLd%JC
zYoqOBhoBN*IuUzo#A9<Cz<X?SE7D*{LBnR#&rVhzU=3ZOc6UQfpcit+$CKlxTlTXp
zr=F&=Kf<?rcOz)KUQ0i$=uYLu!#hq=AxO{EwU)R$LDflWM&tD>;pC5B`@Z)B80}EH
zvvs6XDBPV6EPoLQsUIaqOC|f(E|irX$jY67{>qbOE1z)J+Di4dH#F;1IeDCQkErON
zw%vkv@=j3jToDC|8aDI1bN^d>wvT*szUk*Z&C@~9lcwkcx*Sft$qWYoXi$x0-rYE6
z5NTe%h%>>3aO)18AxF@;mm1R42o{3l3hOlnCiweJz@aJiM&$IH%wwufD9ide{X+eV
z{)+@53eEu%_B`^K<ZE@doaOr`7b4*0^7NpK0lI!l>Bp03hPP%TiCkT{kroE4jX)uJ
z+9xO4AZGZUIcx)Y`HL5nM&e+s%!rjS1qr0Op!G$}kZg^?m1tJ?Vx6JeQ*lE7N*|n~
zFdDQ*xTqa=Q$<mLGH{3X$dGa7+-R4(1xSubPy5^B+j0gdgJauk_3;^p>^=8S1k&h_
z2<@@1denKSYK=ktzK_seIAO>u%(PdGor(f@vO8S9A=j&q^dF~`VZu^(LKbA9=bhwc
zL1^RxCXRURoLlMHf2Pgc(=~Cz>1x7Bd)<cghE3K;2${yP(4}SSb5@`>L;1$@<bWxd
zN#K?p4Sj$JwlDNx1z~1uYJ0df+$C|9FW_0OP4>Fa3<@^4rFTTWdnZvp6@m?75s|E@
zg1Va|%!JlJ>*e$|2^Ovkp9lD$2mzE24TmoaXz1GEY0EO@aU?d(fJ;w9Esal<wii6T
z=u_1N8?!Dz3G`VWB1SJP2n<M%xri2w3w5DgFdUd(^Y7<DKlAOBNn2ep%Mx6TSe$J(
zw-3<WR8a0T-})F{4Q=L-%G6?BD45C!|F@1kl`qSn5Rp|Nd{>%7L>ZapKHAtd`$I}I
zY*>qKy1aa$fL|~2diQ^n=q^zqA->n)Eox?Z54G)N71D-!LqC+D(LxA9mz3Tgs1ECY
z<JNni3rPlheaG__qWT=w6hPG%xGSX5)d!J)PETMa8*bEbXLOn~9F7>fr_UYewa&aO
zRpz{qAtnjLc1yQEu=$17A8k@)H?MpbA~x>T9c~~{>I!W~q}h^;B<S4b?ci-gQL6rG
zgIq`b<p5=>5s(%0g)#fCpkU)eOQzVo`|GYhdppv0qPKRw0-ZAS;MZG&`v4_loIBP(
zf+gs6fm>}f+NAzHP*?WB#5`I$zm>0)66Z1|LxUdzkm-E01`STgRD0YZJ~8(cymvy9
zI=;O*v~J_8^CNUN8jCqx6OFH36^mkt1*&v7UXb<?qu`^74B4&v^fwB)r4u!^Mi(}&
zoK&G=MUoRBXy=6NE;W3%V2jY`k<qT6VD*}RGE#_a26dtzzc>b@(Oxxg2%wb1F=2YB
zlwscY0jCZ5uh_G^^PyrP8+iAg8P>jjTog@<XcqNl4lb#(7oOvsW9Yp4NEfNl^y!d3
zvW~^em(pH7O*tJ^ds09(9fdmbjCE-msAF%f9IiA~gK5beXYWdPC>xfbzR7wNa@b0P
z!1%r0?hhi*!f4n~=mp1Er@c28<jq8rHsnoqavX+$Z*BlN#H!Jj$YE21+@USIc{7#n
z$|RfOn-CC`XFtH93Q0;R%VW2;pb)?rNB&Dv2D5j4kK!Fe&_-OE`Y|H+YC+&4&kbm@
zJ&SimK;PHVMO7sT$ARru%@C|R<F0=<s8zl5Pc|BKBCU4N=t9vq#jLPggyA?_<%ic}
zwD!ia30G1DE~GBu(*4oLs3G)M-R0sBV(ptLTt1Z2joweuu{#>FQx#nj>jeo8w>RM>
z1tij?<9(ylc=!VmxT7Pwj8qojy(i;-=39V^$cMl*m-TkXeFwv=<wYVW)|YsAPD&YT
z9xj2JQ2FTH0j_t<CM~t@_85$(M<fx-#$NCZviF>WUSX_dpZ6ZjK4n)qtp9jRN{YMN
z=_zlcV%lM26hDHq-8A6R?R{kgMQyV;{0o?3k3@NsL+(beE6FYdITv#zjyoE~T_{I}
zeM*1|)Wrp@+43(W>C>xg9HblDoi}dQYvjppkm`D;Oqjsj&?FCu<Cr5G)*$*uj<MU^
zY_E$_z=g8UyANtN5-U2MwBTiCRJIIvOV|5O?RT;0qEbqA90rU-?0p}n$)^Cf(x6!#
zHMXS9^=B348OT(4UImyr?4{O5UhgpO@c#scAGOD^gV9V1kY#Ev&xpor9hJbl2p+li
zF1n-{_h-_D(_GTgGdax*N6q6ESyKJ6?FdP{3Uo@dv*vEDK~mVS8Wo5NQ9^(so7Mag
z3Jq4=WNB2*+>ydF=QaZ1-8b5Sf0R@!_i!^ssaRGocgVVa{6KbXme9*P=y?_F9ux_&
zk*+1J9Ms85*2cyDXF8MhXONg7<ZZ-A!K`AL#cKoz1z-X$8nvsDECok~)iik6W)UnP
zylW_${K=kNR{tvMemkxJJaPE9@0n5%8B;NXYw=F3j+t<H1UvMr_y)Kz2uuTwUwx#P
z(0|aab0#wRh`{htC3VsVifryRxAKsgxwwI|0KL1jV(*9tZ(mKf&TD4mW;6hyy&hSv
zOq-c<bz#rplE~ofzGW|T4k%&zJZ>Q#_LbdS>w~bxD!ELv5&j(PC%$|d`N+FwFJe5-
z_>8Shhj;(EO$;mN4M(wHXP=&9Bu6NjG_Cv%D=d<XSN-$+F24XYmeoJYO&#oKJ36kS
z(_v3uM$EE6cdsUJ^^u9)@7*iU8K9h?WAaXRC9l*#gh}_0*N4CoeNmGP;P_%~uX{)a
z8AIQ}HfKy=8XixZv#SuFz>~y>d?Zj?T<i<|LW!yvE9w;Wo{vs=)$+?awnsDuKr!H6
zg({d{(TibxJ6qQTy0Ee`ZP~W%MGxCV<SYmdq%BQ`*BGN5&op8?R2BEyV`*-w?ME&-
zWt?8T96Rlg#HzBb^)qu*(wGJ|@vRrF%kO7@xFK0-5Rg7KVA;iJpm!Kun{x|MWr{>Z
zk<pr0?cnkD0C^UF@FouA0ps}<YGf^1@logYj>~JiE9Ruz>{HaV&5?w2uA4}Y!=%m&
zh*`MGvE@}|5Flvpe}^@0G{{qq72HE>Qka7*!Ra8k=ieW+j$TfIZf+PTV^2@sMbZQ~
zc>`V3%@#7NNxG70#<u@Ye7R{5+|g-54;AQa)-P1>svY<%PrzFNb3U!*Z-HPJL^0;n
z?SPM_HZ$P<PkCyD;9?B({)Up<{?Z%gYJ+`pha>UsWGDnigI~%6K}&?@EQ}~zB`pjN
zy{D~-g_9J2vajbNTm_^i2}}=P#BVgX(o<LxClsBZ!tAPQ6uXFhdwx-CW~Gt8^Lcai
z?(rbw%xoBQY_|Pgs3f5vK-;dISWjB_c7;yy;yRSMpQQEB$=1MXn=}gph~75v4AD`V
zYY%>~gZuB7{V78@$(E;Z)N}8<13YBkT4j7YJ#yN3w&eu}rg5pR-F!FYXcrs`p!)<<
zu+b$Ng{tvpu6lmWWpVZ!)*L>e38%M-2Gmlhv8sXzfTjoqTyKrapb&N_GqV}AgX;tS
z%CRCA8lB&L6XjW7YJTbc$uGYm!4e=!&z$+o1t(0T=B+m-BD8%`?3?HFgVm@>REtK_
zFic~MVQD?<r_={jZ^X-{7#uIC$CE5{TOaO2S1^QAD$Y)tTv9#NIbuvGJ-l<qlgMG^
z_e9?(knFg}z4X{pffr9#kLB-+9`KL?kP~)YEI9kN!;?KbY6Giqhwl!FetW4Qi{$yr
zB9#4`4tVFxj4wN?6a~s`-%cWZCf$`%jFB4Vi5K(}u@fkvkrpH#aEIF1dV-3IvJ{;`
zF<f=!nv9r4E*W1@PAAdN0Ilk%i^CS~Oq{dO`V><qUQqfL{Ss17fX9Lk1tNC~ZM>qK
zEgrwdu=7)F)mgWEX+{&LipC&{uKFiD=7j%^g@Qq9;F0I~R`S5!Y6Iw}niTVT20>_@
zZEF~3{i3_+!JK4Prq1Hl^~&jMbkhor>juywh`mbk?uZlrilSIwLamdIeB%`a7eo~l
zbu7dW6(><o5K-u5?yL}rGU%Hi3lT)LW1Upqo5!BMfFX1sgA1yKw%7}g9++7+d}5)(
z-egOJw`NW-T7Jt--Jf-Lb3Jiv-)Qz}g$o%E>eVQ;gJ|YV5Ej6PeQd*ZlRAd*obpfg
zd05Y_f#sj1>Gv}Z(AXt=4Bb%9aaIrcd>&Wr1L^loAr<KrdYHt3W|&;P$M#TGxup~V
z=U+K<350>Ph`?+>3CDXpd&(pkt_BTo0uhoq#UQuNKbls(0QCSlqp+t!=}=ZzZWI0#
zosp2~P&Bj*&k*m+hu&f0p}v{w3r%1|5GdJs46o!DaSrmo37?oHimLmEnBvObTui-m
zLd{dT@_TG5BH_h(h6}%l?8@jFLw~idEEKBzY9F!8^%JkZUwWYJOJM%RUm0QYqj16;
zCz9Qkx+f$JN5K;rX|>F{0BO7=d+c)$CoTP1xH2AAvA$1yf_)uQ;)Xe2bWj)aW>fd6
zggegl-kl{_vGYaY&ld`dY!n(_gtO?E<0!M|6~016b}L`15E|>2hRhd|Mbg{-|Km3G
z?ro7M|JI+vxQJLtF#?SXRVs2R8!^e^b{;x$KH!b${Me2im`Pjr|F+O=-Qi+CWk_E$
zg(|=>nCl7wS$ZIE_}gi!4kJs${Uj|_l^z|J*SD_VHyLTX>56|~5<jE@<fEUc?CT+l
zbwP&+<Gi=5w~ws=BHQD6!PU1rAV54%kA0j;Gqkl5=B~z`8<s8n0e6cgRNdi_4)uqv
z$uzs%#rEDDl<VArj||Lka;c~j0nHsQbTCqP>`f8AQmrXbOVmKeF<*$$tqmQUeUA#^
z=?5@{#Tzc+hbE}>hyFCjVWX@5t(Z6up1)x!!vjD_4E+V?wE(|bYtu{aZBwppzwtR}
zhJUAtQWUKkw%n_>xQG6ju$7$}{#JG2nrK+cOq;T^T%RCT;w!mUrZn*FFPf8%ijE+A
zlm@iYFeeoraVLFs=c77eM)JLhINWBau6M<hW;WeHezW$RJ}n-wvx+g<Zb%2pusAz4
z=c{QhQT%+RyPBm`T*Q}voUBcMB^!!O^vU#6kEkhJ54DOOt8%?XtHL@}n#FZ8X11G6
z<_aUmvO8Kr;4Xi|W>pfk)(wtf@OMI+{S!hZ-|P?5sRCV_qQr$CFGxVxT#<<snK|4F
zuvn)fbQanu0e$GK5y3)Ey!2Q}wViKaFU_owv1FNHBU%?{Smm-6ItYu4G61xWs2NH2
zQW%+?@<`F4Mm|xX1nEOAz9AxS5b|;OBYZ-;ph5+}k^^b`U@VoP%%-S|%pe!K=2Z0;
znm;ah)FDC6q9eXJaRj(e4Kw~T@v$MXGw1y}MiTubv6mfdcd@T#9<HWrc9jXUn*rce
zICndF!kp;=?YF_U7Eh!;L$}JTlhIoZ>iQDwu4E;p9&cwtk-<fdZ_2hsvaHeq;omDV
zOjx@Va%2_gzV)@;AeE6*RomYDf66r8aWGEh#~a>$LvKXEEM=bb;%1Dl!SX$(V6(|D
z+Xw+br*4KADCHaikvlC9D9opB{uD-k8SWjv>r}Zj7)Ywt$#Y;c(<LeH%*ub{c54kc
z$S7>)g}j2xd=rV~h4n)egUgPc%ffNYl{eWqs#_Q4KciHnx>g|;0G4K9R=cM7M!-xs
z3cy9yA8=Lu$d#~G&W`S@&$;4%QEXI-POPOg8|1o|!*(E%a%Tc%cJa7bBILXj1}Fdh
z)p4wxZ>mj<%j4^G`p%rBxg$#mu;y_<NH?0ga6<iXF4d5$oqLhKXj^iEEI$7VdB`;g
zpQ115$SK+QoDxCd)`KU5#NU0~a-F-tRD_ja&4N=619Q^vI+5~_)PWxl4>DNZ<a-Y?
z8J=)XH_auN^`)Wl$-qUxn4TNLclM)Sce1HyMdXjTqtbfD1ULH(qbJh0n7L7g6{jim
zIM3xNiASaq1jrpQ=*uxz)3aJX>7pFmGGcQ9$)v+bYM4~@WnZ|6{kIjYZQNv9tYu(b
z37@Ntwu_ABZDIbZJ6(ZCS(P@*f`8ZGdJY6J%_ntnSHIL*mf)4&<Vs)h6L}RvyxhE9
zI0I`ozSScR+St>Y_vJEtE1@H&sH%e9hC85MVOYdpbqfPmAO_exBUas}C&~jv=bqaX
zliXUA{(dLgWv7^jeuy_!Eplef0XM!)9q?5kssoah=J?pi`~BBB{Nu0BVLWMqP~zu#
z*AE=Wp@Ga(lhZig`Y=Q_1Ikq<;XMe-9u~+ltHd3m?h9WL$|Di2bxINY%`sqc-_KTS
zae1$O28;HAh^`0)x9gJ?C21^pI!PMHx0#;~@1dEyPDnveVFs%$)JA<#i(5(IO3%+=
zTIDZwNIf?O@rK^4Z>QmP^QvU<v<`D(*A}<hE72(*$#c_gZ($<UHcwykkQWZ4){tq^
z`^2SN;Id1Xp-MNv+PWmN>Upu|2p*YPzK5om#=0T`QXsi_E#Xb|vXiz6n$M8ia$4)o
zd!;{CaM0^!b&8{6B@7fi-Ua+df+}XP-Gv{&wPUL=WG5muG8`*UTQF|)ausaXNn(j^
z6}lACAm(-#Vjr2P<UraIWJ>4NwH(^W(?S;ukpHcN6IcFr@NIJ?6!Y2ZVdD*hZge@X
z*qKqfpLr$OJ1>wP7a0S3_q3WFrn_yhwZ8oX8651!?Hx7<c!BP+ZK3zbEZDqDkik<X
z$o_j#xhZlu0;BHs9*{CY(w17>uDE<0H|bMO+A4HJmWL-7-K)gXpdf?M;-6H<wOAux
zLS=Q{$QjoEO=fuJa|+U9pGxCIL_?c0oZ_?x3~2N_EA2OQidu8U`lOd%2?RXo(_T-h
zR246VqS8AAUn?Jrma^4Fk7z&AsQmqM66blGNys!DzWzTbDs9F)Y`GMx|8BfZl8hhT
zK;X6`Y73++dLb^guM89h#0LQ5nxF&znyDHIvP!jGsx{Sej+3^CL%lE-=e;Dvo*gnU
zvn4OEn=BM`OR;ce)eBPhRG-X@kAI)8Sbn$-4*Vzp|KF!4z@=gC;nu{QxG|~n8{!35
zrF-)<AP!b1+>h+s?Ek6nl62l}85Ly+b>N?;@j(_nO|;CDvWwK^bY@mZ7muRDs74>@
zt7jlTO~o>LgjKA?KNHjspcp6Fh^-4xmqw<;r{>=Dk@yLH%v(s0=hhF+Y)1YOqUjm7
zQ?U|-0lBTVz&Qz8v7{+oFPhwWH97F3$obRgwIp&;|8Kl!8C$zL<_YQZ;}$DIOOY{h
zz$u*>nCLT9jkpuhjfHX-We!WmQ60o5rz&Hsrj_eFffH$i3@Jt-G{oha#`XRt93&Q|
zCjAW<vyz)0oM5{~|2X3<Z-22}oX$`g{`v1!_Xf{_U-BGUJ=^0Z@;F+z&Z$@S7i<|x
z!eREa()U!#kCeQm;WgHu`o@gCp&3T$`sKm)_qqv;lX9?S&ahSw8p0Io6f5p`*dIHj
zKW}#dv4i*RWRH#L)ExKEAT&)D2U-HPrkkfd;Sj_Qba4qAiZzgD$QTT!LG^<rCLcC#
z3v)O|UitzrJoV%7DAvgYQ*t$;s`&Pm(x6L=T0~+mBbp%b9+S7OO18G)%5JgI{G_c5
zG0?wXqTUM}n24zn7s+C6fum86tCp|g7&_d<Sle(-e4&r?7FHczQ1X&F)1UsHMu(<m
z2Sx33cUVn!%h4iluVFqE=S@a2>R>;8@U}yVS!^$wA;@Gxa1ug^rlzhe7e-{YjMZVM
z+Zx;RF7#GlGt`9NhHXSMOORDXb3WEGFST@2q7~|@9#x`A<5j`~+8d1PA}hMXbL?Le
zS6bBs{-egIz=Hleb)pPcZLB+)S!E{`INPSBL(HtU{%QfRiy3KK!9soUng;W`FmL8j
zCz?HiWpxsxU`S6intquNDD^CxAwePB!TJ)a>k*m-VxG|a**AU;*8mo;r2JI)<vyO)
zrwX=b%}-3XEgi>d|9(3vgdmpsS_%CJJi16WR|X^CqgT;18`+`&&E925*cmhN#`ARz
zcd1;}?<)#EX<(g=tdGf)%&heNKShe>IOYXKZ<Nj*h662WJ9cT)Vgs;9fn_W<u-%IO
zF8P@5O@1$KCj=gIwGy93*A}SC<t6E>l`BQsDDt|?Cbif72=h{4IwtGn(MFL|%$<m%
z3eA?ToBgQm31^|nnq;xaROf3U9XmtDy0_cn%~;ZKKAOUZGS{}rcsCQBv9-0iZRX%v
zJ6eh;D;Ceet0qJ=L|K0u_o&)_;sWN<J*JH?raZxdD-6*OD(0--D>G@6B2(njAd%zh
zFk0#WPIweS&lNU0%kl$tE1<HdSqe4g70&^&f3np2iBVQwIGiy>=o2;TzB6Lz*osuI
zEIIY>GZv?SSaKmUfj{T^_(vC87F^Xharv6p^P$j_Mf~_JM&D>I0->Gz%0*tCR>=Z+
zROdJd9OG{ez46;B3VOdk4@Z#2adhp`yW8>V<N`E-I%(XIR?xmX6aVzW1A0aXAj`F1
z(tCGh;z&vQ$*w0pBM3qFgM?KpgGA#3r$TOJt{EMH+;&i(fHU(dlikPjdw5(0UW+og
z&kBgwo_)H5+@<9aI=~2FY=RHyG-?dmt?yj&(}9)WT&5>Z@YMX@a%tP5&<!tG{C7o~
z5wdoyI8LcL69Hu!09WQ-r?-gL+)td?&x`%M%*+H~b_QX6K*VD%N6A<g>ly8-8NO*q
zTIYJt|KZku_NSG_kl=K`SD)lEX@V^vZgZ{zYXwuq?vd66gfe!n1mfX*=YH6d#)-`H
z9|&)~kB}CCP$5=>nhz7hkK-68YqtO&&2uBtg)xI+8haCLV1+XXI>4N@;Z^wS$gY;~
zJETy?jd(NRy@n;wn43o#SC8IJ#b19@RmTnb5(sB3p`T`z>hxx@`rp9~I|g)myAS~H
ztn=>uDh>wd6Henz)-}7aqZ+Std!Vm&h^bvB%+kN=K;jkI4<=tL60ir@HmewAwo!v)
zAe{wNA`BXyalPjYGYA5`>ZIoY5h2aNqfw?Arse#GQc*6dkRe*-G}kiy`%BW_;3Vw<
z81Y!@8(WdW8tAA^_%J$HluK8Y0SIKhU<+B<98=w9t3LK{yW%ul=ELm8hr_XC@hH1t
zA!D!GymeQol!+#z{NHeQThKs`CyUeB)Rj$6$9BW)TS=l<Dop(*(#Id0k}qsFN@+V~
z5WsJa5K}S!e5oQygmmxnfmY~ah>B;CJ%B2jYX~bhdrj)dhV35R&!brbyMzJ3!AHl!
zNb*5*pO++C4OVT+r6q@N8=_yJi*W8G4!Ph&TciSpl|reyI22V=QoUF4_a|kc(%#Ec
zP81b_1Z+|Hv*KHLu-X{e)^EcKi|j(E9g9d7!^0|CY+*;kT-#A*E&u+~k@|NUE^(TT
zEncL(P>o<)|Hajmmd^Ya8ymio%#JDWMcv(`+{=<`Wx4Ys+<Fk0(|dcroj6iH7<;I{
zP~~2Kq~tA^mQ6X5>55qvcV&?gy_?&7!O-jrVB8_#jWl}KHVhI*U-?8h>y_BMaVnf^
z<&U!H)sc8pcBu2^Q>WnGy}`^oI`_=TIbIE1%4GBUX>=h4Z_^q%wWyp&0<zMzjoVW|
zpUx?o`0t2AliQ=}cMO8XyI!(q9&+G{V)?lnt+O++t6DzQJ4<}VsR@Xw$RBut@!W_8
zcKB-hR7B6lIHb9*ESn0O)IxppJMoQ)XTsg`W`8j<GY~S_%DPqQ<TV92JmIVGAg%uI
z;Jnp;k7x#;E4O*%au0_;Tm!|HEY_j>_nkHMl=Sn->HC_QrA-_eAl9y+sIV;f)eC29
z_s`;MasW#}w7(%V5Ft1Au4I2h`(ewu_5$ktP_U>6uSrV)Ikcz-VXojfwbxu+fB3$e
z+4@yn4q-iS@j6hopa$Vq+oR0<$V;xcvHwl%@yd0Q(0uMf8luK6l9};oF}YelT^-kf
z&CnT?yW0}4x@F5y<qBa=FdTNe`A#NHv14c<XBV+(0vxG^u`z0Z^sg;rkL)%98Oei)
z$I+P46Jn$xM;uM(7>*B1-s1OBhz_1?otuyVz&)~B<o-}Z&Kl^5HWTqPtAvFd>#YCd
zTUBQE1=*=cfVA~aL*GcbM$*dB8VJqirBe?N_SNQ9+J(B)p~b0lf-_GyO$QwRpjAkb
ze*K4Mt$@}fz8mIt=iVgVM3WPWzX6Tzih|}y%Ky8*o^0z3Z2H*vdNe-#@1(9&+FKd`
z&`GzSw)0%LKxmXX^I|awd!yxW;A{^JXbb5ZO!6*&1QuU4(D-YalTq>pOev@m*es_!
z$ype3KS^4l5IhU_)};vd_Dd1!qXLqa0?)t?H*&fSV$df`MRRt(HNR9@RE$;XyEX%|
zPiO7P^0LCCg3fcBeXT;bm@J$`+NUd&xs<Q%*pHQdG*{S+|07O51nuLWDlQs2j8sp#
zXIkp9X%;t6Uly1_Q^Df)bIK4?B{1kNlK?@WM&(wLjacp!ou;Lo81W_w&+?PNVb?<c
zabTeCw44V-yLf&pJ5I<V_2V@K6U~zY<`#XOUXEJue5+;tQ2tIhuff!EcCC3_jnS0o
z8d<6F=iedrbB0UbZGIz}Wxf&2)R<T%CoEOyD~s$64m07!C?su4&fp@{3=mS5qYAn>
zD9&210~WSs(*ct{5O|^LWt~BgpWMfc1$l+)8t89MO8fh`LrY3%G}TWDBXk7;fdwGL
zmkKF94D<rHAlfB^vK;eh$|cVp0@7NajAFW{f^P<*WWZpeKh}kJAZ$-)_)-u1bQ2JF
zd4@Pd^<XpB4dzMhAGuV>Y&X6f2_b;~FVVqXm=?0yX`x=c!-uCOoLZk9lzJodtd1fn
z+}t!MM;K7R*o<5stThi|lAe~NZBxEVBg1qgVVOz}*wkf)oGW;V@%R1%R&EL9)&YO_
zZoWkW+Zi?cuzr_&B=nc-xXhzT%Y>TrCLYK-AVkToh+8b_D(LSWY**Qf@YRLvg5)oR
zb*)U|ESg2cU8isIRMq<f(bu*|CVF_@XYV#1$iJ5mzKho_)}h(#EF1vt(nzmKJ+SfA
z>EP3)`HwQd3}TKMpz_{s9g~_kIZL*C`)rxgfw{<9(Ul!paE@O<0^6<0v|UhxCfDUq
zTz_LS%3>vy0b|Q=WRgZ8U<q+c1ANk^e_1X)tq^5imRa@c`h}}6ZsW@nMcS!sIvsKs
zxZpW+m$>Tobzw)9tzfTPf|n1$$%RToEK{E&r_JSvJ^U?abXq6l1ohN+JJrg1yZ^p)
zd*X;K^6)d*g2P%m`EJ;>5Wu4Z|1lZ;8%wj^8125w0v#vUkPT5HHN-Svm5R`(bA6>4
zVD`GDZ2*n2OZPo<mO$^~GAP%@BBm|>?kjy8FZ-|M1_=w`pV*$kHZek;(0=OVhXQE6
zg@-BakPIhBYp5uDX2dXx9;;o0FV-njV+;%Zwg{w*x!>Jxk)EUD1C|ffCd^1Wt5Z1)
zv;tg<qk4)iX$ZI<n3al0@r2ZIQiFE%8X{bmt9V6JKu4^<A~fgI6;SIrsm({2ql60(
z-tmpYDFXK=>%IM5vZa2Q>9C+oDu7c7!!Kz7)iG>n3*S>92%SH3&l&6`R+u0D1d@J1
z;KtmOn~{G3z807&N1|}{9Kmf#vr14^U|>9A=rqH;3uP<;ei#w9xF*Uu`}6CgM*GFP
z!|$jNeBfzfPex|jSw`+jF@Co+FLOtFsy06uMH+;}#SY+^)V&{tyj^cDk(QnphX8_p
z_}=ajYE^v)Y#u(qAEsj{lB<$eVQ`!+&b28Mv6j>+R%AGKWV!7h4+huL^|zW>zkF!e
zmjt=Crvzz~eg(U5@7a)WbKDNGp6G1R<1BV~+G1js=84LOTsL?xQ$E=Hi+ghx2L0PW
zfT+)?vUi3!FJ-||{z0tG!jN~vO+V4~%zAs=8YjuDprW&TNVlt_GMk_0)g0uBQQ##B
z-@}^=3e=SZdO9S4A9^#D6djdSQhRSA&Qpt{i%GTSJw9u^bPt=k*H27-oin8OmMuA4
z>M=>5&QxpE2-`Owt`CR;A4D_seGfvrQ1*G&TOLn@M28nTJnTg(fiBd>$4U<{zcjYI
z>qn41L(DCyX(F(Kr0Br|*1{fJFtGQdH|qQc68OZvS43P-R82_|GfC-i3}vYNz6O2+
za^lJ(#md*7hNH%zR$1O*MiF%3_wR5?9}<--bC5kq`pjL_#?w~O+;P*Fj|j)P;ZLS&
zx^nEO)-&=&w0zdlaLx2g8S5OeF}a)`VF%KMalR~|3y3(mg_H-@=!?kKZNFc~aKGsO
z(1x*~{A5QcM@Xm6`djYdI6}4b(v;!ym!Sz3Ht{@iSSGP8Bkrrl{6enG+br{4QCBI?
z1)9lh+$eC!fy^WCI&?ur?pI#`@O%IK8AdS{4C7Wz7j`JouJJ+^J(E$tLF0W?E?Y%7
zYAk~@q~+gA<Ebjxvn{f0|68D_OP!W^?DSx}#CVmn|9|UPuyQg3Bdk}3azWWo$Bj>c
zX7J5sHF?dMId;`Dj0j=<?rUn1@&iw|1B~x=e?&Nv<7%7h3U}SlukgwxHV-iNhYO7?
zgyX6cwkqW=W#R(;BQnP^H1xu2h{J+G=4Z01b8_x9Z@Hzusjn$D!G!P!9QsO@Jwo&9
z(Qm|5BP7wpyEoYp)os+rziLtlPTdh5pWmLE0NU|8XxiKp%YM79<96&76lXN?Yh|_O
z2&RhB&)>7UyoJa)R*UdACeuGR&nTn^^D<A@Wv}@5Ik1;SvS)dCT(<CZaR0c}{*u_*
zO7B=57@_<~=%(N{bXeF?kyg5?K<q}x{k7oK18Zz(6^+OjSF0{C^1X(-lIlCAFc*rz
zgYAKTczG}a@pE$;HM^M`1DYi_MdfO4c+(gyma-is->YJXsr7LjM8AZ&=8l~aF~-~>
z#q%B+m#JX%MT6)t2ujmP(m{v>HklqYbvznO1_z90tgVLkQ(UXQ6^AGL#@kkWBCjw|
zAE)vM5}k6&p<oseHzdXgaVmE`rhw1^F7MXmiIvWNz?HqYEM9WRWKQ=pZYw@FBuJ-+
zAl-lZ|C>aSoM8%<pF1>n4_pG7J18d2)fKXff_O|oRma$Y2+fYk0!qztX4{~iNk^)~
z@!O6Ss%JM)r-<kZsVIQy=t(vH)a@Edetl~1+h`;?L!14huu&)9!+IBCST(TSa`^U}
zaN4nNC8Nri0A7eT17Nj#y6?B-u0PNSUaS}H?)LxgUV4QLNWjc5k*dK;Cr?eHoco`k
zJR<T_w(2pB!fhdvkJO}Oi-mv$Bps+b<Z0lGeHBYxE^9||j@Y@xAsXW+hc?Z9CS~Lt
z!~}in#36w;@w^I?TAV9N35+5Qg@QQS1eznfjkg+AuvtafDZL~~ogU6FD~cxR()^5A
zhp5qDz!A}lyWpm;dgAe@s1HGy$7A`tCa+apW>%16u<kiOza}lg_{BH-DJmcl#mTVQ
zVhQ)hqAZQc;w19)ia9{q_onJClsEvM-WSz|W3%#INo~$L7&Q%+C&3XTqK8xlliu#p
zM7sGq&A1IVSG%j%(_ju!6c!bSj0IB5=Ogq>IPhUHwd;?eOgZS|a_Q5q9L^H-bBS`r
zFI=fK3GUhdlNJ&E+7rxtT?^NjKigN<XC5j<aDquf`WFx$k7afY89M9fW9wGu@*!2b
zXlbPFMO)fmn<S?r<B+J))5E!pht8!359mbom0_tNg+JpXw3qOSSOhJ27}v38)+Qj~
zW(e6ZF%%}cqs)~eaeUI^2x!!|AWvt=D{itbXu=&6Pku_`#OCA(A*}7~Ks_=_9(?4^
zS8w$pf8P~ytzxp+Ft|5$nnVYClb48LA6Rt;aH5FpWPL9<v;XBmh%@)$X@x$6R0O`j
zy0fB_en?^#`f?cRgaO7E=YK2T8rS~K%QH(A6t;H$1Pixp1^aDSJ{kIN0e(-f2u{rN
zx$uScX&#S;vYAwZ!l1jYdz)Ne5x?29&F@dyiV(d>YbFpM2smg2=w1rTRIoPk1jkgx
zk#M~s-ZXw0%iSCQ|F3(xd(DWN{u~a>Xs=R-V!Wd7IjYu0Ex!lUf{(63b?xVEXo-~(
zrca6l*aiqIGcAQPN{c#EJNrW>(n*fR=AU3q&~Dg{?vDwHN|?l!Iqq#=B(B*blm}h;
z<y;!%QgoiShv7QQGYy4eP%f}q?fQMANmzoW^A|)BlA>v!$RyJWduEUHSDB`NDwtW^
zdHPvv%!N^N^KH!Ehy)j$hE7-oHCAgFdjH;!9pIBUmYotENYJvhmq>4lYC3%h@VjfR
zFxH*~84TW75R4Ur2>y%o*68dU3w8IQ1m61=du)4@<Uym7j2zij<567OCNx|2yaMpN
z7BZeK`m@l{lthV#M5E{O8j?J;2g!ljJE{P|`~3=4?WdkE-0p9g`BX>j`^<xi(qb4v
zIXI+Jt?paJO?5Ip(Tf<P2w@1ru`Gotrq&g)?i*%9V<<wRkT6v--xE0#n=l5>IaawS
z&!(}P|J=u$A<+1JXOp(JKAR;Lg4tpp+ibX`xp?0C*}@Z)*%94e080S}Z+2MV@wii$
zz`)lte}jP!AeX#%>`kXoSXKe9o)g)QQOZ~dA;KxX(vfr;RRDkzC&b2y4p4TXnYPNk
zWy^T8xvnX%d3}DM*a#`$W5V_A*lNM=99*RPLNBnuv&^#0+4YrmMGgl(gjqLjuZ?=D
zort)+f``<{B!u=`lm#~O63JLjK3n$2Fyzc3_<A?zXU!qMl@r8VmnoPfrFK+$Pw!9A
zYMVpMPBa`a?$I3Ello3gDE(gg=%V`8NfRk)lgGiek8`Y@5Pl{%6uC0eCW4Y6Ct23o
z?aDibmsJ&`O&hJg8JhVFb(wZlunWg-U<Di5To<0cZ6{ewY8;H$anjEEXVI^zaRf2`
z|8aE=+oAx-l0CL<+qP}nwr$(CZQHi)v2EMvs<qyv`U`TBgG5B^PdW1y8*qxTgC>}`
z)M3cB{pA^EnE3F!wVK)^?GIrJIAyA22_|vbUn_;E&aC!RjPwsSqoqNT(t0oe0Mf<Z
zN&!38Pq**JZMlte+a{UiN>~i6rD)mhCkQy&lQ80@?)LH)RlOQtBlIGUVVe)H+;zUG
z6_Ft(l_LvF0K1((#g|NSA|L(SZDRi39<1*VQIVQV&#P7zmYMRYuj7nj;wPuGK`^aE
z28@*!`R^r6hxe%^xhsoH+eU@Ey$Eb0tr7~3SIGsl+t66nQ`G>@2n}y)z+qEqOs!M!
z@GZVj#ta{L=`gsxJ7rg7ilf9X$c5*jOl`Tq$>O1X@~QG;pSA2F@QC|WcFM;urDBq9
z?MAbS)))aZ^Smw%Y3Z{^Nu@Q6T&a&p(_SlOjes1~of{ekVR7zY-((84z`yKr5LcI`
zYYO+e=^l<6gFrEV`RjU`h`$M+5WAG4G*7yqnkdOejAm?1k-CWNkO$p4o=2)+yYJzh
z`8Hz{)`iGAYuErcYNr<IBP^<wQd%||Bq^s@=%a%-^ZoFJJ9ZpDuOO&F&xGK$6P#GP
zl+}SU^;6R7R0W>FDBgD@Dt&mLl>?I-`-T16tgwXuRAm6@$*qnh<I5+e!R*%L%TPMS
z5``h&2+R@A>W*J+g%cPO11Q!1tX!6wup5o%YVQ9qB=+{`iCIJ`As-*Cqt!B7trUEW
zFjkO}90M*-o~sDGv|}*#7|xuW5qJhT%6LGw#f=wa4G)&an7VyFQy}=z7$yK`NIfwS
zYw#{ul}tpEi~yAJ<<3%Y5OI;<81!TyFJEeB3^ESEfSPS~ivUcr23_Ju;2Tax!?n0W
zn^xb81Fu2Iq<bh>04UL}=JaKGj`Qd5$Et`1qm!u-LHY)p@&SEL<xAk2LU46>f;i*h
zW)mpqfAP;N2PSQ(=^y#T<Sv!E24GiJ*65z$DTNbF%K&M@JB`xB?h}0q#51mx3=&(S
z#B!Vz@lY9km>BHoT=e6vHO$N%4<Ww}jOT9OBbLUtB-`=Uxd@E}H%x-4S^F=((gXlJ
zXj=PYrH>&C09)l{<3Izvrfm_4IZlB^vWm8!mg|!9(l*${y6T`uy_*EF1HMADOS*}}
zj><9yN$YGzUW6V5^0cOE`-EkJ9-FW5G_F$zl)_Fo6rtOYiD@PR(Q7p&7z>9S`FGu6
zBhh6KT`=Ms3glM@jz>n6-T=2~1AxpQeeq!va+T^b=AZgq$E&Du>6Nw_2Xmw3f6VMZ
zGX|5n-KxyW3i&~cbrkVmHr{hDu;8>SewPr(gBn(H2MhMnD-#MV&b$95QPwcovA05|
zn4tI#0W%Dr$nRraX1H!+mlb?XIp2L8(V_PVypD&9pNN>8a;x?RwUM2}E1-Oubebvu
zINsepiu3;%Hv@H|{w2a0Pik9-B(`YC)0S^k_7i$6Dp}YXX6zSV^B*>mCcoX(7MJfh
z6>jPHPknLLl^9{nq5tx=mbOD{miQ;buEyjprKMY{ZL=>FmPPpt()~DD3wJ}3#%Z??
ztN^`k<BwVrPkf-J>7H*x5+mt`t+Hc5k0T(s@$`JDN?y;@ilL?Z+if=*Vu_58T0b==
zLyWV?O;n1`RsxCaJcvD+1__IVrTFh~S5r_pHXBIw6{kZ_e_I)rgigk?Aziul1nVdd
zemF28eU#1?$je7XyB0{f6JUd1+SO4L8ZtY9OXP4W#H??*_qgpR1XEl_14Vi%a2;(Y
z#eBeF_sVJ0_0zRtgecE=Jz#Vr>p3VA3k6|DN#d;FnJg#^<Sk1PQ!^&b@5j4mLZa2B
zb(aKmi#U-%!34z2lqEIL?kR6iH$jt}*mk>8>A*Bsfje3%_@bJlZfe_xs*Gg-m7oA<
zJXiUP9*8osn-vKPfR9+U%-i_R?l#hZeDeX3$MCF$5ZeT2aE)43aP!sP)90Y#$>>0*
zvsc67eHd~Ty=`N7Nx%|=V)o8kd)cJ7M{z=PWkOUr9@omB11IP}?y(2m7q;b`|Jc!}
z5*qre<;E=!HWRQb3w5|scjUez`kPC&8r;B<#vaym9F=Ak2iBj6Xu>PAnCc);RSBRe
zX`NyH3XrNRUg#J%lM)4Id~c%4YPfH5<SPHdpbQ5~Y|cO81R^0MofCaAQCKD$c+?Xq
zg+?=mpSbkkSRq;2xOHp#;?-5Dwm(}&Cy==;vs_0hh<UK3C*?5*ZkkbP*|hu?MaVMh
ztEm_G`F9KCs;@1A@PAvOiglR*M8lo$?!mlvA*o3!<r3}_^0A#!F_)0&BilJrkgM5&
zqgD&&r=JFpE78nGtZ`0#DOu3_Pl?XcV@-0!sJ82az1OnG^*7JH)mNG!T;4|MmOOh%
zc-}`7(=WB_Y(Ta*!c0w2%d{o#^oQ`8%32Y6@>HjJwyM7om9p=aBJN58O#sayu}i~i
zVT>`+l8Gt|x*UC}M?5@2#(T(g;?W5*V_7!X2SqLOkzHK-*8}#D$r$2Anx)t5ndkrd
zr8t&OZr!(Uq_AbiHBSbQ$`zpO9{EL72+guOnxld<x`UE~Wm|ep<C)&vo1-n-+X1-U
z9*Qh3gZO-B)y)*Z?{Qxz%vUA&RuiH9%%17ou57dVU)xs(03~Q++A>G7(ggi@`4RtL
zKtBBvhAr{&9nKRqYJ3NC3H}uEBs-K=+|QsR(j1ZOx43DKC%Y~oEv9}AVd5)v7kQ|!
z4={dS#PE$0EJA0Adw76-zU9gR%o+v@4vn94ohEr?0HGWFk>6#H(H<oW`A>+gh!fm@
zN+J6N%K@K9WY%J)!~=w#(h_fAnD-J=J3yfqb${ZHgEvbN5u3!|!5(H)d<&@K0ksX>
z<+vpZ$$m3M!dk+m`=!DeW=leWiYNxex7YUmVAs*w#cHb1$&adolE>$SyPZT%xv*|W
z8Dv~r?-vgB`Hb>;w<oYnTA(6(G`2x=cd?&RF@pL6-$yi4h1VPY=({3hbmXbGG3fo=
zH+@1S|DWI<MEg(iYHD4u!T-I;aG6vP1^X^S0{MnGUrr=*ZruwMu%tMP1_QLnQQuP;
zPd9Ia%(4ri;+U*vQi(N<x%k~06sM@B{Lh+b?rr(FW&KYT&EK93@Is9C*$FpvFXFXn
z8LMw6@6k0_FGB5neO>TCXQd~7gW9jpgfl&y(0gVgi6E*H!hs4q>(RlOp9p2)1(jZz
zyKJ^b*b_w5mn_8Ha&-s7MO1cIuHI-<_@_rJVFmc`zS&Tm=t0>EeiK}SW4~wqQ*4td
ze*KqUlWx?I8l<+^;!J18<1`w19!^pZA8Q?dP{t~lxWNd5TIY1%olUB4vAvvOUOEx<
zG^(*N?)blO5AX^36j}ZgBrB&ZhurNwW`WUIDG!}G>m^ygT7-#!(tRX;G^vWh3Y!Zo
z8(@6(E#8R=_7(>bFzn_ooqi*8WzHGo3T=X+{+`MKNhmN|gsh`}bUgqRJxVB>Lzu0e
zaihncWLV1EM&pnd5)5RHDEg^h?3_3R_WP`)bt5(Of`HK_tt@(&-SJ-a^fa27TX43O
zSx^-Lh9~1-AipvX70W;zE;3|y?E{4p>`z!Yd~}ZadO=SuT3FwNEf)4-+2f(dl2#0{
zr{1XtPZ^B!dMn=`fN>!RXF{5}S*tGL$rKsJFe4AM^1$}ck^N~pFLm7Xx#G7TrQF?-
z%dSzBKjbVnmd=BNP^Mq9xV|fJ4kfX+i_MTOE9RuFvdMF<DL}s)Qv8aW?+1?0?*w7#
z^oyyFN`(w*>*j>Ft@E(jV;9xTcMyD;2`*-kbRJIj(pc5|Loa`MNat~PgC8w-Gkl#a
ze`H5V=<#wcw_*4a=G~dO^6qn)4Jk+&r0orb&Bdpi0LC@EG`0RQm=)nk<A53ce{{$f
z-fF_J0Xv+NFxA`lOb*dmlLJTpYnv@e_-!~nzvVwtX_E~f-!p#?LGlN3O{i;g(EE<T
zPAorOe~OJZ<zkBwTjdEV-|z4SB6AVd>sfWJ8=NVdr5`KkPCCGRbys5+Rv1MLLR{%p
zfoq(w(m|i8QKPQO_s2JHnrF2}TDGHogS0X$=e(=!v=i=@n*s%JSu0<}0`$EqZIKmd
zoQ`ROfo+qQnch#jFtHQ8XUVB*U<{K|ZEzj~yPl1<s5{`qiEKPgg9Z&he{#YB8IGo)
z)#yin%F@7CDfHxP6b^!aER8^KDd}`c@Ut?LrYNd>9EPlW!*EKyS}`#GnGpxf)7oa?
zHz|MQKCWUJ6@Ai!Cn*kZaW9{3+Tj9SxjTc2#$V+Iplz1|&Jll<eI)eGFgy+1C_kDt
zBMU|x|M9`lK91stC*re$8HmrDjq{_RnbyzF>q01ZrqSmy(*}%9u<v&vobh!d@Yvx~
zzy`HUUPYw6n%9gTu5P0<_v(}*`W%m1(x|q_YK8A_Qf$OZFczQ)D{;)GGUA*3{?%s8
zJydW*!AF=<XE=mQ%EvyhExeO<B2oeLRdf$FvaH^!?AT4w)-vDgkyEOTduyHq8+|cq
zt@pXV0d0u*rzoD;yKS<R6n@lc9piPtgPw1KX}5GfeX^R_F_5G;(JSHGS9Qn_KdyT?
zUnU#I+7n&7!V9z(4{^H}ZidiA<j7$K6)j~PI7D~hRRa5BQ2DsL=Th+oRYy+Y%&wJ@
zyAYmRu}#s*FbLGmV~e3l7T_`_Ny`r{jvAIu+=dKV;6($7?CK9YSdf5_&Ris?{0|Tj
z_B!-U?mZu??o+bMJnih$L)D+*Tm`XuBLPUdFQnD9`YPNnRTnxez4~Zc?gypsbKv?K
zOdbJY2KSWQkgj&z-dh<caBF|C$1Q8KTz8_DeOuX$Fp2#JhSXii-QNgX8+uvLF{Kjt
z4tyfJp(nHq_#ea%QRk(--m45>(aE!KI1Egh)l=4IkyHnNDia-}vJ=2zCRGVGr|s1>
z+%PTRxiRyWu(VXF@5XxI36zhn;O+(eTp`;F`qqDT4&XeEP;01`s7rs_<w8xNEUmCi
zw441;Xse16w0kx?zDt^V-SD9vHvc_|qHS^tJWhvC3vmwc3^X#MZ?d6kGD=TdSAD_O
z=aYZ%HPb=V_x;fb#U*G8;}zZy9oGW*izUpDlk<8$Vp1PTh)8VD42jioa(wpL_H7h!
z-aYK(?9D4mXnWWH8B;5Pa!ZY*Ck=(^*8lb$(eUpD&G-L49JdZC|79vSi5{Kvw!e6F
zaT;fi+>&4{&1`~sKA@>8$s-KlM#3Fh<P)nLk8!RdQk%UtJ(cJz-qMXXu?^nLw5E%i
zD3>)<wyromOr1`3wZPm5t0+28PX0cyR?ehZD#wbA-yCS7#Q^}g?`%15ubX=hBbaLC
zf4aHkG*3GGOP<wJX#1ooQJEp_o6_ifTame=Nf_}l+9CMgm%xCca=}CQIDEOy7;>mP
z{mzH16oiXL8p<G6<I=@lgey#Tqe0wET-IBsyw@KU3Vb!QAl{U`wW#&39I}9my+=n$
z!lc5VCumeJ8(O&<R(3Fhe!!?<PK=F;tm?pe?7Uc+LQD4Nt$-chEHx~CaX7*e$2-8F
z^sC*=6$p$v#)e#_y@`W!eKx1TN0huvZZo>pZD-8RJI|@x$(+hV-e|hSon3ORR4hSr
zJ^Yo7jOG-eA-OYezHb_A&zW=RStvkwHoNX8{qd6p#B>>zooM87+m$6!oW7(TaL>^u
z64R2PmNdd8ILWITfXfpiGtF+3G<%XcS&Rlak+8(oS@6j~OvwiKgv_)2zYbr8@A;bL
ze&*_UlT<6*s(bnUB-mV|9Pldg1^B_hde5Em+i7^juLsu>q~^}Q{s+Q36?%UJUgW{d
zA)d9w?w$!W?U%Z>`wA^PT7!q@Ik_u3Iow<73nsIw^86}XF;ngKmJsH4E;40db{jTN
zh!Z2bf~Li9LH|&Tv5*$<kvJ>MZonc$SjbP8y~NYFp>Iu@EJy9TU&A8Mr~kBeup?DA
z_{}N%?!5GG-&PiYEgrqD^?6iTmX`?x4yweEYhI*VFLiNZAFzu)=C<Mq`5*{#J#>M~
zJ9q*w-`in5kAfI&BLeJT%ue4sBcuHqpMl@ybuW>|l`28H1T%(P+orjUy0HA*6};e)
zXw}t$Mk>%|N+u^`60|Lv!G2D%18SEC{0+%xsxWS)NSxHE+~R}%JUNPip@;(iO;knT
zz}mZr%58QIPiRx2E<Ze&Uw7z6vIg<-U-^Z~e1z2K3x@4{!$<bW)s}`X=*_7UwYUjU
z26Zy<nY6Iz>!vZTkBJD%|HfpU3juIib&b!d``xox*f{!Hf3MF~3JWCvYm4uJRUQs2
z<zq(q32@^Ae*lkop32h%EDPHC*<fp^5K98t6`v}|i!!|jIzWm3S@z-fF6Phvoxbo{
zo_PyeALwDLs3L|_DJ#Hmdj8TI01olk%!hgyH%9GYrRaX<F4Z=xec5M+e|{>u9BvHA
zAF@%Plb+Y0o4qY=mu2GdjEAwNbup*DWYx?K*EKLyR?MtGaYK6lMOvY00Pk5`>iw1;
zO#lp>RwJ&YMHdxNv-K_NB?h&a$c6o+<UTZ7U1^Q?hmMVD0R^w!#0+3}WapYa-Cq1F
zo~e)?AiAZGXmUF#($YM%rEO(KWFNxsl3MTpQt=^SIkGo;TsD|bAqkd|7|guzp!p*-
zOvdDt8(Fcqs^e5>=Sno&QIai9{J}H6;4clZvt<UsrXk58;RdFQMD%F(4eJ(x;JP3>
zqeft?;08W)x4fZiwY1{&qLKNLRTZI8{ay5H-H!L2@Y%YxLx`;egT~<W*Fjli-&m$;
zkOHLLe>vKjsRWNry-M>Mx=eXa!x@xWB}kb}qvHM47tS$sH2XV(@<aUmB6TZ3_y2Zk
z+jwI{g~Tb5DT%Hw0FQzi?5KM=Xe-zimo$;6Lu|ckh-%xF@ammGNaorJl~uGBkfXsV
zEn)M~kB9#-n!wu4>ANHL50PEw4XX*M&hr+9Hm?kMowHZUij)AnV_xSqxZ1m@E%op~
zD~@!Ym)VIsO|>t?)ovHYZ<E#RU6RyPcf>4zm|D)Ie^F-&uGnY+8IaGo=&99fISB&5
zTMNX=AMqOne^}l<%_RC!Ex`N<kSgQ)B2-AcsW#5%^E}mICdtK1eubY8<Y4nVaDq*k
zW|8bKb4|+*V8tD{359G-PgU`$RhfR^RviL;RtYUIAb5btwwhh{n#edfhL0LB@aW16
zMDK*K%4Oz->ZPE_&#2*RWI=lK|AmP<*+~F=_MmeP>JRc!RyJTp0!ooSV56mcU3Eu?
zSaMFk$BQ3A&qaTw#@jzL2JYh~CT34dJv)?Q(RbBVWC4CE-&>1->Y(gsaViJWY<8k~
zjyt?`b4Jbvy1~%VCr*T|Vws0#?0jFVf$E~Lq-1ZzFPFG)tUFhyGuv-2X-qB}u9FHn
zQ=-wkyd(}b@_uo)p5i@{GeWlJsdKl1n{iI^kR~EtWySF``}h6-VUDsUPn^nTTg+gU
zDUrm;A^^)tC|Vfsvh)87<GgR@fBK1cU#R1fl}K$}`(mrbH3r^p!>VSaRI0sqp`kY*
zu7&y`p>dHF0rGbAXS*=a@N3mD?VVP6oyHt{o~=M8-#;=A_V0Tfe#5M|RxZ^D#Q!J2
zH^Da9GN!~9KKdpGZR~rnJ7(RUT2V5JsI;YF%+YY<qDtb$Z~}2&LE3y3KPX`IhLJcg
zdry~)K5P|W3!qovj++$x_b5(08^-FJW8m>#H!5@yn6zgTvneYA=;&dYp<WKE%`?da
z^1xdVvzp{R-a#wNag$yn8+|S)_U{#y$rOy9(RtB*+~f#e3iyA)U*|l+VE#-~LFd59
z-zY*2qjh(8Yo+~9$lqP`H*+NBAJN2Jdhw$;sum&+?Z*Q05b@OP&8r<wkJU6PS9DjH
z$KjjbTk5_=e&QMv@WX^nuyg$GlzO;zXwwSWUye4w?*N;6xjDk8i(rWjPU|v;+V+P+
zCWRBbXex20KMOsEyQEE;jr!NQkuDyV2VotTgYzvequK}i!Sf1=h4mWr8(}@9P`sN*
zEJl(P$pNu8f`#=U-6v4y(I?Wgiq6gCQ%H24201kna(ts6I|3|g+mH~?6QVMHS^c&w
zUy>f{^?TR~i@Y~bQBz~*m;4>UJZZ34fy+L;J?(`y=+Ss!<YT@JC))IfK=*0^lyq94
zAMOVPc?Bgj_cjFLOsxR?y14iJtwD)zQ<$gR)rh(10>SqN(%dX&^wJyeQb!kYndb<G
z0ej>3=cK>~DE;ixPU!eQu26>J2~#;&q^7cNkT=gmnOK#!dopR2uh9d|mFIL~io5gw
zqRAQ&S0vh9f{=lav<t4Qa>)denlZH-j*My1nn=s!Ypy^rWu3}%c?coBr?mJ;?TwM)
zVgMsPQgN)@!&&uv9X-#0V`}g|cqrgj`oN6s6cn)1XT~~c2uG8L#I^7t=#>nJ2<~Ql
zkixOZdzy+gk%s^O`|PY|OC^^&qby`Ix2K}bGpP;c@MGv0jxe-NM?p!<$Hl*_O0+R0
zqO9(*lMci2#>hU@;m@?G6+*5NDw<WIsCokv&@D4(oYU`UffK?{YN}IPpvgC{KGvoM
zrIJV{#M3Mx>$+}Xt4(k;xc-YfolmSn#=@5=W0->asJc;9wIIE<pRGXAId&YeC4RLD
zwho*1aZo%rNa69dt*{#-x`zZS6)5Y9E?2d)ZTw?UQgj3_rczLvc5zF46>R+?q&{(o
zyLR*M_Fj0ankBdr{>d*a-oh@+af-gd6>Sv#BOtoL^cwJ*=5G5il-}u(QvlSMv{7do
zxn1u~G410k&8HU|JJKS#m*3~`zEi<N@J*k22ZS9AiR7S+FX3a4?zwi90xkp3ir|Hp
zX7<H;6K$##ggq@<pD#o|2IKr@V?=z>_hw2uw874Enf5jyNF_)VBWmE#CiO5=!uUI0
zs`+e2v_Khnclbf30>go`(@30ixiRh*XEhdN2xiH!4RP;?q9G%L$C12wDdNJl+O_}k
zbF)yymWdKxX};d(Ne!S^<Fl1C<XD(6M93-0cvd4fK{&9ZBDYU@V~k`=8T^xX#S<yf
z)3@tVU3>LC;H_Nzd11|jn;wQ;A95HRS!)o-&av6->jB=3d~-<brNI5y+nsHWW}b4f
zZ!d7)54X+!;PsM+G-ja4gCnUlweD#Ts`l!G$m&u!GMaX%)N1bATht3&OHJrlNtNa?
zjL#RIrI7<4%hbDQS-#8o>rxCWM5#fAE)@kUgvORvr-ANL600QXJ#EAq8<+3_Z$ZDe
z)iitB@ahQf34f8X^=tEQNNRRWZ^4p4J7TZ@zVq&_pvu?st9F{0eY>Vp;Gbf$f#Sr<
z#jVG9l%K%<s@(JwwK};Ch2Ted|DNECwj(R=aH;SByUv<DBzkiWH|3N6{mHCbaxqB<
zhyROr@R0fy7I}m`pSW%ngtm2DFaqxm4GTbgECFUUO{OYwc%~6uv{xPEWA|ZAiu!NF
z{~iAg4O|ryA3t^g`R<pL&d)9@XAQ`ozuoHddVm!0Kgfe~1EtbuKKG<ujb{X~qDrO2
zq|St$NL0N@mayB;GrCM9rMco7UzBB6mSXpoQzxYIv?Un_t0AAC1Kqp?|LbRuzmB}!
z3Yn@b`~8nwzff7_4qZ@%?=^U<_OxKeWRVdbMIP3=xHEo@4e#05LQ(0(6KwozldmH)
zIUtqGhsf)A5xd?i%;|d<HU?8F(3KbG4B3eo%&b$#KhSCs>Y7gb@>RcG5e?DvNId8&
z9-ad>hivL?CFaoPmY=@~6gRyih}kF}$|be!dZxH)Q&wq?mO;OmDEO+Ut8#x$$eykZ
zUBugm#SJZf>xcPE<`KQ4s@6qKGpU3{2<di;48m<VN|DMTtvqw?Lbx4ZUmgC#o}A_U
z1We*fL9Ay*fqt;=6$3N&J8RIl@HS-=zqU1J^*gOuVelgI_yN92sQ8&$f%pOY_^}Qn
z^qom7JIo|?ex_@?^|z1~09-$Z`elcnk?!-C*B7FiyHS+ctQevPAlbz?5;FJUzP6gx
zC)-;p+If6yqYrPq5;V>QxZY|a=%A*Zf6R|EYi^7m{`)QAAL_XvSq&WcvqYcnfZs^;
z>Tclq1}R`O{6|d6=}KPf!Y%)q)yuk+W~uRKb;HIQDhOxbDok|r@hUb`6>4Yj;I8I4
z;UcOQa`M{&ZX<}H5RKA00$td6ke$}66MPOaU-ibuiE=ADy<owSUBgf&>tov~^{TTh
z3^9b81JC41ucw)oy=|?YT*Zh4{*B&LKocdMM6jIrNVfN<MNJ|1&0zv^#Hou!tNOu0
zkDNx`QZ{!9;|SF6^Px=6uG`|2FwS&Pp$#E1g31ioueT;gK<J?<?eo-AQ>pMEC;&WK
zyoHuN!@n$4$nNWd$6;7^OlUP(ci2SNa0p_|>#K2L@!rhGELn6xOx~x}dh7d-V}$#a
z-z$eD<<j>k?TpY=sT!T`hs;*ds9Ee9CRowTDyy>fO%CdopwXk=8~Jps>uy)S(t<7m
zvadFSdyX8Tr53aG)n2s5*I#8L>nZr4)dRX@ZGX$x=TWN~Rn=aKSBQgIT6pY7rzW;M
zB&1?jTK`VKH6DdOvAs6=BiI?<YXLO9FqPwik;errJ-+CcIxlu^{Uj?H1JNJQ@(Ogi
zJ`>UtE%b*|>^INXAWPEzGHje@xaXp`hky1HbVeeGpk;O(M3N}Jn^5n9{OhPcZ#^4H
ztdz`KVW%#2RU8BQLUCP+0L5<rJJG-rsCpr+wz!op6^n?J5M8xi&F-)*^UiqE(pF(X
zG!?rYi9{k94p{WUMX{mg$#3^nAb<~!E|n>tkwSlw1>x2R?5hRXxm)TNyj>IltQ3t!
zC>;PL;<)c=r%UuWVS=559x1Y`5&!mwOq`pF;hF>84Gj-d;UrNwH?(^F+{Kp93%tHk
zJH3MMwvB<Rt|@!4(t!jp30qV(aXQ=WdX2M19pId*#nK#h65<xJ`>u$SSw($Q>-GzE
z3T!Z+?Kygh?6h^jlN{`#fjJ&DGF+v8k;*V-;FcA(<Knf$p~%h-2h>VfM&8wI4(z?e
zWSB;w0rT0pofMj30HFH&z!A61P9Oj&RkYbv))bDLD*ez?%6Ibi;=)!Om}bSRw@=$(
zYcHSn84anyv}eIDzr#z^1frC@te49e{?qI4?IiqbnDjA4wT}%RUfUmk%4o?hWYr)b
zGR(N!$jC*d%c4yKh6x3pRW{FU|0GfWwW|Jiph*9Q|KZ)@kMWeR=c0-6j4u5TG6_i7
z1v(&g=!&M=G(w&`!weYjinD?J)56Mc+Vu4jFK_DDX)9X6wIdbBDXSm9tdQB^(Nmfy
z(G7SM2iHeBhpRdNZjUAn!~*GV>MGjpuYr))%Fp{PNPW)zNiv|KVx+4#6;iueAK>1n
zffQ@A<c`30CZy{ycQC$*m<uV7&!Yv$C$wW=S~>7gb9EqsnOD25Hvbf+P+M~JiC=ML
z>2H==f5JcfEX_8{z9X6orK25jBRE}C&=1ziVKcGV1p>1yw5_0-oy{Zbcn80*T~#ZU
zFKyrK!>XP)JFQrmKZT7Pf=l3NVEyL7_4C`+0wrDUvI0_HM;M}bx3p)QV8&HW3pK60
zxW6VD&@P)UL(d7})0LOarLOH0lUl|$-Fe|HDg7E6DHAZItjkVx*46X50=SNP4oGqh
z4W(PsDhKK`>H{M8vSxpCTPdOTu<s2HTyAe3Sn}$Z4i@g#YV_o12?Qn$NWGTpuH_H0
zpt8+<*g&iq=19*~!+?WzGSY{_x9Szvgx#Q``&AQ?zv{|~^-T@jRq!K-;g{mW+(~@w
zXpM<F+iX{z6yK_y@5d!_1#FY_zD<1yxF;BY<Bag5Vd>UG31M1yr3OcMbuQR*>r1H3
z)=J^FZYq<1HOH+uucc+byU9#MOTytQdMRCZw%>6!s@l*s<^H|NE<@e)AK6fq+jY*g
z=c~8tk%AVYCd@}fI<lqhU{FHFyBoj9C-x93Tt7Ma`#}_xi4jgzm<zaXo1Fl5lX$MN
z%`2yE*_%|0O{PS^Z#>!hFR>v>e~f)|K|vT^!U+?lLdcc21P@VN7AS?#{DTkB5q46D
z`++NRP&kHLgQM+fj~)UGWlV8IkMnFI&}eoESGg%N&#1xXZ!_iPpfMyoQ|pr=mZ(}C
z8*8^dGz5Ony?|F&(cZ&@5W=Z){JghI9PE^ThsqW$XbIa#o3#0I)q@iOn3V;+NaFt|
zF&wy0zYRyY&lTih7Z^N0>s&D-XO+R#^Ys)5yJHwhc43ox4BO&-vYKePCtcA@Jp3Kr
zc3`EVE``jA0&65Ny{agS3@yMlMN0UH#5^LM(D|u98`3!jqWakoK-|N?J;)0TU+dBQ
zgp8DUzjhXc^oV+R<s!)o`R(kds=j`9c@{j#7>%G?i9Q4WA@?Fvyj{Xnn#CrdWw6Ow
z3oIIaP{{<nGoYkimU`S4{O~8d!EL@+(QmLby4nrVQCMgIJ`;1~Sm3G$!et;9A3n6h
zNFZXccf46X9%WtJYyNBeSZgl^7@Hl*s_4WoVBpgJUhdx0IL~`kbJsRx|ChgkST}W6
zU<Zx5aX`3zD&c)Z{%(ci?1V2`*D-e|*&$b(cBHI>L&M-6EkZRaha+ffy8QYlaBMw}
zkd%&Tv;g7=70i2L3<4SB*#)rWH)f+}s&xez2R=Lz4P^KLKORJV45Z_268KHsbZ`zK
za#UkbA<v&rM>B%(Oef>Wo5o`HYyO<>&nQw+V?q;&?{xWBSx;X2-QX!kyv9%+Alca*
zb~q7wBwA1T$bl!Kc~nTGq-bXfx#5s{6~kziy!~XC7@IMh`@le2;{Rpdw1ysMUFNWS
z%ZicEhD^^iI2%5=*#BU+4{(GfS4pEqg}aJ8KGrk*>9mc_6du=0q{i>vCzp517N-tr
zG6^bJ4um#Gr&4vEPxy%<9Bn6$LTAmH_ZPKPnw;@IzLkm%DO>bm2B$ir5`Q2`38C9t
z4(@@vsAKPd$~+m`>g=LWiswv`0Z$BfqOdnKVQDsOg?sGX<;UE7`CtAX3<!y74*&mo
zwX9*AWQebf8Il++k+$06#A_6kL@XUvR?g(HXyBJe@80boVH8XOD>?%%ck$L-01x|}
zG8JICA?MxIA@$0hhnWKHrGo>+<|Kf01F@5PVho2NNW%m4n-3c|Mt&^**tg0gqJHRK
zUE!=)R9+0*mFNs`P+#Sb5~7-4T|ZXlqB`oRQ^oJ^|79xQ*e#>gnIYM6?=osvGF<rE
z(LZNZE6>%87=pDh83(@5`h}ljoLuDh1XSrP<cu>Bjhvvs_t`7UMDi-}wFjtyS0S;P
zecPdFPh^LaVgPDqgi#J4ObiNjk(AJv+oJjY@Ti0qmsp%Huev<!{&m_=tb>$`SX_tw
zPB|hx=wbdzB#6u}r!j~_!ECrg9R;+%9m7P-NpAJb>GZ;=^zC<Er_Ly8YuPRDE282x
zdbOd@;G}EfIUPWJ?&kR+oJ@N{YG9+Q27AJgD5qTqm*F_-xGbenme72Q3!U}xXo`#;
zkRJfv0OX6GJ$^72aEFQC>_3wcg?v^z`p2j;18$yE)uiQSHQq2$5QkQFd_6W1d-i)$
zk@;&$_F(q?na{T%NL^@&L$Qm6q?r^M3^xUnH)6g2L9K9yMva)-BUZ#guIO#nllod_
zlPt^IfOJ#;WZvO78Ia>;7YW4Po`>tP`Hv;~zjf`Cu&y(DyKlF9%1Zt(FO0Hfl1nXc
zWGm~|`ohS<5C=!4W}s4Dy&jPp_^LMr(z17xFzXFtHkh77R(f;3Ck+Bq*@m?y8G4Jk
zsSZf?k6f*ALnm-Hr}bVpSnsh$H&QGV_u#xWPk8B&Afy1`%K-#X6TNE%H5WK+l1^);
zV(tXPD5=g^xJ(E&?E=i}@uT3xuj40&ViDx+#*2c;c<hi_W*`s}B#mYdnDu(CLcvba
z)H$g{4}yn-79$-hGex?Y%pYgwCL~=`AQi>J5~gB*JD&J63OGCzhC>s$MM{Kh&vX_-
z*+Y;Nlr`wiT*Lj^Vp3I9C#Lhh`gLsIQwJNSX?qjayyNF>mBv;_{f*EiDOO^)>wH$R
z!C~_oV9Z-`1#qgg!~80JRaQ;hKW6v<zl{-+QpnK*7WENcs?u#Dz&z~;qMHge6J$zG
zy=iey>eiG{_%GBm&G5W9A*++b0JYz@X6kFg`4F$84=PX?;(v*L#l>=EYHi8Y>!TyA
z8{K~V-8bWa0CI(7w7FNld3HU>g>?2P5071QERFG{S0Sk20Pg#T_FRf&__H%@nd52;
z@;+@+t8q2L1g*hN#9x3;#cHA2u9!wx*`p1VfXc4q_5`b_xP_>nUp5TIncr$LZsSIz
zqJnCyNAyo<+ftTIAm?4!7UT%Qn2pP^B&)w18H>4X&ZD&XIU~r%Kn>20S({!m^42g}
zm;W^o$MDk6niTQ85%Z1BHw%))=nc=%bQ|)_{kEaTQ{uSx`SlQUQl)I_@SG!^XZ~}?
z(Df8X`uKo51U3*>2+^L6!zTHl3>9hJ0X;tUyaQfvsa650ryV@VYD*E?{s`%#+};~O
z#!$_<+|Hq}WULqXH5|Vq3`^xaR58KrtZqm#-vUY3M8CZS`IKhsOu&G*$g04C1_*Zi
z5e5`N{UC$;%B+T~LsHg+V)b6z1>c*^PNOpYf<JpD;j@fvp{yT;yeeH70(M@BPMu%T
zzYb<rd6Wn%TrabmeF33|4ARX_jOSkRD}#J^m*i@<6S|{Kp{&vb%ot5|sOYCmOlqGY
zbQA7;7PTWDAv8XIVNZ|gFas=Uf)?+z_C)(*D8Xm>Pzgt1G2OuT3pg~HrC34sg8QPJ
z*3_(IBOg}Jh0y~^Q%x__0W+>pqU2B~1mJGFzU=g^&O$BewTT;o1T}OX;|CYY+wC7#
zuDM;;H&vlf+X7LuZBYB%a!NHJmt${HD~q8FyME3#czi2dd;*SU&^_#Z_I!;_b7!?2
z%M%qUi-^YN0gf6od#QJht>h}bK*(=f3q;!8NcbpB-@l0H2=rGm&gzi<*5#PGWJ9QF
zRntBr*l1T@4M}qNN?sdEu>j)KiZ)U|aR~r?Wzu9iUq(iL?35jm?0}e`A$)Y6z7}#l
z44%cb?)VeUuuW?(TQo7A$ys<R?&XC~j^(GUV7Jsaok_9<K4zqEziT|gz&WqNwVMA&
z%hp^}UQ4K}>s$AfVJlK~=IfGrY4YzuDpi+<<kR~ndkj`ug3Ku|Dme*opMExNsulfo
ze!VmP<fP;GUEr-REC>)csH0x5D8oAI1^eFNfJWTs5d;4Q-M|K7))>)UMh_QouX|AP
zf3@|Lnu+bbK{jU8JGBm;#uKrc(n+gvSa!M1?C@hHlqt-@VqNSri)e;ms$C>tDPeJi
z#A{!q%N*sHL+otelDufz;0xU`NYp~<6ojmD%k{x$ocZB6s}@~>Bn(FG+_6U3q!Zn%
zNp@gTM>9L3_s(KJq?_so+?g~0={sJmG+V8G90<cv(v`X`aVOQD*jG1#xiR5AgzG@L
z2w1`x55O`Kt@VV{&pTZvm`!A>Eu&|;wFiryaYIT!2&Ncn=^3#!CH!B9Kyc8E!(Kd8
zXX|6L)j^SDj*ZJ?R|Ua7nmJq?SDC(ilfw`c;|LV>wWoCZxx;D_-lWtzkwdt5?O-}o
zbC-RA;&||akSOOH4@|&JaDrv>5d`t=UM2w-Zuv^j_w~1=gXNl=?jC>Ji~vH7WFUz2
z%%s{n?LFZu!?#Z1+m1Mgd#Y_QLl2?_HV1+6_BchslIdCTG6U;LI_=Y?_SbijY+VqB
zNewwg!l`iE$|e3kYwIZj0s2Nws<&ec$yaN4>6Ki^Wlqmj82cugVmPz6i$|3Ajr2d&
z8Q`f=>p>y5_}&E&e%?To5f7o6@3v-CeBa;IRrlM5vU|I--d;?vIzMc;g7$bBgyGSx
z8-oOf6i4K~(@QR}F}f?I@0<KB;{M1yw+@NiqobEp<g+m+*h3v@(JgGt<tcHm$FfdQ
zv>q@d$C2tdo=s)<XOhXi;^$-(!*iDGA|W{VMcuy$rAE^z%Vy@-)E@CVxy#2N=#G1n
zXlsc>0CY_KipsTSq!d*Qcab{BJDhD&z2t-xHLlkC5aD*(MzgG?Q=Abr)^J2fZ8AGe
zQ5?zE^{i|jk~bhZd$d8Qxvhy3JjC>78+EUczsqlEBBd;sUtm?SrpPi9JPAl+8R%t*
zBMDPdZWKeLUIiiN_!OH>>7fEPMa<3%ePG8UsTQF027?oiua+u|$wZLN&vRJd_<ENB
z#=~Hkr<A~LCoXVFfT19JfIvZ*`2zPU5_L_<Ub_VE+eXUhg@{dR)bt4Q>pLS3`475)
z7QAHk0HEEZgCgKrd0_vxN;MlscsfgF>JO>6rM9;*?Rv`!(;%5r{qb85^V_KLF9A|Y
zbt!njz1`TMzPMG^tZs+2{>VTGP~R(9$#Ot}D$YC{unJc`zWHi-(u5ZIfx0?8<Br=-
zJ(l9zWI{(eNDHi*@})pQ_Bsa503BFUU2gOP%t#&D{9sMEkS7a<7mD_`n&~0k657*3
zP0qN>ZF4@9V)JJ+Mf_kCt=DKLFuM#g<dpYtrOU7q+XWl?6fm8SN8D7V;HWby7RPEV
zc_;Jg5@kl|$D%dkP_-#R1VHzoa*^m32F%1A#%B)#sQ5a%tBk!vtT0T_t-Ed8=DTg%
zwr$(CZQHhO+qP}*eZF&Z{+l~EgWIF(q?1m1(v_-J&#K%k4CI@|X<%_9tIDDUaS@Bv
zP57Jn<3y;ouT@RrbX3{%F1e8B%P09u4%w8Y+lG_;mI%Jb_;(8qAbB9-zZT<E;tTba
z91LVeJ*t~7Wb%VafI(zY&yY4lNpqS*KwS4K#<{+>pq*qHC9$rc=(e?^AgB+L@)GQp
zoh@lwQ>Hd3PYuF*y$&ZcFUtH3{3!lzIEY*Q`_aIDUy@3*td;rbDXIp_eN!c}Due8h
zm*lVFRT3XE)UH6Xe<2YKOE9kHa%nGmOmCf+d?T};A4pAiY;g5qG<DoVh2e8>08Y?x
za4)W7k*n&8rcqQLQ63kx94GfR(qR@}sv|t+U}4b3jMH5b(#^tO6h&2iW1#JGjuv~>
z;Ot}nYB@3TV%A=nj~*kiv8Ic&Kzlxs&&&UgT-%l+DsW!Q+?<E3STPL#58q0(){{V5
zs1Rbq8*f(OMczoieRL#?&~a~*ip&cLhc$s{%p38F<qN<llGs%DhEb$V7UKgGd-W_i
zy)Y9Q_lkwtOaq>B?a65o3#;OW3+N}6$YP11bk#}}6r}f@_}pqBsVRtS+NZK9Bdn-n
zdNgzSU263ayY(Brup^7z@wh|_g>s2VJ{IHv5ob!=V*Wtv{I|61n?)LjT>v%|>`eF*
z27!C{%3#&)I!d`DCJ#l}d<AgsvO18A3xJ{PQZapQ0T&zQJ{ugum|pQ{8S`oNKqqO)
zpOM$DNH-&Ha>IfKL<Ne53_A~VvE9vtWkBcEc<8j~WX~MA@z}%zwTaXbP%IWQ&62(?
zZRXQjg9n4p`@4+)Z1!&gkl1;1UtSgFvur|I1L{8RNL-jfkKT3ONaa79LvA)_`Rs0M
zu?+_{XrDxIQVtzEEWKaE7qmC%$<00&2;TtKMa&JvAm6BCP};KiWXtGZ?`-4vs$i8K
zUvNsp;XPrb!Y0ha%XneCZ7JcD>z5Hv(^fPo|NHB`J_*yPWDE4pmC!SHdn?AYBt|p%
zNB&kLnj*YVBxB?~5S6yJuEw-KR5Kilj{4L>P4Fo0>FdyBb(WcTp-l*3oERqgQ)^?n
z`7=z*(U}YHIG~b6DPcj4q+Q0so3+M&90ZiSXPy%9KV%YMcrw0llC}^845NU@p8UMA
z_s_sF=i{Y_)m4%|<!{}DL`R(3Ifu{6X`Y2mDDmpd4$9@}OD42;;*Y+G#@JL;!)WL~
z3LMao*83KoD13#4xQR>D=}Q&~lhlihO(}`^{hk|0?sJO#`;Q{n@%`|mfy(|ge)Tr^
z*}BjF>`44z1wZTaI2iPefMjpIlGAS=_wA9kM_&m{2x-hLB4IV7i6uQYeWR+grq>Y%
z!ddn?Fv4jez6u?F7Y4T$jjrK;wwKszN5*j!+Qlf`35y5Fao=wVP|H@uV1%+5?n<P7
z&Pjm6^c%BfM)R6^j7@Ba{mf&tcaU}I`SHx=0TenPLANGopZ+r-74D?i2Af*svxLRH
zoaQNKnA)iYFz(ZfC$|>1I*^!;$ALFn#Z-iY@L0t;VQD4{E$FbkgIpJ3B6#Vjzt`Jn
zv5%?+k8bD9NW38-bLf&w!jM%Al-6t9`MSg&pJ)uugh?q2z5Z-0B3wPtYmtsqou<PS
z)BWiIYWp-yYQiU*?gjFoWZNq&{eD)I{3!+zXb`%xwMAYtVxUPd2UOXOh@^d~hqUYC
zo^HbI)<B^u90<OEdf6-)Ph5a7of&ia<s4Py&(IP*{_jz-#60-iCI2ed!C(|@nwEzc
zdJyQ!bi<gPJNr`qf!T|OhbyhihJD4rSXyC6KP*P8uvd2dV&ZMry*Hgs_7&+l2)|au
zex0mlr8ZrS9t48OES1xe76DX;X9;Wt)U)|KO~8h#>PNolq6a8=pHe{UFP^rS_Zty5
zq>iq9SR4F8qbEkFES6)omr1YebJc`4{nDUHP6qqSC{`ZZ{;b7EDp`c3RhNL=<E-&U
z9h;%)>buC1`skC^D9SglfE+`9V4C2r?9K{?e#p*#-Zb_RK7Pu^kqDNEDX#h#H<+@@
zgFbl4a2Aa`BuwOG4rzsh5d_m|3x}?r7Z_!6d+&8B5!#zQ!0B$_=0I*f9c%U+p+lUB
zB|bH~Hq7PpU_VdaD7UN04R)(@NYjqE&(5jF`tIHu(_oPue@xlI7f5+Xm&1B4S_#%@
zn5tzxoe}~o|4}@(&283}wKMuN{D8oW83=d`Cxod@0<J12!tX3K8)0bgcDr)Jxr|k$
ztqC;#<R4QMKrT0U?L$KaxE5hppkJ7RlD?uuYd^`o6j#ii!k^F8SZCH8Khz8r66S-3
zhAi-2jKcI`ClM!Wk%+&K)+Y3BQLQz6WdyeAai5w{YH_Un6nB`k+xsMe>x`l(w!a8~
zgv8_esGfwnS-|=Gg&8>Xnvm+8)1-QyJ*zDiep3lTZo!(edBrYd{R*~m7>jJ!p%JHx
zblUr)e@m!nR9SQ3h}5R)gERPmq~~EhYxfNXuo>9*x3CD&O#jHj3mHz0H6KpV)+RS&
zy*K!Ir3)!%bst;pe|Uo-<YT6q>d}6*@Nc*(r7+=MAH8bWKAOl{&kd<(gTtq(Iu)3m
z_Ako);m4_74`BK}O0?PKh$GO3Or{`PQaAw^aUGxN%<RVrdX<dksxbFeOT&RI>2RU+
zp~u9$*|_wr_5d#s>_sgL)pbLky*36(vBk}6y_lzqB*;unpAV317s*&8iv)GLYp$4N
zd-W=qqGlztlJeQ1g*nGN+TzcDcvlQ4iTe>>b5`Ewa~x3ltE&0ZMBz0HrwWiSqC^gc
zGQzQl2pbev2AI9sqs?ICX{cb_Cm!H>mg!bh*-%DgG}HoI*%SaGerA&fn#$3qCAX0p
zD!Vj1HVdSkw7zXAtOgdh&r+*gQ%C_}u<oU}f>f3y0YA-6mz%*e9{AhYVTNHR7O9(#
zH9L!tRGwFTo(&Kg>6*~(&v;y!?ea;hHbE~M9SQOK?P1K;St4`<^J^?g1xzoJRC}{a
zf&?ap%=3|cD6;;h8jhXHaM6XXMvyDS55dNv)!Tek!kxGO_JX@Jt}3b%g3^(N=KFdr
z)q*X}XNraT;xI_z#7C{YaiqP{K=<Jo1@4#h2)kTfDPcte!Dw2vcN#yukQ0#@UDNJ%
zd{Zb9D@FurYRT>$L^^i`GL=ChNvxzTnjqqg)$*NPWK(GwAV0akA*Q%)V5_5AqGr4E
zIaaqsJ@7gqIorQ|YlQ9`N{*26d+jM!I6fVw5>BGzAtY*`dgZX+*+m4)3-5;qzsR)9
zO^>)QTb4XYlP5UVLbj8nRDyQ~An#=z)POSHWb-0?8hRg8h>RF|X&IGR>|REkgNt1~
zSe6JdW$8Oa26h-TckGwShcK2)QEiI=M}1P|2dl9sc)S8T1@x)B=X!+6M!rOZf?b?O
zN1+Qm*n<&U3`TW%t=CH|)@`m+G!jbhWn7`g*R)VMx;eo$WR)-W0dpeE78HtjV@3F?
zn=V69&j5nc*13xnP&D|$?^#q5WelD6yhlcExGnq+mK!Uv<2dhq*`a3J)$<Z}T3_rn
zMaIcn#z^eQ?|8NFM1LR4Z3D*E;8k?X1C24Qe6#djQAKZVaH!gbBLF~e*!kskRdzyv
zVrbtG?TELD7xd(F=Vps|+>@!z3l&W!4^X*Vsz?)*bWyr3!}somLu@oH?)l?0iK}N5
z!8(iS`)D2>#^YQWtF%m{L*hCMob;M1+AJlV^;3jA_*&a4Q8}>#D%D49)c>xA3U0K~
zb_(r0Y4#F3p?FY-=J@CIbo)34a(@%kRXg}TTVq|_wTSi6^)A>}PA#-Qp}Xjjq+>u>
zGX&Gepu4L8aA4QR`!w{4rMmXh*kLhn#)=6CO!|J&8<sC55T*uoIB1So`zvWVAY7{y
z2Tzp$Y{eAr)*K>>s9ri+RbKj6@0*A~>u+&uGt3rdhCg=`HR1ONJ$E61ai;HOev&eK
zO$J|j6({Q;y{kA6F-}lAeb24*)}sNZsI!31mGf?x7*j)D;Ib0Fb>*I9GkMWZGrOjc
z#WL;fg4|8fw9gij)vl&1^FPhHVN`0Up=B;#-CxAT3C@M-G{_%L9fMFy#~;ooLf!#Z
zRc30gL|D4MNt$+b<I%;d*3@~Y@gQTK;k0uN>mSZs6M#mH=$%ntF)XN?{g|KtP14lP
zw_@|4g6~zj8-R=?n#APQ$CW^d0L*+9T9^X{K*cx&K;B1cg((1A;*ZF#*Hb5)>?3_#
zOM$?CAR(}!Q)8xMvNymHv~pHZU!xWW#!r0g&01P&;QVgo`&crHj;jdgqK3ZFw1Am`
z24^EhJTVa#h&FrxR+$fPd!L|(uHHsD+A^{ohngt&mwcEh@$v9Wk9If6I5$HwjHt6}
zlGLYGjH5(!j}fiR(TD@2KtD*KPQ?dEhrya23D_<IliTU|g3xbgIXr+|^62jPCZ5jQ
zpZZl)-KS;JnRf#nn;*l1qV;vzEtRKU*2`U5R1=9GC4cR`=$wo|v;Dws{QRI4m~5T9
z9?428r1P57wP#;Uqk__o$rWV_UWhx{BAC4Aj>g9lFc|XXEc?q6Z1WwEF=-X|1UHbC
zYl_=Y>nDgN0Tzbnu|q$FAIoK!O7~w?jzyf5j$VVw`5=11kPssn@4UKLC!k7%f8fn)
zQ5MMtt8^e&1RtzRy@A8?Hc@nv=5zsNq1~2z@r?@q6q3e@IYDD>&;<c5B8+P)Tsm7x
z?v?jPgR=a26KIRwFa8{fwZxZ5+1KOb)-f2EKj}A4MtTD)7iNSU`$<<xZHFX6D%tz;
zSl8icnw$gZQO)u?!-?&+bx8|@OQb0=^^Po%YtqQb&acf2N~nIf7$LnNgaC36;Ei!L
z2)AgOLwp8R@jVtK0H(E@!b$?3#vGAeSAl!f0i_(}$_#28{;Wb8DtI)4h%%+UFeVK1
zqdkiMS)X&VsqvH_<E&5;5}I0p75?<PtT^xs(8OhuX|gsj72PfF$^C06N~C>;5B*I%
z(uI~REK?6<TL@R54t}6L|AZ_m%#<Ow^CWDEY%|W&u$z@eKe(MtR3s!rTj@uL3fH2~
z+wfh5-Y%l_vJVt1LiyB!?J@svs<S9J-;<jCQ6GQtdbFQOXQVc0nzDb7I!WK#h{ZuX
zLAJ8yPY<97R{K$IN^=hC7w0zkl#a-!{Ihg>-MPz8dpB$GrxDRHrU1auvfq|>c;z`n
zBd6n56ElLG7Kl%^tRFtGE()nBjz$UCMAGk=6#5&8x8ZXWWdy{^xi_Ke1=?*9FbXe1
zD;bN)quj|dpv9v#8l|6+?-U;zstv)^MzssY<>6|u^+S!95qc>2jxgJ`7tgmNWoCOA
z7RS>N-yTh0_B;izxVsrVJD-4rqH^?Gd~<|c#oNi{H}nkTYFt?kAnh$}gD*5hB5>Lz
z!I`N=@&W!3fnliK+Byze0$bcsTgHkfsU*Y9Krt!<O7C1G?j&f{&ccx2RJ_a0o(lZW
zFYng*3eRkap3d}j3BoT^O|iT38z8+87R-hk6fL0UdnHHsACQZ=YizN7e4=5KqpHaR
z-${6NVtRInGMq^0d<cl-Z&(xbZvEXww<A!Fr&pLOf~2z<q9-+ZL{0)wFw=&qg7S-)
zo<BQ9zBWAD5!2gyY&j_A>0b|%XCP?)%9wg!fBHc5cY{O9yxeGc6VpAHe8=#g5PXx*
zG)b(<x~d0)+XO$j@;vm^*W2XMrtfy#5bd)(tBy!&2y}0Q`cu%4`Gwyc#PsqeL^QN+
z6$Ej=2^&k8pzaCj=8^tHLQWyL!N!P05?}@VeL**R>={B${;AjJFK<{TaRMSe67Qk@
z#}WcX1edFEBC+d)p?GeOk&xfIMu-*K>izip^0$g!5~wEHk?8??H<>3d@3Tk_H&G02
z0LP^UbV`vYmGEWZ5<G6*w65qxrZO2I<G$~+U;rF*AGc%xu4~{NVTAQ7j%mJv8(Hmc
zwj7A*r886p16sf^c+XhNx{{-x0TG_n#gZL&iU80&p%b_<WpU!k(0;W6(V*cR8BX`_
zMbq0^Kb*B(L}NL@*HAQzt6jG#jKhY6*S#wIs-LxrP*}Hfenwv%rgB3r9XyM~ey=Aq
z_oSTNX|GsX%s*e#2A#d$ulr#pmz^rJesju39uPLF5{6b8KwB(7-D(5Tlm_$se%U~=
zW0e<Qu^m$b>#k4tS?$@w{InfOZP(ZFhEQvl!UKA#s!z}9n&kAE^a^7(sXUN}`mM7C
zB{x_%2K{*?f%?XCN1KiDelrSZSITrvv$Qo^Lf)JDh8;v{wk4>B|2oU^1NBS>0vEMU
zb~c07qPSr=FWt*9k6ZR0bKC4cZLG?`XlK@h0K<eOA`ZK2m@d>1;!X$kr>W1pB|Sn0
z;=QHQ8YPa8Fo8AfWrbW(QGBUm1hGzYO9P%w9yL~)FeKF7x1@R#=iQ;j7Ab9~*H>Dj
z_iZ8Y(m}1oRVr-*GRM|H1+q5=`B@CJqxhQq1*161DGoTfG<_(Lwl3kH#&d4?qWE^J
z9(}btlZ_IYz;Up)^`RKhIY=OUysNA+A4kE?fa&EG?wTDnUPljH(IaXac2g1?-Jo~s
zjAmI}%aUCs&)^$v5Kmjjt{Mo<+(7q|XmnYPx|W%La6F!FGUIWt3bYr<_eCMuNJL-=
z3m-AjKaf+xS#@I`(h{I`<mZK%pG|bf=+0VB7B`Gp)5m3t5hW?$vp5Sa9Qy_A{~WRR
z+YJcGEq<p~+P5neT&oGTT7;t#N<KJdUzBsxDxMe#p``-=cW~QIe8+6s&RMrfyQ!&k
z;N_4uTRhnZg<H!~R)bor(WF5GAgmmHN=Tbs6+{*;R3huJ%!p_iLMq@I$^8J27!jw~
znh(4Y1BuHa>3tVS4H(>`(eq=n`eiO{y9l=?>gSv1fW7knu^G=%F;afBnH{>UP9b+%
z{bXNPG(jyfIQ9kp<+Kdh{s+U<Mcexk0Ku&3!4SY?Iq(TTu@~lMHt*0jtrev}l@1n?
zwpzMQq;BQH7G`ZKjdsH$poikqS(F)`{2}W^s?NGI=0Auj-o#j-H(U^pEJj@Ii_(7%
z{xEGM)F$A2<vn~LL7|rLqq;hTCyApdZ3l_@cPBiqe-JBb8McdL2e5$a^yx|X0{RJi
z$NquBWLuErnEw#^2u%YfgNs!;p*xXu_kg1|BAIjyQ_;!FFJ@hJpV)4DCEN)r{>nep
zw_yxb-NCmID|>h&dD|FLL5k_=;h;{9>;0MtC}nND*Hp!cef{BMNsM0-$Sz;HcD!Ly
zf^0Zdac9o5BA2_r?3BeM;S-{MX%<VO(#Cz-F0!6G*1I+6CNUh=aQFh1?dputvNUl3
zf9b*9RDO|sN2sFrfg74Ol+=r=-)1j;HRo99Ac6mjc>^4HBUbHhnn(EerO<%tahIQ^
z`Q}dOOLMxf#!cRFu7r^u^j8OEH9<g8{hxWrdUfpNTiYeKYOP4ef)?-bf1MvdP@RWH
zBG?F*M3UO;hLoNjKzo#stSe23iBwJ7x&9)Sj1s8`$T9~n0^uZQ#K^Y)>YZ)T#dufz
zU81(Ty8|ThBDY=IZyOjs5KS_H`$HFNf>Qev_$(1R5OoKO_?+|G9JGR@4OZk30!U|r
zfk}h(6!iG_9FM{o=}h`x<xI+@$*9EaF-F}wZ$I}RZULqzSzZQVyZqn5)@=UvO@<3)
z=+rwd7B_JpGCrGne2<9~hs%v|W4W}8Lz@kC^?iPG%!$B0HInlU)#N|M5z{Z&)YSd?
zEiHgTfD6%{tA@dO>B9L<&5A`bf6ZHG1J}t!^tXy~2gVeicbi7Z2D70EJGL-D1Gaao
zH!Rz)%Ru>l9GsRz>ebk92XIL&Lg3&7x1>QUFf*?ZWth+<?;??BJ6@mEy9QH|J@qMA
z_tgs`e5Sp?>kGy`o;cGTYV{G(o$0_CUG9An2ia+5TX8IjNz{7_3LqG^_b(L38x)1a
zN1xqT5Q=_^yS(3O$-a!OXH5=A3B=W#J=^ytoTo+6Pxzx=9?^8t^b1Jjgsjk>l_X5^
z{_*zpJAOmv#_=EoG6E9KFMa+KE~%7k(HiYqX0<kZLlDvwS7=2kb1kbpdvGJeIb&<Z
zY9#4+3n!51{0G!HobagmLER*y`(B=hrop)QcrK?(0SE1-gl>CCt4WLP@1BlKhr|n!
zQ?JqeGC(fZA9`Yqx$~+M)F+0xN>YW)l862ofbo_=L>v=8b;Spp3Scy>x{x^vJ$g-`
zyx>7mY+5c<c2tL)o`Q|TR5gF27lo!+z$G+u57}QZ6!>#MDY<!Zn^mfXpxIk<glcr}
zXe%(6(Znp>*IikGPDa>mK3l{Wdb*68%C0>40SP<;;qzMC+b9s(ruTzP4f((VjZptA
z<I8+b(JJ(OWUU?GA_AJ2OsLtHfZtv-<baER$!r;C+(dD1y*)wa_ChiCh6te%4>Zcp
z`U4JUQ>vLG_n=qxsBvw+L2C*wuPX5g>}3tV&7*4EU0#P!POfWs@91HRv!_C4Jf069
zbOz1rfzBjfz5vVV^!%3d?@35=!JL?VH0S|yMauI(UWc?$1YLd3jVTE*R61$`f2;Om
z!O$Pee#4Jk8V(JWAZ%FP$~R=6<hy5aL|#8;SzF$886r<@C#27_?k9O^6wXWeR9-cJ
z@bd#DTSIDtKoWHLql$;C+`}Z@s*V{pPQY=RPdp7&o#{yBIpk8MVStGzzqPp2vDt$G
z=5218Co(0`uqA8bqb4YsHmV9;M`f=-!}vGPz9Fg&ZTcHt<&RnmUeXAEm_(IvA4hii
zWiPjybhwHM9_0iSxzaG9TEktV=pZ(0sLiq9@T`#KBK$kizt@1PCFo{H6z_l7#B!ll
zmBArpCTxYT;^jWKB{IV449f`tRXy~Re?wBKL)*yH4OAlmX<&wxGM0Wu>Pyon0NNLG
ztR(F2k98n}`J;MY7Shfd9&GYdhr!~<V|K9Q*t%g$R`@*$u=crcCGz7yi3eVX9Z1pD
zF%&VH#>68+s9eoC^=I4mj8fj*f(u;jx3h*BG4C(@^}5r<&lZy)D#}YLrdy>a42v(C
z1zatj3FG6lq>ywNlvra|NXCIdZ*;H{N^ba%A~$582Lk{58^U(q+$$OoDHGMVxk;4a
zS*L`Fe=2KDUw&QXk<g{l>3d?a!q_YNOcze7hx}~s0A6dT;W+x=wSVvwOVpX`voKIf
zE$cUK>jQpuH}Z14;y5-6iR7R_pnYHI3cJ!%FohO}^k<j}<c<9eW^=Z8?aX~T<+WnZ
z+NZZ;uHHCdUy8(_K>dV|AdaPWtp*v*2-f6$QxK6KSdE-h@ij?c$um}bF<2tmY4>iD
z0G{(a0#I^a%~Z3twhe_gv^IufGz~ZYWR8!cp=rhE6m`9jq6i%Uol%B0M6snS*%5)s
zVS^I2S#;jD<!N58fuzrgW9xz{3?_+47{SG4Vct3}jrbF!#sjBj@W6);BiubE8oM0V
zbsOM*g&uTCnc>*R-Gegq6@1Y#HXEPsONFrY#0w=Mby-R1Ku?m{%Y7Gqw#W(Nf_{1O
z!n^ERF0Y3g!dpK5TM<TZQ6UOVI&>Clp|AM?{R4ycvTY+TbxnV7^i(6{#?>B~GauAR
z_PkY8rg(h3LE+aXJdDCYD-Huua$FP#ggtTv4NL4>Y=V>ex$wugB#y?mpV_?-zpWXB
z-Wzlka)zHBOfdV1(z;`zro37}Ym&{0vZ!nAxL?^wA6)5q`k7)c=MufAp<Tj45Z8!(
zE59oD4Lp_57DrL27Zimrv>nQ7Li5m}Ol*yvoE=RJZ2os-XJ`q<#6V9#Pw>AZZf+<#
zX%kyBXLAMu1~x|4|JgATu(2~S{LhZ*zf9x*93x<7=U^lFe-;#-sD-t&i6a4>sI`H!
ziLi;0ov{fNFE7;pxy*et#syRvMRSdnGRB#b-rpH+Cr8o^YKXocfr%bQXHh&VI8ias
zxzahvpMYRTT-+^uId1oB_igv<$I53fvn8G5%fmJ2=NgzPs1>g*8+IG3@IU2WM*z3?
zApj^WsSyFbf1I3uSX>-_T80LGq;uf+SnQNFgh0E%0sTWC0}28H!sBcygy1eB%RYU-
zksCRHJOBU+8hB**(*xl9$NTWFP%!Z@U?c&2IV^t=_&o+(Q2PNRRliO*qCA(^u}<#a
zH%NWJ1|UBJ17hvoEdYlZ1P~P1000(2G0*S^EiuM1$b3*x0YdQ`pJ2VjCUFAoVRv_K
zZZ0>085<t^ploIi^gg7>Ca^Q1EkZE(FxY*Si9gvm=A)Svcl$Jek5~B?zCYeJ+6AN_
zKY$w;IRyrgQ<sxN*akm>f7dkt4~vU`Dm2I|xW*4W5c>Yy6d-_yzhB7L(w7<m#dRAK
z1WYJbm%sk5d^&DF+9e2}Ic3!oK~KCk0K)VsI^yv$Sl<)4hkw2-!4=ow-J$@12?s8~
zdF>G2mlH5?KCL(#9$WcR9iE3@NJp0`X?hIM_68=9Q0KvKr5s|UzyICsPS)Gp0q5X;
zF8$tLwsiqL_LiQ_dVAMBR)2o&Edt93ABP*+_TT0;fw(_H9!6hyJw3o7l)rnxjfWrU
z{F`gQH&{U5v>VU+S7*NtK&zV#|93%ad>5Uz9$P#(h`(^V(6`SY-1k#3GzgG&zCKAm
zmLYh^!7tlq4yNJP*oW;eL^*nY^qs6PKfqqyoL(RGEs7~{7>CDS+OOAecch!!lX}e4
zT<Rat$;p8(fS#?d003KGIz2uB1qBHN0^$Mq`yW$0E5xT6p`Vj#(8eI3q2IEXo5Ekk
z#*rLi{Z9wswZGr!V(^{>I*|TX-Qvtg@O!_TpZ}j(&!6kZ-^723$e+r^U#<AY&cp@V
z>?`<z-#&p^dD2^6G}lEZ@!cvvux}eoy`NGHf!}p4*f7}T?YEsWEM%t^I7fQUk{&vw
zi&ChkfOT_$c>NE4<j0Whz13QFK7BarHtgq>3!pvl$NO){4h_co!!4*oSJH_cgku}u
zpL7KX@Q{r!4OU+~JwPzOf49TksJ9yu&^yo_>mu0Ui`F=RE*=Js#~Dz&)f~P)wAlWC
zMoaX3{%cr(Kti|XZvA%H_p$<h7&!#3;vVHYdg1$h{(nT@gMLEQf3Xk|zqkUwCg{Ij
z)Ms61k91*uVS=6CHPrig{dOupJ+!_FeZ+s_@W;sCz)ryge>-q|dwltRACNzwzjNOG
zeujVdC_Pr|Gdmj}Z+|e@<yle4<6ms=aRUK6h~Zu6*KdwHGB12*dvhl{^aT3b7m)1g
zM9T%7%@<-N+rV<SErb<y(^jH&>m5F2h%>i*kPV3&RE&Y>h-QuxKDfe8RFc+ZjZDvL
zy<0CW>WHv(E?9IwwbXj&vDGYxvam|e-V=MNRTrfr9^*B1UAJyGmu48p;kt2~pXnbl
zRb3PXuCy2MbF`>+nYV`<a|g&)oL8uWa`&~7VjV`XhSNb%W9d%SOk))ocZ3}l4IJWd
z-M4W$xjv*5zm8IW@1W$hf3ns50d*Hhe%mAMbKVuaeOlNr#Fk3`G@q3c=ZL9$AF(Op
zD9L@IpwJ#iF%GSDY*mb>XP<-OV{b951yMBLHv#q+@-gK)yz{&tW4W{GEaLZ@2ywpn
z|MP#o8)x$R8nCDc44px)4m&@fJ|+9?mBuRpnf386^^z1Mg8c^=#qpj!0A#uYYG6Uc
z0JM{Va!7rf$$|D*#U4jE?EWFdhL?tGO|nO{AdFX3j`+{&!H_evkt)B(1;+D2=`mBN
zxPN_Th^Z!upwyo8I}CS9*tue01rM{#Fe5=*;BE0x9d?KI#`3P+wKPo_uL+bWNuAXX
z67`CeHj7;hl&Zt~V&hiR|7LD1uwbiD3B4CjViJqIgAd5h`>Q`4PyQ2^$zh6Vrs!Gg
zPJI}bqu%zb)Jh8$6m;*Sp@A4SmRJ;L<K46kAzqt-iq$coa?H9P;`XrlG1<mVFVK6L
z$z5adTyx4j7NRVC@FYV5i{N>eI>b!&?zr(<%Gv&sOO@p@VW&8+hNNQ`Kd`cM1HF2C
z<uUvuQLO%YpKDsZtUkHLo$QqApR3DFq@!=-c-(48Dwi@^1-(#hL*7|2yig|Y^ys)s
z)tDvB5Hk{PwFop=3s4zQd|BzEm4!7QYyK2yE9SP0fQ#uS`@fItn>k-`1NFn(G1`yw
z*yie{*CnoT3FJ(wy)1T2`6muFSTD7U9}1Q?L?Gn8*8ygDyOgw{{BnLy#MO)I-A3o|
zIOZA8C!YqVnFJX4+YI8kZqipOpC4`!xJ^+Om%r<`T6n5H)EP}L8Ogl7g-+y8HuB^q
z>qvMTssC^#OE=wk0a1SM^4JY2b<d2QFq~TLR%mo@%qLSXm;%Oi8vpKoSV(sSBILq4
zvl@^jf}?o`t#|G$bGhRc^f8iC>zmB%FvrvYSMH9&2b^~o=Gr8{rW9-OgUuQf7NutM
zMMq2d?vG&1-tgCMF~bRt%skXggwhT#VR|)<H5G`P>wNnbI!e946uORMm#YTyXEI0O
zOTub=|E|xp07~PUUtYsekE!~u*IV!BBjY);<5)>Q9=r9DBy8%kQCGCBXPfRCnWVdL
zc1VBU!I}mvt1vZNg9chB`SK$qVlIue;=Pm+iPx6@2Bl9$_C@|`{4Dp?5N9-AZEcS!
zy?&RFNLgCToFcGH-_QYzX7JlyY@(($Tea|E-ly$8dozZF5GbYZ)7mm|g8C?(&)y8t
zoYNLl3Ut<Mb(D17VfrVZ->#oeZc6huS%WPTPOwuBLl9daxHH<mbb(#?*3&&96MXGm
z3pDUk=`+5Ail1qII;;@wCF9KWiPD&QBkq=-_$N-D1f$;acp4|kvm2!6-k^4$56aZ$
z_5M?}VQyw^n=SM_&=~E*XXjXL>hG)yLoB_jjA)JZI!w306l8j^H3s%*cnBrPY`n&r
z+IwWR$gn12tqb*1%b!WP=RX+p9%P(sl$<!HL7D6Jsle@EweVTS&ozthy0P$u^_v>j
zeBk{ZH6=f)TuAwc->O}o3CT%{7^X7l%8Zih$4M)+ULi|(S8lIU9x)?J$Mc=?d!%ni
z-u%NLAbczpMI;EuGbITsb=w_hq>R^QZnQTq?QQi^aCE&-UST_x%-Xqkvf+>AR^yDH
zTMktHV|3LH$b%swB>no2Iq}*gh_M#O`Q@B#8!HvTelD{!r$75EdKzgYCFl`Y0EWow
z+I>GoPxnYZSeI0*&Bf_b3oo8?Izl<+u=}dfaU1J#C-h&@zU5JqUYK>F*Mi%?9JSKe
zX{)d?<y!4<$X5A9n|>#?wTk8%OSwmlzW}&+EgH>8JqckXDM!Pb=J#5Path6jJIfFP
ze=jVk5LinLRFj&qDgXL0nS<^!-9weK?%uVCf2GLHeI7uYZE%nR>G4W&E<9>|y&J3M
z`_wE{>m<Qo{<&f7;8IFi&ySIuOzA7uYpzdFNwlEX5M_)e4=8hH$NAQ5myOt8raeTU
zF_oqrb<JHdR@cNofjX5EYA3Eym2rg{rA+rF8KvoTG^`h6lTS%GV!msw<jMRw1Nt)P
z@L^t++F)Yqj_)6EJsbuqo7T-}lfSVP$~^;&uI$3mW4_4+N7D4EJ~P%4%<LoGkXDL`
zS&;$FoYv-u4W(3c1k2``D}+<vhBy>({2NfWVJE9>zex6oYUMt96`pZ4X7<oI%#|yZ
z!+Eo;urktgEVj@Ki1Yx11s+#4`v8818OyGV{x~U=T(H$ASg4Pot$1sAiDGwkYodCZ
z>XvP##@v-glh<5)LQy{WPWq)cXdCWrOHs6Ap(A=2boYa70SkNjTn;xqxQUTsvy}dA
zeXq8strk&N_V1?ArIy8V%!Nw`aBiu0i-<Vj24LKq*m*?){~2j)yq)oMnOHPMF%mp0
zxlAp!<YDzLJ%2!0uiA=AX+cW;m+u%wNkOQmHXiDr)6Sl|r@(C7w`%%CX^EI<-%aBc
z_`hafIZP+xX)i*4xmKXM)RTFZ^yA1Zgjnqq?|zbX!f+eZqmp%}`4A{{wM_om#ShD1
zD5eOp;?T4*4R>F?aZVYvc&b@RQ<wVjgwAenB8&(R!LBlrHOdq{782h40v51K%oAqj
zTP7_Js~Hx#E11mF^0-1t927JumYB-s^Eo@~NSKGJ`ogO}A|X-4m}hq7-SL-fEW!Jx
zH<+bGzOt-+ofBPwwa0QK!8<bBv==yUbX;n%dUJiOUXdJ}4`+wyOH_p0sKz;eruefZ
za*IeusJJ5m&9})d)_I)sZat{+%e(O!V?3Ibm}jQ3v@qU-d1GFP^-@ymhZY=@hTPdk
z5piB^k$g}-Pk_c18TXB?mnKgzwo6@E)hY}C^tcG#TcaOH!}SUCFH8}oAVhqY)0W|;
z$*F2A%oTN+N%&r=p02C&SNKM+WyQ1f?EIE5>|GW*%CZLh9U^gbQmcgJ3k7*2W%;wL
z9XjK;_a@RhD@7#2o+gWdIk3F3s+!Okgl?@&lDG(srgkwdA(f5UkXmnVTHT6FrWE!A
zW5N9F!b<dZF*u+13s4zl>=yS%sEmop2^aIB1WDM+Ioe4lJz^ykp8O5VH7^{aQKCcn
zpA6r}&b&j`8vH5@f)^}}fut_fA5^?cj8AvF3W-FmnFzH!QhBeZLhD&vJIqem{upoR
zfjyw$Z%kI*D<$UTHS^U2eJWD4v6v&w&TiRtJV##M1Kkk~Joh9V#4r66Man`~>QZTH
zgX}`dFgw!N*x|e=wls!{NpsuviB3p9zN}%@G)?9vz2r@L(NJx@A??BbMjsg-mU=Jn
zxd9+vTvM^Et&sM%H<M)Iy*n|hBw*Q09VFj)Vb<iNnJw1{=eb>FL{R*bezJ1jl7KsZ
z2e%%?Js!HH(5sNFSLp<ruAN+KVfxI-Rph)S<88C5E1MT~&ki~GL|HN9j&qkW8)Vnr
zJqnlfvb4QZeg!H_o?XmhIPvhho2(0*OJ5!2EYI_B!zCo&gN@W}y9eA$2~L3@nPWov
zu8+>hiPMzQ8R;GVEa?hyd)<<5y~`EV$zOH7db6bLt}k*6y&qc<=!DR%n_l3o6WqNt
zbd&X>Whzne$07t+^u>F&`3wTq#cU^8Ct67$bS3Bo_?n!K7n59law*cxoQkT}IH5V^
z`E)#O=~$l{%R6_uMwL`D69Xc_!30FM0EmSSKzfXeX&+b-=RCB$jRM*Y^YDchpO6K6
zW=l0-OD(+70uyQx4LYdcRO?ALcZ2OPgoC^ZAeWmK9D2WC1^qCc^t?W-<To%cq~6DZ
zagyr`Hvj~I%gbJ0m7HXW^IejP5eZiDQ8)spjqhrd@B81;OD)G-#j$?fmb4QoeF3hC
zh#Aqz6^)OYQ0OI_Csk$-$Ie80!moYl;jjCzWl0Y^!3mq(L{~2~H{k*qp(|c?U`Nt=
z*^h?`43o|_dzxzMDvI3<pz?a*mJ9hAwlG<4J(GHH9vDO;G%q1(k8E4yN^%@_Q5zhp
zBYeD}j>M8(GsWlkDJ46N|56SxLLU9BnccPg%u`DYMVTAz#;KBNtESILR?FyA1(o3c
z%wGZdhUWR+sYCGHb|BTNRwpuLHiVt!L*CB}S8DZ1<=6m);}Eb*HVefYD>)OUHCNx9
z^m=i4{>AB%2;|i`!*t(B^VE@xv8TBGdRZx&u~np6atPaU@BtOQ8HY!RZyVUbwyA>D
z<;%3+{t6|nv>udo;x&hF%3w}wO3vUThZb29FY)$ww&}_-wVbeqjoP6DORo7D^Gp<v
zIg629?)26(!fGfkv=lDMwIZ)8*r03AW*g%Ma4(S7|I3AToId`RZ{+Xk<`=%+Z_}n@
z1lO}vURmxvlYHb3cyHLb=NVY&-<c`l-h&=ZzcbHV4^w}NdowF_XN8YrSddE%y-?XV
zHQO!5Q=xNTW_-zHNA?^EAIA-av0SlXC%)3%>?CJ_MR5jYzdBalSaj*Ez_EnUfN!$9
z$h@a>lSuP=+Tu<de8*rE-Z8i5`#>NDZ|vf6aZ!#V!lIq}k5;DC);VjBmDk^Nlw(t1
zgD+OW!Jy3uMDla}S?%P9YanRZrlwPYs8+T06~mSpZ(N1@HoVwwXKCKjV1j)x`>*Z%
z5RUK!C%=JlAkh^T90M1#iWze2S}eCM9f=gF8BZ}8K@fs*Rh-ziAt*@}-p}-W?Qi^M
zYo{$5;>z9~Yo>>H&=PDa%p=Jv<21smW;c2QW0({b9F43Q;$57An15<S7$f8tvO5*z
zVq0n`a-;g*GBixHinDs*N99t;tg-HXPv(Ih!yOhMbUW;vQyfzq7L}s2R*lD_D}6li
zgtpZqg5f-qx0r&m7oxl>oJ?1>&Gr=0oU<Di2DENhpK;DzBUzd^t)GI<>P~QsFW*`h
z_@>vd<O(-ehTe*km=|yB;+d%S<l15$)Os;2Jl?<`-N6Lm3C-sFCYQjgt!Fh%7?v6~
zt5%@!^JTa{3-a40f8T<p?&0JK-Zo$IAMYp+Oh@9)V&|?B#No^1mv9-ov&YPrf*ry}
zVFvM23fUeo!mi=M>%tDBmj2g8HA-k+!Lz<LBXaZ|gMlW4@Jtimzz0d0({JsYRxo{&
zlG60vpR|G1J)T*9c%Sdr^VTyfXO`!I7k7Sqe{+yn@LYt?^7+t%Ov4Pk#EHUH1-vks
zxQraC^z3ax?Z_&3)nD~WuQK)Q$UWi1ra!gx0peJ6PllvCI8&wmb*SpQ1T?Z)@7olL
z!Ki_Sj*hLNLn*J3%c*J-_2YIh@5mV|sfo5J^jodu)D&^D(@Wd#F}TPkEJjdJSe0hh
z$Wz6EVGrWOX|Gp-33!{#>olHWS+zJ+wFfY#M`Pe7P|mG!YJA>g8|{t}Xp@n4q3D9u
zR>j?1Ysyt0g&BB{=f-GFQl0TKb9K4$4HMCE>d0`BpB$oi@f12IzKSNP?}zzr9uvqw
zgNA7`N_vWK=!bQ|c7G?!(6(U3_z>(=os#GdqHYd;nMy97EAWj<tPkEv3imkK=Qen|
zw}373;)l{QGISVu(rN!ErjaP=6Y_PLd_lczgDYsC6ZGcTp4tKhsFQX)+>SyH9ZI6E
zPoy|hB;N4NzamVff-q}ty(1Hlc>@pz+=K(_Nk;#1mh+*Sxa7)rxT(#h1<?i=<A2kD
zQ>$bjdRcA6vnzs+IbTY09^#%g-Q{uYW#U14k6oFOM(owfJv+i!7V<1=yp*Zuh&AUP
zRA~WstwV>NCU9;vmf=j!{mX##LQ|kPK}ZUC1F~^)73ve5C5FlA?3@lUFt86<d*w71
zSK+owJX{(bqG@<qP{D_B(25#dN6rXmTtalfYm1*+qVCN#l`-#NV(K4pLm#W;r}ClP
zv^+WP)C3E%bzwokZWeT>7G0Q=GKxw*i{u#KwL;10xGvy&efapANB^Xn9JNhjeM?Sl
zVLJme_ReR8+m$xt>GY9cB8kt8d6jR|yH}#VJTiu?jIV_YS}^6*Z5M8}j^q8eR86un
zaV$QzN9ZhUq$ZWAdeUt2n%*}pwNSy^1i}djXpDks1&2rRzK}Jqgd;)@sOw$5sh!D#
z_|n|f6KuxEtCP}TDgv!Q#0{&6*B?BRevZLKM})6Mxf~k&DTSD8o+Yw94W0`ZNW$ei
z<O{jinbPbGP`5Rk1gO#!Gnmo4nb^x@Vc;y4fh4Mx52c7opK}cndPm*ExYz&>8!ILF
zy>><Z1A<cTd7t@+F<f|Z&R}e2eVS9o^%LF_ugZv+5OG;il3&WDX~M5LaDVxb9Fpc;
z_p<m#a^dj5$B^y{zXZ0u5$Zq=$t=snbv>r#9Hzi6AAPL^m_7&XT)SH~=p7$*EF7y>
zA9<hbY`U{DoS{V%adLU9FrjyU0EcIezClg(HqSjsYqyg$clU|#d<}jzRvn@8(JUuo
zm)n=m_bydbqueZ9@hPtXLwO@My$Q6>#T%Pn!GswWsSfW!Xf(PiVNe}<JF?!G<zuwm
zbDrOr12Fg392?is{&Y}`8;<<j4{ARu3YrcVy$dFjH4gTm2Ng#K!8RIA7+1VU#@16~
zQB%8ruWdy<!{|jHJX&c)25rmt6fTFHQcbsiHBvGAshz#Wnu%---Tn4C0FlmS5hE^M
zVvmUslu$X_*SfA5?wTRtLZZ);fgy+N^A-#MOYj2F_H>d~`Qt2P<>W%D0OWMT>K9@F
z+jG2|Xb!5tm4HZV3DIK%jnrJ&^F<6k&!;!@`E*ZcvSeY|Uf;5z7%D1ja&o`V<qbqB
zG3TjJ#LOnMK<|BV|JKSNL_HMy9xo61`Ivqra$Jzn+Q+d~are<<w-X@1OYy2{&)64(
z<<Wam_8Sfi*H8M48TGwHVu=^ZBo<dFkv-4&m+(L#6}L5puAH044(C^VO5zGrEy=yE
z>0(3`WwMx>XA8JK)Dl0f5O;*l<-l37Ehaw;f&L$97EVr)$V^BO!d8QT%F5Q+7FF_t
z#|kKaZUU#yuDNZICy^Zrho(McRvv{eWX;G#vS$@E)!QtC4@Qjw7kxzl)^2NeoAcS5
zrm~z)dT|!IVCk7rifd>K-xr(<l4LbE8*q^k(*V{BrFbfWwi)Vd{k{7;y`tAETzR7j
zZLxRq`S@_cI@YYws#^^S&55a+ns=u)%$LBO=2rHfojWbGXL(ENwBCLan34HdlcPoR
z(i=!f<#fb0$&3`Dy4|OBM-1#4+gVxqc<ONPo7h>@BWhRT9<uLp9;YhB1OjT?m#;~M
z+CK?H%3w)4fNYLp(l$=JZgtm+!WCEc_sKnkqI!WyjFAN)Pj=1D;yfTS3Xy?hHDf<q
z`-XUG_hPR(#Y#ix8zwjzf(7c2INO(`<g7sFF&NQjF=TT|i$#KI*v`bML@PLvGx3TD
z&oJ}POkjLj5n51{$eAP~tk1av_rN!0<@x!ik<s9g^cA}=%EvzR#7=u^R`odHoFDi8
zxoVxV`tg+k$*L>cM1md8UFT8|Rr8bl>jQrfjA%K=3EN)3IlO9RQM)YrZGDRW(3k(-
ztEqy0e4=_;UJU*!hbq2kMlr6d&^+Tr=w;VBQnRanJ2JLE<Pkcpkb_oRu~)_-=bcs=
zJ83D6?2rNRb2*W5<Nlifx5;W}I-)mxJ@qQ5=6lrUkX~|nFG0IEeJcisU$LiTF@oYw
zO=AgkvV<)Rkxr}BHAndDJb7J=0X4)NMJ6w_it)&7Z?0vA|Gj2ndKlT>hI;r@)~VPY
zv5F$JgNnWv8TEd;mpLMa&FsV_Y3A^~<Wyt$rRdx9m5eBI$T4x;od$L3s<T(Rfz6pO
z&G*n)eS1(6m3dHm=4pyx?5JhLDFY~x_Vnn{jzvd5K>rVVOi+RjS${Wgm3Ktba+1Sh
z6|iqs5!%|zIKA{`aK^ml3a1)1aaMGrsJ69Ku7L=`@bt(FlEv>oV~vfq;x=r_2Lq>t
z>-lXm<on6Hgwb~7MxIw9dd4C@65vUAChWu29&qj}{VJ!;l80qKigyDV?IAFDu2kp!
zwnqNu#JGdZq$Q|K;)imly}B?-Gjn0%4aK!unE|u0n{v3ra(i0J9_3NYrSUl5`Z(+@
z==wssBEDel5q$7X8}>J}wzI`@)kTwab*P1#I{YT-4~u^0-Gu=kS`jHQ^rrOBc4%U6
z4OMjs64GWgAmX2lw8b(gT6$I?g&xL?A2+uBSN5JLA7Rs63MxS+__sC;P)mU@f;FZ%
zn}s4}Lr%MQ;yTw&uGoLH*SU#i{$AcUXYU`EuE}ne@2c&kn)b4sa^kvR+G-PWY<6(f
z`chs}s|+6;u=G(FQ+Swz8mGsMrEa1zWY_IEOf^(v7!kF-KV`=prjE|ng3UjH)sh0{
z`*NdFc1ykV96rMbTwA8A6orKl{@IK)|K+7zc|qrBHgArQJP&OVNd-EOdAN~#mVHrv
za2rlKXb<5pixa`=Z7n81s1VvW^vOM<mMzKIDZLpFc~1nlZh57I2$CzB?tWC6BR&|M
z95dZ~pwcR(k`O-o%80Oc=43_7K35^8TRG@YX@_IvmRx}qh1-!Odm^}9t7hl67)A?q
zjT~aw_`b@)7Kx{;O$Z1;-}yJf!?zc-D%b&y;Xr#mtEN8rlweQy{iVC-Yx6lC!|H`m
zSHCJ=oe-8LcDXA3-|8A?o={+xUiMK4fUn0TPKPh4nYKhwmzBl(M;oSp-$R&nIDaEx
z)6!=uTq+n&k3@tKMY!aD7)E1Dc3c_gYorX`ACBhKx>nS3FxV`-IxTCxBpa(_KZrb^
zsR41ZN61)7hc-tM{7$N1ZM3mU9CIG?7wowIT)}e1fi$hqD_caNYOo_cLe_zLzY&3J
z*5`1_tyMRShPHc?B!o&0hsk0{N^gRiUj*McoW$GxxGA%T8QqMjzYOZ2{iSM*HFzkP
zIeDF$!#KU<P`Lo|dC*VHkb<G8_mokGmvgXkmvy(flN(?_nxl1F_kmMWUD9Tc;ohi}
zm<3gk%@oJ3*+rFGgM9OK^kStcCik@z>uH79=C6f3eQrj?`BdUsRC;^BxHyc`R@HGF
z3>Dq4!P4vR7^`AxR&5(lNp|%KBfY{_wt|>ZXMwkfOY3PJMWJ*%Q7yW#gm>P~K{7Dj
z*PEE#Z4cD7@omQX*s&Dr5|z2EpST#C8oGJK>9KXD!0ER#l?r`$&;5M7lR4Q!pI#|+
zVLVN4=0AO4hjW;%X2!LP3w3zt9uOApHg0Zi3#G=%#XH+fIVzikB69*_bh?Cm*I`RW
zGPb0edsVt>?1l-w4TEMjVqY)647~9&;KXbFrRUY;Sjqr^NBHeZz3~@RCf*UWvIa#r
zKVUmHY}EA-j-HEEdRmF?`<4<Hx~T}&`I}b0`HjgxhVv}=>1!TK@F^EG`FZ9$?UWr(
zKAxmkTKALfO~iSAUbNa`77cqQUMb}g$y(Mi?XW3jYdf=FTaraTwfDZzO$?aIRK+v@
zga5&D><F#FE9WxmM6rul5*m=n?7|0QCsHp{%4=DXjXAGOV*d-53wHQ<AnnGm4aU6D
z3QOZYliq7LSnH?6CMf*^EO=zntVoC36P`*c-c?JK)tybqlFzKzQt~qmmsg^y`!@eo
zP|pSoU5aI3>w3r-HXDGoI%27o`1TE|mQq%}jTIC5XqVaW=o*ou4yuZ_GOf;9JL)Dr
z$Z&oeMfI;smsP^i)^%*_SW!Gy0r(0s{EVqPiO+WLzJ#5d>dl9pV@r;i!REXJT!x2o
z>EpQDli#f)E6^0LN8j!qp=F<kPFr>0mPt$d0!uUbK~bS(E;!G|%Pz{W`!u&y)Mr5&
zow?C7q$<uBw##O#QctUq8Mows@2!`9@{&?;tZR-wwW3Z=ZZe&ht{FbQd{~MDegeZK
zm$h;q@(%SKkU|_y@m;z^pB$n+f^s#FG?pFQy(B4y7`lo#ReQfq9vWR>6etdW@A-I>
z1g64)E6{#JjnD>$Z=_SPLPkhrhQmD#G)^rhN77;Q?p1+xu1PRVjqWZk31=2unj70t
zhb=6QR=_4&+{(Os?g&{5ffV`oT&E>ZbRr!n=G00W2buWQOb9D0++vEayVz0#nX;1O
zQ9)xA@I{})q(E=gGArrjDM&$swc!d%ZDH-2T2MCAu(}l{bHo2i8_Dq$3+VQ?P$wgy
zBFMgXlzT#D*ly0K{+eJre;UZ6>Eb*{td&VlC#ybq|McB~z61}xq6%00Wr{u14OniS
zSzU+kZ7jizQq}v*A?@3U!1?zF0J!FR^nVl1F#g|!GfW(8|D%s#Bw(dy{D0Ll|6kz@
zD+e3X|8L=p8>sq{&l;biqGTkqQb3kzQ5RQ<0?8<={xEB+L^MLN)CH|YiY)>lDX1`{
z0u~7gN-|u4Tlw1)_uJE--rARLSM810?8pCN>>Qgk0lIAalx^F#ZQFKLmu=g&ZL7P>
zwr$(CtETUbn24E(_rv^$jLgWr&R!?yJ#Xes@56DY)t0&hSd6=uH4(A~Q4*69Mv;Ya
z76=GPupomGky5&E$`*X2z3+Qj#X+Zc7Lya1=z{=~jTJU#=wh)?lXn&n2{_$$2MHJi
z5K3t!q|hQlB7y;%euERw{RX%;P~bu{B7&b1BQe5)wO}J31&95+%<eqD`GGx%d;keC
zF)6zY?g3FeuyEl4NB|JVWvt`48AzZGAlXDjPS}fwc*M^8X-!&bb<x3z2^q}GI3)3+
zT+}yEAbp1#mR``Xz(PJF#a^)qfJg(+rGj-o>L!52ob$M)5A`hK3Aoq@(Af_MA4tUL
zk^TWm2@BV24v}$w3KFBpIB4JSZ683mJ97jO>@WB?J9FTR1R3{w1RExpa81eB4-w}8
z%-O$X2q2O3HLBrIM+ArqG6WcMz#`uuJcABw^}>7f*3b6=<j_n2m^*v<-;9W?xS>Ok
zCcAbRd{Md~eFlHPfvdt?+{1|)Fr%X17xyeMLH%#|iT%Saq6EE&e16h!_aG|{#BgRm
zD3P2&HxKw_CB6{A>x*7nrlG>XBmt%W%)4X&Mg+hl&OWVEV(%mb*oP^oUd7$NxtXE_
z$^epXxD0_!q_CgD+o1qHBLM9?|K!e#0NhUsr63^y6}}G`*HGR8bf~BJV2N>LhuQDj
zqLrf;JEEKb643ejdGRaQ91}It;o*(rb0tFT`m|CDyAt}-^36b8O|68ZS3^=3m5`Jg
z2s9vIe;z>f+4qz0XcxTafBuSKfEPl7?0|Gxr2i@QrT6EA0QvTN4UxZBAQ+4IZZQ<d
z<7ev8TM&v6^at!+;NdHM;wSzXL+M+i?8jX!>t$=xZ_U#m<ePwJ74Q1^0V1&c+LzW3
z4mRP{RPd8y5&7BM9nMhk)%WG6`P{JY)m2f5bB~G+6d40N>SuX?Da*kg^N}4F#_?M&
zd&lb`I@CFs#IPk1^L2;>{00p4I~}ga6j9^T1T^^M*d7Hl*nsP@UPynG@l*Nh4?G+w
zC{))fzY>%b05cZ+Lvc4eKAjZMP57B5Y_#383Wta!PT1&y0q8dO4<JF7b7ZpMl@jZ<
zqcpz_&Dtj@Bzl>%@VPd~={@<<`EEL5%;10(W@3s984Yb+4Ec+%UfJLUMTan!Y*UJ-
z9SIGGww`3v!6tr*jx77<5BXD`rMycZtF7KToEjgzvzfs4EB%tw@>|3WjH6W@w<Gsp
zZ2pY_w#*}+VF#D|mgwyuvskJ~Gw7C_LpEPlS+FkD`J(N(+|`SQ+)2481AdsY9M#sW
z`apAB)jX}QI6GE!eZE}76uht51agP0|B;`YKW-<cGXwJy<3U-T&jylMkOtY5kG=m6
zt1ZSy^(mp=O!&l3TYtk}Y$sov^Zj%hy0VA*?@7A5&C!Af*V!VC?Ep7{`~w-T8m3J*
z{q^mJw!Z8|q9dF9LrjqOC?4Z~vR{^pvcd;w^`Zh5uDu-5*siEZ2+Zhdm)7TtwfmXN
zy7s+7FaBhc+<^yyn~TzO&7KRWJv3HHMNS%>_j7}pFXrV1rkIAK`YP0QGB}`N+HP0>
zk=;*x`j*Qx-|bl@871p8))RG>p?%BDgfu}KZKg(=yxYIf57op^23`ypTWc>vk@-hA
zf14`rWxZ6zNsP~o9Uht%{ILFsqFMxr?av9%mYA$K8D2ttd!%o`aK7~2e<k{J)h+4m
zZ+uFuOE5`l0nDcto}McbG|BhUMzfDpqV<rxaZN)U6@!!qI!{JAgktQy6KX+?QS(ZL
zm_~3~7vTC~1Bk$?;3e)apV_#g6Wu7rwm<Epg@>T}9tfi7D#Zia_phmY`&3XG!|u%d
z!uWUC1AT_m$hfiALls}Yj@-eeWW>i8r@w_CRXXGAcz-co!|2O+;4V}#_iW_gOmS#W
zaX-gaHK`Is$Z8&+rPsvjF;S?e<<f>$=PcX0<($BuNOoB7sIAdLpTv3N|1+nqHg}G_
z#b!EG67f7d@p^c}d1|1Tpw3_<sg8Dmp>5ecM=|**@mKx(iCp)*<l0d4bbrX-FD=`<
zE)k}8p!La@YDjGe!P`!0wa@hWJ=;z<lEEXq>U(ZMZ3k&S0Q8c&S2U3%-*CB=X3M!)
zvf0Cq9};+P%SCdbVrzKfHh_C64%|?;YV7toqnmQoLdK?jcslfGW!rwI<s+V?Bj?*d
zVc4Z$9eOWj=T%~xy<5POJYV0LtndnLV1|dp+_VOoF*6<sR<!0)pY3z=L2W%s&CD`c
z$QXJgxjiC3X-vFh&-tM;%Y2buc#<k*w;1;vNL;O(Sj*$E#C~beW0CtR0TBaJq{zs`
zTm;0hW?^xhk>xD809ToDaIolngbnq%ApYGG7b(D1<?ZRMiSQB@R(H5tP2NKny<z%!
zY|Q~&Z#7M*Go`w;($oc9gbo)w>u*IF#^XbbnJU&yJ3b`f!zolCUw(xLdxS=~jvRx(
z-Ozgp5X3sQvA12#IBi_DJFm@_OwdBRf}PMAxPx6F@ET_FOS5>p;~akQN92V9C1Sjt
zio_k4)CaFk^r=hCH_YtZkNc85Nw9kmb8}O^*Zwv||A;<`M_|7=K}`)hrAR-Yyyt%+
z;*jfP7RUHS)z8IjG^K+|ym6RFSAA(ypMmKs-_54?gfIp(QYWi@1ktjY0=@a%8#c*<
z|KUDc3rlgQ7Al33ofV@^_MuyzJk!4z*-nbH)=UrDGV9>3$j3fo2bKGxh8vAGMpNxm
zbsU$Y0}k(){w5$Krx)&b=W2$k5mOZ1ZgWwp|EY&%)(O+KF7_8bOymZ3W16OAg(k7E
zV%ONohE1qyYl`}^AsHoZdy9{{XfON7E1?OE2Rce`DBs>Mizplo`fcqrdm9$_0~K6;
zQ+O`fsWcm*F)$j$8u$-cjMz=o7_%wI@8_|dIqYXJygU(FmyGHNQqQYda1I2L#=_a&
z-rY>|FdU;Ic0^7OBLklkU8CqPI_|H~@)_0AKXgAdwq21{J>DJp*P>o?D}OL;P$Qu3
zSKP%srC(tLXp*S9^;5l7kT<m@ywTju=>`PiB=0LLdh{6`7N(1$98bk2k1B-{k;mc!
z0ws5wtF44ZXEHa+iZuFbmfAnfuXq~O`2MLYT^P>3K+;)5Tbb?6xEVKhYe(9uaI!fK
zkF31w>)KG+T}?Zb>9Lq^qSND(q6kWFrkCXNJ1TC?*Lh+?a0IIBh)(Ffi8&BeO?`%P
zSVZBD8s62lt{YTh1;Lw#i!G;c<Pv{a9x1OYG%X{j(B%-H=xUpW>{^H)nXe*>kur}i
zz59peH|IYjdNYGxH8m1Lp!1|7`KmZbN+q5M_!A-2V5ZJ?8e2am_o`df;+_a^zYAcB
zi-t3-<qW6bs;}X{TARZLD7x;BE7d+SqXEGVEha3s&HRI-nF?kYlbz)!pA_V(p&r~c
z&{)*NT!-cZP!)fr4781g*dV4b)o)4vkXrgOLQt)QLq(4wjz7U)=xY0yN6PF|+rhB@
zkQPZu9zM@0&2O0S$LDT_7Y$GJycae%OVSCv+@*;8wl+SR;aTFBym^76N6W6<24gE@
zSctfOTYMm@qiOn=Uh^;78Xj{JqwQXrxPpZrYq9K?LEtS^ft)D|aG&4KX!0=AAY#ul
zMaAAbwtRbN3nic4)fDwbq?df<&2Hf^P2zIlwCAF(``B0<e6@PHnM8gCL72(Hzkd@)
zi6Gax7-Yhu#&q4sPM2Vk`H62Dr^<a(X4u<}RQT&qb$7S?v=?d*MOF5FL%c4B(<DcY
zX;^x1<B8I$(ET7D{G2*X{ASVd)$?M@vi4rI=Q$BCHe1yFF;rc^npiLKE6Ujdfv#|j
zs)N@Mk&!;h<=<A2jkzYruYQC8YhRXy0*X6e6=e>hnjy0mFlYh6!-xU*0HQRo;WcGJ
zBUJ+CQ->xm-o(<ty2yKQJn(I;@UMKsdlti|m`n4--8x=TyN5qMxgIC^jG=HegJpJ9
z!JY~cOB0tDPNq7jH?FAuyP`-VtI@Y!g3B>>y$7veun-Xw;}l}is+sU=7EJ6e7~E&J
zG=~0OPJ+yz=H=Jgo0vPac;lB0w>l9@Up3pL2onmu8M68-e67_^@FL1pPUmY4g6TtL
zrjrE~7|%xD)X?aS*4f|{<_nML(#mUHTg@|;lKx{L{xyL($N}0@MT)j!yViR6J5*#?
z8db;+CU6@3fUyJ5;CbsYmx%{6c34g2GL_glVsNF!3TAu`A#n?twQKwR+<rrCz6cvX
z#|;PlPY(wX$f<<?gwy4nK9bsroF`|*Xmuv;OjeM>2){SSCo8yfsdEt<`|Cp^qgPr@
zRD_Adz<VX4(wgPLN>_DtU#U=QI@Lt{92)83#RG}1Sk(;W6O>rde)lMQCG$1Vu(`lJ
zs8!=}3~b=F46rTZvk)p&$Cw`$U1aA{%zm3QS?9l()LK5&LQltl_2jXn6`k%fuXFaG
z!XZ9SDX)n}_09UoWMnIC4xXD?h#m#A?IWX|P07<nf|lBF*L&ziQd+tCOf*%+(j9Gc
za66sW*dn`dbE@<aKt8`0GS9xKd*OH9L~h1byI&m`8Fu4bjqf`3HU{)aZ!bOXQZb1a
z^R&Lf(9|{>rHHIg(W>*odHXrpnUVdYne?<>o(sN|8ag=U@%H_6w85lHNt}M)8<)pc
zFK<%;=yXBXSE~51p)J2V!Q3tNRC?)kpFGb^vq@L{@rm-TZ(O&!NN;(M=bRU#T*OEN
zVt60(-D{{5t8yt~expdOvAwvF|I&x~C=;&g-+~W}hbH!r!K5IlNGyf2={B`C&Tids
z3EKz0{VV`VS6p$l<dvCSjB};f&F<jWp%hmR%Vp6DGjDeUYU|Ro&#5Y%03WaMZNx$L
z+PlFn5UBY)(pkHp0nvumYo5s!sC{TtH)9_dE5#E(KuBe3UP0(;nhre}7_H#Qh=K2C
zz81G{SEaXN&X8;A?jarp+lDq{%B<oZ<|JQ2L-lJv!H0ANBdP{d$4>}FsGCHB=$_X^
za9@o=SFOHXJv)TrX)4;8r5e4&k|7cA>Eu|tec#J|n4utNEa@`u7ly(1!Yh4z+R_v=
zO*?>SDzq+HQW*KSWc69e$b_e^<gHJ{m)bLjwG)LMTxOEMvU1E4^SS)MCU`tt0Fz9k
zW2)2prnt9R$0|B`HUi3c*fEz6H^3(w48Ao>yb!-f^-ca%H)vQftUIQGV$L_);~0Bu
zowuTNk9YV_l?xpws-mEPL7!EAPFDpjiZ2PAr-GIMl1-YGNl@vhbgXs#XLRV#Qec~I
zM#3=Tgp&pFeQ4&uNv2z5>G<$-K7&~DI%>ZE(!(?21#OnUNjRMm!;EgU_YH^5TOtpz
zCSyfI5mLSGS`uj|nH5ib9bMAYk?D#$ZE&spHhxYeUUD_>>*B|qR76jQ>2lU=yjL(-
zDiQ85{=qImItq*9dZeYYS%b{r-zdbgV_GZmzu}5FWEP!%dFRbod>1|n6We?9{23zc
zjKzu3?rt43%epb$^CZP~Hulzz60wKJ56&~sr)7NUEZRYurGGaM&VbOK=Z4Xs_LO66
zvgH`6bDAy0PA9O*TAtgnAwjn0vHGrxg12xOe+N~%649Q{Q6QlwZhJtyH5?9}sjQ$R
zn(lDTH|>%BI#$H@9X)8_6OA^AE@^7DBvBHnwP*LjhVvVZBPSq{H*gk`1>w*nv*VQ+
zwFDxU@Xb?&?@F9UY$%cE_ma_$JMT-rYJb3kW%91O@=6U#UVr&~Z7;woEnbR^Z=G;z
zbYqXKJq3JT<hdD}mOwsJn4U~mm8`2!(UnU~SxVSznpVcEqWx-prvEwJGTa|Ov`>lI
z;kkAeSGn1OBtHpB9jk@cg~M&UM5hl0$F;}>Vw*<~8-;>4PZg4Z6KmYQ{b#^8$5*`z
zmP?&U9=9A;GRT33WAJ=ios8X?$Qq9DYPHX!I)e14p10=QPJh_iV6jH`mqb}k{CIba
zH2Pk~oZ_|2z8LnwaM}Jyjr$WOZ0{f?nkW|phi#ZPyXRkOs&cY7)*?HHbsVLm5!D~L
zFtglIJ65es#ZM}Do&V07oekPHjWV?NleqXI@tfZtXAvKLf5pnxn|5a3l;Z~5&dp<M
zYvtjnSYCwI|9Uqb77{Md%j=0y2DmgAciGiOosz{{FDJL7q$E)E&!YuRZsxheu@2k>
z88KS1?sgR8B+iJH-S!#EV#0gMvz!us5-X7^YU#GRpjyeme%&fu=m$2>u(ed>uTGrv
zd#5IPHNCIc5oZ+c35g<1@aNC4Hk4HEa>m-hmawuer3C!B#(X-0IhTGTmS|;yMf|m@
z%40gwdUYns$%2EhE0t!f-<!PSo?^CU>kDv3HEUkgQoY*G_0nV{l#1hh2+|v?f3K=x
zS1hjVAu{rusZXbJXe@DSPaDn5?iZmiMbQgx93zvQwftj{?(iidn~-dLx=p@ICP^|%
z^73c-5#T($3WT-tEa<luHezEAB#bIn<LWF>uR7Y&I4MbDz}&!(WcN)Fxu6n@_;32D
zu|&wRKe_a4&TD<=|1iRIKj~(f5|LA2l@e_nFXiX5OjZCD7Rydv(O#&|uIWV6&RsSA
ze3Oqw%?x^5vm4RHRZL{-8f$vYw>_e3MYpp*cwK`w#3L#b+*V~OwM1Ak)mYM0NG=Cw
zG?ve-N!XWN%c{tKPkUZ}%;p2-`fbeMoQ#fGoVibl&R&%d<)rFR>%m{tc7eH4$k>@~
z+O_H#f^z~M$dtaCvkF_cyTUTB(8ywS1Z4k>VU2ODVCdRU9bS`DW*_5yoGIVu-dOFB
zn30*@V#s3Ov1%x%pTOWsuKlK(<fYq`^}FLMynMLKTK>>q*N7wqjm0w4t>y;*fZ?A5
z#hQ=VCkDUtQ;WT7aYDN!)AEvpl-h69I1Mk+`{3Grt1h{Rml)G(n@Xodcg`dR<vc{K
z`-N;R$LA4{T$aczR_xJl)k>`QlD19FkhFwRE*1<2Orl?|Yu>tK0P?^iwc%RvIhiOg
z6}p6wj$a2}_AK$*g`;QBvcH@C;L#&noEbx=z%))qt9V;SWpzd#nb&z=xoTIcv&Wlw
ztV-DAG$?7tB|GGwa5ly_4o0A3B?M;Qk)bg&C8f`Mo#9PvDT;nw#N9?&i&}+xZ>p7h
zC`K#9oBdR*NAOe<`8;u*HsscVj9b)qLglCL^OyViVeu%}fpHaKGuV@gv?kj&tetAP
zylC>ze(~o$&cVrCIB`iyVF(_TWa8Jzsu8-h{rF)nU!ah<Uu78GmAhN`@O_6Yp+bz3
zp>xAp={nU40&=Ay&7@=0bMd)hMKzhU)!M+wFVXIFlfG<aBMr(4mY~=2WghUKDxRrq
zPRaLGyCWVVe$G7v_vkyWZRW3-6fv3d)AID`SrKUBrNt{=LOB+HxNL%2V})aB*|s$g
z*eoAonCl8O@<bk7I(D=X=!9wyy#<;AP7f$Un)n%FhS>yNWA{Iz;S<SG`FPlm8;z?O
zVkHotsmEGlenr17MfR8p-ucTNh|c<G##sdlsU!H|97pYPv6yVH$>|H?)6y6(a@2k@
z$YiZ*Ds*Lb?M4LatYn{bRX^H=QLqGN3==XJozDUw_8eR0#gDz$w~`EGob|1DYtH=E
z4r{#UH9x82>GD^|o;Qs$^OgD#a0aL$v7|ufT|u_6TdK~tjSuOxJ0Zutgh-?y6gc0w
z2&|bQ?8~83-Q<_>=lFYx$bvqi%JNr)Cn79Z@k#R@A6%GuKSkG7ls#Srd$cs6G&x8f
zjU49}^<$%U3sWE_X^RsYMYjthkVE^IS*PPvjizX0F9%k|yQ5)nJe@r$Jp2p4?oMZ`
zBDv~qdZn}#qWkPnG`&eIaNDA3nqj~BIRWWcWKA|`tK{-a)wZ@jTz2A@Pe)Y4B%3ug
zQ*VW&UQWI`0*MmK_wuS5)?U1Zb7xvcUHqy{<jgsWH%`ZBM<|U5FYIz~rlt9)jNeD1
zo$9<2W_7F+Ev#nyy?j2*kujFAvN~!pNu9q}mvDO1#qClA?>;T-Q_}}^60<>I{OZn1
zI~mRBk;=5TPHeSP<Q^h%yS(e2Rs+DjM|GwvjQ+4)*IgaS2$OquMu~ljj2x1b8hnV7
z5$EV=v}k|2gpghL{O0J^b71^VnE4)AP&GN&4rANSPe&L;A<Iazwv`Do7r|%7oKzzw
zSsf$&`+AkSon?WYqMvyK%lpB2`uEiWZ)uN{OCo}ho5Ujd6i7*A0y_Jk=gif1R_j9L
zmDMw0rP7Vn!Ik=F2zQR5&27NRB+r=gTJu0#Bwqd@?XYk+GH#8g?soMLQT}A)?bM*m
zIu)hI!+0CmAlFFPSgg6#b)?xzjLm~Jc5y#josO^4FOEf18K@#lDB-p@NCuXGOmr5w
zP85X?FZ=bga(tS`uCVz#f{CzrkQPzfl1|T_=7?fS8atVm`#(@9-qH;xhTyn|FZfIA
zr#Rt2Ew2bTkKJVcs1~Z~Ay6=K#QCxO`g|%Tb%tf+@}Bc3r^^a|mRNik0@g%#vD3{d
zn8ms%ednoc;w~pCPA&NC(I&Bkp2W5g1NDz~us7>_kJLB`z!h+{A?{G!AO886>tnti
z5$htZ1%BD*dm5nnby-(f6tB>Y_3PNo(0*Vo@waq?#Dy;Qp>k+b#HYl57``JTAv)n*
zAGzzS?hZ&jvaz8%c#_ZPczlf{W;x7Egmri0Y$gjYGevU=TLQODx%5k#Hjlx6Nu-JZ
zog>*4SJ-Rvr*5WPO}yZoJO2?+ff|xX^sX`0E4_dPfq6^$6@dK40G>6Qn&aD0EoaF8
zM&Vj_NRc{~UJ?QIVk%;aj-9f7EylH6i+Qae^L6{x9^`*e>DfOziddpc@0Kb){43dQ
zwrloBr<YNkUqph`>CJXga83H_{zH!Gy;x&pGno{m&ULU)D9x3UqVeI+flM0+j)0xr
z?RG_|6ZXV&ASx6E^!T+ln3hf<@C3_79HQzY(cBB02bm`C8Iw%?&R<|2bIdiCP|4`U
zLmY~s)zj$`X|dcEv&#*-2W9=Rhaf9o&_ht1gJ3$az4v${`yXu$zD#OX>6nD90X1c%
z$nqEObS>{_A+mnSVUds}`(iZ?kbl5)uvWw5+6z8PPa#40!cIqS&QJYjMU#|hmome@
z;jo3o{#&4OA%gHfK|9v}1npRv{zu!Ljf<1>zY*U5hIVYM|7U3D3Za^8y+B7vT;P%d
zUr2=~eA5;2NZu7f8bU~#5CT7+4JmokC7no)E0{$nhFT)YK-?9Knn?WFm~-=a(&1j~
zt+6b<ow>#`Gs)uJvu8NRa;OqQcvWB}2^xkl%0LOGxV*d!fCd5u3w;9v3yt99jM>Gc
zINk9hj+0PC#f}q|{9*`UhKBAp^ra?*MX!hz1>m=H0R{8}3Nla?b)^*%|Jl$e-#8E>
zlYlD%Hun$%*adcpkb%Td94SfkIu#u<K)}7Hcj5u^j2Hk)Dyr!Z8oYv2Sh2o7LQp}R
z5XS&+69v%V96*>PBW~2)y9Sgz76k0Dn6zN;z(6p;Va%~ak)e}rCjfzS7|0MHCZcq$
z2)TPQ3cyQXd7QEM6vYLQKybdh_aa)x-vJ5>05t<p@L|NWtEe2Hpi#hv3J{o97C<g~
z1ra-jwL1X)-u!=+_qV_wsuzk6b0W@t4Q5DKaqf-)M12QPSVIK&AYhlJzpqSrnEC)n
zpf@N`uENAsp9CJrYtY{Vz<y2ez!g;IAcCt<Ka=6$#k=&FtOD5AkIv$O`KApkHBkYS
zB)PeTkg!>&=Kj<UsQ&^acZNWL3E!B1P7a^%=F2_Eh_4wYLOXikVaV2M995Ac1n>*u
z_YsI-V?a?5@_s+EF`$A5a1P~$`05#um=5!(f%v)*o7*=t0(J)6FcJs!6ucqQC?Lvj
zk-&o*Ak-%G<@4>nyMvB|2pQ1ZhZ%r}3NC^8rGj@6w*J%H_#x592ZSD^`3?jWBp~qP
z`MaMPHb|7y^9$ss$rz|q!pv+qi`QTLTR~9@>I~|34+R|fHAEB)NKlA~DS-32?`FsK
zQSes47xFu~I<P^)n8oiUx~rnc+wDgLcv=8@5BReq10GpMk22tapiBok3OcCKp!dhV
z`$zh%XYSKH^@n2Nr-OuzgQDEPae61<hXmd!jK}j!$guJvtZ!TpClU>0zo(FVc4vJl
zOnBFB`Uh{RH=w~uQM9)q<rpOD7AETRd0@`UL4i^fAr6S=vuw(~=T4!Is}D($j}-g+
z0WEk68TGRsQ{8lTWOW4+dtz#b2oalxYqDPK`){G9(pLw98Ym{zTO~h{5)%M26xb8V
zC_TPO6o_B2MwUo%#^4eh@|Gk4(*_#A^M{}pKa%*p%|b~k0HEGKU66mhgAWxD0OMvL
zIm)ooBM;J1sJQCpHwU^gzVpnmCsLTF$T+viiA;;PuZc5%-=&?n9c*u^cs#6s?yf@A
z-6w1fEZcG(F_rEyP%~*c#oSccBFJVv;)X}Ia<le;63##2I$7T-+I`1VT|1C*l^1W|
zJMfjV>)hYVEx#U-Y@SpzNU9ceK0Id<LwrG)65iVm$0g}|v*IR4?y*@+t%l-{xn8ue
ztfZG!>6$KdKlfY&R5n&OV<Gk!aqKr;<ZN?0&oVKJn(Lx2m)WdR<PlH(J9PWITkF0h
z#=Z!cpdF(2@=v(Ys9Na<rmCo&I$zclMcXKq<BoLsZKF!LYPWSo?ufCV$YOa;{_0-|
z6VE=kg+(Tod7?mz=&-+R0=~7Q|8}Q4QPZwt(IzH6M6%&NFG3Krl$#;WF0&$S3kdr%
zyP6dGubrun%vw*&vKxd)&4c_<+@Qe~<Ej`0O})L!ITaqHc-m97^7RI_$Y(7EQZeVP
zZG}Qq+7>Dg-zHXqT0Y11RCS!Lq(^FNUpzlj2z6}d(_Wmz0%n9z<>S3oA`FLVpz9P$
z!6$|cipfyy$;ru-8Lo%lp*1;1DF(R_|MgLbF~t|eeGImE5#3!!61LRuwLdyL&6In1
znMG}S8hlRFEoxs7$&aKq6juaehL&GgBh8?TO@<(mKB|@k$ICAJ1CiGKvT}m4rYK>w
zo*j_XglmuYy|YhD8vZt>CM0<88@peR;pr~tS2~oTybsARW(h5Scs$6`C#B53`8Ue9
zz)p~qkybC^`@&lqb9J%&THpOMZVdNO>mrZ^@ebPL0X>qe(IwZQ<Y;6!oLn_a8#40C
zb5~d9W=aaB!P^kW76H7`tffl<8A!)_7D=*dxfqC|s$^J41XSgFPHjaSu0<t^O%05j
zU&Z!P$)ZHkT{z~LBH0wWhCbeRNWZQk57@g5nibWhex<*SHA)9<$c#9DwEh)BZ+ccT
zri95t$w`5}=9Qf}U>liwvhQu`=4x(40fCn$U?Dj6Ezb$|Eneys`lC^kPf0Q<jjklv
zNEh1$je?wDmIxJom7EV|B6C)ptuF6qXkDmIlmkkCX~ae{g~L8<5NS>k6@{y;d_8*Q
z>=v+J9f_bL8PYM1VxrAP3LEZGY^Lr!HD`NRxmYD`y>4FLL2$l5SZ3QUQFn7uD_1>B
z0p@P4$cSDFdv$<4BPZq4A=Wpkva)B3GBw9QxjWm_KkLbVVR4%m#TG>ibq-U*F^k4>
z?Bn7*N$7gt7ctvs76@&!wDi{mNCR~nbIEf@X2e*({ZcUUD0MnE&sh<uJjg((*7@93
zaBSBid-T?e>ECli-=YVL{|hlpseH`S*{^k;4<Xo83ONTl77j)%DJ0`F)#9XvZ`50l
zIJr1VV2~!3+R#t4d)+%msxTwBQ)O6{%g>qp70_FduNyJXWT^r{#(=y~XH|3X2La7V
z-1YglS*TKqy0hNAUYfi_iJH!S>J}@rzawVP-)_--=WVydMJIb~D9Z$A0vZj<^wQkL
z#PfBdjr4CHAv8y4Cv;}C?6N1{MwW0<WP=4Rhk#iT-$=KOQxqX*OYVd2^Ez&RUjaR`
znHsNWpu*k$>ph~moDsG~)(oxAn(-GgIV%B|^fx_(A-F{7BUA8@dV1?ax|8_$<qsAs
zH9G~GZ-+_#iycBk;%{w-93@_wHRd&ZPQAz13+q3=QPO!Aps%h@lrE1t@*iz$YuW}<
z#)7dRA=x6bj%8!yzd^?O)GX`xg>xHk|7vsXU8Nn=3ULef{BdH{3wt=0C7gM~JV9p0
zkCInnCJ<j5f`M3Kq(I)n7Bf>BM<SK)<Dc)vhv6lkwM6kPFmI&gG~7>$GOB3BYA|NJ
zbQ~fvTWMVxo7MYT^54~a4iE#|;fVvM(F!k2T8_`6T^hPdn6H>t9he~xcEzaEh%#yl
z?%#t-S)}Fxz1brpfybcUk$ipv?ulyO4Uv+X>4~<%`90fBa4a4>#=p|N82@bEil|}C
zkF(*kysq8jUwLw%CNopNt?93^6_z!A`WDWdETW*mz7wDnWjE3+#Z`fmP*K2SLZc44
zX`!o`>v&qQH4uBrmo>&bdbzpWsF*O0qODR|_>gb@gl2%yCbZdXy>#VZ7=^s-Uq@E%
zqBdUWQb!Cvk;Ufw$?ZE(7}2o?S%>rQm&A^f{=qH-L9N%JDK3<I9&f^;iKCvzIP=77
zl5X{M7>On(GjJCCnc%whbtJ`>IOP;q7Hs@^lYeJNi0YCQHK9O@BMsMq>$TBakeLc`
zlx?3jXe1=i{k$4tThHFA0wADW!NMcu{MC!trt!4#7CaS$>r52yy4y)o7(W(Z43Td$
zqUyMeV1CG4&0W?dZ!iJ3!!E2xfkxhCl09X&CZ~eRv%RC@toq}SO}coa?H~}d=z3Sy
zU)<uR6|KOQpxbFs#g_KlcN%gEHRLdZ23U=^e*v*RV`n921TT1s)aKU#>$UUD)WCjA
z&s1p!hZcM2U!Pu^P7}ooqqA!R>EV&$vfNB$Z%U<e0bO^|3#PO~*$H&c2Skz^zGF5<
zl6-_IuGLOl`-ES5pVv-2IaeL$Md^VYfBHnrU(L@!-w%}QEw)7yJ7{u4`uNC+y+sz3
z;}{<I`KJCDzhUtY=Tp;tt8MLV%2&j&pAJ8L*mNWL0hiH_MU$52bJ$6JdGXgdv}6!p
zfpupsU<8t!9B!y;4;Hb2K3(DJ1rI^F|B6Fz#$8IT|I6BBrLYxmHu+g3un4AFm0LXz
zACsLKi-h0pJ9q&@(5Z_Lcg~gtehfYv7}Ix+cDW+p0e;g~H~et3%B*26>W)>OS09$d
zcHlgm4X%^Xf&NBsDTVej%%S#gf8q-jJX4hP;_T<NRMiER0xl3r@{|L~;gA6hXEyYz
z+wwmUe5$3|z%pM_?<Q@n59cfJO?(!#eSxV3F_5}mue#-oh+D6(D3-*(wYP=rKcZ~7
zF!`kHFmAb?yQE2Zyj=F$U#iE5_0zbREJDw3D@k!~bHz1>qd7L(*W`HN-5ZuFj3&)s
zRr{cn*P(y}A-3sJ#Fds0#pKyRn*}wJazLbI9m>_|h-+*5ajVfj0IS<5K=1j0idt9;
zO&w;p?|V!zkq7tEu-Vuz%6!G<9(zHv_*e9HNpqch4_&f0jJ|OL&EH$>@62IzwfUX6
zfmN1WkD8%Wz^Z6sbBj1@GiwP=hqSb)#8kV?l1<V*iWexoymc2Yi<$1|FEqVQoZB-j
zoG0(XcQ28ZJk9N=k=jN+lhoYh37rw@6gP~l&?2sfOOnd9UFE(QSM4^F@J(ymw$oiV
z<K;5m!$0b2(M=OADxfikWe(n{ep@9ta5aI(;-U9DQ8M+J+lv~E9tVeJ;nk7u-jX@8
z&2L+B`H9wc?rD+bPf&3XwUoxhDY@Vgnj>G-FoSF(><d6xMmd(~Cf`(hmk-01M(qfe
z@sT5$5g%L4{vO8aT~xEPX*_|so@P&0G3_NEsTr_pToH@?mp(qa2rqKp!JDL+;g80L
zR;CQr7d?5oatVAm1szlWdcC5mr)6b37kYUIg9&Ie^P66I-<Cs;ziWnsaX-h3EB8eu
zcykHpNrkLz!1d$^SiwFlSNeutqdFue5UzvDy7n@<Q281n!POQ-Ck%n>g6DU=!?&jk
z(ox+Bd|u9y?R*q+%ger40pk~r-5R#^H=b^>%1*w!BkuCGbJ)L0d7TozeTzW;Wyhye
zgFF!{B&YkK+wSv_;J>COzO+rhc4sZ(Q;Ih5mZl!Roeg-m(JV#pvltd!n(GZ29fY*3
zLQ>9Vy|}7#Q_Y&4mp&3h&qlk9QvXz@V$T2%j*LC&VNARe?lNL0t}a~zenq;M&(P)U
zAkrPiSNlwNB`Mx6{dPYIJE3HBUjCgt=v|$l^@I~ylHa?nFAC{sfJ!|Jz|Yc*J$ZI}
zs7-1Y5_s5p-isv8(pVJVK&uFl8QJSPxQ;hN;omr3VB);ker1{rRDLnPV~J9rE+5C!
zJN1?7mN;3UVZ{8CD3#^<)SYm$ycYiPrFKj)3H0S4#m0uH2xZ*iE?qpXZbP%@QSbas
zlkDlI+Rz!e#`8Odrm^Pb!e)udpvU&s4=sU4HUFPRp9rHi(ju)HPwSTWPYGw5Zh92M
z#wqVAjoA-luLOSuqZ=m5Oq})(Pqo%(LY6kWcY}H7)`u%*_w9WS$`VRfcCjxKUz7H#
zW`DQKqwL!5Lwx0LXjY(g=>vW3ACbH(n(AH%xzF^>u40DP(BO0JD+qI&vli~-)YAvz
zyy`25R|S<gBuiP`pI4Ygki#SjYPBb=?Tnm}7J)+-<NGLNZm)_Yr`=DlU)m1t+R)^y
zC#1i(3uEWiMLYOfQrm35e#gvxo7(#0nm)$#frM#=LPiIG(^PBZ#kU3zNDCmk?_V{9
z@sYvjCBIkEqfeFyG&r2iF_{swN?Xy(s6srA{hNSGKTh{B$iX~a#8Bj1RsNT}%#X~#
zY;m`hq3LV7l^hkyC>+eqVP@TJ4gDge7;KJXrsWm|78Czmy(y#1mtRXv-W(ECMf!Tc
zv34&{%IA?C;X|dJ$6B1KIs10NOCJEI;C#F?B@Wd7PJTlf8EZwm@MXq34@MK@O8&|m
zNgD7dQe1{}L*l!&duj_iF(&`k3y(ex--Il}$&LzBmx3p%C3)y)Upj)xB-_e{Vk*Kf
zN0l1iz8R+Z)F{o+V^}H+pJH!a%gq1E2-V|a4?!nlt!6t-ZmyL*FX&nv;UWvPfu+5<
zQ1Q@2Ndw9G#2YlI3rozoiqyXOjk-5Yg%i(;q`ta&`YX0Pf3OwGW3@KI+SDi0{gZMW
zk8^iUKy5~Aw|0~@VbPesBFla8Y7MTaqi3?jsbRYUOrPEsn$_{`QbXKqt8SH-3EQJN
zKUZHv)|xO~x;1#%hN&rtN4&Dl8vCk?ze|yt8upA#aZ@wVgTBV1FALUL*2W#OAUCKh
zSDs22oBMeZB2<P@@^h>u`dD~qa3U8t*kJf(XHekiFc`+Cktn<%f>hw;neMJO!j|Wu
zTHEItE=I;f!V+_T?NX89ef>1ZuOPG_^j(?MS@bws-)5_p#~qhfi$0tt--|!-r?0A9
zzBD_u`26DNOV?SF>Vp?c!9SdjY}mo6uiWFKK!^Df-*Zj)S7c6xxXCrt%2HU~!J6#z
zGJdyEi86{t0`dmwz~d|q@}Wma%~SkLjFy3r;6C5H@zYYl<RUcl*GC7bvjRcVfDEBU
zY?vx?#+FPw##i1mZ26(n2PROvz43hFO-!r<@k37RTNyZKJpzv&l~212Mj9Sc)|Yt4
zbWC@-VF^bhWysyTX8iEQ(n0X0#Q=3#ttgDYd}Qg!i*mM_hr+GGo?B*LV4nj=D{i1I
zJoA#PN!phft%T<Xl9tOLnHDY+h>Z#`@6{^8WX+je<61XU8Ld&Kt}U!0gH&bJ&0{V4
zc#@K{FE=z=nimKt!EVhiN2X@#R&(9v&MYLQ)&Sksw<3%8i^D+rZVG-#8FkkY?>*?2
z7FF{=MDYdT{F+qimCGu8&SH&q#tq80jtw2jHRd`Ib%i(43Y9a-rnB{Uh&{1SbZl|E
zuyb*1Qgc;K!y)-+_eWl$P<~SU3{DO*UpfOQ$~tsmd`HAg%trV4WygvCM#r^lbF?RV
za@Q5#_dfX#A3u5CA{P9-!nv_S-DWOU^Q;f9dIHS+uM%RPKslN|(wG3MQ%3Ov!Gfxj
z)nX5ZuP45ZS<A+lKloNX5tLHCtX-2SrS0c)e;gLz4($F|L(ts>oH(*JD%&4pLbzB_
z4^X#MQN$%Z*<nxCvrF7DM=Ej~|MkRQ_bs#ELMG4-h^_2fg-gH6-Beb!gH7#PKT#mT
zvL2AihmG*~LcI)^2|aKmcJ=UWDpvn0D2gztNsX7%7WH57IBn)Mnm`82&pR4BI;ktv
zeq0~?VnRD(D26z@ZNP5%&9;a+jnIwKyo<<={;@3L^ZOJm#~!7Whi=9Ed7LzYmfw#Q
zQlkJD%8A%te8Tc5g5yM6bh}B;Jrq*4RLKLwOHO~Yo5as$>YoPM8kuVv4FW+--EIk3
z&5Kw5HN^__kwKRLnIk}wJGnBD?mMveoi6fnn>+8YvGFW4DXe=6OMk)Z>S!ZX&UO;W
zMQy-ulh;i#bq&zRkl19ybDd9JcPiTR-dUEwl)>DHUt(Z4G!wwz&qMue*#FeQV+rfA
zyat#;RFeyfQU5WtOoFxgvJkGm<)m#JHto;1=5bARzJn^pxHy%bBh@?Zwnu2M{Zmj8
zvvR1m@mp#i?%}j&F-<?2hqE!7WX#tQr`;G@B<-ojS~|G6OpeYo<@$t}*GuyY_17zK
znZ@pRXSOK~!yWH{J{9>5%!_a<s`(NO_kHh1ajjoRHTl)L56cw-$GmS<4XOZYnCIak
z!USkaIc-%?eX@d@K@9L%?KNsN^azEHL2Wm<nF_6LrVWKwjdcv@Z!t=ATgt88X}cJK
zkr%@CzcafIbnT1&U!Jgtw@~?uXTWZ$g>YU*zx~U$msZP*Zex}Yqe=wJp!40AL$d9F
z+SZBq3bpZgD5d*b!>jsylRkyUx;eKlHF=+(DNNK!op=xkO>s+BSbW?&E>d&{s<iXw
z)pEW<*c#2VOWDuPi@#n_+Jn;C6ofuygzqdl?{TzT%Xp|No{Lh_EninAA4&CfaBB@V
zck-8K;i+P1^<DHkriHfhTE(Z&OPwrDe$J9ctb^~=3UP{UM6QqCH=9h>*j0M&QEDYe
z7eXELRrBFB+VaZc-;b&XY;e^B(RDhf(@vLcS`6(q1b}878w-Cu=K*7rGXpoX(=C(k
z;vc9md`QzN%h>N}dU0Nf(@$Y6G<u#Sk{Er>u43<@@}%)cM@ubK=jLo)4Hn1`>t($R
zb2{?Bx-sbSzHzpB<2UefXTpWBHn4(9iikQrMVC);0lyoNj(-Dq5>uzAA})S$JWuH*
z8l!*i%<7G<?rn3$9|YN%tLAkZ5{(VP$f#Qc(Ae|)88Zbi%9C_2B#-2YuSJONJo!E~
z6-~(&AfPNY(>csqn5YoSe2u<%@_Rei#w}6~Eq@!dC#qRv?2%sAmK)H+eVkbOV#1rh
zBBJQd*~-01O^oq%UyUt5G&2ctN2d(&I!e_@(Ouh@<Y&yJZ7z^Z)+ib={ep~>T0p}k
z@{K<qexV4tJ)C)in_q~Tf#}YQah^(rOrquyg@@{5W=@etTL_}97%~{<xBKSIe@Tcn
zbKkjNW3IdTJR@|M{OTCzT|++I6k{r3;q}y0<H_c5?o7yv45M+7K;FM<Jfvp!%>|^j
zFhUiar2jp+#`#9N+`Xpo3{F<(+pV+Xvc7Og8N~7nZJn_6JJb68@D$y58wCe-_C6z4
zcN{I8P_1~cu~Goq{bYbJQ{r8G=Em`RvB{Ae!X2{7fIlflaOl`-)j+FbL?o79+X77b
z<+;Z^HG<{0g2X`lWBQ$bgYnPaC~jv9@kJfqJ~5(4h+xmv`LL(Mg`7>e6Y!nH*cj&<
zw~@5Ig>IFUa$oWk^;H60O0wzk2{2w`v$&4V5MK5+&k9Grm5CWsP^N;?64wn<Nh|2_
zn~Z|271v=OFixJc+OjBpZpwR>iLjdXJulS5Z?O<mG)ZX*t(=_N2J$Ch;bUf5^{&lp
z=q5)XxYEzkmQNhEIrFRqWXtn<{L=|uC_gC@59>H;nZ$Xw%@4nAN}CSnwCWiXkRjz_
zRb@(89KkIMT*Wp{0@+Fe{*NS;q(Dd~XVuNa%Hls=&QvckRbqDceSd^}yp}cCo$T3M
zylFgSe;v1>FB4&|%?ZXl>SnS6Z3|-GLC&Gso2->;`1rpdoY1Z}X<U=UwFV!Z*<68v
zNw1iOlE&|ENkNh%Y_wJC{5m%I{`EVQ92J2RVEy-o7$NHM40Jwxn7<U0^mLT>1#fbJ
zK_e;Y(8*tfa<qJW!f8qYrRAETGVKV{ba+fzN#Y5@Ot}!k$CUct`axBsmfVG5d2*}t
z*npU=CzFuiG7&b77Je5{`be}hQB=Pl0(r|!#Q#L-*#8ruW8?ZCgpPxmgZV!ZI!+d5
z_Wv`XYXVbEvBqGBMV5w?q@)tzfF*>Rr;Bxg`~OO6mcOj?kig3GWVt~BAudwx!GB#K
zDG7H@?>bNTZhq>Yd@r=D^UMu8UVN{-Gfr7uTT5z<(hR{cQOAZR;84LvtIkeu?|}jY
z{p<)65Yi*1FoIk_e_{`q&jR-#Az`WC4bXo(FhWN59|}sQ6k@|dD>}M@-rj?FfQfmA
ziUtY-2oNdnTZmxkp%Xybgld4SHUVgus4=~!NugZc{Y1@flB#(<0zftDHUNDjB%<km
zMrun6MqFdCAmBwoNuCB2>SDA}qymsXK>>+*KhS;DcHyGj(f7Bl9UacWIf$E#tye1S
z@&P=cmJqYxB)twC4Q#s_69Cr)lvf4o%~n}}9uMR`Ln!<t_!)dqFc4)gk}+5qu_Aq)
zqBSFKz&QM@k{|f21GvZ!v)^+%5XJ6{1E6!W^9Sl><e!lm^09?wbR7El5H`q5xS$z;
z6G4JmP<R`Ia~60A8c?v@11l5<i8)Si2p+^4M5_eeBLe}1TG9j{R1Nok7t!n^nwA9R
z0N#JCmdG<OQZz{m*PiIl$>~)j1%A=+bwcD^g=TYC$P);^0ED)Qbp52+5Gq<{8`x@g
za6j;d3+w9kjXU|<C?Z}9WYA$kAp(E{`+F$>4KRR9Bh!%wn!vhpme-b~7mS$mzL5>A
zW7r0vCZOlQ)c_?1U3<_`I9S1cy*~c!pW4@!kckPHhA>Scpfp1rNYt17Q%X#mhx8b3
zf6hS=Ls-$dcnrYj)91+q>JXzf=HlD~!NZQkBniob?sFUcNPgN+aY|yKC!n(p^bMfv
z1KbHfA~Fg{2w?0z*)d`jN)Rvw{5YzGt@i?m{nete7k1D(z6t>s`Co=0pFC;YuwuH5
z0Z#;Z*#NKr^$LRRAM@t_XQL*0tEc?Y$osJugRYB<>v^j2$NKbtB&3KaJ|TcXb<|6&
zAX5x3R0n$RDSO}TVb_4Ofpc_yH>hPs4$%g;tf)Qk2Zs`(6y)t)&O$6n-7@fbgYo~i
zUce<%Y#@gPdUI_7w0Z>g{>&9FPmBY(`V%UaeAWUNH=pcK9TloGUKm&pQxHM|`t}GF
zbP1zme1L%g_WFzb+QEE&3z)qFaG^v>^Z-?FegF<8?#oIhGzbuHR!_lB5+p;w2r~R{
zCqS{CD9)h(=a2twkNl%OSd<j6I-`W@lRrsN1)?E_#-h@9>@Bd;cJmKek<a(s{T+};
zj-dMOzat#2jfB7IKS)u5oU4R^_Gm!HxAztN-BCbMp*tN{7x4rA4B89wL-%d%pkC*Y
z!g9~irlj((wdbo9*oSXOv$;l<k*e9?>*}yzTFRQrvocKhd~YS=QDdZ$0Z8)Xp4hlv
z+fp53!oY&LV7?C|oysgqn5)E4y@W^?!6&!11d@rA&Xi<*t7FR~sk`jHDYtFj9a(0S
z-Y_aGxov_7uWzz|q>EvS)!Kh5uQPyddazHmKi>LF*c>D31|%O4<V@TyO8x7vi}=KK
zuA~U}u-dPlLa4ca)nv!t)php|d)YjR2^tv8a!RN>d@C^qrH>5s&t<OeWOw<86>h4K
zX`u;<30{@6rm%xgiV0ovDsKUTCTU2V>2y(WG~cXvky_kv982uRD?Ak*mb_;z<}>?l
z82;{p+Vi{1SRv&<8RHQJRlH)cE3=Y>FDMiqRTllZU0O(pzGJiKvn%nh@+Ix1+7{sg
zYWGnIi+CO`VgzI;6yw@tyLhSy)Y5-R$w(5Vzj0sGn{kL*8>mH+c}3ugp~Gx2JhkP@
zbD2xwDy<INlI`YLLeTmBdt&Jyjl<O(1m6}H$@g%w5{F8W-9z1U4%{;JO9xLr0`bC}
z-_<!W*0Yy8xvXP}8b*}jw{MnPnd)slZ#<h@K0Goi(7-%7sUmnaN^oD0y{}Rxx+AJL
z6OPn>SFPzkp`Yzlh&|pKzXsYa!mhlgge7EZ%BprA{Qk%_3#aE}@vCbdK(_xS0q+o?
z<1$qp9xc2}ML(j0kC{)~mjOrcj?(8HE;|>6x?()#X~~X6>wZ~f`d|%#7w0c|nVm8l
zF5ZHHt*P5v?s#8C)i=9l-j)mA3MB9^;nGbIKq+c|?9f#RnC9q{8AP2aHxJz25ovE0
zwX4S!Se<j1G?>zNe(+8ie&`zM;n9j`6{|y<Z~dj3GUMNI-Wgx&kZ0wbP9vP@ddbqF
zBeJx2dXY-5QS_|OQKfZ#k*#dzmr0v+=tJRTEG@EbA56`%<VAJU?@Nb`!U&p;&vt1_
z-b7PjG}|3Hx)eLCaNf_+8;l?K2@8zxpc-epHJkD<5qfc2RiT{SUFE8Pzot<dKlORu
z$g#tfJjEHllz>dZf`%Lb@1MB@(pOUUlv4cCscj<0J4GE(vBnlg!hCX&q<tIzReY`Q
z!z-{H`R%FD^|F9}AUpeZ;{C=d;GB02m{xt5vWIh{_0nelTQ@=uve>*#4@UcmbOrM5
z{Vw{-Aw3hs3v9D=P(_d%%MX}%P4P3cHW6VF^kddy{uzDB>bs_qa4MhsmL2pResvB~
z;mO&)-Xcfna%N=JCUpw1t#jEo29Agh|4w*UjP6faFube!$-+LM#s6~|LB>m)`SuF4
zZ9XrkaVwQ4)jeabNXOBm2HIVmXq5WNE>XZg)hO^c`F5c>)vGRw0u3tp+azj1`T8N>
zZLO-64x@wSqYY}4fnyw{OY$z(&3+9G16ssp4m<~BM0z<_ByTLWJ}>@VfgivRBNTU=
zg4olMy`I&&&d{B6T_rNoaAl^(Ha2SGV$ozR3{m+2tb)u}_M9sbomSye)m{ecp)e$V
zP+{y)nxEsD`|^vv^|%Q;)<0Flt~>EzL?LcG`j|f&Q-G$Cbs%r#*T@k|a(g(%1p<z^
zf5Q54KO+pjpDKtd_Vx+(s_l>Ae9uQyU3CWbzM~pQZfu-dC(5rzhUjRWgmr6F6jTfK
zf=+E)JzJr@*xX`a78opUO|;H_mw%OUaCI71nU_CVJ57k)ttq91ZyE24nd!QAMY((m
zMz#6VG+)C_j9f!tqn~NDvPT0oaMjyoA7~nHk6Va|M%&kN)fl5>@G6^u4Q8`v39Xge
zucA}<M}VJ|Ks1(IoA0gsJCWyCIi{E?JvP<aVTF8!u94zxj5t>jjfOAeH%Dka{s|*X
z3!K~}lrX+~?7ib71_75OIaLYiEYDq{@dDQ&a$OgqyzttGD%ys>H13{0P_f@ksa}cR
zVydlhk>9ll2v>@k2d?d3uva)m9|o3hz^M~K6Tt_7>@ei}(_t%y?S>p<fhm`&jevuO
zg?Va2iusQWl;abc%K7bhRixhL<=;p;8d;_}_IL=@*;)A4zKMJ9Myo9K2)h%_^P0TA
z53#k|`@natqb70zKUiY`gu0mH7LIMFFRf<k4PZtP?_nHdj2O~J)&FAb9D+oNx^!E%
zja#;D<CbmPw(VQCZQHhO+qTiwgN}YL;ve)dCppX5C(r)AwbtSCSF?4Rs_lI#miiWQ
z{H~#+GSW=at>3a9uXEV%8qNA;pFM7zr!=;Q91}mHziA&I2uwgq{Gq-irNLRAddpRi
zfIRrMZDEP78)Afh|JAq3|FZC<g2RPGE$7SvG^pc_`-NFzB&S4X3%}5KZNHjnP*GVd
z4mS!<x@dMX4tyj>(O|wS*N9PnSol25o$*|429u*#J01=&lhIE;MX<K5@E9i3i)_qT
zB+W^HKaXuGX`9SaLG9t)jDB%w31Mds#kSvgX|e0>(KmciaB@8a#CSAA`pVVjHH_`o
z4HQ1Fyf5*V5y-zUxJX;vy*9p#(79+?N7tiVM;_H0!op@B6)8*IIbyQcWGkR$ga*B~
z`Q4rbE+fJkx~abm2o;O#B3>E>rIOBvmRhJ5BiA@-({0D;Wl-nQej%#5N_*gR8qyvC
zrXRBJiq;^EWp0mX>D1p%Ce1)@ws*7bQLSa9(uSyTe(lZE$lF`&M~+IIBixaSiCsmr
zPh?G}Do|Q71Qynvy#azGaM>?U_1QR}ZDG9a&W~sX&(iHnR4(jfk)!)wejKZM-rIBW
z^eEKlaL{a)Uq2HsEUfzNjkK9^)H=U=|Ms_X4eE~5&*M_twKQCn8A+Y_SPx*5;umEN
zE6~`}RA11BhodRjPEwpZ34Gi76Aa!aP9!Mzl+uD2rVkOfp69?#6+M7;ac!oP@7Y9R
zR?{fA4s?rJU{%D5O2#IyT6(YCqbrMA<Y~_%v0{&8<JzK0+MURc2}?GACn=Q!`x;*}
zyLGG<FVUR=CG`zu2M8bqSOq<rku^LCp$p41<R4n<HC3>o2!_+)KM!hmHPj;cJ8Fr-
zheAN^c=EyWSBI}G@DCdCVoVG67SNEtwKu~mc|3d*G6=-1bmybYm@G0bE$WOO%yEMf
z`olrAM*#XXE7r(UFkns^p#A`fSsc7!FI;2BdhvU6OCp0}`-D6(RXZ#^MYJP@ATy8!
zNmoKVbJgt`4=7A8wbZJ1Yy!zKONqFT=21f&jla0q-w#@MA70kNZGlD&`Dq$IsZPnu
zgorkhy&%_&?mFmsGE|I?=lQO|+VG#<kzRG1$Rp;0clBvCT%=5AqcBs(E+zYZV_f!x
z`5d75U+3~Sh!fM%7al5)sDD?{<{DzGze+rGw^$;y!!&SL@z?~zQMQ&rd&AQ8-1J$o
zOOlw<td1x!!{Pxhq+v-7Ss~{O5R(Ho7Uc6)QufwmbYD(U=KiwvL3kHrSL*7sx3B3-
zYmr4D{4}qJBKnBwx$x~MIVEzLPeA3Y{K+QK5$I89SJ9edjbpF0SuEV_HXE*NZ<@%|
zvbR9g=@>0zl9lG#yl3|cxS!fj9g%bPsChf}GLrLMs+L2)nI6&0@D3G&E;h3V<T>u+
zmhZ-I+J3A6$6k?f3Bnx+riCXyr@$L#-0KfmI~hfoIZxJIg_oX^3Sll&B>e-_R0BbT
z?DY4xpPf%oJTkiHr8Nc0p}s@pA1R+5Abxw#XDegthh07=wQ}+c6MH`QkizyfyEtK#
zmX3znOi$+*?CG`E5zcOsnB={iuiK-gt|R~IKf?l%!aHC?%QZP1AA|35&-H2UE15H7
z?>g)K3nFM;%;MEwPAQ8BP39D6FyGO^J&^;+2eeF8k~WpdBLu6A2zX3CfS~N<vhTXv
zajkS0Lt7g;O*GY`v&Wf&2(Oh}8KR0`rHo(JZau48H)U~(A@PQ?nOw9Ez7h>Nwkmbp
zmOe6_&2Jo2#0{Y&!^M<yi&gbdmgmKE)UC;Cgs=Y4NneH?Nt3)gzEC55S9@OS?^S%Q
zTJ}YhZvN>~darL+KRGTe%y8UY9;RE956x-=Lt{8*MR^n%WYZI4G?%QI&Hkg5yY+$O
z>~m#b<)-OV(Rmsz{PG7B#kpfow6mGdasYnJYn^9OiK2gn8No2x0ePlLoCQFR+iCV5
zr5E)|8!!-jTW5{{l6``+pG~N9*(%JRqJJ>Hl^efNk+=NA{yYiP45>{zKNp^Fji(_7
zhzN!6rTUB+S6Gr9u(&_O*^yEgfPo<wJWV8iwzY5w4gS7@o5A2a#xkH+F276g7TL#Q
zWPW_KuIV2qFX!zCYlaA$!G6g(%>}1Wby`d3y9JP##>6#HYE%=~6R3r1lUil1bIPUk
z$GBYobz*~0DMB7`?629bqgmfay*LqL2Lpp^uX_D_*gdr;y>qNJ+SBY1F0zO|xzV5p
z7ObA}EL^$1bpR=wYX8{Sp)KsH?Cq47n9fq@I2k5_SaODIXhJPCMU@7no#ANiACVD;
zBzu#ESfPM3o^a(Fr^1%p3Z$m9(hL4F*4*?2m&OX#)ZtQZLGT)ORKtxsl57qvvTBr!
zErfgC^CHLvw@VJ&2I+EvL#Kg5_2EsN9c6T)^)ox>A&EgYhPhTrI!O_A<#4tU-quo+
zFg(xu<ekU+3|ZCB{t`c`E_RCLrqIMJg5mLkq?34)4b}!7+L%&%O2s3}6*v0CB}ORX
zp@AOjKFw69><^wW$u&q>^Fgm)%9(AV>$^RsHEC~=tswKWv5Z+Y4~@RpsJOhafuA@p
z&GY##WOjwA+{zSYdSNv^aMm7$B3loGpdo8)V&0thp`EZy>b=FFy0*bc;vNnl(S=N%
zpS%T#qH9cfyaLLZLQX06BOrRcYOl3!@25P$^z-YB4f0b-VW<Qa6xc*lwYcs*irMFp
z3(TQ#=|AlfVs(z7{``QorpEoQ!#OR~G?Gk;NZtZb2yt@J5NG2$*0oEr<8fT8GJiM=
z6I6~%=LHubg=vdMr-ts!h0s?Eqtezp-s<ZQAGTr!{8MEetPJS_XKXbU8uU>34`2_m
zh#pWKcIogF(A#3NJ|~M}EbyL<35g{V#b|O`Y~5+9!b>5iHm}`<ys?WKN6)v-0Hhic
z#%f3tqDV7flH=d8pcXwZw&J;(&#SGTPs5^qu<_);q3Y$fVumbqP-bNM52u)%J&eJ#
zn<LYy#JMWQ_SEV0TKQs@?5|nh^P#Y63%8F{lit^c2W=I-B*lR%6nA<s1H${Mzwt4=
z6i6M*L=BQe!v{K3wG=|=Spt+AOd;}p&Osx)gBzWKy+gDK#b!D6`3F{=)I<1&-%AqS
z;LREeHDXIH-X+_=`JU_oV+wnwMpHXG?Ws%7?)sd9OvKY3RkpCX-7o46XT3PcE23$8
zm!eCmUn$4QfYv?H#PDx{p7a#~n61*jPHkj-=fnpcFS}<aBwk$UNE5vCOUe+bQ8SNg
zT{6o1K}u*d3vvV8{dfzld|&t+a4GKtISol{ciXbX3Op*W+PEW_b^K`61SgN~qRAFs
z5;%eFnd7T{Ul7CyqGH?3a;PDeo*lL>-!UXp5<zu#kq5IcqFi<l!gv<e&bGOLuG3Xg
zHjO~5jegdJGUB7zi`J{wsm1-+@w*()Ikbj<*|2hSA1Rc^Kz*JgTsXQO{#+A@K{@^e
z)wyMdC+&kFiUyl7Li;aO4bM67u<xdc*V`NC`O>F;X%Zf$owf3#;-z&jCgkJxA%$SF
zv7*auW;BTs=Z0kqw1nshqROmh2OY409D=p?Tm+s?_Nww;;2=FEZ$gd_mY?YvvP4~X
zF`DD~T^H?rICIm6=H=Z(!UwyLHR>p2Y8-@6%izqi52qkFDc{3F!aSMKyfrDswaR(;
z{v(hTsT$4%9DinZO8LlQmspB_Qc8CIPKSt;6AyOtr}zW3%nUkPJ+QI-k5=Zur18b8
zhm7=oGM*VqvS0(pRh4ey@ZE2zOQ8)WGv`vXOZ5?fsM|7DZRR^a<?hxJ9VKL`_n({T
z$ZFG%SZ-Ne2BkYvDCEykgQ2t+C$2ZkJq5?H2TeZ?`~d*!2~9#P8FHk6W&n}P8Bp#O
zFwc~te4n@zS|G?H!-j}unl(bAWA^g#(`yq{M{Esd8lxAN%bWrKp1Fv8pXw}64$~E$
z2h@pe3(uQ(1f=wXkzq8*liK1CZg=5vTg!n<!hv(~)0-WhG{iDP)4YlOqHtctGfAiM
zDLv|jZMul7j1sUt$kE*KsKb&$1F`nxL-D(qROdZFRpaxf*B?Bq$3q#q*<FX5l6m-u
z_RZkfX_Q~R#v=%J3lATGJ4FamR@NFY^zfoe*mUv&0^I<iqfrARkv+6qyCIP;PbraK
zCQnE{+DB=>`E47V=&K}c`XHCmBiBR&(XB}iq&xMCbl}TpFqVDwpUGCfR<4GzI694$
zOFk*CwCQy|u_+teHq6t~)Q#5Q4sLH-%hV(G`{hH?1+AlL$pN<2BG-r}SRRSd*njYU
zC4;`MO&-5;r`)z?eOOjoP9_<zK4)Pi3sDYQt+V4IoX_$5<W1tX9YQ<_C78+8OBlw~
z_fF-+9$BS|4gk?*VS`~<=-fDVKyN6U`ewsUsc|OMSpu^Ue<4ehs&lh%k$h2YWY~os
zM8ztFxJ2(#<7d#kU}GJ{@)(j@R%u!KN5$W!xlXcLN^SfDZUVjHv?+^6K10CCG}>sj
zIysp3xyh7`Hrn@>rz13$@N4Vl<*|R%amcFPsJ2lr%i?hbsAcoD+$`8ahGs3CZ!SRv
z<qCTgLut_A=yMh=R^Q4o$)&wi<q3IQpo!HkrJ~_>D*du?IU!VsI0wtGnJq1G3_75}
z4;n(+F_$S^U7sI@<Zwg^uk2McI3F;)h9i#q?<@`ejb)0f4dLXkC4j?eRo84RPnBSD
z;y6ojH|3Cm`0VnnMq2J<K`mjM2hQg&CFLomnGkFXSPZo}G{5sEI{PkID05wiHN+uD
zUZ~ansnihXPeD-{u-Y@nDSS3TB_<0i(v3?h=$JZqnjfr##2toC;%p=`;-FG0)1%vO
zghQ^FwY?s0X{O0k8>{tj`*49S4Kz2QMPMXj9Y@<TIhPP{c*5{GjX68%wG~TZ?$&xX
zO3|5mpWWa1n7`IeTSEIh2gpuXaJgW#X|wHcpKpFu2L%ZeeGbgJ*c_c`xXmU5>?no;
zZFF1=+Mx?vN>>bd_pKiY%pPALTQGr+L-}dtF5V!f4uR}Cf)Rqt2^+e!*1xdnWL{v6
zM-rrR=xp`kcUHhgxhIkT6(5*@1vKA-9ytB9!A$r5;UeEj7g0819T#>H)cu{%dD#Q<
z(nn%0@JdfW2u)w#Qj4CsL->LL#9U^a%JLE+fCIMdH*Rr&1TBa@Fz>I;%Jq>MsF*bz
zIpLp)h}G*#W`A0P-$;gt;^)%0LSyZg!Msx)c<>8~dU(?qEd8+x<dxAm;j%2lRd8vS
zF{#FNo!t66Otw-O`pNk7Ph0JBH;KQL8k8;BbY%AvQjd<99tOS9#h1<UnP)`HJm(oD
z9<Kp-VTj7CDdugf6d)PYHas#Zto|ih^;#pfUEKnvBwZ|-=bh*%8MN%IO~UfGsZrRv
z-HPB~Zk^-)@iiP7)IeECWThZ>!~CeKH1A8CU>4s!C^EG;b*i!8(_~{bbwOsrUH^v7
zC-wLy&CvnG&?fp@>f3W4c(n${w{q~|>0&VBJXeQ?MYCPNVwbh=@TkOj?v7TvWW$(V
zi^Z2u;j-G_zO<tBeu<{;OI@cHiPInDYV5Fcko3J8^YZR^FyN%am1GM@p%y?j{q_`X
z`47?f&V8K~Qr)yetvP-PYDSRFjCT*jyTwL)*<jJ`Ll_NbdAgf!l|V=}3_8468pTbD
zrNSf`=j^I>E{%R$tpC?+X3=A~s*U|j^DrEMG#HDnO<^B~&f>A6_W(7@geNiAxp5%K
zB@l>TzoX&em~2IEC_r5I(V>HKc88jcy#}}7#(h=Bm<)RS{?ydO2s4HkZ&7Fi;(;03
zVC*HaNKFS#+)hrywmK||tzJYpL*F6tKzdlou4N{|)n$@S802}8Xml2ET!^7cZGP4$
zX_;Nd*R8c_uQXd^kA&Tu$K(!gM%HXFj12uZ^c^Oy@9Kf^vqbG)BrXx-ajJW~z<$|%
zoq0Cc`}yO|Y5r_M1<#N#JaftC3S$%o&UBU7OaJ4b;)D3ZMsJUkXo3rdZw85}uEtDf
z?z}?#VcN8M0LwYC3J4imzDroQ&C9iI%)|7ei)<a823kzVJMyI4Mp;kI6lUgtJzmVo
zeI}*&6)9AmFJ7Z`$<mE^M7`FREpE{!-c!-;8Z^*j3i#^`QTO*6;(;S=^Byq`CZ_#y
zHbx6idh&~sx*Y;+XzhBh9)=}pYzrTlw&62*a`=&sIC`83PbRNt?u@MgEAqU5=~QCF
ztwjFw4f=F>l$&9SjW$``ispmrUAQB_C}?G0!B((sIM9ld?`{QaL{+_{qAW-%9vP8D
z4U%%k@)nhx=3E8l`2%r`b?aXoZy|E@Ndb_^pks6Hnfd!$Z;k@T&RzbMX$K5EEz{o1
zXCQMIf88NR6<G_x@fTNjrR^g;8=o0(TD=_6u)maQQIwYokFe}0_`&Gib82mn1E-p<
zp`g$5g)Rx*nXj2AJA7{GozF^)w2X@&HJx@&8eIOc4|DAF5Il8<zo~k^W)jfM4XKjX
zSg(W;b&WFN-f4oTmzI*)V>gvQ-Ob-s^eDWu_t5x}fp+nf^iY|<B;J`Bpo6f<ZXT&;
zL|M<p<0c*7XzWj<b49msph;`W<k~ZbS*|i?3#<LAlk@tADyQ#DJCiP8>!DI9ljIs7
z4uqtmJtZX}414r#_8MoB)sI?DUFbHeJy&h6r>c=-pOEd1t62fkP2$3IBr(2x8caUv
z?ZO7a2wSaog6Xa2VMx6350CZ8`wvSSrY6sO8ddJs-9FG~y%Z*)c}pL?3R*<!p5|>e
zM6-`(hEgPU$*W%sPtR93!GRq9P^rqQwJ?I}qek}`pkFoo$*2q6@N8)PuDUS;H{9(#
zP3O`}dkEanTBMuEf#eBsFA!$IPsb+}TI3$IW!Y;q`Dyz>>3nRT-_5g}l?0G?N*=5@
z8v(9@YLVa3*s42hal`s=Jd<Ub6~XeF0!!y{4FO2Tqpq&O7CS1aNZ(iJQ!cEoLVxL3
zp<o63yWbs~pCd8<T~+Y4U&EFXY?XEzRX>>FaWk7>?U5X_Wipib5`pfcKl<h9Vp4@?
zo=^@u-m#yEk}Ah%0#5Yk3w2b#vpdd~bES3PNnWyb>p|cl$d$NWfrHjf#BTiU7Tox-
z=V^l7#T&dl+bdJc<?nb%^S-=-tij(;3#o7=O@d3pxcZmZ?KV-kyHWeLU}vu!t?F+L
zLD0fmN`O|Ac;;4cI6=#>vySxa5ijxF%+4emy&8t_ZJV-aaf4hpwC=>|X>tLH<gMmZ
z@b77Bp<9W|bNTRO=aggh<aNJDEoqV-jR65-10Pg4RtN3KW$GhM5lTtT{Xi+g&6eWM
zcnuk99paiQ0znN*QB<M9++lH?6C~8Cy2NlPBzj0dtOo@yIz^~7AqQnMCM8@O*;iP#
zD`L=lniIRL6n0H8Q8PwTVT=7?)_ktJbG5^@(|(ae@C`>Bp<^^!j`%@g=IT0e6uMmP
zMds`Zo{6sgqNQlk;tzj~uGyWr@vQVgSs-5=qALc;Kl84nf#zd&`UmebTyt^h_6hXO
zfu!Y{wKgZDet2Xb(SF?Bw#Agtok`IUZ(n?qkiBD`%p_}y)z>)%q%p$?DXT}Pgdbo8
zV&<*?lzw3UPw5BN|HTOZ+PInj*UkO^_LJFJ82;~2;Z{(kMNM>88ECPRM?a@frxGV|
zqA3^{7^cBl{H%Er?RkP<4R=Z*L|8x~J`F6=&goP4OV`a$&+<!^y5+HJ_Sa?C4DZL9
zsR=A{*E18Xx@Ibi93)t<<DLCOIN%{mHs-?}kefSbtGoMKU0Uj6uN}m#?VpS>fYWoZ
z5P_lZ2!b1^#sDIEP%8F-QoukUr7Z#gUO<4HSd5%n3_3c$oD|hZTf#|Ym|VRhz-CZ0
zJ76V!xm;}41n$YT4OA;rc+tbR55!)J0kB<URMg|oE4Wx^p!NXk%3J_gs#cy^$hf&-
zC?Gem20-Aw?f(uy=);F{Mcm!Gd3ZQza<thGXk8VqvIA!8wes+zpMp6(0jvZ0B*Dx!
zIskoBL}6z@=9<F0d`#TJfCYGJv;hG^001=u3T`3LUdw6bQUS!_+)Dk$$vuJz`u?l(
z6VVI#>c|ejYt#J`^l|V-g@EzCu{J&oc6?|B`UEC)1%OWv0x_$ga1!F##{sA!x1lRc
z6^0G7XM3a%8lt971kuxC11cB41gJ(p`Kg$b5k<9%c|Cju7V=phccO|h$Ur4%eWWiV
z!%w~m`?2zk(p$}sJ=o^?@M&I6gmMh|^yLW(BxEhnGhXZLdOQ~zpuOo&3FXTU0r7!1
z2?qfVaUTu^3Hh5wp#{iIiQ<{50rA+L?%f&Qq0a~N)iq6J0tg}pK7|JZM8sR|wo$?5
z2iRP~IlcMV3GuC|eR~CH*28A+#WDjAG5A5o0R$HCtwQ{A1@#1!a!0&B0KWb9_&OPb
z$)nfAK-vF-|8k9RPjp6+hH2vXPW;3x$ow-2y*n{P2epfYx(|ALcLxa=6buUZ{S#ea
z4f@>>^K-B4AD{;?*V7!qUeeQYc_#{7=?fMFdwZjnP9Nmp53uYT^qr|1y8?DM{PIKn
zvP1jhOZkI(^h5dhvlSQ51#-VJ{f@r(W7y&VB-Hssk1*~WN>t1b9Fhup`lA5r?;BMO
zHj8$7{n(>|+KOs`Wt8Uv@z?Q=XYbhi9v#j_5y%tJx~b0&`=dwc0loUiavNWdTn_sf
z?Av(&ztheAXCwrJ5nFVSW<MnM7cY#!AoMd`0ny~Y_Kn5rBS7GnR8f({#+ttpmW1D%
z0?&}t%wMx(0CsC9q;D4l4Ip2@2LR$Y^u46^t0a#}YG|OEgg)JmHUsK^#YRWq->t5u
zpXphDWt$wK0@<x=cKD+6!vk#9SOXy7pY?qJ`R@IB7ESC6)ca1~@onvgm>j~n)CUC=
zL_B}P7M08Dm2++R0SJ?lx&F<>V9I~^W&(0ghy9_~9Q+$(h9ijNtC<~!FIBBq;tNCw
z7dC<e^-Z$Rm-Kx>ZoR3kjVRz_iEBUYTjQ&1z@Ljg3+8!8G%3QpxMyuPVq8U?M7DD5
z8JV<HT?%sGFDAhL;MHBz^&U7`!bIzk+`JSstYc1>7%J=gSYW`{ntAK-P0MA*A<Y3F
zUC3Tb>pG}R@8Ent4JT#^UC@|;;)B{G^Sjg+3bZv3HyMw&dc7l+YE{*{m}<%2plzW+
zp40Y2&OOZZ<BfvCrOMc7inyOo&9+D7wfM}$j~-oO-qM!+>wAxOM8bY8SWOhNKkm83
zOl$Z!k+OH$=dTJh5^UkkBDl0Sh(gR;{@7+HE`(C}Z>@aFMr_g{;N<?O3=#%qNM>(x
zqBOaGg3lBhd;>WYWE1;}`6v+Aq6@>;p(Yg4Cvoyho42@mb#%UCzt4Ly9>sV@{UcmH
zx@;Kj%!~P}Rs<k^B~(NNy0`R3qkSbcI4M~hqoTmeBHaC!P`LMVW3fPTVs%oO*QY^A
zJZyA!WyL{o9YN!SA$G3>`=1g30||0nGgLWg*FgEls-etv!wT@O1W~)u>6y!f-H4g(
zAY$a5Ux*Vad0#1$V~a0Yo%-L~PvAVjj(mhp8Ef2S>prv`Y(DJVjFgDtt?ehJO<@ry
z{cwV9et;hS7&{$VZ)gf_<OwxuDOS5=fSA?0+|1*t63V<gud!XUF{L>EZFEUR(NQQ)
z&pQz33;5sd#_X?tTsy|?m0@b>zFq2)Mv_HcX-^iZSGog|ZNp)hNkFt8FXiFz`Vp8q
zY(j^726*T@l52z0ntPHdzAA><U%1F=2BcE66Sw4y88fm#<|b|Z;=)LL>t4a8lUJ0B
zuo>5zl64S41E$O>9NjA6hfxfx$d=QrXxn~0;B1`>&VsY6e~+mP!M7gq(5ic@)cy3c
zq5rQ8Ab-$IJpw6Ztxgr<DD`<n2(mdsuAe8VV2~xt62{~Y;&_x1yhZ=EpIC)AA=M^}
zvDX@sw3_eN;@fFw%saHbCJsx?d2GxSsD*uP{HQFvwf~H+dt_r!NSCqxmNPh=OUopT
zb}32#iv|N>R8D1Lc2Elf8rH~66grkU6>izieU0XA3vZ<jO(;dlyTL=8=agJ*<Ylds
zYpddG(|{e_Obsl{nVAz4s$#U{Gn2-Fsl1FYV@YL+&}riJST=Yma{lT1Lsy>ic+<DM
z0?*kDB4A%q4>NEg3f)t^L5PB<-?1LSpWHFgHLQ*gr>Adp1ak}Q=OeL@K#K=}t#Vrv
zRGB?&5WL=^JPT9}A}0GsN_fNV>F%$#r&Fnv+i4(POY-bFo^K-WQSFc?d(cep&P2E8
zJRhItnw|HxwCJ9s-eLtz5SFG3;X&xC@N<DV7;f=3x#r3i59!YA?}WblMVxA{4RY}?
zz{>BXcu~!3op>i(Z>TIc374$HRa1)T*}kXw@#+(pBvt9Mw8Mq=k5k<C`!eVuvo%hr
z=T#K921c~ZHX$R!wb!g@VWYZb{L$pf@uFr9iND_e-Q=<VS2Z41A460z70e&DG6S-H
z8kgH;TJXM3`Gl|A^zZ(~CQ+Xq{3gos_igUa+}lI4>1d7LTDjKprt_4sYg2M?kg}xl
zYRe}76uo(xQFi0lM>s}Td-ZB`%L%+SdZ@b6FDJhllvaUlv$Y(=GiIiIzbJg_rQ%HD
zbKm0lEfTj)x*$qv{_vkwDIy`xmk*(>`)LkQaer8cK+?fbJyOWbImcJeSnekv&${k}
zQ8)^Me$130VF!0(Vp=+s8FJx$)p&xTJ8r!SP~VenPgpjg3E7(LjHa&5h7+#{Py}nM
z36ggcRQ%oMwqJ}V-s!1Gd@F?)qx^u``^<+`^lFp(o<ckl0^`c2FNQ8ZBlC#tinuub
z7kssLQv0m;;67|}ocgP&ViH6Yv-lKg(4=xSJLSp_YGQG0mh$MD`sSzFL{3~P4;(6c
zSFX>UHiZG*zuPEdyFM11$*(mAjbREpB!*0Z;>nf7^teb}!n|`%z=6?UKtCEZ;l{XW
z1N!tPDghTYx;I&1*HJJHxQn%&u&yM{%p;P#fNjt{@uIS0nFx%7yGq-vrtHQ$0*ci*
zQDuo34PaxffZ?^4f(drgOfpT+vXPvz-_O0o(;R@tA3J*n5&ZX}5r^A_R)o>MGjj14
zIU8_NzUk%6Ig_q-n?z2#u^md=sS}y5noWG;8h7(nEf>{!@QyT+$Wlq>-UY2h2_sDx
zoR~}Q^1)d4AI@1wy0Z6J{j)nI-Bd5iCHSYprFf5a%Cio+OQo8sXU3hTW5ufX33zkd
zH2cs9^u|y#wX%1{mXcPLH2c7(7`GBIKrx>EH)6z=5(9M3n0@AOzlD?y`3LmUoiM4V
z47#E9unZQNK5+!O@|^nl_z>RuB5zJM^HF_K4v*c~QL1h|!?O&I+m23VN^qpKRUQMb
zqvaTh;*Vd-D8NB-_z|;bz0G;&pYKYmLWmuecgZY73M>Z8FnckzpWuRG{Q~=$?)iYh
z=1gDjb=Q&iqHb`i_K(V(W74TN^i&8pc_Uk!mrTKpI0Mq#9-+@nLA{0n&m&oKC)N$I
z3L)rD$FQ&X13vdzL>z}sG4k<(D_MD~#(y8TE{H7RhIX#mCGVNPvAS-A5RU?wNf_P5
zWZT#4Jonn6TcuIF5+nGRT>+hHbs}AVYIi|dDX7pL6`Bi?ioVU5q|*{(WrRIF7K9{%
ze>3%#*+bojGbJ$H)Tpw<{ZY&SB$Zn+?+O?F@DyHdyen)p?~|o3X+iHzA{6)waJ+l{
zJsL;Ko31wD#mw$5TMmR=jac%*nCg6;5_PkL9dYyT)yQyX<r#9_H1vPxq3<0sX2}a7
z7orVpN5O$64kY<Ww8gTca|m(gbSNL{APtj;0x=Cr-r)i<-ObUi1F(KSkixz#VPSb*
zGEKrjV4tlah2|HyZI84%0q-a<8KE7WDuvd>=#8-$1>$UCT-wJ*W5S5{+!ovOzvFb^
zw~qt5jU;e|p#>@ZW~(o{|At}OWv0tIsr@(>Pj4!+kUcq28to134LW-cYmY0wUZ25b
zawO1%1-|4)K$P)M^Tjiup}4NtuZ`kT8Lzea035FF?zHxY4k5vZYN?=jeT=d13Lwx@
zjx9-b35MK4%Y%*#Mfp(2zOj}=m?N$czWgO0OlQA8_FtB24dY$`S!8iK=<24|F1?Ni
z-TF513Wyv@JzOvB7Gd*sGU0Z1v^e+T`7257rc%Y8TQMc5k=G|^wojP@%Yez*GCilk
z_svA{xa}kb5g(6Pq5g>$WxM}`T#c}u3w8x~7sfkk@-}q}j*O4rnT65;CIzP|$?4$T
zhnLuzshnx$rysahjl(*3Gra{(^D206wCgDetFKZ4sNNl4-FQqzv3{^y^fJHMBT9$$
z8xFzuiBC_nNL>DU>76Iea6_v#8k&*i^iKx}`!SVb%^*Bsm$Ktl)mM@i<wT1yK0b_{
zu@J^T)aH5Th)pVp!R_I&bmv{RA*h?nWb4IUyqhd8xdcQky2vHLq^Wr$NXZWBnR8Za
zbHPs%;4e-dITav27?F|}$y9EYT;XGSGN}9}Y@{Wl2RDfwcw25?=6~?jmt$I=Cj=!t
zBkf7d5Za;Bmt(f==iu&pTGQ?lI%CF!KeNwJ7w;FY2UcAsP`>0PuuppG(k7#&2lP*<
zu}9S>-el%y^5S)4<$Q?M*e|T$$j<1iitm<ySOfrGTycvSDa+%Q8MgbGTWy{#G?}5;
zfSbq=MzZ7cv1PgF@mlZZ#@=4}S%8-D6*XIu(VT4U8;Q7(@#Wf!h2Fa~qnCFdK@Z|e
z4fL_q0|JSkC7I0mk6fZ_$ULGzyK{U0*3J8GS-E~C{Ar84imK#UtCz@Ml1XVv5H);t
zqT-oYkj26iUJyYck;1v{ngio`_fvN6f4f`b&z?Q=0Oxe>wv;b3-%oMHP1d#N#Jcbq
zj?ZxcchlxJ?wl!rqS;P6e5NzYa%0b)*An@5ua`XY773TO);2MyJuEnP#rJS9;(V@~
zhO&Xlrjd>OCfAN*RY@BfN=f5wWu?ht^iH3ol&Nv(=}czK$8(VY{l-X2^NZcX+-91@
z7^Sk+Jr47-BhHZ&PPy%#Ty`31l5nq8)LQ1~)n;@H16r{nzm5sI?IAI<PgG`z&?8!D
z9fUXYP<g%DX17LM7sLD$;U9;{H=;FcgDc9EIO<?X6d2U=d>Yc`J}7HoY><1p^cVg2
zIPF6-_cd(*DjE)}<E)n;+y`xoR>H&f59aGeAb<K1O`E)k6DMbyRZW7qA)ED2b$*HD
zULH(h*Nr{BC4N9Q1crDS+N&5H<t4a;g-!^8tA>!hxq-L#XjPPY5eC}d)fQcss7_bv
z2ej6ps=vB~-e4fv!W1<x`@>Xj)lE9-sG$2!3M8@D>&G9Iq;b(`FI|r?8ii_8_=hIM
zENWZzB|)Y+AMA{roQ&x_YgGh)x#|I%P_$MM8Yc=ci^u-NWPPHHa`+xefzOqV$u7So
zBL<svX^4y;cm-^_#miQuT+SCU(*&5<vyn-rF2Zh+EWh3EcF&5_OsA}gY8g~>p%aas
zxox3PbMuNX*JgaZgF|zzRYl0>;xayB&<e1iAGl2hQfN=#2=^s(u|jfMSFOovYg2VT
z`b@U#7>+%TwFHFcCUy&jvSx&)tXU6LJfSp_sE*0AoV?%5*&ofK@P3WSNJeq0oUk0Q
z9B7Iojo0)&tj%*ZGXk+%ftUcHCYrl(IW9ViNnK)nk1u*BV(vsZ4jozR))W`Sv~s#C
zEZ)blZyr-1Dj+$Dt_QWv^(wyP)N56a@yS{`ng~^xaE-K1H0MqbQyW!e7+QBtQ`&fy
z=FNp{so{lRFrM~pDlvHw^wd-2{#z`x*;lzKE4jMP5IbI;V^#Mo%le29q$+9e<o`LU
z;4EVLlC%zSY5I3-7d;-0c|e;>U&m}qVtLL%x|$qLsn{j3Ieq7U%0;MRh*}+l5q6Z(
z0Bk?OF<)g{ubBFaS+c!XjY=}Fe2d3kSx*Y}(&QEjahi%MVWPNYuY15u8s{yfprXdb
zmXqMZ<GaoFS(3=_nk*z<!`<X!CP(+T?{?F<Rk9Y?=>85i2{eaJA1@t}G0NpWj>Aox
zxrc$UgqAd5r6D;cg;=|X+}Bi(yD6ZQ9JxA27m@VUriS_41<wJ>P60)#HoxZzfU1(w
zyDsks;s6BUf*rxF;Mytyw2%zxUc+jb0GfZet2@FPF;O)LLD?q`!gYew2RS<xvD`n+
zb8r$@lP?k(yxUx_pxmE#fAshp2XGxaWn<)7dh%|9Z7Ud0ToRRkgS$-%$@(Y^-VSEb
zThvKn*}t|DSa~Ghp_6*x(hpv0q<sN}Pc5ASOj5>1Haa6qhjuSgx)dnqA_Uc#kQTgW
z=auOAQo_4$;UdeMB{ec1&eqYu;8la(^ZiN9QngaxczJp(_5HWYsl`H!OEw-UFqYSq
zre+ZhY@A}mlqG9TP6sMvZf)FrY%3SfW+&xEs8g@pq~Zbf@gSQ`P(!!%OZOP8-*p5C
z1TqE+c6oUGf}<QFBBP?*)5a{Q;Nod3fN95z8t-v?{m+%GPi_i25uMw^;*yOtUO^7O
zT_ywXzA{XMuC<q;EAw&0BAqN1E1Ix_?$s{ZqMn(XRdp?A?0}@uvMN9;A1QPm-*dwx
z=_Htw+%PO&usIE}f(YlH{YYnY1#ka6%N1dcM5wt0JNI{p`v_9!(oUbMbf@16(Y0)-
zFUqqP5&p<AQN=0{eYeazH?>#RD)9kil}4d9h{jv5i@fa{8gHGHRI`pUlwS1Ed8WU)
z+|-PM=+uwp-tBu`hoGB_14{M}q~osjZ<+e#YGnSI#!>>F13MaE$Og_l6R|H|%p~lz
zOunLd5oPfjMe?t?q*Ob4c73ehos_O+zX`&OzwY)}<Ev#+a;;Kq!CsT0y}moyc&a?C
z<md))I#Rur*Srqo*L=%Ex+LK_y=Ev$i#s=900c#5<cLxt-+b{NwMbcWVg8@+erM5i
zY>ZUQW(LA;V3QFBnJNx$L=<>%UxdTvnUOfO4FwOmPG%9v5qcS}o`Q!U4&)r4ncNw<
z%av(FmG}^z^h?*-VRUV-YLih9(-dm-EMz8z+EQ->S4vvbYUCQ_Y-+ouDcTpgT;4&P
z_2}`{&V0tO7RMaZykNl2hEG4~l<Cz51I)`A5{dGG1>Mdvd3cz~Bpo+4=6WW@jW8+6
zTGJkX3p8y5@5LzRk1p?$d4o`0gZF#yb$oEFKHSXqmi%QW#tzze!KU46Ey?0AaUyvV
zw>K`@&O-Y>U?O6#YYt<on5TEAow^Wzq%-oG-7k>Pf^pKGyiyeMsh&<uetPG%9VbeF
z7_;(DTPnL!2)eTeLvrg^7mwImL@ryi!9*t&o^@V$lIhg2#%yaqQu0f&c88SDREk}H
zhj~ZhY04VN9>o?cwwf=4BP~c0mj0)xFwn=BkLMzIP3fRw++YF@ds^8Iz5_;Pg76Wc
zEIIGNc`Z){O7-TuHAP3Jl5Hpj0<<BwGLqK(F2wUSQwG$cQEcg&W@-c$mSMea4sYWV
z2eNTZaD_icsIDflo!Fpjla8hwyv`dr33wZ@8ZpE3?eBG#;>_Xd=b4Gu8}$msgu=8r
z#V%Aa;|J;)2g3Kc_YbEH@R7DoKJzjY6**|x#LcnpMV<!USCn~>iWchAf~LdXeF*J&
zsnk!rn>FH_NU**DBL`#)BwHm|JPY0#F&HMHef)`LAtg1B6gUQ|lnjDh1u?t0I*ta{
z&7A*?u1UAih;5&&FypCoG##zF7NFQP{TAK4jS=s;b<i0-sAOlWaz!eh{Pwj$$Rn0y
zh8JLz3}P9UE!&ZA4cJ0t&(683IJztSL{XP#(^Zm3q+p$q`Rc*pnrEJhbtdkgFmCqI
zkuF9~)JKcedAAe99V5;7yUR&NIQmqZ+v`1(D}nVHyCLIGw?h=RMB}g(R{pVQZZqzH
zU28t6)-d?~6wQ`U^BNswxDfBrn9^v$<(WQ*+j0q}P{h32rG}3gYx*@Wo^{tf{3(0k
z8D|T5^n*rw36$qk@F*kk&*_A%JM_k>nL61n<Tl8d*uA%24!5mZdUu<W&DC7q@VjB@
z?1~UaFJtm^Kc_HdOKM%V|F~@CVT;i328uWKcDg3o)<~(|=Xuex$Nkz`l}T){Oe+AB
zX@CilqKj=K)5T}OnP<ZS^>w+c%K1lXmSdeUqV9U?;9ge}u!rbdz~$0TNH2aHU*KD}
zT(x+Z8jO@sSl#qU{dJM-TsW;czEH4kijdD8>hH)81X?r$3=c&daMas`F10ym!8^ku
z4wWy|VzW#)isFiER}BpNY6?NZGO9mlMXV)I&ME|^8!>1?{)GNkqFE^NN_Y~QfO*^D
z46|`B)MztPjGR+z`Sxjb&}`0OUn^e5Y|^d%)>%t0{->vfsEtZ0(cqK3VDHo6)htv|
z1%b1?J|87(Jb}iW2{)@Q+|uM|cq@0T`$?sy3YVTH-R`GbTtgwoCFGuJpm_nxuX!Af
zW2b3<b>KOo7`@Xsa4B0+pMxx-a3#Oebp!aL>jmCof5}NQ`X(Y|o}O9ru6LYmQF^jX
zY#^zggVH-WI><StM9x;WhB`bj)*r6#`g=8Ay&8T2!C+D2CbQ$wGIPRI_!NaybteIh
zLom`X!?+pKM<=RtbmlF{m;^;Uo6&M_2<%(pQ9_!Au_t}RRnhe-$z)ASe@RK8!ATW%
zx1M)3?_7z)(i2hoV6^jjvbu|0deNj|r9MT#3rXi;Ox79aXEe@UQ+y75Fv%cJC6=wJ
zFHm~+PtaSgV^=%=E*550z1P-1U5?R`?V7j?hTJL^_ZcoFHqK1EwR<qvm_gkns>Tvg
zQ5|7>!(0I2k{J2TQftJ3;G#4B`_s2W@d;DalzaX;!(RecGQ-#sJG^q^u$mK^FNOhB
zehY?@Pii&ZrWB#Xis52s0T`zM%+4)CC_AqF&`#L3jzF|W6h#r$`wXLGA1n{cW)o2a
z-Su3e*siqhA{Jf2#^*pbR_hjB@c9A4uBDM#Hi0A(xQp8~-*Z`2+KHLK-h7Pb>RXk_
zP_5kBT%mHf^QG7G`_Mrcc@#jx9jCtJPpr+}5hBoWTZ)qa&2pEHg1jnO8W~JX<52h3
z5{-GT1#^Jp4uP#Red)10G%05&Cfv>nMMuO14D>Yabok|yeKzdPpsKdo<V&}ET3H@I
zzcmK$2SP)au)G8v71H@|qCr$kysQcKxrWcM$B!GeRs~Eyv&T`qT))Ze%vNQdFK0Ko
z>6bR)=g^xf;aSmaU75f9q6;{)CY;y;0B6Q9N#IsJ71N2K`AADDc@uPCJx6=~ADiNt
z>L)VbVb8;BFIYu43D5d$dV$a;I+lj$UuKt{(wXDUKFT(`hZK`9PUeVoFVX5W+0{&2
zxjBwF<Hi}!PvmsnDaD2OGBWvcABF<M^4vXWQotW=Dtz*U&Gk%*)3*tVxj?+ppi`QL
zMG0ECjyl_bv6Z<4V&GBN)*CeT6)_r4^g?fXuaXsK*A1d*(?|6NPuL>e8c5?IyYnlE
zW_B_B1_f(cZ+d@a7vgJ^U59_~6lZlEnT_YZ=tUd2Xq7CPlBjfWQrF%wmGKsD$$}s+
zFdnap@osldGZFEKs-0F82DRUTxeQ)yvCo=|uET{j+JUx%Ec2;>%z&)CoYk&pepWG|
zV$-3q+82Q4y(^sKPkFWeqaj|)*((((321*XQDPV%iQ`4>%XhR=Wg|JlRJ`KcBEPQ^
zaZYqf$lR9zHbFhgtjnmjiN^iE<seu-+fsdClAyK>8%(T3$ZIqn+>mBamJYj;;CP`K
z0L3d_HzErir7vh@kP$emzhYREgr3xST)2$-Y~@}5Eu2U>bhr-F@<uhbSdf;VT5Y0&
zWz_0*n7tiTmIvC-k4{<CUDB}_V0f$W#YbwhDL%f>bcgslOvtY4k8Gw7(10z(-pi!6
z8N*-P+(%)*`%Zbj=K;68UG6WuLW<p5g+bs(7Yhs5jnC_qP0>e4MpvTTp4MTm-7W?v
zAI?m8y->~ozJMZ?k=zh8xL!9Gm#N`x(1%M-tn)?AT+;ASLQubC(jqbM8=@%Rgb(Gs
zoC;NC@$>BN(v!6H&`9fR<D?tZRP||RvHbiAov<ssr7&(g)fnKaT86u%ey3cO9_qe5
z8Mtv(nsk<U2G>4<X_4o3Ol)@#&ImsoK{9wvLx-;QXe5TXP?EO4%{_1<4%9ewiKf7e
zd7b#sCOa3vd=4-k%23T4*C?`Ow2B2QoNvuAr(=LCF5@qaKpo`P6%*`y6#U?FGPTfO
z(57Y|NHbp(JuMyYT)S%cWUr>>$um&&lpVXr%-51T5_;w4oE>JJCb&~mwUtpJ)sk`|
z8X_T|fDgDRm%NA?lv6aa%oku9kU#t~QB#L(Ho__wa!%f3_EhCCdG|PEfD1V5%g1kr
zKWm$!wJvev)Ff%nUggnxYx<tBGxp%P=K0;$%1?;9SNmv_eG_7&i>EYmk;$aIg&!y}
z5I1ih)d6j*gZ?DfTBzEsf%Ra_#Z9A?_5(#@hRnSPALqLRT}A704{K{EWaf;%7G7oA
zAP+=$qzSWaE2-8uh+Sy2mHenOpapbcNhakB9ry&cV3<hUwM6K$-1?<2m+i<XFyp{x
z(2rhF1{01UNxmeFMR8_ff}6_$<LqyahX68%1TVF(J?RVA$iUAOGhSMgLVC{E;8uQU
zCUzr+6NqG|y36}74tpfkQIfIOjnfI-&JyNy+>9}*V!6w^ZMET+jB57Svw+k7sA@&G
ztvx6JJ`LcPaF^U=a-{8dN^W-_KsRnE7P?+CN#Le4%uHbDW30f`f5DfiuO7f_Y0$)p
zS;DuNaqM!69=|LEjQTrsEBk?HC3*^wa7ZlG$x%Aje}kydHTw%2oP^2KFKNvz-=ch`
z$;MR_(asb$!k}R<`~VtP2eSQ#;07c8e+X`{F*5uQr-Bimoq?I-f1duo+y)yH<NuXf
zVeM+Hl&M}zbDh4s-pU2y>gsBJ3YNahjJAn`q!oaixr?+JAY`|K-?v3W$K+^w?P1&X
z^i{UrWSOP?u^96(CqKr)A?Vzh)u&~pb(tv$V9i0JOsk_K13<<FkA;)fNQD6r%+4_m
zkf%rB$BO|n3&sW9+6uUtnW<&w^oy7<wN(v^qCx338+v4em~8+Lz=uOn^~+A^N&p`m
zN5kLW+auW9JD$Eiryc$-5yyrB<G1buungnDz^|&-FD)g7*Gp7g038j)>8s}V^b6@I
z;u(a>1*!w$YWGhASeB^<`0z#YOG+SuxKANvd+q^c_wdus^9@q(;N$>MGIl0DT3m7h
zsGtACIS-Ia1d*G6Te5|CPWl)M+w9={YRRbr@Ypko`>Jd7ru(S7v~-aZh7%P54G^Fv
z@QZNx#ZX|4=yp?ZYH$H=e*p(>X8q87As#-9;`!ahgh~M*tiHo<Y;Ehno&tc;OK@?p
zcL?=W11OUrtS%wu9vuQWeWrjq`K@~X_`3fL$OQrYyyBmkJ&bTn`{IXX{27FXnfK%W
zQL~0^{4t!{Y2|&*@stM*#J`67c?|q{y*m*RkcocY{&76aVff~a6%vvZSQm>v>H&T2
zpuR9W0tsMW2WZUm?F4BL_y+!_wFDsev6|^I_}(G~Sot|F=P#uigw~rJ`(E*|`+oYu
zPWz^llo%hI2#t!+1?U|fAc5H3-#Y<;xW9k@(sii%UGVos&-TFnFirHl?L>fpdHPq)
zCLd>21_@owr}s~M8bgy!AgYs+Q9G$0x9On|bInBB6MQw}KV%`tOX9?H%fj5_2_)xd
zj9`bSL@oA$&<}5)s!=N!o^g+Tp{F}w|I}E<q`$#8#hH{qcnrd+SU{M{qt8Yj73skq
zGi+C84%A4{lH|AEYt^9@Rq=$eU*MseR^uF{NnvgqVRae!`PM7#Nv(&VW@?1**wXa<
zJq)%o$ecsW*g#7J<+u^XK=lO<jl8gLp~d-U5zluU-IMUv%L46oh_qaC?g-cMT>juI
zDOIUEw5EW(`5jThiBhe#dV_&<x}Xt0;>F-En{EF<;z&vOCBS=HDUs)B=7)OMffExb
z8SLLaz_IO04=ckyf8c>co0VVW1){=<)f!OZsaFk#RUK|k-#+D-43FQo@2TNVh+S^1
zFnh7oT6k@7#{5-;ixF&Rid^jc<^oWTfsmPiH8>nW={7QRBQl)|SJ9y9;Trg;&%Hq;
zAX677D5{t_FaaIo5W6~`a=g}ACBB(HhNk<cMS5kFug0ElK4$Qp_@f-TESV#dX(9>Q
zC-MlHIS5l#{*qi)-Gf0LM$@M(5f$<QoMW1HQ*LZ~<t8%gqjKrcU&=d}mD>{=Qu&Yt
z&Ni|IOy*MIs$NISAMt~d<r*;S3x)2}we*Wmla)*~XLFSbMi_BFUh?|#xHi^Q1GEN-
zm}xsm$^znn%BuTIEAgAsfz<DZxz(jghVJe%`F=pFo5+u1S-Z*TeZ%&c2tBGTdgoH`
zO<Wuhi9YN}t)ZaZnuoAa-mxRLu_`aM=0h_@<_LVV*r^8;jDcA=w1L?m7_1IDXz3zA
zO_b3U#?r_Ol^PtqfOnxolOB4R3K>WLVh>*?w-k*Z@bO%Asj-zK2Fe8t2qI5-g_!;u
zf9;}qT_(=Md9GP|L7ixaodHhyX^_C0&Stqkv;}5w=WE&t4_e<Y6;3%mpPmBaOWz6q
z)X-5fWJ#CuU+p2K&g2d5T8AN2(rczex<U`7kA)WBhj$mX%hSJ1mr5|>AP2awjqH>4
z6J^yeh3cZpgg@qI)OJp0@DVK&LuMs@p~(3r`{wkfz~O}8<XT|&NZ@Fzl9+A<h#Kdl
z8gw2q95JPAa|3ri>(7Cw(JEGOcCXFihI~_pNgSYY&I(QW^R$4X=SDxV&zZcQ+Dj+E
zFI8g~Xi9OV(imzMA`%li@0-eA{#FOJ{`2M;HA-6J$0s&xQqzLgd$MCo(whgOT}bPc
zulKmOP4|lDA0|$D*~(fqYgeuzck!;tLtB`{q!o3UjKq|bNrgSAUOOARjXMZWi`?GY
znTF1lyZ7S|*$u-H(PTd2ArU%9^GDY(&&v7w(E54xf(l>v9E$+aEMBV8gP=(xKa$?>
z#%-;Uk2m1?I#rGMC-6o*6s0UsL|IdNG1cD`9)_p4M3o%SJJw07h%x%om7krcJ?(QW
zV^gyju6)$u9Bf^_l`ae^eCv2AZLNzk1+IE#Rs7yfS{b=28r{*=Rm~!hgApuv*2#{d
zAD7XE>Li>CpN64I>vpFP9r-cPWQ2CH3VCn>_);uM*z1>`m8KK(adwXsnXnInR%?2_
zwGC(cRYQM?S?{Qp&5h0C#Q;P@e8IGDRtyF$9zdn?4Tl*&@*qt@#+XqaB}aHkFk5i-
zHj{!tfynf~#OGC}?g*HWq%{T}qF#;Lc|b_K{CC4sSY19zV20KzC4tV^*&5A)ZY_2X
z0DvE&3@jHUwmX5C#b}Mv=+!n1SKF9?@br2K?b~Y1-|VHg4T@X?uTDF++9IVfn4cU(
z8#KPp)^tbuF6f7QlvkI2rR8~Zh|6)m`FqN#`@&ve(#&KxhwI*3L~Yg77~2Up##j8}
zow!^MuP+F%l=W`3XA1d^HqG=D@{-|b4ENJX+riz&fKckoy1Y;Oxvy@QJhcu;_IyXZ
zW&8?^$ABp6SS#QcLwTQFzowY_X~$CG$BW6c;7EP)ac*4A-l_PbD%;!!{NGC&jT5*9
zWQCA`JQe6EL6nwU)TBw)l+i@}S1@_hlkG-g5Upql9GoUd#;|^AchTt9V{u)~$XiEt
zRw4D%4Rq}8e>0qtMOJC^+8|9~8cjXdn0HbiZW2J*>35fZZ6OfcPO+A-K)X@Y1WF7!
zCX#*kotd@W>UgQ#>;K|<NFV$cTj$g)j1o2HZF|4lwr$(CZQHhO+qP}nwr%GmRY~RI
zyPO{|GhJ&v-R*3ak_C&iDYompurexrzf-gsV50W1`p@D-=7c<)$}{EP@}O+SqG(y!
zU68<*9l)sVk9~X0(2+MwS0c|^VQVz|!QSfSI1TZ$B)$U4N7cLpts?>0!{cwuD>VTy
zG4TF6<u2%}KK&G2c0;sb&m4oJBrU@}#Evb|eS)WLRQ=lKca~4~!lhgjRZf;X8qH|u
z4xXEnICvDE)I~N+ReUZ$mUR4Ow5G;FnNYc6l~Zy`zuS=e+xAs>yr!K%n8x&?m$J>8
zEfeEXeHoNAi1Hhi3va|2d<ZMWDYQVy7h@(H!3X0W(3yL3^Kfv1xc1tY-X`?;zoiIn
zl?R-B!0r_%SdL}XiWZbTh%cmdFa>aDWyxX;V~h$hH<h{8+JH7sRyNj3fj8_$%c<Kt
z91N(aQ9F#zX@s)KwD3IV*`^S>FwFbcZSfSkLKevhLtCokLU!KV#Kj{ig#iIr#RpGu
zOEb7x!X1W2O9G*G=AGFH)5Fm+(f=xS1fb1c6L)mj`YN8|Sklm2bT}BsD=L>_BDB<f
z@O%mXtK*~nA)S8-N_K;@l|i|6=mCB(u@g<2i`!;=*pv$PGZcA7W_fPLO^w%Xof%8e
z&3G3_ot&wsf!T*sbH!Lg^*kV-5INYRiqx!ZE=qO+ahEr@>-(kmJg{m6ULln38_wY4
zRW*V`gWqG~?fU1HC*A(vx1lWNlb|keA-<1KgUbao9UGC?|AQd@e5*QCTE{0=xQtW6
zkd8A>G7DnG7zLhISe3tN1mHG<%wl8>wYSWNidsX#$|2^w7GoV_@laVgN-&ztqv42x
zr!us^?J7Y!dI0s<QCCfda+~K(?QHFe06&ZXNj{h&bgbDL_le>T**aY}g3yC7^Nxxs
z2?K;dG@;N5a=-WFsXp4_xDwX(Y4O?OJLt7DZB{a(-u&Uc0m3wGx6$%;3bEWLsn5-q
zPv}%*zj!%5Db&S1F}RVjjvV4VR6?Qi8xMVWdq}G-G&6h0*s@q;(wjEYVk>Egia&jK
zE?pIY^mc-2Yavr3&Fb&2SC^n9>ua~n)vYw+JFj9EO#s~V`I=WObiq!~XFd%sIrVv8
z(~18`pQSX52o?ZHp;8tV(SaJxI<c*Y3)qbMGXYs7R?d8Lu=%@zyx=<%(1do3ZLn?7
z*Ss8w3EryxUv{!%-rI0wgdqfv<biQT@@_U63mqjv?LjR4!t7`{1}&)D34Y0G_g^m?
zo{Qy`Dmudrnal78fTBTnr-9ACZjvKBEacMqo0#Iw8lFz%U-hAFAm9!y46cYkpZ?Z9
zHFM0(b<jHSbIvN4a5wANADFL^G9?#tr9=ehFF>C;_;P9WSx}A=6s+(;K`OoX34mz!
z%B63AA~gb_6xB8aorWC1ACR*0398gsAF-iR**BD#&w%TB$P(J}vu+b12N#Z)FT~HD
zvutVF*xn_&Xs6Y{X0N5*KHyM@Trv@TP@-v}4Ue7LQlMyD(`;$Ipdypm^VH=BDnbpM
zUzCFMSj06&`+YC7?@$}7;Az!w#mD2vh*RDwC2fn!zc7nyMr9(-X}E{-HFe_~r#cwP
zQLx~c)C!&%kfC~UF%gygWJgC`rmvY_QCW<=^p)<DaF|fRqmpxCDF{5LLv9YyFx0QF
z4B&ILx^L>6Jl&#6iRV&CD|noa09|tiy9DcB?q~s)?;@_ntp1eg++_z-?4D;^uJsIe
z?#82Z{i&$D@>_Pk>KV^OxUMyLNL!gtSoJUSja47n@oB%fR+w%{aiDA@_IkX+t4k(>
zRVUi6myi#cTWP0#!0WR6doiv|$|&hAyct{oo%O?hdNcAF)yK$@Hf|Dz5Yt7%2WRwt
z5AobY8>Tp6-;=h#w1xE#&CrV*lTdVE<3VN+EFlaN(+&e=XqR{OnSpzd^QyOB4a6qb
zY{IOt9>W=hkxLS$r*IbGSi9bq4mG}<)uX)x#~yI}>pn7Rt4^}2hjiF7h~{KD;b|qC
zBf@u`^iqyzZst{Q*fPQ$wk2r9Hy<9GN&fJB5q;H<dcjm8G{~)a@1C3r7qf;~p=~W8
z_j{+i!nnzIoI3Jbgp6e|5REWm)q#(p62ntVnmUN|%r|(<GaG}k&i#wcUXava?nr#~
zf+LPDVB^jTn~Z3yxf>nIZRz6AC8fts_6=WMJBIevTx#8_Y~~;JX|_~3Y}6;8nVB$|
z_U@fLBdhPh@4%>(Cs+C{Qh$o!?i<;2SYU&QyvO~Ag(2h5;1^h$*K6X#2e3T%sebUn
zE4FzjgM$k3l{%K&E#>qpTOoK@gVv8U)=_$w>uaqTGJ)zPwJ}YjlsC*q>zq6c<2^bp
zPoV<)J9|6QFUsN5zO_25R~ZV0-HkeOVs+?kP1GJAh=pGgTkMfGzMPDNaIG$o5GnUB
zA2gEOP2g}ATE|u}dP6I}3mwp|s|OPtv~;Qwi)IuA)6o-5zXXM&$Y|2xFkq<P$%JX<
zUw^<Wm2QB{mljgnlr^D9XM{|&KB%)~Provj_aUauU!@y30)0w?^F)pZ_Ss}<-7Tk?
zO{aw2Ttfc+m++$$ysH(8Di1%LqL&)ElRQ2X*9CQAld09L0S_RCT5znIGE8g07uD`<
zZg#?(;(4Eesv`!pMJF*&Vmr21f6CceRKfV*5HcwNz>epI?ofT(_R(%l7Ou$RoyoQP
z;B%kWen#ZrU$5+7yAqAYoz^m}gJDvd5}kFYM0?%d^<}JeU+F1}lv(q37;syULwvX;
z9SVI#50NZryd_e438G~lvl28X@D@ZDf<<MIjOP^eMzZim1o!B0UWZGjG*q8NMGO}P
zd5@^82Cwa`wEz{%&yBFuas7>wU6fpmn5+q`ov5n)WL|s)h@MeQFNR?Q&!)Jow>OF}
znh;R=Z6N1$mdZHhhf3LujuV@PYGMkIrz7>2$QDAOE%=3kA8Ckgxi2SfAFzwaZw3<}
zsZQR&4HVR`<gaY%GUizAj;v>7tH4g$5Jd7Q;gK!vXv2HU$u_e1EPp$^{zF8JBpUo6
z0*25lB@Qa$01jf)?YMlbK@Z$R$;PZJf-oH1F7xCgRHr0Bl#;jcrsUeBV?2Aq5tFVX
zR!LdDf33v@w`+W0bibS!t>w2o78e@(X^rgXxq_HFhz$6kcy^`o4T8)iM<R|(9V9%Q
zxfO_kR5Wj#oeQb|f}SuFK>^j{IPtkDDYCkyfe&=f?7>a+mfxa33>-8jp^cRn>&TLZ
zT&>))CjwlaT)|*r^lyIBKd)0((H_gG9=d3Jyb3c=UXN<uf$~^e5V6jc=K&ZbXQUyF
z9m>r<%pMuFK(&Ev7q1k@#XVm2bwMN#yl*DTbVI4g^LAQ~Gl~>Ae(&O9DJfg*13jMs
zF`?S|XxW&7EMYBCh}wstqo<8Av+SjbsBt*9K;#sX#k<>fMLa}TS0IJRG3`wD8V7jM
zC{L<n-MstqAZ9DortB?Oeo6mS_rGTr$Upp11eOpk=|4jZ2Ejw+*sEa3PhvY~Np(G;
zgxq)~Oq}Z<MEAs4U9D(G%ATb60W3|h5D>{=U)&an-Br9bTXQ1OGkmlMCE2sVsoR+x
z5EX6*5a$v9#oXADfrP%E*i_RH8HP5DkVIIm)!J-xgEle&<<RC_gu2P%Qj$&gE)jqA
zZQ;x+l#K7k4_009g$tXkn4+fe9Sqo_MXe@h1q@q6M4B%<DniEc{oHErzG`CLv^%&j
zQSPI)(8P1uks`k{TZ}B&dd0qeF@uA)^I1yI)>WTcE`iMH**X==)NG`Nb*iqR0{(G#
z`L=v^2#UUbUR#JgSJ>1Tc=<*k6j{^vFR3brn^wM}iFWUsc>%5t2JLXRMDl7L?clvS
zFAv2I9BEA+Z=d&JiPIJu9P=Qf8#@_wBsq+qO<dMTtUhe86N1L1tg<Bbk*AF3Gj!{`
z;+0!|A;LGSvtqBtl7;?fz8I49f-gmedOUB~J54PzfO&C)eI7jmF&~*nG3P}oy>`c+
zlq;SRVTF)ht*uox@w-l1b3oB`J`#+C5It+q?IZIe)>qZ}?cp@zwO`F^z?hg%K!1NK
z9<pT+Dz848TnFd+?l>y_1u_g0h}Zs4Puj^-9EfK$y$0M}Hv$SZl|Ab;7IJTQfgbLm
zM(a2MD#>lPg?Qqbm`b3L3o#LQZGPE)b6|lQr03XAborT{+7%~Ipf?{(4}0chnMx9p
z^3`DWbDwAO7~@#eW$=4{?k6bBD+eRiur_$koGJ$-d)e5P#)+Ynx1WDYa(ih!U%2cB
zvCgBby`~Ql*GOtEP)V^Y(`2>;R2<2K<aIz^2iRdB85mnZGAOaC8kSugGxrW|B2{9a
z;=gGB$l?*qZ4i*dPG62@UKF^&E+<otmPOEYLR-ubHFxz#%Y}Gd&GP(vOW$@2G4Gwr
zt}ys0Sa-Ln%oSy)xH%tJ|7XU?c`SLxF>0RJ{e1TP#AdoSda2edM>2PcyGAQ=r*O{B
z8xnxUOKUnW1L^zCvpdg^+x6c9MAQ~b|1xEiyP+z(5*M`D5?cm8XBEW_({!rreG!d5
zekEo}VJIdcxyn@2jT}PfQs4`rK}TVuCb~|SqI64rKloly<o9Q-5^<7PXeg;(S`=i#
zopYAz>p0G%0-{R1rvzVOut`HIXKn^vKW3~&fX>Jf6guuopQssHNI}8gu+7biMleH*
zn&{f<fhL}rqt(e=yEK@6=O&$u?NlW~rxIhM6Rj#PG*7LbVJS0>p^Nf%D5`}`iVe1i
z&+zgWA6rAEV&tlNFN#+6poV`*(s^=%3`g<8xW-{(e^m(WObpiM8F}^`lJYhxY|Jwe
z7~)Sx8Dpvm@FlI7;J3XB?qtI?QheT?&c^*v=jVzFXI!IruUe+91Z(4JIK;ndTnQE9
z!8PN69diIuR1Z`r$=b4=METN!Mp)<{8Nr@xq{;?Gdx^hrtAo<`K(N*v<9X-|pJAN&
z8-5#4{kAb<2k9Z}+NhZ)b;mKT?5!vD>Zk4IbJFqq1$fT;9ib<#Fg%DCFjLTc3%_}E
zu6S}GOWiaaou1Pf>FJlt9InRlZQ+x@0gi*!k`<IA9n{JO8gIA2yL?VCiNRCnr$Q<#
z$2^q!T1li|^}J0`espk2cy!9`*a?g4jzK^o-|f!^>UDZ87~tQ-whI1kho=?D67{IU
z!O@tYvZxz&LLz*7o4kpeexB`@b}{|lLTw7OZxb0W->tGzH+t7iIr`IqhWLs7abP_Z
z!eO-B?FdUxoyd~F=Azvt3t-<|Qmn*`jr?I^Eg@dhB*6n$$&kf^6)m7!kPxDzSqS`f
z05q~2cq&)Q&UTMmT48cmUJ$V}8@7<oUP`}{T>}0Adg^;{A`Go`L}|Jy290M_#{62?
zK}7+n<)E%je7~uDEKo_cZ-G8(K|cg?5Liy@9InOrV~ho|c#rE=gSM3aWQEbzS%v!|
zi^w-L+}FC~aMwcw!3|62OB<_DU-XCFmiX<QWModGf`~BgDF_3mo`pNODns%}CG)-~
z6P|}Qx$nzi4iLGd*3Eo>{f8KKxWQ*-ji(wh!H`a1EaJ^YN7D#NQ7w$=qpOIG28^;X
zTiu081-@aC@U`v$_#YcAIYQ&3zoK1pDD5mYbk+rg%Kf1!IpWeq4Zbb(g_70YZsa?n
z5Ha}m{2EcBJU-FUXY{6}16*y9U961j=hf*>==k^%{JSW(@YjENVUdaT@;zw5fI8|K
zuu^lHEgogTAY4E_tHXn}R@b}=)=0y;7HGL#H!n{|p_u$p?-sk^7;wG+iu|j4Ph_<S
zM|l;JU$t*<1?1f^sfB9=bYl*zTou}7qDAT&(e%O;II^ZX9d&NeW?5WHx(tRUhW#<C
z=;i!ee>JN$`qBkxl*zLA(U6(ENq^8LkDHKX6cnsc!0zO-XI6ke!%NoP5E*0Xm8a}-
zePC1?7%^@5#LoBMRr$nOpRf?lNxI1TBTu9f6XxACA<-&BWx!Rl)Im+<MCf_@oEdmB
zhj1d&V0sqY|3aO79{dm+yARV>^@%lD)&d#U3Ihq1L9;@%dl?kCp;&UcY~nk0%@<9o
zeEtmF#3SYlh1Ij_^FeRh#j1f2R>3Kq1GL9!<BM+gqbjTcp6)LrWp8ve)S-Ez_v)mm
z_A%(#M_Sj)JyRCZxO24-f`ME}rqDNaq_&N6h!E!L4?_097qpFRn_9f8UXs11KhkY1
zP?^#|mg-!ms-=8;RWqaF^=d!8OsCobbS|LTbg%^!`_=$id$n=IDYb>*+`+31aXSn#
zY(c8zx7r*t40%w0i_c{xs*`tLm>4<&UgPT>>(g*9rVi83TX^|QAX}k3Oq~qlF0)8w
zX!hePkRG`vfK59)gL<z`r}>-8M>4^uJWfW}c1w)p+h|>A4iHoEf)*?vS7=m3+&b+K
z<dmJhnI!nR$IHLf=^iR!^wCt6S5DGpq@SK6nUxp`wd1hr6j}{)6yCE`k$iAzWEm|z
zF?t$&%&rJ4@l*BzCUKv9PXK`%6S&WV5|&G*a1M2a(FFKt29}iZnNzU%x6`%O`>FFr
zdjj2xpAnM0?Wz^GwaT76-wd4!I1v=$F<+U1#XcTU(&Hvq=onKyslG3W5wyDO7LhF^
zy6o%`Np~VIM@aWK{FbZsUyA@RtEWF#T?d5VUospMf)GQ7XHgPzM7X<KO4;LFcZwdV
zxl;dLTtz><ZJ!Mif6g<E!^7^LU;-au$Xc-BFL9{15hyc0W`pbdff>D`f}RdGPA)kJ
ziwHnFlAO+tAU}U#igwF}?{U6|CD4v74oMnctBMbF?j>u$c`XNr5>m#<wt`bYoS~H&
zXoaT^*{$HN&uKt2*;wFEC;qimmos)Mua5lKmK8G;IM*dWtM}<z8rz#gQ@94{Nz|O`
zsw`z&;(zOEiwUX7U;xbzG1^#%>g!lBMHGjr`wb0AM#PAORCHjtK%Or!?9}-AwY|(S
zYtH<{h3)|-SE_(Q7|x3GaP5zAX!ZB~?-9@_FH8^3LR^=@Aw@x{PktArjvb0cy)HYC
zL$C%iDUt_B$JeXyP;v;w^1wARV_i-xc}zMzGL_nxo;bQEjhnr3rIWLiH?O3GY@L6b
zJb{W^Bw50v(ujMrLQB!q@|K2f3H@cX&HbfO^@)^c3)9S=eM*24&Wcud#T6wJgKzkR
zb1a7T;?htwg_!HPeJmZT$2<3L#=Wb;s6Le;;y4l&+R<h9c(+XuVT^}@-KS0H+(Jtr
zaBiV2(fZaV?MF<3^MCc0?YoB6&EXSiIi#yBb!Y{&6<C#%89!D=JVg`Z;NN*ph7pCt
zyc^%%fnO@=_b|tBN8qw^K3+C~ZOSX=8R8s#w+sE4;|A*G4L642JX$ZGKd2@z(cC5C
zO1a~sWDe}>22iF`X0WJ@>ugT-IBjEVM+liMHhG{Wp-P!x%>*fHZ8&$#9XENqO|D0g
z4ATyVa%tfo&BA%(VNUJ?W~FQ1JmssUyIpEF0&j(61`DiF3i59&)E-lQ#4O4E#>d%{
z5!E+F?k`^`jcgcFSD>7WXLvYjU)YCYaestS4^ua#p@|><1Sl`8j74!e<9SnhQ;O;T
z!uk(9n!*JGTuqeJK?uCPg@#(nO|X45gpG^OUcMq$VCSp-*C>+O!2Y;{<A4&@df26c
z6^#8uKMzC>mTM1jQu{QTPhOs^=f2`*)!kDlX)22=_^9D6U1o+}C!VG6spj^@Uuuch
zF*E|kA0Xum@hhWythkXUNo8L`ZSE!!WQy4$^@;p{XLhq62t)KhMd#2r#ial&Qdc2<
z%UC&oyp3m#jU>#rj)t&W-OxWXyZn1hV3}Iyjo45@Cb1o2qZZpfLp#APIjb7Pb@X<*
zk0zwQ=NCK5`7~us$|t`^D}XI~<(7Dnp*QK@bjX!+x=AdmPOUmeT3;pwnTMZaKQTHr
zkacNEUu$=(IL@-ES(2r5T<VvqSDIvJk8}HNGVJaBlha=|DeexhHRI?j)Y=0doyOp{
zo-PWM|LDOArF^NpA500w4|B5-2Z7wAut4No;L2LUcJbZ0ScaKF^e!NqQV~2y@a*<_
zaW;`J=%LVj>e*t+#ol|a&bAeZes_j%xtF;0*)q*CErsBR{4c`Dw+{}=8YL)G1tKVg
z|2;oR8nkdYHOC>_s&b*@)~$miWlZCC81$V=QZGkGpG8bNQG;r7|08FmgAd=U?PA+V
z1PCp=&?g3RuFJ6^>+(!kmIj&q=JHjjFi_&7P06*3lDkepYyPklA+sgM)oxX;`fu_h
z1WilYE05^xVq`}n>|J|o7JQVf&_b1cS*ZYPY_fBFQzGXm<+hJ@I%u1|93LJ}nC}*{
z=QK$zDqA$fx$Og)52J`|>9191krCgXBYC}M{F3)Oy7rRJiI$2Ct+q(Ma%rWJ@x_W*
z&_~reUFjlxvNhEi#!;AO-_CR=nqxB7NRb?4ZGo%BT|&z<ayqDH!b1Ou)JM?lmM~8~
z!M&w0G&Wvhq#Vj&5`Znd*;JF0f4zl`Y9~ZiY|PkjQ=jE_taRwG73oYn;?DSELofWb
zsJcyw^`AFxrN@R~-(g)1#gWuavuab|%>?QT1f%qboD;ovzKPOQ1;~Ws#VgHzgJ@ok
zksxzV0$Jg-np;|t7!w--3NJ4508@-Kia8;8xyf*#2cPfR4<L1;Rr!BHQW*b7B!%Vw
zLMV**ObjgS|L^$!Gbv1r3=9na2TFmW6Sc5*HgUwK6SX#QHW4;4vNJY;;^l>Ma&|N^
zuz_;l{I9yk-gKsu7u(8^OYWL%cDR+L!Dg$~MhkgsRTz1zHRo=}E6>TdrK(r+Z@aqp
z^Ri3z?ebPcmfF<ps`}8tZcum*#P}G9JgTCczM+v32t9z>{`hz>mK1Cj)wPunY?f3T
zfCbsezcGTxKLVqFdVCy23=W~S>CL{Gp2-bN9z)@83qrnymA<vU!5*Z1Q)8<`6Fmdi
zU0X*7R69r8KbF?J-!Cy)MjBxDloUV-+6vjfzB@3qIGf#HQu`K-e|va!_`g>&f8WsD
z#sDO~fu6C!g|PrEeUk&I`mYEe`r0~%<~L*l^4$)gwU#t?_78x`rMU@kJhBoZa$>3i
zKsW?LIT#SEbrb+2!f(+gC#U^4f|bG1^;hlg9ANg3OatpX&-mSM@y`Qi=Z^^RAUz#m
z6jgK<KnR%$T8ll@?}609$`V}vFK%Of<kwH<55Vyg9MAs}53T}ml(h6uxJzAY3S&JT
zpgj1-`dTMj1{<)^b(A!=)!)zI?$rDt?!-?B)|$GS=hrXjk4$iJV;_$Z#AfEVAnxHm
zUj-Qhv>UP!DD;`%yQ`}+!$+LP%rT!4k(HtKf#Fl0bCMtXhnaHBjdcyrZ`p`n=i}Wg
zI`c`$adL^pUme8n4QdNZBU5WV3otp?-%wdV(Ze6c?~N*b{kt6K4_)eC4LQKl-;xPz
zHV(};pk{QxUkb!gU+!Ou^RHfVe0)w98V@oVxPNX)4r2fC;55v>zQOYcUAri4Y%FQ(
z>>ue*Uhj9^@0}qdg995wpq5S}(;-}|v=wB{Jqk@`O>l8e&g!2?*Dy%uciEXH^oZg3
zw))*Z(wi(O+a7GLK52iv+nJ%(V{OJT{w&C^xg%vJyS5qRTS;*9;&hwqlT5>Y3$OMY
zlpxC3s5smq=iw@ckqwJ{fN3NP)myddWI;5VNH&FLUw086k_VOV$z4zldkY+iW$7te
z_XMsD>|?cu_(2N6-_$Loy1MT?+&2qHY_5lai2sj3y6Nw3kO26k1Is8ZuhhL%w^R@+
zs4*iB_Kt{%M$?zxU?p+Q(JN&wEHMej@%2=KLkqNunpN=u9$q>MAx!77=eE768YV!)
zGv!xcA#>1@XI4se=T~TqjZ*jWufq*-g)4*8<VTPtm}>WV!S^^TCXV1EYm$<qnK;~Q
zbw`_At=bR=-g7v0H)fOSU#JEa7SqAS<tw9{qCtw0niptt^)@h{{VjRzNVRX>{(!3`
z)Xs&cp_;<Nu`gZ5c=b_+OL@f3XZWgWsP|$Q8Myk5tQnhaM0&*!nj4>fwz5`Rg2vg~
zBFEK7^2Kt&#f}qOOGcP4!(^HYN^wJuxbyhT7<9n1o_u!Pj(9txbdn5H;PH&tRvW$H
zr5UJ~t_;+(WH5WNUcyulBBCN|kU8|uiW!Qv3>l@A9<m7?(RzB+E>AX!_J2iTP_;#b
z`f@sxyNy<Fn;7Q^>L^Js-O3se&+W0N2LBm@86^0E8TB=!7CGi11W19C{uzMK+OTk>
zI;yQ+u630nDN3)K4kaU0kb^=6wN|9ne1<rtgxS)<gOy5~=~r|&M<pf<zI00(c=uBF
zqD!9?nh1jgH%LvO?JiJH_b=JK7?QL-b+N_6h;L#gdl2VPA@N>=JgNFjd(x)Jw^#vc
zq=&2Y+y78<1zBm`CE@n0TC#1gO*vg(6gkzd!`$r2-`A-_W#kBP-Y)HvO}pujYoMX<
zW|#1^EnS|!rp-6?eL{NP_+13S7=+PipSfkhm{TfrXr%F$^&k!Z?tlY+xJptsVofnH
zy&-=+UMj8RlXp{5<6k<rK9a16p4O!kIgc`M`q=|XrN*+v;UxrlmFmtN-=~t$Q2G9Q
zN15{9LkU5~L)+`-5x-3dqfj(20i#>#SiX@OB??rgwL>-ZSE8Ws+5?1fmEPy~Y3#XX
zdW`p#-OomK)o%*p8pryOBvl%0$8MzhEg)QJ?1mHregwLTtS#=P1*$M{iCkK*-1@S=
z){b{jp8X*S`(YbdO2K^2T4cOFt5u6R<J8)TBQMZMSf*xkb*i^I%q_)Xk|z%8o7hju
zV*~ZpZsSO96yw5BL$Rw${HGLT-z<ytpVE+|d32O?A}mEB$|wA(LRceU3l~1uX1DUW
z4?Dn6MVYUX0i!!`>e@_trz{|nbKOS(WU!I8!d;uJty1F$T|Ia$l&-1<A<;p*t$ao<
znIH{f=4!C|M;X+|@?<VfoA?ABz<slvIe7yoTmso>C}M5vaFoLlaGZ8~*pG71mE99z
zjMl=DkNBU{d}Lms%||Q{Aw)fzd-EE><TOGXox-#FBaFljG@^Ij{0mI5ew7Ubl^chA
zsFZFOtbts*!N@&XnZyU{gOpTV)J!Xh(*9{WnEGa*B({?U0lbBF86N|<!Q1K-ui`|h
zhE$dNbFS$qX)W)`oA+?A>ty~X_yS4YKHCf8lg@OMC~lv`M(8KxHE9f3oqFd>R4d{a
zKPbE0A$=4z{kbePTdYtDwW8RWm)my`SKPa|lz9b5_G)Qk;5x4^H8Tqw@Nu|W>t72;
zs=Hwm<^Z}<sEYsZ+61u6+6-;*Ow=P16k}eRoN?BJQ$Xt5tLrzZBBkuxKyW4+dg10T
zKPJ(7vpUPs^vm52@G13bAl`^{r;1&U>qvuLyW3+Uwajty$6A@zkJ_CTH~zWJ`m!`L
z2xsHSxE(yhO2#O)m(Um5xCRx4t%clu$vooPsWx<xR`Lf%5zV#}btmI-cRJug=iL)#
zl+1WM?2)K<gz9Xus=ORv@~v#RQvr^9H7iyuN#N=lwkMbfnivdpb7zPc1)D5^619hH
zNcTnC$Q9LpD3oa>MZQB@Z6qLp^G-k!pq~=~AK=FA9doWI)A7SKmHtxu3OnRheEizp
zPT)0XU5l#whjT}{H!viZJksaeM!>GU=1Wjh@h=udEt*-|(oujWVG{<BE&VT4g(F)Y
zdZ11GCC&V+<W^d~Vm-)F-~P<RFMGNsm#{!cHHs7SCu$2hpcYC6kO~m=Os4B(y^KyA
z`yKXH{4&$`Sw#oMZu~I)bnA^t{S9pBIx@X4*C@}WaD{ostTk#Qg5gz9=>wMq7h$6c
zx%|RWc(@*CiWnt};zPVa{10tp!EZz2BO9uI>nLc=hcak6!*rzX*{KsAwL#0kzLmd!
zkCewFhI-lxl&Pr-J#?t^G*yb}Wdg!IN#iVg-m$r)z>Bv@z8w__^jYfX;XyP6H8zgi
z?oRQzGH!YEXDW=~PK6j$nDF3eYEwXe8nMbl((-@6_3~;>V<2_Xnh3S4RPu^NqvvD8
z?=nRdy@o1Auzk*i=4A2jR!SuQI$Hm#$J#A-)<@{zvpR{-I&_5XElZPo7Kun|rta>+
z$U8C%Dj?*O&(l{3(j>%6`#1!SjS5`#vU;dw1NKf3Xq<*4DdzfZo5eAR0u%V)4i^Ck
zjkQVP-WUI3LL5Z7cHMMrvQ}8A?PTk6JlOXG;;yW_5KSN&XI}Y6VEp_X#x_(d_6m<B
zWSHwuGJ~%*H5)BFjoz->y^H<7?W2&p?<OH^s};CB&Ca)n7H<DOK8h7!l+R*PWNOnp
zNTZZFSY#GRQSqOd4+53#$uB5^uuW^LJz&cF;ep+W+1nTZRdKwAY&I%MtzlT)_jG`$
zC$GGh3?6gOh4#<tOk|7udGgG$LIF72s<gXqiAzm<s(`~0YN;c_^#u2A$Q=Xk0WlYE
zfKP)a1I7kFZ{>Xpd@8G19gj}tL=ETJ4#Y*$IpKdMNQ+8tJ+F0d*rd`Eu{GUirWb`$
zE^}TZS&c@1k~Q+NZ|evuO}Up=f;LOC_f@)tz-zWP^1fd5g~)j_S=kyh#L4U0U4f@S
zcZb52?XTmn?wVHGqwf)%t5Se_2*`g0pB2C6a=uOumk^OK>4`W`|EdJ?mNfpg9R!<4
zD|to^W8MPFr|kZfQ4s+_2dQ|V{PLP4l|AT@Ix+n=!aOl7UI#c0?{<*DC+uD=`Clr>
znX<s=psoJ1YOCLSW+GMnHuzWqDI|bAQGkhrJod}75wLM6H6~hwp@Y^D2uv&z^d9O9
zRgb7uu0HU6+gT830B*R@#x)!MYxYqAGmKX8N!PVmK}?icN8CkNNM}p8Yb32t_?k7Z
zb#e%;cA{ycb>yq^*O+3s$5aReMfN}t-CnfP+>A)7F}SDQhQ4)~eZc|w!~+v0r=Cm3
zlYa-YaHG8NRBch<83;KxM>Rq|Nm9Erin}|{oj4A79n0Dp(ioeTicE;4;5vb1x%Iu7
zaY%XH>f6*B85s?Qd@|&3Gmu(wYOK?Sn_x%$rs>$)1}_vu(3zbhd$eMj%-3P;qR1lU
z3H|}g+8CJRlN_AqkDZO0Wo<~dNn4@V_}C4hJM5senv~6K>gYmIz#kx`LxHDOq(lHI
z4j9CixIav#3HsC%t1Y{n{8hP@Z{mOEMPbHJY|@oiQqfZQfx#9u0n!u>vAn*_O{g=g
z;^zuv2)338OJ-WerofvpdH+I1XuF+FjDRmhcM7RJ3vpp%4y_+2G1m>HvCj|w?ho!W
zz5b`Xw+yKq<A({ZT;1g*+}xlj+0&gx(QB}5;#AE{5yP4{BB6(6PB@V!sO&I?W+q|q
zBy!}{xuc4y%aK^q_^7?h9k4>>^%dVU$He-eV4&iitIbWbdG`;7)dwN=@Me|pclq0@
zfdE0z+`?{zvALi|g|Bo;>lVbQRPF2LLhe}OUI_$MEKf6~qgfDiX8;ltV;IJ*#50?;
zGOWe3sJrJRU}Z*a){wjG{d3p)!Jdbt_UdT=2NQ-9T4Un@WAB!{{;9SVD}cZ>#?+`V
z79PE)<l3?nD0zjQe{`lHNu>HM5*N2oc}KDRO+)QN$;UMcaOU0OAaORs+CU*5Y=J<y
z05O8jCHOsu4_NrY&`sqh?+Fkm1sJGynGdB!r;bt}?I+RCNQ9@rGMwgM*|NP>gY)*?
z$ap~}=@`IjGs160<-a_&k6E{MFB6X2p&ej{;Nc0@4XCFR35I3(^wrl{pLfO!z8T1#
zTgdajV<tR0lwS3QkP&PaSEHy%P9K>7WK_23`>w6R>KW09+M<0_uGRh-VhrZzW|Z~i
zVUrirx-pukO^}_oNNdUKJkva?z$bp_ml!f;_9$Sb$zMzUHyFL|1GlvN*ddxS03HU-
zC!o|ZKU!*;q|yKC0?4@9lyiSJnw?-fMNAGuQuR0CqKr`TzWxh97F^huqA9e-z!8HD
zY0#hmx)`1@_!j-q-|~7=%fBuu>6J6V8J;#bM6a56l6#xOa9>8pNuPJg)9vTC;x045
zl<PvWStC+|g{oePzdOw@Wy4TDQ^&?7X0>0See^Pk#nu6|r+T8<`ZuYEu6Ahoz)p0;
zs&w)Iablx%SfnB1A}?X+Fe`Ero;gHNHS0{v(n>@r?6fprrIl|^gj9GXr)yizN5^EH
z&_y3kY8yHMn|W7-)2S4}y)axfo}m`EQDHkEge@@w6uMh70EGa(M7JkR23E3wcZ?cK
zc=w)qBN8)~j(6We0erVHzzJi&*`hsQ59gE$unP)Y!2b9Okp>)Ze;ba3-)i~fm5S87
z+=w53Hfh0cIq<Md?_Y$IN()RDxua}B_=h}*VY!G><(Gz1m>~O`4YX3|-v<jc3O}WQ
z<n<CgSN<ueg<&|7*`82HyBMC2#0VWxam0W{zJy`-J>%ULLtLe_3b;7t_^WWFn|_VG
zg@&%a1JAg~4BfB4hAgEPOER@L?naXUjeV&WWmbq2?23?c072GxPU-X&hXHp%T!d2J
zr$vn-B;DMGgL!MKf)l;Y7-~^F5wiQ%h@y#+;_k<Yq?`KA(p3}|D$}85pQzcAk<5Dj
zoHQG@<@_aJEjf5Fm%lfsB|`5iYZ;Q&et%s#tLf^g)f!Y67KFfk4Ybdy4*1yn`4Hi9
zI>0rsqs2RHeGJXCA_$^lF%!X8(s(QOBW8FMk%Tkb&#S1C5hfN4<*TK$dSi5-rleqW
zgfOe0DTS_jzTRfmT<Eua;&B;ewpNhw>2McJ@}GaZhYZSe<6*9(g{pAcSv#<DdTCZf
zx$2RiU6lZ1hV4IP)SxZ$`ID6z<Xds4R$)#)?x`3PUE3PzuUH=K7#sIwZg3W!e~><O
z5h}Z2(;h{Hh;P?!)VbJEk=~v&Q9OvNAHxMTdriHxodbY46#@p!DU^9=e<aay$xO*0
zDSkmJ8td0aJPKQBPRy%ywq#bBeRD9KffGa8M(0~6q!eIyByMfu*y5)5HUNt~sZ(q6
zHPfj39n>zKx@%8qiE|O4Qy8w=HiB?PCe;fd?IW3>p!VofI-Myb1?V@G)i0ip5H{iQ
zV+T(W$Q$X6r<QE~EKB9lb4885n=J709~sllFq2G)Chi35uj9lTqW$VRq@1qWc&OVs
zr6asQC&hQVW<`le=jh{1Gek=S9pGi-`nm>F7GO?Onp)!QiCJGJj45bEe?SF|EA$Hn
zYP|(apkigO&6y<DelXrJ2Z%VAu2_DytIX0Oi=Df$T!x2}Ou)OlFWjL3H6$`(@+Lb0
z7*5?Y%A>bQCtPVCMiGSpxiIg&j=iUiC5{{na>~f{6z%3ep|FZVzc|&s*YG~TF?W>j
z+cXa>cBg2uJ&QgP$yiaoolEyS{CeL<PSkH?lxt+_Hy&9%8R^MNkscoHBwj7I92U+O
zs{Zr`%F6!_n((^37NL7@=HtNvU+gasHp2^I@lQfO9^N?<h~#iRZT&>V#$yr6BoN41
zRmI_1$^kA^4vd~?`#n2ECr%mngrnlnB?^lP{61!O2{Y=SGIAv>_Ujw;wNQuS6F0-K
z{utnQljb%ZyZ8DM%?D|{3jB_0rH3|0WW0NK3^qfJ>V~9TX9ErW>2aH}hK^vr+HzR*
zomz0duXGXB)Q?Htkxu>23!k}u^O;sRXnYTW1<Na4@ndAFOLksFD%Z?rQ^rd+B{xE?
z2TN;^zE>bpQE;+#z5VmT1ehH9bO<LO?EnU^ePPG}Dbg>@PV+1%a$eOn6XZ?INh$w=
zZ<HxrB_H4784Q$3_gavbwnQrRvT}A|W%E#k{6kP-z;&Mq2on^43$JKissEBi6CV5F
z?6^ks7;X<lrN_U~M{0v=jM2tQGrx^0b!4uhYh2Qt6PFPxY+jBI7_j$%KUGJVp^gk%
zeM&<R3D)4UZYRMvnmz;=)yl3(Q}2KYoYU%!%e^!9Mps*h%_bWEO=RbwSqJ$Qh8am%
zUl)zc)akxAw2M^w9zER?&^jsK!vM%l^km4h<!k*AMO23&|3Wim&9Km&6cnJ7c(PZo
zn`#O@jE0B(&-GYBE4jjdY&sXdJQBb^T`f%Yy)RgCuo<h>^Tm%$ZdV4fSr>|lWVr-8
z%x3AxBA6oR3}@gWnQ3h;f0epXz23JA7pO+T-BZv|(YNC{g72oDga)2w8U4e7S27uv
z&<VbO(ZI1y$q-ZQn5^JR2;<>*6k+%Ne_Bzkk`O=eP@nhN(^DKZ(2KZ@0_vR09$V0`
zMdt`^e%o~pjG2b;LV3LDpU-q$UPQ{78UT^5u+YV#&z}76)4tM-nNj@IESke2r+{0z
zFXjQv>3PxHi$TXJvlnl%dUtrtnlu7&g{YKny(vo%eM91YXU-HbYdUQz5{yV38l{?8
zKT><6&~wL3`iEt9ws?(OJG8-Xqy5GUTv9!3H(vPK*)*ZO0!dH^9*1vM21NDA-|RVM
zSJhY)$D-m0ZmZe>Ybh@y!(rvO-_@H}Bl=`GC2jz;PH3`S`(JFq*&#7>%|e?LB~wP9
zRaZ2v3#WZ|m1l?2RCLW^^MN8)S;w%L8kj8>C}fuWOF5&5pT&a%nic&)82-cI#3QC8
zOx#IRapl|7ObV+;k*!hxv`2JyVdG&JsG<9K;a|m@5gqhOo6nu_H$;pxEg%J<9}nRV
zEHWC~>-%saHk0EKG<|k!42U{UO`mtVv(y-RG~$SnpVPDj3I!?k(HtC;iw<u0aVg5P
zAn)QV4|L|>#O7DKH&5qoy@4WR>an?%OhklQZuvZcMu76Vb4O&GAF`Kk*WVqQVR2eJ
zct5Y};7583d(t|Grwz97ApJ*752FRiOaIFsGnX+gk$zV~qPxkLM8&?84?`3iopOZr
zc+(upw`O(?J<}T4glclxA2Wo*ZpvokF48ul4|MRGH7Io*<kKcr&us=dEjsoUB$`7d
zdvv~A4A<*t3##Jnqtezfj%a5Rq~IML@z4u%x!&w*Ad$Sairj1`HGTWhpkN6!%r?iZ
zllZ}wybTDFUsF?k87S}x^FH(w5YFktn4u1X7-4!y<Tq?^LUMpe^ddAxG;iYCKVL8~
zn+oumY}_S}zu_i#xeDmAVP3E5SRa^2sIOW1rJuEeh-0lFVTG5bGyc?~=7}$5j}XIy
zil}oeL|s9U=0pB`b#AmrJq;N*`Pf@3eJ(RhO|7O8M>Lmt*9}0X;qplN=7%8vU~_{=
zF)4Q>oTQOP2c86$Pj`f^2x7_Q|F|gcXlql5cnI2!817&B32{u6DZ(xs>80SQTr0bR
ziuhygu=~6;IlX8>g|<XCyx!*9rAB@o{_hU%8Kp6`wLPh2b1ml5&ORd@yMsI}bW`zA
zEY*}tjdvi(j^DrB7x{4eXs!-Lst1DlwP;)Focog4&=GElQC3;r+q9dx6{nkZk4MA7
zFya4*s-`5-kwBBNyrM)j-nW4Dza39|a^Hv6b5j+<>H+mSAPinkyl-9~KJ!p>wacH-
zK-8v8x9WckJ2bE|IXVt{fS4XA^BB}*BFrUGkt^NJ%MhyVLcwJQ2%tSSk<cR@OooX<
zB4S*}&A@$YrO@Ri5Vy#vfYNYcyD;p__49nPL3jDniH*^etz&s?ZNhi5ud-H=D5`1q
zuGnoG_7<*!KA-KAf2e^Glzr;2KP=Zw<iR1Wfa^SWlh$Ga+7ld-ZTv)cavT;77O8|E
zr2aF5XA+|q`>brVc(zW<dL~#qa%xCrd?cp^RL?dR!`jyQopqz9A+NlU;N5e4FY!J=
zrLkyl*teIfVTNh{(dw0hDB;Civw-qIin0UAR{wqkW}eX+dkiz#T2@#v9#XM-w3s-+
z3SBQ-FVx<O_|afVZD>3m`yfrt#R4{|Mp$bm%gQnCPj@)XNJ98lnLOA;PaxE^h{~l8
z9X<`NDUPVKIFO}bwF86P0?S$u*)i23AZh8HBc6@pr>(=uaDOhM1qI$IrWK{HZhiov
z)xZ<*E@8X6i4ZauwV4J%)5bAhU=nW<M>$)o7A3tX(UmTq6h~mAh4ut&&_Gj07uqDt
zBaGvoYhY?7U=qyiX~n4Di?qB^i%~h^BoRzYT11_h-TDsVeWtXig=A^1BUS-Vw$z8Y
z46Kd4yg`G?wJNCe8!0CF)#p+8^eN?MR6HITsn?92ubiuV$v|2u08d@V9eBO66X^m7
zD75)u<*yyTA-AK1zxpEmwd<fbM~u`;WQ9J0VxtEn!Lm7G$@m!7M!5w5-(wh^O_=uv
zarBeg9y52Mrtwk0h5!)<&CVm>!ikA7aIxQ|O*`-9PJ^X5OcV}SQ!MOcl2Bh76+Df%
z_O7w)4x)}SqqMk85n@Z8XS}^Gu9p%zq+4~Ua_0pRIj*S9_Pr#}Pm(XPm&9TI_$Z88
z#e!jDIIJ&2^4a1*%@3{N^Y}IXH>}btR<Z7(^i7)53<<C7w(VJ81L{Dplj%&er9?(|
zH#-Zq0d;`W8DX>otWooQuF48RFN!&R-YiLzmB!f%Hkcu7!fl|HXC*|G9v}VI4O2mQ
zGj?`_0g`h3Qh90&8YAG416G7ZMtnl>CIfQa`K58>zFZYTdWRw$Q_@$N7KQd34JPSN
zb3pMV-%*MXeDk4XrMdE$yvy$*iLdhQGcpY}N8v&ELD+X;_@n*X&f|5MsK?qaY4=5{
zuOMr-dE*-MMspSUxZKBE*aZnP=_jzqo3jL-`f{a|r2WsuN44xJS~zv$U*k3GdCb2Z
z*<Zl`lymD4_w0W3ch$cM)?%rvM`0?-=Bg1tN`EC5ra+|d#`T&&bw1OI7#5Y9MQ8U;
zFpV!8M(rBAM<WZ@TQ|_NId*pwy{`$2$(22I52+i6oOAu2aM$dDU<ooAF5q9s;NuIv
zn@3+vS{Y<L4OC@eCF7+4Vb=tK)&*Dkq8YVSLQ%!$<jP4rHcG+S?M-QskT|fI8=W9a
zuD@K=%}P>-FaHl6BK7Nu^wkojWfgCL-3faM+D9aG3XC=65E4I#`Y)s((y~~+x>Wg^
zgIs_wU(IA3Whm1=VLes#7-Ev&lJS!On9%>Qlr7e|_1_a=otE<)lr#n#gKI)3fjk=H
zFd)zBw=yl0k#P7-y*@94Z5Tgt%0gf3LB5p8qs^|(P1@yLCPqn4;jdEkV`PXFuIWB^
zPD;;9xF|Yg5m*dzD4;%Lhu}wNYsau!xWbfiaZ9qfbF=>forE$@Ci`}h8U?A;^rYnE
zMNQ3kAyitZN{?URULobFC6;T;R)4!p?QD0oy??H8(Wy@s^HdF#1oNJZW%~hvA(=3S
z1YA1}w}-km*7fn}9X|;25gvVt^dpPSv$GV%yaF+iC&RC^9q2mMK2*4#GVSWM_%t$0
zs1-_Jce&?+L=hG2dalQG6)!fwV&Qq<2MO9G<Z7;O*eI>m*8;%Osf<dna`|GTZr)oT
zJ_Kq7gGeY`Ve#8E))kt^@giPRuhE^PDL%XL@o9pzQTFH0;aid=XvDQGZbH-o|DJ&q
zL6hrl+u?jaV>T=fwjm^awjt$_Z)p{E-BGR#nQ=*;_7N%YbL1G_{V^yX`fX3a%>r{m
z&CqCU)$M$~J&{@p>Jk44+}<>GdygK6XY_wk9h6#Gq$NhqY-P~UpBU*hYx~k)gr`kF
zj0MAYLCJgJEpY0?mJ6hO;69-kWz5X=eTocJ*=h180vqMz)8N!zzXIbfg8In!bo=Po
ztGb0Uk`BPCb1dE{7dWRRzI9)B$Bsl_r;sm6)|$&JrJ;QWu%@S+rTpkGnu>;4gO9zt
zI_{WpaAuT@KPAHb<5;H<*1XWll{|7OX4xP(H~n<Q#t4n|+9@&@w6=?6AQ1E8Ajz7y
zC~ds@-e`Zzf4_E7pj(?mGVzo*&HgQVuxF)^K>?b+$o|J;3R`)=Bg2e5cEDfWl6QqF
zvF$glH*1u|G@Tkug_*w0aa@<vqO9b}keaLaXbf?1ztJV5v+?<lvChTlnAFT)Cnbv|
zt=*vSZ*V0vb;y2tnC_>*+F;gz)`cpYe0ou`r*LDHNk6JMy*8Q$OaHeP+sf84;hN6B
zK0QtsN^j+aH#$$VsgP^m{(STV`>N{S4od^t;%(pvcUBqLw5nsc(g0qE`|TaC8>Jo#
zya=$!4+CJ^!w*ezs>34<9tSCp(`MvuRD7Tld7GHC7}%Kau^B@vPdAQEktFykhZ9IK
zWFhHrnl6KqJ;_RR+^!mcJuoIo|7Wy(mE*fV?QDXL;s27&f3?OQv3f6ZC!6ZwgKfAS
zWy#fp+|KlTwG1P3IJUfCYH-iLxkj6DbA3Bp&Bzyr{LTVn#$cv`cW}5M;3?kACj6o0
z?~fDGNLZL&9$+))*2mINux>v;=p*Q<IrF=W2aXgHf3`}fITXu=HY(DFE+}<`-}yB?
zl#tK`E72H+&kNhmHRd=NU-`|p8{*DV9T=5KH3~`aH+FmjAw8$~-1Z@DC)1l!OcXbI
zd^a&5pS8D~Qe)Ftiy((7^u4OO1c$ji+NWzvn+Z4*O%7bO*^P}f+DDQH5>Qb{lCPXw
z9=*N_qQ*&Ua{pc;kZ2E~k${egm#mw=*TJ=TRz2a)^YnDCxmUov6gAa~HZTKr1f*WM
zw2=-1qW4sfC0B)3q-bV}{X8lU%VT^Q9WhK9_?zN0U>2=64W1Wp62*^`X#rdR6to?z
zE;(x8;$YqwP)I*~3w31>y7ZzTw+_fmBIoWeh`Q6{i_+m|?aF`!_ANF8M2Wzcp6{A$
zqPOb?;M|Qz5^`3#4=Gk4SM?)Bh0OFf1)VEUhYpN+bD_nQaps&+RIYf$!t%PQMq^(m
zFbpe-`wK-#L;4uT#3+aZGw>YCYn5BVxjGgMymmINDYxq)Yx<>u14thGTG-(5rMip(
zc0A3L>@XWHn2;*dIz1Z@LiJ0#YK2etYT&SJ>znu<AWY@%QoOcx^dZ+V`sC1%0dU$X
zF<XE7m%DPpk44gztG`I3U3uY_EJ&;j*hq~yM(s0s{5922a~wrcwZzK|E5)a(xbx&$
zdQ2}hBQbG9N9{F&sszQnWGOM|dP`W;VSj1+%uq?m$`C%}GWS8kz|Q-s3CW^<Tb05q
zUdes6Io4)JVfdi6qdZ!vdX$8yUZ;27q=XM(YIeP$h35CBi%e6$a{R-x!ciQ6IrRzw
zTcbZXPj@}3{TRn$j2Y$V+TM9`Jg1#20Nn4D%*4f<xIHbQG@c%XnC%|7Yk6-@I8<47
z^OEALn~R;Y21apa*Xf;7oJ2=a#1y@jfQTH?Ec*%aFw_^L4mW43AxVklo{-BmNtaVw
zM)Cmu=$bEZDqRx8Qc0_&xvBsKP!wR1>8^*F7K37*h(6~D%sVT)N_RUhkJ^y>FWDcP
zaMS1@Y(+{h*CJQXnMpwajm(mK2v}#hF(O=CDzK1EzDF1BO6$@^72+B?Yntz!_2`#d
zt)&A@EF{u}2Rp!>9F_@qfDyZ>c#t`0F3#L&P^nfMY8slFx3zogRd5kr?47KYc9K}>
zV~LAErGv%kT=F7=T=RC61;BRb$IT?hLW2`%zdjqx=AR^_#P2r{;EM}ISu}jfyNfG<
zRVJeITo-xHdI3t~0w_*d0ovb>4@i)#3>TR+XC(wMl!ghq=wFxpji`e7nJh<OaQ3Tl
zyU$k*eaS)jh={=}z!$w+^sN@Jg8tPK1;7WXm_4N)b{+OFE2yNHfjl!}-Fw*3;xsoQ
z{Tz&<@$nei{h974OUzAM!+fct&!^cyGW}VFT|h^CloqkqE5R892;NnJD2eWiRJY(g
zx(JPPeB4E_XwPK`v4$@NoS^o@&awsfNnqtmDwcPh?~$y7*b-OIuYZD`y4hjJ80h~3
zGeFG0Dz_+cPf3xm+nQ2KxCnuQ>yIpbl&O_s#)~cU_!N$%bLG{`^FY5AHFp=10=4|>
zUqc!06;fI<f{m7959G$40Y=E$aVe@Ed0!(?CTGz;u$H1D{0NVVOw>$|bqak{IEQ((
zjwFqo_6SC0TKw+YxHVW6_oLxtofE@RT;-zG^xdEp>#-F?B$iKuL{EOJP9kt0;{BKK
zns{2gD&<ZIT<?1LW1;YtF9KjZuqw{|hcHKpjfZ2ykk?`IRChVct=YZKyfKY=#j^LO
z6t$7pKg-7~pkKBDVQC1`yyFmqw15_}#EraHZfX0>Orl7$UFiI{-boH9eQU>WV1MyR
zPr#~u*cETPas%N3UVpadim@l!vW*_^tvbh)B;HFj#$0l15x{l3D26*DwG7ccNdjpN
zUyYN5^{Hm+gMFTl0v|T0Nn-KdzAkemVu`~~=jFYGP%>Mf2u;7Fn^bL=;?zmi_Kzun
zhj%8!$4#SG8kxAbc4M@sk)$G<%P^fWE?HQzA;|r9^q00VMIu@D#V(8>o-8F_`@wXT
zC)Cw)2hMprwn&l32tJot0vOrI#8yDc0Bw>)T#*G~|JJXYL%hgsMV;-g$zS7rjKa`*
zoLL@!otSF5FQN*Ww&<a><4meuVLIc<EM4zg8Prosdr8eQ&ceg-m#yH(^MmT_H19C$
zD>zk@^^XcW%3*DEFjf<QXd1j=lhcCM1rj6*paB%|&NFpI{oaI<JX1$1C-kIA6&$nM
zx=hXMHAd41bT|R$v4mE4!S;j)p7GQHU3n2JfTuu&!~HQ94}lOC@eF50N2>iDJgu@9
zqGV_)cjV6YZTbO}KR&F-)b?=Kp#)ZuJ?K}VhP?TRy9>p>T20M?KuBDtpxlySwX*MI
zaEQT$6V2D}XGSL+>^#Ku-n!^@FRDeXdsoD@PZ6>+%CqxOC}loLPh)hpU;6dI&3*;7
zk;-UC^F(IvHkehvtmF(zoxu^<RnbYg#Y(m36u>0K>4eHE1I|4%K0Kt77A&jVR_bs!
zr?w@sM?QK$iZ3d-FvPSqd>(V<W)P>UMt&W?<I@>W`8$?dM5#P}{5HgNIsc%2ZCfk~
zsbv81Z5*O0Qeb8NuH#9#D5<ZCofoWO$hG>``FVNYl87^mR346lM#L`a{PvBZL_ZQ;
zmsLUgoi>5UctI3Yfq>06SoV8_ykoAvZ*?ZnT}A<=9f}0OCU}=YqsHX91|x4z0g^S^
zylSau2Z-JAw1udKXk(A57d*mZ{~9bbktdJOgk~k~tgtqmE52o~`&tA{NW|1QJPZBR
zBJ48VYK3T*o9C#VM^e8;_MgMKNp-Vt*Xc^PC5<Dj%=eAJ!6|ko<4XF?7NvNQM=lnk
zEDUiuY%ecLyq)qZ^=x`$-YDnu_Szp)fBf2!@3GC%vRgB2C)+(XIkGt_69Ai27tQOA
z#8-ZL3-VO5JKbeaw<LcsoG9Oup#^3=mQ;?7QIgX_2cA}~>*dS)1&(1f$)Y7T#a8#P
zZ-RqftSL0!hr$tF(?=z@LnGsHf`gDW(mYod9awrC1r=R35<Rn|&nw5^sh6v&M@O}>
zt!KZbcJMwURFO7W{|vO+Jl;S2_f;x{I<<$c;IEN3|Gx;&b7L5A#{p0AWHg5mjLgKh
zlaYE!q}hVYsyWM8kJxST)&d+nIjPz(sve+r9HSrs8y>aogPu^S8#aiu7R1Ul3!2k1
zP($(9N>nfMus5mlgxusiK55hw9^Tzi4!~yin7K-6t+dyU;Z0OGw0%mRzI>0vUt$95
zx1&;V7-CKcrAC(zA^wOO#4%nmoe@p`;RFv6+|Ye47bHhGm_bkg<00MeDnZ60!mBmj
zZ(zDM-Yr25-AyP8$W;7YYa44uwV);(>O^U~3(DPLb$6#Q6Hx2z(=eQGs-vT|uPS^2
zq(tY$&%sq0yOtR?RLJNecVtte==wRh%Ob)U-X>(&Q5E_Ic`5V*kPRyB%YbJN+pJq;
zTzkxq78XvxVjh>bH5f9S#9w0^G|?{{(p-aT!zwdjQQdw@K!ZG_QIp$m&RbAt<(O|m
zJQjN3y?J$xQYv&j-vd$YzS<U7)ASTADK;b{Qi-E}VKgFuCTygSYBIAGdTpZyb|Feg
zhIfZSO8IQElf2H>xST9`9JZKyU+GSdiInwm&>+FW^>|Tw+3V=FF%~RfCR37%)Jkx-
zT&SD9>Wf&K;;QJlIL1Q6a7ngTui3!l9>VHH!7v_OK3Sz6L~SR89n3t{VnCixD#-t`
zpDJ%ZX~ayB!TYS#{6aD2O2TaYQrK$sg{4-?(Qx)H>W3V0dkbvp(0V!mc{yr$_GsQQ
z<vnS*40@NFQx1s+_CP^;Fdom=s;h`4HeaGX<86Q>LFxr_q3X=RnO8G;_hpG$A=A1y
z-eupEV1nZ{OO2ZV#~uP1t$q*u@tOnWgdezznT}97D}emIZ^m<C$S%nV(WwEcq4`>K
z40C;j*&MB00!X9U6pLdSdV+q4KqCk71K9^s0<+>{$^+2uD$tZos+W)UOK%;u+{x#I
zV}N~a0*`y};owbda%Z0%zyx2o+DW_63Lz)q`G91B>;&k-9E`GQvQ2nY;GA-%zS!ov
zB8BP3l7{%tH#Z8%g^+BQ2ly?VHJ7&tEE9+>)~!{DY~Qh?c%rqxNI^EzbbEgska>o6
zprN<Z9y=`p4<b9^`L{}qb28G#xnhjm>QuJoSbEl5Kw)c%q$dSXQ~z@7;&m@qjPpZ&
z9KkZ|p=4h_y$)qBOc-)1?`T;yjoIbv6IDAl@V@_jH6XoFl1&RJ1ql$41c43l<2F)U
zJl_3*wOH-OZ^At2d$6KV)&V`?cXPpjGLp#SXSkewb`EWI=g@S()wojH?qn6?OtT?b
zm*G|@RKP4A=$7opo;X&GuqejhVU<9msfrF-MR&K8u!(=+-&|ZZtIBNVgdGMnD>8i$
zsn)Ifdg#?<^E~3u4C|C$Tf|Dc*buyqEe}>!B(-G$D<Ub((6M`wE#)xe%%)I4DY;Un
zR!JUuSft31uibG3W~k#7|A}!`y9p0iBEJC}li%3sTUE%6Cuo0ue7b|fN;>V9(~o+3
zNSd)Vm)CZe!=>F1Ex|rvbB8&*!I<8m`Y~&Fu6Gj&%6<MABHG!!CY+X~iKYV9FXr6s
zkxb$`Flh1cM<3l^Fz+=VtMV||#8hc-2N~VELFW}OParvA@Gt*S4A*qqB-r-b4fo?~
z2n9MC^zS=z{SvE!l`wgZ4q}N`n~!GpS0moD(@74?czFCzq6ywAb~G~^J3c#`(A!$7
z(gqdf?OI0l(h~RYV~g%nfep7H_c80>?7B!zzaHbr7zVB$%9?K=jr@F*1yQZ1lqh<X
zx6zzOrOKEAbQ%Af%|OJM%CmSlpvhPn^g$V5sD6pSeNxE0QucN+@V)4r;uKCC?0O=_
z=1;AWtvu)&B|~jh^NJXRbBSbGJ#sx6fAK+E9XH@hERwtFmWVY-Q(a!|+?`ZfpSvNA
zXBHV4VXu@@ko%G^-Y@ej*Zx|Z0rXA5OCemn5lfcBPNsvfGW)WvYn<5*Z)juEiZKA!
z7ZJ)YZ%u<rKyoQ7vkPVX3wwGO|BRoeU$BhwjvXhv4s5+zYJKd~%BYZ81sPlT#Gym)
z+rWO(w$`I`2AT=3<VT#6L&;U3{7h&W$e}vf4kChVA2YY4CW<=t<nTW$w#vloOWg~d
z+;9uon!{pBL^Ye>k=jb@<p(?S2hC`%`yV5V8&J@SYV$*>TsBzZE*K$BOIlyDxLKim
zIPKO(j0}rtz1YO1cKDgl-WCrVzTlspU=Jp9HBt`GMUWtT8R;jS2Z28m(3STk@(fy&
zLT?62y$>O<JM2;M9YQ=qd%8^KX=(yHpu}E0)37=06lXb&*SGhhEvH;7a<ohaY4OkY
zXzyVUDu$FPGs0#|g}8^f=s6Sv_U~v9wCU{#e>!El=LuPV+4X@XvD{_eK52srfMeu;
zIKW7s{dDhV(ldlgC*ABcz}5{8PsSfLjUDNSAK$Spw4xJ*U4g^9MDH}Qufo7bN;&kg
z_TXw*3)wor(N=zg?GzhHpF|?Wh(_Fr*PCBF?otdo#hp`Q*S|gvt)T9wajZjJ40qK#
zl;kzk^hp6aSfsx|EgjlUnmcl|PB<)T8vJ-UX^Ct8Mh<tKBVKp3$lI=8wyNdoJ(N-s
zDoZ7s3>Mptns=7a_<FjpqHpD+wmw{!`n>>yaL{S;OnFlGOG~)<nJ;JSo!c)3hHR>#
zNr5Thk+#>KTkVx%*x1H$%V(!3i2#&#V5&4eR7nz!>AF7nIe^10#3UDP1giYz2EGzZ
z-e>+$_kda98B@<Ym)a!Ta$4kPHaI>%^SyTls8ZObxY#h`4GJow&6)!tZfFNm`ih5(
zG4hpO!+dl@5-w4{a&i)=1D~(YF7L+5gY7;VI+rMoexCwZ;#dJ(YP6BsqJKWi%flMy
zav6`8imV9);it%lRflff;=8a7=TBtnSV7c!r$TR)1YD|2N#$k+9n#sEG1YpAsyJZX
z+@j0!<hxFp#Ia?X8CCb*f)D1yCIA6IudX$xoB4?*M2~qY$wk}II<8%mh{L|}`Z`KB
z=}*e|RtvHS7x1$Q>Ez;s+s6HXsGwa$X-gqF8TkGVo3ahUZ4VALEl<ao!}GJN0xPH1
zVHHH!r+Pb7E$?WzEU?EDrA4Otm7zW`U`)qM6PQuYhU*j$@yj05$chvP9wp*8BG+ho
z90ew9+HZC7ToTO?b%gF(u7jduGjko7xuv(y@!JOEl){+fG?9pe`+F_U#vS$uh#Y@0
z-nkIm?v)rqRJCG6ah^ytX1<!V;o$C5!V!4)4dxUgi(|BpHktuESrVOT{2w`94QP%6
zSrKLSIN_(?<v_wm7CHk%&ikypo4&TXeJQ#=lmqo8DRU@1B_;#YWja>cG=GrFPTAm2
z7-|x8`W0FqUPJor0;8agQD6C+9Y1W%mrCxO;`c%NY35gckw3f6ij1INb@nKh=(=GN
z%GYPKVH-Srb=ic+8`{nK7OdAEb0h1)H#f3AVuX`58qL1SxBXGkpg{u0wq}6kZ_3Za
zaongQ!?>>lSGZKw9Z@Cg`I;@v2~dJx$&LCg#v%w~&57`;SHlk~A4|aQ-FQ7Hjyu?P
zB;K3k6-l<2z<RPS#2=H5psYt>xKOwE${Q4UDVJhq*Gavxe+qt}*}BIp!?CwiZ3dZ%
zl#LE}tWD;rq7zH7Vod46FwEDWvHs~;*KBk777`ipN$q0F%$v55U(xetV`XTd>4`YU
zId`T_?6sBc#~VfA2Qwx0yw@NE57eg##=kqZnRKHBr&Vb&Ku8;4gIzjUJ^`(Ee_stA
zc~KD;PDd9V7q)NOAMIBj5AH-Qs4)Ezg<N-{rVRX>^Vz~!E|5yyy?+zY#_l^z2eu8t
z)_JWoTg!UzBt=yqweD3q#p0*-=|x%#$((e030Lqz&*<N?6SInsc?gw0!pFYn|2&K$
zH!k^v{GS6uK*X+)`=%TA+idhuM~>Hl=a{lITCA{htFOL$mxHwa{**$n1zJQfc8^tB
z?6*SE^p*(y&%KKtEm`Bkr=U{TZtohHn>%XSg8NTPy)&OSj~6nhD64ZC^K7>3RzxpO
z+*c!&$uuDuDiMVKr(w8g$2S})?c-$3Asufa2$cCcLuqt3d`fa$MRpjBHg_f{`lRBV
z<3~l$P>2{w_j`F{PIEYAr;CIPTvqt;>y+g5DsX)nJbAlVTp=Gxc1Hldbe%GRyfRb-
zrkBq&05!vKyYpYiOg736?@an9+t!hQ+uybMotH1voHW9SAFA$Jp4yJUd8cfOH=ZWF
zt)mgTd~gz5xxStyuwM5Dr7c&^U|zg6dm&Ik9sO#=%_$wcy08VgA5AdlH!2+MLpLNp
z5KwkC%9Gce`;ZJwOXed&Q$w4gK^Bof6+_wkJ;dFN)4aTs$tRGH@|>*@h5lHP@P=nO
zODH~kLkU|RB#XxZIj){Y{tosb?7LRBH+C_PJkw0e-7w$27m0o4MM$|D{YFme#2zpa
zUYZNALAI`)YCRC!X=kkHk2{|3v&gEaV|maj=T~YH&q`X#@YIVw4ED1h${3Le4g4Vx
z9ApC)g`O$n;RyNPf2F|cPUP$%L2UlU`=31%6z`jZnEnjD=1Ce71R(q>n85Ewg{r^>
zSGR#^i_U$Pvbo&2-dQY%m@3DUwTSfzjwlDXfC6B4NH~$DDs8j_xq;%E;b81eVuK&h
zOfuFsT-y+OS+*K@jI3dApdKky@N-AcNc@tWzNLM=Fk~|#H8LD8Pg^Jg(@6ETD$X*u
zgD6$d?yrfe0?5k6MjhxVv`wK1bd%!<hT;BW#}vbF&ImUrUUkSm^bDGW{*jUL{@1fz
zF#d3>;7s4QDT$q|4Y3?H_0+zQwgpzHJ+?DT@qw6fv-4rWlESzB<v@clOD^<vp${A3
z;P%g;x1+SDu{ER}mH3+H{g&EbZ*hOrmwD%N`@o9mzjteA&528p%QA|3B6$xHk+3%u
ziw4JO=)bso|NQq|<)rz!w&^*5h@m+!VtKrLGd@y>*SNfVP58bHJ?aly1))l1Tw%lT
zar`;IkE$l+WQ7hW#De0B3%;#kP0ujy6`UKuHjMYrEltu5RtNHeJ$iJBwkNjRlRNA&
zq<eST?kpMD5)%Yoz+5079&2z)tCxDYxFffLvd&{S&@cGD$XxSg{n0ArvoFk7NI0;K
zq^ck1H?#5bJPhB|LO+@Mdk57o8mdlRtbWX_GJ33^n&{ZuQVWuj+%{)&$cQDz*xA$}
z8aSI?lsuaUChTX|SES`Y7k`D-z;n;yjcJm!#7FL7=p)j*as_IXiKZ0ReEz@dbzsbE
z?b-XEEXOX)ns$n;bscx1Tz(x-2Es>Qe~vM~Pk*x?eU4rx)ys`h;38pfVbC+g&=`m$
z$`Hm1JC5V#awYw|o~l9({2;;Ghvh+A+8eXP1sAaxZSu8gH-iT2f)=F>@)>Saiqxw|
zG-1g$q4*VimTo5A9ku{ULC>052tpTD05kCbj@xl|GZxhw0-F0}=cDWiDyx)$^E*Fn
z;3uRxH6u1coU?>=a-cpzGRS5C4?(7`FsKC&=93jK<f`q_-`~bHPY7>$zeEyP5ikCE
zFV$BOS3@E*odlP!n6(!%Y+;GUFV>AcduG<rZ!2$1HvAwvwCQxA(JYBxVZPYNcdc7~
z=rmKAc0W`td#Kujc@`-j?o}TxY0#xo5#&+kFatp$rEgr4NQlGVP2Ts6q${<z)m4uu
zb!GZ>{Dgn6><Yrd)91{wmb4|{;}2C>6B>;COrN-r_R*72!Rf_Kq&cok<$5oBNpL#(
zg8KK7R@%%t$z*!>Yu|+Y*QH(~FysJ8s#SJe>{CWLO^|uWeGE_3MjK?4p5Ku~8FQg=
zCH(fQp;4Tja<|t)o-ez-Oi()CD3}VSS^8(mSkg{P&F_7T2<<*i_Ovv)Fnt|ennT;X
ze)A)&QC(o}W%H97VLsIwIek$kKPWoedln)Eb!hGbvy(OL5WRDLtn^D)5QDl3-*~yk
zE!$W23{ZsJnR!eH>D+ID(QkT=j~U$K+|D<8BLFdX2*+!(tJ~nvi)Nz=k^5Mz<}T+Y
zAQlWk!ilk9F>7tRSYoxe^bRE}Ye{d>E{2z9z=ztKOX-PZVuw3M;=Q8AF;Sq;Lnu9%
zF3oo7em`Out$oR?efG6-hR%kscSYDbt22$xVMJ%8X&3}`oFiH$-X}T9|KJ|wkd}gV
zdw3VZ$zC6F$O_9%&}>C+`xU9H=mHs+HCy5*JdT*vNWWi^hVSSWA^Tiv3L$>Xr94hd
zhi90OEvSoIN6RL4S`xGi9~FFZ?Jrdv-#+fNy=dcQs9mfrp<peA#d#!(<EUu=Q~C{E
z1l`@$6kk$^TS!sU6OFM<S6JWqbv?v+_&YNqg%T5tI;SPfE>_y~<+(js=pdGkyclG$
zOz5yLrf4-PP?TE?q$*pL@q9$z1P&Ex2fn*tkdp&`MCmRV8wdxla99s2p#Rq9h-9qA
z2hw7JA^<-DP+L@@26}<qi)dIqIWx(QN6(s*K40@fbItz?fA%L35=E60sFZRC?P$U$
z9ebISt2)$M=a-E!GRI7`nV3;rTzY-lx|A4ofFoG+(XL!Ox;4_;+(5JlDfQMkJ&4qa
z4<6~hpea*8suvA&X;qqsI;nT^m-m{iH;<Ln`#uI=_b;)<PlrEZxK^aHQr#p}-XPUo
zs+>7#Tm&T6KsW$r!em4j4Z6=VUKBGR!|`E<Cc+mV<^q|bdpc^3rO7Zs)9)Bx$@vLt
zS2*J)KycIeB9pF<+_JhaP3@WL&^QpUhvmOFZqJbNXaRc-`E>(QXx0t6gg3%bwnfUA
zG-o_Wc1|2}mt|6+sy0T$i4Mdf@-OjJb^Nwtu%&na;e7T(mnrZ#VA?+Z14w2x4p4tW
z>ilb0=X`NILycH%o!ZsG{g+#0H0vv?**JuqCcBku_NT*rD>K?VqLBx}sFcNCFy_wY
zHD^)yLAh~t=KZ3mgHlKVI6j`Lmj-H#^+X(H9g_7K_@~7^5q#+tb*B7M#!9E34yZ&z
z3v7+@gj(!xf|$DWeL#@WfiWt*U&n;~GxJN;@s!@s7&v(v<DT9}^{_O2)97-%XYf@#
z+bpr|VcVSOor@ZKFwRW%Amm5az1@hC#iZ5Wx#BODre6fGFC5#YNdN~<zAXYU+03k~
zhb)Y(srF(DgxR4w7It~kzGxiGMIdhl75;S&(~-iJ0=oU%twYh6el{c}q0|B-IKMFS
z5fN_(A8aQTv8l4lfo*V$f;0_W;wJ4oBnm%PLd+k|Y}i>cZ^HjCwLD70gP6iwvy~t5
z@~zG<nk=%mtSeV$$ibt#9BvT&@*{O|o|YqH9umE3PQltP){n@Pp;CN;e06~-zAWXt
zBMB-erLKjux>PZhID%EvNX`+^r*Lwg?*N1vfR`YK@$+S2YnMR|e_wLLvHjqC%srRM
zcbqR<CqR)`f!_JL8Of6h$gz1$Ou=l#T)yZ7d>ZGv9QAA(#P)hw5-_!Fp3j6YPvSv$
z&oAtLY~M7NjpL9B`H{q6HYY6rxDGTJy$5I}Q5r)Y_tA2T5kJt5pNceB^6uilaCz5E
zkJO{By1G%YducQR3<b8zWKIr+X3O&h3&S9ifg)}0=bOXVcZ+&<Ve?R7v_JnE@ty$A
zQ#$YiEP{dP%}Xj3M4PdtL`}V9WvyxR;xW;?4EZe?a8Rw}d5G3(IJ}_fDyLE6CXv|H
zEN-hYc$tFLW)y&!c2f}*tyH`}672QTq8CZ;P-jUPUuI?Y?5lMv&TrKD_OWJhnyZPS
zdzmMRCI9)jCVGX^BW=rVFL&tH`?gTi-1Yc9x7LeH5IdlvULWk=Z;#v^4|Du~yF;Rv
z$1FVFey6cCiM*{j5P2@hlRv>#E!&hlb1;~-B-nvFx}4%q)>xlv%aFpmtW;Q@i^+X+
zYCf56(-f`CU38qW)Kh?;_0~<z$Hli+D+XFbQJh)K3Cws_2^X@bCR{U36DC=1l_XO!
zf>PKkyHHkz%5v4v_kNJN_+VCIl2}l=??Cs(_=4ug^d}I1Wze&J4r%&18C5z8A0Qi7
zLCeaO)CdK)OYo-^940kSRXY{*C1l2xfHSTH2GWeTxAXwwKEyBCt4&(=PlD`szxcy@
z=^+nB6EA18Yx146)ELOuCbZ29jjU6Hdx_V)+t^FlGdYTWKmOE8;q!;C8q{8ap5%Z5
zBz^*+#u+6q8rQ*DmoDrWW)$>Ran-UnOli$YE2W~r;^Ov%QrwEQX4FU;=9@o5Gg#p~
z{J%IIj5h7N6}?y4{gGFr*F<i-pNZHY_K$)y!!Qqu(nPo{?iC-ibd%3yGMhQMr+5lx
zU&;6~<2}vMkoJu(Aa#7Bdi=MhEDbtxEVB`-d6qr+;R4$LP$?1ufsz(k-^(HFXggI@
z3^YLHP|1}<UM2m-*0Dcr?7{t~oiZ<IU?<J4+RxXR4fU5B+FabTt7WtEc=0_=Sro1i
zkFdyLkY-jhs6Kz3UN2%WGis$O!5HrY-2s@$7(wFRkcA}xp-b=!k#&aJ1GeLYx{IXW
zc9Y%oJnHF~b2X9omwcX~@b9qf>M8~!m$dx#Kk}GtV`xF1TFR}yLrjA5v+EvM?44O1
zo!4Lm0l53+oHTQ(jt0SVj;hjNS~SI4%-z|7c=947<mLC4g!ixu7e`Rn-x%xpR@#Ne
z9mFzyFtoUg^x8VBEVsm?qBpt3-WI5HwD<(Ou^GPtu&u-m@L0yqw1p*}pnVDw=l;wI
z6W+iShXvjiV+LvNqA&L`Bh-)<oNq#FWH%Cgl8&$zjcQG+Va))wl%v+u_Uem|VIOT8
zcUDQPpo&z(U?8=9%zPdSMMV=y&t77#E`b;b<uHHP97C}UHSRlmgWV-2IE*$4J-&Gl
zg$@rZRycH@jL8&(3gz^kN(LXwkM3G(i!-<-GIj}V#PV~PlG|XAd1s4@V>n(<#i7J;
zwz-&w!@B4s@N^14?a1Y!CJqWEef6(IIDOv>$K=Er*vvt|@D1)&8~!;+IKDpKpHV2(
zWI<S<|AWgeNlDx-EgIez<Ufr4{lI;T>T`+$umQGUj3_oNWf}uA4Tta>)kavE4vekv
zZK{KlZqZu8AqL7rW!u3$k|cGfpz!H5roC=PbfU)~m}L1Xs&$Ci=PnsHlX~&qbzD=Z
z8a*WPgP~TP;1UKPv&v;?IhE^AGloPdV@6{%{75LxJ1d5wNzJ%ykUJ3qbU-jhY6zl*
z^>w@+ccfKhKI%2n3CkS2S8t~k6{JRl%Q8=dmq>}Gx%g}B>l(N>kPjrpJC1z{>rQtL
zo$VUAwmgl|(R;zYKg15VB9;Y_AYqWQfA55GPfl>^Jl<hEns9g-wfQ}5A6U1{4D10I
zr*@YxQv259dR9@0l9AK)lBL{C&0qsts})O+JSgFtuKQv?sjEj3yEFTL4g@4fM~yz$
zs^Jtzo>-FlBQir2s=U*$x^>aCfU%*7pwm*y0dbMDWBHy+GjI;(NE9+;832DxA@36P
z%n<foARd*0iETV085(v6zDuyYs}5-$^iY6f%tdrNrWU%tSpXK)0<NwV_VjN>+}x2b
zAIw7}J1SSyZvir&97md7kJeYPf?Pg`#h_L?D6dNE;wkuumM}WERSi-WqS~Y<e``HB
z>_#Pb+ui<4)|lxm5Sw<kx<!|jq7}!ro@>-Qs6x90Xj(i|pI;DBMgwBnuVWhmZikX*
zDe<SF(r2jM<znrfTuz7BX96YN)~Lb@uv4v`*q5%jdGqCf>FG|oN&J~$({1-(@mE3@
z2f|av7yEi^5V=~|_%Yn+G=SPFMEcV27_TbN)3j+>A&W{Xlb2-v#bt?(y5ZzRJv77O
zoHgW?3@)3i)+hm}3NFT{t^clJ@>J<Qs;qQcJ7m6gxRkJSxh8~!oU#I6$ca_fB%&x{
z#omCWg>TQ_9}tB@_ChqFX1D?m7(jYSeNat}AuNc<4ULnxx&~BoEq|va`~Qc{Pm2wl
zW7_}!j<3LVcz}R7i_`IU%X7!QutbVANAEx5GqGy<aBdFfpns}4?gVXsDr9k3m>F#$
zC4S?DSz!SBhUlkl&<XU&w+f71T*<wsPa5PY%?%pRP)><G?H?!RT-WqYKJNG-SaB;Y
zmAh!}8AkalG@HKbXG~?IW)!B2-44BcRx`>;gm8ejuYSla&#P*+x!i`?kLXLID<c`v
z-)c(WdRuDNu)#;Mvu|@X{rp@O86!oO+^!=2@9;w71D+Gr4fU<;>=P4mIeX%Hjm1W#
z4<LBKyKCUr#Nyy>%Ff>=>!soMzTI5HN?ERsn!a(QduVGQrOZ~Y_X!@5e^wRWQc_Qp
zYqy{7Gq+azGSk$f%pbxYe!ex&wUjugH95bvNYu7IR{*k0Y`Z$ivM-;GseRUciI0Jw
z*OUmE`77{g<sHL%$;K_u(oO{3a?tl6UBUaiHMXt@|Fp1E4IP|C%aFMCef~(lZCB8O
z?ms?S@0-`hGe+#dsxZV$dwDFL-pc|y>+!iR#(u;jBkJownZDQ^)Eu-7nnOTHmuCi0
z6HdQzIG*}XNE-{t_nYK`q;%F}a}&7~K>-eH@zYa*4Pe^8mR@dDCz>PU2iEiBgm<OU
zts4zUe0zIF3Br3}&J%L&M+`|f3`>1V^H}*PYlQfJGJlB>ei5Wk@Gn_>jY|iaPx*=y
z@o(O9YJdd!@25#@y?>nHS-6K03CWDls1?VSWm)+5tX9he=&Pw<dvHE_Dq97E&0>e?
z7gfC^e<SQ}|MO<clU)4Oh?EW%$2NMMfv|6PhO;KoZX@MzkYbmOcOu#cCyk{>q2A^*
z-&_1#^B%y?Z*{fHwC>K27c0Dx3`tIfq2yAqeihWQm?-`dDg$ua@FB-w=zx*vlQmee
zM`hy|jOUIp{TyRN+`E6(r=JEp=(AQT(-X{}NYma9q_a_duyc35K5-tQvL~cVP#2(H
z2iDLM5$Ss-sFB!`R}14f1CP0!vHPxz5lUpY{x3g8!v%1w+t3;h-QCK!!4x?Ee5*~k
zuT-bxG7yx*%s82w4m8HnU}{TsUwD+H)aX!Dzib>XH=8T$xz4~lBWeT=0uzboom**t
z$n;S+1V%|u5F{VpQ(1u&fa#%d54$B7GFg>f-86o<LQ5Nef($rdzJ_Su*$=GO>|g|y
zQDp~iY%1+9b=M~g^<jd`lu-Wrzwal@1~LOQ8&f)u=1%3+yJ9#2<x`P2$PrN(piPGU
zdsEmd$NhLKjJO=p5q$}esHVEDDU7%|-=M_ELl;iceT>9-TQN;KXurgq#4^;Z_#8C_
z)Wa(XIRWwDIBL3;i&J^|alN#aG8Tt?^+CL~-*hKZlx_=Y2%VI>gR3#iOx|C&PH}=1
zx@zGmXv^*YQO5o;@gkg@z|GjEV+JtFwaKlP{l_OuUnk!_?L3<t^++*TjV^f-0lm50
z&t-VFvaO=PpIP#gRRTNwiWw{@6Hr<|U2ETa_Y@?rpacLpW$LW<n*^rn{M}1VpgrI~
zF$f)St(_ev(wOXo>`a^#x%d?zMVEIp4R*x$^7AG4WbyCPDF-Q3^vT1KK9b36Ps)VX
zwPyfxu{lI}Q8z)}U<n)hms0ew%d;Nz=aOp5ox`uWz#^Ma3{eJhRzPWMHx0d;f2B7)
z7J(byP$Yb{1HBaQ6n~XhjlqSJYDRvu${D1TGQ`|oXGGJ{ol%WBkoVRz*YXbPXg7Hk
zKaKZ2c7bFGKe7x>1{05Iq<1TYOQ7<YipztysBI&sWtJwhKfl;J^&Ta0bjMfV(j3B+
zjmd27YZvq(o}1@QJOm0i+2xf0oE?^O|Ily9-#NtTY3RD`;cp;lbNPZG19DZ0PMkb8
zJEt4WPHOSvi)WvGn#ug*C=FrX#U?ja#SV>ZM#l(S#*!efBpG#~od3Nb#Ry<!`1FUq
z=3fOlHN>Og+up(c{S;udJt4Y!MGzhGnTd*}UAZc0`>LS?bRDHwTU7eMOrdk$yNV=x
zY~gSE38TCKhCZpvz2dBWdZb^Lt&Ubi7?}-ZY>ikf(u%n!iF#_m?bTH^iI3PVEi3zq
zPEMM&xa>X=9fn)Inh-39*D?XeUHcR*6DVGX%s?NzjYa$``#s#)kMDk>R?mjTk+k)c
zeD%Rs>V0ix8ntDT`vaBdj+P^iG#KGsA2jU}VWVIL;gaq<l);*xyk}MwU2z9;+M99H
zGo~MSm?Ez%0vH%)2yA#qKm!Gl^B1BRVmtY<a3}wMpmU*#iUvx~sbw1V8Z)>R^C;)(
zC@aMH=#ksLjgjpAthGEC^&*X%0!a=#w6(x{UyW;5CCx4@)@CW>#9k9P@b}!ZrGpe%
zF8<!{f6)L<uz*1;lY)>KlwKj*g~j7M=k$f-oV?I1wOFPVBhoRJQZ1&@+bT#MhV9%|
zK^v<hsK26D0cs3*D7$cb?E;5DE%O$P?VB0_vtbUC`*(45ZV1st(1P`Y{(q;em^Sz%
zJrMWYr0G>F@gVktN9x4<S5lG0RmkiLPZA5f@4j_kDbTq=B__*+lW!21u6pf$6gZ<#
z3fV>S^eSNvbuagg!3R|57K(Wul`F<}kMIPj;u+e&n5jef!!XP?@3iKg%9YA-YHL5)
z%rc?N-ZuMS_bub&Zn*Air=a4DD`s#z(vF@9I_7QekrNXjTOmudD{a%9AkIe1X(Z3w
z7ml3DyCuSjaap*1@H)_c9UR(%?Q38n6cH=0UW%ZTmtE0PqSe-W30~%4CucuE;4h^O
zyw~M~7Ct?2>)MO#wwkTd!5BBo`o-q7s1m(EwdXHe<;Wsx3m1>H^AKV#e(UkfMVzy?
zb^1RkGl(bih7xr2+#2B>(dt(^Nt-E!?C<o4f{U407z8_V-{O(ThVvMx5Q=E0FJioQ
zRx-p+vvM2~5UUYIguSFHi}l$&O1}fS02-bSjeFAN`>411*xtiBaqDw?c`B~fC8}K9
zGnw7nSU|5(!g^hQd>L0=!vHxHWIZI>4$pV%-=EPO!b!R8rhGL5tGE+uoHM6Kos`s`
z-jU~}q{-^=q?&;3YiE9o{AwZbTo`NxQ4ZC)D%46nLn?UNDhVJ;?JEX8Q3oD$!C<mx
z1%FPvzbYMvDSBO0!E{oXJzd5kShZS$n6E~uRt|Ax>|Z#?4#oyh8xO@W3ODf2DoO>T
zm%urp+$VlP0Rf@5%P-d^*O+IWN{fwci)&q5gF&-ShYGX@aet^vP?@TUY=sO&k+iwp
z>hypCW>#)RV3`>nP>E!OCq;S5E(jq?-U<Fwiz8{e!RWhVc(8UD+5dZ12^zLx+a7!`
zoOephm5IEF{7-`^qk?oev2qwzM@$2*7nN;zV}jm;k_NPM#QDy%48m##DrsF4RXmkb
z+#WT}W78$db?P~OHvZLmg0~)6uPd6=8pRI9soAxK`O-NA@Vqpz5Qc#N4jXNfTc{)`
z4}4*llu5sAWqD2MDt5IUa}K*fwT7K2UOnJqTn^`<!*R3j&OM*}T7gplU_#|3GP10=
zK57WYKay6XJ%7yoW3;|>7!V$?aXM<}yl3yHZ%Z+qdopq>HOg=BUCD&I5}~PP3yTo2
z=vPxHJ4)=E3A;Kg98`^j?PCLFmi%fKT2J|y7BTyaB!lt=L?P)`=$Uc^?A%@Mgv&;H
z*K8~~qiJM>h18<#Uw9)5c-V{Xj#{PZ(q!flovj5rdh$6%0}8;Sl<ZG~NPdGe7d}g~
zreJw?Ou|~o$P(;a(zfM*$%D~Aj%Zj~wf0nGnDSlPLw?m^DX=tXv3J4*K8Zz>krJ1y
zc~ui2?@#G(>O#Qg{NY;10R3touEicA()FYEIsj|o-V?^CH?b^CxY=p4Xb9SnmH$6j
z#YQs~eA8>enkbr<uG$&-!U`o!B21uYi)@pjU@u<!=0G4B%*Qc#e%BJ)20<UYL9z&A
zyimHYeCmkPbF&oW00jEYtSdRW;|A9-*B<|@0;w9_of0|;!qVmrmCR<tb5>tH4J{p(
zw8s2RNy~s?Wlo}Z7borGI-=NX-6JKiA8{dt!hl~!-7)mf)2}Enm6nJa;yAy?p(v6}
zraXC+nv5@ihv^?+QqO}z5(}susG-=VrB4oJq)A8{M0v+L+3)kSK-w^<2jxXKCY|xJ
zMw=$55B-Zo=nSEq2zZx_f*mv9UWJa(x66+}PJ!jQretdqHubqWnan|hpKUh*Qr%I5
zh!Efb5&xT*0#-WN5M&{EGIiL;U;j6f1_1yshy!E@;YswqKfP0wF*mga{xO!^d6e_5
z>x~H@=J_8`)*yuj@(^JG_408D*juWeG~J4-2Xj(RMM2jH&@7bz{82^kc>B<!7jmAA
zq(RxDVu}Y+p?xU{k&KD%lTFL*xVz(H73Zl5gpV)|Lv7mOw)pclGr9w(EzWhT;K$Pm
zgwVfvI2zAp9MT(_oJ3ky`&c-@99drH{t7Z~czMlq9K)NraC&U{Ly(7ar<!`M!YRjD
z)}wYuEE~K3V`@D%-{tfpl%h|86I`8;W5D!88~s#fF4o@Ee-DK&5|=ii3sLE0u`L@-
z7+vd4L?nS0$a&D4gmj(Ia4#^v+BFAayZ$)BjNH4Uy^LBJWuQ*B&bK)NQmKho#1jTL
zl^OD+uuJYNz`l$~R8e@&2{YUwv#V^=h+hB_I4YyN;Lqpb-cGc8l6`=PF@lX?#)FG6
zPf%rliyV+{3o{)hZ~0|A&a?$7zN!$Ns)m^Y@8`=eUZiUKyTX{=NYjwlsdxB@xp-Sn
z1$e$-?=Jba?3Q)+c_m>BhYKLu0uCg$2$ay#nM=W%&e9#Hd4C`qnyTk~kH#BM;&mjv
zP}51G$_|?(h%ub2**nNg^iR>aeNg&nWjYhs{D;lDxziW-&hLI#y>IJHK3YN8`3F?0
zC>ULm$?wLZQ3!vOCCW0@iE0s$=ca%F*oa2$x=}Af5`!yrCcm>>+bn%4bt`hTOXC_U
z)uk;qED}m`iOA*|7fX*HY@bP>h#Yr}bnHC#OwTp<B^BkbW+eQYuR;vV*vVRQMxhx#
zPk&%6yi2FMFpxpudO?;76X=GcMV?s0ZBpih)+u2@XFPWm9yM=jt@`3th>Vvee!f1d
z=_)Lul|yZW2W#27<ENEe;^H07TH??@6?H9Iio>Y+PyiJRug`oTnXgp>!Pj{Vg{|+9
z;qFM-3qY6>8A8MW=`V8`)A_kM=OxJWb?2SnneR{MWahLU1tg*0$MDB_lTW9<LxlIG
zPT&jgd~|3|z7v1(G($#2WQ6L2;s??kOkg4toNP-Z=JXG~#BC5E%>iAPo(=&Vqg_&+
z$TKnq&6@tW&3tEo+U=7fJZ^==o)AX3EojY~b@r7|gjwW3aGXbke2|HY{*3yZq|jK7
zA|5qY0P*+YS7H#^E)Dn5$Q26XOrz~pzoLhL5&6ZdaX$2qhimq{vWr_D{V`r0`&PBO
zlrVyTZB6x23h~i;V}Z4evlz8lTWdtLMmjxLWG%>AZyq|qS^cB);Sp)x_3*QMmya6W
z+wB~B84L)iO=n-g0K^c`Z3p_MtDl3h@T53R^i0bba7-P5l!A!UL}K&VpM5N!fgX}@
zIVyL0(Hk{qV}veAg=Y+9R4}@gm#;l89~sRcElH4YuBB|rKTSe5oF`0qSSR-DHVEL3
zFfhe;EYGJqlLjAm5@7#a(%BgP->%4B&RfSq#mMHL%%I*iS79?M5;lKT+Gvrs#M?J^
zpZ=`cx}m>i(fyaz`wuzPW>1f--l=HB96S!p%UH|`Cvf<Nt!}UC#y6J-1^<eJv?(e{
z#NRh5phNnp{xgNU%}YT$dTB^IA#$h_T!x$M<Ml~n*dA>~Tq&g71!8CcFxQJ&Tgs$~
zlv_B<-wD|#9bF2Jsge(~%;p+~QSm_3A%<q4>n4loLt#M>nh^-7Vj!}m{z4yJz2;SZ
zEdI10N8Ws7C!RFcml0G#Kc7Y=KX6oc$j>bBN+P1UGC(T*l@A^q-H9cm0H7T0&6<_|
zgRQr>+M_SVrlEF=PhqG{{F9=I5Qoh5eKy$U3T8?!NFvsY7^#5Apev!M(Ox^u$VFbD
zg)$rJ)oQ>iG|5aIhN~%bFuIrabsjrzZQpE#5eiV8lWImJm?3L^AaioQ$dzpRzuz%7
z17F9Ut9*9y;AM8;PtkS}KbSOVlXCoHd(St|v}0np301~lo=5^=T43{yiqtQ-vdCd1
zw8!0e{~KunX)|U^Mc1h6HA5RT<Rn7!!79tj`OveMwO~HwFbDY6n|xjI)VkQlm4nI}
zC*0j}1S~YF`W~5_lt`qkipf-SO?Z#0IHPT<C<=3~!K-3cAl*L;V<6Y@z8i6|ZU4}r
zD@E`iF=U@C5SkvnEfZpkpmQ{|^Om?^_dlP(xUg!?Fp3!me|T41pO}?&khGaTQoUM8
zgjp(OhbbpRXPjK!WqflNdtd8Bp8!6di0t$`JFY{Yzc9To9aa*WWxpVHKY>3o0cfs(
zz;R*<EP8M|ZfwLf&yC_x*s3h2-rQY6gK2?rDfFbz`TB#@JoxGOg`jV~L#4l3lL+*_
z+K@VAOSo|`;hI#h&2wlM@n3z0l$~{<QL$TUx8ZuijUN*CPZ8w;Aw>>&s}q~ze>2#Q
zF7gW(hgr_gEo!HmbQO2;aom^@cJoOfEWBG>k<wCc%%4Y7SDv!P_zW2G9vtpgZ*|25
zK1tZv=xQ*?I_ZyRAvb*!Qd06Vy$7UImgjh(iXSZ9O154=oPh`QQb0TxFynBM?pRf*
zm<&$!g8I)tlcxMTG>N1$sS<LRc3Dl?-<`7v5!y`L1qEhz$(XaO=TYY}P;{f$q$eji
zTq?r}R+Kl0XkN9g<?zVtJ^$OTKmc#pnKp31out$|ogWouUZ@G>a4Z|kAS;pBM0?@@
zi9Dbrny7f1*~RHuEW2Q7-Is@pb217iyzte|hGKp-u{=mnNy^h@eacx{O%v{NNplb!
zU9_oj0W%b_z;ZqRD<yvL0DN^bh586WKlBwp0nStyY_xX8{vO3`!$G7`$iL{gO0L>i
zW!kB}Wt`P#l(u(u^F*$STtJ%>s6;p^{>**;QbuwTSj^4I^=fbMJ6$4Dp`2cl1+ER$
zo6=#bnY+Yq`tZE`-}))F5$N8gjVLGS6C621>$D<ewwa;xZBc0Qi*2K(7Y!RVXaurc
zMK*PqDG>lFxw^2JAh>B`pCtJ|Y5g@ElvL@gpk4yIM=tO;E$GT45*#;N6cA;~aH=MY
z2S<f8P)q5QZFCuX3m84H$^zN)!p%_!-pNuZf9YIF#PA-)+#?x@W2EGj<f8+g_`Fl#
z45GbkqF?kkY^}!f%u?thvYDati@$$Z%Q^BMt~~ks^q>+OaJ_@t7ZHFm@YIy3nKUYR
z4lTodaAYHJ;Q#iY+gH$rA!t3ybKDf0@eD#P{DJ+qRdXD+Dn}?<^<w}Pc>LkLMvCR6
zmVCgWW=+25b+xbMDKv4!PvDF(fD3umbqI2oA$leshherbapq=GGYyQDn0x5rlaH!3
zG{TPv=`3NdK5jJEzLXfeL*Wl?6psrg8r`-DC6hV7^W{$!54ranzv#N_sm;)2Fy%37
zoCh248FM0_U#hO!nZ-!m2*U`rv(6Envx(=iQRGtz@N>(VlgV57M-ea%xVG^DSn1JW
zY3evfW7p@71P4=lN*=Bf&$@5wT1eLYicpl`alVvHZqC?Q4@4K$Q;1**T+4}(851S8
zEZ5b=+{5Kpi~Ex6XB+fMKsEygGUjd})ot38*#Ed0PP@mF`LWh#FaUYb|9w$cA1&xE
z{zl0=srrzv83ZpqixU<WTS_C^q(Q-y45!~ibhs>j^3Xk{s{(rUNINOj6qjZ#@F5nQ
z9HGM;T_V~ep`Fk7N5)8XyS5bJwY1sIOi-T!3A<KN425B<u0;!Pe|h1mxBNcxTD}-^
z3n_PVpZX5R!;<?ImK{C2pZBg&d}35n?Kj0;3s5ty{3;?OyFg<mOwR(7WSBV$UJE>j
z4NlK!)Uy8hv&n^YlVm3vVEqzeIy9XEuwB3&l8ojA;&-9O151r_oDXJkvcbfUp!+p}
z#UidmBG<A>w<SOfS6v^ZgE7ziF9jE|10g3Op&ho}hsbm#uLONh?5`|z{3Xcy#26UK
zj@Zf2)*Kza)?jexDXe%$TYL?+7a3M%>LgZ}+AJqaGgnRtW)&*grq~`0cGrzF$N{aO
zv2rm)NHUEHke*{ikc4hApcI2Vp4-zU^=h_#tB2=KDZdVHo5`}8dpq|#X$|Fa(5xmR
z{Uu@F3n_L~6)18^Gs~4K_C)p1l3b(G#DXuKdEN=6cS37?t1Ath_d7%0r#VyEu>xDZ
zq8%9kvq0rGghTn<ObHzy1QScM5lT31>Il0nYc&i{`y(>Q!RCAGZ(W*3r4#Yy*&yrX
zyp<hTY0?wknzcD^D&7@RC7reTup8TlKLu>bUNTFBR%VTx$h;DV?FQi~m{q7+$DNvf
zw&Vwx5l3lm!G5N%0Z@<$)v=4u8|oJwPDfv|3mPG!P}*&ij+a&wF>h4b0N+e@o`Wwz
zJoou(J|>wDI40Z!MxPiGbijoz>Nt4yGEEr!wmwHb1!aWcBSMa`nkTOz=2g)j6wl}5
z#yzYB2Y8Q7lQJ(gSy?+{V!WmHJi6ZbzDyb?ukBgRbi<RITNU4y&z_Fz4Y83&3`Ws>
zfjCUbipNgOr`0DQg{685N6iP}+RcF^i~3Q?UHt2q*k-$yZ<KZOJ8!BMlJzak^wkv(
z8cfaTbcz36-L}>Z<lQaxaDcI{pmPzbfy}}$xG%2+D!fSfc)oy4=Eeeq`7V;@(pj-s
zCD=!G$x~iJv6=5?168SLIaUmKfm1!KAGn9qIBq;iwz7I)U&)6uyp2Om^GV<yw;fk)
zFrzf1V;a>RM_n%TahejSx{&+Y1IzYX;`?Z2r*{K&jsu2BK(n}PG}1H_$`2l^vgyFL
zqpstl5|O{iJbtZN0Zka0z-`Fka<kgA9wZPa0SoBDlyo6tqKx_t^mGxUeY7Adeh=`f
z@IcBBm&hSSG+%otK(^KF5P|<=M=T|B{aOGaq_0{;eG~?56LCp%><-HXa04OCm#WEB
zzc-yc`l04)ESB^f5zK`1ftXRlbO#_U)Q@vmE38o|^$DqR>vB^bnv8=b!vhS=n6#_6
zo{3URK}!+Jn1UC@NIPS1q0bn(_2J!sFG8Y{x=Sl>h6j*o;H{z+N53w4e|}_{A)1Oc
zi$7{!y{TP#u%G=NW=d-!u@OQjJs>4*K{IL8D&g`_L0&0jy?Gmvl1Pg}%C-cC^E-xU
zZnVR*@|r}^h*K#2F0k<vDElDQ2fMkW2|>4Oacg>Bm9Be(ZMVnhpB2b6<MsL;#=#yO
z43R7Mg_-(HcMeVBMrYqBfrmeoU~osG9mIR}*Z)AEY!{SSw~60_5o@Z`-H-KnI`D~@
zU#_jHWf*6c(VHjsEBU3kWV*3IlwOT{uQPCb#M&pJwF&hDloL+4F$I_p_7xj++t+i@
z(>Ic!L~{zYs7~3F!_qzy)+!vN%CRXe8|x`=Ss_?J%^PpT)XuhEQ*s8yGH1pjx{|mZ
z4z}^lY32c>4rSF!eMN{OJlrSzz0MWnw(<W#VJWz4nF&W~bor<lF)*V*QZ#oEIWuG$
z*M5lhU#|p^wRC86pkh{z=Ul@L8JsrTdEnq1uR4+@=mY8SI|2tzZ!e^EFI*Pwui&&y
z8eNwZpE>fL$cNz+eov{!1cxh?$l_3?Jh)k5z@VHMFzyR906<WL4HjoRgpW9FEuIJ}
zNEz8{=^GmQuvACZRU$$B_eXdaO0fo{z+|T@EW>(6Q^Ob^sQPyd-r)Ihq*f+6UnjzI
zc?KG;U8sZ-zBO->a&bu1Bw1b)KX5T_vdm_WWKq;kriy2%hw<NHceQ}9COvf6Z}^6P
z)v`&pEU06-zse{){M)FSCl&Us4lMh0A=LMy;xtKcWsq@wGOG&oKIt8>UQMZ}T1nt#
z-jIIhG>@Y2Ci;{a0RjI2oKW8k1|7(!Bt_~qx$m!uFeCyHDasVDoi3T*Yhr;A#?Qqj
zW%!Cp*)v&bGBcNK?0#M(Z+JZO1vh!NXyk`z2-}<2HMpTl5LP5u?3_#{7a`_BoYP%)
z!fk7wy&@o*Vb9M<PydbaBUPI1Q-}E$89YZkQ>IbDw*lNn6=&8XF83Fhe#Hqx+EZ$a
zs}#(jpMY6~eFJ!;&6jU%+qToOZQHhui8V<knAn=wwry*oi6*w4$=oEn-|qf*_uku2
zzvro=U!AIYtGl1m^;UgP?#;MDopWHlIyY_eXsHq<9d@5mx>d@;#rgR91#}DG3E=wL
zLoHClVysh<>Yc&$pu;c(?&q$Mgn?_F+oRxrFBrWIjwTYBAs{K1*G2y+9$`#rM(>c4
z{X=!Ine%pVjs|s>+Kfx=B(Fp31YfS5O+lO8j@rfdY+!O9T^TH$1~m7EaM8&xO6a+c
zqDq!YRHAZ4%ZJUxdq5e`3m?gZjzsN`8uev-d6R-1u76p4U%@~LISr@uecK^V%|p41
zq)gyEHBdo+lpH<M+R4%eN1>q##(Om)mgr<c7#(VvAja2QVb*R~TE`Y)F{%|B%Pw<{
z7i`vPV`DtttZh&jSHeFaPH?BF^KYkEITPXmLMsV-sr8zO!*&aqM3H-E$2ITk=|{P5
z%JP8h$Oh;~N<od!u;?NSyx%(W^a<8kx3`cgh*9q{7Q3h1+~_%Zb|n@eY8?5WfPvUR
z)%YM4)t5%v8y1(eCCs)}tt~qJQ&mr`7a<A;By~bBCqd=KFe86ygz8LqW|FIl&zs7W
zSN($ixz94o<6scg*b|Rocr&v=seSAL!|<h(BQkKV<d05wbK3aZ!uYS$DP`1X*40>Z
z0%mT=us%HgT6G6<3`KPqQC*5BRP<12gidp*yv*7xVYVg7uG@l?%9aQ-j5EazS89%J
z$Rv(|Ef?75TlgA@QM=#gikb(joLaFg#_-EU1w0byqLSE246j?P$PuVMa&ZD6<5NPR
z<<AT*b{*%iCcc3j&=m0CB)7*c{R06a1xWl;M{n2PDods0&aefbX~%)cP_7F|D}S}N
zJV`J>ytyJYQRFt&63&2%Wds-RyckS7bthyW5nQcKdocTI7ZR7JLXB*v3jUqSa|VBG
z0i1!IhuB4FCiaUq(0Y{LVj$mU>CB*K$dl>^{KT&I;NP>8`~ghQ3njF}=_?5F+M7;a
z6ke$tiEb0wq*4>R!EifYcPS8b#8fP`ZM~_Ef|^-5nHrPZ3_m$5C~c>g8>1H%|HA;J
z?zB{o&ff*GZPcVjSy6O4!0oVSv%NpT+?nD#XccRHsuL9jPm-RM&xlU7S@bKgB)^d{
z5E%|Ndwnasi0W%w<63dKt=%k_<QzoMt|KFJ+C0n{<v3Ffr4;6@_0`p{H3ik7izagM
zqLqvxX8(ujt6H#1A2d7CqEf2ng?;bL3;ofpLoC{^!PP{FsPs}og<$dRx%?OyZuLjy
zwIB5iWaoz{kq;&|tUr6jOwB4t(rhx?n$wMjI3wY?cgn?&bWD+9)FfZBx=LI^jeZoS
zo<lc?1qYq`X_w9%rp)7l1|||}hQ12N=BgFkLyZf{TN*f8sfso!iqVVmxi2<AwQ;wx
z<DyOV*g^YeJj%)pn=Cx}-in_?(pqj9G0PoYB5+ScMwf(3pWLC@!3kMfF|}9VMxeqe
z0mqpD?)h8DC<Z-KNBuDcG@CCZXi1DHhp>3E{O!O6ub$D^2G^qhOx!IG4Brri{FSj_
zEK+5*T5c&4$2MxBH*(KzTujP5QGPC4y0nsE17W35!nO(eMpQCpWWD|agH2WiyyeZm
zKycg7otDD2w=SQT^Xm=oJt6Tb7ltqvUM-oL(uNx_<}5?)z_fxYi59xcZxlbeaX<?U
zMm5VL$HO;6-P{Qg43(h{m#JPz^6FyALu0%MVIk-Qat#yB2uqq3``R5!Msvkfc{tEo
zPs5nQCS9y=<Pfr5uA8~rjX3MZ^=Bv@o0RAKe>{~hg=m(4TFDtJToOl3bM~LL$4~k;
z)*r3o<G}xc)+&1Pssbf|EY*~`V7`Iun8ry4x&HQ0GoQj4nG$D83;$yrbGTYTN%<(v
zOCl+^*xf*v{hS?mTyAAgMMx#~LaTn59YkqzHaO)<-uPUYlrr+cp~3$Auh%jm=T04+
zdf=Dx5^GnZzh7@Fz=5(H2h77On7?HU7q9IHy_OL};@CG<xC!`z!BN?YGhIp>(lo>8
zAU$vsEZGXR%3f_lAS*AWj-;=qRx8EDw4FJnP}FdaAsVmuifdI~j7}J$e>df>nc-Ct
zYnwAg`NM9rS=j$ue$>8WF~NBpCx2Yff1*j@I}%iF42aQ}J?1mw!}e=Ma@xR+i0LqD
z*VaAXhW2yRh`2$04adN}<>_YeX;#I63J}9L#_}978@M58L(Te(T&cKugcAPC%q1ue
zi?5Y$-H3^1$r9&jk%R2RMeVg|{&{>vU}6`T*DLjwlM_Xr6x5z6{^1RIBm1;Z^Nk@|
zArTfl!)G($9z_Z*>|G6ChIr;uBs@*;z>2=LJ)stQWIA@!h=AOhFlxT_9Sp6Vf}+8_
zuW(sQwW^Z>6UbR9&XS`_xW_6Y{TX@zI7rLAo1G<xkHL!oup0@y2pt-&AiCw&lPyAE
zV7C;A$hh+c5~pMX+@K89L-(viD8_yWFvd-?%N~y<L0y5tU-CRz#;%<hetU`0w?v#H
zy6@2~5O_svEx(1nsNB|xQt-{_Lr}pBZd_nET2>jDt)-%1St$%IYQT}$mA1pnqFL8x
zc5xPZwC|0LM!L9622j|s1I9avfA^@?ANr`Ho9VXFy&8uD_ZvjBwuW4vdiNurWLiyy
zLPiR&tU~UzEALq65-tBqgr_QC`O^JE%vr>&TyhO&vUYK}F@~bRQbaVZYvmR^n!Mam
zv>oi>p03f4F?f9Yr@5(MY1@vvRpy#rL-uc_uQ1`Q*cd`vU?T-gS-j*5<Z=<F#9}kM
z_%O?mm<~SMpcWK&B&Np-!1#?vOPrEhT77%b-%C5nC4Yt-&tDGznPWbC%VruAQ^2RC
z-N6JDCH7g`Cu9$RQ`J-)Xew31kD-BjTFRht{$UCl9j_=Aq)^V=h~m(oK_x?HrouF)
ze&{y38G}K>#+I7=p-CkSOX8&*`B13mGTi6iE;PnS8!r=GIaGezw-sSD=`vd|GDvTr
zy>40>U^5Lkqw&ydG4-9Q#NE^@yuBRlWa%j)=hCH0j!lPndo~oEjaEDwx6mjSNlro(
zFC?g!t3ZE0+-TSrD@KZ$ec!(Yrqk9^tVdvFjPV6_FFt_DK{{)IyKG?^NYyca03@Vf
z1?D!K`OS2aqhMX^x+6NLRXM%;ZQH-a5eM(d4dLDd4U6klsy24IP*g<jWkgyX{PL%f
zDnXMb5Y_w9$Bx>Jig6b#ZRg63kjJoIr5rq4wsLxNu|Kby+)gR4b?9WehN{%xI7-@k
zu=@j|js=k4H_vdl?I~0N{TgZ3dCIK-1Pxhtp)^{f#x8vaAw`3=MV|qPUv_#DC&S1X
z{C@Z~*&y`_s_YNgvMLEBbedv8kpI{K(6gZ?tzn5Mu)1l$pYFS!T8CS!;^i%q>h3%2
z7yWC)SWMViEQqci;r@}cA%tOvE|j$NKonlttg^Cf!$gRQFzmvw>WgRYzunS^E55UY
z8Dn6}D5DmVDs)G-74%n%7YjISca7cC<nk=?PGj2D;0MJpq8d|e&)-fKa$l$D^-1|%
zBo;VhFaj|^z1|^VXlGFo{B`g(>}Vf$qsiS<&e4F$T!xxV)(Ae*sL_+85h8*sk6)UK
z;oOScq>!3z+%F-}8e8_v@0_MoXMmSphO-*D8dJe7b7U1(<t7J_?rzEi7VGfQyVR^p
zA}Ds4rjq{VXU9GWg?mObC64naf;82uhxr7C%77?0Q}*P<j4~CMh%cuPM51$&=Mbmk
zA{5tjo!qKhrlvo)(F|GJBf}!A+86-$eC)G93WNSke$hT!%f!7Ys%51ykcwgq9RaRw
zB%C;6`d6aSrq#N_(C~S~4HWzGXdiS;wsjj{kFP@1$L6FdGc}y2{drzor4tcWF}Jq7
zv<$vtW8dI+4R9Px)9|w!{B9i|=~Y^vz_|%T{y;-^iOB5R+{KAcCH7+!*to!|(otDk
zDoa)pBi4|TgdOP3#70d*aw(NDmk`<(_mUvz!i{XyP1No=PTP@wZD<>w;qk-^J&~DK
z)M9>uWvd_xo0q^rFjCI1G!vgYo*&EfX}z!yerBY_u|W@Q>k`fz5yNYB;j8H39UOV1
zUmrX|7z;$T-qu`v9ZHiYuT{>px&XB<TocJ>UtCuMK}G!DP&O;<9xn<daobvLEwH$)
zW>~6%H14@&)fZ|ev1e`!7i;^h6B;A`rt^=!#JIBn&~~Y{fXEp6PFe-IMyF{^J34!L
zpt*a9Z?K2nD8D_tZ<{rqNV!tc2ZSa~5ElS@Wp+h9gfEpc*?XZ<HY(tOD2&HXq(+Lo
zvPfz7OdOWL95YMv*a7i<gYZYL*1iH8ry51`$kgeA^Mk-&<c72Tq`&5Mf`qMlyw<-F
zZ{bn*6d%6c)uzqKo$#P{BA4mG&t{fbjXZgnXhllSJ7bMnFQ${}<Q^DumL$7HB^S}G
zYAxIJiwH<0+Nl8n?1lvqbg$rMWD*qP%Sdn?M!6T^mgJAtVWI~fM(ctrAzddX82op-
z9qX;kAvFuh5Y-})4&$okfhw3tc8d?3ig69mP^IGpC+&4-nW4q<G=HI96uidKTevFP
zr*zY8DTJ`LPRvJDL-9#n3|zf!KTw*iIzp=7mdKd{T2&u)AaNdJ`j9fr$kGaiWu&tI
zVpXfp*By`O<=o^fxLtC7L8u>r!owvt-0PY$#qWh5lBgmQFVnX6oCkjzgca7G2IY7<
zQ}*Y>7L9Mb=U}5n$WKOF8eaPQ<xUekwaNWU!WSDXTE7f9w*E^Yz(VSjo&iw{sG+*!
ztRfLD#zfsZUSWw|61sl*Z1($x>{lV;GjAkGR!tcgw7Lk6gWu&@+mPAw;5TH5Vq(mr
z@J?an_~ZtyDxX^-_Dc5+%|@-5P^V^qBtXz;=sHjPQ|g>lkH{e@bKOUCJ43tB&jWo<
z1?69IhY}aLUE35!uw|gM%uieUzYoK&{q>{sZJb5@1unhT^Kwj+QxHX<3%t^?(U|bQ
zuG=oLem6>Wr#j&@znADIPMV88d9=_#aN*Y`*Xo=!(d&eym$zXS;aix6L5|GAd3#rZ
zsP)G;>$oXFkFsJTpFU;2yU1|Ewi9aBI4mgQY@~RVK^KkgzSBNF*aV-xjvNdLVx+~Z
zDWj5zUO4zPD)K*aKWn@HxcI#|(!3NPzg1zj*9aqgziXtHe@uIEX*$z%|Gxf1Co5WK
zxjw9owjdl<zalD@zSGDuv5=!xv9U6o5Te-%5io$!y89wjX&LDbiEuHV5w1=i%~Hh~
zdS%1zS%dUgLb(!5+T?v1B`x!+VX1g9vGtdV0%_!;7~x0%1nu->50mlXWy^8=89MPj
zg3w*<RIrzj-?QUX<buc3pA{vK+qo}F@g-drM(2Z$z+90;t65)ZW<er{M8Uzi54{;^
zYvs4tnQ3Z!vt`Z{^`RCHf?mzTG@O{_H9}8{YTLH%Fw{-rnRt(GPa?PKmGtpYSGKS9
z0gp|-eyWMqY3;BtKOYpTurPh&z-q^cw$_0}L5)L>K-3lEgpU9XEU-b)E2-e{JHDQ#
zK69X>S)L)fN)kG_wdM`Ikk2=;14xb}<C;uSc_t`<!qRpWW^%=lUwUtyGV^M$tA)3C
z-F+YdVv#V9WTqf>fDi-yz(Su)R&4$15^rOEnKok`?F=XYdbxMD2m1VXl&PSp{rk+l
zp`fd17vLkouL0V^hhHB?b(@c+#XTug==s#11ZmAqjXPecB<f0&Be{OH+k{4onfM*H
z5=i=0VkWxsEGtR;PGj75IzATyKj5dKzzh=gOjZrkh|)aQUWukOR2TYYlJYZqq)n~0
zX*c+fEdG==S8$JAm*xaV3ec7y7BsUqfx%A}Z>8()yh8X`yj0-i9EKjc%%{TrP#*6k
z?cU~4%}Y57G6R}p#`Na?n`A|YWkeFjj+Df|P2XBDxXzH~2XNK84`(#Yt!~?9E4PqE
z*>qHUN%xpje@xp4Z|ITnwJ)tVwVt?vQqozMA1KjZKgrPt!Yo$oa4>SIDD?9Ji)JK|
zwf8IB)q@etZb1mqR4`WZH)c{^4XI#`(mkl&nI&rZ+Ir+#N<y7QQX7a>Qk_Mb!TaF-
zln0_J&8l6EHg;t3BxXv4-Lr6y253$r6=7KS&4X-YfC$;kB@lSCK))|-xy^j^T>*WR
zCX2j8A#<|;>7APNKs);FpPs~D9{_~vZk|s0M!GimDv58VX=}4{euaET+A<$R%+|Ez
z=F;q<>z|A{g^W)FA(0v*OxQXEAM(ELr6Ede6eM<q9HgPp&WPv4QC#UkD2gZPiw~a^
zKjduAFyrieEYw?lul-=FO%ETOrdeL=dAtoAFc{P!^`4hPDQXIb9b%7F3JG@xH9)}+
zBB<wdvvFoWSXg}b(H(EW9iju-xhr4E*8^VstRc{O^(zt%Tv)A=Qct1JY41+u?t7ni
zUQpa|I^VJddzvHhn(-g7{s#3Ptt`6aOx{0uwOr-8A&SHLZi<@_C8m_==A6bjQ~^9v
z>~4)JKo&Q1{Z}h(Bl{4yqY+yzuoR;gG<}4HpCt3-i?FAgV~qNa@edJa%fH$U8D;w-
zvPc(OuGmO<R3ew5A^K^XUr>lSfw9af$R9bL5peMR8pYJd(qbVf1R*ViY^N-RhRHN6
z6v!_31ObNbiHI!eFRU{3ISe<9P2L7n?sS!l7ggS-78?~h@c_s$0w@yp&0bN<6Kp78
zu~tiR4L3fl3ugrIYR}+Oka-*>Y5c}e0ZO5toU3$kX*0c9tMe()ZTQw4fe%?H@O-qv
zWX^KyUI)X!k~$=uH<M@3{e4Ee+9OMwC-VlTlq-#j91;=<7)Ev=UEJI-2S8Klee95w
zQ1o`m+8^(Vib}!lf0ZKluk^pUOL~wtn^Dy<tC86VoM6#JuCwx?*y%efM{3O;4b030
zgVkAcfWZmPNK!{Qt)0eG?|w~hYLz0_f_!P)nyeFHTFzi6pUap;(DNQ>m2*t>Gr8n|
zk~8WG)VsWW1|8Z+vzNS)MtklCNXXwMLTo!c+>L-bGU9*pBkOwPm#wowot<bqtNbI%
z?Py7Nvs;pLFFUp8`)Uh9UW;k=tezIrfOc>(8tvx=Drinl1?5FXP!!JZ(NGzYVSaGs
zYba|x2~0k!fS8Kq)scdcIA#FVH{v7hcsizLddNO{tD8bVVJIhD+&z}T@mAtkNMQO6
zRkUKG7y>W!S=Ugm<Jl?#!Kd7*3Wyk*@n@R@$imzah<ow;G>j5(G*-*C9_o*^(zzEt
z{8bixH&Evu9Gh(qH2*#KxMO8HeG88!Bc_*a+44kSal5>QG~_2b%bMk)%^SBNl5wSu
z%@SU}=-{2v$_$)^6`Vw=p)BtcEG}lMSlCgdSj!+ponnBDcFp`f#X>Ld=$iAE!Yvmh
zA=M}ic;%!B<M)-zZ<Vos?t8XTLK(IGfNx&|MVE{>U#H8w?{O)b5)*N!X}Dp<?=)_2
z1dCt3#5%#aI)uUw*Ih}VezWSkuTD|AiuD~fL}ev<_mrS{qiF#rR9fif3K0h^1I0*q
zH(cN~T}qF677_7U+F3oinV!z%Jbx&UH53euzpLY`gj7=xUAi3oAFX4M@Tle>%&$a1
zwuJ=B<}D#3J@Cm~#4@T{bAgholXT3(XxU!0Gn4rnnZ_I`BfaT;f}Z;LWq>`rs`tcI
zh3?c3wXbwst}Sk!shiL=ZU)>?=Q<UDs4fn4(d?MLxV_)uziQLwaTjOwd0*cWsrx2R
zQy`owppjmlRvv-SZT^>I-r3my%Q5eY&JLz-Chy0!Q#qQNtD0%jGc&L<F#rJ6FpNTO
zu9gnYRJtr2?C%$cE)x@z#s{(bAh!QOK3Ss=*6xGoGO@m2|8Dvz{xop?kePiD7ivaT
zD_2{ye*qTx(5QS6<`43T@LBo?j{ZaZ5A$j5@FB7IAod^RKWq6cxqrw$>-)#)6W!!L
zOh0v>o}aRRG5rktQ)l{N{||!D2jl!fK3nrykNJN9{wMUO`)3FJ<0<uF^$GZ&{qWy<
z@UtcVub}>=2V_40KdnEj{X}*9kbQ>tFO30EGpe{5Tbr4<Qc*LCIGY){{<lFD`|$f5
zyU)Ns0bM?1|3nY?U^qVr!w30f|Iz6(v3(Af!iVOw^3R6+qyB{b9I4Nq{FlJE{sWQi
zUrX<p%+!oBW?wuUoK0P*-fzXvu&o^IMU7m|h^R!l0Zaf^CT0K^GcyYt6RY;Sg`9)w
z|6Qr-Y~<)@W=g~;Ze;6X2E(YRDyGRG?q+LiY-Df$aqp{ITDcItzyECx&=IMdIlH`9
zN5sOw%*xEh1z=}mp$9Oq|1&w>9n3U|WUbuIh~6V%W|X(`R8V1XaJHZ(vT-ze|NG9&
zh{*llA=nvM7+9!b`1wC(qJyzD41j~>zsx_?FOFtJj0(oqDz0`gjPgWW>@bYtR?aT2
zM4TM&MOia@3s*}bRxU0UqR-cd*4FhsW=3(__s$SCGjT9A`#^VbeIHso7|+!+9UT``
zuGOyT>O&c2m0E2JtH^X3VW^s(9*P<kxIwXDd&+DlTN56*`fk4*jd=XK-fS{Ll{>vt
zaJxo?i|sFnUWKfE%XxGmSKuj4NKJGtJCB0`xmUD(sZ2$&y1&=a#!R}@zACY9qRY=z
zGiL5V_9cBi(1gU%H_2KAXOy9HE!+CV$qL4aY-Iscg}2YC<4AAyU8Fw<$Ey_?saJ|M
zihnCsI*9(yAxM_|_M{3284>|#_P}*K&O$y+Zjun_JTWj%0dR3BeZgMr;)^geiN>|C
zRZT+S4~QY++Uwk0SbC9uj8$jrM`7>0UM`}5fRIRHW-_$q!g@%Q8@k!pUzqCic#6#g
z#*)Oa!(0WyiSj18c}rYKXo@{wz)b^kfuQMO8R;E~>Bu2h`fz3Enl9!06^VeQn2;rt
z@m^U48NLRDfVGQuQ(4IZyNc*Rn1C22VT6KNAvleLP67KIS%vlz6~!Udz|e&zLrm!Y
zAP2`*3dPuWF8tBJWU47uHVZ>3sWXF0UW`FUElQ0@X6{Hl3NsT7D;FT;h^kK0Km>b=
zsChLMh~L;Fay<h{fCYqj>mqe52~98uMzh;K)ef58i*7}V?n#wS|4!aBmmr8{+pWrh
zVb|H(Tfp-oq@1uz(sR7m68WVucyn6TaT3Xwj#53i-&12lB9S3fSv|3!PYWo*)CPjz
zZ;?Y%-EDBl7(&9D2Y-g+pw4oJ6VQ8Cex0TIJDBY~q!0_p(+d4bhva@QbP@*F&Qghl
zW6!tBN7XzLE3SY<rU(MT*=fihEfwbFzpr+JvM^689<PQ$V-14rYjl5H`EYe>3GQ8n
zLX(Y1T}g#33(zhz68ejkAV7iU!Xq=7bIczdTmY8fNt%%Gx}IlR!DrH^QVt@mHA#U(
z$S=z7+VrPlG5SvG9Zn7oPOSAXh0cBlWPxl2Oi*`-B|5EAzlvQhuoF)h<F+DJ$=UT?
zrZi)AFZQ>*?y<G5yC1GQ^Yd0O4N`_XI&0TF+%>bw1u5lV=<Gey+u04zssEKrHdipO
z=Sua1c}g#EfW{m`Tz-$ZEG5w9DXr5`ptjgE(8HgCE3lUm&{AZ|LnS1Y<kLgH2gQt}
zYxMJJau5e?<z)2K<9_#QM=*yEyNdD#o5zB1N`J0fLgVDl_zrQ1f%3%4jTuW`J$TVe
ztFjtm(b4gS=f(XCG3P@%yoRKuM86svS4dA<v!;s&qtE59!>>Upps<yM+z&inr<E4_
z8!sGQrStfVZr2wN%9LHfDPCNTp-n3MKTyDM*M88Q{mDe*f8IMZuG5F#AD4OW3H4J`
zb;jhI>fk}kU)R#b=jT?4*%{9HL0*@EVN-uHt`9vXvzlY_3?s*{jK6$Q@>z`-l|Qad
zF!H^BePoGy4I!zTQRGT=Q5A=`&8-;nJ{`p1Ln<{OH7i{(*{1fY2V@W)Na`RcqU8C{
zBjo2G@?#%CUKT5~H8i~WPygk6$=M}^a?&U$P5@oGX`rIM@h@3g6twfByH1sx_DPD{
zEnhFDz3aK<RkBP#I)b!7@^tkwrY-g#!n$1k>&kH1($6xf(9p~aGW_Tof7?SGte+@G
zALt^3#OCgV?|<K!WE6-fDTWevTtzuW2fP+8oUoovxLIFDHxA!wuaHPio%AAjKjHYb
zI3&Lb-EyUe{5rx8zVGa(UbYZP*4w)83VwK~g#Sh8rkw)&(>>oq$VTbW`Hx>m{tbv?
zyE`mXP-QTEe0(g#q#P&sBxn}(hS0%HjhPi#6~?WkH2TPd%P6&Y*%WiVfm58j{@h#1
ztYV3xJ-Et4VU9aOiegqhAv2^PND7BUK|S;BBQ#)jPKjV4&*NL;#4`3jzu3>D0Oviz
zRe=pFBmD~T#wBNKEhbi@S4KAk;F&mus*saikD+Sj8b}_;ZP9VKw2W%2&+bbz(CI->
z{$}}33Bw9eqh>i6_jjD-t4ut#l!N8YcZGati@8NXM8cUcy23WOF79QzDHjMnP8U>~
zRY;d|q_*C5)kA2PJQZx-vm$s~uoW!zu|Awkz6U7~XDW%dc6dK6S}T-Fp}{cO`_Z+&
zmtKhGWkNd=)+g*FM&3J3T-PX@`ll=E!tgF4LqbFWlt7nUMgO@@@J6u~a$%+2(wO+~
zaLw$l&H3mXtx){tiZC>wICw(Bqk0Lv{JOPPIQfdAgm?WmpnNLIGlA?=AQAGLtQs_Z
zEi*sBsX+zW;0j>*p9|~czph~jgW8}YdI)c)od4CuUX8G)$qkDwKxIO$;cO0!A$g1E
z-Tb;n+m=t7l{naq!tVTyy%>!SjWWt{?uLW{C-;y-HH=3%T24C{(@1D3fL!fT2u4nc
z_)s2gW9tZF1OndFiimn<5KlO{3KewhdqWro_eObH0CxeV5o~K?1ieG0@M@9&EKLZ%
zViK}jK9zV4MhQ+`yvlZvl=Fy0t-{r@&&;wU{*q)H%R*c+<#?YBT*YtlLg9$uOGeGX
z6;t#Pbo+i=L7g35N+-t!vij{Sltr;L_CxAEXg~|VXm9lQ*5uA270j8VmGp(Fn@F38
zIJspcS=ki1Hx|M7(gtZB8ah#A2W>s9Xbwm1C!&0jwLWFna_p)Qk<i36KGizNqp|$T
zkr#9`74!~qt_Y0yCwIMJg47Gu0X>~L(Ck9DnK;)aG+=%`8PxmlmZav$;LCi5JYzEP
z&KUd2LJ$!UiSDV9QNng}n(c-%c_M&$hj5@v3VbPbInQ`L$^BSg-(UELWqi5CmV9|*
zvv=;7eCVf`3`L{uSuh-x>2)DNKK!fd)XO{fA@T?P30`cv@)##ifNV_vvMOfh*Ylkh
zjbQ=aw4W*C&(p^p>6PEVAIu}~%a)I;<^JB?am;lr*lLqVgl+v%{!4kMWiY!U)b)!Y
z*FJwG2IKMQ-eP*yhSPcF&NA`?mQQO{QNnh@%3cG5G~UC~-Cg%Ll&O5HH~<c7RT+7f
zAYm=#DK(GL^fI;gsDACzDg4W~PLsdJ7N?n=7KECE49l_bPWsuk$mLpmxN7CJ>i)R$
z<u>f*JJ9W>8mGt8gKB&xsP{Y>bvEoKF6=pr!AGg|%R%=1MR%U~Ix;B1^vC4i<hm1{
z!hKsyHMS9qN7Zd7fBH{Yox#71y%}yU=bQ@M#d{%;surV`NW7)5@4Y3VPi=O1{oU@c
z`Wmj@jZYSIDjCuZ9@0&gNYfl_v)apXN|fQwS%)jK45$xwZ^hRKy1PMG-2pl`jXW|A
zo?fi0A{7SCp<vkOZ|U&9dY!a_O{ssrHrJ;2;G}XsgTRvUcSUaQN#vs2qo>+Km~L>U
zB${PbSaIRp7f8?%FMdt)g%i~KC0l&w6}jZ-=c@<YIO_wmGOG5CE-=xDo%6)=nhl5}
zdz0>{dAp<AZry|Z+lDtJ2gQS)tb_XLcqOKPYg+Zm>>w-qZ`HbAWpCQk;lHe}qx}Ff
z_IhvT>}4tC+df(s4}Knmv^gDozJI1u1bBUKPBHcG*U)uV-uK@8?$DsJJW*ktq8Agp
z>yfIyGSLu!P}HfZ-rx3y;SW8#GitU&?%i(LRq3#{lrVcX?uEPtd`#bZ*;IJx-8q$3
zxa8AP>vcmwQDMKOYq~mX+L)?78L+eGD|>adIG?jg(2wSze+~e*ZYD)`5W>?7`=#CY
zxR0>4+l9XsejkZuWn9cvcJ#Z<nuhE=f99%N!0+{vhK9_YYJdYqiR)PpEziz2OqdyU
zV8-^?tr~yl@v(m%@gjHW>4~9JmI;lqgPf;z-Fo%}-`&~<P?$KD<dwqnzFc1At-Sk}
zs>&`4S&el|X4qLChnZ59HoH^n()X+12Gf3jp76J?oh%r7H?WnVi-p&YZBG{V`cEsz
z))6{1=?*sY-WHv?{*uyo1?m}Q5Y>hB%s9z4LaNJlsn2_{SFGHbLTFYw6rGG3KU+8x
z#Fy#+9Jv@Db&H;enlx!GE0ViBPYU16>hyd*IYK-rws2@s=GoeDEGFd!b>xQgOiCgc
zdZO@qlmA|bdzch$37s^UzRuc!@-SxA-NpBI^ori#_17;(J-dOVIyUH>>V~f8iwLdP
zx;1%7OSd}ZcD2cc5|wKCwrO3qtOQ&6Pc7d?1I7X-oG@WxRp=M#5KY2YF{jJIW|$u+
z0hL9nsRc9v(g7X2@N0haRD55aR%|&5<;+unYykxQIu^IZV+ujVb&wW#he4<lMdq6e
z6kl0!*HxJHC37NIi%|`~LzCsD7=DZRJ<wRH%C4qDW8EY+Rdl?nYE%lhnk=>!Z>Qo9
zuCjgDOkWxMu!5TTt$8^4fQeNt{OB^sMAy%cI@3&G2WpxhL*Jqh9pFyWbOU&4K7FhU
zSU0ZiWE(x;A)XGjp_98{_qPe<>8*Z_Rqzwtg7hboh+sg+<7{zuY~J#moeqAX@ceS?
zg=dOHGD3X{b_e3Eq$v?VbN?pfSo?Qt*Q)OE<(C}gTDK%-E~=5gZsqZ1^H1M{eQ^>P
zgOab^c{%dQ<!pNa!U1z9G@XuKFJA!K29<r$vZ?L0;*T(u9E)cOb{AH4^jUT?#U4@;
zn>)UcNB22LtG}PT11R4J!^42a_wt)7eLBbq^_<sry6%li$&nB6d&YE$ve#7Bb9`R{
zX3QCR0$5LzTreLFHmdg5e(~gr58u;!oUxog1OL)t^T_a~Oe|p^an-=~_V&L&n`@fv
z+KGhkPodbcCqTl?TCEv0aOItT34LZq4e$`Y1J0eHKV2np>!`)fA{iFl5F>j=un{9P
zURN|~`QsSD-vM84ASd21K7{Bd`nn}P6l0_MN+&TmP3>0m^B_!7fzWiQ8YS{pO1;HR
zfHu$U$o9?fnpbLi-a}MZ)K7N^F}3CQ(Ze>4W7aO~w<0;#%E<1km!_a$vMVA25_65+
zZm8&RNGUM0hOk&G-L|kBMQ$zbS=Mjnb+h{_1GiU8`~<sc-z*0<#p5$6C1st<0CC?p
zkL{%9v>+o1vnIkM-hc16^3xfMQxW`8_07@^g(dkezjj227>N}dtv?a{Vv(<br%ZF?
zIxaHiphR@<<;<tmY-%NcE}0cwCh|<u`96m|G>Ba!Gi;032<C>}vg|!135#6Y_}(8t
zxRpywzj>en3K4}g0gh@t8lesn;&z4+UP;Qb7hZ9*LN(Su!!W>WD!ND@;Eb#T?FO0(
z@`y#fXL=QCUWd;V8}s|Z;aDW_r>QMBX~DZ-DQt4ZyC5Y%s|3L@o-nlAx~Y9swT-kW
zM6l0wP&I73d$pk*nyG#Gi)7LMt1k@FRMifpVI?<6VC`{u@LiD!g=Q%&r!88y+a_@n
zm+jOBDcfm!m%VR;pgeA@M*C|PAZmn%s`ashbQeA2AtbSGn6bx|r=C;?52{pjUz9qs
zpd-gi7{rPRp*25OUJ@7nNo45KZo5ghx&9fPw0r#O+X^uz2}P)Gcq*#r2I`zpu>1&E
zn+BbeCy!N_D)FsLi}Aui#BjhgJ*LU}E+6rP3pd(!kpYcwOV&K28r+fY1=eKi26L<n
zwlN%s>5t3C)+3YMdt7F)GxMJay}~8?;`vmQT0vb?*vhv1h9Kjif@pD726!$X?(km?
z$4tw;9%G)a>r@-(${=p5s{b<oMHXq|+O_7W+w~HDfDd8QEg8aUVjB*Y(-lZYE2(V7
z$4}o0jB%7}ZN<M@Rot?3)^Z_&u}F`6e+ra}dZ_aZH#|~#u>&9X+DWe;RFyK(YuC1V
zwNM8K(MA<jnEE&}mq3XE#TQgbdNjkt+4d>bIY8YP)Jcg(mcyhBZ|8?3@mi(FyAR{q
zyHAY!yj;QJNPiZUaMI~Ju&Rm^eb`Q%1klRHTg?#r)r`3*@1EQ&y{PxVhl4gwjPi96
zL|Yq>GL%X6^K(DWrmk^$9IkpIG5!UvWR(H?5Z(_!K5SppuUu^gbMF;~#W_!aAWKPy
zOBdZXmH6FV7+X=P_E*!g$5?jcbq=JbL^-b{YTEOyXYJD&x|F(3>lAY<-iledOj^pu
zJ#;(mDhDEI>U4hH=nz6g+SLTPO~EL(HPshk(phy?C#rgpX5Fd#I=!~Ss}bc!O@!7v
zHL7mYO+npVQ5#!Myc9OO)iwtr5|Rw}cC4j*FUc|NE|FH<nftn|vB9gv@eC!VM4&k(
z`XRe_mw^ljoGVxZL~7TlbKLN;#!Mg6P%}C5QY4<FaWK30#_QrJ5d2g{IO?-pb<uV3
zm-U=Ps$?YU2|xWQ9dAW+ZDls<MP?&+hmztKX5E^4X4bAMvtyNS4WX_V(}6!br1#tv
z*ivH4fCD>C>nD`qvceI|+bV_hqHl$lB<vn$-<o-**6u2^V-#)Uwe)B_5nXiLx$6rm
z)tC&?s9r>n|9pHFW4>mVshgVpRR{mKTKq3vp&}5yq7Dj`^MoUDv9W7=500vSVl{Gr
z8Uq0R4X_7G&5`nBA3>s(;96>HS4Ej3aGuzpC?QbwceVBORCXL^L78Y#x@=J*jam@h
zI<Dm2dECH5Dw$ma03Y6THOJHgbV9Bs>|Cm|&lQ`tb02<Z-da!YAO-TO?CSm=;MKBl
zlq9}6A;I=iQ?|KLQJkRFX<S{tvX^gBKYnED=H}V6!EmhgTHP{uMrrmJd;zKM{C`Wh
zbNr8lpQf^zISiwey{VZekq#3P3mc~%45Nybm)S=VhEan^hna|li1}Tp?BL+~E@XR$
zQ2y{RcX;PMGWZ{yD3K1Y5Hq_dix`I}yBG@_i?|3E6DzxjhzJXSm4iz}h=rYrpXmQ@
z@?OusXBs(K*#9ljNc8{DG?FiD$}D=|4PQ;mbPw-Le>Yb*H#0Lgf1{!u|2Z+Sz$!Q1
z(4g{D9Lbd#qSsJS6x_s?dBe8-41m?XG08x(JjlM>c4F?|W5@v;1Ovh|t-*oFZ_r)+
z{lGKZS4DcoT1&Z~+cM~my6~6vH<%F-a#bOkXcf75^S^SL1qFY7Xo6u1RWHrBOk;P%
zyp0IqXrlj|Nzv~n>A&rdOP2&$ml$>A%xjmZc(EO><4_6mvG#~ts(SIAjedZ>?@K6L
zKeslKAU6Y&VFcS<iHOh(gcss>ejcJ;=)v;Vyk^LA8o=%@!Fd+wUby(Ta}6B72A6vU
ze{TU&Pg(t9UH>qY;P9(Rjl$T2_iura&2eB(D8k+V)j!J#{aek<P;X+CTdArqF_eV;
zNO)mJrQ1~wQT^enp8MkoOfbcUvN&GbxbsZJ@PCiS=b4~Y977QgJ=_S)3uePMvc77i
z2D>;y?-yQG^R)uO)<9uy)6hvJIPhwPjw^=HlJ_lEO3owlwn8km_L@mPm#t9#j&Qch
zolXhC<|+x`ol#SjlIivq4p9Pi#c}g#GRX|5g;Bnuya;CsXF6oX32e!e(w53bGD0$%
zv0?><7kmE=P)#X{r4t~Zk3K@#B*Wo%74kC=euQ~7&^b?}?WvN|6eCOU+w7osQ3_Gc
zVY2<7E&Md_G;s3JzXk*lAke}Qen<5<F@He7Fj=udx7Lx5ZeFsHbdhu~&%*x7vZ9I1
zogKXMaG-KSP_YV8(gwVDAwP}bMwlrAs)C%2m7nJfoHK!?qp*ppeq^R5ocp9IY9bj;
z^n>%`u0uWz<hfqpUX0LDF((J~^*x~#LO$?1nI~e=I!32llUCj$`6Mc2f|)5Iq&cgA
zZ;pu2t4eP2-A~ix!j$#Kw6e`Wxy?OrUBD<J!q;GU8G_n|m@k9T*I>UAt-<Q#;%Xb=
zCR#t&jx%<Pn0ff$m&)x)Sop4%Ry;H2tR~(0JleJ=%Do<|gw-iT@}H^SJFXPVn<=FG
ztmdD_Q1Z97?J&Vn8iL99QDp`(V}(I;!Y43+`z6cv!)5;4AQJ5NZeD=U^@+8B$<)B5
w<U(mA;`%2hwx`c|$DlU5{?88!7gr-^S5N2nPX`t@0Dz4hhMZhXK^*4)0Bc{wxc~qF

literal 0
HcmV?d00001

diff --git a/img/neglog.png b/img/neglog.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..967136debffb10953a24b0cb40eafe1f44d65c88
GIT binary patch
literal 15926
zcmeIZWmMH)@HhG;BqR+|LL^j>P(V5qK|w%~IMN^@9nv6W04gGiAV@dDp(G9+f`EY1
zp)?{bUD9{HsK0yff87`NS?hWEyl@>kXUFV`&&-~g{p_adRf@xmhY<v!P`q~K7J}gW
zA_(3H2@!lF+&=IVKE#~lZ#${m-E(p^b}&U$jGgSQ?VPMF?woWnb#Sz>vlZkM;uAb~
z(%i|(-cg*N-{!voe0C0I{9j_Pw8A2!_Sdu>5roPZ{fGBnCd~ptq>>b`T+(oho*Q)c
z)L5(7U)oS!x8dSoJ3)H=<S%&_LcQmQHSc39vNSF0`ullgM7oANY;5#(!Ym(DXk=+*
z)lukKc6$uI;^U6WV}F!MN`39J)&=d;&C$cGZ?2f&A9V;36r5c1l$^NaaIcZLRm5}H
zyJa(WOn|(W8VItkwQ$CR&naC(S@?)zL+}yg8#x~QR(+4e7rweEhY%u2E(88a1o8b!
zjlgJYe}n`<j0FGBl>grx;~JR3fAp?(Qr*}%;pow$KkY>``G^rDny^+tLtj7Z%NJ#_
znDt+NN00~cxw$vLfB&u(4vbd4bm`K=yu7?jzS^UN)hySpU3>MDRhBQj`G+OQr*Y9u
zvZ<xTHm+grDe{fLCcsOdj}9c~d(vdGv*?%m$O#x!|Gy$c<<CUb!O~mT=nOqSTo4o-
zw-;TlKVj$OHY7kk=-4XN^yQ0&vhs_{&98Qr4KJB{j*}rsTfpUuNKa4COhKn=r%A9>
z&-e<J)aol1@88B!>)%ZJa*ZE%bao0qShv>1U^ecjfJS-o+_gL8`tcCm)FU#!sb#TR
zfdaRsJA>|%F{L}p&76v@(%YFG9UTRpn-2P}gU(*s+z28YclbNy$g`i5li1?o+l~`o
zEQV=mXj1Z9rFE@(vkP-CfN~De<uO+uJIlxSmLnx4#ra$8+qbEYiK$pNybN+M202B$
z4}u#yB@Tgtub$F%LHb3RUQ!O9@Nc*159ie>xMo{aw);9JhF4Lilq&}_3ra8WhL^y|
z!=p5rU;Lqsl9H0R^P#F=W-{CFGBPsySPvaK6q3B$mpa5l3w*wdBlnf_Cs%{vTG@Kv
zE3-a)P-FG}opA3<#QlK{d3pK9aR+C&YqtVhr`94tv|o<qO(H#AUFO4;UUS2flap4n
zJz20vNA*Jj=VsobsfWZYH*IaR9UL9kstKshT)e1-(RbD?@_8GK8sDR9AgZ7fB9=Xw
z+H=FhF8wwk$yV7V3ayeWFKnxJUAlXFXSZf^Fs7y{sVY&a8^b<^q@<*Sd)iK5z_J4O
z>HRNxh{>}AU$rgLEt0O%qS`kq?H&gvzG=JYgVEG1jB7C!!ATOgS@TNAb#sE$qJ{9|
zNp(K^Ajrw5)QE~KF+c?2G5GE_0dVvYDP9}lpS9VL$oO}(fEFaD2xX7`E)Jpm``<P^
z;OWOFh&etV0m0uX17!4nmk}i-|DVhFQlhJH!7BC)FpOH6#Fs0c06jgrTl9bb<7L7J
zpuPkvKcW@){YM}QTL-(L$aSzv!S7-Q0r)=)tXS}BAGC@Zi2eWC#pnp^axh28kr1Wu
z2pp805|03k>oOvANie_{*oe-q7T{oILs>zJAFp_u6g|Tsyf%)nyeK$QGXcdGKkl>v
zP1k^F9iIw~VAoeCk;vp{a@GI7?YexxOk!Apk<|C^w|~APgYP0E#s2&K50}s#4$l1X
z5n>*qkbS@jLiqAP0=cmKlLI9|#{~_L0wWH{E2cwFPfIBK#-0Q{6uLMH4<~N}Z8c*5
z{`Y_He47vzExO7dIiVAZX_)>lA|zCJTOS5gD*_)rT|b}^<-!#B5MQH9h>)V(F=pAn
zTv)o;c_99Wi22b28KHZ2{LvzGQuzVtuX1e=Yg^kMe(xnR3Wf_;&YwTu)Y#ab<GseS
z>6u3R^Uu;pY@PA6+!sF*uQkZ*siAOD|AHY2tYN0lDkrReuBXP2tZdi)4>Mpzy&~Hf
zzKYdbUt=UNAwq78Misw*1ojo*A3N*Cg7pPK=H||^jR>}g%I*JdkSQ>0Wl`+F+4L89
ztXb;2jrygnx@V#a_OS-XT)n@yu&<@58K&@(DLpq=ps=7|YHxd?Hw<IoKCt0dVc=dd
zw7ww4a$~#q58ui9T@XX>P1B0S8Zw<q&ytIFLz!lAURqV#gA1#_@>^LpqylMqL;B}z
zeeRl>70LAe66_kdOowWebbv9vf4BT?HVFw`*Ma*1w#B3V>oyyMu5ku#qlf1D3bD-_
zPThE4T3WQ$d2>E9&|v2_zNlSxx{}iiCZ`(HF!s8C4y9F(FT8vFb`37TcXnpxr<04d
zufLyP%;E(BH8r*8&!5i}NPU@p#g^XFe;KtIyjC3E;*UW7p52Y%oQDL&mR};y_vM)e
zqL9A3UA6z9NQUQPN4kz&hK=>SpAw2?rv1q8sifeU@T#4Z?5aJFu+Y#mf`aP3`mQna
zrL)<#K3djyi!Cc|#f1Bv1a({dei7l~;4okMQKwVxc0U-_yP&+>aiAX`aaiB4$LXe9
z+Y1d24A&Ek^%L$;wZeh*RbK_`vku*tF=0MXEkZCb^I4<^jZ0*yLGj~xk)Hbp+KmS$
zdxyQ2<HKQ8*TJ|*Zy)*xF^1>xN2yU`Kv(y?&p>~ml8Z+WmBl(XqyPS(t~~{UpuX~F
z6NdvhB0}j=Xg?tKF(6JcPOe&y2-Jh{V8cEPp5wvx(y(D)3!b(0disa&X7_~=1Uan$
z#CtlqZTH6dbCK}?=YD&@YEQ(N9SZ%cO`H!P;~Q*tzd_+zNXE<o7UTj^KVB{o%Tl31
z8KEfH%2AV3oQe%ICwQ|#TqB=QjG0BW?jMk657u4Whi@cB_ZVn;7zFr$qda*4SMlsf
zB*$ybYLEa5Mm5|<aJF;kY#G8Y2L~O2KNMg5;S43Z&;dH2gO}^LjSj?N4PUPYt_+hV
zfB2rJ!{3V!Bs>g+U5Y;o$op;YJ8E?~@XEr%FqiATD3j8&;1G_m9yi`>AZO$^e5v$o
zgO!LcCjkX5d^)_gD~(yq)eZ+d_l2`|4dMM{LKmopv6i#QTdf1&K=(-eDf*viLjT|u
z3DDL>i!>h)icSyxVhYDPP=)td1h>_C-%rrS)pa8X;sm@%{8@a>PlEXZ`8*K-*TL?p
zX>#eLdwfRsH6Q;sEYHccfaBn}dT`vrf4t|yk8kYIJAf4<;N`i;|8cy~83{bVCPW?)
z()O272yqHM`0*ypPw|;%lC2duhjJiZ5M5)i-9ePYE<ZT%5;zp!D=_75u{uMRe)Xg0
z9)VcUi>VjLH?q7pcQ_Rf(Kyp$fYvq!yj(y9(DIY)$oiv)S$K=o2MTc#--!RS>ayYC
z)c6n-^zo@+Ai4EFk-CxiR-7!0lR;=TyRrWiks0F5OZ!jG$ool*3ntf?IN`y%MjxCJ
zNr#_Ly%!&|o)Ht%{_x=gql|a?MVr2^u~uhMCc{j^2}x8iMm1S{)!boWVUc2vsrSA{
zrnnA!Vbasn`>K4ZjvhOvvbpn6@k1ZxR;?09g4*8t1j6dMc*)ev%xbzLWv-uyip9Eb
zvWS;Z?537gpBbDj;v+!Qu;+@3O01;z@b0{8SY%`d=`pUU^t4#<(Ff%QIg%_l0veXc
zRf57f=6KT27urIk5}Rj(d}(g(4B@;U8Wn}5;n6bx_~=mS=0w!mfMYB3{|i@HHwtUF
ziioOj9SHRtWvu`?HZb?{-Mh(LH)1mjt$J~GWiYYOxRxkOw<x>$|AFMedHMO8nwp&9
z&E2DgDcuGtCHo5wqRFj3&XtMmH6D}vaDdXfv8B&*F0Nue{eCtQz6=Zuj8Yy>0X9hr
zK^+Nl0WY^>-@iXoqL)n>Jf`?8I8=h`vOn8+m;=j6Kp-X@g|DDlOV|8hnS^zJzF9C4
z1>@bONeL!OitFP7C`L)bh@v46tn}V*6RE{&g1#cVxVQX<*{9<?Z;1@pKemub+Le^0
zeFQu~?(`#~rcK8y_O@m{mg?w)U4Gr(-RiCC`B4`rY&Rs?>8+qkY%g=5IMn?H#5Y6u
zN~ccgJGIMKtZ&v99|wFSk;NOt+gX0zZv=L=(rnq?^&`KS5$vbR_pmRIR%YAI=8CY>
z)J^#-SJ0poqDt}YU-{1ayBpZt+_sscWt>>U7e^Coy1)HMB1832L6)#uWXMg9UExKW
zaIYSFT4#FP-fEi1Tw!m)ow~zPyQ`h(3Tqox`}$&HVmi4-50$Q8&*Ixm7G<IgYFahq
zzGpVNw7`fOK{);orfOmqH(Atu3c1efiN(YSPH$9hNGW!_X1}_+J-lzwDzy>qz5FI_
z)%ji8UFFp4vnxCWNo`3B%6X-53}1xQceXc2CcT$}UO*PEDmVEtCfV%_fI*4efhZ;~
zl0B8HHq<gS^ck20@3@tF)bT~5)AeOmeB8AD24IUXX)z*dTtjFxR9@1#jxqGo9IFq?
zk57zcc*~gcR3Jc-;;Xox`;I+&JHp`eAuX{|x`Ow<wAp#DoM7-zh>T?X8Yg4etLGR5
z&XEt>Jd68mpXQ&&c`d{xmm1)d(AQU#c(IwqYgG-6Sb7Z}WDR+5+tAR`HjO)2)cR9^
zausxs$Ap}J$2WIo)qMN4iMWsTLHLeDkrh+Mb9{X#cs1P6y96!=Nsk`k?@owRk@hW~
zRvgRURt&+>GUemIl^}<VkO45+)EjZxpkCKe+0GRWXJ6;9&?p-AE{lwe%;Z}LRi=+P
zqu8f)GliCw>=N*=5Ki=xRmK1=JM9o83Bk>75CC9nQf5CLNL5i!Q!OklSHB?1d+Eb#
z<BX+?j#ptbqY_^--(Z=&Vgrw9PEIZ^oL$s;6Mvlb_rzz%PU~Q9Q-Ko{=jBlgDHy+*
zQdkGn^^+ANZfo5b*Agi<wo5l;cAZ!;Cb78MYF$d^`~nDYe0@oL;m#y6-3!-G^gdc~
zTV)|apskAft{@s47=3^NGCQMG=;gCwxrrwueR_+jBu2t@252qur#R6w?w3fQ4+deU
z7{qOLB8wLQ`kRid9<lvoON_^lXQ!PYg0UDXcW0FLEQb3q4Ks6AQ<D-zUe^l?3(?DJ
zp~JXR5VJ(jOh_3or?gT@`cj|nt)v^v&CYw@$g$T!WiO5k;Qt~jj1sZy$<V|)ja1{o
z)r^OeQ~ns2a$BZ$erRauU1xV@H%XR~L0iBXxF&kd%`R;9n|as{UeXuzdNp4m^!xHT
z1WAZ5TX8*e_$lQ`xJtC>d2`IRcg(a{BRb408e{By7QO9*eaMzYynS;{vCpeOXI$9e
zz@50z*fUoHpne{;cj}wB7d;LKF|PHu*xT8R6t;SMsC!NMmR_<#>S=S#{X*#$Y}>&7
zXkxJ4ErV)jq*Z3$b9{Up?$xUK_r7+BRBfu%H8fc5@9jojFa-m7?lj~+Ic?{&9o3x@
z8`7y;=F2)6rmIH^Nh7Q;`0uc=>C-Zs&%8IA4PCx@4|{D)k9>UW0eImIq3mpL)m|YQ
zn+Ik{I;Tx?%)TomE^zUA*PQ|?5Ouhia)c+RJQ4oob*?Y?>~DLFhhaDrA=plFSr{7Z
zO?h|6Lp3j&(!$3gixShLtq*#Un*gfT-rlZL=3<jJ2iXBlC#M3A#>thl+}s&C*9H9~
zE?#~^w7GD2IcG417DIp_zs`(M;te}>s-V~d{x12fdMdEWe0OVYt21sdIc|SvG9(#w
zFf~s|X)zu%m13tfPf%*i7?vqHtxZ2ZNacJ}uGS~f33<z_o7%wgAahq>;pq`}SW{#=
z1DhSf0a7o@IgIN_H@LREaw?eb_b#{mRnfw=Y_aDrNoMP~@sR59`)pIlFGQ)M+<isJ
zZm4`rn)TSR&VcR+ySpBbE)2ADXIQqCmOFf9d~NBh2*OstpJ%GR7<JL6gN(mC-n99x
zMe|!;t#A|WfZ7CY_T7Yq$NHRq&c`)^Z=|UBtVL{+N#)%Id68kyeB1IR1(ir4#mU$Q
z*-F>t%-XN$_AaoNDINE{Itsx632J>neB;=XIha<)`}a2?l_0(SOVC}CWzciwt5&#K
zq@aJw8Lm^x0X(y7-;V^N=>y~hVB_zh2MZRBA)JiDmKxi*_N1$`R6f5S4|#3qlko^*
zl<!8|3;M;c=rNgp>W^|Bwa04%>6|*1*t!1nDaod%G#U4d6rFdi5C4cOj_y7^#P6%`
zK&X?^jxTBX^xoIh)U4ZFeaY0GRWy_Vd8yu-rY|B^S27Z7V#IG7q%r$3q4BsE`w0FB
zWTaAOW-KXKByY<FP<H1U*9zVJObw~1+4iffg{6|}b@F~i{6y~Iwbc-u1rrW9Bl-FH
zh3+f&vh+%BmATA?7}KM0+aj?biM>8cL+8n^zc6>Er$3H%x@zLZtJ=}rQVxi6egG=s
z-bp>c-D{1tab~EPFITg8{*0va;j*}mv{UA;^haP$1?Nfp5%yq7hmIVIl<Oa_?bTM(
zy-?}3(tSBq_%#5H_TzgGeX8&cAZKv6mE$PN)YRNOJ8r2OtG#hlFF!|lWpDMFUi+wy
z&!qdn33|lW0LBs|6GX(t4UeyPV=-3CKO3LFd^tb%e5+?Q`mSkdlIHF1c%ON0iz-R*
z?6P(w#hTTIE~9>QF2zjB?;XUMORZ}V#STLeW*q9`sb}!T5u)n$Y3Y?1MeUGepE*9Y
z(GPzj(u8yI1o1KCbF4XlIm-+kfwNQx)<$BC$Be|e{UC*uo3_3}T#3ilNk#aTtm_+-
zPEiF|*F*Mrf)P!OeoAq%D7JY@F#l@WSz$IMQ(=RwZ)(=gVsIU~a>xlOh<YlJmK`mA
zGi0@<f%xFM@Pr%R$hX8{M%GV^d5fd!a#<iY3(cB7ftc4<(e>)AuF1}%)SiXrh~6rY
z|AZ3X2-#YCCl-<{f@4wp8_@gSltaj6j}fhRcCjg1TAnX(Qt5S71V1mTNmz{(j#&H9
z*?&JBprJW@7rmsN45da0x<mrfEZua<Ez7^^?2*#>gEmdDAw*}=IurIKt=@A?Pj|a#
zSXtwWPXW`oNqq5sbu7JWQhlzbt&$XL*x(G|w67R^eeTqk^r+UxFpk}&+TDz$jzi$x
zrLH36_QSCPvSMfNXJlG+2xg*H2CkC`QSqWc8g1<40>1R78Vk=Ou)^RY$m44Hu?t~Q
zjQls`^51&q4$nA%AYZW~L=Oeh<XrUxZiTE)c5iaOf1iIq%oh^hELvV24uAk%+mgDO
zTcu7dpEbTRz0Itrjbrh&gG2y$&XWpAXaU5!Qky^DFpAhlcc(Cg*N(Qu(7k+H%T}>w
z@%kcj<{!OIwq`}FEG+?!B&F86)Mt8g;=0G9+oqJmvm>H;6}P%|<C-T0&t-$NAY|_+
zu0CN~e93XLr5lpDX3l3%kK@E@X-+Vt+8k<F?R(3v6%P9F=v5ZM2m~3)U!z2<+7snZ
zuX*J3@<3{Kw7vJ%u|(&UlD+1df&Fz=&8~~<?i3)BV#pWJ9zSkATI1&d$_w7h>(+vH
zf%)qJTi0!N35l|B?61Dy7W%{^7NjUk6J4c?l7Xqz<xKv@-<GfBq2cH7-g*&)P(77d
zDJk-l0dlHo>W~wzbquK@m|FAbui7|BrvFKoVB)&@6r(7$rX;TSD25npwRSpts5->$
zc>?ue2Wb`D-95_VxH%;D!F)+yrB@lwcCc?RLef2N;%ihITp?Tz`-B{)p*grU7>6l7
z4sq%(co>o_VK~fZ=NM>O2tpV+il(s?uU%{V_Q6ELIxsL$-NC^jZSLVrRh96qg@rRc
zdmTDb%fS^}(?tq8`bQx&$A=yL@m;N-%$I#()e85_HPofl)X_TvKM~=ih}*~?I#7P(
z<+o`+p-UF_=4e`xowWM-*D+Lv!1gNHcU4(ehy@4-9yH!gDM<{)Xki1i?4v{x#QqLp
zHTB5Lpti@uOT+cH(~$&Q<~P#oXh4f)6%g_x!%VL;+_SKc>>ik6l_V)>F`&lyG<X6}
zc9s*{8Q;am=S3>;dRkz0iZO6snZk!(u3UXG{Q=9x4T+uE<)*c7G8@_lCxE*Ewct77
z%H0lus{IC*tU<$j_vJyvZPbWd+xW5k)j>sVKo^zfqN&dxJPsl#ye9~KqPO$(?VuL>
z^m3e9uT+)VTF?MDxcc8m5IGHSD6u=E9GrFXGx_W+yBmfwG`%|@{iApS$);<8-D4|U
z+ym2XQT>P4K3#R!3P*`Y@B}`^#J<Ta<7Z%3^jNIW_gKik6UYPcnif0KS51{l(N%6i
zU`pRn6OJ?Q{HSz52<<7P&lk+3BK$?W7`yto&HA)V>|p#(o({GdX40}DeOKHf)Pwbf
zFOB65po+MYGOMXIR#*zrn-OG(f<7tu&rVyVo{>1KK-@el<TLHz&Imy^TohK%<Hvtp
zz45d|uvb;nVRqa&Tfg*@a}c=MLlA~h<F)zwuLt+8$V75soQlCZyMp8T-}`g%9j8Ei
z^{EjXOQ+Q9t$W)Vb@KieUn?E-tE}@GqrCpiM)2C|xyXN|rA^*Y(<oNoAJ9xZ5q=CG
z56LBfO;I+S&W=rnJIK(my9SxTw@;%+2y&STk9uq3smAVfz#AIo(FMZ2-z7mAb{voq
zrp_SoeZ>(YTwe9IB`)LJXMwCf-PFzNz1W`S8Fc0mJnFerDwQ6fHsi^Ad#@0~1Z?cq
z?Qy+xjEL_mIphlQ8zRnWzx{|*?+-`%T#A*3wez$Bnr06e5%Cmxs;b(o+J)V>^UvF=
zo04^p;WNzBiepaCJK*C{{F9|Z1wQ2l+dhIq+_forj5*nEcVe{Wc>nMjAOGY_o^G0~
z@Ei$!L4PhR?t^?U-(b9H98&>0zfF!%Hu@Eh_~q+4F^Sh3%rd^4O||sObV}LH-*hCS
zdqD)*@FU1lVPZ{f!SClwTaCX)Lz2yUSlX&&%G5O1RA@1vTB?Wes8838+E1lAIu_m?
zx>9%L$#jxb%GUarRVYTs#MuHoc@&B7)LXL3*9leUBC^R{3zn6voEuH7R)@^w55!XX
z5P52QLZUjWYEV>No%nQmeShX5e(N5B1<w}uhXALf_$O5rEiV_m-F1uHTghZn?0CaE
zKAj=sm3Z{V<GL^~&Kx=9)7d~0$C*jGmmRD=0%}WYqdIYh2_?bVJ$+uLTHz?EzQ|J+
z2_I|!q4N8w3dx-B3;M9`H+&L_hx=2wC`kzr>Q^Mb0`jW+ZWZ3O<oaUH@#Jzk%OAaW
z`$G!FAwh$lWrPQYs6YyrR)3Fz_nnB^d<2P&gkDNXaApTKin1A!Db0W|Sukqw(D3KB
zGP2gL0yag+54Zd5nnux<=PE+t1bZFEoI(=A?{d|fZwBA!y-_86c~mt(>z8PT*#36H
zo}Dh+pe%x%Q$VidkUEMx)n*!dtkeq%iPxqym2wTP{-8zGy2)}1a(6~F_$NIE!3_-+
z8>iC7Mq%yK<QBZOGGU=32a8-ruEaehcb)0^Ub|LLAt-!7>Jm+1Q0a6XZ)BCz<HOuD
znS4|TqRWOP-UwnI>4_4FP0(#=*1Q{`&N_d#``7;N&Fj+NTAc~-kSTUT+0_y-4_h(2
z;-QLhWtCP%Ex9*0s49!D(@Ev&fS<Un&w?OqP?&2*1Eg`8*wp>ac?+fIfnD=S-CHdo
z&ZT2Hae3DWA!NIPJV{}q45$=5dwsun&f3e);Vs8>3dNzwwSKDAG);F)>xo<d(R+^c
z=V~QQ{}kxpTIf)srxkwe=tY+IZ58`P>ixkQiXjfSeylbJDp>V=)(GSwK%N|)u){YB
z7Vz~5Xf>PaRtZ>Zd#=xowFu?-%GhpLRcu}W5K>eu4&@G$JuYOOgy6larijpVyU%=Q
zhwvtZM#tx!rZOxDoIAxzX5y$#o!uc)sM}FNejOpYIsBO?t9{qbC)?*2_iK(i1^?*=
zvx%t&v+*<1+yg&mpgQ8e8HIdfCy%czg!>zdr)xNlc|DFbf{6}7ps(Fw>crd^qSut6
z!dUxnNkQ@hnGI)u%K{Kp?5Iw@J$Ug!F`qQAy0L0N9SuH$&%7dnmwT07w#UM9X?mRE
zkj~CV#au5rQ=g2gNL&;)u>J@k9@5b8XT?`*mK9$;?#<yzZK}m)%tUc0*4`Q`TpZB*
zx~t$HO?U~Z#t8TvLmoWAJ1&}WB69UhB!P#eW-R1uLXt-<mUP_a?ezsN#+)QU%>S-<
zb7V<K$YOeiV5@URQnQHY<3N`iujqsKd<=2vPX%ZL5#Pb{e^)Gq4bf0+YbA1L{iNv0
z^9nN3j!&~AF5Eo-+L#tYg5)0ldzOc-oo&gctgIcK*p+^|Kn`$ReGHG+YNsEMzYNMP
zzKqBk{uR&}H>j~q<wQ}<KBHQ3dY`Boa-5DKl_!m|Yv<kLux|dIABXV}FTcNxAL$(U
z(J2u}W7SB!z2^S<YRFHgYm>n$y=Y|gj9|NQ)aWA#^5nvVT_euy6F*eE)l-$#E?<6h
zOI_XhyJ@(^#{8gGxSs(n%S0Dvn(0hTRBKy@Roc`G<FnwACHe!`VmN1=zO(jB+35zq
zPp>m`P6xlm2=y&AL*TW)J=`05R=sOrAX8$YT)n@@uD2ydf`*RH^;X=+{Yy{$2kW}G
zR%SdaD%YMeM(uv&|4Ng>s>+&)O{LVRD!vxTLx@B?+w8B$Tf{>856u8m$?V)Ti*fEz
ztO&q6uG3^yuCv$3CbhA2DNJjd?!^^93Fr1=<=v6hhm3JCpGS=m61*?Ngw-zF>vQT*
zILFxyXMZqhi0yhnFPqTVKaf}?!;5mfFsZGx(hKr}GNN9u_?Y9;zkRkRgUwe7K|D7@
z?$Z0C=?G0NEz9l<%?7WS-r2C;S)2W#v86K-68${{XF?%|#|!Z++)~zh(&Xm?0*)ot
zIB$N!i*(&ONpa(PZm|*~>v{z8j3LQrIBZw7i_^+6$jZ#j9IKp%fU&(|W2oPvEQa`%
zzDCc*8L-sCUvD0Z-!$m0^qP6a;pL-*<D-xISeJr_)@ew6OQ%z#&^`>Put|5kVv|$-
ztt0NcxJjP%-7u9-TKavJk3k}B+<xzAHf}w-;MT4UF0<K!b0U+6@nsQ+W<(K2|AZ*p
zQpKFAy;AAlBLw3U6E53=^s?((8k#wni%dO+7ip&KO})0)A%5PP|9Q^qK@Gy$a8>&@
z8xqg+W%wecZ?B<G1)6fM+MTmwJb&lPwo6feRzyU^n=Nu8Y7QUF;@FNuMP7m|K=3)c
z*^);`j45LzE~pGgg{0&=Z1YHd!G#YJ`uf)F*o+}=<#JBf!}+=)k9=bW$oQR+vBkAJ
zjJv#RYVr`roNYNAdz3Xju-<g0{}_=uQ@~Ta>RSgy+%rN(uei`WSPc&fSgU`_&Yfdp
zJuJ<^sTv-{8sE%y*Yf6aqrMXpV#M+n2<<OK>Uio@6e-(TOC{1sJnwE>t+ScnqEzlG
zI!z8au6Ig5Ua})?rz5IJeWhxU%dXvSQEPiI?^INdKkfO&qdt4;4it;T1x4f?8%!<N
zr-VvOPG#~QM=sO<wdAR1;EIO^wBA?Q@OG`U8%FcfADL*=F4+}!)$?yT5yOQMGNwkp
zeEI`V)L-&)k`?THbdrmT=qy{?BiH9%8>_|$OV+UxT}?UrP=ExHs{cFGqjo5%+vCB5
z*F#$c*S3`^j}z6#h(B=iL6PiUkn*^|c_jMO-($A*uQO%!=t4#!>jqgEMyJ103gX?>
zgvLlgF8zF1d63!0I1HiI`*%*m^W<`6!CJF(Hv%CXsq5QLX^H2Ec^mUyEU9xf>%0Zy
z+ejldn85UR!Xr%xURL*7l01B_ez?dg-ZNSfy>~xSP+Z@!KH0)kD=}J?Pn-fV{6{?g
zrDtiEeD=$)@VFeen%lb|T<E#P6LXX`MVozVHu`nCIJ=0SJO^@e!tNRBF-{Uj&iHeA
z<(6qIEJ$Yf%yFv)6_xCkKqftvQn4fRNV>S$-3*7V2Ho3dk=p@(!0sgB1-M7`Ok$?u
z%9K`f^f^)U8QuKY_#slbgOw<aQt_6CTZDWVzU=UwKhBQiBS%g_Ju8uGxVe|Ne1KdX
zWT(YVZa;5fX*V<*U&pxI%JhTb3;zwzC{0kbS`RBEs<{=W^*};W1~koVB6aG^z+R-Z
zkT%3xw3>&JiN8=yl2AP<h}Ib(Y0{oik<#Zm6`|v4xRXyk?_~ZX-dh|iO#PC1M2ns$
z5RdTuU&&EFm!we9DXP-LuD`YH9=gE1(^T?!_YS*|Bhb|}mm}z)9{P^nL@foexBMpy
zW~OsF-B%wp7g*j%@0sUc$j!UG%+K`>DC!JIHHU2I*6AzS8fTGcroWpQiKy^O+wh2{
z2Cs+CBvqJhtuCJ5tX$^*yjb9-(z--k)9DxzN`Jya<pW~Rgd!-5G4gR92<v-gm{7Rg
zTxjc4;zH{#F1cWTElE%>^1P6?pns})(<=_zP$ZY>uPMl0h45;NBWHk>WTmNafoJ0!
zrK7kIUvpNvT!@g(wGb`}r4R}KvNzCa_;(My(^@|)+DavTT<z!f9GEkvisL_xzEVgn
z6LPkfQDF#4PJjF+bmlqky$<5?@vm95NkOu4^}d1M#h)1S-G_(A!@FHPzK;C7t->6V
zeD?7h*eMUnra$fNzcU~c#(yP0^)6(F$VT#J`r0N98Xva?N^Q+lU9-qO1Jg3oA8%WL
zfEZuDjfVt`@F4;c(ti|AWMtTNOgs)llTVQEo$9P@5Ff}>T^`2Sdb%WXQOu-)U$v;I
zzM{oQFh%>9-@Zed!`~9K4mA`=!z?N-^VtNGjJ+mj5>5;AeNh$0t{kc3lyj{7r(JpQ
z{$n_v7q-sK+)yzHz1vO5h4p#n-g4KEzB=`sviHeDL&BORf@38+<i0NdNbAAAx9NH-
z7dDq*uX`zMCQ3)VynghRgZh{-ACFp^>1j(aONHdqXD&oLlHy7HQ)&`P(1khfjGl>}
zo5j;cDKD9@3#+9N+t%MLb<)vFtT)?!JPPd8Vj{R${g>y|OiI`aRB2Eh$_l_1WQ{~X
ztRr60!h9^@zP4>ptE%-JZE09!wKM6%n}35lYU*h6+P067{gm)j)+O8dXn!@~>d-yI
zwBCEANhpaX#Kl4`zPj)cc9hlhQaAFY=HGtefZBcfdRaDEF*P=aH2c(V4NjLn2?-s2
z*%P5$RC&HS>jQz_Ry`u(DuDNh<e&bTW0x+@=Cf;V{kj&0E82U9(dsun^DB;eoa)It
zL#M-n1MSi3B!qxD2Qf0ToxXI@$}AyGir!o6c8V9L@Urs~zlDQday_~I><I!r#y8VF
z@5#f7IO`mOE?3|A$M#prrS<o`3^WE4bc>6U6?pZNYv2MLq<o_d1}m5r3yF88yq+d~
z9`sY(PuB3C0#-v5S%}tF_S=?5xxEa2wa@>U;iHQbW$GCDDH_ytt!=8uNR+#_j_q!I
z_}>tfFkT{3*RzQq+ud?1SeiehXHuSJ?%Xom-}=XAkD0IwaaZtCZ<YC%SS&q1Of@^!
z^swz82NA*0Za0Vk8(2xmc1P_EEqVi9)y7a#C_d|4TqO*;cD?Osk4*lXJ2dqre$|Tq
zh?KRnFt=>442kTq9i<y>>uehspG{(qZc<TcTPz@iBbrk^1(Ts<CoueHj=q%;E<Mj+
zESNMebfLpoZM0j?iRoljT(v5dEV{WoJb3qt&LjV{hV6apIYzE}h4uSuvLi-+ty1=+
z`4WS;hFaQS9m^bF_7d@@q;5Fw+_FF(2jr)OpnzDCPRa;1)qw&xidohi@B4&uPo)0|
zkTB0bm3BO=2S;2ZRoC68sh7pxFcZ8T8~Xbi#T@Gbm0$W2__27Ho5E#(h9TkcU&n!b
zd=J3>;JRf&S+UNxl4T$3>BIh{YNL!jeVkuZtjL~{GQOg(^~*Zq^cQjQsg>Yb(ZrM0
zJ#^GZU;yfSyPU${Zu-Y#R5|v4yonCwr(~nL9)y8AG=<VjO(()|>?Nar7U#?C7NzSH
zpP4O1kCOs7+WoC#?Z>eIxuzMqr07t$@zr2;Ri$W$t?epR*ZU8xZU_D&)1_zNhx#Q`
zFRP+9R?3YcqFPJ4-f-;e<cOyNAjlQs+Px)4xCM!wU1IEzQC(6SI7(F!{BQEq7Xfl;
zx(PGX!ItOgjE8N>85?M4QEGNEyP5)bxvmrv*GA)BMI6n^^ge%>%5i;k7(d~~f3ss#
zY2#q<CV{a<&~me-Zmn@plO<#Db|v^^fLCErv6lU7&${D(ic%=PRKIseXq0-eW{0=k
ziWmwtkj6)IRc(7qAsyn97|r3Xv&SdGdbq1HwEzID%roa!-;K85?5C*w9=|aWK2yg^
zNxT}UMmS16^@P%hYSD)pY1{Ucmh;nGL#sJ(Gh_yj2Za>oGuZBr&&7pVCi%{U9G`GH
zgEdsPn#?V<ia45fsqq7F6#Ln}CV~0yjf@cKS>7b4dBErtU#>;mG^0~%oJIMzcUsmx
zi!t&gD`gDjS*&3u5$84)FBOOl{67)b=KkGFN>l%2hv0{|n!Qi%>u03g)vv|PkA7U%
z=@!OCFYYSde?9lm-sqO{0|BOp<5+Un7d6F*OWS`FAH6ZA=gwN+qT(zf`t+#D0}5#B
zm*iu(ErY90$}jUPF}$K*N%8$HKWT5|kg3;x#A{XLW4h7aJ!m_v_J{PqE&X;SXL+lc
zSIMfa7!jfL_#c6?ZtvIBZmOj{Y7!SNq|X}tkloyR<3-R^+j;8;ch>^d{3ZMysf@+&
zPa=rnYij0%_IF1ZW4@P2bo~%?>gsG`JMO(X3wc^*tX0Q{Qf@Dg;*8F1X3DdJG+Cem
zO*4~JegsFWev7l8*HIfCP@t*^l&hAKC1XGqH4BIC(P;Ec-*lh!bt}#@7&?}z^L7XC
zJnu(VY7pEs_3`|zI_@{V-%S32BvK0fHDTRCGxjMm<Sb%Z!+VAMYOXb5%{GwV7e7>s
z%SErp?MDbd9s379h!Gcb!mIUvW25#KKI1(&W2y)#h?Fm%=qawf&`On1V6ZVfU4KUK
zyh7vs*AAk;%AUX5jB-Tq5E6RG<u@*=DZLEtu=xHgCRT)8F3ed)Tu(cV-H`N|jbZOa
z9Gdg$u*|{HIPE%~s*P!K@;O4%UvtO5Y;N1UPT}a0%M1_bAk{HyFB*EBE<L&UT2Qmn
zuhnv6dT{@i3yiePSd6jeWAK$2<JqL-K5YHHVN%Tb>$j@Dk(hFAVR(H?9(<#vRzH?l
zLVJgr9kR>Rr$B~BP1wWePo#e!7|^dwg=V>=SR$X3nHiYT5B~f$cV>Hqhwf?i2&d;|
zD@q)e()U&^?o1HE6c7~<)x7vbZ(5ubHoxq8v~#ds>1AN(n^*LZri1Q;YtSh6J*)Q&
zG(^d%KWNBZgtBH%FcY>{?Z)FsFaMWJE3S;er%!!hJ=zH><a%|RAhAsN49<I4Mp|jq
zSdZ>Q&Ua}98i~fX=Ing1iHWCz7z7mp>G*rznZ;T-Ya__*dKzXnjK>p&RM!gG#Jb6<
zH%;MGymTyB%!jl~b($1VguZDJgi+yD*xr2BFy{1|E-SgrB($CF%$CG6hI#Xp(!}D`
zphj!vgRa*>hh|=nouvk0#|dSrrBBC7M;?(CI8LfkFp0L!EJNAi8YFr;bmjVzFYT6k
zs;CFv;OsV_!4&${c<jezv3)4cNT_(@)-~3x7L4gvT@-vXc1preZhv&bJf$QlY~s0=
zXK0p*O3}Bi3j&>~DxII69V@)s7_xrQcx4){pDG_n>ovEntw4!Xr&}#CaOW&#d>dO}
z#5q$1VrO=JaJF_kk%4AK&w>wQB6*aifqc&2kBv)tbimQ=Cz!hy-1?EEVW?}ez1fdb
zD}k1NwA#+>I?!&s9WCZq;4;_8H$1lHF^(3Hax#{Oe>99uZxI3;?eDaQ5S2wU{(2sk
zClMF^&1E_Yu8J?Uw&jc!!(@csx|MS;cVR&<b?gEq4I0N@ud_(+wK|F>e_EVaZ^iNS
z6IJKsU4ZW5GrYW6wd(~1LTDysGZqds4dwN@0x2kaVJxARF(J{lW#;Z)GBBTwxgH=6
z6E7N894$4bZ>SL8YV}?h9E8UKbHl6>F3OLIDA0B^YYAU`zlJe27Z=>&!-uW=Td0oz
z3aqZ#BVmFMHBHSFX!_+od$w`r);W`YBqAgvF*i3?b+9rdBt%vJ<HdhX!-I1!E6q$N
z_4w$vPs!%;<CAT(+rvjdr^Rq{>$i0~76yiN#W!3Q<4s}AxE!daLl0E$dw9#?J7m@m
zO-d+TrCT#tVfW>`Dsj^KH>5X{DVfES50TN{)`xPgYz{Oemj8IpqhVl>ZMZvw;pXP<
zfKu5S)Z)$C;xC<E+k>vUL9dNLeHL1U;X8(el<V?F#y;rBh>_v99kf>zak<-%!UXc`
zIocfgKi@1ZT1kQ}FkZO(G%+bj*rJ0YOQ&$=NzVRaEfxBg{MD;Gr%zw?*%@Qqe&5m7
z8{@SE9p)D6zrN25S5-k<HQGA`eIcvHg$Y?@RdhCJ!`0%VeGscmr7Ky%>-l-IoL(%N
z4g=QT($EO?r)18M+23sS(y*DDo!`5Svwo*4F(*`4U(e0XE{Aq{LCJsneP7!uv?okM
z6Smg9d#QjWLvCY1IbOlMlePp6YaQ458IBw|Qm=kP%JkPjN$2fi`-CHObY@JFZn@39
zljGwI(7IU<J@7%$>%@3NYAqB-8<zvCz4Y9trspfs2}>i7sTiRVP6Q5PvIDPL1W%nh
z^#V$=8~4W((#p0Ize4itMRYWiNlUa?y+v9~k4T+AU=Llmp2M^AHhn@SAXf!%@5-gd
z({c1xJ(<(B8FCocjRxp)B2VkI*xB2t5?NkeexZrgVlb(Hah|X2SDtjXWI_2#i$r~l
z>yX9HT8@t}2LoiKwnz=_dP|}ZH+*Ow6Q(_PyUn=&^K14XiTUEB=H6lN?YVmRQ^L9o
z`sH49-jJ#2wJZpnpAXD_!6MaHyfO6PE8kZaRcAxJ`*k$+=+l9*`LYErcw<qv{R4W_
zga>Sk)C>%U=*GXR0)fz}q|1K#bXqO$DvSH4&rMA;g^Y6(ck$!(Cv7S5Sg)FxB%wV(
zVvZ9|-=xi2n6mWCaLpT;&=%S`TeX&DX93-QmX?+?g*tMB>AwPVmNz{!va@k(K~-Pv
zGq&$Qk1N^;J72jyKg8F5QPtG296C!Qp)}0mF~x>99o7a=_4@4g`lMG@R`M%RTBPO4
zz$>8y_<9!j^4geQ+++2<f!CTQbpI9cD=F}lwG84ak9~d?8Wxrg#cK--3uateN=kZh
zadGp;aTFJ}CMNDdL+)92_N3k!3e&Va{>mAjy-6PpU0v*g*TRDewM3ifrpj++t~v9?
zW0aufN~5DYZ%p2TK;7Nlbt*gx!2s6a#Sk_#QyI<nfw75F<p!vl`at`?95fbn(qQxw
z{QZf9MMP#puJg4+GO~}3Gbs$XChluk3!P=ZhXh`z_E*lY>Dyf0aCS8;aEA_5XK2Tq
z8V@(r0+!i@nem)1<JZyAaq8B@pg7jOI9j`%A*nmvvf$S``38!sd8W-m&NCY5y9<xs
zqXBDQ1Y6q<2`Rd+H$XPodF89fY<Agv2fS%oh3RKyWa75lb*o=GitI~xGo3wq_AnXQ
z?5d9~Cnsmj-i-tm4-b#<94aa*3{=*0x*2Cc8U^l~<Kb&bth?8Ipd$_KU0b{N4%as5
zr3UZt&=*y3*3zZ=6P%lJPmSphQ&IJ9FI43?wuq(Ou%r@BTYm8R_3H#Y0wU=5EwVcy
zY#9po+|k;Au&AhhtZ+b{`gc}%&(ZPao!}a@j%kDl*$#--)zwYIIl2I<=<;IHWKBTX
zDM#*KQBbh#NLJJ-aWD;-<H2Niy<iY5^=w_8?v$w5gU1)WKO5iB968c%Rp?&|atf(h
z5%Jmc<Tb2}cC=LP81x!-C@JvTcCi^OE!_QJ^btRZ{`_U#BHQi)i_Wc#)mM((Rdmo;
ztN||$f%knybKmo?Leqn`wswV%-Fu0!T{R5mbXxwH5ECse*K{D|agR8gN!vi$I6^-h
z=Poo{7JL9tJ@!`D_WX|@KVA?JQ_}kz)1wbj?n7H<QB|eQ*-dD`vP2=sZEHHs=0j*X
zzmu!sIm5~U5-KW@y~O|-dU*IY7i`k-QhN<U!Z0{UX9({IR$!0@26F-^sju4YuVRpJ
z`6VE|vna<dBGUUic>gyQcJDA-O4+sv*ph;qTk+EGvEUQi8w(<kMz>LpmHZwd?wq0N
z<M-;OzP^q1_q@7q@H~aB(GBz^h*uX^VE8hiq(2z>Eqp)%K<|Z9?Ce3%XvzpL@{G3~
z(bn7h>)*{>-FAstJ&lwj1U^1}@j?h~Oh2ccmmJJPsXzFg4qoZt*wQ=4BCWEgw`=5X
zy87@}zCg^g0eGO`F(A57zVad>f}Wj+r@43z*Z-olv{X7<+{xM1M{@Zyd;L^<QV{wx
zJ9}+}h+XXc-;1O0bHUE6;lB82)&7@3Z_3*ER%pvII(_hx?SHx^Xqx?Bc!4X6?dZ6b
zl9o0L&j!th*8!8yT)1#+p=!U<FAUGO1bzAC*$9p(shO`#8G0hS0Z@gZhZ$`!hVTzp
zDuf77KwEg_5C0RkZNvL}u4toRKhCBT`edQu#s*?TBSyGfc*=WuRn)&^#zJ4Q%|Njl
z+WHI~Z~`=w2!1u@=lD3hin=KscLUyC7L+m}0_ZcH-y!w&3Mw(;nqv*Yy|D2bxK}GE
z(?Fdk|G$lYrpfH4qo`-ok5gG%T0$FB;ic?qkFK3IgaZ-&a@9!N%wsC)Ht1zv+gWLC
z9(QP*cAD9ojO(50#zNe86s<yc9=tNlWjJvD|C`<}PwW$Ly$U|V;=x%15e1?suX-i>
IveBde3-I-1F8}}l

literal 0
HcmV?d00001

diff --git a/lec2/entropy.py b/lec2/entropy.py
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..db059f7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lec2/entropy.py
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python
+
+from letters import file2prob, file2pairs
+from math import log
+
+def entropy(dist):
+    """
+    Calculate the entropy of a probability distribution. The
+    probability distribution is given as a dictionary where
+    the keys are the support and the values are the probabilities
+    """
+    return -sum(p*log(p, 2) for p in dist.values() if p > 0)
+
+if __name__ == '__main__':
+    import sys
+    
+    if len(sys.argv) != 2:
+        print("Usage: %s filename" % sys.argv[0])
+        sys.exit(-1)
+        
+    filename = sys.argv[1]
+
+    probs = file2prob(filename)
+    conds = file2pairs(filename)
+
+    cc = sum([ [probs[c]*d for d in conds[c].values()]
+               for c in conds ], [])
+    centropy = -sum(p*log(p,2) for p in cc if p > 0)
+    print(entropy(probs)/-log(1/len(probs),2), centropy/-log(1/len(cc),2))
diff --git a/lec2/example.py b/lec2/example.py
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f60ef55
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lec2/example.py
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python
+
+from entropy import entropy
+
+fair_coin = { "heads": 0.5, "tails": 0.5 }
+two_coins = { "HH": 0.25, "HT": 0.25, "TH": 0.25, "TT": 0.25 }
+fair_die  = { 1: 1/6, 2: 1/6, 3: 1/6, 4: 1/6, 5: 1/6, 6: 1/6 }
+unfair_die = { 1: 1/5, 2: 1/10, 3: 1/10, 4: 1/10, 5: 1/10, 6: 2/5 }
+
+print("Entropy of a fair coin:", entropy(fair_coin))
+print("Entropy of two fair coins:", entropy(two_coins))
+print("Entropy of a fair six-sided die:", entropy(fair_die))
+print("Entropy of an unfair six-sided die:", entropy(unfair_die))
+
+from letters import file2prob, letters
+
+print("Entropy of the uniform alphabet:",
+      entropy({ c: 1/len(letters) for c in letters }))
+
+probs = file2prob("republic.txt")
+
+lines = []
+for i in range(6):
+    line = []
+    for j in range(5):
+        try:
+            letter = letters[i*5+j]
+        except IndexError: 
+            continue
+        line.append("%s %.04f" % (letter, probs[letter]))
+    lines.append("   ".join(line))
+
+print("#+begin_src")
+print("\n".join(lines))
+print("#+end_src")
+            
+print("Entropy of letters in Plato's Republic:", entropy(probs))
diff --git a/lec2/letters.py b/lec2/letters.py
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..22f445c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lec2/letters.py
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python
+
+letters = 'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz '
+
+def file2prob(filename):
+    """
+    Read a file and return a dictionary of letters and
+    their probabilities
+    """
+    letter_dict  = { c: 0 for c in letters }
+    letter_total = 0
+
+    with open(filename) as fp:
+        for c in fp.read():
+            if c.lower() not in letter_dict:
+                continue
+            letter_dict[c.lower()] += 1
+            letter_total += 1
+
+    probs = { c: letter_dict[c]/letter_total for c in letter_dict }
+    return probs
+
+def file2pairs(filename):
+    """
+    Read a file and return a dictionary of letters and
+    the probabilities of following letters. That is, the
+    conditional probability of a letter given its
+    predecessor.
+    """
+    letter_dict  = { c: { a: 0 for a in letters }
+                     for c in letters }
+    previous = None
+    with open(filename) as fp:
+        for c in fp.read():
+            if c not in letter_dict:
+                continue
+            c = c.lower()
+            if previous is None:
+                previous = c
+                continue
+            letter_dict[previous][c] += 1
+            previous = c
+
+    probs = { c: { d: letter_dict[c][d]/sum(letter_dict[c].values())
+                   for d in letters } for c in letters }
+    return probs
+
+if __name__ == '__main__':
+    import sys
+    
+    if len(sys.argv) != 3:
+        print("Usage: %s filename letter" % sys.argv[0])
+        sys.exit(-1)
+        
+    filename = sys.argv[1]
+    letter = sys.argv[2]
+
+    probs = file2prob(filename)
+    print(probs[letter])
diff --git a/lec2/republic.txt b/lec2/republic.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0ec9e37
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lec2/republic.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,24919 @@
+The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Republic
+    
+This ebook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
+most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
+whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
+of the Project Gutenberg License included with this ebook or online
+at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States,
+you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located
+before using this eBook.
+
+Title: The Republic
+
+
+Author: Plato
+
+Translator: Benjamin Jowett
+
+Release date: October 1, 1998 [eBook #1497]
+                Most recently updated: September 11, 2021
+
+Language: English
+
+
+
+*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE REPUBLIC ***
+
+
+
+THE REPUBLIC
+
+By Plato
+
+Translated by Benjamin Jowett
+
+Note: See also “The Republic” by Plato, Jowett, eBook #150
+
+
+Contents
+
+ INTRODUCTION AND ANALYSIS.
+ THE REPUBLIC.
+ PERSONS OF THE DIALOGUE.
+ BOOK I.
+ BOOK II.
+ BOOK III.
+ BOOK IV.
+ BOOK V.
+ BOOK VI.
+ BOOK VII.
+ BOOK VIII.
+ BOOK IX.
+ BOOK X.
+
+
+
+
+ INTRODUCTION AND ANALYSIS.
+
+
+The Republic of Plato is the longest of his works with the exception of
+the Laws, and is certainly the greatest of them. There are nearer
+approaches to modern metaphysics in the Philebus and in the Sophist;
+the Politicus or Statesman is more ideal; the form and institutions of
+the State are more clearly drawn out in the Laws; as works of art, the
+Symposium and the Protagoras are of higher excellence. But no other
+Dialogue of Plato has the same largeness of view and the same
+perfection of style; no other shows an equal knowledge of the world, or
+contains more of those thoughts which are new as well as old, and not
+of one age only but of all. Nowhere in Plato is there a deeper irony or
+a greater wealth of humour or imagery, or more dramatic power. Nor in
+any other of his writings is the attempt made to interweave life and
+speculation, or to connect politics with philosophy. The Republic is
+the centre around which the other Dialogues may be grouped; here
+philosophy reaches the highest point (cp, especially in Books V, VI,
+VII) to which ancient thinkers ever attained. Plato among the Greeks,
+like Bacon among the moderns, was the first who conceived a method of
+knowledge, although neither of them always distinguished the bare
+outline or form from the substance of truth; and both of them had to be
+content with an abstraction of science which was not yet realized. He
+was the greatest metaphysical genius whom the world has seen; and in
+him, more than in any other ancient thinker, the germs of future
+knowledge are contained. The sciences of logic and psychology, which
+have supplied so many instruments of thought to after-ages, are based
+upon the analyses of Socrates and Plato. The principles of definition,
+the law of contradiction, the fallacy of arguing in a circle, the
+distinction between the essence and accidents of a thing or notion,
+between means and ends, between causes and conditions; also the
+division of the mind into the rational, concupiscent, and irascible
+elements, or of pleasures and desires into necessary and
+unnecessary—these and other great forms of thought are all of them to
+be found in the Republic, and were probably first invented by Plato.
+The greatest of all logical truths, and the one of which writers on
+philosophy are most apt to lose sight, the difference between words and
+things, has been most strenuously insisted on by him (cp. Rep.; Polit.;
+Cratyl. 435, 436 ff), although he has not always avoided the confusion
+of them in his own writings (e.g. Rep.). But he does not bind up truth
+in logical formulae,—logic is still veiled in metaphysics; and the
+science which he imagines to ‘contemplate all truth and all existence’
+is very unlike the doctrine of the syllogism which Aristotle claims to
+have discovered (Soph. Elenchi, 33. 18).
+
+Neither must we forget that the Republic is but the third part of a
+still larger design which was to have included an ideal history of
+Athens, as well as a political and physical philosophy. The fragment of
+the Critias has given birth to a world-famous fiction, second only in
+importance to the tale of Troy and the legend of Arthur; and is said as
+a fact to have inspired some of the early navigators of the sixteenth
+century. This mythical tale, of which the subject was a history of the
+wars of the Athenians against the Island of Atlantis, is supposed to be
+founded upon an unfinished poem of Solon, to which it would have stood
+in the same relation as the writings of the logographers to the poems
+of Homer. It would have told of a struggle for Liberty (cp. Tim. 25 C),
+intended to represent the conflict of Persia and Hellas. We may judge
+from the noble commencement of the Timaeus, from the fragment of the
+Critias itself, and from the third book of the Laws, in what manner
+Plato would have treated this high argument. We can only guess why the
+great design was abandoned; perhaps because Plato became sensible of
+some incongruity in a fictitious history, or because he had lost his
+interest in it, or because advancing years forbade the completion of
+it; and we may please ourselves with the fancy that had this imaginary
+narrative ever been finished, we should have found Plato himself
+sympathising with the struggle for Hellenic independence (cp. Laws,
+iii. 698 ff.), singing a hymn of triumph over Marathon and Salamis,
+perhaps making the reflection of Herodotus (v. 78) where he
+contemplates the growth of the Athenian empire—‘How brave a thing is
+freedom of speech, which has made the Athenians so far exceed every
+other state of Hellas in greatness!’ or, more probably, attributing the
+victory to the ancient good order of Athens and to the favor of Apollo
+and Athene (cp. Introd. to Critias).
+
+Again, Plato may be regarded as the ‘captain’ (‘arhchegoz’) or leader
+of a goodly band of followers; for in the Republic is to be found the
+original of Cicero’s De Republica, of St. Augustine’s City of God, of
+the Utopia of Sir Thomas More, and of the numerous other imaginary
+States which are framed upon the same model. The extent to which
+Aristotle or the Aristotelian school were indebted to him in the
+Politics has been little recognised, and the recognition is the more
+necessary because it is not made by Aristotle himself. The two
+philosophers had more in common than they were conscious of; and
+probably some elements of Plato remain still undetected in Aristotle.
+In English philosophy too, many affinities may be traced, not only in
+the works of the Cambridge Platonists, but in great original writers
+like Berkeley or Coleridge, to Plato and his ideas. That there is a
+truth higher than experience, of which the mind bears witness to
+herself, is a conviction which in our own generation has been
+enthusiastically asserted, and is perhaps gaining ground. Of the Greek
+authors who at the Renaissance brought a new life into the world Plato
+has had the greatest influence. The Republic of Plato is also the first
+treatise upon education, of which the writings of Milton and Locke,
+Rousseau, Jean Paul, and Goethe are the legitimate descendants. Like
+Dante or Bunyan, he has a revelation of another life; like Bacon, he is
+profoundly impressed with the unity of knowledge; in the early Church
+he exercised a real influence on theology, and at the Revival of
+Literature on politics. Even the fragments of his words when ‘repeated
+at second-hand’ (Symp. 215 D) have in all ages ravished the hearts of
+men, who have seen reflected in them their own higher nature. He is the
+father of idealism in philosophy, in politics, in literature. And many
+of the latest conceptions of modern thinkers and statesmen, such as the
+unity of knowledge, the reign of law, and the equality of the sexes,
+have been anticipated in a dream by him.
+
+The argument of the Republic is the search after Justice, the nature of
+which is first hinted at by Cephalus, the just and blameless old
+man—then discussed on the basis of proverbial morality by Socrates and
+Polemarchus—then caricatured by Thrasymachus and partially explained by
+Socrates—reduced to an abstraction by Glaucon and Adeimantus, and
+having become invisible in the individual reappears at length in the
+ideal State which is constructed by Socrates. The first care of the
+rulers is to be education, of which an outline is drawn after the old
+Hellenic model, providing only for an improved religion and morality,
+and more simplicity in music and gymnastic, a manlier strain of poetry,
+and greater harmony of the individual and the State. We are thus led on
+to the conception of a higher State, in which ‘no man calls anything
+his own,’ and in which there is neither ‘marrying nor giving in
+marriage,’ and ‘kings are philosophers’ and ‘philosophers are kings;’
+and there is another and higher education, intellectual as well as
+moral and religious, of science as well as of art, and not of youth
+only but of the whole of life. Such a State is hardly to be realized in
+this world and quickly degenerates. To the perfect ideal succeeds the
+government of the soldier and the lover of honour, this again declining
+into democracy, and democracy into tyranny, in an imaginary but regular
+order having not much resemblance to the actual facts. When ‘the wheel
+has come full circle’ we do not begin again with a new period of human
+life; but we have passed from the best to the worst, and there we end.
+The subject is then changed and the old quarrel of poetry and
+philosophy which had been more lightly treated in the earlier books of
+the Republic is now resumed and fought out to a conclusion. Poetry is
+discovered to be an imitation thrice removed from the truth, and Homer,
+as well as the dramatic poets, having been condemned as an imitator, is
+sent into banishment along with them. And the idea of the State is
+supplemented by the revelation of a future life.
+
+The division into books, like all similar divisions (Cp. Sir G.C. Lewis
+in the Classical Museum, vol. ii. p 1.), is probably later than the age
+of Plato. The natural divisions are five in number;—(1) Book I and the
+first half of Book II down to the paragraph beginning, ‘I had always
+admired the genius of Glaucon and Adeimantus,’ which is introductory;
+the first book containing a refutation of the popular and sophistical
+notions of justice, and concluding, like some of the earlier Dialogues,
+without arriving at any definite result. To this is appended a
+restatement of the nature of justice according to common opinion, and
+an answer is demanded to the question—What is justice, stripped of
+appearances? The second division (2) includes the remainder of the
+second and the whole of the third and fourth books, which are mainly
+occupied with the construction of the first State and the first
+education. The third division (3) consists of the fifth, sixth, and
+seventh books, in which philosophy rather than justice is the subject
+of enquiry, and the second State is constructed on principles of
+communism and ruled by philosophers, and the contemplation of the idea
+of good takes the place of the social and political virtues. In the
+eighth and ninth books (4) the perversions of States and of the
+individuals who correspond to them are reviewed in succession; and the
+nature of pleasure and the principle of tyranny are further analysed in
+the individual man. The tenth book (5) is the conclusion of the whole,
+in which the relations of philosophy to poetry are finally determined,
+and the happiness of the citizens in this life, which has now been
+assured, is crowned by the vision of another.
+
+Or a more general division into two parts may be adopted; the first
+(Books I - IV) containing the description of a State framed generally
+in accordance with Hellenic notions of religion and morality, while in
+the second (Books V - X) the Hellenic State is transformed into an
+ideal kingdom of philosophy, of which all other governments are the
+perversions. These two points of view are really opposed, and the
+opposition is only veiled by the genius of Plato. The Republic, like
+the Phaedrus (see Introduction to Phaedrus), is an imperfect whole; the
+higher light of philosophy breaks through the regularity of the
+Hellenic temple, which at last fades away into the heavens. Whether
+this imperfection of structure arises from an enlargement of the plan;
+or from the imperfect reconcilement in the writer’s own mind of the
+struggling elements of thought which are now first brought together by
+him; or, perhaps, from the composition of the work at different
+times—are questions, like the similar question about the Iliad and the
+Odyssey, which are worth asking, but which cannot have a distinct
+answer. In the age of Plato there was no regular mode of publication,
+and an author would have the less scruple in altering or adding to a
+work which was known only to a few of his friends. There is no
+absurdity in supposing that he may have laid his labours aside for a
+time, or turned from one work to another; and such interruptions would
+be more likely to occur in the case of a long than of a short writing.
+In all attempts to determine the chronological order of the Platonic
+writings on internal evidence, this uncertainty about any single
+Dialogue being composed at one time is a disturbing element, which must
+be admitted to affect longer works, such as the Republic and the Laws,
+more than shorter ones. But, on the other hand, the seeming
+discrepancies of the Republic may only arise out of the discordant
+elements which the philosopher has attempted to unite in a single
+whole, perhaps without being himself able to recognise the
+inconsistency which is obvious to us. For there is a judgment of after
+ages which few great writers have ever been able to anticipate for
+themselves. They do not perceive the want of connexion in their own
+writings, or the gaps in their systems which are visible enough to
+those who come after them. In the beginnings of literature and
+philosophy, amid the first efforts of thought and language, more
+inconsistencies occur than now, when the paths of speculation are well
+worn and the meaning of words precisely defined. For consistency, too,
+is the growth of time; and some of the greatest creations of the human
+mind have been wanting in unity. Tried by this test, several of the
+Platonic Dialogues, according to our modern ideas, appear to be
+defective, but the deficiency is no proof that they were composed at
+different times or by different hands. And the supposition that the
+Republic was written uninterruptedly and by a continuous effort is in
+some degree confirmed by the numerous references from one part of the
+work to another.
+
+The second title, ‘Concerning Justice,’ is not the one by which the
+Republic is quoted, either by Aristotle or generally in antiquity, and,
+like the other second titles of the Platonic Dialogues, may therefore
+be assumed to be of later date. Morgenstern and others have asked
+whether the definition of justice, which is the professed aim, or the
+construction of the State is the principal argument of the work. The
+answer is, that the two blend in one, and are two faces of the same
+truth; for justice is the order of the State, and the State is the
+visible embodiment of justice under the conditions of human society.
+The one is the soul and the other is the body, and the Greek ideal of
+the State, as of the individual, is a fair mind in a fair body. In
+Hegelian phraseology the state is the reality of which justice is the
+idea. Or, described in Christian language, the kingdom of God is
+within, and yet developes into a Church or external kingdom; ‘the house
+not made with hands, eternal in the heavens,’ is reduced to the
+proportions of an earthly building. Or, to use a Platonic image,
+justice and the State are the warp and the woof which run through the
+whole texture. And when the constitution of the State is completed, the
+conception of justice is not dismissed, but reappears under the same or
+different names throughout the work, both as the inner law of the
+individual soul, and finally as the principle of rewards and
+punishments in another life. The virtues are based on justice, of which
+common honesty in buying and selling is the shadow, and justice is
+based on the idea of good, which is the harmony of the world, and is
+reflected both in the institutions of states and in motions of the
+heavenly bodies (cp. Tim. 47). The Timaeus, which takes up the
+political rather than the ethical side of the Republic, and is chiefly
+occupied with hypotheses concerning the outward world, yet contains
+many indications that the same law is supposed to reign over the State,
+over nature, and over man.
+
+Too much, however, has been made of this question both in ancient and
+modern times. There is a stage of criticism in which all works, whether
+of nature or of art, are referred to design. Now in ancient writings,
+and indeed in literature generally, there remains often a large element
+which was not comprehended in the original design. For the plan grows
+under the author’s hand; new thoughts occur to him in the act of
+writing; he has not worked out the argument to the end before he
+begins. The reader who seeks to find some one idea under which the
+whole may be conceived, must necessarily seize on the vaguest and most
+general. Thus Stallbaum, who is dissatisfied with the ordinary
+explanations of the argument of the Republic, imagines himself to have
+found the true argument ‘in the representation of human life in a State
+perfected by justice, and governed according to the idea of good.’
+There may be some use in such general descriptions, but they can hardly
+be said to express the design of the writer. The truth is, that we may
+as well speak of many designs as of one; nor need anything be excluded
+from the plan of a great work to which the mind is naturally led by the
+association of ideas, and which does not interfere with the general
+purpose. What kind or degree of unity is to be sought after in a
+building, in the plastic arts, in poetry, in prose, is a problem which
+has to be determined relatively to the subject-matter. To Plato
+himself, the enquiry ‘what was the intention of the writer,’ or ‘what
+was the principal argument of the Republic’ would have been hardly
+intelligible, and therefore had better be at once dismissed (cp. the
+Introduction to the Phaedrus).
+
+Is not the Republic the vehicle of three or four great truths which, to
+Plato’s own mind, are most naturally represented in the form of the
+State? Just as in the Jewish prophets the reign of Messiah, or ‘the day
+of the Lord,’ or the suffering Servant or people of God, or the ‘Sun of
+righteousness with healing in his wings’ only convey, to us at least,
+their great spiritual ideals, so through the Greek State Plato reveals
+to us his own thoughts about divine perfection, which is the idea of
+good—like the sun in the visible world;—about human perfection, which
+is justice—about education beginning in youth and continuing in later
+years—about poets and sophists and tyrants who are the false teachers
+and evil rulers of mankind—about ‘the world’ which is the embodiment of
+them—about a kingdom which exists nowhere upon earth but is laid up in
+heaven to be the pattern and rule of human life. No such inspired
+creation is at unity with itself, any more than the clouds of heaven
+when the sun pierces through them. Every shade of light and dark, of
+truth, and of fiction which is the veil of truth, is allowable in a
+work of philosophical imagination. It is not all on the same plane; it
+easily passes from ideas to myths and fancies, from facts to figures of
+speech. It is not prose but poetry, at least a great part of it, and
+ought not to be judged by the rules of logic or the probabilities of
+history. The writer is not fashioning his ideas into an artistic whole;
+they take possession of him and are too much for him. We have no need
+therefore to discuss whether a State such as Plato has conceived is
+practicable or not, or whether the outward form or the inward life came
+first into the mind of the writer. For the practicability of his ideas
+has nothing to do with their truth; and the highest thoughts to which
+he attains may be truly said to bear the greatest ‘marks of
+design’—justice more than the external frame-work of the State, the
+idea of good more than justice. The great science of dialectic or the
+organisation of ideas has no real content; but is only a type of the
+method or spirit in which the higher knowledge is to be pursued by the
+spectator of all time and all existence. It is in the fifth, sixth, and
+seventh books that Plato reaches the ‘summit of speculation,’ and
+these, although they fail to satisfy the requirements of a modern
+thinker, may therefore be regarded as the most important, as they are
+also the most original, portions of the work.
+
+It is not necessary to discuss at length a minor question which has
+been raised by Boeckh, respecting the imaginary date at which the
+conversation was held (the year 411 B.C. which is proposed by him will
+do as well as any other); for a writer of fiction, and especially a
+writer who, like Plato, is notoriously careless of chronology (cp.
+Rep., Symp., 193 A, etc.), only aims at general probability. Whether
+all the persons mentioned in the Republic could ever have met at any
+one time is not a difficulty which would have occurred to an Athenian
+reading the work forty years later, or to Plato himself at the time of
+writing (any more than to Shakespeare respecting one of his own
+dramas); and need not greatly trouble us now. Yet this may be a
+question having no answer ‘which is still worth asking,’ because the
+investigation shows that we cannot argue historically from the dates in
+Plato; it would be useless therefore to waste time in inventing
+far-fetched reconcilements of them in order to avoid chronological
+difficulties, such, for example, as the conjecture of C.F. Hermann,
+that Glaucon and Adeimantus are not the brothers but the uncles of
+Plato (cp. Apol. 34 A), or the fancy of Stallbaum that Plato
+intentionally left anachronisms indicating the dates at which some of
+his Dialogues were written.
+
+The principal characters in the Republic are Cephalus, Polemarchus,
+Thrasymachus, Socrates, Glaucon, and Adeimantus. Cephalus appears in
+the introduction only, Polemarchus drops at the end of the first
+argument, and Thrasymachus is reduced to silence at the close of the
+first book. The main discussion is carried on by Socrates, Glaucon, and
+Adeimantus. Among the company are Lysias (the orator) and Euthydemus,
+the sons of Cephalus and brothers of Polemarchus, an unknown
+Charmantides—these are mute auditors; also there is Cleitophon, who
+once interrupts, where, as in the Dialogue which bears his name, he
+appears as the friend and ally of Thrasymachus.
+
+Cephalus, the patriarch of the house, has been appropriately engaged in
+offering a sacrifice. He is the pattern of an old man who has almost
+done with life, and is at peace with himself and with all mankind. He
+feels that he is drawing nearer to the world below, and seems to linger
+around the memory of the past. He is eager that Socrates should come to
+visit him, fond of the poetry of the last generation, happy in the
+consciousness of a well-spent life, glad at having escaped from the
+tyranny of youthful lusts. His love of conversation, his affection, his
+indifference to riches, even his garrulity, are interesting traits of
+character. He is not one of those who have nothing to say, because
+their whole mind has been absorbed in making money. Yet he acknowledges
+that riches have the advantage of placing men above the temptation to
+dishonesty or falsehood. The respectful attention shown to him by
+Socrates, whose love of conversation, no less than the mission imposed
+upon him by the Oracle, leads him to ask questions of all men, young
+and old alike, should also be noted. Who better suited to raise the
+question of justice than Cephalus, whose life might seem to be the
+expression of it? The moderation with which old age is pictured by
+Cephalus as a very tolerable portion of existence is characteristic,
+not only of him, but of Greek feeling generally, and contrasts with the
+exaggeration of Cicero in the De Senectute. The evening of life is
+described by Plato in the most expressive manner, yet with the fewest
+possible touches. As Cicero remarks (Ep. ad Attic. iv. 16), the aged
+Cephalus would have been out of place in the discussion which follows,
+and which he could neither have understood nor taken part in without a
+violation of dramatic propriety (cp. Lysimachus in the Laches).
+
+His ‘son and heir’ Polemarchus has the frankness and impetuousness of
+youth; he is for detaining Socrates by force in the opening scene, and
+will not ‘let him off’ on the subject of women and children. Like
+Cephalus, he is limited in his point of view, and represents the
+proverbial stage of morality which has rules of life rather than
+principles; and he quotes Simonides (cp. Aristoph. Clouds) as his
+father had quoted Pindar. But after this he has no more to say; the
+answers which he makes are only elicited from him by the dialectic of
+Socrates. He has not yet experienced the influence of the Sophists like
+Glaucon and Adeimantus, nor is he sensible of the necessity of refuting
+them; he belongs to the pre-Socratic or pre-dialectical age. He is
+incapable of arguing, and is bewildered by Socrates to such a degree
+that he does not know what he is saying. He is made to admit that
+justice is a thief, and that the virtues follow the analogy of the
+arts. From his brother Lysias (contra Eratosth.) we learn that he fell
+a victim to the Thirty Tyrants, but no allusion is here made to his
+fate, nor to the circumstance that Cephalus and his family were of
+Syracusan origin, and had migrated from Thurii to Athens.
+
+The ‘Chalcedonian giant,’ Thrasymachus, of whom we have already heard
+in the Phaedrus, is the personification of the Sophists, according to
+Plato’s conception of them, in some of their worst characteristics. He
+is vain and blustering, refusing to discourse unless he is paid, fond
+of making an oration, and hoping thereby to escape the inevitable
+Socrates; but a mere child in argument, and unable to foresee that the
+next ‘move’ (to use a Platonic expression) will ‘shut him up.’ He has
+reached the stage of framing general notions, and in this respect is in
+advance of Cephalus and Polemarchus. But he is incapable of defending
+them in a discussion, and vainly tries to cover his confusion with
+banter and insolence. Whether such doctrines as are attributed to him
+by Plato were really held either by him or by any other Sophist is
+uncertain; in the infancy of philosophy serious errors about morality
+might easily grow up—they are certainly put into the mouths of speakers
+in Thucydides; but we are concerned at present with Plato’s description
+of him, and not with the historical reality. The inequality of the
+contest adds greatly to the humour of the scene. The pompous and empty
+Sophist is utterly helpless in the hands of the great master of
+dialectic, who knows how to touch all the springs of vanity and
+weakness in him. He is greatly irritated by the irony of Socrates, but
+his noisy and imbecile rage only lays him more and more open to the
+thrusts of his assailant. His determination to cram down their throats,
+or put ‘bodily into their souls’ his own words, elicits a cry of horror
+from Socrates. The state of his temper is quite as worthy of remark as
+the process of the argument. Nothing is more amusing than his complete
+submission when he has been once thoroughly beaten. At first he seems
+to continue the discussion with reluctance, but soon with apparent
+good-will, and he even testifies his interest at a later stage by one
+or two occasional remarks. When attacked by Glaucon he is humorously
+protected by Socrates ‘as one who has never been his enemy and is now
+his friend.’ From Cicero and Quintilian and from Aristotle’s Rhetoric
+we learn that the Sophist whom Plato has made so ridiculous was a man
+of note whose writings were preserved in later ages. The play on his
+name which was made by his contemporary Herodicus (Aris. Rhet.), ‘thou
+wast ever bold in battle,’ seems to show that the description of him is
+not devoid of verisimilitude.
+
+When Thrasymachus has been silenced, the two principal respondents,
+Glaucon and Adeimantus, appear on the scene: here, as in Greek tragedy
+(cp. Introd. to Phaedo), three actors are introduced. At first sight
+the two sons of Ariston may seem to wear a family likeness, like the
+two friends Simmias and Cebes in the Phaedo. But on a nearer
+examination of them the similarity vanishes, and they are seen to be
+distinct characters. Glaucon is the impetuous youth who can ‘just never
+have enough of fechting’ (cp. the character of him in Xen. Mem. iii.
+6); the man of pleasure who is acquainted with the mysteries of love;
+the ‘juvenis qui gaudet canibus,’ and who improves the breed of
+animals; the lover of art and music who has all the experiences of
+youthful life. He is full of quickness and penetration, piercing easily
+below the clumsy platitudes of Thrasymachus to the real difficulty; he
+turns out to the light the seamy side of human life, and yet does not
+lose faith in the just and true. It is Glaucon who seizes what may be
+termed the ludicrous relation of the philosopher to the world, to whom
+a state of simplicity is ‘a city of pigs,’ who is always prepared with
+a jest when the argument offers him an opportunity, and who is ever
+ready to second the humour of Socrates and to appreciate the
+ridiculous, whether in the connoisseurs of music, or in the lovers of
+theatricals, or in the fantastic behaviour of the citizens of
+democracy. His weaknesses are several times alluded to by Socrates,
+who, however, will not allow him to be attacked by his brother
+Adeimantus. He is a soldier, and, like Adeimantus, has been
+distinguished at the battle of Megara (anno 456?)...The character of
+Adeimantus is deeper and graver, and the profounder objections are
+commonly put into his mouth. Glaucon is more demonstrative, and
+generally opens the game. Adeimantus pursues the argument further.
+Glaucon has more of the liveliness and quick sympathy of youth;
+Adeimantus has the maturer judgment of a grown-up man of the world. In
+the second book, when Glaucon insists that justice and injustice shall
+be considered without regard to their consequences, Adeimantus remarks
+that they are regarded by mankind in general only for the sake of their
+consequences; and in a similar vein of reflection he urges at the
+beginning of the fourth book that Socrates fails in making his citizens
+happy, and is answered that happiness is not the first but the second
+thing, not the direct aim but the indirect consequence of the good
+government of a State. In the discussion about religion and mythology,
+Adeimantus is the respondent, but Glaucon breaks in with a slight jest,
+and carries on the conversation in a lighter tone about music and
+gymnastic to the end of the book. It is Adeimantus again who volunteers
+the criticism of common sense on the Socratic method of argument, and
+who refuses to let Socrates pass lightly over the question of women and
+children. It is Adeimantus who is the respondent in the more
+argumentative, as Glaucon in the lighter and more imaginative portions
+of the Dialogue. For example, throughout the greater part of the sixth
+book, the causes of the corruption of philosophy and the conception of
+the idea of good are discussed with Adeimantus. Glaucon resumes his
+place of principal respondent; but he has a difficulty in apprehending
+the higher education of Socrates, and makes some false hits in the
+course of the discussion. Once more Adeimantus returns with the
+allusion to his brother Glaucon whom he compares to the contentious
+State; in the next book he is again superseded, and Glaucon continues
+to the end.
+
+Thus in a succession of characters Plato represents the successive
+stages of morality, beginning with the Athenian gentleman of the olden
+time, who is followed by the practical man of that day regulating his
+life by proverbs and saws; to him succeeds the wild generalization of
+the Sophists, and lastly come the young disciples of the great teacher,
+who know the sophistical arguments but will not be convinced by them,
+and desire to go deeper into the nature of things. These too, like
+Cephalus, Polemarchus, Thrasymachus, are clearly distinguished from one
+another. Neither in the Republic, nor in any other Dialogue of Plato,
+is a single character repeated.
+
+The delineation of Socrates in the Republic is not wholly consistent.
+In the first book we have more of the real Socrates, such as he is
+depicted in the Memorabilia of Xenophon, in the earliest Dialogues of
+Plato, and in the Apology. He is ironical, provoking, questioning, the
+old enemy of the Sophists, ready to put on the mask of Silenus as well
+as to argue seriously. But in the sixth book his enmity towards the
+Sophists abates; he acknowledges that they are the representatives
+rather than the corrupters of the world. He also becomes more dogmatic
+and constructive, passing beyond the range either of the political or
+the speculative ideas of the real Socrates. In one passage Plato
+himself seems to intimate that the time had now come for Socrates, who
+had passed his whole life in philosophy, to give his own opinion and
+not to be always repeating the notions of other men. There is no
+evidence that either the idea of good or the conception of a perfect
+state were comprehended in the Socratic teaching, though he certainly
+dwelt on the nature of the universal and of final causes (cp. Xen.
+Mem.; Phaedo); and a deep thinker like him, in his thirty or forty
+years of public teaching, could hardly have failed to touch on the
+nature of family relations, for which there is also some positive
+evidence in the Memorabilia (Mem.) The Socratic method is nominally
+retained; and every inference is either put into the mouth of the
+respondent or represented as the common discovery of him and Socrates.
+But any one can see that this is a mere form, of which the affectation
+grows wearisome as the work advances. The method of enquiry has passed
+into a method of teaching in which by the help of interlocutors the
+same thesis is looked at from various points of view. The nature of the
+process is truly characterized by Glaucon, when he describes himself as
+a companion who is not good for much in an investigation, but can see
+what he is shown, and may, perhaps, give the answer to a question more
+fluently than another.
+
+Neither can we be absolutely certain that Socrates himself taught the
+immortality of the soul, which is unknown to his disciple Glaucon in
+the Republic (cp. Apol.); nor is there any reason to suppose that he
+used myths or revelations of another world as a vehicle of instruction,
+or that he would have banished poetry or have denounced the Greek
+mythology. His favorite oath is retained, and a slight mention is made
+of the daemonium, or internal sign, which is alluded to by Socrates as
+a phenomenon peculiar to himself. A real element of Socratic teaching,
+which is more prominent in the Republic than in any of the other
+Dialogues of Plato, is the use of example and illustration τὰ φορτικὰ
+αὐτῷ προσφέροντες, ‘Let us apply the test of common instances.’ ‘You,’
+says Adeimantus, ironically, in the sixth book, ‘are so unaccustomed to
+speak in images.’ And this use of examples or images, though truly
+Socratic in origin, is enlarged by the genius of Plato into the form of
+an allegory or parable, which embodies in the concrete what has been
+already described, or is about to be described, in the abstract. Thus
+the figure of the cave in Book VII is a recapitulation of the divisions
+of knowledge in Book VI. The composite animal in Book IX is an allegory
+of the parts of the soul. The noble captain and the ship and the true
+pilot in Book VI are a figure of the relation of the people to the
+philosophers in the State which has been described. Other figures, such
+as the dog, or the marriage of the portionless maiden, or the drones
+and wasps in the eighth and ninth books, also form links of connexion
+in long passages, or are used to recall previous discussions.
+
+Plato is most true to the character of his master when he describes him
+as ‘not of this world.’ And with this representation of him the ideal
+state and the other paradoxes of the Republic are quite in accordance,
+though they cannot be shown to have been speculations of Socrates. To
+him, as to other great teachers both philosophical and religious, when
+they looked upward, the world seemed to be the embodiment of error and
+evil. The common sense of mankind has revolted against this view, or
+has only partially admitted it. And even in Socrates himself the
+sterner judgement of the multitude at times passes into a sort of
+ironical pity or love. Men in general are incapable of philosophy, and
+are therefore at enmity with the philosopher; but their
+misunderstanding of him is unavoidable: for they have never seen him as
+he truly is in his own image; they are only acquainted with artificial
+systems possessing no native force of truth—words which admit of many
+applications. Their leaders have nothing to measure with, and are
+therefore ignorant of their own stature. But they are to be pitied or
+laughed at, not to be quarrelled with; they mean well with their
+nostrums, if they could only learn that they are cutting off a Hydra’s
+head. This moderation towards those who are in error is one of the most
+characteristic features of Socrates in the Republic. In all the
+different representations of Socrates, whether of Xenophon or Plato,
+and amid the differences of the earlier or later Dialogues, he always
+retains the character of the unwearied and disinterested seeker after
+truth, without which he would have ceased to be Socrates.
+
+Leaving the characters we may now analyse the contents of the Republic,
+and then proceed to consider (1) The general aspects of this Hellenic
+ideal of the State, (2) The modern lights in which the thoughts of
+Plato may be read.
+
+BOOK I. The Republic opens with a truly Greek scene—a festival in
+honour of the goddess Bendis which is held in the Piraeus; to this is
+added the promise of an equestrian torch-race in the evening. The whole
+work is supposed to be recited by Socrates on the day after the
+festival to a small party, consisting of Critias, Timaeus, Hermocrates,
+and another; this we learn from the first words of the Timaeus.
+
+When the rhetorical advantage of reciting the Dialogue has been gained,
+the attention is not distracted by any reference to the audience; nor
+is the reader further reminded of the extraordinary length of the
+narrative. Of the numerous company, three only take any serious part in
+the discussion; nor are we informed whether in the evening they went to
+the torch-race, or talked, as in the Symposium, through the night. The
+manner in which the conversation has arisen is described as
+follows:—Socrates and his companion Glaucon are about to leave the
+festival when they are detained by a message from Polemarchus, who
+speedily appears accompanied by Adeimantus, the brother of Glaucon, and
+with playful violence compels them to remain, promising them not only
+the torch-race, but the pleasure of conversation with the young, which
+to Socrates is a far greater attraction. They return to the house of
+Cephalus, Polemarchus’ father, now in extreme old age, who is found
+sitting upon a cushioned seat crowned for a sacrifice. ‘You should come
+to me oftener, Socrates, for I am too old to go to you; and at my time
+of life, having lost other pleasures, I care the more for
+conversation.’ Socrates asks him what he thinks of age, to which the
+old man replies, that the sorrows and discontents of age are to be
+attributed to the tempers of men, and that age is a time of peace in
+which the tyranny of the passions is no longer felt. Yes, replies
+Socrates, but the world will say, Cephalus, that you are happy in old
+age because you are rich. ‘And there is something in what they say,
+Socrates, but not so much as they imagine—as Themistocles replied to
+the Seriphian, “Neither you, if you had been an Athenian, nor I, if I
+had been a Seriphian, would ever have been famous,” I might in like
+manner reply to you, Neither a good poor man can be happy in age, nor
+yet a bad rich man.’ Socrates remarks that Cephalus appears not to care
+about riches, a quality which he ascribes to his having inherited, not
+acquired them, and would like to know what he considers to be the chief
+advantage of them. Cephalus answers that when you are old the belief in
+the world below grows upon you, and then to have done justice and never
+to have been compelled to do injustice through poverty, and never to
+have deceived anyone, are felt to be unspeakable blessings. Socrates,
+who is evidently preparing for an argument, next asks, What is the
+meaning of the word justice? To tell the truth and pay your debts? No
+more than this? Or must we admit exceptions? Ought I, for example, to
+put back into the hands of my friend, who has gone mad, the sword which
+I borrowed of him when he was in his right mind? ‘There must be
+exceptions.’ ‘And yet,’ says Polemarchus, ‘the definition which has
+been given has the authority of Simonides.’ Here Cephalus retires to
+look after the sacrifices, and bequeaths, as Socrates facetiously
+remarks, the possession of the argument to his heir, Polemarchus...
+
+The description of old age is finished, and Plato, as his manner is,
+has touched the key-note of the whole work in asking for the definition
+of justice, first suggesting the question which Glaucon afterwards
+pursues respecting external goods, and preparing for the concluding
+mythus of the world below in the slight allusion of Cephalus. The
+portrait of the just man is a natural frontispiece or introduction to
+the long discourse which follows, and may perhaps imply that in all our
+perplexity about the nature of justice, there is no difficulty in
+discerning ‘who is a just man.’ The first explanation has been
+supported by a saying of Simonides; and now Socrates has a mind to show
+that the resolution of justice into two unconnected precepts, which
+have no common principle, fails to satisfy the demands of dialectic.
+
+...He proceeds: What did Simonides mean by this saying of his? Did he
+mean that I was to give back arms to a madman? ‘No, not in that case,
+not if the parties are friends, and evil would result. He meant that
+you were to do what was proper, good to friends and harm to enemies.’
+Every act does something to somebody; and following this analogy,
+Socrates asks, What is this due and proper thing which justice does,
+and to whom? He is answered that justice does good to friends and harm
+to enemies. But in what way good or harm? ‘In making alliances with the
+one, and going to war with the other.’ Then in time of peace what is
+the good of justice? The answer is that justice is of use in contracts,
+and contracts are money partnerships. Yes; but how in such partnerships
+is the just man of more use than any other man? ‘When you want to have
+money safely kept and not used.’ Then justice will be useful when money
+is useless. And there is another difficulty: justice, like the art of
+war or any other art, must be of opposites, good at attack as well as
+at defence, at stealing as well as at guarding. But then justice is a
+thief, though a hero notwithstanding, like Autolycus, the Homeric hero,
+who was ‘excellent above all men in theft and perjury’—to such a pass
+have you and Homer and Simonides brought us; though I do not forget
+that the thieving must be for the good of friends and the harm of
+enemies. And still there arises another question: Are friends to be
+interpreted as real or seeming; enemies as real or seeming? And are our
+friends to be only the good, and our enemies to be the evil? The answer
+is, that we must do good to our seeming and real good friends, and evil
+to our seeming and real evil enemies—good to the good, evil to the
+evil. But ought we to render evil for evil at all, when to do so will
+only make men more evil? Can justice produce injustice any more than
+the art of horsemanship can make bad horsemen, or heat produce cold?
+The final conclusion is, that no sage or poet ever said that the just
+return evil for evil; this was a maxim of some rich and mighty man,
+Periander, Perdiccas, or Ismenias the Theban (about B.C. 398-381)...
+
+Thus the first stage of aphoristic or unconscious morality is shown to
+be inadequate to the wants of the age; the authority of the poets is
+set aside, and through the winding mazes of dialectic we make an
+approach to the Christian precept of forgiveness of injuries. Similar
+words are applied by the Persian mystic poet to the Divine being when
+the questioning spirit is stirred within him:—‘If because I do evil,
+Thou punishest me by evil, what is the difference between Thee and me?’
+In this both Plato and Kheyam rise above the level of many Christian
+(?) theologians. The first definition of justice easily passes into the
+second; for the simple words ‘to speak the truth and pay your debts’ is
+substituted the more abstract ‘to do good to your friends and harm to
+your enemies.’ Either of these explanations gives a sufficient rule of
+life for plain men, but they both fall short of the precision of
+philosophy. We may note in passing the antiquity of casuistry, which
+not only arises out of the conflict of established principles in
+particular cases, but also out of the effort to attain them, and is
+prior as well as posterior to our fundamental notions of morality. The
+‘interrogation’ of moral ideas; the appeal to the authority of Homer;
+the conclusion that the maxim, ‘Do good to your friends and harm to
+your enemies,’ being erroneous, could not have been the word of any
+great man, are all of them very characteristic of the Platonic
+Socrates.
+
+...Here Thrasymachus, who has made several attempts to interrupt, but
+has hitherto been kept in order by the company, takes advantage of a
+pause and rushes into the arena, beginning, like a savage animal, with
+a roar. ‘Socrates,’ he says, ‘what folly is this?—Why do you agree to
+be vanquished by one another in a pretended argument?’ He then
+prohibits all the ordinary definitions of justice; to which Socrates
+replies that he cannot tell how many twelve is, if he is forbidden to
+say 2 x 6, or 3 x 4, or 6 x 2, or 4 x 3. At first Thrasymachus is
+reluctant to argue; but at length, with a promise of payment on the
+part of the company and of praise from Socrates, he is induced to open
+the game. ‘Listen,’ he says, ‘my answer is that might is right, justice
+the interest of the stronger: now praise me.’ Let me understand you
+first. Do you mean that because Polydamas the wrestler, who is stronger
+than we are, finds the eating of beef for his interest, the eating of
+beef is also for our interest, who are not so strong? Thrasymachus is
+indignant at the illustration, and in pompous words, apparently
+intended to restore dignity to the argument, he explains his meaning to
+be that the rulers make laws for their own interests. But suppose, says
+Socrates, that the ruler or stronger makes a mistake—then the interest
+of the stronger is not his interest. Thrasymachus is saved from this
+speedy downfall by his disciple Cleitophon, who introduces the word
+‘thinks;’—not the actual interest of the ruler, but what he thinks or
+what seems to be his interest, is justice. The contradiction is escaped
+by the unmeaning evasion: for though his real and apparent interests
+may differ, what the ruler thinks to be his interest will always remain
+what he thinks to be his interest.
+
+Of course this was not the original assertion, nor is the new
+interpretation accepted by Thrasymachus himself. But Socrates is not
+disposed to quarrel about words, if, as he significantly insinuates,
+his adversary has changed his mind. In what follows Thrasymachus does
+in fact withdraw his admission that the ruler may make a mistake, for
+he affirms that the ruler as a ruler is infallible. Socrates is quite
+ready to accept the new position, which he equally turns against
+Thrasymachus by the help of the analogy of the arts. Every art or
+science has an interest, but this interest is to be distinguished from
+the accidental interest of the artist, and is only concerned with the
+good of the things or persons which come under the art. And justice has
+an interest which is the interest not of the ruler or judge, but of
+those who come under his sway.
+
+Thrasymachus is on the brink of the inevitable conclusion, when he
+makes a bold diversion. ‘Tell me, Socrates,’ he says, ‘have you a
+nurse?’ What a question! Why do you ask? ‘Because, if you have, she
+neglects you and lets you go about drivelling, and has not even taught
+you to know the shepherd from the sheep. For you fancy that shepherds
+and rulers never think of their own interest, but only of their sheep
+or subjects, whereas the truth is that they fatten them for their use,
+sheep and subjects alike. And experience proves that in every relation
+of life the just man is the loser and the unjust the gainer, especially
+where injustice is on the grand scale, which is quite another thing
+from the petty rogueries of swindlers and burglars and robbers of
+temples. The language of men proves this—our ‘gracious’ and ‘blessed’
+tyrant and the like—all which tends to show (1) that justice is the
+interest of the stronger; and (2) that injustice is more profitable and
+also stronger than justice.’
+
+Thrasymachus, who is better at a speech than at a close argument,
+having deluged the company with words, has a mind to escape. But the
+others will not let him go, and Socrates adds a humble but earnest
+request that he will not desert them at such a crisis of their fate.
+‘And what can I do more for you?’ he says; ‘would you have me put the
+words bodily into your souls?’ God forbid! replies Socrates; but we
+want you to be consistent in the use of terms, and not to employ
+‘physician’ in an exact sense, and then again ‘shepherd’ or ‘ruler’ in
+an inexact,—if the words are strictly taken, the ruler and the shepherd
+look only to the good of their people or flocks and not to their own:
+whereas you insist that rulers are solely actuated by love of office.
+‘No doubt about it,’ replies Thrasymachus. Then why are they paid? Is
+not the reason, that their interest is not comprehended in their art,
+and is therefore the concern of another art, the art of pay, which is
+common to the arts in general, and therefore not identical with any one
+of them? Nor would any man be a ruler unless he were induced by the
+hope of reward or the fear of punishment;—the reward is money or
+honour, the punishment is the necessity of being ruled by a man worse
+than himself. And if a State (or Church) were composed entirely of good
+men, they would be affected by the last motive only; and there would be
+as much ‘nolo episcopari’ as there is at present of the opposite...
+
+The satire on existing governments is heightened by the simple and
+apparently incidental manner in which the last remark is introduced.
+There is a similar irony in the argument that the governors of mankind
+do not like being in office, and that therefore they demand pay.
+
+...Enough of this: the other assertion of Thrasymachus is far more
+important—that the unjust life is more gainful than the just. Now, as
+you and I, Glaucon, are not convinced by him, we must reply to him; but
+if we try to compare their respective gains we shall want a judge to
+decide for us; we had better therefore proceed by making mutual
+admissions of the truth to one another.
+
+Thrasymachus had asserted that perfect injustice was more gainful than
+perfect justice, and after a little hesitation he is induced by
+Socrates to admit the still greater paradox that injustice is virtue
+and justice vice. Socrates praises his frankness, and assumes the
+attitude of one whose only wish is to understand the meaning of his
+opponents. At the same time he is weaving a net in which Thrasymachus
+is finally enclosed. The admission is elicited from him that the just
+man seeks to gain an advantage over the unjust only, but not over the
+just, while the unjust would gain an advantage over either. Socrates,
+in order to test this statement, employs once more the favourite
+analogy of the arts. The musician, doctor, skilled artist of any sort,
+does not seek to gain more than the skilled, but only more than the
+unskilled (that is to say, he works up to a rule, standard, law, and
+does not exceed it), whereas the unskilled makes random efforts at
+excess. Thus the skilled falls on the side of the good, and the
+unskilled on the side of the evil, and the just is the skilled, and the
+unjust is the unskilled.
+
+There was great difficulty in bringing Thrasymachus to the point; the
+day was hot and he was streaming with perspiration, and for the first
+time in his life he was seen to blush. But his other thesis that
+injustice was stronger than justice has not yet been refuted, and
+Socrates now proceeds to the consideration of this, which, with the
+assistance of Thrasymachus, he hopes to clear up; the latter is at
+first churlish, but in the judicious hands of Socrates is soon restored
+to good-humour: Is there not honour among thieves? Is not the strength
+of injustice only a remnant of justice? Is not absolute injustice
+absolute weakness also? A house that is divided against itself cannot
+stand; two men who quarrel detract from one another’s strength, and he
+who is at war with himself is the enemy of himself and the gods. Not
+wickedness therefore, but semi-wickedness flourishes in states,—a
+remnant of good is needed in order to make union in action
+possible,—there is no kingdom of evil in this world.
+
+Another question has not been answered: Is the just or the unjust the
+happier? To this we reply, that every art has an end and an excellence
+or virtue by which the end is accomplished. And is not the end of the
+soul happiness, and justice the excellence of the soul by which
+happiness is attained? Justice and happiness being thus shown to be
+inseparable, the question whether the just or the unjust is the happier
+has disappeared.
+
+Thrasymachus replies: ‘Let this be your entertainment, Socrates, at the
+festival of Bendis.’ Yes; and a very good entertainment with which your
+kindness has supplied me, now that you have left off scolding. And yet
+not a good entertainment—but that was my own fault, for I tasted of too
+many things. First of all the nature of justice was the subject of our
+enquiry, and then whether justice is virtue and wisdom, or evil and
+folly; and then the comparative advantages of just and unjust: and the
+sum of all is that I know not what justice is; how then shall I know
+whether the just is happy or not?...
+
+Thus the sophistical fabric has been demolished, chiefly by appealing
+to the analogy of the arts. ‘Justice is like the arts (1) in having no
+external interest, and (2) in not aiming at excess, and (3) justice is
+to happiness what the implement of the workman is to his work.’ At this
+the modern reader is apt to stumble, because he forgets that Plato is
+writing in an age when the arts and the virtues, like the moral and
+intellectual faculties, were still undistinguished. Among early
+enquirers into the nature of human action the arts helped to fill up
+the void of speculation; and at first the comparison of the arts and
+the virtues was not perceived by them to be fallacious. They only saw
+the points of agreement in them and not the points of difference.
+Virtue, like art, must take means to an end; good manners are both an
+art and a virtue; character is naturally described under the image of a
+statue; and there are many other figures of speech which are readily
+transferred from art to morals. The next generation cleared up these
+perplexities; or at least supplied after ages with a further analysis
+of them. The contemporaries of Plato were in a state of transition, and
+had not yet fully realized the common-sense distinction of Aristotle,
+that ‘virtue is concerned with action, art with production’ (Nic.
+Eth.), or that ‘virtue implies intention and constancy of purpose,’
+whereas ‘art requires knowledge only’. And yet in the absurdities which
+follow from some uses of the analogy, there seems to be an intimation
+conveyed that virtue is more than art. This is implied in the reductio
+ad absurdum that ‘justice is a thief,’ and in the dissatisfaction which
+Socrates expresses at the final result.
+
+The expression ‘an art of pay’ which is described as ‘common to all the
+arts’ is not in accordance with the ordinary use of language. Nor is it
+employed elsewhere either by Plato or by any other Greek writer. It is
+suggested by the argument, and seems to extend the conception of art to
+doing as well as making. Another flaw or inaccuracy of language may be
+noted in the words ‘men who are injured are made more unjust.’ For
+those who are injured are not necessarily made worse, but only harmed
+or ill-treated.
+
+The second of the three arguments, ‘that the just does not aim at
+excess,’ has a real meaning, though wrapped up in an enigmatical form.
+That the good is of the nature of the finite is a peculiarly Hellenic
+sentiment, which may be compared with the language of those modern
+writers who speak of virtue as fitness, and of freedom as obedience to
+law. The mathematical or logical notion of limit easily passes into an
+ethical one, and even finds a mythological expression in the conception
+of envy (Greek). Ideas of measure, equality, order, unity, proportion,
+still linger in the writings of moralists; and the true spirit of the
+fine arts is better conveyed by such terms than by superlatives.
+
+‘When workmen strive to do better than well,
+They do confound their skill in covetousness.’ (King John. Act. iv. Sc.
+2.)
+
+
+The harmony of the soul and body, and of the parts of the soul with one
+another, a harmony ‘fairer than that of musical notes,’ is the true
+Hellenic mode of conceiving the perfection of human nature.
+
+In what may be called the epilogue of the discussion with Thrasymachus,
+Plato argues that evil is not a principle of strength, but of discord
+and dissolution, just touching the question which has been often
+treated in modern times by theologians and philosophers, of the
+negative nature of evil. In the last argument we trace the germ of the
+Aristotelian doctrine of an end and a virtue directed towards the end,
+which again is suggested by the arts. The final reconcilement of
+justice and happiness and the identity of the individual and the State
+are also intimated. Socrates reassumes the character of a
+‘know-nothing;’ at the same time he appears to be not wholly satisfied
+with the manner in which the argument has been conducted. Nothing is
+concluded; but the tendency of the dialectical process, here as always,
+is to enlarge our conception of ideas, and to widen their application
+to human life.
+
+BOOK II. Thrasymachus is pacified, but the intrepid Glaucon insists on
+continuing the argument. He is not satisfied with the indirect manner
+in which, at the end of the last book, Socrates had disposed of the
+question ‘Whether the just or the unjust is the happier.’ He begins by
+dividing goods into three classes:—first, goods desirable in
+themselves; secondly, goods desirable in themselves and for their
+results; thirdly, goods desirable for their results only. He then asks
+Socrates in which of the three classes he would place justice. In the
+second class, replies Socrates, among goods desirable for themselves
+and also for their results. ‘Then the world in general are of another
+mind, for they say that justice belongs to the troublesome class of
+goods which are desirable for their results only. Socrates answers that
+this is the doctrine of Thrasymachus which he rejects. Glaucon thinks
+that Thrasymachus was too ready to listen to the voice of the charmer,
+and proposes to consider the nature of justice and injustice in
+themselves and apart from the results and rewards of them which the
+world is always dinning in his ears. He will first of all speak of the
+nature and origin of justice; secondly, of the manner in which men view
+justice as a necessity and not a good; and thirdly, he will prove the
+reasonableness of this view.
+
+‘To do injustice is said to be a good; to suffer injustice an evil. As
+the evil is discovered by experience to be greater than the good, the
+sufferers, who cannot also be doers, make a compact that they will have
+neither, and this compact or mean is called justice, but is really the
+impossibility of doing injustice. No one would observe such a compact
+if he were not obliged. Let us suppose that the just and unjust have
+two rings, like that of Gyges in the well-known story, which make them
+invisible, and then no difference will appear in them, for every one
+will do evil if he can. And he who abstains will be regarded by the
+world as a fool for his pains. Men may praise him in public out of fear
+for themselves, but they will laugh at him in their hearts (Cp.
+Gorgias.)
+
+‘And now let us frame an ideal of the just and unjust. Imagine the
+unjust man to be master of his craft, seldom making mistakes and easily
+correcting them; having gifts of money, speech, strength—the greatest
+villain bearing the highest character: and at his side let us place the
+just in his nobleness and simplicity—being, not seeming—without name or
+reward—clothed in his justice only—the best of men who is thought to be
+the worst, and let him die as he has lived. I might add (but I would
+rather put the rest into the mouth of the panegyrists of injustice—they
+will tell you) that the just man will be scourged, racked, bound, will
+have his eyes put out, and will at last be crucified (literally
+impaled)—and all this because he ought to have preferred seeming to
+being. How different is the case of the unjust who clings to appearance
+as the true reality! His high character makes him a ruler; he can marry
+where he likes, trade where he likes, help his friends and hurt his
+enemies; having got rich by dishonesty he can worship the gods better,
+and will therefore be more loved by them than the just.’
+
+I was thinking what to answer, when Adeimantus joined in the already
+unequal fray. He considered that the most important point of all had
+been omitted:—‘Men are taught to be just for the sake of rewards;
+parents and guardians make reputation the incentive to virtue. And
+other advantages are promised by them of a more solid kind, such as
+wealthy marriages and high offices. There are the pictures in Homer and
+Hesiod of fat sheep and heavy fleeces, rich corn-fields and trees
+toppling with fruit, which the gods provide in this life for the just.
+And the Orphic poets add a similar picture of another. The heroes of
+Musaeus and Eumolpus lie on couches at a festival, with garlands on
+their heads, enjoying as the meed of virtue a paradise of immortal
+drunkenness. Some go further, and speak of a fair posterity in the
+third and fourth generation. But the wicked they bury in a slough and
+make them carry water in a sieve: and in this life they attribute to
+them the infamy which Glaucon was assuming to be the lot of the just
+who are supposed to be unjust.
+
+‘Take another kind of argument which is found both in poetry and
+prose:—“Virtue,” as Hesiod says, “is honourable but difficult, vice is
+easy and profitable.” You may often see the wicked in great prosperity
+and the righteous afflicted by the will of heaven. And mendicant
+prophets knock at rich men’s doors, promising to atone for the sins of
+themselves or their fathers in an easy fashion with sacrifices and
+festive games, or with charms and invocations to get rid of an enemy
+good or bad by divine help and at a small charge;—they appeal to books
+professing to be written by Musaeus and Orpheus, and carry away the
+minds of whole cities, and promise to “get souls out of purgatory;” and
+if we refuse to listen to them, no one knows what will happen to us.
+
+‘When a lively-minded ingenuous youth hears all this, what will be his
+conclusion? “Will he,” in the language of Pindar, “make justice his
+high tower, or fortify himself with crooked deceit?” Justice, he
+reflects, without the appearance of justice, is misery and ruin;
+injustice has the promise of a glorious life. Appearance is master of
+truth and lord of happiness. To appearance then I will turn,—I will put
+on the show of virtue and trail behind me the fox of Archilochus. I
+hear some one saying that “wickedness is not easily concealed,” to
+which I reply that “nothing great is easy.” Union and force and
+rhetoric will do much; and if men say that they cannot prevail over the
+gods, still how do we know that there are gods? Only from the poets,
+who acknowledge that they may be appeased by sacrifices. Then why not
+sin and pay for indulgences out of your sin? For if the righteous are
+only unpunished, still they have no further reward, while the wicked
+may be unpunished and have the pleasure of sinning too. But what of the
+world below? Nay, says the argument, there are atoning powers who will
+set that matter right, as the poets, who are the sons of the gods, tell
+us; and this is confirmed by the authority of the State.
+
+‘How can we resist such arguments in favour of injustice? Add good
+manners, and, as the wise tell us, we shall make the best of both
+worlds. Who that is not a miserable caitiff will refrain from smiling
+at the praises of justice? Even if a man knows the better part he will
+not be angry with others; for he knows also that more than human virtue
+is needed to save a man, and that he only praises justice who is
+incapable of injustice.
+
+‘The origin of the evil is that all men from the beginning, heroes,
+poets, instructors of youth, have always asserted “the temporal
+dispensation,” the honours and profits of justice. Had we been taught
+in early youth the power of justice and injustice inherent in the soul,
+and unseen by any human or divine eye, we should not have needed others
+to be our guardians, but every one would have been the guardian of
+himself. This is what I want you to show, Socrates;—other men use
+arguments which rather tend to strengthen the position of Thrasymachus
+that “might is right;” but from you I expect better things. And please,
+as Glaucon said, to exclude reputation; let the just be thought unjust
+and the unjust just, and do you still prove to us the superiority of
+justice’...
+
+The thesis, which for the sake of argument has been maintained by
+Glaucon, is the converse of that of Thrasymachus—not right is the
+interest of the stronger, but right is the necessity of the weaker.
+Starting from the same premises he carries the analysis of society a
+step further back;—might is still right, but the might is the weakness
+of the many combined against the strength of the few.
+
+There have been theories in modern as well as in ancient times which
+have a family likeness to the speculations of Glaucon; e.g. that power
+is the foundation of right; or that a monarch has a divine right to
+govern well or ill; or that virtue is self-love or the love of power;
+or that war is the natural state of man; or that private vices are
+public benefits. All such theories have a kind of plausibility from
+their partial agreement with experience. For human nature oscillates
+between good and evil, and the motives of actions and the origin of
+institutions may be explained to a certain extent on either hypothesis
+according to the character or point of view of a particular thinker.
+The obligation of maintaining authority under all circumstances and
+sometimes by rather questionable means is felt strongly and has become
+a sort of instinct among civilized men. The divine right of kings, or
+more generally of governments, is one of the forms under which this
+natural feeling is expressed. Nor again is there any evil which has not
+some accompaniment of good or pleasure; nor any good which is free from
+some alloy of evil; nor any noble or generous thought which may not be
+attended by a shadow or the ghost of a shadow of self-interest or of
+self-love. We know that all human actions are imperfect; but we do not
+therefore attribute them to the worse rather than to the better motive
+or principle. Such a philosophy is both foolish and false, like that
+opinion of the clever rogue who assumes all other men to be like
+himself. And theories of this sort do not represent the real nature of
+the State, which is based on a vague sense of right gradually corrected
+and enlarged by custom and law (although capable also of perversion),
+any more than they describe the origin of society, which is to be
+sought in the family and in the social and religious feelings of man.
+Nor do they represent the average character of individuals, which
+cannot be explained simply on a theory of evil, but has always a
+counteracting element of good. And as men become better such theories
+appear more and more untruthful to them, because they are more
+conscious of their own disinterestedness. A little experience may make
+a man a cynic; a great deal will bring him back to a truer and kindlier
+view of the mixed nature of himself and his fellow men.
+
+The two brothers ask Socrates to prove to them that the just is happy
+when they have taken from him all that in which happiness is ordinarily
+supposed to consist. Not that there is (1) any absurdity in the attempt
+to frame a notion of justice apart from circumstances. For the ideal
+must always be a paradox when compared with the ordinary conditions of
+human life. Neither the Stoical ideal nor the Christian ideal is true
+as a fact, but they may serve as a basis of education, and may exercise
+an ennobling influence. An ideal is none the worse because ‘some one
+has made the discovery’ that no such ideal was ever realized. And in a
+few exceptional individuals who are raised above the ordinary level of
+humanity, the ideal of happiness may be realized in death and misery.
+This may be the state which the reason deliberately approves, and which
+the utilitarian as well as every other moralist may be bound in certain
+cases to prefer.
+
+Nor again, (2) must we forget that Plato, though he agrees generally
+with the view implied in the argument of the two brothers, is not
+expressing his own final conclusion, but rather seeking to dramatize
+one of the aspects of ethical truth. He is developing his idea
+gradually in a series of positions or situations. He is exhibiting
+Socrates for the first time undergoing the Socratic interrogation.
+Lastly, (3) the word ‘happiness’ involves some degree of confusion
+because associated in the language of modern philosophy with conscious
+pleasure or satisfaction, which was not equally present to his mind.
+
+Glaucon has been drawing a picture of the misery of the just and the
+happiness of the unjust, to which the misery of the tyrant in Book IX
+is the answer and parallel. And still the unjust must appear just; that
+is ‘the homage which vice pays to virtue.’ But now Adeimantus, taking
+up the hint which had been already given by Glaucon, proceeds to show
+that in the opinion of mankind justice is regarded only for the sake of
+rewards and reputation, and points out the advantage which is given to
+such arguments as those of Thrasymachus and Glaucon by the conventional
+morality of mankind. He seems to feel the difficulty of ‘justifying the
+ways of God to man.’ Both the brothers touch upon the question, whether
+the morality of actions is determined by their consequences; and both
+of them go beyond the position of Socrates, that justice belongs to the
+class of goods not desirable for themselves only, but desirable for
+themselves and for their results, to which he recalls them. In their
+attempt to view justice as an internal principle, and in their
+condemnation of the poets, they anticipate him. The common life of
+Greece is not enough for them; they must penetrate deeper into the
+nature of things.
+
+It has been objected that justice is honesty in the sense of Glaucon
+and Adeimantus, but is taken by Socrates to mean all virtue. May we not
+more truly say that the old-fashioned notion of justice is enlarged by
+Socrates, and becomes equivalent to universal order or well-being,
+first in the State, and secondly in the individual? He has found a new
+answer to his old question (Protag.), ‘whether the virtues are one or
+many,’ viz. that one is the ordering principle of the three others. In
+seeking to establish the purely internal nature of justice, he is met
+by the fact that man is a social being, and he tries to harmonise the
+two opposite theses as well as he can. There is no more inconsistency
+in this than was inevitable in his age and country; there is no use in
+turning upon him the cross lights of modern philosophy, which, from
+some other point of view, would appear equally inconsistent. Plato does
+not give the final solution of philosophical questions for us; nor can
+he be judged of by our standard.
+
+The remainder of the Republic is developed out of the question of the
+sons of Ariston. Three points are deserving of remark in what
+immediately follows:—First, that the answer of Socrates is altogether
+indirect. He does not say that happiness consists in the contemplation
+of the idea of justice, and still less will he be tempted to affirm the
+Stoical paradox that the just man can be happy on the rack. But first
+he dwells on the difficulty of the problem and insists on restoring man
+to his natural condition, before he will answer the question at all. He
+too will frame an ideal, but his ideal comprehends not only abstract
+justice, but the whole relations of man. Under the fanciful
+illustration of the large letters he implies that he will only look for
+justice in society, and that from the State he will proceed to the
+individual. His answer in substance amounts to this,—that under
+favourable conditions, i.e. in the perfect State, justice and happiness
+will coincide, and that when justice has been once found, happiness may
+be left to take care of itself. That he falls into some degree of
+inconsistency, when in the tenth book he claims to have got rid of the
+rewards and honours of justice, may be admitted; for he has left those
+which exist in the perfect State. And the philosopher ‘who retires
+under the shelter of a wall’ can hardly have been esteemed happy by
+him, at least not in this world. Still he maintains the true attitude
+of moral action. Let a man do his duty first, without asking whether he
+will be happy or not, and happiness will be the inseparable accident
+which attends him. ‘Seek ye first the kingdom of God and his
+righteousness, and all these things shall be added unto you.’
+
+Secondly, it may be remarked that Plato preserves the genuine character
+of Greek thought in beginning with the State and in going on to the
+individual. First ethics, then politics—this is the order of ideas to
+us; the reverse is the order of history. Only after many struggles of
+thought does the individual assert his right as a moral being. In early
+ages he is not ONE, but one of many, the citizen of a State which is
+prior to him; and he has no notion of good or evil apart from the law
+of his country or the creed of his church. And to this type he is
+constantly tending to revert, whenever the influence of custom, or of
+party spirit, or the recollection of the past becomes too strong for
+him.
+
+Thirdly, we may observe the confusion or identification of the
+individual and the State, of ethics and politics, which pervades early
+Greek speculation, and even in modern times retains a certain degree of
+influence. The subtle difference between the collective and individual
+action of mankind seems to have escaped early thinkers, and we too are
+sometimes in danger of forgetting the conditions of united human
+action, whenever we either elevate politics into ethics, or lower
+ethics to the standard of politics. The good man and the good citizen
+only coincide in the perfect State; and this perfection cannot be
+attained by legislation acting upon them from without, but, if at all,
+by education fashioning them from within.
+
+...Socrates praises the sons of Ariston, ‘inspired offspring of the
+renowned hero,’ as the elegiac poet terms them; but he does not
+understand how they can argue so eloquently on behalf of injustice
+while their character shows that they are uninfluenced by their own
+arguments. He knows not how to answer them, although he is afraid of
+deserting justice in the hour of need. He therefore makes a condition,
+that having weak eyes he shall be allowed to read the large letters
+first and then go on to the smaller, that is, he must look for justice
+in the State first, and will then proceed to the individual.
+Accordingly he begins to construct the State.
+
+Society arises out of the wants of man. His first want is food; his
+second a house; his third a coat. The sense of these needs and the
+possibility of satisfying them by exchange, draw individuals together
+on the same spot; and this is the beginning of a State, which we take
+the liberty to invent, although necessity is the real inventor. There
+must be first a husbandman, secondly a builder, thirdly a weaver, to
+which may be added a cobbler. Four or five citizens at least are
+required to make a city. Now men have different natures, and one man
+will do one thing better than many; and business waits for no man.
+Hence there must be a division of labour into different employments;
+into wholesale and retail trade; into workers, and makers of workmen’s
+tools; into shepherds and husbandmen. A city which includes all this
+will have far exceeded the limit of four or five, and yet not be very
+large. But then again imports will be required, and imports necessitate
+exports, and this implies variety of produce in order to attract the
+taste of purchasers; also merchants and ships. In the city too we must
+have a market and money and retail trades; otherwise buyers and sellers
+will never meet, and the valuable time of the producers will be wasted
+in vain efforts at exchange. If we add hired servants the State will be
+complete. And we may guess that somewhere in the intercourse of the
+citizens with one another justice and injustice will appear.
+
+Here follows a rustic picture of their way of life. They spend their
+days in houses which they have built for themselves; they make their
+own clothes and produce their own corn and wine. Their principal food
+is meal and flour, and they drink in moderation. They live on the best
+of terms with each other, and take care not to have too many children.
+‘But,’ said Glaucon, interposing, ‘are they not to have a relish?’
+Certainly; they will have salt and olives and cheese, vegetables and
+fruits, and chestnuts to roast at the fire. ‘’Tis a city of pigs,
+Socrates.’ Why, I replied, what do you want more? ‘Only the comforts of
+life,—sofas and tables, also sauces and sweets.’ I see; you want not
+only a State, but a luxurious State; and possibly in the more complex
+frame we may sooner find justice and injustice. Then the fine arts must
+go to work—every conceivable instrument and ornament of luxury will be
+wanted. There will be dancers, painters, sculptors, musicians, cooks,
+barbers, tire-women, nurses, artists; swineherds and neatherds too for
+the animals, and physicians to cure the disorders of which luxury is
+the source. To feed all these superfluous mouths we shall need a part
+of our neighbour’s land, and they will want a part of ours. And this is
+the origin of war, which may be traced to the same causes as other
+political evils. Our city will now require the slight addition of a
+camp, and the citizen will be converted into a soldier. But then again
+our old doctrine of the division of labour must not be forgotten. The
+art of war cannot be learned in a day, and there must be a natural
+aptitude for military duties. There will be some warlike natures who
+have this aptitude—dogs keen of scent, swift of foot to pursue, and
+strong of limb to fight. And as spirit is the foundation of courage,
+such natures, whether of men or animals, will be full of spirit. But
+these spirited natures are apt to bite and devour one another; the
+union of gentleness to friends and fierceness against enemies appears
+to be an impossibility, and the guardian of a State requires both
+qualities. Who then can be a guardian? The image of the dog suggests an
+answer. For dogs are gentle to friends and fierce to strangers. Your
+dog is a philosopher who judges by the rule of knowing or not knowing;
+and philosophy, whether in man or beast, is the parent of gentleness.
+The human watchdogs must be philosophers or lovers of learning which
+will make them gentle. And how are they to be learned without
+education?
+
+But what shall their education be? Is any better than the old-fashioned
+sort which is comprehended under the name of music and gymnastic? Music
+includes literature, and literature is of two kinds, true and false.
+‘What do you mean?’ he said. I mean that children hear stories before
+they learn gymnastics, and that the stories are either untrue, or have
+at most one or two grains of truth in a bushel of falsehood. Now early
+life is very impressible, and children ought not to learn what they
+will have to unlearn when they grow up; we must therefore have a
+censorship of nursery tales, banishing some and keeping others. Some of
+them are very improper, as we may see in the great instances of Homer
+and Hesiod, who not only tell lies but bad lies; stories about Uranus
+and Saturn, which are immoral as well as false, and which should never
+be spoken of to young persons, or indeed at all; or, if at all, then in
+a mystery, after the sacrifice, not of an Eleusinian pig, but of some
+unprocurable animal. Shall our youth be encouraged to beat their
+fathers by the example of Zeus, or our citizens be incited to quarrel
+by hearing or seeing representations of strife among the gods? Shall
+they listen to the narrative of Hephaestus binding his mother, and of
+Zeus sending him flying for helping her when she was beaten? Such tales
+may possibly have a mystical interpretation, but the young are
+incapable of understanding allegory. If any one asks what tales are to
+be allowed, we will answer that we are legislators and not book-makers;
+we only lay down the principles according to which books are to be
+written; to write them is the duty of others.
+
+And our first principle is, that God must be represented as he is; not
+as the author of all things, but of good only. We will not suffer the
+poets to say that he is the steward of good and evil, or that he has
+two casks full of destinies;—or that Athene and Zeus incited Pandarus
+to break the treaty; or that God caused the sufferings of Niobe, or of
+Pelops, or the Trojan war; or that he makes men sin when he wishes to
+destroy them. Either these were not the actions of the gods, or God was
+just, and men were the better for being punished. But that the deed was
+evil, and God the author, is a wicked, suicidal fiction which we will
+allow no one, old or young, to utter. This is our first and great
+principle—God is the author of good only.
+
+And the second principle is like unto it:—With God is no variableness
+or change of form. Reason teaches us this; for if we suppose a change
+in God, he must be changed either by another or by himself. By
+another?—but the best works of nature and art and the noblest qualities
+of mind are least liable to be changed by any external force. By
+himself?—but he cannot change for the better; he will hardly change for
+the worse. He remains for ever fairest and best in his own image.
+Therefore we refuse to listen to the poets who tell us of Here begging
+in the likeness of a priestess or of other deities who prowl about at
+night in strange disguises; all that blasphemous nonsense with which
+mothers fool the manhood out of their children must be suppressed. But
+some one will say that God, who is himself unchangeable, may take a
+form in relation to us. Why should he? For gods as well as men hate the
+lie in the soul, or principle of falsehood; and as for any other form
+of lying which is used for a purpose and is regarded as innocent in
+certain exceptional cases—what need have the gods of this? For they are
+not ignorant of antiquity like the poets, nor are they afraid of their
+enemies, nor is any madman a friend of theirs. God then is true, he is
+absolutely true; he changes not, he deceives not, by day or night, by
+word or sign. This is our second great principle—God is true. Away with
+the lying dream of Agamemnon in Homer, and the accusation of Thetis
+against Apollo in Aeschylus...
+
+In order to give clearness to his conception of the State, Plato
+proceeds to trace the first principles of mutual need and of division
+of labour in an imaginary community of four or five citizens. Gradually
+this community increases; the division of labour extends to countries;
+imports necessitate exports; a medium of exchange is required, and
+retailers sit in the market-place to save the time of the producers.
+These are the steps by which Plato constructs the first or primitive
+State, introducing the elements of political economy by the way. As he
+is going to frame a second or civilized State, the simple naturally
+comes before the complex. He indulges, like Rousseau, in a picture of
+primitive life—an idea which has indeed often had a powerful influence
+on the imagination of mankind, but he does not seriously mean to say
+that one is better than the other (Politicus); nor can any inference be
+drawn from the description of the first state taken apart from the
+second, such as Aristotle appears to draw in the Politics. We should
+not interpret a Platonic dialogue any more than a poem or a parable in
+too literal or matter-of-fact a style. On the other hand, when we
+compare the lively fancy of Plato with the dried-up abstractions of
+modern treatises on philosophy, we are compelled to say with
+Protagoras, that the ‘mythus is more interesting’ (Protag.)
+
+Several interesting remarks which in modern times would have a place in
+a treatise on Political Economy are scattered up and down the writings
+of Plato: especially Laws, Population; Free Trade; Adulteration; Wills
+and Bequests; Begging; Eryxias, (though not Plato’s), Value and Demand;
+Republic, Division of Labour. The last subject, and also the origin of
+Retail Trade, is treated with admirable lucidity in the second book of
+the Republic. But Plato never combined his economic ideas into a
+system, and never seems to have recognized that Trade is one of the
+great motive powers of the State and of the world. He would make retail
+traders only of the inferior sort of citizens (Rep., Laws), though he
+remarks, quaintly enough (Laws), that ‘if only the best men and the
+best women everywhere were compelled to keep taverns for a time or to
+carry on retail trade, etc., then we should knew how pleasant and
+agreeable all these things are.’
+
+The disappointment of Glaucon at the ‘city of pigs,’ the ludicrous
+description of the ministers of luxury in the more refined State, and
+the afterthought of the necessity of doctors, the illustration of the
+nature of the guardian taken from the dog, the desirableness of
+offering some almost unprocurable victim when impure mysteries are to
+be celebrated, the behaviour of Zeus to his father and of Hephaestus to
+his mother, are touches of humour which have also a serious meaning. In
+speaking of education Plato rather startles us by affirming that a
+child must be trained in falsehood first and in truth afterwards. Yet
+this is not very different from saying that children must be taught
+through the medium of imagination as well as reason; that their minds
+can only develope gradually, and that there is much which they must
+learn without understanding. This is also the substance of Plato’s
+view, though he must be acknowledged to have drawn the line somewhat
+differently from modern ethical writers, respecting truth and
+falsehood. To us, economies or accommodations would not be allowable
+unless they were required by the human faculties or necessary for the
+communication of knowledge to the simple and ignorant. We should insist
+that the word was inseparable from the intention, and that we must not
+be ‘falsely true,’ i.e. speak or act falsely in support of what was
+right or true. But Plato would limit the use of fictions only by
+requiring that they should have a good moral effect, and that such a
+dangerous weapon as falsehood should be employed by the rulers alone
+and for great objects.
+
+A Greek in the age of Plato attached no importance to the question
+whether his religion was an historical fact. He was just beginning to
+be conscious that the past had a history; but he could see nothing
+beyond Homer and Hesiod. Whether their narratives were true or false
+did not seriously affect the political or social life of Hellas. Men
+only began to suspect that they were fictions when they recognised them
+to be immoral. And so in all religions: the consideration of their
+morality comes first, afterwards the truth of the documents in which
+they are recorded, or of the events natural or supernatural which are
+told of them. But in modern times, and in Protestant countries perhaps
+more than in Catholic, we have been too much inclined to identify the
+historical with the moral; and some have refused to believe in religion
+at all, unless a superhuman accuracy was discernible in every part of
+the record. The facts of an ancient or religious history are amongst
+the most important of all facts; but they are frequently uncertain, and
+we only learn the true lesson which is to be gathered from them when we
+place ourselves above them. These reflections tend to show that the
+difference between Plato and ourselves, though not unimportant, is not
+so great as might at first sight appear. For we should agree with him
+in placing the moral before the historical truth of religion; and,
+generally, in disregarding those errors or misstatements of fact which
+necessarily occur in the early stages of all religions. We know also
+that changes in the traditions of a country cannot be made in a day;
+and are therefore tolerant of many things which science and criticism
+would condemn.
+
+We note in passing that the allegorical interpretation of mythology,
+said to have been first introduced as early as the sixth century before
+Christ by Theagenes of Rhegium, was well established in the age of
+Plato, and here, as in the Phaedrus, though for a different reason, was
+rejected by him. That anachronisms whether of religion or law, when men
+have reached another stage of civilization, should be got rid of by
+fictions is in accordance with universal experience. Great is the art
+of interpretation; and by a natural process, which when once discovered
+was always going on, what could not be altered was explained away. And
+so without any palpable inconsistency there existed side by side two
+forms of religion, the tradition inherited or invented by the poets and
+the customary worship of the temple; on the other hand, there was the
+religion of the philosopher, who was dwelling in the heaven of ideas,
+but did not therefore refuse to offer a cock to Aesculapius, or to be
+seen saying his prayers at the rising of the sun. At length the
+antagonism between the popular and philosophical religion, never so
+great among the Greeks as in our own age, disappeared, and was only
+felt like the difference between the religion of the educated and
+uneducated among ourselves. The Zeus of Homer and Hesiod easily passed
+into the ‘royal mind’ of Plato (Philebus); the giant Heracles became
+the knight-errant and benefactor of mankind. These and still more
+wonderful transformations were readily effected by the ingenuity of
+Stoics and neo-Platonists in the two or three centuries before and
+after Christ. The Greek and Roman religions were gradually permeated by
+the spirit of philosophy; having lost their ancient meaning, they were
+resolved into poetry and morality; and probably were never purer than
+at the time of their decay, when their influence over the world was
+waning.
+
+A singular conception which occurs towards the end of the book is the
+lie in the soul; this is connected with the Platonic and Socratic
+doctrine that involuntary ignorance is worse than voluntary. The lie in
+the soul is a true lie, the corruption of the highest truth, the
+deception of the highest part of the soul, from which he who is
+deceived has no power of delivering himself. For example, to represent
+God as false or immoral, or, according to Plato, as deluding men with
+appearances or as the author of evil; or again, to affirm with
+Protagoras that ‘knowledge is sensation,’ or that ‘being is becoming,’
+or with Thrasymachus ‘that might is right,’ would have been regarded by
+Plato as a lie of this hateful sort. The greatest unconsciousness of
+the greatest untruth, e.g. if, in the language of the Gospels (John),
+‘he who was blind’ were to say ‘I see,’ is another aspect of the state
+of mind which Plato is describing. The lie in the soul may be further
+compared with the sin against the Holy Ghost (Luke), allowing for the
+difference between Greek and Christian modes of speaking. To this is
+opposed the lie in words, which is only such a deception as may occur
+in a play or poem, or allegory or figure of speech, or in any sort of
+accommodation,—which though useless to the gods may be useful to men in
+certain cases. Socrates is here answering the question which he had
+himself raised about the propriety of deceiving a madman; and he is
+also contrasting the nature of God and man. For God is Truth, but
+mankind can only be true by appearing sometimes to be partial, or
+false. Reserving for another place the greater questions of religion or
+education, we may note further, (1) the approval of the old traditional
+education of Greece; (2) the preparation which Plato is making for the
+attack on Homer and the poets; (3) the preparation which he is also
+making for the use of economies in the State; (4) the contemptuous and
+at the same time euphemistic manner in which here as below he alludes
+to the ‘Chronique Scandaleuse’ of the gods.
+
+BOOK III. There is another motive in purifying religion, which is to
+banish fear; for no man can be courageous who is afraid of death, or
+who believes the tales which are repeated by the poets concerning the
+world below. They must be gently requested not to abuse hell; they may
+be reminded that their stories are both untrue and discouraging. Nor
+must they be angry if we expunge obnoxious passages, such as the
+depressing words of Achilles—‘I would rather be a serving-man than rule
+over all the dead;’ and the verses which tell of the squalid mansions,
+the senseless shadows, the flitting soul mourning over lost strength
+and youth, the soul with a gibber going beneath the earth like smoke,
+or the souls of the suitors which flutter about like bats. The terrors
+and horrors of Cocytus and Styx, ghosts and sapless shades, and the
+rest of their Tartarean nomenclature, must vanish. Such tales may have
+their use; but they are not the proper food for soldiers. As little can
+we admit the sorrows and sympathies of the Homeric heroes:—Achilles,
+the son of Thetis, in tears, throwing ashes on his head, or pacing up
+and down the sea-shore in distraction; or Priam, the cousin of the
+gods, crying aloud, rolling in the mire. A good man is not prostrated
+at the loss of children or fortune. Neither is death terrible to him;
+and therefore lamentations over the dead should not be practised by men
+of note; they should be the concern of inferior persons only, whether
+women or men. Still worse is the attribution of such weakness to the
+gods; as when the goddesses say, ‘Alas! my travail!’ and worst of all,
+when the king of heaven himself laments his inability to save Hector,
+or sorrows over the impending doom of his dear Sarpedon. Such a
+character of God, if not ridiculed by our young men, is likely to be
+imitated by them. Nor should our citizens be given to excess of
+laughter—‘Such violent delights’ are followed by a violent re-action.
+The description in the Iliad of the gods shaking their sides at the
+clumsiness of Hephaestus will not be admitted by us. ‘Certainly not.’
+
+Truth should have a high place among the virtues, for falsehood, as we
+were saying, is useless to the gods, and only useful to men as a
+medicine. But this employment of falsehood must remain a privilege of
+state; the common man must not in return tell a lie to the ruler; any
+more than the patient would tell a lie to his physician, or the sailor
+to his captain.
+
+In the next place our youth must be temperate, and temperance consists
+in self-control and obedience to authority. That is a lesson which
+Homer teaches in some places: ‘The Achaeans marched on breathing
+prowess, in silent awe of their leaders;’—but a very different one in
+other places: ‘O heavy with wine, who hast the eyes of a dog, but the
+heart of a stag.’ Language of the latter kind will not impress
+self-control on the minds of youth. The same may be said about his
+praises of eating and drinking and his dread of starvation; also about
+the verses in which he tells of the rapturous loves of Zeus and Here,
+or of how Hephaestus once detained Ares and Aphrodite in a net on a
+similar occasion. There is a nobler strain heard in the words:—‘Endure,
+my soul, thou hast endured worse.’ Nor must we allow our citizens to
+receive bribes, or to say, ‘Gifts persuade the gods, gifts reverend
+kings;’ or to applaud the ignoble advice of Phoenix to Achilles that he
+should get money out of the Greeks before he assisted them; or the
+meanness of Achilles himself in taking gifts from Agamemnon; or his
+requiring a ransom for the body of Hector; or his cursing of Apollo; or
+his insolence to the river-god Scamander; or his dedication to the dead
+Patroclus of his own hair which had been already dedicated to the other
+river-god Spercheius; or his cruelty in dragging the body of Hector
+round the walls, and slaying the captives at the pyre: such a
+combination of meanness and cruelty in Cheiron’s pupil is
+inconceivable. The amatory exploits of Peirithous and Theseus are
+equally unworthy. Either these so-called sons of gods were not the sons
+of gods, or they were not such as the poets imagine them, any more than
+the gods themselves are the authors of evil. The youth who believes
+that such things are done by those who have the blood of heaven flowing
+in their veins will be too ready to imitate their example.
+
+Enough of gods and heroes;—what shall we say about men? What the poets
+and story-tellers say—that the wicked prosper and the righteous are
+afflicted, or that justice is another’s gain? Such misrepresentations
+cannot be allowed by us. But in this we are anticipating the definition
+of justice, and had therefore better defer the enquiry.
+
+The subjects of poetry have been sufficiently treated; next follows
+style. Now all poetry is a narrative of events past, present, or to
+come; and narrative is of three kinds, the simple, the imitative, and a
+composition of the two. An instance will make my meaning clear. The
+first scene in Homer is of the last or mixed kind, being partly
+description and partly dialogue. But if you throw the dialogue into the
+‘oratio obliqua,’ the passage will run thus: The priest came and prayed
+Apollo that the Achaeans might take Troy and have a safe return if
+Agamemnon would only give him back his daughter; and the other Greeks
+assented, but Agamemnon was wroth, and so on—The whole then becomes
+descriptive, and the poet is the only speaker left; or, if you omit the
+narrative, the whole becomes dialogue. These are the three styles—which
+of them is to be admitted into our State? ‘Do you ask whether tragedy
+and comedy are to be admitted?’ Yes, but also something more—Is it not
+doubtful whether our guardians are to be imitators at all? Or rather,
+has not the question been already answered, for we have decided that
+one man cannot in his life play many parts, any more than he can act
+both tragedy and comedy, or be rhapsodist and actor at once? Human
+nature is coined into very small pieces, and as our guardians have
+their own business already, which is the care of freedom, they will
+have enough to do without imitating. If they imitate they should
+imitate, not any meanness or baseness, but the good only; for the mask
+which the actor wears is apt to become his face. We cannot allow men to
+play the parts of women, quarrelling, weeping, scolding, or boasting
+against the gods,—least of all when making love or in labour. They must
+not represent slaves, or bullies, or cowards, drunkards, or madmen, or
+blacksmiths, or neighing horses, or bellowing bulls, or sounding
+rivers, or a raging sea. A good or wise man will be willing to perform
+good and wise actions, but he will be ashamed to play an inferior part
+which he has never practised; and he will prefer to employ the
+descriptive style with as little imitation as possible. The man who has
+no self-respect, on the contrary, will imitate anybody and anything;
+sounds of nature and cries of animals alike; his whole performance will
+be imitation of gesture and voice. Now in the descriptive style there
+are few changes, but in the dramatic there are a great many. Poets and
+musicians use either, or a compound of both, and this compound is very
+attractive to youth and their teachers as well as to the vulgar. But
+our State in which one man plays one part only is not adapted for
+complexity. And when one of these polyphonous pantomimic gentlemen
+offers to exhibit himself and his poetry we will show him every
+observance of respect, but at the same time tell him that there is no
+room for his kind in our State; we prefer the rough, honest poet, and
+will not depart from our original models (Laws).
+
+Next as to the music. A song or ode has three parts,—the subject, the
+harmony, and the rhythm; of which the two last are dependent upon the
+first. As we banished strains of lamentation, so we may now banish the
+mixed Lydian harmonies, which are the harmonies of lamentation; and as
+our citizens are to be temperate, we may also banish convivial
+harmonies, such as the Ionian and pure Lydian. Two remain—the Dorian
+and Phrygian, the first for war, the second for peace; the one
+expressive of courage, the other of obedience or instruction or
+religious feeling. And as we reject varieties of harmony, we shall also
+reject the many-stringed, variously-shaped instruments which give
+utterance to them, and in particular the flute, which is more complex
+than any of them. The lyre and the harp may be permitted in the town,
+and the Pan’s-pipe in the fields. Thus we have made a purgation of
+music, and will now make a purgation of metres. These should be like
+the harmonies, simple and suitable to the occasion. There are four
+notes of the tetrachord, and there are three ratios of metre, 3/2, 2/2,
+2/1, which have all their characteristics, and the feet have different
+characteristics as well as the rhythms. But about this you and I must
+ask Damon, the great musician, who speaks, if I remember rightly, of a
+martial measure as well as of dactylic, trochaic, and iambic rhythms,
+which he arranges so as to equalize the syllables with one another,
+assigning to each the proper quantity. We only venture to affirm the
+general principle that the style is to conform to the subject and the
+metre to the style; and that the simplicity and harmony of the soul
+should be reflected in them all. This principle of simplicity has to be
+learnt by every one in the days of his youth, and may be gathered
+anywhere, from the creative and constructive arts, as well as from the
+forms of plants and animals.
+
+Other artists as well as poets should be warned against meanness or
+unseemliness. Sculpture and painting equally with music must conform to
+the law of simplicity. He who violates it cannot be allowed to work in
+our city, and to corrupt the taste of our citizens. For our guardians
+must grow up, not amid images of deformity which will gradually poison
+and corrupt their souls, but in a land of health and beauty where they
+will drink in from every object sweet and harmonious influences. And of
+all these influences the greatest is the education given by music,
+which finds a way into the innermost soul and imparts to it the sense
+of beauty and of deformity. At first the effect is unconscious; but
+when reason arrives, then he who has been thus trained welcomes her as
+the friend whom he always knew. As in learning to read, first we
+acquire the elements or letters separately, and afterwards their
+combinations, and cannot recognize reflections of them until we know
+the letters themselves;—in like manner we must first attain the
+elements or essential forms of the virtues, and then trace their
+combinations in life and experience. There is a music of the soul which
+answers to the harmony of the world; and the fairest object of a
+musical soul is the fair mind in the fair body. Some defect in the
+latter may be excused, but not in the former. True love is the daughter
+of temperance, and temperance is utterly opposed to the madness of
+bodily pleasure. Enough has been said of music, which makes a fair
+ending with love.
+
+Next we pass on to gymnastics; about which I would remark, that the
+soul is related to the body as a cause to an effect, and therefore if
+we educate the mind we may leave the education of the body in her
+charge, and need only give a general outline of the course to be
+pursued. In the first place the guardians must abstain from strong
+drink, for they should be the last persons to lose their wits. Whether
+the habits of the palaestra are suitable to them is more doubtful, for
+the ordinary gymnastic is a sleepy sort of thing, and if left off
+suddenly is apt to endanger health. But our warrior athletes must be
+wide-awake dogs, and must also be inured to all changes of food and
+climate. Hence they will require a simpler kind of gymnastic, akin to
+their simple music; and for their diet a rule may be found in Homer,
+who feeds his heroes on roast meat only, and gives them no fish
+although they are living at the sea-side, nor boiled meats which
+involve an apparatus of pots and pans; and, if I am not mistaken, he
+nowhere mentions sweet sauces. Sicilian cookery and Attic confections
+and Corinthian courtezans, which are to gymnastic what Lydian and
+Ionian melodies are to music, must be forbidden. Where gluttony and
+intemperance prevail the town quickly fills with doctors and pleaders;
+and law and medicine give themselves airs as soon as the freemen of a
+State take an interest in them. But what can show a more disgraceful
+state of education than to have to go abroad for justice because you
+have none of your own at home? And yet there IS a worse stage of the
+same disease—when men have learned to take a pleasure and pride in the
+twists and turns of the law; not considering how much better it would
+be for them so to order their lives as to have no need of a nodding
+justice. And there is a like disgrace in employing a physician, not for
+the cure of wounds or epidemic disorders, but because a man has by
+laziness and luxury contracted diseases which were unknown in the days
+of Asclepius. How simple is the Homeric practice of medicine. Eurypylus
+after he has been wounded drinks a posset of Pramnian wine, which is of
+a heating nature; and yet the sons of Asclepius blame neither the
+damsel who gives him the drink, nor Patroclus who is attending on him.
+The truth is that this modern system of nursing diseases was introduced
+by Herodicus the trainer; who, being of a sickly constitution, by a
+compound of training and medicine tortured first himself and then a
+good many other people, and lived a great deal longer than he had any
+right. But Asclepius would not practise this art, because he knew that
+the citizens of a well-ordered State have no leisure to be ill, and
+therefore he adopted the ‘kill or cure’ method, which artisans and
+labourers employ. ‘They must be at their business,’ they say, ‘and have
+no time for coddling: if they recover, well; if they don’t, there is an
+end of them.’ Whereas the rich man is supposed to be a gentleman who
+can afford to be ill. Do you know a maxim of Phocylides—that ‘when a
+man begins to be rich’ (or, perhaps, a little sooner) ‘he should
+practise virtue’? But how can excessive care of health be inconsistent
+with an ordinary occupation, and yet consistent with that practice of
+virtue which Phocylides inculcates? When a student imagines that
+philosophy gives him a headache, he never does anything; he is always
+unwell. This was the reason why Asclepius and his sons practised no
+such art. They were acting in the interest of the public, and did not
+wish to preserve useless lives, or raise up a puny offspring to
+wretched sires. Honest diseases they honestly cured; and if a man was
+wounded, they applied the proper remedies, and then let him eat and
+drink what he liked. But they declined to treat intemperate and
+worthless subjects, even though they might have made large fortunes out
+of them. As to the story of Pindar, that Asclepius was slain by a
+thunderbolt for restoring a rich man to life, that is a lie—following
+our old rule we must say either that he did not take bribes, or that he
+was not the son of a god.
+
+Glaucon then asks Socrates whether the best physicians and the best
+judges will not be those who have had severally the greatest experience
+of diseases and of crimes. Socrates draws a distinction between the two
+professions. The physician should have had experience of disease in his
+own body, for he cures with his mind and not with his body. But the
+judge controls mind by mind; and therefore his mind should not be
+corrupted by crime. Where then is he to gain experience? How is he to
+be wise and also innocent? When young a good man is apt to be deceived
+by evil-doers, because he has no pattern of evil in himself; and
+therefore the judge should be of a certain age; his youth should have
+been innocent, and he should have acquired insight into evil not by the
+practice of it, but by the observation of it in others. This is the
+ideal of a judge; the criminal turned detective is wonderfully
+suspicious, but when in company with good men who have experience, he
+is at fault, for he foolishly imagines that every one is as bad as
+himself. Vice may be known of virtue, but cannot know virtue. This is
+the sort of medicine and this the sort of law which will prevail in our
+State; they will be healing arts to better natures; but the evil body
+will be left to die by the one, and the evil soul will be put to death
+by the other. And the need of either will be greatly diminished by good
+music which will give harmony to the soul, and good gymnastic which
+will give health to the body. Not that this division of music and
+gymnastic really corresponds to soul and body; for they are both
+equally concerned with the soul, which is tamed by the one and aroused
+and sustained by the other. The two together supply our guardians with
+their twofold nature. The passionate disposition when it has too much
+gymnastic is hardened and brutalized, the gentle or philosophic temper
+which has too much music becomes enervated. While a man is allowing
+music to pour like water through the funnel of his ears, the edge of
+his soul gradually wears away, and the passionate or spirited element
+is melted out of him. Too little spirit is easily exhausted; too much
+quickly passes into nervous irritability. So, again, the athlete by
+feeding and training has his courage doubled, but he soon grows stupid;
+he is like a wild beast, ready to do everything by blows and nothing by
+counsel or policy. There are two principles in man, reason and passion,
+and to these, not to the soul and body, the two arts of music and
+gymnastic correspond. He who mingles them in harmonious concord is the
+true musician,—he shall be the presiding genius of our State.
+
+The next question is, Who are to be our rulers? First, the elder must
+rule the younger; and the best of the elders will be the best
+guardians. Now they will be the best who love their subjects most, and
+think that they have a common interest with them in the welfare of the
+state. These we must select; but they must be watched at every epoch of
+life to see whether they have retained the same opinions and held out
+against force and enchantment. For time and persuasion and the love of
+pleasure may enchant a man into a change of purpose, and the force of
+grief and pain may compel him. And therefore our guardians must be men
+who have been tried by many tests, like gold in the refiner’s fire, and
+have been passed first through danger, then through pleasure, and at
+every age have come out of such trials victorious and without stain, in
+full command of themselves and their principles; having all their
+faculties in harmonious exercise for their country’s good. These shall
+receive the highest honours both in life and death. (It would perhaps
+be better to confine the term ‘guardians’ to this select class: the
+younger men may be called ‘auxiliaries.’)
+
+And now for one magnificent lie, in the belief of which, Oh that we
+could train our rulers!—at any rate let us make the attempt with the
+rest of the world. What I am going to tell is only another version of
+the legend of Cadmus; but our unbelieving generation will be slow to
+accept such a story. The tale must be imparted, first to the rulers,
+then to the soldiers, lastly to the people. We will inform them that
+their youth was a dream, and that during the time when they seemed to
+be undergoing their education they were really being fashioned in the
+earth, who sent them up when they were ready; and that they must
+protect and cherish her whose children they are, and regard each other
+as brothers and sisters. ‘I do not wonder at your being ashamed to
+propound such a fiction.’ There is more behind. These brothers and
+sisters have different natures, and some of them God framed to rule,
+whom he fashioned of gold; others he made of silver, to be auxiliaries;
+others again to be husbandmen and craftsmen, and these were formed by
+him of brass and iron. But as they are all sprung from a common stock,
+a golden parent may have a silver son, or a silver parent a golden son,
+and then there must be a change of rank; the son of the rich must
+descend, and the child of the artisan rise, in the social scale; for an
+oracle says ‘that the State will come to an end if governed by a man of
+brass or iron.’ Will our citizens ever believe all this? ‘Not in the
+present generation, but in the next, perhaps, Yes.’
+
+Now let the earthborn men go forth under the command of their rulers,
+and look about and pitch their camp in a high place, which will be safe
+against enemies from without, and likewise against insurrections from
+within. There let them sacrifice and set up their tents; for soldiers
+they are to be and not shopkeepers, the watchdogs and guardians of the
+sheep; and luxury and avarice will turn them into wolves and tyrants.
+Their habits and their dwellings should correspond to their education.
+They should have no property; their pay should only meet their
+expenses; and they should have common meals. Gold and silver we will
+tell them that they have from God, and this divine gift in their souls
+they must not alloy with that earthly dross which passes under the name
+of gold. They only of the citizens may not touch it, or be under the
+same roof with it, or drink from it; it is the accursed thing. Should
+they ever acquire houses or lands or money of their own, they will
+become householders and tradesmen instead of guardians, enemies and
+tyrants instead of helpers, and the hour of ruin, both to themselves
+and the rest of the State, will be at hand.
+
+The religious and ethical aspect of Plato’s education will hereafter be
+considered under a separate head. Some lesser points may be more
+conveniently noticed in this place.
+
+1. The constant appeal to the authority of Homer, whom, with grave
+irony, Plato, after the manner of his age, summons as a witness about
+ethics and psychology, as well as about diet and medicine; attempting
+to distinguish the better lesson from the worse, sometimes altering the
+text from design; more than once quoting or alluding to Homer
+inaccurately, after the manner of the early logographers turning the
+Iliad into prose, and delighting to draw far-fetched inferences from
+his words, or to make ludicrous applications of them. He does not, like
+Heracleitus, get into a rage with Homer and Archilochus (Heracl.), but
+uses their words and expressions as vehicles of a higher truth; not on
+a system like Theagenes of Rhegium or Metrodorus, or in later times the
+Stoics, but as fancy may dictate. And the conclusions drawn from them
+are sound, although the premises are fictitious. These fanciful appeals
+to Homer add a charm to Plato’s style, and at the same time they have
+the effect of a satire on the follies of Homeric interpretation. To us
+(and probably to himself), although they take the form of arguments,
+they are really figures of speech. They may be compared with modern
+citations from Scripture, which have often a great rhetorical power
+even when the original meaning of the words is entirely lost sight of.
+The real, like the Platonic Socrates, as we gather from the Memorabilia
+of Xenophon, was fond of making similar adaptations. Great in all ages
+and countries, in religion as well as in law and literature, has been
+the art of interpretation.
+
+2. ‘The style is to conform to the subject and the metre to the style.’
+Notwithstanding the fascination which the word ‘classical’ exercises
+over us, we can hardly maintain that this rule is observed in all the
+Greek poetry which has come down to us. We cannot deny that the thought
+often exceeds the power of lucid expression in Aeschylus and Pindar; or
+that rhetoric gets the better of the thought in the Sophist-poet
+Euripides. Only perhaps in Sophocles is there a perfect harmony of the
+two; in him alone do we find a grace of language like the beauty of a
+Greek statue, in which there is nothing to add or to take away; at
+least this is true of single plays or of large portions of them. The
+connection in the Tragic Choruses and in the Greek lyric poets is not
+unfrequently a tangled thread which in an age before logic the poet was
+unable to draw out. Many thoughts and feelings mingled in his mind, and
+he had no power of disengaging or arranging them. For there is a subtle
+influence of logic which requires to be transferred from prose to
+poetry, just as the music and perfection of language are infused by
+poetry into prose. In all ages the poet has been a bad judge of his own
+meaning (Apol.); for he does not see that the word which is full of
+associations to his own mind is difficult and unmeaning to that of
+another; or that the sequence which is clear to himself is puzzling to
+others. There are many passages in some of our greatest modern poets
+which are far too obscure; in which there is no proportion between
+style and subject, in which any half-expressed figure, any harsh
+construction, any distorted collocation of words, any remote sequence
+of ideas is admitted; and there is no voice ‘coming sweetly from
+nature,’ or music adding the expression of feeling to thought. As if
+there could be poetry without beauty, or beauty without ease and
+clearness. The obscurities of early Greek poets arose necessarily out
+of the state of language and logic which existed in their age. They are
+not examples to be followed by us; for the use of language ought in
+every generation to become clearer and clearer. Like Shakespere, they
+were great in spite, not in consequence, of their imperfections of
+expression. But there is no reason for returning to the necessary
+obscurity which prevailed in the infancy of literature. The English
+poets of the last century were certainly not obscure; and we have no
+excuse for losing what they had gained, or for going back to the
+earlier or transitional age which preceded them. The thought of our own
+times has not out-stripped language; a want of Plato’s ‘art of
+measuring’ is the rule cause of the disproportion between them.
+
+3. In the third book of the Republic a nearer approach is made to a
+theory of art than anywhere else in Plato. His views may be summed up
+as follows:—True art is not fanciful and imitative, but simple and
+ideal,—the expression of the highest moral energy, whether in action or
+repose. To live among works of plastic art which are of this noble and
+simple character, or to listen to such strains, is the best of
+influences,—the true Greek atmosphere, in which youth should be brought
+up. That is the way to create in them a natural good taste, which will
+have a feeling of truth and beauty in all things. For though the poets
+are to be expelled, still art is recognized as another aspect of
+reason—like love in the Symposium, extending over the same sphere, but
+confined to the preliminary education, and acting through the power of
+habit; and this conception of art is not limited to strains of music or
+the forms of plastic art, but pervades all nature and has a wide
+kindred in the world. The Republic of Plato, like the Athens of
+Pericles, has an artistic as well as a political side.
+
+There is hardly any mention in Plato of the creative arts; only in two
+or three passages does he even allude to them (Rep.; Soph.). He is not
+lost in rapture at the great works of Phidias, the Parthenon, the
+Propylea, the statues of Zeus or Athene. He would probably have
+regarded any abstract truth of number or figure as higher than the
+greatest of them. Yet it is hard to suppose that some influence, such
+as he hopes to inspire in youth, did not pass into his own mind from
+the works of art which he saw around him. We are living upon the
+fragments of them, and find in a few broken stones the standard of
+truth and beauty. But in Plato this feeling has no expression; he
+nowhere says that beauty is the object of art; he seems to deny that
+wisdom can take an external form (Phaedrus); he does not distinguish
+the fine from the mechanical arts. Whether or no, like some writers, he
+felt more than he expressed, it is at any rate remarkable that the
+greatest perfection of the fine arts should coincide with an almost
+entire silence about them. In one very striking passage he tells us
+that a work of art, like the State, is a whole; and this conception of
+a whole and the love of the newly-born mathematical sciences may be
+regarded, if not as the inspiring, at any rate as the regulating
+principles of Greek art (Xen. Mem.; and Sophist).
+
+4. Plato makes the true and subtle remark that the physician had better
+not be in robust health; and should have known what illness is in his
+own person. But the judge ought to have had no similar experience of
+evil; he is to be a good man who, having passed his youth in innocence,
+became acquainted late in life with the vices of others. And therefore,
+according to Plato, a judge should not be young, just as a young man
+according to Aristotle is not fit to be a hearer of moral philosophy.
+The bad, on the other hand, have a knowledge of vice, but no knowledge
+of virtue. It may be doubted, however, whether this train of reflection
+is well founded. In a remarkable passage of the Laws it is acknowledged
+that the evil may form a correct estimate of the good. The union of
+gentleness and courage in Book ii. at first seemed to be a paradox, yet
+was afterwards ascertained to be a truth. And Plato might also have
+found that the intuition of evil may be consistent with the abhorrence
+of it. There is a directness of aim in virtue which gives an insight
+into vice. And the knowledge of character is in some degree a natural
+sense independent of any special experience of good or evil.
+
+5. One of the most remarkable conceptions of Plato, because un-Greek
+and also very different from anything which existed at all in his age
+of the world, is the transposition of ranks. In the Spartan state there
+had been enfranchisement of Helots and degradation of citizens under
+special circumstances. And in the ancient Greek aristocracies, merit
+was certainly recognized as one of the elements on which government was
+based. The founders of states were supposed to be their benefactors,
+who were raised by their great actions above the ordinary level of
+humanity; at a later period, the services of warriors and legislators
+were held to entitle them and their descendants to the privileges of
+citizenship and to the first rank in the state. And although the
+existence of an ideal aristocracy is slenderly proven from the remains
+of early Greek history, and we have a difficulty in ascribing such a
+character, however the idea may be defined, to any actual Hellenic
+state—or indeed to any state which has ever existed in the world—still
+the rule of the best was certainly the aspiration of philosophers, who
+probably accommodated a good deal their views of primitive history to
+their own notions of good government. Plato further insists on applying
+to the guardians of his state a series of tests by which all those who
+fell short of a fixed standard were either removed from the governing
+body, or not admitted to it; and this ‘academic’ discipline did to a
+certain extent prevail in Greek states, especially in Sparta. He also
+indicates that the system of caste, which existed in a great part of
+the ancient, and is by no means extinct in the modern European world,
+should be set aside from time to time in favour of merit. He is aware
+how deeply the greater part of mankind resent any interference with the
+order of society, and therefore he proposes his novel idea in the form
+of what he himself calls a ‘monstrous fiction.’ (Compare the ceremony
+of preparation for the two ‘great waves’ in Book v.) Two principles are
+indicated by him: first, that there is a distinction of ranks dependent
+on circumstances prior to the individual: second, that this distinction
+is and ought to be broken through by personal qualities. He adapts
+mythology like the Homeric poems to the wants of the state, making ‘the
+Phoenician tale’ the vehicle of his ideas. Every Greek state had a myth
+respecting its own origin; the Platonic republic may also have a tale
+of earthborn men. The gravity and verisimilitude with which the tale is
+told, and the analogy of Greek tradition, are a sufficient verification
+of the ‘monstrous falsehood.’ Ancient poetry had spoken of a gold and
+silver and brass and iron age succeeding one another, but Plato
+supposes these differences in the natures of men to exist together in a
+single state. Mythology supplies a figure under which the lesson may be
+taught (as Protagoras says, ‘the myth is more interesting’), and also
+enables Plato to touch lightly on new principles without going into
+details. In this passage he shadows forth a general truth, but he does
+not tell us by what steps the transposition of ranks is to be effected.
+Indeed throughout the Republic he allows the lower ranks to fade into
+the distance. We do not know whether they are to carry arms, and
+whether in the fifth book they are or are not included in the
+communistic regulations respecting property and marriage. Nor is there
+any use in arguing strictly either from a few chance words, or from the
+silence of Plato, or in drawing inferences which were beyond his
+vision. Aristotle, in his criticism on the position of the lower
+classes, does not perceive that the poetical creation is ‘like the air,
+invulnerable,’ and cannot be penetrated by the shafts of his logic
+(Pol.).
+
+6. Two paradoxes which strike the modern reader as in the highest
+degree fanciful and ideal, and which suggest to him many reflections,
+are to be found in the third book of the Republic: first, the great
+power of music, so much beyond any influence which is experienced by us
+in modern times, when the art or science has been far more developed,
+and has found the secret of harmony, as well as of melody; secondly,
+the indefinite and almost absolute control which the soul is supposed
+to exercise over the body.
+
+In the first we suspect some degree of exaggeration, such as we may
+also observe among certain masters of the art, not unknown to us, at
+the present day. With this natural enthusiasm, which is felt by a few
+only, there seems to mingle in Plato a sort of Pythagorean reverence
+for numbers and numerical proportion to which Aristotle is a stranger.
+Intervals of sound and number are to him sacred things which have a law
+of their own, not dependent on the variations of sense. They rise above
+sense, and become a connecting link with the world of ideas. But it is
+evident that Plato is describing what to him appears to be also a fact.
+The power of a simple and characteristic melody on the impressible mind
+of the Greek is more than we can easily appreciate. The effect of
+national airs may bear some comparison with it. And, besides all this,
+there is a confusion between the harmony of musical notes and the
+harmony of soul and body, which is so potently inspired by them.
+
+The second paradox leads up to some curious and interesting
+questions—How far can the mind control the body? Is the relation
+between them one of mutual antagonism or of mutual harmony? Are they
+two or one, and is either of them the cause of the other? May we not at
+times drop the opposition between them, and the mode of describing
+them, which is so familiar to us, and yet hardly conveys any precise
+meaning, and try to view this composite creature, man, in a more simple
+manner? Must we not at any rate admit that there is in human nature a
+higher and a lower principle, divided by no distinct line, which at
+times break asunder and take up arms against one another? Or again,
+they are reconciled and move together, either unconsciously in the
+ordinary work of life, or consciously in the pursuit of some noble aim,
+to be attained not without an effort, and for which every thought and
+nerve are strained. And then the body becomes the good friend or ally,
+or servant or instrument of the mind. And the mind has often a
+wonderful and almost superhuman power of banishing disease and weakness
+and calling out a hidden strength. Reason and the desires, the
+intellect and the senses are brought into harmony and obedience so as
+to form a single human being. They are ever parting, ever meeting; and
+the identity or diversity of their tendencies or operations is for the
+most part unnoticed by us. When the mind touches the body through the
+appetites, we acknowledge the responsibility of the one to the other.
+There is a tendency in us which says ‘Drink.’ There is another which
+says, ‘Do not drink; it is not good for you.’ And we all of us know
+which is the rightful superior. We are also responsible for our health,
+although into this sphere there enter some elements of necessity which
+may be beyond our control. Still even in the management of health, care
+and thought, continued over many years, may make us almost free agents,
+if we do not exact too much of ourselves, and if we acknowledge that
+all human freedom is limited by the laws of nature and of mind.
+
+We are disappointed to find that Plato, in the general condemnation
+which he passes on the practice of medicine prevailing in his own day,
+depreciates the effects of diet. He would like to have diseases of a
+definite character and capable of receiving a definite treatment. He is
+afraid of invalidism interfering with the business of life. He does not
+recognize that time is the great healer both of mental and bodily
+disorders; and that remedies which are gradual and proceed little by
+little are safer than those which produce a sudden catastrophe. Neither
+does he see that there is no way in which the mind can more surely
+influence the body than by the control of eating and drinking; or any
+other action or occasion of human life on which the higher freedom of
+the will can be more simple or truly asserted.
+
+7. Lesser matters of style may be remarked.
+
+(1) The affected ignorance of music, which is Plato’s way of expressing
+that he is passing lightly over the subject.
+
+(2) The tentative manner in which here, as in the second book, he
+proceeds with the construction of the State.
+
+(3) The description of the State sometimes as a reality, and then again
+as a work of imagination only; these are the arts by which he sustains
+the reader’s interest.
+
+(4) Connecting links, or the preparation for the entire expulsion of
+the poets in Book X.
+
+(5) The companion pictures of the lover of litigation and the
+valetudinarian, the satirical jest about the maxim of Phocylides, the
+manner in which the image of the gold and silver citizens is taken up
+into the subject, and the argument from the practice of Asclepius,
+should not escape notice.
+
+BOOK IV. Adeimantus said: ‘Suppose a person to argue, Socrates, that
+you make your citizens miserable, and this by their own free-will; they
+are the lords of the city, and yet instead of having, like other men,
+lands and houses and money of their own, they live as mercenaries and
+are always mounting guard.’ You may add, I replied, that they receive
+no pay but only their food, and have no money to spend on a journey or
+a mistress. ‘Well, and what answer do you give?’ My answer is, that our
+guardians may or may not be the happiest of men,—I should not be
+surprised to find in the long-run that they were,—but this is not the
+aim of our constitution, which was designed for the good of the whole
+and not of any one part. If I went to a sculptor and blamed him for
+having painted the eye, which is the noblest feature of the face, not
+purple but black, he would reply: ‘The eye must be an eye, and you
+should look at the statue as a whole.’ ‘Now I can well imagine a fool’s
+paradise, in which everybody is eating and drinking, clothed in purple
+and fine linen, and potters lie on sofas and have their wheel at hand,
+that they may work a little when they please; and cobblers and all the
+other classes of a State lose their distinctive character. And a State
+may get on without cobblers; but when the guardians degenerate into
+boon companions, then the ruin is complete. Remember that we are not
+talking of peasants keeping holiday, but of a State in which every man
+is expected to do his own work. The happiness resides not in this or
+that class, but in the State as a whole. I have another remark to
+make:—A middle condition is best for artisans; they should have money
+enough to buy tools, and not enough to be independent of business. And
+will not the same condition be best for our citizens? If they are poor,
+they will be mean; if rich, luxurious and lazy; and in neither case
+contented. ‘But then how will our poor city be able to go to war
+against an enemy who has money?’ There may be a difficulty in fighting
+against one enemy; against two there will be none. In the first place,
+the contest will be carried on by trained warriors against well-to-do
+citizens: and is not a regular athlete an easy match for two stout
+opponents at least? Suppose also, that before engaging we send
+ambassadors to one of the two cities, saying, ‘Silver and gold we have
+not; do you help us and take our share of the spoil;’—who would fight
+against the lean, wiry dogs, when they might join with them in preying
+upon the fatted sheep? ‘But if many states join their resources, shall
+we not be in danger?’ I am amused to hear you use the word ‘state’ of
+any but our own State. They are ‘states,’ but not ‘a state’—many in
+one. For in every state there are two hostile nations, rich and poor,
+which you may set one against the other. But our State, while she
+remains true to her principles, will be in very deed the mightiest of
+Hellenic states.
+
+To the size of the state there is no limit but the necessity of unity;
+it must be neither too large nor too small to be one. This is a matter
+of secondary importance, like the principle of transposition which was
+intimated in the parable of the earthborn men. The meaning there
+implied was that every man should do that for which he was fitted, and
+be at one with himself, and then the whole city would be united. But
+all these things are secondary, if education, which is the great
+matter, be duly regarded. When the wheel has once been set in motion,
+the speed is always increasing; and each generation improves upon the
+preceding, both in physical and moral qualities. The care of the
+governors should be directed to preserve music and gymnastic from
+innovation; alter the songs of a country, Damon says, and you will soon
+end by altering its laws. The change appears innocent at first, and
+begins in play; but the evil soon becomes serious, working secretly
+upon the characters of individuals, then upon social and commercial
+relations, and lastly upon the institutions of a state; and there is
+ruin and confusion everywhere. But if education remains in the
+established form, there will be no danger. A restorative process will
+be always going on; the spirit of law and order will raise up what has
+fallen down. Nor will any regulations be needed for the lesser matters
+of life—rules of deportment or fashions of dress. Like invites like for
+good or for evil. Education will correct deficiencies and supply the
+power of self-government. Far be it from us to enter into the
+particulars of legislation; let the guardians take care of education,
+and education will take care of all other things.
+
+But without education they may patch and mend as they please; they will
+make no progress, any more than a patient who thinks to cure himself by
+some favourite remedy and will not give up his luxurious mode of
+living. If you tell such persons that they must first alter their
+habits, then they grow angry; they are charming people. ‘Charming,—nay,
+the very reverse.’ Evidently these gentlemen are not in your good
+graces, nor the state which is like them. And such states there are
+which first ordain under penalty of death that no one shall alter the
+constitution, and then suffer themselves to be flattered into and out
+of anything; and he who indulges them and fawns upon them, is their
+leader and saviour. ‘Yes, the men are as bad as the states.’ But do you
+not admire their cleverness? ‘Nay, some of them are stupid enough to
+believe what the people tell them.’ And when all the world is telling a
+man that he is six feet high, and he has no measure, how can he believe
+anything else? But don’t get into a passion: to see our statesmen
+trying their nostrums, and fancying that they can cut off at a blow the
+Hydra-like rogueries of mankind, is as good as a play. Minute
+enactments are superfluous in good states, and are useless in bad ones.
+
+And now what remains of the work of legislation? Nothing for us; but to
+Apollo the god of Delphi we leave the ordering of the greatest of all
+things—that is to say, religion. Only our ancestral deity sitting upon
+the centre and navel of the earth will be trusted by us if we have any
+sense, in an affair of such magnitude. No foreign god shall be supreme
+in our realms...
+
+Here, as Socrates would say, let us ‘reflect on’ (Greek) what has
+preceded: thus far we have spoken not of the happiness of the citizens,
+but only of the well-being of the State. They may be the happiest of
+men, but our principal aim in founding the State was not to make them
+happy. They were to be guardians, not holiday-makers. In this pleasant
+manner is presented to us the famous question both of ancient and
+modern philosophy, touching the relation of duty to happiness, of right
+to utility.
+
+First duty, then happiness, is the natural order of our moral ideas.
+The utilitarian principle is valuable as a corrective of error, and
+shows to us a side of ethics which is apt to be neglected. It may be
+admitted further that right and utility are co-extensive, and that he
+who makes the happiness of mankind his object has one of the highest
+and noblest motives of human action. But utility is not the historical
+basis of morality; nor the aspect in which moral and religious ideas
+commonly occur to the mind. The greatest happiness of all is, as we
+believe, the far-off result of the divine government of the universe.
+The greatest happiness of the individual is certainly to be found in a
+life of virtue and goodness. But we seem to be more assured of a law of
+right than we can be of a divine purpose, that ‘all mankind should be
+saved;’ and we infer the one from the other. And the greatest happiness
+of the individual may be the reverse of the greatest happiness in the
+ordinary sense of the term, and may be realised in a life of pain, or
+in a voluntary death. Further, the word ‘happiness’ has several
+ambiguities; it may mean either pleasure or an ideal life, happiness
+subjective or objective, in this world or in another, of ourselves only
+or of our neighbours and of all men everywhere. By the modern founder
+of Utilitarianism the self-regarding and disinterested motives of
+action are included under the same term, although they are commonly
+opposed by us as benevolence and self-love. The word happiness has not
+the definiteness or the sacredness of ‘truth’ and ‘right’; it does not
+equally appeal to our higher nature, and has not sunk into the
+conscience of mankind. It is associated too much with the comforts and
+conveniences of life; too little with ‘the goods of the soul which we
+desire for their own sake.’ In a great trial, or danger, or temptation,
+or in any great and heroic action, it is scarcely thought of. For these
+reasons ‘the greatest happiness’ principle is not the true foundation
+of ethics. But though not the first principle, it is the second, which
+is like unto it, and is often of easier application. For the larger
+part of human actions are neither right nor wrong, except in so far as
+they tend to the happiness of mankind (Introd. to Gorgias and
+Philebus).
+
+The same question reappears in politics, where the useful or expedient
+seems to claim a larger sphere and to have a greater authority. For
+concerning political measures, we chiefly ask: How will they affect the
+happiness of mankind? Yet here too we may observe that what we term
+expediency is merely the law of right limited by the conditions of
+human society. Right and truth are the highest aims of government as
+well as of individuals; and we ought not to lose sight of them because
+we cannot directly enforce them. They appeal to the better mind of
+nations; and sometimes they are too much for merely temporal interests
+to resist. They are the watchwords which all men use in matters of
+public policy, as well as in their private dealings; the peace of
+Europe may be said to depend upon them. In the most commercial and
+utilitarian states of society the power of ideas remains. And all the
+higher class of statesmen have in them something of that idealism which
+Pericles is said to have gathered from the teaching of Anaxagoras. They
+recognise that the true leader of men must be above the motives of
+ambition, and that national character is of greater value than material
+comfort and prosperity. And this is the order of thought in Plato;
+first, he expects his citizens to do their duty, and then under
+favourable circumstances, that is to say, in a well-ordered State,
+their happiness is assured. That he was far from excluding the modern
+principle of utility in politics is sufficiently evident from other
+passages; in which ‘the most beneficial is affirmed to be the most
+honourable’, and also ‘the most sacred’.
+
+We may note
+
+(1) The manner in which the objection of Adeimantus here, is designed
+to draw out and deepen the argument of Socrates.
+
+(2) The conception of a whole as lying at the foundation both of
+politics and of art, in the latter supplying the only principle of
+criticism, which, under the various names of harmony, symmetry,
+measure, proportion, unity, the Greek seems to have applied to works of
+art.
+
+(3) The requirement that the State should be limited in size, after the
+traditional model of a Greek state; as in the Politics of Aristotle,
+the fact that the cities of Hellas were small is converted into a
+principle.
+
+(4) The humorous pictures of the lean dogs and the fatted sheep, of the
+light active boxer upsetting two stout gentlemen at least, of the
+‘charming’ patients who are always making themselves worse; or again,
+the playful assumption that there is no State but our own; or the grave
+irony with which the statesman is excused who believes that he is six
+feet high because he is told so, and having nothing to measure with is
+to be pardoned for his ignorance—he is too amusing for us to be
+seriously angry with him.
+
+(5) The light and superficial manner in which religion is passed over
+when provision has been made for two great principles,—first, that
+religion shall be based on the highest conception of the gods,
+secondly, that the true national or Hellenic type shall be
+maintained...
+
+Socrates proceeds: But where amid all this is justice? Son of Ariston,
+tell me where. Light a candle and search the city, and get your brother
+and the rest of our friends to help in seeking for her. ‘That won’t
+do,’ replied Glaucon, ‘you yourself promised to make the search and
+talked about the impiety of deserting justice.’ Well, I said, I will
+lead the way, but do you follow. My notion is, that our State being
+perfect will contain all the four virtues—wisdom, courage, temperance,
+justice. If we eliminate the three first, the unknown remainder will be
+justice.
+
+First then, of wisdom: the State which we have called into being will
+be wise because politic. And policy is one among many kinds of
+skill,—not the skill of the carpenter, or of the worker in metal, or of
+the husbandman, but the skill of him who advises about the interests of
+the whole State. Of such a kind is the skill of the guardians, who are
+a small class in number, far smaller than the blacksmiths; but in them
+is concentrated the wisdom of the State. And if this small ruling class
+have wisdom, then the whole State will be wise.
+
+Our second virtue is courage, which we have no difficulty in finding in
+another class—that of soldiers. Courage may be defined as a sort of
+salvation—the never-failing salvation of the opinions which law and
+education have prescribed concerning dangers. You know the way in which
+dyers first prepare the white ground and then lay on the dye of purple
+or of any other colour. Colours dyed in this way become fixed, and no
+soap or lye will ever wash them out. Now the ground is education, and
+the laws are the colours; and if the ground is properly laid, neither
+the soap of pleasure nor the lye of pain or fear will ever wash them
+out. This power which preserves right opinion about danger I would ask
+you to call ‘courage,’ adding the epithet ‘political’ or ‘civilized’ in
+order to distinguish it from mere animal courage and from a higher
+courage which may hereafter be discussed.
+
+Two virtues remain; temperance and justice. More than the preceding
+virtues temperance suggests the idea of harmony. Some light is thrown
+upon the nature of this virtue by the popular description of a man as
+‘master of himself’—which has an absurd sound, because the master is
+also the servant. The expression really means that the better principle
+in a man masters the worse. There are in cities whole classes—women,
+slaves and the like—who correspond to the worse, and a few only to the
+better; and in our State the former class are held under control by the
+latter. Now to which of these classes does temperance belong? ‘To both
+of them.’ And our State if any will be the abode of temperance; and we
+were right in describing this virtue as a harmony which is diffused
+through the whole, making the dwellers in the city to be of one mind,
+and attuning the upper and middle and lower classes like the strings of
+an instrument, whether you suppose them to differ in wisdom, strength
+or wealth.
+
+And now we are near the spot; let us draw in and surround the cover and
+watch with all our eyes, lest justice should slip away and escape. Tell
+me, if you see the thicket move first. ‘Nay, I would have you lead.’
+Well then, offer up a prayer and follow. The way is dark and difficult;
+but we must push on. I begin to see a track. ‘Good news.’ Why, Glaucon,
+our dulness of scent is quite ludicrous! While we are straining our
+eyes into the distance, justice is tumbling out at our feet. We are as
+bad as people looking for a thing which they have in their hands. Have
+you forgotten our old principle of the division of labour, or of every
+man doing his own business, concerning which we spoke at the foundation
+of the State—what but this was justice? Is there any other virtue
+remaining which can compete with wisdom and temperance and courage in
+the scale of political virtue? For ‘every one having his own’ is the
+great object of government; and the great object of trade is that every
+man should do his own business. Not that there is much harm in a
+carpenter trying to be a cobbler, or a cobbler transforming himself
+into a carpenter; but great evil may arise from the cobbler leaving his
+last and turning into a guardian or legislator, or when a single
+individual is trainer, warrior, legislator, all in one. And this evil
+is injustice, or every man doing another’s business. I do not say that
+as yet we are in a condition to arrive at a final conclusion. For the
+definition which we believe to hold good in states has still to be
+tested by the individual. Having read the large letters we will now
+come back to the small. From the two together a brilliant light may be
+struck out...
+
+Socrates proceeds to discover the nature of justice by a method of
+residues. Each of the first three virtues corresponds to one of the
+three parts of the soul and one of the three classes in the State,
+although the third, temperance, has more of the nature of a harmony
+than the first two. If there be a fourth virtue, that can only be
+sought for in the relation of the three parts in the soul or classes in
+the State to one another. It is obvious and simple, and for that very
+reason has not been found out. The modern logician will be inclined to
+object that ideas cannot be separated like chemical substances, but
+that they run into one another and may be only different aspects or
+names of the same thing, and such in this instance appears to be the
+case. For the definition here given of justice is verbally the same as
+one of the definitions of temperance given by Socrates in the
+Charmides, which however is only provisional, and is afterwards
+rejected. And so far from justice remaining over when the other virtues
+are eliminated, the justice and temperance of the Republic can with
+difficulty be distinguished. Temperance appears to be the virtue of a
+part only, and one of three, whereas justice is a universal virtue of
+the whole soul. Yet on the other hand temperance is also described as a
+sort of harmony, and in this respect is akin to justice. Justice seems
+to differ from temperance in degree rather than in kind; whereas
+temperance is the harmony of discordant elements, justice is the
+perfect order by which all natures and classes do their own business,
+the right man in the right place, the division and co-operation of all
+the citizens. Justice, again, is a more abstract notion than the other
+virtues, and therefore, from Plato’s point of view, the foundation of
+them, to which they are referred and which in idea precedes them. The
+proposal to omit temperance is a mere trick of style intended to avoid
+monotony.
+
+There is a famous question discussed in one of the earlier Dialogues of
+Plato (Protagoras; Arist. Nic. Ethics), ‘Whether the virtues are one or
+many?’ This receives an answer which is to the effect that there are
+four cardinal virtues (now for the first time brought together in
+ethical philosophy), and one supreme over the rest, which is not like
+Aristotle’s conception of universal justice, virtue relative to others,
+but the whole of virtue relative to the parts. To this universal
+conception of justice or order in the first education and in the moral
+nature of man, the still more universal conception of the good in the
+second education and in the sphere of speculative knowledge seems to
+succeed. Both might be equally described by the terms ‘law,’ ‘order,’
+‘harmony;’ but while the idea of good embraces ‘all time and all
+existence,’ the conception of justice is not extended beyond man.
+
+...Socrates is now going to identify the individual and the State. But
+first he must prove that there are three parts of the individual soul.
+His argument is as follows:—Quantity makes no difference in quality.
+The word ‘just,’ whether applied to the individual or to the State, has
+the same meaning. And the term ‘justice’ implied that the same three
+principles in the State and in the individual were doing their own
+business. But are they really three or one? The question is difficult,
+and one which can hardly be solved by the methods which we are now
+using; but the truer and longer way would take up too much of our time.
+‘The shorter will satisfy me.’ Well then, you would admit that the
+qualities of states mean the qualities of the individuals who compose
+them? The Scythians and Thracians are passionate, our own race
+intellectual, and the Egyptians and Phoenicians covetous, because the
+individual members of each have such and such a character; the
+difficulty is to determine whether the several principles are one or
+three; whether, that is to say, we reason with one part of our nature,
+desire with another, are angry with another, or whether the whole soul
+comes into play in each sort of action. This enquiry, however, requires
+a very exact definition of terms. The same thing in the same relation
+cannot be affected in two opposite ways. But there is no impossibility
+in a man standing still, yet moving his arms, or in a top which is
+fixed on one spot going round upon its axis. There is no necessity to
+mention all the possible exceptions; let us provisionally assume that
+opposites cannot do or be or suffer opposites in the same relation. And
+to the class of opposites belong assent and dissent, desire and
+avoidance. And one form of desire is thirst and hunger: and here arises
+a new point—thirst is thirst of drink, hunger is hunger of food; not of
+warm drink or of a particular kind of food, with the single exception
+of course that the very fact of our desiring anything implies that it
+is good. When relative terms have no attributes, their correlatives
+have no attributes; when they have attributes, their correlatives also
+have them. For example, the term ‘greater’ is simply relative to
+‘less,’ and knowledge refers to a subject of knowledge. But on the
+other hand, a particular knowledge is of a particular subject. Again,
+every science has a distinct character, which is defined by an object;
+medicine, for example, is the science of health, although not to be
+confounded with health. Having cleared our ideas thus far, let us
+return to the original instance of thirst, which has a definite
+object—drink. Now the thirsty soul may feel two distinct impulses; the
+animal one saying ‘Drink;’ the rational one, which says ‘Do not drink.’
+The two impulses are contradictory; and therefore we may assume that
+they spring from distinct principles in the soul. But is passion a
+third principle, or akin to desire? There is a story of a certain
+Leontius which throws some light on this question. He was coming up
+from the Piraeus outside the north wall, and he passed a spot where
+there were dead bodies lying by the executioner. He felt a longing
+desire to see them and also an abhorrence of them; at first he turned
+away and shut his eyes, then, suddenly tearing them open, he
+said,—‘Take your fill, ye wretches, of the fair sight.’ Now is there
+not here a third principle which is often found to come to the
+assistance of reason against desire, but never of desire against
+reason? This is passion or spirit, of the separate existence of which
+we may further convince ourselves by putting the following case:—When a
+man suffers justly, if he be of a generous nature he is not indignant
+at the hardships which he undergoes: but when he suffers unjustly, his
+indignation is his great support; hunger and thirst cannot tame him;
+the spirit within him must do or die, until the voice of the shepherd,
+that is, of reason, bidding his dog bark no more, is heard within. This
+shows that passion is the ally of reason. Is passion then the same with
+reason? No, for the former exists in children and brutes; and Homer
+affords a proof of the distinction between them when he says, ‘He smote
+his breast, and thus rebuked his soul.’
+
+And now, at last, we have reached firm ground, and are able to infer
+that the virtues of the State and of the individual are the same. For
+wisdom and courage and justice in the State are severally the wisdom
+and courage and justice in the individuals who form the State. Each of
+the three classes will do the work of its own class in the State, and
+each part in the individual soul; reason, the superior, and passion,
+the inferior, will be harmonized by the influence of music and
+gymnastic. The counsellor and the warrior, the head and the arm, will
+act together in the town of Mansoul, and keep the desires in proper
+subjection. The courage of the warrior is that quality which preserves
+a right opinion about dangers in spite of pleasures and pains. The
+wisdom of the counsellor is that small part of the soul which has
+authority and reason. The virtue of temperance is the friendship of the
+ruling and the subject principles, both in the State and in the
+individual. Of justice we have already spoken; and the notion already
+given of it may be confirmed by common instances. Will the just state
+or the just individual steal, lie, commit adultery, or be guilty of
+impiety to gods and men? ‘No.’ And is not the reason of this that the
+several principles, whether in the state or in the individual, do their
+own business? And justice is the quality which makes just men and just
+states. Moreover, our old division of labour, which required that there
+should be one man for one use, was a dream or anticipation of what was
+to follow; and that dream has now been realized in justice, which
+begins by binding together the three chords of the soul, and then acts
+harmoniously in every relation of life. And injustice, which is the
+insubordination and disobedience of the inferior elements in the soul,
+is the opposite of justice, and is inharmonious and unnatural, being to
+the soul what disease is to the body; for in the soul as well as in the
+body, good or bad actions produce good or bad habits. And virtue is the
+health and beauty and well-being of the soul, and vice is the disease
+and weakness and deformity of the soul.
+
+Again the old question returns upon us: Is justice or injustice the
+more profitable? The question has become ridiculous. For injustice,
+like mortal disease, makes life not worth having. Come up with me to
+the hill which overhangs the city and look down upon the single form of
+virtue, and the infinite forms of vice, among which are four special
+ones, characteristic both of states and of individuals. And the state
+which corresponds to the single form of virtue is that which we have
+been describing, wherein reason rules under one of two names—monarchy
+and aristocracy. Thus there are five forms in all, both of states and
+of souls...
+
+In attempting to prove that the soul has three separate faculties,
+Plato takes occasion to discuss what makes difference of faculties. And
+the criterion which he proposes is difference in the working of the
+faculties. The same faculty cannot produce contradictory effects. But
+the path of early reasoners is beset by thorny entanglements, and he
+will not proceed a step without first clearing the ground. This leads
+him into a tiresome digression, which is intended to explain the nature
+of contradiction. First, the contradiction must be at the same time and
+in the same relation. Secondly, no extraneous word must be introduced
+into either of the terms in which the contradictory proposition is
+expressed: for example, thirst is of drink, not of warm drink. He
+implies, what he does not say, that if, by the advice of reason, or by
+the impulse of anger, a man is restrained from drinking, this proves
+that thirst, or desire under which thirst is included, is distinct from
+anger and reason. But suppose that we allow the term ‘thirst’ or
+‘desire’ to be modified, and say an ‘angry thirst,’ or a ‘revengeful
+desire,’ then the two spheres of desire and anger overlap and become
+confused. This case therefore has to be excluded. And still there
+remains an exception to the rule in the use of the term ‘good,’ which
+is always implied in the object of desire. These are the discussions of
+an age before logic; and any one who is wearied by them should remember
+that they are necessary to the clearing up of ideas in the first
+development of the human faculties.
+
+The psychology of Plato extends no further than the division of the
+soul into the rational, irascible, and concupiscent elements, which, as
+far as we know, was first made by him, and has been retained by
+Aristotle and succeeding ethical writers. The chief difficulty in this
+early analysis of the mind is to define exactly the place of the
+irascible faculty (Greek), which may be variously described under the
+terms righteous indignation, spirit, passion. It is the foundation of
+courage, which includes in Plato moral courage, the courage of enduring
+pain, and of surmounting intellectual difficulties, as well as of
+meeting dangers in war. Though irrational, it inclines to side with the
+rational: it cannot be aroused by punishment when justly inflicted: it
+sometimes takes the form of an enthusiasm which sustains a man in the
+performance of great actions. It is the ‘lion heart’ with which the
+reason makes a treaty. On the other hand it is negative rather than
+positive; it is indignant at wrong or falsehood, but does not, like
+Love in the Symposium and Phaedrus, aspire to the vision of Truth or
+Good. It is the peremptory military spirit which prevails in the
+government of honour. It differs from anger (Greek), this latter term
+having no accessory notion of righteous indignation. Although Aristotle
+has retained the word, yet we may observe that ‘passion’ (Greek) has
+with him lost its affinity to the rational and has become
+indistinguishable from ‘anger’ (Greek). And to this vernacular use
+Plato himself in the Laws seems to revert, though not always. By modern
+philosophy too, as well as in our ordinary conversation, the words
+anger or passion are employed almost exclusively in a bad sense; there
+is no connotation of a just or reasonable cause by which they are
+aroused. The feeling of ‘righteous indignation’ is too partial and
+accidental to admit of our regarding it as a separate virtue or habit.
+We are tempted also to doubt whether Plato is right in supposing that
+an offender, however justly condemned, could be expected to acknowledge
+the justice of his sentence; this is the spirit of a philosopher or
+martyr rather than of a criminal.
+
+We may observe how nearly Plato approaches Aristotle’s famous thesis,
+that ‘good actions produce good habits.’ The words ‘as healthy
+practices (Greek) produce health, so do just practices produce
+justice,’ have a sound very like the Nicomachean Ethics. But we note
+also that an incidental remark in Plato has become a far-reaching
+principle in Aristotle, and an inseparable part of a great Ethical
+system.
+
+There is a difficulty in understanding what Plato meant by ‘the longer
+way’: he seems to intimate some metaphysic of the future which will not
+be satisfied with arguing from the principle of contradiction. In the
+sixth and seventh books (compare Sophist and Parmenides) he has given
+us a sketch of such a metaphysic; but when Glaucon asks for the final
+revelation of the idea of good, he is put off with the declaration that
+he has not yet studied the preliminary sciences. How he would have
+filled up the sketch, or argued about such questions from a higher
+point of view, we can only conjecture. Perhaps he hoped to find some a
+priori method of developing the parts out of the whole; or he might
+have asked which of the ideas contains the other ideas, and possibly
+have stumbled on the Hegelian identity of the ‘ego’ and the
+‘universal.’ Or he may have imagined that ideas might be constructed in
+some manner analogous to the construction of figures and numbers in the
+mathematical sciences. The most certain and necessary truth was to
+Plato the universal; and to this he was always seeking to refer all
+knowledge or opinion, just as in modern times we seek to rest them on
+the opposite pole of induction and experience. The aspirations of
+metaphysicians have always tended to pass beyond the limits of human
+thought and language: they seem to have reached a height at which they
+are ‘moving about in worlds unrealized,’ and their conceptions,
+although profoundly affecting their own minds, become invisible or
+unintelligible to others. We are not therefore surprized to find that
+Plato himself has nowhere clearly explained his doctrine of ideas; or
+that his school in a later generation, like his contemporaries Glaucon
+and Adeimantus, were unable to follow him in this region of
+speculation. In the Sophist, where he is refuting the scepticism which
+maintained either that there was no such thing as predication, or that
+all might be predicated of all, he arrives at the conclusion that some
+ideas combine with some, but not all with all. But he makes only one or
+two steps forward on this path; he nowhere attains to any connected
+system of ideas, or even to a knowledge of the most elementary
+relations of the sciences to one another.
+
+BOOK V. I was going to enumerate the four forms of vice or decline in
+states, when Polemarchus—he was sitting a little farther from me than
+Adeimantus—taking him by the coat and leaning towards him, said
+something in an undertone, of which I only caught the words, ‘Shall we
+let him off?’ ‘Certainly not,’ said Adeimantus, raising his voice.
+Whom, I said, are you not going to let off? ‘You,’ he said. Why?
+‘Because we think that you are not dealing fairly with us in omitting
+women and children, of whom you have slily disposed under the general
+formula that friends have all things in common.’ And was I not right?
+‘Yes,’ he replied, ‘but there are many sorts of communism or community,
+and we want to know which of them is right. The company, as you have
+just heard, are resolved to have a further explanation.’ Thrasymachus
+said, ‘Do you think that we have come hither to dig for gold, or to
+hear you discourse?’ Yes, I said; but the discourse should be of a
+reasonable length. Glaucon added, ‘Yes, Socrates, and there is reason
+in spending the whole of life in such discussions; but pray, without
+more ado, tell us how this community is to be carried out, and how the
+interval between birth and education is to be filled up.’ Well, I said,
+the subject has several difficulties—What is possible? is the first
+question. What is desirable? is the second. ‘Fear not,’ he replied,
+‘for you are speaking among friends.’ That, I replied, is a sorry
+consolation; I shall destroy my friends as well as myself. Not that I
+mind a little innocent laughter; but he who kills the truth is a
+murderer. ‘Then,’ said Glaucon, laughing, ‘in case you should murder us
+we will acquit you beforehand, and you shall be held free from the
+guilt of deceiving us.’
+
+Socrates proceeds:—The guardians of our state are to be watch-dogs, as
+we have already said. Now dogs are not divided into hes and shes—we do
+not take the masculine gender out to hunt and leave the females at home
+to look after their puppies. They have the same employments—the only
+difference between them is that the one sex is stronger and the other
+weaker. But if women are to have the same employments as men, they must
+have the same education—they must be taught music and gymnastics, and
+the art of war. I know that a great joke will be made of their riding
+on horseback and carrying weapons; the sight of the naked old wrinkled
+women showing their agility in the palaestra will certainly not be a
+vision of beauty, and may be expected to become a famous jest. But we
+must not mind the wits; there was a time when they might have laughed
+at our present gymnastics. All is habit: people have at last found out
+that the exposure is better than the concealment of the person, and now
+they laugh no more. Evil only should be the subject of ridicule.
+
+The first question is, whether women are able either wholly or
+partially to share in the employments of men. And here we may be
+charged with inconsistency in making the proposal at all. For we
+started originally with the division of labour; and the diversity of
+employments was based on the difference of natures. But is there no
+difference between men and women? Nay, are they not wholly different?
+THERE was the difficulty, Glaucon, which made me unwilling to speak of
+family relations. However, when a man is out of his depth, whether in a
+pool or in an ocean, he can only swim for his life; and we must try to
+find a way of escape, if we can.
+
+The argument is, that different natures have different uses, and the
+natures of men and women are said to differ. But this is only a verbal
+opposition. We do not consider that the difference may be purely
+nominal and accidental; for example, a bald man and a hairy man are
+opposed in a single point of view, but you cannot infer that because a
+bald man is a cobbler a hairy man ought not to be a cobbler. Now why is
+such an inference erroneous? Simply because the opposition between them
+is partial only, like the difference between a male physician and a
+female physician, not running through the whole nature, like the
+difference between a physician and a carpenter. And if the difference
+of the sexes is only that the one beget and the other bear children,
+this does not prove that they ought to have distinct educations.
+Admitting that women differ from men in capacity, do not men equally
+differ from one another? Has not nature scattered all the qualities
+which our citizens require indifferently up and down among the two
+sexes? and even in their peculiar pursuits, are not women often, though
+in some cases superior to men, ridiculously enough surpassed by them?
+Women are the same in kind as men, and have the same aptitude or want
+of aptitude for medicine or gymnastic or war, but in a less degree. One
+woman will be a good guardian, another not; and the good must be chosen
+to be the colleagues of our guardians. If however their natures are the
+same, the inference is that their education must also be the same;
+there is no longer anything unnatural or impossible in a woman learning
+music and gymnastic. And the education which we give them will be the
+very best, far superior to that of cobblers, and will train up the very
+best women, and nothing can be more advantageous to the State than
+this. Therefore let them strip, clothed in their chastity, and share in
+the toils of war and in the defence of their country; he who laughs at
+them is a fool for his pains.
+
+The first wave is past, and the argument is compelled to admit that men
+and women have common duties and pursuits. A second and greater wave is
+rolling in—community of wives and children; is this either expedient or
+possible? The expediency I do not doubt; I am not so sure of the
+possibility. ‘Nay, I think that a considerable doubt will be
+entertained on both points.’ I meant to have escaped the trouble of
+proving the first, but as you have detected the little stratagem I must
+even submit. Only allow me to feed my fancy like the solitary in his
+walks, with a dream of what might be, and then I will return to the
+question of what can be.
+
+In the first place our rulers will enforce the laws and make new ones
+where they are wanted, and their allies or ministers will obey. You, as
+legislator, have already selected the men; and now you shall select the
+women. After the selection has been made, they will dwell in common
+houses and have their meals in common, and will be brought together by
+a necessity more certain than that of mathematics. But they cannot be
+allowed to live in licentiousness; that is an unholy thing, which the
+rulers are determined to prevent. For the avoidance of this, holy
+marriage festivals will be instituted, and their holiness will be in
+proportion to their usefulness. And here, Glaucon, I should like to ask
+(as I know that you are a breeder of birds and animals), Do you not
+take the greatest care in the mating? ‘Certainly.’ And there is no
+reason to suppose that less care is required in the marriage of human
+beings. But then our rulers must be skilful physicians of the State,
+for they will often need a strong dose of falsehood in order to bring
+about desirable unions between their subjects. The good must be paired
+with the good, and the bad with the bad, and the offspring of the one
+must be reared, and of the other destroyed; in this way the flock will
+be preserved in prime condition. Hymeneal festivals will be celebrated
+at times fixed with an eye to population, and the brides and
+bridegrooms will meet at them; and by an ingenious system of lots the
+rulers will contrive that the brave and the fair come together, and
+that those of inferior breed are paired with inferiors—the latter will
+ascribe to chance what is really the invention of the rulers. And when
+children are born, the offspring of the brave and fair will be carried
+to an enclosure in a certain part of the city, and there attended by
+suitable nurses; the rest will be hurried away to places unknown. The
+mothers will be brought to the fold and will suckle the children; care
+however must be taken that none of them recognise their own offspring;
+and if necessary other nurses may also be hired. The trouble of
+watching and getting up at night will be transferred to attendants.
+‘Then the wives of our guardians will have a fine easy time when they
+are having children.’ And quite right too, I said, that they should.
+
+The parents ought to be in the prime of life, which for a man may be
+reckoned at thirty years—from twenty-five, when he has ‘passed the
+point at which the speed of life is greatest,’ to fifty-five; and at
+twenty years for a woman—from twenty to forty. Any one above or below
+those ages who partakes in the hymeneals shall be guilty of impiety;
+also every one who forms a marriage connexion at other times without
+the consent of the rulers. This latter regulation applies to those who
+are within the specified ages, after which they may range at will,
+provided they avoid the prohibited degrees of parents and children, or
+of brothers and sisters, which last, however, are not absolutely
+prohibited, if a dispensation be procured. ‘But how shall we know the
+degrees of affinity, when all things are common?’ The answer is, that
+brothers and sisters are all such as are born seven or nine months
+after the espousals, and their parents those who are then espoused, and
+every one will have many children and every child many parents.
+
+Socrates proceeds: I have now to prove that this scheme is advantageous
+and also consistent with our entire polity. The greatest good of a
+State is unity; the greatest evil, discord and distraction. And there
+will be unity where there are no private pleasures or pains or
+interests—where if one member suffers all the members suffer, if one
+citizen is touched all are quickly sensitive; and the least hurt to the
+little finger of the State runs through the whole body and vibrates to
+the soul. For the true State, like an individual, is injured as a whole
+when any part is affected. Every State has subjects and rulers, who in
+a democracy are called rulers, and in other States masters: but in our
+State they are called saviours and allies; and the subjects who in
+other States are termed slaves, are by us termed nurturers and
+paymasters, and those who are termed comrades and colleagues in other
+places, are by us called fathers and brothers. And whereas in other
+States members of the same government regard one of their colleagues as
+a friend and another as an enemy, in our State no man is a stranger to
+another; for every citizen is connected with every other by ties of
+blood, and these names and this way of speaking will have a
+corresponding reality—brother, father, sister, mother, repeated from
+infancy in the ears of children, will not be mere words. Then again the
+citizens will have all things in common, in having common property they
+will have common pleasures and pains.
+
+Can there be strife and contention among those who are of one mind; or
+lawsuits about property when men have nothing but their bodies which
+they call their own; or suits about violence when every one is bound to
+defend himself? The permission to strike when insulted will be an
+‘antidote’ to the knife and will prevent disturbances in the State. But
+no younger man will strike an elder; reverence will prevent him from
+laying hands on his kindred, and he will fear that the rest of the
+family may retaliate. Moreover, our citizens will be rid of the lesser
+evils of life; there will be no flattery of the rich, no sordid
+household cares, no borrowing and not paying. Compared with the
+citizens of other States, ours will be Olympic victors, and crowned
+with blessings greater still—they and their children having a better
+maintenance during life, and after death an honourable burial. Nor has
+the happiness of the individual been sacrificed to the happiness of the
+State; our Olympic victor has not been turned into a cobbler, but he
+has a happiness beyond that of any cobbler. At the same time, if any
+conceited youth begins to dream of appropriating the State to himself,
+he must be reminded that ‘half is better than the whole.’ ‘I should
+certainly advise him to stay where he is when he has the promise of
+such a brave life.’
+
+But is such a community possible?—as among the animals, so also among
+men; and if possible, in what way possible? About war there is no
+difficulty; the principle of communism is adapted to military service.
+Parents will take their children to look on at a battle, just as
+potters’ boys are trained to the business by looking on at the wheel.
+And to the parents themselves, as to other animals, the sight of their
+young ones will prove a great incentive to bravery. Young warriors must
+learn, but they must not run into danger, although a certain degree of
+risk is worth incurring when the benefit is great. The young creatures
+should be placed under the care of experienced veterans, and they
+should have wings—that is to say, swift and tractable steeds on which
+they may fly away and escape. One of the first things to be done is to
+teach a youth to ride.
+
+Cowards and deserters shall be degraded to the class of husbandmen;
+gentlemen who allow themselves to be taken prisoners, may be presented
+to the enemy. But what shall be done to the hero? First of all he shall
+be crowned by all the youths in the army; secondly, he shall receive
+the right hand of fellowship; and thirdly, do you think that there is
+any harm in his being kissed? We have already determined that he shall
+have more wives than others, in order that he may have as many children
+as possible. And at a feast he shall have more to eat; we have the
+authority of Homer for honouring brave men with ‘long chines,’ which is
+an appropriate compliment, because meat is a very strengthening thing.
+Fill the bowl then, and give the best seats and meats to the brave—may
+they do them good! And he who dies in battle will be at once declared
+to be of the golden race, and will, as we believe, become one of
+Hesiod’s guardian angels. He shall be worshipped after death in the
+manner prescribed by the oracle; and not only he, but all other
+benefactors of the State who die in any other way, shall be admitted to
+the same honours.
+
+The next question is, How shall we treat our enemies? Shall Hellenes be
+enslaved? No; for there is too great a risk of the whole race passing
+under the yoke of the barbarians. Or shall the dead be despoiled?
+Certainly not; for that sort of thing is an excuse for skulking, and
+has been the ruin of many an army. There is meanness and feminine
+malice in making an enemy of the dead body, when the soul which was the
+owner has fled—like a dog who cannot reach his assailants, and quarrels
+with the stones which are thrown at him instead. Again, the arms of
+Hellenes should not be offered up in the temples of the Gods; they are
+a pollution, for they are taken from brethren. And on similar grounds
+there should be a limit to the devastation of Hellenic territory—the
+houses should not be burnt, nor more than the annual produce carried
+off. For war is of two kinds, civil and foreign; the first of which is
+properly termed ‘discord,’ and only the second ‘war;’ and war between
+Hellenes is in reality civil war—a quarrel in a family, which is ever
+to be regarded as unpatriotic and unnatural, and ought to be prosecuted
+with a view to reconciliation in a true phil-Hellenic spirit, as of
+those who would chasten but not utterly enslave. The war is not against
+a whole nation who are a friendly multitude of men, women, and
+children, but only against a few guilty persons; when they are punished
+peace will be restored. That is the way in which Hellenes should war
+against one another—and against barbarians, as they war against one
+another now.
+
+‘But, my dear Socrates, you are forgetting the main question: Is such a
+State possible? I grant all and more than you say about the blessedness
+of being one family—fathers, brothers, mothers, daughters, going out to
+war together; but I want to ascertain the possibility of this ideal
+State.’ You are too unmerciful. The first wave and the second wave I
+have hardly escaped, and now you will certainly drown me with the
+third. When you see the towering crest of the wave, I expect you to
+take pity. ‘Not a whit.’
+
+Well, then, we were led to form our ideal polity in the search after
+justice, and the just man answered to the just State. Is this ideal at
+all the worse for being impracticable? Would the picture of a perfectly
+beautiful man be any the worse because no such man ever lived? Can any
+reality come up to the idea? Nature will not allow words to be fully
+realized; but if I am to try and realize the ideal of the State in a
+measure, I think that an approach may be made to the perfection of
+which I dream by one or two, I do not say slight, but possible changes
+in the present constitution of States. I would reduce them to a single
+one—the great wave, as I call it. Until, then, kings are philosophers,
+or philosophers are kings, cities will never cease from ill: no, nor
+the human race; nor will our ideal polity ever come into being. I know
+that this is a hard saying, which few will be able to receive.
+‘Socrates, all the world will take off his coat and rush upon you with
+sticks and stones, and therefore I would advise you to prepare an
+answer.’ You got me into the scrape, I said. ‘And I was right,’ he
+replied; ‘however, I will stand by you as a sort of do-nothing,
+well-meaning ally.’ Having the help of such a champion, I will do my
+best to maintain my position. And first, I must explain of whom I speak
+and what sort of natures these are who are to be philosophers and
+rulers. As you are a man of pleasure, you will not have forgotten how
+indiscriminate lovers are in their attachments; they love all, and turn
+blemishes into beauties. The snub-nosed youth is said to have a winning
+grace; the beak of another has a royal look; the featureless are
+faultless; the dark are manly, the fair angels; the sickly have a new
+term of endearment invented expressly for them, which is ‘honey-pale.’
+Lovers of wine and lovers of ambition also desire the objects of their
+affection in every form. Now here comes the point:—The philosopher too
+is a lover of knowledge in every form; he has an insatiable curiosity.
+‘But will curiosity make a philosopher? Are the lovers of sights and
+sounds, who let out their ears to every chorus at the Dionysiac
+festivals, to be called philosophers?’ They are not true philosophers,
+but only an imitation. ‘Then how are we to describe the true?’
+
+You would acknowledge the existence of abstract ideas, such as justice,
+beauty, good, evil, which are severally one, yet in their various
+combinations appear to be many. Those who recognize these realities are
+philosophers; whereas the other class hear sounds and see colours, and
+understand their use in the arts, but cannot attain to the true or
+waking vision of absolute justice or beauty or truth; they have not the
+light of knowledge, but of opinion, and what they see is a dream only.
+Perhaps he of whom we say the last will be angry with us; can we pacify
+him without revealing the disorder of his mind? Suppose we say that, if
+he has knowledge we rejoice to hear it, but knowledge must be of
+something which is, as ignorance is of something which is not; and
+there is a third thing, which both is and is not, and is matter of
+opinion only. Opinion and knowledge, then, having distinct objects,
+must also be distinct faculties. And by faculties I mean powers unseen
+and distinguishable only by the difference in their objects, as opinion
+and knowledge differ, since the one is liable to err, but the other is
+unerring and is the mightiest of all our faculties. If being is the
+object of knowledge, and not-being of ignorance, and these are the
+extremes, opinion must lie between them, and may be called darker than
+the one and brighter than the other. This intermediate or contingent
+matter is and is not at the same time, and partakes both of existence
+and of non-existence. Now I would ask my good friend, who denies
+abstract beauty and justice, and affirms a many beautiful and a many
+just, whether everything he sees is not in some point of view
+different—the beautiful ugly, the pious impious, the just unjust? Is
+not the double also the half, and are not heavy and light relative
+terms which pass into one another? Everything is and is not, as in the
+old riddle—‘A man and not a man shot and did not shoot a bird and not a
+bird with a stone and not a stone.’ The mind cannot be fixed on either
+alternative; and these ambiguous, intermediate, erring, half-lighted
+objects, which have a disorderly movement in the region between being
+and not-being, are the proper matter of opinion, as the immutable
+objects are the proper matter of knowledge. And he who grovels in the
+world of sense, and has only this uncertain perception of things, is
+not a philosopher, but a lover of opinion only...
+
+The fifth book is the new beginning of the Republic, in which the
+community of property and of family are first maintained, and the
+transition is made to the kingdom of philosophers. For both of these
+Plato, after his manner, has been preparing in some chance words of
+Book IV, which fall unperceived on the reader’s mind, as they are
+supposed at first to have fallen on the ear of Glaucon and Adeimantus.
+The ‘paradoxes,’ as Morgenstern terms them, of this book of the
+Republic will be reserved for another place; a few remarks on the
+style, and some explanations of difficulties, may be briefly added.
+
+First, there is the image of the waves, which serves for a sort of
+scheme or plan of the book. The first wave, the second wave, the third
+and greatest wave come rolling in, and we hear the roar of them. All
+that can be said of the extravagance of Plato’s proposals is
+anticipated by himself. Nothing is more admirable than the hesitation
+with which he proposes the solemn text, ‘Until kings are philosophers,’
+etc.; or the reaction from the sublime to the ridiculous, when Glaucon
+describes the manner in which the new truth will be received by
+mankind.
+
+Some defects and difficulties may be noted in the execution of the
+communistic plan. Nothing is told us of the application of communism to
+the lower classes; nor is the table of prohibited degrees capable of
+being made out. It is quite possible that a child born at one hymeneal
+festival may marry one of its own brothers or sisters, or even one of
+its parents, at another. Plato is afraid of incestuous unions, but at
+the same time he does not wish to bring before us the fact that the
+city would be divided into families of those born seven and nine months
+after each hymeneal festival. If it were worth while to argue seriously
+about such fancies, we might remark that while all the old affinities
+are abolished, the newly prohibited affinity rests not on any natural
+or rational principle, but only upon the accident of children having
+been born in the same month and year. Nor does he explain how the lots
+could be so manipulated by the legislature as to bring together the
+fairest and best. The singular expression which is employed to describe
+the age of five-and-twenty may perhaps be taken from some poet.
+
+In the delineation of the philosopher, the illustrations of the nature
+of philosophy derived from love are more suited to the apprehension of
+Glaucon, the Athenian man of pleasure, than to modern tastes or
+feelings. They are partly facetious, but also contain a germ of truth.
+That science is a whole, remains a true principle of inductive as well
+as of metaphysical philosophy; and the love of universal knowledge is
+still the characteristic of the philosopher in modern as well as in
+ancient times.
+
+At the end of the fifth book Plato introduces the figment of contingent
+matter, which has exercised so great an influence both on the Ethics
+and Theology of the modern world, and which occurs here for the first
+time in the history of philosophy. He did not remark that the degrees
+of knowledge in the subject have nothing corresponding to them in the
+object. With him a word must answer to an idea; and he could not
+conceive of an opinion which was an opinion about nothing. The
+influence of analogy led him to invent ‘parallels and conjugates’ and
+to overlook facts. To us some of his difficulties are puzzling only
+from their simplicity: we do not perceive that the answer to them ‘is
+tumbling out at our feet.’ To the mind of early thinkers, the
+conception of not-being was dark and mysterious; they did not see that
+this terrible apparition which threatened destruction to all knowledge
+was only a logical determination. The common term under which, through
+the accidental use of language, two entirely different ideas were
+included was another source of confusion. Thus through the ambiguity of
+(Greek) Plato, attempting to introduce order into the first chaos of
+human thought, seems to have confused perception and opinion, and to
+have failed to distinguish the contingent from the relative. In the
+Theaetetus the first of these difficulties begins to clear up; in the
+Sophist the second; and for this, as well as for other reasons, both
+these dialogues are probably to be regarded as later than the Republic.
+
+BOOK VI. Having determined that the many have no knowledge of true
+being, and have no clear patterns in their minds of justice, beauty,
+truth, and that philosophers have such patterns, we have now to ask
+whether they or the many shall be rulers in our State. But who can
+doubt that philosophers should be chosen, if they have the other
+qualities which are required in a ruler? For they are lovers of the
+knowledge of the eternal and of all truth; they are haters of
+falsehood; their meaner desires are absorbed in the interests of
+knowledge; they are spectators of all time and all existence; and in
+the magnificence of their contemplation the life of man is as nothing
+to them, nor is death fearful. Also they are of a social, gracious
+disposition, equally free from cowardice and arrogance. They learn and
+remember easily; they have harmonious, well-regulated minds; truth
+flows to them sweetly by nature. Can the god of Jealousy himself find
+any fault with such an assemblage of good qualities?
+
+Here Adeimantus interposes:—‘No man can answer you, Socrates; but every
+man feels that this is owing to his own deficiency in argument. He is
+driven from one position to another, until he has nothing more to say,
+just as an unskilful player at draughts is reduced to his last move by
+a more skilled opponent. And yet all the time he may be right. He may
+know, in this very instance, that those who make philosophy the
+business of their lives, generally turn out rogues if they are bad men,
+and fools if they are good. What do you say?’ I should say that he is
+quite right. ‘Then how is such an admission reconcileable with the
+doctrine that philosophers should be kings?’
+
+I shall answer you in a parable which will also let you see how poor a
+hand I am at the invention of allegories. The relation of good men to
+their governments is so peculiar, that in order to defend them I must
+take an illustration from the world of fiction. Conceive the captain of
+a ship, taller by a head and shoulders than any of the crew, yet a
+little deaf, a little blind, and rather ignorant of the seaman’s art.
+The sailors want to steer, although they know nothing of the art; and
+they have a theory that it cannot be learned. If the helm is refused
+them, they drug the captain’s posset, bind him hand and foot, and take
+possession of the ship. He who joins in the mutiny is termed a good
+pilot and what not; they have no conception that the true pilot must
+observe the winds and the stars, and must be their master, whether they
+like it or not;—such an one would be called by them fool, prater,
+star-gazer. This is my parable; which I will beg you to interpret for
+me to those gentlemen who ask why the philosopher has such an evil
+name, and to explain to them that not he, but those who will not use
+him, are to blame for his uselessness. The philosopher should not beg
+of mankind to be put in authority over them. The wise man should not
+seek the rich, as the proverb bids, but every man, whether rich or
+poor, must knock at the door of the physician when he has need of him.
+Now the pilot is the philosopher—he whom in the parable they call
+star-gazer, and the mutinous sailors are the mob of politicians by whom
+he is rendered useless. Not that these are the worst enemies of
+philosophy, who is far more dishonoured by her own professing sons when
+they are corrupted by the world. Need I recall the original image of
+the philosopher? Did we not say of him just now, that he loved truth
+and hated falsehood, and that he could not rest in the multiplicity of
+phenomena, but was led by a sympathy in his own nature to the
+contemplation of the absolute? All the virtues as well as truth, who is
+the leader of them, took up their abode in his soul. But as you were
+observing, if we turn aside to view the reality, we see that the
+persons who were thus described, with the exception of a small and
+useless class, are utter rogues.
+
+The point which has to be considered, is the origin of this corruption
+in nature. Every one will admit that the philosopher, in our
+description of him, is a rare being. But what numberless causes tend to
+destroy these rare beings! There is no good thing which may not be a
+cause of evil—health, wealth, strength, rank, and the virtues
+themselves, when placed under unfavourable circumstances. For as in the
+animal or vegetable world the strongest seeds most need the
+accompaniment of good air and soil, so the best of human characters
+turn out the worst when they fall upon an unsuitable soil; whereas weak
+natures hardly ever do any considerable good or harm; they are not the
+stuff out of which either great criminals or great heroes are made. The
+philosopher follows the same analogy: he is either the best or the
+worst of all men. Some persons say that the Sophists are the corrupters
+of youth; but is not public opinion the real Sophist who is everywhere
+present—in those very persons, in the assembly, in the courts, in the
+camp, in the applauses and hisses of the theatre re-echoed by the
+surrounding hills? Will not a young man’s heart leap amid these
+discordant sounds? and will any education save him from being carried
+away by the torrent? Nor is this all. For if he will not yield to
+opinion, there follows the gentle compulsion of exile or death. What
+principle of rival Sophists or anybody else can overcome in such an
+unequal contest? Characters there may be more than human, who are
+exceptions—God may save a man, but not his own strength. Further, I
+would have you consider that the hireling Sophist only gives back to
+the world their own opinions; he is the keeper of the monster, who
+knows how to flatter or anger him, and observes the meaning of his
+inarticulate grunts. Good is what pleases him, evil what he dislikes;
+truth and beauty are determined only by the taste of the brute. Such is
+the Sophist’s wisdom, and such is the condition of those who make
+public opinion the test of truth, whether in art or in morals. The
+curse is laid upon them of being and doing what it approves, and when
+they attempt first principles the failure is ludicrous. Think of all
+this and ask yourself whether the world is more likely to be a believer
+in the unity of the idea, or in the multiplicity of phenomena. And the
+world if not a believer in the idea cannot be a philosopher, and must
+therefore be a persecutor of philosophers. There is another evil:—the
+world does not like to lose the gifted nature, and so they flatter the
+young (Alcibiades) into a magnificent opinion of his own capacity; the
+tall, proper youth begins to expand, and is dreaming of kingdoms and
+empires. If at this instant a friend whispers to him, ‘Now the gods
+lighten thee; thou art a great fool’ and must be educated—do you think
+that he will listen? Or suppose a better sort of man who is attracted
+towards philosophy, will they not make Herculean efforts to spoil and
+corrupt him? Are we not right in saying that the love of knowledge, no
+less than riches, may divert him? Men of this class (Critias) often
+become politicians—they are the authors of great mischief in states,
+and sometimes also of great good. And thus philosophy is deserted by
+her natural protectors, and others enter in and dishonour her. Vulgar
+little minds see the land open and rush from the prisons of the arts
+into her temple. A clever mechanic having a soul coarse as his body,
+thinks that he will gain caste by becoming her suitor. For philosophy,
+even in her fallen estate, has a dignity of her own—and he, like a bald
+little blacksmith’s apprentice as he is, having made some money and got
+out of durance, washes and dresses himself as a bridegroom and marries
+his master’s daughter. What will be the issue of such marriages? Will
+they not be vile and bastard, devoid of truth and nature? ‘They will.’
+Small, then, is the remnant of genuine philosophers; there may be a few
+who are citizens of small states, in which politics are not worth
+thinking of, or who have been detained by Theages’ bridle of ill
+health; for my own case of the oracular sign is almost unique, and too
+rare to be worth mentioning. And these few when they have tasted the
+pleasures of philosophy, and have taken a look at that den of thieves
+and place of wild beasts, which is human life, will stand aside from
+the storm under the shelter of a wall, and try to preserve their own
+innocence and to depart in peace. ‘A great work, too, will have been
+accomplished by them.’ Great, yes, but not the greatest; for man is a
+social being, and can only attain his highest development in the
+society which is best suited to him.
+
+Enough, then, of the causes why philosophy has such an evil name.
+Another question is, Which of existing states is suited to her? Not one
+of them; at present she is like some exotic seed which degenerates in a
+strange soil; only in her proper state will she be shown to be of
+heavenly growth. ‘And is her proper state ours or some other?’ Ours in
+all points but one, which was left undetermined. You may remember our
+saying that some living mind or witness of the legislator was needed in
+states. But we were afraid to enter upon a subject of such difficulty,
+and now the question recurs and has not grown easier:—How may
+philosophy be safely studied? Let us bring her into the light of day,
+and make an end of the inquiry.
+
+In the first place, I say boldly that nothing can be worse than the
+present mode of study. Persons usually pick up a little philosophy in
+early youth, and in the intervals of business, but they never master
+the real difficulty, which is dialectic. Later, perhaps, they
+occasionally go to a lecture on philosophy. Years advance, and the sun
+of philosophy, unlike that of Heracleitus, sets never to rise again.
+This order of education should be reversed; it should begin with
+gymnastics in youth, and as the man strengthens, he should increase the
+gymnastics of his soul. Then, when active life is over, let him finally
+return to philosophy. ‘You are in earnest, Socrates, but the world will
+be equally earnest in withstanding you—no more than Thrasymachus.’ Do
+not make a quarrel between Thrasymachus and me, who were never enemies
+and are now good friends enough. And I shall do my best to convince him
+and all mankind of the truth of my words, or at any rate to prepare for
+the future when, in another life, we may again take part in similar
+discussions. ‘That will be a long time hence.’ Not long in comparison
+with eternity. The many will probably remain incredulous, for they have
+never seen the natural unity of ideas, but only artificial
+juxtapositions; not free and generous thoughts, but tricks of
+controversy and quips of law;—a perfect man ruling in a perfect state,
+even a single one they have not known. And we foresaw that there was no
+chance of perfection either in states or individuals until a necessity
+was laid upon philosophers—not the rogues, but those whom we called the
+useless class—of holding office; or until the sons of kings were
+inspired with a true love of philosophy. Whether in the infinity of
+past time there has been, or is in some distant land, or ever will be
+hereafter, an ideal such as we have described, we stoutly maintain that
+there has been, is, and will be such a state whenever the Muse of
+philosophy rules. Will you say that the world is of another mind? O, my
+friend, do not revile the world! They will soon change their opinion if
+they are gently entreated, and are taught the true nature of the
+philosopher. Who can hate a man who loves him? Or be jealous of one who
+has no jealousy? Consider, again, that the many hate not the true but
+the false philosophers—the pretenders who force their way in without
+invitation, and are always speaking of persons and not of principles,
+which is unlike the spirit of philosophy. For the true philosopher
+despises earthly strife; his eye is fixed on the eternal order in
+accordance with which he moulds himself into the Divine image (and not
+himself only, but other men), and is the creator of the virtues private
+as well as public. When mankind see that the happiness of states is
+only to be found in that image, will they be angry with us for
+attempting to delineate it? ‘Certainly not. But what will be the
+process of delineation?’ The artist will do nothing until he has made a
+tabula rasa; on this he will inscribe the constitution of a state,
+glancing often at the divine truth of nature, and from that deriving
+the godlike among men, mingling the two elements, rubbing out and
+painting in, until there is a perfect harmony or fusion of the divine
+and human. But perhaps the world will doubt the existence of such an
+artist. What will they doubt? That the philosopher is a lover of truth,
+having a nature akin to the best?—and if they admit this will they
+still quarrel with us for making philosophers our kings? ‘They will be
+less disposed to quarrel.’ Let us assume then that they are pacified.
+Still, a person may hesitate about the probability of the son of a king
+being a philosopher. And we do not deny that they are very liable to be
+corrupted; but yet surely in the course of ages there might be one
+exception—and one is enough. If one son of a king were a philosopher,
+and had obedient citizens, he might bring the ideal polity into being.
+Hence we conclude that our laws are not only the best, but that they
+are also possible, though not free from difficulty.
+
+I gained nothing by evading the troublesome questions which arose
+concerning women and children. I will be wiser now and acknowledge that
+we must go to the bottom of another question: What is to be the
+education of our guardians? It was agreed that they were to be lovers
+of their country, and were to be tested in the refiner’s fire of
+pleasures and pains, and those who came forth pure and remained fixed
+in their principles were to have honours and rewards in life and after
+death. But at this point, the argument put on her veil and turned into
+another path. I hesitated to make the assertion which I now
+hazard,—that our guardians must be philosophers. You remember all the
+contradictory elements, which met in the philosopher—how difficult to
+find them all in a single person! Intelligence and spirit are not often
+combined with steadiness; the stolid, fearless, nature is averse to
+intellectual toil. And yet these opposite elements are all necessary,
+and therefore, as we were saying before, the aspirant must be tested in
+pleasures and dangers; and also, as we must now further add, in the
+highest branches of knowledge. You will remember, that when we spoke of
+the virtues mention was made of a longer road, which you were satisfied
+to leave unexplored. ‘Enough seemed to have been said.’ Enough, my
+friend; but what is enough while anything remains wanting? Of all men
+the guardian must not faint in the search after truth; he must be
+prepared to take the longer road, or he will never reach that higher
+region which is above the four virtues; and of the virtues too he must
+not only get an outline, but a clear and distinct vision. (Strange that
+we should be so precise about trifles, so careless about the highest
+truths!) ‘And what are the highest?’ You to pretend unconsciousness,
+when you have so often heard me speak of the idea of good, about which
+we know so little, and without which though a man gain the world he has
+no profit of it! Some people imagine that the good is wisdom; but this
+involves a circle,—the good, they say, is wisdom, wisdom has to do with
+the good. According to others the good is pleasure; but then comes the
+absurdity that good is bad, for there are bad pleasures as well as
+good. Again, the good must have reality; a man may desire the
+appearance of virtue, but he will not desire the appearance of good.
+Ought our guardians then to be ignorant of this supreme principle, of
+which every man has a presentiment, and without which no man has any
+real knowledge of anything? ‘But, Socrates, what is this supreme
+principle, knowledge or pleasure, or what? You may think me
+troublesome, but I say that you have no business to be always repeating
+the doctrines of others instead of giving us your own.’ Can I say what
+I do not know? ‘You may offer an opinion.’ And will the blindness and
+crookedness of opinion content you when you might have the light and
+certainty of science? ‘I will only ask you to give such an explanation
+of the good as you have given already of temperance and justice.’ I
+wish that I could, but in my present mood I cannot reach to the height
+of the knowledge of the good. To the parent or principal I cannot
+introduce you, but to the child begotten in his image, which I may
+compare with the interest on the principal, I will. (Audit the account,
+and do not let me give you a false statement of the debt.) You remember
+our old distinction of the many beautiful and the one beautiful, the
+particular and the universal, the objects of sight and the objects of
+thought? Did you ever consider that the objects of sight imply a
+faculty of sight which is the most complex and costly of our senses,
+requiring not only objects of sense, but also a medium, which is light;
+without which the sight will not distinguish between colours and all
+will be a blank? For light is the noble bond between the perceiving
+faculty and the thing perceived, and the god who gives us light is the
+sun, who is the eye of the day, but is not to be confounded with the
+eye of man. This eye of the day or sun is what I call the child of the
+good, standing in the same relation to the visible world as the good to
+the intellectual. When the sun shines the eye sees, and in the
+intellectual world where truth is, there is sight and light. Now that
+which is the sun of intelligent natures, is the idea of good, the cause
+of knowledge and truth, yet other and fairer than they are, and
+standing in the same relation to them in which the sun stands to light.
+O inconceivable height of beauty, which is above knowledge and above
+truth! (‘You cannot surely mean pleasure,’ he said. Peace, I replied.)
+And this idea of good, like the sun, is also the cause of growth, and
+the author not of knowledge only, but of being, yet greater far than
+either in dignity and power. ‘That is a reach of thought more than
+human; but, pray, go on with the image, for I suspect that there is
+more behind.’ There is, I said; and bearing in mind our two suns or
+principles, imagine further their corresponding worlds—one of the
+visible, the other of the intelligible; you may assist your fancy by
+figuring the distinction under the image of a line divided into two
+unequal parts, and may again subdivide each part into two lesser
+segments representative of the stages of knowledge in either sphere.
+The lower portion of the lower or visible sphere will consist of
+shadows and reflections, and its upper and smaller portion will contain
+real objects in the world of nature or of art. The sphere of the
+intelligible will also have two divisions,—one of mathematics, in which
+there is no ascent but all is descent; no inquiring into premises, but
+only drawing of inferences. In this division the mind works with
+figures and numbers, the images of which are taken not from the
+shadows, but from the objects, although the truth of them is seen only
+with the mind’s eye; and they are used as hypotheses without being
+analysed. Whereas in the other division reason uses the hypotheses as
+stages or steps in the ascent to the idea of good, to which she fastens
+them, and then again descends, walking firmly in the region of ideas,
+and of ideas only, in her ascent as well as descent, and finally
+resting in them. ‘I partly understand,’ he replied; ‘you mean that the
+ideas of science are superior to the hypothetical, metaphorical
+conceptions of geometry and the other arts or sciences, whichever is to
+be the name of them; and the latter conceptions you refuse to make
+subjects of pure intellect, because they have no first principle,
+although when resting on a first principle, they pass into the higher
+sphere.’ You understand me very well, I said. And now to those four
+divisions of knowledge you may assign four corresponding faculties—pure
+intelligence to the highest sphere; active intelligence to the second;
+to the third, faith; to the fourth, the perception of shadows—and the
+clearness of the several faculties will be in the same ratio as the
+truth of the objects to which they are related...
+
+Like Socrates, we may recapitulate the virtues of the philosopher. In
+language which seems to reach beyond the horizon of that age and
+country, he is described as ‘the spectator of all time and all
+existence.’ He has the noblest gifts of nature, and makes the highest
+use of them. All his desires are absorbed in the love of wisdom, which
+is the love of truth. None of the graces of a beautiful soul are
+wanting in him; neither can he fear death, or think much of human life.
+The ideal of modern times hardly retains the simplicity of the antique;
+there is not the same originality either in truth or error which
+characterized the Greeks. The philosopher is no longer living in the
+unseen, nor is he sent by an oracle to convince mankind of ignorance;
+nor does he regard knowledge as a system of ideas leading upwards by
+regular stages to the idea of good. The eagerness of the pursuit has
+abated; there is more division of labour and less of comprehensive
+reflection upon nature and human life as a whole; more of exact
+observation and less of anticipation and inspiration. Still, in the
+altered conditions of knowledge, the parallel is not wholly lost; and
+there may be a use in translating the conception of Plato into the
+language of our own age. The philosopher in modern times is one who
+fixes his mind on the laws of nature in their sequence and connexion,
+not on fragments or pictures of nature; on history, not on controversy;
+on the truths which are acknowledged by the few, not on the opinions of
+the many. He is aware of the importance of ‘classifying according to
+nature,’ and will try to ‘separate the limbs of science without
+breaking them’ (Phaedr.). There is no part of truth, whether great or
+small, which he will dishonour; and in the least things he will discern
+the greatest (Parmen.). Like the ancient philosopher he sees the world
+pervaded by analogies, but he can also tell ‘why in some cases a single
+instance is sufficient for an induction’ (Mill’s Logic), while in other
+cases a thousand examples would prove nothing. He inquires into a
+portion of knowledge only, because the whole has grown too vast to be
+embraced by a single mind or life. He has a clearer conception of the
+divisions of science and of their relation to the mind of man than was
+possible to the ancients. Like Plato, he has a vision of the unity of
+knowledge, not as the beginning of philosophy to be attained by a study
+of elementary mathematics, but as the far-off result of the working of
+many minds in many ages. He is aware that mathematical studies are
+preliminary to almost every other; at the same time, he will not reduce
+all varieties of knowledge to the type of mathematics. He too must have
+a nobility of character, without which genius loses the better half of
+greatness. Regarding the world as a point in immensity, and each
+individual as a link in a never-ending chain of existence, he will not
+think much of his own life, or be greatly afraid of death.
+
+Adeimantus objects first of all to the form of the Socratic reasoning,
+thus showing that Plato is aware of the imperfection of his own method.
+He brings the accusation against himself which might be brought against
+him by a modern logician—that he extracts the answer because he knows
+how to put the question. In a long argument words are apt to change
+their meaning slightly, or premises may be assumed or conclusions
+inferred with rather too much certainty or universality; the variation
+at each step may be unobserved, and yet at last the divergence becomes
+considerable. Hence the failure of attempts to apply arithmetical or
+algebraic formulae to logic. The imperfection, or rather the higher and
+more elastic nature of language, does not allow words to have the
+precision of numbers or of symbols. And this quality in language
+impairs the force of an argument which has many steps.
+
+The objection, though fairly met by Socrates in this particular
+instance, may be regarded as implying a reflection upon the Socratic
+mode of reasoning. And here, as elsewhere, Plato seems to intimate that
+the time had come when the negative and interrogative method of
+Socrates must be superseded by a positive and constructive one, of
+which examples are given in some of the later dialogues. Adeimantus
+further argues that the ideal is wholly at variance with facts; for
+experience proves philosophers to be either useless or rogues. Contrary
+to all expectation Socrates has no hesitation in admitting the truth of
+this, and explains the anomaly in an allegory, first characteristically
+depreciating his own inventive powers. In this allegory the people are
+distinguished from the professional politicians, and, as elsewhere, are
+spoken of in a tone of pity rather than of censure under the image of
+‘the noble captain who is not very quick in his perceptions.’
+
+The uselessness of philosophers is explained by the circumstance that
+mankind will not use them. The world in all ages has been divided
+between contempt and fear of those who employ the power of ideas and
+know no other weapons. Concerning the false philosopher, Socrates
+argues that the best is most liable to corruption; and that the finer
+nature is more likely to suffer from alien conditions. We too observe
+that there are some kinds of excellence which spring from a peculiar
+delicacy of constitution; as is evidently true of the poetical and
+imaginative temperament, which often seems to depend on impressions,
+and hence can only breathe or live in a certain atmosphere. The man of
+genius has greater pains and greater pleasures, greater powers and
+greater weaknesses, and often a greater play of character than is to be
+found in ordinary men. He can assume the disguise of virtue or
+disinterestedness without having them, or veil personal enmity in the
+language of patriotism and philosophy,—he can say the word which all
+men are thinking, he has an insight which is terrible into the follies
+and weaknesses of his fellow-men. An Alcibiades, a Mirabeau, or a
+Napoleon the First, are born either to be the authors of great evils in
+states, or ‘of great good, when they are drawn in that direction.’
+
+Yet the thesis, ‘corruptio optimi pessima,’ cannot be maintained
+generally or without regard to the kind of excellence which is
+corrupted. The alien conditions which are corrupting to one nature, may
+be the elements of culture to another. In general a man can only
+receive his highest development in a congenial state or family, among
+friends or fellow-workers. But also he may sometimes be stirred by
+adverse circumstances to such a degree that he rises up against them
+and reforms them. And while weaker or coarser characters will extract
+good out of evil, say in a corrupt state of the church or of society,
+and live on happily, allowing the evil to remain, the finer or stronger
+natures may be crushed or spoiled by surrounding influences—may become
+misanthrope and philanthrope by turns; or in a few instances, like the
+founders of the monastic orders, or the Reformers, owing to some
+peculiarity in themselves or in their age, may break away entirely from
+the world and from the church, sometimes into great good, sometimes
+into great evil, sometimes into both. And the same holds in the lesser
+sphere of a convent, a school, a family.
+
+Plato would have us consider how easily the best natures are
+overpowered by public opinion, and what efforts the rest of mankind
+will make to get possession of them. The world, the church, their own
+profession, any political or party organization, are always carrying
+them off their legs and teaching them to apply high and holy names to
+their own prejudices and interests. The ‘monster’ corporation to which
+they belong judges right and truth to be the pleasure of the community.
+The individual becomes one with his order; or, if he resists, the world
+is too much for him, and will sooner or later be revenged on him. This
+is, perhaps, a one-sided but not wholly untrue picture of the maxims
+and practice of mankind when they ‘sit down together at an assembly,’
+either in ancient or modern times.
+
+When the higher natures are corrupted by politics, the lower take
+possession of the vacant place of philosophy. This is described in one
+of those continuous images in which the argument, to use a Platonic
+expression, ‘veils herself,’ and which is dropped and reappears at
+intervals. The question is asked,—Why are the citizens of states so
+hostile to philosophy? The answer is, that they do not know her. And
+yet there is also a better mind of the many; they would believe if they
+were taught. But hitherto they have only known a conventional imitation
+of philosophy, words without thoughts, systems which have no life in
+them; a (divine) person uttering the words of beauty and freedom, the
+friend of man holding communion with the Eternal, and seeking to frame
+the state in that image, they have never known. The same double feeling
+respecting the mass of mankind has always existed among men. The first
+thought is that the people are the enemies of truth and right; the
+second, that this only arises out of an accidental error and confusion,
+and that they do not really hate those who love them, if they could be
+educated to know them.
+
+In the latter part of the sixth book, three questions have to be
+considered: 1st, the nature of the longer and more circuitous way,
+which is contrasted with the shorter and more imperfect method of Book
+IV; 2nd, the heavenly pattern or idea of the state; 3rd, the relation
+of the divisions of knowledge to one another and to the corresponding
+faculties of the soul:
+
+1. Of the higher method of knowledge in Plato we have only a glimpse.
+Neither here nor in the Phaedrus or Symposium, nor yet in the Philebus
+or Sophist, does he give any clear explanation of his meaning. He would
+probably have described his method as proceeding by regular steps to a
+system of universal knowledge, which inferred the parts from the whole
+rather than the whole from the parts. This ideal logic is not practised
+by him in the search after justice, or in the analysis of the parts of
+the soul; there, like Aristotle in the Nicomachean Ethics, he argues
+from experience and the common use of language. But at the end of the
+sixth book he conceives another and more perfect method, in which all
+ideas are only steps or grades or moments of thought, forming a
+connected whole which is self-supporting, and in which consistency is
+the test of truth. He does not explain to us in detail the nature of
+the process. Like many other thinkers both in ancient and modern times
+his mind seems to be filled with a vacant form which he is unable to
+realize. He supposes the sciences to have a natural order and connexion
+in an age when they can hardly be said to exist. He is hastening on to
+the ‘end of the intellectual world’ without even making a beginning of
+them.
+
+In modern times we hardly need to be reminded that the process of
+acquiring knowledge is here confused with the contemplation of absolute
+knowledge. In all science a priori and a posteriori truths mingle in
+various proportions. The a priori part is that which is derived from
+the most universal experience of men, or is universally accepted by
+them; the a posteriori is that which grows up around the more general
+principles and becomes imperceptibly one with them. But Plato
+erroneously imagines that the synthesis is separable from the analysis,
+and that the method of science can anticipate science. In entertaining
+such a vision of a priori knowledge he is sufficiently justified, or at
+least his meaning may be sufficiently explained by the similar attempts
+of Descartes, Kant, Hegel, and even of Bacon himself, in modern
+philosophy. Anticipations or divinations, or prophetic glimpses of
+truths whether concerning man or nature, seem to stand in the same
+relation to ancient philosophy which hypotheses bear to modern
+inductive science. These ‘guesses at truth’ were not made at random;
+they arose from a superficial impression of uniformities and first
+principles in nature which the genius of the Greek, contemplating the
+expanse of heaven and earth, seemed to recognize in the distance. Nor
+can we deny that in ancient times knowledge must have stood still, and
+the human mind been deprived of the very instruments of thought, if
+philosophy had been strictly confined to the results of experience.
+
+2. Plato supposes that when the tablet has been made blank the artist
+will fill in the lineaments of the ideal state. Is this a pattern laid
+up in heaven, or mere vacancy on which he is supposed to gaze with
+wondering eye? The answer is, that such ideals are framed partly by the
+omission of particulars, partly by imagination perfecting the form
+which experience supplies (Phaedo). Plato represents these ideals in a
+figure as belonging to another world; and in modern times the idea will
+sometimes seem to precede, at other times to co-operate with the hand
+of the artist. As in science, so also in creative art, there is a
+synthetical as well as an analytical method. One man will have the
+whole in his mind before he begins; to another the processes of mind
+and hand will be simultaneous.
+
+3. There is no difficulty in seeing that Plato’s divisions of knowledge
+are based, first, on the fundamental antithesis of sensible and
+intellectual which pervades the whole pre-Socratic philosophy; in which
+is implied also the opposition of the permanent and transient, of the
+universal and particular. But the age of philosophy in which he lived
+seemed to require a further distinction;—numbers and figures were
+beginning to separate from ideas. The world could no longer regard
+justice as a cube, and was learning to see, though imperfectly, that
+the abstractions of sense were distinct from the abstractions of mind.
+Between the Eleatic being or essence and the shadows of phenomena, the
+Pythagorean principle of number found a place, and was, as Aristotle
+remarks, a conducting medium from one to the other. Hence Plato is led
+to introduce a third term which had not hitherto entered into the
+scheme of his philosophy. He had observed the use of mathematics in
+education; they were the best preparation for higher studies. The
+subjective relation between them further suggested an objective one;
+although the passage from one to the other is really imaginary
+(Metaph.). For metaphysical and moral philosophy has no connexion with
+mathematics; number and figure are the abstractions of time and space,
+not the expressions of purely intellectual conceptions. When divested
+of metaphor, a straight line or a square has no more to do with right
+and justice than a crooked line with vice. The figurative association
+was mistaken for a real one; and thus the three latter divisions of the
+Platonic proportion were constructed.
+
+There is more difficulty in comprehending how he arrived at the first
+term of the series, which is nowhere else mentioned, and has no
+reference to any other part of his system. Nor indeed does the relation
+of shadows to objects correspond to the relation of numbers to ideas.
+Probably Plato has been led by the love of analogy (Timaeus) to make
+four terms instead of three, although the objects perceived in both
+divisions of the lower sphere are equally objects of sense. He is also
+preparing the way, as his manner is, for the shadows of images at the
+beginning of the seventh book, and the imitation of an imitation in the
+tenth. The line may be regarded as reaching from unity to infinity, and
+is divided into two unequal parts, and subdivided into two more; each
+lower sphere is the multiplication of the preceding. Of the four
+faculties, faith in the lower division has an intermediate position
+(cp. for the use of the word faith or belief, (Greek), Timaeus),
+contrasting equally with the vagueness of the perception of shadows
+(Greek) and the higher certainty of understanding (Greek) and reason
+(Greek).
+
+The difference between understanding and mind or reason (Greek) is
+analogous to the difference between acquiring knowledge in the parts
+and the contemplation of the whole. True knowledge is a whole, and is
+at rest; consistency and universality are the tests of truth. To this
+self-evidencing knowledge of the whole the faculty of mind is supposed
+to correspond. But there is a knowledge of the understanding which is
+incomplete and in motion always, because unable to rest in the
+subordinate ideas. Those ideas are called both images and
+hypotheses—images because they are clothed in sense, hypotheses because
+they are assumptions only, until they are brought into connexion with
+the idea of good.
+
+The general meaning of the passage, ‘Noble, then, is the bond which
+links together sight...And of this kind I spoke as the intelligible...’
+so far as the thought contained in it admits of being translated into
+the terms of modern philosophy, may be described or explained as
+follows:—There is a truth, one and self-existent, to which by the help
+of a ladder let down from above, the human intelligence may ascend.
+This unity is like the sun in the heavens, the light by which all
+things are seen, the being by which they are created and sustained. It
+is the IDEA of good. And the steps of the ladder leading up to this
+highest or universal existence are the mathematical sciences, which
+also contain in themselves an element of the universal. These, too, we
+see in a new manner when we connect them with the idea of good. They
+then cease to be hypotheses or pictures, and become essential parts of
+a higher truth which is at once their first principle and their final
+cause.
+
+We cannot give any more precise meaning to this remarkable passage, but
+we may trace in it several rudiments or vestiges of thought which are
+common to us and to Plato: such as (1) the unity and correlation of the
+sciences, or rather of science, for in Plato’s time they were not yet
+parted off or distinguished; (2) the existence of a Divine Power, or
+life or idea or cause or reason, not yet conceived or no longer
+conceived as in the Timaeus and elsewhere under the form of a person;
+(3) the recognition of the hypothetical and conditional character of
+the mathematical sciences, and in a measure of every science when
+isolated from the rest; (4) the conviction of a truth which is
+invisible, and of a law, though hardly a law of nature, which permeates
+the intellectual rather than the visible world.
+
+The method of Socrates is hesitating and tentative, awaiting the fuller
+explanation of the idea of good, and of the nature of dialectic in the
+seventh book. The imperfect intelligence of Glaucon, and the reluctance
+of Socrates to make a beginning, mark the difficulty of the subject.
+The allusion to Theages’ bridle, and to the internal oracle, or demonic
+sign, of Socrates, which here, as always in Plato, is only prohibitory;
+the remark that the salvation of any remnant of good in the present
+evil state of the world is due to God only; the reference to a future
+state of existence, which is unknown to Glaucon in the tenth book, and
+in which the discussions of Socrates and his disciples would be
+resumed; the surprise in the answers; the fanciful irony of Socrates,
+where he pretends that he can only describe the strange position of the
+philosopher in a figure of speech; the original observation that the
+Sophists, after all, are only the representatives and not the leaders
+of public opinion; the picture of the philosopher standing aside in the
+shower of sleet under a wall; the figure of ‘the great beast’ followed
+by the expression of good-will towards the common people who would not
+have rejected the philosopher if they had known him; the ‘right noble
+thought’ that the highest truths demand the greatest exactness; the
+hesitation of Socrates in returning once more to his well-worn theme of
+the idea of good; the ludicrous earnestness of Glaucon; the comparison
+of philosophy to a deserted maiden who marries beneath her—are some of
+the most interesting characteristics of the sixth book.
+
+Yet a few more words may be added, on the old theme, which was so oft
+discussed in the Socratic circle, of which we, like Glaucon and
+Adeimantus, would fain, if possible, have a clearer notion. Like them,
+we are dissatisfied when we are told that the idea of good can only be
+revealed to a student of the mathematical sciences, and we are inclined
+to think that neither we nor they could have been led along that path
+to any satisfactory goal. For we have learned that differences of
+quantity cannot pass into differences of quality, and that the
+mathematical sciences can never rise above themselves into the sphere
+of our higher thoughts, although they may sometimes furnish symbols and
+expressions of them, and may train the mind in habits of abstraction
+and self-concentration. The illusion which was natural to an ancient
+philosopher has ceased to be an illusion to us. But if the process by
+which we are supposed to arrive at the idea of good be really
+imaginary, may not the idea itself be also a mere abstraction? We
+remark, first, that in all ages, and especially in primitive
+philosophy, words such as being, essence, unity, good, have exerted an
+extraordinary influence over the minds of men. The meagreness or
+negativeness of their content has been in an inverse ratio to their
+power. They have become the forms under which all things were
+comprehended. There was a need or instinct in the human soul which they
+satisfied; they were not ideas, but gods, and to this new mythology the
+men of a later generation began to attach the powers and associations
+of the elder deities.
+
+The idea of good is one of those sacred words or forms of thought,
+which were beginning to take the place of the old mythology. It meant
+unity, in which all time and all existence were gathered up. It was the
+truth of all things, and also the light in which they shone forth, and
+became evident to intelligences human and divine. It was the cause of
+all things, the power by which they were brought into being. It was the
+universal reason divested of a human personality. It was the life as
+well as the light of the world, all knowledge and all power were
+comprehended in it. The way to it was through the mathematical
+sciences, and these too were dependent on it. To ask whether God was
+the maker of it, or made by it, would be like asking whether God could
+be conceived apart from goodness, or goodness apart from God. The God
+of the Timaeus is not really at variance with the idea of good; they
+are aspects of the same, differing only as the personal from the
+impersonal, or the masculine from the neuter, the one being the
+expression or language of mythology, the other of philosophy.
+
+This, or something like this, is the meaning of the idea of good as
+conceived by Plato. Ideas of number, order, harmony, development may
+also be said to enter into it. The paraphrase which has just been given
+of it goes beyond the actual words of Plato. We have perhaps arrived at
+the stage of philosophy which enables us to understand what he is
+aiming at, better than he did himself. We are beginning to realize what
+he saw darkly and at a distance. But if he could have been told that
+this, or some conception of the same kind, but higher than this, was
+the truth at which he was aiming, and the need which he sought to
+supply, he would gladly have recognized that more was contained in his
+own thoughts than he himself knew. As his words are few and his manner
+reticent and tentative, so must the style of his interpreter be. We
+should not approach his meaning more nearly by attempting to define it
+further. In translating him into the language of modern thought, we
+might insensibly lose the spirit of ancient philosophy. It is
+remarkable that although Plato speaks of the idea of good as the first
+principle of truth and being, it is nowhere mentioned in his writings
+except in this passage. Nor did it retain any hold upon the minds of
+his disciples in a later generation; it was probably unintelligible to
+them. Nor does the mention of it in Aristotle appear to have any
+reference to this or any other passage in his extant writings.
+
+BOOK VII. And now I will describe in a figure the enlightenment or
+unenlightenment of our nature:—Imagine human beings living in an
+underground den which is open towards the light; they have been there
+from childhood, having their necks and legs chained, and can only see
+into the den. At a distance there is a fire, and between the fire and
+the prisoners a raised way, and a low wall is built along the way, like
+the screen over which marionette players show their puppets. Behind the
+wall appear moving figures, who hold in their hands various works of
+art, and among them images of men and animals, wood and stone, and some
+of the passers-by are talking and others silent. ‘A strange parable,’
+he said, ‘and strange captives.’ They are ourselves, I replied; and
+they see only the shadows of the images which the fire throws on the
+wall of the den; to these they give names, and if we add an echo which
+returns from the wall, the voices of the passengers will seem to
+proceed from the shadows. Suppose now that you suddenly turn them round
+and make them look with pain and grief to themselves at the real
+images; will they believe them to be real? Will not their eyes be
+dazzled, and will they not try to get away from the light to something
+which they are able to behold without blinking? And suppose further,
+that they are dragged up a steep and rugged ascent into the presence of
+the sun himself, will not their sight be darkened with the excess of
+light? Some time will pass before they get the habit of perceiving at
+all; and at first they will be able to perceive only shadows and
+reflections in the water; then they will recognize the moon and the
+stars, and will at length behold the sun in his own proper place as he
+is. Last of all they will conclude:—This is he who gives us the year
+and the seasons, and is the author of all that we see. How will they
+rejoice in passing from darkness to light! How worthless to them will
+seem the honours and glories of the den! But now imagine further, that
+they descend into their old habitations;—in that underground dwelling
+they will not see as well as their fellows, and will not be able to
+compete with them in the measurement of the shadows on the wall; there
+will be many jokes about the man who went on a visit to the sun and
+lost his eyes, and if they find anybody trying to set free and
+enlighten one of their number, they will put him to death, if they can
+catch him. Now the cave or den is the world of sight, the fire is the
+sun, the way upwards is the way to knowledge, and in the world of
+knowledge the idea of good is last seen and with difficulty, but when
+seen is inferred to be the author of good and right—parent of the lord
+of light in this world, and of truth and understanding in the other. He
+who attains to the beatific vision is always going upwards; he is
+unwilling to descend into political assemblies and courts of law; for
+his eyes are apt to blink at the images or shadows of images which they
+behold in them—he cannot enter into the ideas of those who have never
+in their lives understood the relation of the shadow to the substance.
+But blindness is of two kinds, and may be caused either by passing out
+of darkness into light or out of light into darkness, and a man of
+sense will distinguish between them, and will not laugh equally at both
+of them, but the blindness which arises from fulness of light he will
+deem blessed, and pity the other; or if he laugh at the puzzled soul
+looking at the sun, he will have more reason to laugh than the
+inhabitants of the den at those who descend from above. There is a
+further lesson taught by this parable of ours. Some persons fancy that
+instruction is like giving eyes to the blind, but we say that the
+faculty of sight was always there, and that the soul only requires to
+be turned round towards the light. And this is conversion; other
+virtues are almost like bodily habits, and may be acquired in the same
+manner, but intelligence has a diviner life, and is indestructible,
+turning either to good or evil according to the direction given. Did
+you never observe how the mind of a clever rogue peers out of his eyes,
+and the more clearly he sees, the more evil he does? Now if you take
+such an one, and cut away from him those leaden weights of pleasure and
+desire which bind his soul to earth, his intelligence will be turned
+round, and he will behold the truth as clearly as he now discerns his
+meaner ends. And have we not decided that our rulers must neither be so
+uneducated as to have no fixed rule of life, nor so over-educated as to
+be unwilling to leave their paradise for the business of the world? We
+must choose out therefore the natures who are most likely to ascend to
+the light and knowledge of the good; but we must not allow them to
+remain in the region of light; they must be forced down again among the
+captives in the den to partake of their labours and honours. ‘Will they
+not think this a hardship?’ You should remember that our purpose in
+framing the State was not that our citizens should do what they like,
+but that they should serve the State for the common good of all. May we
+not fairly say to our philosopher,—Friend, we do you no wrong; for in
+other States philosophy grows wild, and a wild plant owes nothing to
+the gardener, but you have been trained by us to be the rulers and
+kings of our hive, and therefore we must insist on your descending into
+the den. You must, each of you, take your turn, and become able to use
+your eyes in the dark, and with a little practice you will see far
+better than those who quarrel about the shadows, whose knowledge is a
+dream only, whilst yours is a waking reality. It may be that the saint
+or philosopher who is best fitted, may also be the least inclined to
+rule, but necessity is laid upon him, and he must no longer live in the
+heaven of ideas. And this will be the salvation of the State. For those
+who rule must not be those who are desirous to rule; and, if you can
+offer to our citizens a better life than that of rulers generally is,
+there will be a chance that the rich, not only in this world’s goods,
+but in virtue and wisdom, may bear rule. And the only life which is
+better than the life of political ambition is that of philosophy, which
+is also the best preparation for the government of a State.
+
+Then now comes the question,—How shall we create our rulers; what way
+is there from darkness to light? The change is effected by philosophy;
+it is not the turning over of an oyster-shell, but the conversion of a
+soul from night to day, from becoming to being. And what training will
+draw the soul upwards? Our former education had two branches,
+gymnastic, which was occupied with the body, and music, the sister art,
+which infused a natural harmony into mind and literature; but neither
+of these sciences gave any promise of doing what we want. Nothing
+remains to us but that universal or primary science of which all the
+arts and sciences are partakers, I mean number or calculation. ‘Very
+true.’ Including the art of war? ‘Yes, certainly.’ Then there is
+something ludicrous about Palamedes in the tragedy, coming in and
+saying that he had invented number, and had counted the ranks and set
+them in order. For if Agamemnon could not count his feet (and without
+number how could he?) he must have been a pretty sort of general
+indeed. No man should be a soldier who cannot count, and indeed he is
+hardly to be called a man. But I am not speaking of these practical
+applications of arithmetic, for number, in my view, is rather to be
+regarded as a conductor to thought and being. I will explain what I
+mean by the last expression:—Things sensible are of two kinds; the one
+class invite or stimulate the mind, while in the other the mind
+acquiesces. Now the stimulating class are the things which suggest
+contrast and relation. For example, suppose that I hold up to the eyes
+three fingers—a fore finger, a middle finger, a little finger—the sight
+equally recognizes all three fingers, but without number cannot further
+distinguish them. Or again, suppose two objects to be relatively great
+and small, these ideas of greatness and smallness are supplied not by
+the sense, but by the mind. And the perception of their contrast or
+relation quickens and sets in motion the mind, which is puzzled by the
+confused intimations of sense, and has recourse to number in order to
+find out whether the things indicated are one or more than one. Number
+replies that they are two and not one, and are to be distinguished from
+one another. Again, the sight beholds great and small, but only in a
+confused chaos, and not until they are distinguished does the question
+arise of their respective natures; we are thus led on to the
+distinction between the visible and intelligible. That was what I meant
+when I spoke of stimulants to the intellect; I was thinking of the
+contradictions which arise in perception. The idea of unity, for
+example, like that of a finger, does not arouse thought unless
+involving some conception of plurality; but when the one is also the
+opposite of one, the contradiction gives rise to reflection; an example
+of this is afforded by any object of sight. All number has also an
+elevating effect; it raises the mind out of the foam and flux of
+generation to the contemplation of being, having lesser military and
+retail uses also. The retail use is not required by us; but as our
+guardian is to be a soldier as well as a philosopher, the military one
+may be retained. And to our higher purpose no science can be better
+adapted; but it must be pursued in the spirit of a philosopher, not of
+a shopkeeper. It is concerned, not with visible objects, but with
+abstract truth; for numbers are pure abstractions—the true
+arithmetician indignantly denies that his unit is capable of division.
+When you divide, he insists that you are only multiplying; his ‘one’ is
+not material or resolvable into fractions, but an unvarying and
+absolute equality; and this proves the purely intellectual character of
+his study. Note also the great power which arithmetic has of sharpening
+the wits; no other discipline is equally severe, or an equal test of
+general ability, or equally improving to a stupid person.
+
+Let our second branch of education be geometry. ‘I can easily see,’
+replied Glaucon, ‘that the skill of the general will be doubled by his
+knowledge of geometry.’ That is a small matter; the use of geometry, to
+which I refer, is the assistance given by it in the contemplation of
+the idea of good, and the compelling the mind to look at true being,
+and not at generation only. Yet the present mode of pursuing these
+studies, as any one who is the least of a mathematician is aware, is
+mean and ridiculous; they are made to look downwards to the arts, and
+not upwards to eternal existence. The geometer is always talking of
+squaring, subtending, apposing, as if he had in view action; whereas
+knowledge is the real object of the study. It should elevate the soul,
+and create the mind of philosophy; it should raise up what has fallen
+down, not to speak of lesser uses in war and military tactics, and in
+the improvement of the faculties.
+
+Shall we propose, as a third branch of our education, astronomy? ‘Very
+good,’ replied Glaucon; ‘the knowledge of the heavens is necessary at
+once for husbandry, navigation, military tactics.’ I like your way of
+giving useful reasons for everything in order to make friends of the
+world. And there is a difficulty in proving to mankind that education
+is not only useful information but a purification of the eye of the
+soul, which is better than the bodily eye, for by this alone is truth
+seen. Now, will you appeal to mankind in general or to the philosopher?
+or would you prefer to look to yourself only? ‘Every man is his own
+best friend.’ Then take a step backward, for we are out of order, and
+insert the third dimension which is of solids, after the second which
+is of planes, and then you may proceed to solids in motion. But solid
+geometry is not popular and has not the patronage of the State, nor is
+the use of it fully recognized; the difficulty is great, and the
+votaries of the study are conceited and impatient. Still the charm of
+the pursuit wins upon men, and, if government would lend a little
+assistance, there might be great progress made. ‘Very true,’ replied
+Glaucon; ‘but do I understand you now to begin with plane geometry, and
+to place next geometry of solids, and thirdly, astronomy, or the motion
+of solids?’ Yes, I said; my hastiness has only hindered us.
+
+‘Very good, and now let us proceed to astronomy, about which I am
+willing to speak in your lofty strain. No one can fail to see that the
+contemplation of the heavens draws the soul upwards.’ I am an
+exception, then; astronomy as studied at present appears to me to draw
+the soul not upwards, but downwards. Star-gazing is just looking up at
+the ceiling—no better; a man may lie on his back on land or on water—he
+may look up or look down, but there is no science in that. The vision
+of knowledge of which I speak is seen not with the eyes, but with the
+mind. All the magnificence of the heavens is but the embroidery of a
+copy which falls far short of the divine Original, and teaches nothing
+about the absolute harmonies or motions of things. Their beauty is like
+the beauty of figures drawn by the hand of Daedalus or any other great
+artist, which may be used for illustration, but no mathematician would
+seek to obtain from them true conceptions of equality or numerical
+relations. How ridiculous then to look for these in the map of the
+heavens, in which the imperfection of matter comes in everywhere as a
+disturbing element, marring the symmetry of day and night, of months
+and years, of the sun and stars in their courses. Only by problems can
+we place astronomy on a truly scientific basis. Let the heavens alone,
+and exert the intellect.
+
+Still, mathematics admit of other applications, as the Pythagoreans
+say, and we agree. There is a sister science of harmonical motion,
+adapted to the ear as astronomy is to the eye, and there may be other
+applications also. Let us inquire of the Pythagoreans about them, not
+forgetting that we have an aim higher than theirs, which is the
+relation of these sciences to the idea of good. The error which
+pervades astronomy also pervades harmonics. The musicians put their
+ears in the place of their minds. ‘Yes,’ replied Glaucon, ‘I like to
+see them laying their ears alongside of their neighbours’ faces—some
+saying, “That’s a new note,” others declaring that the two notes are
+the same.’ Yes, I said; but you mean the empirics who are always
+twisting and torturing the strings of the lyre, and quarrelling about
+the tempers of the strings; I am referring rather to the Pythagorean
+harmonists, who are almost equally in error. For they investigate only
+the numbers of the consonances which are heard, and ascend no
+higher,—of the true numerical harmony which is unheard, and is only to
+be found in problems, they have not even a conception. ‘That last,’ he
+said, ‘must be a marvellous thing.’ A thing, I replied, which is only
+useful if pursued with a view to the good.
+
+All these sciences are the prelude of the strain, and are profitable if
+they are regarded in their natural relations to one another. ‘I dare
+say, Socrates,’ said Glaucon; ‘but such a study will be an endless
+business.’ What study do you mean—of the prelude, or what? For all
+these things are only the prelude, and you surely do not suppose that a
+mere mathematician is also a dialectician? ‘Certainly not. I have
+hardly ever known a mathematician who could reason.’ And yet, Glaucon,
+is not true reasoning that hymn of dialectic which is the music of the
+intellectual world, and which was by us compared to the effort of
+sight, when from beholding the shadows on the wall we arrived at last
+at the images which gave the shadows? Even so the dialectical faculty
+withdrawing from sense arrives by the pure intellect at the
+contemplation of the idea of good, and never rests but at the very end
+of the intellectual world. And the royal road out of the cave into the
+light, and the blinking of the eyes at the sun and turning to
+contemplate the shadows of reality, not the shadows of an image
+only—this progress and gradual acquisition of a new faculty of sight by
+the help of the mathematical sciences, is the elevation of the soul to
+the contemplation of the highest ideal of being.
+
+‘So far, I agree with you. But now, leaving the prelude, let us proceed
+to the hymn. What, then, is the nature of dialectic, and what are the
+paths which lead thither?’ Dear Glaucon, you cannot follow me here.
+There can be no revelation of the absolute truth to one who has not
+been disciplined in the previous sciences. But that there is a science
+of absolute truth, which is attained in some way very different from
+those now practised, I am confident. For all other arts or sciences are
+relative to human needs and opinions; and the mathematical sciences are
+but a dream or hypothesis of true being, and never analyse their own
+principles. Dialectic alone rises to the principle which is above
+hypotheses, converting and gently leading the eye of the soul out of
+the barbarous slough of ignorance into the light of the upper world,
+with the help of the sciences which we have been describing—sciences,
+as they are often termed, although they require some other name,
+implying greater clearness than opinion and less clearness than
+science, and this in our previous sketch was understanding. And so we
+get four names—two for intellect, and two for opinion,—reason or mind,
+understanding, faith, perception of shadows—which make a proportion—
+being:becoming::intellect:opinion—and science:belief::understanding:
+perception of shadows. Dialectic may be further described as that
+science which defines and explains the essence or being of each nature,
+which distinguishes and abstracts the good, and is ready to do battle
+against all opponents in the cause of good. To him who is not a
+dialectician life is but a sleepy dream; and many a man is in his grave
+before his is well waked up. And would you have the future rulers of
+your ideal State intelligent beings, or stupid as posts? ‘Certainly not
+the latter.’ Then you must train them in dialectic, which will teach
+them to ask and answer questions, and is the coping-stone of the
+sciences.
+
+I dare say that you have not forgotten how our rulers were chosen; and
+the process of selection may be carried a step further:—As before, they
+must be constant and valiant, good-looking, and of noble manners, but
+now they must also have natural ability which education will improve;
+that is to say, they must be quick at learning, capable of mental toil,
+retentive, solid, diligent natures, who combine intellectual with moral
+virtues; not lame and one-sided, diligent in bodily exercise and
+indolent in mind, or conversely; not a maimed soul, which hates
+falsehood and yet unintentionally is always wallowing in the mire of
+ignorance; not a bastard or feeble person, but sound in wind and limb,
+and in perfect condition for the great gymnastic trial of the mind.
+Justice herself can find no fault with natures such as these; and they
+will be the saviours of our State; disciples of another sort would only
+make philosophy more ridiculous than she is at present. Forgive my
+enthusiasm; I am becoming excited; but when I see her trampled
+underfoot, I am angry at the authors of her disgrace. ‘I did not notice
+that you were more excited than you ought to have been.’ But I felt
+that I was. Now do not let us forget another point in the selection of
+our disciples—that they must be young and not old. For Solon is
+mistaken in saying that an old man can be always learning; youth is the
+time of study, and here we must remember that the mind is free and
+dainty, and, unlike the body, must not be made to work against the
+grain. Learning should be at first a sort of play, in which the natural
+bent is detected. As in training them for war, the young dogs should at
+first only taste blood; but when the necessary gymnastics are over
+which during two or three years divide life between sleep and bodily
+exercise, then the education of the soul will become a more serious
+matter. At twenty years of age, a selection must be made of the more
+promising disciples, with whom a new epoch of education will begin. The
+sciences which they have hitherto learned in fragments will now be
+brought into relation with each other and with true being; for the
+power of combining them is the test of speculative and dialectical
+ability. And afterwards at thirty a further selection shall be made of
+those who are able to withdraw from the world of sense into the
+abstraction of ideas. But at this point, judging from present
+experience, there is a danger that dialectic may be the source of many
+evils. The danger may be illustrated by a parallel case:—Imagine a
+person who has been brought up in wealth and luxury amid a crowd of
+flatterers, and who is suddenly informed that he is a supposititious
+son. He has hitherto honoured his reputed parents and disregarded the
+flatterers, and now he does the reverse. This is just what happens with
+a man’s principles. There are certain doctrines which he learnt at home
+and which exercised a parental authority over him. Presently he finds
+that imputations are cast upon them; a troublesome querist comes and
+asks, ‘What is the just and good?’ or proves that virtue is vice and
+vice virtue, and his mind becomes unsettled, and he ceases to love,
+honour, and obey them as he has hitherto done. He is seduced into the
+life of pleasure, and becomes a lawless person and a rogue. The case of
+such speculators is very pitiable, and, in order that our thirty years’
+old pupils may not require this pity, let us take every possible care
+that young persons do not study philosophy too early. For a young man
+is a sort of puppy who only plays with an argument; and is reasoned
+into and out of his opinions every day; he soon begins to believe
+nothing, and brings himself and philosophy into discredit. A man of
+thirty does not run on in this way; he will argue and not merely
+contradict, and adds new honour to philosophy by the sobriety of his
+conduct. What time shall we allow for this second gymnastic training of
+the soul?—say, twice the time required for the gymnastics of the body;
+six, or perhaps five years, to commence at thirty, and then for fifteen
+years let the student go down into the den, and command armies, and
+gain experience of life. At fifty let him return to the end of all
+things, and have his eyes uplifted to the idea of good, and order his
+life after that pattern; if necessary, taking his turn at the helm of
+State, and training up others to be his successors. When his time comes
+he shall depart in peace to the islands of the blest. He shall be
+honoured with sacrifices, and receive such worship as the Pythian
+oracle approves.
+
+‘You are a statuary, Socrates, and have made a perfect image of our
+governors.’ Yes, and of our governesses, for the women will share in
+all things with the men. And you will admit that our State is not a
+mere aspiration, but may really come into being when there shall arise
+philosopher-kings, one or more, who will despise earthly vanities, and
+will be the servants of justice only. ‘And how will they begin their
+work?’ Their first act will be to send away into the country all those
+who are more than ten years of age, and to proceed with those who are
+left...
+
+At the commencement of the sixth book, Plato anticipated his
+explanation of the relation of the philosopher to the world in an
+allegory, in this, as in other passages, following the order which he
+prescribes in education, and proceeding from the concrete to the
+abstract. At the commencement of Book VII, under the figure of a cave
+having an opening towards a fire and a way upwards to the true light,
+he returns to view the divisions of knowledge, exhibiting familiarly,
+as in a picture, the result which had been hardly won by a great effort
+of thought in the previous discussion; at the same time casting a
+glance onward at the dialectical process, which is represented by the
+way leading from darkness to light. The shadows, the images, the
+reflection of the sun and stars in the water, the stars and sun
+themselves, severally correspond,—the first, to the realm of fancy and
+poetry,—the second, to the world of sense,—the third, to the
+abstractions or universals of sense, of which the mathematical sciences
+furnish the type,—the fourth and last to the same abstractions, when
+seen in the unity of the idea, from which they derive a new meaning and
+power. The true dialectical process begins with the contemplation of
+the real stars, and not mere reflections of them, and ends with the
+recognition of the sun, or idea of good, as the parent not only of
+light but of warmth and growth. To the divisions of knowledge the
+stages of education partly answer:—first, there is the early education
+of childhood and youth in the fancies of the poets, and in the laws and
+customs of the State;—then there is the training of the body to be a
+warrior athlete, and a good servant of the mind;—and thirdly, after an
+interval follows the education of later life, which begins with
+mathematics and proceeds to philosophy in general.
+
+There seem to be two great aims in the philosophy of Plato,—first, to
+realize abstractions; secondly, to connect them. According to him, the
+true education is that which draws men from becoming to being, and to a
+comprehensive survey of all being. He desires to develop in the human
+mind the faculty of seeing the universal in all things; until at last
+the particulars of sense drop away and the universal alone remains. He
+then seeks to combine the universals which he has disengaged from
+sense, not perceiving that the correlation of them has no other basis
+but the common use of language. He never understands that abstractions,
+as Hegel says, are ‘mere abstractions’—of use when employed in the
+arrangement of facts, but adding nothing to the sum of knowledge when
+pursued apart from them, or with reference to an imaginary idea of
+good. Still the exercise of the faculty of abstraction apart from facts
+has enlarged the mind, and played a great part in the education of the
+human race. Plato appreciated the value of this faculty, and saw that
+it might be quickened by the study of number and relation. All things
+in which there is opposition or proportion are suggestive of
+reflection. The mere impression of sense evokes no power of thought or
+of mind, but when sensible objects ask to be compared and
+distinguished, then philosophy begins. The science of arithmetic first
+suggests such distinctions. The follow in order the other sciences of
+plain and solid geometry, and of solids in motion, one branch of which
+is astronomy or the harmony of the spheres,—to this is appended the
+sister science of the harmony of sounds. Plato seems also to hint at
+the possibility of other applications of arithmetical or mathematical
+proportions, such as we employ in chemistry and natural philosophy,
+such as the Pythagoreans and even Aristotle make use of in Ethics and
+Politics, e.g. his distinction between arithmetical and geometrical
+proportion in the Ethics (Book V), or between numerical and
+proportional equality in the Politics.
+
+The modern mathematician will readily sympathise with Plato’s delight
+in the properties of pure mathematics. He will not be disinclined to
+say with him:—Let alone the heavens, and study the beauties of number
+and figure in themselves. He too will be apt to depreciate their
+application to the arts. He will observe that Plato has a conception of
+geometry, in which figures are to be dispensed with; thus in a distant
+and shadowy way seeming to anticipate the possibility of working
+geometrical problems by a more general mode of analysis. He will remark
+with interest on the backward state of solid geometry, which, alas! was
+not encouraged by the aid of the State in the age of Plato; and he will
+recognize the grasp of Plato’s mind in his ability to conceive of one
+science of solids in motion including the earth as well as the
+heavens,—not forgetting to notice the intimation to which allusion has
+been already made, that besides astronomy and harmonics the science of
+solids in motion may have other applications. Still more will he be
+struck with the comprehensiveness of view which led Plato, at a time
+when these sciences hardly existed, to say that they must be studied in
+relation to one another, and to the idea of good, or common principle
+of truth and being. But he will also see (and perhaps without surprise)
+that in that stage of physical and mathematical knowledge, Plato has
+fallen into the error of supposing that he can construct the heavens a
+priori by mathematical problems, and determine the principles of
+harmony irrespective of the adaptation of sounds to the human ear. The
+illusion was a natural one in that age and country. The simplicity and
+certainty of astronomy and harmonics seemed to contrast with the
+variation and complexity of the world of sense; hence the circumstance
+that there was some elementary basis of fact, some measurement of
+distance or time or vibrations on which they must ultimately rest, was
+overlooked by him. The modern predecessors of Newton fell into errors
+equally great; and Plato can hardly be said to have been very far
+wrong, or may even claim a sort of prophetic insight into the subject,
+when we consider that the greater part of astronomy at the present day
+consists of abstract dynamics, by the help of which most astronomical
+discoveries have been made.
+
+The metaphysical philosopher from his point of view recognizes
+mathematics as an instrument of education,—which strengthens the power
+of attention, developes the sense of order and the faculty of
+construction, and enables the mind to grasp under simple formulae the
+quantitative differences of physical phenomena. But while acknowledging
+their value in education, he sees also that they have no connexion with
+our higher moral and intellectual ideas. In the attempt which Plato
+makes to connect them, we easily trace the influences of ancient
+Pythagorean notions. There is no reason to suppose that he is speaking
+of the ideal numbers; but he is describing numbers which are pure
+abstractions, to which he assigns a real and separate existence, which,
+as ‘the teachers of the art’ (meaning probably the Pythagoreans) would
+have affirmed, repel all attempts at subdivision, and in which unity
+and every other number are conceived of as absolute. The truth and
+certainty of numbers, when thus disengaged from phenomena, gave them a
+kind of sacredness in the eyes of an ancient philosopher. Nor is it
+easy to say how far ideas of order and fixedness may have had a moral
+and elevating influence on the minds of men, ‘who,’ in the words of the
+Timaeus, ‘might learn to regulate their erring lives according to
+them.’ It is worthy of remark that the old Pythagorean ethical symbols
+still exist as figures of speech among ourselves. And those who in
+modern times see the world pervaded by universal law, may also see an
+anticipation of this last word of modern philosophy in the Platonic
+idea of good, which is the source and measure of all things, and yet
+only an abstraction (Philebus).
+
+Two passages seem to require more particular explanations. First, that
+which relates to the analysis of vision. The difficulty in this passage
+may be explained, like many others, from differences in the modes of
+conception prevailing among ancient and modern thinkers. To us, the
+perceptions of sense are inseparable from the act of the mind which
+accompanies them. The consciousness of form, colour, distance, is
+indistinguishable from the simple sensation, which is the medium of
+them. Whereas to Plato sense is the Heraclitean flux of sense, not the
+vision of objects in the order in which they actually present
+themselves to the experienced sight, but as they may be imagined to
+appear confused and blurred to the half-awakened eye of the infant. The
+first action of the mind is aroused by the attempt to set in order this
+chaos, and the reason is required to frame distinct conceptions under
+which the confused impressions of sense may be arranged. Hence arises
+the question, ‘What is great, what is small?’ and thus begins the
+distinction of the visible and the intelligible.
+
+The second difficulty relates to Plato’s conception of harmonics. Three
+classes of harmonists are distinguished by him:—first, the
+Pythagoreans, whom he proposes to consult as in the previous discussion
+on music he was to consult Damon—they are acknowledged to be masters in
+the art, but are altogether deficient in the knowledge of its higher
+import and relation to the good; secondly, the mere empirics, whom
+Glaucon appears to confuse with them, and whom both he and Socrates
+ludicrously describe as experimenting by mere auscultation on the
+intervals of sounds. Both of these fall short in different degrees of
+the Platonic idea of harmony, which must be studied in a purely
+abstract way, first by the method of problems, and secondly as a part
+of universal knowledge in relation to the idea of good.
+
+The allegory has a political as well as a philosophical meaning. The
+den or cave represents the narrow sphere of politics or law (compare
+the description of the philosopher and lawyer in the Theaetetus), and
+the light of the eternal ideas is supposed to exercise a disturbing
+influence on the minds of those who return to this lower world. In
+other words, their principles are too wide for practical application;
+they are looking far away into the past and future, when their business
+is with the present. The ideal is not easily reduced to the conditions
+of actual life, and may often be at variance with them. And at first,
+those who return are unable to compete with the inhabitants of the den
+in the measurement of the shadows, and are derided and persecuted by
+them; but after a while they see the things below in far truer
+proportions than those who have never ascended into the upper world.
+The difference between the politician turned into a philosopher and the
+philosopher turned into a politician, is symbolized by the two kinds of
+disordered eyesight, the one which is experienced by the captive who is
+transferred from darkness to day, the other, of the heavenly messenger
+who voluntarily for the good of his fellow-men descends into the den.
+In what way the brighter light is to dawn on the inhabitants of the
+lower world, or how the idea of good is to become the guiding principle
+of politics, is left unexplained by Plato. Like the nature and
+divisions of dialectic, of which Glaucon impatiently demands to be
+informed, perhaps he would have said that the explanation could not be
+given except to a disciple of the previous sciences. (Symposium.)
+
+Many illustrations of this part of the Republic may be found in modern
+Politics and in daily life. For among ourselves, too, there have been
+two sorts of Politicians or Statesmen, whose eyesight has become
+disordered in two different ways. First, there have been great men who,
+in the language of Burke, ‘have been too much given to general maxims,’
+who, like J.S. Mill or Burke himself, have been theorists or
+philosophers before they were politicians, or who, having been students
+of history, have allowed some great historical parallel, such as the
+English Revolution of 1688, or possibly Athenian democracy or Roman
+Imperialism, to be the medium through which they viewed contemporary
+events. Or perhaps the long projecting shadow of some existing
+institution may have darkened their vision. The Church of the future,
+the Commonwealth of the future, the Society of the future, have so
+absorbed their minds, that they are unable to see in their true
+proportions the Politics of to-day. They have been intoxicated with
+great ideas, such as liberty, or equality, or the greatest happiness of
+the greatest number, or the brotherhood of humanity, and they no longer
+care to consider how these ideas must be limited in practice or
+harmonized with the conditions of human life. They are full of light,
+but the light to them has become only a sort of luminous mist or
+blindness. Almost every one has known some enthusiastic half-educated
+person, who sees everything at false distances, and in erroneous
+proportions.
+
+With this disorder of eyesight may be contrasted another—of those who
+see not far into the distance, but what is near only; who have been
+engaged all their lives in a trade or a profession; who are limited to
+a set or sect of their own. Men of this kind have no universal except
+their own interests or the interests of their class, no principle but
+the opinion of persons like themselves, no knowledge of affairs beyond
+what they pick up in the streets or at their club. Suppose them to be
+sent into a larger world, to undertake some higher calling, from being
+tradesmen to turn generals or politicians, from being schoolmasters to
+become philosophers:—or imagine them on a sudden to receive an inward
+light which reveals to them for the first time in their lives a higher
+idea of God and the existence of a spiritual world, by this sudden
+conversion or change is not their daily life likely to be upset; and on
+the other hand will not many of their old prejudices and narrownesses
+still adhere to them long after they have begun to take a more
+comprehensive view of human things? From familiar examples like these
+we may learn what Plato meant by the eyesight which is liable to two
+kinds of disorders.
+
+Nor have we any difficulty in drawing a parallel between the young
+Athenian in the fifth century before Christ who became unsettled by new
+ideas, and the student of a modern University who has been the subject
+of a similar ‘aufklärung.’ We too observe that when young men begin to
+criticise customary beliefs, or to analyse the constitution of human
+nature, they are apt to lose hold of solid principle (ἅπαν τὸ βέβαιον
+αὐτῶν ἐξοίχεται). They are like trees which have been frequently
+transplanted. The earth about them is loose, and they have no roots
+reaching far into the soil. They ‘light upon every flower,’ following
+their own wayward wills, or because the wind blows them. They catch
+opinions, as diseases are caught—when they are in the air. Borne hither
+and thither, ‘they speedily fall into beliefs’ the opposite of those in
+which they were brought up. They hardly retain the distinction of right
+and wrong; they seem to think one thing as good as another. They
+suppose themselves to be searching after truth when they are playing
+the game of ‘follow my leader.’ They fall in love ‘at first sight’ with
+paradoxes respecting morality, some fancy about art, some novelty or
+eccentricity in religion, and like lovers they are so absorbed for a
+time in their new notion that they can think of nothing else. The
+resolution of some philosophical or theological question seems to them
+more interesting and important than any substantial knowledge of
+literature or science or even than a good life. Like the youth in the
+Philebus, they are ready to discourse to any one about a new
+philosophy. They are generally the disciples of some eminent professor
+or sophist, whom they rather imitate than understand. They may be
+counted happy if in later years they retain some of the simple truths
+which they acquired in early education, and which they may, perhaps,
+find to be worth all the rest. Such is the picture which Plato draws
+and which we only reproduce, partly in his own words, of the dangers
+which beset youth in times of transition, when old opinions are fading
+away and the new are not yet firmly established. Their condition is
+ingeniously compared by him to that of a supposititious son, who has
+made the discovery that his reputed parents are not his real ones, and,
+in consequence, they have lost their authority over him.
+
+The distinction between the mathematician and the dialectician is also
+noticeable. Plato is very well aware that the faculty of the
+mathematician is quite distinct from the higher philosophical sense
+which recognizes and combines first principles. The contempt which he
+expresses for distinctions of words, the danger of involuntary
+falsehood, the apology which Socrates makes for his earnestness of
+speech, are highly characteristic of the Platonic style and mode of
+thought. The quaint notion that if Palamedes was the inventor of number
+Agamemnon could not have counted his feet; the art by which we are made
+to believe that this State of ours is not a dream only; the gravity
+with which the first step is taken in the actual creation of the State,
+namely, the sending out of the city all who had arrived at ten years of
+age, in order to expedite the business of education by a generation,
+are also truly Platonic. (For the last, compare the passage at the end
+of the third book, in which he expects the lie about the earthborn men
+to be believed in the second generation.)
+
+BOOK VIII. And so we have arrived at the conclusion, that in the
+perfect State wives and children are to be in common; and the education
+and pursuits of men and women, both in war and peace, are to be common,
+and kings are to be philosophers and warriors, and the soldiers of the
+State are to live together, having all things in common; and they are
+to be warrior athletes, receiving no pay but only their food, from the
+other citizens. Now let us return to the point at which we digressed.
+‘That is easily done,’ he replied: ‘You were speaking of the State
+which you had constructed, and of the individual who answered to this,
+both of whom you affirmed to be good; and you said that of inferior
+States there were four forms and four individuals corresponding to
+them, which although deficient in various degrees, were all of them
+worth inspecting with a view to determining the relative happiness or
+misery of the best or worst man. Then Polemarchus and Adeimantus
+interrupted you, and this led to another argument,—and so here we are.’
+Suppose that we put ourselves again in the same position, and do you
+repeat your question. ‘I should like to know of what constitutions you
+were speaking?’ Besides the perfect State there are only four of any
+note in Hellas:—first, the famous Lacedaemonian or Cretan commonwealth;
+secondly, oligarchy, a State full of evils; thirdly, democracy, which
+follows next in order; fourthly, tyranny, which is the disease or death
+of all government. Now, States are not made of ‘oak and rock,’ but of
+flesh and blood; and therefore as there are five States there must be
+five human natures in individuals, which correspond to them. And first,
+there is the ambitious nature, which answers to the Lacedaemonian
+State; secondly, the oligarchical nature; thirdly, the democratical;
+and fourthly, the tyrannical. This last will have to be compared with
+the perfectly just, which is the fifth, that we may know which is the
+happier, and then we shall be able to determine whether the argument of
+Thrasymachus or our own is the more convincing. And as before we began
+with the State and went on to the individual, so now, beginning with
+timocracy, let us go on to the timocratical man, and then proceed to
+the other forms of government, and the individuals who answer to them.
+
+But how did timocracy arise out of the perfect State? Plainly, like all
+changes of government, from division in the rulers. But whence came
+division? ‘Sing, heavenly Muses,’ as Homer says;—let them condescend to
+answer us, as if we were children, to whom they put on a solemn face in
+jest. ‘And what will they say?’ They will say that human things are
+fated to decay, and even the perfect State will not escape from this
+law of destiny, when ‘the wheel comes full circle’ in a period short or
+long. Plants or animals have times of fertility and sterility, which
+the intelligence of rulers because alloyed by sense will not enable
+them to ascertain, and children will be born out of season. For whereas
+divine creations are in a perfect cycle or number, the human creation
+is in a number which declines from perfection, and has four terms and
+three intervals of numbers, increasing, waning, assimilating,
+dissimilating, and yet perfectly commensurate with each other. The base
+of the number with a fourth added (or which is 3:4), multiplied by five
+and cubed, gives two harmonies:—the first a square number, which is a
+hundred times the base (or a hundred times a hundred); the second, an
+oblong, being a hundred squares of the rational diameter of a figure
+the side of which is five, subtracting one from each square or two
+perfect squares from all, and adding a hundred cubes of three. This
+entire number is geometrical and contains the rule or law of
+generation. When this law is neglected marriages will be unpropitious;
+the inferior offspring who are then born will in time become the
+rulers; the State will decline, and education fall into decay;
+gymnastic will be preferred to music, and the gold and silver and brass
+and iron will form a chaotic mass—thus division will arise. Such is the
+Muses’ answer to our question. ‘And a true answer, of course:—but what
+more have they to say?’ They say that the two races, the iron and
+brass, and the silver and gold, will draw the State different ways;—the
+one will take to trade and moneymaking, and the others, having the true
+riches and not caring for money, will resist them: the contest will end
+in a compromise; they will agree to have private property, and will
+enslave their fellow-citizens who were once their friends and
+nurturers. But they will retain their warlike character, and will be
+chiefly occupied in fighting and exercising rule. Thus arises
+timocracy, which is intermediate between aristocracy and oligarchy.
+
+The new form of government resembles the ideal in obedience to rulers
+and contempt for trade, and having common meals, and in devotion to
+warlike and gymnastic exercises. But corruption has crept into
+philosophy, and simplicity of character, which was once her note, is
+now looked for only in the military class. Arts of war begin to prevail
+over arts of peace; the ruler is no longer a philosopher; as in
+oligarchies, there springs up among them an extravagant love of
+gain—get another man’s and save your own, is their principle; and they
+have dark places in which they hoard their gold and silver, for the use
+of their women and others; they take their pleasures by stealth, like
+boys who are running away from their father—the law; and their
+education is not inspired by the Muse, but imposed by the strong arm of
+power. The leading characteristic of this State is party spirit and
+ambition.
+
+And what manner of man answers to such a State? ‘In love of
+contention,’ replied Adeimantus, ‘he will be like our friend Glaucon.’
+In that respect, perhaps, but not in others. He is self-asserting and
+ill-educated, yet fond of literature, although not himself a
+speaker,—fierce with slaves, but obedient to rulers, a lover of power
+and honour, which he hopes to gain by deeds of arms,—fond, too, of
+gymnastics and of hunting. As he advances in years he grows avaricious,
+for he has lost philosophy, which is the only saviour and guardian of
+men. His origin is as follows:—His father is a good man dwelling in an
+ill-ordered State, who has retired from politics in order that he may
+lead a quiet life. His mother is angry at her loss of precedence among
+other women; she is disgusted at her husband’s selfishness, and she
+expatiates to her son on the unmanliness and indolence of his father.
+The old family servant takes up the tale, and says to the youth:—‘When
+you grow up you must be more of a man than your father.’ All the world
+are agreed that he who minds his own business is an idiot, while a
+busybody is highly honoured and esteemed. The young man compares this
+spirit with his father’s words and ways, and as he is naturally well
+disposed, although he has suffered from evil influences, he rests at a
+middle point and becomes ambitious and a lover of honour.
+
+And now let us set another city over against another man. The next form
+of government is oligarchy, in which the rule is of the rich only; nor
+is it difficult to see how such a State arises. The decline begins with
+the possession of gold and silver; illegal modes of expenditure are
+invented; one draws another on, and the multitude are infected; riches
+outweigh virtue; lovers of money take the place of lovers of honour;
+misers of politicians; and, in time, political privileges are confined
+by law to the rich, who do not shrink from violence in order to effect
+their purposes.
+
+Thus much of the origin,—let us next consider the evils of oligarchy.
+Would a man who wanted to be safe on a voyage take a bad pilot because
+he was rich, or refuse a good one because he was poor? And does not the
+analogy apply still more to the State? And there are yet greater evils:
+two nations are struggling together in one—the rich and the poor; and
+the rich dare not put arms into the hands of the poor, and are
+unwilling to pay for defenders out of their own money. And have we not
+already condemned that State in which the same persons are warriors as
+well as shopkeepers? The greatest evil of all is that a man may sell
+his property and have no place in the State; while there is one class
+which has enormous wealth, the other is entirely destitute. But observe
+that these destitutes had not really any more of the governing nature
+in them when they were rich than now that they are poor; they were
+miserable spendthrifts always. They are the drones of the hive; only
+whereas the actual drone is unprovided by nature with a sting, the
+two-legged things whom we call drones are some of them without stings
+and some of them have dreadful stings; in other words, there are
+paupers and there are rogues. These are never far apart; and in
+oligarchical cities, where nearly everybody is a pauper who is not a
+ruler, you will find abundance of both. And this evil state of society
+originates in bad education and bad government.
+
+Like State, like man,—the change in the latter begins with the
+representative of timocracy; he walks at first in the ways of his
+father, who may have been a statesman, or general, perhaps; and
+presently he sees him ‘fallen from his high estate,’ the victim of
+informers, dying in prison or exile, or by the hand of the executioner.
+The lesson which he thus receives, makes him cautious; he leaves
+politics, represses his pride, and saves pence. Avarice is enthroned as
+his bosom’s lord, and assumes the style of the Great King; the rational
+and spirited elements sit humbly on the ground at either side, the one
+immersed in calculation, the other absorbed in the admiration of
+wealth. The love of honour turns to love of money; the conversion is
+instantaneous. The man is mean, saving, toiling, the slave of one
+passion which is the master of the rest: Is he not the very image of
+the State? He has had no education, or he would never have allowed the
+blind god of riches to lead the dance within him. And being uneducated
+he will have many slavish desires, some beggarly, some knavish,
+breeding in his soul. If he is the trustee of an orphan, and has the
+power to defraud, he will soon prove that he is not without the will,
+and that his passions are only restrained by fear and not by reason.
+Hence he leads a divided existence; in which the better desires mostly
+prevail. But when he is contending for prizes and other distinctions,
+he is afraid to incur a loss which is to be repaid only by barren
+honour; in time of war he fights with a small part of his resources,
+and usually keeps his money and loses the victory.
+
+Next comes democracy and the democratic man, out of oligarchy and the
+oligarchical man. Insatiable avarice is the ruling passion of an
+oligarchy; and they encourage expensive habits in order that they may
+gain by the ruin of extravagant youth. Thus men of family often lose
+their property or rights of citizenship; but they remain in the city,
+full of hatred against the new owners of their estates and ripe for
+revolution. The usurer with stooping walk pretends not to see them; he
+passes by, and leaves his sting—that is, his money—in some other
+victim; and many a man has to pay the parent or principal sum
+multiplied into a family of children, and is reduced into a state of
+dronage by him. The only way of diminishing the evil is either to limit
+a man in his use of his property, or to insist that he shall lend at
+his own risk. But the ruling class do not want remedies; they care only
+for money, and are as careless of virtue as the poorest of the
+citizens. Now there are occasions on which the governors and the
+governed meet together,—at festivals, on a journey, voyaging or
+fighting. The sturdy pauper finds that in the hour of danger he is not
+despised; he sees the rich man puffing and panting, and draws the
+conclusion which he privately imparts to his companions,—‘that our
+people are not good for much;’ and as a sickly frame is made ill by a
+mere touch from without, or sometimes without external impulse is ready
+to fall to pieces of itself, so from the least cause, or with none at
+all, the city falls ill and fights a battle for life or death. And
+democracy comes into power when the poor are the victors, killing some
+and exiling some, and giving equal shares in the government to all the
+rest.
+
+The manner of life in such a State is that of democrats; there is
+freedom and plainness of speech, and every man does what is right in
+his own eyes, and has his own way of life. Hence arise the most various
+developments of character; the State is like a piece of embroidery of
+which the colours and figures are the manners of men, and there are
+many who, like women and children, prefer this variety to real beauty
+and excellence. The State is not one but many, like a bazaar at which
+you can buy anything. The great charm is, that you may do as you like;
+you may govern if you like, let it alone if you like; go to war and
+make peace if you feel disposed, and all quite irrespective of anybody
+else. When you condemn men to death they remain alive all the same; a
+gentleman is desired to go into exile, and he stalks about the streets
+like a hero; and nobody sees him or cares for him. Observe, too, how
+grandly Democracy sets her foot upon all our fine theories of
+education,—how little she cares for the training of her statesmen! The
+only qualification which she demands is the profession of patriotism.
+Such is democracy;—a pleasing, lawless, various sort of government,
+distributing equality to equals and unequals alike.
+
+Let us now inspect the individual democrat; and first, as in the case
+of the State, we will trace his antecedents. He is the son of a miserly
+oligarch, and has been taught by him to restrain the love of
+unnecessary pleasures. Perhaps I ought to explain this latter
+term:—Necessary pleasures are those which are good, and which we cannot
+do without; unnecessary pleasures are those which do no good, and of
+which the desire might be eradicated by early training. For example,
+the pleasures of eating and drinking are necessary and healthy, up to a
+certain point; beyond that point they are alike hurtful to body and
+mind, and the excess may be avoided. When in excess, they may be
+rightly called expensive pleasures, in opposition to the useful ones.
+And the drone, as we called him, is the slave of these unnecessary
+pleasures and desires, whereas the miserly oligarch is subject only to
+the necessary.
+
+The oligarch changes into the democrat in the following manner:—The
+youth who has had a miserly bringing up, gets a taste of the drone’s
+honey; he meets with wild companions, who introduce him to every new
+pleasure. As in the State, so in the individual, there are allies on
+both sides, temptations from without and passions from within; there is
+reason also and external influences of parents and friends in alliance
+with the oligarchical principle; and the two factions are in violent
+conflict with one another. Sometimes the party of order prevails, but
+then again new desires and new disorders arise, and the whole mob of
+passions gets possession of the Acropolis, that is to say, the soul,
+which they find void and unguarded by true words and works. Falsehoods
+and illusions ascend to take their place; the prodigal goes back into
+the country of the Lotophagi or drones, and openly dwells there. And if
+any offer of alliance or parley of individual elders comes from home,
+the false spirits shut the gates of the castle and permit no one to
+enter,—there is a battle, and they gain the victory; and straightway
+making alliance with the desires, they banish modesty, which they call
+folly, and send temperance over the border. When the house has been
+swept and garnished, they dress up the exiled vices, and, crowning them
+with garlands, bring them back under new names. Insolence they call
+good breeding, anarchy freedom, waste magnificence, impudence courage.
+Such is the process by which the youth passes from the necessary
+pleasures to the unnecessary. After a while he divides his time
+impartially between them; and perhaps, when he gets older and the
+violence of passion has abated, he restores some of the exiles and
+lives in a sort of equilibrium, indulging first one pleasure and then
+another; and if reason comes and tells him that some pleasures are good
+and honourable, and others bad and vile, he shakes his head and says
+that he can make no distinction between them. Thus he lives in the
+fancy of the hour; sometimes he takes to drink, and then he turns
+abstainer; he practises in the gymnasium or he does nothing at all;
+then again he would be a philosopher or a politician; or again, he
+would be a warrior or a man of business; he is
+
+‘Every thing by starts and nothing long.’
+
+
+There remains still the finest and fairest of all men and all
+States—tyranny and the tyrant. Tyranny springs from democracy much as
+democracy springs from oligarchy. Both arise from excess; the one from
+excess of wealth, the other from excess of freedom. ‘The great natural
+good of life,’ says the democrat, ‘is freedom.’ And this exclusive love
+of freedom and regardlessness of everything else, is the cause of the
+change from democracy to tyranny. The State demands the strong wine of
+freedom, and unless her rulers give her a plentiful draught, punishes
+and insults them; equality and fraternity of governors and governed is
+the approved principle. Anarchy is the law, not of the State only, but
+of private houses, and extends even to the animals. Father and son,
+citizen and foreigner, teacher and pupil, old and young, are all on a
+level; fathers and teachers fear their sons and pupils, and the wisdom
+of the young man is a match for the elder, and the old imitate the
+jaunty manners of the young because they are afraid of being thought
+morose. Slaves are on a level with their masters and mistresses, and
+there is no difference between men and women. Nay, the very animals in
+a democratic State have a freedom which is unknown in other places. The
+she-dogs are as good as their she-mistresses, and horses and asses
+march along with dignity and run their noses against anybody who comes
+in their way. ‘That has often been my experience.’ At last the citizens
+become so sensitive that they cannot endure the yoke of laws, written
+or unwritten; they would have no man call himself their master. Such is
+the glorious beginning of things out of which tyranny springs.
+‘Glorious, indeed; but what is to follow?’ The ruin of oligarchy is the
+ruin of democracy; for there is a law of contraries; the excess of
+freedom passes into the excess of slavery, and the greater the freedom
+the greater the slavery. You will remember that in the oligarchy were
+found two classes—rogues and paupers, whom we compared to drones with
+and without stings. These two classes are to the State what phlegm and
+bile are to the human body; and the State-physician, or legislator,
+must get rid of them, just as the bee-master keeps the drones out of
+the hive. Now in a democracy, too, there are drones, but they are more
+numerous and more dangerous than in the oligarchy; there they are inert
+and unpractised, here they are full of life and animation; and the
+keener sort speak and act, while the others buzz about the bema and
+prevent their opponents from being heard. And there is another class in
+democratic States, of respectable, thriving individuals, who can be
+squeezed when the drones have need of their possessions; there is
+moreover a third class, who are the labourers and the artisans, and
+they make up the mass of the people. When the people meet, they are
+omnipotent, but they cannot be brought together unless they are
+attracted by a little honey; and the rich are made to supply the honey,
+of which the demagogues keep the greater part themselves, giving a
+taste only to the mob. Their victims attempt to resist; they are driven
+mad by the stings of the drones, and so become downright oligarchs in
+self-defence. Then follow informations and convictions for treason. The
+people have some protector whom they nurse into greatness, and from
+this root the tree of tyranny springs. The nature of the change is
+indicated in the old fable of the temple of Zeus Lycaeus, which tells
+how he who tastes human flesh mixed up with the flesh of other victims
+will turn into a wolf. Even so the protector, who tastes human blood,
+and slays some and exiles others with or without law, who hints at
+abolition of debts and division of lands, must either perish or become
+a wolf—that is, a tyrant. Perhaps he is driven out, but he soon comes
+back from exile; and then if his enemies cannot get rid of him by
+lawful means, they plot his assassination. Thereupon the friend of the
+people makes his well-known request to them for a body-guard, which
+they readily grant, thinking only of his danger and not of their own.
+Now let the rich man make to himself wings, for he will never run away
+again if he does not do so then. And the Great Protector, having
+crushed all his rivals, stands proudly erect in the chariot of State, a
+full-blown tyrant: Let us enquire into the nature of his happiness.
+
+In the early days of his tyranny he smiles and beams upon everybody; he
+is not a ‘dominus,’ no, not he: he has only come to put an end to debt
+and the monopoly of land. Having got rid of foreign enemies, he makes
+himself necessary to the State by always going to war. He is thus
+enabled to depress the poor by heavy taxes, and so keep them at work;
+and he can get rid of bolder spirits by handing them over to the enemy.
+Then comes unpopularity; some of his old associates have the courage to
+oppose him. The consequence is, that he has to make a purgation of the
+State; but, unlike the physician who purges away the bad, he must get
+rid of the high-spirited, the wise and the wealthy; for he has no
+choice between death and a life of shame and dishonour. And the more
+hated he is, the more he will require trusty guards; but how will he
+obtain them? ‘They will come flocking like birds—for pay.’ Will he not
+rather obtain them on the spot? He will take the slaves from their
+owners and make them his body-guard; these are his trusted friends, who
+admire and look up to him. Are not the tragic poets wise who magnify
+and exalt the tyrant, and say that he is wise by association with the
+wise? And are not their praises of tyranny alone a sufficient reason
+why we should exclude them from our State? They may go to other cities,
+and gather the mob about them with fine words, and change commonwealths
+into tyrannies and democracies, receiving honours and rewards for their
+services; but the higher they and their friends ascend constitution
+hill, the more their honour will fail and become ‘too asthmatic to
+mount.’ To return to the tyrant—How will he support that rare army of
+his? First, by robbing the temples of their treasures, which will
+enable him to lighten the taxes; then he will take all his father’s
+property, and spend it on his companions, male or female. Now his
+father is the demus, and if the demus gets angry, and says that a great
+hulking son ought not to be a burden on his parents, and bids him and
+his riotous crew begone, then will the parent know what a monster he
+has been nurturing, and that the son whom he would fain expel is too
+strong for him. ‘You do not mean to say that he will beat his father?’
+Yes, he will, after having taken away his arms. ‘Then he is a parricide
+and a cruel, unnatural son.’ And the people have jumped from the fear
+of slavery into slavery, out of the smoke into the fire. Thus liberty,
+when out of all order and reason, passes into the worst form of
+servitude...
+
+In the previous books Plato has described the ideal State; now he
+returns to the perverted or declining forms, on which he had lightly
+touched at the end of Book IV. These he describes in a succession of
+parallels between the individuals and the States, tracing the origin of
+either in the State or individual which has preceded them. He begins by
+asking the point at which he digressed; and is thus led shortly to
+recapitulate the substance of the three former books, which also
+contain a parallel of the philosopher and the State.
+
+Of the first decline he gives no intelligible account; he would not
+have liked to admit the most probable causes of the fall of his ideal
+State, which to us would appear to be the impracticability of communism
+or the natural antagonism of the ruling and subject classes. He throws
+a veil of mystery over the origin of the decline, which he attributes
+to ignorance of the law of population. Of this law the famous
+geometrical figure or number is the expression. Like the ancients in
+general, he had no idea of the gradual perfectibility of man or of the
+education of the human race. His ideal was not to be attained in the
+course of ages, but was to spring in full armour from the head of the
+legislator. When good laws had been given, he thought only of the
+manner in which they were likely to be corrupted, or of how they might
+be filled up in detail or restored in accordance with their original
+spirit. He appears not to have reflected upon the full meaning of his
+own words, ‘In the brief space of human life, nothing great can be
+accomplished’; or again, as he afterwards says in the Laws, ‘Infinite
+time is the maker of cities.’ The order of constitutions which is
+adopted by him represents an order of thought rather than a succession
+of time, and may be considered as the first attempt to frame a
+philosophy of history.
+
+The first of these declining States is timocracy, or the government of
+soldiers and lovers of honour, which answers to the Spartan State; this
+is a government of force, in which education is not inspired by the
+Muses, but imposed by the law, and in which all the finer elements of
+organization have disappeared. The philosopher himself has lost the
+love of truth, and the soldier, who is of a simpler and honester
+nature, rules in his stead. The individual who answers to timocracy has
+some noticeable qualities. He is described as ill educated, but, like
+the Spartan, a lover of literature; and although he is a harsh master
+to his servants he has no natural superiority over them. His character
+is based upon a reaction against the circumstances of his father, who
+in a troubled city has retired from politics; and his mother, who is
+dissatisfied at her own position, is always urging him towards the life
+of political ambition. Such a character may have had this origin, and
+indeed Livy attributes the Licinian laws to a feminine jealousy of a
+similar kind. But there is obviously no connection between the manner
+in which the timocratic State springs out of the ideal, and the mere
+accident by which the timocratic man is the son of a retired statesman.
+
+The two next stages in the decline of constitutions have even less
+historical foundation. For there is no trace in Greek history of a
+polity like the Spartan or Cretan passing into an oligarchy of wealth,
+or of the oligarchy of wealth passing into a democracy. The order of
+history appears to be different; first, in the Homeric times there is
+the royal or patriarchal form of government, which a century or two
+later was succeeded by an oligarchy of birth rather than of wealth, and
+in which wealth was only the accident of the hereditary possession of
+land and power. Sometimes this oligarchical government gave way to a
+government based upon a qualification of property, which, according to
+Aristotle’s mode of using words, would have been called a timocracy;
+and this in some cities, as at Athens, became the conducting medium to
+democracy. But such was not the necessary order of succession in
+States; nor, indeed, can any order be discerned in the endless
+fluctuation of Greek history (like the tides in the Euripus), except,
+perhaps, in the almost uniform tendency from monarchy to aristocracy in
+the earliest times. At first sight there appears to be a similar
+inversion in the last step of the Platonic succession; for tyranny,
+instead of being the natural end of democracy, in early Greek history
+appears rather as a stage leading to democracy; the reign of
+Peisistratus and his sons is an episode which comes between the
+legislation of Solon and the constitution of Cleisthenes; and some
+secret cause common to them all seems to have led the greater part of
+Hellas at her first appearance in the dawn of history, e.g. Athens,
+Argos, Corinth, Sicyon, and nearly every State with the exception of
+Sparta, through a similar stage of tyranny which ended either in
+oligarchy or democracy. But then we must remember that Plato is
+describing rather the contemporary governments of the Sicilian States,
+which alternated between democracy and tyranny, than the ancient
+history of Athens or Corinth.
+
+The portrait of the tyrant himself is just such as the later Greek
+delighted to draw of Phalaris and Dionysius, in which, as in the lives
+of mediaeval saints or mythic heroes, the conduct and actions of one
+were attributed to another in order to fill up the outline. There was
+no enormity which the Greek was not today to believe of them; the
+tyrant was the negation of government and law; his assassination was
+glorious; there was no crime, however unnatural, which might not with
+probability be attributed to him. In this, Plato was only following the
+common thought of his countrymen, which he embellished and exaggerated
+with all the power of his genius. There is no need to suppose that he
+drew from life; or that his knowledge of tyrants is derived from a
+personal acquaintance with Dionysius. The manner in which he speaks of
+them would rather tend to render doubtful his ever having ‘consorted’
+with them, or entertained the schemes, which are attributed to him in
+the Epistles, of regenerating Sicily by their help.
+
+Plato in a hyperbolical and serio-comic vein exaggerates the follies of
+democracy which he also sees reflected in social life. To him democracy
+is a state of individualism or dissolution; in which every one is doing
+what is right in his own eyes. Of a people animated by a common spirit
+of liberty, rising as one man to repel the Persian host, which is the
+leading idea of democracy in Herodotus and Thucydides, he never seems
+to think. But if he is not a believer in liberty, still less is he a
+lover of tyranny. His deeper and more serious condemnation is reserved
+for the tyrant, who is the ideal of wickedness and also of weakness,
+and who in his utter helplessness and suspiciousness is leading an
+almost impossible existence, without that remnant of good which, in
+Plato’s opinion, was required to give power to evil (Book I). This
+ideal of wickedness living in helpless misery, is the reverse of that
+other portrait of perfect injustice ruling in happiness and splendour,
+which first of all Thrasymachus, and afterwards the sons of Ariston had
+drawn, and is also the reverse of the king whose rule of life is the
+good of his subjects.
+
+Each of these governments and individuals has a corresponding ethical
+gradation: the ideal State is under the rule of reason, not
+extinguishing but harmonizing the passions, and training them in
+virtue; in the timocracy and the timocratic man the constitution,
+whether of the State or of the individual, is based, first, upon
+courage, and secondly, upon the love of honour; this latter virtue,
+which is hardly to be esteemed a virtue, has superseded all the rest.
+In the second stage of decline the virtues have altogether disappeared,
+and the love of gain has succeeded to them; in the third stage, or
+democracy, the various passions are allowed to have free play, and the
+virtues and vices are impartially cultivated. But this freedom, which
+leads to many curious extravagances of character, is in reality only a
+state of weakness and dissipation. At last, one monster passion takes
+possession of the whole nature of man—this is tyranny. In all of them
+excess—the excess first of wealth and then of freedom, is the element
+of decay.
+
+The eighth book of the Republic abounds in pictures of life and
+fanciful allusions; the use of metaphorical language is carried to a
+greater extent than anywhere else in Plato. We may remark,
+
+(1), the description of the two nations in one, which become more and
+more divided in the Greek Republics, as in feudal times, and perhaps
+also in our own;
+
+(2), the notion of democracy expressed in a sort of Pythagorean formula
+as equality among unequals;
+
+(3), the free and easy ways of men and animals, which are
+characteristic of liberty, as foreign mercenaries and universal
+mistrust are of the tyrant;
+
+(4), the proposal that mere debts should not be recoverable by law is a
+speculation which has often been entertained by reformers of the law in
+modern times, and is in harmony with the tendencies of modern
+legislation. Debt and land were the two great difficulties of the
+ancient lawgiver: in modern times we may be said to have almost, if not
+quite, solved the first of these difficulties, but hardly the second.
+
+Still more remarkable are the corresponding portraits of individuals:
+there is the family picture of the father and mother and the old
+servant of the timocratical man, and the outward respectability and
+inherent meanness of the oligarchical; the uncontrolled licence and
+freedom of the democrat, in which the young Alcibiades seems to be
+depicted, doing right or wrong as he pleases, and who at last, like the
+prodigal, goes into a far country (note here the play of language by
+which the democratic man is himself represented under the image of a
+State having a citadel and receiving embassies); and there is the
+wild-beast nature, which breaks loose in his successor. The hit about
+the tyrant being a parricide; the representation of the tyrant’s life
+as an obscene dream; the rhetorical surprise of a more miserable than
+the most miserable of men in Book IX; the hint to the poets that if
+they are the friends of tyrants there is no place for them in a
+constitutional State, and that they are too clever not to see the
+propriety of their own expulsion; the continuous image of the drones
+who are of two kinds, swelling at last into the monster drone having
+wings (Book IX),—are among Plato’s happiest touches.
+
+There remains to be considered the great difficulty of this book of the
+Republic, the so-called number of the State. This is a puzzle almost as
+great as the Number of the Beast in the Book of Revelation, and though
+apparently known to Aristotle, is referred to by Cicero as a proverb of
+obscurity (Ep. ad Att.). And some have imagined that there is no answer
+to the puzzle, and that Plato has been practising upon his readers. But
+such a deception as this is inconsistent with the manner in which
+Aristotle speaks of the number (Pol.), and would have been ridiculous
+to any reader of the Republic who was acquainted with Greek
+mathematics. As little reason is there for supposing that Plato
+intentionally used obscure expressions; the obscurity arises from our
+want of familiarity with the subject. On the other hand, Plato himself
+indicates that he is not altogether serious, and in describing his
+number as a solemn jest of the Muses, he appears to imply some degree
+of satire on the symbolical use of number. (Compare Cratylus; Protag.)
+
+Our hope of understanding the passage depends principally on an
+accurate study of the words themselves; on which a faint light is
+thrown by the parallel passage in the ninth book. Another help is the
+allusion in Aristotle, who makes the important remark that the latter
+part of the passage (Greek) describes a solid figure. (Pol.—‘He only
+says that nothing is abiding, but that all things change in a certain
+cycle; and that the origin of the change is a base of numbers which are
+in the ratio of 4:3; and this when combined with a figure of five gives
+two harmonies; he means when the number of this figure becomes solid.’)
+Some further clue may be gathered from the appearance of the
+Pythagorean triangle, which is denoted by the numbers 3, 4, 5, and in
+which, as in every right-angled triangle, the squares of the two lesser
+sides equal the square of the hypotenuse (9 + 16 = 25).
+
+Plato begins by speaking of a perfect or cyclical number (Tim.), i.e. a
+number in which the sum of the divisors equals the whole; this is the
+divine or perfect number in which all lesser cycles or revolutions are
+complete. He also speaks of a human or imperfect number, having four
+terms and three intervals of numbers which are related to one another
+in certain proportions; these he converts into figures, and finds in
+them when they have been raised to the third power certain elements of
+number, which give two ‘harmonies,’ the one square, the other oblong;
+but he does not say that the square number answers to the divine, or
+the oblong number to the human cycle; nor is any intimation given that
+the first or divine number represents the period of the world, the
+second the period of the state, or of the human race as Zeller
+supposes; nor is the divine number afterwards mentioned (Arist.). The
+second is the number of generations or births, and presides over them
+in the same mysterious manner in which the stars preside over them, or
+in which, according to the Pythagoreans, opportunity, justice,
+marriage, are represented by some number or figure. This is probably
+the number 216.
+
+The explanation given in the text supposes the two harmonies to make up
+the number 8000. This explanation derives a certain plausibility from
+the circumstance that 8000 is the ancient number of the Spartan
+citizens (Herod.), and would be what Plato might have called ‘a number
+which nearly concerns the population of a city’; the mysterious
+disappearance of the Spartan population may possibly have suggested to
+him the first cause of his decline of States. The lesser or square
+‘harmony,’ of 400, might be a symbol of the guardians,—the larger or
+oblong ‘harmony,’ of the people, and the numbers 3, 4, 5 might refer
+respectively to the three orders in the State or parts of the soul, the
+four virtues, the five forms of government. The harmony of the musical
+scale, which is elsewhere used as a symbol of the harmony of the state,
+is also indicated. For the numbers 3, 4, 5, which represent the sides
+of the Pythagorean triangle, also denote the intervals of the scale.
+
+The terms used in the statement of the problem may be explained as
+follows. A perfect number (Greek), as already stated, is one which is
+equal to the sum of its divisors. Thus 6, which is the first perfect or
+cyclical number, = 1 + 2 + 3. The words (Greek), ‘terms’ or ‘notes,’
+and (Greek), ‘intervals,’ are applicable to music as well as to number
+and figure. (Greek) is the ‘base’ on which the whole calculation
+depends, or the ‘lowest term’ from which it can be worked out. The
+words (Greek) have been variously translated—‘squared and cubed’
+(Donaldson), ‘equalling and equalled in power’ (Weber), ‘by involution
+and evolution,’ i.e. by raising the power and extracting the root (as
+in the translation). Numbers are called ‘like and unlike’ (Greek) when
+the factors or the sides of the planes and cubes which they represent
+are or are not in the same ratio: e.g. 8 and 27 = 2 cubed and 3 cubed;
+and conversely. ‘Waxing’ (Greek) numbers, called also ‘increasing’
+(Greek), are those which are exceeded by the sum of their divisors:
+e.g. 12 and 18 are less than 16 and 21. ‘Waning’ (Greek) numbers,
+called also ‘decreasing’ (Greek) are those which succeed the sum of
+their divisors: e.g. 8 and 27 exceed 7 and 13. The words translated
+‘commensurable and agreeable to one another’ (Greek) seem to be
+different ways of describing the same relation, with more or less
+precision. They are equivalent to ‘expressible in terms having the same
+relation to one another,’ like the series 8, 12, 18, 27, each of which
+numbers is in the relation of (1 and 1/2) to the preceding. The ‘base,’
+or ‘fundamental number, which has 1/3 added to it’ (1 and 1/3) = 4/3 or
+a musical fourth. (Greek) is a ‘proportion’ of numbers as of musical
+notes, applied either to the parts or factors of a single number or to
+the relation of one number to another. The first harmony is a ‘square’
+number (Greek); the second harmony is an ‘oblong’ number (Greek), i.e.
+a number representing a figure of which the opposite sides only are
+equal. (Greek) = ‘numbers squared from’ or ‘upon diameters’; (Greek) =
+‘rational,’ i.e. omitting fractions, (Greek), ‘irrational,’ i.e.
+including fractions; e.g. 49 is a square of the rational diameter of a
+figure the side of which = 5: 50, of an irrational diameter of the
+same. For several of the explanations here given and for a good deal
+besides I am indebted to an excellent article on the Platonic Number by
+Dr. Donaldson (Proc. of the Philol. Society).
+
+The conclusions which he draws from these data are summed up by him as
+follows. Having assumed that the number of the perfect or divine cycle
+is the number of the world, and the number of the imperfect cycle the
+number of the state, he proceeds: ‘The period of the world is defined
+by the perfect number 6, that of the state by the cube of that number
+or 216, which is the product of the last pair of terms in the Platonic
+Tetractys (a series of seven terms, 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 8, 27); and if we
+take this as the basis of our computation, we shall have two cube
+numbers (Greek), viz. 8 and 27; and the mean proportionals between
+these, viz. 12 and 18, will furnish three intervals and four terms, and
+these terms and intervals stand related to one another in the
+sesqui-altera ratio, i.e. each term is to the preceding as 3/2. Now if
+we remember that the number 216 = 8 x 27 = 3 cubed + 4 cubed + 5 cubed,
+and 3 squared + 4 squared = 5 squared, we must admit that this number
+implies the numbers 3, 4, 5, to which musicians attach so much
+importance. And if we combine the ratio 4/3 with the number 5, or
+multiply the ratios of the sides by the hypotenuse, we shall by first
+squaring and then cubing obtain two expressions, which denote the ratio
+of the two last pairs of terms in the Platonic Tetractys, the former
+multiplied by the square, the latter by the cube of the number 10, the
+sum of the first four digits which constitute the Platonic Tetractys.’
+The two (Greek) he elsewhere explains as follows: ‘The first (Greek) is
+(Greek), in other words (4/3 x 5) all squared = 100 x 2 squared over 3
+squared. The second (Greek), a cube of the same root, is described as
+100 multiplied (alpha) by the rational diameter of 5 diminished by
+unity, i.e., as shown above, 48: (beta) by two incommensurable
+diameters, i.e. the two first irrationals, or 2 and 3: and (gamma) by
+the cube of 3, or 27. Thus we have (48 + 5 + 27) 100 = 1000 x 2 cubed.
+This second harmony is to be the cube of the number of which the former
+harmony is the square, and therefore must be divided by the cube of 3.
+In other words, the whole expression will be: (1), for the first
+harmony, 400/9: (2), for the second harmony, 8000/27.’
+
+The reasons which have inclined me to agree with Dr. Donaldson and also
+with Schleiermacher in supposing that 216 is the Platonic number of
+births are: (1) that it coincides with the description of the number
+given in the first part of the passage (Greek...): (2) that the number
+216 with its permutations would have been familiar to a Greek
+mathematician, though unfamiliar to us: (3) that 216 is the cube of 6,
+and also the sum of 3 cubed, 4 cubed, 5 cubed, the numbers 3, 4, 5
+representing the Pythagorean triangle, of which the sides when squared
+equal the square of the hypotenuse (9 + 16 = 25): (4) that it is also
+the period of the Pythagorean Metempsychosis: (5) the three ultimate
+terms or bases (3, 4, 5) of which 216 is composed answer to the third,
+fourth, fifth in the musical scale: (6) that the number 216 is the
+product of the cubes of 2 and 3, which are the two last terms in the
+Platonic Tetractys: (7) that the Pythagorean triangle is said by
+Plutarch (de Is. et Osir.), Proclus (super prima Eucl.), and Quintilian
+(de Musica) to be contained in this passage, so that the tradition of
+the school seems to point in the same direction: (8) that the
+Pythagorean triangle is called also the figure of marriage (Greek).
+
+But though agreeing with Dr. Donaldson thus far, I see no reason for
+supposing, as he does, that the first or perfect number is the world,
+the human or imperfect number the state; nor has he given any proof
+that the second harmony is a cube. Nor do I think that (Greek) can mean
+‘two incommensurables,’ which he arbitrarily assumes to be 2 and 3, but
+rather, as the preceding clause implies, (Greek), i.e. two square
+numbers based upon irrational diameters of a figure the side of which
+is 5 = 50 x 2.
+
+The greatest objection to the translation is the sense given to the
+words (Greek), ‘a base of three with a third added to it, multiplied by
+5.’ In this somewhat forced manner Plato introduces once more the
+numbers of the Pythagorean triangle. But the coincidences in the
+numbers which follow are in favour of the explanation. The first
+harmony of 400, as has been already remarked, probably represents the
+rulers; the second and oblong harmony of 7600, the people.
+
+And here we take leave of the difficulty. The discovery of the riddle
+would be useless, and would throw no light on ancient mathematics. The
+point of interest is that Plato should have used such a symbol, and
+that so much of the Pythagorean spirit should have prevailed in him.
+His general meaning is that divine creation is perfect, and is
+represented or presided over by a perfect or cyclical number; human
+generation is imperfect, and represented or presided over by an
+imperfect number or series of numbers. The number 5040, which is the
+number of the citizens in the Laws, is expressly based by him on
+utilitarian grounds, namely, the convenience of the number for
+division; it is also made up of the first seven digits multiplied by
+one another. The contrast of the perfect and imperfect number may have
+been easily suggested by the corrections of the cycle, which were made
+first by Meton and secondly by Callippus; (the latter is said to have
+been a pupil of Plato). Of the degree of importance or of exactness to
+be attributed to the problem, the number of the tyrant in Book IX (729
+= 365 x 2), and the slight correction of the error in the number
+5040/12 (Laws), may furnish a criterion. There is nothing surprising in
+the circumstance that those who were seeking for order in nature and
+had found order in number, should have imagined one to give law to the
+other. Plato believes in a power of number far beyond what he could see
+realized in the world around him, and he knows the great influence
+which ‘the little matter of 1, 2, 3’ exercises upon education. He may
+even be thought to have a prophetic anticipation of the discoveries of
+Quetelet and others, that numbers depend upon numbers; e.g.—in
+population, the numbers of births and the respective numbers of
+children born of either sex, on the respective ages of parents, i.e. on
+other numbers.
+
+BOOK IX. Last of all comes the tyrannical man, about whom we have to
+enquire, Whence is he, and how does he live—in happiness or in misery?
+There is, however, a previous question of the nature and number of the
+appetites, which I should like to consider first. Some of them are
+unlawful, and yet admit of being chastened and weakened in various
+degrees by the power of reason and law. ‘What appetites do you mean?’ I
+mean those which are awake when the reasoning powers are asleep, which
+get up and walk about naked without any self-respect or shame; and
+there is no conceivable folly or crime, however cruel or unnatural, of
+which, in imagination, they may not be guilty. ‘True,’ he said; ‘very
+true.’ But when a man’s pulse beats temperately; and he has supped on a
+feast of reason and come to a knowledge of himself before going to
+rest, and has satisfied his desires just enough to prevent their
+perturbing his reason, which remains clear and luminous, and when he is
+free from quarrel and heat,—the visions which he has on his bed are
+least irregular and abnormal. Even in good men there is such an
+irregular wild-beast nature, which peers out in sleep.
+
+To return:—You remember what was said of the democrat; that he was the
+son of a miserly father, who encouraged the saving desires and
+repressed the ornamental and expensive ones; presently the youth got
+into fine company, and began to entertain a dislike to his father’s
+narrow ways; and being a better man than the corrupters of his youth,
+he came to a mean, and led a life, not of lawless or slavish passion,
+but of regular and successive indulgence. Now imagine that the youth
+has become a father, and has a son who is exposed to the same
+temptations, and has companions who lead him into every sort of
+iniquity, and parents and friends who try to keep him right. The
+counsellors of evil find that their only chance of retaining him is to
+implant in his soul a monster drone, or love; while other desires buzz
+around him and mystify him with sweet sounds and scents, this monster
+love takes possession of him, and puts an end to every true or modest
+thought or wish. Love, like drunkenness and madness, is a tyranny; and
+the tyrannical man, whether made by nature or habit, is just a
+drinking, lusting, furious sort of animal.
+
+And how does such an one live? ‘Nay, that you must tell me.’ Well then,
+I fancy that he will live amid revelries and harlotries, and love will
+be the lord and master of the house. Many desires require much money,
+and so he spends all that he has and borrows more; and when he has
+nothing the young ravens are still in the nest in which they were
+hatched, crying for food. Love urges them on; and they must be
+gratified by force or fraud, or if not, they become painful and
+troublesome; and as the new pleasures succeed the old ones, so will the
+son take possession of the goods of his parents; if they show signs of
+refusing, he will defraud and deceive them; and if they openly resist,
+what then? ‘I can only say, that I should not much like to be in their
+place.’ But, O heavens, Adeimantus, to think that for some new-fangled
+and unnecessary love he will give up his old father and mother, best
+and dearest of friends, or enslave them to the fancies of the hour!
+Truly a tyrannical son is a blessing to his father and mother! When
+there is no more to be got out of them, he turns burglar or pickpocket,
+or robs a temple. Love overmasters the thoughts of his youth, and he
+becomes in sober reality the monster that he was sometimes in sleep. He
+waxes strong in all violence and lawlessness; and is ready for any deed
+of daring that will supply the wants of his rabble-rout. In a
+well-ordered State there are only a few such, and these in time of war
+go out and become the mercenaries of a tyrant. But in time of peace
+they stay at home and do mischief; they are the thieves, footpads,
+cut-purses, man-stealers of the community; or if they are able to
+speak, they turn false-witnesses and informers. ‘No small catalogue of
+crimes truly, even if the perpetrators are few.’ Yes, I said; but small
+and great are relative terms, and no crimes which are committed by them
+approach those of the tyrant, whom this class, growing strong and
+numerous, create out of themselves. If the people yield, well and good,
+but, if they resist, then, as before he beat his father and mother, so
+now he beats his fatherland and motherland, and places his mercenaries
+over them. Such men in their early days live with flatterers, and they
+themselves flatter others, in order to gain their ends; but they soon
+discard their followers when they have no longer any need of them; they
+are always either masters or servants,—the joys of friendship are
+unknown to them. And they are utterly treacherous and unjust, if the
+nature of justice be at all understood by us. They realize our dream;
+and he who is the most of a tyrant by nature, and leads the life of a
+tyrant for the longest time, will be the worst of them, and being the
+worst of them, will also be the most miserable.
+
+Like man, like State,—the tyrannical man will answer to tyranny, which
+is the extreme opposite of the royal State; for one is the best and the
+other the worst. But which is the happier? Great and terrible as the
+tyrant may appear enthroned amid his satellites, let us not be afraid
+to go in and ask; and the answer is, that the monarchical is the
+happiest, and the tyrannical the most miserable of States. And may we
+not ask the same question about the men themselves, requesting some one
+to look into them who is able to penetrate the inner nature of man, and
+will not be panic-struck by the vain pomp of tyranny? I will suppose
+that he is one who has lived with him, and has seen him in family life,
+or perhaps in the hour of trouble and danger.
+
+Assuming that we ourselves are the impartial judge for whom we seek,
+let us begin by comparing the individual and State, and ask first of
+all, whether the State is likely to be free or enslaved—Will there not
+be a little freedom and a great deal of slavery? And the freedom is of
+the bad, and the slavery of the good; and this applies to the man as
+well as to the State; for his soul is full of meanness and slavery, and
+the better part is enslaved to the worse. He cannot do what he would,
+and his mind is full of confusion; he is the very reverse of a freeman.
+The State will be poor and full of misery and sorrow; and the man’s
+soul will also be poor and full of sorrows, and he will be the most
+miserable of men. No, not the most miserable, for there is yet a more
+miserable. ‘Who is that?’ The tyrannical man who has the misfortune
+also to become a public tyrant. ‘There I suspect that you are right.’
+Say rather, ‘I am sure;’ conjecture is out of place in an enquiry of
+this nature. He is like a wealthy owner of slaves, only he has more of
+them than any private individual. You will say, ‘The owners of slaves
+are not generally in any fear of them.’ But why? Because the whole city
+is in a league which protects the individual. Suppose however that one
+of these owners and his household is carried off by a god into a
+wilderness, where there are no freemen to help him—will he not be in an
+agony of terror?—will he not be compelled to flatter his slaves and to
+promise them many things sore against his will? And suppose the same
+god who carried him off were to surround him with neighbours who
+declare that no man ought to have slaves, and that the owners of them
+should be punished with death. ‘Still worse and worse! He will be in
+the midst of his enemies.’ And is not our tyrant such a captive soul,
+who is tormented by a swarm of passions which he cannot indulge; living
+indoors always like a woman, and jealous of those who can go out and
+see the world?
+
+Having so many evils, will not the most miserable of men be still more
+miserable in a public station? Master of others when he is not master
+of himself; like a sick man who is compelled to be an athlete; the
+meanest of slaves and the most abject of flatterers; wanting all
+things, and never able to satisfy his desires; always in fear and
+distraction, like the State of which he is the representative. His
+jealous, hateful, faithless temper grows worse with command; he is more
+and more faithless, envious, unrighteous,—the most wretched of men, a
+misery to himself and to others. And so let us have a final trial and
+proclamation; need we hire a herald, or shall I proclaim the result?
+‘Made the proclamation yourself.’ The son of Ariston (the best) is of
+opinion that the best and justest of men is also the happiest, and that
+this is he who is the most royal master of himself; and that the unjust
+man is he who is the greatest tyrant of himself and of his State. And I
+add further—‘seen or unseen by gods or men.’
+
+This is our first proof. The second is derived from the three kinds of
+pleasure, which answer to the three elements of the soul—reason,
+passion, desire; under which last is comprehended avarice as well as
+sensual appetite, while passion includes ambition, party-feeling, love
+of reputation. Reason, again, is solely directed to the attainment of
+truth, and careless of money and reputation. In accordance with the
+difference of men’s natures, one of these three principles is in the
+ascendant, and they have their several pleasures corresponding to them.
+Interrogate now the three natures, and each one will be found praising
+his own pleasures and depreciating those of others. The money-maker
+will contrast the vanity of knowledge with the solid advantages of
+wealth. The ambitious man will despise knowledge which brings no
+honour; whereas the philosopher will regard only the fruition of truth,
+and will call other pleasures necessary rather than good. Now, how
+shall we decide between them? Is there any better criterion than
+experience and knowledge? And which of the three has the truest
+knowledge and the widest experience? The experience of youth makes the
+philosopher acquainted with the two kinds of desire, but the avaricious
+and the ambitious man never taste the pleasures of truth and wisdom.
+Honour he has equally with them; they are ‘judged of him,’ but he is
+‘not judged of them,’ for they never attain to the knowledge of true
+being. And his instrument is reason, whereas their standard is only
+wealth and honour; and if by reason we are to judge, his good will be
+the truest. And so we arrive at the result that the pleasure of the
+rational part of the soul, and a life passed in such pleasure is the
+pleasantest. He who has a right to judge judges thus. Next comes the
+life of ambition, and, in the third place, that of money-making.
+
+Twice has the just man overthrown the unjust—once more, as in an
+Olympian contest, first offering up a prayer to the saviour Zeus, let
+him try a fall. A wise man whispers to me that the pleasures of the
+wise are true and pure; all others are a shadow only. Let us examine
+this: Is not pleasure opposed to pain, and is there not a mean state
+which is neither? When a man is sick, nothing is more pleasant to him
+than health. But this he never found out while he was well. In pain he
+desires only to cease from pain; on the other hand, when he is in an
+ecstasy of pleasure, rest is painful to him. Thus rest or cessation is
+both pleasure and pain. But can that which is neither become both?
+Again, pleasure and pain are motions, and the absence of them is rest;
+but if so, how can the absence of either of them be the other? Thus we
+are led to infer that the contradiction is an appearance only, and
+witchery of the senses. And these are not the only pleasures, for there
+are others which have no preceding pains. Pure pleasure then is not the
+absence of pain, nor pure pain the absence of pleasure; although most
+of the pleasures which reach the mind through the body are reliefs of
+pain, and have not only their reactions when they depart, but their
+anticipations before they come. They can be best described in a simile.
+There is in nature an upper, lower, and middle region, and he who
+passes from the lower to the middle imagines that he is going up and is
+already in the upper world; and if he were taken back again would
+think, and truly think, that he was descending. All this arises out of
+his ignorance of the true upper, middle, and lower regions. And a like
+confusion happens with pleasure and pain, and with many other things.
+The man who compares grey with black, calls grey white; and the man who
+compares absence of pain with pain, calls the absence of pain pleasure.
+Again, hunger and thirst are inanitions of the body, ignorance and
+folly of the soul; and food is the satisfaction of the one, knowledge
+of the other. Now which is the purer satisfaction—that of eating and
+drinking, or that of knowledge? Consider the matter thus: The
+satisfaction of that which has more existence is truer than of that
+which has less. The invariable and immortal has a more real existence
+than the variable and mortal, and has a corresponding measure of
+knowledge and truth. The soul, again, has more existence and truth and
+knowledge than the body, and is therefore more really satisfied and has
+a more natural pleasure. Those who feast only on earthly food, are
+always going at random up to the middle and down again; but they never
+pass into the true upper world, or have a taste of true pleasure. They
+are like fatted beasts, full of gluttony and sensuality, and ready to
+kill one another by reason of their insatiable lust; for they are not
+filled with true being, and their vessel is leaky (Gorgias). Their
+pleasures are mere shadows of pleasure, mixed with pain, coloured and
+intensified by contrast, and therefore intensely desired; and men go
+fighting about them, as Stesichorus says that the Greeks fought about
+the shadow of Helen at Troy, because they know not the truth.
+
+The same may be said of the passionate element:—the desires of the
+ambitious soul, as well as of the covetous, have an inferior
+satisfaction. Only when under the guidance of reason do either of the
+other principles do their own business or attain the pleasure which is
+natural to them. When not attaining, they compel the other parts of the
+soul to pursue a shadow of pleasure which is not theirs. And the more
+distant they are from philosophy and reason, the more distant they will
+be from law and order, and the more illusive will be their pleasures.
+The desires of love and tyranny are the farthest from law, and those of
+the king are nearest to it. There is one genuine pleasure, and two
+spurious ones: the tyrant goes beyond even the latter; he has run away
+altogether from law and reason. Nor can the measure of his inferiority
+be told, except in a figure. The tyrant is the third removed from the
+oligarch, and has therefore, not a shadow of his pleasure, but the
+shadow of a shadow only. The oligarch, again, is thrice removed from
+the king, and thus we get the formula 3 x 3, which is the number of a
+surface, representing the shadow which is the tyrant’s pleasure, and if
+you like to cube this ‘number of the beast,’ you will find that the
+measure of the difference amounts to 729; the king is 729 times more
+happy than the tyrant. And this extraordinary number is NEARLY equal to
+the number of days and nights in a year (365 x 2 = 730); and is
+therefore concerned with human life. This is the interval between a
+good and bad man in happiness only: what must be the difference between
+them in comeliness of life and virtue!
+
+Perhaps you may remember some one saying at the beginning of our
+discussion that the unjust man was profited if he had the reputation of
+justice. Now that we know the nature of justice and injustice, let us
+make an image of the soul, which will personify his words. First of
+all, fashion a multitudinous beast, having a ring of heads of all
+manner of animals, tame and wild, and able to produce and change them
+at pleasure. Suppose now another form of a lion, and another of a man;
+the second smaller than the first, the third than the second; join them
+together and cover them with a human skin, in which they are completely
+concealed. When this has been done, let us tell the supporter of
+injustice that he is feeding up the beasts and starving the man. The
+maintainer of justice, on the other hand, is trying to strengthen the
+man; he is nourishing the gentle principle within him, and making an
+alliance with the lion heart, in order that he may be able to keep down
+the many-headed hydra, and bring all into unity with each other and
+with themselves. Thus in every point of view, whether in relation to
+pleasure, honour, or advantage, the just man is right, and the unjust
+wrong.
+
+But now, let us reason with the unjust, who is not intentionally in
+error. Is not the noble that which subjects the beast to the man, or
+rather to the God in man; the ignoble, that which subjects the man to
+the beast? And if so, who would receive gold on condition that he was
+to degrade the noblest part of himself under the worst?—who would sell
+his son or daughter into the hands of brutal and evil men, for any
+amount of money? And will he sell his own fairer and diviner part
+without any compunction to the most godless and foul? Would he not be
+worse than Eriphyle, who sold her husband’s life for a necklace? And
+intemperance is the letting loose of the multiform monster, and pride
+and sullenness are the growth and increase of the lion and serpent
+element, while luxury and effeminacy are caused by a too great
+relaxation of spirit. Flattery and meanness again arise when the
+spirited element is subjected to avarice, and the lion is habituated to
+become a monkey. The real disgrace of handicraft arts is, that those
+who are engaged in them have to flatter, instead of mastering their
+desires; therefore we say that they should be placed under the control
+of the better principle in another because they have none in
+themselves; not, as Thrasymachus imagined, to the injury of the
+subjects, but for their good. And our intention in educating the young,
+is to give them self-control; the law desires to nurse up in them a
+higher principle, and when they have acquired this, they may go their
+ways.
+
+‘What, then, shall a man profit, if he gain the whole world’ and become
+more and more wicked? Or what shall he profit by escaping discovery, if
+the concealment of evil prevents the cure? If he had been punished, the
+brute within him would have been silenced, and the gentler element
+liberated; and he would have united temperance, justice, and wisdom in
+his soul—a union better far than any combination of bodily gifts. The
+man of understanding will honour knowledge above all; in the next place
+he will keep under his body, not only for the sake of health and
+strength, but in order to attain the most perfect harmony of body and
+soul. In the acquisition of riches, too, he will aim at order and
+harmony; he will not desire to heap up wealth without measure, but he
+will fear that the increase of wealth will disturb the constitution of
+his own soul. For the same reason he will only accept such honours as
+will make him a better man; any others he will decline. ‘In that case,’
+said he, ‘he will never be a politician.’ Yes, but he will, in his own
+city; though probably not in his native country, unless by some divine
+accident. ‘You mean that he will be a citizen of the ideal city, which
+has no place upon earth.’ But in heaven, I replied, there is a pattern
+of such a city, and he who wishes may order his life after that image.
+Whether such a state is or ever will be matters not; he will act
+according to that pattern and no other...
+
+The most noticeable points in the 9th Book of the Republic are:—(1) the
+account of pleasure; (2) the number of the interval which divides the
+king from the tyrant; (3) the pattern which is in heaven.
+
+1. Plato’s account of pleasure is remarkable for moderation, and in
+this respect contrasts with the later Platonists and the views which
+are attributed to them by Aristotle. He is not, like the Cynics,
+opposed to all pleasure, but rather desires that the several parts of
+the soul shall have their natural satisfaction; he even agrees with the
+Epicureans in describing pleasure as something more than the absence of
+pain. This is proved by the circumstance that there are pleasures which
+have no antecedent pains (as he also remarks in the Philebus), such as
+the pleasures of smell, and also the pleasures of hope and
+anticipation. In the previous book he had made the distinction between
+necessary and unnecessary pleasure, which is repeated by Aristotle, and
+he now observes that there are a further class of ‘wild beast’
+pleasures, corresponding to Aristotle’s (Greek). He dwells upon the
+relative and unreal character of sensual pleasures and the illusion
+which arises out of the contrast of pleasure and pain, pointing out the
+superiority of the pleasures of reason, which are at rest, over the
+fleeting pleasures of sense and emotion. The pre-eminence of royal
+pleasure is shown by the fact that reason is able to form a judgment of
+the lower pleasures, while the two lower parts of the soul are
+incapable of judging the pleasures of reason. Thus, in his treatment of
+pleasure, as in many other subjects, the philosophy of Plato is ‘sawn
+up into quantities’ by Aristotle; the analysis which was originally
+made by him became in the next generation the foundation of further
+technical distinctions. Both in Plato and Aristotle we note the
+illusion under which the ancients fell of regarding the transience of
+pleasure as a proof of its unreality, and of confounding the permanence
+of the intellectual pleasures with the unchangeableness of the
+knowledge from which they are derived. Neither do we like to admit that
+the pleasures of knowledge, though more elevating, are not more lasting
+than other pleasures, and are almost equally dependent on the accidents
+of our bodily state (Introduction to Philebus).
+
+2. The number of the interval which separates the king from the tyrant,
+and royal from tyrannical pleasures, is 729, the cube of 9. Which Plato
+characteristically designates as a number concerned with human life,
+because NEARLY equivalent to the number of days and nights in the year.
+He is desirous of proclaiming that the interval between them is
+immeasurable, and invents a formula to give expression to his idea.
+Those who spoke of justice as a cube, of virtue as an art of measuring
+(Prot.), saw no inappropriateness in conceiving the soul under the
+figure of a line, or the pleasure of the tyrant as separated from the
+pleasure of the king by the numerical interval of 729. And in modern
+times we sometimes use metaphorically what Plato employed as a
+philosophical formula. ‘It is not easy to estimate the loss of the
+tyrant, except perhaps in this way,’ says Plato. So we might say, that
+although the life of a good man is not to be compared to that of a bad
+man, yet you may measure the difference between them by valuing one
+minute of the one at an hour of the other (‘One day in thy courts is
+better than a thousand’), or you might say that ‘there is an infinite
+difference.’ But this is not so much as saying, in homely phrase, ‘They
+are a thousand miles asunder.’ And accordingly Plato finds the natural
+vehicle of his thoughts in a progression of numbers; this arithmetical
+formula he draws out with the utmost seriousness, and both here and in
+the number of generation seems to find an additional proof of the truth
+of his speculation in forming the number into a geometrical figure;
+just as persons in our own day are apt to fancy that a statement is
+verified when it has been only thrown into an abstract form. In
+speaking of the number 729 as proper to human life, he probably
+intended to intimate that one year of the tyrannical = 12 hours of the
+royal life.
+
+The simple observation that the comparison of two similar solids is
+effected by the comparison of the cubes of their sides, is the
+mathematical groundwork of this fanciful expression. There is some
+difficulty in explaining the steps by which the number 729 is obtained;
+the oligarch is removed in the third degree from the royal and
+aristocratical, and the tyrant in the third degree from the
+oligarchical; but we have to arrange the terms as the sides of a square
+and to count the oligarch twice over, thus reckoning them not as = 5
+but as = 9. The square of 9 is passed lightly over as only a step
+towards the cube.
+
+3. Towards the close of the Republic, Plato seems to be more and more
+convinced of the ideal character of his own speculations. At the end of
+the 9th Book the pattern which is in heaven takes the place of the city
+of philosophers on earth. The vision which has received form and
+substance at his hands, is now discovered to be at a distance. And yet
+this distant kingdom is also the rule of man’s life. (‘Say not lo!
+here, or lo! there, for the kingdom of God is within you.’) Thus a note
+is struck which prepares for the revelation of a future life in the
+following Book. But the future life is present still; the ideal of
+politics is to be realized in the individual.
+
+BOOK X. Many things pleased me in the order of our State, but there was
+nothing which I liked better than the regulation about poetry. The
+division of the soul throws a new light on our exclusion of imitation.
+I do not mind telling you in confidence that all poetry is an outrage
+on the understanding, unless the hearers have that balm of knowledge
+which heals error. I have loved Homer ever since I was a boy, and even
+now he appears to me to be the great master of tragic poetry. But much
+as I love the man, I love truth more, and therefore I must speak out:
+and first of all, will you explain what is imitation, for really I do
+not understand? ‘How likely then that I should understand!’ That might
+very well be, for the duller often sees better than the keener eye.
+‘True, but in your presence I can hardly venture to say what I think.’
+Then suppose that we begin in our old fashion, with the doctrine of
+universals. Let us assume the existence of beds and tables. There is
+one idea of a bed, or of a table, which the maker of each had in his
+mind when making them; he did not make the ideas of beds and tables,
+but he made beds and tables according to the ideas. And is there not a
+maker of the works of all workmen, who makes not only vessels but
+plants and animals, himself, the earth and heaven, and things in heaven
+and under the earth? He makes the Gods also. ‘He must be a wizard
+indeed!’ But do you not see that there is a sense in which you could do
+the same? You have only to take a mirror, and catch the reflection of
+the sun, and the earth, or anything else—there now you have made them.
+‘Yes, but only in appearance.’ Exactly so; and the painter is such a
+creator as you are with the mirror, and he is even more unreal than the
+carpenter; although neither the carpenter nor any other artist can be
+supposed to make the absolute bed. ‘Not if philosophers may be
+believed.’ Nor need we wonder that his bed has but an imperfect
+relation to the truth. Reflect:—Here are three beds; one in nature,
+which is made by God; another, which is made by the carpenter; and the
+third, by the painter. God only made one, nor could he have made more
+than one; for if there had been two, there would always have been a
+third—more absolute and abstract than either, under which they would
+have been included. We may therefore conceive God to be the natural
+maker of the bed, and in a lower sense the carpenter is also the maker;
+but the painter is rather the imitator of what the other two make; he
+has to do with a creation which is thrice removed from reality. And the
+tragic poet is an imitator, and, like every other imitator, is thrice
+removed from the king and from the truth. The painter imitates not the
+original bed, but the bed made by the carpenter. And this, without
+being really different, appears to be different, and has many points of
+view, of which only one is caught by the painter, who represents
+everything because he represents a piece of everything, and that piece
+an image. And he can paint any other artist, although he knows nothing
+of their arts; and this with sufficient skill to deceive children or
+simple people. Suppose now that somebody came to us and told us, how he
+had met a man who knew all that everybody knows, and better than
+anybody:—should we not infer him to be a simpleton who, having no
+discernment of truth and falsehood, had met with a wizard or enchanter,
+whom he fancied to be all-wise? And when we hear persons saying that
+Homer and the tragedians know all the arts and all the virtues, must we
+not infer that they are under a similar delusion? they do not see that
+the poets are imitators, and that their creations are only imitations.
+‘Very true.’ But if a person could create as well as imitate, he would
+rather leave some permanent work and not an imitation only; he would
+rather be the receiver than the giver of praise? ‘Yes, for then he
+would have more honour and advantage.’
+
+Let us now interrogate Homer and the poets. Friend Homer, say I to him,
+I am not going to ask you about medicine, or any art to which your
+poems incidentally refer, but about their main subjects—war, military
+tactics, politics. If you are only twice and not thrice removed from
+the truth—not an imitator or an image-maker, please to inform us what
+good you have ever done to mankind? Is there any city which professes
+to have received laws from you, as Sicily and Italy have from
+Charondas, Sparta from Lycurgus, Athens from Solon? Or was any war ever
+carried on by your counsels? or is any invention attributed to you, as
+there is to Thales and Anacharsis? Or is there any Homeric way of life,
+such as the Pythagorean was, in which you instructed men, and which is
+called after you? ‘No, indeed; and Creophylus (Flesh-child) was even
+more unfortunate in his breeding than he was in his name, if, as
+tradition says, Homer in his lifetime was allowed by him and his other
+friends to starve.’ Yes, but could this ever have happened if Homer had
+really been the educator of Hellas? Would he not have had many devoted
+followers? If Protagoras and Prodicus can persuade their contemporaries
+that no one can manage house or State without them, is it likely that
+Homer and Hesiod would have been allowed to go about as beggars—I mean
+if they had really been able to do the world any good?—would not men
+have compelled them to stay where they were, or have followed them
+about in order to get education? But they did not; and therefore we may
+infer that Homer and all the poets are only imitators, who do but
+imitate the appearances of things. For as a painter by a knowledge of
+figure and colour can paint a cobbler without any practice in cobbling,
+so the poet can delineate any art in the colours of language, and give
+harmony and rhythm to the cobbler and also to the general; and you know
+how mere narration, when deprived of the ornaments of metre, is like a
+face which has lost the beauty of youth and never had any other. Once
+more, the imitator has no knowledge of reality, but only of appearance.
+The painter paints, and the artificer makes a bridle and reins, but
+neither understands the use of them—the knowledge of this is confined
+to the horseman; and so of other things. Thus we have three arts: one
+of use, another of invention, a third of imitation; and the user
+furnishes the rule to the two others. The flute-player will know the
+good and bad flute, and the maker will put faith in him; but the
+imitator will neither know nor have faith—neither science nor true
+opinion can be ascribed to him. Imitation, then, is devoid of
+knowledge, being only a kind of play or sport, and the tragic and epic
+poets are imitators in the highest degree.
+
+And now let us enquire, what is the faculty in man which answers to
+imitation. Allow me to explain my meaning: Objects are differently seen
+when in the water and when out of the water, when near and when at a
+distance; and the painter or juggler makes use of this variation to
+impose upon us. And the art of measuring and weighing and calculating
+comes in to save our bewildered minds from the power of appearance;
+for, as we were saying, two contrary opinions of the same about the
+same and at the same time, cannot both of them be true. But which of
+them is true is determined by the art of calculation; and this is
+allied to the better faculty in the soul, as the arts of imitation are
+to the worse. And the same holds of the ear as well as of the eye, of
+poetry as well as painting. The imitation is of actions voluntary or
+involuntary, in which there is an expectation of a good or bad result,
+and present experience of pleasure and pain. But is a man in harmony
+with himself when he is the subject of these conflicting influences? Is
+there not rather a contradiction in him? Let me further ask, whether he
+is more likely to control sorrow when he is alone or when he is in
+company. ‘In the latter case.’ Feeling would lead him to indulge his
+sorrow, but reason and law control him and enjoin patience; since he
+cannot know whether his affliction is good or evil, and no human thing
+is of any great consequence, while sorrow is certainly a hindrance to
+good counsel. For when we stumble, we should not, like children, make
+an uproar; we should take the measures which reason prescribes, not
+raising a lament, but finding a cure. And the better part of us is
+ready to follow reason, while the irrational principle is full of
+sorrow and distraction at the recollection of our troubles.
+Unfortunately, however, this latter furnishes the chief materials of
+the imitative arts. Whereas reason is ever in repose and cannot easily
+be displayed, especially to a mixed multitude who have no experience of
+her. Thus the poet is like the painter in two ways: first he paints an
+inferior degree of truth, and secondly, he is concerned with an
+inferior part of the soul. He indulges the feelings, while he enfeebles
+the reason; and we refuse to allow him to have authority over the mind
+of man; for he has no measure of greater and less, and is a maker of
+images and very far gone from truth.
+
+But we have not yet mentioned the heaviest count in the indictment—the
+power which poetry has of injuriously exciting the feelings. When we
+hear some passage in which a hero laments his sufferings at tedious
+length, you know that we sympathize with him and praise the poet; and
+yet in our own sorrows such an exhibition of feeling is regarded as
+effeminate and unmanly (Ion). Now, ought a man to feel pleasure in
+seeing another do what he hates and abominates in himself? Is he not
+giving way to a sentiment which in his own case he would control?—he is
+off his guard because the sorrow is another’s; and he thinks that he
+may indulge his feelings without disgrace, and will be the gainer by
+the pleasure. But the inevitable consequence is that he who begins by
+weeping at the sorrows of others, will end by weeping at his own. The
+same is true of comedy,—you may often laugh at buffoonery which you
+would be ashamed to utter, and the love of coarse merriment on the
+stage will at last turn you into a buffoon at home. Poetry feeds and
+waters the passions and desires; she lets them rule instead of ruling
+them. And therefore, when we hear the encomiasts of Homer affirming
+that he is the educator of Hellas, and that all life should be
+regulated by his precepts, we may allow the excellence of their
+intentions, and agree with them in thinking Homer a great poet and
+tragedian. But we shall continue to prohibit all poetry which goes
+beyond hymns to the Gods and praises of famous men. Not pleasure and
+pain, but law and reason shall rule in our State.
+
+These are our grounds for expelling poetry; but lest she should charge
+us with discourtesy, let us also make an apology to her. We will remind
+her that there is an ancient quarrel between poetry and philosophy, of
+which there are many traces in the writings of the poets, such as the
+saying of ‘the she-dog, yelping at her mistress,’ and ‘the philosophers
+who are ready to circumvent Zeus,’ and ‘the philosophers who are
+paupers.’ Nevertheless we bear her no ill-will, and will gladly allow
+her to return upon condition that she makes a defence of herself in
+verse; and her supporters who are not poets may speak in prose. We
+confess her charms; but if she cannot show that she is useful as well
+as delightful, like rational lovers, we must renounce our love, though
+endeared to us by early associations. Having come to years of
+discretion, we know that poetry is not truth, and that a man should be
+careful how he introduces her to that state or constitution which he
+himself is; for there is a mighty issue at stake—no less than the good
+or evil of a human soul. And it is not worth while to forsake justice
+and virtue for the attractions of poetry, any more than for the sake of
+honour or wealth. ‘I agree with you.’
+
+And yet the rewards of virtue are greater far than I have described.
+‘And can we conceive things greater still?’ Not, perhaps, in this brief
+span of life: but should an immortal being care about anything short of
+eternity? ‘I do not understand what you mean?’ Do you not know that the
+soul is immortal? ‘Surely you are not prepared to prove that?’ Indeed I
+am. ‘Then let me hear this argument, of which you make so light.’
+
+You would admit that everything has an element of good and of evil. In
+all things there is an inherent corruption; and if this cannot destroy
+them, nothing else will. The soul too has her own corrupting
+principles, which are injustice, intemperance, cowardice, and the like.
+But none of these destroy the soul in the same sense that disease
+destroys the body. The soul may be full of all iniquities, but is not,
+by reason of them, brought any nearer to death. Nothing which was not
+destroyed from within ever perished by external affection of evil. The
+body, which is one thing, cannot be destroyed by food, which is
+another, unless the badness of the food is communicated to the body.
+Neither can the soul, which is one thing, be corrupted by the body,
+which is another, unless she herself is infected. And as no bodily evil
+can infect the soul, neither can any bodily evil, whether disease or
+violence, or any other destroy the soul, unless it can be shown to
+render her unholy and unjust. But no one will ever prove that the souls
+of men become more unjust when they die. If a person has the audacity
+to say the contrary, the answer is—Then why do criminals require the
+hand of the executioner, and not die of themselves? ‘Truly,’ he said,
+‘injustice would not be very terrible if it brought a cessation of
+evil; but I rather believe that the injustice which murders others may
+tend to quicken and stimulate the life of the unjust.’ You are quite
+right. If sin which is her own natural and inherent evil cannot destroy
+the soul, hardly will anything else destroy her. But the soul which
+cannot be destroyed either by internal or external evil must be
+immortal and everlasting. And if this be true, souls will always exist
+in the same number. They cannot diminish, because they cannot be
+destroyed; nor yet increase, for the increase of the immortal must come
+from something mortal, and so all would end in immortality. Neither is
+the soul variable and diverse; for that which is immortal must be of
+the fairest and simplest composition. If we would conceive her truly,
+and so behold justice and injustice in their own nature, she must be
+viewed by the light of reason pure as at birth, or as she is reflected
+in philosophy when holding converse with the divine and immortal and
+eternal. In her present condition we see her only like the sea-god
+Glaucus, bruised and maimed in the sea which is the world, and covered
+with shells and stones which are incrusted upon her from the
+entertainments of earth.
+
+Thus far, as the argument required, we have said nothing of the rewards
+and honours which the poets attribute to justice; we have contented
+ourselves with showing that justice in herself is best for the soul in
+herself, even if a man should put on a Gyges’ ring and have the helmet
+of Hades too. And now you shall repay me what you borrowed; and I will
+enumerate the rewards of justice in life and after death. I granted,
+for the sake of argument, as you will remember, that evil might perhaps
+escape the knowledge of Gods and men, although this was really
+impossible. And since I have shown that justice has reality, you must
+grant me also that she has the palm of appearance. In the first place,
+the just man is known to the Gods, and he is therefore the friend of
+the Gods, and he will receive at their hands every good, always
+excepting such evil as is the necessary consequence of former sins. All
+things end in good to him, either in life or after death, even what
+appears to be evil; for the Gods have a care of him who desires to be
+in their likeness. And what shall we say of men? Is not honesty the
+best policy? The clever rogue makes a great start at first, but breaks
+down before he reaches the goal, and slinks away in dishonour; whereas
+the true runner perseveres to the end, and receives the prize. And you
+must allow me to repeat all the blessings which you attributed to the
+fortunate unjust—they bear rule in the city, they marry and give in
+marriage to whom they will; and the evils which you attributed to the
+unfortunate just, do really fall in the end on the unjust, although, as
+you implied, their sufferings are better veiled in silence.
+
+But all the blessings of this present life are as nothing when compared
+with those which await good men after death. ‘I should like to hear
+about them.’ Come, then, and I will tell you the story of Er, the son
+of Armenius, a valiant man. He was supposed to have died in battle, but
+ten days afterwards his body was found untouched by corruption and sent
+home for burial. On the twelfth day he was placed on the funeral pyre
+and there he came to life again, and told what he had seen in the world
+below. He said that his soul went with a great company to a place, in
+which there were two chasms near together in the earth beneath, and two
+corresponding chasms in the heaven above. And there were judges sitting
+in the intermediate space, bidding the just ascend by the heavenly way
+on the right hand, having the seal of their judgment set upon them
+before, while the unjust, having the seal behind, were bidden to
+descend by the way on the left hand. Him they told to look and listen,
+as he was to be their messenger to men from the world below. And he
+beheld and saw the souls departing after judgment at either chasm; some
+who came from earth, were worn and travel-stained; others, who came
+from heaven, were clean and bright. They seemed glad to meet and rest
+awhile in the meadow; here they discoursed with one another of what
+they had seen in the other world. Those who came from earth wept at the
+remembrance of their sorrows, but the spirits from above spoke of
+glorious sights and heavenly bliss. He said that for every evil deed
+they were punished tenfold—now the journey was of a thousand years’
+duration, because the life of man was reckoned as a hundred years—and
+the rewards of virtue were in the same proportion. He added something
+hardly worth repeating about infants dying almost as soon as they were
+born. Of parricides and other murderers he had tortures still more
+terrible to narrate. He was present when one of the spirits asked—Where
+is Ardiaeus the Great? (This Ardiaeus was a cruel tyrant, who had
+murdered his father, and his elder brother, a thousand years before.)
+Another spirit answered, ‘He comes not hither, and will never come. And
+I myself,’ he added, ‘actually saw this terrible sight. At the entrance
+of the chasm, as we were about to reascend, Ardiaeus appeared, and some
+other sinners—most of whom had been tyrants, but not all—and just as
+they fancied that they were returning to life, the chasm gave a roar,
+and then wild, fiery-looking men who knew the meaning of the sound,
+seized him and several others, and bound them hand and foot and threw
+them down, and dragged them along at the side of the road, lacerating
+them and carding them like wool, and explaining to the passers-by, that
+they were going to be cast into hell.’ The greatest terror of the
+pilgrims ascending was lest they should hear the voice, and when there
+was silence one by one they passed up with joy. To these sufferings
+there were corresponding delights.
+
+On the eighth day the souls of the pilgrims resumed their journey, and
+in four days came to a spot whence they looked down upon a line of
+light, in colour like a rainbow, only brighter and clearer. One day
+more brought them to the place, and they saw that this was the column
+of light which binds together the whole universe. The ends of the
+column were fastened to heaven, and from them hung the distaff of
+Necessity, on which all the heavenly bodies turned—the hook and spindle
+were of adamant, and the whorl of a mixed substance. The whorl was in
+form like a number of boxes fitting into one another with their edges
+turned upwards, making together a single whorl which was pierced by the
+spindle. The outermost had the rim broadest, and the inner whorls were
+smaller and smaller, and had their rims narrower. The largest (the
+fixed stars) was spangled—the seventh (the sun) was brightest—the
+eighth (the moon) shone by the light of the seventh—the second and
+fifth (Saturn and Mercury) were most like one another and yellower than
+the eighth—the third (Jupiter) had the whitest light—the fourth (Mars)
+was red—the sixth (Venus) was in whiteness second. The whole had one
+motion, but while this was revolving in one direction the seven inner
+circles were moving in the opposite, with various degrees of swiftness
+and slowness. The spindle turned on the knees of Necessity, and a Siren
+stood hymning upon each circle, while Lachesis, Clotho, and Atropos,
+the daughters of Necessity, sat on thrones at equal intervals, singing
+of past, present, and future, responsive to the music of the Sirens;
+Clotho from time to time guiding the outer circle with a touch of her
+right hand; Atropos with her left hand touching and guiding the inner
+circles; Lachesis in turn putting forth her hand from time to time to
+guide both of them. On their arrival the pilgrims went to Lachesis, and
+there was an interpreter who arranged them, and taking from her knees
+lots, and samples of lives, got up into a pulpit and said: ‘Mortal
+souls, hear the words of Lachesis, the daughter of Necessity. A new
+period of mortal life has begun, and you may choose what divinity you
+please; the responsibility of choosing is with you—God is blameless.’
+After speaking thus, he cast the lots among them and each one took up
+the lot which fell near him. He then placed on the ground before them
+the samples of lives, many more than the souls present; and there were
+all sorts of lives, of men and of animals. There were tyrannies ending
+in misery and exile, and lives of men and women famous for their
+different qualities; and also mixed lives, made up of wealth and
+poverty, sickness and health. Here, Glaucon, is the great risk of human
+life, and therefore the whole of education should be directed to the
+acquisition of such a knowledge as will teach a man to refuse the evil
+and choose the good. He should know all the combinations which occur in
+life—of beauty with poverty or with wealth,—of knowledge with external
+goods,—and at last choose with reference to the nature of the soul,
+regarding that only as the better life which makes men better, and
+leaving the rest. And a man must take with him an iron sense of truth
+and right into the world below, that there too he may remain undazzled
+by wealth or the allurements of evil, and be determined to avoid the
+extremes and choose the mean. For this, as the messenger reported the
+interpreter to have said, is the true happiness of man; and any one, as
+he proclaimed, may, if he choose with understanding, have a good lot,
+even though he come last. ‘Let not the first be careless in his choice,
+nor the last despair.’ He spoke; and when he had spoken, he who had
+drawn the first lot chose a tyranny: he did not see that he was fated
+to devour his own children—and when he discovered his mistake, he wept
+and beat his breast, blaming chance and the Gods and anybody rather
+than himself. He was one of those who had come from heaven, and in his
+previous life had been a citizen of a well-ordered State, but he had
+only habit and no philosophy. Like many another, he made a bad choice,
+because he had no experience of life; whereas those who came from earth
+and had seen trouble were not in such a hurry to choose. But if a man
+had followed philosophy while upon earth, and had been moderately
+fortunate in his lot, he might not only be happy here, but his
+pilgrimage both from and to this world would be smooth and heavenly.
+Nothing was more curious than the spectacle of the choice, at once sad
+and laughable and wonderful; most of the souls only seeking to avoid
+their own condition in a previous life. He saw the soul of Orpheus
+changing into a swan because he would not be born of a woman; there was
+Thamyras becoming a nightingale; musical birds, like the swan, choosing
+to be men; the twentieth soul, which was that of Ajax, preferring the
+life of a lion to that of a man, in remembrance of the injustice which
+was done to him in the judgment of the arms; and Agamemnon, from a like
+enmity to human nature, passing into an eagle. About the middle was the
+soul of Atalanta choosing the honours of an athlete, and next to her
+Epeus taking the nature of a workwoman; among the last was Thersites,
+who was changing himself into a monkey. Thither, the last of all, came
+Odysseus, and sought the lot of a private man, which lay neglected and
+despised, and when he found it he went away rejoicing, and said that if
+he had been first instead of last, his choice would have been the same.
+Men, too, were seen passing into animals, and wild and tame animals
+changing into one another.
+
+When all the souls had chosen they went to Lachesis, who sent with each
+of them their genius or attendant to fulfil their lot. He first of all
+brought them under the hand of Clotho, and drew them within the
+revolution of the spindle impelled by her hand; from her they were
+carried to Atropos, who made the threads irreversible; whence, without
+turning round, they passed beneath the throne of Necessity; and when
+they had all passed, they moved on in scorching heat to the plain of
+Forgetfulness and rested at evening by the river Unmindful, whose water
+could not be retained in any vessel; of this they had all to drink a
+certain quantity—some of them drank more than was required, and he who
+drank forgot all things. Er himself was prevented from drinking. When
+they had gone to rest, about the middle of the night there were
+thunderstorms and earthquakes, and suddenly they were all driven divers
+ways, shooting like stars to their birth. Concerning his return to the
+body, he only knew that awaking suddenly in the morning he found
+himself lying on the pyre.
+
+Thus, Glaucon, the tale has been saved, and will be our salvation, if
+we believe that the soul is immortal, and hold fast to the heavenly way
+of Justice and Knowledge. So shall we pass undefiled over the river of
+Forgetfulness, and be dear to ourselves and to the Gods, and have a
+crown of reward and happiness both in this world and also in the
+millennial pilgrimage of the other.
+
+The Tenth Book of the Republic of Plato falls into two divisions:
+first, resuming an old thread which has been interrupted, Socrates
+assails the poets, who, now that the nature of the soul has been
+analyzed, are seen to be very far gone from the truth; and secondly,
+having shown the reality of the happiness of the just, he demands that
+appearance shall be restored to him, and then proceeds to prove the
+immortality of the soul. The argument, as in the Phaedo and Gorgias, is
+supplemented by the vision of a future life.
+
+Why Plato, who was himself a poet, and whose dialogues are poems and
+dramas, should have been hostile to the poets as a class, and
+especially to the dramatic poets; why he should not have seen that
+truth may be embodied in verse as well as in prose, and that there are
+some indefinable lights and shadows of human life which can only be
+expressed in poetry—some elements of imagination which always entwine
+with reason; why he should have supposed epic verse to be inseparably
+associated with the impurities of the old Hellenic mythology; why he
+should try Homer and Hesiod by the unfair and prosaic test of
+utility,—are questions which have always been debated amongst students
+of Plato. Though unable to give a complete answer to them, we may
+show—first, that his views arose naturally out of the circumstances of
+his age; and secondly, we may elicit the truth as well as the error
+which is contained in them.
+
+He is the enemy of the poets because poetry was declining in his own
+lifetime, and a theatrocracy, as he says in the Laws, had taken the
+place of an intellectual aristocracy. Euripides exhibited the last
+phase of the tragic drama, and in him Plato saw the friend and
+apologist of tyrants, and the Sophist of tragedy. The old comedy was
+almost extinct; the new had not yet arisen. Dramatic and lyric poetry,
+like every other branch of Greek literature, was falling under the
+power of rhetoric. There was no ‘second or third’ to Aeschylus and
+Sophocles in the generation which followed them. Aristophanes, in one
+of his later comedies (Frogs), speaks of ‘thousands of tragedy-making
+prattlers,’ whose attempts at poetry he compares to the chirping of
+swallows; ‘their garrulity went far beyond Euripides,’—‘they appeared
+once upon the stage, and there was an end of them.’ To a man of genius
+who had a real appreciation of the godlike Aeschylus and the noble and
+gentle Sophocles, though disagreeing with some parts of their
+‘theology’ (Rep.), these ‘minor poets’ must have been contemptible and
+intolerable. There is no feeling stronger in the dialogues of Plato
+than a sense of the decline and decay both in literature and in
+politics which marked his own age. Nor can he have been expected to
+look with favour on the licence of Aristophanes, now at the end of his
+career, who had begun by satirizing Socrates in the Clouds, and in a
+similar spirit forty years afterwards had satirized the founders of
+ideal commonwealths in his Eccleziazusae, or Female Parliament (Laws).
+
+There were other reasons for the antagonism of Plato to poetry. The
+profession of an actor was regarded by him as a degradation of human
+nature, for ‘one man in his life’ cannot ‘play many parts;’ the
+characters which the actor performs seem to destroy his own character,
+and to leave nothing which can be truly called himself. Neither can any
+man live his life and act it. The actor is the slave of his art, not
+the master of it. Taking this view Plato is more decided in his
+expulsion of the dramatic than of the epic poets, though he must have
+known that the Greek tragedians afforded noble lessons and examples of
+virtue and patriotism, to which nothing in Homer can be compared. But
+great dramatic or even great rhetorical power is hardly consistent with
+firmness or strength of mind, and dramatic talent is often incidentally
+associated with a weak or dissolute character.
+
+In the Tenth Book Plato introduces a new series of objections. First,
+he says that the poet or painter is an imitator, and in the third
+degree removed from the truth. His creations are not tested by rule and
+measure; they are only appearances. In modern times we should say that
+art is not merely imitation, but rather the expression of the ideal in
+forms of sense. Even adopting the humble image of Plato, from which his
+argument derives a colour, we should maintain that the artist may
+ennoble the bed which he paints by the folds of the drapery, or by the
+feeling of home which he introduces; and there have been modern
+painters who have imparted such an ideal interest to a blacksmith’s or
+a carpenter’s shop. The eye or mind which feels as well as sees can
+give dignity and pathos to a ruined mill, or a straw-built shed
+(Rembrandt), to the hull of a vessel ‘going to its last home’ (Turner).
+Still more would this apply to the greatest works of art, which seem to
+be the visible embodiment of the divine. Had Plato been asked whether
+the Zeus or Athene of Pheidias was the imitation of an imitation only,
+would he not have been compelled to admit that something more was to be
+found in them than in the form of any mortal; and that the rule of
+proportion to which they conformed was ‘higher far than any geometry or
+arithmetic could express?’ (Statesman.)
+
+Again, Plato objects to the imitative arts that they express the
+emotional rather than the rational part of human nature. He does not
+admit Aristotle’s theory, that tragedy or other serious imitations are
+a purgation of the passions by pity and fear; to him they appear only
+to afford the opportunity of indulging them. Yet we must acknowledge
+that we may sometimes cure disordered emotions by giving expression to
+them; and that they often gain strength when pent up within our own
+breast. It is not every indulgence of the feelings which is to be
+condemned. For there may be a gratification of the higher as well as of
+the lower—thoughts which are too deep or too sad to be expressed by
+ourselves, may find an utterance in the words of poets. Every one would
+acknowledge that there have been times when they were consoled and
+elevated by beautiful music or by the sublimity of architecture or by
+the peacefulness of nature. Plato has himself admitted, in the earlier
+part of the Republic, that the arts might have the effect of
+harmonizing as well as of enervating the mind; but in the Tenth Book he
+regards them through a Stoic or Puritan medium. He asks only ‘What good
+have they done?’ and is not satisfied with the reply, that ‘They have
+given innocent pleasure to mankind.’
+
+He tells us that he rejoices in the banishment of the poets, since he
+has found by the analysis of the soul that they are concerned with the
+inferior faculties. He means to say that the higher faculties have to
+do with universals, the lower with particulars of sense. The poets are
+on a level with their own age, but not on a level with Socrates and
+Plato; and he was well aware that Homer and Hesiod could not be made a
+rule of life by any process of legitimate interpretation; his ironical
+use of them is in fact a denial of their authority; he saw, too, that
+the poets were not critics—as he says in the Apology, ‘Any one was a
+better interpreter of their writings than they were themselves. He
+himself ceased to be a poet when he became a disciple of Socrates;
+though, as he tells us of Solon, ‘he might have been one of the
+greatest of them, if he had not been deterred by other pursuits’ (Tim.)
+Thus from many points of view there is an antagonism between Plato and
+the poets, which was foreshadowed to him in the old quarrel between
+philosophy and poetry. The poets, as he says in the Protagoras, were
+the Sophists of their day; and his dislike of the one class is
+reflected on the other. He regards them both as the enemies of
+reasoning and abstraction, though in the case of Euripides more with
+reference to his immoral sentiments about tyrants and the like. For
+Plato is the prophet who ‘came into the world to convince men’—first of
+the fallibility of sense and opinion, and secondly of the reality of
+abstract ideas. Whatever strangeness there may be in modern times in
+opposing philosophy to poetry, which to us seem to have so many
+elements in common, the strangeness will disappear if we conceive of
+poetry as allied to sense, and of philosophy as equivalent to thought
+and abstraction. Unfortunately the very word ‘idea,’ which to Plato is
+expressive of the most real of all things, is associated in our minds
+with an element of subjectiveness and unreality. We may note also how
+he differs from Aristotle who declares poetry to be truer than history,
+for the opposite reason, because it is concerned with universals, not
+like history, with particulars (Poet).
+
+The things which are seen are opposed in Scripture to the things which
+are unseen—they are equally opposed in Plato to universals and ideas.
+To him all particulars appear to be floating about in a world of sense;
+they have a taint of error or even of evil. There is no difficulty in
+seeing that this is an illusion; for there is no more error or
+variation in an individual man, horse, bed, etc., than in the class
+man, horse, bed, etc.; nor is the truth which is displayed in
+individual instances less certain than that which is conveyed through
+the medium of ideas. But Plato, who is deeply impressed with the real
+importance of universals as instruments of thought, attributes to them
+an essential truth which is imaginary and unreal; for universals may be
+often false and particulars true. Had he attained to any clear
+conception of the individual, which is the synthesis of the universal
+and the particular; or had he been able to distinguish between opinion
+and sensation, which the ambiguity of the words (Greek) and the like,
+tended to confuse, he would not have denied truth to the particulars of
+sense.
+
+But the poets are also the representatives of falsehood and feigning in
+all departments of life and knowledge, like the sophists and
+rhetoricians of the Gorgias and Phaedrus; they are the false priests,
+false prophets, lying spirits, enchanters of the world. There is
+another count put into the indictment against them by Plato, that they
+are the friends of the tyrant, and bask in the sunshine of his
+patronage. Despotism in all ages has had an apparatus of false ideas
+and false teachers at its service—in the history of Modern Europe as
+well as of Greece and Rome. For no government of men depends solely
+upon force; without some corruption of literature and morals—some
+appeal to the imagination of the masses—some pretence to the favour of
+heaven—some element of good giving power to evil, tyranny, even for a
+short time, cannot be maintained. The Greek tyrants were not insensible
+to the importance of awakening in their cause a Pseudo-Hellenic
+feeling; they were proud of successes at the Olympic games; they were
+not devoid of the love of literature and art. Plato is thinking in the
+first instance of Greek poets who had graced the courts of Dionysius or
+Archelaus: and the old spirit of freedom is roused within him at their
+prostitution of the Tragic Muse in the praises of tyranny. But his
+prophetic eye extends beyond them to the false teachers of other ages
+who are the creatures of the government under which they live. He
+compares the corruption of his contemporaries with the idea of a
+perfect society, and gathers up into one mass of evil the evils and
+errors of mankind; to him they are personified in the rhetoricians,
+sophists, poets, rulers who deceive and govern the world.
+
+A further objection which Plato makes to poetry and the imitative arts
+is that they excite the emotions. Here the modern reader will be
+disposed to introduce a distinction which appears to have escaped him.
+For the emotions are neither bad nor good in themselves, and are not
+most likely to be controlled by the attempt to eradicate them, but by
+the moderate indulgence of them. And the vocation of art is to present
+thought in the form of feeling, to enlist the feelings on the side of
+reason, to inspire even for a moment courage or resignation; perhaps to
+suggest a sense of infinity and eternity in a way which mere language
+is incapable of attaining. True, the same power which in the purer age
+of art embodies gods and heroes only, may be made to express the
+voluptuous image of a Corinthian courtezan. But this only shows that
+art, like other outward things, may be turned to good and also to evil,
+and is not more closely connected with the higher than with the lower
+part of the soul. All imitative art is subject to certain limitations,
+and therefore necessarily partakes of the nature of a compromise.
+Something of ideal truth is sacrificed for the sake of the
+representation, and something in the exactness of the representation is
+sacrificed to the ideal. Still, works of art have a permanent element;
+they idealize and detain the passing thought, and are the intermediates
+between sense and ideas.
+
+In the present stage of the human mind, poetry and other forms of
+fiction may certainly be regarded as a good. But we can also imagine
+the existence of an age in which a severer conception of truth has
+either banished or transformed them. At any rate we must admit that
+they hold a different place at different periods of the world’s
+history. In the infancy of mankind, poetry, with the exception of
+proverbs, is the whole of literature, and the only instrument of
+intellectual culture; in modern times she is the shadow or echo of her
+former self, and appears to have a precarious existence. Milton in his
+day doubted whether an epic poem was any longer possible. At the same
+time we must remember, that what Plato would have called the charms of
+poetry have been partly transferred to prose; he himself (Statesman)
+admits rhetoric to be the handmaiden of Politics, and proposes to find
+in the strain of law (Laws) a substitute for the old poets. Among
+ourselves the creative power seems often to be growing weaker, and
+scientific fact to be more engrossing and overpowering to the mind than
+formerly. The illusion of the feelings commonly called love, has
+hitherto been the inspiring influence of modern poetry and romance, and
+has exercised a humanizing if not a strengthening influence on the
+world. But may not the stimulus which love has given to fancy be some
+day exhausted? The modern English novel which is the most popular of
+all forms of reading is not more than a century or two old: will the
+tale of love a hundred years hence, after so many thousand variations
+of the same theme, be still received with unabated interest?
+
+Art cannot claim to be on a level with philosophy or religion, and may
+often corrupt them. It is possible to conceive a mental state in which
+all artistic representations are regarded as a false and imperfect
+expression, either of the religious ideal or of the philosophical
+ideal. The fairest forms may be revolting in certain moods of mind, as
+is proved by the fact that the Mahometans, and many sects of
+Christians, have renounced the use of pictures and images. The
+beginning of a great religion, whether Christian or Gentile, has not
+been ‘wood or stone,’ but a spirit moving in the hearts of men. The
+disciples have met in a large upper room or in ‘holes and caves of the
+earth’; in the second or third generation, they have had mosques,
+temples, churches, monasteries. And the revival or reform of religions,
+like the first revelation of them, has come from within and has
+generally disregarded external ceremonies and accompaniments.
+
+But poetry and art may also be the expression of the highest truth and
+the purest sentiment. Plato himself seems to waver between two opposite
+views—when, as in the third Book, he insists that youth should be
+brought up amid wholesome imagery; and again in Book X, when he
+banishes the poets from his Republic. Admitting that the arts, which
+some of us almost deify, have fallen short of their higher aim, we must
+admit on the other hand that to banish imagination wholly would be
+suicidal as well as impossible. For nature too is a form of art; and a
+breath of the fresh air or a single glance at the varying landscape
+would in an instant revive and reillumine the extinguished spark of
+poetry in the human breast. In the lower stages of civilization
+imagination more than reason distinguishes man from the animals; and to
+banish art would be to banish thought, to banish language, to banish
+the expression of all truth. No religion is wholly devoid of external
+forms; even the Mahometan who renounces the use of pictures and images
+has a temple in which he worships the Most High, as solemn and
+beautiful as any Greek or Christian building. Feeling too and thought
+are not really opposed; for he who thinks must feel before he can
+execute. And the highest thoughts, when they become familiarized to us,
+are always tending to pass into the form of feeling.
+
+Plato does not seriously intend to expel poets from life and society.
+But he feels strongly the unreality of their writings; he is protesting
+against the degeneracy of poetry in his own day as we might protest
+against the want of serious purpose in modern fiction, against the
+unseemliness or extravagance of some of our poets or novelists, against
+the time-serving of preachers or public writers, against the
+regardlessness of truth which to the eye of the philosopher seems to
+characterize the greater part of the world. For we too have reason to
+complain that our poets and novelists ‘paint inferior truth’ and ‘are
+concerned with the inferior part of the soul’; that the readers of them
+become what they read and are injuriously affected by them. And we look
+in vain for that healthy atmosphere of which Plato speaks,—‘the beauty
+which meets the sense like a breeze and imperceptibly draws the soul,
+even in childhood, into harmony with the beauty of reason.’
+
+For there might be a poetry which would be the hymn of divine
+perfection, the harmony of goodness and truth among men: a strain which
+should renew the youth of the world, and bring back the ages in which
+the poet was man’s only teacher and best friend,—which would find
+materials in the living present as well as in the romance of the past,
+and might subdue to the fairest forms of speech and verse the
+intractable materials of modern civilisation,—which might elicit the
+simple principles, or, as Plato would have called them, the essential
+forms, of truth and justice out of the variety of opinion and the
+complexity of modern society,—which would preserve all the good of each
+generation and leave the bad unsung,—which should be based not on vain
+longings or faint imaginings, but on a clear insight into the nature of
+man. Then the tale of love might begin again in poetry or prose, two in
+one, united in the pursuit of knowledge, or the service of God and man;
+and feelings of love might still be the incentive to great thoughts and
+heroic deeds as in the days of Dante or Petrarch; and many types of
+manly and womanly beauty might appear among us, rising above the
+ordinary level of humanity, and many lives which were like poems
+(Laws), be not only written, but lived by us. A few such strains have
+been heard among men in the tragedies of Aeschylus and Sophocles, whom
+Plato quotes, not, as Homer is quoted by him, in irony, but with deep
+and serious approval,—in the poetry of Milton and Wordsworth, and in
+passages of other English poets,—first and above all in the Hebrew
+prophets and psalmists. Shakespeare has taught us how great men should
+speak and act; he has drawn characters of a wonderful purity and depth;
+he has ennobled the human mind, but, like Homer (Rep.), he ‘has left no
+way of life.’ The next greatest poet of modern times, Goethe, is
+concerned with ‘a lower degree of truth’; he paints the world as a
+stage on which ‘all the men and women are merely players’; he
+cultivates life as an art, but he furnishes no ideals of truth and
+action. The poet may rebel against any attempt to set limits to his
+fancy; and he may argue truly that moralizing in verse is not poetry.
+Possibly, like Mephistopheles in Faust, he may retaliate on his
+adversaries. But the philosopher will still be justified in asking,
+‘How may the heavenly gift of poesy be devoted to the good of mankind?’
+
+Returning to Plato, we may observe that a similar mixture of truth and
+error appears in other parts of the argument. He is aware of the
+absurdity of mankind framing their whole lives according to Homer; just
+as in the Phaedrus he intimates the absurdity of interpreting mythology
+upon rational principles; both these were the modern tendencies of his
+own age, which he deservedly ridicules. On the other hand, his argument
+that Homer, if he had been able to teach mankind anything worth
+knowing, would not have been allowed by them to go about begging as a
+rhapsodist, is both false and contrary to the spirit of Plato (Rep.).
+It may be compared with those other paradoxes of the Gorgias, that ‘No
+statesman was ever unjustly put to death by the city of which he was
+the head’; and that ‘No Sophist was ever defrauded by his pupils’
+(Gorg.)...
+
+The argument for immortality seems to rest on the absolute dualism of
+soul and body. Admitting the existence of the soul, we know of no force
+which is able to put an end to her. Vice is her own proper evil; and if
+she cannot be destroyed by that, she cannot be destroyed by any other.
+Yet Plato has acknowledged that the soul may be so overgrown by the
+incrustations of earth as to lose her original form; and in the Timaeus
+he recognizes more strongly than in the Republic the influence which
+the body has over the mind, denying even the voluntariness of human
+actions, on the ground that they proceed from physical states (Tim.).
+In the Republic, as elsewhere, he wavers between the original soul
+which has to be restored, and the character which is developed by
+training and education...
+
+The vision of another world is ascribed to Er, the son of Armenius, who
+is said by Clement of Alexandria to have been Zoroaster. The tale has
+certainly an oriental character, and may be compared with the
+pilgrimages of the soul in the Zend Avesta (Haug, Avesta). But no trace
+of acquaintance with Zoroaster is found elsewhere in Plato’s writings,
+and there is no reason for giving him the name of Er the Pamphylian.
+The philosophy of Heracleitus cannot be shown to be borrowed from
+Zoroaster, and still less the myths of Plato.
+
+The local arrangement of the vision is less distinct than that of the
+Phaedrus and Phaedo. Astronomy is mingled with symbolism and mythology;
+the great sphere of heaven is represented under the symbol of a
+cylinder or box, containing the seven orbits of the planets and the
+fixed stars; this is suspended from an axis or spindle which turns on
+the knees of Necessity; the revolutions of the seven orbits contained
+in the cylinder are guided by the fates, and their harmonious motion
+produces the music of the spheres. Through the innermost or eighth of
+these, which is the moon, is passed the spindle; but it is doubtful
+whether this is the continuation of the column of light, from which the
+pilgrims contemplate the heavens; the words of Plato imply that they
+are connected, but not the same. The column itself is clearly not of
+adamant. The spindle (which is of adamant) is fastened to the ends of
+the chains which extend to the middle of the column of light—this
+column is said to hold together the heaven; but whether it hangs from
+the spindle, or is at right angles to it, is not explained. The
+cylinder containing the orbits of the stars is almost as much a symbol
+as the figure of Necessity turning the spindle;—for the outermost rim
+is the sphere of the fixed stars, and nothing is said about the
+intervals of space which divide the paths of the stars in the heavens.
+The description is both a picture and an orrery, and therefore is
+necessarily inconsistent with itself. The column of light is not the
+Milky Way—which is neither straight, nor like a rainbow—but the
+imaginary axis of the earth. This is compared to the rainbow in respect
+not of form but of colour, and not to the undergirders of a trireme,
+but to the straight rope running from prow to stern in which the
+undergirders meet.
+
+The orrery or picture of the heavens given in the Republic differs in
+its mode of representation from the circles of the same and of the
+other in the Timaeus. In both the fixed stars are distinguished from
+the planets, and they move in orbits without them, although in an
+opposite direction: in the Republic as in the Timaeus they are all
+moving round the axis of the world. But we are not certain that in the
+former they are moving round the earth. No distinct mention is made in
+the Republic of the circles of the same and other; although both in the
+Timaeus and in the Republic the motion of the fixed stars is supposed
+to coincide with the motion of the whole. The relative thickness of the
+rims is perhaps designed to express the relative distances of the
+planets. Plato probably intended to represent the earth, from which Er
+and his companions are viewing the heavens, as stationary in place; but
+whether or not herself revolving, unless this is implied in the
+revolution of the axis, is uncertain (Timaeus). The spectator may be
+supposed to look at the heavenly bodies, either from above or below.
+The earth is a sort of earth and heaven in one, like the heaven of the
+Phaedrus, on the back of which the spectator goes out to take a peep at
+the stars and is borne round in the revolution. There is no distinction
+between the equator and the ecliptic. But Plato is no doubt led to
+imagine that the planets have an opposite motion to that of the fixed
+stars, in order to account for their appearances in the heavens. In the
+description of the meadow, and the retribution of the good and evil
+after death, there are traces of Homer.
+
+The description of the axis as a spindle, and of the heavenly bodies as
+forming a whole, partly arises out of the attempt to connect the
+motions of the heavenly bodies with the mythological image of the web,
+or weaving of the Fates. The giving of the lots, the weaving of them,
+and the making of them irreversible, which are ascribed to the three
+Fates—Lachesis, Clotho, Atropos, are obviously derived from their
+names. The element of chance in human life is indicated by the order of
+the lots. But chance, however adverse, may be overcome by the wisdom of
+man, if he knows how to choose aright; there is a worse enemy to man
+than chance; this enemy is himself. He who was moderately fortunate in
+the number of the lot—even the very last comer—might have a good life
+if he chose with wisdom. And as Plato does not like to make an
+assertion which is unproven, he more than confirms this statement a few
+sentences afterwards by the example of Odysseus, who chose last. But
+the virtue which is founded on habit is not sufficient to enable a man
+to choose; he must add to virtue knowledge, if he is to act rightly
+when placed in new circumstances. The routine of good actions and good
+habits is an inferior sort of goodness; and, as Coleridge says, ‘Common
+sense is intolerable which is not based on metaphysics,’ so Plato would
+have said, ‘Habit is worthless which is not based upon philosophy.’
+
+The freedom of the will to refuse the evil and to choose the good is
+distinctly asserted. ‘Virtue is free, and as a man honours or
+dishonours her he will have more or less of her.’ The life of man is
+‘rounded’ by necessity; there are circumstances prior to birth which
+affect him (Pol.). But within the walls of necessity there is an open
+space in which he is his own master, and can study for himself the
+effects which the variously compounded gifts of nature or fortune have
+upon the soul, and act accordingly. All men cannot have the first
+choice in everything. But the lot of all men is good enough, if they
+choose wisely and will live diligently.
+
+The verisimilitude which is given to the pilgrimage of a thousand
+years, by the intimation that Ardiaeus had lived a thousand years
+before; the coincidence of Er coming to life on the twelfth day after
+he was supposed to have been dead with the seven days which the
+pilgrims passed in the meadow, and the four days during which they
+journeyed to the column of light; the precision with which the soul is
+mentioned who chose the twentieth lot; the passing remarks that there
+was no definite character among the souls, and that the souls which had
+chosen ill blamed any one rather than themselves; or that some of the
+souls drank more than was necessary of the waters of Forgetfulness,
+while Er himself was hindered from drinking; the desire of Odysseus to
+rest at last, unlike the conception of him in Dante and Tennyson; the
+feigned ignorance of how Er returned to the body, when the other souls
+went shooting like stars to their birth,—add greatly to the probability
+of the narrative. They are such touches of nature as the art of Defoe
+might have introduced when he wished to win credibility for marvels and
+apparitions.
+
+
+There still remain to be considered some points which have been
+intentionally reserved to the end: (1) the Janus-like character of the
+Republic, which presents two faces—one an Hellenic state, the other a
+kingdom of philosophers. Connected with the latter of the two aspects
+are (2) the paradoxes of the Republic, as they have been termed by
+Morgenstern: (a) the community of property; (b) of families; (c) the
+rule of philosophers; (d) the analogy of the individual and the State,
+which, like some other analogies in the Republic, is carried too far.
+We may then proceed to consider (3) the subject of education as
+conceived by Plato, bringing together in a general view the education
+of youth and the education of after-life; (4) we may note further some
+essential differences between ancient and modern politics which are
+suggested by the Republic; (5) we may compare the Politicus and the
+Laws; (6) we may observe the influence exercised by Plato on his
+imitators; and (7) take occasion to consider the nature and value of
+political, and (8) of religious ideals.
+
+1. Plato expressly says that he is intending to found an Hellenic State
+(Book V). Many of his regulations are characteristically Spartan; such
+as the prohibition of gold and silver, the common meals of the men, the
+military training of the youth, the gymnastic exercises of the women.
+The life of Sparta was the life of a camp (Laws), enforced even more
+rigidly in time of peace than in war; the citizens of Sparta, like
+Plato’s, were forbidden to trade—they were to be soldiers and not
+shopkeepers. Nowhere else in Greece was the individual so completely
+subjected to the State; the time when he was to marry, the education of
+his children, the clothes which he was to wear, the food which he was
+to eat, were all prescribed by law. Some of the best enactments in the
+Republic, such as the reverence to be paid to parents and elders, and
+some of the worst, such as the exposure of deformed children, are
+borrowed from the practice of Sparta. The encouragement of friendships
+between men and youths, or of men with one another, as affording
+incentives to bravery, is also Spartan; in Sparta too a nearer approach
+was made than in any other Greek State to equality of the sexes, and to
+community of property; and while there was probably less of
+licentiousness in the sense of immorality, the tie of marriage was
+regarded more lightly than in the rest of Greece. The ‘suprema lex’ was
+the preservation of the family, and the interest of the State. The
+coarse strength of a military government was not favourable to purity
+and refinement; and the excessive strictness of some regulations seems
+to have produced a reaction. Of all Hellenes the Spartans were most
+accessible to bribery; several of the greatest of them might be
+described in the words of Plato as having a ‘fierce secret longing
+after gold and silver.’ Though not in the strict sense communists, the
+principle of communism was maintained among them in their division of
+lands, in their common meals, in their slaves, and in the free use of
+one another’s goods. Marriage was a public institution: and the women
+were educated by the State, and sang and danced in public with the men.
+
+Many traditions were preserved at Sparta of the severity with which the
+magistrates had maintained the primitive rule of music and poetry; as
+in the Republic of Plato, the new-fangled poet was to be expelled.
+Hymns to the Gods, which are the only kind of music admitted into the
+ideal State, were the only kind which was permitted at Sparta. The
+Spartans, though an unpoetical race, were nevertheless lovers of
+poetry; they had been stirred by the Elegiac strains of Tyrtaeus, they
+had crowded around Hippias to hear his recitals of Homer; but in this
+they resembled the citizens of the timocratic rather than of the ideal
+State. The council of elder men also corresponds to the Spartan
+gerousia; and the freedom with which they are permitted to judge about
+matters of detail agrees with what we are told of that institution.
+Once more, the military rule of not spoiling the dead or offering arms
+at the temples; the moderation in the pursuit of enemies; the
+importance attached to the physical well-being of the citizens; the use
+of warfare for the sake of defence rather than of aggression—are
+features probably suggested by the spirit and practice of Sparta.
+
+To the Spartan type the ideal State reverts in the first decline; and
+the character of the individual timocrat is borrowed from the Spartan
+citizen. The love of Lacedaemon not only affected Plato and Xenophon,
+but was shared by many undistinguished Athenians; there they seemed to
+find a principle which was wanting in their own democracy. The (Greek)
+of the Spartans attracted them, that is to say, not the goodness of
+their laws, but the spirit of order and loyalty which prevailed.
+Fascinated by the idea, citizens of Athens would imitate the
+Lacedaemonians in their dress and manners; they were known to the
+contemporaries of Plato as ‘the persons who had their ears bruised,’
+like the Roundheads of the Commonwealth. The love of another church or
+country when seen at a distance only, the longing for an imaginary
+simplicity in civilized times, the fond desire of a past which never
+has been, or of a future which never will be,—these are aspirations of
+the human mind which are often felt among ourselves. Such feelings meet
+with a response in the Republic of Plato.
+
+But there are other features of the Platonic Republic, as, for example,
+the literary and philosophical education, and the grace and beauty of
+life, which are the reverse of Spartan. Plato wishes to give his
+citizens a taste of Athenian freedom as well as of Lacedaemonian
+discipline. His individual genius is purely Athenian, although in
+theory he is a lover of Sparta; and he is something more than either—he
+has also a true Hellenic feeling. He is desirous of humanizing the wars
+of Hellenes against one another; he acknowledges that the Delphian God
+is the grand hereditary interpreter of all Hellas. The spirit of
+harmony and the Dorian mode are to prevail, and the whole State is to
+have an external beauty which is the reflex of the harmony within. But
+he has not yet found out the truth which he afterwards enunciated in
+the Laws—that he was a better legislator who made men to be of one
+mind, than he who trained them for war. The citizens, as in other
+Hellenic States, democratic as well as aristocratic, are really an
+upper class; for, although no mention is made of slaves, the lower
+classes are allowed to fade away into the distance, and are represented
+in the individual by the passions. Plato has no idea either of a social
+State in which all classes are harmonized, or of a federation of Hellas
+or the world in which different nations or States have a place. His
+city is equipped for war rather than for peace, and this would seem to
+be justified by the ordinary condition of Hellenic States. The myth of
+the earth-born men is an embodiment of the orthodox tradition of
+Hellas, and the allusion to the four ages of the world is also
+sanctioned by the authority of Hesiod and the poets. Thus we see that
+the Republic is partly founded on the ideal of the old Greek polis,
+partly on the actual circumstances of Hellas in that age. Plato, like
+the old painters, retains the traditional form, and like them he has
+also a vision of a city in the clouds.
+
+There is yet another thread which is interwoven in the texture of the
+work; for the Republic is not only a Dorian State, but a Pythagorean
+league. The ‘way of life’ which was connected with the name of
+Pythagoras, like the Catholic monastic orders, showed the power which
+the mind of an individual might exercise over his contemporaries, and
+may have naturally suggested to Plato the possibility of reviving such
+‘mediaeval institutions.’ The Pythagoreans, like Plato, enforced a rule
+of life and a moral and intellectual training. The influence ascribed
+to music, which to us seems exaggerated, is also a Pythagorean feature;
+it is not to be regarded as representing the real influence of music in
+the Greek world. More nearly than any other government of Hellas, the
+Pythagorean league of three hundred was an aristocracy of virtue. For
+once in the history of mankind the philosophy of order or (Greek),
+expressing and consequently enlisting on its side the combined
+endeavours of the better part of the people, obtained the management of
+public affairs and held possession of it for a considerable time (until
+about B.C. 500). Probably only in States prepared by Dorian
+institutions would such a league have been possible. The rulers, like
+Plato’s (Greek), were required to submit to a severe training in order
+to prepare the way for the education of the other members of the
+community. Long after the dissolution of the Order, eminent
+Pythagoreans, such as Archytas of Tarentum, retained their political
+influence over the cities of Magna Graecia. There was much here that
+was suggestive to the kindred spirit of Plato, who had doubtless
+meditated deeply on the ‘way of life of Pythagoras’ (Rep.) and his
+followers. Slight traces of Pythagoreanism are to be found in the
+mystical number of the State, in the number which expresses the
+interval between the king and the tyrant, in the doctrine of
+transmigration, in the music of the spheres, as well as in the great
+though secondary importance ascribed to mathematics in education.
+
+But as in his philosophy, so also in the form of his State, he goes far
+beyond the old Pythagoreans. He attempts a task really impossible,
+which is to unite the past of Greek history with the future of
+philosophy, analogous to that other impossibility, which has often been
+the dream of Christendom, the attempt to unite the past history of
+Europe with the kingdom of Christ. Nothing actually existing in the
+world at all resembles Plato’s ideal State; nor does he himself imagine
+that such a State is possible. This he repeats again and again; e.g. in
+the Republic, or in the Laws where, casting a glance back on the
+Republic, he admits that the perfect state of communism and philosophy
+was impossible in his own age, though still to be retained as a
+pattern. The same doubt is implied in the earnestness with which he
+argues in the Republic that ideals are none the worse because they
+cannot be realized in fact, and in the chorus of laughter, which like a
+breaking wave will, as he anticipates, greet the mention of his
+proposals; though like other writers of fiction, he uses all his art to
+give reality to his inventions. When asked how the ideal polity can
+come into being, he answers ironically, ‘When one son of a king becomes
+a philosopher’; he designates the fiction of the earth-born men as ‘a
+noble lie’; and when the structure is finally complete, he fairly tells
+you that his Republic is a vision only, which in some sense may have
+reality, but not in the vulgar one of a reign of philosophers upon
+earth. It has been said that Plato flies as well as walks, but this
+falls short of the truth; for he flies and walks at the same time, and
+is in the air and on firm ground in successive instants.
+
+Niebuhr has asked a trifling question, which may be briefly noticed in
+this place—Was Plato a good citizen? If by this is meant, Was he loyal
+to Athenian institutions?—he can hardly be said to be the friend of
+democracy: but neither is he the friend of any other existing form of
+government; all of them he regarded as ‘states of faction’ (Laws); none
+attained to his ideal of a voluntary rule over voluntary subjects,
+which seems indeed more nearly to describe democracy than any other;
+and the worst of them is tyranny. The truth is, that the question has
+hardly any meaning when applied to a great philosopher whose writings
+are not meant for a particular age and country, but for all time and
+all mankind. The decline of Athenian politics was probably the motive
+which led Plato to frame an ideal State, and the Republic may be
+regarded as reflecting the departing glory of Hellas. As well might we
+complain of St. Augustine, whose great work ‘The City of God’
+originated in a similar motive, for not being loyal to the Roman
+Empire. Even a nearer parallel might be afforded by the first
+Christians, who cannot fairly be charged with being bad citizens
+because, though ‘subject to the higher powers,’ they were looking
+forward to a city which is in heaven.
+
+2. The idea of the perfect State is full of paradox when judged of
+according to the ordinary notions of mankind. The paradoxes of one age
+have been said to become the commonplaces of the next; but the
+paradoxes of Plato are at least as paradoxical to us as they were to
+his contemporaries. The modern world has either sneered at them as
+absurd, or denounced them as unnatural and immoral; men have been
+pleased to find in Aristotle’s criticisms of them the anticipation of
+their own good sense. The wealthy and cultivated classes have disliked
+and also dreaded them; they have pointed with satisfaction to the
+failure of efforts to realize them in practice. Yet since they are the
+thoughts of one of the greatest of human intelligences, and of one who
+had done most to elevate morality and religion, they seem to deserve a
+better treatment at our hands. We may have to address the public, as
+Plato does poetry, and assure them that we mean no harm to existing
+institutions. There are serious errors which have a side of truth and
+which therefore may fairly demand a careful consideration: there are
+truths mixed with error of which we may indeed say, ‘The half is better
+than the whole.’ Yet ‘the half’ may be an important contribution to the
+study of human nature.
+
+(a) The first paradox is the community of goods, which is mentioned
+slightly at the end of the third Book, and seemingly, as Aristotle
+observes, is confined to the guardians; at least no mention is made of
+the other classes. But the omission is not of any real significance,
+and probably arises out of the plan of the work, which prevents the
+writer from entering into details.
+
+Aristotle censures the community of property much in the spirit of
+modern political economy, as tending to repress industry, and as doing
+away with the spirit of benevolence. Modern writers almost refuse to
+consider the subject, which is supposed to have been long ago settled
+by the common opinion of mankind. But it must be remembered that the
+sacredness of property is a notion far more fixed in modern than in
+ancient times. The world has grown older, and is therefore more
+conservative. Primitive society offered many examples of land held in
+common, either by a tribe or by a township, and such may probably have
+been the original form of landed tenure. Ancient legislators had
+invented various modes of dividing and preserving the divisions of land
+among the citizens; according to Aristotle there were nations who held
+the land in common and divided the produce, and there were others who
+divided the land and stored the produce in common. The evils of debt
+and the inequality of property were far greater in ancient than in
+modern times, and the accidents to which property was subject from war,
+or revolution, or taxation, or other legislative interference, were
+also greater. All these circumstances gave property a less fixed and
+sacred character. The early Christians are believed to have held their
+property in common, and the principle is sanctioned by the words of
+Christ himself, and has been maintained as a counsel of perfection in
+almost all ages of the Church. Nor have there been wanting instances of
+modern enthusiasts who have made a religion of communism; in every age
+of religious excitement notions like Wycliffe’s ‘inheritance of grace’
+have tended to prevail. A like spirit, but fiercer and more violent,
+has appeared in politics. ‘The preparation of the Gospel of peace’ soon
+becomes the red flag of Republicanism.
+
+We can hardly judge what effect Plato’s views would have upon his own
+contemporaries; they would perhaps have seemed to them only an
+exaggeration of the Spartan commonwealth. Even modern writers would
+acknowledge that the right of private property is based on expediency,
+and may be interfered with in a variety of ways for the public good.
+Any other mode of vesting property which was found to be more
+advantageous, would in time acquire the same basis of right; ‘the most
+useful,’ in Plato’s words, ‘would be the most sacred.’ The lawyers and
+ecclesiastics of former ages would have spoken of property as a sacred
+institution. But they only meant by such language to oppose the
+greatest amount of resistance to any invasion of the rights of
+individuals and of the Church.
+
+When we consider the question, without any fear of immediate
+application to practice, in the spirit of Plato’s Republic, are we
+quite sure that the received notions of property are the best? Is the
+distribution of wealth which is customary in civilized countries the
+most favourable that can be conceived for the education and development
+of the mass of mankind? Can ‘the spectator of all time and all
+existence’ be quite convinced that one or two thousand years hence,
+great changes will not have taken place in the rights of property, or
+even that the very notion of property, beyond what is necessary for
+personal maintenance, may not have disappeared? This was a distinction
+familiar to Aristotle, though likely to be laughed at among ourselves.
+Such a change would not be greater than some other changes through
+which the world has passed in the transition from ancient to modern
+society, for example, the emancipation of the serfs in Russia, or the
+abolition of slavery in America and the West Indies; and not so great
+as the difference which separates the Eastern village community from
+the Western world. To accomplish such a revolution in the course of a
+few centuries, would imply a rate of progress not more rapid than has
+actually taken place during the last fifty or sixty years. The kingdom
+of Japan underwent more change in five or six years than Europe in five
+or six hundred. Many opinions and beliefs which have been cherished
+among ourselves quite as strongly as the sacredness of property have
+passed away; and the most untenable propositions respecting the right
+of bequests or entail have been maintained with as much fervour as the
+most moderate. Some one will be heard to ask whether a state of society
+can be final in which the interests of thousands are perilled on the
+life or character of a single person. And many will indulge the hope
+that our present condition may, after all, be only transitional, and
+may conduct to a higher, in which property, besides ministering to the
+enjoyment of the few, may also furnish the means of the highest culture
+to all, and will be a greater benefit to the public generally, and also
+more under the control of public authority. There may come a time when
+the saying, ‘Have I not a right to do what I will with my own?’ will
+appear to be a barbarous relic of individualism;—when the possession of
+a part may be a greater blessing to each and all than the possession of
+the whole is now to any one.
+
+Such reflections appear visionary to the eye of the practical
+statesman, but they are within the range of possibility to the
+philosopher. He can imagine that in some distant age or clime, and
+through the influence of some individual, the notion of common property
+may or might have sunk as deep into the heart of a race, and have
+become as fixed to them, as private property is to ourselves. He knows
+that this latter institution is not more than four or five thousand
+years old: may not the end revert to the beginning? In our own age even
+Utopias affect the spirit of legislation, and an abstract idea may
+exercise a great influence on practical politics.
+
+The objections that would be generally urged against Plato’s community
+of property, are the old ones of Aristotle, that motives for exertion
+would be taken away, and that disputes would arise when each was
+dependent upon all. Every man would produce as little and consume as
+much as he liked. The experience of civilized nations has hitherto been
+adverse to Socialism. The effort is too great for human nature; men try
+to live in common, but the personal feeling is always breaking in. On
+the other hand it may be doubted whether our present notions of
+property are not conventional, for they differ in different countries
+and in different states of society. We boast of an individualism which
+is not freedom, but rather an artificial result of the industrial state
+of modern Europe. The individual is nominally free, but he is also
+powerless in a world bound hand and foot in the chains of economic
+necessity. Even if we cannot expect the mass of mankind to become
+disinterested, at any rate we observe in them a power of organization
+which fifty years ago would never have been suspected. The same forces
+which have revolutionized the political system of Europe, may effect a
+similar change in the social and industrial relations of mankind. And
+if we suppose the influence of some good as well as neutral motives
+working in the community, there will be no absurdity in expecting that
+the mass of mankind having power, and becoming enlightened about the
+higher possibilities of human life, when they learn how much more is
+attainable for all than is at present the possession of a favoured few,
+may pursue the common interest with an intelligence and persistency
+which mankind have hitherto never seen.
+
+Now that the world has once been set in motion, and is no longer held
+fast under the tyranny of custom and ignorance; now that criticism has
+pierced the veil of tradition and the past no longer overpowers the
+present,—the progress of civilization may be expected to be far greater
+and swifter than heretofore. Even at our present rate of speed the
+point at which we may arrive in two or three generations is beyond the
+power of imagination to foresee. There are forces in the world which
+work, not in an arithmetical, but in a geometrical ratio of increase.
+Education, to use the expression of Plato, moves like a wheel with an
+ever-multiplying rapidity. Nor can we say how great may be its
+influence, when it becomes universal,—when it has been inherited by
+many generations,—when it is freed from the trammels of superstition
+and rightly adapted to the wants and capacities of different classes of
+men and women. Neither do we know how much more the co-operation of
+minds or of hands may be capable of accomplishing, whether in labour or
+in study. The resources of the natural sciences are not half-developed
+as yet; the soil of the earth, instead of growing more barren, may
+become many times more fertile than hitherto; the uses of machinery far
+greater, and also more minute than at present. New secrets of
+physiology may be revealed, deeply affecting human nature in its
+innermost recesses. The standard of health may be raised and the lives
+of men prolonged by sanitary and medical knowledge. There may be peace,
+there may be leisure, there may be innocent refreshments of many kinds.
+The ever-increasing power of locomotion may join the extremes of earth.
+There may be mysterious workings of the human mind, such as occur only
+at great crises of history. The East and the West may meet together,
+and all nations may contribute their thoughts and their experience to
+the common stock of humanity. Many other elements enter into a
+speculation of this kind. But it is better to make an end of them. For
+such reflections appear to the majority far-fetched, and to men of
+science, commonplace.
+
+(b) Neither to the mind of Plato nor of Aristotle did the doctrine of
+community of property present at all the same difficulty, or appear to
+be the same violation of the common Hellenic sentiment, as the
+community of wives and children. This paradox he prefaces by another
+proposal, that the occupations of men and women shall be the same, and
+that to this end they shall have a common training and education. Male
+and female animals have the same pursuits—why not also the two sexes of
+man?
+
+But have we not here fallen into a contradiction? for we were saying
+that different natures should have different pursuits. How then can men
+and women have the same? And is not the proposal inconsistent with our
+notion of the division of labour?—These objections are no sooner raised
+than answered; for, according to Plato, there is no organic difference
+between men and women, but only the accidental one that men beget and
+women bear children. Following the analogy of the other animals, he
+contends that all natural gifts are scattered about indifferently among
+both sexes, though there may be a superiority of degree on the part of
+the men. The objection on the score of decency to their taking part in
+the same gymnastic exercises, is met by Plato’s assertion that the
+existing feeling is a matter of habit.
+
+That Plato should have emancipated himself from the ideas of his own
+country and from the example of the East, shows a wonderful
+independence of mind. He is conscious that women are half the human
+race, in some respects the more important half (Laws); and for the sake
+both of men and women he desires to raise the woman to a higher level
+of existence. He brings, not sentiment, but philosophy to bear upon a
+question which both in ancient and modern times has been chiefly
+regarded in the light of custom or feeling. The Greeks had noble
+conceptions of womanhood in the goddesses Athene and Artemis, and in
+the heroines Antigone and Andromache. But these ideals had no
+counterpart in actual life. The Athenian woman was in no way the equal
+of her husband; she was not the entertainer of his guests or the
+mistress of his house, but only his housekeeper and the mother of his
+children. She took no part in military or political matters; nor is
+there any instance in the later ages of Greece of a woman becoming
+famous in literature. ‘Hers is the greatest glory who has the least
+renown among men,’ is the historian’s conception of feminine
+excellence. A very different ideal of womanhood is held up by Plato to
+the world; she is to be the companion of the man, and to share with him
+in the toils of war and in the cares of government. She is to be
+similarly trained both in bodily and mental exercises. She is to lose
+as far as possible the incidents of maternity and the characteristics
+of the female sex.
+
+The modern antagonist of the equality of the sexes would argue that the
+differences between men and women are not confined to the single point
+urged by Plato; that sensibility, gentleness, grace, are the qualities
+of women, while energy, strength, higher intelligence, are to be looked
+for in men. And the criticism is just: the differences affect the whole
+nature, and are not, as Plato supposes, confined to a single point. But
+neither can we say how far these differences are due to education and
+the opinions of mankind, or physically inherited from the habits and
+opinions of former generations. Women have been always taught, not
+exactly that they are slaves, but that they are in an inferior
+position, which is also supposed to have compensating advantages; and
+to this position they have conformed. It is also true that the physical
+form may easily change in the course of generations through the mode of
+life; and the weakness or delicacy, which was once a matter of opinion,
+may become a physical fact. The characteristics of sex vary greatly in
+different countries and ranks of society, and at different ages in the
+same individuals. Plato may have been right in denying that there was
+any ultimate difference in the sexes of man other than that which
+exists in animals, because all other differences may be conceived to
+disappear in other states of society, or under different circumstances
+of life and training.
+
+The first wave having been passed, we proceed to the second—community
+of wives and children. ‘Is it possible? Is it desirable?’ For as
+Glaucon intimates, and as we far more strongly insist, ‘Great doubts
+may be entertained about both these points.’ Any free discussion of the
+question is impossible, and mankind are perhaps right in not allowing
+the ultimate bases of social life to be examined. Few of us can safely
+enquire into the things which nature hides, any more than we can
+dissect our own bodies. Still, the manner in which Plato arrived at his
+conclusions should be considered. For here, as Mr. Grote has remarked,
+is a wonderful thing, that one of the wisest and best of men should
+have entertained ideas of morality which are wholly at variance with
+our own. And if we would do Plato justice, we must examine carefully
+the character of his proposals. First, we may observe that the
+relations of the sexes supposed by him are the reverse of licentious:
+he seems rather to aim at an impossible strictness. Secondly, he
+conceives the family to be the natural enemy of the state; and he
+entertains the serious hope that an universal brotherhood may take the
+place of private interests—an aspiration which, although not justified
+by experience, has possessed many noble minds. On the other hand, there
+is no sentiment or imagination in the connections which men and women
+are supposed by him to form; human beings return to the level of the
+animals, neither exalting to heaven, nor yet abusing the natural
+instincts. All that world of poetry and fancy which the passion of love
+has called forth in modern literature and romance would have been
+banished by Plato. The arrangements of marriage in the Republic are
+directed to one object—the improvement of the race. In successive
+generations a great development both of bodily and mental qualities
+might be possible. The analogy of animals tends to show that mankind
+can within certain limits receive a change of nature. And as in animals
+we should commonly choose the best for breeding, and destroy the
+others, so there must be a selection made of the human beings whose
+lives are worthy to be preserved.
+
+We start back horrified from this Platonic ideal, in the belief, first,
+that the higher feelings of humanity are far too strong to be crushed
+out; secondly, that if the plan could be carried into execution we
+should be poorly recompensed by improvements in the breed for the loss
+of the best things in life. The greatest regard for the weakest and
+meanest of human beings—the infant, the criminal, the insane, the
+idiot, truly seems to us one of the noblest results of Christianity. We
+have learned, though as yet imperfectly, that the individual man has an
+endless value in the sight of God, and that we honour Him when we
+honour the darkened and disfigured image of Him (Laws). This is the
+lesson which Christ taught in a parable when He said, ‘Their angels do
+always behold the face of My Father which is in heaven.’ Such lessons
+are only partially realized in any age; they were foreign to the age of
+Plato, as they have very different degrees of strength in different
+countries or ages of the Christian world. To the Greek the family was a
+religious and customary institution binding the members together by a
+tie inferior in strength to that of friendship, and having a less
+solemn and sacred sound than that of country. The relationship which
+existed on the lower level of custom, Plato imagined that he was
+raising to the higher level of nature and reason; while from the modern
+and Christian point of view we regard him as sanctioning murder and
+destroying the first principles of morality.
+
+The great error in these and similar speculations is that the
+difference between man and the animals is forgotten in them. The human
+being is regarded with the eye of a dog- or bird-fancier, or at best of
+a slave-owner; the higher or human qualities are left out. The breeder
+of animals aims chiefly at size or speed or strength; in a few cases at
+courage or temper; most often the fitness of the animal for food is the
+great desideratum. But mankind are not bred to be eaten, nor yet for
+their superiority in fighting or in running or in drawing carts.
+Neither does the improvement of the human race consist merely in the
+increase of the bones and flesh, but in the growth and enlightenment of
+the mind. Hence there must be ‘a marriage of true minds’ as well as of
+bodies, of imagination and reason as well as of lusts and instincts.
+Men and women without feeling or imagination are justly called brutes;
+yet Plato takes away these qualities and puts nothing in their place,
+not even the desire of a noble offspring, since parents are not to know
+their own children. The most important transaction of social life, he
+who is the idealist philosopher converts into the most brutal. For the
+pair are to have no relation to one another, except at the hymeneal
+festival; their children are not theirs, but the state’s; nor is any
+tie of affection to unite them. Yet here the analogy of the animals
+might have saved Plato from a gigantic error, if he had ‘not lost sight
+of his own illustration.’ For the ‘nobler sort of birds and beasts’
+nourish and protect their offspring and are faithful to one another.
+
+An eminent physiologist thinks it worth while ‘to try and place life on
+a physical basis.’ But should not life rest on the moral rather than
+upon the physical? The higher comes first, then the lower, first the
+human and rational, afterwards the animal. Yet they are not absolutely
+divided; and in times of sickness or moments of self-indulgence they
+seem to be only different aspects of a common human nature which
+includes them both. Neither is the moral the limit of the physical, but
+the expansion and enlargement of it,—the highest form which the
+physical is capable of receiving. As Plato would say, the body does not
+take care of the body, and still less of the mind, but the mind takes
+care of both. In all human action not that which is common to man and
+the animals is the characteristic element, but that which distinguishes
+him from them. Even if we admit the physical basis, and resolve all
+virtue into health of body ‘la facon que notre sang circule,’ still on
+merely physical grounds we must come back to ideas. Mind and reason and
+duty and conscience, under these or other names, are always
+reappearing. There cannot be health of body without health of mind; nor
+health of mind without the sense of duty and the love of truth (Charm).
+
+That the greatest of ancient philosophers should in his regulations
+about marriage have fallen into the error of separating body and mind,
+does indeed appear surprising. Yet the wonder is not so much that Plato
+should have entertained ideas of morality which to our own age are
+revolting, but that he should have contradicted himself to an extent
+which is hardly credible, falling in an instant from the heaven of
+idealism into the crudest animalism. Rejoicing in the newly found gift
+of reflection, he appears to have thought out a subject about which he
+had better have followed the enlightened feeling of his own age. The
+general sentiment of Hellas was opposed to his monstrous fancy. The old
+poets, and in later time the tragedians, showed no want of respect for
+the family, on which much of their religion was based. But the example
+of Sparta, and perhaps in some degree the tendency to defy public
+opinion, seems to have misled him. He will make one family out of all
+the families of the state. He will select the finest specimens of men
+and women and breed from these only.
+
+Yet because the illusion is always returning (for the animal part of
+human nature will from time to time assert itself in the disguise of
+philosophy as well as of poetry), and also because any departure from
+established morality, even where this is not intended, is apt to be
+unsettling, it may be worth while to draw out a little more at length
+the objections to the Platonic marriage. In the first place, history
+shows that wherever polygamy has been largely allowed the race has
+deteriorated. One man to one woman is the law of God and nature. Nearly
+all the civilized peoples of the world at some period before the age of
+written records, have become monogamists; and the step when once taken
+has never been retraced. The exceptions occurring among Brahmins or
+Mahometans or the ancient Persians, are of that sort which may be said
+to prove the rule. The connexions formed between superior and inferior
+races hardly ever produce a noble offspring, because they are
+licentious; and because the children in such cases usually despise the
+mother and are neglected by the father who is ashamed of them.
+Barbarous nations when they are introduced by Europeans to vice die
+out; polygamist peoples either import and adopt children from other
+countries, or dwindle in numbers, or both. Dynasties and aristocracies
+which have disregarded the laws of nature have decreased in numbers and
+degenerated in stature; ‘mariages de convenance’ leave their enfeebling
+stamp on the offspring of them (King Lear). The marriage of near
+relations, or the marrying in and in of the same family tends
+constantly to weakness or idiocy in the children, sometimes assuming
+the form as they grow older of passionate licentiousness. The common
+prostitute rarely has any offspring. By such unmistakable evidence is
+the authority of morality asserted in the relations of the sexes: and
+so many more elements enter into this ‘mystery’ than are dreamed of by
+Plato and some other philosophers.
+
+Recent enquirers have indeed arrived at the conclusion that among
+primitive tribes there existed a community of wives as of property, and
+that the captive taken by the spear was the only wife or slave whom any
+man was permitted to call his own. The partial existence of such
+customs among some of the lower races of man, and the survival of
+peculiar ceremonies in the marriages of some civilized nations, are
+thought to furnish a proof of similar institutions having been once
+universal. There can be no question that the study of anthropology has
+considerably changed our views respecting the first appearance of man
+upon the earth. We know more about the aborigines of the world than
+formerly, but our increasing knowledge shows above all things how
+little we know. With all the helps which written monuments afford, we
+do but faintly realize the condition of man two thousand or three
+thousand years ago. Of what his condition was when removed to a
+distance 200,000 or 300,000 years, when the majority of mankind were
+lower and nearer the animals than any tribe now existing upon the
+earth, we cannot even entertain conjecture. Plato (Laws) and Aristotle
+(Metaph.) may have been more right than we imagine in supposing that
+some forms of civilisation were discovered and lost several times over.
+If we cannot argue that all barbarism is a degraded civilization,
+neither can we set any limits to the depth of degradation to which the
+human race may sink through war, disease, or isolation. And if we are
+to draw inferences about the origin of marriage from the practice of
+barbarous nations, we should also consider the remoter analogy of the
+animals. Many birds and animals, especially the carnivorous, have only
+one mate, and the love and care of offspring which seems to be natural
+is inconsistent with the primitive theory of marriage. If we go back to
+an imaginary state in which men were almost animals and the companions
+of them, we have as much right to argue from what is animal to what is
+human as from the barbarous to the civilized man. The record of animal
+life on the globe is fragmentary,—the connecting links are wanting and
+cannot be supplied; the record of social life is still more fragmentary
+and precarious. Even if we admit that our first ancestors had no such
+institution as marriage, still the stages by which men passed from
+outer barbarism to the comparative civilization of China, Assyria, and
+Greece, or even of the ancient Germans, are wholly unknown to us.
+
+Such speculations are apt to be unsettling, because they seem to show
+that an institution which was thought to be a revelation from heaven,
+is only the growth of history and experience. We ask what is the origin
+of marriage, and we are told that like the right of property, after
+many wars and contests, it has gradually arisen out of the selfishness
+of barbarians. We stand face to face with human nature in its primitive
+nakedness. We are compelled to accept, not the highest, but the lowest
+account of the origin of human society. But on the other hand we may
+truly say that every step in human progress has been in the same
+direction, and that in the course of ages the idea of marriage and of
+the family has been more and more defined and consecrated. The
+civilized East is immeasurably in advance of any savage tribes; the
+Greeks and Romans have improved upon the East; the Christian nations
+have been stricter in their views of the marriage relation than any of
+the ancients. In this as in so many other things, instead of looking
+back with regret to the past, we should look forward with hope to the
+future. We must consecrate that which we believe to be the most holy,
+and that ‘which is the most holy will be the most useful.’ There is
+more reason for maintaining the sacredness of the marriage tie, when we
+see the benefit of it, than when we only felt a vague religious horror
+about the violation of it. But in all times of transition, when
+established beliefs are being undermined, there is a danger that in the
+passage from the old to the new we may insensibly let go the moral
+principle, finding an excuse for listening to the voice of passion in
+the uncertainty of knowledge, or the fluctuations of opinion. And there
+are many persons in our own day who, enlightened by the study of
+anthropology, and fascinated by what is new and strange, some using the
+language of fear, others of hope, are inclined to believe that a time
+will come when through the self-assertion of women, or the rebellious
+spirit of children, by the analysis of human relations, or by the force
+of outward circumstances, the ties of family life may be broken or
+greatly relaxed. They point to societies in America and elsewhere which
+tend to show that the destruction of the family need not necessarily
+involve the overthrow of all morality. Wherever we may think of such
+speculations, we can hardly deny that they have been more rife in this
+generation than in any other; and whither they are tending, who can
+predict?
+
+To the doubts and queries raised by these ‘social reformers’ respecting
+the relation of the sexes and the moral nature of man, there is a
+sufficient answer, if any is needed. The difference about them and us
+is really one of fact. They are speaking of man as they wish or fancy
+him to be, but we are speaking of him as he is. They isolate the animal
+part of his nature; we regard him as a creature having many sides, or
+aspects, moving between good and evil, striving to rise above himself
+and to become ‘a little lower than the angels.’ We also, to use a
+Platonic formula, are not ignorant of the dissatisfactions and
+incompatibilities of family life, of the meannesses of trade, of the
+flatteries of one class of society by another, of the impediments which
+the family throws in the way of lofty aims and aspirations. But we are
+conscious that there are evils and dangers in the background greater
+still, which are not appreciated, because they are either concealed or
+suppressed. What a condition of man would that be, in which human
+passions were controlled by no authority, divine or human, in which
+there was no shame or decency, no higher affection overcoming or
+sanctifying the natural instincts, but simply a rule of health! Is it
+for this that we are asked to throw away the civilization which is the
+growth of ages?
+
+For strength and health are not the only qualities to be desired; there
+are the more important considerations of mind and character and soul.
+We know how human nature may be degraded; we do not know how by
+artificial means any improvement in the breed can be effected. The
+problem is a complex one, for if we go back only four steps (and these
+at least enter into the composition of a child), there are commonly
+thirty progenitors to be taken into account. Many curious facts, rarely
+admitting of proof, are told us respecting the inheritance of disease
+or character from a remote ancestor. We can trace the physical
+resemblances of parents and children in the same family—
+
+‘Sic oculos, sic ille manus, sic ora ferebat’;
+
+but scarcely less often the differences which distinguish children both
+from their parents and from one another. We are told of similar mental
+peculiarities running in families, and again of a tendency, as in the
+animals, to revert to a common or original stock. But we have a
+difficulty in distinguishing what is a true inheritance of genius or
+other qualities, and what is mere imitation or the result of similar
+circumstances. Great men and great women have rarely had great fathers
+and mothers. Nothing that we know of in the circumstances of their
+birth or lineage will explain their appearance. Of the English poets of
+the last and two preceding centuries scarcely a descendant
+remains,—none have ever been distinguished. So deeply has nature hidden
+her secret, and so ridiculous is the fancy which has been entertained
+by some that we might in time by suitable marriage arrangements or, as
+Plato would have said, ‘by an ingenious system of lots,’ produce a
+Shakespeare or a Milton. Even supposing that we could breed men having
+the tenacity of bulldogs, or, like the Spartans, ‘lacking the wit to
+run away in battle,’ would the world be any the better? Many of the
+noblest specimens of the human race have been among the weakest
+physically. Tyrtaeus or Aesop, or our own Newton, would have been
+exposed at Sparta; and some of the fairest and strongest men and women
+have been among the wickedest and worst. Not by the Platonic device of
+uniting the strong and fair with the strong and fair, regardless of
+sentiment and morality, nor yet by his other device of combining
+dissimilar natures (Statesman), have mankind gradually passed from the
+brutality and licentiousness of primitive marriage to marriage
+Christian and civilized.
+
+Few persons would deny that we bring into the world an inheritance of
+mental and physical qualities derived first from our parents, or
+through them from some remoter ancestor, secondly from our race,
+thirdly from the general condition of mankind into which we are born.
+Nothing is commoner than the remark, that ‘So and so is like his father
+or his uncle’; and an aged person may not unfrequently note a
+resemblance in a youth to a long-forgotten ancestor, observing that
+‘Nature sometimes skips a generation.’ It may be true also, that if we
+knew more about our ancestors, these similarities would be even more
+striking to us. Admitting the facts which are thus described in a
+popular way, we may however remark that there is no method of
+difference by which they can be defined or estimated, and that they
+constitute only a small part of each individual. The doctrine of
+heredity may seem to take out of our hands the conduct of our own
+lives, but it is the idea, not the fact, which is really terrible to
+us. For what we have received from our ancestors is only a fraction of
+what we are, or may become. The knowledge that drunkenness or insanity
+has been prevalent in a family may be the best safeguard against their
+recurrence in a future generation. The parent will be most awake to the
+vices or diseases in his child of which he is most sensible within
+himself. The whole of life may be directed to their prevention or cure.
+The traces of consumption may become fainter, or be wholly effaced: the
+inherent tendency to vice or crime may be eradicated. And so heredity,
+from being a curse, may become a blessing. We acknowledge that in the
+matter of our birth, as in our nature generally, there are previous
+circumstances which affect us. But upon this platform of circumstances
+or within this wall of necessity, we have still the power of creating a
+life for ourselves by the informing energy of the human will.
+
+There is another aspect of the marriage question to which Plato is a
+stranger. All the children born in his state are foundlings. It never
+occurred to him that the greater part of them, according to universal
+experience, would have perished. For children can only be brought up in
+families. There is a subtle sympathy between the mother and the child
+which cannot be supplied by other mothers, or by ‘strong nurses one or
+more’ (Laws). If Plato’s ‘pen’ was as fatal as the Creches of Paris, or
+the foundling hospital of Dublin, more than nine-tenths of his children
+would have perished. There would have been no need to expose or put out
+of the way the weaklier children, for they would have died of
+themselves. So emphatically does nature protest against the destruction
+of the family.
+
+What Plato had heard or seen of Sparta was applied by him in a mistaken
+way to his ideal commonwealth. He probably observed that both the
+Spartan men and women were superior in form and strength to the other
+Greeks; and this superiority he was disposed to attribute to the laws
+and customs relating to marriage. He did not consider that the desire
+of a noble offspring was a passion among the Spartans, or that their
+physical superiority was to be attributed chiefly, not to their
+marriage customs, but to their temperance and training. He did not
+reflect that Sparta was great, not in consequence of the relaxation of
+morality, but in spite of it, by virtue of a political principle
+stronger far than existed in any other Grecian state. Least of all did
+he observe that Sparta did not really produce the finest specimens of
+the Greek race. The genius, the political inspiration of Athens, the
+love of liberty—all that has made Greece famous with posterity, were
+wanting among the Spartans. They had no Themistocles, or Pericles, or
+Aeschylus, or Sophocles, or Socrates, or Plato. The individual was not
+allowed to appear above the state; the laws were fixed, and he had no
+business to alter or reform them. Yet whence has the progress of cities
+and nations arisen, if not from remarkable individuals, coming into the
+world we know not how, and from causes over which we have no control?
+Something too much may have been said in modern times of the value of
+individuality. But we can hardly condemn too strongly a system which,
+instead of fostering the scattered seeds or sparks of genius and
+character, tends to smother and extinguish them.
+
+Still, while condemning Plato, we must acknowledge that neither
+Christianity, nor any other form of religion and society, has hitherto
+been able to cope with this most difficult of social problems, and that
+the side from which Plato regarded it is that from which we turn away.
+Population is the most untameable force in the political and social
+world. Do we not find, especially in large cities, that the greatest
+hindrance to the amelioration of the poor is their improvidence in
+marriage?—a small fault truly, if not involving endless consequences.
+There are whole countries too, such as India, or, nearer home, Ireland,
+in which a right solution of the marriage question seems to lie at the
+foundation of the happiness of the community. There are too many people
+on a given space, or they marry too early and bring into the world a
+sickly and half-developed offspring; or owing to the very conditions of
+their existence, they become emaciated and hand on a similar life to
+their descendants. But who can oppose the voice of prudence to the
+‘mightiest passions of mankind’ (Laws), especially when they have been
+licensed by custom and religion? In addition to the influences of
+education, we seem to require some new principles of right and wrong in
+these matters, some force of opinion, which may indeed be already heard
+whispering in private, but has never affected the moral sentiments of
+mankind in general. We unavoidably lose sight of the principle of
+utility, just in that action of our lives in which we have the most
+need of it. The influences which we can bring to bear upon this
+question are chiefly indirect. In a generation or two, education,
+emigration, improvements in agriculture and manufactures, may have
+provided the solution. The state physician hardly likes to probe the
+wound: it is beyond his art; a matter which he cannot safely let alone,
+but which he dare not touch:
+
+‘We do but skin and film the ulcerous place.’
+
+When again in private life we see a whole family one by one dropping
+into the grave under the Ate of some inherited malady, and the parents
+perhaps surviving them, do our minds ever go back silently to that day
+twenty-five or thirty years before on which under the fairest auspices,
+amid the rejoicings of friends and acquaintances, a bride and
+bridegroom joined hands with one another? In making such a reflection
+we are not opposing physical considerations to moral, but moral to
+physical; we are seeking to make the voice of reason heard, which
+drives us back from the extravagance of sentimentalism on common sense.
+The late Dr. Combe is said by his biographer to have resisted the
+temptation to marriage, because he knew that he was subject to
+hereditary consumption. One who deserved to be called a man of genius,
+a friend of my youth, was in the habit of wearing a black ribbon on his
+wrist, in order to remind him that, being liable to outbreaks of
+insanity, he must not give way to the natural impulses of affection: he
+died unmarried in a lunatic asylum. These two little facts suggest the
+reflection that a very few persons have done from a sense of duty what
+the rest of mankind ought to have done under like circumstances, if
+they had allowed themselves to think of all the misery which they were
+about to bring into the world. If we could prevent such marriages
+without any violation of feeling or propriety, we clearly ought; and
+the prohibition in the course of time would be protected by a ‘horror
+naturalis’ similar to that which, in all civilized ages and countries,
+has prevented the marriage of near relations by blood. Mankind would
+have been the happier, if some things which are now allowed had from
+the beginning been denied to them; if the sanction of religion could
+have prohibited practices inimical to health; if sanitary principles
+could in early ages have been invested with a superstitious awe. But,
+living as we do far on in the world’s history, we are no longer able to
+stamp at once with the impress of religion a new prohibition. A free
+agent cannot have his fancies regulated by law; and the execution of
+the law would be rendered impossible, owing to the uncertainty of the
+cases in which marriage was to be forbidden. Who can weigh virtue, or
+even fortune against health, or moral and mental qualities against
+bodily? Who can measure probabilities against certainties? There has
+been some good as well as evil in the discipline of suffering; and
+there are diseases, such as consumption, which have exercised a
+refining and softening influence on the character. Youth is too
+inexperienced to balance such nice considerations; parents do not often
+think of them, or think of them too late. They are at a distance and
+may probably be averted; change of place, a new state of life, the
+interests of a home may be the cure of them. So persons vainly reason
+when their minds are already made up and their fortunes irrevocably
+linked together. Nor is there any ground for supposing that marriages
+are to any great extent influenced by reflections of this sort, which
+seem unable to make any head against the irresistible impulse of
+individual attachment.
+
+Lastly, no one can have observed the first rising flood of the passions
+in youth, the difficulty of regulating them, and the effects on the
+whole mind and nature which follow from them, the stimulus which is
+given to them by the imagination, without feeling that there is
+something unsatisfactory in our method of treating them. That the most
+important influence on human life should be wholly left to chance or
+shrouded in mystery, and instead of being disciplined or understood,
+should be required to conform only to an external standard of
+propriety—cannot be regarded by the philosopher as a safe or
+satisfactory condition of human things. And still those who have the
+charge of youth may find a way by watchfulness, by affection, by the
+manliness and innocence of their own lives, by occasional hints, by
+general admonitions which every one can apply for himself, to mitigate
+this terrible evil which eats out the heart of individuals and corrupts
+the moral sentiments of nations. In no duty towards others is there
+more need of reticence and self-restraint. So great is the danger lest
+he who would be the counsellor of another should reveal the secret
+prematurely, lest he should get another too much into his power; or fix
+the passing impression of evil by demanding the confession of it.
+
+Nor is Plato wrong in asserting that family attachments may interfere
+with higher aims. If there have been some who ‘to party gave up what
+was meant for mankind,’ there have certainly been others who to family
+gave up what was meant for mankind or for their country. The cares of
+children, the necessity of procuring money for their support, the
+flatteries of the rich by the poor, the exclusiveness of caste, the
+pride of birth or wealth, the tendency of family life to divert men
+from the pursuit of the ideal or the heroic, are as lowering in our own
+age as in that of Plato. And if we prefer to look at the gentle
+influences of home, the development of the affections, the amenities of
+society, the devotion of one member of a family for the good of the
+others, which form one side of the picture, we must not quarrel with
+him, or perhaps ought rather to be grateful to him, for having
+presented to us the reverse. Without attempting to defend Plato on
+grounds of morality, we may allow that there is an aspect of the world
+which has not unnaturally led him into error.
+
+We hardly appreciate the power which the idea of the State, like all
+other abstract ideas, exercised over the mind of Plato. To us the State
+seems to be built up out of the family, or sometimes to be the
+framework in which family and social life is contained. But to Plato in
+his present mood of mind the family is only a disturbing influence
+which, instead of filling up, tends to disarrange the higher unity of
+the State. No organization is needed except a political, which,
+regarded from another point of view, is a military one. The State is
+all-sufficing for the wants of man, and, like the idea of the Church in
+later ages, absorbs all other desires and affections. In time of war
+the thousand citizens are to stand like a rampart impregnable against
+the world or the Persian host; in time of peace the preparation for war
+and their duties to the State, which are also their duties to one
+another, take up their whole life and time. The only other interest
+which is allowed to them besides that of war, is the interest of
+philosophy. When they are too old to be soldiers they are to retire
+from active life and to have a second novitiate of study and
+contemplation. There is an element of monasticism even in Plato’s
+communism. If he could have done without children, he might have
+converted his Republic into a religious order. Neither in the Laws,
+when the daylight of common sense breaks in upon him, does he retract
+his error. In the state of which he would be the founder, there is no
+marrying or giving in marriage: but because of the infirmity of
+mankind, he condescends to allow the law of nature to prevail.
+
+(c) But Plato has an equal, or, in his own estimation, even greater
+paradox in reserve, which is summed up in the famous text, ‘Until kings
+are philosophers or philosophers are kings, cities will never cease
+from ill.’ And by philosophers he explains himself to mean those who
+are capable of apprehending ideas, especially the idea of good. To the
+attainment of this higher knowledge the second education is directed.
+Through a process of training which has already made them good citizens
+they are now to be made good legislators. We find with some surprise
+(not unlike the feeling which Aristotle in a well-known passage
+describes the hearers of Plato’s lectures as experiencing, when they
+went to a discourse on the idea of good, expecting to be instructed in
+moral truths, and received instead of them arithmetical and
+mathematical formulae) that Plato does not propose for his future
+legislators any study of finance or law or military tactics, but only
+of abstract mathematics, as a preparation for the still more abstract
+conception of good. We ask, with Aristotle, What is the use of a man
+knowing the idea of good, if he does not know what is good for this
+individual, this state, this condition of society? We cannot understand
+how Plato’s legislators or guardians are to be fitted for their work of
+statesmen by the study of the five mathematical sciences. We vainly
+search in Plato’s own writings for any explanation of this seeming
+absurdity.
+
+The discovery of a great metaphysical conception seems to ravish the
+mind with a prophetic consciousness which takes away the power of
+estimating its value. No metaphysical enquirer has ever fairly
+criticised his own speculations; in his own judgment they have been
+above criticism; nor has he understood that what to him seemed to be
+absolute truth may reappear in the next generation as a form of logic
+or an instrument of thought. And posterity have also sometimes equally
+misapprehended the real value of his speculations. They appear to them
+to have contributed nothing to the stock of human knowledge. The IDEA
+of good is apt to be regarded by the modern thinker as an unmeaning
+abstraction; but he forgets that this abstraction is waiting ready for
+use, and will hereafter be filled up by the divisions of knowledge.
+When mankind do not as yet know that the world is subject to law, the
+introduction of the mere conception of law or design or final cause,
+and the far-off anticipation of the harmony of knowledge, are great
+steps onward. Even the crude generalization of the unity of all things
+leads men to view the world with different eyes, and may easily affect
+their conception of human life and of politics, and also their own
+conduct and character (Tim). We can imagine how a great mind like that
+of Pericles might derive elevation from his intercourse with Anaxagoras
+(Phaedr.). To be struggling towards a higher but unattainable
+conception is a more favourable intellectual condition than to rest
+satisfied in a narrow portion of ascertained fact. And the earlier,
+which have sometimes been the greater ideas of science, are often lost
+sight of at a later period. How rarely can we say of any modern
+enquirer in the magnificent language of Plato, that ‘He is the
+spectator of all time and of all existence!’
+
+Nor is there anything unnatural in the hasty application of these vast
+metaphysical conceptions to practical and political life. In the first
+enthusiasm of ideas men are apt to see them everywhere, and to apply
+them in the most remote sphere. They do not understand that the
+experience of ages is required to enable them to fill up ‘the
+intermediate axioms.’ Plato himself seems to have imagined that the
+truths of psychology, like those of astronomy and harmonics, would be
+arrived at by a process of deduction, and that the method which he has
+pursued in the Fourth Book, of inferring them from experience and the
+use of language, was imperfect and only provisional. But when, after
+having arrived at the idea of good, which is the end of the science of
+dialectic, he is asked, What is the nature, and what are the divisions
+of the science? He refuses to answer, as if intending by the refusal to
+intimate that the state of knowledge which then existed was not such as
+would allow the philosopher to enter into his final rest. The previous
+sciences must first be studied, and will, we may add, continue to be
+studied tell the end of time, although in a sense different from any
+which Plato could have conceived. But we may observe, that while he is
+aware of the vacancy of his own ideal, he is full of enthusiasm in the
+contemplation of it. Looking into the orb of light, he sees nothing,
+but he is warmed and elevated. The Hebrew prophet believed that faith
+in God would enable him to govern the world; the Greek philosopher
+imagined that contemplation of the good would make a legislator. There
+is as much to be filled up in the one case as in the other, and the one
+mode of conception is to the Israelite what the other is to the Greek.
+Both find a repose in a divine perfection, which, whether in a more
+personal or impersonal form, exists without them and independently of
+them, as well as within them.
+
+There is no mention of the idea of good in the Timaeus, nor of the
+divine Creator of the world in the Republic; and we are naturally led
+to ask in what relation they stand to one another. Is God above or
+below the idea of good? Or is the Idea of Good another mode of
+conceiving God? The latter appears to be the truer answer. To the Greek
+philosopher the perfection and unity of God was a far higher conception
+than his personality, which he hardly found a word to express, and
+which to him would have seemed to be borrowed from mythology. To the
+Christian, on the other hand, or to the modern thinker in general, it
+is difficult, if not impossible, to attach reality to what he terms
+mere abstraction; while to Plato this very abstraction is the truest
+and most real of all things. Hence, from a difference in forms of
+thought, Plato appears to be resting on a creation of his own mind
+only. But if we may be allowed to paraphrase the idea of good by the
+words ‘intelligent principle of law and order in the universe,
+embracing equally man and nature,’ we begin to find a meeting-point
+between him and ourselves.
+
+The question whether the ruler or statesman should be a philosopher is
+one that has not lost interest in modern times. In most countries of
+Europe and Asia there has been some one in the course of ages who has
+truly united the power of command with the power of thought and
+reflection, as there have been also many false combinations of these
+qualities. Some kind of speculative power is necessary both in
+practical and political life; like the rhetorician in the Phaedrus, men
+require to have a conception of the varieties of human character, and
+to be raised on great occasions above the commonplaces of ordinary
+life. Yet the idea of the philosopher-statesman has never been popular
+with the mass of mankind; partly because he cannot take the world into
+his confidence or make them understand the motives from which he acts;
+and also because they are jealous of a power which they do not
+understand. The revolution which human nature desires to effect step by
+step in many ages is likely to be precipitated by him in a single year
+or life. They are afraid that in the pursuit of his greater aims he may
+disregard the common feelings of humanity, he is too apt to be looking
+into the distant future or back into the remote past, and unable to see
+actions or events which, to use an expression of Plato’s ‘are tumbling
+out at his feet.’ Besides, as Plato would say, there are other
+corruptions of these philosophical statesmen. Either ‘the native hue of
+resolution is sicklied o’er with the pale cast of thought,’ and at the
+moment when action above all things is required he is undecided, or
+general principles are enunciated by him in order to cover some change
+of policy; or his ignorance of the world has made him more easily fall
+a prey to the arts of others; or in some cases he has been converted
+into a courtier, who enjoys the luxury of holding liberal opinions, but
+was never known to perform a liberal action. No wonder that mankind
+have been in the habit of calling statesmen of this class pedants,
+sophisters, doctrinaires, visionaries. For, as we may be allowed to
+say, a little parodying the words of Plato, ‘they have seen bad
+imitations of the philosopher-statesman.’ But a man in whom the power
+of thought and action are perfectly balanced, equal to the present,
+reaching forward to the future, ‘such a one,’ ruling in a
+constitutional state, ‘they have never seen.’
+
+But as the philosopher is apt to fail in the routine of political life,
+so the ordinary statesman is also apt to fail in extraordinary crises.
+When the face of the world is beginning to alter, and thunder is heard
+in the distance, he is still guided by his old maxims, and is the slave
+of his inveterate party prejudices; he cannot perceive the signs of the
+times; instead of looking forward he looks back; he learns nothing and
+forgets nothing; with ‘wise saws and modern instances’ he would stem
+the rising tide of revolution. He lives more and more within the circle
+of his own party, as the world without him becomes stronger. This seems
+to be the reason why the old order of things makes so poor a figure
+when confronted with the new, why churches can never reform, why most
+political changes are made blindly and convulsively. The great crises
+in the history of nations have often been met by an ecclesiastical
+positiveness, and a more obstinate reassertion of principles which have
+lost their hold upon a nation. The fixed ideas of a reactionary
+statesman may be compared to madness; they grow upon him, and he
+becomes possessed by them; no judgement of others is ever admitted by
+him to be weighed in the balance against his own.
+
+(d) Plato, labouring under what, to modern readers, appears to have
+been a confusion of ideas, assimilates the state to the individual, and
+fails to distinguish Ethics from Politics. He thinks that to be most of
+a state which is most like one man, and in which the citizens have the
+greatest uniformity of character. He does not see that the analogy is
+partly fallacious, and that the will or character of a state or nation
+is really the balance or rather the surplus of individual wills, which
+are limited by the condition of having to act in common. The movement
+of a body of men can never have the pliancy or facility of a single
+man; the freedom of the individual, which is always limited, becomes
+still more straitened when transferred to a nation. The powers of
+action and feeling are necessarily weaker and more balanced when they
+are diffused through a community; whence arises the often discussed
+question, ‘Can a nation, like an individual, have a conscience?’ We
+hesitate to say that the characters of nations are nothing more than
+the sum of the characters of the individuals who compose them; because
+there may be tendencies in individuals which react upon one another. A
+whole nation may be wiser than any one man in it; or may be animated by
+some common opinion or feeling which could not equally have affected
+the mind of a single person, or may have been inspired by a leader of
+genius to perform acts more than human. Plato does not appear to have
+analysed the complications which arise out of the collective action of
+mankind. Neither is he capable of seeing that analogies, though
+specious as arguments, may often have no foundation in fact, or of
+distinguishing between what is intelligible or vividly present to the
+mind, and what is true. In this respect he is far below Aristotle, who
+is comparatively seldom imposed upon by false analogies. He cannot
+disentangle the arts from the virtues—at least he is always arguing
+from one to the other. His notion of music is transferred from harmony
+of sounds to harmony of life: in this he is assisted by the ambiguities
+of language as well as by the prevalence of Pythagorean notions. And
+having once assimilated the state to the individual, he imagines that
+he will find the succession of states paralleled in the lives of
+individuals.
+
+Still, through this fallacious medium, a real enlargement of ideas is
+attained. When the virtues as yet presented no distinct conception to
+the mind, a great advance was made by the comparison of them with the
+arts; for virtue is partly art, and has an outward form as well as an
+inward principle. The harmony of music affords a lively image of the
+harmonies of the world and of human life, and may be regarded as a
+splendid illustration which was naturally mistaken for a real analogy.
+In the same way the identification of ethics with politics has a
+tendency to give definiteness to ethics, and also to elevate and
+ennoble men’s notions of the aims of government and of the duties of
+citizens; for ethics from one point of view may be conceived as an
+idealized law and politics; and politics, as ethics reduced to the
+conditions of human society. There have been evils which have arisen
+out of the attempt to identify them, and this has led to the separation
+or antagonism of them, which has been introduced by modern political
+writers. But we may likewise feel that something has been lost in their
+separation, and that the ancient philosophers who estimated the moral
+and intellectual wellbeing of mankind first, and the wealth of nations
+and individuals second, may have a salutary influence on the
+speculations of modern times. Many political maxims originate in a
+reaction against an opposite error; and when the errors against which
+they were directed have passed away, they in turn become errors.
+
+3. Plato’s views of education are in several respects remarkable; like
+the rest of the Republic they are partly Greek and partly ideal,
+beginning with the ordinary curriculum of the Greek youth, and
+extending to after-life. Plato is the first writer who distinctly says
+that education is to comprehend the whole of life, and to be a
+preparation for another in which education begins again. This is the
+continuous thread which runs through the Republic, and which more than
+any other of his ideas admits of an application to modern life.
+
+He has long given up the notion that virtue cannot be taught; and he is
+disposed to modify the thesis of the Protagoras, that the virtues are
+one and not many. He is not unwilling to admit the sensible world into
+his scheme of truth. Nor does he assert in the Republic the
+involuntariness of vice, which is maintained by him in the Timaeus,
+Sophist, and Laws (Protag., Apol., Gorg.). Nor do the so-called
+Platonic ideas recovered from a former state of existence affect his
+theory of mental improvement. Still we observe in him the remains of
+the old Socratic doctrine, that true knowledge must be elicited from
+within, and is to be sought for in ideas, not in particulars of sense.
+Education, as he says, will implant a principle of intelligence which
+is better than ten thousand eyes. The paradox that the virtues are one,
+and the kindred notion that all virtue is knowledge, are not entirely
+renounced; the first is seen in the supremacy given to justice over the
+rest; the second in the tendency to absorb the moral virtues in the
+intellectual, and to centre all goodness in the contemplation of the
+idea of good. The world of sense is still depreciated and identified
+with opinion, though admitted to be a shadow of the true. In the
+Republic he is evidently impressed with the conviction that vice arises
+chiefly from ignorance and may be cured by education; the multitude are
+hardly to be deemed responsible for what they do. A faint allusion to
+the doctrine of reminiscence occurs in the Tenth Book; but Plato’s
+views of education have no more real connection with a previous state
+of existence than our own; he only proposes to elicit from the mind
+that which is there already. Education is represented by him, not as
+the filling of a vessel, but as the turning the eye of the soul towards
+the light.
+
+He treats first of music or literature, which he divides into true and
+false, and then goes on to gymnastics; of infancy in the Republic he
+takes no notice, though in the Laws he gives sage counsels about the
+nursing of children and the management of the mothers, and would have
+an education which is even prior to birth. But in the Republic he
+begins with the age at which the child is capable of receiving ideas,
+and boldly asserts, in language which sounds paradoxical to modern
+ears, that he must be taught the false before he can learn the true.
+The modern and ancient philosophical world are not agreed about truth
+and falsehood; the one identifies truth almost exclusively with fact,
+the other with ideas. This is the difference between ourselves and
+Plato, which is, however, partly a difference of words. For we too
+should admit that a child must receive many lessons which he
+imperfectly understands; he must be taught some things in a figure
+only, some too which he can hardly be expected to believe when he grows
+older; but we should limit the use of fiction by the necessity of the
+case. Plato would draw the line differently; according to him the aim
+of early education is not truth as a matter of fact, but truth as a
+matter of principle; the child is to be taught first simple religious
+truths, and then simple moral truths, and insensibly to learn the
+lesson of good manners and good taste. He would make an entire
+reformation of the old mythology; like Xenophanes and Heracleitus he is
+sensible of the deep chasm which separates his own age from Homer and
+Hesiod, whom he quotes and invests with an imaginary authority, but
+only for his own purposes. The lusts and treacheries of the gods are to
+be banished; the terrors of the world below are to be dispelled; the
+misbehaviour of the Homeric heroes is not to be a model for youth. But
+there is another strain heard in Homer which may teach our youth
+endurance; and something may be learnt in medicine from the simple
+practice of the Homeric age. The principles on which religion is to be
+based are two only: first, that God is true; secondly, that he is good.
+Modern and Christian writers have often fallen short of these; they can
+hardly be said to have gone beyond them.
+
+The young are to be brought up in happy surroundings, out of the way of
+sights or sounds which may hurt the character or vitiate the taste.
+They are to live in an atmosphere of health; the breeze is always to be
+wafting to them the impressions of truth and goodness. Could such an
+education be realized, or if our modern religious education could be
+bound up with truth and virtue and good manners and good taste, that
+would be the best hope of human improvement. Plato, like ourselves, is
+looking forward to changes in the moral and religious world, and is
+preparing for them. He recognizes the danger of unsettling young men’s
+minds by sudden changes of laws and principles, by destroying the
+sacredness of one set of ideas when there is nothing else to take their
+place. He is afraid too of the influence of the drama, on the ground
+that it encourages false sentiment, and therefore he would not have his
+children taken to the theatre; he thinks that the effect on the
+spectators is bad, and on the actors still worse. His idea of education
+is that of harmonious growth, in which are insensibly learnt the
+lessons of temperance and endurance, and the body and mind develope in
+equal proportions. The first principle which runs through all art and
+nature is simplicity; this also is to be the rule of human life.
+
+The second stage of education is gymnastic, which answers to the period
+of muscular growth and development. The simplicity which is enforced in
+music is extended to gymnastic; Plato is aware that the training of the
+body may be inconsistent with the training of the mind, and that bodily
+exercise may be easily overdone. Excessive training of the body is apt
+to give men a headache or to render them sleepy at a lecture on
+philosophy, and this they attribute not to the true cause, but to the
+nature of the subject. Two points are noticeable in Plato’s treatment
+of gymnastic:—First, that the time of training is entirely separated
+from the time of literary education. He seems to have thought that two
+things of an opposite and different nature could not be learnt at the
+same time. Here we can hardly agree with him; and, if we may judge by
+experience, the effect of spending three years between the ages of
+fourteen and seventeen in mere bodily exercise would be far from
+improving to the intellect. Secondly, he affirms that music and
+gymnastic are not, as common opinion is apt to imagine, intended, the
+one for the cultivation of the mind and the other of the body, but that
+they are both equally designed for the improvement of the mind. The
+body, in his view, is the servant of the mind; the subjection of the
+lower to the higher is for the advantage of both. And doubtless the
+mind may exercise a very great and paramount influence over the body,
+if exerted not at particular moments and by fits and starts, but
+continuously, in making preparation for the whole of life. Other Greek
+writers saw the mischievous tendency of Spartan discipline (Arist. Pol;
+Thuc.). But only Plato recognized the fundamental error on which the
+practice was based.
+
+The subject of gymnastic leads Plato to the sister subject of medicine,
+which he further illustrates by the parallel of law. The modern
+disbelief in medicine has led in this, as in some other departments of
+knowledge, to a demand for greater simplicity; physicians are becoming
+aware that they often make diseases ‘greater and more complicated’ by
+their treatment of them (Rep.). In two thousand years their art has
+made but slender progress; what they have gained in the analysis of the
+parts is in a great degree lost by their feebler conception of the
+human frame as a whole. They have attended more to the cure of diseases
+than to the conditions of health; and the improvements in medicine have
+been more than counterbalanced by the disuse of regular training. Until
+lately they have hardly thought of air and water, the importance of
+which was well understood by the ancients; as Aristotle remarks, ‘Air
+and water, being the elements which we most use, have the greatest
+effect upon health’ (Polit.). For ages physicians have been under the
+dominion of prejudices which have only recently given way; and now
+there are as many opinions in medicine as in theology, and an equal
+degree of scepticism and some want of toleration about both. Plato has
+several good notions about medicine; according to him, ‘the eye cannot
+be cured without the rest of the body, nor the body without the mind’
+(Charm.). No man of sense, he says in the Timaeus, would take physic;
+and we heartily sympathize with him in the Laws when he declares that
+‘the limbs of the rustic worn with toil will derive more benefit from
+warm baths than from the prescriptions of a not over wise doctor.’ But
+we can hardly praise him when, in obedience to the authority of Homer,
+he depreciates diet, or approve of the inhuman spirit in which he would
+get rid of invalid and useless lives by leaving them to die. He does
+not seem to have considered that the ‘bridle of Theages’ might be
+accompanied by qualities which were of far more value to the State than
+the health or strength of the citizens; or that the duty of taking care
+of the helpless might be an important element of education in a State.
+The physician himself (this is a delicate and subtle observation)
+should not be a man in robust health; he should have, in modern
+phraseology, a nervous temperament; he should have experience of
+disease in his own person, in order that his powers of observation may
+be quickened in the case of others.
+
+The perplexity of medicine is paralleled by the perplexity of law; in
+which, again, Plato would have men follow the golden rule of
+simplicity. Greater matters are to be determined by the legislator or
+by the oracle of Delphi, lesser matters are to be left to the temporary
+regulation of the citizens themselves. Plato is aware that laissez
+faire is an important element of government. The diseases of a State
+are like the heads of a hydra; they multiply when they are cut off. The
+true remedy for them is not extirpation but prevention. And the way to
+prevent them is to take care of education, and education will take care
+of all the rest. So in modern times men have often felt that the only
+political measure worth having—the only one which would produce any
+certain or lasting effect, was a measure of national education. And in
+our own more than in any previous age the necessity has been recognized
+of restoring the ever-increasing confusion of law to simplicity and
+common sense.
+
+When the training in music and gymnastic is completed, there follows
+the first stage of active and public life. But soon education is to
+begin again from a new point of view. In the interval between the
+Fourth and Seventh Books we have discussed the nature of knowledge, and
+have thence been led to form a higher conception of what was required
+of us. For true knowledge, according to Plato, is of abstractions, and
+has to do, not with particulars or individuals, but with universals
+only; not with the beauties of poetry, but with the ideas of
+philosophy. And the great aim of education is the cultivation of the
+habit of abstraction. This is to be acquired through the study of the
+mathematical sciences. They alone are capable of giving ideas of
+relation, and of arousing the dormant energies of thought.
+
+Mathematics in the age of Plato comprehended a very small part of that
+which is now included in them; but they bore a much larger proportion
+to the sum of human knowledge. They were the only organon of thought
+which the human mind at that time possessed, and the only measure by
+which the chaos of particulars could be reduced to rule and order. The
+faculty which they trained was naturally at war with the poetical or
+imaginative; and hence to Plato, who is everywhere seeking for
+abstractions and trying to get rid of the illusions of sense, nearly
+the whole of education is contained in them. They seemed to have an
+inexhaustible application, partly because their true limits were not
+yet understood. These Plato himself is beginning to investigate; though
+not aware that number and figure are mere abstractions of sense, he
+recognizes that the forms used by geometry are borrowed from the
+sensible world. He seeks to find the ultimate ground of mathematical
+ideas in the idea of good, though he does not satisfactorily explain
+the connexion between them; and in his conception of the relation of
+ideas to numbers, he falls very far short of the definiteness
+attributed to him by Aristotle (Met.). But if he fails to recognize the
+true limits of mathematics, he also reaches a point beyond them; in his
+view, ideas of number become secondary to a higher conception of
+knowledge. The dialectician is as much above the mathematician as the
+mathematician is above the ordinary man. The one, the self-proving, the
+good which is the higher sphere of dialectic, is the perfect truth to
+which all things ascend, and in which they finally repose.
+
+This self-proving unity or idea of good is a mere vision of which no
+distinct explanation can be given, relative only to a particular stage
+in Greek philosophy. It is an abstraction under which no individuals
+are comprehended, a whole which has no parts (Arist., Nic. Eth.). The
+vacancy of such a form was perceived by Aristotle, but not by Plato.
+Nor did he recognize that in the dialectical process are included two
+or more methods of investigation which are at variance with each other.
+He did not see that whether he took the longer or the shorter road, no
+advance could be made in this way. And yet such visions often have an
+immense effect; for although the method of science cannot anticipate
+science, the idea of science, not as it is, but as it will be in the
+future, is a great and inspiring principle. In the pursuit of knowledge
+we are always pressing forward to something beyond us; and as a false
+conception of knowledge, for example the scholastic philosophy, may
+lead men astray during many ages, so the true ideal, though vacant, may
+draw all their thoughts in a right direction. It makes a great
+difference whether the general expectation of knowledge, as this
+indefinite feeling may be termed, is based upon a sound judgment. For
+mankind may often entertain a true conception of what knowledge ought
+to be when they have but a slender experience of facts. The correlation
+of the sciences, the consciousness of the unity of nature, the idea of
+classification, the sense of proportion, the unwillingness to stop
+short of certainty or to confound probability with truth, are important
+principles of the higher education. Although Plato could tell us
+nothing, and perhaps knew that he could tell us nothing, of the
+absolute truth, he has exercised an influence on the human mind which
+even at the present day is not exhausted; and political and social
+questions may yet arise in which the thoughts of Plato may be read anew
+and receive a fresh meaning.
+
+The Idea of good is so called only in the Republic, but there are
+traces of it in other dialogues of Plato. It is a cause as well as an
+idea, and from this point of view may be compared with the creator of
+the Timaeus, who out of his goodness created all things. It corresponds
+to a certain extent with the modern conception of a law of nature, or
+of a final cause, or of both in one, and in this regard may be
+connected with the measure and symmetry of the Philebus. It is
+represented in the Symposium under the aspect of beauty, and is
+supposed to be attained there by stages of initiation, as here by
+regular gradations of knowledge. Viewed subjectively, it is the process
+or science of dialectic. This is the science which, according to the
+Phaedrus, is the true basis of rhetoric, which alone is able to
+distinguish the natures and classes of men and things; which divides a
+whole into the natural parts, and reunites the scattered parts into a
+natural or organized whole; which defines the abstract essences or
+universal ideas of all things, and connects them; which pierces the
+veil of hypotheses and reaches the final cause or first principle of
+all; which regards the sciences in relation to the idea of good. This
+ideal science is the highest process of thought, and may be described
+as the soul conversing with herself or holding communion with eternal
+truth and beauty, and in another form is the everlasting question and
+answer—the ceaseless interrogative of Socrates. The dialogues of Plato
+are themselves examples of the nature and method of dialectic. Viewed
+objectively, the idea of good is a power or cause which makes the world
+without us correspond with the world within. Yet this world without us
+is still a world of ideas. With Plato the investigation of nature is
+another department of knowledge, and in this he seeks to attain only
+probable conclusions (Timaeus).
+
+If we ask whether this science of dialectic which Plato only half
+explains to us is more akin to logic or to metaphysics, the answer is
+that in his mind the two sciences are not as yet distinguished, any
+more than the subjective and objective aspects of the world and of man,
+which German philosophy has revealed to us. Nor has he determined
+whether his science of dialectic is at rest or in motion, concerned
+with the contemplation of absolute being, or with a process of
+development and evolution. Modern metaphysics may be described as the
+science of abstractions, or as the science of the evolution of thought;
+modern logic, when passing beyond the bounds of mere Aristotelian
+forms, may be defined as the science of method. The germ of both of
+them is contained in the Platonic dialectic; all metaphysicians have
+something in common with the ideas of Plato; all logicians have derived
+something from the method of Plato. The nearest approach in modern
+philosophy to the universal science of Plato, is to be found in the
+Hegelian ‘succession of moments in the unity of the idea.’ Plato and
+Hegel alike seem to have conceived the world as the correlation of
+abstractions; and not impossibly they would have understood one another
+better than any of their commentators understand them (Swift’s Voyage
+to Laputa. ‘Having a desire to see those ancients who were most
+renowned for wit and learning, I set apart one day on purpose. I
+proposed that Homer and Aristotle might appear at the head of all their
+commentators; but these were so numerous that some hundreds were forced
+to attend in the court and outward rooms of the palace. I knew, and
+could distinguish these two heroes, at first sight, not only from the
+crowd, but from each other. Homer was the taller and comelier person of
+the two, walked very erect for one of his age, and his eyes were the
+most quick and piercing I ever beheld. Aristotle stooped much, and made
+use of a staff. His visage was meagre, his hair lank and thin, and his
+voice hollow. I soon discovered that both of them were perfect
+strangers to the rest of the company, and had never seen or heard of
+them before. And I had a whisper from a ghost, who shall be nameless,
+“That these commentators always kept in the most distant quarters from
+their principals, in the lower world, through a consciousness of shame
+and guilt, because they had so horribly misrepresented the meaning of
+these authors to posterity.” I introduced Didymus and Eustathius to
+Homer, and prevailed on him to treat them better than perhaps they
+deserved, for he soon found they wanted a genius to enter into the
+spirit of a poet. But Aristotle was out of all patience with the
+account I gave him of Scotus and Ramus, as I presented them to him; and
+he asked them “whether the rest of the tribe were as great dunces as
+themselves?”’). There is, however, a difference between them: for
+whereas Hegel is thinking of all the minds of men as one mind, which
+developes the stages of the idea in different countries or at different
+times in the same country, with Plato these gradations are regarded
+only as an order of thought or ideas; the history of the human mind had
+not yet dawned upon him.
+
+Many criticisms may be made on Plato’s theory of education. While in
+some respects he unavoidably falls short of modern thinkers, in others
+he is in advance of them. He is opposed to the modes of education which
+prevailed in his own time; but he can hardly be said to have discovered
+new ones. He does not see that education is relative to the characters
+of individuals; he only desires to impress the same form of the state
+on the minds of all. He has no sufficient idea of the effect of
+literature on the formation of the mind, and greatly exaggerates that
+of mathematics. His aim is above all things to train the reasoning
+faculties; to implant in the mind the spirit and power of abstraction;
+to explain and define general notions, and, if possible, to connect
+them. No wonder that in the vacancy of actual knowledge his followers,
+and at times even he himself, should have fallen away from the doctrine
+of ideas, and have returned to that branch of knowledge in which alone
+the relation of the one and many can be truly seen—the science of
+number. In his views both of teaching and training he might be styled,
+in modern language, a doctrinaire; after the Spartan fashion he would
+have his citizens cast in one mould; he does not seem to consider that
+some degree of freedom, ‘a little wholesome neglect,’ is necessary to
+strengthen and develope the character and to give play to the
+individual nature. His citizens would not have acquired that knowledge
+which in the vision of Er is supposed to be gained by the pilgrims from
+their experience of evil.
+
+On the other hand, Plato is far in advance of modern philosophers and
+theologians when he teaches that education is to be continued through
+life and will begin again in another. He would never allow education of
+some kind to cease; although he was aware that the proverbial saying of
+Solon, ‘I grow old learning many things,’ cannot be applied literally.
+Himself ravished with the contemplation of the idea of good, and
+delighting in solid geometry (Rep.), he has no difficulty in imagining
+that a lifetime might be passed happily in such pursuits. We who know
+how many more men of business there are in the world than real students
+or thinkers, are not equally sanguine. The education which he proposes
+for his citizens is really the ideal life of the philosopher or man of
+genius, interrupted, but only for a time, by practical duties,—a life
+not for the many, but for the few.
+
+Yet the thought of Plato may not be wholly incapable of application to
+our own times. Even if regarded as an ideal which can never be
+realized, it may have a great effect in elevating the characters of
+mankind, and raising them above the routine of their ordinary
+occupation or profession. It is the best form under which we can
+conceive the whole of life. Nevertheless the idea of Plato is not
+easily put into practice. For the education of after life is
+necessarily the education which each one gives himself. Men and women
+cannot be brought together in schools or colleges at forty or fifty
+years of age; and if they could the result would be disappointing. The
+destination of most men is what Plato would call ‘the Den’ for the
+whole of life, and with that they are content. Neither have they
+teachers or advisers with whom they can take counsel in riper years.
+There is no ‘schoolmaster abroad’ who will tell them of their faults,
+or inspire them with the higher sense of duty, or with the ambition of
+a true success in life; no Socrates who will convict them of ignorance;
+no Christ, or follower of Christ, who will reprove them of sin. Hence
+they have a difficulty in receiving the first element of improvement,
+which is self-knowledge. The hopes of youth no longer stir them; they
+rather wish to rest than to pursue high objects. A few only who have
+come across great men and women, or eminent teachers of religion and
+morality, have received a second life from them, and have lighted a
+candle from the fire of their genius.
+
+The want of energy is one of the main reasons why so few persons
+continue to improve in later years. They have not the will, and do not
+know the way. They ‘never try an experiment,’ or look up a point of
+interest for themselves; they make no sacrifices for the sake of
+knowledge; their minds, like their bodies, at a certain age become
+fixed. Genius has been defined as ‘the power of taking pains’; but
+hardly any one keeps up his interest in knowledge throughout a whole
+life. The troubles of a family, the business of making money, the
+demands of a profession destroy the elasticity of the mind. The waxen
+tablet of the memory which was once capable of receiving ‘true thoughts
+and clear impressions’ becomes hard and crowded; there is not room for
+the accumulations of a long life (Theaet.). The student, as years
+advance, rather makes an exchange of knowledge than adds to his stores.
+There is no pressing necessity to learn; the stock of Classics or
+History or Natural Science which was enough for a man at twenty-five is
+enough for him at fifty. Neither is it easy to give a definite answer
+to any one who asks how he is to improve. For self-education consists
+in a thousand things, commonplace in themselves,—in adding to what we
+are by nature something of what we are not; in learning to see
+ourselves as others see us; in judging, not by opinion, but by the
+evidence of facts; in seeking out the society of superior minds; in a
+study of lives and writings of great men; in observation of the world
+and character; in receiving kindly the natural influence of different
+times of life; in any act or thought which is raised above the practice
+or opinions of mankind; in the pursuit of some new or original enquiry;
+in any effort of mind which calls forth some latent power.
+
+If any one is desirous of carrying out in detail the Platonic education
+of after-life, some such counsels as the following may be offered to
+him:—That he shall choose the branch of knowledge to which his own mind
+most distinctly inclines, and in which he takes the greatest delight,
+either one which seems to connect with his own daily employment, or,
+perhaps, furnishes the greatest contrast to it. He may study from the
+speculative side the profession or business in which he is practically
+engaged. He may make Homer, Dante, Shakespeare, Plato, Bacon the
+friends and companions of his life. He may find opportunities of
+hearing the living voice of a great teacher. He may select for enquiry
+some point of history or some unexplained phenomenon of nature. An hour
+a day passed in such scientific or literary pursuits will furnish as
+many facts as the memory can retain, and will give him ‘a pleasure not
+to be repented of’ (Timaeus). Only let him beware of being the slave of
+crotchets, or of running after a Will o’ the Wisp in his ignorance, or
+in his vanity of attributing to himself the gifts of a poet or assuming
+the air of a philosopher. He should know the limits of his own powers.
+Better to build up the mind by slow additions, to creep on quietly from
+one thing to another, to gain insensibly new powers and new interests
+in knowledge, than to form vast schemes which are never destined to be
+realized. But perhaps, as Plato would say, ‘This is part of another
+subject’ (Tim.); though we may also defend our digression by his
+example (Theaet.).
+
+4. We remark with surprise that the progress of nations or the natural
+growth of institutions which fill modern treatises on political
+philosophy seem hardly ever to have attracted the attention of Plato
+and Aristotle. The ancients were familiar with the mutability of human
+affairs; they could moralize over the ruins of cities and the fall of
+empires (Plato, Statesman, and Sulpicius’ Letter to Cicero); by them
+fate and chance were deemed to be real powers, almost persons, and to
+have had a great share in political events. The wiser of them like
+Thucydides believed that ‘what had been would be again,’ and that a
+tolerable idea of the future could be gathered from the past. Also they
+had dreams of a Golden Age which existed once upon a time and might
+still exist in some unknown land, or might return again in the remote
+future. But the regular growth of a state enlightened by experience,
+progressing in knowledge, improving in the arts, of which the citizens
+were educated by the fulfilment of political duties, appears never to
+have come within the range of their hopes and aspirations. Such a state
+had never been seen, and therefore could not be conceived by them.
+Their experience (Aristot. Metaph.; Plato, Laws) led them to conclude
+that there had been cycles of civilization in which the arts had been
+discovered and lost many times over, and cities had been overthrown and
+rebuilt again and again, and deluges and volcanoes and other natural
+convulsions had altered the face of the earth. Tradition told them of
+many destructions of mankind and of the preservation of a remnant. The
+world began again after a deluge and was reconstructed out of the
+fragments of itself. Also they were acquainted with empires of unknown
+antiquity, like the Egyptian or Assyrian; but they had never seen them
+grow, and could not imagine, any more than we can, the state of man
+which preceded them. They were puzzled and awestricken by the Egyptian
+monuments, of which the forms, as Plato says, not in a figure, but
+literally, were ten thousand years old (Laws), and they contrasted the
+antiquity of Egypt with their own short memories.
+
+The early legends of Hellas have no real connection with the later
+history: they are at a distance, and the intermediate region is
+concealed from view; there is no road or path which leads from one to
+the other. At the beginning of Greek history, in the vestibule of the
+temple, is seen standing first of all the figure of the legislator,
+himself the interpreter and servant of the God. The fundamental laws
+which he gives are not supposed to change with time and circumstances.
+The salvation of the state is held rather to depend on the inviolable
+maintenance of them. They were sanctioned by the authority of heaven,
+and it was deemed impiety to alter them. The desire to maintain them
+unaltered seems to be the origin of what at first sight is very
+surprising to us—the intolerant zeal of Plato against innovators in
+religion or politics (Laws); although with a happy inconsistency he is
+also willing that the laws of other countries should be studied and
+improvements in legislation privately communicated to the Nocturnal
+Council (Laws). The additions which were made to them in later ages in
+order to meet the increasing complexity of affairs were still ascribed
+by a fiction to the original legislator; and the words of such
+enactments at Athens were disputed over as if they had been the words
+of Solon himself. Plato hopes to preserve in a later generation the
+mind of the legislator; he would have his citizens remain within the
+lines which he has laid down for them. He would not harass them with
+minute regulations, he would have allowed some changes in the laws: but
+not changes which would affect the fundamental institutions of the
+state, such for example as would convert an aristocracy into a
+timocracy, or a timocracy into a popular form of government.
+
+Passing from speculations to facts, we observe that progress has been
+the exception rather than the law of human history. And therefore we
+are not surprised to find that the idea of progress is of modern rather
+than of ancient date; and, like the idea of a philosophy of history, is
+not more than a century or two old. It seems to have arisen out of the
+impression left on the human mind by the growth of the Roman Empire and
+of the Christian Church, and to be due to the political and social
+improvements which they introduced into the world; and still more in
+our own century to the idealism of the first French Revolution and the
+triumph of American Independence; and in a yet greater degree to the
+vast material prosperity and growth of population in England and her
+colonies and in America. It is also to be ascribed in a measure to the
+greater study of the philosophy of history. The optimist temperament of
+some great writers has assisted the creation of it, while the opposite
+character has led a few to regard the future of the world as dark. The
+‘spectator of all time and of all existence’ sees more of ‘the
+increasing purpose which through the ages ran’ than formerly: but to
+the inhabitant of a small state of Hellas the vision was necessarily
+limited like the valley in which he dwelt. There was no remote past on
+which his eye could rest, nor any future from which the veil was partly
+lifted up by the analogy of history. The narrowness of view, which to
+ourselves appears so singular, was to him natural, if not unavoidable.
+
+5. For the relation of the Republic to the Statesman and the Laws, and
+the two other works of Plato which directly treat of politics, see the
+Introductions to the two latter; a few general points of comparison may
+be touched upon in this place.
+
+And first of the Laws.
+
+(1) The Republic, though probably written at intervals, yet speaking
+generally and judging by the indications of thought and style, may be
+reasonably ascribed to the middle period of Plato’s life: the Laws are
+certainly the work of his declining years, and some portions of them at
+any rate seem to have been written in extreme old age.
+
+(2) The Republic is full of hope and aspiration: the Laws bear the
+stamp of failure and disappointment. The one is a finished work which
+received the last touches of the author: the other is imperfectly
+executed, and apparently unfinished. The one has the grace and beauty
+of youth: the other has lost the poetical form, but has more of the
+severity and knowledge of life which is characteristic of old age.
+
+(3) The most conspicuous defect of the Laws is the failure of dramatic
+power, whereas the Republic is full of striking contrasts of ideas and
+oppositions of character.
+
+(4) The Laws may be said to have more the nature of a sermon, the
+Republic of a poem; the one is more religious, the other more
+intellectual.
+
+(5) Many theories of Plato, such as the doctrine of ideas, the
+government of the world by philosophers, are not found in the Laws; the
+immortality of the soul is first mentioned in xii; the person of
+Socrates has altogether disappeared. The community of women and
+children is renounced; the institution of common or public meals for
+women (Laws) is for the first time introduced (Ar. Pol.).
+
+(6) There remains in the Laws the old enmity to the poets, who are
+ironically saluted in high-flown terms, and, at the same time, are
+peremptorily ordered out of the city, if they are not willing to submit
+their poems to the censorship of the magistrates (Rep.).
+
+(7) Though the work is in most respects inferior, there are a few
+passages in the Laws, such as the honour due to the soul, the evils of
+licentious or unnatural love, the whole of Book x. (religion), the
+dishonesty of retail trade, and bequests, which come more home to us,
+and contain more of what may be termed the modern element in Plato than
+almost anything in the Republic.
+
+The relation of the two works to one another is very well given:
+
+(1) by Aristotle in the Politics from the side of the Laws:—
+
+‘The same, or nearly the same, objections apply to Plato’s later work,
+the Laws, and therefore we had better examine briefly the constitution
+which is therein described. In the Republic, Socrates has definitely
+settled in all a few questions only; such as the community of women and
+children, the community of property, and the constitution of the state.
+The population is divided into two classes—one of husbandmen, and the
+other of warriors; from this latter is taken a third class of
+counsellors and rulers of the state. But Socrates has not determined
+whether the husbandmen and artists are to have a share in the
+government, and whether they too are to carry arms and share in
+military service or not. He certainly thinks that the women ought to
+share in the education of the guardians, and to fight by their side.
+The remainder of the work is filled up with digressions foreign to the
+main subject, and with discussions about the education of the
+guardians. In the Laws there is hardly anything but laws; not much is
+said about the constitution. This, which he had intended to make more
+of the ordinary type, he gradually brings round to the other or ideal
+form. For with the exception of the community of women and property, he
+supposes everything to be the same in both states; there is to be the
+same education; the citizens of both are to live free from servile
+occupations, and there are to be common meals in both. The only
+difference is that in the Laws the common meals are extended to women,
+and the warriors number about 5000, but in the Republic only 1000.’
+
+(2) by Plato in the Laws (Book v.), from the side of the Republic:—
+
+‘The first and highest form of the state and of the government and of
+the law is that in which there prevails most widely the ancient saying
+that “Friends have all things in common.” Whether there is now, or ever
+will be, this communion of women and children and of property, in which
+the private and individual is altogether banished from life, and things
+which are by nature private, such as eyes and ears and hands, have
+become common, and all men express praise and blame, and feel joy and
+sorrow, on the same occasions, and the laws unite the city to the
+utmost,—whether all this is possible or not, I say that no man, acting
+upon any other principle, will ever constitute a state more exalted in
+virtue, or truer or better than this. Such a state, whether inhabited
+by Gods or sons of Gods, will make them blessed who dwell therein; and
+therefore to this we are to look for the pattern of the state, and to
+cling to this, and, as far as possible, to seek for one which is like
+this. The state which we have now in hand, when created, will be
+nearest to immortality and unity in the next degree; and after that, by
+the grace of God, we will complete the third one. And we will begin by
+speaking of the nature and origin of the second.’
+
+The comparatively short work called the Statesman or Politicus in its
+style and manner is more akin to the Laws, while in its idealism it
+rather resembles the Republic. As far as we can judge by various
+indications of language and thought, it must be later than the one and
+of course earlier than the other. In both the Republic and Statesman a
+close connection is maintained between Politics and Dialectic. In the
+Statesman, enquiries into the principles of Method are interspersed
+with discussions about Politics. The comparative advantages of the rule
+of law and of a person are considered, and the decision given in favour
+of a person (Arist. Pol.). But much may be said on the other side, nor
+is the opposition necessary; for a person may rule by law, and law may
+be so applied as to be the living voice of the legislator. As in the
+Republic, there is a myth, describing, however, not a future, but a
+former existence of mankind. The question is asked, ‘Whether the state
+of innocence which is described in the myth, or a state like our own
+which possesses art and science and distinguishes good from evil, is
+the preferable condition of man.’ To this question of the comparative
+happiness of civilized and primitive life, which was so often discussed
+in the last century and in our own, no answer is given. The Statesman,
+though less perfect in style than the Republic and of far less range,
+may justly be regarded as one of the greatest of Plato’s dialogues.
+
+6. Others as well as Plato have chosen an ideal Republic to be the
+vehicle of thoughts which they could not definitely express, or which
+went beyond their own age. The classical writing which approaches most
+nearly to the Republic of Plato is the ‘De Republica’ of Cicero; but
+neither in this nor in any other of his dialogues does he rival the art
+of Plato. The manners are clumsy and inferior; the hand of the
+rhetorician is apparent at every turn. Yet noble sentiments are
+constantly recurring: the true note of Roman patriotism—‘We Romans are
+a great people’—resounds through the whole work. Like Socrates, Cicero
+turns away from the phenomena of the heavens to civil and political
+life. He would rather not discuss the ‘two Suns’ of which all Rome was
+talking, when he can converse about ‘the two nations in one’ which had
+divided Rome ever since the days of the Gracchi. Like Socrates again,
+speaking in the person of Scipio, he is afraid lest he should assume
+too much the character of a teacher, rather than of an equal who is
+discussing among friends the two sides of a question. He would confine
+the terms King or State to the rule of reason and justice, and he will
+not concede that title either to a democracy or to a monarchy. But
+under the rule of reason and justice he is willing to include the
+natural superior ruling over the natural inferior, which he compares to
+the soul ruling over the body. He prefers a mixture of forms of
+government to any single one. The two portraits of the just and the
+unjust, which occur in the second book of the Republic, are transferred
+to the state—Philus, one of the interlocutors, maintaining against his
+will the necessity of injustice as a principle of government, while the
+other, Laelius, supports the opposite thesis. His views of language and
+number are derived from Plato; like him he denounces the drama. He also
+declares that if his life were to be twice as long he would have no
+time to read the lyric poets. The picture of democracy is translated by
+him word for word, though he had hardly shown himself able to ‘carry
+the jest’ of Plato. He converts into a stately sentence the humorous
+fancy about the animals, who ‘are so imbued with the spirit of
+democracy that they make the passers-by get out of their way.’ His
+description of the tyrant is imitated from Plato, but is far inferior.
+The second book is historical, and claims for the Roman constitution
+(which is to him the ideal) a foundation of fact such as Plato probably
+intended to have given to the Republic in the Critias. His most
+remarkable imitation of Plato is the adaptation of the vision of Er,
+which is converted by Cicero into the ‘Somnium Scipionis’; he has
+‘romanized’ the myth of the Republic, adding an argument for the
+immortality of the soul taken from the Phaedrus, and some other touches
+derived from the Phaedo and the Timaeus. Though a beautiful tale and
+containing splendid passages, the ‘Somnium Scipionis; is very inferior
+to the vision of Er; it is only a dream, and hardly allows the reader
+to suppose that the writer believes in his own creation. Whether his
+dialogues were framed on the model of the lost dialogues of Aristotle,
+as he himself tells us, or of Plato, to which they bear many
+superficial resemblances, he is still the Roman orator; he is not
+conversing, but making speeches, and is never able to mould the
+intractable Latin to the grace and ease of the Greek Platonic dialogue.
+But if he is defective in form, much more is he inferior to the Greek
+in matter; he nowhere in his philosophical writings leaves upon our
+minds the impression of an original thinker.
+
+Plato’s Republic has been said to be a church and not a state; and such
+an ideal of a city in the heavens has always hovered over the Christian
+world, and is embodied in St. Augustine’s ‘De Civitate Dei,’ which is
+suggested by the decay and fall of the Roman Empire, much in the same
+manner in which we may imagine the Republic of Plato to have been
+influenced by the decline of Greek politics in the writer’s own age.
+The difference is that in the time of Plato the degeneracy, though
+certain, was gradual and insensible: whereas the taking of Rome by the
+Goths stirred like an earthquake the age of St. Augustine. Men were
+inclined to believe that the overthrow of the city was to be ascribed
+to the anger felt by the old Roman deities at the neglect of their
+worship. St. Augustine maintains the opposite thesis; he argues that
+the destruction of the Roman Empire is due, not to the rise of
+Christianity, but to the vices of Paganism. He wanders over Roman
+history, and over Greek philosophy and mythology, and finds everywhere
+crime, impiety and falsehood. He compares the worst parts of the
+Gentile religions with the best elements of the faith of Christ. He
+shows nothing of the spirit which led others of the early Christian
+Fathers to recognize in the writings of the Greek philosophers the
+power of the divine truth. He traces the parallel of the kingdom of
+God, that is, the history of the Jews, contained in their scriptures,
+and of the kingdoms of the world, which are found in gentile writers,
+and pursues them both into an ideal future. It need hardly be remarked
+that his use both of Greek and of Roman historians and of the sacred
+writings of the Jews is wholly uncritical. The heathen mythology, the
+Sybilline oracles, the myths of Plato, the dreams of Neo-Platonists are
+equally regarded by him as matter of fact. He must be acknowledged to
+be a strictly polemical or controversial writer who makes the best of
+everything on one side and the worst of everything on the other. He has
+no sympathy with the old Roman life as Plato has with Greek life, nor
+has he any idea of the ecclesiastical kingdom which was to arise out of
+the ruins of the Roman empire. He is not blind to the defects of the
+Christian Church, and looks forward to a time when Christian and Pagan
+shall be alike brought before the judgment-seat, and the true City of
+God shall appear...The work of St. Augustine is a curious repertory of
+antiquarian learning and quotations, deeply penetrated with Christian
+ethics, but showing little power of reasoning, and a slender knowledge
+of the Greek literature and language. He was a great genius, and a
+noble character, yet hardly capable of feeling or understanding
+anything external to his own theology. Of all the ancient philosophers
+he is most attracted by Plato, though he is very slightly acquainted
+with his writings. He is inclined to believe that the idea of creation
+in the Timaeus is derived from the narrative in Genesis; and he is
+strangely taken with the coincidence (?) of Plato’s saying that ‘the
+philosopher is the lover of God,’ and the words of the Book of Exodus
+in which God reveals himself to Moses (Exod.) He dwells at length on
+miracles performed in his own day, of which the evidence is regarded by
+him as irresistible. He speaks in a very interesting manner of the
+beauty and utility of nature and of the human frame, which he conceives
+to afford a foretaste of the heavenly state and of the resurrection of
+the body. The book is not really what to most persons the title of it
+would imply, and belongs to an age which has passed away. But it
+contains many fine passages and thoughts which are for all time.
+
+The short treatise de Monarchia of Dante is by far the most remarkable
+of mediaeval ideals, and bears the impress of the great genius in whom
+Italy and the Middle Ages are so vividly reflected. It is the vision of
+an Universal Empire, which is supposed to be the natural and necessary
+government of the world, having a divine authority distinct from the
+Papacy, yet coextensive with it. It is not ‘the ghost of the dead Roman
+Empire sitting crowned upon the grave thereof,’ but the legitimate heir
+and successor of it, justified by the ancient virtues of the Romans and
+the beneficence of their rule. Their right to be the governors of the
+world is also confirmed by the testimony of miracles, and acknowledged
+by St. Paul when he appealed to Caesar, and even more emphatically by
+Christ Himself, Who could not have made atonement for the sins of men
+if He had not been condemned by a divinely authorized tribunal. The
+necessity for the establishment of an Universal Empire is proved partly
+by a priori arguments such as the unity of God and the unity of the
+family or nation; partly by perversions of Scripture and history, by
+false analogies of nature, by misapplied quotations from the classics,
+and by odd scraps and commonplaces of logic, showing a familiar but by
+no means exact knowledge of Aristotle (of Plato there is none). But a
+more convincing argument still is the miserable state of the world,
+which he touchingly describes. He sees no hope of happiness or peace
+for mankind until all nations of the earth are comprehended in a single
+empire. The whole treatise shows how deeply the idea of the Roman
+Empire was fixed in the minds of his contemporaries. Not much argument
+was needed to maintain the truth of a theory which to his own
+contemporaries seemed so natural and congenial. He speaks, or rather
+preaches, from the point of view, not of the ecclesiastic, but of the
+layman, although, as a good Catholic, he is willing to acknowledge that
+in certain respects the Empire must submit to the Church. The beginning
+and end of all his noble reflections and of his arguments, good and
+bad, is the aspiration ‘that in this little plot of earth belonging to
+mortal man life may pass in freedom and peace.’ So inextricably is his
+vision of the future bound up with the beliefs and circumstances of his
+own age.
+
+The ‘Utopia’ of Sir Thomas More is a surprising monument of his genius,
+and shows a reach of thought far beyond his contemporaries. The book
+was written by him at the age of about 34 or 35, and is full of the
+generous sentiments of youth. He brings the light of Plato to bear upon
+the miserable state of his own country. Living not long after the Wars
+of the Roses, and in the dregs of the Catholic Church in England, he is
+indignant at the corruption of the clergy, at the luxury of the
+nobility and gentry, at the sufferings of the poor, at the calamities
+caused by war. To the eye of More the whole world was in dissolution
+and decay; and side by side with the misery and oppression which he has
+described in the First Book of the Utopia, he places in the Second Book
+the ideal state which by the help of Plato he had constructed. The
+times were full of stir and intellectual interest. The distant murmur
+of the Reformation was beginning to be heard. To minds like More’s,
+Greek literature was a revelation: there had arisen an art of
+interpretation, and the New Testament was beginning to be understood as
+it had never been before, and has not often been since, in its natural
+sense. The life there depicted appeared to him wholly unlike that of
+Christian commonwealths, in which ‘he saw nothing but a certain
+conspiracy of rich men procuring their own commodities under the name
+and title of the Commonwealth.’ He thought that Christ, like Plato,
+‘instituted all things common,’ for which reason, he tells us, the
+citizens of Utopia were the more willing to receive his doctrines
+(‘Howbeit, I think this was no small help and furtherance in the
+matter, that they heard us say that Christ instituted among his, all
+things common, and that the same community doth yet remain in the
+rightest Christian communities’ (Utopia).). The community of property
+is a fixed idea with him, though he is aware of the arguments which may
+be urged on the other side (‘These things (I say), when I consider with
+myself, I hold well with Plato, and do nothing marvel that he would
+make no laws for them that refused those laws, whereby all men should
+have and enjoy equal portions of riches and commodities. For the wise
+men did easily foresee this to be the one and only way to the wealth of
+a community, if equality of all things should be brought in and
+established’ (Utopia).). We wonder how in the reign of Henry VIII,
+though veiled in another language and published in a foreign country,
+such speculations could have been endured.
+
+He is gifted with far greater dramatic invention than any one who
+succeeded him, with the exception of Swift. In the art of feigning he
+is a worthy disciple of Plato. Like him, starting from a small portion
+of fact, he founds his tale with admirable skill on a few lines in the
+Latin narrative of the voyages of Amerigo Vespucci. He is very precise
+about dates and facts, and has the power of making us believe that the
+narrator of the tale must have been an eyewitness. We are fairly
+puzzled by his manner of mixing up real and imaginary persons; his boy
+John Clement and Peter Giles, citizen of Antwerp, with whom he disputes
+about the precise words which are supposed to have been used by the
+(imaginary) Portuguese traveller, Raphael Hythloday. ‘I have the more
+cause,’ says Hythloday, ‘to fear that my words shall not be believed,
+for that I know how difficultly and hardly I myself would have believed
+another man telling the same, if I had not myself seen it with mine own
+eyes.’ Or again: ‘If you had been with me in Utopia, and had presently
+seen their fashions and laws as I did which lived there five years and
+more, and would never have come thence, but only to make the new land
+known here,’ etc. More greatly regrets that he forgot to ask Hythloday
+in what part of the world Utopia is situated; he ‘would have spent no
+small sum of money rather than it should have escaped him,’ and he begs
+Peter Giles to see Hythloday or write to him and obtain an answer to
+the question. After this we are not surprised to hear that a Professor
+of Divinity (perhaps ‘a late famous vicar of Croydon in Surrey,’ as the
+translator thinks) is desirous of being sent thither as a missionary by
+the High Bishop, ‘yea, and that he may himself be made Bishop of
+Utopia, nothing doubting that he must obtain this Bishopric with suit;
+and he counteth that a godly suit which proceedeth not of the desire of
+honour or lucre, but only of a godly zeal.’ The design may have failed
+through the disappearance of Hythloday, concerning whom we have ‘very
+uncertain news’ after his departure. There is no doubt, however, that
+he had told More and Giles the exact situation of the island, but
+unfortunately at the same moment More’s attention, as he is reminded in
+a letter from Giles, was drawn off by a servant, and one of the company
+from a cold caught on shipboard coughed so loud as to prevent Giles
+from hearing. And ‘the secret has perished’ with him; to this day the
+place of Utopia remains unknown.
+
+The words of Phaedrus, ‘O Socrates, you can easily invent Egyptians or
+anything,’ are recalled to our mind as we read this lifelike fiction.
+Yet the greater merit of the work is not the admirable art, but the
+originality of thought. More is as free as Plato from the prejudices of
+his age, and far more tolerant. The Utopians do not allow him who
+believes not in the immortality of the soul to share in the
+administration of the state (Laws), ‘howbeit they put him to no
+punishment, because they be persuaded that it is in no man’s power to
+believe what he list’; and ‘no man is to be blamed for reasoning in
+support of his own religion (‘One of our company in my presence was
+sharply punished. He, as soon as he was baptised, began, against our
+wills, with more earnest affection than wisdom, to reason of Christ’s
+religion, and began to wax so hot in his matter, that he did not only
+prefer our religion before all other, but also did despise and condemn
+all other, calling them profane, and the followers of them wicked and
+devilish, and the children of everlasting damnation. When he had thus
+long reasoned the matter, they laid hold on him, accused him, and
+condemned him into exile, not as a despiser of religion, but as a
+seditious person and a raiser up of dissension among the people’).’ In
+the public services ‘no prayers be used, but such as every man may
+boldly pronounce without giving offence to any sect.’ He says
+significantly, ‘There be that give worship to a man that was once of
+excellent virtue or of famous glory, not only as God, but also the
+chiefest and highest God. But the most and the wisest part, rejecting
+all these, believe that there is a certain godly power unknown, far
+above the capacity and reach of man’s wit, dispersed throughout all the
+world, not in bigness, but in virtue and power. Him they call the
+Father of all. To Him alone they attribute the beginnings, the
+increasings, the proceedings, the changes, and the ends of all things.
+Neither give they any divine honours to any other than him.’ So far was
+More from sharing the popular beliefs of his time. Yet at the end he
+reminds us that he does not in all respects agree with the customs and
+opinions of the Utopians which he describes. And we should let him have
+the benefit of this saving clause, and not rudely withdraw the veil
+behind which he has been pleased to conceal himself.
+
+Nor is he less in advance of popular opinion in his political and moral
+speculations. He would like to bring military glory into contempt; he
+would set all sorts of idle people to profitable occupation, including
+in the same class, priests, women, noblemen, gentlemen, and ‘sturdy and
+valiant beggars,’ that the labour of all may be reduced to six hours a
+day. His dislike of capital punishment, and plans for the reformation
+of offenders; his detestation of priests and lawyers (Compare his
+satirical observation: ‘They (the Utopians) have priests of exceeding
+holiness, and therefore very few.); his remark that ‘although every one
+may hear of ravenous dogs and wolves and cruel man-eaters, it is not
+easy to find states that are well and wisely governed,’ are curiously
+at variance with the notions of his age and indeed with his own life.
+There are many points in which he shows a modern feeling and a
+prophetic insight like Plato. He is a sanitary reformer; he maintains
+that civilized states have a right to the soil of waste countries; he
+is inclined to the opinion which places happiness in virtuous
+pleasures, but herein, as he thinks, not disagreeing from those other
+philosophers who define virtue to be a life according to nature. He
+extends the idea of happiness so as to include the happiness of others;
+and he argues ingeniously, ‘All men agree that we ought to make others
+happy; but if others, how much more ourselves!’ And still he thinks
+that there may be a more excellent way, but to this no man’s reason can
+attain unless heaven should inspire him with a higher truth. His
+ceremonies before marriage; his humane proposal that war should be
+carried on by assassinating the leaders of the enemy, may be compared
+to some of the paradoxes of Plato. He has a charming fancy, like the
+affinities of Greeks and barbarians in the Timaeus, that the Utopians
+learnt the language of the Greeks with the more readiness because they
+were originally of the same race with them. He is penetrated with the
+spirit of Plato, and quotes or adapts many thoughts both from the
+Republic and from the Timaeus. He prefers public duties to private, and
+is somewhat impatient of the importunity of relations. His citizens
+have no silver or gold of their own, but are ready enough to pay them
+to their mercenaries. There is nothing of which he is more contemptuous
+than the love of money. Gold is used for fetters of criminals, and
+diamonds and pearls for children’s necklaces (When the ambassadors came
+arrayed in gold and peacocks’ feathers ‘to the eyes of all the Utopians
+except very few, which had been in other countries for some reasonable
+cause, all that gorgeousness of apparel seemed shameful and
+reproachful. In so much that they most reverently saluted the vilest
+and most abject of them for lords—passing over the ambassadors
+themselves without any honour, judging them by their wearing of golden
+chains to be bondmen. You should have seen children also, that had cast
+away their pearls and precious stones, when they saw the like sticking
+upon the ambassadors’ caps, dig and push their mothers under the sides,
+saying thus to them—“Look, though he were a little child still.” But
+the mother; yea and that also in good earnest: “Peace, son,” saith she,
+“I think he be some of the ambassadors’ fools.”’)
+
+Like Plato he is full of satirical reflections on governments and
+princes; on the state of the world and of knowledge. The hero of his
+discourse (Hythloday) is very unwilling to become a minister of state,
+considering that he would lose his independence and his advice would
+never be heeded (Compare an exquisite passage, of which the conclusion
+is as follows: ‘And verily it is naturally given...suppressed and
+ended.’) He ridicules the new logic of his time; the Utopians could
+never be made to understand the doctrine of Second Intentions (‘For
+they have not devised one of all those rules of restrictions,
+amplifications, and suppositions, very wittily invented in the small
+Logicals, which here our children in every place do learn. Furthermore,
+they were never yet able to find out the second intentions; insomuch
+that none of them all could ever see man himself in common, as they
+call him, though he be (as you know) bigger than was ever any giant,
+yea, and pointed to of us even with our finger.’) He is very severe on
+the sports of the gentry; the Utopians count ‘hunting the lowest, the
+vilest, and the most abject part of butchery.’ He quotes the words of
+the Republic in which the philosopher is described ‘standing out of the
+way under a wall until the driving storm of sleet and rain be
+overpast,’ which admit of a singular application to More’s own fate;
+although, writing twenty years before (about the year 1514), he can
+hardly be supposed to have foreseen this. There is no touch of satire
+which strikes deeper than his quiet remark that the greater part of the
+precepts of Christ are more at variance with the lives of ordinary
+Christians than the discourse of Utopia (‘And yet the most part of them
+is more dissident from the manners of the world now a days, than my
+communication was. But preachers, sly and wily men, following your
+counsel (as I suppose) because they saw men evil-willing to frame their
+manners to Christ’s rule, they have wrested and wried his doctrine,
+and, like a rule of lead, have applied it to men’s manners, that by
+some means at the least way, they might agree together.’)
+
+The ‘New Atlantis’ is only a fragment, and far inferior in merit to the
+‘Utopia.’ The work is full of ingenuity, but wanting in creative fancy,
+and by no means impresses the reader with a sense of credibility. In
+some places Lord Bacon is characteristically different from Sir Thomas
+More, as, for example, in the external state which he attributes to the
+governor of Solomon’s House, whose dress he minutely describes, while
+to Sir Thomas More such trappings appear simple ridiculous. Yet, after
+this programme of dress, Bacon adds the beautiful trait, ‘that he had a
+look as though he pitied men.’ Several things are borrowed by him from
+the Timaeus; but he has injured the unity of style by adding thoughts
+and passages which are taken from the Hebrew Scriptures.
+
+The ‘City of the Sun’ written by Campanella (1568-1639), a Dominican
+friar, several years after the ‘New Atlantis’ of Bacon, has many
+resemblances to the Republic of Plato. The citizens have wives and
+children in common; their marriages are of the same temporary sort, and
+are arranged by the magistrates from time to time. They do not,
+however, adopt his system of lots, but bring together the best natures,
+male and female, ‘according to philosophical rules.’ The infants until
+two years of age are brought up by their mothers in public temples; and
+since individuals for the most part educate their children badly, at
+the beginning of their third year they are committed to the care of the
+State, and are taught at first, not out of books, but from paintings of
+all kinds, which are emblazoned on the walls of the city. The city has
+six interior circuits of walls, and an outer wall which is the seventh.
+On this outer wall are painted the figures of legislators and
+philosophers, and on each of the interior walls the symbols or forms of
+some one of the sciences are delineated. The women are, for the most
+part, trained, like the men, in warlike and other exercises; but they
+have two special occupations of their own. After a battle, they and the
+boys soothe and relieve the wounded warriors; also they encourage them
+with embraces and pleasant words. Some elements of the Christian or
+Catholic religion are preserved among them. The life of the Apostles is
+greatly admired by this people because they had all things in common;
+and the short prayer which Jesus Christ taught men is used in their
+worship. It is a duty of the chief magistrates to pardon sins, and
+therefore the whole people make secret confession of them to the
+magistrates, and they to their chief, who is a sort of Rector
+Metaphysicus; and by this means he is well informed of all that is
+going on in the minds of men. After confession, absolution is granted
+to the citizens collectively, but no one is mentioned by name. There
+also exists among them a practice of perpetual prayer, performed by a
+succession of priests, who change every hour. Their religion is a
+worship of God in Trinity, that is of Wisdom, Love and Power, but
+without any distinction of persons. They behold in the sun the
+reflection of His glory; mere graven images they reject, refusing to
+fall under the ‘tyranny’ of idolatry.
+
+Many details are given about their customs of eating and drinking,
+about their mode of dressing, their employments, their wars. Campanella
+looks forward to a new mode of education, which is to be a study of
+nature, and not of Aristotle. He would not have his citizens waste
+their time in the consideration of what he calls ‘the dead signs of
+things.’ He remarks that he who knows one science only, does not really
+know that one any more than the rest, and insists strongly on the
+necessity of a variety of knowledge. More scholars are turned out in
+the City of the Sun in one year than by contemporary methods in ten or
+fifteen. He evidently believes, like Bacon, that henceforward natural
+science will play a great part in education, a hope which seems hardly
+to have been realized, either in our own or in any former age; at any
+rate the fulfilment of it has been long deferred.
+
+There is a good deal of ingenuity and even originality in this work,
+and a most enlightened spirit pervades it. But it has little or no
+charm of style, and falls very far short of the ‘New Atlantis’ of
+Bacon, and still more of the ‘Utopia’ of Sir Thomas More. It is full of
+inconsistencies, and though borrowed from Plato, shows but a
+superficial acquaintance with his writings. It is a work such as one
+might expect to have been written by a philosopher and man of genius
+who was also a friar, and who had spent twenty-seven years of his life
+in a prison of the Inquisition. The most interesting feature of the
+book, common to Plato and Sir Thomas More, is the deep feeling which is
+shown by the writer, of the misery and ignorance prevailing among the
+lower classes in his own time. Campanella takes note of Aristotle’s
+answer to Plato’s community of property, that in a society where all
+things are common, no individual would have any motive to work (Arist.
+Pol.): he replies, that his citizens being happy and contented in
+themselves (they are required to work only four hours a day), will have
+greater regard for their fellows than exists among men at present. He
+thinks, like Plato, that if he abolishes private feelings and
+interests, a great public feeling will take their place.
+
+Other writings on ideal states, such as the ‘Oceana’ of Harrington, in
+which the Lord Archon, meaning Cromwell, is described, not as he was,
+but as he ought to have been; or the ‘Argenis’ of Barclay, which is an
+historical allegory of his own time, are too unlike Plato to be worth
+mentioning. More interesting than either of these, and far more
+Platonic in style and thought, is Sir John Eliot’s ‘Monarchy of Man,’
+in which the prisoner of the Tower, no longer able ‘to be a politician
+in the land of his birth,’ turns away from politics to view ‘that other
+city which is within him,’ and finds on the very threshold of the grave
+that the secret of human happiness is the mastery of self. The change
+of government in the time of the English Commonwealth set men thinking
+about first principles, and gave rise to many works of this class...The
+great original genius of Swift owes nothing to Plato; nor is there any
+trace in the conversation or in the works of Dr. Johnson of any
+acquaintance with his writings. He probably would have refuted Plato
+without reading him, in the same fashion in which he supposed himself
+to have refuted Bishop Berkeley’s theory of the non-existence of
+matter. If we except the so-called English Platonists, or rather
+Neo-Platonists, who never understood their master, and the writings of
+Coleridge, who was to some extent a kindred spirit, Plato has left no
+permanent impression on English literature.
+
+7. Human life and conduct are affected by ideals in the same way that
+they are affected by the examples of eminent men. Neither the one nor
+the other are immediately applicable to practice, but there is a virtue
+flowing from them which tends to raise individuals above the common
+routine of society or trade, and to elevate States above the mere
+interests of commerce or the necessities of self-defence. Like the
+ideals of art they are partly framed by the omission of particulars;
+they require to be viewed at a certain distance, and are apt to fade
+away if we attempt to approach them. They gain an imaginary
+distinctness when embodied in a State or in a system of philosophy, but
+they still remain the visions of ‘a world unrealized.’ More striking
+and obvious to the ordinary mind are the examples of great men, who
+have served their own generation and are remembered in another. Even in
+our own family circle there may have been some one, a woman, or even a
+child, in whose face has shone forth a goodness more than human. The
+ideal then approaches nearer to us, and we fondly cling to it. The
+ideal of the past, whether of our own past lives or of former states of
+society, has a singular fascination for the minds of many. Too late we
+learn that such ideals cannot be recalled, though the recollection of
+them may have a humanizing influence on other times. But the
+abstractions of philosophy are to most persons cold and vacant; they
+give light without warmth; they are like the full moon in the heavens
+when there are no stars appearing. Men cannot live by thought alone;
+the world of sense is always breaking in upon them. They are for the
+most part confined to a corner of earth, and see but a little way
+beyond their own home or place of abode; they ‘do not lift up their
+eyes to the hills’; they are not awake when the dawn appears. But in
+Plato we have reached a height from which a man may look into the
+distance and behold the future of the world and of philosophy. The
+ideal of the State and of the life of the philosopher; the ideal of an
+education continuing through life and extending equally to both sexes;
+the ideal of the unity and correlation of knowledge; the faith in good
+and immortality—are the vacant forms of light on which Plato is seeking
+to fix the eye of mankind.
+
+8. Two other ideals, which never appeared above the horizon in Greek
+Philosophy, float before the minds of men in our own day: one seen more
+clearly than formerly, as though each year and each generation brought
+us nearer to some great change; the other almost in the same degree
+retiring from view behind the laws of nature, as if oppressed by them,
+but still remaining a silent hope of we know not what hidden in the
+heart of man. The first ideal is the future of the human race in this
+world; the second the future of the individual in another. The first is
+the more perfect realization of our own present life; the second, the
+abnegation of it: the one, limited by experience, the other,
+transcending it. Both of them have been and are powerful motives of
+action; there are a few in whom they have taken the place of all
+earthly interests. The hope of a future for the human race at first
+sight seems to be the more disinterested, the hope of individual
+existence the more egotistical, of the two motives. But when men have
+learned to resolve their hope of a future either for themselves or for
+the world into the will of God—‘not my will but Thine,’ the difference
+between them falls away; and they may be allowed to make either of them
+the basis of their lives, according to their own individual character
+or temperament. There is as much faith in the willingness to work for
+an unseen future in this world as in another. Neither is it
+inconceivable that some rare nature may feel his duty to another
+generation, or to another century, almost as strongly as to his own, or
+that living always in the presence of God, he may realize another world
+as vividly as he does this.
+
+The greatest of all ideals may, or rather must be conceived by us under
+similitudes derived from human qualities; although sometimes, like the
+Jewish prophets, we may dash away these figures of speech and describe
+the nature of God only in negatives. These again by degrees acquire a
+positive meaning. It would be well, if when meditating on the higher
+truths either of philosophy or religion, we sometimes substituted one
+form of expression for another, lest through the necessities of
+language we should become the slaves of mere words.
+
+There is a third ideal, not the same, but akin to these, which has a
+place in the home and heart of every believer in the religion of
+Christ, and in which men seem to find a nearer and more familiar truth,
+the Divine man, the Son of Man, the Saviour of mankind, Who is the
+first-born and head of the whole family in heaven and earth, in Whom
+the Divine and human, that which is without and that which is within
+the range of our earthly faculties, are indissolubly united. Neither is
+this divine form of goodness wholly separable from the ideal of the
+Christian Church, which is said in the New Testament to be ‘His body,’
+or at variance with those other images of good which Plato sets before
+us. We see Him in a figure only, and of figures of speech we select but
+a few, and those the simplest, to be the expression of Him. We behold
+Him in a picture, but He is not there. We gather up the fragments of
+His discourses, but neither do they represent Him as He truly was. His
+dwelling is neither in heaven nor earth, but in the heart of man. This
+is that image which Plato saw dimly in the distance, which, when
+existing among men, he called, in the language of Homer, ‘the likeness
+of God,’ the likeness of a nature which in all ages men have felt to be
+greater and better than themselves, and which in endless forms, whether
+derived from Scripture or nature, from the witness of history or from
+the human heart, regarded as a person or not as a person, with or
+without parts or passions, existing in space or not in space, is and
+will always continue to be to mankind the Idea of Good.
+
+
+
+
+ THE REPUBLIC.
+
+
+
+
+ PERSONS OF THE DIALOGUE.
+
+
+Socrates, who is the narrator.
+
+Glaucon.
+
+Adeimantus.
+
+Polemarchus.
+
+Cephalus.
+
+Thrasymachus.
+
+Cleitophon.
+
+And others who are mute auditors.
+
+The scene is laid in the house of Cephalus at the Piraeus; and the
+whole dialogue is narrated by Socrates the day after it actually took
+place to Timaeus, Hermocrates, Critias, and a nameless person, who are
+introduced in the Timaeus.
+
+
+
+
+ BOOK I.
+
+
+I went down yesterday to the Piraeus with Glaucon the son of Ariston,
+that I might offer up my prayers to the goddess (Bendis, the Thracian
+Artemis.); and also because I wanted to see in what manner they would
+celebrate the festival, which was a new thing. I was delighted with the
+procession of the inhabitants; but that of the Thracians was equally,
+if not more, beautiful. When we had finished our prayers and viewed the
+spectacle, we turned in the direction of the city; and at that instant
+Polemarchus the son of Cephalus chanced to catch sight of us from a
+distance as we were starting on our way home, and told his servant to
+run and bid us wait for him. The servant took hold of me by the cloak
+behind, and said: Polemarchus desires you to wait.
+
+I turned round, and asked him where his master was.
+
+There he is, said the youth, coming after you, if you will only wait.
+
+Certainly we will, said Glaucon; and in a few minutes Polemarchus
+appeared, and with him Adeimantus, Glaucon’s brother, Niceratus the son
+of Nicias, and several others who had been at the procession.
+
+Polemarchus said to me: I perceive, Socrates, that you and your
+companion are already on your way to the city.
+
+You are not far wrong, I said.
+
+But do you see, he rejoined, how many we are?
+
+Of course.
+
+And are you stronger than all these? for if not, you will have to
+remain where you are.
+
+May there not be the alternative, I said, that we may persuade you to
+let us go?
+
+But can you persuade us, if we refuse to listen to you? he said.
+
+Certainly not, replied Glaucon.
+
+Then we are not going to listen; of that you may be assured.
+
+Adeimantus added: Has no one told you of the torch-race on horseback in
+honour of the goddess which will take place in the evening?
+
+With horses! I replied: That is a novelty. Will horsemen carry torches
+and pass them one to another during the race?
+
+Yes, said Polemarchus, and not only so, but a festival will be
+celebrated at night, which you certainly ought to see. Let us rise soon
+after supper and see this festival; there will be a gathering of young
+men, and we will have a good talk. Stay then, and do not be perverse.
+
+Glaucon said: I suppose, since you insist, that we must.
+
+Very good, I replied.
+
+Accordingly we went with Polemarchus to his house; and there we found
+his brothers Lysias and Euthydemus, and with them Thrasymachus the
+Chalcedonian, Charmantides the Paeanian, and Cleitophon the son of
+Aristonymus. There too was Cephalus the father of Polemarchus, whom I
+had not seen for a long time, and I thought him very much aged. He was
+seated on a cushioned chair, and had a garland on his head, for he had
+been sacrificing in the court; and there were some other chairs in the
+room arranged in a semicircle, upon which we sat down by him. He
+saluted me eagerly, and then he said:—
+
+You don’t come to see me, Socrates, as often as you ought: If I were
+still able to go and see you I would not ask you to come to me. But at
+my age I can hardly get to the city, and therefore you should come
+oftener to the Piraeus. For let me tell you, that the more the
+pleasures of the body fade away, the greater to me is the pleasure and
+charm of conversation. Do not then deny my request, but make our house
+your resort and keep company with these young men; we are old friends,
+and you will be quite at home with us.
+
+I replied: There is nothing which for my part I like better, Cephalus,
+than conversing with aged men; for I regard them as travellers who have
+gone a journey which I too may have to go, and of whom I ought to
+enquire, whether the way is smooth and easy, or rugged and difficult.
+And this is a question which I should like to ask of you who have
+arrived at that time which the poets call the ‘threshold of old age’—Is
+life harder towards the end, or what report do you give of it?
+
+I will tell you, Socrates, he said, what my own feeling is. Men of my
+age flock together; we are birds of a feather, as the old proverb says;
+and at our meetings the tale of my acquaintance commonly is—I cannot
+eat, I cannot drink; the pleasures of youth and love are fled away:
+there was a good time once, but now that is gone, and life is no longer
+life. Some complain of the slights which are put upon them by
+relations, and they will tell you sadly of how many evils their old age
+is the cause. But to me, Socrates, these complainers seem to blame that
+which is not really in fault. For if old age were the cause, I too
+being old, and every other old man, would have felt as they do. But
+this is not my own experience, nor that of others whom I have known.
+How well I remember the aged poet Sophocles, when in answer to the
+question, How does love suit with age, Sophocles,—are you still the man
+you were? Peace, he replied; most gladly have I escaped the thing of
+which you speak; I feel as if I had escaped from a mad and furious
+master. His words have often occurred to my mind since, and they seem
+as good to me now as at the time when he uttered them. For certainly
+old age has a great sense of calm and freedom; when the passions relax
+their hold, then, as Sophocles says, we are freed from the grasp not of
+one mad master only, but of many. The truth is, Socrates, that these
+regrets, and also the complaints about relations, are to be attributed
+to the same cause, which is not old age, but men’s characters and
+tempers; for he who is of a calm and happy nature will hardly feel the
+pressure of age, but to him who is of an opposite disposition youth and
+age are equally a burden.
+
+I listened in admiration, and wanting to draw him out, that he might go
+on—Yes, Cephalus, I said: but I rather suspect that people in general
+are not convinced by you when you speak thus; they think that old age
+sits lightly upon you, not because of your happy disposition, but
+because you are rich, and wealth is well known to be a great comforter.
+
+You are right, he replied; they are not convinced: and there is
+something in what they say; not, however, so much as they imagine. I
+might answer them as Themistocles answered the Seriphian who was
+abusing him and saying that he was famous, not for his own merits but
+because he was an Athenian: ‘If you had been a native of my country or
+I of yours, neither of us would have been famous.’ And to those who are
+not rich and are impatient of old age, the same reply may be made; for
+to the good poor man old age cannot be a light burden, nor can a bad
+rich man ever have peace with himself.
+
+May I ask, Cephalus, whether your fortune was for the most part
+inherited or acquired by you?
+
+Acquired! Socrates; do you want to know how much I acquired? In the art
+of making money I have been midway between my father and grandfather:
+for my grandfather, whose name I bear, doubled and trebled the value of
+his patrimony, that which he inherited being much what I possess now;
+but my father Lysanias reduced the property below what it is at
+present: and I shall be satisfied if I leave to these my sons not less
+but a little more than I received.
+
+That was why I asked you the question, I replied, because I see that
+you are indifferent about money, which is a characteristic rather of
+those who have inherited their fortunes than of those who have acquired
+them; the makers of fortunes have a second love of money as a creation
+of their own, resembling the affection of authors for their own poems,
+or of parents for their children, besides that natural love of it for
+the sake of use and profit which is common to them and all men. And
+hence they are very bad company, for they can talk about nothing but
+the praises of wealth.
+
+That is true, he said.
+
+Yes, that is very true, but may I ask another question?—What do you
+consider to be the greatest blessing which you have reaped from your
+wealth?
+
+One, he said, of which I could not expect easily to convince others.
+For let me tell you, Socrates, that when a man thinks himself to be
+near death, fears and cares enter into his mind which he never had
+before; the tales of a world below and the punishment which is exacted
+there of deeds done here were once a laughing matter to him, but now he
+is tormented with the thought that they may be true: either from the
+weakness of age, or because he is now drawing nearer to that other
+place, he has a clearer view of these things; suspicions and alarms
+crowd thickly upon him, and he begins to reflect and consider what
+wrongs he has done to others. And when he finds that the sum of his
+transgressions is great he will many a time like a child start up in
+his sleep for fear, and he is filled with dark forebodings. But to him
+who is conscious of no sin, sweet hope, as Pindar charmingly says, is
+the kind nurse of his age:
+
+‘Hope,’ he says, ‘cherishes the soul of him who lives in justice and
+holiness, and is the nurse of his age and the companion of his
+journey;—hope which is mightiest to sway the restless soul of man.’
+
+How admirable are his words! And the great blessing of riches, I do not
+say to every man, but to a good man, is, that he has had no occasion to
+deceive or to defraud others, either intentionally or unintentionally;
+and when he departs to the world below he is not in any apprehension
+about offerings due to the gods or debts which he owes to men. Now to
+this peace of mind the possession of wealth greatly contributes; and
+therefore I say, that, setting one thing against another, of the many
+advantages which wealth has to give, to a man of sense this is in my
+opinion the greatest.
+
+Well said, Cephalus, I replied; but as concerning justice, what is
+it?—to speak the truth and to pay your debts—no more than this? And
+even to this are there not exceptions? Suppose that a friend when in
+his right mind has deposited arms with me and he asks for them when he
+is not in his right mind, ought I to give them back to him? No one
+would say that I ought or that I should be right in doing so, any more
+than they would say that I ought always to speak the truth to one who
+is in his condition.
+
+You are quite right, he replied.
+
+But then, I said, speaking the truth and paying your debts is not a
+correct definition of justice.
+
+Quite correct, Socrates, if Simonides is to be believed, said
+Polemarchus interposing.
+
+I fear, said Cephalus, that I must go now, for I have to look after the
+sacrifices, and I hand over the argument to Polemarchus and the
+company.
+
+Is not Polemarchus your heir? I said.
+
+To be sure, he answered, and went away laughing to the sacrifices.
+
+Tell me then, O thou heir of the argument, what did Simonides say, and
+according to you truly say, about justice?
+
+He said that the repayment of a debt is just, and in saying so he
+appears to me to be right.
+
+I should be sorry to doubt the word of such a wise and inspired man,
+but his meaning, though probably clear to you, is the reverse of clear
+to me. For he certainly does not mean, as we were just now saying, that
+I ought to return a deposit of arms or of anything else to one who asks
+for it when he is not in his right senses; and yet a deposit cannot be
+denied to be a debt.
+
+True.
+
+Then when the person who asks me is not in his right mind I am by no
+means to make the return?
+
+Certainly not.
+
+When Simonides said that the repayment of a debt was justice, he did
+not mean to include that case?
+
+Certainly not; for he thinks that a friend ought always to do good to a
+friend and never evil.
+
+You mean that the return of a deposit of gold which is to the injury of
+the receiver, if the two parties are friends, is not the repayment of a
+debt,—that is what you would imagine him to say?
+
+Yes.
+
+And are enemies also to receive what we owe to them?
+
+To be sure, he said, they are to receive what we owe them, and an
+enemy, as I take it, owes to an enemy that which is due or proper to
+him—that is to say, evil.
+
+Simonides, then, after the manner of poets, would seem to have spoken
+darkly of the nature of justice; for he really meant to say that
+justice is the giving to each man what is proper to him, and this he
+termed a debt.
+
+That must have been his meaning, he said.
+
+By heaven! I replied; and if we asked him what due or proper thing is
+given by medicine, and to whom, what answer do you think that he would
+make to us?
+
+He would surely reply that medicine gives drugs and meat and drink to
+human bodies.
+
+And what due or proper thing is given by cookery, and to what?
+
+Seasoning to food.
+
+And what is that which justice gives, and to whom?
+
+If, Socrates, we are to be guided at all by the analogy of the
+preceding instances, then justice is the art which gives good to
+friends and evil to enemies.
+
+That is his meaning then?
+
+I think so.
+
+And who is best able to do good to his friends and evil to his enemies
+in time of sickness?
+
+The physician.
+
+Or when they are on a voyage, amid the perils of the sea?
+
+The pilot.
+
+And in what sort of actions or with a view to what result is the just
+man most able to do harm to his enemy and good to his friend?
+
+In going to war against the one and in making alliances with the other.
+
+But when a man is well, my dear Polemarchus, there is no need of a
+physician?
+
+No.
+
+And he who is not on a voyage has no need of a pilot?
+
+No.
+
+Then in time of peace justice will be of no use?
+
+I am very far from thinking so.
+
+You think that justice may be of use in peace as well as in war?
+
+Yes.
+
+Like husbandry for the acquisition of corn?
+
+Yes.
+
+Or like shoemaking for the acquisition of shoes,—that is what you mean?
+
+Yes.
+
+And what similar use or power of acquisition has justice in time of
+peace?
+
+In contracts, Socrates, justice is of use.
+
+And by contracts you mean partnerships?
+
+Exactly.
+
+But is the just man or the skilful player a more useful and better
+partner at a game of draughts?
+
+The skilful player.
+
+And in the laying of bricks and stones is the just man a more useful or
+better partner than the builder?
+
+Quite the reverse.
+
+Then in what sort of partnership is the just man a better partner than
+the harp-player, as in playing the harp the harp-player is certainly a
+better partner than the just man?
+
+In a money partnership.
+
+Yes, Polemarchus, but surely not in the use of money; for you do not
+want a just man to be your counsellor in the purchase or sale of a
+horse; a man who is knowing about horses would be better for that,
+would he not?
+
+Certainly.
+
+And when you want to buy a ship, the shipwright or the pilot would be
+better?
+
+True.
+
+Then what is that joint use of silver or gold in which the just man is
+to be preferred?
+
+When you want a deposit to be kept safely.
+
+You mean when money is not wanted, but allowed to lie?
+
+Precisely.
+
+That is to say, justice is useful when money is useless?
+
+That is the inference.
+
+And when you want to keep a pruning-hook safe, then justice is useful
+to the individual and to the state; but when you want to use it, then
+the art of the vine-dresser?
+
+Clearly.
+
+And when you want to keep a shield or a lyre, and not to use them, you
+would say that justice is useful; but when you want to use them, then
+the art of the soldier or of the musician?
+
+Certainly.
+
+And so of all other things;—justice is useful when they are useless,
+and useless when they are useful?
+
+That is the inference.
+
+Then justice is not good for much. But let us consider this further
+point: Is not he who can best strike a blow in a boxing match or in any
+kind of fighting best able to ward off a blow?
+
+Certainly.
+
+And he who is most skilful in preventing or escaping from a disease is
+best able to create one?
+
+True.
+
+And he is the best guard of a camp who is best able to steal a march
+upon the enemy?
+
+Certainly.
+
+Then he who is a good keeper of anything is also a good thief?
+
+That, I suppose, is to be inferred.
+
+Then if the just man is good at keeping money, he is good at stealing
+it.
+
+That is implied in the argument.
+
+Then after all the just man has turned out to be a thief. And this is a
+lesson which I suspect you must have learnt out of Homer; for he,
+speaking of Autolycus, the maternal grandfather of Odysseus, who is a
+favourite of his, affirms that
+
+‘He was excellent above all men in theft and perjury.’
+
+And so, you and Homer and Simonides are agreed that justice is an art
+of theft; to be practised however ‘for the good of friends and for the
+harm of enemies,’—that was what you were saying?
+
+No, certainly not that, though I do not now know what I did say; but I
+still stand by the latter words.
+
+Well, there is another question: By friends and enemies do we mean
+those who are so really, or only in seeming?
+
+Surely, he said, a man may be expected to love those whom he thinks
+good, and to hate those whom he thinks evil.
+
+Yes, but do not persons often err about good and evil: many who are not
+good seem to be so, and conversely?
+
+That is true.
+
+Then to them the good will be enemies and the evil will be their
+friends? True.
+
+And in that case they will be right in doing good to the evil and evil
+to the good?
+
+Clearly.
+
+But the good are just and would not do an injustice?
+
+True.
+
+Then according to your argument it is just to injure those who do no
+wrong?
+
+Nay, Socrates; the doctrine is immoral.
+
+Then I suppose that we ought to do good to the just and harm to the
+unjust?
+
+I like that better.
+
+But see the consequence:—Many a man who is ignorant of human nature has
+friends who are bad friends, and in that case he ought to do harm to
+them; and he has good enemies whom he ought to benefit; but, if so, we
+shall be saying the very opposite of that which we affirmed to be the
+meaning of Simonides.
+
+Very true, he said: and I think that we had better correct an error
+into which we seem to have fallen in the use of the words ‘friend’ and
+‘enemy.’
+
+What was the error, Polemarchus? I asked.
+
+We assumed that he is a friend who seems to be or who is thought good.
+
+And how is the error to be corrected?
+
+We should rather say that he is a friend who is, as well as seems,
+good; and that he who seems only, and is not good, only seems to be and
+is not a friend; and of an enemy the same may be said.
+
+You would argue that the good are our friends and the bad our enemies?
+
+Yes.
+
+And instead of saying simply as we did at first, that it is just to do
+good to our friends and harm to our enemies, we should further say: It
+is just to do good to our friends when they are good and harm to our
+enemies when they are evil?
+
+Yes, that appears to me to be the truth.
+
+But ought the just to injure any one at all?
+
+Undoubtedly he ought to injure those who are both wicked and his
+enemies.
+
+When horses are injured, are they improved or deteriorated?
+
+The latter.
+
+Deteriorated, that is to say, in the good qualities of horses, not of
+dogs?
+
+Yes, of horses.
+
+And dogs are deteriorated in the good qualities of dogs, and not of
+horses?
+
+Of course.
+
+And will not men who are injured be deteriorated in that which is the
+proper virtue of man?
+
+Certainly.
+
+And that human virtue is justice?
+
+To be sure.
+
+Then men who are injured are of necessity made unjust?
+
+That is the result.
+
+But can the musician by his art make men unmusical?
+
+Certainly not.
+
+Or the horseman by his art make them bad horsemen?
+
+Impossible.
+
+And can the just by justice make men unjust, or speaking generally, can
+the good by virtue make them bad?
+
+Assuredly not.
+
+Any more than heat can produce cold?
+
+It cannot.
+
+Or drought moisture?
+
+Clearly not.
+
+Nor can the good harm any one?
+
+Impossible.
+
+And the just is the good?
+
+Certainly.
+
+Then to injure a friend or any one else is not the act of a just man,
+but of the opposite, who is the unjust?
+
+I think that what you say is quite true, Socrates.
+
+Then if a man says that justice consists in the repayment of debts, and
+that good is the debt which a just man owes to his friends, and evil
+the debt which he owes to his enemies,—to say this is not wise; for it
+is not true, if, as has been clearly shown, the injuring of another can
+be in no case just.
+
+I agree with you, said Polemarchus.
+
+Then you and I are prepared to take up arms against any one who
+attributes such a saying to Simonides or Bias or Pittacus, or any other
+wise man or seer?
+
+I am quite ready to do battle at your side, he said.
+
+Shall I tell you whose I believe the saying to be?
+
+Whose?
+
+I believe that Periander or Perdiccas or Xerxes or Ismenias the Theban,
+or some other rich and mighty man, who had a great opinion of his own
+power, was the first to say that justice is ‘doing good to your friends
+and harm to your enemies.’
+
+Most true, he said.
+
+Yes, I said; but if this definition of justice also breaks down, what
+other can be offered?
+
+Several times in the course of the discussion Thrasymachus had made an
+attempt to get the argument into his own hands, and had been put down
+by the rest of the company, who wanted to hear the end. But when
+Polemarchus and I had done speaking and there was a pause, he could no
+longer hold his peace; and, gathering himself up, he came at us like a
+wild beast, seeking to devour us. We were quite panic-stricken at the
+sight of him.
+
+He roared out to the whole company: What folly, Socrates, has taken
+possession of you all? And why, sillybillies, do you knock under to one
+another? I say that if you want really to know what justice is, you
+should not only ask but answer, and you should not seek honour to
+yourself from the refutation of an opponent, but have your own answer;
+for there is many a one who can ask and cannot answer. And now I will
+not have you say that justice is duty or advantage or profit or gain or
+interest, for this sort of nonsense will not do for me; I must have
+clearness and accuracy.
+
+I was panic-stricken at his words, and could not look at him without
+trembling. Indeed I believe that if I had not fixed my eye upon him, I
+should have been struck dumb: but when I saw his fury rising, I looked
+at him first, and was therefore able to reply to him.
+
+Thrasymachus, I said, with a quiver, don’t be hard upon us. Polemarchus
+and I may have been guilty of a little mistake in the argument, but I
+can assure you that the error was not intentional. If we were seeking
+for a piece of gold, you would not imagine that we were ‘knocking under
+to one another,’ and so losing our chance of finding it. And why, when
+we are seeking for justice, a thing more precious than many pieces of
+gold, do you say that we are weakly yielding to one another and not
+doing our utmost to get at the truth? Nay, my good friend, we are most
+willing and anxious to do so, but the fact is that we cannot. And if
+so, you people who know all things should pity us and not be angry with
+us.
+
+How characteristic of Socrates! he replied, with a bitter laugh;—that’s
+your ironical style! Did I not foresee—have I not already told you,
+that whatever he was asked he would refuse to answer, and try irony or
+any other shuffle, in order that he might avoid answering?
+
+You are a philosopher, Thrasymachus, I replied, and well know that if
+you ask a person what numbers make up twelve, taking care to prohibit
+him whom you ask from answering twice six, or three times four, or six
+times two, or four times three, ‘for this sort of nonsense will not do
+for me,’—then obviously, if that is your way of putting the question,
+no one can answer you. But suppose that he were to retort,
+‘Thrasymachus, what do you mean? If one of these numbers which you
+interdict be the true answer to the question, am I falsely to say some
+other number which is not the right one?—is that your meaning?’—How
+would you answer him?
+
+Just as if the two cases were at all alike! he said.
+
+Why should they not be? I replied; and even if they are not, but only
+appear to be so to the person who is asked, ought he not to say what he
+thinks, whether you and I forbid him or not?
+
+I presume then that you are going to make one of the interdicted
+answers?
+
+I dare say that I may, notwithstanding the danger, if upon reflection I
+approve of any of them.
+
+But what if I give you an answer about justice other and better, he
+said, than any of these? What do you deserve to have done to you?
+
+Done to me!—as becomes the ignorant, I must learn from the wise—that is
+what I deserve to have done to me.
+
+What, and no payment! a pleasant notion!
+
+I will pay when I have the money, I replied.
+
+But you have, Socrates, said Glaucon: and you, Thrasymachus, need be
+under no anxiety about money, for we will all make a contribution for
+Socrates.
+
+Yes, he replied, and then Socrates will do as he always does—refuse to
+answer himself, but take and pull to pieces the answer of some one
+else.
+
+Why, my good friend, I said, how can any one answer who knows, and says
+that he knows, just nothing; and who, even if he has some faint notions
+of his own, is told by a man of authority not to utter them? The
+natural thing is, that the speaker should be some one like yourself who
+professes to know and can tell what he knows. Will you then kindly
+answer, for the edification of the company and of myself?
+
+Glaucon and the rest of the company joined in my request, and
+Thrasymachus, as any one might see, was in reality eager to speak; for
+he thought that he had an excellent answer, and would distinguish
+himself. But at first he affected to insist on my answering; at length
+he consented to begin. Behold, he said, the wisdom of Socrates; he
+refuses to teach himself, and goes about learning of others, to whom he
+never even says Thank you.
+
+That I learn of others, I replied, is quite true; but that I am
+ungrateful I wholly deny. Money I have none, and therefore I pay in
+praise, which is all I have; and how ready I am to praise any one who
+appears to me to speak well you will very soon find out when you
+answer; for I expect that you will answer well.
+
+Listen, then, he said; I proclaim that justice is nothing else than the
+interest of the stronger. And now why do you not praise me? But of
+course you won’t.
+
+Let me first understand you, I replied. Justice, as you say, is the
+interest of the stronger. What, Thrasymachus, is the meaning of this?
+You cannot mean to say that because Polydamas, the pancratiast, is
+stronger than we are, and finds the eating of beef conducive to his
+bodily strength, that to eat beef is therefore equally for our good who
+are weaker than he is, and right and just for us?
+
+That’s abominable of you, Socrates; you take the words in the sense
+which is most damaging to the argument.
+
+Not at all, my good sir, I said; I am trying to understand them; and I
+wish that you would be a little clearer.
+
+Well, he said, have you never heard that forms of government differ;
+there are tyrannies, and there are democracies, and there are
+aristocracies?
+
+Yes, I know.
+
+And the government is the ruling power in each state?
+
+Certainly.
+
+And the different forms of government make laws democratical,
+aristocratical, tyrannical, with a view to their several interests; and
+these laws, which are made by them for their own interests, are the
+justice which they deliver to their subjects, and him who transgresses
+them they punish as a breaker of the law, and unjust. And that is what
+I mean when I say that in all states there is the same principle of
+justice, which is the interest of the government; and as the government
+must be supposed to have power, the only reasonable conclusion is, that
+everywhere there is one principle of justice, which is the interest of
+the stronger.
+
+Now I understand you, I said; and whether you are right or not I will
+try to discover. But let me remark, that in defining justice you have
+yourself used the word ‘interest’ which you forbade me to use. It is
+true, however, that in your definition the words ‘of the stronger’ are
+added.
+
+A small addition, you must allow, he said.
+
+Great or small, never mind about that: we must first enquire whether
+what you are saying is the truth. Now we are both agreed that justice
+is interest of some sort, but you go on to say ‘of the stronger’; about
+this addition I am not so sure, and must therefore consider further.
+
+Proceed.
+
+I will; and first tell me, Do you admit that it is just for subjects to
+obey their rulers?
+
+I do.
+
+But are the rulers of states absolutely infallible, or are they
+sometimes liable to err?
+
+To be sure, he replied, they are liable to err.
+
+Then in making their laws they may sometimes make them rightly, and
+sometimes not?
+
+True.
+
+When they make them rightly, they make them agreeably to their
+interest; when they are mistaken, contrary to their interest; you admit
+that?
+
+Yes.
+
+And the laws which they make must be obeyed by their subjects,—and that
+is what you call justice?
+
+Doubtless.
+
+Then justice, according to your argument, is not only obedience to the
+interest of the stronger but the reverse?
+
+What is that you are saying? he asked.
+
+I am only repeating what you are saying, I believe. But let us
+consider: Have we not admitted that the rulers may be mistaken about
+their own interest in what they command, and also that to obey them is
+justice? Has not that been admitted?
+
+Yes.
+
+Then you must also have acknowledged justice not to be for the interest
+of the stronger, when the rulers unintentionally command things to be
+done which are to their own injury. For if, as you say, justice is the
+obedience which the subject renders to their commands, in that case, O
+wisest of men, is there any escape from the conclusion that the weaker
+are commanded to do, not what is for the interest, but what is for the
+injury of the stronger?
+
+Nothing can be clearer, Socrates, said Polemarchus.
+
+Yes, said Cleitophon, interposing, if you are allowed to be his
+witness.
+
+But there is no need of any witness, said Polemarchus, for Thrasymachus
+himself acknowledges that rulers may sometimes command what is not for
+their own interest, and that for subjects to obey them is justice.
+
+Yes, Polemarchus,—Thrasymachus said that for subjects to do what was
+commanded by their rulers is just.
+
+Yes, Cleitophon, but he also said that justice is the interest of the
+stronger, and, while admitting both these propositions, he further
+acknowledged that the stronger may command the weaker who are his
+subjects to do what is not for his own interest; whence follows that
+justice is the injury quite as much as the interest of the stronger.
+
+But, said Cleitophon, he meant by the interest of the stronger what the
+stronger thought to be his interest,—this was what the weaker had to
+do; and this was affirmed by him to be justice.
+
+Those were not his words, rejoined Polemarchus.
+
+Never mind, I replied, if he now says that they are, let us accept his
+statement. Tell me, Thrasymachus, I said, did you mean by justice what
+the stronger thought to be his interest, whether really so or not?
+
+Certainly not, he said. Do you suppose that I call him who is mistaken
+the stronger at the time when he is mistaken?
+
+Yes, I said, my impression was that you did so, when you admitted that
+the ruler was not infallible but might be sometimes mistaken.
+
+You argue like an informer, Socrates. Do you mean, for example, that he
+who is mistaken about the sick is a physician in that he is mistaken?
+or that he who errs in arithmetic or grammar is an arithmetician or
+grammarian at the time when he is making the mistake, in respect of the
+mistake? True, we say that the physician or arithmetician or grammarian
+has made a mistake, but this is only a way of speaking; for the fact is
+that neither the grammarian nor any other person of skill ever makes a
+mistake in so far as he is what his name implies; they none of them err
+unless their skill fails them, and then they cease to be skilled
+artists. No artist or sage or ruler errs at the time when he is what
+his name implies; though he is commonly said to err, and I adopted the
+common mode of speaking. But to be perfectly accurate, since you are
+such a lover of accuracy, we should say that the ruler, in so far as he
+is a ruler, is unerring, and, being unerring, always commands that
+which is for his own interest; and the subject is required to execute
+his commands; and therefore, as I said at first and now repeat, justice
+is the interest of the stronger.
+
+Indeed, Thrasymachus, and do I really appear to you to argue like an
+informer?
+
+Certainly, he replied.
+
+And do you suppose that I ask these questions with any design of
+injuring you in the argument?
+
+Nay, he replied, ‘suppose’ is not the word—I know it; but you will be
+found out, and by sheer force of argument you will never prevail.
+
+I shall not make the attempt, my dear man; but to avoid any
+misunderstanding occurring between us in future, let me ask, in what
+sense do you speak of a ruler or stronger whose interest, as you were
+saying, he being the superior, it is just that the inferior should
+execute—is he a ruler in the popular or in the strict sense of the
+term?
+
+In the strictest of all senses, he said. And now cheat and play the
+informer if you can; I ask no quarter at your hands. But you never will
+be able, never.
+
+And do you imagine, I said, that I am such a madman as to try and
+cheat, Thrasymachus? I might as well shave a lion.
+
+Why, he said, you made the attempt a minute ago, and you failed.
+
+Enough, I said, of these civilities. It will be better that I should
+ask you a question: Is the physician, taken in that strict sense of
+which you are speaking, a healer of the sick or a maker of money? And
+remember that I am now speaking of the true physician.
+
+A healer of the sick, he replied.
+
+And the pilot—that is to say, the true pilot—is he a captain of sailors
+or a mere sailor?
+
+A captain of sailors.
+
+The circumstance that he sails in the ship is not to be taken into
+account; neither is he to be called a sailor; the name pilot by which
+he is distinguished has nothing to do with sailing, but is significant
+of his skill and of his authority over the sailors.
+
+Very true, he said.
+
+Now, I said, every art has an interest?
+
+Certainly.
+
+For which the art has to consider and provide?
+
+Yes, that is the aim of art.
+
+And the interest of any art is the perfection of it—this and nothing
+else?
+
+What do you mean?
+
+I mean what I may illustrate negatively by the example of the body.
+Suppose you were to ask me whether the body is self-sufficing or has
+wants, I should reply: Certainly the body has wants; for the body may
+be ill and require to be cured, and has therefore interests to which
+the art of medicine ministers; and this is the origin and intention of
+medicine, as you will acknowledge. Am I not right?
+
+Quite right, he replied.
+
+But is the art of medicine or any other art faulty or deficient in any
+quality in the same way that the eye may be deficient in sight or the
+ear fail of hearing, and therefore requires another art to provide for
+the interests of seeing and hearing—has art in itself, I say, any
+similar liability to fault or defect, and does every art require
+another supplementary art to provide for its interests, and that
+another and another without end? Or have the arts to look only after
+their own interests? Or have they no need either of themselves or of
+another?—having no faults or defects, they have no need to correct
+them, either by the exercise of their own art or of any other; they
+have only to consider the interest of their subject-matter. For every
+art remains pure and faultless while remaining true—that is to say,
+while perfect and unimpaired. Take the words in your precise sense, and
+tell me whether I am not right.
+
+Yes, clearly.
+
+Then medicine does not consider the interest of medicine, but the
+interest of the body?
+
+True, he said.
+
+Nor does the art of horsemanship consider the interests of the art of
+horsemanship, but the interests of the horse; neither do any other arts
+care for themselves, for they have no needs; they care only for that
+which is the subject of their art?
+
+True, he said.
+
+But surely, Thrasymachus, the arts are the superiors and rulers of
+their own subjects?
+
+To this he assented with a good deal of reluctance.
+
+Then, I said, no science or art considers or enjoins the interest of
+the stronger or superior, but only the interest of the subject and
+weaker?
+
+He made an attempt to contest this proposition also, but finally
+acquiesced.
+
+Then, I continued, no physician, in so far as he is a physician,
+considers his own good in what he prescribes, but the good of his
+patient; for the true physician is also a ruler having the human body
+as a subject, and is not a mere money-maker; that has been admitted?
+
+Yes.
+
+And the pilot likewise, in the strict sense of the term, is a ruler of
+sailors and not a mere sailor?
+
+That has been admitted.
+
+And such a pilot and ruler will provide and prescribe for the interest
+of the sailor who is under him, and not for his own or the ruler’s
+interest?
+
+He gave a reluctant ‘Yes.’
+
+Then, I said, Thrasymachus, there is no one in any rule who, in so far
+as he is a ruler, considers or enjoins what is for his own interest,
+but always what is for the interest of his subject or suitable to his
+art; to that he looks, and that alone he considers in everything which
+he says and does.
+
+When we had got to this point in the argument, and every one saw that
+the definition of justice had been completely upset, Thrasymachus,
+instead of replying to me, said: Tell me, Socrates, have you got a
+nurse?
+
+Why do you ask such a question, I said, when you ought rather to be
+answering?
+
+Because she leaves you to snivel, and never wipes your nose: she has
+not even taught you to know the shepherd from the sheep.
+
+What makes you say that? I replied.
+
+Because you fancy that the shepherd or neatherd fattens or tends the
+sheep or oxen with a view to their own good and not to the good of
+himself or his master; and you further imagine that the rulers of
+states, if they are true rulers, never think of their subjects as
+sheep, and that they are not studying their own advantage day and
+night. Oh, no; and so entirely astray are you in your ideas about the
+just and unjust as not even to know that justice and the just are in
+reality another’s good; that is to say, the interest of the ruler and
+stronger, and the loss of the subject and servant; and injustice the
+opposite; for the unjust is lord over the truly simple and just: he is
+the stronger, and his subjects do what is for his interest, and
+minister to his happiness, which is very far from being their own.
+Consider further, most foolish Socrates, that the just is always a
+loser in comparison with the unjust. First of all, in private
+contracts: wherever the unjust is the partner of the just you will find
+that, when the partnership is dissolved, the unjust man has always more
+and the just less. Secondly, in their dealings with the State: when
+there is an income-tax, the just man will pay more and the unjust less
+on the same amount of income; and when there is anything to be received
+the one gains nothing and the other much. Observe also what happens
+when they take an office; there is the just man neglecting his affairs
+and perhaps suffering other losses, and getting nothing out of the
+public, because he is just; moreover he is hated by his friends and
+acquaintance for refusing to serve them in unlawful ways. But all this
+is reversed in the case of the unjust man. I am speaking, as before, of
+injustice on a large scale in which the advantage of the unjust is most
+apparent; and my meaning will be most clearly seen if we turn to that
+highest form of injustice in which the criminal is the happiest of men,
+and the sufferers or those who refuse to do injustice are the most
+miserable—that is to say tyranny, which by fraud and force takes away
+the property of others, not little by little but wholesale;
+comprehending in one, things sacred as well as profane, private and
+public; for which acts of wrong, if he were detected perpetrating any
+one of them singly, he would be punished and incur great disgrace—they
+who do such wrong in particular cases are called robbers of temples,
+and man-stealers and burglars and swindlers and thieves. But when a man
+besides taking away the money of the citizens has made slaves of them,
+then, instead of these names of reproach, he is termed happy and
+blessed, not only by the citizens but by all who hear of his having
+achieved the consummation of injustice. For mankind censure injustice,
+fearing that they may be the victims of it and not because they shrink
+from committing it. And thus, as I have shown, Socrates, injustice,
+when on a sufficient scale, has more strength and freedom and mastery
+than justice; and, as I said at first, justice is the interest of the
+stronger, whereas injustice is a man’s own profit and interest.
+
+Thrasymachus, when he had thus spoken, having, like a bath-man, deluged
+our ears with his words, had a mind to go away. But the company would
+not let him; they insisted that he should remain and defend his
+position; and I myself added my own humble request that he would not
+leave us. Thrasymachus, I said to him, excellent man, how suggestive
+are your remarks! And are you going to run away before you have fairly
+taught or learned whether they are true or not? Is the attempt to
+determine the way of man’s life so small a matter in your eyes—to
+determine how life may be passed by each one of us to the greatest
+advantage?
+
+And do I differ from you, he said, as to the importance of the enquiry?
+
+You appear rather, I replied, to have no care or thought about us,
+Thrasymachus—whether we live better or worse from not knowing what you
+say you know, is to you a matter of indifference. Prithee, friend, do
+not keep your knowledge to yourself; we are a large party; and any
+benefit which you confer upon us will be amply rewarded. For my own
+part I openly declare that I am not convinced, and that I do not
+believe injustice to be more gainful than justice, even if uncontrolled
+and allowed to have free play. For, granting that there may be an
+unjust man who is able to commit injustice either by fraud or force,
+still this does not convince me of the superior advantage of injustice,
+and there may be others who are in the same predicament with myself.
+Perhaps we may be wrong; if so, you in your wisdom should convince us
+that we are mistaken in preferring justice to injustice.
+
+And how am I to convince you, he said, if you are not already convinced
+by what I have just said; what more can I do for you? Would you have me
+put the proof bodily into your souls?
+
+Heaven forbid! I said; I would only ask you to be consistent; or, if
+you change, change openly and let there be no deception. For I must
+remark, Thrasymachus, if you will recall what was previously said, that
+although you began by defining the true physician in an exact sense,
+you did not observe a like exactness when speaking of the shepherd; you
+thought that the shepherd as a shepherd tends the sheep not with a view
+to their own good, but like a mere diner or banquetter with a view to
+the pleasures of the table; or, again, as a trader for sale in the
+market, and not as a shepherd. Yet surely the art of the shepherd is
+concerned only with the good of his subjects; he has only to provide
+the best for them, since the perfection of the art is already ensured
+whenever all the requirements of it are satisfied. And that was what I
+was saying just now about the ruler. I conceived that the art of the
+ruler, considered as ruler, whether in a state or in private life,
+could only regard the good of his flock or subjects; whereas you seem
+to think that the rulers in states, that is to say, the true rulers,
+like being in authority.
+
+Think! Nay, I am sure of it.
+
+Then why in the case of lesser offices do men never take them willingly
+without payment, unless under the idea that they govern for the
+advantage not of themselves but of others? Let me ask you a question:
+Are not the several arts different, by reason of their each having a
+separate function? And, my dear illustrious friend, do say what you
+think, that we may make a little progress.
+
+Yes, that is the difference, he replied.
+
+And each art gives us a particular good and not merely a general
+one—medicine, for example, gives us health; navigation, safety at sea,
+and so on?
+
+Yes, he said.
+
+And the art of payment has the special function of giving pay: but we
+do not confuse this with other arts, any more than the art of the pilot
+is to be confused with the art of medicine, because the health of the
+pilot may be improved by a sea voyage. You would not be inclined to
+say, would you, that navigation is the art of medicine, at least if we
+are to adopt your exact use of language?
+
+Certainly not.
+
+Or because a man is in good health when he receives pay you would not
+say that the art of payment is medicine?
+
+I should not.
+
+Nor would you say that medicine is the art of receiving pay because a
+man takes fees when he is engaged in healing?
+
+Certainly not.
+
+And we have admitted, I said, that the good of each art is specially
+confined to the art?
+
+Yes.
+
+Then, if there be any good which all artists have in common, that is to
+be attributed to something of which they all have the common use?
+
+True, he replied.
+
+And when the artist is benefited by receiving pay the advantage is
+gained by an additional use of the art of pay, which is not the art
+professed by him?
+
+He gave a reluctant assent to this.
+
+Then the pay is not derived by the several artists from their
+respective arts. But the truth is, that while the art of medicine gives
+health, and the art of the builder builds a house, another art attends
+them which is the art of pay. The various arts may be doing their own
+business and benefiting that over which they preside, but would the
+artist receive any benefit from his art unless he were paid as well?
+
+I suppose not.
+
+But does he therefore confer no benefit when he works for nothing?
+
+Certainly, he confers a benefit.
+
+Then now, Thrasymachus, there is no longer any doubt that neither arts
+nor governments provide for their own interests; but, as we were before
+saying, they rule and provide for the interests of their subjects who
+are the weaker and not the stronger—to their good they attend and not
+to the good of the superior. And this is the reason, my dear
+Thrasymachus, why, as I was just now saying, no one is willing to
+govern; because no one likes to take in hand the reformation of evils
+which are not his concern without remuneration. For, in the execution
+of his work, and in giving his orders to another, the true artist does
+not regard his own interest, but always that of his subjects; and
+therefore in order that rulers may be willing to rule, they must be
+paid in one of three modes of payment, money, or honour, or a penalty
+for refusing.
+
+What do you mean, Socrates? said Glaucon. The first two modes of
+payment are intelligible enough, but what the penalty is I do not
+understand, or how a penalty can be a payment.
+
+You mean that you do not understand the nature of this payment which to
+the best men is the great inducement to rule? Of course you know that
+ambition and avarice are held to be, as indeed they are, a disgrace?
+
+Very true.
+
+And for this reason, I said, money and honour have no attraction for
+them; good men do not wish to be openly demanding payment for governing
+and so to get the name of hirelings, nor by secretly helping themselves
+out of the public revenues to get the name of thieves. And not being
+ambitious they do not care about honour. Wherefore necessity must be
+laid upon them, and they must be induced to serve from the fear of
+punishment. And this, as I imagine, is the reason why the forwardness
+to take office, instead of waiting to be compelled, has been deemed
+dishonourable. Now the worst part of the punishment is that he who
+refuses to rule is liable to be ruled by one who is worse than himself.
+And the fear of this, as I conceive, induces the good to take office,
+not because they would, but because they cannot help—not under the idea
+that they are going to have any benefit or enjoyment themselves, but as
+a necessity, and because they are not able to commit the task of ruling
+to any one who is better than themselves, or indeed as good. For there
+is reason to think that if a city were composed entirely of good men,
+then to avoid office would be as much an object of contention as to
+obtain office is at present; then we should have plain proof that the
+true ruler is not meant by nature to regard his own interest, but that
+of his subjects; and every one who knew this would choose rather to
+receive a benefit from another than to have the trouble of conferring
+one. So far am I from agreeing with Thrasymachus that justice is the
+interest of the stronger. This latter question need not be further
+discussed at present; but when Thrasymachus says that the life of the
+unjust is more advantageous than that of the just, his new statement
+appears to me to be of a far more serious character. Which of us has
+spoken truly? And which sort of life, Glaucon, do you prefer?
+
+I for my part deem the life of the just to be the more advantageous, he
+answered.
+
+Did you hear all the advantages of the unjust which Thrasymachus was
+rehearsing?
+
+Yes, I heard him, he replied, but he has not convinced me.
+
+Then shall we try to find some way of convincing him, if we can, that
+he is saying what is not true?
+
+Most certainly, he replied.
+
+If, I said, he makes a set speech and we make another recounting all
+the advantages of being just, and he answers and we rejoin, there must
+be a numbering and measuring of the goods which are claimed on either
+side, and in the end we shall want judges to decide; but if we proceed
+in our enquiry as we lately did, by making admissions to one another,
+we shall unite the offices of judge and advocate in our own persons.
+
+Very good, he said.
+
+And which method do I understand you to prefer? I said.
+
+That which you propose.
+
+Well, then, Thrasymachus, I said, suppose you begin at the beginning
+and answer me. You say that perfect injustice is more gainful than
+perfect justice?
+
+Yes, that is what I say, and I have given you my reasons.
+
+And what is your view about them? Would you call one of them virtue and
+the other vice?
+
+Certainly.
+
+I suppose that you would call justice virtue and injustice vice?
+
+What a charming notion! So likely too, seeing that I affirm injustice
+to be profitable and justice not.
+
+What else then would you say?
+
+The opposite, he replied.
+
+And would you call justice vice?
+
+No, I would rather say sublime simplicity.
+
+Then would you call injustice malignity?
+
+No; I would rather say discretion.
+
+And do the unjust appear to you to be wise and good?
+
+Yes, he said; at any rate those of them who are able to be perfectly
+unjust, and who have the power of subduing states and nations; but
+perhaps you imagine me to be talking of cutpurses. Even this profession
+if undetected has advantages, though they are not to be compared with
+those of which I was just now speaking.
+
+I do not think that I misapprehend your meaning, Thrasymachus, I
+replied; but still I cannot hear without amazement that you class
+injustice with wisdom and virtue, and justice with the opposite.
+
+Certainly I do so class them.
+
+Now, I said, you are on more substantial and almost unanswerable
+ground; for if the injustice which you were maintaining to be
+profitable had been admitted by you as by others to be vice and
+deformity, an answer might have been given to you on received
+principles; but now I perceive that you will call injustice honourable
+and strong, and to the unjust you will attribute all the qualities
+which were attributed by us before to the just, seeing that you do not
+hesitate to rank injustice with wisdom and virtue.
+
+You have guessed most infallibly, he replied.
+
+Then I certainly ought not to shrink from going through with the
+argument so long as I have reason to think that you, Thrasymachus, are
+speaking your real mind; for I do believe that you are now in earnest
+and are not amusing yourself at our expense.
+
+I may be in earnest or not, but what is that to you?—to refute the
+argument is your business.
+
+Very true, I said; that is what I have to do: But will you be so good
+as answer yet one more question? Does the just man try to gain any
+advantage over the just?
+
+Far otherwise; if he did he would not be the simple amusing creature
+which he is.
+
+And would he try to go beyond just action?
+
+He would not.
+
+And how would he regard the attempt to gain an advantage over the
+unjust; would that be considered by him as just or unjust?
+
+He would think it just, and would try to gain the advantage; but he
+would not be able.
+
+Whether he would or would not be able, I said, is not to the point. My
+question is only whether the just man, while refusing to have more than
+another just man, would wish and claim to have more than the unjust?
+
+Yes, he would.
+
+And what of the unjust—does he claim to have more than the just man and
+to do more than is just?
+
+Of course, he said, for he claims to have more than all men.
+
+And the unjust man will strive and struggle to obtain more than the
+unjust man or action, in order that he may have more than all?
+
+True.
+
+We may put the matter thus, I said—the just does not desire more than
+his like but more than his unlike, whereas the unjust desires more than
+both his like and his unlike?
+
+Nothing, he said, can be better than that statement.
+
+And the unjust is good and wise, and the just is neither?
+
+Good again, he said.
+
+And is not the unjust like the wise and good and the just unlike them?
+
+Of course, he said, he who is of a certain nature, is like those who
+are of a certain nature; he who is not, not.
+
+Each of them, I said, is such as his like is?
+
+Certainly, he replied.
+
+Very good, Thrasymachus, I said; and now to take the case of the arts:
+you would admit that one man is a musician and another not a musician?
+
+Yes.
+
+And which is wise and which is foolish?
+
+Clearly the musician is wise, and he who is not a musician is foolish.
+
+And he is good in as far as he is wise, and bad in as far as he is
+foolish?
+
+Yes.
+
+And you would say the same sort of thing of the physician?
+
+Yes.
+
+And do you think, my excellent friend, that a musician when he adjusts
+the lyre would desire or claim to exceed or go beyond a musician in the
+tightening and loosening the strings?
+
+I do not think that he would.
+
+But he would claim to exceed the non-musician?
+
+Of course.
+
+And what would you say of the physician? In prescribing meats and
+drinks would he wish to go beyond another physician or beyond the
+practice of medicine?
+
+He would not.
+
+But he would wish to go beyond the non-physician?
+
+Yes.
+
+And about knowledge and ignorance in general; see whether you think
+that any man who has knowledge ever would wish to have the choice of
+saying or doing more than another man who has knowledge. Would he not
+rather say or do the same as his like in the same case?
+
+That, I suppose, can hardly be denied.
+
+And what of the ignorant? would he not desire to have more than either
+the knowing or the ignorant?
+
+I dare say.
+
+And the knowing is wise?
+
+Yes.
+
+And the wise is good?
+
+True.
+
+Then the wise and good will not desire to gain more than his like, but
+more than his unlike and opposite?
+
+I suppose so.
+
+Whereas the bad and ignorant will desire to gain more than both?
+
+Yes.
+
+But did we not say, Thrasymachus, that the unjust goes beyond both his
+like and unlike? Were not these your words?
+
+They were.
+
+And you also said that the just will not go beyond his like but his
+unlike?
+
+Yes.
+
+Then the just is like the wise and good, and the unjust like the evil
+and ignorant?
+
+That is the inference.
+
+And each of them is such as his like is?
+
+That was admitted.
+
+Then the just has turned out to be wise and good and the unjust evil
+and ignorant.
+
+Thrasymachus made all these admissions, not fluently, as I repeat them,
+but with extreme reluctance; it was a hot summer’s day, and the
+perspiration poured from him in torrents; and then I saw what I had
+never seen before, Thrasymachus blushing. As we were now agreed that
+justice was virtue and wisdom, and injustice vice and ignorance, I
+proceeded to another point:
+
+Well, I said, Thrasymachus, that matter is now settled; but were we not
+also saying that injustice had strength; do you remember?
+
+Yes, I remember, he said, but do not suppose that I approve of what you
+are saying or have no answer; if however I were to answer, you would be
+quite certain to accuse me of haranguing; therefore either permit me to
+have my say out, or if you would rather ask, do so, and I will answer
+‘Very good,’ as they say to story-telling old women, and will nod ‘Yes’
+and ‘No.’
+
+Certainly not, I said, if contrary to your real opinion.
+
+Yes, he said, I will, to please you, since you will not let me speak.
+What else would you have?
+
+Nothing in the world, I said; and if you are so disposed I will ask and
+you shall answer.
+
+Proceed.
+
+Then I will repeat the question which I asked before, in order that our
+examination of the relative nature of justice and injustice may be
+carried on regularly. A statement was made that injustice is stronger
+and more powerful than justice, but now justice, having been identified
+with wisdom and virtue, is easily shown to be stronger than injustice,
+if injustice is ignorance; this can no longer be questioned by any one.
+But I want to view the matter, Thrasymachus, in a different way: You
+would not deny that a state may be unjust and may be unjustly
+attempting to enslave other states, or may have already enslaved them,
+and may be holding many of them in subjection?
+
+True, he replied; and I will add that the best and most perfectly
+unjust state will be most likely to do so.
+
+I know, I said, that such was your position; but what I would further
+consider is, whether this power which is possessed by the superior
+state can exist or be exercised without justice or only with justice.
+
+If you are right in your view, and justice is wisdom, then only with
+justice; but if I am right, then without justice.
+
+I am delighted, Thrasymachus, to see you not only nodding assent and
+dissent, but making answers which are quite excellent.
+
+That is out of civility to you, he replied.
+
+You are very kind, I said; and would you have the goodness also to
+inform me, whether you think that a state, or an army, or a band of
+robbers and thieves, or any other gang of evil-doers could act at all
+if they injured one another?
+
+No indeed, he said, they could not.
+
+But if they abstained from injuring one another, then they might act
+together better?
+
+Yes.
+
+And this is because injustice creates divisions and hatreds and
+fighting, and justice imparts harmony and friendship; is not that true,
+Thrasymachus?
+
+I agree, he said, because I do not wish to quarrel with you.
+
+How good of you, I said; but I should like to know also whether
+injustice, having this tendency to arouse hatred, wherever existing,
+among slaves or among freemen, will not make them hate one another and
+set them at variance and render them incapable of common action?
+
+Certainly.
+
+And even if injustice be found in two only, will they not quarrel and
+fight, and become enemies to one another and to the just?
+
+They will.
+
+And suppose injustice abiding in a single person, would your wisdom say
+that she loses or that she retains her natural power?
+
+Let us assume that she retains her power.
+
+Yet is not the power which injustice exercises of such a nature that
+wherever she takes up her abode, whether in a city, in an army, in a
+family, or in any other body, that body is, to begin with, rendered
+incapable of united action by reason of sedition and distraction; and
+does it not become its own enemy and at variance with all that opposes
+it, and with the just? Is not this the case?
+
+Yes, certainly.
+
+And is not injustice equally fatal when existing in a single person; in
+the first place rendering him incapable of action because he is not at
+unity with himself, and in the second place making him an enemy to
+himself and the just? Is not that true, Thrasymachus?
+
+Yes.
+
+And O my friend, I said, surely the gods are just?
+
+Granted that they are.
+
+But if so, the unjust will be the enemy of the gods, and the just will
+be their friend?
+
+Feast away in triumph, and take your fill of the argument; I will not
+oppose you, lest I should displease the company.
+
+Well then, proceed with your answers, and let me have the remainder of
+my repast. For we have already shown that the just are clearly wiser
+and better and abler than the unjust, and that the unjust are incapable
+of common action; nay more, that to speak as we did of men who are evil
+acting at any time vigorously together, is not strictly true, for if
+they had been perfectly evil, they would have laid hands upon one
+another; but it is evident that there must have been some remnant of
+justice in them, which enabled them to combine; if there had not been
+they would have injured one another as well as their victims; they were
+but half-villains in their enterprises; for had they been whole
+villains, and utterly unjust, they would have been utterly incapable of
+action. That, as I believe, is the truth of the matter, and not what
+you said at first. But whether the just have a better and happier life
+than the unjust is a further question which we also proposed to
+consider. I think that they have, and for the reasons which I have
+given; but still I should like to examine further, for no light matter
+is at stake, nothing less than the rule of human life.
+
+Proceed.
+
+I will proceed by asking a question: Would you not say that a horse has
+some end?
+
+I should.
+
+And the end or use of a horse or of anything would be that which could
+not be accomplished, or not so well accomplished, by any other thing?
+
+I do not understand, he said.
+
+Let me explain: Can you see, except with the eye?
+
+Certainly not.
+
+Or hear, except with the ear?
+
+No.
+
+These then may be truly said to be the ends of these organs?
+
+They may.
+
+But you can cut off a vine-branch with a dagger or with a chisel, and
+in many other ways?
+
+Of course.
+
+And yet not so well as with a pruning-hook made for the purpose?
+
+True.
+
+May we not say that this is the end of a pruning-hook?
+
+We may.
+
+Then now I think you will have no difficulty in understanding my
+meaning when I asked the question whether the end of anything would be
+that which could not be accomplished, or not so well accomplished, by
+any other thing?
+
+I understand your meaning, he said, and assent.
+
+And that to which an end is appointed has also an excellence? Need I
+ask again whether the eye has an end?
+
+It has.
+
+And has not the eye an excellence?
+
+Yes.
+
+And the ear has an end and an excellence also?
+
+True.
+
+And the same is true of all other things; they have each of them an end
+and a special excellence?
+
+That is so.
+
+Well, and can the eyes fulfil their end if they are wanting in their
+own proper excellence and have a defect instead?
+
+How can they, he said, if they are blind and cannot see?
+
+You mean to say, if they have lost their proper excellence, which is
+sight; but I have not arrived at that point yet. I would rather ask the
+question more generally, and only enquire whether the things which
+fulfil their ends fulfil them by their own proper excellence, and fail
+of fulfilling them by their own defect?
+
+Certainly, he replied.
+
+I might say the same of the ears; when deprived of their own proper
+excellence they cannot fulfil their end?
+
+True.
+
+And the same observation will apply to all other things?
+
+I agree.
+
+Well; and has not the soul an end which nothing else can fulfil? for
+example, to superintend and command and deliberate and the like. Are
+not these functions proper to the soul, and can they rightly be
+assigned to any other?
+
+To no other.
+
+And is not life to be reckoned among the ends of the soul?
+
+Assuredly, he said.
+
+And has not the soul an excellence also?
+
+Yes.
+
+And can she or can she not fulfil her own ends when deprived of that
+excellence?
+
+She cannot.
+
+Then an evil soul must necessarily be an evil ruler and superintendent,
+and the good soul a good ruler?
+
+Yes, necessarily.
+
+And we have admitted that justice is the excellence of the soul, and
+injustice the defect of the soul?
+
+That has been admitted.
+
+Then the just soul and the just man will live well, and the unjust man
+will live ill?
+
+That is what your argument proves.
+
+And he who lives well is blessed and happy, and he who lives ill the
+reverse of happy?
+
+Certainly.
+
+Then the just is happy, and the unjust miserable?
+
+So be it.
+
+But happiness and not misery is profitable.
+
+Of course.
+
+Then, my blessed Thrasymachus, injustice can never be more profitable
+than justice.
+
+Let this, Socrates, he said, be your entertainment at the Bendidea.
+
+For which I am indebted to you, I said, now that you have grown gentle
+towards me and have left off scolding. Nevertheless, I have not been
+well entertained; but that was my own fault and not yours. As an
+epicure snatches a taste of every dish which is successively brought to
+table, he not having allowed himself time to enjoy the one before, so
+have I gone from one subject to another without having discovered what
+I sought at first, the nature of justice. I left that enquiry and
+turned away to consider whether justice is virtue and wisdom or evil
+and folly; and when there arose a further question about the
+comparative advantages of justice and injustice, I could not refrain
+from passing on to that. And the result of the whole discussion has
+been that I know nothing at all. For I know not what justice is, and
+therefore I am not likely to know whether it is or is not a virtue, nor
+can I say whether the just man is happy or unhappy.
+
+
+
+
+ BOOK II.
+
+
+With these words I was thinking that I had made an end of the
+discussion; but the end, in truth, proved to be only a beginning. For
+Glaucon, who is always the most pugnacious of men, was dissatisfied at
+Thrasymachus’ retirement; he wanted to have the battle out. So he said
+to me: Socrates, do you wish really to persuade us, or only to seem to
+have persuaded us, that to be just is always better than to be unjust?
+
+I should wish really to persuade you, I replied, if I could.
+
+Then you certainly have not succeeded. Let me ask you now:—How would
+you arrange goods—are there not some which we welcome for their own
+sakes, and independently of their consequences, as, for example,
+harmless pleasures and enjoyments, which delight us at the time,
+although nothing follows from them?
+
+I agree in thinking that there is such a class, I replied.
+
+Is there not also a second class of goods, such as knowledge, sight,
+health, which are desirable not only in themselves, but also for their
+results?
+
+Certainly, I said.
+
+And would you not recognize a third class, such as gymnastic, and the
+care of the sick, and the physician’s art; also the various ways of
+money-making—these do us good but we regard them as disagreeable; and
+no one would choose them for their own sakes, but only for the sake of
+some reward or result which flows from them?
+
+There is, I said, this third class also. But why do you ask?
+
+Because I want to know in which of the three classes you would place
+justice?
+
+In the highest class, I replied,—among those goods which he who would
+be happy desires both for their own sake and for the sake of their
+results.
+
+Then the many are of another mind; they think that justice is to be
+reckoned in the troublesome class, among goods which are to be pursued
+for the sake of rewards and of reputation, but in themselves are
+disagreeable and rather to be avoided.
+
+I know, I said, that this is their manner of thinking, and that this
+was the thesis which Thrasymachus was maintaining just now, when he
+censured justice and praised injustice. But I am too stupid to be
+convinced by him.
+
+I wish, he said, that you would hear me as well as him, and then I
+shall see whether you and I agree. For Thrasymachus seems to me, like a
+snake, to have been charmed by your voice sooner than he ought to have
+been; but to my mind the nature of justice and injustice have not yet
+been made clear. Setting aside their rewards and results, I want to
+know what they are in themselves, and how they inwardly work in the
+soul. If you, please, then, I will revive the argument of Thrasymachus.
+And first I will speak of the nature and origin of justice according to
+the common view of them. Secondly, I will show that all men who
+practise justice do so against their will, of necessity, but not as a
+good. And thirdly, I will argue that there is reason in this view, for
+the life of the unjust is after all better far than the life of the
+just—if what they say is true, Socrates, since I myself am not of their
+opinion. But still I acknowledge that I am perplexed when I hear the
+voices of Thrasymachus and myriads of others dinning in my ears; and,
+on the other hand, I have never yet heard the superiority of justice to
+injustice maintained by any one in a satisfactory way. I want to hear
+justice praised in respect of itself; then I shall be satisfied, and
+you are the person from whom I think that I am most likely to hear
+this; and therefore I will praise the unjust life to the utmost of my
+power, and my manner of speaking will indicate the manner in which I
+desire to hear you too praising justice and censuring injustice. Will
+you say whether you approve of my proposal?
+
+Indeed I do; nor can I imagine any theme about which a man of sense
+would oftener wish to converse.
+
+I am delighted, he replied, to hear you say so, and shall begin by
+speaking, as I proposed, of the nature and origin of justice.
+
+They say that to do injustice is, by nature, good; to suffer injustice,
+evil; but that the evil is greater than the good. And so when men have
+both done and suffered injustice and have had experience of both, not
+being able to avoid the one and obtain the other, they think that they
+had better agree among themselves to have neither; hence there arise
+laws and mutual covenants; and that which is ordained by law is termed
+by them lawful and just. This they affirm to be the origin and nature
+of justice;—it is a mean or compromise, between the best of all, which
+is to do injustice and not be punished, and the worst of all, which is
+to suffer injustice without the power of retaliation; and justice,
+being at a middle point between the two, is tolerated not as a good,
+but as the lesser evil, and honoured by reason of the inability of men
+to do injustice. For no man who is worthy to be called a man would ever
+submit to such an agreement if he were able to resist; he would be mad
+if he did. Such is the received account, Socrates, of the nature and
+origin of justice.
+
+Now that those who practise justice do so involuntarily and because
+they have not the power to be unjust will best appear if we imagine
+something of this kind: having given both to the just and the unjust
+power to do what they will, let us watch and see whither desire will
+lead them; then we shall discover in the very act the just and unjust
+man to be proceeding along the same road, following their interest,
+which all natures deem to be their good, and are only diverted into the
+path of justice by the force of law. The liberty which we are supposing
+may be most completely given to them in the form of such a power as is
+said to have been possessed by Gyges, the ancestor of Croesus the
+Lydian. According to the tradition, Gyges was a shepherd in the service
+of the king of Lydia; there was a great storm, and an earthquake made
+an opening in the earth at the place where he was feeding his flock.
+Amazed at the sight, he descended into the opening, where, among other
+marvels, he beheld a hollow brazen horse, having doors, at which he
+stooping and looking in saw a dead body of stature, as appeared to him,
+more than human, and having nothing on but a gold ring; this he took
+from the finger of the dead and reascended. Now the shepherds met
+together, according to custom, that they might send their monthly
+report about the flocks to the king; into their assembly he came having
+the ring on his finger, and as he was sitting among them he chanced to
+turn the collet of the ring inside his hand, when instantly he became
+invisible to the rest of the company and they began to speak of him as
+if he were no longer present. He was astonished at this, and again
+touching the ring he turned the collet outwards and reappeared; he made
+several trials of the ring, and always with the same result—when he
+turned the collet inwards he became invisible, when outwards he
+reappeared. Whereupon he contrived to be chosen one of the messengers
+who were sent to the court; whereas soon as he arrived he seduced the
+queen, and with her help conspired against the king and slew him, and
+took the kingdom. Suppose now that there were two such magic rings, and
+the just put on one of them and the unjust the other; no man can be
+imagined to be of such an iron nature that he would stand fast in
+justice. No man would keep his hands off what was not his own when he
+could safely take what he liked out of the market, or go into houses
+and lie with any one at his pleasure, or kill or release from prison
+whom he would, and in all respects be like a God among men. Then the
+actions of the just would be as the actions of the unjust; they would
+both come at last to the same point. And this we may truly affirm to be
+a great proof that a man is just, not willingly or because he thinks
+that justice is any good to him individually, but of necessity, for
+wherever any one thinks that he can safely be unjust, there he is
+unjust. For all men believe in their hearts that injustice is far more
+profitable to the individual than justice, and he who argues as I have
+been supposing, will say that they are right. If you could imagine any
+one obtaining this power of becoming invisible, and never doing any
+wrong or touching what was another’s, he would be thought by the
+lookers-on to be a most wretched idiot, although they would praise him
+to one another’s faces, and keep up appearances with one another from a
+fear that they too might suffer injustice. Enough of this.
+
+Now, if we are to form a real judgment of the life of the just and
+unjust, we must isolate them; there is no other way; and how is the
+isolation to be effected? I answer: Let the unjust man be entirely
+unjust, and the just man entirely just; nothing is to be taken away
+from either of them, and both are to be perfectly furnished for the
+work of their respective lives. First, let the unjust be like other
+distinguished masters of craft; like the skilful pilot or physician,
+who knows intuitively his own powers and keeps within their limits, and
+who, if he fails at any point, is able to recover himself. So let the
+unjust make his unjust attempts in the right way, and lie hidden if he
+means to be great in his injustice: (he who is found out is nobody:)
+for the highest reach of injustice is, to be deemed just when you are
+not. Therefore I say that in the perfectly unjust man we must assume
+the most perfect injustice; there is to be no deduction, but we must
+allow him, while doing the most unjust acts, to have acquired the
+greatest reputation for justice. If he have taken a false step he must
+be able to recover himself; he must be one who can speak with effect,
+if any of his deeds come to light, and who can force his way where
+force is required by his courage and strength, and command of money and
+friends. And at his side let us place the just man in his nobleness and
+simplicity, wishing, as Aeschylus says, to be and not to seem good.
+There must be no seeming, for if he seem to be just he will be honoured
+and rewarded, and then we shall not know whether he is just for the
+sake of justice or for the sake of honours and rewards; therefore, let
+him be clothed in justice only, and have no other covering; and he must
+be imagined in a state of life the opposite of the former. Let him be
+the best of men, and let him be thought the worst; then he will have
+been put to the proof; and we shall see whether he will be affected by
+the fear of infamy and its consequences. And let him continue thus to
+the hour of death; being just and seeming to be unjust. When both have
+reached the uttermost extreme, the one of justice and the other of
+injustice, let judgment be given which of them is the happier of the
+two.
+
+Heavens! my dear Glaucon, I said, how energetically you polish them up
+for the decision, first one and then the other, as if they were two
+statues.
+
+I do my best, he said. And now that we know what they are like there is
+no difficulty in tracing out the sort of life which awaits either of
+them. This I will proceed to describe; but as you may think the
+description a little too coarse, I ask you to suppose, Socrates, that
+the words which follow are not mine.—Let me put them into the mouths of
+the eulogists of injustice: They will tell you that the just man who is
+thought unjust will be scourged, racked, bound—will have his eyes burnt
+out; and, at last, after suffering every kind of evil, he will be
+impaled: Then he will understand that he ought to seem only, and not to
+be, just; the words of Aeschylus may be more truly spoken of the unjust
+than of the just. For the unjust is pursuing a reality; he does not
+live with a view to appearances—he wants to be really unjust and not to
+seem only:—
+
+‘His mind has a soil deep and fertile, Out of which spring his prudent
+counsels.’
+
+In the first place, he is thought just, and therefore bears rule in the
+city; he can marry whom he will, and give in marriage to whom he will;
+also he can trade and deal where he likes, and always to his own
+advantage, because he has no misgivings about injustice; and at every
+contest, whether in public or private, he gets the better of his
+antagonists, and gains at their expense, and is rich, and out of his
+gains he can benefit his friends, and harm his enemies; moreover, he
+can offer sacrifices, and dedicate gifts to the gods abundantly and
+magnificently, and can honour the gods or any man whom he wants to
+honour in a far better style than the just, and therefore he is likely
+to be dearer than they are to the gods. And thus, Socrates, gods and
+men are said to unite in making the life of the unjust better than the
+life of the just.
+
+I was going to say something in answer to Glaucon, when Adeimantus, his
+brother, interposed: Socrates, he said, you do not suppose that there
+is nothing more to be urged?
+
+Why, what else is there? I answered.
+
+The strongest point of all has not been even mentioned, he replied.
+
+Well, then, according to the proverb, ‘Let brother help brother’—if he
+fails in any part do you assist him; although I must confess that
+Glaucon has already said quite enough to lay me in the dust, and take
+from me the power of helping justice.
+
+Nonsense, he replied. But let me add something more: There is another
+side to Glaucon’s argument about the praise and censure of justice and
+injustice, which is equally required in order to bring out what I
+believe to be his meaning. Parents and tutors are always telling their
+sons and their wards that they are to be just; but why? not for the
+sake of justice, but for the sake of character and reputation; in the
+hope of obtaining for him who is reputed just some of those offices,
+marriages, and the like which Glaucon has enumerated among the
+advantages accruing to the unjust from the reputation of justice. More,
+however, is made of appearances by this class of persons than by the
+others; for they throw in the good opinion of the gods, and will tell
+you of a shower of benefits which the heavens, as they say, rain upon
+the pious; and this accords with the testimony of the noble Hesiod and
+Homer, the first of whom says, that the gods make the oaks of the just—
+
+ ‘To bear acorns at their summit, and bees in the middle;
+And the sheep are bowed down with the weight of their fleeces,’
+
+
+and many other blessings of a like kind are provided for them. And
+Homer has a very similar strain; for he speaks of one whose fame is—
+
+‘As the fame of some blameless king who, like a god, Maintains justice;
+to whom the black earth brings forth Wheat and barley, whose trees are
+bowed with fruit, And his sheep never fail to bear, and the sea gives
+him fish.’
+
+Still grander are the gifts of heaven which Musaeus and his son
+vouchsafe to the just; they take them down into the world below, where
+they have the saints lying on couches at a feast, everlastingly drunk,
+crowned with garlands; their idea seems to be that an immortality of
+drunkenness is the highest meed of virtue. Some extend their rewards
+yet further; the posterity, as they say, of the faithful and just shall
+survive to the third and fourth generation. This is the style in which
+they praise justice. But about the wicked there is another strain; they
+bury them in a slough in Hades, and make them carry water in a sieve;
+also while they are yet living they bring them to infamy, and inflict
+upon them the punishments which Glaucon described as the portion of the
+just who are reputed to be unjust; nothing else does their invention
+supply. Such is their manner of praising the one and censuring the
+other.
+
+Once more, Socrates, I will ask you to consider another way of speaking
+about justice and injustice, which is not confined to the poets, but is
+found in prose writers. The universal voice of mankind is always
+declaring that justice and virtue are honourable, but grievous and
+toilsome; and that the pleasures of vice and injustice are easy of
+attainment, and are only censured by law and opinion. They say also
+that honesty is for the most part less profitable than dishonesty; and
+they are quite ready to call wicked men happy, and to honour them both
+in public and private when they are rich or in any other way
+influential, while they despise and overlook those who may be weak and
+poor, even though acknowledging them to be better than the others. But
+most extraordinary of all is their mode of speaking about virtue and
+the gods: they say that the gods apportion calamity and misery to many
+good men, and good and happiness to the wicked. And mendicant prophets
+go to rich men’s doors and persuade them that they have a power
+committed to them by the gods of making an atonement for a man’s own or
+his ancestor’s sins by sacrifices or charms, with rejoicings and
+feasts; and they promise to harm an enemy, whether just or unjust, at a
+small cost; with magic arts and incantations binding heaven, as they
+say, to execute their will. And the poets are the authorities to whom
+they appeal, now smoothing the path of vice with the words of Hesiod;—
+
+‘Vice may be had in abundance without trouble; the way is smooth and
+her dwelling-place is near. But before virtue the gods have set toil,’
+
+and a tedious and uphill road: then citing Homer as a witness that the
+gods may be influenced by men; for he also says:—
+
+‘The gods, too, may be turned from their purpose; and men pray to them
+and avert their wrath by sacrifices and soothing entreaties, and by
+libations and the odour of fat, when they have sinned and
+transgressed.’
+
+And they produce a host of books written by Musaeus and Orpheus, who
+were children of the Moon and the Muses—that is what they say—according
+to which they perform their ritual, and persuade not only individuals,
+but whole cities, that expiations and atonements for sin may be made by
+sacrifices and amusements which fill a vacant hour, and are equally at
+the service of the living and the dead; the latter sort they call
+mysteries, and they redeem us from the pains of hell, but if we neglect
+them no one knows what awaits us.
+
+He proceeded: And now when the young hear all this said about virtue
+and vice, and the way in which gods and men regard them, how are their
+minds likely to be affected, my dear Socrates,—those of them, I mean,
+who are quickwitted, and, like bees on the wing, light on every flower,
+and from all that they hear are prone to draw conclusions as to what
+manner of persons they should be and in what way they should walk if
+they would make the best of life? Probably the youth will say to
+himself in the words of Pindar—
+
+‘Can I by justice or by crooked ways of deceit ascend a loftier tower
+which may be a fortress to me all my days?’
+
+For what men say is that, if I am really just and am not also thought
+just profit there is none, but the pain and loss on the other hand are
+unmistakeable. But if, though unjust, I acquire the reputation of
+justice, a heavenly life is promised to me. Since then, as philosophers
+prove, appearance tyrannizes over truth and is lord of happiness, to
+appearance I must devote myself. I will describe around me a picture
+and shadow of virtue to be the vestibule and exterior of my house;
+behind I will trail the subtle and crafty fox, as Archilochus, greatest
+of sages, recommends. But I hear some one exclaiming that the
+concealment of wickedness is often difficult; to which I answer,
+Nothing great is easy. Nevertheless, the argument indicates this, if we
+would be happy, to be the path along which we should proceed. With a
+view to concealment we will establish secret brotherhoods and political
+clubs. And there are professors of rhetoric who teach the art of
+persuading courts and assemblies; and so, partly by persuasion and
+partly by force, I shall make unlawful gains and not be punished. Still
+I hear a voice saying that the gods cannot be deceived, neither can
+they be compelled. But what if there are no gods? or, suppose them to
+have no care of human things—why in either case should we mind about
+concealment? And even if there are gods, and they do care about us, yet
+we know of them only from tradition and the genealogies of the poets;
+and these are the very persons who say that they may be influenced and
+turned by ‘sacrifices and soothing entreaties and by offerings.’ Let us
+be consistent then, and believe both or neither. If the poets speak
+truly, why then we had better be unjust, and offer of the fruits of
+injustice; for if we are just, although we may escape the vengeance of
+heaven, we shall lose the gains of injustice; but, if we are unjust, we
+shall keep the gains, and by our sinning and praying, and praying and
+sinning, the gods will be propitiated, and we shall not be punished.
+‘But there is a world below in which either we or our posterity will
+suffer for our unjust deeds.’ Yes, my friend, will be the reflection,
+but there are mysteries and atoning deities, and these have great
+power. That is what mighty cities declare; and the children of the
+gods, who were their poets and prophets, bear a like testimony.
+
+On what principle, then, shall we any longer choose justice rather than
+the worst injustice? when, if we only unite the latter with a deceitful
+regard to appearances, we shall fare to our mind both with gods and
+men, in life and after death, as the most numerous and the highest
+authorities tell us. Knowing all this, Socrates, how can a man who has
+any superiority of mind or person or rank or wealth, be willing to
+honour justice; or indeed to refrain from laughing when he hears
+justice praised? And even if there should be some one who is able to
+disprove the truth of my words, and who is satisfied that justice is
+best, still he is not angry with the unjust, but is very ready to
+forgive them, because he also knows that men are not just of their own
+free will; unless, peradventure, there be some one whom the divinity
+within him may have inspired with a hatred of injustice, or who has
+attained knowledge of the truth—but no other man. He only blames
+injustice who, owing to cowardice or age or some weakness, has not the
+power of being unjust. And this is proved by the fact that when he
+obtains the power, he immediately becomes unjust as far as he can be.
+
+The cause of all this, Socrates, was indicated by us at the beginning
+of the argument, when my brother and I told you how astonished we were
+to find that of all the professing panegyrists of justice—beginning
+with the ancient heroes of whom any memorial has been preserved to us,
+and ending with the men of our own time—no one has ever blamed
+injustice or praised justice except with a view to the glories,
+honours, and benefits which flow from them. No one has ever adequately
+described either in verse or prose the true essential nature of either
+of them abiding in the soul, and invisible to any human or divine eye;
+or shown that of all the things of a man’s soul which he has within
+him, justice is the greatest good, and injustice the greatest evil. Had
+this been the universal strain, had you sought to persuade us of this
+from our youth upwards, we should not have been on the watch to keep
+one another from doing wrong, but every one would have been his own
+watchman, because afraid, if he did wrong, of harbouring in himself the
+greatest of evils. I dare say that Thrasymachus and others would
+seriously hold the language which I have been merely repeating, and
+words even stronger than these about justice and injustice, grossly, as
+I conceive, perverting their true nature. But I speak in this vehement
+manner, as I must frankly confess to you, because I want to hear from
+you the opposite side; and I would ask you to show not only the
+superiority which justice has over injustice, but what effect they have
+on the possessor of them which makes the one to be a good and the other
+an evil to him. And please, as Glaucon requested of you, to exclude
+reputations; for unless you take away from each of them his true
+reputation and add on the false, we shall say that you do not praise
+justice, but the appearance of it; we shall think that you are only
+exhorting us to keep injustice dark, and that you really agree with
+Thrasymachus in thinking that justice is another’s good and the
+interest of the stronger, and that injustice is a man’s own profit and
+interest, though injurious to the weaker. Now as you have admitted that
+justice is one of that highest class of goods which are desired indeed
+for their results, but in a far greater degree for their own sakes—like
+sight or hearing or knowledge or health, or any other real and natural
+and not merely conventional good—I would ask you in your praise of
+justice to regard one point only: I mean the essential good and evil
+which justice and injustice work in the possessors of them. Let others
+praise justice and censure injustice, magnifying the rewards and
+honours of the one and abusing the other; that is a manner of arguing
+which, coming from them, I am ready to tolerate, but from you who have
+spent your whole life in the consideration of this question, unless I
+hear the contrary from your own lips, I expect something better. And
+therefore, I say, not only prove to us that justice is better than
+injustice, but show what they either of them do to the possessor of
+them, which makes the one to be a good and the other an evil, whether
+seen or unseen by gods and men.
+
+I had always admired the genius of Glaucon and Adeimantus, but on
+hearing these words I was quite delighted, and said: Sons of an
+illustrious father, that was not a bad beginning of the Elegiac verses
+which the admirer of Glaucon made in honour of you after you had
+distinguished yourselves at the battle of Megara:—
+
+‘Sons of Ariston,’ he sang, ‘divine offspring of an illustrious hero.’
+
+The epithet is very appropriate, for there is something truly divine in
+being able to argue as you have done for the superiority of injustice,
+and remaining unconvinced by your own arguments. And I do believe that
+you are not convinced—this I infer from your general character, for had
+I judged only from your speeches I should have mistrusted you. But now,
+the greater my confidence in you, the greater is my difficulty in
+knowing what to say. For I am in a strait between two; on the one hand
+I feel that I am unequal to the task; and my inability is brought home
+to me by the fact that you were not satisfied with the answer which I
+made to Thrasymachus, proving, as I thought, the superiority which
+justice has over injustice. And yet I cannot refuse to help, while
+breath and speech remain to me; I am afraid that there would be an
+impiety in being present when justice is evil spoken of and not lifting
+up a hand in her defence. And therefore I had best give such help as I
+can.
+
+Glaucon and the rest entreated me by all means not to let the question
+drop, but to proceed in the investigation. They wanted to arrive at the
+truth, first, about the nature of justice and injustice, and secondly,
+about their relative advantages. I told them, what I really thought,
+that the enquiry would be of a serious nature, and would require very
+good eyes. Seeing then, I said, that we are no great wits, I think that
+we had better adopt a method which I may illustrate thus; suppose that
+a short-sighted person had been asked by some one to read small letters
+from a distance; and it occurred to some one else that they might be
+found in another place which was larger and in which the letters were
+larger—if they were the same and he could read the larger letters
+first, and then proceed to the lesser—this would have been thought a
+rare piece of good fortune.
+
+Very true, said Adeimantus; but how does the illustration apply to our
+enquiry?
+
+I will tell you, I replied; justice, which is the subject of our
+enquiry, is, as you know, sometimes spoken of as the virtue of an
+individual, and sometimes as the virtue of a State.
+
+True, he replied.
+
+And is not a State larger than an individual?
+
+It is.
+
+Then in the larger the quantity of justice is likely to be larger and
+more easily discernible. I propose therefore that we enquire into the
+nature of justice and injustice, first as they appear in the State, and
+secondly in the individual, proceeding from the greater to the lesser
+and comparing them.
+
+That, he said, is an excellent proposal.
+
+And if we imagine the State in process of creation, we shall see the
+justice and injustice of the State in process of creation also.
+
+I dare say.
+
+When the State is completed there may be a hope that the object of our
+search will be more easily discovered.
+
+Yes, far more easily.
+
+But ought we to attempt to construct one? I said; for to do so, as I am
+inclined to think, will be a very serious task. Reflect therefore.
+
+I have reflected, said Adeimantus, and am anxious that you should
+proceed.
+
+A State, I said, arises, as I conceive, out of the needs of mankind; no
+one is self-sufficing, but all of us have many wants. Can any other
+origin of a State be imagined?
+
+There can be no other.
+
+Then, as we have many wants, and many persons are needed to supply
+them, one takes a helper for one purpose and another for another; and
+when these partners and helpers are gathered together in one habitation
+the body of inhabitants is termed a State.
+
+True, he said.
+
+And they exchange with one another, and one gives, and another
+receives, under the idea that the exchange will be for their good.
+
+Very true.
+
+Then, I said, let us begin and create in idea a State; and yet the true
+creator is necessity, who is the mother of our invention.
+
+Of course, he replied.
+
+Now the first and greatest of necessities is food, which is the
+condition of life and existence.
+
+Certainly.
+
+The second is a dwelling, and the third clothing and the like.
+
+True.
+
+And now let us see how our city will be able to supply this great
+demand: We may suppose that one man is a husbandman, another a builder,
+some one else a weaver—shall we add to them a shoemaker, or perhaps
+some other purveyor to our bodily wants?
+
+Quite right.
+
+The barest notion of a State must include four or five men.
+
+Clearly.
+
+And how will they proceed? Will each bring the result of his labours
+into a common stock?—the individual husbandman, for example, producing
+for four, and labouring four times as long and as much as he need in
+the provision of food with which he supplies others as well as himself;
+or will he have nothing to do with others and not be at the trouble of
+producing for them, but provide for himself alone a fourth of the food
+in a fourth of the time, and in the remaining three fourths of his time
+be employed in making a house or a coat or a pair of shoes, having no
+partnership with others, but supplying himself all his own wants?
+
+Adeimantus thought that he should aim at producing food only and not at
+producing everything.
+
+Probably, I replied, that would be the better way; and when I hear you
+say this, I am myself reminded that we are not all alike; there are
+diversities of natures among us which are adapted to different
+occupations.
+
+Very true.
+
+And will you have a work better done when the workman has many
+occupations, or when he has only one?
+
+When he has only one.
+
+Further, there can be no doubt that a work is spoilt when not done at
+the right time?
+
+No doubt.
+
+For business is not disposed to wait until the doer of the business is
+at leisure; but the doer must follow up what he is doing, and make the
+business his first object.
+
+He must.
+
+And if so, we must infer that all things are produced more plentifully
+and easily and of a better quality when one man does one thing which is
+natural to him and does it at the right time, and leaves other things.
+
+Undoubtedly.
+
+Then more than four citizens will be required; for the husbandman will
+not make his own plough or mattock, or other implements of agriculture,
+if they are to be good for anything. Neither will the builder make his
+tools—and he too needs many; and in like manner the weaver and
+shoemaker.
+
+True.
+
+Then carpenters, and smiths, and many other artisans, will be sharers
+in our little State, which is already beginning to grow?
+
+True.
+
+Yet even if we add neatherds, shepherds, and other herdsmen, in order
+that our husbandmen may have oxen to plough with, and builders as well
+as husbandmen may have draught cattle, and curriers and weavers fleeces
+and hides,—still our State will not be very large.
+
+That is true; yet neither will it be a very small State which contains
+all these.
+
+Then, again, there is the situation of the city—to find a place where
+nothing need be imported is wellnigh impossible.
+
+Impossible.
+
+Then there must be another class of citizens who will bring the
+required supply from another city?
+
+There must.
+
+But if the trader goes empty-handed, having nothing which they require
+who would supply his need, he will come back empty-handed.
+
+That is certain.
+
+And therefore what they produce at home must be not only enough for
+themselves, but such both in quantity and quality as to accommodate
+those from whom their wants are supplied.
+
+Very true.
+
+Then more husbandmen and more artisans will be required?
+
+They will.
+
+Not to mention the importers and exporters, who are called merchants?
+
+Yes.
+
+Then we shall want merchants?
+
+We shall.
+
+And if merchandise is to be carried over the sea, skilful sailors will
+also be needed, and in considerable numbers?
+
+Yes, in considerable numbers.
+
+Then, again, within the city, how will they exchange their productions?
+To secure such an exchange was, as you will remember, one of our
+principal objects when we formed them into a society and constituted a
+State.
+
+Clearly they will buy and sell.
+
+Then they will need a market-place, and a money-token for purposes of
+exchange.
+
+Certainly.
+
+Suppose now that a husbandman, or an artisan, brings some production to
+market, and he comes at a time when there is no one to exchange with
+him,—is he to leave his calling and sit idle in the market-place?
+
+Not at all; he will find people there who, seeing the want, undertake
+the office of salesmen. In well-ordered states they are commonly those
+who are the weakest in bodily strength, and therefore of little use for
+any other purpose; their duty is to be in the market, and to give money
+in exchange for goods to those who desire to sell and to take money
+from those who desire to buy.
+
+This want, then, creates a class of retail-traders in our State. Is not
+‘retailer’ the term which is applied to those who sit in the
+market-place engaged in buying and selling, while those who wander from
+one city to another are called merchants?
+
+Yes, he said.
+
+And there is another class of servants, who are intellectually hardly
+on the level of companionship; still they have plenty of bodily
+strength for labour, which accordingly they sell, and are called, if I
+do not mistake, hirelings, hire being the name which is given to the
+price of their labour.
+
+True.
+
+Then hirelings will help to make up our population?
+
+Yes.
+
+And now, Adeimantus, is our State matured and perfected?
+
+I think so.
+
+Where, then, is justice, and where is injustice, and in what part of
+the State did they spring up?
+
+Probably in the dealings of these citizens with one another. I cannot
+imagine that they are more likely to be found any where else.
+
+I dare say that you are right in your suggestion, I said; we had better
+think the matter out, and not shrink from the enquiry.
+
+Let us then consider, first of all, what will be their way of life, now
+that we have thus established them. Will they not produce corn, and
+wine, and clothes, and shoes, and build houses for themselves? And when
+they are housed, they will work, in summer, commonly, stripped and
+barefoot, but in winter substantially clothed and shod. They will feed
+on barley-meal and flour of wheat, baking and kneading them, making
+noble cakes and loaves; these they will serve up on a mat of reeds or
+on clean leaves, themselves reclining the while upon beds strewn with
+yew or myrtle. And they and their children will feast, drinking of the
+wine which they have made, wearing garlands on their heads, and hymning
+the praises of the gods, in happy converse with one another. And they
+will take care that their families do not exceed their means; having an
+eye to poverty or war.
+
+But, said Glaucon, interposing, you have not given them a relish to
+their meal.
+
+True, I replied, I had forgotten; of course they must have a
+relish—salt, and olives, and cheese, and they will boil roots and herbs
+such as country people prepare; for a dessert we shall give them figs,
+and peas, and beans; and they will roast myrtle-berries and acorns at
+the fire, drinking in moderation. And with such a diet they may be
+expected to live in peace and health to a good old age, and bequeath a
+similar life to their children after them.
+
+Yes, Socrates, he said, and if you were providing for a city of pigs,
+how else would you feed the beasts?
+
+But what would you have, Glaucon? I replied.
+
+Why, he said, you should give them the ordinary conveniences of life.
+People who are to be comfortable are accustomed to lie on sofas, and
+dine off tables, and they should have sauces and sweets in the modern
+style.
+
+Yes, I said, now I understand: the question which you would have me
+consider is, not only how a State, but how a luxurious State is
+created; and possibly there is no harm in this, for in such a State we
+shall be more likely to see how justice and injustice originate. In my
+opinion the true and healthy constitution of the State is the one which
+I have described. But if you wish also to see a State at fever-heat, I
+have no objection. For I suspect that many will not be satisfied with
+the simpler way of life. They will be for adding sofas, and tables, and
+other furniture; also dainties, and perfumes, and incense, and
+courtesans, and cakes, all these not of one sort only, but in every
+variety; we must go beyond the necessaries of which I was at first
+speaking, such as houses, and clothes, and shoes: the arts of the
+painter and the embroiderer will have to be set in motion, and gold and
+ivory and all sorts of materials must be procured.
+
+True, he said.
+
+Then we must enlarge our borders; for the original healthy State is no
+longer sufficient. Now will the city have to fill and swell with a
+multitude of callings which are not required by any natural want; such
+as the whole tribe of hunters and actors, of whom one large class have
+to do with forms and colours; another will be the votaries of
+music—poets and their attendant train of rhapsodists, players, dancers,
+contractors; also makers of divers kinds of articles, including women’s
+dresses. And we shall want more servants. Will not tutors be also in
+request, and nurses wet and dry, tirewomen and barbers, as well as
+confectioners and cooks; and swineherds, too, who were not needed and
+therefore had no place in the former edition of our State, but are
+needed now? They must not be forgotten: and there will be animals of
+many other kinds, if people eat them.
+
+Certainly.
+
+And living in this way we shall have much greater need of physicians
+than before?
+
+Much greater.
+
+And the country which was enough to support the original inhabitants
+will be too small now, and not enough?
+
+Quite true.
+
+Then a slice of our neighbours’ land will be wanted by us for pasture
+and tillage, and they will want a slice of ours, if, like ourselves,
+they exceed the limit of necessity, and give themselves up to the
+unlimited accumulation of wealth?
+
+That, Socrates, will be inevitable.
+
+And so we shall go to war, Glaucon. Shall we not?
+
+Most certainly, he replied.
+
+Then without determining as yet whether war does good or harm, thus
+much we may affirm, that now we have discovered war to be derived from
+causes which are also the causes of almost all the evils in States,
+private as well as public.
+
+Undoubtedly.
+
+And our State must once more enlarge; and this time the enlargement
+will be nothing short of a whole army, which will have to go out and
+fight with the invaders for all that we have, as well as for the things
+and persons whom we were describing above.
+
+Why? he said; are they not capable of defending themselves?
+
+No, I said; not if we were right in the principle which was
+acknowledged by all of us when we were framing the State: the
+principle, as you will remember, was that one man cannot practise many
+arts with success.
+
+Very true, he said.
+
+But is not war an art?
+
+Certainly.
+
+And an art requiring as much attention as shoemaking?
+
+Quite true.
+
+And the shoemaker was not allowed by us to be a husbandman, or a
+weaver, or a builder—in order that we might have our shoes well made;
+but to him and to every other worker was assigned one work for which he
+was by nature fitted, and at that he was to continue working all his
+life long and at no other; he was not to let opportunities slip, and
+then he would become a good workman. Now nothing can be more important
+than that the work of a soldier should be well done. But is war an art
+so easily acquired that a man may be a warrior who is also a
+husbandman, or shoemaker, or other artisan; although no one in the
+world would be a good dice or draught player who merely took up the
+game as a recreation, and had not from his earliest years devoted
+himself to this and nothing else? No tools will make a man a skilled
+workman, or master of defence, nor be of any use to him who has not
+learned how to handle them, and has never bestowed any attention upon
+them. How then will he who takes up a shield or other implement of war
+become a good fighter all in a day, whether with heavy-armed or any
+other kind of troops?
+
+Yes, he said, the tools which would teach men their own use would be
+beyond price.
+
+And the higher the duties of the guardian, I said, the more time, and
+skill, and art, and application will be needed by him?
+
+No doubt, he replied.
+
+Will he not also require natural aptitude for his calling?
+
+Certainly.
+
+Then it will be our duty to select, if we can, natures which are fitted
+for the task of guarding the city?
+
+It will.
+
+And the selection will be no easy matter, I said; but we must be brave
+and do our best.
+
+We must.
+
+Is not the noble youth very like a well-bred dog in respect of guarding
+and watching?
+
+What do you mean?
+
+I mean that both of them ought to be quick to see, and swift to
+overtake the enemy when they see him; and strong too if, when they have
+caught him, they have to fight with him.
+
+All these qualities, he replied, will certainly be required by them.
+
+Well, and your guardian must be brave if he is to fight well?
+
+Certainly.
+
+And is he likely to be brave who has no spirit, whether horse or dog or
+any other animal? Have you never observed how invincible and
+unconquerable is spirit and how the presence of it makes the soul of
+any creature to be absolutely fearless and indomitable?
+
+I have.
+
+Then now we have a clear notion of the bodily qualities which are
+required in the guardian.
+
+True.
+
+And also of the mental ones; his soul is to be full of spirit?
+
+Yes.
+
+But are not these spirited natures apt to be savage with one another,
+and with everybody else?
+
+A difficulty by no means easy to overcome, he replied.
+
+Whereas, I said, they ought to be dangerous to their enemies, and
+gentle to their friends; if not, they will destroy themselves without
+waiting for their enemies to destroy them.
+
+True, he said.
+
+What is to be done then? I said; how shall we find a gentle nature
+which has also a great spirit, for the one is the contradiction of the
+other?
+
+True.
+
+He will not be a good guardian who is wanting in either of these two
+qualities; and yet the combination of them appears to be impossible;
+and hence we must infer that to be a good guardian is impossible.
+
+I am afraid that what you say is true, he replied.
+
+Here feeling perplexed I began to think over what had preceded.—My
+friend, I said, no wonder that we are in a perplexity; for we have lost
+sight of the image which we had before us.
+
+What do you mean? he said.
+
+I mean to say that there do exist natures gifted with those opposite
+qualities.
+
+And where do you find them?
+
+Many animals, I replied, furnish examples of them; our friend the dog
+is a very good one: you know that well-bred dogs are perfectly gentle
+to their familiars and acquaintances, and the reverse to strangers.
+
+Yes, I know.
+
+Then there is nothing impossible or out of the order of nature in our
+finding a guardian who has a similar combination of qualities?
+
+Certainly not.
+
+Would not he who is fitted to be a guardian, besides the spirited
+nature, need to have the qualities of a philosopher?
+
+I do not apprehend your meaning.
+
+The trait of which I am speaking, I replied, may be also seen in the
+dog, and is remarkable in the animal.
+
+What trait?
+
+Why, a dog, whenever he sees a stranger, is angry; when an
+acquaintance, he welcomes him, although the one has never done him any
+harm, nor the other any good. Did this never strike you as curious?
+
+The matter never struck me before; but I quite recognise the truth of
+your remark.
+
+And surely this instinct of the dog is very charming;—your dog is a
+true philosopher.
+
+Why?
+
+Why, because he distinguishes the face of a friend and of an enemy only
+by the criterion of knowing and not knowing. And must not an animal be
+a lover of learning who determines what he likes and dislikes by the
+test of knowledge and ignorance?
+
+Most assuredly.
+
+And is not the love of learning the love of wisdom, which is
+philosophy?
+
+They are the same, he replied.
+
+And may we not say confidently of man also, that he who is likely to be
+gentle to his friends and acquaintances, must by nature be a lover of
+wisdom and knowledge?
+
+That we may safely affirm.
+
+Then he who is to be a really good and noble guardian of the State will
+require to unite in himself philosophy and spirit and swiftness and
+strength?
+
+Undoubtedly.
+
+Then we have found the desired natures; and now that we have found
+them, how are they to be reared and educated? Is not this an enquiry
+which may be expected to throw light on the greater enquiry which is
+our final end—How do justice and injustice grow up in States? for we do
+not want either to omit what is to the point or to draw out the
+argument to an inconvenient length.
+
+Adeimantus thought that the enquiry would be of great service to us.
+
+Then, I said, my dear friend, the task must not be given up, even if
+somewhat long.
+
+Certainly not.
+
+Come then, and let us pass a leisure hour in story-telling, and our
+story shall be the education of our heroes.
+
+By all means.
+
+And what shall be their education? Can we find a better than the
+traditional sort?—and this has two divisions, gymnastic for the body,
+and music for the soul.
+
+True.
+
+Shall we begin education with music, and go on to gymnastic afterwards?
+
+By all means.
+
+And when you speak of music, do you include literature or not?
+
+I do.
+
+And literature may be either true or false?
+
+Yes.
+
+And the young should be trained in both kinds, and we begin with the
+false?
+
+I do not understand your meaning, he said.
+
+You know, I said, that we begin by telling children stories which,
+though not wholly destitute of truth, are in the main fictitious; and
+these stories are told them when they are not of an age to learn
+gymnastics.
+
+Very true.
+
+That was my meaning when I said that we must teach music before
+gymnastics.
+
+Quite right, he said.
+
+You know also that the beginning is the most important part of any
+work, especially in the case of a young and tender thing; for that is
+the time at which the character is being formed and the desired
+impression is more readily taken.
+
+Quite true.
+
+And shall we just carelessly allow children to hear any casual tales
+which may be devised by casual persons, and to receive into their minds
+ideas for the most part the very opposite of those which we should wish
+them to have when they are grown up?
+
+We cannot.
+
+Then the first thing will be to establish a censorship of the writers
+of fiction, and let the censors receive any tale of fiction which is
+good, and reject the bad; and we will desire mothers and nurses to tell
+their children the authorised ones only. Let them fashion the mind with
+such tales, even more fondly than they mould the body with their hands;
+but most of those which are now in use must be discarded.
+
+Of what tales are you speaking? he said.
+
+You may find a model of the lesser in the greater, I said; for they are
+necessarily of the same type, and there is the same spirit in both of
+them.
+
+Very likely, he replied; but I do not as yet know what you would term
+the greater.
+
+Those, I said, which are narrated by Homer and Hesiod, and the rest of
+the poets, who have ever been the great story-tellers of mankind.
+
+But which stories do you mean, he said; and what fault do you find with
+them?
+
+A fault which is most serious, I said; the fault of telling a lie, and,
+what is more, a bad lie.
+
+But when is this fault committed?
+
+Whenever an erroneous representation is made of the nature of gods and
+heroes,—as when a painter paints a portrait not having the shadow of a
+likeness to the original.
+
+Yes, he said, that sort of thing is certainly very blameable; but what
+are the stories which you mean?
+
+First of all, I said, there was that greatest of all lies in high
+places, which the poet told about Uranus, and which was a bad lie
+too,—I mean what Hesiod says that Uranus did, and how Cronus retaliated
+on him. The doings of Cronus, and the sufferings which in turn his son
+inflicted upon him, even if they were true, ought certainly not to be
+lightly told to young and thoughtless persons; if possible, they had
+better be buried in silence. But if there is an absolute necessity for
+their mention, a chosen few might hear them in a mystery, and they
+should sacrifice not a common (Eleusinian) pig, but some huge and
+unprocurable victim; and then the number of the hearers will be very
+few indeed.
+
+Why, yes, said he, those stories are extremely objectionable.
+
+Yes, Adeimantus, they are stories not to be repeated in our State; the
+young man should not be told that in committing the worst of crimes he
+is far from doing anything outrageous; and that even if he chastises
+his father when he does wrong, in whatever manner, he will only be
+following the example of the first and greatest among the gods.
+
+I entirely agree with you, he said; in my opinion those stories are
+quite unfit to be repeated.
+
+Neither, if we mean our future guardians to regard the habit of
+quarrelling among themselves as of all things the basest, should any
+word be said to them of the wars in heaven, and of the plots and
+fightings of the gods against one another, for they are not true. No,
+we shall never mention the battles of the giants, or let them be
+embroidered on garments; and we shall be silent about the innumerable
+other quarrels of gods and heroes with their friends and relatives. If
+they would only believe us we would tell them that quarrelling is
+unholy, and that never up to this time has there been any quarrel
+between citizens; this is what old men and old women should begin by
+telling children; and when they grow up, the poets also should be told
+to compose for them in a similar spirit. But the narrative of
+Hephaestus binding Here his mother, or how on another occasion Zeus
+sent him flying for taking her part when she was being beaten, and all
+the battles of the gods in Homer—these tales must not be admitted into
+our State, whether they are supposed to have an allegorical meaning or
+not. For a young person cannot judge what is allegorical and what is
+literal; anything that he receives into his mind at that age is likely
+to become indelible and unalterable; and therefore it is most important
+that the tales which the young first hear should be models of virtuous
+thoughts.
+
+There you are right, he replied; but if any one asks where are such
+models to be found and of what tales are you speaking—how shall we
+answer him?
+
+I said to him, You and I, Adeimantus, at this moment are not poets, but
+founders of a State: now the founders of a State ought to know the
+general forms in which poets should cast their tales, and the limits
+which must be observed by them, but to make the tales is not their
+business.
+
+Very true, he said; but what are these forms of theology which you
+mean?
+
+Something of this kind, I replied:—God is always to be represented as
+he truly is, whatever be the sort of poetry, epic, lyric or tragic, in
+which the representation is given.
+
+Right.
+
+And is he not truly good? and must he not be represented as such?
+
+Certainly.
+
+And no good thing is hurtful?
+
+No, indeed.
+
+And that which is not hurtful hurts not?
+
+Certainly not.
+
+And that which hurts not does no evil?
+
+No.
+
+And can that which does no evil be a cause of evil?
+
+Impossible.
+
+And the good is advantageous?
+
+Yes.
+
+And therefore the cause of well-being?
+
+Yes.
+
+It follows therefore that the good is not the cause of all things, but
+of the good only?
+
+Assuredly.
+
+Then God, if he be good, is not the author of all things, as the many
+assert, but he is the cause of a few things only, and not of most
+things that occur to men. For few are the goods of human life, and many
+are the evils, and the good is to be attributed to God alone; of the
+evils the causes are to be sought elsewhere, and not in him.
+
+That appears to me to be most true, he said.
+
+Then we must not listen to Homer or to any other poet who is guilty of
+the folly of saying that two casks
+
+‘Lie at the threshold of Zeus, full of lots, one of good, the other of
+evil lots,’
+
+and that he to whom Zeus gives a mixture of the two
+
+‘Sometimes meets with evil fortune, at other times with good;’
+
+but that he to whom is given the cup of unmingled ill,
+
+‘Him wild hunger drives o’er the beauteous earth.’
+
+And again—
+
+‘Zeus, who is the dispenser of good and evil to us.’
+
+And if any one asserts that the violation of oaths and treaties, which
+was really the work of Pandarus, was brought about by Athene and Zeus,
+or that the strife and contention of the gods was instigated by Themis
+and Zeus, he shall not have our approval; neither will we allow our
+young men to hear the words of Aeschylus, that
+
+‘God plants guilt among men when he desires utterly to destroy a
+house.’
+
+And if a poet writes of the sufferings of Niobe—the subject of the
+tragedy in which these iambic verses occur—or of the house of Pelops,
+or of the Trojan war or on any similar theme, either we must not permit
+him to say that these are the works of God, or if they are of God, he
+must devise some explanation of them such as we are seeking; he must
+say that God did what was just and right, and they were the better for
+being punished; but that those who are punished are miserable, and that
+God is the author of their misery—the poet is not to be permitted to
+say; though he may say that the wicked are miserable because they
+require to be punished, and are benefited by receiving punishment from
+God; but that God being good is the author of evil to any one is to be
+strenuously denied, and not to be said or sung or heard in verse or
+prose by any one whether old or young in any well-ordered commonwealth.
+Such a fiction is suicidal, ruinous, impious.
+
+I agree with you, he replied, and am ready to give my assent to the
+law.
+
+Let this then be one of our rules and principles concerning the gods,
+to which our poets and reciters will be expected to conform,—that God
+is not the author of all things, but of good only.
+
+That will do, he said.
+
+And what do you think of a second principle? Shall I ask you whether
+God is a magician, and of a nature to appear insidiously now in one
+shape, and now in another—sometimes himself changing and passing into
+many forms, sometimes deceiving us with the semblance of such
+transformations; or is he one and the same immutably fixed in his own
+proper image?
+
+I cannot answer you, he said, without more thought.
+
+Well, I said; but if we suppose a change in anything, that change must
+be effected either by the thing itself, or by some other thing?
+
+Most certainly.
+
+And things which are at their best are also least liable to be altered
+or discomposed; for example, when healthiest and strongest, the human
+frame is least liable to be affected by meats and drinks, and the plant
+which is in the fullest vigour also suffers least from winds or the
+heat of the sun or any similar causes.
+
+Of course.
+
+And will not the bravest and wisest soul be least confused or deranged
+by any external influence?
+
+True.
+
+And the same principle, as I should suppose, applies to all composite
+things—furniture, houses, garments: when good and well made, they are
+least altered by time and circumstances.
+
+Very true.
+
+Then everything which is good, whether made by art or nature, or both,
+is least liable to suffer change from without?
+
+True.
+
+But surely God and the things of God are in every way perfect?
+
+Of course they are.
+
+Then he can hardly be compelled by external influence to take many
+shapes?
+
+He cannot.
+
+But may he not change and transform himself?
+
+Clearly, he said, that must be the case if he is changed at all.
+
+And will he then change himself for the better and fairer, or for the
+worse and more unsightly?
+
+If he change at all he can only change for the worse, for we cannot
+suppose him to be deficient either in virtue or beauty.
+
+Very true, Adeimantus; but then, would any one, whether God or man,
+desire to make himself worse?
+
+Impossible.
+
+Then it is impossible that God should ever be willing to change; being,
+as is supposed, the fairest and best that is conceivable, every God
+remains absolutely and for ever in his own form.
+
+That necessarily follows, he said, in my judgment.
+
+Then, I said, my dear friend, let none of the poets tell us that
+
+‘The gods, taking the disguise of strangers from other lands, walk up
+and down cities in all sorts of forms;’
+
+and let no one slander Proteus and Thetis, neither let any one, either
+in tragedy or in any other kind of poetry, introduce Here disguised in
+the likeness of a priestess asking an alms
+
+‘For the life-giving daughters of Inachus the river of Argos;’
+
+—let us have no more lies of that sort. Neither must we have mothers
+under the influence of the poets scaring their children with a bad
+version of these myths—telling how certain gods, as they say, ‘Go about
+by night in the likeness of so many strangers and in divers forms;’ but
+let them take heed lest they make cowards of their children, and at the
+same time speak blasphemy against the gods.
+
+Heaven forbid, he said.
+
+But although the gods are themselves unchangeable, still by witchcraft
+and deception they may make us think that they appear in various forms?
+
+Perhaps, he replied.
+
+Well, but can you imagine that God will be willing to lie, whether in
+word or deed, or to put forth a phantom of himself?
+
+I cannot say, he replied.
+
+Do you not know, I said, that the true lie, if such an expression may
+be allowed, is hated of gods and men?
+
+What do you mean? he said.
+
+I mean that no one is willingly deceived in that which is the truest
+and highest part of himself, or about the truest and highest matters;
+there, above all, he is most afraid of a lie having possession of him.
+
+Still, he said, I do not comprehend you.
+
+The reason is, I replied, that you attribute some profound meaning to
+my words; but I am only saying that deception, or being deceived or
+uninformed about the highest realities in the highest part of
+themselves, which is the soul, and in that part of them to have and to
+hold the lie, is what mankind least like;—that, I say, is what they
+utterly detest.
+
+There is nothing more hateful to them.
+
+And, as I was just now remarking, this ignorance in the soul of him who
+is deceived may be called the true lie; for the lie in words is only a
+kind of imitation and shadowy image of a previous affection of the
+soul, not pure unadulterated falsehood. Am I not right?
+
+Perfectly right.
+
+The true lie is hated not only by the gods, but also by men?
+
+Yes.
+
+Whereas the lie in words is in certain cases useful and not hateful; in
+dealing with enemies—that would be an instance; or again, when those
+whom we call our friends in a fit of madness or illusion are going to
+do some harm, then it is useful and is a sort of medicine or
+preventive; also in the tales of mythology, of which we were just now
+speaking—because we do not know the truth about ancient times, we make
+falsehood as much like truth as we can, and so turn it to account.
+
+Very true, he said.
+
+But can any of these reasons apply to God? Can we suppose that he is
+ignorant of antiquity, and therefore has recourse to invention?
+
+That would be ridiculous, he said.
+
+Then the lying poet has no place in our idea of God?
+
+I should say not.
+
+Or perhaps he may tell a lie because he is afraid of enemies?
+
+That is inconceivable.
+
+But he may have friends who are senseless or mad?
+
+But no mad or senseless person can be a friend of God.
+
+Then no motive can be imagined why God should lie?
+
+None whatever.
+
+Then the superhuman and divine is absolutely incapable of falsehood?
+
+Yes.
+
+Then is God perfectly simple and true both in word and deed; he changes
+not; he deceives not, either by sign or word, by dream or waking
+vision.
+
+Your thoughts, he said, are the reflection of my own.
+
+You agree with me then, I said, that this is the second type or form in
+which we should write and speak about divine things. The gods are not
+magicians who transform themselves, neither do they deceive mankind in
+any way.
+
+I grant that.
+
+Then, although we are admirers of Homer, we do not admire the lying
+dream which Zeus sends to Agamemnon; neither will we praise the verses
+of Aeschylus in which Thetis says that Apollo at her nuptials
+
+‘Was celebrating in song her fair progeny whose days were to be long,
+and to know no sickness. And when he had spoken of my lot as in all
+things blessed of heaven he raised a note of triumph and cheered my
+soul. And I thought that the word of Phoebus, being divine and full of
+prophecy, would not fail. And now he himself who uttered the strain, he
+who was present at the banquet, and who said this—he it is who has
+slain my son.’
+
+These are the kind of sentiments about the gods which will arouse our
+anger; and he who utters them shall be refused a chorus; neither shall
+we allow teachers to make use of them in the instruction of the young,
+meaning, as we do, that our guardians, as far as men can be, should be
+true worshippers of the gods and like them.
+
+I entirely agree, he said, in these principles, and promise to make
+them my laws.
+
+
+
+
+ BOOK III.
+
+
+Such then, I said, are our principles of theology—some tales are to be
+told, and others are not to be told to our disciples from their youth
+upwards, if we mean them to honour the gods and their parents, and to
+value friendship with one another.
+
+Yes; and I think that our principles are right, he said.
+
+But if they are to be courageous, must they not learn other lessons
+besides these, and lessons of such a kind as will take away the fear of
+death? Can any man be courageous who has the fear of death in him?
+
+Certainly not, he said.
+
+And can he be fearless of death, or will he choose death in battle
+rather than defeat and slavery, who believes the world below to be real
+and terrible?
+
+Impossible.
+
+Then we must assume a control over the narrators of this class of tales
+as well as over the others, and beg them not simply to revile but
+rather to commend the world below, intimating to them that their
+descriptions are untrue, and will do harm to our future warriors.
+
+That will be our duty, he said.
+
+Then, I said, we shall have to obliterate many obnoxious passages,
+beginning with the verses,
+
+‘I would rather be a serf on the land of a poor and portionless man
+than rule over all the dead who have come to nought.’
+
+We must also expunge the verse, which tells us how Pluto feared,
+
+‘Lest the mansions grim and squalid which the gods abhor should be seen
+both of mortals and immortals.’
+
+And again:—
+
+‘O heavens! verily in the house of Hades there is soul and ghostly form
+but no mind at all!’
+
+Again of Tiresias:—
+
+‘(To him even after death did Persephone grant mind,) that he alone
+should be wise; but the other souls are flitting shades.’
+
+Again:—
+
+‘The soul flying from the limbs had gone to Hades, lamenting her fate,
+leaving manhood and youth.’
+
+Again:—
+
+‘And the soul, with shrilling cry, passed like smoke beneath the
+earth.’
+
+And,—
+
+‘As bats in hollow of mystic cavern, whenever any of them has dropped
+out of the string and falls from the rock, fly shrilling and cling to
+one another, so did they with shrilling cry hold together as they
+moved.’
+
+And we must beg Homer and the other poets not to be angry if we strike
+out these and similar passages, not because they are unpoetical, or
+unattractive to the popular ear, but because the greater the poetical
+charm of them, the less are they meet for the ears of boys and men who
+are meant to be free, and who should fear slavery more than death.
+
+Undoubtedly.
+
+Also we shall have to reject all the terrible and appalling names which
+describe the world below—Cocytus and Styx, ghosts under the earth, and
+sapless shades, and any similar words of which the very mention causes
+a shudder to pass through the inmost soul of him who hears them. I do
+not say that these horrible stories may not have a use of some kind;
+but there is a danger that the nerves of our guardians may be rendered
+too excitable and effeminate by them.
+
+There is a real danger, he said.
+
+Then we must have no more of them.
+
+True.
+
+Another and a nobler strain must be composed and sung by us.
+
+Clearly.
+
+And shall we proceed to get rid of the weepings and wailings of famous
+men?
+
+They will go with the rest.
+
+But shall we be right in getting rid of them? Reflect: our principle is
+that the good man will not consider death terrible to any other good
+man who is his comrade.
+
+Yes; that is our principle.
+
+And therefore he will not sorrow for his departed friend as though he
+had suffered anything terrible?
+
+He will not.
+
+Such an one, as we further maintain, is sufficient for himself and his
+own happiness, and therefore is least in need of other men.
+
+True, he said.
+
+And for this reason the loss of a son or brother, or the deprivation of
+fortune, is to him of all men least terrible.
+
+Assuredly.
+
+And therefore he will be least likely to lament, and will bear with the
+greatest equanimity any misfortune of this sort which may befall him.
+
+Yes, he will feel such a misfortune far less than another.
+
+Then we shall be right in getting rid of the lamentations of famous
+men, and making them over to women (and not even to women who are good
+for anything), or to men of a baser sort, that those who are being
+educated by us to be the defenders of their country may scorn to do the
+like.
+
+That will be very right.
+
+Then we will once more entreat Homer and the other poets not to depict
+Achilles, who is the son of a goddess, first lying on his side, then on
+his back, and then on his face; then starting up and sailing in a
+frenzy along the shores of the barren sea; now taking the sooty ashes
+in both his hands and pouring them over his head, or weeping and
+wailing in the various modes which Homer has delineated. Nor should he
+describe Priam the kinsman of the gods as praying and beseeching,
+
+‘Rolling in the dirt, calling each man loudly by his name.’
+
+Still more earnestly will we beg of him at all events not to introduce
+the gods lamenting and saying,
+
+‘Alas! my misery! Alas! that I bore the bravest to my sorrow.’
+
+But if he must introduce the gods, at any rate let him not dare so
+completely to misrepresent the greatest of the gods, as to make him
+say—
+
+‘O heavens! with my eyes verily I behold a dear friend of mine chased
+round and round the city, and my heart is sorrowful.’
+
+Or again:—
+
+Woe is me that I am fated to have Sarpedon, dearest of men to me,
+subdued at the hands of Patroclus the son of Menoetius.’
+
+For if, my sweet Adeimantus, our youth seriously listen to such
+unworthy representations of the gods, instead of laughing at them as
+they ought, hardly will any of them deem that he himself, being but a
+man, can be dishonoured by similar actions; neither will he rebuke any
+inclination which may arise in his mind to say and do the like. And
+instead of having any shame or self-control, he will be always whining
+and lamenting on slight occasions.
+
+Yes, he said, that is most true.
+
+Yes, I replied; but that surely is what ought not to be, as the
+argument has just proved to us; and by that proof we must abide until
+it is disproved by a better.
+
+It ought not to be.
+
+Neither ought our guardians to be given to laughter. For a fit of
+laughter which has been indulged to excess almost always produces a
+violent reaction.
+
+So I believe.
+
+Then persons of worth, even if only mortal men, must not be represented
+as overcome by laughter, and still less must such a representation of
+the gods be allowed.
+
+Still less of the gods, as you say, he replied.
+
+Then we shall not suffer such an expression to be used about the gods
+as that of Homer when he describes how
+
+‘Inextinguishable laughter arose among the blessed gods, when they saw
+Hephaestus bustling about the mansion.’
+
+On your views, we must not admit them.
+
+On my views, if you like to father them on me; that we must not admit
+them is certain.
+
+Again, truth should be highly valued; if, as we were saying, a lie is
+useless to the gods, and useful only as a medicine to men, then the use
+of such medicines should be restricted to physicians; private
+individuals have no business with them.
+
+Clearly not, he said.
+
+Then if any one at all is to have the privilege of lying, the rulers of
+the State should be the persons; and they, in their dealings either
+with enemies or with their own citizens, may be allowed to lie for the
+public good. But nobody else should meddle with anything of the kind;
+and although the rulers have this privilege, for a private man to lie
+to them in return is to be deemed a more heinous fault than for the
+patient or the pupil of a gymnasium not to speak the truth about his
+own bodily illnesses to the physician or to the trainer, or for a
+sailor not to tell the captain what is happening about the ship and the
+rest of the crew, and how things are going with himself or his fellow
+sailors.
+
+Most true, he said.
+
+If, then, the ruler catches anybody beside himself lying in the State,
+
+‘Any of the craftsmen, whether he be priest or physician or carpenter,’
+
+he will punish him for introducing a practice which is equally
+subversive and destructive of ship or State.
+
+Most certainly, he said, if our idea of the State is ever carried out.
+
+In the next place our youth must be temperate?
+
+Certainly.
+
+Are not the chief elements of temperance, speaking generally, obedience
+to commanders and self-control in sensual pleasures?
+
+True.
+
+Then we shall approve such language as that of Diomede in Homer,
+
+‘Friend, sit still and obey my word,’
+
+and the verses which follow,
+
+‘The Greeks marched breathing prowess, ...in silent awe of their
+leaders,’
+
+and other sentiments of the same kind.
+
+We shall.
+
+What of this line,
+
+‘O heavy with wine, who hast the eyes of a dog and the heart of a
+stag,’
+
+and of the words which follow? Would you say that these, or any similar
+impertinences which private individuals are supposed to address to
+their rulers, whether in verse or prose, are well or ill spoken?
+
+They are ill spoken.
+
+They may very possibly afford some amusement, but they do not conduce
+to temperance. And therefore they are likely to do harm to our young
+men—you would agree with me there?
+
+Yes.
+
+And then, again, to make the wisest of men say that nothing in his
+opinion is more glorious than
+
+‘When the tables are full of bread and meat, and the cup-bearer carries
+round wine which he draws from the bowl and pours into the cups,’
+
+is it fit or conducive to temperance for a young man to hear such
+words? Or the verse
+
+‘The saddest of fates is to die and meet destiny from hunger?’
+
+What would you say again to the tale of Zeus, who, while other gods and
+men were asleep and he the only person awake, lay devising plans, but
+forgot them all in a moment through his lust, and was so completely
+overcome at the sight of Here that he would not even go into the hut,
+but wanted to lie with her on the ground, declaring that he had never
+been in such a state of rapture before, even when they first met one
+another
+
+‘Without the knowledge of their parents;’
+
+or that other tale of how Hephaestus, because of similar goings on,
+cast a chain around Ares and Aphrodite?
+
+Indeed, he said, I am strongly of opinion that they ought not to hear
+that sort of thing.
+
+But any deeds of endurance which are done or told by famous men, these
+they ought to see and hear; as, for example, what is said in the
+verses,
+
+‘He smote his breast, and thus reproached his heart, Endure, my heart;
+far worse hast thou endured!’
+
+Certainly, he said.
+
+In the next place, we must not let them be receivers of gifts or lovers
+of money.
+
+Certainly not.
+
+Neither must we sing to them of
+
+‘Gifts persuading gods, and persuading reverend kings.’
+
+Neither is Phoenix, the tutor of Achilles, to be approved or deemed to
+have given his pupil good counsel when he told him that he should take
+the gifts of the Greeks and assist them; but that without a gift he
+should not lay aside his anger. Neither will we believe or acknowledge
+Achilles himself to have been such a lover of money that he took
+Agamemnon’s gifts, or that when he had received payment he restored the
+dead body of Hector, but that without payment he was unwilling to do
+so.
+
+Undoubtedly, he said, these are not sentiments which can be approved.
+
+Loving Homer as I do, I hardly like to say that in attributing these
+feelings to Achilles, or in believing that they are truly attributed to
+him, he is guilty of downright impiety. As little can I believe the
+narrative of his insolence to Apollo, where he says,
+
+‘Thou hast wronged me, O far-darter, most abominable of deities. Verily
+I would be even with thee, if I had only the power;’
+
+or his insubordination to the river-god, on whose divinity he is ready
+to lay hands; or his offering to the dead Patroclus of his own hair,
+which had been previously dedicated to the other river-god Spercheius,
+and that he actually performed this vow; or that he dragged Hector
+round the tomb of Patroclus, and slaughtered the captives at the pyre;
+of all this I cannot believe that he was guilty, any more than I can
+allow our citizens to believe that he, the wise Cheiron’s pupil, the
+son of a goddess and of Peleus who was the gentlest of men and third in
+descent from Zeus, was so disordered in his wits as to be at one time
+the slave of two seemingly inconsistent passions, meanness, not
+untainted by avarice, combined with overweening contempt of gods and
+men.
+
+You are quite right, he replied.
+
+And let us equally refuse to believe, or allow to be repeated, the tale
+of Theseus son of Poseidon, or of Peirithous son of Zeus, going forth
+as they did to perpetrate a horrid rape; or of any other hero or son of
+a god daring to do such impious and dreadful things as they falsely
+ascribe to them in our day: and let us further compel the poets to
+declare either that these acts were not done by them, or that they were
+not the sons of gods;—both in the same breath they shall not be
+permitted to affirm. We will not have them trying to persuade our youth
+that the gods are the authors of evil, and that heroes are no better
+than men—sentiments which, as we were saying, are neither pious nor
+true, for we have already proved that evil cannot come from the gods.
+
+Assuredly not.
+
+And further they are likely to have a bad effect on those who hear
+them; for everybody will begin to excuse his own vices when he is
+convinced that similar wickednesses are always being perpetrated by—
+
+‘The kindred of the gods, the relatives of Zeus, whose ancestral altar,
+the altar of Zeus, is aloft in air on the peak of Ida,’
+
+and who have
+
+‘the blood of deities yet flowing in their veins.’
+
+And therefore let us put an end to such tales, lest they engender
+laxity of morals among the young.
+
+By all means, he replied.
+
+But now that we are determining what classes of subjects are or are not
+to be spoken of, let us see whether any have been omitted by us. The
+manner in which gods and demigods and heroes and the world below should
+be treated has been already laid down.
+
+Very true.
+
+And what shall we say about men? That is clearly the remaining portion
+of our subject.
+
+Clearly so.
+
+But we are not in a condition to answer this question at present, my
+friend.
+
+Why not?
+
+Because, if I am not mistaken, we shall have to say that about men
+poets and story-tellers are guilty of making the gravest misstatements
+when they tell us that wicked men are often happy, and the good
+miserable; and that injustice is profitable when undetected, but that
+justice is a man’s own loss and another’s gain—these things we shall
+forbid them to utter, and command them to sing and say the opposite.
+
+To be sure we shall, he replied.
+
+But if you admit that I am right in this, then I shall maintain that
+you have implied the principle for which we have been all along
+contending.
+
+I grant the truth of your inference.
+
+That such things are or are not to be said about men is a question
+which we cannot determine until we have discovered what justice is, and
+how naturally advantageous to the possessor, whether he seem to be just
+or not.
+
+Most true, he said.
+
+Enough of the subjects of poetry: let us now speak of the style; and
+when this has been considered, both matter and manner will have been
+completely treated.
+
+I do not understand what you mean, said Adeimantus.
+
+Then I must make you understand; and perhaps I may be more intelligible
+if I put the matter in this way. You are aware, I suppose, that all
+mythology and poetry is a narration of events, either past, present, or
+to come?
+
+Certainly, he replied.
+
+And narration may be either simple narration, or imitation, or a union
+of the two?
+
+That again, he said, I do not quite understand.
+
+I fear that I must be a ridiculous teacher when I have so much
+difficulty in making myself apprehended. Like a bad speaker, therefore,
+I will not take the whole of the subject, but will break a piece off in
+illustration of my meaning. You know the first lines of the Iliad, in
+which the poet says that Chryses prayed Agamemnon to release his
+daughter, and that Agamemnon flew into a passion with him; whereupon
+Chryses, failing of his object, invoked the anger of the God against
+the Achaeans. Now as far as these lines,
+
+‘And he prayed all the Greeks, but especially the two sons of Atreus,
+the chiefs of the people,’
+
+the poet is speaking in his own person; he never leads us to suppose
+that he is any one else. But in what follows he takes the person of
+Chryses, and then he does all that he can to make us believe that the
+speaker is not Homer, but the aged priest himself. And in this double
+form he has cast the entire narrative of the events which occurred at
+Troy and in Ithaca and throughout the Odyssey.
+
+Yes.
+
+And a narrative it remains both in the speeches which the poet recites
+from time to time and in the intermediate passages?
+
+Quite true.
+
+But when the poet speaks in the person of another, may we not say that
+he assimilates his style to that of the person who, as he informs you,
+is going to speak?
+
+Certainly.
+
+And this assimilation of himself to another, either by the use of voice
+or gesture, is the imitation of the person whose character he assumes?
+
+Of course.
+
+Then in this case the narrative of the poet may be said to proceed by
+way of imitation?
+
+Very true.
+
+Or, if the poet everywhere appears and never conceals himself, then
+again the imitation is dropped, and his poetry becomes simple
+narration. However, in order that I may make my meaning quite clear,
+and that you may no more say, ‘I don’t understand,’ I will show how the
+change might be effected. If Homer had said, ‘The priest came, having
+his daughter’s ransom in his hands, supplicating the Achaeans, and
+above all the kings;’ and then if, instead of speaking in the person of
+Chryses, he had continued in his own person, the words would have been,
+not imitation, but simple narration. The passage would have run as
+follows (I am no poet, and therefore I drop the metre), ‘The priest
+came and prayed the gods on behalf of the Greeks that they might
+capture Troy and return safely home, but begged that they would give
+him back his daughter, and take the ransom which he brought, and
+respect the God. Thus he spoke, and the other Greeks revered the priest
+and assented. But Agamemnon was wroth, and bade him depart and not come
+again, lest the staff and chaplets of the God should be of no avail to
+him—the daughter of Chryses should not be released, he said—she should
+grow old with him in Argos. And then he told him to go away and not to
+provoke him, if he intended to get home unscathed. And the old man went
+away in fear and silence, and, when he had left the camp, he called
+upon Apollo by his many names, reminding him of everything which he had
+done pleasing to him, whether in building his temples, or in offering
+sacrifice, and praying that his good deeds might be returned to him,
+and that the Achaeans might expiate his tears by the arrows of the
+god,’—and so on. In this way the whole becomes simple narrative.
+
+I understand, he said.
+
+Or you may suppose the opposite case—that the intermediate passages are
+omitted, and the dialogue only left.
+
+That also, he said, I understand; you mean, for example, as in tragedy.
+
+You have conceived my meaning perfectly; and if I mistake not, what you
+failed to apprehend before is now made clear to you, that poetry and
+mythology are, in some cases, wholly imitative—instances of this are
+supplied by tragedy and comedy; there is likewise the opposite style,
+in which the poet is the only speaker—of this the dithyramb affords the
+best example; and the combination of both is found in epic, and in
+several other styles of poetry. Do I take you with me?
+
+Yes, he said; I see now what you meant.
+
+I will ask you to remember also what I began by saying, that we had
+done with the subject and might proceed to the style.
+
+Yes, I remember.
+
+In saying this, I intended to imply that we must come to an
+understanding about the mimetic art,—whether the poets, in narrating
+their stories, are to be allowed by us to imitate, and if so, whether
+in whole or in part, and if the latter, in what parts; or should all
+imitation be prohibited?
+
+You mean, I suspect, to ask whether tragedy and comedy shall be
+admitted into our State?
+
+Yes, I said; but there may be more than this in question: I really do
+not know as yet, but whither the argument may blow, thither we go.
+
+And go we will, he said.
+
+Then, Adeimantus, let me ask you whether our guardians ought to be
+imitators; or rather, has not this question been decided by the rule
+already laid down that one man can only do one thing well, and not
+many; and that if he attempt many, he will altogether fail of gaining
+much reputation in any?
+
+Certainly.
+
+And this is equally true of imitation; no one man can imitate many
+things as well as he would imitate a single one?
+
+He cannot.
+
+Then the same person will hardly be able to play a serious part in
+life, and at the same time to be an imitator and imitate many other
+parts as well; for even when two species of imitation are nearly
+allied, the same persons cannot succeed in both, as, for example, the
+writers of tragedy and comedy—did you not just now call them
+imitations?
+
+Yes, I did; and you are right in thinking that the same persons cannot
+succeed in both.
+
+Any more than they can be rhapsodists and actors at once?
+
+True.
+
+Neither are comic and tragic actors the same; yet all these things are
+but imitations.
+
+They are so.
+
+And human nature, Adeimantus, appears to have been coined into yet
+smaller pieces, and to be as incapable of imitating many things well,
+as of performing well the actions of which the imitations are copies.
+
+Quite true, he replied.
+
+If then we adhere to our original notion and bear in mind that our
+guardians, setting aside every other business, are to dedicate
+themselves wholly to the maintenance of freedom in the State, making
+this their craft, and engaging in no work which does not bear on this
+end, they ought not to practise or imitate anything else; if they
+imitate at all, they should imitate from youth upward only those
+characters which are suitable to their profession—the courageous,
+temperate, holy, free, and the like; but they should not depict or be
+skilful at imitating any kind of illiberality or baseness, lest from
+imitation they should come to be what they imitate. Did you never
+observe how imitations, beginning in early youth and continuing far
+into life, at length grow into habits and become a second nature,
+affecting body, voice, and mind?
+
+Yes, certainly, he said.
+
+Then, I said, we will not allow those for whom we profess a care and of
+whom we say that they ought to be good men, to imitate a woman, whether
+young or old, quarrelling with her husband, or striving and vaunting
+against the gods in conceit of her happiness, or when she is in
+affliction, or sorrow, or weeping; and certainly not one who is in
+sickness, love, or labour.
+
+Very right, he said.
+
+Neither must they represent slaves, male or female, performing the
+offices of slaves?
+
+They must not.
+
+And surely not bad men, whether cowards or any others, who do the
+reverse of what we have just been prescribing, who scold or mock or
+revile one another in drink or out of drink, or who in any other manner
+sin against themselves and their neighbours in word or deed, as the
+manner of such is. Neither should they be trained to imitate the action
+or speech of men or women who are mad or bad; for madness, like vice,
+is to be known but not to be practised or imitated.
+
+Very true, he replied.
+
+Neither may they imitate smiths or other artificers, or oarsmen, or
+boatswains, or the like?
+
+How can they, he said, when they are not allowed to apply their minds
+to the callings of any of these?
+
+Nor may they imitate the neighing of horses, the bellowing of bulls,
+the murmur of rivers and roll of the ocean, thunder, and all that sort
+of thing?
+
+Nay, he said, if madness be forbidden, neither may they copy the
+behaviour of madmen.
+
+You mean, I said, if I understand you aright, that there is one sort of
+narrative style which may be employed by a truly good man when he has
+anything to say, and that another sort will be used by a man of an
+opposite character and education.
+
+And which are these two sorts? he asked.
+
+Suppose, I answered, that a just and good man in the course of a
+narration comes on some saying or action of another good man,—I should
+imagine that he will like to personate him, and will not be ashamed of
+this sort of imitation: he will be most ready to play the part of the
+good man when he is acting firmly and wisely; in a less degree when he
+is overtaken by illness or love or drink, or has met with any other
+disaster. But when he comes to a character which is unworthy of him, he
+will not make a study of that; he will disdain such a person, and will
+assume his likeness, if at all, for a moment only when he is performing
+some good action; at other times he will be ashamed to play a part
+which he has never practised, nor will he like to fashion and frame
+himself after the baser models; he feels the employment of such an art,
+unless in jest, to be beneath him, and his mind revolts at it.
+
+So I should expect, he replied.
+
+Then he will adopt a mode of narration such as we have illustrated out
+of Homer, that is to say, his style will be both imitative and
+narrative; but there will be very little of the former, and a great
+deal of the latter. Do you agree?
+
+Certainly, he said; that is the model which such a speaker must
+necessarily take.
+
+But there is another sort of character who will narrate anything, and,
+the worse he is, the more unscrupulous he will be; nothing will be too
+bad for him: and he will be ready to imitate anything, not as a joke,
+but in right good earnest, and before a large company. As I was just
+now saying, he will attempt to represent the roll of thunder, the noise
+of wind and hail, or the creaking of wheels, and pulleys, and the
+various sounds of flutes, pipes, trumpets, and all sorts of
+instruments: he will bark like a dog, bleat like a sheep, or crow like
+a cock; his entire art will consist in imitation of voice and gesture,
+and there will be very little narration.
+
+That, he said, will be his mode of speaking.
+
+These, then, are the two kinds of style?
+
+Yes.
+
+And you would agree with me in saying that one of them is simple and
+has but slight changes; and if the harmony and rhythm are also chosen
+for their simplicity, the result is that the speaker, if he speaks
+correctly, is always pretty much the same in style, and he will keep
+within the limits of a single harmony (for the changes are not great),
+and in like manner he will make use of nearly the same rhythm?
+
+That is quite true, he said.
+
+Whereas the other requires all sorts of harmonies and all sorts of
+rhythms, if the music and the style are to correspond, because the
+style has all sorts of changes.
+
+That is also perfectly true, he replied.
+
+And do not the two styles, or the mixture of the two, comprehend all
+poetry, and every form of expression in words? No one can say anything
+except in one or other of them or in both together.
+
+They include all, he said.
+
+And shall we receive into our State all the three styles, or one only
+of the two unmixed styles? or would you include the mixed?
+
+I should prefer only to admit the pure imitator of virtue.
+
+Yes, I said, Adeimantus, but the mixed style is also very charming: and
+indeed the pantomimic, which is the opposite of the one chosen by you,
+is the most popular style with children and their attendants, and with
+the world in general.
+
+I do not deny it.
+
+But I suppose you would argue that such a style is unsuitable to our
+State, in which human nature is not twofold or manifold, for one man
+plays one part only?
+
+Yes; quite unsuitable.
+
+And this is the reason why in our State, and in our State only, we
+shall find a shoemaker to be a shoemaker and not a pilot also, and a
+husbandman to be a husbandman and not a dicast also, and a soldier a
+soldier and not a trader also, and the same throughout?
+
+True, he said.
+
+And therefore when any one of these pantomimic gentlemen, who are so
+clever that they can imitate anything, comes to us, and makes a
+proposal to exhibit himself and his poetry, we will fall down and
+worship him as a sweet and holy and wonderful being; but we must also
+inform him that in our State such as he are not permitted to exist; the
+law will not allow them. And so when we have anointed him with myrrh,
+and set a garland of wool upon his head, we shall send him away to
+another city. For we mean to employ for our souls’ health the rougher
+and severer poet or story-teller, who will imitate the style of the
+virtuous only, and will follow those models which we prescribed at
+first when we began the education of our soldiers.
+
+We certainly will, he said, if we have the power.
+
+Then now, my friend, I said, that part of music or literary education
+which relates to the story or myth may be considered to be finished;
+for the matter and manner have both been discussed.
+
+I think so too, he said.
+
+Next in order will follow melody and song.
+
+That is obvious.
+
+Every one can see already what we ought to say about them, if we are to
+be consistent with ourselves.
+
+I fear, said Glaucon, laughing, that the word ‘every one’ hardly
+includes me, for I cannot at the moment say what they should be; though
+I may guess.
+
+At any rate you can tell that a song or ode has three parts—the words,
+the melody, and the rhythm; that degree of knowledge I may presuppose?
+
+Yes, he said; so much as that you may.
+
+And as for the words, there will surely be no difference between words
+which are and which are not set to music; both will conform to the same
+laws, and these have been already determined by us?
+
+Yes.
+
+And the melody and rhythm will depend upon the words?
+
+Certainly.
+
+We were saying, when we spoke of the subject-matter, that we had no
+need of lamentation and strains of sorrow?
+
+True.
+
+And which are the harmonies expressive of sorrow? You are musical, and
+can tell me.
+
+The harmonies which you mean are the mixed or tenor Lydian, and the
+full-toned or bass Lydian, and such like.
+
+These then, I said, must be banished; even to women who have a
+character to maintain they are of no use, and much less to men.
+
+Certainly.
+
+In the next place, drunkenness and softness and indolence are utterly
+unbecoming the character of our guardians.
+
+Utterly unbecoming.
+
+And which are the soft or drinking harmonies?
+
+The Ionian, he replied, and the Lydian; they are termed ‘relaxed.’
+
+Well, and are these of any military use?
+
+Quite the reverse, he replied; and if so the Dorian and the Phrygian
+are the only ones which you have left.
+
+I answered: Of the harmonies I know nothing, but I want to have one
+warlike, to sound the note or accent which a brave man utters in the
+hour of danger and stern resolve, or when his cause is failing, and he
+is going to wounds or death or is overtaken by some other evil, and at
+every such crisis meets the blows of fortune with firm step and a
+determination to endure; and another to be used by him in times of
+peace and freedom of action, when there is no pressure of necessity,
+and he is seeking to persuade God by prayer, or man by instruction and
+admonition, or on the other hand, when he is expressing his willingness
+to yield to persuasion or entreaty or admonition, and which represents
+him when by prudent conduct he has attained his end, not carried away
+by his success, but acting moderately and wisely under the
+circumstances, and acquiescing in the event. These two harmonies I ask
+you to leave; the strain of necessity and the strain of freedom, the
+strain of the unfortunate and the strain of the fortunate, the strain
+of courage, and the strain of temperance; these, I say, leave.
+
+And these, he replied, are the Dorian and Phrygian harmonies of which I
+was just now speaking.
+
+Then, I said, if these and these only are to be used in our songs and
+melodies, we shall not want multiplicity of notes or a panharmonic
+scale?
+
+I suppose not.
+
+Then we shall not maintain the artificers of lyres with three corners
+and complex scales, or the makers of any other many-stringed
+curiously-harmonised instruments?
+
+Certainly not.
+
+But what do you say to flute-makers and flute-players? Would you admit
+them into our State when you reflect that in this composite use of
+harmony the flute is worse than all the stringed instruments put
+together; even the panharmonic music is only an imitation of the flute?
+
+Clearly not.
+
+There remain then only the lyre and the harp for use in the city, and
+the shepherds may have a pipe in the country.
+
+That is surely the conclusion to be drawn from the argument.
+
+The preferring of Apollo and his instruments to Marsyas and his
+instruments is not at all strange, I said.
+
+Not at all, he replied.
+
+And so, by the dog of Egypt, we have been unconsciously purging the
+State, which not long ago we termed luxurious.
+
+And we have done wisely, he replied.
+
+Then let us now finish the purgation, I said. Next in order to
+harmonies, rhythms will naturally follow, and they should be subject to
+the same rules, for we ought not to seek out complex systems of metre,
+or metres of every kind, but rather to discover what rhythms are the
+expressions of a courageous and harmonious life; and when we have found
+them, we shall adapt the foot and the melody to words having a like
+spirit, not the words to the foot and melody. To say what these rhythms
+are will be your duty—you must teach me them, as you have already
+taught me the harmonies.
+
+But, indeed, he replied, I cannot tell you. I only know that there are
+some three principles of rhythm out of which metrical systems are
+framed, just as in sounds there are four notes (i.e. the four notes of
+the tetrachord.) out of which all the harmonies are composed; that is
+an observation which I have made. But of what sort of lives they are
+severally the imitations I am unable to say.
+
+Then, I said, we must take Damon into our counsels; and he will tell us
+what rhythms are expressive of meanness, or insolence, or fury, or
+other unworthiness, and what are to be reserved for the expression of
+opposite feelings. And I think that I have an indistinct recollection
+of his mentioning a complex Cretic rhythm; also a dactylic or heroic,
+and he arranged them in some manner which I do not quite understand,
+making the rhythms equal in the rise and fall of the foot, long and
+short alternating; and, unless I am mistaken, he spoke of an iambic as
+well as of a trochaic rhythm, and assigned to them short and long
+quantities. Also in some cases he appeared to praise or censure the
+movement of the foot quite as much as the rhythm; or perhaps a
+combination of the two; for I am not certain what he meant. These
+matters, however, as I was saying, had better be referred to Damon
+himself, for the analysis of the subject would be difficult, you know?
+(Socrates expresses himself carelessly in accordance with his assumed
+ignorance of the details of the subject. In the first part of the
+sentence he appears to be speaking of paeonic rhythms which are in the
+ratio of 3/2; in the second part, of dactylic and anapaestic rhythms,
+which are in the ratio of 1/1; in the last clause, of iambic and
+trochaic rhythms, which are in the ratio of 1/2 or 2/1.)
+
+Rather so, I should say.
+
+But there is no difficulty in seeing that grace or the absence of grace
+is an effect of good or bad rhythm.
+
+None at all.
+
+And also that good and bad rhythm naturally assimilate to a good and
+bad style; and that harmony and discord in like manner follow style;
+for our principle is that rhythm and harmony are regulated by the
+words, and not the words by them.
+
+Just so, he said, they should follow the words.
+
+And will not the words and the character of the style depend on the
+temper of the soul?
+
+Yes.
+
+And everything else on the style?
+
+Yes.
+
+Then beauty of style and harmony and grace and good rhythm depend on
+simplicity,—I mean the true simplicity of a rightly and nobly ordered
+mind and character, not that other simplicity which is only an
+euphemism for folly?
+
+Very true, he replied.
+
+And if our youth are to do their work in life, must they not make these
+graces and harmonies their perpetual aim?
+
+They must.
+
+And surely the art of the painter and every other creative and
+constructive art are full of them,—weaving, embroidery, architecture,
+and every kind of manufacture; also nature, animal and vegetable,—in
+all of them there is grace or the absence of grace. And ugliness and
+discord and inharmonious motion are nearly allied to ill words and ill
+nature, as grace and harmony are the twin sisters of goodness and
+virtue and bear their likeness.
+
+That is quite true, he said.
+
+But shall our superintendence go no further, and are the poets only to
+be required by us to express the image of the good in their works, on
+pain, if they do anything else, of expulsion from our State? Or is the
+same control to be extended to other artists, and are they also to be
+prohibited from exhibiting the opposite forms of vice and intemperance
+and meanness and indecency in sculpture and building and the other
+creative arts; and is he who cannot conform to this rule of ours to be
+prevented from practising his art in our State, lest the taste of our
+citizens be corrupted by him? We would not have our guardians grow up
+amid images of moral deformity, as in some noxious pasture, and there
+browse and feed upon many a baneful herb and flower day by day, little
+by little, until they silently gather a festering mass of corruption in
+their own soul. Let our artists rather be those who are gifted to
+discern the true nature of the beautiful and graceful; then will our
+youth dwell in a land of health, amid fair sights and sounds, and
+receive the good in everything; and beauty, the effluence of fair
+works, shall flow into the eye and ear, like a health-giving breeze
+from a purer region, and insensibly draw the soul from earliest years
+into likeness and sympathy with the beauty of reason.
+
+There can be no nobler training than that, he replied.
+
+And therefore, I said, Glaucon, musical training is a more potent
+instrument than any other, because rhythm and harmony find their way
+into the inward places of the soul, on which they mightily fasten,
+imparting grace, and making the soul of him who is rightly educated
+graceful, or of him who is ill-educated ungraceful; and also because he
+who has received this true education of the inner being will most
+shrewdly perceive omissions or faults in art and nature, and with a
+true taste, while he praises and rejoices over and receives into his
+soul the good, and becomes noble and good, he will justly blame and
+hate the bad, now in the days of his youth, even before he is able to
+know the reason why; and when reason comes he will recognise and salute
+the friend with whom his education has made him long familiar.
+
+Yes, he said, I quite agree with you in thinking that our youth should
+be trained in music and on the grounds which you mention.
+
+Just as in learning to read, I said, we were satisfied when we knew the
+letters of the alphabet, which are very few, in all their recurring
+sizes and combinations; not slighting them as unimportant whether they
+occupy a space large or small, but everywhere eager to make them out;
+and not thinking ourselves perfect in the art of reading until we
+recognise them wherever they are found:
+
+True—
+
+Or, as we recognise the reflection of letters in the water, or in a
+mirror, only when we know the letters themselves; the same art and
+study giving us the knowledge of both:
+
+Exactly—
+
+Even so, as I maintain, neither we nor our guardians, whom we have to
+educate, can ever become musical until we and they know the essential
+forms of temperance, courage, liberality, magnificence, and their
+kindred, as well as the contrary forms, in all their combinations, and
+can recognise them and their images wherever they are found, not
+slighting them either in small things or great, but believing them all
+to be within the sphere of one art and study.
+
+Most assuredly.
+
+And when a beautiful soul harmonizes with a beautiful form, and the two
+are cast in one mould, that will be the fairest of sights to him who
+has an eye to see it?
+
+The fairest indeed.
+
+And the fairest is also the loveliest?
+
+That may be assumed.
+
+And the man who has the spirit of harmony will be most in love with the
+loveliest; but he will not love him who is of an inharmonious soul?
+
+That is true, he replied, if the deficiency be in his soul; but if
+there be any merely bodily defect in another he will be patient of it,
+and will love all the same.
+
+I perceive, I said, that you have or have had experiences of this sort,
+and I agree. But let me ask you another question: Has excess of
+pleasure any affinity to temperance?
+
+How can that be? he replied; pleasure deprives a man of the use of his
+faculties quite as much as pain.
+
+Or any affinity to virtue in general?
+
+None whatever.
+
+Any affinity to wantonness and intemperance?
+
+Yes, the greatest.
+
+And is there any greater or keener pleasure than that of sensual love?
+
+No, nor a madder.
+
+Whereas true love is a love of beauty and order—temperate and
+harmonious?
+
+Quite true, he said.
+
+Then no intemperance or madness should be allowed to approach true
+love?
+
+Certainly not.
+
+Then mad or intemperate pleasure must never be allowed to come near the
+lover and his beloved; neither of them can have any part in it if their
+love is of the right sort?
+
+No, indeed, Socrates, it must never come near them.
+
+Then I suppose that in the city which we are founding you would make a
+law to the effect that a friend should use no other familiarity to his
+love than a father would use to his son, and then only for a noble
+purpose, and he must first have the other’s consent; and this rule is
+to limit him in all his intercourse, and he is never to be seen going
+further, or, if he exceeds, he is to be deemed guilty of coarseness and
+bad taste.
+
+I quite agree, he said.
+
+Thus much of music, which makes a fair ending; for what should be the
+end of music if not the love of beauty?
+
+I agree, he said.
+
+After music comes gymnastic, in which our youth are next to be trained.
+
+Certainly.
+
+Gymnastic as well as music should begin in early years; the training in
+it should be careful and should continue through life. Now my belief
+is,—and this is a matter upon which I should like to have your opinion
+in confirmation of my own, but my own belief is,—not that the good body
+by any bodily excellence improves the soul, but, on the contrary, that
+the good soul, by her own excellence, improves the body as far as this
+may be possible. What do you say?
+
+Yes, I agree.
+
+Then, to the mind when adequately trained, we shall be right in handing
+over the more particular care of the body; and in order to avoid
+prolixity we will now only give the general outlines of the subject.
+
+Very good.
+
+That they must abstain from intoxication has been already remarked by
+us; for of all persons a guardian should be the last to get drunk and
+not know where in the world he is.
+
+Yes, he said; that a guardian should require another guardian to take
+care of him is ridiculous indeed.
+
+But next, what shall we say of their food; for the men are in training
+for the great contest of all—are they not?
+
+Yes, he said.
+
+And will the habit of body of our ordinary athletes be suited to them?
+
+Why not?
+
+I am afraid, I said, that a habit of body such as they have is but a
+sleepy sort of thing, and rather perilous to health. Do you not observe
+that these athletes sleep away their lives, and are liable to most
+dangerous illnesses if they depart, in ever so slight a degree, from
+their customary regimen?
+
+Yes, I do.
+
+Then, I said, a finer sort of training will be required for our warrior
+athletes, who are to be like wakeful dogs, and to see and hear with the
+utmost keenness; amid the many changes of water and also of food, of
+summer heat and winter cold, which they will have to endure when on a
+campaign, they must not be liable to break down in health.
+
+That is my view.
+
+The really excellent gymnastic is twin sister of that simple music
+which we were just now describing.
+
+How so?
+
+Why, I conceive that there is a gymnastic which, like our music, is
+simple and good; and especially the military gymnastic.
+
+What do you mean?
+
+My meaning may be learned from Homer; he, you know, feeds his heroes at
+their feasts, when they are campaigning, on soldiers’ fare; they have
+no fish, although they are on the shores of the Hellespont, and they
+are not allowed boiled meats but only roast, which is the food most
+convenient for soldiers, requiring only that they should light a fire,
+and not involving the trouble of carrying about pots and pans.
+
+True.
+
+And I can hardly be mistaken in saying that sweet sauces are nowhere
+mentioned in Homer. In proscribing them, however, he is not singular;
+all professional athletes are well aware that a man who is to be in
+good condition should take nothing of the kind.
+
+Yes, he said; and knowing this, they are quite right in not taking
+them.
+
+Then you would not approve of Syracusan dinners, and the refinements of
+Sicilian cookery?
+
+I think not.
+
+Nor, if a man is to be in condition, would you allow him to have a
+Corinthian girl as his fair friend?
+
+Certainly not.
+
+Neither would you approve of the delicacies, as they are thought, of
+Athenian confectionary?
+
+Certainly not.
+
+All such feeding and living may be rightly compared by us to melody and
+song composed in the panharmonic style, and in all the rhythms.
+
+Exactly.
+
+There complexity engendered licence, and here disease; whereas
+simplicity in music was the parent of temperance in the soul; and
+simplicity in gymnastic of health in the body.
+
+Most true, he said.
+
+But when intemperance and diseases multiply in a State, halls of
+justice and medicine are always being opened; and the arts of the
+doctor and the lawyer give themselves airs, finding how keen is the
+interest which not only the slaves but the freemen of a city take about
+them.
+
+Of course.
+
+And yet what greater proof can there be of a bad and disgraceful state
+of education than this, that not only artisans and the meaner sort of
+people need the skill of first-rate physicians and judges, but also
+those who would profess to have had a liberal education? Is it not
+disgraceful, and a great sign of want of good-breeding, that a man
+should have to go abroad for his law and physic because he has none of
+his own at home, and must therefore surrender himself into the hands of
+other men whom he makes lords and judges over him?
+
+Of all things, he said, the most disgraceful.
+
+Would you say ‘most,’ I replied, when you consider that there is a
+further stage of the evil in which a man is not only a life-long
+litigant, passing all his days in the courts, either as plaintiff or
+defendant, but is actually led by his bad taste to pride himself on his
+litigiousness; he imagines that he is a master in dishonesty; able to
+take every crooked turn, and wriggle into and out of every hole,
+bending like a withy and getting out of the way of justice: and all for
+what?—in order to gain small points not worth mentioning, he not
+knowing that so to order his life as to be able to do without a napping
+judge is a far higher and nobler sort of thing. Is not that still more
+disgraceful?
+
+Yes, he said, that is still more disgraceful.
+
+Well, I said, and to require the help of medicine, not when a wound has
+to be cured, or on occasion of an epidemic, but just because, by
+indolence and a habit of life such as we have been describing, men fill
+themselves with waters and winds, as if their bodies were a marsh,
+compelling the ingenious sons of Asclepius to find more names for
+diseases, such as flatulence and catarrh; is not this, too, a disgrace?
+
+Yes, he said, they do certainly give very strange and newfangled names
+to diseases.
+
+Yes, I said, and I do not believe that there were any such diseases in
+the days of Asclepius; and this I infer from the circumstance that the
+hero Eurypylus, after he has been wounded in Homer, drinks a posset of
+Pramnian wine well besprinkled with barley-meal and grated cheese,
+which are certainly inflammatory, and yet the sons of Asclepius who
+were at the Trojan war do not blame the damsel who gives him the drink,
+or rebuke Patroclus, who is treating his case.
+
+Well, he said, that was surely an extraordinary drink to be given to a
+person in his condition.
+
+Not so extraordinary, I replied, if you bear in mind that in former
+days, as is commonly said, before the time of Herodicus, the guild of
+Asclepius did not practise our present system of medicine, which may be
+said to educate diseases. But Herodicus, being a trainer, and himself
+of a sickly constitution, by a combination of training and doctoring
+found out a way of torturing first and chiefly himself, and secondly
+the rest of the world.
+
+How was that? he said.
+
+By the invention of lingering death; for he had a mortal disease which
+he perpetually tended, and as recovery was out of the question, he
+passed his entire life as a valetudinarian; he could do nothing but
+attend upon himself, and he was in constant torment whenever he
+departed in anything from his usual regimen, and so dying hard, by the
+help of science he struggled on to old age.
+
+A rare reward of his skill!
+
+Yes, I said; a reward which a man might fairly expect who never
+understood that, if Asclepius did not instruct his descendants in
+valetudinarian arts, the omission arose, not from ignorance or
+inexperience of such a branch of medicine, but because he knew that in
+all well-ordered states every individual has an occupation to which he
+must attend, and has therefore no leisure to spend in continually being
+ill. This we remark in the case of the artisan, but, ludicrously
+enough, do not apply the same rule to people of the richer sort.
+
+How do you mean? he said.
+
+I mean this: When a carpenter is ill he asks the physician for a rough
+and ready cure; an emetic or a purge or a cautery or the knife,—these
+are his remedies. And if some one prescribes for him a course of
+dietetics, and tells him that he must swathe and swaddle his head, and
+all that sort of thing, he replies at once that he has no time to be
+ill, and that he sees no good in a life which is spent in nursing his
+disease to the neglect of his customary employment; and therefore
+bidding good-bye to this sort of physician, he resumes his ordinary
+habits, and either gets well and lives and does his business, or, if
+his constitution fails, he dies and has no more trouble.
+
+Yes, he said, and a man in his condition of life ought to use the art
+of medicine thus far only.
+
+Has he not, I said, an occupation; and what profit would there be in
+his life if he were deprived of his occupation?
+
+Quite true, he said.
+
+But with the rich man this is otherwise; of him we do not say that he
+has any specially appointed work which he must perform, if he would
+live.
+
+He is generally supposed to have nothing to do.
+
+Then you never heard of the saying of Phocylides, that as soon as a man
+has a livelihood he should practise virtue?
+
+Nay, he said, I think that he had better begin somewhat sooner.
+
+Let us not have a dispute with him about this, I said; but rather ask
+ourselves: Is the practice of virtue obligatory on the rich man, or can
+he live without it? And if obligatory on him, then let us raise a
+further question, whether this dieting of disorders, which is an
+impediment to the application of the mind in carpentering and the
+mechanical arts, does not equally stand in the way of the sentiment of
+Phocylides?
+
+Of that, he replied, there can be no doubt; such excessive care of the
+body, when carried beyond the rules of gymnastic, is most inimical to
+the practice of virtue.
+
+Yes, indeed, I replied, and equally incompatible with the management of
+a house, an army, or an office of state; and, what is most important of
+all, irreconcileable with any kind of study or thought or
+self-reflection—there is a constant suspicion that headache and
+giddiness are to be ascribed to philosophy, and hence all practising or
+making trial of virtue in the higher sense is absolutely stopped; for a
+man is always fancying that he is being made ill, and is in constant
+anxiety about the state of his body.
+
+Yes, likely enough.
+
+And therefore our politic Asclepius may be supposed to have exhibited
+the power of his art only to persons who, being generally of healthy
+constitution and habits of life, had a definite ailment; such as these
+he cured by purges and operations, and bade them live as usual, herein
+consulting the interests of the State; but bodies which disease had
+penetrated through and through he would not have attempted to cure by
+gradual processes of evacuation and infusion: he did not want to
+lengthen out good-for-nothing lives, or to have weak fathers begetting
+weaker sons;—if a man was not able to live in the ordinary way he had
+no business to cure him; for such a cure would have been of no use
+either to himself, or to the State.
+
+Then, he said, you regard Asclepius as a statesman.
+
+Clearly; and his character is further illustrated by his sons. Note
+that they were heroes in the days of old and practised the medicines of
+which I am speaking at the siege of Troy: You will remember how, when
+Pandarus wounded Menelaus, they
+
+‘Sucked the blood out of the wound, and sprinkled soothing remedies,’
+
+but they never prescribed what the patient was afterwards to eat or
+drink in the case of Menelaus, any more than in the case of Eurypylus;
+the remedies, as they conceived, were enough to heal any man who before
+he was wounded was healthy and regular in his habits; and even though
+he did happen to drink a posset of Pramnian wine, he might get well all
+the same. But they would have nothing to do with unhealthy and
+intemperate subjects, whose lives were of no use either to themselves
+or others; the art of medicine was not designed for their good, and
+though they were as rich as Midas, the sons of Asclepius would have
+declined to attend them.
+
+They were very acute persons, those sons of Asclepius.
+
+Naturally so, I replied. Nevertheless, the tragedians and Pindar
+disobeying our behests, although they acknowledge that Asclepius was
+the son of Apollo, say also that he was bribed into healing a rich man
+who was at the point of death, and for this reason he was struck by
+lightning. But we, in accordance with the principle already affirmed by
+us, will not believe them when they tell us both;—if he was the son of
+a god, we maintain that he was not avaricious; or, if he was
+avaricious, he was not the son of a god.
+
+All that, Socrates, is excellent; but I should like to put a question
+to you: Ought there not to be good physicians in a State, and are not
+the best those who have treated the greatest number of constitutions
+good and bad? and are not the best judges in like manner those who are
+acquainted with all sorts of moral natures?
+
+Yes, I said, I too would have good judges and good physicians. But do
+you know whom I think good?
+
+Will you tell me?
+
+I will, if I can. Let me however note that in the same question you
+join two things which are not the same.
+
+How so? he asked.
+
+Why, I said, you join physicians and judges. Now the most skilful
+physicians are those who, from their youth upwards, have combined with
+the knowledge of their art the greatest experience of disease; they had
+better not be robust in health, and should have had all manner of
+diseases in their own persons. For the body, as I conceive, is not the
+instrument with which they cure the body; in that case we could not
+allow them ever to be or to have been sickly; but they cure the body
+with the mind, and the mind which has become and is sick can cure
+nothing.
+
+That is very true, he said.
+
+But with the judge it is otherwise; since he governs mind by mind; he
+ought not therefore to have been trained among vicious minds, and to
+have associated with them from youth upwards, and to have gone through
+the whole calendar of crime, only in order that he may quickly infer
+the crimes of others as he might their bodily diseases from his own
+self-consciousness; the honourable mind which is to form a healthy
+judgment should have had no experience or contamination of evil habits
+when young. And this is the reason why in youth good men often appear
+to be simple, and are easily practised upon by the dishonest, because
+they have no examples of what evil is in their own souls.
+
+Yes, he said, they are far too apt to be deceived.
+
+Therefore, I said, the judge should not be young; he should have
+learned to know evil, not from his own soul, but from late and long
+observation of the nature of evil in others: knowledge should be his
+guide, not personal experience.
+
+Yes, he said, that is the ideal of a judge.
+
+Yes, I replied, and he will be a good man (which is my answer to your
+question); for he is good who has a good soul. But the cunning and
+suspicious nature of which we spoke,—he who has committed many crimes,
+and fancies himself to be a master in wickedness, when he is amongst
+his fellows, is wonderful in the precautions which he takes, because he
+judges of them by himself: but when he gets into the company of men of
+virtue, who have the experience of age, he appears to be a fool again,
+owing to his unseasonable suspicions; he cannot recognise an honest
+man, because he has no pattern of honesty in himself; at the same time,
+as the bad are more numerous than the good, and he meets with them
+oftener, he thinks himself, and is by others thought to be, rather wise
+than foolish.
+
+Most true, he said.
+
+Then the good and wise judge whom we are seeking is not this man, but
+the other; for vice cannot know virtue too, but a virtuous nature,
+educated by time, will acquire a knowledge both of virtue and vice: the
+virtuous, and not the vicious, man has wisdom—in my opinion.
+
+And in mine also.
+
+This is the sort of medicine, and this is the sort of law, which you
+will sanction in your state. They will minister to better natures,
+giving health both of soul and of body; but those who are diseased in
+their bodies they will leave to die, and the corrupt and incurable
+souls they will put an end to themselves.
+
+That is clearly the best thing both for the patients and for the State.
+
+And thus our youth, having been educated only in that simple music
+which, as we said, inspires temperance, will be reluctant to go to law.
+
+Clearly.
+
+And the musician, who, keeping to the same track, is content to
+practise the simple gymnastic, will have nothing to do with medicine
+unless in some extreme case.
+
+That I quite believe.
+
+The very exercises and tolls which he undergoes are intended to
+stimulate the spirited element of his nature, and not to increase his
+strength; he will not, like common athletes, use exercise and regimen
+to develope his muscles.
+
+Very right, he said.
+
+Neither are the two arts of music and gymnastic really designed, as is
+often supposed, the one for the training of the soul, the other for the
+training of the body.
+
+What then is the real object of them?
+
+I believe, I said, that the teachers of both have in view chiefly the
+improvement of the soul.
+
+How can that be? he asked.
+
+Did you never observe, I said, the effect on the mind itself of
+exclusive devotion to gymnastic, or the opposite effect of an exclusive
+devotion to music?
+
+In what way shown? he said.
+
+The one producing a temper of hardness and ferocity, the other of
+softness and effeminacy, I replied.
+
+Yes, he said, I am quite aware that the mere athlete becomes too much
+of a savage, and that the mere musician is melted and softened beyond
+what is good for him.
+
+Yet surely, I said, this ferocity only comes from spirit, which, if
+rightly educated, would give courage, but, if too much intensified, is
+liable to become hard and brutal.
+
+That I quite think.
+
+On the other hand the philosopher will have the quality of gentleness.
+And this also, when too much indulged, will turn to softness, but, if
+educated rightly, will be gentle and moderate.
+
+True.
+
+And in our opinion the guardians ought to have both these qualities?
+
+Assuredly.
+
+And both should be in harmony?
+
+Beyond question.
+
+And the harmonious soul is both temperate and courageous?
+
+Yes.
+
+And the inharmonious is cowardly and boorish?
+
+Very true.
+
+And, when a man allows music to play upon him and to pour into his soul
+through the funnel of his ears those sweet and soft and melancholy airs
+of which we were just now speaking, and his whole life is passed in
+warbling and the delights of song; in the first stage of the process
+the passion or spirit which is in him is tempered like iron, and made
+useful, instead of brittle and useless. But, if he carries on the
+softening and soothing process, in the next stage he begins to melt and
+waste, until he has wasted away his spirit and cut out the sinews of
+his soul; and he becomes a feeble warrior.
+
+Very true.
+
+If the element of spirit is naturally weak in him the change is
+speedily accomplished, but if he have a good deal, then the power of
+music weakening the spirit renders him excitable;—on the least
+provocation he flames up at once, and is speedily extinguished; instead
+of having spirit he grows irritable and passionate and is quite
+impracticable.
+
+Exactly.
+
+And so in gymnastics, if a man takes violent exercise and is a great
+feeder, and the reverse of a great student of music and philosophy, at
+first the high condition of his body fills him with pride and spirit,
+and he becomes twice the man that he was.
+
+Certainly.
+
+And what happens? if he do nothing else, and holds no converse with the
+Muses, does not even that intelligence which there may be in him,
+having no taste of any sort of learning or enquiry or thought or
+culture, grow feeble and dull and blind, his mind never waking up or
+receiving nourishment, and his senses not being purged of their mists?
+
+True, he said.
+
+And he ends by becoming a hater of philosophy, uncivilized, never using
+the weapon of persuasion,—he is like a wild beast, all violence and
+fierceness, and knows no other way of dealing; and he lives in all
+ignorance and evil conditions, and has no sense of propriety and grace.
+
+That is quite true, he said.
+
+And as there are two principles of human nature, one the spirited and
+the other the philosophical, some God, as I should say, has given
+mankind two arts answering to them (and only indirectly to the soul and
+body), in order that these two principles (like the strings of an
+instrument) may be relaxed or drawn tighter until they are duly
+harmonized.
+
+That appears to be the intention.
+
+And he who mingles music with gymnastic in the fairest proportions, and
+best attempers them to the soul, may be rightly called the true
+musician and harmonist in a far higher sense than the tuner of the
+strings.
+
+You are quite right, Socrates.
+
+And such a presiding genius will be always required in our State if the
+government is to last.
+
+Yes, he will be absolutely necessary.
+
+Such, then, are our principles of nurture and education: Where would be
+the use of going into further details about the dances of our citizens,
+or about their hunting and coursing, their gymnastic and equestrian
+contests? For these all follow the general principle, and having found
+that, we shall have no difficulty in discovering them.
+
+I dare say that there will be no difficulty.
+
+Very good, I said; then what is the next question? Must we not ask who
+are to be rulers and who subjects?
+
+Certainly.
+
+There can be no doubt that the elder must rule the younger.
+
+Clearly.
+
+And that the best of these must rule.
+
+That is also clear.
+
+Now, are not the best husbandmen those who are most devoted to
+husbandry?
+
+Yes.
+
+And as we are to have the best of guardians for our city, must they not
+be those who have most the character of guardians?
+
+Yes.
+
+And to this end they ought to be wise and efficient, and to have a
+special care of the State?
+
+True.
+
+And a man will be most likely to care about that which he loves?
+
+To be sure.
+
+And he will be most likely to love that which he regards as having the
+same interests with himself, and that of which the good or evil fortune
+is supposed by him at any time most to affect his own?
+
+Very true, he replied.
+
+Then there must be a selection. Let us note among the guardians those
+who in their whole life show the greatest eagerness to do what is for
+the good of their country, and the greatest repugnance to do what is
+against her interests.
+
+Those are the right men.
+
+And they will have to be watched at every age, in order that we may see
+whether they preserve their resolution, and never, under the influence
+either of force or enchantment, forget or cast off their sense of duty
+to the State.
+
+How cast off? he said.
+
+I will explain to you, I replied. A resolution may go out of a man’s
+mind either with his will or against his will; with his will when he
+gets rid of a falsehood and learns better, against his will whenever he
+is deprived of a truth.
+
+I understand, he said, the willing loss of a resolution; the meaning of
+the unwilling I have yet to learn.
+
+Why, I said, do you not see that men are unwillingly deprived of good,
+and willingly of evil? Is not to have lost the truth an evil, and to
+possess the truth a good? and you would agree that to conceive things
+as they are is to possess the truth?
+
+Yes, he replied; I agree with you in thinking that mankind are deprived
+of truth against their will.
+
+And is not this involuntary deprivation caused either by theft, or
+force, or enchantment?
+
+Still, he replied, I do not understand you.
+
+I fear that I must have been talking darkly, like the tragedians. I
+only mean that some men are changed by persuasion and that others
+forget; argument steals away the hearts of one class, and time of the
+other; and this I call theft. Now you understand me?
+
+Yes.
+
+Those again who are forced, are those whom the violence of some pain or
+grief compels to change their opinion.
+
+I understand, he said, and you are quite right.
+
+And you would also acknowledge that the enchanted are those who change
+their minds either under the softer influence of pleasure, or the
+sterner influence of fear?
+
+Yes, he said; everything that deceives may be said to enchant.
+
+Therefore, as I was just now saying, we must enquire who are the best
+guardians of their own conviction that what they think the interest of
+the State is to be the rule of their lives. We must watch them from
+their youth upwards, and make them perform actions in which they are
+most likely to forget or to be deceived, and he who remembers and is
+not deceived is to be selected, and he who fails in the trial is to be
+rejected. That will be the way?
+
+Yes.
+
+And there should also be toils and pains and conflicts prescribed for
+them, in which they will be made to give further proof of the same
+qualities.
+
+Very right, he replied.
+
+And then, I said, we must try them with enchantments—that is the third
+sort of test—and see what will be their behaviour: like those who take
+colts amid noise and tumult to see if they are of a timid nature, so
+must we take our youth amid terrors of some kind, and again pass them
+into pleasures, and prove them more thoroughly than gold is proved in
+the furnace, that we may discover whether they are armed against all
+enchantments, and of a noble bearing always, good guardians of
+themselves and of the music which they have learned, and retaining
+under all circumstances a rhythmical and harmonious nature, such as
+will be most serviceable to the individual and to the State. And he who
+at every age, as boy and youth and in mature life, has come out of the
+trial victorious and pure, shall be appointed a ruler and guardian of
+the State; he shall be honoured in life and death, and shall receive
+sepulture and other memorials of honour, the greatest that we have to
+give. But him who fails, we must reject. I am inclined to think that
+this is the sort of way in which our rulers and guardians should be
+chosen and appointed. I speak generally, and not with any pretension to
+exactness.
+
+And, speaking generally, I agree with you, he said.
+
+And perhaps the word ‘guardian’ in the fullest sense ought to be
+applied to this higher class only who preserve us against foreign
+enemies and maintain peace among our citizens at home, that the one may
+not have the will, or the others the power, to harm us. The young men
+whom we before called guardians may be more properly designated
+auxiliaries and supporters of the principles of the rulers.
+
+I agree with you, he said.
+
+How then may we devise one of those needful falsehoods of which we
+lately spoke—just one royal lie which may deceive the rulers, if that
+be possible, and at any rate the rest of the city?
+
+What sort of lie? he said.
+
+Nothing new, I replied; only an old Phoenician tale (Laws) of what has
+often occurred before now in other places, (as the poets say, and have
+made the world believe,) though not in our time, and I do not know
+whether such an event could ever happen again, or could now even be
+made probable, if it did.
+
+How your words seem to hesitate on your lips!
+
+You will not wonder, I replied, at my hesitation when you have heard.
+
+Speak, he said, and fear not.
+
+Well then, I will speak, although I really know not how to look you in
+the face, or in what words to utter the audacious fiction, which I
+propose to communicate gradually, first to the rulers, then to the
+soldiers, and lastly to the people. They are to be told that their
+youth was a dream, and the education and training which they received
+from us, an appearance only; in reality during all that time they were
+being formed and fed in the womb of the earth, where they themselves
+and their arms and appurtenances were manufactured; when they were
+completed, the earth, their mother, sent them up; and so, their country
+being their mother and also their nurse, they are bound to advise for
+her good, and to defend her against attacks, and her citizens they are
+to regard as children of the earth and their own brothers.
+
+You had good reason, he said, to be ashamed of the lie which you were
+going to tell.
+
+True, I replied, but there is more coming; I have only told you half.
+Citizens, we shall say to them in our tale, you are brothers, yet God
+has framed you differently. Some of you have the power of command, and
+in the composition of these he has mingled gold, wherefore also they
+have the greatest honour; others he has made of silver, to be
+auxiliaries; others again who are to be husbandmen and craftsmen he has
+composed of brass and iron; and the species will generally be preserved
+in the children. But as all are of the same original stock, a golden
+parent will sometimes have a silver son, or a silver parent a golden
+son. And God proclaims as a first principle to the rulers, and above
+all else, that there is nothing which they should so anxiously guard,
+or of which they are to be such good guardians, as of the purity of the
+race. They should observe what elements mingle in their offspring; for
+if the son of a golden or silver parent has an admixture of brass and
+iron, then nature orders a transposition of ranks, and the eye of the
+ruler must not be pitiful towards the child because he has to descend
+in the scale and become a husbandman or artisan, just as there may be
+sons of artisans who having an admixture of gold or silver in them are
+raised to honour, and become guardians or auxiliaries. For an oracle
+says that when a man of brass or iron guards the State, it will be
+destroyed. Such is the tale; is there any possibility of making our
+citizens believe in it?
+
+Not in the present generation, he replied; there is no way of
+accomplishing this; but their sons may be made to believe in the tale,
+and their sons’ sons, and posterity after them.
+
+I see the difficulty, I replied; yet the fostering of such a belief
+will make them care more for the city and for one another. Enough,
+however, of the fiction, which may now fly abroad upon the wings of
+rumour, while we arm our earth-born heroes, and lead them forth under
+the command of their rulers. Let them look round and select a spot
+whence they can best suppress insurrection, if any prove refractory
+within, and also defend themselves against enemies, who like wolves may
+come down on the fold from without; there let them encamp, and when
+they have encamped, let them sacrifice to the proper Gods and prepare
+their dwellings.
+
+Just so, he said.
+
+And their dwellings must be such as will shield them against the cold
+of winter and the heat of summer.
+
+I suppose that you mean houses, he replied.
+
+Yes, I said; but they must be the houses of soldiers, and not of
+shop-keepers.
+
+What is the difference? he said.
+
+That I will endeavour to explain, I replied. To keep watch-dogs, who,
+from want of discipline or hunger, or some evil habit or other, would
+turn upon the sheep and worry them, and behave not like dogs but
+wolves, would be a foul and monstrous thing in a shepherd?
+
+Truly monstrous, he said.
+
+And therefore every care must be taken that our auxiliaries, being
+stronger than our citizens, may not grow to be too much for them and
+become savage tyrants instead of friends and allies?
+
+Yes, great care should be taken.
+
+And would not a really good education furnish the best safeguard?
+
+But they are well-educated already, he replied.
+
+I cannot be so confident, my dear Glaucon, I said; I am much more
+certain that they ought to be, and that true education, whatever that
+may be, will have the greatest tendency to civilize and humanize them
+in their relations to one another, and to those who are under their
+protection.
+
+Very true, he replied.
+
+And not only their education, but their habitations, and all that
+belongs to them, should be such as will neither impair their virtue as
+guardians, nor tempt them to prey upon the other citizens. Any man of
+sense must acknowledge that.
+
+He must.
+
+Then now let us consider what will be their way of life, if they are to
+realize our idea of them. In the first place, none of them should have
+any property of his own beyond what is absolutely necessary; neither
+should they have a private house or store closed against any one who
+has a mind to enter; their provisions should be only such as are
+required by trained warriors, who are men of temperance and courage;
+they should agree to receive from the citizens a fixed rate of pay,
+enough to meet the expenses of the year and no more; and they will go
+to mess and live together like soldiers in a camp. Gold and silver we
+will tell them that they have from God; the diviner metal is within
+them, and they have therefore no need of the dross which is current
+among men, and ought not to pollute the divine by any such earthly
+admixture; for that commoner metal has been the source of many unholy
+deeds, but their own is undefiled. And they alone of all the citizens
+may not touch or handle silver or gold, or be under the same roof with
+them, or wear them, or drink from them. And this will be their
+salvation, and they will be the saviours of the State. But should they
+ever acquire homes or lands or moneys of their own, they will become
+housekeepers and husbandmen instead of guardians, enemies and tyrants
+instead of allies of the other citizens; hating and being hated,
+plotting and being plotted against, they will pass their whole life in
+much greater terror of internal than of external enemies, and the hour
+of ruin, both to themselves and to the rest of the State, will be at
+hand. For all which reasons may we not say that thus shall our State be
+ordered, and that these shall be the regulations appointed by us for
+guardians concerning their houses and all other matters?
+
+Yes, said Glaucon.
+
+
+
+
+ BOOK IV.
+
+
+Here Adeimantus interposed a question: How would you answer, Socrates,
+said he, if a person were to say that you are making these people
+miserable, and that they are the cause of their own unhappiness; the
+city in fact belongs to them, but they are none the better for it;
+whereas other men acquire lands, and build large and handsome houses,
+and have everything handsome about them, offering sacrifices to the
+gods on their own account, and practising hospitality; moreover, as you
+were saying just now, they have gold and silver, and all that is usual
+among the favourites of fortune; but our poor citizens are no better
+than mercenaries who are quartered in the city and are always mounting
+guard?
+
+Yes, I said; and you may add that they are only fed, and not paid in
+addition to their food, like other men; and therefore they cannot, if
+they would, take a journey of pleasure; they have no money to spend on
+a mistress or any other luxurious fancy, which, as the world goes, is
+thought to be happiness; and many other accusations of the same nature
+might be added.
+
+But, said he, let us suppose all this to be included in the charge.
+
+You mean to ask, I said, what will be our answer?
+
+Yes.
+
+If we proceed along the old path, my belief, I said, is that we shall
+find the answer. And our answer will be that, even as they are, our
+guardians may very likely be the happiest of men; but that our aim in
+founding the State was not the disproportionate happiness of any one
+class, but the greatest happiness of the whole; we thought that in a
+State which is ordered with a view to the good of the whole we should
+be most likely to find justice, and in the ill-ordered State injustice:
+and, having found them, we might then decide which of the two is the
+happier. At present, I take it, we are fashioning the happy State, not
+piecemeal, or with a view of making a few happy citizens, but as a
+whole; and by-and-by we will proceed to view the opposite kind of
+State. Suppose that we were painting a statue, and some one came up to
+us and said, Why do you not put the most beautiful colours on the most
+beautiful parts of the body—the eyes ought to be purple, but you have
+made them black—to him we might fairly answer, Sir, you would not
+surely have us beautify the eyes to such a degree that they are no
+longer eyes; consider rather whether, by giving this and the other
+features their due proportion, we make the whole beautiful. And so I
+say to you, do not compel us to assign to the guardians a sort of
+happiness which will make them anything but guardians; for we too can
+clothe our husbandmen in royal apparel, and set crowns of gold on their
+heads, and bid them till the ground as much as they like, and no more.
+Our potters also might be allowed to repose on couches, and feast by
+the fireside, passing round the winecup, while their wheel is
+conveniently at hand, and working at pottery only as much as they like;
+in this way we might make every class happy—and then, as you imagine,
+the whole State would be happy. But do not put this idea into our
+heads; for, if we listen to you, the husbandman will be no longer a
+husbandman, the potter will cease to be a potter, and no one will have
+the character of any distinct class in the State. Now this is not of
+much consequence where the corruption of society, and pretension to be
+what you are not, is confined to cobblers; but when the guardians of
+the laws and of the government are only seeming and not real guardians,
+then see how they turn the State upside down; and on the other hand
+they alone have the power of giving order and happiness to the State.
+We mean our guardians to be true saviours and not the destroyers of the
+State, whereas our opponent is thinking of peasants at a festival, who
+are enjoying a life of revelry, not of citizens who are doing their
+duty to the State. But, if so, we mean different things, and he is
+speaking of something which is not a State. And therefore we must
+consider whether in appointing our guardians we would look to their
+greatest happiness individually, or whether this principle of happiness
+does not rather reside in the State as a whole. But if the latter be
+the truth, then the guardians and auxiliaries, and all others equally
+with them, must be compelled or induced to do their own work in the
+best way. And thus the whole State will grow up in a noble order, and
+the several classes will receive the proportion of happiness which
+nature assigns to them.
+
+I think that you are quite right.
+
+I wonder whether you will agree with another remark which occurs to me.
+
+What may that be?
+
+There seem to be two causes of the deterioration of the arts.
+
+What are they?
+
+Wealth, I said, and poverty.
+
+How do they act?
+
+The process is as follows: When a potter becomes rich, will he, think
+you, any longer take the same pains with his art?
+
+Certainly not.
+
+He will grow more and more indolent and careless?
+
+Very true.
+
+And the result will be that he becomes a worse potter?
+
+Yes; he greatly deteriorates.
+
+But, on the other hand, if he has no money, and cannot provide himself
+with tools or instruments, he will not work equally well himself, nor
+will he teach his sons or apprentices to work equally well.
+
+Certainly not.
+
+Then, under the influence either of poverty or of wealth, workmen and
+their work are equally liable to degenerate?
+
+That is evident.
+
+Here, then, is a discovery of new evils, I said, against which the
+guardians will have to watch, or they will creep into the city
+unobserved.
+
+What evils?
+
+Wealth, I said, and poverty; the one is the parent of luxury and
+indolence, and the other of meanness and viciousness, and both of
+discontent.
+
+That is very true, he replied; but still I should like to know,
+Socrates, how our city will be able to go to war, especially against an
+enemy who is rich and powerful, if deprived of the sinews of war.
+
+There would certainly be a difficulty, I replied, in going to war with
+one such enemy; but there is no difficulty where there are two of them.
+
+How so? he asked.
+
+In the first place, I said, if we have to fight, our side will be
+trained warriors fighting against an army of rich men.
+
+That is true, he said.
+
+And do you not suppose, Adeimantus, that a single boxer who was perfect
+in his art would easily be a match for two stout and well-to-do
+gentlemen who were not boxers?
+
+Hardly, if they came upon him at once.
+
+What, now, I said, if he were able to run away and then turn and strike
+at the one who first came up? And supposing he were to do this several
+times under the heat of a scorching sun, might he not, being an expert,
+overturn more than one stout personage?
+
+Certainly, he said, there would be nothing wonderful in that.
+
+And yet rich men probably have a greater superiority in the science and
+practise of boxing than they have in military qualities.
+
+Likely enough.
+
+Then we may assume that our athletes will be able to fight with two or
+three times their own number?
+
+I agree with you, for I think you right.
+
+And suppose that, before engaging, our citizens send an embassy to one
+of the two cities, telling them what is the truth: Silver and gold we
+neither have nor are permitted to have, but you may; do you therefore
+come and help us in war, and take the spoils of the other city: Who, on
+hearing these words, would choose to fight against lean wiry dogs,
+rather than, with the dogs on their side, against fat and tender sheep?
+
+That is not likely; and yet there might be a danger to the poor State
+if the wealth of many States were to be gathered into one.
+
+But how simple of you to use the term State at all of any but our own!
+
+Why so?
+
+You ought to speak of other States in the plural number; not one of
+them is a city, but many cities, as they say in the game. For indeed
+any city, however small, is in fact divided into two, one the city of
+the poor, the other of the rich; these are at war with one another; and
+in either there are many smaller divisions, and you would be altogether
+beside the mark if you treated them all as a single State. But if you
+deal with them as many, and give the wealth or power or persons of the
+one to the others, you will always have a great many friends and not
+many enemies. And your State, while the wise order which has now been
+prescribed continues to prevail in her, will be the greatest of States,
+I do not mean to say in reputation or appearance, but in deed and
+truth, though she number not more than a thousand defenders. A single
+State which is her equal you will hardly find, either among Hellenes or
+barbarians, though many that appear to be as great and many times
+greater.
+
+That is most true, he said.
+
+And what, I said, will be the best limit for our rulers to fix when
+they are considering the size of the State and the amount of territory
+which they are to include, and beyond which they will not go?
+
+What limit would you propose?
+
+I would allow the State to increase so far as is consistent with unity;
+that, I think, is the proper limit.
+
+Very good, he said.
+
+Here then, I said, is another order which will have to be conveyed to
+our guardians: Let our city be accounted neither large nor small, but
+one and self-sufficing.
+
+And surely, said he, this is not a very severe order which we impose
+upon them.
+
+And the other, said I, of which we were speaking before is lighter
+still,—I mean the duty of degrading the offspring of the guardians when
+inferior, and of elevating into the rank of guardians the offspring of
+the lower classes, when naturally superior. The intention was, that, in
+the case of the citizens generally, each individual should be put to
+the use for which nature intended him, one to one work, and then every
+man would do his own business, and be one and not many; and so the
+whole city would be one and not many.
+
+Yes, he said; that is not so difficult.
+
+The regulations which we are prescribing, my good Adeimantus, are not,
+as might be supposed, a number of great principles, but trifles all, if
+care be taken, as the saying is, of the one great thing,—a thing,
+however, which I would rather call, not great, but sufficient for our
+purpose.
+
+What may that be? he asked.
+
+Education, I said, and nurture: If our citizens are well educated, and
+grow into sensible men, they will easily see their way through all
+these, as well as other matters which I omit; such, for example, as
+marriage, the possession of women and the procreation of children,
+which will all follow the general principle that friends have all
+things in common, as the proverb says.
+
+That will be the best way of settling them.
+
+Also, I said, the State, if once started well, moves with accumulating
+force like a wheel. For good nurture and education implant good
+constitutions, and these good constitutions taking root in a good
+education improve more and more, and this improvement affects the breed
+in man as in other animals.
+
+Very possibly, he said.
+
+Then to sum up: This is the point to which, above all, the attention of
+our rulers should be directed,—that music and gymnastic be preserved in
+their original form, and no innovation made. They must do their utmost
+to maintain them intact. And when any one says that mankind most regard
+
+‘The newest song which the singers have,’
+
+they will be afraid that he may be praising, not new songs, but a new
+kind of song; and this ought not to be praised, or conceived to be the
+meaning of the poet; for any musical innovation is full of danger to
+the whole State, and ought to be prohibited. So Damon tells me, and I
+can quite believe him;—he says that when modes of music change, the
+fundamental laws of the State always change with them.
+
+Yes, said Adeimantus; and you may add my suffrage to Damon’s and your
+own.
+
+Then, I said, our guardians must lay the foundations of their fortress
+in music?
+
+Yes, he said; the lawlessness of which you speak too easily steals in.
+
+Yes, I replied, in the form of amusement; and at first sight it appears
+harmless.
+
+Why, yes, he said, and there is no harm; were it not that little by
+little this spirit of licence, finding a home, imperceptibly penetrates
+into manners and customs; whence, issuing with greater force, it
+invades contracts between man and man, and from contracts goes on to
+laws and constitutions, in utter recklessness, ending at last,
+Socrates, by an overthrow of all rights, private as well as public.
+
+Is that true? I said.
+
+That is my belief, he replied.
+
+Then, as I was saying, our youth should be trained from the first in a
+stricter system, for if amusements become lawless, and the youths
+themselves become lawless, they can never grow up into well-conducted
+and virtuous citizens.
+
+Very true, he said.
+
+And when they have made a good beginning in play, and by the help of
+music have gained the habit of good order, then this habit of order, in
+a manner how unlike the lawless play of the others! will accompany them
+in all their actions and be a principle of growth to them, and if there
+be any fallen places in the State will raise them up again.
+
+Very true, he said.
+
+Thus educated, they will invent for themselves any lesser rules which
+their predecessors have altogether neglected.
+
+What do you mean?
+
+I mean such things as these:—when the young are to be silent before
+their elders; how they are to show respect to them by standing and
+making them sit; what honour is due to parents; what garments or shoes
+are to be worn; the mode of dressing the hair; deportment and manners
+in general. You would agree with me?
+
+Yes.
+
+But there is, I think, small wisdom in legislating about such
+matters,—I doubt if it is ever done; nor are any precise written
+enactments about them likely to be lasting.
+
+Impossible.
+
+It would seem, Adeimantus, that the direction in which education starts
+a man, will determine his future life. Does not like always attract
+like?
+
+To be sure.
+
+Until some one rare and grand result is reached which may be good, and
+may be the reverse of good?
+
+That is not to be denied.
+
+And for this reason, I said, I shall not attempt to legislate further
+about them.
+
+Naturally enough, he replied.
+
+Well, and about the business of the agora, and the ordinary dealings
+between man and man, or again about agreements with artisans; about
+insult and injury, or the commencement of actions, and the appointment
+of juries, what would you say? there may also arise questions about any
+impositions and exactions of market and harbour dues which may be
+required, and in general about the regulations of markets, police,
+harbours, and the like. But, oh heavens! shall we condescend to
+legislate on any of these particulars?
+
+I think, he said, that there is no need to impose laws about them on
+good men; what regulations are necessary they will find out soon enough
+for themselves.
+
+Yes, I said, my friend, if God will only preserve to them the laws
+which we have given them.
+
+And without divine help, said Adeimantus, they will go on for ever
+making and mending their laws and their lives in the hope of attaining
+perfection.
+
+You would compare them, I said, to those invalids who, having no
+self-restraint, will not leave off their habits of intemperance?
+
+Exactly.
+
+Yes, I said; and what a delightful life they lead! they are always
+doctoring and increasing and complicating their disorders, and always
+fancying that they will be cured by any nostrum which anybody advises
+them to try.
+
+Such cases are very common, he said, with invalids of this sort.
+
+Yes, I replied; and the charming thing is that they deem him their
+worst enemy who tells them the truth, which is simply that, unless they
+give up eating and drinking and wenching and idling, neither drug nor
+cautery nor spell nor amulet nor any other remedy will avail.
+
+Charming! he replied. I see nothing charming in going into a passion
+with a man who tells you what is right.
+
+These gentlemen, I said, do not seem to be in your good graces.
+
+Assuredly not.
+
+Nor would you praise the behaviour of States which act like the men
+whom I was just now describing. For are there not ill-ordered States in
+which the citizens are forbidden under pain of death to alter the
+constitution; and yet he who most sweetly courts those who live under
+this regime and indulges them and fawns upon them and is skilful in
+anticipating and gratifying their humours is held to be a great and
+good statesman—do not these States resemble the persons whom I was
+describing?
+
+Yes, he said; the States are as bad as the men; and I am very far from
+praising them.
+
+But do you not admire, I said, the coolness and dexterity of these
+ready ministers of political corruption?
+
+Yes, he said, I do; but not of all of them, for there are some whom the
+applause of the multitude has deluded into the belief that they are
+really statesmen, and these are not much to be admired.
+
+What do you mean? I said; you should have more feeling for them. When a
+man cannot measure, and a great many others who cannot measure declare
+that he is four cubits high, can he help believing what they say?
+
+Nay, he said, certainly not in that case.
+
+Well, then, do not be angry with them; for are they not as good as a
+play, trying their hand at paltry reforms such as I was describing;
+they are always fancying that by legislation they will make an end of
+frauds in contracts, and the other rascalities which I was mentioning,
+not knowing that they are in reality cutting off the heads of a hydra?
+
+Yes, he said; that is just what they are doing.
+
+I conceive, I said, that the true legislator will not trouble himself
+with this class of enactments whether concerning laws or the
+constitution either in an ill-ordered or in a well-ordered State; for
+in the former they are quite useless, and in the latter there will be
+no difficulty in devising them; and many of them will naturally flow
+out of our previous regulations.
+
+What, then, he said, is still remaining to us of the work of
+legislation?
+
+Nothing to us, I replied; but to Apollo, the God of Delphi, there
+remains the ordering of the greatest and noblest and chiefest things of
+all.
+
+Which are they? he said.
+
+The institution of temples and sacrifices, and the entire service of
+gods, demigods, and heroes; also the ordering of the repositories of
+the dead, and the rites which have to be observed by him who would
+propitiate the inhabitants of the world below. These are matters of
+which we are ignorant ourselves, and as founders of a city we should be
+unwise in trusting them to any interpreter but our ancestral deity. He
+is the god who sits in the centre, on the navel of the earth, and he is
+the interpreter of religion to all mankind.
+
+You are right, and we will do as you propose.
+
+But where, amid all this, is justice? son of Ariston, tell me where.
+Now that our city has been made habitable, light a candle and search,
+and get your brother and Polemarchus and the rest of our friends to
+help, and let us see where in it we can discover justice and where
+injustice, and in what they differ from one another, and which of them
+the man who would be happy should have for his portion, whether seen or
+unseen by gods and men.
+
+Nonsense, said Glaucon: did you not promise to search yourself, saying
+that for you not to help justice in her need would be an impiety?
+
+I do not deny that I said so, and as you remind me, I will be as good
+as my word; but you must join.
+
+We will, he replied.
+
+Well, then, I hope to make the discovery in this way: I mean to begin
+with the assumption that our State, if rightly ordered, is perfect.
+
+That is most certain.
+
+And being perfect, is therefore wise and valiant and temperate and
+just.
+
+That is likewise clear.
+
+And whichever of these qualities we find in the State, the one which is
+not found will be the residue?
+
+Very good.
+
+If there were four things, and we were searching for one of them,
+wherever it might be, the one sought for might be known to us from the
+first, and there would be no further trouble; or we might know the
+other three first, and then the fourth would clearly be the one left.
+
+Very true, he said.
+
+And is not a similar method to be pursued about the virtues, which are
+also four in number?
+
+Clearly.
+
+First among the virtues found in the State, wisdom comes into view, and
+in this I detect a certain peculiarity.
+
+What is that?
+
+The State which we have been describing is said to be wise as being
+good in counsel?
+
+Very true.
+
+And good counsel is clearly a kind of knowledge, for not by ignorance,
+but by knowledge, do men counsel well?
+
+Clearly.
+
+And the kinds of knowledge in a State are many and diverse?
+
+Of course.
+
+There is the knowledge of the carpenter; but is that the sort of
+knowledge which gives a city the title of wise and good in counsel?
+
+Certainly not; that would only give a city the reputation of skill in
+carpentering.
+
+Then a city is not to be called wise because possessing a knowledge
+which counsels for the best about wooden implements?
+
+Certainly not.
+
+Nor by reason of a knowledge which advises about brazen pots, I said,
+nor as possessing any other similar knowledge?
+
+Not by reason of any of them, he said.
+
+Nor yet by reason of a knowledge which cultivates the earth; that would
+give the city the name of agricultural?
+
+Yes.
+
+Well, I said, and is there any knowledge in our recently-founded State
+among any of the citizens which advises, not about any particular thing
+in the State, but about the whole, and considers how a State can best
+deal with itself and with other States?
+
+There certainly is.
+
+And what is this knowledge, and among whom is it found? I asked.
+
+It is the knowledge of the guardians, he replied, and is found among
+those whom we were just now describing as perfect guardians.
+
+And what is the name which the city derives from the possession of this
+sort of knowledge?
+
+The name of good in counsel and truly wise.
+
+And will there be in our city more of these true guardians or more
+smiths?
+
+The smiths, he replied, will be far more numerous.
+
+Will not the guardians be the smallest of all the classes who receive a
+name from the profession of some kind of knowledge?
+
+Much the smallest.
+
+And so by reason of the smallest part or class, and of the knowledge
+which resides in this presiding and ruling part of itself, the whole
+State, being thus constituted according to nature, will be wise; and
+this, which has the only knowledge worthy to be called wisdom, has been
+ordained by nature to be of all classes the least.
+
+Most true.
+
+Thus, then, I said, the nature and place in the State of one of the
+four virtues has somehow or other been discovered.
+
+And, in my humble opinion, very satisfactorily discovered, he replied.
+
+Again, I said, there is no difficulty in seeing the nature of courage,
+and in what part that quality resides which gives the name of
+courageous to the State.
+
+How do you mean?
+
+Why, I said, every one who calls any State courageous or cowardly, will
+be thinking of the part which fights and goes out to war on the State’s
+behalf.
+
+No one, he replied, would ever think of any other.
+
+The rest of the citizens may be courageous or may be cowardly, but
+their courage or cowardice will not, as I conceive, have the effect of
+making the city either the one or the other.
+
+Certainly not.
+
+The city will be courageous in virtue of a portion of herself which
+preserves under all circumstances that opinion about the nature of
+things to be feared and not to be feared in which our legislator
+educated them; and this is what you term courage.
+
+I should like to hear what you are saying once more, for I do not think
+that I perfectly understand you.
+
+I mean that courage is a kind of salvation.
+
+Salvation of what?
+
+Of the opinion respecting things to be feared, what they are and of
+what nature, which the law implants through education; and I mean by
+the words ‘under all circumstances’ to intimate that in pleasure or in
+pain, or under the influence of desire or fear, a man preserves, and
+does not lose this opinion. Shall I give you an illustration?
+
+If you please.
+
+You know, I said, that dyers, when they want to dye wool for making the
+true sea-purple, begin by selecting their white colour first; this they
+prepare and dress with much care and pains, in order that the white
+ground may take the purple hue in full perfection. The dyeing then
+proceeds; and whatever is dyed in this manner becomes a fast colour,
+and no washing either with lyes or without them can take away the
+bloom. But, when the ground has not been duly prepared, you will have
+noticed how poor is the look either of purple or of any other colour.
+
+Yes, he said; I know that they have a washed-out and ridiculous
+appearance.
+
+Then now, I said, you will understand what our object was in selecting
+our soldiers, and educating them in music and gymnastic; we were
+contriving influences which would prepare them to take the dye of the
+laws in perfection, and the colour of their opinion about dangers and
+of every other opinion was to be indelibly fixed by their nurture and
+training, not to be washed away by such potent lyes as
+pleasure—mightier agent far in washing the soul than any soda or lye;
+or by sorrow, fear, and desire, the mightiest of all other solvents.
+And this sort of universal saving power of true opinion in conformity
+with law about real and false dangers I call and maintain to be
+courage, unless you disagree.
+
+But I agree, he replied; for I suppose that you mean to exclude mere
+uninstructed courage, such as that of a wild beast or of a slave—this,
+in your opinion, is not the courage which the law ordains, and ought to
+have another name.
+
+Most certainly.
+
+Then I may infer courage to be such as you describe?
+
+Why, yes, said I, you may, and if you add the words ‘of a citizen,’ you
+will not be far wrong;—hereafter, if you like, we will carry the
+examination further, but at present we are seeking not for courage but
+justice; and for the purpose of our enquiry we have said enough.
+
+You are right, he replied.
+
+Two virtues remain to be discovered in the State—first, temperance, and
+then justice which is the end of our search.
+
+Very true.
+
+Now, can we find justice without troubling ourselves about temperance?
+
+I do not know how that can be accomplished, he said, nor do I desire
+that justice should be brought to light and temperance lost sight of;
+and therefore I wish that you would do me the favour of considering
+temperance first.
+
+Certainly, I replied, I should not be justified in refusing your
+request.
+
+Then consider, he said.
+
+Yes, I replied; I will; and as far as I can at present see, the virtue
+of temperance has more of the nature of harmony and symphony than the
+preceding.
+
+How so? he asked.
+
+Temperance, I replied, is the ordering or controlling of certain
+pleasures and desires; this is curiously enough implied in the saying
+of ‘a man being his own master;’ and other traces of the same notion
+may be found in language.
+
+No doubt, he said.
+
+There is something ridiculous in the expression ‘master of himself;’
+for the master is also the servant and the servant the master; and in
+all these modes of speaking the same person is denoted.
+
+Certainly.
+
+The meaning is, I believe, that in the human soul there is a better and
+also a worse principle; and when the better has the worse under
+control, then a man is said to be master of himself; and this is a term
+of praise: but when, owing to evil education or association, the better
+principle, which is also the smaller, is overwhelmed by the greater
+mass of the worse—in this case he is blamed and is called the slave of
+self and unprincipled.
+
+Yes, there is reason in that.
+
+And now, I said, look at our newly-created State, and there you will
+find one of these two conditions realized; for the State, as you will
+acknowledge, may be justly called master of itself, if the words
+‘temperance’ and ‘self-mastery’ truly express the rule of the better
+part over the worse.
+
+Yes, he said, I see that what you say is true.
+
+Let me further note that the manifold and complex pleasures and desires
+and pains are generally found in children and women and servants, and
+in the freemen so called who are of the lowest and more numerous class.
+
+Certainly, he said.
+
+Whereas the simple and moderate desires which follow reason, and are
+under the guidance of mind and true opinion, are to be found only in a
+few, and those the best born and best educated.
+
+Very true.
+
+These two, as you may perceive, have a place in our State; and the
+meaner desires of the many are held down by the virtuous desires and
+wisdom of the few.
+
+That I perceive, he said.
+
+Then if there be any city which may be described as master of its own
+pleasures and desires, and master of itself, ours may claim such a
+designation?
+
+Certainly, he replied.
+
+It may also be called temperate, and for the same reasons?
+
+Yes.
+
+And if there be any State in which rulers and subjects will be agreed
+as to the question who are to rule, that again will be our State?
+
+Undoubtedly.
+
+And the citizens being thus agreed among themselves, in which class
+will temperance be found—in the rulers or in the subjects?
+
+In both, as I should imagine, he replied.
+
+Do you observe that we were not far wrong in our guess that temperance
+was a sort of harmony?
+
+Why so?
+
+Why, because temperance is unlike courage and wisdom, each of which
+resides in a part only, the one making the State wise and the other
+valiant; not so temperance, which extends to the whole, and runs
+through all the notes of the scale, and produces a harmony of the
+weaker and the stronger and the middle class, whether you suppose them
+to be stronger or weaker in wisdom or power or numbers or wealth, or
+anything else. Most truly then may we deem temperance to be the
+agreement of the naturally superior and inferior, as to the right to
+rule of either, both in states and individuals.
+
+I entirely agree with you.
+
+And so, I said, we may consider three out of the four virtues to have
+been discovered in our State. The last of those qualities which make a
+state virtuous must be justice, if we only knew what that was.
+
+The inference is obvious.
+
+The time then has arrived, Glaucon, when, like huntsmen, we should
+surround the cover, and look sharp that justice does not steal away,
+and pass out of sight and escape us; for beyond a doubt she is
+somewhere in this country: watch therefore and strive to catch a sight
+of her, and if you see her first, let me know.
+
+Would that I could! but you should regard me rather as a follower who
+has just eyes enough to see what you show him—that is about as much as
+I am good for.
+
+Offer up a prayer with me and follow.
+
+I will, but you must show me the way.
+
+Here is no path, I said, and the wood is dark and perplexing; still we
+must push on.
+
+Let us push on.
+
+Here I saw something: Halloo! I said, I begin to perceive a track, and
+I believe that the quarry will not escape.
+
+Good news, he said.
+
+Truly, I said, we are stupid fellows.
+
+Why so?
+
+Why, my good sir, at the beginning of our enquiry, ages ago, there was
+justice tumbling out at our feet, and we never saw her; nothing could
+be more ridiculous. Like people who go about looking for what they have
+in their hands—that was the way with us—we looked not at what we were
+seeking, but at what was far off in the distance; and therefore, I
+suppose, we missed her.
+
+What do you mean?
+
+I mean to say that in reality for a long time past we have been talking
+of justice, and have failed to recognise her.
+
+I grow impatient at the length of your exordium.
+
+Well then, tell me, I said, whether I am right or not: You remember the
+original principle which we were always laying down at the foundation
+of the State, that one man should practise one thing only, the thing to
+which his nature was best adapted;—now justice is this principle or a
+part of it.
+
+Yes, we often said that one man should do one thing only.
+
+Further, we affirmed that justice was doing one’s own business, and not
+being a busybody; we said so again and again, and many others have said
+the same to us.
+
+Yes, we said so.
+
+Then to do one’s own business in a certain way may be assumed to be
+justice. Can you tell me whence I derive this inference?
+
+I cannot, but I should like to be told.
+
+Because I think that this is the only virtue which remains in the State
+when the other virtues of temperance and courage and wisdom are
+abstracted; and, that this is the ultimate cause and condition of the
+existence of all of them, and while remaining in them is also their
+preservative; and we were saying that if the three were discovered by
+us, justice would be the fourth or remaining one.
+
+That follows of necessity.
+
+If we are asked to determine which of these four qualities by its
+presence contributes most to the excellence of the State, whether the
+agreement of rulers and subjects, or the preservation in the soldiers
+of the opinion which the law ordains about the true nature of dangers,
+or wisdom and watchfulness in the rulers, or whether this other which I
+am mentioning, and which is found in children and women, slave and
+freeman, artisan, ruler, subject,—the quality, I mean, of every one
+doing his own work, and not being a busybody, would claim the palm—the
+question is not so easily answered.
+
+Certainly, he replied, there would be a difficulty in saying which.
+
+Then the power of each individual in the State to do his own work
+appears to compete with the other political virtues, wisdom,
+temperance, courage.
+
+Yes, he said.
+
+And the virtue which enters into this competition is justice?
+
+Exactly.
+
+Let us look at the question from another point of view: Are not the
+rulers in a State those to whom you would entrust the office of
+determining suits at law?
+
+Certainly.
+
+And are suits decided on any other ground but that a man may neither
+take what is another’s, nor be deprived of what is his own?
+
+Yes; that is their principle.
+
+Which is a just principle?
+
+Yes.
+
+Then on this view also justice will be admitted to be the having and
+doing what is a man’s own, and belongs to him?
+
+Very true.
+
+Think, now, and say whether you agree with me or not. Suppose a
+carpenter to be doing the business of a cobbler, or a cobbler of a
+carpenter; and suppose them to exchange their implements or their
+duties, or the same person to be doing the work of both, or whatever be
+the change; do you think that any great harm would result to the State?
+
+Not much.
+
+But when the cobbler or any other man whom nature designed to be a
+trader, having his heart lifted up by wealth or strength or the number
+of his followers, or any like advantage, attempts to force his way into
+the class of warriors, or a warrior into that of legislators and
+guardians, for which he is unfitted, and either to take the implements
+or the duties of the other; or when one man is trader, legislator, and
+warrior all in one, then I think you will agree with me in saying that
+this interchange and this meddling of one with another is the ruin of
+the State.
+
+Most true.
+
+Seeing then, I said, that there are three distinct classes, any
+meddling of one with another, or the change of one into another, is the
+greatest harm to the State, and may be most justly termed evil-doing?
+
+Precisely.
+
+And the greatest degree of evil-doing to one’s own city would be termed
+by you injustice?
+
+Certainly.
+
+This then is injustice; and on the other hand when the trader, the
+auxiliary, and the guardian each do their own business, that is
+justice, and will make the city just.
+
+I agree with you.
+
+We will not, I said, be over-positive as yet; but if, on trial, this
+conception of justice be verified in the individual as well as in the
+State, there will be no longer any room for doubt; if it be not
+verified, we must have a fresh enquiry. First let us complete the old
+investigation, which we began, as you remember, under the impression
+that, if we could previously examine justice on the larger scale, there
+would be less difficulty in discerning her in the individual. That
+larger example appeared to be the State, and accordingly we constructed
+as good a one as we could, knowing well that in the good State justice
+would be found. Let the discovery which we made be now applied to the
+individual—if they agree, we shall be satisfied; or, if there be a
+difference in the individual, we will come back to the State and have
+another trial of the theory. The friction of the two when rubbed
+together may possibly strike a light in which justice will shine forth,
+and the vision which is then revealed we will fix in our souls.
+
+That will be in regular course; let us do as you say.
+
+I proceeded to ask: When two things, a greater and less, are called by
+the same name, are they like or unlike in so far as they are called the
+same?
+
+Like, he replied.
+
+The just man then, if we regard the idea of justice only, will be like
+the just State?
+
+He will.
+
+And a State was thought by us to be just when the three classes in the
+State severally did their own business; and also thought to be
+temperate and valiant and wise by reason of certain other affections
+and qualities of these same classes?
+
+True, he said.
+
+And so of the individual; we may assume that he has the same three
+principles in his own soul which are found in the State; and he may be
+rightly described in the same terms, because he is affected in the same
+manner?
+
+Certainly, he said.
+
+Once more then, O my friend, we have alighted upon an easy
+question—whether the soul has these three principles or not?
+
+An easy question! Nay, rather, Socrates, the proverb holds that hard is
+the good.
+
+Very true, I said; and I do not think that the method which we are
+employing is at all adequate to the accurate solution of this question;
+the true method is another and a longer one. Still we may arrive at a
+solution not below the level of the previous enquiry.
+
+May we not be satisfied with that? he said;—under the circumstances, I
+am quite content.
+
+I too, I replied, shall be extremely well satisfied.
+
+Then faint not in pursuing the speculation, he said.
+
+Must we not acknowledge, I said, that in each of us there are the same
+principles and habits which there are in the State; and that from the
+individual they pass into the State?—how else can they come there? Take
+the quality of passion or spirit;—it would be ridiculous to imagine
+that this quality, when found in States, is not derived from the
+individuals who are supposed to possess it, e.g. the Thracians,
+Scythians, and in general the northern nations; and the same may be
+said of the love of knowledge, which is the special characteristic of
+our part of the world, or of the love of money, which may, with equal
+truth, be attributed to the Phoenicians and Egyptians.
+
+Exactly so, he said.
+
+There is no difficulty in understanding this.
+
+None whatever.
+
+But the question is not quite so easy when we proceed to ask whether
+these principles are three or one; whether, that is to say, we learn
+with one part of our nature, are angry with another, and with a third
+part desire the satisfaction of our natural appetites; or whether the
+whole soul comes into play in each sort of action—to determine that is
+the difficulty.
+
+Yes, he said; there lies the difficulty.
+
+Then let us now try and determine whether they are the same or
+different.
+
+How can we? he asked.
+
+I replied as follows: The same thing clearly cannot act or be acted
+upon in the same part or in relation to the same thing at the same
+time, in contrary ways; and therefore whenever this contradiction
+occurs in things apparently the same, we know that they are really not
+the same, but different.
+
+Good.
+
+For example, I said, can the same thing be at rest and in motion at the
+same time in the same part?
+
+Impossible.
+
+Still, I said, let us have a more precise statement of terms, lest we
+should hereafter fall out by the way. Imagine the case of a man who is
+standing and also moving his hands and his head, and suppose a person
+to say that one and the same person is in motion and at rest at the
+same moment—to such a mode of speech we should object, and should
+rather say that one part of him is in motion while another is at rest.
+
+Very true.
+
+And suppose the objector to refine still further, and to draw the nice
+distinction that not only parts of tops, but whole tops, when they spin
+round with their pegs fixed on the spot, are at rest and in motion at
+the same time (and he may say the same of anything which revolves in
+the same spot), his objection would not be admitted by us, because in
+such cases things are not at rest and in motion in the same parts of
+themselves; we should rather say that they have both an axis and a
+circumference, and that the axis stands still, for there is no
+deviation from the perpendicular; and that the circumference goes
+round. But if, while revolving, the axis inclines either to the right
+or left, forwards or backwards, then in no point of view can they be at
+rest.
+
+That is the correct mode of describing them, he replied.
+
+Then none of these objections will confuse us, or incline us to believe
+that the same thing at the same time, in the same part or in relation
+to the same thing, can act or be acted upon in contrary ways.
+
+Certainly not, according to my way of thinking.
+
+Yet, I said, that we may not be compelled to examine all such
+objections, and prove at length that they are untrue, let us assume
+their absurdity, and go forward on the understanding that hereafter, if
+this assumption turn out to be untrue, all the consequences which
+follow shall be withdrawn.
+
+Yes, he said, that will be the best way.
+
+Well, I said, would you not allow that assent and dissent, desire and
+aversion, attraction and repulsion, are all of them opposites, whether
+they are regarded as active or passive (for that makes no difference in
+the fact of their opposition)?
+
+Yes, he said, they are opposites.
+
+Well, I said, and hunger and thirst, and the desires in general, and
+again willing and wishing,—all these you would refer to the classes
+already mentioned. You would say—would you not?—that the soul of him
+who desires is seeking after the object of his desire; or that he is
+drawing to himself the thing which he wishes to possess: or again, when
+a person wants anything to be given him, his mind, longing for the
+realization of his desire, intimates his wish to have it by a nod of
+assent, as if he had been asked a question?
+
+Very true.
+
+And what would you say of unwillingness and dislike and the absence of
+desire; should not these be referred to the opposite class of repulsion
+and rejection?
+
+Certainly.
+
+Admitting this to be true of desire generally, let us suppose a
+particular class of desires, and out of these we will select hunger and
+thirst, as they are termed, which are the most obvious of them?
+
+Let us take that class, he said.
+
+The object of one is food, and of the other drink?
+
+Yes.
+
+And here comes the point: is not thirst the desire which the soul has
+of drink, and of drink only; not of drink qualified by anything else;
+for example, warm or cold, or much or little, or, in a word, drink of
+any particular sort: but if the thirst be accompanied by heat, then the
+desire is of cold drink; or, if accompanied by cold, then of warm
+drink; or, if the thirst be excessive, then the drink which is desired
+will be excessive; or, if not great, the quantity of drink will also be
+small: but thirst pure and simple will desire drink pure and simple,
+which is the natural satisfaction of thirst, as food is of hunger?
+
+Yes, he said; the simple desire is, as you say, in every case of the
+simple object, and the qualified desire of the qualified object.
+
+But here a confusion may arise; and I should wish to guard against an
+opponent starting up and saying that no man desires drink only, but
+good drink, or food only, but good food; for good is the universal
+object of desire, and thirst being a desire, will necessarily be thirst
+after good drink; and the same is true of every other desire.
+
+Yes, he replied, the opponent might have something to say.
+
+Nevertheless I should still maintain, that of relatives some have a
+quality attached to either term of the relation; others are simple and
+have their correlatives simple.
+
+I do not know what you mean.
+
+Well, you know of course that the greater is relative to the less?
+
+Certainly.
+
+And the much greater to the much less?
+
+Yes.
+
+And the sometime greater to the sometime less, and the greater that is
+to be to the less that is to be?
+
+Certainly, he said.
+
+And so of more and less, and of other correlative terms, such as the
+double and the half, or again, the heavier and the lighter, the swifter
+and the slower; and of hot and cold, and of any other relatives;—is not
+this true of all of them?
+
+Yes.
+
+And does not the same principle hold in the sciences? The object of
+science is knowledge (assuming that to be the true definition), but the
+object of a particular science is a particular kind of knowledge; I
+mean, for example, that the science of house-building is a kind of
+knowledge which is defined and distinguished from other kinds and is
+therefore termed architecture.
+
+Certainly.
+
+Because it has a particular quality which no other has?
+
+Yes.
+
+And it has this particular quality because it has an object of a
+particular kind; and this is true of the other arts and sciences?
+
+Yes.
+
+Now, then, if I have made myself clear, you will understand my original
+meaning in what I said about relatives. My meaning was, that if one
+term of a relation is taken alone, the other is taken alone; if one
+term is qualified, the other is also qualified. I do not mean to say
+that relatives may not be disparate, or that the science of health is
+healthy, or of disease necessarily diseased, or that the sciences of
+good and evil are therefore good and evil; but only that, when the term
+science is no longer used absolutely, but has a qualified object which
+in this case is the nature of health and disease, it becomes defined,
+and is hence called not merely science, but the science of medicine.
+
+I quite understand, and I think as you do.
+
+Would you not say that thirst is one of these essentially relative
+terms, having clearly a relation—
+
+Yes, thirst is relative to drink.
+
+And a certain kind of thirst is relative to a certain kind of drink;
+but thirst taken alone is neither of much nor little, nor of good nor
+bad, nor of any particular kind of drink, but of drink only?
+
+Certainly.
+
+Then the soul of the thirsty one, in so far as he is thirsty, desires
+only drink; for this he yearns and tries to obtain it?
+
+That is plain.
+
+And if you suppose something which pulls a thirsty soul away from
+drink, that must be different from the thirsty principle which draws
+him like a beast to drink; for, as we were saying, the same thing
+cannot at the same time with the same part of itself act in contrary
+ways about the same.
+
+Impossible.
+
+No more than you can say that the hands of the archer push and pull the
+bow at the same time, but what you say is that one hand pushes and the
+other pulls.
+
+Exactly so, he replied.
+
+And might a man be thirsty, and yet unwilling to drink?
+
+Yes, he said, it constantly happens.
+
+And in such a case what is one to say? Would you not say that there was
+something in the soul bidding a man to drink, and something else
+forbidding him, which is other and stronger than the principle which
+bids him?
+
+I should say so.
+
+And the forbidding principle is derived from reason, and that which
+bids and attracts proceeds from passion and disease?
+
+Clearly.
+
+Then we may fairly assume that they are two, and that they differ from
+one another; the one with which a man reasons, we may call the rational
+principle of the soul, the other, with which he loves and hungers and
+thirsts and feels the flutterings of any other desire, may be termed
+the irrational or appetitive, the ally of sundry pleasures and
+satisfactions?
+
+Yes, he said, we may fairly assume them to be different.
+
+Then let us finally determine that there are two principles existing in
+the soul. And what of passion, or spirit? Is it a third, or akin to one
+of the preceding?
+
+I should be inclined to say—akin to desire.
+
+Well, I said, there is a story which I remember to have heard, and in
+which I put faith. The story is, that Leontius, the son of Aglaion,
+coming up one day from the Piraeus, under the north wall on the
+outside, observed some dead bodies lying on the ground at the place of
+execution. He felt a desire to see them, and also a dread and
+abhorrence of them; for a time he struggled and covered his eyes, but
+at length the desire got the better of him; and forcing them open, he
+ran up to the dead bodies, saying, Look, ye wretches, take your fill of
+the fair sight.
+
+I have heard the story myself, he said.
+
+The moral of the tale is, that anger at times goes to war with desire,
+as though they were two distinct things.
+
+Yes; that is the meaning, he said.
+
+And are there not many other cases in which we observe that when a
+man’s desires violently prevail over his reason, he reviles himself,
+and is angry at the violence within him, and that in this struggle,
+which is like the struggle of factions in a State, his spirit is on the
+side of his reason;—but for the passionate or spirited element to take
+part with the desires when reason decides that she should not be
+opposed, is a sort of thing which I believe that you never observed
+occurring in yourself, nor, as I should imagine, in any one else?
+
+Certainly not.
+
+Suppose that a man thinks he has done a wrong to another, the nobler he
+is the less able is he to feel indignant at any suffering, such as
+hunger, or cold, or any other pain which the injured person may inflict
+upon him—these he deems to be just, and, as I say, his anger refuses to
+be excited by them.
+
+True, he said.
+
+But when he thinks that he is the sufferer of the wrong, then he boils
+and chafes, and is on the side of what he believes to be justice; and
+because he suffers hunger or cold or other pain he is only the more
+determined to persevere and conquer. His noble spirit will not be
+quelled until he either slays or is slain; or until he hears the voice
+of the shepherd, that is, reason, bidding his dog bark no more.
+
+The illustration is perfect, he replied; and in our State, as we were
+saying, the auxiliaries were to be dogs, and to hear the voice of the
+rulers, who are their shepherds.
+
+I perceive, I said, that you quite understand me; there is, however, a
+further point which I wish you to consider.
+
+What point?
+
+You remember that passion or spirit appeared at first sight to be a
+kind of desire, but now we should say quite the contrary; for in the
+conflict of the soul spirit is arrayed on the side of the rational
+principle.
+
+Most assuredly.
+
+But a further question arises: Is passion different from reason also,
+or only a kind of reason; in which latter case, instead of three
+principles in the soul, there will only be two, the rational and the
+concupiscent; or rather, as the State was composed of three classes,
+traders, auxiliaries, counsellors, so may there not be in the
+individual soul a third element which is passion or spirit, and when
+not corrupted by bad education is the natural auxiliary of reason?
+
+Yes, he said, there must be a third.
+
+Yes, I replied, if passion, which has already been shown to be
+different from desire, turn out also to be different from reason.
+
+But that is easily proved:—We may observe even in young children that
+they are full of spirit almost as soon as they are born, whereas some
+of them never seem to attain to the use of reason, and most of them
+late enough.
+
+Excellent, I said, and you may see passion equally in brute animals,
+which is a further proof of the truth of what you are saying. And we
+may once more appeal to the words of Homer, which have been already
+quoted by us,
+
+‘He smote his breast, and thus rebuked his soul,’
+
+for in this verse Homer has clearly supposed the power which reasons
+about the better and worse to be different from the unreasoning anger
+which is rebuked by it.
+
+Very true, he said.
+
+And so, after much tossing, we have reached land, and are fairly agreed
+that the same principles which exist in the State exist also in the
+individual, and that they are three in number.
+
+Exactly.
+
+Must we not then infer that the individual is wise in the same way, and
+in virtue of the same quality which makes the State wise?
+
+Certainly.
+
+Also that the same quality which constitutes courage in the State
+constitutes courage in the individual, and that both the State and the
+individual bear the same relation to all the other virtues?
+
+Assuredly.
+
+And the individual will be acknowledged by us to be just in the same
+way in which the State is just?
+
+That follows, of course.
+
+We cannot but remember that the justice of the State consisted in each
+of the three classes doing the work of its own class?
+
+We are not very likely to have forgotten, he said.
+
+We must recollect that the individual in whom the several qualities of
+his nature do their own work will be just, and will do his own work?
+
+Yes, he said, we must remember that too.
+
+And ought not the rational principle, which is wise, and has the care
+of the whole soul, to rule, and the passionate or spirited principle to
+be the subject and ally?
+
+Certainly.
+
+And, as we were saying, the united influence of music and gymnastic
+will bring them into accord, nerving and sustaining the reason with
+noble words and lessons, and moderating and soothing and civilizing the
+wildness of passion by harmony and rhythm?
+
+Quite true, he said.
+
+And these two, thus nurtured and educated, and having learned truly to
+know their own functions, will rule over the concupiscent, which in
+each of us is the largest part of the soul and by nature most
+insatiable of gain; over this they will keep guard, lest, waxing great
+and strong with the fulness of bodily pleasures, as they are termed,
+the concupiscent soul, no longer confined to her own sphere, should
+attempt to enslave and rule those who are not her natural-born
+subjects, and overturn the whole life of man?
+
+Very true, he said.
+
+Both together will they not be the best defenders of the whole soul and
+the whole body against attacks from without; the one counselling, and
+the other fighting under his leader, and courageously executing his
+commands and counsels?
+
+True.
+
+And he is to be deemed courageous whose spirit retains in pleasure and
+in pain the commands of reason about what he ought or ought not to
+fear?
+
+Right, he replied.
+
+And him we call wise who has in him that little part which rules, and
+which proclaims these commands; that part too being supposed to have a
+knowledge of what is for the interest of each of the three parts and of
+the whole?
+
+Assuredly.
+
+And would you not say that he is temperate who has these same elements
+in friendly harmony, in whom the one ruling principle of reason, and
+the two subject ones of spirit and desire are equally agreed that
+reason ought to rule, and do not rebel?
+
+Certainly, he said, that is the true account of temperance whether in
+the State or individual.
+
+And surely, I said, we have explained again and again how and by virtue
+of what quality a man will be just.
+
+That is very certain.
+
+And is justice dimmer in the individual, and is her form different, or
+is she the same which we found her to be in the State?
+
+There is no difference in my opinion, he said.
+
+Because, if any doubt is still lingering in our minds, a few
+commonplace instances will satisfy us of the truth of what I am saying.
+
+What sort of instances do you mean?
+
+If the case is put to us, must we not admit that the just State, or the
+man who is trained in the principles of such a State, will be less
+likely than the unjust to make away with a deposit of gold or silver?
+Would any one deny this?
+
+No one, he replied.
+
+Will the just man or citizen ever be guilty of sacrilege or theft, or
+treachery either to his friends or to his country?
+
+Never.
+
+Neither will he ever break faith where there have been oaths or
+agreements?
+
+Impossible.
+
+No one will be less likely to commit adultery, or to dishonour his
+father and mother, or to fail in his religious duties?
+
+No one.
+
+And the reason is that each part of him is doing its own business,
+whether in ruling or being ruled?
+
+Exactly so.
+
+Are you satisfied then that the quality which makes such men and such
+states is justice, or do you hope to discover some other?
+
+Not I, indeed.
+
+Then our dream has been realized; and the suspicion which we
+entertained at the beginning of our work of construction, that some
+divine power must have conducted us to a primary form of justice, has
+now been verified?
+
+Yes, certainly.
+
+And the division of labour which required the carpenter and the
+shoemaker and the rest of the citizens to be doing each his own
+business, and not another’s, was a shadow of justice, and for that
+reason it was of use?
+
+Clearly.
+
+But in reality justice was such as we were describing, being concerned
+however, not with the outward man, but with the inward, which is the
+true self and concernment of man: for the just man does not permit the
+several elements within him to interfere with one another, or any of
+them to do the work of others,—he sets in order his own inner life, and
+is his own master and his own law, and at peace with himself; and when
+he has bound together the three principles within him, which may be
+compared to the higher, lower, and middle notes of the scale, and the
+intermediate intervals—when he has bound all these together, and is no
+longer many, but has become one entirely temperate and perfectly
+adjusted nature, then he proceeds to act, if he has to act, whether in
+a matter of property, or in the treatment of the body, or in some
+affair of politics or private business; always thinking and calling
+that which preserves and co-operates with this harmonious condition,
+just and good action, and the knowledge which presides over it, wisdom,
+and that which at any time impairs this condition, he will call unjust
+action, and the opinion which presides over it ignorance.
+
+You have said the exact truth, Socrates.
+
+Very good; and if we were to affirm that we had discovered the just man
+and the just State, and the nature of justice in each of them, we
+should not be telling a falsehood?
+
+Most certainly not.
+
+May we say so, then?
+
+Let us say so.
+
+And now, I said, injustice has to be considered.
+
+Clearly.
+
+Must not injustice be a strife which arises among the three
+principles—a meddlesomeness, and interference, and rising up of a part
+of the soul against the whole, an assertion of unlawful authority,
+which is made by a rebellious subject against a true prince, of whom he
+is the natural vassal,—what is all this confusion and delusion but
+injustice, and intemperance and cowardice and ignorance, and every form
+of vice?
+
+Exactly so.
+
+And if the nature of justice and injustice be known, then the meaning
+of acting unjustly and being unjust, or, again, of acting justly, will
+also be perfectly clear?
+
+What do you mean? he said.
+
+Why, I said, they are like disease and health; being in the soul just
+what disease and health are in the body.
+
+How so? he said.
+
+Why, I said, that which is healthy causes health, and that which is
+unhealthy causes disease.
+
+Yes.
+
+And just actions cause justice, and unjust actions cause injustice?
+
+That is certain.
+
+And the creation of health is the institution of a natural order and
+government of one by another in the parts of the body; and the creation
+of disease is the production of a state of things at variance with this
+natural order?
+
+True.
+
+And is not the creation of justice the institution of a natural order
+and government of one by another in the parts of the soul, and the
+creation of injustice the production of a state of things at variance
+with the natural order?
+
+Exactly so, he said.
+
+Then virtue is the health and beauty and well-being of the soul, and
+vice the disease and weakness and deformity of the same?
+
+True.
+
+And do not good practices lead to virtue, and evil practices to vice?
+
+Assuredly.
+
+Still our old question of the comparative advantage of justice and
+injustice has not been answered: Which is the more profitable, to be
+just and act justly and practise virtue, whether seen or unseen of gods
+and men, or to be unjust and act unjustly, if only unpunished and
+unreformed?
+
+In my judgment, Socrates, the question has now become ridiculous. We
+know that, when the bodily constitution is gone, life is no longer
+endurable, though pampered with all kinds of meats and drinks, and
+having all wealth and all power; and shall we be told that when the
+very essence of the vital principle is undermined and corrupted, life
+is still worth having to a man, if only he be allowed to do whatever he
+likes with the single exception that he is not to acquire justice and
+virtue, or to escape from injustice and vice; assuming them both to be
+such as we have described?
+
+Yes, I said, the question is, as you say, ridiculous. Still, as we are
+near the spot at which we may see the truth in the clearest manner with
+our own eyes, let us not faint by the way.
+
+Certainly not, he replied.
+
+Come up hither, I said, and behold the various forms of vice, those of
+them, I mean, which are worth looking at.
+
+I am following you, he replied: proceed.
+
+I said, The argument seems to have reached a height from which, as from
+some tower of speculation, a man may look down and see that virtue is
+one, but that the forms of vice are innumerable; there being four
+special ones which are deserving of note.
+
+What do you mean? he said.
+
+I mean, I replied, that there appear to be as many forms of the soul as
+there are distinct forms of the State.
+
+How many?
+
+There are five of the State, and five of the soul, I said.
+
+What are they?
+
+The first, I said, is that which we have been describing, and which may
+be said to have two names, monarchy and aristocracy, accordingly as
+rule is exercised by one distinguished man or by many.
+
+True, he replied.
+
+But I regard the two names as describing one form only; for whether the
+government is in the hands of one or many, if the governors have been
+trained in the manner which we have supposed, the fundamental laws of
+the State will be maintained.
+
+That is true, he replied.
+
+
+
+
+ BOOK V.
+
+
+Such is the good and true City or State, and the good and true man is
+of the same pattern; and if this is right every other is wrong; and the
+evil is one which affects not only the ordering of the State, but also
+the regulation of the individual soul, and is exhibited in four forms.
+
+What are they? he said.
+
+I was proceeding to tell the order in which the four evil forms
+appeared to me to succeed one another, when Polemarchus, who was
+sitting a little way off, just beyond Adeimantus, began to whisper to
+him: stretching forth his hand, he took hold of the upper part of his
+coat by the shoulder, and drew him towards him, leaning forward himself
+so as to be quite close and saying something in his ear, of which I
+only caught the words, ‘Shall we let him off, or what shall we do?’
+
+Certainly not, said Adeimantus, raising his voice.
+
+Who is it, I said, whom you are refusing to let off?
+
+You, he said.
+
+I repeated, Why am I especially not to be let off?
+
+Why, he said, we think that you are lazy, and mean to cheat us out of a
+whole chapter which is a very important part of the story; and you
+fancy that we shall not notice your airy way of proceeding; as if it
+were self-evident to everybody, that in the matter of women and
+children ‘friends have all things in common.’
+
+And was I not right, Adeimantus?
+
+Yes, he said; but what is right in this particular case, like
+everything else, requires to be explained; for community may be of many
+kinds. Please, therefore, to say what sort of community you mean. We
+have been long expecting that you would tell us something about the
+family life of your citizens—how they will bring children into the
+world, and rear them when they have arrived, and, in general, what is
+the nature of this community of women and children—for we are of
+opinion that the right or wrong management of such matters will have a
+great and paramount influence on the State for good or for evil. And
+now, since the question is still undetermined, and you are taking in
+hand another State, we have resolved, as you heard, not to let you go
+until you give an account of all this.
+
+To that resolution, said Glaucon, you may regard me as saying Agreed.
+
+And without more ado, said Thrasymachus, you may consider us all to be
+equally agreed.
+
+I said, You know not what you are doing in thus assailing me: What an
+argument are you raising about the State! Just as I thought that I had
+finished, and was only too glad that I had laid this question to sleep,
+and was reflecting how fortunate I was in your acceptance of what I
+then said, you ask me to begin again at the very foundation, ignorant
+of what a hornet’s nest of words you are stirring. Now I foresaw this
+gathering trouble, and avoided it.
+
+For what purpose do you conceive that we have come here, said
+Thrasymachus,—to look for gold, or to hear discourse?
+
+Yes, but discourse should have a limit.
+
+Yes, Socrates, said Glaucon, and the whole of life is the only limit
+which wise men assign to the hearing of such discourses. But never mind
+about us; take heart yourself and answer the question in your own way:
+What sort of community of women and children is this which is to
+prevail among our guardians? and how shall we manage the period between
+birth and education, which seems to require the greatest care? Tell us
+how these things will be.
+
+Yes, my simple friend, but the answer is the reverse of easy; many more
+doubts arise about this than about our previous conclusions. For the
+practicability of what is said may be doubted; and looked at in another
+point of view, whether the scheme, if ever so practicable, would be for
+the best, is also doubtful. Hence I feel a reluctance to approach the
+subject, lest our aspiration, my dear friend, should turn out to be a
+dream only.
+
+Fear not, he replied, for your audience will not be hard upon you; they
+are not sceptical or hostile.
+
+I said: My good friend, I suppose that you mean to encourage me by
+these words.
+
+Yes, he said.
+
+Then let me tell you that you are doing just the reverse; the
+encouragement which you offer would have been all very well had I
+myself believed that I knew what I was talking about: to declare the
+truth about matters of high interest which a man honours and loves
+among wise men who love him need occasion no fear or faltering in his
+mind; but to carry on an argument when you are yourself only a
+hesitating enquirer, which is my condition, is a dangerous and slippery
+thing; and the danger is not that I shall be laughed at (of which the
+fear would be childish), but that I shall miss the truth where I have
+most need to be sure of my footing, and drag my friends after me in my
+fall. And I pray Nemesis not to visit upon me the words which I am
+going to utter. For I do indeed believe that to be an involuntary
+homicide is a less crime than to be a deceiver about beauty or goodness
+or justice in the matter of laws. And that is a risk which I would
+rather run among enemies than among friends, and therefore you do well
+to encourage me.
+
+Glaucon laughed and said: Well then, Socrates, in case you and your
+argument do us any serious injury you shall be acquitted beforehand of
+the homicide, and shall not be held to be a deceiver; take courage then
+and speak.
+
+Well, I said, the law says that when a man is acquitted he is free from
+guilt, and what holds at law may hold in argument.
+
+Then why should you mind?
+
+Well, I replied, I suppose that I must retrace my steps and say what I
+perhaps ought to have said before in the proper place. The part of the
+men has been played out, and now properly enough comes the turn of the
+women. Of them I will proceed to speak, and the more readily since I am
+invited by you.
+
+For men born and educated like our citizens, the only way, in my
+opinion, of arriving at a right conclusion about the possession and use
+of women and children is to follow the path on which we originally
+started, when we said that the men were to be the guardians and
+watchdogs of the herd.
+
+True.
+
+Let us further suppose the birth and education of our women to be
+subject to similar or nearly similar regulations; then we shall see
+whether the result accords with our design.
+
+What do you mean?
+
+What I mean may be put into the form of a question, I said: Are dogs
+divided into hes and shes, or do they both share equally in hunting and
+in keeping watch and in the other duties of dogs? or do we entrust to
+the males the entire and exclusive care of the flocks, while we leave
+the females at home, under the idea that the bearing and suckling their
+puppies is labour enough for them?
+
+No, he said, they share alike; the only difference between them is that
+the males are stronger and the females weaker.
+
+But can you use different animals for the same purpose, unless they are
+bred and fed in the same way?
+
+You cannot.
+
+Then, if women are to have the same duties as men, they must have the
+same nurture and education?
+
+Yes.
+
+The education which was assigned to the men was music and gymnastic.
+
+Yes.
+
+Then women must be taught music and gymnastic and also the art of war,
+which they must practise like the men?
+
+That is the inference, I suppose.
+
+I should rather expect, I said, that several of our proposals, if they
+are carried out, being unusual, may appear ridiculous.
+
+No doubt of it.
+
+Yes, and the most ridiculous thing of all will be the sight of women
+naked in the palaestra, exercising with the men, especially when they
+are no longer young; they certainly will not be a vision of beauty, any
+more than the enthusiastic old men who in spite of wrinkles and
+ugliness continue to frequent the gymnasia.
+
+Yes, indeed, he said: according to present notions the proposal would
+be thought ridiculous.
+
+But then, I said, as we have determined to speak our minds, we must not
+fear the jests of the wits which will be directed against this sort of
+innovation; how they will talk of women’s attainments both in music and
+gymnastic, and above all about their wearing armour and riding upon
+horseback!
+
+Very true, he replied.
+
+Yet having begun we must go forward to the rough places of the law; at
+the same time begging of these gentlemen for once in their life to be
+serious. Not long ago, as we shall remind them, the Hellenes were of
+the opinion, which is still generally received among the barbarians,
+that the sight of a naked man was ridiculous and improper; and when
+first the Cretans and then the Lacedaemonians introduced the custom,
+the wits of that day might equally have ridiculed the innovation.
+
+No doubt.
+
+But when experience showed that to let all things be uncovered was far
+better than to cover them up, and the ludicrous effect to the outward
+eye vanished before the better principle which reason asserted, then
+the man was perceived to be a fool who directs the shafts of his
+ridicule at any other sight but that of folly and vice, or seriously
+inclines to weigh the beautiful by any other standard but that of the
+good.
+
+Very true, he replied.
+
+First, then, whether the question is to be put in jest or in earnest,
+let us come to an understanding about the nature of woman: Is she
+capable of sharing either wholly or partially in the actions of men, or
+not at all? And is the art of war one of those arts in which she can or
+can not share? That will be the best way of commencing the enquiry, and
+will probably lead to the fairest conclusion.
+
+That will be much the best way.
+
+Shall we take the other side first and begin by arguing against
+ourselves; in this manner the adversary’s position will not be
+undefended.
+
+Why not? he said.
+
+Then let us put a speech into the mouths of our opponents. They will
+say: ‘Socrates and Glaucon, no adversary need convict you, for you
+yourselves, at the first foundation of the State, admitted the
+principle that everybody was to do the one work suited to his own
+nature.’ And certainly, if I am not mistaken, such an admission was
+made by us. ‘And do not the natures of men and women differ very much
+indeed?’ And we shall reply: Of course they do. Then we shall be asked,
+‘Whether the tasks assigned to men and to women should not be
+different, and such as are agreeable to their different natures?’
+Certainly they should. ‘But if so, have you not fallen into a serious
+inconsistency in saying that men and women, whose natures are so
+entirely different, ought to perform the same actions?’—What defence
+will you make for us, my good Sir, against any one who offers these
+objections?
+
+That is not an easy question to answer when asked suddenly; and I shall
+and I do beg of you to draw out the case on our side.
+
+These are the objections, Glaucon, and there are many others of a like
+kind, which I foresaw long ago; they made me afraid and reluctant to
+take in hand any law about the possession and nurture of women and
+children.
+
+By Zeus, he said, the problem to be solved is anything but easy.
+
+Why yes, I said, but the fact is that when a man is out of his depth,
+whether he has fallen into a little swimming bath or into mid ocean, he
+has to swim all the same.
+
+Very true.
+
+And must not we swim and try to reach the shore: we will hope that
+Arion’s dolphin or some other miraculous help may save us?
+
+I suppose so, he said.
+
+Well then, let us see if any way of escape can be found. We
+acknowledged—did we not? that different natures ought to have different
+pursuits, and that men’s and women’s natures are different. And now
+what are we saying?—that different natures ought to have the same
+pursuits,—this is the inconsistency which is charged upon us.
+
+Precisely.
+
+Verily, Glaucon, I said, glorious is the power of the art of
+contradiction!
+
+Why do you say so?
+
+Because I think that many a man falls into the practice against his
+will. When he thinks that he is reasoning he is really disputing, just
+because he cannot define and divide, and so know that of which he is
+speaking; and he will pursue a merely verbal opposition in the spirit
+of contention and not of fair discussion.
+
+Yes, he replied, such is very often the case; but what has that to do
+with us and our argument?
+
+A great deal; for there is certainly a danger of our getting
+unintentionally into a verbal opposition.
+
+In what way?
+
+Why we valiantly and pugnaciously insist upon the verbal truth, that
+different natures ought to have different pursuits, but we never
+considered at all what was the meaning of sameness or difference of
+nature, or why we distinguished them when we assigned different
+pursuits to different natures and the same to the same natures.
+
+Why, no, he said, that was never considered by us.
+
+I said: Suppose that by way of illustration we were to ask the question
+whether there is not an opposition in nature between bald men and hairy
+men; and if this is admitted by us, then, if bald men are cobblers, we
+should forbid the hairy men to be cobblers, and conversely?
+
+That would be a jest, he said.
+
+Yes, I said, a jest; and why? because we never meant when we
+constructed the State, that the opposition of natures should extend to
+every difference, but only to those differences which affected the
+pursuit in which the individual is engaged; we should have argued, for
+example, that a physician and one who is in mind a physician may be
+said to have the same nature.
+
+True.
+
+Whereas the physician and the carpenter have different natures?
+
+Certainly.
+
+And if, I said, the male and female sex appear to differ in their
+fitness for any art or pursuit, we should say that such pursuit or art
+ought to be assigned to one or the other of them; but if the difference
+consists only in women bearing and men begetting children, this does
+not amount to a proof that a woman differs from a man in respect of the
+sort of education she should receive; and we shall therefore continue
+to maintain that our guardians and their wives ought to have the same
+pursuits.
+
+Very true, he said.
+
+Next, we shall ask our opponent how, in reference to any of the
+pursuits or arts of civic life, the nature of a woman differs from that
+of a man?
+
+That will be quite fair.
+
+And perhaps he, like yourself, will reply that to give a sufficient
+answer on the instant is not easy; but after a little reflection there
+is no difficulty.
+
+Yes, perhaps.
+
+Suppose then that we invite him to accompany us in the argument, and
+then we may hope to show him that there is nothing peculiar in the
+constitution of women which would affect them in the administration of
+the State.
+
+By all means.
+
+Let us say to him: Come now, and we will ask you a question:—when you
+spoke of a nature gifted or not gifted in any respect, did you mean to
+say that one man will acquire a thing easily, another with difficulty;
+a little learning will lead the one to discover a great deal; whereas
+the other, after much study and application, no sooner learns than he
+forgets; or again, did you mean, that the one has a body which is a
+good servant to his mind, while the body of the other is a hindrance to
+him?—would not these be the sort of differences which distinguish the
+man gifted by nature from the one who is ungifted?
+
+No one will deny that.
+
+And can you mention any pursuit of mankind in which the male sex has
+not all these gifts and qualities in a higher degree than the female?
+Need I waste time in speaking of the art of weaving, and the management
+of pancakes and preserves, in which womankind does really appear to be
+great, and in which for her to be beaten by a man is of all things the
+most absurd?
+
+You are quite right, he replied, in maintaining the general inferiority
+of the female sex: although many women are in many things superior to
+many men, yet on the whole what you say is true.
+
+And if so, my friend, I said, there is no special faculty of
+administration in a state which a woman has because she is a woman, or
+which a man has by virtue of his sex, but the gifts of nature are alike
+diffused in both; all the pursuits of men are the pursuits of women
+also, but in all of them a woman is inferior to a man.
+
+Very true.
+
+Then are we to impose all our enactments on men and none of them on
+women?
+
+That will never do.
+
+One woman has a gift of healing, another not; one is a musician, and
+another has no music in her nature?
+
+Very true.
+
+And one woman has a turn for gymnastic and military exercises, and
+another is unwarlike and hates gymnastics?
+
+Certainly.
+
+And one woman is a philosopher, and another is an enemy of philosophy;
+one has spirit, and another is without spirit?
+
+That is also true.
+
+Then one woman will have the temper of a guardian, and another not. Was
+not the selection of the male guardians determined by differences of
+this sort?
+
+Yes.
+
+Men and women alike possess the qualities which make a guardian; they
+differ only in their comparative strength or weakness.
+
+Obviously.
+
+And those women who have such qualities are to be selected as the
+companions and colleagues of men who have similar qualities and whom
+they resemble in capacity and in character?
+
+Very true.
+
+And ought not the same natures to have the same pursuits?
+
+They ought.
+
+Then, as we were saying before, there is nothing unnatural in assigning
+music and gymnastic to the wives of the guardians—to that point we come
+round again.
+
+Certainly not.
+
+The law which we then enacted was agreeable to nature, and therefore
+not an impossibility or mere aspiration; and the contrary practice,
+which prevails at present, is in reality a violation of nature.
+
+That appears to be true.
+
+We had to consider, first, whether our proposals were possible, and
+secondly whether they were the most beneficial?
+
+Yes.
+
+And the possibility has been acknowledged?
+
+Yes.
+
+The very great benefit has next to be established?
+
+Quite so.
+
+You will admit that the same education which makes a man a good
+guardian will make a woman a good guardian; for their original nature
+is the same?
+
+Yes.
+
+I should like to ask you a question.
+
+What is it?
+
+Would you say that all men are equal in excellence, or is one man
+better than another?
+
+The latter.
+
+And in the commonwealth which we were founding do you conceive the
+guardians who have been brought up on our model system to be more
+perfect men, or the cobblers whose education has been cobbling?
+
+What a ridiculous question!
+
+You have answered me, I replied: Well, and may we not further say that
+our guardians are the best of our citizens?
+
+By far the best.
+
+And will not their wives be the best women?
+
+Yes, by far the best.
+
+And can there be anything better for the interests of the State than
+that the men and women of a State should be as good as possible?
+
+There can be nothing better.
+
+And this is what the arts of music and gymnastic, when present in such
+manner as we have described, will accomplish?
+
+Certainly.
+
+Then we have made an enactment not only possible but in the highest
+degree beneficial to the State?
+
+True.
+
+Then let the wives of our guardians strip, for their virtue will be
+their robe, and let them share in the toils of war and the defence of
+their country; only in the distribution of labours the lighter are to
+be assigned to the women, who are the weaker natures, but in other
+respects their duties are to be the same. And as for the man who laughs
+at naked women exercising their bodies from the best of motives, in his
+laughter he is plucking
+
+‘A fruit of unripe wisdom,’
+
+and he himself is ignorant of what he is laughing at, or what he is
+about;—for that is, and ever will be, the best of sayings, That the
+useful is the noble and the hurtful is the base.
+
+Very true.
+
+Here, then, is one difficulty in our law about women, which we may say
+that we have now escaped; the wave has not swallowed us up alive for
+enacting that the guardians of either sex should have all their
+pursuits in common; to the utility and also to the possibility of this
+arrangement the consistency of the argument with itself bears witness.
+
+Yes, that was a mighty wave which you have escaped.
+
+Yes, I said, but a greater is coming; you will not think much of this
+when you see the next.
+
+Go on; let me see.
+
+The law, I said, which is the sequel of this and of all that has
+preceded, is to the following effect,—‘that the wives of our guardians
+are to be common, and their children are to be common, and no parent is
+to know his own child, nor any child his parent.’
+
+Yes, he said, that is a much greater wave than the other; and the
+possibility as well as the utility of such a law are far more
+questionable.
+
+I do not think, I said, that there can be any dispute about the very
+great utility of having wives and children in common; the possibility
+is quite another matter, and will be very much disputed.
+
+I think that a good many doubts may be raised about both.
+
+You imply that the two questions must be combined, I replied. Now I
+meant that you should admit the utility; and in this way, as I thought,
+I should escape from one of them, and then there would remain only the
+possibility.
+
+But that little attempt is detected, and therefore you will please to
+give a defence of both.
+
+Well, I said, I submit to my fate. Yet grant me a little favour: let me
+feast my mind with the dream as day dreamers are in the habit of
+feasting themselves when they are walking alone; for before they have
+discovered any means of effecting their wishes—that is a matter which
+never troubles them—they would rather not tire themselves by thinking
+about possibilities; but assuming that what they desire is already
+granted to them, they proceed with their plan, and delight in detailing
+what they mean to do when their wish has come true—that is a way which
+they have of not doing much good to a capacity which was never good for
+much. Now I myself am beginning to lose heart, and I should like, with
+your permission, to pass over the question of possibility at present.
+Assuming therefore the possibility of the proposal, I shall now proceed
+to enquire how the rulers will carry out these arrangements, and I
+shall demonstrate that our plan, if executed, will be of the greatest
+benefit to the State and to the guardians. First of all, then, if you
+have no objection, I will endeavour with your help to consider the
+advantages of the measure; and hereafter the question of possibility.
+
+I have no objection; proceed.
+
+First, I think that if our rulers and their auxiliaries are to be
+worthy of the name which they bear, there must be willingness to obey
+in the one and the power of command in the other; the guardians must
+themselves obey the laws, and they must also imitate the spirit of them
+in any details which are entrusted to their care.
+
+That is right, he said.
+
+You, I said, who are their legislator, having selected the men, will
+now select the women and give them to them;—they must be as far as
+possible of like natures with them; and they must live in common houses
+and meet at common meals. None of them will have anything specially his
+or her own; they will be together, and will be brought up together, and
+will associate at gymnastic exercises. And so they will be drawn by a
+necessity of their natures to have intercourse with each
+other—necessity is not too strong a word, I think?
+
+Yes, he said;—necessity, not geometrical, but another sort of necessity
+which lovers know, and which is far more convincing and constraining to
+the mass of mankind.
+
+True, I said; and this, Glaucon, like all the rest, must proceed after
+an orderly fashion; in a city of the blessed, licentiousness is an
+unholy thing which the rulers will forbid.
+
+Yes, he said, and it ought not to be permitted.
+
+Then clearly the next thing will be to make matrimony sacred in the
+highest degree, and what is most beneficial will be deemed sacred?
+
+Exactly.
+
+And how can marriages be made most beneficial?—that is a question which
+I put to you, because I see in your house dogs for hunting, and of the
+nobler sort of birds not a few. Now, I beseech you, do tell me, have
+you ever attended to their pairing and breeding?
+
+In what particulars?
+
+Why, in the first place, although they are all of a good sort, are not
+some better than others?
+
+True.
+
+And do you breed from them all indifferently, or do you take care to
+breed from the best only?
+
+From the best.
+
+And do you take the oldest or the youngest, or only those of ripe age?
+
+I choose only those of ripe age.
+
+And if care was not taken in the breeding, your dogs and birds would
+greatly deteriorate?
+
+Certainly.
+
+And the same of horses and animals in general?
+
+Undoubtedly.
+
+Good heavens! my dear friend, I said, what consummate skill will our
+rulers need if the same principle holds of the human species!
+
+Certainly, the same principle holds; but why does this involve any
+particular skill?
+
+Because, I said, our rulers will often have to practise upon the body
+corporate with medicines. Now you know that when patients do not
+require medicines, but have only to be put under a regimen, the
+inferior sort of practitioner is deemed to be good enough; but when
+medicine has to be given, then the doctor should be more of a man.
+
+That is quite true, he said; but to what are you alluding?
+
+I mean, I replied, that our rulers will find a considerable dose of
+falsehood and deceit necessary for the good of their subjects: we were
+saying that the use of all these things regarded as medicines might be
+of advantage.
+
+And we were very right.
+
+And this lawful use of them seems likely to be often needed in the
+regulations of marriages and births.
+
+How so?
+
+Why, I said, the principle has been already laid down that the best of
+either sex should be united with the best as often, and the inferior
+with the inferior, as seldom as possible; and that they should rear the
+offspring of the one sort of union, but not of the other, if the flock
+is to be maintained in first-rate condition. Now these goings on must
+be a secret which the rulers only know, or there will be a further
+danger of our herd, as the guardians may be termed, breaking out into
+rebellion.
+
+Very true.
+
+Had we not better appoint certain festivals at which we will bring
+together the brides and bridegrooms, and sacrifices will be offered and
+suitable hymeneal songs composed by our poets: the number of weddings
+is a matter which must be left to the discretion of the rulers, whose
+aim will be to preserve the average of population? There are many other
+things which they will have to consider, such as the effects of wars
+and diseases and any similar agencies, in order as far as this is
+possible to prevent the State from becoming either too large or too
+small.
+
+Certainly, he replied.
+
+We shall have to invent some ingenious kind of lots which the less
+worthy may draw on each occasion of our bringing them together, and
+then they will accuse their own ill-luck and not the rulers.
+
+To be sure, he said.
+
+And I think that our braver and better youth, besides their other
+honours and rewards, might have greater facilities of intercourse with
+women given them; their bravery will be a reason, and such fathers
+ought to have as many sons as possible.
+
+True.
+
+And the proper officers, whether male or female or both, for offices
+are to be held by women as well as by men—
+
+Yes—
+
+The proper officers will take the offspring of the good parents to the
+pen or fold, and there they will deposit them with certain nurses who
+dwell in a separate quarter; but the offspring of the inferior, or of
+the better when they chance to be deformed, will be put away in some
+mysterious, unknown place, as they should be.
+
+Yes, he said, that must be done if the breed of the guardians is to be
+kept pure.
+
+They will provide for their nurture, and will bring the mothers to the
+fold when they are full of milk, taking the greatest possible care that
+no mother recognises her own child; and other wet-nurses may be engaged
+if more are required. Care will also be taken that the process of
+suckling shall not be protracted too long; and the mothers will have no
+getting up at night or other trouble, but will hand over all this sort
+of thing to the nurses and attendants.
+
+You suppose the wives of our guardians to have a fine easy time of it
+when they are having children.
+
+Why, said I, and so they ought. Let us, however, proceed with our
+scheme. We were saying that the parents should be in the prime of life?
+
+Very true.
+
+And what is the prime of life? May it not be defined as a period of
+about twenty years in a woman’s life, and thirty in a man’s?
+
+Which years do you mean to include?
+
+A woman, I said, at twenty years of age may begin to bear children to
+the State, and continue to bear them until forty; a man may begin at
+five-and-twenty, when he has passed the point at which the pulse of
+life beats quickest, and continue to beget children until he be
+fifty-five.
+
+Certainly, he said, both in men and women those years are the prime of
+physical as well as of intellectual vigour.
+
+Any one above or below the prescribed ages who takes part in the public
+hymeneals shall be said to have done an unholy and unrighteous thing;
+the child of which he is the father, if it steals into life, will have
+been conceived under auspices very unlike the sacrifices and prayers,
+which at each hymeneal priestesses and priest and the whole city will
+offer, that the new generation may be better and more useful than their
+good and useful parents, whereas his child will be the offspring of
+darkness and strange lust.
+
+Very true, he replied.
+
+And the same law will apply to any one of those within the prescribed
+age who forms a connection with any woman in the prime of life without
+the sanction of the rulers; for we shall say that he is raising up a
+bastard to the State, uncertified and unconsecrated.
+
+Very true, he replied.
+
+This applies, however, only to those who are within the specified age:
+after that we allow them to range at will, except that a man may not
+marry his daughter or his daughter’s daughter, or his mother or his
+mother’s mother; and women, on the other hand, are prohibited from
+marrying their sons or fathers, or son’s son or father’s father, and so
+on in either direction. And we grant all this, accompanying the
+permission with strict orders to prevent any embryo which may come into
+being from seeing the light; and if any force a way to the birth, the
+parents must understand that the offspring of such an union cannot be
+maintained, and arrange accordingly.
+
+That also, he said, is a reasonable proposition. But how will they know
+who are fathers and daughters, and so on?
+
+They will never know. The way will be this:—dating from the day of the
+hymeneal, the bridegroom who was then married will call all the male
+children who are born in the seventh and tenth month afterwards his
+sons, and the female children his daughters, and they will call him
+father, and he will call their children his grandchildren, and they
+will call the elder generation grandfathers and grandmothers. All who
+were begotten at the time when their fathers and mothers came together
+will be called their brothers and sisters, and these, as I was saying,
+will be forbidden to inter-marry. This, however, is not to be
+understood as an absolute prohibition of the marriage of brothers and
+sisters; if the lot favours them, and they receive the sanction of the
+Pythian oracle, the law will allow them.
+
+Quite right, he replied.
+
+Such is the scheme, Glaucon, according to which the guardians of our
+State are to have their wives and families in common. And now you would
+have the argument show that this community is consistent with the rest
+of our polity, and also that nothing can be better—would you not?
+
+Yes, certainly.
+
+Shall we try to find a common basis by asking of ourselves what ought
+to be the chief aim of the legislator in making laws and in the
+organization of a State,—what is the greatest good, and what is the
+greatest evil, and then consider whether our previous description has
+the stamp of the good or of the evil?
+
+By all means.
+
+Can there be any greater evil than discord and distraction and
+plurality where unity ought to reign? or any greater good than the bond
+of unity?
+
+There cannot.
+
+And there is unity where there is community of pleasures and
+pains—where all the citizens are glad or grieved on the same occasions
+of joy and sorrow?
+
+No doubt.
+
+Yes; and where there is no common but only private feeling a State is
+disorganized—when you have one half of the world triumphing and the
+other plunged in grief at the same events happening to the city or the
+citizens?
+
+Certainly.
+
+Such differences commonly originate in a disagreement about the use of
+the terms ‘mine’ and ‘not mine,’ ‘his’ and ‘not his.’
+
+Exactly so.
+
+And is not that the best-ordered State in which the greatest number of
+persons apply the terms ‘mine’ and ‘not mine’ in the same way to the
+same thing?
+
+Quite true.
+
+Or that again which most nearly approaches to the condition of the
+individual—as in the body, when but a finger of one of us is hurt, the
+whole frame, drawn towards the soul as a centre and forming one kingdom
+under the ruling power therein, feels the hurt and sympathizes all
+together with the part affected, and we say that the man has a pain in
+his finger; and the same expression is used about any other part of the
+body, which has a sensation of pain at suffering or of pleasure at the
+alleviation of suffering.
+
+Very true, he replied; and I agree with you that in the best-ordered
+State there is the nearest approach to this common feeling which you
+describe.
+
+Then when any one of the citizens experiences any good or evil, the
+whole State will make his case their own, and will either rejoice or
+sorrow with him?
+
+Yes, he said, that is what will happen in a well-ordered State.
+
+It will now be time, I said, for us to return to our State and see
+whether this or some other form is most in accordance with these
+fundamental principles.
+
+Very good.
+
+Our State like every other has rulers and subjects?
+
+True.
+
+All of whom will call one another citizens?
+
+Of course.
+
+But is there not another name which people give to their rulers in
+other States?
+
+Generally they call them masters, but in democratic States they simply
+call them rulers.
+
+And in our State what other name besides that of citizens do the people
+give the rulers?
+
+They are called saviours and helpers, he replied.
+
+And what do the rulers call the people?
+
+Their maintainers and foster-fathers.
+
+And what do they call them in other States?
+
+Slaves.
+
+And what do the rulers call one another in other States?
+
+Fellow-rulers.
+
+And what in ours?
+
+Fellow-guardians.
+
+Did you ever know an example in any other State of a ruler who would
+speak of one of his colleagues as his friend and of another as not
+being his friend?
+
+Yes, very often.
+
+And the friend he regards and describes as one in whom he has an
+interest, and the other as a stranger in whom he has no interest?
+
+Exactly.
+
+But would any of your guardians think or speak of any other guardian as
+a stranger?
+
+Certainly he would not; for every one whom they meet will be regarded
+by them either as a brother or sister, or father or mother, or son or
+daughter, or as the child or parent of those who are thus connected
+with him.
+
+Capital, I said; but let me ask you once more: Shall they be a family
+in name only; or shall they in all their actions be true to the name?
+For example, in the use of the word ‘father,’ would the care of a
+father be implied and the filial reverence and duty and obedience to
+him which the law commands; and is the violator of these duties to be
+regarded as an impious and unrighteous person who is not likely to
+receive much good either at the hands of God or of man? Are these to be
+or not to be the strains which the children will hear repeated in their
+ears by all the citizens about those who are intimated to them to be
+their parents and the rest of their kinsfolk?
+
+These, he said, and none other; for what can be more ridiculous than
+for them to utter the names of family ties with the lips only and not
+to act in the spirit of them?
+
+Then in our city the language of harmony and concord will be more often
+heard than in any other. As I was describing before, when any one is
+well or ill, the universal word will be ‘with me it is well’ or ‘it is
+ill.’
+
+Most true.
+
+And agreeably to this mode of thinking and speaking, were we not saying
+that they will have their pleasures and pains in common?
+
+Yes, and so they will.
+
+And they will have a common interest in the same thing which they will
+alike call ‘my own,’ and having this common interest they will have a
+common feeling of pleasure and pain?
+
+Yes, far more so than in other States.
+
+And the reason of this, over and above the general constitution of the
+State, will be that the guardians will have a community of women and
+children?
+
+That will be the chief reason.
+
+And this unity of feeling we admitted to be the greatest good, as was
+implied in our own comparison of a well-ordered State to the relation
+of the body and the members, when affected by pleasure or pain?
+
+That we acknowledged, and very rightly.
+
+Then the community of wives and children among our citizens is clearly
+the source of the greatest good to the State?
+
+Certainly.
+
+And this agrees with the other principle which we were affirming,—that
+the guardians were not to have houses or lands or any other property;
+their pay was to be their food, which they were to receive from the
+other citizens, and they were to have no private expenses; for we
+intended them to preserve their true character of guardians.
+
+Right, he replied.
+
+Both the community of property and the community of families, as I am
+saying, tend to make them more truly guardians; they will not tear the
+city in pieces by differing about ‘mine’ and ‘not mine;’ each man
+dragging any acquisition which he has made into a separate house of his
+own, where he has a separate wife and children and private pleasures
+and pains; but all will be affected as far as may be by the same
+pleasures and pains because they are all of one opinion about what is
+near and dear to them, and therefore they all tend towards a common
+end.
+
+Certainly, he replied.
+
+And as they have nothing but their persons which they can call their
+own, suits and complaints will have no existence among them; they will
+be delivered from all those quarrels of which money or children or
+relations are the occasion.
+
+Of course they will.
+
+Neither will trials for assault or insult ever be likely to occur among
+them. For that equals should defend themselves against equals we shall
+maintain to be honourable and right; we shall make the protection of
+the person a matter of necessity.
+
+That is good, he said.
+
+Yes; and there is a further good in the law; viz. that if a man has a
+quarrel with another he will satisfy his resentment then and there, and
+not proceed to more dangerous lengths.
+
+Certainly.
+
+To the elder shall be assigned the duty of ruling and chastising the
+younger.
+
+Clearly.
+
+Nor can there be a doubt that the younger will not strike or do any
+other violence to an elder, unless the magistrates command him; nor
+will he slight him in any way. For there are two guardians, shame and
+fear, mighty to prevent him: shame, which makes men refrain from laying
+hands on those who are to them in the relation of parents; fear, that
+the injured one will be succoured by the others who are his brothers,
+sons, fathers.
+
+That is true, he replied.
+
+Then in every way the laws will help the citizens to keep the peace
+with one another?
+
+Yes, there will be no want of peace.
+
+And as the guardians will never quarrel among themselves there will be
+no danger of the rest of the city being divided either against them or
+against one another.
+
+None whatever.
+
+I hardly like even to mention the little meannesses of which they will
+be rid, for they are beneath notice: such, for example, as the flattery
+of the rich by the poor, and all the pains and pangs which men
+experience in bringing up a family, and in finding money to buy
+necessaries for their household, borrowing and then repudiating,
+getting how they can, and giving the money into the hands of women and
+slaves to keep—the many evils of so many kinds which people suffer in
+this way are mean enough and obvious enough, and not worth speaking of.
+
+Yes, he said, a man has no need of eyes in order to perceive that.
+
+And from all these evils they will be delivered, and their life will be
+blessed as the life of Olympic victors and yet more blessed.
+
+How so?
+
+The Olympic victor, I said, is deemed happy in receiving a part only of
+the blessedness which is secured to our citizens, who have won a more
+glorious victory and have a more complete maintenance at the public
+cost. For the victory which they have won is the salvation of the whole
+State; and the crown with which they and their children are crowned is
+the fulness of all that life needs; they receive rewards from the hands
+of their country while living, and after death have an honourable
+burial.
+
+Yes, he said, and glorious rewards they are.
+
+Do you remember, I said, how in the course of the previous discussion
+some one who shall be nameless accused us of making our guardians
+unhappy—they had nothing and might have possessed all things—to whom we
+replied that, if an occasion offered, we might perhaps hereafter
+consider this question, but that, as at present advised, we would make
+our guardians truly guardians, and that we were fashioning the State
+with a view to the greatest happiness, not of any particular class, but
+of the whole?
+
+Yes, I remember.
+
+And what do you say, now that the life of our protectors is made out to
+be far better and nobler than that of Olympic victors—is the life of
+shoemakers, or any other artisans, or of husbandmen, to be compared
+with it?
+
+Certainly not.
+
+At the same time I ought here to repeat what I have said elsewhere,
+that if any of our guardians shall try to be happy in such a manner
+that he will cease to be a guardian, and is not content with this safe
+and harmonious life, which, in our judgment, is of all lives the best,
+but infatuated by some youthful conceit of happiness which gets up into
+his head shall seek to appropriate the whole state to himself, then he
+will have to learn how wisely Hesiod spoke, when he said, ‘half is more
+than the whole.’
+
+If he were to consult me, I should say to him: Stay where you are, when
+you have the offer of such a life.
+
+You agree then, I said, that men and women are to have a common way of
+life such as we have described—common education, common children; and
+they are to watch over the citizens in common whether abiding in the
+city or going out to war; they are to keep watch together, and to hunt
+together like dogs; and always and in all things, as far as they are
+able, women are to share with the men? And in so doing they will do
+what is best, and will not violate, but preserve the natural relation
+of the sexes.
+
+I agree with you, he replied.
+
+The enquiry, I said, has yet to be made, whether such a community be
+found possible—as among other animals, so also among men—and if
+possible, in what way possible?
+
+You have anticipated the question which I was about to suggest.
+
+There is no difficulty, I said, in seeing how war will be carried on by
+them.
+
+How?
+
+Why, of course they will go on expeditions together; and will take with
+them any of their children who are strong enough, that, after the
+manner of the artisan’s child, they may look on at the work which they
+will have to do when they are grown up; and besides looking on they
+will have to help and be of use in war, and to wait upon their fathers
+and mothers. Did you never observe in the arts how the potters’ boys
+look on and help, long before they touch the wheel?
+
+Yes, I have.
+
+And shall potters be more careful in educating their children and in
+giving them the opportunity of seeing and practising their duties than
+our guardians will be?
+
+The idea is ridiculous, he said.
+
+There is also the effect on the parents, with whom, as with other
+animals, the presence of their young ones will be the greatest
+incentive to valour.
+
+That is quite true, Socrates; and yet if they are defeated, which may
+often happen in war, how great the danger is! the children will be lost
+as well as their parents, and the State will never recover.
+
+True, I said; but would you never allow them to run any risk?
+
+I am far from saying that.
+
+Well, but if they are ever to run a risk should they not do so on some
+occasion when, if they escape disaster, they will be the better for it?
+
+Clearly.
+
+Whether the future soldiers do or do not see war in the days of their
+youth is a very important matter, for the sake of which some risk may
+fairly be incurred.
+
+Yes, very important.
+
+This then must be our first step,—to make our children spectators of
+war; but we must also contrive that they shall be secured against
+danger; then all will be well.
+
+True.
+
+Their parents may be supposed not to be blind to the risks of war, but
+to know, as far as human foresight can, what expeditions are safe and
+what dangerous?
+
+That may be assumed.
+
+And they will take them on the safe expeditions and be cautious about
+the dangerous ones?
+
+True.
+
+And they will place them under the command of experienced veterans who
+will be their leaders and teachers?
+
+Very properly.
+
+Still, the dangers of war cannot be always foreseen; there is a good
+deal of chance about them?
+
+True.
+
+Then against such chances the children must be at once furnished with
+wings, in order that in the hour of need they may fly away and escape.
+
+What do you mean? he said.
+
+I mean that we must mount them on horses in their earliest youth, and
+when they have learnt to ride, take them on horseback to see war: the
+horses must not be spirited and warlike, but the most tractable and yet
+the swiftest that can be had. In this way they will get an excellent
+view of what is hereafter to be their own business; and if there is
+danger they have only to follow their elder leaders and escape.
+
+I believe that you are right, he said.
+
+Next, as to war; what are to be the relations of your soldiers to one
+another and to their enemies? I should be inclined to propose that the
+soldier who leaves his rank or throws away his arms, or is guilty of
+any other act of cowardice, should be degraded into the rank of a
+husbandman or artisan. What do you think?
+
+By all means, I should say.
+
+And he who allows himself to be taken prisoner may as well be made a
+present of to his enemies; he is their lawful prey, and let them do
+what they like with him.
+
+Certainly.
+
+But the hero who has distinguished himself, what shall be done to him?
+In the first place, he shall receive honour in the army from his
+youthful comrades; every one of them in succession shall crown him.
+What do you say?
+
+I approve.
+
+And what do you say to his receiving the right hand of fellowship?
+
+To that too, I agree.
+
+But you will hardly agree to my next proposal.
+
+What is your proposal?
+
+That he should kiss and be kissed by them.
+
+Most certainly, and I should be disposed to go further, and say: Let no
+one whom he has a mind to kiss refuse to be kissed by him while the
+expedition lasts. So that if there be a lover in the army, whether his
+love be youth or maiden, he may be more eager to win the prize of
+valour.
+
+Capital, I said. That the brave man is to have more wives than others
+has been already determined: and he is to have first choices in such
+matters more than others, in order that he may have as many children as
+possible?
+
+Agreed.
+
+Again, there is another manner in which, according to Homer, brave
+youths should be honoured; for he tells how Ajax, after he had
+distinguished himself in battle, was rewarded with long chines, which
+seems to be a compliment appropriate to a hero in the flower of his
+age, being not only a tribute of honour but also a very strengthening
+thing.
+
+Most true, he said.
+
+Then in this, I said, Homer shall be our teacher; and we too, at
+sacrifices and on the like occasions, will honour the brave according
+to the measure of their valour, whether men or women, with hymns and
+those other distinctions which we were mentioning; also with
+
+‘seats of precedence, and meats and full cups;’
+
+and in honouring them, we shall be at the same time training them.
+
+That, he replied, is excellent.
+
+Yes, I said; and when a man dies gloriously in war shall we not say, in
+the first place, that he is of the golden race?
+
+To be sure.
+
+Nay, have we not the authority of Hesiod for affirming that when they
+are dead
+
+‘They are holy angels upon the earth, authors of good, averters of
+evil, the guardians of speech-gifted men’?
+
+Yes; and we accept his authority.
+
+We must learn of the god how we are to order the sepulture of divine
+and heroic personages, and what is to be their special distinction; and
+we must do as he bids?
+
+By all means.
+
+And in ages to come we will reverence them and kneel before their
+sepulchres as at the graves of heroes. And not only they but any who
+are deemed pre-eminently good, whether they die from age, or in any
+other way, shall be admitted to the same honours.
+
+That is very right, he said.
+
+Next, how shall our soldiers treat their enemies? What about this?
+
+In what respect do you mean?
+
+First of all, in regard to slavery? Do you think it right that Hellenes
+should enslave Hellenic States, or allow others to enslave them, if
+they can help? Should not their custom be to spare them, considering
+the danger which there is that the whole race may one day fall under
+the yoke of the barbarians?
+
+To spare them is infinitely better.
+
+Then no Hellene should be owned by them as a slave; that is a rule
+which they will observe and advise the other Hellenes to observe.
+
+Certainly, he said; they will in this way be united against the
+barbarians and will keep their hands off one another.
+
+Next as to the slain; ought the conquerors, I said, to take anything
+but their armour? Does not the practice of despoiling an enemy afford
+an excuse for not facing the battle? Cowards skulk about the dead,
+pretending that they are fulfilling a duty, and many an army before now
+has been lost from this love of plunder.
+
+Very true.
+
+And is there not illiberality and avarice in robbing a corpse, and also
+a degree of meanness and womanishness in making an enemy of the dead
+body when the real enemy has flown away and left only his fighting gear
+behind him,—is not this rather like a dog who cannot get at his
+assailant, quarrelling with the stones which strike him instead?
+
+Very like a dog, he said.
+
+Then we must abstain from spoiling the dead or hindering their burial?
+
+Yes, he replied, we most certainly must.
+
+Neither shall we offer up arms at the temples of the gods, least of all
+the arms of Hellenes, if we care to maintain good feeling with other
+Hellenes; and, indeed, we have reason to fear that the offering of
+spoils taken from kinsmen may be a pollution unless commanded by the
+god himself?
+
+Very true.
+
+Again, as to the devastation of Hellenic territory or the burning of
+houses, what is to be the practice?
+
+May I have the pleasure, he said, of hearing your opinion?
+
+Both should be forbidden, in my judgment; I would take the annual
+produce and no more. Shall I tell you why?
+
+Pray do.
+
+Why, you see, there is a difference in the names ‘discord’ and ‘war,’
+and I imagine that there is also a difference in their natures; the one
+is expressive of what is internal and domestic, the other of what is
+external and foreign; and the first of the two is termed discord, and
+only the second, war.
+
+That is a very proper distinction, he replied.
+
+And may I not observe with equal propriety that the Hellenic race is
+all united together by ties of blood and friendship, and alien and
+strange to the barbarians?
+
+Very good, he said.
+
+And therefore when Hellenes fight with barbarians and barbarians with
+Hellenes, they will be described by us as being at war when they fight,
+and by nature enemies, and this kind of antagonism should be called
+war; but when Hellenes fight with one another we shall say that Hellas
+is then in a state of disorder and discord, they being by nature
+friends; and such enmity is to be called discord.
+
+I agree.
+
+Consider then, I said, when that which we have acknowledged to be
+discord occurs, and a city is divided, if both parties destroy the
+lands and burn the houses of one another, how wicked does the strife
+appear! No true lover of his country would bring himself to tear in
+pieces his own nurse and mother: There might be reason in the conqueror
+depriving the conquered of their harvest, but still they would have the
+idea of peace in their hearts and would not mean to go on fighting for
+ever.
+
+Yes, he said, that is a better temper than the other.
+
+And will not the city, which you are founding, be an Hellenic city?
+
+It ought to be, he replied.
+
+Then will not the citizens be good and civilized?
+
+Yes, very civilized.
+
+And will they not be lovers of Hellas, and think of Hellas as their own
+land, and share in the common temples?
+
+Most certainly.
+
+And any difference which arises among them will be regarded by them as
+discord only—a quarrel among friends, which is not to be called a war?
+
+Certainly not.
+
+Then they will quarrel as those who intend some day to be reconciled?
+
+Certainly.
+
+They will use friendly correction, but will not enslave or destroy
+their opponents; they will be correctors, not enemies?
+
+Just so.
+
+And as they are Hellenes themselves they will not devastate Hellas, nor
+will they burn houses, nor ever suppose that the whole population of a
+city—men, women, and children—are equally their enemies, for they know
+that the guilt of war is always confined to a few persons and that the
+many are their friends. And for all these reasons they will be
+unwilling to waste their lands and rase their houses; their enmity to
+them will only last until the many innocent sufferers have compelled
+the guilty few to give satisfaction?
+
+I agree, he said, that our citizens should thus deal with their
+Hellenic enemies; and with barbarians as the Hellenes now deal with one
+another.
+
+Then let us enact this law also for our guardians:—that they are
+neither to devastate the lands of Hellenes nor to burn their houses.
+
+Agreed; and we may agree also in thinking that these, like all our
+previous enactments, are very good.
+
+But still I must say, Socrates, that if you are allowed to go on in
+this way you will entirely forget the other question which at the
+commencement of this discussion you thrust aside:—Is such an order of
+things possible, and how, if at all? For I am quite ready to
+acknowledge that the plan which you propose, if only feasible, would do
+all sorts of good to the State. I will add, what you have omitted, that
+your citizens will be the bravest of warriors, and will never leave
+their ranks, for they will all know one another, and each will call the
+other father, brother, son; and if you suppose the women to join their
+armies, whether in the same rank or in the rear, either as a terror to
+the enemy, or as auxiliaries in case of need, I know that they will
+then be absolutely invincible; and there are many domestic advantages
+which might also be mentioned and which I also fully acknowledge: but,
+as I admit all these advantages and as many more as you please, if only
+this State of yours were to come into existence, we need say no more
+about them; assuming then the existence of the State, let us now turn
+to the question of possibility and ways and means—the rest may be left.
+
+If I loiter for a moment, you instantly make a raid upon me, I said,
+and have no mercy; I have hardly escaped the first and second waves,
+and you seem not to be aware that you are now bringing upon me the
+third, which is the greatest and heaviest. When you have seen and heard
+the third wave, I think you will be more considerate and will
+acknowledge that some fear and hesitation was natural respecting a
+proposal so extraordinary as that which I have now to state and
+investigate.
+
+The more appeals of this sort which you make, he said, the more
+determined are we that you shall tell us how such a State is possible:
+speak out and at once.
+
+Let me begin by reminding you that we found our way hither in the
+search after justice and injustice.
+
+True, he replied; but what of that?
+
+I was only going to ask whether, if we have discovered them, we are to
+require that the just man should in nothing fail of absolute justice;
+or may we be satisfied with an approximation, and the attainment in him
+of a higher degree of justice than is to be found in other men?
+
+The approximation will be enough.
+
+We were enquiring into the nature of absolute justice and into the
+character of the perfectly just, and into injustice and the perfectly
+unjust, that we might have an ideal. We were to look at these in order
+that we might judge of our own happiness and unhappiness according to
+the standard which they exhibited and the degree in which we resembled
+them, but not with any view of showing that they could exist in fact.
+
+True, he said.
+
+Would a painter be any the worse because, after having delineated with
+consummate art an ideal of a perfectly beautiful man, he was unable to
+show that any such man could ever have existed?
+
+He would be none the worse.
+
+Well, and were we not creating an ideal of a perfect State?
+
+To be sure.
+
+And is our theory a worse theory because we are unable to prove the
+possibility of a city being ordered in the manner described?
+
+Surely not, he replied.
+
+That is the truth, I said. But if, at your request, I am to try and
+show how and under what conditions the possibility is highest, I must
+ask you, having this in view, to repeat your former admissions.
+
+What admissions?
+
+I want to know whether ideals are ever fully realized in language? Does
+not the word express more than the fact, and must not the actual,
+whatever a man may think, always, in the nature of things, fall short
+of the truth? What do you say?
+
+I agree.
+
+Then you must not insist on my proving that the actual State will in
+every respect coincide with the ideal: if we are only able to discover
+how a city may be governed nearly as we proposed, you will admit that
+we have discovered the possibility which you demand; and will be
+contented. I am sure that I should be contented—will not you?
+
+Yes, I will.
+
+Let me next endeavour to show what is that fault in States which is the
+cause of their present maladministration, and what is the least change
+which will enable a State to pass into the truer form; and let the
+change, if possible, be of one thing only, or, if not, of two; at any
+rate, let the changes be as few and slight as possible.
+
+Certainly, he replied.
+
+I think, I said, that there might be a reform of the State if only one
+change were made, which is not a slight or easy though still a possible
+one.
+
+What is it? he said.
+
+Now then, I said, I go to meet that which I liken to the greatest of
+the waves; yet shall the word be spoken, even though the wave break and
+drown me in laughter and dishonour; and do you mark my words.
+
+Proceed.
+
+I said: ‘Until philosophers are kings, or the kings and princes of this
+world have the spirit and power of philosophy, and political greatness
+and wisdom meet in one, and those commoner natures who pursue either to
+the exclusion of the other are compelled to stand aside, cities will
+never have rest from their evils,—nor the human race, as I believe,—and
+then only will this our State have a possibility of life and behold the
+light of day.’ Such was the thought, my dear Glaucon, which I would
+fain have uttered if it had not seemed too extravagant; for to be
+convinced that in no other State can there be happiness private or
+public is indeed a hard thing.
+
+Socrates, what do you mean? I would have you consider that the word
+which you have uttered is one at which numerous persons, and very
+respectable persons too, in a figure pulling off their coats all in a
+moment, and seizing any weapon that comes to hand, will run at you
+might and main, before you know where you are, intending to do heaven
+knows what; and if you don’t prepare an answer, and put yourself in
+motion, you will be ‘pared by their fine wits,’ and no mistake.
+
+You got me into the scrape, I said.
+
+And I was quite right; however, I will do all I can to get you out of
+it; but I can only give you good-will and good advice, and, perhaps, I
+may be able to fit answers to your questions better than another—that
+is all. And now, having such an auxiliary, you must do your best to
+show the unbelievers that you are right.
+
+I ought to try, I said, since you offer me such invaluable assistance.
+And I think that, if there is to be a chance of our escaping, we must
+explain to them whom we mean when we say that philosophers are to rule
+in the State; then we shall be able to defend ourselves: There will be
+discovered to be some natures who ought to study philosophy and to be
+leaders in the State; and others who are not born to be philosophers,
+and are meant to be followers rather than leaders.
+
+Then now for a definition, he said.
+
+Follow me, I said, and I hope that I may in some way or other be able
+to give you a satisfactory explanation.
+
+Proceed.
+
+I dare say that you remember, and therefore I need not remind you, that
+a lover, if he is worthy of the name, ought to show his love, not to
+some one part of that which he loves, but to the whole.
+
+I really do not understand, and therefore beg of you to assist my
+memory.
+
+Another person, I said, might fairly reply as you do; but a man of
+pleasure like yourself ought to know that all who are in the flower of
+youth do somehow or other raise a pang or emotion in a lover’s breast,
+and are thought by him to be worthy of his affectionate regards. Is not
+this a way which you have with the fair: one has a snub nose, and you
+praise his charming face; the hook-nose of another has, you say, a
+royal look; while he who is neither snub nor hooked has the grace of
+regularity: the dark visage is manly, the fair are children of the
+gods; and as to the sweet ‘honey pale,’ as they are called, what is the
+very name but the invention of a lover who talks in diminutives, and is
+not averse to paleness if appearing on the cheek of youth? In a word,
+there is no excuse which you will not make, and nothing which you will
+not say, in order not to lose a single flower that blooms in the
+spring-time of youth.
+
+If you make me an authority in matters of love, for the sake of the
+argument, I assent.
+
+And what do you say of lovers of wine? Do you not see them doing the
+same? They are glad of any pretext of drinking any wine.
+
+Very good.
+
+And the same is true of ambitious men; if they cannot command an army,
+they are willing to command a file; and if they cannot be honoured by
+really great and important persons, they are glad to be honoured by
+lesser and meaner people,—but honour of some kind they must have.
+
+Exactly.
+
+Once more let me ask: Does he who desires any class of goods, desire
+the whole class or a part only?
+
+The whole.
+
+And may we not say of the philosopher that he is a lover, not of a part
+of wisdom only, but of the whole?
+
+Yes, of the whole.
+
+And he who dislikes learning, especially in youth, when he has no power
+of judging what is good and what is not, such an one we maintain not to
+be a philosopher or a lover of knowledge, just as he who refuses his
+food is not hungry, and may be said to have a bad appetite and not a
+good one?
+
+Very true, he said.
+
+Whereas he who has a taste for every sort of knowledge and who is
+curious to learn and is never satisfied, may be justly termed a
+philosopher? Am I not right?
+
+Glaucon said: If curiosity makes a philosopher, you will find many a
+strange being will have a title to the name. All the lovers of sights
+have a delight in learning, and must therefore be included. Musical
+amateurs, too, are a folk strangely out of place among philosophers,
+for they are the last persons in the world who would come to anything
+like a philosophical discussion, if they could help, while they run
+about at the Dionysiac festivals as if they had let out their ears to
+hear every chorus; whether the performance is in town or country—that
+makes no difference—they are there. Now are we to maintain that all
+these and any who have similar tastes, as well as the professors of
+quite minor arts, are philosophers?
+
+Certainly not, I replied; they are only an imitation.
+
+He said: Who then are the true philosophers?
+
+Those, I said, who are lovers of the vision of truth.
+
+That is also good, he said; but I should like to know what you mean?
+
+To another, I replied, I might have a difficulty in explaining; but I
+am sure that you will admit a proposition which I am about to make.
+
+What is the proposition?
+
+That since beauty is the opposite of ugliness, they are two?
+
+Certainly.
+
+And inasmuch as they are two, each of them is one?
+
+True again.
+
+And of just and unjust, good and evil, and of every other class, the
+same remark holds: taken singly, each of them is one; but from the
+various combinations of them with actions and things and with one
+another, they are seen in all sorts of lights and appear many?
+
+Very true.
+
+And this is the distinction which I draw between the sight-loving,
+art-loving, practical class and those of whom I am speaking, and who
+are alone worthy of the name of philosophers.
+
+How do you distinguish them? he said.
+
+The lovers of sounds and sights, I replied, are, as I conceive, fond of
+fine tones and colours and forms and all the artificial products that
+are made out of them, but their mind is incapable of seeing or loving
+absolute beauty.
+
+True, he replied.
+
+Few are they who are able to attain to the sight of this.
+
+Very true.
+
+And he who, having a sense of beautiful things has no sense of absolute
+beauty, or who, if another lead him to a knowledge of that beauty is
+unable to follow—of such an one I ask, Is he awake or in a dream only?
+Reflect: is not the dreamer, sleeping or waking, one who likens
+dissimilar things, who puts the copy in the place of the real object?
+
+I should certainly say that such an one was dreaming.
+
+But take the case of the other, who recognises the existence of
+absolute beauty and is able to distinguish the idea from the objects
+which participate in the idea, neither putting the objects in the place
+of the idea nor the idea in the place of the objects—is he a dreamer,
+or is he awake?
+
+He is wide awake.
+
+And may we not say that the mind of the one who knows has knowledge,
+and that the mind of the other, who opines only, has opinion?
+
+Certainly.
+
+But suppose that the latter should quarrel with us and dispute our
+statement, can we administer any soothing cordial or advice to him,
+without revealing to him that there is sad disorder in his wits?
+
+We must certainly offer him some good advice, he replied.
+
+Come, then, and let us think of something to say to him. Shall we begin
+by assuring him that he is welcome to any knowledge which he may have,
+and that we are rejoiced at his having it? But we should like to ask
+him a question: Does he who has knowledge know something or nothing?
+(You must answer for him.)
+
+I answer that he knows something.
+
+Something that is or is not?
+
+Something that is; for how can that which is not ever be known?
+
+And are we assured, after looking at the matter from many points of
+view, that absolute being is or may be absolutely known, but that the
+utterly non-existent is utterly unknown?
+
+Nothing can be more certain.
+
+Good. But if there be anything which is of such a nature as to be and
+not to be, that will have a place intermediate between pure being and
+the absolute negation of being?
+
+Yes, between them.
+
+And, as knowledge corresponded to being and ignorance of necessity to
+not-being, for that intermediate between being and not-being there has
+to be discovered a corresponding intermediate between ignorance and
+knowledge, if there be such?
+
+Certainly.
+
+Do we admit the existence of opinion?
+
+Undoubtedly.
+
+As being the same with knowledge, or another faculty?
+
+Another faculty.
+
+Then opinion and knowledge have to do with different kinds of matter
+corresponding to this difference of faculties?
+
+Yes.
+
+And knowledge is relative to being and knows being. But before I
+proceed further I will make a division.
+
+What division?
+
+I will begin by placing faculties in a class by themselves: they are
+powers in us, and in all other things, by which we do as we do. Sight
+and hearing, for example, I should call faculties. Have I clearly
+explained the class which I mean?
+
+Yes, I quite understand.
+
+Then let me tell you my view about them. I do not see them, and
+therefore the distinctions of figure, colour, and the like, which
+enable me to discern the differences of some things, do not apply to
+them. In speaking of a faculty I think only of its sphere and its
+result; and that which has the same sphere and the same result I call
+the same faculty, but that which has another sphere and another result
+I call different. Would that be your way of speaking?
+
+Yes.
+
+And will you be so very good as to answer one more question? Would you
+say that knowledge is a faculty, or in what class would you place it?
+
+Certainly knowledge is a faculty, and the mightiest of all faculties.
+
+And is opinion also a faculty?
+
+Certainly, he said; for opinion is that with which we are able to form
+an opinion.
+
+And yet you were acknowledging a little while ago that knowledge is not
+the same as opinion?
+
+Why, yes, he said: how can any reasonable being ever identify that
+which is infallible with that which errs?
+
+An excellent answer, proving, I said, that we are quite conscious of a
+distinction between them.
+
+Yes.
+
+Then knowledge and opinion having distinct powers have also distinct
+spheres or subject-matters?
+
+That is certain.
+
+Being is the sphere or subject-matter of knowledge, and knowledge is to
+know the nature of being?
+
+Yes.
+
+And opinion is to have an opinion?
+
+Yes.
+
+And do we know what we opine? or is the subject-matter of opinion the
+same as the subject-matter of knowledge?
+
+Nay, he replied, that has been already disproven; if difference in
+faculty implies difference in the sphere or subject-matter, and if, as
+we were saying, opinion and knowledge are distinct faculties, then the
+sphere of knowledge and of opinion cannot be the same.
+
+Then if being is the subject-matter of knowledge, something else must
+be the subject-matter of opinion?
+
+Yes, something else.
+
+Well then, is not-being the subject-matter of opinion? or, rather, how
+can there be an opinion at all about not-being? Reflect: when a man has
+an opinion, has he not an opinion about something? Can he have an
+opinion which is an opinion about nothing?
+
+Impossible.
+
+He who has an opinion has an opinion about some one thing?
+
+Yes.
+
+And not-being is not one thing but, properly speaking, nothing?
+
+True.
+
+Of not-being, ignorance was assumed to be the necessary correlative; of
+being, knowledge?
+
+True, he said.
+
+Then opinion is not concerned either with being or with not-being?
+
+Not with either.
+
+And can therefore neither be ignorance nor knowledge?
+
+That seems to be true.
+
+But is opinion to be sought without and beyond either of them, in a
+greater clearness than knowledge, or in a greater darkness than
+ignorance?
+
+In neither.
+
+Then I suppose that opinion appears to you to be darker than knowledge,
+but lighter than ignorance?
+
+Both; and in no small degree.
+
+And also to be within and between them?
+
+Yes.
+
+Then you would infer that opinion is intermediate?
+
+No question.
+
+But were we not saying before, that if anything appeared to be of a
+sort which is and is not at the same time, that sort of thing would
+appear also to lie in the interval between pure being and absolute
+not-being; and that the corresponding faculty is neither knowledge nor
+ignorance, but will be found in the interval between them?
+
+True.
+
+And in that interval there has now been discovered something which we
+call opinion?
+
+There has.
+
+Then what remains to be discovered is the object which partakes equally
+of the nature of being and not-being, and cannot rightly be termed
+either, pure and simple; this unknown term, when discovered, we may
+truly call the subject of opinion, and assign each to their proper
+faculty,—the extremes to the faculties of the extremes and the mean to
+the faculty of the mean.
+
+True.
+
+This being premised, I would ask the gentleman who is of opinion that
+there is no absolute or unchangeable idea of beauty—in whose opinion
+the beautiful is the manifold—he, I say, your lover of beautiful
+sights, who cannot bear to be told that the beautiful is one, and the
+just is one, or that anything is one—to him I would appeal, saying,
+Will you be so very kind, sir, as to tell us whether, of all these
+beautiful things, there is one which will not be found ugly; or of the
+just, which will not be found unjust; or of the holy, which will not
+also be unholy?
+
+No, he replied; the beautiful will in some point of view be found ugly;
+and the same is true of the rest.
+
+And may not the many which are doubles be also halves?—doubles, that
+is, of one thing, and halves of another?
+
+Quite true.
+
+And things great and small, heavy and light, as they are termed, will
+not be denoted by these any more than by the opposite names?
+
+True; both these and the opposite names will always attach to all of
+them.
+
+And can any one of those many things which are called by particular
+names be said to be this rather than not to be this?
+
+He replied: They are like the punning riddles which are asked at feasts
+or the children’s puzzle about the eunuch aiming at the bat, with what
+he hit him, as they say in the puzzle, and upon what the bat was
+sitting. The individual objects of which I am speaking are also a
+riddle, and have a double sense: nor can you fix them in your mind,
+either as being or not-being, or both, or neither.
+
+Then what will you do with them? I said. Can they have a better place
+than between being and not-being? For they are clearly not in greater
+darkness or negation than not-being, or more full of light and
+existence than being.
+
+That is quite true, he said.
+
+Thus then we seem to have discovered that the many ideas which the
+multitude entertain about the beautiful and about all other things are
+tossing about in some region which is half-way between pure being and
+pure not-being?
+
+We have.
+
+Yes; and we had before agreed that anything of this kind which we might
+find was to be described as matter of opinion, and not as matter of
+knowledge; being the intermediate flux which is caught and detained by
+the intermediate faculty.
+
+Quite true.
+
+Then those who see the many beautiful, and who yet neither see absolute
+beauty, nor can follow any guide who points the way thither; who see
+the many just, and not absolute justice, and the like,—such persons may
+be said to have opinion but not knowledge?
+
+That is certain.
+
+But those who see the absolute and eternal and immutable may be said to
+know, and not to have opinion only?
+
+Neither can that be denied.
+
+The one love and embrace the subjects of knowledge, the other those of
+opinion? The latter are the same, as I dare say you will remember, who
+listened to sweet sounds and gazed upon fair colours, but would not
+tolerate the existence of absolute beauty.
+
+Yes, I remember.
+
+Shall we then be guilty of any impropriety in calling them lovers of
+opinion rather than lovers of wisdom, and will they be very angry with
+us for thus describing them?
+
+I shall tell them not to be angry; no man should be angry at what is
+true.
+
+But those who love the truth in each thing are to be called lovers of
+wisdom and not lovers of opinion.
+
+Assuredly.
+
+
+
+
+ BOOK VI.
+
+
+And thus, Glaucon, after the argument has gone a weary way, the true
+and the false philosophers have at length appeared in view.
+
+I do not think, he said, that the way could have been shortened.
+
+I suppose not, I said; and yet I believe that we might have had a
+better view of both of them if the discussion could have been confined
+to this one subject and if there were not many other questions awaiting
+us, which he who desires to see in what respect the life of the just
+differs from that of the unjust must consider.
+
+And what is the next question? he asked.
+
+Surely, I said, the one which follows next in order. Inasmuch as
+philosophers only are able to grasp the eternal and unchangeable, and
+those who wander in the region of the many and variable are not
+philosophers, I must ask you which of the two classes should be the
+rulers of our State?
+
+And how can we rightly answer that question?
+
+Whichever of the two are best able to guard the laws and institutions
+of our State—let them be our guardians.
+
+Very good.
+
+Neither, I said, can there be any question that the guardian who is to
+keep anything should have eyes rather than no eyes?
+
+There can be no question of that.
+
+And are not those who are verily and indeed wanting in the knowledge of
+the true being of each thing, and who have in their souls no clear
+pattern, and are unable as with a painter’s eye to look at the absolute
+truth and to that original to repair, and having perfect vision of the
+other world to order the laws about beauty, goodness, justice in this,
+if not already ordered, and to guard and preserve the order of them—are
+not such persons, I ask, simply blind?
+
+Truly, he replied, they are much in that condition.
+
+And shall they be our guardians when there are others who, besides
+being their equals in experience and falling short of them in no
+particular of virtue, also know the very truth of each thing?
+
+There can be no reason, he said, for rejecting those who have this
+greatest of all great qualities; they must always have the first place
+unless they fail in some other respect.
+
+Suppose then, I said, that we determine how far they can unite this and
+the other excellences.
+
+By all means.
+
+In the first place, as we began by observing, the nature of the
+philosopher has to be ascertained. We must come to an understanding
+about him, and, when we have done so, then, if I am not mistaken, we
+shall also acknowledge that such an union of qualities is possible, and
+that those in whom they are united, and those only, should be rulers in
+the State.
+
+What do you mean?
+
+Let us suppose that philosophical minds always love knowledge of a sort
+which shows them the eternal nature not varying from generation and
+corruption.
+
+Agreed.
+
+And further, I said, let us agree that they are lovers of all true
+being; there is no part whether greater or less, or more or less
+honourable, which they are willing to renounce; as we said before of
+the lover and the man of ambition.
+
+True.
+
+And if they are to be what we were describing, is there not another
+quality which they should also possess?
+
+What quality?
+
+Truthfulness: they will never intentionally receive into their mind
+falsehood, which is their detestation, and they will love the truth.
+
+Yes, that may be safely affirmed of them.
+
+‘May be,’ my friend, I replied, is not the word; say rather ‘must be
+affirmed:’ for he whose nature is amorous of anything cannot help
+loving all that belongs or is akin to the object of his affections.
+
+Right, he said.
+
+And is there anything more akin to wisdom than truth?
+
+How can there be?
+
+Can the same nature be a lover of wisdom and a lover of falsehood?
+
+Never.
+
+The true lover of learning then must from his earliest youth, as far as
+in him lies, desire all truth?
+
+Assuredly.
+
+But then again, as we know by experience, he whose desires are strong
+in one direction will have them weaker in others; they will be like a
+stream which has been drawn off into another channel.
+
+True.
+
+He whose desires are drawn towards knowledge in every form will be
+absorbed in the pleasures of the soul, and will hardly feel bodily
+pleasure—I mean, if he be a true philosopher and not a sham one.
+
+That is most certain.
+
+Such an one is sure to be temperate and the reverse of covetous; for
+the motives which make another man desirous of having and spending,
+have no place in his character.
+
+Very true.
+
+Another criterion of the philosophical nature has also to be
+considered.
+
+What is that?
+
+There should be no secret corner of illiberality; nothing can be more
+antagonistic than meanness to a soul which is ever longing after the
+whole of things both divine and human.
+
+Most true, he replied.
+
+Then how can he who has magnificence of mind and is the spectator of
+all time and all existence, think much of human life?
+
+He cannot.
+
+Or can such an one account death fearful?
+
+No indeed.
+
+Then the cowardly and mean nature has no part in true philosophy?
+
+Certainly not.
+
+Or again: can he who is harmoniously constituted, who is not covetous
+or mean, or a boaster, or a coward—can he, I say, ever be unjust or
+hard in his dealings?
+
+Impossible.
+
+Then you will soon observe whether a man is just and gentle, or rude
+and unsociable; these are the signs which distinguish even in youth the
+philosophical nature from the unphilosophical.
+
+True.
+
+There is another point which should be remarked.
+
+What point?
+
+Whether he has or has not a pleasure in learning; for no one will love
+that which gives him pain, and in which after much toil he makes little
+progress.
+
+Certainly not.
+
+And again, if he is forgetful and retains nothing of what he learns,
+will he not be an empty vessel?
+
+That is certain.
+
+Labouring in vain, he must end in hating himself and his fruitless
+occupation? Yes.
+
+Then a soul which forgets cannot be ranked among genuine philosophic
+natures; we must insist that the philosopher should have a good memory?
+
+Certainly.
+
+And once more, the inharmonious and unseemly nature can only tend to
+disproportion?
+
+Undoubtedly.
+
+And do you consider truth to be akin to proportion or to disproportion?
+
+To proportion.
+
+Then, besides other qualities, we must try to find a naturally
+well-proportioned and gracious mind, which will move spontaneously
+towards the true being of everything.
+
+Certainly.
+
+Well, and do not all these qualities, which we have been enumerating,
+go together, and are they not, in a manner, necessary to a soul, which
+is to have a full and perfect participation of being?
+
+They are absolutely necessary, he replied.
+
+And must not that be a blameless study which he only can pursue who has
+the gift of a good memory, and is quick to learn,—noble, gracious, the
+friend of truth, justice, courage, temperance, who are his kindred?
+
+The god of jealousy himself, he said, could find no fault with such a
+study.
+
+And to men like him, I said, when perfected by years and education, and
+to these only you will entrust the State.
+
+Here Adeimantus interposed and said: To these statements, Socrates, no
+one can offer a reply; but when you talk in this way, a strange feeling
+passes over the minds of your hearers: They fancy that they are led
+astray a little at each step in the argument, owing to their own want
+of skill in asking and answering questions; these littles accumulate,
+and at the end of the discussion they are found to have sustained a
+mighty overthrow and all their former notions appear to be turned
+upside down. And as unskilful players of draughts are at last shut up
+by their more skilful adversaries and have no piece to move, so they
+too find themselves shut up at last; for they have nothing to say in
+this new game of which words are the counters; and yet all the time
+they are in the right. The observation is suggested to me by what is
+now occurring. For any one of us might say, that although in words he
+is not able to meet you at each step of the argument, he sees as a fact
+that the votaries of philosophy, when they carry on the study, not only
+in youth as a part of education, but as the pursuit of their maturer
+years, most of them become strange monsters, not to say utter rogues,
+and that those who may be considered the best of them are made useless
+to the world by the very study which you extol.
+
+Well, and do you think that those who say so are wrong?
+
+I cannot tell, he replied; but I should like to know what is your
+opinion.
+
+Hear my answer; I am of opinion that they are quite right.
+
+Then how can you be justified in saying that cities will not cease from
+evil until philosophers rule in them, when philosophers are
+acknowledged by us to be of no use to them?
+
+You ask a question, I said, to which a reply can only be given in a
+parable.
+
+Yes, Socrates; and that is a way of speaking to which you are not at
+all accustomed, I suppose.
+
+I perceive, I said, that you are vastly amused at having plunged me
+into such a hopeless discussion; but now hear the parable, and then you
+will be still more amused at the meagreness of my imagination: for the
+manner in which the best men are treated in their own States is so
+grievous that no single thing on earth is comparable to it; and
+therefore, if I am to plead their cause, I must have recourse to
+fiction, and put together a figure made up of many things, like the
+fabulous unions of goats and stags which are found in pictures. Imagine
+then a fleet or a ship in which there is a captain who is taller and
+stronger than any of the crew, but he is a little deaf and has a
+similar infirmity in sight, and his knowledge of navigation is not much
+better. The sailors are quarrelling with one another about the
+steering—every one is of opinion that he has a right to steer, though
+he has never learned the art of navigation and cannot tell who taught
+him or when he learned, and will further assert that it cannot be
+taught, and they are ready to cut in pieces any one who says the
+contrary. They throng about the captain, begging and praying him to
+commit the helm to them; and if at any time they do not prevail, but
+others are preferred to them, they kill the others or throw them
+overboard, and having first chained up the noble captain’s senses with
+drink or some narcotic drug, they mutiny and take possession of the
+ship and make free with the stores; thus, eating and drinking, they
+proceed on their voyage in such manner as might be expected of them.
+Him who is their partisan and cleverly aids them in their plot for
+getting the ship out of the captain’s hands into their own whether by
+force or persuasion, they compliment with the name of sailor, pilot,
+able seaman, and abuse the other sort of man, whom they call a
+good-for-nothing; but that the true pilot must pay attention to the
+year and seasons and sky and stars and winds, and whatever else belongs
+to his art, if he intends to be really qualified for the command of a
+ship, and that he must and will be the steerer, whether other people
+like or not—the possibility of this union of authority with the
+steerer’s art has never seriously entered into their thoughts or been
+made part of their calling. Now in vessels which are in a state of
+mutiny and by sailors who are mutineers, how will the true pilot be
+regarded? Will he not be called by them a prater, a star-gazer, a
+good-for-nothing?
+
+Of course, said Adeimantus.
+
+Then you will hardly need, I said, to hear the interpretation of the
+figure, which describes the true philosopher in his relation to the
+State; for you understand already.
+
+Certainly.
+
+Then suppose you now take this parable to the gentleman who is
+surprised at finding that philosophers have no honour in their cities;
+explain it to him and try to convince him that their having honour
+would be far more extraordinary.
+
+I will.
+
+Say to him, that, in deeming the best votaries of philosophy to be
+useless to the rest of the world, he is right; but also tell him to
+attribute their uselessness to the fault of those who will not use
+them, and not to themselves. The pilot should not humbly beg the
+sailors to be commanded by him—that is not the order of nature; neither
+are ‘the wise to go to the doors of the rich’—the ingenious author of
+this saying told a lie—but the truth is, that, when a man is ill,
+whether he be rich or poor, to the physician he must go, and he who
+wants to be governed, to him who is able to govern. The ruler who is
+good for anything ought not to beg his subjects to be ruled by him;
+although the present governors of mankind are of a different stamp;
+they may be justly compared to the mutinous sailors, and the true
+helmsmen to those who are called by them good-for-nothings and
+star-gazers.
+
+Precisely so, he said.
+
+For these reasons, and among men like these, philosophy, the noblest
+pursuit of all, is not likely to be much esteemed by those of the
+opposite faction; not that the greatest and most lasting injury is done
+to her by her opponents, but by her own professing followers, the same
+of whom you suppose the accuser to say, that the greater number of them
+are arrant rogues, and the best are useless; in which opinion I agreed.
+
+Yes.
+
+And the reason why the good are useless has now been explained?
+
+True.
+
+Then shall we proceed to show that the corruption of the majority is
+also unavoidable, and that this is not to be laid to the charge of
+philosophy any more than the other?
+
+By all means.
+
+And let us ask and answer in turn, first going back to the description
+of the gentle and noble nature. Truth, as you will remember, was his
+leader, whom he followed always and in all things; failing in this, he
+was an impostor, and had no part or lot in true philosophy.
+
+Yes, that was said.
+
+Well, and is not this one quality, to mention no others, greatly at
+variance with present notions of him?
+
+Certainly, he said.
+
+And have we not a right to say in his defence, that the true lover of
+knowledge is always striving after being—that is his nature; he will
+not rest in the multiplicity of individuals which is an appearance
+only, but will go on—the keen edge will not be blunted, nor the force
+of his desire abate until he have attained the knowledge of the true
+nature of every essence by a sympathetic and kindred power in the soul,
+and by that power drawing near and mingling and becoming incorporate
+with very being, having begotten mind and truth, he will have knowledge
+and will live and grow truly, and then, and not till then, will he
+cease from his travail.
+
+Nothing, he said, can be more just than such a description of him.
+
+And will the love of a lie be any part of a philosopher’s nature? Will
+he not utterly hate a lie?
+
+He will.
+
+And when truth is the captain, we cannot suspect any evil of the band
+which he leads?
+
+Impossible.
+
+Justice and health of mind will be of the company, and temperance will
+follow after?
+
+True, he replied.
+
+Neither is there any reason why I should again set in array the
+philosopher’s virtues, as you will doubtless remember that courage,
+magnificence, apprehension, memory, were his natural gifts. And you
+objected that, although no one could deny what I then said, still, if
+you leave words and look at facts, the persons who are thus described
+are some of them manifestly useless, and the greater number utterly
+depraved; we were then led to enquire into the grounds of these
+accusations, and have now arrived at the point of asking why are the
+majority bad, which question of necessity brought us back to the
+examination and definition of the true philosopher.
+
+Exactly.
+
+And we have next to consider the corruptions of the philosophic nature,
+why so many are spoiled and so few escape spoiling—I am speaking of
+those who were said to be useless but not wicked—and, when we have done
+with them, we will speak of the imitators of philosophy, what manner of
+men are they who aspire after a profession which is above them and of
+which they are unworthy, and then, by their manifold inconsistencies,
+bring upon philosophy, and upon all philosophers, that universal
+reprobation of which we speak.
+
+What are these corruptions? he said.
+
+I will see if I can explain them to you. Every one will admit that a
+nature having in perfection all the qualities which we required in a
+philosopher, is a rare plant which is seldom seen among men.
+
+Rare indeed.
+
+And what numberless and powerful causes tend to destroy these rare
+natures!
+
+What causes?
+
+In the first place there are their own virtues, their courage,
+temperance, and the rest of them, every one of which praiseworthy
+qualities (and this is a most singular circumstance) destroys and
+distracts from philosophy the soul which is the possessor of them.
+
+That is very singular, he replied.
+
+Then there are all the ordinary goods of life—beauty, wealth, strength,
+rank, and great connections in the State—you understand the sort of
+things—these also have a corrupting and distracting effect.
+
+I understand; but I should like to know more precisely what you mean
+about them.
+
+Grasp the truth as a whole, I said, and in the right way; you will then
+have no difficulty in apprehending the preceding remarks, and they will
+no longer appear strange to you.
+
+And how am I to do so? he asked.
+
+Why, I said, we know that all germs or seeds, whether vegetable or
+animal, when they fail to meet with proper nutriment or climate or
+soil, in proportion to their vigour, are all the more sensitive to the
+want of a suitable environment, for evil is a greater enemy to what is
+good than to what is not.
+
+Very true.
+
+There is reason in supposing that the finest natures, when under alien
+conditions, receive more injury than the inferior, because the contrast
+is greater.
+
+Certainly.
+
+And may we not say, Adeimantus, that the most gifted minds, when they
+are ill-educated, become pre-eminently bad? Do not great crimes and the
+spirit of pure evil spring out of a fulness of nature ruined by
+education rather than from any inferiority, whereas weak natures are
+scarcely capable of any very great good or very great evil?
+
+There I think that you are right.
+
+And our philosopher follows the same analogy—he is like a plant which,
+having proper nurture, must necessarily grow and mature into all
+virtue, but, if sown and planted in an alien soil, becomes the most
+noxious of all weeds, unless he be preserved by some divine power. Do
+you really think, as people so often say, that our youth are corrupted
+by Sophists, or that private teachers of the art corrupt them in any
+degree worth speaking of? Are not the public who say these things the
+greatest of all Sophists? And do they not educate to perfection young
+and old, men and women alike, and fashion them after their own hearts?
+
+When is this accomplished? he said.
+
+When they meet together, and the world sits down at an assembly, or in
+a court of law, or a theatre, or a camp, or in any other popular
+resort, and there is a great uproar, and they praise some things which
+are being said or done, and blame other things, equally exaggerating
+both, shouting and clapping their hands, and the echo of the rocks and
+the place in which they are assembled redoubles the sound of the praise
+or blame—at such a time will not a young man’s heart, as they say, leap
+within him? Will any private training enable him to stand firm against
+the overwhelming flood of popular opinion? or will he be carried away
+by the stream? Will he not have the notions of good and evil which the
+public in general have—he will do as they do, and as they are, such
+will he be?
+
+Yes, Socrates; necessity will compel him.
+
+And yet, I said, there is a still greater necessity, which has not been
+mentioned.
+
+What is that?
+
+The gentle force of attainder or confiscation or death, which, as you
+are aware, these new Sophists and educators, who are the public, apply
+when their words are powerless.
+
+Indeed they do; and in right good earnest.
+
+Now what opinion of any other Sophist, or of any private person, can be
+expected to overcome in such an unequal contest?
+
+None, he replied.
+
+No, indeed, I said, even to make the attempt is a great piece of folly;
+there neither is, nor has been, nor is ever likely to be, any different
+type of character which has had no other training in virtue but that
+which is supplied by public opinion—I speak, my friend, of human virtue
+only; what is more than human, as the proverb says, is not included:
+for I would not have you ignorant that, in the present evil state of
+governments, whatever is saved and comes to good is saved by the power
+of God, as we may truly say.
+
+I quite assent, he replied.
+
+Then let me crave your assent also to a further observation.
+
+What are you going to say?
+
+Why, that all those mercenary individuals, whom the many call Sophists
+and whom they deem to be their adversaries, do, in fact, teach nothing
+but the opinion of the many, that is to say, the opinions of their
+assemblies; and this is their wisdom. I might compare them to a man who
+should study the tempers and desires of a mighty strong beast who is
+fed by him—he would learn how to approach and handle him, also at what
+times and from what causes he is dangerous or the reverse, and what is
+the meaning of his several cries, and by what sounds, when another
+utters them, he is soothed or infuriated; and you may suppose further,
+that when, by continually attending upon him, he has become perfect in
+all this, he calls his knowledge wisdom, and makes of it a system or
+art, which he proceeds to teach, although he has no real notion of what
+he means by the principles or passions of which he is speaking, but
+calls this honourable and that dishonourable, or good or evil, or just
+or unjust, all in accordance with the tastes and tempers of the great
+brute. Good he pronounces to be that in which the beast delights and
+evil to be that which he dislikes; and he can give no other account of
+them except that the just and noble are the necessary, having never
+himself seen, and having no power of explaining to others the nature of
+either, or the difference between them, which is immense. By heaven,
+would not such an one be a rare educator?
+
+Indeed he would.
+
+And in what way does he who thinks that wisdom is the discernment of
+the tempers and tastes of the motley multitude, whether in painting or
+music, or, finally, in politics, differ from him whom I have been
+describing? For when a man consorts with the many, and exhibits to them
+his poem or other work of art or the service which he has done the
+State, making them his judges when he is not obliged, the so-called
+necessity of Diomede will oblige him to produce whatever they praise.
+And yet the reasons are utterly ludicrous which they give in
+confirmation of their own notions about the honourable and good. Did
+you ever hear any of them which were not?
+
+No, nor am I likely to hear.
+
+You recognise the truth of what I have been saying? Then let me ask you
+to consider further whether the world will ever be induced to believe
+in the existence of absolute beauty rather than of the many beautiful,
+or of the absolute in each kind rather than of the many in each kind?
+
+Certainly not.
+
+Then the world cannot possibly be a philosopher?
+
+Impossible.
+
+And therefore philosophers must inevitably fall under the censure of
+the world?
+
+They must.
+
+And of individuals who consort with the mob and seek to please them?
+
+That is evident.
+
+Then, do you see any way in which the philosopher can be preserved in
+his calling to the end? and remember what we were saying of him, that
+he was to have quickness and memory and courage and magnificence—these
+were admitted by us to be the true philosopher’s gifts.
+
+Yes.
+
+Will not such an one from his early childhood be in all things first
+among all, especially if his bodily endowments are like his mental
+ones?
+
+Certainly, he said.
+
+And his friends and fellow-citizens will want to use him as he gets
+older for their own purposes?
+
+No question.
+
+Falling at his feet, they will make requests to him and do him honour
+and flatter him, because they want to get into their hands now, the
+power which he will one day possess.
+
+That often happens, he said.
+
+And what will a man such as he is be likely to do under such
+circumstances, especially if he be a citizen of a great city, rich and
+noble, and a tall proper youth? Will he not be full of boundless
+aspirations, and fancy himself able to manage the affairs of Hellenes
+and of barbarians, and having got such notions into his head will he
+not dilate and elevate himself in the fulness of vain pomp and
+senseless pride?
+
+To be sure he will.
+
+Now, when he is in this state of mind, if some one gently comes to him
+and tells him that he is a fool and must get understanding, which can
+only be got by slaving for it, do you think that, under such adverse
+circumstances, he will be easily induced to listen?
+
+Far otherwise.
+
+And even if there be some one who through inherent goodness or natural
+reasonableness has had his eyes opened a little and is humbled and
+taken captive by philosophy, how will his friends behave when they
+think that they are likely to lose the advantage which they were hoping
+to reap from his companionship? Will they not do and say anything to
+prevent him from yielding to his better nature and to render his
+teacher powerless, using to this end private intrigues as well as
+public prosecutions?
+
+There can be no doubt of it.
+
+And how can one who is thus circumstanced ever become a philosopher?
+
+Impossible.
+
+Then were we not right in saying that even the very qualities which
+make a man a philosopher may, if he be ill-educated, divert him from
+philosophy, no less than riches and their accompaniments and the other
+so-called goods of life?
+
+We were quite right.
+
+Thus, my excellent friend, is brought about all that ruin and failure
+which I have been describing of the natures best adapted to the best of
+all pursuits; they are natures which we maintain to be rare at any
+time; this being the class out of which come the men who are the
+authors of the greatest evil to States and individuals; and also of the
+greatest good when the tide carries them in that direction; but a small
+man never was the doer of any great thing either to individuals or to
+States.
+
+That is most true, he said.
+
+And so philosophy is left desolate, with her marriage rite incomplete:
+for her own have fallen away and forsaken her, and while they are
+leading a false and unbecoming life, other unworthy persons, seeing
+that she has no kinsmen to be her protectors, enter in and dishonour
+her; and fasten upon her the reproaches which, as you say, her
+reprovers utter, who affirm of her votaries that some are good for
+nothing, and that the greater number deserve the severest punishment.
+
+That is certainly what people say.
+
+Yes; and what else would you expect, I said, when you think of the puny
+creatures who, seeing this land open to them—a land well stocked with
+fair names and showy titles—like prisoners running out of prison into a
+sanctuary, take a leap out of their trades into philosophy; those who
+do so being probably the cleverest hands at their own miserable crafts?
+For, although philosophy be in this evil case, still there remains a
+dignity about her which is not to be found in the arts. And many are
+thus attracted by her whose natures are imperfect and whose souls are
+maimed and disfigured by their meannesses, as their bodies are by their
+trades and crafts. Is not this unavoidable?
+
+Yes.
+
+Are they not exactly like a bald little tinker who has just got out of
+durance and come into a fortune; he takes a bath and puts on a new
+coat, and is decked out as a bridegroom going to marry his master’s
+daughter, who is left poor and desolate?
+
+A most exact parallel.
+
+What will be the issue of such marriages? Will they not be vile and
+bastard?
+
+There can be no question of it.
+
+And when persons who are unworthy of education approach philosophy and
+make an alliance with her who is in a rank above them what sort of
+ideas and opinions are likely to be generated? Will they not be
+sophisms captivating to the ear, having nothing in them genuine, or
+worthy of or akin to true wisdom?
+
+No doubt, he said.
+
+Then, Adeimantus, I said, the worthy disciples of philosophy will be
+but a small remnant: perchance some noble and well-educated person,
+detained by exile in her service, who in the absence of corrupting
+influences remains devoted to her; or some lofty soul born in a mean
+city, the politics of which he contemns and neglects; and there may be
+a gifted few who leave the arts, which they justly despise, and come to
+her;—or peradventure there are some who are restrained by our friend
+Theages’ bridle; for everything in the life of Theages conspired to
+divert him from philosophy; but ill-health kept him away from politics.
+My own case of the internal sign is hardly worth mentioning, for
+rarely, if ever, has such a monitor been given to any other man. Those
+who belong to this small class have tasted how sweet and blessed a
+possession philosophy is, and have also seen enough of the madness of
+the multitude; and they know that no politician is honest, nor is there
+any champion of justice at whose side they may fight and be saved. Such
+an one may be compared to a man who has fallen among wild beasts—he
+will not join in the wickedness of his fellows, but neither is he able
+singly to resist all their fierce natures, and therefore seeing that he
+would be of no use to the State or to his friends, and reflecting that
+he would have to throw away his life without doing any good either to
+himself or others, he holds his peace, and goes his own way. He is like
+one who, in the storm of dust and sleet which the driving wind hurries
+along, retires under the shelter of a wall; and seeing the rest of
+mankind full of wickedness, he is content, if only he can live his own
+life and be pure from evil or unrighteousness, and depart in peace and
+good-will, with bright hopes.
+
+Yes, he said, and he will have done a great work before he departs.
+
+A great work—yes; but not the greatest, unless he find a State suitable
+to him; for in a State which is suitable to him, he will have a larger
+growth and be the saviour of his country, as well as of himself.
+
+The causes why philosophy is in such an evil name have now been
+sufficiently explained: the injustice of the charges against her has
+been shown—is there anything more which you wish to say?
+
+Nothing more on that subject, he replied; but I should like to know
+which of the governments now existing is in your opinion the one
+adapted to her.
+
+Not any of them, I said; and that is precisely the accusation which I
+bring against them—not one of them is worthy of the philosophic nature,
+and hence that nature is warped and estranged;—as the exotic seed which
+is sown in a foreign land becomes denaturalized, and is wont to be
+overpowered and to lose itself in the new soil, even so this growth of
+philosophy, instead of persisting, degenerates and receives another
+character. But if philosophy ever finds in the State that perfection
+which she herself is, then will be seen that she is in truth divine,
+and that all other things, whether natures of men or institutions, are
+but human;—and now, I know, that you are going to ask, What that State
+is:
+
+No, he said; there you are wrong, for I was going to ask another
+question—whether it is the State of which we are the founders and
+inventors, or some other?
+
+Yes, I replied, ours in most respects; but you may remember my saying
+before, that some living authority would always be required in the
+State having the same idea of the constitution which guided you when as
+legislator you were laying down the laws.
+
+That was said, he replied.
+
+Yes, but not in a satisfactory manner; you frightened us by interposing
+objections, which certainly showed that the discussion would be long
+and difficult; and what still remains is the reverse of easy.
+
+What is there remaining?
+
+The question how the study of philosophy may be so ordered as not to be
+the ruin of the State: All great attempts are attended with risk; ‘hard
+is the good,’ as men say.
+
+Still, he said, let the point be cleared up, and the enquiry will then
+be complete.
+
+I shall not be hindered, I said, by any want of will, but, if at all,
+by a want of power: my zeal you may see for yourselves; and please to
+remark in what I am about to say how boldly and unhesitatingly I
+declare that States should pursue philosophy, not as they do now, but
+in a different spirit.
+
+In what manner?
+
+At present, I said, the students of philosophy are quite young;
+beginning when they are hardly past childhood, they devote only the
+time saved from moneymaking and housekeeping to such pursuits; and even
+those of them who are reputed to have most of the philosophic spirit,
+when they come within sight of the great difficulty of the subject, I
+mean dialectic, take themselves off. In after life when invited by some
+one else, they may, perhaps, go and hear a lecture, and about this they
+make much ado, for philosophy is not considered by them to be their
+proper business: at last, when they grow old, in most cases they are
+extinguished more truly than Heracleitus’ sun, inasmuch as they never
+light up again. (Heraclitus said that the sun was extinguished every
+evening and relighted every morning.)
+
+But what ought to be their course?
+
+Just the opposite. In childhood and youth their study, and what
+philosophy they learn, should be suited to their tender years: during
+this period while they are growing up towards manhood, the chief and
+special care should be given to their bodies that they may have them to
+use in the service of philosophy; as life advances and the intellect
+begins to mature, let them increase the gymnastics of the soul; but
+when the strength of our citizens fails and is past civil and military
+duties, then let them range at will and engage in no serious labour, as
+we intend them to live happily here, and to crown this life with a
+similar happiness in another.
+
+How truly in earnest you are, Socrates! he said; I am sure of that; and
+yet most of your hearers, if I am not mistaken, are likely to be still
+more earnest in their opposition to you, and will never be convinced;
+Thrasymachus least of all.
+
+Do not make a quarrel, I said, between Thrasymachus and me, who have
+recently become friends, although, indeed, we were never enemies; for I
+shall go on striving to the utmost until I either convert him and other
+men, or do something which may profit them against the day when they
+live again, and hold the like discourse in another state of existence.
+
+You are speaking of a time which is not very near.
+
+Rather, I replied, of a time which is as nothing in comparison with
+eternity. Nevertheless, I do not wonder that the many refuse to
+believe; for they have never seen that of which we are now speaking
+realized; they have seen only a conventional imitation of philosophy,
+consisting of words artificially brought together, not like these of
+ours having a natural unity. But a human being who in word and work is
+perfectly moulded, as far as he can be, into the proportion and
+likeness of virtue—such a man ruling in a city which bears the same
+image, they have never yet seen, neither one nor many of them—do you
+think that they ever did?
+
+No indeed.
+
+No, my friend, and they have seldom, if ever, heard free and noble
+sentiments; such as men utter when they are earnestly and by every
+means in their power seeking after truth for the sake of knowledge,
+while they look coldly on the subtleties of controversy, of which the
+end is opinion and strife, whether they meet with them in the courts of
+law or in society.
+
+They are strangers, he said, to the words of which you speak.
+
+And this was what we foresaw, and this was the reason why truth forced
+us to admit, not without fear and hesitation, that neither cities nor
+States nor individuals will ever attain perfection until the small
+class of philosophers whom we termed useless but not corrupt are
+providentially compelled, whether they will or not, to take care of the
+State, and until a like necessity be laid on the State to obey them; or
+until kings, or if not kings, the sons of kings or princes, are
+divinely inspired with a true love of true philosophy. That either or
+both of these alternatives are impossible, I see no reason to affirm:
+if they were so, we might indeed be justly ridiculed as dreamers and
+visionaries. Am I not right?
+
+Quite right.
+
+If then, in the countless ages of the past, or at the present hour in
+some foreign clime which is far away and beyond our ken, the perfected
+philosopher is or has been or hereafter shall be compelled by a
+superior power to have the charge of the State, we are ready to assert
+to the death, that this our constitution has been, and is—yea, and will
+be whenever the Muse of Philosophy is queen. There is no impossibility
+in all this; that there is a difficulty, we acknowledge ourselves.
+
+My opinion agrees with yours, he said.
+
+But do you mean to say that this is not the opinion of the multitude?
+
+I should imagine not, he replied.
+
+O my friend, I said, do not attack the multitude: they will change
+their minds, if, not in an aggressive spirit, but gently and with the
+view of soothing them and removing their dislike of over-education, you
+show them your philosophers as they really are and describe as you were
+just now doing their character and profession, and then mankind will
+see that he of whom you are speaking is not such as they supposed—if
+they view him in this new light, they will surely change their notion
+of him, and answer in another strain. Who can be at enmity with one who
+loves them, who that is himself gentle and free from envy will be
+jealous of one in whom there is no jealousy? Nay, let me answer for
+you, that in a few this harsh temper may be found but not in the
+majority of mankind.
+
+I quite agree with you, he said.
+
+And do you not also think, as I do, that the harsh feeling which the
+many entertain towards philosophy originates in the pretenders, who
+rush in uninvited, and are always abusing them, and finding fault with
+them, who make persons instead of things the theme of their
+conversation? and nothing can be more unbecoming in philosophers than
+this.
+
+It is most unbecoming.
+
+For he, Adeimantus, whose mind is fixed upon true being, has surely no
+time to look down upon the affairs of earth, or to be filled with
+malice and envy, contending against men; his eye is ever directed
+towards things fixed and immutable, which he sees neither injuring nor
+injured by one another, but all in order moving according to reason;
+these he imitates, and to these he will, as far as he can, conform
+himself. Can a man help imitating that with which he holds reverential
+converse?
+
+Impossible.
+
+And the philosopher holding converse with the divine order, becomes
+orderly and divine, as far as the nature of man allows; but like every
+one else, he will suffer from detraction.
+
+Of course.
+
+And if a necessity be laid upon him of fashioning, not only himself,
+but human nature generally, whether in States or individuals, into that
+which he beholds elsewhere, will he, think you, be an unskilful
+artificer of justice, temperance, and every civil virtue?
+
+Anything but unskilful.
+
+And if the world perceives that what we are saying about him is the
+truth, will they be angry with philosophy? Will they disbelieve us,
+when we tell them that no State can be happy which is not designed by
+artists who imitate the heavenly pattern?
+
+They will not be angry if they understand, he said. But how will they
+draw out the plan of which you are speaking?
+
+They will begin by taking the State and the manners of men, from which,
+as from a tablet, they will rub out the picture, and leave a clean
+surface. This is no easy task. But whether easy or not, herein will lie
+the difference between them and every other legislator,—they will have
+nothing to do either with individual or State, and will inscribe no
+laws, until they have either found, or themselves made, a clean
+surface.
+
+They will be very right, he said.
+
+Having effected this, they will proceed to trace an outline of the
+constitution?
+
+No doubt.
+
+And when they are filling in the work, as I conceive, they will often
+turn their eyes upwards and downwards: I mean that they will first look
+at absolute justice and beauty and temperance, and again at the human
+copy; and will mingle and temper the various elements of life into the
+image of a man; and this they will conceive according to that other
+image, which, when existing among men, Homer calls the form and
+likeness of God.
+
+Very true, he said.
+
+And one feature they will erase, and another they will put in, until
+they have made the ways of men, as far as possible, agreeable to the
+ways of God?
+
+Indeed, he said, in no way could they make a fairer picture.
+
+And now, I said, are we beginning to persuade those whom you described
+as rushing at us with might and main, that the painter of constitutions
+is such an one as we are praising; at whom they were so very indignant
+because to his hands we committed the State; and are they growing a
+little calmer at what they have just heard?
+
+Much calmer, if there is any sense in them.
+
+Why, where can they still find any ground for objection? Will they
+doubt that the philosopher is a lover of truth and being?
+
+They would not be so unreasonable.
+
+Or that his nature, being such as we have delineated, is akin to the
+highest good?
+
+Neither can they doubt this.
+
+But again, will they tell us that such a nature, placed under
+favourable circumstances, will not be perfectly good and wise if any
+ever was? Or will they prefer those whom we have rejected?
+
+Surely not.
+
+Then will they still be angry at our saying, that, until philosophers
+bear rule, States and individuals will have no rest from evil, nor will
+this our imaginary State ever be realized?
+
+I think that they will be less angry.
+
+Shall we assume that they are not only less angry but quite gentle, and
+that they have been converted and for very shame, if for no other
+reason, cannot refuse to come to terms?
+
+By all means, he said.
+
+Then let us suppose that the reconciliation has been effected. Will any
+one deny the other point, that there may be sons of kings or princes
+who are by nature philosophers?
+
+Surely no man, he said.
+
+And when they have come into being will any one say that they must of
+necessity be destroyed; that they can hardly be saved is not denied
+even by us; but that in the whole course of ages no single one of them
+can escape—who will venture to affirm this?
+
+Who indeed!
+
+But, said I, one is enough; let there be one man who has a city
+obedient to his will, and he might bring into existence the ideal
+polity about which the world is so incredulous.
+
+Yes, one is enough.
+
+The ruler may impose the laws and institutions which we have been
+describing, and the citizens may possibly be willing to obey them?
+
+Certainly.
+
+And that others should approve, of what we approve, is no miracle or
+impossibility?
+
+I think not.
+
+But we have sufficiently shown, in what has preceded, that all this, if
+only possible, is assuredly for the best.
+
+We have.
+
+And now we say not only that our laws, if they could be enacted, would
+be for the best, but also that the enactment of them, though difficult,
+is not impossible.
+
+Very good.
+
+And so with pain and toil we have reached the end of one subject, but
+more remains to be discussed;—how and by what studies and pursuits will
+the saviours of the constitution be created, and at what ages are they
+to apply themselves to their several studies?
+
+Certainly.
+
+I omitted the troublesome business of the possession of women, and the
+procreation of children, and the appointment of the rulers, because I
+knew that the perfect State would be eyed with jealousy and was
+difficult of attainment; but that piece of cleverness was not of much
+service to me, for I had to discuss them all the same. The women and
+children are now disposed of, but the other question of the rulers must
+be investigated from the very beginning. We were saying, as you will
+remember, that they were to be lovers of their country, tried by the
+test of pleasures and pains, and neither in hardships, nor in dangers,
+nor at any other critical moment were to lose their patriotism—he was
+to be rejected who failed, but he who always came forth pure, like gold
+tried in the refiner’s fire, was to be made a ruler, and to receive
+honours and rewards in life and after death. This was the sort of thing
+which was being said, and then the argument turned aside and veiled her
+face; not liking to stir the question which has now arisen.
+
+I perfectly remember, he said.
+
+Yes, my friend, I said, and I then shrank from hazarding the bold word;
+but now let me dare to say—that the perfect guardian must be a
+philosopher.
+
+Yes, he said, let that be affirmed.
+
+And do not suppose that there will be many of them; for the gifts which
+were deemed by us to be essential rarely grow together; they are mostly
+found in shreds and patches.
+
+What do you mean? he said.
+
+You are aware, I replied, that quick intelligence, memory, sagacity,
+cleverness, and similar qualities, do not often grow together, and that
+persons who possess them and are at the same time high-spirited and
+magnanimous are not so constituted by nature as to live orderly and in
+a peaceful and settled manner; they are driven any way by their
+impulses, and all solid principle goes out of them.
+
+Very true, he said.
+
+On the other hand, those steadfast natures which can better be depended
+upon, which in a battle are impregnable to fear and immovable, are
+equally immovable when there is anything to be learned; they are always
+in a torpid state, and are apt to yawn and go to sleep over any
+intellectual toil.
+
+Quite true.
+
+And yet we were saying that both qualities were necessary in those to
+whom the higher education is to be imparted, and who are to share in
+any office or command.
+
+Certainly, he said.
+
+And will they be a class which is rarely found?
+
+Yes, indeed.
+
+Then the aspirant must not only be tested in those labours and dangers
+and pleasures which we mentioned before, but there is another kind of
+probation which we did not mention—he must be exercised also in many
+kinds of knowledge, to see whether the soul will be able to endure the
+highest of all, or will faint under them, as in any other studies and
+exercises.
+
+Yes, he said, you are quite right in testing him. But what do you mean
+by the highest of all knowledge?
+
+You may remember, I said, that we divided the soul into three parts;
+and distinguished the several natures of justice, temperance, courage,
+and wisdom?
+
+Indeed, he said, if I had forgotten, I should not deserve to hear more.
+
+And do you remember the word of caution which preceded the discussion
+of them?
+
+To what do you refer?
+
+We were saying, if I am not mistaken, that he who wanted to see them in
+their perfect beauty must take a longer and more circuitous way, at the
+end of which they would appear; but that we could add on a popular
+exposition of them on a level with the discussion which had preceded.
+And you replied that such an exposition would be enough for you, and so
+the enquiry was continued in what to me seemed to be a very inaccurate
+manner; whether you were satisfied or not, it is for you to say.
+
+Yes, he said, I thought and the others thought that you gave us a fair
+measure of truth.
+
+But, my friend, I said, a measure of such things which in any degree
+falls short of the whole truth is not fair measure; for nothing
+imperfect is the measure of anything, although persons are too apt to
+be contented and think that they need search no further.
+
+Not an uncommon case when people are indolent.
+
+Yes, I said; and there cannot be any worse fault in a guardian of the
+State and of the laws.
+
+True.
+
+The guardian then, I said, must be required to take the longer circuit,
+and toil at learning as well as at gymnastics, or he will never reach
+the highest knowledge of all which, as we were just now saying, is his
+proper calling.
+
+What, he said, is there a knowledge still higher than this—higher than
+justice and the other virtues?
+
+Yes, I said, there is. And of the virtues too we must behold not the
+outline merely, as at present—nothing short of the most finished
+picture should satisfy us. When little things are elaborated with an
+infinity of pains, in order that they may appear in their full beauty
+and utmost clearness, how ridiculous that we should not think the
+highest truths worthy of attaining the highest accuracy!
+
+A right noble thought; but do you suppose that we shall refrain from
+asking you what is this highest knowledge?
+
+Nay, I said, ask if you will; but I am certain that you have heard the
+answer many times, and now you either do not understand me or, as I
+rather think, you are disposed to be troublesome; for you have often
+been told that the idea of good is the highest knowledge, and that all
+other things become useful and advantageous only by their use of this.
+You can hardly be ignorant that of this I was about to speak,
+concerning which, as you have often heard me say, we know so little;
+and, without which, any other knowledge or possession of any kind will
+profit us nothing. Do you think that the possession of all other things
+is of any value if we do not possess the good? or the knowledge of all
+other things if we have no knowledge of beauty and goodness?
+
+Assuredly not.
+
+You are further aware that most people affirm pleasure to be the good,
+but the finer sort of wits say it is knowledge?
+
+Yes.
+
+And you are aware too that the latter cannot explain what they mean by
+knowledge, but are obliged after all to say knowledge of the good?
+
+How ridiculous!
+
+Yes, I said, that they should begin by reproaching us with our
+ignorance of the good, and then presume our knowledge of it—for the
+good they define to be knowledge of the good, just as if we understood
+them when they use the term ‘good’—this is of course ridiculous.
+
+Most true, he said.
+
+And those who make pleasure their good are in equal perplexity; for
+they are compelled to admit that there are bad pleasures as well as
+good.
+
+Certainly.
+
+And therefore to acknowledge that bad and good are the same?
+
+True.
+
+There can be no doubt about the numerous difficulties in which this
+question is involved.
+
+There can be none.
+
+Further, do we not see that many are willing to do or to have or to
+seem to be what is just and honourable without the reality; but no one
+is satisfied with the appearance of good—the reality is what they seek;
+in the case of the good, appearance is despised by every one.
+
+Very true, he said.
+
+Of this then, which every soul of man pursues and makes the end of all
+his actions, having a presentiment that there is such an end, and yet
+hesitating because neither knowing the nature nor having the same
+assurance of this as of other things, and therefore losing whatever
+good there is in other things,—of a principle such and so great as this
+ought the best men in our State, to whom everything is entrusted, to be
+in the darkness of ignorance?
+
+Certainly not, he said.
+
+I am sure, I said, that he who does not know how the beautiful and the
+just are likewise good will be but a sorry guardian of them; and I
+suspect that no one who is ignorant of the good will have a true
+knowledge of them.
+
+That, he said, is a shrewd suspicion of yours.
+
+And if we only have a guardian who has this knowledge our State will be
+perfectly ordered?
+
+Of course, he replied; but I wish that you would tell me whether you
+conceive this supreme principle of the good to be knowledge or
+pleasure, or different from either?
+
+Aye, I said, I knew all along that a fastidious gentleman like you
+would not be contented with the thoughts of other people about these
+matters.
+
+True, Socrates; but I must say that one who like you has passed a
+lifetime in the study of philosophy should not be always repeating the
+opinions of others, and never telling his own.
+
+Well, but has any one a right to say positively what he does not know?
+
+Not, he said, with the assurance of positive certainty; he has no right
+to do that: but he may say what he thinks, as a matter of opinion.
+
+And do you not know, I said, that all mere opinions are bad, and the
+best of them blind? You would not deny that those who have any true
+notion without intelligence are only like blind men who feel their way
+along the road?
+
+Very true.
+
+And do you wish to behold what is blind and crooked and base, when
+others will tell you of brightness and beauty?
+
+Still, I must implore you, Socrates, said Glaucon, not to turn away
+just as you are reaching the goal; if you will only give such an
+explanation of the good as you have already given of justice and
+temperance and the other virtues, we shall be satisfied.
+
+Yes, my friend, and I shall be at least equally satisfied, but I cannot
+help fearing that I shall fail, and that my indiscreet zeal will bring
+ridicule upon me. No, sweet sirs, let us not at present ask what is the
+actual nature of the good, for to reach what is now in my thoughts
+would be an effort too great for me. But of the child of the good who
+is likest him, I would fain speak, if I could be sure that you wished
+to hear—otherwise, not.
+
+By all means, he said, tell us about the child, and you shall remain in
+our debt for the account of the parent.
+
+I do indeed wish, I replied, that I could pay, and you receive, the
+account of the parent, and not, as now, of the offspring only; take,
+however, this latter by way of interest, and at the same time have a
+care that I do not render a false account, although I have no intention
+of deceiving you.
+
+Yes, we will take all the care that we can: proceed.
+
+Yes, I said, but I must first come to an understanding with you, and
+remind you of what I have mentioned in the course of this discussion,
+and at many other times.
+
+What?
+
+The old story, that there is a many beautiful and a many good, and so
+of other things which we describe and define; to all of them the term
+‘many’ is applied.
+
+True, he said.
+
+And there is an absolute beauty and an absolute good, and of other
+things to which the term ‘many’ is applied there is an absolute; for
+they may be brought under a single idea, which is called the essence of
+each.
+
+Very true.
+
+The many, as we say, are seen but not known, and the ideas are known
+but not seen.
+
+Exactly.
+
+And what is the organ with which we see the visible things?
+
+The sight, he said.
+
+And with the hearing, I said, we hear, and with the other senses
+perceive the other objects of sense?
+
+True.
+
+But have you remarked that sight is by far the most costly and complex
+piece of workmanship which the artificer of the senses ever contrived?
+
+No, I never have, he said.
+
+Then reflect; has the ear or voice need of any third or additional
+nature in order that the one may be able to hear and the other to be
+heard?
+
+Nothing of the sort.
+
+No, indeed, I replied; and the same is true of most, if not all, the
+other senses—you would not say that any of them requires such an
+addition?
+
+Certainly not.
+
+But you see that without the addition of some other nature there is no
+seeing or being seen?
+
+How do you mean?
+
+Sight being, as I conceive, in the eyes, and he who has eyes wanting to
+see; colour being also present in them, still unless there be a third
+nature specially adapted to the purpose, the owner of the eyes will see
+nothing and the colours will be invisible.
+
+Of what nature are you speaking?
+
+Of that which you term light, I replied.
+
+True, he said.
+
+Noble, then, is the bond which links together sight and visibility, and
+great beyond other bonds by no small difference of nature; for light is
+their bond, and light is no ignoble thing?
+
+Nay, he said, the reverse of ignoble.
+
+And which, I said, of the gods in heaven would you say was the lord of
+this element? Whose is that light which makes the eye to see perfectly
+and the visible to appear?
+
+You mean the sun, as you and all mankind say.
+
+May not the relation of sight to this deity be described as follows?
+
+How?
+
+Neither sight nor the eye in which sight resides is the sun?
+
+No.
+
+Yet of all the organs of sense the eye is the most like the sun?
+
+By far the most like.
+
+And the power which the eye possesses is a sort of effluence which is
+dispensed from the sun?
+
+Exactly.
+
+Then the sun is not sight, but the author of sight who is recognised by
+sight?
+
+True, he said.
+
+And this is he whom I call the child of the good, whom the good begat
+in his own likeness, to be in the visible world, in relation to sight
+and the things of sight, what the good is in the intellectual world in
+relation to mind and the things of mind:
+
+Will you be a little more explicit? he said.
+
+Why, you know, I said, that the eyes, when a person directs them
+towards objects on which the light of day is no longer shining, but the
+moon and stars only, see dimly, and are nearly blind; they seem to have
+no clearness of vision in them?
+
+Very true.
+
+But when they are directed towards objects on which the sun shines,
+they see clearly and there is sight in them?
+
+Certainly.
+
+And the soul is like the eye: when resting upon that on which truth and
+being shine, the soul perceives and understands, and is radiant with
+intelligence; but when turned towards the twilight of becoming and
+perishing, then she has opinion only, and goes blinking about, and is
+first of one opinion and then of another, and seems to have no
+intelligence?
+
+Just so.
+
+Now, that which imparts truth to the known and the power of knowing to
+the knower is what I would have you term the idea of good, and this you
+will deem to be the cause of science, and of truth in so far as the
+latter becomes the subject of knowledge; beautiful too, as are both
+truth and knowledge, you will be right in esteeming this other nature
+as more beautiful than either; and, as in the previous instance, light
+and sight may be truly said to be like the sun, and yet not to be the
+sun, so in this other sphere, science and truth may be deemed to be
+like the good, but not the good; the good has a place of honour yet
+higher.
+
+What a wonder of beauty that must be, he said, which is the author of
+science and truth, and yet surpasses them in beauty; for you surely
+cannot mean to say that pleasure is the good?
+
+God forbid, I replied; but may I ask you to consider the image in
+another point of view?
+
+In what point of view?
+
+You would say, would you not, that the sun is not only the author of
+visibility in all visible things, but of generation and nourishment and
+growth, though he himself is not generation?
+
+Certainly.
+
+In like manner the good may be said to be not only the author of
+knowledge to all things known, but of their being and essence, and yet
+the good is not essence, but far exceeds essence in dignity and power.
+
+Glaucon said, with a ludicrous earnestness: By the light of heaven, how
+amazing!
+
+Yes, I said, and the exaggeration may be set down to you; for you made
+me utter my fancies.
+
+And pray continue to utter them; at any rate let us hear if there is
+anything more to be said about the similitude of the sun.
+
+Yes, I said, there is a great deal more.
+
+Then omit nothing, however slight.
+
+I will do my best, I said; but I should think that a great deal will
+have to be omitted.
+
+I hope not, he said.
+
+You have to imagine, then, that there are two ruling powers, and that
+one of them is set over the intellectual world, the other over the
+visible. I do not say heaven, lest you should fancy that I am playing
+upon the name (‘ourhanoz, orhatoz’). May I suppose that you have this
+distinction of the visible and intelligible fixed in your mind?
+
+I have.
+
+Now take a line which has been cut into two unequal parts, and divide
+each of them again in the same proportion, and suppose the two main
+divisions to answer, one to the visible and the other to the
+intelligible, and then compare the subdivisions in respect of their
+clearness and want of clearness, and you will find that the first
+section in the sphere of the visible consists of images. And by images
+I mean, in the first place, shadows, and in the second place,
+reflections in water and in solid, smooth and polished bodies and the
+like: Do you understand?
+
+Yes, I understand.
+
+Imagine, now, the other section, of which this is only the resemblance,
+to include the animals which we see, and everything that grows or is
+made.
+
+Very good.
+
+Would you not admit that both the sections of this division have
+different degrees of truth, and that the copy is to the original as the
+sphere of opinion is to the sphere of knowledge?
+
+Most undoubtedly.
+
+Next proceed to consider the manner in which the sphere of the
+intellectual is to be divided.
+
+In what manner?
+
+Thus:—There are two subdivisions, in the lower of which the soul uses
+the figures given by the former division as images; the enquiry can
+only be hypothetical, and instead of going upwards to a principle
+descends to the other end; in the higher of the two, the soul passes
+out of hypotheses, and goes up to a principle which is above
+hypotheses, making no use of images as in the former case, but
+proceeding only in and through the ideas themselves.
+
+I do not quite understand your meaning, he said.
+
+Then I will try again; you will understand me better when I have made
+some preliminary remarks. You are aware that students of geometry,
+arithmetic, and the kindred sciences assume the odd and the even and
+the figures and three kinds of angles and the like in their several
+branches of science; these are their hypotheses, which they and every
+body are supposed to know, and therefore they do not deign to give any
+account of them either to themselves or others; but they begin with
+them, and go on until they arrive at last, and in a consistent manner,
+at their conclusion?
+
+Yes, he said, I know.
+
+And do you not know also that although they make use of the visible
+forms and reason about them, they are thinking not of these, but of the
+ideals which they resemble; not of the figures which they draw, but of
+the absolute square and the absolute diameter, and so on—the forms
+which they draw or make, and which have shadows and reflections in
+water of their own, are converted by them into images, but they are
+really seeking to behold the things themselves, which can only be seen
+with the eye of the mind?
+
+That is true.
+
+And of this kind I spoke as the intelligible, although in the search
+after it the soul is compelled to use hypotheses; not ascending to a
+first principle, because she is unable to rise above the region of
+hypothesis, but employing the objects of which the shadows below are
+resemblances in their turn as images, they having in relation to the
+shadows and reflections of them a greater distinctness, and therefore a
+higher value.
+
+I understand, he said, that you are speaking of the province of
+geometry and the sister arts.
+
+And when I speak of the other division of the intelligible, you will
+understand me to speak of that other sort of knowledge which reason
+herself attains by the power of dialectic, using the hypotheses not as
+first principles, but only as hypotheses—that is to say, as steps and
+points of departure into a world which is above hypotheses, in order
+that she may soar beyond them to the first principle of the whole; and
+clinging to this and then to that which depends on this, by successive
+steps she descends again without the aid of any sensible object, from
+ideas, through ideas, and in ideas she ends.
+
+I understand you, he replied; not perfectly, for you seem to me to be
+describing a task which is really tremendous; but, at any rate, I
+understand you to say that knowledge and being, which the science of
+dialectic contemplates, are clearer than the notions of the arts, as
+they are termed, which proceed from hypotheses only: these are also
+contemplated by the understanding, and not by the senses: yet, because
+they start from hypotheses and do not ascend to a principle, those who
+contemplate them appear to you not to exercise the higher reason upon
+them, although when a first principle is added to them they are
+cognizable by the higher reason. And the habit which is concerned with
+geometry and the cognate sciences I suppose that you would term
+understanding and not reason, as being intermediate between opinion and
+reason.
+
+You have quite conceived my meaning, I said; and now, corresponding to
+these four divisions, let there be four faculties in the soul—reason
+answering to the highest, understanding to the second, faith (or
+conviction) to the third, and perception of shadows to the last—and let
+there be a scale of them, and let us suppose that the several faculties
+have clearness in the same degree that their objects have truth.
+
+I understand, he replied, and give my assent, and accept your
+arrangement.
+
+
+
+
+ BOOK VII.
+
+
+And now, I said, let me show in a figure how far our nature is
+enlightened or unenlightened:—Behold! human beings living in a
+underground den, which has a mouth open towards the light and reaching
+all along the den; here they have been from their childhood, and have
+their legs and necks chained so that they cannot move, and can only see
+before them, being prevented by the chains from turning round their
+heads. Above and behind them a fire is blazing at a distance, and
+between the fire and the prisoners there is a raised way; and you will
+see, if you look, a low wall built along the way, like the screen which
+marionette players have in front of them, over which they show the
+puppets.
+
+I see.
+
+And do you see, I said, men passing along the wall carrying all sorts
+of vessels, and statues and figures of animals made of wood and stone
+and various materials, which appear over the wall? Some of them are
+talking, others silent.
+
+You have shown me a strange image, and they are strange prisoners.
+
+Like ourselves, I replied; and they see only their own shadows, or the
+shadows of one another, which the fire throws on the opposite wall of
+the cave?
+
+True, he said; how could they see anything but the shadows if they were
+never allowed to move their heads?
+
+And of the objects which are being carried in like manner they would
+only see the shadows?
+
+Yes, he said.
+
+And if they were able to converse with one another, would they not
+suppose that they were naming what was actually before them?
+
+Very true.
+
+And suppose further that the prison had an echo which came from the
+other side, would they not be sure to fancy when one of the passers-by
+spoke that the voice which they heard came from the passing shadow?
+
+No question, he replied.
+
+To them, I said, the truth would be literally nothing but the shadows
+of the images.
+
+That is certain.
+
+And now look again, and see what will naturally follow if the prisoners
+are released and disabused of their error. At first, when any of them
+is liberated and compelled suddenly to stand up and turn his neck round
+and walk and look towards the light, he will suffer sharp pains; the
+glare will distress him, and he will be unable to see the realities of
+which in his former state he had seen the shadows; and then conceive
+some one saying to him, that what he saw before was an illusion, but
+that now, when he is approaching nearer to being and his eye is turned
+towards more real existence, he has a clearer vision,—what will be his
+reply? And you may further imagine that his instructor is pointing to
+the objects as they pass and requiring him to name them,—will he not be
+perplexed? Will he not fancy that the shadows which he formerly saw are
+truer than the objects which are now shown to him?
+
+Far truer.
+
+And if he is compelled to look straight at the light, will he not have
+a pain in his eyes which will make him turn away to take refuge in the
+objects of vision which he can see, and which he will conceive to be in
+reality clearer than the things which are now being shown to him?
+
+True, he said.
+
+And suppose once more, that he is reluctantly dragged up a steep and
+rugged ascent, and held fast until he is forced into the presence of
+the sun himself, is he not likely to be pained and irritated? When he
+approaches the light his eyes will be dazzled, and he will not be able
+to see anything at all of what are now called realities.
+
+Not all in a moment, he said.
+
+He will require to grow accustomed to the sight of the upper world. And
+first he will see the shadows best, next the reflections of men and
+other objects in the water, and then the objects themselves; then he
+will gaze upon the light of the moon and the stars and the spangled
+heaven; and he will see the sky and the stars by night better than the
+sun or the light of the sun by day?
+
+Certainly.
+
+Last of all he will be able to see the sun, and not mere reflections of
+him in the water, but he will see him in his own proper place, and not
+in another; and he will contemplate him as he is.
+
+Certainly.
+
+He will then proceed to argue that this is he who gives the season and
+the years, and is the guardian of all that is in the visible world, and
+in a certain way the cause of all things which he and his fellows have
+been accustomed to behold?
+
+Clearly, he said, he would first see the sun and then reason about him.
+
+And when he remembered his old habitation, and the wisdom of the den
+and his fellow-prisoners, do you not suppose that he would felicitate
+himself on the change, and pity them?
+
+Certainly, he would.
+
+And if they were in the habit of conferring honours among themselves on
+those who were quickest to observe the passing shadows and to remark
+which of them went before, and which followed after, and which were
+together; and who were therefore best able to draw conclusions as to
+the future, do you think that he would care for such honours and
+glories, or envy the possessors of them? Would he not say with Homer,
+
+‘Better to be the poor servant of a poor master,’
+
+and to endure anything, rather than think as they do and live after
+their manner?
+
+Yes, he said, I think that he would rather suffer anything than
+entertain these false notions and live in this miserable manner.
+
+Imagine once more, I said, such an one coming suddenly out of the sun
+to be replaced in his old situation; would he not be certain to have
+his eyes full of darkness?
+
+To be sure, he said.
+
+And if there were a contest, and he had to compete in measuring the
+shadows with the prisoners who had never moved out of the den, while
+his sight was still weak, and before his eyes had become steady (and
+the time which would be needed to acquire this new habit of sight might
+be very considerable), would he not be ridiculous? Men would say of him
+that up he went and down he came without his eyes; and that it was
+better not even to think of ascending; and if any one tried to loose
+another and lead him up to the light, let them only catch the offender,
+and they would put him to death.
+
+No question, he said.
+
+This entire allegory, I said, you may now append, dear Glaucon, to the
+previous argument; the prison-house is the world of sight, the light of
+the fire is the sun, and you will not misapprehend me if you interpret
+the journey upwards to be the ascent of the soul into the intellectual
+world according to my poor belief, which, at your desire, I have
+expressed—whether rightly or wrongly God knows. But, whether true or
+false, my opinion is that in the world of knowledge the idea of good
+appears last of all, and is seen only with an effort; and, when seen,
+is also inferred to be the universal author of all things beautiful and
+right, parent of light and of the lord of light in this visible world,
+and the immediate source of reason and truth in the intellectual; and
+that this is the power upon which he who would act rationally either in
+public or private life must have his eye fixed.
+
+I agree, he said, as far as I am able to understand you.
+
+Moreover, I said, you must not wonder that those who attain to this
+beatific vision are unwilling to descend to human affairs; for their
+souls are ever hastening into the upper world where they desire to
+dwell; which desire of theirs is very natural, if our allegory may be
+trusted.
+
+Yes, very natural.
+
+And is there anything surprising in one who passes from divine
+contemplations to the evil state of man, misbehaving himself in a
+ridiculous manner; if, while his eyes are blinking and before he has
+become accustomed to the surrounding darkness, he is compelled to fight
+in courts of law, or in other places, about the images or the shadows
+of images of justice, and is endeavouring to meet the conceptions of
+those who have never yet seen absolute justice?
+
+Anything but surprising, he replied.
+
+Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments of
+the eyes are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from
+coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true of
+the mind’s eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye; and he who
+remembers this when he sees any one whose vision is perplexed and weak,
+will not be too ready to laugh; he will first ask whether that soul of
+man has come out of the brighter life, and is unable to see because
+unaccustomed to the dark, or having turned from darkness to the day is
+dazzled by excess of light. And he will count the one happy in his
+condition and state of being, and he will pity the other; or, if he
+have a mind to laugh at the soul which comes from below into the light,
+there will be more reason in this than in the laugh which greets him
+who returns from above out of the light into the den.
+
+That, he said, is a very just distinction.
+
+But then, if I am right, certain professors of education must be wrong
+when they say that they can put a knowledge into the soul which was not
+there before, like sight into blind eyes.
+
+They undoubtedly say this, he replied.
+
+Whereas, our argument shows that the power and capacity of learning
+exists in the soul already; and that just as the eye was unable to turn
+from darkness to light without the whole body, so too the instrument of
+knowledge can only by the movement of the whole soul be turned from the
+world of becoming into that of being, and learn by degrees to endure
+the sight of being, and of the brightest and best of being, or in other
+words, of the good.
+
+Very true.
+
+And must there not be some art which will effect conversion in the
+easiest and quickest manner; not implanting the faculty of sight, for
+that exists already, but has been turned in the wrong direction, and is
+looking away from the truth?
+
+Yes, he said, such an art may be presumed.
+
+And whereas the other so-called virtues of the soul seem to be akin to
+bodily qualities, for even when they are not originally innate they can
+be implanted later by habit and exercise, the virtue of wisdom more
+than anything else contains a divine element which always remains, and
+by this conversion is rendered useful and profitable; or, on the other
+hand, hurtful and useless. Did you never observe the narrow
+intelligence flashing from the keen eye of a clever rogue—how eager he
+is, how clearly his paltry soul sees the way to his end; he is the
+reverse of blind, but his keen eye-sight is forced into the service of
+evil, and he is mischievous in proportion to his cleverness?
+
+Very true, he said.
+
+But what if there had been a circumcision of such natures in the days
+of their youth; and they had been severed from those sensual pleasures,
+such as eating and drinking, which, like leaden weights, were attached
+to them at their birth, and which drag them down and turn the vision of
+their souls upon the things that are below—if, I say, they had been
+released from these impediments and turned in the opposite direction,
+the very same faculty in them would have seen the truth as keenly as
+they see what their eyes are turned to now.
+
+Very likely.
+
+Yes, I said; and there is another thing which is likely, or rather a
+necessary inference from what has preceded, that neither the uneducated
+and uninformed of the truth, nor yet those who never make an end of
+their education, will be able ministers of State; not the former,
+because they have no single aim of duty which is the rule of all their
+actions, private as well as public; nor the latter, because they will
+not act at all except upon compulsion, fancying that they are already
+dwelling apart in the islands of the blest.
+
+Very true, he replied.
+
+Then, I said, the business of us who are the founders of the State will
+be to compel the best minds to attain that knowledge which we have
+already shown to be the greatest of all—they must continue to ascend
+until they arrive at the good; but when they have ascended and seen
+enough we must not allow them to do as they do now.
+
+What do you mean?
+
+I mean that they remain in the upper world: but this must not be
+allowed; they must be made to descend again among the prisoners in the
+den, and partake of their labours and honours, whether they are worth
+having or not.
+
+But is not this unjust? he said; ought we to give them a worse life,
+when they might have a better?
+
+You have again forgotten, my friend, I said, the intention of the
+legislator, who did not aim at making any one class in the State happy
+above the rest; the happiness was to be in the whole State, and he held
+the citizens together by persuasion and necessity, making them
+benefactors of the State, and therefore benefactors of one another; to
+this end he created them, not to please themselves, but to be his
+instruments in binding up the State.
+
+True, he said, I had forgotten.
+
+Observe, Glaucon, that there will be no injustice in compelling our
+philosophers to have a care and providence of others; we shall explain
+to them that in other States, men of their class are not obliged to
+share in the toils of politics: and this is reasonable, for they grow
+up at their own sweet will, and the government would rather not have
+them. Being self-taught, they cannot be expected to show any gratitude
+for a culture which they have never received. But we have brought you
+into the world to be rulers of the hive, kings of yourselves and of the
+other citizens, and have educated you far better and more perfectly
+than they have been educated, and you are better able to share in the
+double duty. Wherefore each of you, when his turn comes, must go down
+to the general underground abode, and get the habit of seeing in the
+dark. When you have acquired the habit, you will see ten thousand times
+better than the inhabitants of the den, and you will know what the
+several images are, and what they represent, because you have seen the
+beautiful and just and good in their truth. And thus our State, which
+is also yours, will be a reality, and not a dream only, and will be
+administered in a spirit unlike that of other States, in which men
+fight with one another about shadows only and are distracted in the
+struggle for power, which in their eyes is a great good. Whereas the
+truth is that the State in which the rulers are most reluctant to
+govern is always the best and most quietly governed, and the State in
+which they are most eager, the worst.
+
+Quite true, he replied.
+
+And will our pupils, when they hear this, refuse to take their turn at
+the toils of State, when they are allowed to spend the greater part of
+their time with one another in the heavenly light?
+
+Impossible, he answered; for they are just men, and the commands which
+we impose upon them are just; there can be no doubt that every one of
+them will take office as a stern necessity, and not after the fashion
+of our present rulers of State.
+
+Yes, my friend, I said; and there lies the point. You must contrive for
+your future rulers another and a better life than that of a ruler, and
+then you may have a well-ordered State; for only in the State which
+offers this, will they rule who are truly rich, not in silver and gold,
+but in virtue and wisdom, which are the true blessings of life. Whereas
+if they go to the administration of public affairs, poor and hungering
+after their own private advantage, thinking that hence they are to
+snatch the chief good, order there can never be; for they will be
+fighting about office, and the civil and domestic broils which thus
+arise will be the ruin of the rulers themselves and of the whole State.
+
+Most true, he replied.
+
+And the only life which looks down upon the life of political ambition
+is that of true philosophy. Do you know of any other?
+
+Indeed, I do not, he said.
+
+And those who govern ought not to be lovers of the task? For, if they
+are, there will be rival lovers, and they will fight.
+
+No question.
+
+Who then are those whom we shall compel to be guardians? Surely they
+will be the men who are wisest about affairs of State, and by whom the
+State is best administered, and who at the same time have other honours
+and another and a better life than that of politics?
+
+They are the men, and I will choose them, he replied.
+
+And now shall we consider in what way such guardians will be produced,
+and how they are to be brought from darkness to light,—as some are said
+to have ascended from the world below to the gods?
+
+By all means, he replied.
+
+The process, I said, is not the turning over of an oyster-shell (In
+allusion to a game in which two parties fled or pursued according as an
+oyster-shell which was thrown into the air fell with the dark or light
+side uppermost.), but the turning round of a soul passing from a day
+which is little better than night to the true day of being, that is,
+the ascent from below, which we affirm to be true philosophy?
+
+Quite so.
+
+And should we not enquire what sort of knowledge has the power of
+effecting such a change?
+
+Certainly.
+
+What sort of knowledge is there which would draw the soul from becoming
+to being? And another consideration has just occurred to me: You will
+remember that our young men are to be warrior athletes?
+
+Yes, that was said.
+
+Then this new kind of knowledge must have an additional quality?
+
+What quality?
+
+Usefulness in war.
+
+Yes, if possible.
+
+There were two parts in our former scheme of education, were there not?
+
+Just so.
+
+There was gymnastic which presided over the growth and decay of the
+body, and may therefore be regarded as having to do with generation and
+corruption?
+
+True.
+
+Then that is not the knowledge which we are seeking to discover?
+
+No.
+
+But what do you say of music, which also entered to a certain extent
+into our former scheme?
+
+Music, he said, as you will remember, was the counterpart of gymnastic,
+and trained the guardians by the influences of habit, by harmony making
+them harmonious, by rhythm rhythmical, but not giving them science; and
+the words, whether fabulous or possibly true, had kindred elements of
+rhythm and harmony in them. But in music there was nothing which tended
+to that good which you are now seeking.
+
+You are most accurate, I said, in your recollection; in music there
+certainly was nothing of the kind. But what branch of knowledge is
+there, my dear Glaucon, which is of the desired nature; since all the
+useful arts were reckoned mean by us?
+
+Undoubtedly; and yet if music and gymnastic are excluded, and the arts
+are also excluded, what remains?
+
+Well, I said, there may be nothing left of our special subjects; and
+then we shall have to take something which is not special, but of
+universal application.
+
+What may that be?
+
+A something which all arts and sciences and intelligences use in
+common, and which every one first has to learn among the elements of
+education.
+
+What is that?
+
+The little matter of distinguishing one, two, and three—in a word,
+number and calculation:—do not all arts and sciences necessarily
+partake of them?
+
+Yes.
+
+Then the art of war partakes of them?
+
+To be sure.
+
+Then Palamedes, whenever he appears in tragedy, proves Agamemnon
+ridiculously unfit to be a general. Did you never remark how he
+declares that he had invented number, and had numbered the ships and
+set in array the ranks of the army at Troy; which implies that they had
+never been numbered before, and Agamemnon must be supposed literally to
+have been incapable of counting his own feet—how could he if he was
+ignorant of number? And if that is true, what sort of general must he
+have been?
+
+I should say a very strange one, if this was as you say.
+
+Can we deny that a warrior should have a knowledge of arithmetic?
+
+Certainly he should, if he is to have the smallest understanding of
+military tactics, or indeed, I should rather say, if he is to be a man
+at all.
+
+I should like to know whether you have the same notion which I have of
+this study?
+
+What is your notion?
+
+It appears to me to be a study of the kind which we are seeking, and
+which leads naturally to reflection, but never to have been rightly
+used; for the true use of it is simply to draw the soul towards being.
+
+Will you explain your meaning? he said.
+
+I will try, I said; and I wish you would share the enquiry with me, and
+say ‘yes’ or ‘no’ when I attempt to distinguish in my own mind what
+branches of knowledge have this attracting power, in order that we may
+have clearer proof that arithmetic is, as I suspect, one of them.
+
+Explain, he said.
+
+I mean to say that objects of sense are of two kinds; some of them do
+not invite thought because the sense is an adequate judge of them;
+while in the case of other objects sense is so untrustworthy that
+further enquiry is imperatively demanded.
+
+You are clearly referring, he said, to the manner in which the senses
+are imposed upon by distance, and by painting in light and shade.
+
+No, I said, that is not at all my meaning.
+
+Then what is your meaning?
+
+When speaking of uninviting objects, I mean those which do not pass
+from one sensation to the opposite; inviting objects are those which
+do; in this latter case the sense coming upon the object, whether at a
+distance or near, gives no more vivid idea of anything in particular
+than of its opposite. An illustration will make my meaning
+clearer:—here are three fingers—a little finger, a second finger, and a
+middle finger.
+
+Very good.
+
+You may suppose that they are seen quite close: And here comes the
+point.
+
+What is it?
+
+Each of them equally appears a finger, whether seen in the middle or at
+the extremity, whether white or black, or thick or thin—it makes no
+difference; a finger is a finger all the same. In these cases a man is
+not compelled to ask of thought the question what is a finger? for the
+sight never intimates to the mind that a finger is other than a finger.
+
+True.
+
+And therefore, I said, as we might expect, there is nothing here which
+invites or excites intelligence.
+
+There is not, he said.
+
+But is this equally true of the greatness and smallness of the fingers?
+Can sight adequately perceive them? and is no difference made by the
+circumstance that one of the fingers is in the middle and another at
+the extremity? And in like manner does the touch adequately perceive
+the qualities of thickness or thinness, of softness or hardness? And so
+of the other senses; do they give perfect intimations of such matters?
+Is not their mode of operation on this wise—the sense which is
+concerned with the quality of hardness is necessarily concerned also
+with the quality of softness, and only intimates to the soul that the
+same thing is felt to be both hard and soft?
+
+You are quite right, he said.
+
+And must not the soul be perplexed at this intimation which the sense
+gives of a hard which is also soft? What, again, is the meaning of
+light and heavy, if that which is light is also heavy, and that which
+is heavy, light?
+
+Yes, he said, these intimations which the soul receives are very
+curious and require to be explained.
+
+Yes, I said, and in these perplexities the soul naturally summons to
+her aid calculation and intelligence, that she may see whether the
+several objects announced to her are one or two.
+
+True.
+
+And if they turn out to be two, is not each of them one and different?
+
+Certainly.
+
+And if each is one, and both are two, she will conceive the two as in a
+state of division, for if there were undivided they could only be
+conceived of as one?
+
+True.
+
+The eye certainly did see both small and great, but only in a confused
+manner; they were not distinguished.
+
+Yes.
+
+Whereas the thinking mind, intending to light up the chaos, was
+compelled to reverse the process, and look at small and great as
+separate and not confused.
+
+Very true.
+
+Was not this the beginning of the enquiry ‘What is great?’ and ‘What is
+small?’
+
+Exactly so.
+
+And thus arose the distinction of the visible and the intelligible.
+
+Most true.
+
+This was what I meant when I spoke of impressions which invited the
+intellect, or the reverse—those which are simultaneous with opposite
+impressions, invite thought; those which are not simultaneous do not.
+
+I understand, he said, and agree with you.
+
+And to which class do unity and number belong?
+
+I do not know, he replied.
+
+Think a little and you will see that what has preceded will supply the
+answer; for if simple unity could be adequately perceived by the sight
+or by any other sense, then, as we were saying in the case of the
+finger, there would be nothing to attract towards being; but when there
+is some contradiction always present, and one is the reverse of one and
+involves the conception of plurality, then thought begins to be aroused
+within us, and the soul perplexed and wanting to arrive at a decision
+asks ‘What is absolute unity?’ This is the way in which the study of
+the one has a power of drawing and converting the mind to the
+contemplation of true being.
+
+And surely, he said, this occurs notably in the case of one; for we see
+the same thing to be both one and infinite in multitude?
+
+Yes, I said; and this being true of one must be equally true of all
+number?
+
+Certainly.
+
+And all arithmetic and calculation have to do with number?
+
+Yes.
+
+And they appear to lead the mind towards truth?
+
+Yes, in a very remarkable manner.
+
+Then this is knowledge of the kind for which we are seeking, having a
+double use, military and philosophical; for the man of war must learn
+the art of number or he will not know how to array his troops, and the
+philosopher also, because he has to rise out of the sea of change and
+lay hold of true being, and therefore he must be an arithmetician.
+
+That is true.
+
+And our guardian is both warrior and philosopher?
+
+Certainly.
+
+Then this is a kind of knowledge which legislation may fitly prescribe;
+and we must endeavour to persuade those who are to be the principal men
+of our State to go and learn arithmetic, not as amateurs, but they must
+carry on the study until they see the nature of numbers with the mind
+only; nor again, like merchants or retail-traders, with a view to
+buying or selling, but for the sake of their military use, and of the
+soul herself; and because this will be the easiest way for her to pass
+from becoming to truth and being.
+
+That is excellent, he said.
+
+Yes, I said, and now having spoken of it, I must add how charming the
+science is! and in how many ways it conduces to our desired end, if
+pursued in the spirit of a philosopher, and not of a shopkeeper!
+
+How do you mean?
+
+I mean, as I was saying, that arithmetic has a very great and elevating
+effect, compelling the soul to reason about abstract number, and
+rebelling against the introduction of visible or tangible objects into
+the argument. You know how steadily the masters of the art repel and
+ridicule any one who attempts to divide absolute unity when he is
+calculating, and if you divide, they multiply (Meaning either (1) that
+they integrate the number because they deny the possibility of
+fractions; or (2) that division is regarded by them as a process of
+multiplication, for the fractions of one continue to be units.), taking
+care that one shall continue one and not become lost in fractions.
+
+That is very true.
+
+Now, suppose a person were to say to them: O my friends, what are these
+wonderful numbers about which you are reasoning, in which, as you say,
+there is a unity such as you demand, and each unit is equal,
+invariable, indivisible,—what would they answer?
+
+They would answer, as I should conceive, that they were speaking of
+those numbers which can only be realized in thought.
+
+Then you see that this knowledge may be truly called necessary,
+necessitating as it clearly does the use of the pure intelligence in
+the attainment of pure truth?
+
+Yes; that is a marked characteristic of it.
+
+And have you further observed, that those who have a natural talent for
+calculation are generally quick at every other kind of knowledge; and
+even the dull, if they have had an arithmetical training, although they
+may derive no other advantage from it, always become much quicker than
+they would otherwise have been.
+
+Very true, he said.
+
+And indeed, you will not easily find a more difficult study, and not
+many as difficult.
+
+You will not.
+
+And, for all these reasons, arithmetic is a kind of knowledge in which
+the best natures should be trained, and which must not be given up.
+
+I agree.
+
+Let this then be made one of our subjects of education. And next, shall
+we enquire whether the kindred science also concerns us?
+
+You mean geometry?
+
+Exactly so.
+
+Clearly, he said, we are concerned with that part of geometry which
+relates to war; for in pitching a camp, or taking up a position, or
+closing or extending the lines of an army, or any other military
+manoeuvre, whether in actual battle or on a march, it will make all the
+difference whether a general is or is not a geometrician.
+
+Yes, I said, but for that purpose a very little of either geometry or
+calculation will be enough; the question relates rather to the greater
+and more advanced part of geometry—whether that tends in any degree to
+make more easy the vision of the idea of good; and thither, as I was
+saying, all things tend which compel the soul to turn her gaze towards
+that place, where is the full perfection of being, which she ought, by
+all means, to behold.
+
+True, he said.
+
+Then if geometry compels us to view being, it concerns us; if becoming
+only, it does not concern us?
+
+Yes, that is what we assert.
+
+Yet anybody who has the least acquaintance with geometry will not deny
+that such a conception of the science is in flat contradiction to the
+ordinary language of geometricians.
+
+How so?
+
+They have in view practice only, and are always speaking, in a narrow
+and ridiculous manner, of squaring and extending and applying and the
+like—they confuse the necessities of geometry with those of daily life;
+whereas knowledge is the real object of the whole science.
+
+Certainly, he said.
+
+Then must not a further admission be made?
+
+What admission?
+
+That the knowledge at which geometry aims is knowledge of the eternal,
+and not of aught perishing and transient.
+
+That, he replied, may be readily allowed, and is true.
+
+Then, my noble friend, geometry will draw the soul towards truth, and
+create the spirit of philosophy, and raise up that which is now
+unhappily allowed to fall down.
+
+Nothing will be more likely to have such an effect.
+
+Then nothing should be more sternly laid down than that the inhabitants
+of your fair city should by all means learn geometry. Moreover the
+science has indirect effects, which are not small.
+
+Of what kind? he said.
+
+There are the military advantages of which you spoke, I said; and in
+all departments of knowledge, as experience proves, any one who has
+studied geometry is infinitely quicker of apprehension than one who has
+not.
+
+Yes indeed, he said, there is an infinite difference between them.
+
+Then shall we propose this as a second branch of knowledge which our
+youth will study?
+
+Let us do so, he replied.
+
+And suppose we make astronomy the third—what do you say?
+
+I am strongly inclined to it, he said; the observation of the seasons
+and of months and years is as essential to the general as it is to the
+farmer or sailor.
+
+I am amused, I said, at your fear of the world, which makes you guard
+against the appearance of insisting upon useless studies; and I quite
+admit the difficulty of believing that in every man there is an eye of
+the soul which, when by other pursuits lost and dimmed, is by these
+purified and re-illumined; and is more precious far than ten thousand
+bodily eyes, for by it alone is truth seen. Now there are two classes
+of persons: one class of those who will agree with you and will take
+your words as a revelation; another class to whom they will be utterly
+unmeaning, and who will naturally deem them to be idle tales, for they
+see no sort of profit which is to be obtained from them. And therefore
+you had better decide at once with which of the two you are proposing
+to argue. You will very likely say with neither, and that your chief
+aim in carrying on the argument is your own improvement; at the same
+time you do not grudge to others any benefit which they may receive.
+
+I think that I should prefer to carry on the argument mainly on my own
+behalf.
+
+Then take a step backward, for we have gone wrong in the order of the
+sciences.
+
+What was the mistake? he said.
+
+After plane geometry, I said, we proceeded at once to solids in
+revolution, instead of taking solids in themselves; whereas after the
+second dimension the third, which is concerned with cubes and
+dimensions of depth, ought to have followed.
+
+That is true, Socrates; but so little seems to be known as yet about
+these subjects.
+
+Why, yes, I said, and for two reasons:—in the first place, no
+government patronises them; this leads to a want of energy in the
+pursuit of them, and they are difficult; in the second place, students
+cannot learn them unless they have a director. But then a director can
+hardly be found, and even if he could, as matters now stand, the
+students, who are very conceited, would not attend to him. That,
+however, would be otherwise if the whole State became the director of
+these studies and gave honour to them; then disciples would want to
+come, and there would be continuous and earnest search, and discoveries
+would be made; since even now, disregarded as they are by the world,
+and maimed of their fair proportions, and although none of their
+votaries can tell the use of them, still these studies force their way
+by their natural charm, and very likely, if they had the help of the
+State, they would some day emerge into light.
+
+Yes, he said, there is a remarkable charm in them. But I do not clearly
+understand the change in the order. First you began with a geometry of
+plane surfaces?
+
+Yes, I said.
+
+And you placed astronomy next, and then you made a step backward?
+
+Yes, and I have delayed you by my hurry; the ludicrous state of solid
+geometry, which, in natural order, should have followed, made me pass
+over this branch and go on to astronomy, or motion of solids.
+
+True, he said.
+
+Then assuming that the science now omitted would come into existence if
+encouraged by the State, let us go on to astronomy, which will be
+fourth.
+
+The right order, he replied. And now, Socrates, as you rebuked the
+vulgar manner in which I praised astronomy before, my praise shall be
+given in your own spirit. For every one, as I think, must see that
+astronomy compels the soul to look upwards and leads us from this world
+to another.
+
+Every one but myself, I said; to every one else this may be clear, but
+not to me.
+
+And what then would you say?
+
+I should rather say that those who elevate astronomy into philosophy
+appear to me to make us look downwards and not upwards.
+
+What do you mean? he asked.
+
+You, I replied, have in your mind a truly sublime conception of our
+knowledge of the things above. And I dare say that if a person were to
+throw his head back and study the fretted ceiling, you would still
+think that his mind was the percipient, and not his eyes. And you are
+very likely right, and I may be a simpleton: but, in my opinion, that
+knowledge only which is of being and of the unseen can make the soul
+look upwards, and whether a man gapes at the heavens or blinks on the
+ground, seeking to learn some particular of sense, I would deny that he
+can learn, for nothing of that sort is matter of science; his soul is
+looking downwards, not upwards, whether his way to knowledge is by
+water or by land, whether he floats, or only lies on his back.
+
+I acknowledge, he said, the justice of your rebuke. Still, I should
+like to ascertain how astronomy can be learned in any manner more
+conducive to that knowledge of which we are speaking?
+
+I will tell you, I said: The starry heaven which we behold is wrought
+upon a visible ground, and therefore, although the fairest and most
+perfect of visible things, must necessarily be deemed inferior far to
+the true motions of absolute swiftness and absolute slowness, which are
+relative to each other, and carry with them that which is contained in
+them, in the true number and in every true figure. Now, these are to be
+apprehended by reason and intelligence, but not by sight.
+
+True, he replied.
+
+The spangled heavens should be used as a pattern and with a view to
+that higher knowledge; their beauty is like the beauty of figures or
+pictures excellently wrought by the hand of Daedalus, or some other
+great artist, which we may chance to behold; any geometrician who saw
+them would appreciate the exquisiteness of their workmanship, but he
+would never dream of thinking that in them he could find the true equal
+or the true double, or the truth of any other proportion.
+
+No, he replied, such an idea would be ridiculous.
+
+And will not a true astronomer have the same feeling when he looks at
+the movements of the stars? Will he not think that heaven and the
+things in heaven are framed by the Creator of them in the most perfect
+manner? But he will never imagine that the proportions of night and
+day, or of both to the month, or of the month to the year, or of the
+stars to these and to one another, and any other things that are
+material and visible can also be eternal and subject to no
+deviation—that would be absurd; and it is equally absurd to take so
+much pains in investigating their exact truth.
+
+I quite agree, though I never thought of this before.
+
+Then, I said, in astronomy, as in geometry, we should employ problems,
+and let the heavens alone if we would approach the subject in the right
+way and so make the natural gift of reason to be of any real use.
+
+That, he said, is a work infinitely beyond our present astronomers.
+
+Yes, I said; and there are many other things which must also have a
+similar extension given to them, if our legislation is to be of any
+value. But can you tell me of any other suitable study?
+
+No, he said, not without thinking.
+
+Motion, I said, has many forms, and not one only; two of them are
+obvious enough even to wits no better than ours; and there are others,
+as I imagine, which may be left to wiser persons.
+
+But where are the two?
+
+There is a second, I said, which is the counterpart of the one already
+named.
+
+And what may that be?
+
+The second, I said, would seem relatively to the ears to be what the
+first is to the eyes; for I conceive that as the eyes are designed to
+look up at the stars, so are the ears to hear harmonious motions; and
+these are sister sciences—as the Pythagoreans say, and we, Glaucon,
+agree with them?
+
+Yes, he replied.
+
+But this, I said, is a laborious study, and therefore we had better go
+and learn of them; and they will tell us whether there are any other
+applications of these sciences. At the same time, we must not lose
+sight of our own higher object.
+
+What is that?
+
+There is a perfection which all knowledge ought to reach, and which our
+pupils ought also to attain, and not to fall short of, as I was saying
+that they did in astronomy. For in the science of harmony, as you
+probably know, the same thing happens. The teachers of harmony compare
+the sounds and consonances which are heard only, and their labour, like
+that of the astronomers, is in vain.
+
+Yes, by heaven! he said; and ’tis as good as a play to hear them
+talking about their condensed notes, as they call them; they put their
+ears close alongside of the strings like persons catching a sound from
+their neighbour’s wall—one set of them declaring that they distinguish
+an intermediate note and have found the least interval which should be
+the unit of measurement; the others insisting that the two sounds have
+passed into the same—either party setting their ears before their
+understanding.
+
+You mean, I said, those gentlemen who tease and torture the strings and
+rack them on the pegs of the instrument: I might carry on the metaphor
+and speak after their manner of the blows which the plectrum gives, and
+make accusations against the strings, both of backwardness and
+forwardness to sound; but this would be tedious, and therefore I will
+only say that these are not the men, and that I am referring to the
+Pythagoreans, of whom I was just now proposing to enquire about
+harmony. For they too are in error, like the astronomers; they
+investigate the numbers of the harmonies which are heard, but they
+never attain to problems—that is to say, they never reach the natural
+harmonies of number, or reflect why some numbers are harmonious and
+others not.
+
+That, he said, is a thing of more than mortal knowledge.
+
+A thing, I replied, which I would rather call useful; that is, if
+sought after with a view to the beautiful and good; but if pursued in
+any other spirit, useless.
+
+Very true, he said.
+
+Now, when all these studies reach the point of inter-communion and
+connection with one another, and come to be considered in their mutual
+affinities, then, I think, but not till then, will the pursuit of them
+have a value for our objects; otherwise there is no profit in them.
+
+I suspect so; but you are speaking, Socrates, of a vast work.
+
+What do you mean? I said; the prelude or what? Do you not know that all
+this is but the prelude to the actual strain which we have to learn?
+For you surely would not regard the skilled mathematician as a
+dialectician?
+
+Assuredly not, he said; I have hardly ever known a mathematician who
+was capable of reasoning.
+
+But do you imagine that men who are unable to give and take a reason
+will have the knowledge which we require of them?
+
+Neither can this be supposed.
+
+And so, Glaucon, I said, we have at last arrived at the hymn of
+dialectic. This is that strain which is of the intellect only, but
+which the faculty of sight will nevertheless be found to imitate; for
+sight, as you may remember, was imagined by us after a while to behold
+the real animals and stars, and last of all the sun himself. And so
+with dialectic; when a person starts on the discovery of the absolute
+by the light of reason only, and without any assistance of sense, and
+perseveres until by pure intelligence he arrives at the perception of
+the absolute good, he at last finds himself at the end of the
+intellectual world, as in the case of sight at the end of the visible.
+
+Exactly, he said.
+
+Then this is the progress which you call dialectic?
+
+True.
+
+But the release of the prisoners from chains, and their translation
+from the shadows to the images and to the light, and the ascent from
+the underground den to the sun, while in his presence they are vainly
+trying to look on animals and plants and the light of the sun, but are
+able to perceive even with their weak eyes the images in the water
+(which are divine), and are the shadows of true existence (not shadows
+of images cast by a light of fire, which compared with the sun is only
+an image)—this power of elevating the highest principle in the soul to
+the contemplation of that which is best in existence, with which we may
+compare the raising of that faculty which is the very light of the body
+to the sight of that which is brightest in the material and visible
+world—this power is given, as I was saying, by all that study and
+pursuit of the arts which has been described.
+
+I agree in what you are saying, he replied, which may be hard to
+believe, yet, from another point of view, is harder still to deny.
+This, however, is not a theme to be treated of in passing only, but
+will have to be discussed again and again. And so, whether our
+conclusion be true or false, let us assume all this, and proceed at
+once from the prelude or preamble to the chief strain (A play upon the
+Greek word, which means both ‘law’ and ‘strain.’), and describe that in
+like manner. Say, then, what is the nature and what are the divisions
+of dialectic, and what are the paths which lead thither; for these
+paths will also lead to our final rest.
+
+Dear Glaucon, I said, you will not be able to follow me here, though I
+would do my best, and you should behold not an image only but the
+absolute truth, according to my notion. Whether what I told you would
+or would not have been a reality I cannot venture to say; but you would
+have seen something like reality; of that I am confident.
+
+Doubtless, he replied.
+
+But I must also remind you, that the power of dialectic alone can
+reveal this, and only to one who is a disciple of the previous
+sciences.
+
+Of that assertion you may be as confident as of the last.
+
+And assuredly no one will argue that there is any other method of
+comprehending by any regular process all true existence or of
+ascertaining what each thing is in its own nature; for the arts in
+general are concerned with the desires or opinions of men, or are
+cultivated with a view to production and construction, or for the
+preservation of such productions and constructions; and as to the
+mathematical sciences which, as we were saying, have some apprehension
+of true being—geometry and the like—they only dream about being, but
+never can they behold the waking reality so long as they leave the
+hypotheses which they use unexamined, and are unable to give an account
+of them. For when a man knows not his own first principle, and when the
+conclusion and intermediate steps are also constructed out of he knows
+not what, how can he imagine that such a fabric of convention can ever
+become science?
+
+Impossible, he said.
+
+Then dialectic, and dialectic alone, goes directly to the first
+principle and is the only science which does away with hypotheses in
+order to make her ground secure; the eye of the soul, which is
+literally buried in an outlandish slough, is by her gentle aid lifted
+upwards; and she uses as handmaids and helpers in the work of
+conversion, the sciences which we have been discussing. Custom terms
+them sciences, but they ought to have some other name, implying greater
+clearness than opinion and less clearness than science: and this, in
+our previous sketch, was called understanding. But why should we
+dispute about names when we have realities of such importance to
+consider?
+
+Why indeed, he said, when any name will do which expresses the thought
+of the mind with clearness?
+
+At any rate, we are satisfied, as before, to have four divisions; two
+for intellect and two for opinion, and to call the first division
+science, the second understanding, the third belief, and the fourth
+perception of shadows, opinion being concerned with becoming, and
+intellect with being; and so to make a proportion:—
+
+As being is to becoming, so is pure intellect to opinion. And as
+intellect is to opinion, so is science to belief, and understanding to
+the perception of shadows.
+
+But let us defer the further correlation and subdivision of the
+subjects of opinion and of intellect, for it will be a long enquiry,
+many times longer than this has been.
+
+As far as I understand, he said, I agree.
+
+And do you also agree, I said, in describing the dialectician as one
+who attains a conception of the essence of each thing? And he who does
+not possess and is therefore unable to impart this conception, in
+whatever degree he fails, may in that degree also be said to fail in
+intelligence? Will you admit so much?
+
+Yes, he said; how can I deny it?
+
+And you would say the same of the conception of the good? Until the
+person is able to abstract and define rationally the idea of good, and
+unless he can run the gauntlet of all objections, and is ready to
+disprove them, not by appeals to opinion, but to absolute truth, never
+faltering at any step of the argument—unless he can do all this, you
+would say that he knows neither the idea of good nor any other good; he
+apprehends only a shadow, if anything at all, which is given by opinion
+and not by science;—dreaming and slumbering in this life, before he is
+well awake here, he arrives at the world below, and has his final
+quietus.
+
+In all that I should most certainly agree with you.
+
+And surely you would not have the children of your ideal State, whom
+you are nurturing and educating—if the ideal ever becomes a reality—you
+would not allow the future rulers to be like posts (Literally ‘lines,’
+probably the starting-point of a race-course.), having no reason in
+them, and yet to be set in authority over the highest matters?
+
+Certainly not.
+
+Then you will make a law that they shall have such an education as will
+enable them to attain the greatest skill in asking and answering
+questions?
+
+Yes, he said, you and I together will make it.
+
+Dialectic, then, as you will agree, is the coping-stone of the
+sciences, and is set over them; no other science can be placed
+higher—the nature of knowledge can no further go?
+
+I agree, he said.
+
+But to whom we are to assign these studies, and in what way they are to
+be assigned, are questions which remain to be considered.
+
+Yes, clearly.
+
+You remember, I said, how the rulers were chosen before?
+
+Certainly, he said.
+
+The same natures must still be chosen, and the preference again given
+to the surest and the bravest, and, if possible, to the fairest; and,
+having noble and generous tempers, they should also have the natural
+gifts which will facilitate their education.
+
+And what are these?
+
+Such gifts as keenness and ready powers of acquisition; for the mind
+more often faints from the severity of study than from the severity of
+gymnastics: the toil is more entirely the mind’s own, and is not shared
+with the body.
+
+Very true, he replied.
+
+Further, he of whom we are in search should have a good memory, and be
+an unwearied solid man who is a lover of labour in any line; or he will
+never be able to endure the great amount of bodily exercise and to go
+through all the intellectual discipline and study which we require of
+him.
+
+Certainly, he said; he must have natural gifts.
+
+The mistake at present is, that those who study philosophy have no
+vocation, and this, as I was before saying, is the reason why she has
+fallen into disrepute: her true sons should take her by the hand and
+not bastards.
+
+What do you mean?
+
+In the first place, her votary should not have a lame or halting
+industry—I mean, that he should not be half industrious and half idle:
+as, for example, when a man is a lover of gymnastic and hunting, and
+all other bodily exercises, but a hater rather than a lover of the
+labour of learning or listening or enquiring. Or the occupation to
+which he devotes himself may be of an opposite kind, and he may have
+the other sort of lameness.
+
+Certainly, he said.
+
+And as to truth, I said, is not a soul equally to be deemed halt and
+lame which hates voluntary falsehood and is extremely indignant at
+herself and others when they tell lies, but is patient of involuntary
+falsehood, and does not mind wallowing like a swinish beast in the mire
+of ignorance, and has no shame at being detected?
+
+To be sure.
+
+And, again, in respect of temperance, courage, magnificence, and every
+other virtue, should we not carefully distinguish between the true son
+and the bastard? for where there is no discernment of such qualities
+states and individuals unconsciously err; and the state makes a ruler,
+and the individual a friend, of one who, being defective in some part
+of virtue, is in a figure lame or a bastard.
+
+That is very true, he said.
+
+All these things, then, will have to be carefully considered by us; and
+if only those whom we introduce to this vast system of education and
+training are sound in body and mind, justice herself will have nothing
+to say against us, and we shall be the saviours of the constitution and
+of the State; but, if our pupils are men of another stamp, the reverse
+will happen, and we shall pour a still greater flood of ridicule on
+philosophy than she has to endure at present.
+
+That would not be creditable.
+
+Certainly not, I said; and yet perhaps, in thus turning jest into
+earnest I am equally ridiculous.
+
+In what respect?
+
+I had forgotten, I said, that we were not serious, and spoke with too
+much excitement. For when I saw philosophy so undeservedly trampled
+under foot of men I could not help feeling a sort of indignation at the
+authors of her disgrace: and my anger made me too vehement.
+
+Indeed! I was listening, and did not think so.
+
+But I, who am the speaker, felt that I was. And now let me remind you
+that, although in our former selection we chose old men, we must not do
+so in this. Solon was under a delusion when he said that a man when he
+grows old may learn many things—for he can no more learn much than he
+can run much; youth is the time for any extraordinary toil.
+
+Of course.
+
+And, therefore, calculation and geometry and all the other elements of
+instruction, which are a preparation for dialectic, should be presented
+to the mind in childhood; not, however, under any notion of forcing our
+system of education.
+
+Why not?
+
+Because a freeman ought not to be a slave in the acquisition of
+knowledge of any kind. Bodily exercise, when compulsory, does no harm
+to the body; but knowledge which is acquired under compulsion obtains
+no hold on the mind.
+
+Very true.
+
+Then, my good friend, I said, do not use compulsion, but let early
+education be a sort of amusement; you will then be better able to find
+out the natural bent.
+
+That is a very rational notion, he said.
+
+Do you remember that the children, too, were to be taken to see the
+battle on horseback; and that if there were no danger they were to be
+brought close up and, like young hounds, have a taste of blood given
+them?
+
+Yes, I remember.
+
+The same practice may be followed, I said, in all these things—labours,
+lessons, dangers—and he who is most at home in all of them ought to be
+enrolled in a select number.
+
+At what age?
+
+At the age when the necessary gymnastics are over: the period whether
+of two or three years which passes in this sort of training is useless
+for any other purpose; for sleep and exercise are unpropitious to
+learning; and the trial of who is first in gymnastic exercises is one
+of the most important tests to which our youth are subjected.
+
+Certainly, he replied.
+
+After that time those who are selected from the class of twenty years
+old will be promoted to higher honour, and the sciences which they
+learned without any order in their early education will now be brought
+together, and they will be able to see the natural relationship of them
+to one another and to true being.
+
+Yes, he said, that is the only kind of knowledge which takes lasting
+root.
+
+Yes, I said; and the capacity for such knowledge is the great criterion
+of dialectical talent: the comprehensive mind is always the
+dialectical.
+
+I agree with you, he said.
+
+These, I said, are the points which you must consider; and those who
+have most of this comprehension, and who are most steadfast in their
+learning, and in their military and other appointed duties, when they
+have arrived at the age of thirty have to be chosen by you out of the
+select class, and elevated to higher honour; and you will have to prove
+them by the help of dialectic, in order to learn which of them is able
+to give up the use of sight and the other senses, and in company with
+truth to attain absolute being: And here, my friend, great caution is
+required.
+
+Why great caution?
+
+Do you not remark, I said, how great is the evil which dialectic has
+introduced?
+
+What evil? he said.
+
+The students of the art are filled with lawlessness.
+
+Quite true, he said.
+
+Do you think that there is anything so very unnatural or inexcusable in
+their case? or will you make allowance for them?
+
+In what way make allowance?
+
+I want you, I said, by way of parallel, to imagine a supposititious son
+who is brought up in great wealth; he is one of a great and numerous
+family, and has many flatterers. When he grows up to manhood, he learns
+that his alleged are not his real parents; but who the real are he is
+unable to discover. Can you guess how he will be likely to behave
+towards his flatterers and his supposed parents, first of all during
+the period when he is ignorant of the false relation, and then again
+when he knows? Or shall I guess for you?
+
+If you please.
+
+Then I should say, that while he is ignorant of the truth he will be
+likely to honour his father and his mother and his supposed relations
+more than the flatterers; he will be less inclined to neglect them when
+in need, or to do or say anything against them; and he will be less
+willing to disobey them in any important matter.
+
+He will.
+
+But when he has made the discovery, I should imagine that he would
+diminish his honour and regard for them, and would become more devoted
+to the flatterers; their influence over him would greatly increase; he
+would now live after their ways, and openly associate with them, and,
+unless he were of an unusually good disposition, he would trouble
+himself no more about his supposed parents or other relations.
+
+Well, all that is very probable. But how is the image applicable to the
+disciples of philosophy?
+
+In this way: you know that there are certain principles about justice
+and honour, which were taught us in childhood, and under their parental
+authority we have been brought up, obeying and honouring them.
+
+That is true.
+
+There are also opposite maxims and habits of pleasure which flatter and
+attract the soul, but do not influence those of us who have any sense
+of right, and they continue to obey and honour the maxims of their
+fathers.
+
+True.
+
+Now, when a man is in this state, and the questioning spirit asks what
+is fair or honourable, and he answers as the legislator has taught him,
+and then arguments many and diverse refute his words, until he is
+driven into believing that nothing is honourable any more than
+dishonourable, or just and good any more than the reverse, and so of
+all the notions which he most valued, do you think that he will still
+honour and obey them as before?
+
+Impossible.
+
+And when he ceases to think them honourable and natural as heretofore,
+and he fails to discover the true, can he be expected to pursue any
+life other than that which flatters his desires?
+
+He cannot.
+
+And from being a keeper of the law he is converted into a breaker of
+it?
+
+Unquestionably.
+
+Now all this is very natural in students of philosophy such as I have
+described, and also, as I was just now saying, most excusable.
+
+Yes, he said; and, I may add, pitiable.
+
+Therefore, that your feelings may not be moved to pity about our
+citizens who are now thirty years of age, every care must be taken in
+introducing them to dialectic.
+
+Certainly.
+
+There is a danger lest they should taste the dear delight too early;
+for youngsters, as you may have observed, when they first get the taste
+in their mouths, argue for amusement, and are always contradicting and
+refuting others in imitation of those who refute them; like puppy-dogs,
+they rejoice in pulling and tearing at all who come near them.
+
+Yes, he said, there is nothing which they like better.
+
+And when they have made many conquests and received defeats at the
+hands of many, they violently and speedily get into a way of not
+believing anything which they believed before, and hence, not only
+they, but philosophy and all that relates to it is apt to have a bad
+name with the rest of the world.
+
+Too true, he said.
+
+But when a man begins to get older, he will no longer be guilty of such
+insanity; he will imitate the dialectician who is seeking for truth,
+and not the eristic, who is contradicting for the sake of amusement;
+and the greater moderation of his character will increase instead of
+diminishing the honour of the pursuit.
+
+Very true, he said.
+
+And did we not make special provision for this, when we said that the
+disciples of philosophy were to be orderly and steadfast, not, as now,
+any chance aspirant or intruder?
+
+Very true.
+
+Suppose, I said, the study of philosophy to take the place of
+gymnastics and to be continued diligently and earnestly and exclusively
+for twice the number of years which were passed in bodily exercise—will
+that be enough?
+
+Would you say six or four years? he asked.
+
+Say five years, I replied; at the end of the time they must be sent
+down again into the den and compelled to hold any military or other
+office which young men are qualified to hold: in this way they will get
+their experience of life, and there will be an opportunity of trying
+whether, when they are drawn all manner of ways by temptation, they
+will stand firm or flinch.
+
+And how long is this stage of their lives to last?
+
+Fifteen years, I answered; and when they have reached fifty years of
+age, then let those who still survive and have distinguished themselves
+in every action of their lives and in every branch of knowledge come at
+last to their consummation: the time has now arrived at which they must
+raise the eye of the soul to the universal light which lightens all
+things, and behold the absolute good; for that is the pattern according
+to which they are to order the State and the lives of individuals, and
+the remainder of their own lives also; making philosophy their chief
+pursuit, but, when their turn comes, toiling also at politics and
+ruling for the public good, not as though they were performing some
+heroic action, but simply as a matter of duty; and when they have
+brought up in each generation others like themselves and left them in
+their place to be governors of the State, then they will depart to the
+Islands of the Blest and dwell there; and the city will give them
+public memorials and sacrifices and honour them, if the Pythian oracle
+consent, as demigods, but if not, as in any case blessed and divine.
+
+You are a sculptor, Socrates, and have made statues of our governors
+faultless in beauty.
+
+Yes, I said, Glaucon, and of our governesses too; for you must not
+suppose that what I have been saying applies to men only and not to
+women as far as their natures can go.
+
+There you are right, he said, since we have made them to share in all
+things like the men.
+
+Well, I said, and you would agree (would you not?) that what has been
+said about the State and the government is not a mere dream, and
+although difficult not impossible, but only possible in the way which
+has been supposed; that is to say, when the true philosopher kings are
+born in a State, one or more of them, despising the honours of this
+present world which they deem mean and worthless, esteeming above all
+things right and the honour that springs from right, and regarding
+justice as the greatest and most necessary of all things, whose
+ministers they are, and whose principles will be exalted by them when
+they set in order their own city?
+
+How will they proceed?
+
+They will begin by sending out into the country all the inhabitants of
+the city who are more than ten years old, and will take possession of
+their children, who will be unaffected by the habits of their parents;
+these they will train in their own habits and laws, I mean in the laws
+which we have given them: and in this way the State and constitution of
+which we were speaking will soonest and most easily attain happiness,
+and the nation which has such a constitution will gain most.
+
+Yes, that will be the best way. And I think, Socrates, that you have
+very well described how, if ever, such a constitution might come into
+being.
+
+Enough then of the perfect State, and of the man who bears its
+image—there is no difficulty in seeing how we shall describe him.
+
+There is no difficulty, he replied; and I agree with you in thinking
+that nothing more need be said.
+
+
+
+
+ BOOK VIII.
+
+
+And so, Glaucon, we have arrived at the conclusion that in the perfect
+State wives and children are to be in common; and that all education
+and the pursuits of war and peace are also to be common, and the best
+philosophers and the bravest warriors are to be their kings?
+
+That, replied Glaucon, has been acknowledged.
+
+Yes, I said; and we have further acknowledged that the governors, when
+appointed themselves, will take their soldiers and place them in houses
+such as we were describing, which are common to all, and contain
+nothing private, or individual; and about their property, you remember
+what we agreed?
+
+Yes, I remember that no one was to have any of the ordinary possessions
+of mankind; they were to be warrior athletes and guardians, receiving
+from the other citizens, in lieu of annual payment, only their
+maintenance, and they were to take care of themselves and of the whole
+State.
+
+True, I said; and now that this division of our task is concluded, let
+us find the point at which we digressed, that we may return into the
+old path.
+
+There is no difficulty in returning; you implied, then as now, that you
+had finished the description of the State: you said that such a State
+was good, and that the man was good who answered to it, although, as
+now appears, you had more excellent things to relate both of State and
+man. And you said further, that if this was the true form, then the
+others were false; and of the false forms, you said, as I remember,
+that there were four principal ones, and that their defects, and the
+defects of the individuals corresponding to them, were worth examining.
+When we had seen all the individuals, and finally agreed as to who was
+the best and who was the worst of them, we were to consider whether the
+best was not also the happiest, and the worst the most miserable. I
+asked you what were the four forms of government of which you spoke,
+and then Polemarchus and Adeimantus put in their word; and you began
+again, and have found your way to the point at which we have now
+arrived.
+
+Your recollection, I said, is most exact.
+
+Then, like a wrestler, he replied, you must put yourself again in the
+same position; and let me ask the same questions, and do you give me
+the same answer which you were about to give me then.
+
+Yes, if I can, I will, I said.
+
+I shall particularly wish to hear what were the four constitutions of
+which you were speaking.
+
+That question, I said, is easily answered: the four governments of
+which I spoke, so far as they have distinct names, are, first, those of
+Crete and Sparta, which are generally applauded; what is termed
+oligarchy comes next; this is not equally approved, and is a form of
+government which teems with evils: thirdly, democracy, which naturally
+follows oligarchy, although very different: and lastly comes tyranny,
+great and famous, which differs from them all, and is the fourth and
+worst disorder of a State. I do not know, do you? of any other
+constitution which can be said to have a distinct character. There are
+lordships and principalities which are bought and sold, and some other
+intermediate forms of government. But these are nondescripts and may be
+found equally among Hellenes and among barbarians.
+
+Yes, he replied, we certainly hear of many curious forms of government
+which exist among them.
+
+Do you know, I said, that governments vary as the dispositions of men
+vary, and that there must be as many of the one as there are of the
+other? For we cannot suppose that States are made of ‘oak and rock,’
+and not out of the human natures which are in them, and which in a
+figure turn the scale and draw other things after them?
+
+Yes, he said, the States are as the men are; they grow out of human
+characters.
+
+Then if the constitutions of States are five, the dispositions of
+individual minds will also be five?
+
+Certainly.
+
+Him who answers to aristocracy, and whom we rightly call just and good,
+we have already described.
+
+We have.
+
+Then let us now proceed to describe the inferior sort of natures, being
+the contentious and ambitious, who answer to the Spartan polity; also
+the oligarchical, democratical, and tyrannical. Let us place the most
+just by the side of the most unjust, and when we see them we shall be
+able to compare the relative happiness or unhappiness of him who leads
+a life of pure justice or pure injustice. The enquiry will then be
+completed. And we shall know whether we ought to pursue injustice, as
+Thrasymachus advises, or in accordance with the conclusions of the
+argument to prefer justice.
+
+Certainly, he replied, we must do as you say.
+
+Shall we follow our old plan, which we adopted with a view to
+clearness, of taking the State first and then proceeding to the
+individual, and begin with the government of honour?—I know of no name
+for such a government other than timocracy, or perhaps timarchy. We
+will compare with this the like character in the individual; and, after
+that, consider oligarchy and the oligarchical man; and then again we
+will turn our attention to democracy and the democratical man; and
+lastly, we will go and view the city of tyranny, and once more take a
+look into the tyrant’s soul, and try to arrive at a satisfactory
+decision.
+
+That way of viewing and judging of the matter will be very suitable.
+
+First, then, I said, let us enquire how timocracy (the government of
+honour) arises out of aristocracy (the government of the best).
+Clearly, all political changes originate in divisions of the actual
+governing power; a government which is united, however small, cannot be
+moved.
+
+Very true, he said.
+
+In what way, then, will our city be moved, and in what manner will the
+two classes of auxiliaries and rulers disagree among themselves or with
+one another? Shall we, after the manner of Homer, pray the Muses to
+tell us ‘how discord first arose’? Shall we imagine them in solemn
+mockery, to play and jest with us as if we were children, and to
+address us in a lofty tragic vein, making believe to be in earnest?
+
+How would they address us?
+
+After this manner:—A city which is thus constituted can hardly be
+shaken; but, seeing that everything which has a beginning has also an
+end, even a constitution such as yours will not last for ever, but will
+in time be dissolved. And this is the dissolution:—In plants that grow
+in the earth, as well as in animals that move on the earth’s surface,
+fertility and sterility of soul and body occur when the circumferences
+of the circles of each are completed, which in short-lived existences
+pass over a short space, and in long-lived ones over a long space. But
+to the knowledge of human fecundity and sterility all the wisdom and
+education of your rulers will not attain; the laws which regulate them
+will not be discovered by an intelligence which is alloyed with sense,
+but will escape them, and they will bring children into the world when
+they ought not. Now that which is of divine birth has a period which is
+contained in a perfect number (i.e. a cyclical number, such as 6, which
+is equal to the sum of its divisors 1, 2, 3, so that when the circle or
+time represented by 6 is completed, the lesser times or rotations
+represented by 1, 2, 3 are also completed.), but the period of human
+birth is comprehended in a number in which first increments by
+involution and evolution (or squared and cubed) obtaining three
+intervals and four terms of like and unlike, waxing and waning numbers,
+make all the terms commensurable and agreeable to one another.
+(Probably the numbers 3, 4, 5, 6 of which the three first = the sides
+of the Pythagorean triangle. The terms will then be 3 cubed, 4 cubed, 5
+cubed, which together = 6 cubed = 216.) The base of these (3) with a
+third added (4) when combined with five (20) and raised to the third
+power furnishes two harmonies; the first a square which is a hundred
+times as great (400 = 4 x 100) (Or the first a square which is 100 x
+100 = 10,000. The whole number will then be 17,500 = a square of 100,
+and an oblong of 100 by 75.), and the other a figure having one side
+equal to the former, but oblong, consisting of a hundred numbers
+squared upon rational diameters of a square (i.e. omitting fractions),
+the side of which is five (7 x 7 = 49 x 100 = 4900), each of them being
+less by one (than the perfect square which includes the fractions, sc.
+50) or less by (Or, ‘consisting of two numbers squared upon irrational
+diameters,’ etc. = 100. For other explanations of the passage see
+Introduction.) two perfect squares of irrational diameters (of a square
+the side of which is five = 50 + 50 = 100); and a hundred cubes of
+three (27 x 100 = 2700 + 4900 + 400 = 8000). Now this number represents
+a geometrical figure which has control over the good and evil of
+births. For when your guardians are ignorant of the law of births, and
+unite bride and bridegroom out of season, the children will not be
+goodly or fortunate. And though only the best of them will be appointed
+by their predecessors, still they will be unworthy to hold their
+fathers’ places, and when they come into power as guardians, they will
+soon be found to fail in taking care of us, the Muses, first by
+under-valuing music; which neglect will soon extend to gymnastic; and
+hence the young men of your State will be less cultivated. In the
+succeeding generation rulers will be appointed who have lost the
+guardian power of testing the metal of your different races, which,
+like Hesiod’s, are of gold and silver and brass and iron. And so iron
+will be mingled with silver, and brass with gold, and hence there will
+arise dissimilarity and inequality and irregularity, which always and
+in all places are causes of hatred and war. This the Muses affirm to be
+the stock from which discord has sprung, wherever arising; and this is
+their answer to us.
+
+Yes, and we may assume that they answer truly.
+
+Why, yes, I said, of course they answer truly; how can the Muses speak
+falsely?
+
+And what do the Muses say next?
+
+When discord arose, then the two races were drawn different ways: the
+iron and brass fell to acquiring money and land and houses and gold and
+silver; but the gold and silver races, not wanting money but having the
+true riches in their own nature, inclined towards virtue and the
+ancient order of things. There was a battle between them, and at last
+they agreed to distribute their land and houses among individual
+owners; and they enslaved their friends and maintainers, whom they had
+formerly protected in the condition of freemen, and made of them
+subjects and servants; and they themselves were engaged in war and in
+keeping a watch against them.
+
+I believe that you have rightly conceived the origin of the change.
+
+And the new government which thus arises will be of a form intermediate
+between oligarchy and aristocracy?
+
+Very true.
+
+Such will be the change, and after the change has been made, how will
+they proceed? Clearly, the new State, being in a mean between oligarchy
+and the perfect State, will partly follow one and partly the other, and
+will also have some peculiarities.
+
+True, he said.
+
+In the honour given to rulers, in the abstinence of the warrior class
+from agriculture, handicrafts, and trade in general, in the institution
+of common meals, and in the attention paid to gymnastics and military
+training—in all these respects this State will resemble the former.
+
+True.
+
+But in the fear of admitting philosophers to power, because they are no
+longer to be had simple and earnest, but are made up of mixed elements;
+and in turning from them to passionate and less complex characters, who
+are by nature fitted for war rather than peace; and in the value set by
+them upon military stratagems and contrivances, and in the waging of
+everlasting wars—this State will be for the most part peculiar.
+
+Yes.
+
+Yes, I said; and men of this stamp will be covetous of money, like
+those who live in oligarchies; they will have, a fierce secret longing
+after gold and silver, which they will hoard in dark places, having
+magazines and treasuries of their own for the deposit and concealment
+of them; also castles which are just nests for their eggs, and in which
+they will spend large sums on their wives, or on any others whom they
+please.
+
+That is most true, he said.
+
+And they are miserly because they have no means of openly acquiring the
+money which they prize; they will spend that which is another man’s on
+the gratification of their desires, stealing their pleasures and
+running away like children from the law, their father: they have been
+schooled not by gentle influences but by force, for they have neglected
+her who is the true Muse, the companion of reason and philosophy, and
+have honoured gymnastic more than music.
+
+Undoubtedly, he said, the form of government which you describe is a
+mixture of good and evil.
+
+Why, there is a mixture, I said; but one thing, and one thing only, is
+predominantly seen,—the spirit of contention and ambition; and these
+are due to the prevalence of the passionate or spirited element.
+
+Assuredly, he said.
+
+Such is the origin and such the character of this State, which has been
+described in outline only; the more perfect execution was not required,
+for a sketch is enough to show the type of the most perfectly just and
+most perfectly unjust; and to go through all the States and all the
+characters of men, omitting none of them, would be an interminable
+labour.
+
+Very true, he replied.
+
+Now what man answers to this form of government-how did he come into
+being, and what is he like?
+
+I think, said Adeimantus, that in the spirit of contention which
+characterises him, he is not unlike our friend Glaucon.
+
+Perhaps, I said, he may be like him in that one point; but there are
+other respects in which he is very different.
+
+In what respects?
+
+He should have more of self-assertion and be less cultivated, and yet a
+friend of culture; and he should be a good listener, but no speaker.
+Such a person is apt to be rough with slaves, unlike the educated man,
+who is too proud for that; and he will also be courteous to freemen,
+and remarkably obedient to authority; he is a lover of power and a
+lover of honour; claiming to be a ruler, not because he is eloquent, or
+on any ground of that sort, but because he is a soldier and has
+performed feats of arms; he is also a lover of gymnastic exercises and
+of the chase.
+
+Yes, that is the type of character which answers to timocracy.
+
+Such an one will despise riches only when he is young; but as he gets
+older he will be more and more attracted to them, because he has a
+piece of the avaricious nature in him, and is not single-minded towards
+virtue, having lost his best guardian.
+
+Who was that? said Adeimantus.
+
+Philosophy, I said, tempered with music, who comes and takes up her
+abode in a man, and is the only saviour of his virtue throughout life.
+
+Good, he said.
+
+Such, I said, is the timocratical youth, and he is like the
+timocratical State.
+
+Exactly.
+
+His origin is as follows:—He is often the young son of a brave father,
+who dwells in an ill-governed city, of which he declines the honours
+and offices, and will not go to law, or exert himself in any way, but
+is ready to waive his rights in order that he may escape trouble.
+
+And how does the son come into being?
+
+The character of the son begins to develope when he hears his mother
+complaining that her husband has no place in the government, of which
+the consequence is that she has no precedence among other women.
+Further, when she sees her husband not very eager about money, and
+instead of battling and railing in the law courts or assembly, taking
+whatever happens to him quietly; and when she observes that his
+thoughts always centre in himself, while he treats her with very
+considerable indifference, she is annoyed, and says to her son that his
+father is only half a man and far too easy-going: adding all the other
+complaints about her own ill-treatment which women are so fond of
+rehearsing.
+
+Yes, said Adeimantus, they give us plenty of them, and their complaints
+are so like themselves.
+
+And you know, I said, that the old servants also, who are supposed to
+be attached to the family, from time to time talk privately in the same
+strain to the son; and if they see any one who owes money to his
+father, or is wronging him in any way, and he fails to prosecute them,
+they tell the youth that when he grows up he must retaliate upon people
+of this sort, and be more of a man than his father. He has only to walk
+abroad and he hears and sees the same sort of thing: those who do their
+own business in the city are called simpletons, and held in no esteem,
+while the busy-bodies are honoured and applauded. The result is that
+the young man, hearing and seeing all these things—hearing, too, the
+words of his father, and having a nearer view of his way of life, and
+making comparisons of him and others—is drawn opposite ways: while his
+father is watering and nourishing the rational principle in his soul,
+the others are encouraging the passionate and appetitive; and he being
+not originally of a bad nature, but having kept bad company, is at last
+brought by their joint influence to a middle point, and gives up the
+kingdom which is within him to the middle principle of contentiousness
+and passion, and becomes arrogant and ambitious.
+
+You seem to me to have described his origin perfectly.
+
+Then we have now, I said, the second form of government and the second
+type of character?
+
+We have.
+
+Next, let us look at another man who, as Aeschylus says,
+
+‘Is set over against another State;’
+
+or rather, as our plan requires, begin with the State.
+
+By all means.
+
+I believe that oligarchy follows next in order.
+
+And what manner of government do you term oligarchy?
+
+A government resting on a valuation of property, in which the rich have
+power and the poor man is deprived of it.
+
+I understand, he replied.
+
+Ought I not to begin by describing how the change from timocracy to
+oligarchy arises?
+
+Yes.
+
+Well, I said, no eyes are required in order to see how the one passes
+into the other.
+
+How?
+
+The accumulation of gold in the treasury of private individuals is the
+ruin of timocracy; they invent illegal modes of expenditure; for what
+do they or their wives care about the law?
+
+Yes, indeed.
+
+And then one, seeing another grow rich, seeks to rival him, and thus
+the great mass of the citizens become lovers of money.
+
+Likely enough.
+
+And so they grow richer and richer, and the more they think of making a
+fortune the less they think of virtue; for when riches and virtue are
+placed together in the scales of the balance, the one always rises as
+the other falls.
+
+True.
+
+And in proportion as riches and rich men are honoured in the State,
+virtue and the virtuous are dishonoured.
+
+Clearly.
+
+And what is honoured is cultivated, and that which has no honour is
+neglected.
+
+That is obvious.
+
+And so at last, instead of loving contention and glory, men become
+lovers of trade and money; they honour and look up to the rich man, and
+make a ruler of him, and dishonour the poor man.
+
+They do so.
+
+They next proceed to make a law which fixes a sum of money as the
+qualification of citizenship; the sum is higher in one place and lower
+in another, as the oligarchy is more or less exclusive; and they allow
+no one whose property falls below the amount fixed to have any share in
+the government. These changes in the constitution they effect by force
+of arms, if intimidation has not already done their work.
+
+Very true.
+
+And this, speaking generally, is the way in which oligarchy is
+established.
+
+Yes, he said; but what are the characteristics of this form of
+government, and what are the defects of which we were speaking?
+
+First of all, I said, consider the nature of the qualification. Just
+think what would happen if pilots were to be chosen according to their
+property, and a poor man were refused permission to steer, even though
+he were a better pilot?
+
+You mean that they would shipwreck?
+
+Yes; and is not this true of the government of anything?
+
+I should imagine so.
+
+Except a city?—or would you include a city?
+
+Nay, he said, the case of a city is the strongest of all, inasmuch as
+the rule of a city is the greatest and most difficult of all.
+
+This, then, will be the first great defect of oligarchy?
+
+Clearly.
+
+And here is another defect which is quite as bad.
+
+What defect?
+
+The inevitable division: such a State is not one, but two States, the
+one of poor, the other of rich men; and they are living on the same
+spot and always conspiring against one another.
+
+That, surely, is at least as bad.
+
+Another discreditable feature is, that, for a like reason, they are
+incapable of carrying on any war. Either they arm the multitude, and
+then they are more afraid of them than of the enemy; or, if they do not
+call them out in the hour of battle, they are oligarchs indeed, few to
+fight as they are few to rule. And at the same time their fondness for
+money makes them unwilling to pay taxes.
+
+How discreditable!
+
+And, as we said before, under such a constitution the same persons have
+too many callings—they are husbandmen, tradesmen, warriors, all in one.
+Does that look well?
+
+Anything but well.
+
+There is another evil which is, perhaps, the greatest of all, and to
+which this State first begins to be liable.
+
+What evil?
+
+A man may sell all that he has, and another may acquire his property;
+yet after the sale he may dwell in the city of which he is no longer a
+part, being neither trader, nor artisan, nor horseman, nor hoplite, but
+only a poor, helpless creature.
+
+Yes, that is an evil which also first begins in this State.
+
+The evil is certainly not prevented there; for oligarchies have both
+the extremes of great wealth and utter poverty.
+
+True.
+
+But think again: In his wealthy days, while he was spending his money,
+was a man of this sort a whit more good to the State for the purposes
+of citizenship? Or did he only seem to be a member of the ruling body,
+although in truth he was neither ruler nor subject, but just a
+spendthrift?
+
+As you say, he seemed to be a ruler, but was only a spendthrift.
+
+May we not say that this is the drone in the house who is like the
+drone in the honeycomb, and that the one is the plague of the city as
+the other is of the hive?
+
+Just so, Socrates.
+
+And God has made the flying drones, Adeimantus, all without stings,
+whereas of the walking drones he has made some without stings but
+others have dreadful stings; of the stingless class are those who in
+their old age end as paupers; of the stingers come all the criminal
+class, as they are termed.
+
+Most true, he said.
+
+Clearly then, whenever you see paupers in a State, somewhere in that
+neighborhood there are hidden away thieves, and cut-purses and robbers
+of temples, and all sorts of malefactors.
+
+Clearly.
+
+Well, I said, and in oligarchical States do you not find paupers?
+
+Yes, he said; nearly everybody is a pauper who is not a ruler.
+
+And may we be so bold as to affirm that there are also many criminals
+to be found in them, rogues who have stings, and whom the authorities
+are careful to restrain by force?
+
+Certainly, we may be so bold.
+
+The existence of such persons is to be attributed to want of education,
+ill-training, and an evil constitution of the State?
+
+True.
+
+Such, then, is the form and such are the evils of oligarchy; and there
+may be many other evils.
+
+Very likely.
+
+Then oligarchy, or the form of government in which the rulers are
+elected for their wealth, may now be dismissed. Let us next proceed to
+consider the nature and origin of the individual who answers to this
+State.
+
+By all means.
+
+Does not the timocratical man change into the oligarchical on this
+wise?
+
+How?
+
+A time arrives when the representative of timocracy has a son: at first
+he begins by emulating his father and walking in his footsteps, but
+presently he sees him of a sudden foundering against the State as upon
+a sunken reef, and he and all that he has is lost; he may have been a
+general or some other high officer who is brought to trial under a
+prejudice raised by informers, and either put to death, or exiled, or
+deprived of the privileges of a citizen, and all his property taken
+from him.
+
+Nothing more likely.
+
+And the son has seen and known all this—he is a ruined man, and his
+fear has taught him to knock ambition and passion headforemost from his
+bosom’s throne; humbled by poverty he takes to money-making and by mean
+and miserly savings and hard work gets a fortune together. Is not such
+an one likely to seat the concupiscent and covetous element on the
+vacant throne and to suffer it to play the great king within him, girt
+with tiara and chain and scimitar?
+
+Most true, he replied.
+
+And when he has made reason and spirit sit down on the ground
+obediently on either side of their sovereign, and taught them to know
+their place, he compels the one to think only of how lesser sums may be
+turned into larger ones, and will not allow the other to worship and
+admire anything but riches and rich men, or to be ambitious of anything
+so much as the acquisition of wealth and the means of acquiring it.
+
+Of all changes, he said, there is none so speedy or so sure as the
+conversion of the ambitious youth into the avaricious one.
+
+And the avaricious, I said, is the oligarchical youth?
+
+Yes, he said; at any rate the individual out of whom he came is like
+the State out of which oligarchy came.
+
+Let us then consider whether there is any likeness between them.
+
+Very good.
+
+First, then, they resemble one another in the value which they set upon
+wealth?
+
+Certainly.
+
+Also in their penurious, laborious character; the individual only
+satisfies his necessary appetites, and confines his expenditure to
+them; his other desires he subdues, under the idea that they are
+unprofitable.
+
+True.
+
+He is a shabby fellow, who saves something out of everything and makes
+a purse for himself; and this is the sort of man whom the vulgar
+applaud. Is he not a true image of the State which he represents?
+
+He appears to me to be so; at any rate money is highly valued by him as
+well as by the State.
+
+You see that he is not a man of cultivation, I said.
+
+I imagine not, he said; had he been educated he would never have made a
+blind god director of his chorus, or given him chief honour.
+
+Excellent! I said. Yet consider: Must we not further admit that owing
+to this want of cultivation there will be found in him dronelike
+desires as of pauper and rogue, which are forcibly kept down by his
+general habit of life?
+
+True.
+
+Do you know where you will have to look if you want to discover his
+rogueries?
+
+Where must I look?
+
+You should see him where he has some great opportunity of acting
+dishonestly, as in the guardianship of an orphan.
+
+Aye.
+
+It will be clear enough then that in his ordinary dealings which give
+him a reputation for honesty he coerces his bad passions by an enforced
+virtue; not making them see that they are wrong, or taming them by
+reason, but by necessity and fear constraining them, and because he
+trembles for his possessions.
+
+To be sure.
+
+Yes, indeed, my dear friend, but you will find that the natural desires
+of the drone commonly exist in him all the same whenever he has to
+spend what is not his own.
+
+Yes, and they will be strong in him too.
+
+The man, then, will be at war with himself; he will be two men, and not
+one; but, in general, his better desires will be found to prevail over
+his inferior ones.
+
+True.
+
+For these reasons such an one will be more respectable than most
+people; yet the true virtue of a unanimous and harmonious soul will
+flee far away and never come near him.
+
+I should expect so.
+
+And surely, the miser individually will be an ignoble competitor in a
+State for any prize of victory, or other object of honourable ambition;
+he will not spend his money in the contest for glory; so afraid is he
+of awakening his expensive appetites and inviting them to help and join
+in the struggle; in true oligarchical fashion he fights with a small
+part only of his resources, and the result commonly is that he loses
+the prize and saves his money.
+
+Very true.
+
+Can we any longer doubt, then, that the miser and money-maker answers
+to the oligarchical State?
+
+There can be no doubt.
+
+Next comes democracy; of this the origin and nature have still to be
+considered by us; and then we will enquire into the ways of the
+democratic man, and bring him up for judgment.
+
+That, he said, is our method.
+
+Well, I said, and how does the change from oligarchy into democracy
+arise? Is it not on this wise?—The good at which such a State aims is
+to become as rich as possible, a desire which is insatiable?
+
+What then?
+
+The rulers, being aware that their power rests upon their wealth,
+refuse to curtail by law the extravagance of the spendthrift youth
+because they gain by their ruin; they take interest from them and buy
+up their estates and thus increase their own wealth and importance?
+
+To be sure.
+
+There can be no doubt that the love of wealth and the spirit of
+moderation cannot exist together in citizens of the same state to any
+considerable extent; one or the other will be disregarded.
+
+That is tolerably clear.
+
+And in oligarchical States, from the general spread of carelessness and
+extravagance, men of good family have often been reduced to beggary?
+
+Yes, often.
+
+And still they remain in the city; there they are, ready to sting and
+fully armed, and some of them owe money, some have forfeited their
+citizenship; a third class are in both predicaments; and they hate and
+conspire against those who have got their property, and against
+everybody else, and are eager for revolution.
+
+That is true.
+
+On the other hand, the men of business, stooping as they walk, and
+pretending not even to see those whom they have already ruined, insert
+their sting—that is, their money—into some one else who is not on his
+guard against them, and recover the parent sum many times over
+multiplied into a family of children: and so they make drone and pauper
+to abound in the State.
+
+Yes, he said, there are plenty of them—that is certain.
+
+The evil blazes up like a fire; and they will not extinguish it, either
+by restricting a man’s use of his own property, or by another remedy:
+
+What other?
+
+One which is the next best, and has the advantage of compelling the
+citizens to look to their characters:—Let there be a general rule that
+every one shall enter into voluntary contracts at his own risk, and
+there will be less of this scandalous money-making, and the evils of
+which we were speaking will be greatly lessened in the State.
+
+Yes, they will be greatly lessened.
+
+At present the governors, induced by the motives which I have named,
+treat their subjects badly; while they and their adherents, especially
+the young men of the governing class, are habituated to lead a life of
+luxury and idleness both of body and mind; they do nothing, and are
+incapable of resisting either pleasure or pain.
+
+Very true.
+
+They themselves care only for making money, and are as indifferent as
+the pauper to the cultivation of virtue.
+
+Yes, quite as indifferent.
+
+Such is the state of affairs which prevails among them. And often
+rulers and their subjects may come in one another’s way, whether on a
+journey or on some other occasion of meeting, on a pilgrimage or a
+march, as fellow-soldiers or fellow-sailors; aye and they may observe
+the behaviour of each other in the very moment of danger—for where
+danger is, there is no fear that the poor will be despised by the
+rich—and very likely the wiry sunburnt poor man may be placed in battle
+at the side of a wealthy one who has never spoilt his complexion and
+has plenty of superfluous flesh—when he sees such an one puffing and at
+his wits’-end, how can he avoid drawing the conclusion that men like
+him are only rich because no one has the courage to despoil them? And
+when they meet in private will not people be saying to one another ‘Our
+warriors are not good for much’?
+
+Yes, he said, I am quite aware that this is their way of talking.
+
+And, as in a body which is diseased the addition of a touch from
+without may bring on illness, and sometimes even when there is no
+external provocation a commotion may arise within—in the same way
+wherever there is weakness in the State there is also likely to be
+illness, of which the occasion may be very slight, the one party
+introducing from without their oligarchical, the other their
+democratical allies, and then the State falls sick, and is at war with
+herself; and may be at times distracted, even when there is no external
+cause.
+
+Yes, surely.
+
+And then democracy comes into being after the poor have conquered their
+opponents, slaughtering some and banishing some, while to the remainder
+they give an equal share of freedom and power; and this is the form of
+government in which the magistrates are commonly elected by lot.
+
+Yes, he said, that is the nature of democracy, whether the revolution
+has been effected by arms, or whether fear has caused the opposite
+party to withdraw.
+
+And now what is their manner of life, and what sort of a government
+have they? for as the government is, such will be the man.
+
+Clearly, he said.
+
+In the first place, are they not free; and is not the city full of
+freedom and frankness—a man may say and do what he likes?
+
+’Tis said so, he replied.
+
+And where freedom is, the individual is clearly able to order for
+himself his own life as he pleases?
+
+Clearly.
+
+Then in this kind of State there will be the greatest variety of human
+natures?
+
+There will.
+
+This, then, seems likely to be the fairest of States, being like an
+embroidered robe which is spangled with every sort of flower. And just
+as women and children think a variety of colours to be of all things
+most charming, so there are many men to whom this State, which is
+spangled with the manners and characters of mankind, will appear to be
+the fairest of States.
+
+Yes.
+
+Yes, my good Sir, and there will be no better in which to look for a
+government.
+
+Why?
+
+Because of the liberty which reigns there—they have a complete
+assortment of constitutions; and he who has a mind to establish a
+State, as we have been doing, must go to a democracy as he would to a
+bazaar at which they sell them, and pick out the one that suits him;
+then, when he has made his choice, he may found his State.
+
+He will be sure to have patterns enough.
+
+And there being no necessity, I said, for you to govern in this State,
+even if you have the capacity, or to be governed, unless you like, or
+go to war when the rest go to war, or to be at peace when others are at
+peace, unless you are so disposed—there being no necessity also,
+because some law forbids you to hold office or be a dicast, that you
+should not hold office or be a dicast, if you have a fancy—is not this
+a way of life which for the moment is supremely delightful?
+
+For the moment, yes.
+
+And is not their humanity to the condemned in some cases quite
+charming? Have you not observed how, in a democracy, many persons,
+although they have been sentenced to death or exile, just stay where
+they are and walk about the world—the gentleman parades like a hero,
+and nobody sees or cares?
+
+Yes, he replied, many and many a one.
+
+See too, I said, the forgiving spirit of democracy, and the ‘don’t
+care’ about trifles, and the disregard which she shows of all the fine
+principles which we solemnly laid down at the foundation of the city—as
+when we said that, except in the case of some rarely gifted nature,
+there never will be a good man who has not from his childhood been used
+to play amid things of beauty and make of them a joy and a study—how
+grandly does she trample all these fine notions of ours under her feet,
+never giving a thought to the pursuits which make a statesman, and
+promoting to honour any one who professes to be the people’s friend.
+
+Yes, she is of a noble spirit.
+
+These and other kindred characteristics are proper to democracy, which
+is a charming form of government, full of variety and disorder, and
+dispensing a sort of equality to equals and unequals alike.
+
+We know her well.
+
+Consider now, I said, what manner of man the individual is, or rather
+consider, as in the case of the State, how he comes into being.
+
+Very good, he said.
+
+Is not this the way—he is the son of the miserly and oligarchical
+father who has trained him in his own habits?
+
+Exactly.
+
+And, like his father, he keeps under by force the pleasures which are
+of the spending and not of the getting sort, being those which are
+called unnecessary?
+
+Obviously.
+
+Would you like, for the sake of clearness, to distinguish which are the
+necessary and which are the unnecessary pleasures?
+
+I should.
+
+Are not necessary pleasures those of which we cannot get rid, and of
+which the satisfaction is a benefit to us? And they are rightly called
+so, because we are framed by nature to desire both what is beneficial
+and what is necessary, and cannot help it.
+
+True.
+
+We are not wrong therefore in calling them necessary?
+
+We are not.
+
+And the desires of which a man may get rid, if he takes pains from his
+youth upwards—of which the presence, moreover, does no good, and in
+some cases the reverse of good—shall we not be right in saying that all
+these are unnecessary?
+
+Yes, certainly.
+
+Suppose we select an example of either kind, in order that we may have
+a general notion of them?
+
+Very good.
+
+Will not the desire of eating, that is, of simple food and condiments,
+in so far as they are required for health and strength, be of the
+necessary class?
+
+That is what I should suppose.
+
+The pleasure of eating is necessary in two ways; it does us good and it
+is essential to the continuance of life?
+
+Yes.
+
+But the condiments are only necessary in so far as they are good for
+health?
+
+Certainly.
+
+And the desire which goes beyond this, of more delicate food, or other
+luxuries, which might generally be got rid of, if controlled and
+trained in youth, and is hurtful to the body, and hurtful to the soul
+in the pursuit of wisdom and virtue, may be rightly called unnecessary?
+
+Very true.
+
+May we not say that these desires spend, and that the others make money
+because they conduce to production?
+
+Certainly.
+
+And of the pleasures of love, and all other pleasures, the same holds
+good?
+
+True.
+
+And the drone of whom we spoke was he who was surfeited in pleasures
+and desires of this sort, and was the slave of the unnecessary desires,
+whereas he who was subject to the necessary only was miserly and
+oligarchical?
+
+Very true.
+
+Again, let us see how the democratical man grows out of the
+oligarchical: the following, as I suspect, is commonly the process.
+
+What is the process?
+
+When a young man who has been brought up as we were just now
+describing, in a vulgar and miserly way, has tasted drones’ honey and
+has come to associate with fierce and crafty natures who are able to
+provide for him all sorts of refinements and varieties of
+pleasure—then, as you may imagine, the change will begin of the
+oligarchical principle within him into the democratical?
+
+Inevitably.
+
+And as in the city like was helping like, and the change was effected
+by an alliance from without assisting one division of the citizens, so
+too the young man is changed by a class of desires coming from without
+to assist the desires within him, that which is akin and alike again
+helping that which is akin and alike?
+
+Certainly.
+
+And if there be any ally which aids the oligarchical principle within
+him, whether the influence of a father or of kindred, advising or
+rebuking him, then there arises in his soul a faction and an opposite
+faction, and he goes to war with himself.
+
+It must be so.
+
+And there are times when the democratical principle gives way to the
+oligarchical, and some of his desires die, and others are banished; a
+spirit of reverence enters into the young man’s soul and order is
+restored.
+
+Yes, he said, that sometimes happens.
+
+And then, again, after the old desires have been driven out, fresh ones
+spring up, which are akin to them, and because he their father does not
+know how to educate them, wax fierce and numerous.
+
+Yes, he said, that is apt to be the way.
+
+They draw him to his old associates, and holding secret intercourse
+with them, breed and multiply in him.
+
+Very true.
+
+At length they seize upon the citadel of the young man’s soul, which
+they perceive to be void of all accomplishments and fair pursuits and
+true words, which make their abode in the minds of men who are dear to
+the gods, and are their best guardians and sentinels.
+
+None better.
+
+False and boastful conceits and phrases mount upwards and take their
+place.
+
+They are certain to do so.
+
+And so the young man returns into the country of the lotus-eaters, and
+takes up his dwelling there in the face of all men; and if any help be
+sent by his friends to the oligarchical part of him, the aforesaid vain
+conceits shut the gate of the king’s fastness; and they will neither
+allow the embassy itself to enter, nor if private advisers offer the
+fatherly counsel of the aged will they listen to them or receive them.
+There is a battle and they gain the day, and then modesty, which they
+call silliness, is ignominiously thrust into exile by them, and
+temperance, which they nickname unmanliness, is trampled in the mire
+and cast forth; they persuade men that moderation and orderly
+expenditure are vulgarity and meanness, and so, by the help of a rabble
+of evil appetites, they drive them beyond the border.
+
+Yes, with a will.
+
+And when they have emptied and swept clean the soul of him who is now
+in their power and who is being initiated by them in great mysteries,
+the next thing is to bring back to their house insolence and anarchy
+and waste and impudence in bright array having garlands on their heads,
+and a great company with them, hymning their praises and calling them
+by sweet names; insolence they term breeding, and anarchy liberty, and
+waste magnificence, and impudence courage. And so the young man passes
+out of his original nature, which was trained in the school of
+necessity, into the freedom and libertinism of useless and unnecessary
+pleasures.
+
+Yes, he said, the change in him is visible enough.
+
+After this he lives on, spending his money and labour and time on
+unnecessary pleasures quite as much as on necessary ones; but if he be
+fortunate, and is not too much disordered in his wits, when years have
+elapsed, and the heyday of passion is over—supposing that he then
+re-admits into the city some part of the exiled virtues, and does not
+wholly give himself up to their successors—in that case he balances his
+pleasures and lives in a sort of equilibrium, putting the government of
+himself into the hands of the one which comes first and wins the turn;
+and when he has had enough of that, then into the hands of another; he
+despises none of them but encourages them all equally.
+
+Very true, he said.
+
+Neither does he receive or let pass into the fortress any true word of
+advice; if any one says to him that some pleasures are the
+satisfactions of good and noble desires, and others of evil desires,
+and that he ought to use and honour some and chastise and master the
+others—whenever this is repeated to him he shakes his head and says
+that they are all alike, and that one is as good as another.
+
+Yes, he said; that is the way with him.
+
+Yes, I said, he lives from day to day indulging the appetite of the
+hour; and sometimes he is lapped in drink and strains of the flute;
+then he becomes a water-drinker, and tries to get thin; then he takes a
+turn at gymnastics; sometimes idling and neglecting everything, then
+once more living the life of a philosopher; often he is busy with
+politics, and starts to his feet and says and does whatever comes into
+his head; and, if he is emulous of any one who is a warrior, off he is
+in that direction, or of men of business, once more in that. His life
+has neither law nor order; and this distracted existence he terms joy
+and bliss and freedom; and so he goes on.
+
+Yes, he replied, he is all liberty and equality.
+
+Yes, I said; his life is motley and manifold and an epitome of the
+lives of many;—he answers to the State which we described as fair and
+spangled. And many a man and many a woman will take him for their
+pattern, and many a constitution and many an example of manners is
+contained in him.
+
+Just so.
+
+Let him then be set over against democracy; he may truly be called the
+democratic man.
+
+Let that be his place, he said.
+
+Last of all comes the most beautiful of all, man and State alike,
+tyranny and the tyrant; these we have now to consider.
+
+Quite true, he said.
+
+Say then, my friend, In what manner does tyranny arise?—that it has a
+democratic origin is evident.
+
+Clearly.
+
+And does not tyranny spring from democracy in the same manner as
+democracy from oligarchy—I mean, after a sort?
+
+How?
+
+The good which oligarchy proposed to itself and the means by which it
+was maintained was excess of wealth—am I not right?
+
+Yes.
+
+And the insatiable desire of wealth and the neglect of all other things
+for the sake of money-getting was also the ruin of oligarchy?
+
+True.
+
+And democracy has her own good, of which the insatiable desire brings
+her to dissolution?
+
+What good?
+
+Freedom, I replied; which, as they tell you in a democracy, is the
+glory of the State—and that therefore in a democracy alone will the
+freeman of nature deign to dwell.
+
+Yes; the saying is in every body’s mouth.
+
+I was going to observe, that the insatiable desire of this and the
+neglect of other things introduces the change in democracy, which
+occasions a demand for tyranny.
+
+How so?
+
+When a democracy which is thirsting for freedom has evil cup-bearers
+presiding over the feast, and has drunk too deeply of the strong wine
+of freedom, then, unless her rulers are very amenable and give a
+plentiful draught, she calls them to account and punishes them, and
+says that they are cursed oligarchs.
+
+Yes, he replied, a very common occurrence.
+
+Yes, I said; and loyal citizens are insultingly termed by her slaves
+who hug their chains and men of naught; she would have subjects who are
+like rulers, and rulers who are like subjects: these are men after her
+own heart, whom she praises and honours both in private and public.
+Now, in such a State, can liberty have any limit?
+
+Certainly not.
+
+By degrees the anarchy finds a way into private houses, and ends by
+getting among the animals and infecting them.
+
+How do you mean?
+
+I mean that the father grows accustomed to descend to the level of his
+sons and to fear them, and the son is on a level with his father, he
+having no respect or reverence for either of his parents; and this is
+his freedom, and the metic is equal with the citizen and the citizen
+with the metic, and the stranger is quite as good as either.
+
+Yes, he said, that is the way.
+
+And these are not the only evils, I said—there are several lesser ones:
+In such a state of society the master fears and flatters his scholars,
+and the scholars despise their masters and tutors; young and old are
+all alike; and the young man is on a level with the old, and is ready
+to compete with him in word or deed; and old men condescend to the
+young and are full of pleasantry and gaiety; they are loth to be
+thought morose and authoritative, and therefore they adopt the manners
+of the young.
+
+Quite true, he said.
+
+The last extreme of popular liberty is when the slave bought with
+money, whether male or female, is just as free as his or her purchaser;
+nor must I forget to tell of the liberty and equality of the two sexes
+in relation to each other.
+
+Why not, as Aeschylus says, utter the word which rises to our lips?
+
+That is what I am doing, I replied; and I must add that no one who does
+not know would believe, how much greater is the liberty which the
+animals who are under the dominion of man have in a democracy than in
+any other State: for truly, the she-dogs, as the proverb says, are as
+good as their she-mistresses, and the horses and asses have a way of
+marching along with all the rights and dignities of freemen; and they
+will run at any body who comes in their way if he does not leave the
+road clear for them: and all things are just ready to burst with
+liberty.
+
+When I take a country walk, he said, I often experience what you
+describe. You and I have dreamed the same thing.
+
+And above all, I said, and as the result of all, see how sensitive the
+citizens become; they chafe impatiently at the least touch of
+authority, and at length, as you know, they cease to care even for the
+laws, written or unwritten; they will have no one over them.
+
+Yes, he said, I know it too well.
+
+Such, my friend, I said, is the fair and glorious beginning out of
+which springs tyranny.
+
+Glorious indeed, he said. But what is the next step?
+
+The ruin of oligarchy is the ruin of democracy; the same disease
+magnified and intensified by liberty overmasters democracy—the truth
+being that the excessive increase of anything often causes a reaction
+in the opposite direction; and this is the case not only in the seasons
+and in vegetable and animal life, but above all in forms of government.
+
+True.
+
+The excess of liberty, whether in States or individuals, seems only to
+pass into excess of slavery.
+
+Yes, the natural order.
+
+And so tyranny naturally arises out of democracy, and the most
+aggravated form of tyranny and slavery out of the most extreme form of
+liberty?
+
+As we might expect.
+
+That, however, was not, as I believe, your question—you rather desired
+to know what is that disorder which is generated alike in oligarchy and
+democracy, and is the ruin of both?
+
+Just so, he replied.
+
+Well, I said, I meant to refer to the class of idle spendthrifts, of
+whom the more courageous are the leaders and the more timid the
+followers, the same whom we were comparing to drones, some stingless,
+and others having stings.
+
+A very just comparison.
+
+These two classes are the plagues of every city in which they are
+generated, being what phlegm and bile are to the body. And the good
+physician and lawgiver of the State ought, like the wise bee-master, to
+keep them at a distance and prevent, if possible, their ever coming in;
+and if they have anyhow found a way in, then he should have them and
+their cells cut out as speedily as possible.
+
+Yes, by all means, he said.
+
+Then, in order that we may see clearly what we are doing, let us
+imagine democracy to be divided, as indeed it is, into three classes;
+for in the first place freedom creates rather more drones in the
+democratic than there were in the oligarchical State.
+
+That is true.
+
+And in the democracy they are certainly more intensified.
+
+How so?
+
+Because in the oligarchical State they are disqualified and driven from
+office, and therefore they cannot train or gather strength; whereas in
+a democracy they are almost the entire ruling power, and while the
+keener sort speak and act, the rest keep buzzing about the bema and do
+not suffer a word to be said on the other side; hence in democracies
+almost everything is managed by the drones.
+
+Very true, he said.
+
+Then there is another class which is always being severed from the
+mass.
+
+What is that?
+
+They are the orderly class, which in a nation of traders is sure to be
+the richest.
+
+Naturally so.
+
+They are the most squeezable persons and yield the largest amount of
+honey to the drones.
+
+Why, he said, there is little to be squeezed out of people who have
+little.
+
+And this is called the wealthy class, and the drones feed upon them.
+
+That is pretty much the case, he said.
+
+The people are a third class, consisting of those who work with their
+own hands; they are not politicians, and have not much to live upon.
+This, when assembled, is the largest and most powerful class in a
+democracy.
+
+True, he said; but then the multitude is seldom willing to congregate
+unless they get a little honey.
+
+And do they not share? I said. Do not their leaders deprive the rich of
+their estates and distribute them among the people; at the same time
+taking care to reserve the larger part for themselves?
+
+Why, yes, he said, to that extent the people do share.
+
+And the persons whose property is taken from them are compelled to
+defend themselves before the people as they best can?
+
+What else can they do?
+
+And then, although they may have no desire of change, the others charge
+them with plotting against the people and being friends of oligarchy?
+
+True.
+
+And the end is that when they see the people, not of their own accord,
+but through ignorance, and because they are deceived by informers,
+seeking to do them wrong, then at last they are forced to become
+oligarchs in reality; they do not wish to be, but the sting of the
+drones torments them and breeds revolution in them.
+
+That is exactly the truth.
+
+Then come impeachments and judgments and trials of one another.
+
+True.
+
+The people have always some champion whom they set over them and nurse
+into greatness.
+
+Yes, that is their way.
+
+This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he
+first appears above ground he is a protector.
+
+Yes, that is quite clear.
+
+How then does a protector begin to change into a tyrant? Clearly when
+he does what the man is said to do in the tale of the Arcadian temple
+of Lycaean Zeus.
+
+What tale?
+
+The tale is that he who has tasted the entrails of a single human
+victim minced up with the entrails of other victims is destined to
+become a wolf. Did you never hear it?
+
+Oh, yes.
+
+And the protector of the people is like him; having a mob entirely at
+his disposal, he is not restrained from shedding the blood of kinsmen;
+by the favourite method of false accusation he brings them into court
+and murders them, making the life of man to disappear, and with unholy
+tongue and lips tasting the blood of his fellow citizens; some he kills
+and others he banishes, at the same time hinting at the abolition of
+debts and partition of lands: and after this, what will be his destiny?
+Must he not either perish at the hands of his enemies, or from being a
+man become a wolf—that is, a tyrant?
+
+Inevitably.
+
+This, I said, is he who begins to make a party against the rich?
+
+The same.
+
+After a while he is driven out, but comes back, in spite of his
+enemies, a tyrant full grown.
+
+That is clear.
+
+And if they are unable to expel him, or to get him condemned to death
+by a public accusation, they conspire to assassinate him.
+
+Yes, he said, that is their usual way.
+
+Then comes the famous request for a body-guard, which is the device of
+all those who have got thus far in their tyrannical career—‘Let not the
+people’s friend,’ as they say, ‘be lost to them.’
+
+Exactly.
+
+The people readily assent; all their fears are for him—they have none
+for themselves.
+
+Very true.
+
+And when a man who is wealthy and is also accused of being an enemy of
+the people sees this, then, my friend, as the oracle said to Croesus,
+
+‘By pebbly Hermus’ shore he flees and rests not, and is not ashamed to
+be a coward.’
+
+And quite right too, said he, for if he were, he would never be ashamed
+again.
+
+But if he is caught he dies.
+
+Of course.
+
+And he, the protector of whom we spoke, is to be seen, not ‘larding the
+plain’ with his bulk, but himself the overthrower of many, standing up
+in the chariot of State with the reins in his hand, no longer
+protector, but tyrant absolute.
+
+No doubt, he said.
+
+And now let us consider the happiness of the man, and also of the State
+in which a creature like him is generated.
+
+Yes, he said, let us consider that.
+
+At first, in the early days of his power, he is full of smiles, and he
+salutes every one whom he meets;—he to be called a tyrant, who is
+making promises in public and also in private! liberating debtors, and
+distributing land to the people and his followers, and wanting to be so
+kind and good to every one!
+
+Of course, he said.
+
+But when he has disposed of foreign enemies by conquest or treaty, and
+there is nothing to fear from them, then he is always stirring up some
+war or other, in order that the people may require a leader.
+
+To be sure.
+
+Has he not also another object, which is that they may be impoverished
+by payment of taxes, and thus compelled to devote themselves to their
+daily wants and therefore less likely to conspire against him?
+
+Clearly.
+
+And if any of them are suspected by him of having notions of freedom,
+and of resistance to his authority, he will have a good pretext for
+destroying them by placing them at the mercy of the enemy; and for all
+these reasons the tyrant must be always getting up a war.
+
+He must.
+
+Now he begins to grow unpopular.
+
+A necessary result.
+
+Then some of those who joined in setting him up, and who are in power,
+speak their minds to him and to one another, and the more courageous of
+them cast in his teeth what is being done.
+
+Yes, that may be expected.
+
+And the tyrant, if he means to rule, must get rid of them; he cannot
+stop while he has a friend or an enemy who is good for anything.
+
+He cannot.
+
+And therefore he must look about him and see who is valiant, who is
+high-minded, who is wise, who is wealthy; happy man, he is the enemy of
+them all, and must seek occasion against them whether he will or no,
+until he has made a purgation of the State.
+
+Yes, he said, and a rare purgation.
+
+Yes, I said, not the sort of purgation which the physicians make of the
+body; for they take away the worse and leave the better part, but he
+does the reverse.
+
+If he is to rule, I suppose that he cannot help himself.
+
+What a blessed alternative, I said:—to be compelled to dwell only with
+the many bad, and to be by them hated, or not to live at all!
+
+Yes, that is the alternative.
+
+And the more detestable his actions are to the citizens the more
+satellites and the greater devotion in them will he require?
+
+Certainly.
+
+And who are the devoted band, and where will he procure them?
+
+They will flock to him, he said, of their own accord, if he pays them.
+
+By the dog! I said, here are more drones, of every sort and from every
+land.
+
+Yes, he said, there are.
+
+But will he not desire to get them on the spot?
+
+How do you mean?
+
+He will rob the citizens of their slaves; he will then set them free
+and enrol them in his body-guard.
+
+To be sure, he said; and he will be able to trust them best of all.
+
+What a blessed creature, I said, must this tyrant be; he has put to
+death the others and has these for his trusted friends.
+
+Yes, he said; they are quite of his sort.
+
+Yes, I said, and these are the new citizens whom he has called into
+existence, who admire him and are his companions, while the good hate
+and avoid him.
+
+Of course.
+
+Verily, then, tragedy is a wise thing and Euripides a great tragedian.
+
+Why so?
+
+Why, because he is the author of the pregnant saying,
+
+‘Tyrants are wise by living with the wise;’
+
+and he clearly meant to say that they are the wise whom the tyrant
+makes his companions.
+
+Yes, he said, and he also praises tyranny as godlike; and many other
+things of the same kind are said by him and by the other poets.
+
+And therefore, I said, the tragic poets being wise men will forgive us
+and any others who live after our manner if we do not receive them into
+our State, because they are the eulogists of tyranny.
+
+Yes, he said, those who have the wit will doubtless forgive us.
+
+But they will continue to go to other cities and attract mobs, and hire
+voices fair and loud and persuasive, and draw the cities over to
+tyrannies and democracies.
+
+Very true.
+
+Moreover, they are paid for this and receive honour—the greatest
+honour, as might be expected, from tyrants, and the next greatest from
+democracies; but the higher they ascend our constitution hill, the more
+their reputation fails, and seems unable from shortness of breath to
+proceed further.
+
+True.
+
+But we are wandering from the subject: Let us therefore return and
+enquire how the tyrant will maintain that fair and numerous and various
+and ever-changing army of his.
+
+If, he said, there are sacred treasures in the city, he will confiscate
+and spend them; and in so far as the fortunes of attainted persons may
+suffice, he will be able to diminish the taxes which he would otherwise
+have to impose upon the people.
+
+And when these fail?
+
+Why, clearly, he said, then he and his boon companions, whether male or
+female, will be maintained out of his father’s estate.
+
+You mean to say that the people, from whom he has derived his being,
+will maintain him and his companions?
+
+Yes, he said; they cannot help themselves.
+
+But what if the people fly into a passion, and aver that a grown-up son
+ought not to be supported by his father, but that the father should be
+supported by the son? The father did not bring him into being, or
+settle him in life, in order that when his son became a man he should
+himself be the servant of his own servants and should support him and
+his rabble of slaves and companions; but that his son should protect
+him, and that by his help he might be emancipated from the government
+of the rich and aristocratic, as they are termed. And so he bids him
+and his companions depart, just as any other father might drive out of
+the house a riotous son and his undesirable associates.
+
+By heaven, he said, then the parent will discover what a monster he has
+been fostering in his bosom; and, when he wants to drive him out, he
+will find that he is weak and his son strong.
+
+Why, you do not mean to say that the tyrant will use violence? What!
+beat his father if he opposes him?
+
+Yes, he will, having first disarmed him.
+
+Then he is a parricide, and a cruel guardian of an aged parent; and
+this is real tyranny, about which there can be no longer a mistake: as
+the saying is, the people who would escape the smoke which is the
+slavery of freemen, has fallen into the fire which is the tyranny of
+slaves. Thus liberty, getting out of all order and reason, passes into
+the harshest and bitterest form of slavery.
+
+True, he said.
+
+Very well; and may we not rightly say that we have sufficiently
+discussed the nature of tyranny, and the manner of the transition from
+democracy to tyranny?
+
+Yes, quite enough, he said.
+
+
+
+
+ BOOK IX.
+
+
+Last of all comes the tyrannical man; about whom we have once more to
+ask, how is he formed out of the democratical? and how does he live, in
+happiness or in misery?
+
+Yes, he said, he is the only one remaining.
+
+There is, however, I said, a previous question which remains
+unanswered.
+
+What question?
+
+I do not think that we have adequately determined the nature and number
+of the appetites, and until this is accomplished the enquiry will
+always be confused.
+
+Well, he said, it is not too late to supply the omission.
+
+Very true, I said; and observe the point which I want to understand:
+Certain of the unnecessary pleasures and appetites I conceive to be
+unlawful; every one appears to have them, but in some persons they are
+controlled by the laws and by reason, and the better desires prevail
+over them—either they are wholly banished or they become few and weak;
+while in the case of others they are stronger, and there are more of
+them.
+
+Which appetites do you mean?
+
+I mean those which are awake when the reasoning and human and ruling
+power is asleep; then the wild beast within us, gorged with meat or
+drink, starts up and having shaken off sleep, goes forth to satisfy his
+desires; and there is no conceivable folly or crime—not excepting
+incest or any other unnatural union, or parricide, or the eating of
+forbidden food—which at such a time, when he has parted company with
+all shame and sense, a man may not be ready to commit.
+
+Most true, he said.
+
+But when a man’s pulse is healthy and temperate, and when before going
+to sleep he has awakened his rational powers, and fed them on noble
+thoughts and enquiries, collecting himself in meditation; after having
+first indulged his appetites neither too much nor too little, but just
+enough to lay them to sleep, and prevent them and their enjoyments and
+pains from interfering with the higher principle—which he leaves in the
+solitude of pure abstraction, free to contemplate and aspire to the
+knowledge of the unknown, whether in past, present, or future: when
+again he has allayed the passionate element, if he has a quarrel
+against any one—I say, when, after pacifying the two irrational
+principles, he rouses up the third, which is reason, before he takes
+his rest, then, as you know, he attains truth most nearly, and is least
+likely to be the sport of fantastic and lawless visions.
+
+I quite agree.
+
+In saying this I have been running into a digression; but the point
+which I desire to note is that in all of us, even in good men, there is
+a lawless wild-beast nature, which peers out in sleep. Pray, consider
+whether I am right, and you agree with me.
+
+Yes, I agree.
+
+And now remember the character which we attributed to the democratic
+man. He was supposed from his youth upwards to have been trained under
+a miserly parent, who encouraged the saving appetites in him, but
+discountenanced the unnecessary, which aim only at amusement and
+ornament?
+
+True.
+
+And then he got into the company of a more refined, licentious sort of
+people, and taking to all their wanton ways rushed into the opposite
+extreme from an abhorrence of his father’s meanness. At last, being a
+better man than his corruptors, he was drawn in both directions until
+he halted midway and led a life, not of vulgar and slavish passion, but
+of what he deemed moderate indulgence in various pleasures. After this
+manner the democrat was generated out of the oligarch?
+
+Yes, he said; that was our view of him, and is so still.
+
+And now, I said, years will have passed away, and you must conceive
+this man, such as he is, to have a son, who is brought up in his
+father’s principles.
+
+I can imagine him.
+
+Then you must further imagine the same thing to happen to the son which
+has already happened to the father:—he is drawn into a perfectly
+lawless life, which by his seducers is termed perfect liberty; and his
+father and friends take part with his moderate desires, and the
+opposite party assist the opposite ones. As soon as these dire
+magicians and tyrant-makers find that they are losing their hold on
+him, they contrive to implant in him a master passion, to be lord over
+his idle and spendthrift lusts—a sort of monstrous winged drone—that is
+the only image which will adequately describe him.
+
+Yes, he said, that is the only adequate image of him.
+
+And when his other lusts, amid clouds of incense and perfumes and
+garlands and wines, and all the pleasures of a dissolute life, now let
+loose, come buzzing around him, nourishing to the utmost the sting of
+desire which they implant in his drone-like nature, then at last this
+lord of the soul, having Madness for the captain of his guard, breaks
+out into a frenzy: and if he finds in himself any good opinions or
+appetites in process of formation, and there is in him any sense of
+shame remaining, to these better principles he puts an end, and casts
+them forth until he has purged away temperance and brought in madness
+to the full.
+
+Yes, he said, that is the way in which the tyrannical man is generated.
+
+And is not this the reason why of old love has been called a tyrant?
+
+I should not wonder.
+
+Further, I said, has not a drunken man also the spirit of a tyrant?
+
+He has.
+
+And you know that a man who is deranged and not right in his mind, will
+fancy that he is able to rule, not only over men, but also over the
+gods?
+
+That he will.
+
+And the tyrannical man in the true sense of the word comes into being
+when, either under the influence of nature, or habit, or both, he
+becomes drunken, lustful, passionate? O my friend, is not that so?
+
+Assuredly.
+
+Such is the man and such is his origin. And next, how does he live?
+
+Suppose, as people facetiously say, you were to tell me.
+
+I imagine, I said, at the next step in his progress, that there will be
+feasts and carousals and revellings and courtezans, and all that sort
+of thing; Love is the lord of the house within him, and orders all the
+concerns of his soul.
+
+That is certain.
+
+Yes; and every day and every night desires grow up many and formidable,
+and their demands are many.
+
+They are indeed, he said.
+
+His revenues, if he has any, are soon spent.
+
+True.
+
+Then comes debt and the cutting down of his property.
+
+Of course.
+
+When he has nothing left, must not his desires, crowding in the nest
+like young ravens, be crying aloud for food; and he, goaded on by them,
+and especially by love himself, who is in a manner the captain of them,
+is in a frenzy, and would fain discover whom he can defraud or despoil
+of his property, in order that he may gratify them?
+
+Yes, that is sure to be the case.
+
+He must have money, no matter how, if he is to escape horrid pains and
+pangs.
+
+He must.
+
+And as in himself there was a succession of pleasures, and the new got
+the better of the old and took away their rights, so he being younger
+will claim to have more than his father and his mother, and if he has
+spent his own share of the property, he will take a slice of theirs.
+
+No doubt he will.
+
+And if his parents will not give way, then he will try first of all to
+cheat and deceive them.
+
+Very true.
+
+And if he fails, then he will use force and plunder them.
+
+Yes, probably.
+
+And if the old man and woman fight for their own, what then, my friend?
+Will the creature feel any compunction at tyrannizing over them?
+
+Nay, he said, I should not feel at all comfortable about his parents.
+
+But, O heavens! Adeimantus, on account of some new-fangled love of a
+harlot, who is anything but a necessary connection, can you believe
+that he would strike the mother who is his ancient friend and necessary
+to his very existence, and would place her under the authority of the
+other, when she is brought under the same roof with her; or that, under
+like circumstances, he would do the same to his withered old father,
+first and most indispensable of friends, for the sake of some
+newly-found blooming youth who is the reverse of indispensable?
+
+Yes, indeed, he said; I believe that he would.
+
+Truly, then, I said, a tyrannical son is a blessing to his father and
+mother.
+
+He is indeed, he replied.
+
+He first takes their property, and when that fails, and pleasures are
+beginning to swarm in the hive of his soul, then he breaks into a
+house, or steals the garments of some nightly wayfarer; next he
+proceeds to clear a temple. Meanwhile the old opinions which he had
+when a child, and which gave judgment about good and evil, are
+overthrown by those others which have just been emancipated, and are
+now the body-guard of love and share his empire. These in his
+democratic days, when he was still subject to the laws and to his
+father, were only let loose in the dreams of sleep. But now that he is
+under the dominion of love, he becomes always and in waking reality
+what he was then very rarely and in a dream only; he will commit the
+foulest murder, or eat forbidden food, or be guilty of any other horrid
+act. Love is his tyrant, and lives lordly in him and lawlessly, and
+being himself a king, leads him on, as a tyrant leads a State, to the
+performance of any reckless deed by which he can maintain himself and
+the rabble of his associates, whether those whom evil communications
+have brought in from without, or those whom he himself has allowed to
+break loose within him by reason of a similar evil nature in himself.
+Have we not here a picture of his way of life?
+
+Yes, indeed, he said.
+
+And if there are only a few of them in the State, and the rest of the
+people are well disposed, they go away and become the body-guard or
+mercenary soldiers of some other tyrant who may probably want them for
+a war; and if there is no war, they stay at home and do many little
+pieces of mischief in the city.
+
+What sort of mischief?
+
+For example, they are the thieves, burglars, cut-purses, foot-pads,
+robbers of temples, man-stealers of the community; or if they are able
+to speak they turn informers, and bear false witness, and take bribes.
+
+A small catalogue of evils, even if the perpetrators of them are few in
+number.
+
+Yes, I said; but small and great are comparative terms, and all these
+things, in the misery and evil which they inflict upon a State, do not
+come within a thousand miles of the tyrant; when this noxious class and
+their followers grow numerous and become conscious of their strength,
+assisted by the infatuation of the people, they choose from among
+themselves the one who has most of the tyrant in his own soul, and him
+they create their tyrant.
+
+Yes, he said, and he will be the most fit to be a tyrant.
+
+If the people yield, well and good; but if they resist him, as he began
+by beating his own father and mother, so now, if he has the power, he
+beats them, and will keep his dear old fatherland or motherland, as the
+Cretans say, in subjection to his young retainers whom he has
+introduced to be their rulers and masters. This is the end of his
+passions and desires.
+
+Exactly.
+
+When such men are only private individuals and before they get power,
+this is their character; they associate entirely with their own
+flatterers or ready tools; or if they want anything from anybody, they
+in their turn are equally ready to bow down before them: they profess
+every sort of affection for them; but when they have gained their point
+they know them no more.
+
+Yes, truly.
+
+They are always either the masters or servants and never the friends of
+anybody; the tyrant never tastes of true freedom or friendship.
+
+Certainly not.
+
+And may we not rightly call such men treacherous?
+
+No question.
+
+Also they are utterly unjust, if we were right in our notion of
+justice?
+
+Yes, he said, and we were perfectly right.
+
+Let us then sum up in a word, I said, the character of the worst man:
+he is the waking reality of what we dreamed.
+
+Most true.
+
+And this is he who being by nature most of a tyrant bears rule, and the
+longer he lives the more of a tyrant he becomes.
+
+That is certain, said Glaucon, taking his turn to answer.
+
+And will not he who has been shown to be the wickedest, be also the
+most miserable? and he who has tyrannized longest and most, most
+continually and truly miserable; although this may not be the opinion
+of men in general?
+
+Yes, he said, inevitably.
+
+And must not the tyrannical man be like the tyrannical State, and the
+democratical man like the democratical State; and the same of the
+others?
+
+Certainly.
+
+And as State is to State in virtue and happiness, so is man in relation
+to man?
+
+To be sure.
+
+Then comparing our original city, which was under a king, and the city
+which is under a tyrant, how do they stand as to virtue?
+
+They are the opposite extremes, he said, for one is the very best and
+the other is the very worst.
+
+There can be no mistake, I said, as to which is which, and therefore I
+will at once enquire whether you would arrive at a similar decision
+about their relative happiness and misery. And here we must not allow
+ourselves to be panic-stricken at the apparition of the tyrant, who is
+only a unit and may perhaps have a few retainers about him; but let us
+go as we ought into every corner of the city and look all about, and
+then we will give our opinion.
+
+A fair invitation, he replied; and I see, as every one must, that a
+tyranny is the wretchedest form of government, and the rule of a king
+the happiest.
+
+And in estimating the men too, may I not fairly make a like request,
+that I should have a judge whose mind can enter into and see through
+human nature? he must not be like a child who looks at the outside and
+is dazzled at the pompous aspect which the tyrannical nature assumes to
+the beholder, but let him be one who has a clear insight. May I suppose
+that the judgment is given in the hearing of us all by one who is able
+to judge, and has dwelt in the same place with him, and been present at
+his dally life and known him in his family relations, where he may be
+seen stripped of his tragedy attire, and again in the hour of public
+danger—he shall tell us about the happiness and misery of the tyrant
+when compared with other men?
+
+That again, he said, is a very fair proposal.
+
+Shall I assume that we ourselves are able and experienced judges and
+have before now met with such a person? We shall then have some one who
+will answer our enquiries.
+
+By all means.
+
+Let me ask you not to forget the parallel of the individual and the
+State; bearing this in mind, and glancing in turn from one to the other
+of them, will you tell me their respective conditions?
+
+What do you mean? he asked.
+
+Beginning with the State, I replied, would you say that a city which is
+governed by a tyrant is free or enslaved?
+
+No city, he said, can be more completely enslaved.
+
+And yet, as you see, there are freemen as well as masters in such a
+State?
+
+Yes, he said, I see that there are—a few; but the people, speaking
+generally, and the best of them are miserably degraded and enslaved.
+
+Then if the man is like the State, I said, must not the same rule
+prevail? his soul is full of meanness and vulgarity—the best elements
+in him are enslaved; and there is a small ruling part, which is also
+the worst and maddest.
+
+Inevitably.
+
+And would you say that the soul of such an one is the soul of a
+freeman, or of a slave?
+
+He has the soul of a slave, in my opinion.
+
+And the State which is enslaved under a tyrant is utterly incapable of
+acting voluntarily?
+
+Utterly incapable.
+
+And also the soul which is under a tyrant (I am speaking of the soul
+taken as a whole) is least capable of doing what she desires; there is
+a gadfly which goads her, and she is full of trouble and remorse?
+
+Certainly.
+
+And is the city which is under a tyrant rich or poor?
+
+Poor.
+
+And the tyrannical soul must be always poor and insatiable?
+
+True.
+
+And must not such a State and such a man be always full of fear?
+
+Yes, indeed.
+
+Is there any State in which you will find more of lamentation and
+sorrow and groaning and pain?
+
+Certainly not.
+
+And is there any man in whom you will find more of this sort of misery
+than in the tyrannical man, who is in a fury of passions and desires?
+
+Impossible.
+
+Reflecting upon these and similar evils, you held the tyrannical State
+to be the most miserable of States?
+
+And I was right, he said.
+
+Certainly, I said. And when you see the same evils in the tyrannical
+man, what do you say of him?
+
+I say that he is by far the most miserable of all men.
+
+There, I said, I think that you are beginning to go wrong.
+
+What do you mean?
+
+I do not think that he has as yet reached the utmost extreme of misery.
+
+Then who is more miserable?
+
+One of whom I am about to speak.
+
+Who is that?
+
+He who is of a tyrannical nature, and instead of leading a private life
+has been cursed with the further misfortune of being a public tyrant.
+
+From what has been said, I gather that you are right.
+
+Yes, I replied, but in this high argument you should be a little more
+certain, and should not conjecture only; for of all questions, this
+respecting good and evil is the greatest.
+
+Very true, he said.
+
+Let me then offer you an illustration, which may, I think, throw a
+light upon this subject.
+
+What is your illustration?
+
+The case of rich individuals in cities who possess many slaves: from
+them you may form an idea of the tyrant’s condition, for they both have
+slaves; the only difference is that he has more slaves.
+
+Yes, that is the difference.
+
+You know that they live securely and have nothing to apprehend from
+their servants?
+
+What should they fear?
+
+Nothing. But do you observe the reason of this?
+
+Yes; the reason is, that the whole city is leagued together for the
+protection of each individual.
+
+Very true, I said. But imagine one of these owners, the master say of
+some fifty slaves, together with his family and property and slaves,
+carried off by a god into the wilderness, where there are no freemen to
+help him—will he not be in an agony of fear lest he and his wife and
+children should be put to death by his slaves?
+
+Yes, he said, he will be in the utmost fear.
+
+The time has arrived when he will be compelled to flatter divers of his
+slaves, and make many promises to them of freedom and other things,
+much against his will—he will have to cajole his own servants.
+
+Yes, he said, that will be the only way of saving himself.
+
+And suppose the same god, who carried him away, to surround him with
+neighbours who will not suffer one man to be the master of another, and
+who, if they could catch the offender, would take his life?
+
+His case will be still worse, if you suppose him to be everywhere
+surrounded and watched by enemies.
+
+And is not this the sort of prison in which the tyrant will be bound—he
+who being by nature such as we have described, is full of all sorts of
+fears and lusts? His soul is dainty and greedy, and yet alone, of all
+men in the city, he is never allowed to go on a journey, or to see the
+things which other freemen desire to see, but he lives in his hole like
+a woman hidden in the house, and is jealous of any other citizen who
+goes into foreign parts and sees anything of interest.
+
+Very true, he said.
+
+And amid evils such as these will not he who is ill-governed in his own
+person—the tyrannical man, I mean—whom you just now decided to be the
+most miserable of all—will not he be yet more miserable when, instead
+of leading a private life, he is constrained by fortune to be a public
+tyrant? He has to be master of others when he is not master of himself:
+he is like a diseased or paralytic man who is compelled to pass his
+life, not in retirement, but fighting and combating with other men.
+
+Yes, he said, the similitude is most exact.
+
+Is not his case utterly miserable? and does not the actual tyrant lead
+a worse life than he whose life you determined to be the worst?
+
+Certainly.
+
+He who is the real tyrant, whatever men may think, is the real slave,
+and is obliged to practise the greatest adulation and servility, and to
+be the flatterer of the vilest of mankind. He has desires which he is
+utterly unable to satisfy, and has more wants than any one, and is
+truly poor, if you know how to inspect the whole soul of him: all his
+life long he is beset with fear and is full of convulsions and
+distractions, even as the State which he resembles: and surely the
+resemblance holds?
+
+Very true, he said.
+
+Moreover, as we were saying before, he grows worse from having power:
+he becomes and is of necessity more jealous, more faithless, more
+unjust, more friendless, more impious, than he was at first; he is the
+purveyor and cherisher of every sort of vice, and the consequence is
+that he is supremely miserable, and that he makes everybody else as
+miserable as himself.
+
+No man of any sense will dispute your words.
+
+Come then, I said, and as the general umpire in theatrical contests
+proclaims the result, do you also decide who in your opinion is first
+in the scale of happiness, and who second, and in what order the others
+follow: there are five of them in all—they are the royal, timocratical,
+oligarchical, democratical, tyrannical.
+
+The decision will be easily given, he replied; they shall be choruses
+coming on the stage, and I must judge them in the order in which they
+enter, by the criterion of virtue and vice, happiness and misery.
+
+Need we hire a herald, or shall I announce, that the son of Ariston
+(the best) has decided that the best and justest is also the happiest,
+and that this is he who is the most royal man and king over himself;
+and that the worst and most unjust man is also the most miserable, and
+that this is he who being the greatest tyrant of himself is also the
+greatest tyrant of his State?
+
+Make the proclamation yourself, he said.
+
+And shall I add, ‘whether seen or unseen by gods and men’?
+
+Let the words be added.
+
+Then this, I said, will be our first proof; and there is another, which
+may also have some weight.
+
+What is that?
+
+The second proof is derived from the nature of the soul: seeing that
+the individual soul, like the State, has been divided by us into three
+principles, the division may, I think, furnish a new demonstration.
+
+Of what nature?
+
+It seems to me that to these three principles three pleasures
+correspond; also three desires and governing powers.
+
+How do you mean? he said.
+
+There is one principle with which, as we were saying, a man learns,
+another with which he is angry; the third, having many forms, has no
+special name, but is denoted by the general term appetitive, from the
+extraordinary strength and vehemence of the desires of eating and
+drinking and the other sensual appetites which are the main elements of
+it; also money-loving, because such desires are generally satisfied by
+the help of money.
+
+That is true, he said.
+
+If we were to say that the loves and pleasures of this third part were
+concerned with gain, we should then be able to fall back on a single
+notion; and might truly and intelligibly describe this part of the soul
+as loving gain or money.
+
+I agree with you.
+
+Again, is not the passionate element wholly set on ruling and
+conquering and getting fame?
+
+True.
+
+Suppose we call it the contentious or ambitious—would the term be
+suitable?
+
+Extremely suitable.
+
+On the other hand, every one sees that the principle of knowledge is
+wholly directed to the truth, and cares less than either of the others
+for gain or fame.
+
+Far less.
+
+‘Lover of wisdom,’ ‘lover of knowledge,’ are titles which we may fitly
+apply to that part of the soul?
+
+Certainly.
+
+One principle prevails in the souls of one class of men, another in
+others, as may happen?
+
+Yes.
+
+Then we may begin by assuming that there are three classes of
+men—lovers of wisdom, lovers of honour, lovers of gain?
+
+Exactly.
+
+And there are three kinds of pleasure, which are their several objects?
+
+Very true.
+
+Now, if you examine the three classes of men, and ask of them in turn
+which of their lives is pleasantest, each will be found praising his
+own and depreciating that of others: the money-maker will contrast the
+vanity of honour or of learning if they bring no money with the solid
+advantages of gold and silver?
+
+True, he said.
+
+And the lover of honour—what will be his opinion? Will he not think
+that the pleasure of riches is vulgar, while the pleasure of learning,
+if it brings no distinction, is all smoke and nonsense to him?
+
+Very true.
+
+And are we to suppose, I said, that the philosopher sets any value on
+other pleasures in comparison with the pleasure of knowing the truth,
+and in that pursuit abiding, ever learning, not so far indeed from the
+heaven of pleasure? Does he not call the other pleasures necessary,
+under the idea that if there were no necessity for them, he would
+rather not have them?
+
+There can be no doubt of that, he replied.
+
+Since, then, the pleasures of each class and the life of each are in
+dispute, and the question is not which life is more or less honourable,
+or better or worse, but which is the more pleasant or painless—how
+shall we know who speaks truly?
+
+I cannot myself tell, he said.
+
+Well, but what ought to be the criterion? Is any better than experience
+and wisdom and reason?
+
+There cannot be a better, he said.
+
+Then, I said, reflect. Of the three individuals, which has the greatest
+experience of all the pleasures which we enumerated? Has the lover of
+gain, in learning the nature of essential truth, greater experience of
+the pleasure of knowledge than the philosopher has of the pleasure of
+gain?
+
+The philosopher, he replied, has greatly the advantage; for he has of
+necessity always known the taste of the other pleasures from his
+childhood upwards: but the lover of gain in all his experience has not
+of necessity tasted—or, I should rather say, even had he desired, could
+hardly have tasted—the sweetness of learning and knowing truth.
+
+Then the lover of wisdom has a great advantage over the lover of gain,
+for he has a double experience?
+
+Yes, very great.
+
+Again, has he greater experience of the pleasures of honour, or the
+lover of honour of the pleasures of wisdom?
+
+Nay, he said, all three are honoured in proportion as they attain their
+object; for the rich man and the brave man and the wise man alike have
+their crowd of admirers, and as they all receive honour they all have
+experience of the pleasures of honour; but the delight which is to be
+found in the knowledge of true being is known to the philosopher only.
+
+His experience, then, will enable him to judge better than any one?
+
+Far better.
+
+And he is the only one who has wisdom as well as experience?
+
+Certainly.
+
+Further, the very faculty which is the instrument of judgment is not
+possessed by the covetous or ambitious man, but only by the
+philosopher?
+
+What faculty?
+
+Reason, with whom, as we were saying, the decision ought to rest.
+
+Yes.
+
+And reasoning is peculiarly his instrument?
+
+Certainly.
+
+If wealth and gain were the criterion, then the praise or blame of the
+lover of gain would surely be the most trustworthy?
+
+Assuredly.
+
+Or if honour or victory or courage, in that case the judgment of the
+ambitious or pugnacious would be the truest?
+
+Clearly.
+
+But since experience and wisdom and reason are the judges—
+
+The only inference possible, he replied, is that pleasures which are
+approved by the lover of wisdom and reason are the truest.
+
+And so we arrive at the result, that the pleasure of the intelligent
+part of the soul is the pleasantest of the three, and that he of us in
+whom this is the ruling principle has the pleasantest life.
+
+Unquestionably, he said, the wise man speaks with authority when he
+approves of his own life.
+
+And what does the judge affirm to be the life which is next, and the
+pleasure which is next?
+
+Clearly that of the soldier and lover of honour; who is nearer to
+himself than the money-maker.
+
+Last comes the lover of gain?
+
+Very true, he said.
+
+Twice in succession, then, has the just man overthrown the unjust in
+this conflict; and now comes the third trial, which is dedicated to
+Olympian Zeus the saviour: a sage whispers in my ear that no pleasure
+except that of the wise is quite true and pure—all others are a shadow
+only; and surely this will prove the greatest and most decisive of
+falls?
+
+Yes, the greatest; but will you explain yourself?
+
+I will work out the subject and you shall answer my questions.
+
+Proceed.
+
+Say, then, is not pleasure opposed to pain?
+
+True.
+
+And there is a neutral state which is neither pleasure nor pain?
+
+There is.
+
+A state which is intermediate, and a sort of repose of the soul about
+either—that is what you mean?
+
+Yes.
+
+You remember what people say when they are sick?
+
+What do they say?
+
+That after all nothing is pleasanter than health. But then they never
+knew this to be the greatest of pleasures until they were ill.
+
+Yes, I know, he said.
+
+And when persons are suffering from acute pain, you must have heard
+them say that there is nothing pleasanter than to get rid of their
+pain?
+
+I have.
+
+And there are many other cases of suffering in which the mere rest and
+cessation of pain, and not any positive enjoyment, is extolled by them
+as the greatest pleasure?
+
+Yes, he said; at the time they are pleased and well content to be at
+rest.
+
+Again, when pleasure ceases, that sort of rest or cessation will be
+painful?
+
+Doubtless, he said.
+
+Then the intermediate state of rest will be pleasure and will also be
+pain?
+
+So it would seem.
+
+But can that which is neither become both?
+
+I should say not.
+
+And both pleasure and pain are motions of the soul, are they not?
+
+Yes.
+
+But that which is neither was just now shown to be rest and not motion,
+and in a mean between them?
+
+Yes.
+
+How, then, can we be right in supposing that the absence of pain is
+pleasure, or that the absence of pleasure is pain?
+
+Impossible.
+
+This then is an appearance only and not a reality; that is to say, the
+rest is pleasure at the moment and in comparison of what is painful,
+and painful in comparison of what is pleasant; but all these
+representations, when tried by the test of true pleasure, are not real
+but a sort of imposition?
+
+That is the inference.
+
+Look at the other class of pleasures which have no antecedent pains and
+you will no longer suppose, as you perhaps may at present, that
+pleasure is only the cessation of pain, or pain of pleasure.
+
+What are they, he said, and where shall I find them?
+
+There are many of them: take as an example the pleasures of smell,
+which are very great and have no antecedent pains; they come in a
+moment, and when they depart leave no pain behind them.
+
+Most true, he said.
+
+Let us not, then, be induced to believe that pure pleasure is the
+cessation of pain, or pain of pleasure.
+
+No.
+
+Still, the more numerous and violent pleasures which reach the soul
+through the body are generally of this sort—they are reliefs of pain.
+
+That is true.
+
+And the anticipations of future pleasures and pains are of a like
+nature?
+
+Yes.
+
+Shall I give you an illustration of them?
+
+Let me hear.
+
+You would allow, I said, that there is in nature an upper and lower and
+middle region?
+
+I should.
+
+And if a person were to go from the lower to the middle region, would
+he not imagine that he is going up; and he who is standing in the
+middle and sees whence he has come, would imagine that he is already in
+the upper region, if he has never seen the true upper world?
+
+To be sure, he said; how can he think otherwise?
+
+But if he were taken back again he would imagine, and truly imagine,
+that he was descending?
+
+No doubt.
+
+All that would arise out of his ignorance of the true upper and middle
+and lower regions?
+
+Yes.
+
+Then can you wonder that persons who are inexperienced in the truth, as
+they have wrong ideas about many other things, should also have wrong
+ideas about pleasure and pain and the intermediate state; so that when
+they are only being drawn towards the painful they feel pain and think
+the pain which they experience to be real, and in like manner, when
+drawn away from pain to the neutral or intermediate state, they firmly
+believe that they have reached the goal of satiety and pleasure; they,
+not knowing pleasure, err in contrasting pain with the absence of pain,
+which is like contrasting black with grey instead of white—can you
+wonder, I say, at this?
+
+No, indeed; I should be much more disposed to wonder at the opposite.
+
+Look at the matter thus:—Hunger, thirst, and the like, are inanitions
+of the bodily state?
+
+Yes.
+
+And ignorance and folly are inanitions of the soul?
+
+True.
+
+And food and wisdom are the corresponding satisfactions of either?
+
+Certainly.
+
+And is the satisfaction derived from that which has less or from that
+which has more existence the truer?
+
+Clearly, from that which has more.
+
+What classes of things have a greater share of pure existence in your
+judgment—those of which food and drink and condiments and all kinds of
+sustenance are examples, or the class which contains true opinion and
+knowledge and mind and all the different kinds of virtue? Put the
+question in this way:—Which has a more pure being—that which is
+concerned with the invariable, the immortal, and the true, and is of
+such a nature, and is found in such natures; or that which is concerned
+with and found in the variable and mortal, and is itself variable and
+mortal?
+
+Far purer, he replied, is the being of that which is concerned with the
+invariable.
+
+And does the essence of the invariable partake of knowledge in the same
+degree as of essence?
+
+Yes, of knowledge in the same degree.
+
+And of truth in the same degree?
+
+Yes.
+
+And, conversely, that which has less of truth will also have less of
+essence?
+
+Necessarily.
+
+Then, in general, those kinds of things which are in the service of the
+body have less of truth and essence than those which are in the service
+of the soul?
+
+Far less.
+
+And has not the body itself less of truth and essence than the soul?
+
+Yes.
+
+What is filled with more real existence, and actually has a more real
+existence, is more really filled than that which is filled with less
+real existence and is less real?
+
+Of course.
+
+And if there be a pleasure in being filled with that which is according
+to nature, that which is more really filled with more real being will
+more really and truly enjoy true pleasure; whereas that which
+participates in less real being will be less truly and surely
+satisfied, and will participate in an illusory and less real pleasure?
+
+Unquestionably.
+
+Those then who know not wisdom and virtue, and are always busy with
+gluttony and sensuality, go down and up again as far as the mean; and
+in this region they move at random throughout life, but they never pass
+into the true upper world; thither they neither look, nor do they ever
+find their way, neither are they truly filled with true being, nor do
+they taste of pure and abiding pleasure. Like cattle, with their eyes
+always looking down and their heads stooping to the earth, that is, to
+the dining-table, they fatten and feed and breed, and, in their
+excessive love of these delights, they kick and butt at one another
+with horns and hoofs which are made of iron; and they kill one another
+by reason of their insatiable lust. For they fill themselves with that
+which is not substantial, and the part of themselves which they fill is
+also unsubstantial and incontinent.
+
+Verily, Socrates, said Glaucon, you describe the life of the many like
+an oracle.
+
+Their pleasures are mixed with pains—how can they be otherwise? For
+they are mere shadows and pictures of the true, and are coloured by
+contrast, which exaggerates both light and shade, and so they implant
+in the minds of fools insane desires of themselves; and they are fought
+about as Stesichorus says that the Greeks fought about the shadow of
+Helen at Troy in ignorance of the truth.
+
+Something of that sort must inevitably happen.
+
+And must not the like happen with the spirited or passionate element of
+the soul? Will not the passionate man who carries his passion into
+action, be in the like case, whether he is envious and ambitious, or
+violent and contentious, or angry and discontented, if he be seeking to
+attain honour and victory and the satisfaction of his anger without
+reason or sense?
+
+Yes, he said, the same will happen with the spirited element also.
+
+Then may we not confidently assert that the lovers of money and honour,
+when they seek their pleasures under the guidance and in the company of
+reason and knowledge, and pursue after and win the pleasures which
+wisdom shows them, will also have the truest pleasures in the highest
+degree which is attainable to them, inasmuch as they follow truth; and
+they will have the pleasures which are natural to them, if that which
+is best for each one is also most natural to him?
+
+Yes, certainly; the best is the most natural.
+
+And when the whole soul follows the philosophical principle, and there
+is no division, the several parts are just, and do each of them their
+own business, and enjoy severally the best and truest pleasures of
+which they are capable?
+
+Exactly.
+
+But when either of the two other principles prevails, it fails in
+attaining its own pleasure, and compels the rest to pursue after a
+pleasure which is a shadow only and which is not their own?
+
+True.
+
+And the greater the interval which separates them from philosophy and
+reason, the more strange and illusive will be the pleasure?
+
+Yes.
+
+And is not that farthest from reason which is at the greatest distance
+from law and order?
+
+Clearly.
+
+And the lustful and tyrannical desires are, as we saw, at the greatest
+distance? Yes.
+
+And the royal and orderly desires are nearest?
+
+Yes.
+
+Then the tyrant will live at the greatest distance from true or natural
+pleasure, and the king at the least?
+
+Certainly.
+
+But if so, the tyrant will live most unpleasantly, and the king most
+pleasantly?
+
+Inevitably.
+
+Would you know the measure of the interval which separates them?
+
+Will you tell me?
+
+There appear to be three pleasures, one genuine and two spurious: now
+the transgression of the tyrant reaches a point beyond the spurious; he
+has run away from the region of law and reason, and taken up his abode
+with certain slave pleasures which are his satellites, and the measure
+of his inferiority can only be expressed in a figure.
+
+How do you mean?
+
+I assume, I said, that the tyrant is in the third place from the
+oligarch; the democrat was in the middle?
+
+Yes.
+
+And if there is truth in what has preceded, he will be wedded to an
+image of pleasure which is thrice removed as to truth from the pleasure
+of the oligarch?
+
+He will.
+
+And the oligarch is third from the royal; since we count as one royal
+and aristocratical?
+
+Yes, he is third.
+
+Then the tyrant is removed from true pleasure by the space of a number
+which is three times three?
+
+Manifestly.
+
+The shadow then of tyrannical pleasure determined by the number of
+length will be a plane figure.
+
+Certainly.
+
+And if you raise the power and make the plane a solid, there is no
+difficulty in seeing how vast is the interval by which the tyrant is
+parted from the king.
+
+Yes; the arithmetician will easily do the sum.
+
+Or if some person begins at the other end and measures the interval by
+which the king is parted from the tyrant in truth of pleasure, he will
+find him, when the multiplication is completed, living 729 times more
+pleasantly, and the tyrant more painfully by this same interval.
+
+What a wonderful calculation! And how enormous is the distance which
+separates the just from the unjust in regard to pleasure and pain!
+
+Yet a true calculation, I said, and a number which nearly concerns
+human life, if human beings are concerned with days and nights and
+months and years. (729 NEARLY equals the number of days and nights in
+the year.)
+
+Yes, he said, human life is certainly concerned with them.
+
+Then if the good and just man be thus superior in pleasure to the evil
+and unjust, his superiority will be infinitely greater in propriety of
+life and in beauty and virtue?
+
+Immeasurably greater.
+
+Well, I said, and now having arrived at this stage of the argument, we
+may revert to the words which brought us hither: Was not some one
+saying that injustice was a gain to the perfectly unjust who was
+reputed to be just?
+
+Yes, that was said.
+
+Now then, having determined the power and quality of justice and
+injustice, let us have a little conversation with him.
+
+What shall we say to him?
+
+Let us make an image of the soul, that he may have his own words
+presented before his eyes.
+
+Of what sort?
+
+An ideal image of the soul, like the composite creations of ancient
+mythology, such as the Chimera or Scylla or Cerberus, and there are
+many others in which two or more different natures are said to grow
+into one.
+
+There are said of have been such unions.
+
+Then do you now model the form of a multitudinous, many-headed monster,
+having a ring of heads of all manner of beasts, tame and wild, which he
+is able to generate and metamorphose at will.
+
+You suppose marvellous powers in the artist; but, as language is more
+pliable than wax or any similar substance, let there be such a model as
+you propose.
+
+Suppose now that you make a second form as of a lion, and a third of a
+man, the second smaller than the first, and the third smaller than the
+second.
+
+That, he said, is an easier task; and I have made them as you say.
+
+And now join them, and let the three grow into one.
+
+That has been accomplished.
+
+Next fashion the outside of them into a single image, as of a man, so
+that he who is not able to look within, and sees only the outer hull,
+may believe the beast to be a single human creature.
+
+I have done so, he said.
+
+And now, to him who maintains that it is profitable for the human
+creature to be unjust, and unprofitable to be just, let us reply that,
+if he be right, it is profitable for this creature to feast the
+multitudinous monster and strengthen the lion and the lion-like
+qualities, but to starve and weaken the man, who is consequently liable
+to be dragged about at the mercy of either of the other two; and he is
+not to attempt to familiarize or harmonize them with one another—he
+ought rather to suffer them to fight and bite and devour one another.
+
+Certainly, he said; that is what the approver of injustice says.
+
+To him the supporter of justice makes answer that he should ever so
+speak and act as to give the man within him in some way or other the
+most complete mastery over the entire human creature. He should watch
+over the many-headed monster like a good husbandman, fostering and
+cultivating the gentle qualities, and preventing the wild ones from
+growing; he should be making the lion-heart his ally, and in common
+care of them all should be uniting the several parts with one another
+and with himself.
+
+Yes, he said, that is quite what the maintainer of justice say.
+
+And so from every point of view, whether of pleasure, honour, or
+advantage, the approver of justice is right and speaks the truth, and
+the disapprover is wrong and false and ignorant?
+
+Yes, from every point of view.
+
+Come, now, and let us gently reason with the unjust, who is not
+intentionally in error. ‘Sweet Sir,’ we will say to him, ‘what think
+you of things esteemed noble and ignoble? Is not the noble that which
+subjects the beast to the man, or rather to the god in man; and the
+ignoble that which subjects the man to the beast?’ He can hardly avoid
+saying Yes—can he now?
+
+Not if he has any regard for my opinion.
+
+But, if he agree so far, we may ask him to answer another question:
+‘Then how would a man profit if he received gold and silver on the
+condition that he was to enslave the noblest part of him to the worst?
+Who can imagine that a man who sold his son or daughter into slavery
+for money, especially if he sold them into the hands of fierce and evil
+men, would be the gainer, however large might be the sum which he
+received? And will any one say that he is not a miserable caitiff who
+remorselessly sells his own divine being to that which is most godless
+and detestable? Eriphyle took the necklace as the price of her
+husband’s life, but he is taking a bribe in order to compass a worse
+ruin.’
+
+Yes, said Glaucon, far worse—I will answer for him.
+
+Has not the intemperate been censured of old, because in him the huge
+multiform monster is allowed to be too much at large?
+
+Clearly.
+
+And men are blamed for pride and bad temper when the lion and serpent
+element in them disproportionately grows and gains strength?
+
+Yes.
+
+And luxury and softness are blamed, because they relax and weaken this
+same creature, and make a coward of him?
+
+Very true.
+
+And is not a man reproached for flattery and meanness who subordinates
+the spirited animal to the unruly monster, and, for the sake of money,
+of which he can never have enough, habituates him in the days of his
+youth to be trampled in the mire, and from being a lion to become a
+monkey?
+
+True, he said.
+
+And why are mean employments and manual arts a reproach? Only because
+they imply a natural weakness of the higher principle; the individual
+is unable to control the creatures within him, but has to court them,
+and his great study is how to flatter them.
+
+Such appears to be the reason.
+
+And therefore, being desirous of placing him under a rule like that of
+the best, we say that he ought to be the servant of the best, in whom
+the Divine rules; not, as Thrasymachus supposed, to the injury of the
+servant, but because every one had better be ruled by divine wisdom
+dwelling within him; or, if this be impossible, then by an external
+authority, in order that we may be all, as far as possible, under the
+same government, friends and equals.
+
+True, he said.
+
+And this is clearly seen to be the intention of the law, which is the
+ally of the whole city; and is seen also in the authority which we
+exercise over children, and the refusal to let them be free until we
+have established in them a principle analogous to the constitution of a
+state, and by cultivation of this higher element have set up in their
+hearts a guardian and ruler like our own, and when this is done they
+may go their ways.
+
+Yes, he said, the purpose of the law is manifest.
+
+From what point of view, then, and on what ground can we say that a man
+is profited by injustice or intemperance or other baseness, which will
+make him a worse man, even though he acquire money or power by his
+wickedness?
+
+From no point of view at all.
+
+What shall he profit, if his injustice be undetected and unpunished? He
+who is undetected only gets worse, whereas he who is detected and
+punished has the brutal part of his nature silenced and humanized; the
+gentler element in him is liberated, and his whole soul is perfected
+and ennobled by the acquirement of justice and temperance and wisdom,
+more than the body ever is by receiving gifts of beauty, strength and
+health, in proportion as the soul is more honourable than the body.
+
+Certainly, he said.
+
+To this nobler purpose the man of understanding will devote the
+energies of his life. And in the first place, he will honour studies
+which impress these qualities on his soul and will disregard others?
+
+Clearly, he said.
+
+In the next place, he will regulate his bodily habit and training, and
+so far will he be from yielding to brutal and irrational pleasures,
+that he will regard even health as quite a secondary matter; his first
+object will be not that he may be fair or strong or well, unless he is
+likely thereby to gain temperance, but he will always desire so to
+attemper the body as to preserve the harmony of the soul?
+
+Certainly he will, if he has true music in him.
+
+And in the acquisition of wealth there is a principle of order and
+harmony which he will also observe; he will not allow himself to be
+dazzled by the foolish applause of the world, and heap up riches to his
+own infinite harm?
+
+Certainly not, he said.
+
+He will look at the city which is within him, and take heed that no
+disorder occur in it, such as might arise either from superfluity or
+from want; and upon this principle he will regulate his property and
+gain or spend according to his means.
+
+Very true.
+
+And, for the same reason, he will gladly accept and enjoy such honours
+as he deems likely to make him a better man; but those, whether private
+or public, which are likely to disorder his life, he will avoid?
+
+Then, if that is his motive, he will not be a statesman.
+
+By the dog of Egypt, he will! in the city which is his own he certainly
+will, though in the land of his birth perhaps not, unless he have a
+divine call.
+
+I understand; you mean that he will be a ruler in the city of which we
+are the founders, and which exists in idea only; for I do not believe
+that there is such an one anywhere on earth?
+
+In heaven, I replied, there is laid up a pattern of it, methinks, which
+he who desires may behold, and beholding, may set his own house in
+order. But whether such an one exists, or ever will exist in fact, is
+no matter; for he will live after the manner of that city, having
+nothing to do with any other.
+
+I think so, he said.
+
+
+
+
+ BOOK X.
+
+
+Of the many excellences which I perceive in the order of our State,
+there is none which upon reflection pleases me better than the rule
+about poetry.
+
+To what do you refer?
+
+To the rejection of imitative poetry, which certainly ought not to be
+received; as I see far more clearly now that the parts of the soul have
+been distinguished.
+
+What do you mean?
+
+Speaking in confidence, for I should not like to have my words repeated
+to the tragedians and the rest of the imitative tribe—but I do not mind
+saying to you, that all poetical imitations are ruinous to the
+understanding of the hearers, and that the knowledge of their true
+nature is the only antidote to them.
+
+Explain the purport of your remark.
+
+Well, I will tell you, although I have always from my earliest youth
+had an awe and love of Homer, which even now makes the words falter on
+my lips, for he is the great captain and teacher of the whole of that
+charming tragic company; but a man is not to be reverenced more than
+the truth, and therefore I will speak out.
+
+Very good, he said.
+
+Listen to me then, or rather, answer me.
+
+Put your question.
+
+Can you tell me what imitation is? for I really do not know.
+
+A likely thing, then, that I should know.
+
+Why not? for the duller eye may often see a thing sooner than the
+keener.
+
+Very true, he said; but in your presence, even if I had any faint
+notion, I could not muster courage to utter it. Will you enquire
+yourself?
+
+Well then, shall we begin the enquiry in our usual manner: Whenever a
+number of individuals have a common name, we assume them to have also a
+corresponding idea or form:—do you understand me?
+
+I do.
+
+Let us take any common instance; there are beds and tables in the
+world—plenty of them, are there not?
+
+Yes.
+
+But there are only two ideas or forms of them—one the idea of a bed,
+the other of a table.
+
+True.
+
+And the maker of either of them makes a bed or he makes a table for our
+use, in accordance with the idea—that is our way of speaking in this
+and similar instances—but no artificer makes the ideas themselves: how
+could he?
+
+Impossible.
+
+And there is another artist,—I should like to know what you would say
+of him.
+
+Who is he?
+
+One who is the maker of all the works of all other workmen.
+
+What an extraordinary man!
+
+Wait a little, and there will be more reason for your saying so. For
+this is he who is able to make not only vessels of every kind, but
+plants and animals, himself and all other things—the earth and heaven,
+and the things which are in heaven or under the earth; he makes the
+gods also.
+
+He must be a wizard and no mistake.
+
+Oh! you are incredulous, are you? Do you mean that there is no such
+maker or creator, or that in one sense there might be a maker of all
+these things but in another not? Do you see that there is a way in
+which you could make them all yourself?
+
+What way?
+
+An easy way enough; or rather, there are many ways in which the feat
+might be quickly and easily accomplished, none quicker than that of
+turning a mirror round and round—you would soon enough make the sun and
+the heavens, and the earth and yourself, and other animals and plants,
+and all the other things of which we were just now speaking, in the
+mirror.
+
+Yes, he said; but they would be appearances only.
+
+Very good, I said, you are coming to the point now. And the painter too
+is, as I conceive, just such another—a creator of appearances, is he
+not?
+
+Of course.
+
+But then I suppose you will say that what he creates is untrue. And yet
+there is a sense in which the painter also creates a bed?
+
+Yes, he said, but not a real bed.
+
+And what of the maker of the bed? were you not saying that he too
+makes, not the idea which, according to our view, is the essence of the
+bed, but only a particular bed?
+
+Yes, I did.
+
+Then if he does not make that which exists he cannot make true
+existence, but only some semblance of existence; and if any one were to
+say that the work of the maker of the bed, or of any other workman, has
+real existence, he could hardly be supposed to be speaking the truth.
+
+At any rate, he replied, philosophers would say that he was not
+speaking the truth.
+
+No wonder, then, that his work too is an indistinct expression of
+truth.
+
+No wonder.
+
+Suppose now that by the light of the examples just offered we enquire
+who this imitator is?
+
+If you please.
+
+Well then, here are three beds: one existing in nature, which is made
+by God, as I think that we may say—for no one else can be the maker?
+
+No.
+
+There is another which is the work of the carpenter?
+
+Yes.
+
+And the work of the painter is a third?
+
+Yes.
+
+Beds, then, are of three kinds, and there are three artists who
+superintend them: God, the maker of the bed, and the painter?
+
+Yes, there are three of them.
+
+God, whether from choice or from necessity, made one bed in nature and
+one only; two or more such ideal beds neither ever have been nor ever
+will be made by God.
+
+Why is that?
+
+Because even if He had made but two, a third would still appear behind
+them which both of them would have for their idea, and that would be
+the ideal bed and not the two others.
+
+Very true, he said.
+
+God knew this, and He desired to be the real maker of a real bed, not a
+particular maker of a particular bed, and therefore He created a bed
+which is essentially and by nature one only.
+
+So we believe.
+
+Shall we, then, speak of Him as the natural author or maker of the bed?
+
+Yes, he replied; inasmuch as by the natural process of creation He is
+the author of this and of all other things.
+
+And what shall we say of the carpenter—is not he also the maker of the
+bed?
+
+Yes.
+
+But would you call the painter a creator and maker?
+
+Certainly not.
+
+Yet if he is not the maker, what is he in relation to the bed?
+
+I think, he said, that we may fairly designate him as the imitator of
+that which the others make.
+
+Good, I said; then you call him who is third in the descent from nature
+an imitator?
+
+Certainly, he said.
+
+And the tragic poet is an imitator, and therefore, like all other
+imitators, he is thrice removed from the king and from the truth?
+
+That appears to be so.
+
+Then about the imitator we are agreed. And what about the painter?—I
+would like to know whether he may be thought to imitate that which
+originally exists in nature, or only the creations of artists?
+
+The latter.
+
+As they are or as they appear? you have still to determine this.
+
+What do you mean?
+
+I mean, that you may look at a bed from different points of view,
+obliquely or directly or from any other point of view, and the bed will
+appear different, but there is no difference in reality. And the same
+of all things.
+
+Yes, he said, the difference is only apparent.
+
+Now let me ask you another question: Which is the art of painting
+designed to be—an imitation of things as they are, or as they appear—of
+appearance or of reality?
+
+Of appearance.
+
+Then the imitator, I said, is a long way off the truth, and can do all
+things because he lightly touches on a small part of them, and that
+part an image. For example: A painter will paint a cobbler, carpenter,
+or any other artist, though he knows nothing of their arts; and, if he
+is a good artist, he may deceive children or simple persons, when he
+shows them his picture of a carpenter from a distance, and they will
+fancy that they are looking at a real carpenter.
+
+Certainly.
+
+And whenever any one informs us that he has found a man who knows all
+the arts, and all things else that anybody knows, and every single
+thing with a higher degree of accuracy than any other man—whoever tells
+us this, I think that we can only imagine him to be a simple creature
+who is likely to have been deceived by some wizard or actor whom he
+met, and whom he thought all-knowing, because he himself was unable to
+analyse the nature of knowledge and ignorance and imitation.
+
+Most true.
+
+And so, when we hear persons saying that the tragedians, and Homer, who
+is at their head, know all the arts and all things human, virtue as
+well as vice, and divine things too, for that the good poet cannot
+compose well unless he knows his subject, and that he who has not this
+knowledge can never be a poet, we ought to consider whether here also
+there may not be a similar illusion. Perhaps they may have come across
+imitators and been deceived by them; they may not have remembered when
+they saw their works that these were but imitations thrice removed from
+the truth, and could easily be made without any knowledge of the truth,
+because they are appearances only and not realities? Or, after all,
+they may be in the right, and poets do really know the things about
+which they seem to the many to speak so well?
+
+The question, he said, should by all means be considered.
+
+Now do you suppose that if a person were able to make the original as
+well as the image, he would seriously devote himself to the
+image-making branch? Would he allow imitation to be the ruling
+principle of his life, as if he had nothing higher in him?
+
+I should say not.
+
+The real artist, who knew what he was imitating, would be interested in
+realities and not in imitations; and would desire to leave as memorials
+of himself works many and fair; and, instead of being the author of
+encomiums, he would prefer to be the theme of them.
+
+Yes, he said, that would be to him a source of much greater honour and
+profit.
+
+Then, I said, we must put a question to Homer; not about medicine, or
+any of the arts to which his poems only incidentally refer: we are not
+going to ask him, or any other poet, whether he has cured patients like
+Asclepius, or left behind him a school of medicine such as the
+Asclepiads were, or whether he only talks about medicine and other arts
+at second-hand; but we have a right to know respecting military
+tactics, politics, education, which are the chiefest and noblest
+subjects of his poems, and we may fairly ask him about them. ‘Friend
+Homer,’ then we say to him, ‘if you are only in the second remove from
+truth in what you say of virtue, and not in the third—not an image
+maker or imitator—and if you are able to discern what pursuits make men
+better or worse in private or public life, tell us what State was ever
+better governed by your help? The good order of Lacedaemon is due to
+Lycurgus, and many other cities great and small have been similarly
+benefited by others; but who says that you have been a good legislator
+to them and have done them any good? Italy and Sicily boast of
+Charondas, and there is Solon who is renowned among us; but what city
+has anything to say about you?’ Is there any city which he might name?
+
+I think not, said Glaucon; not even the Homerids themselves pretend
+that he was a legislator.
+
+Well, but is there any war on record which was carried on successfully
+by him, or aided by his counsels, when he was alive?
+
+There is not.
+
+Or is there any invention of his, applicable to the arts or to human
+life, such as Thales the Milesian or Anacharsis the Scythian, and other
+ingenious men have conceived, which is attributed to him?
+
+There is absolutely nothing of the kind.
+
+But, if Homer never did any public service, was he privately a guide or
+teacher of any? Had he in his lifetime friends who loved to associate
+with him, and who handed down to posterity an Homeric way of life, such
+as was established by Pythagoras who was so greatly beloved for his
+wisdom, and whose followers are to this day quite celebrated for the
+order which was named after him?
+
+Nothing of the kind is recorded of him. For surely, Socrates,
+Creophylus, the companion of Homer, that child of flesh, whose name
+always makes us laugh, might be more justly ridiculed for his
+stupidity, if, as is said, Homer was greatly neglected by him and
+others in his own day when he was alive?
+
+Yes, I replied, that is the tradition. But can you imagine, Glaucon,
+that if Homer had really been able to educate and improve mankind—if he
+had possessed knowledge and not been a mere imitator—can you imagine, I
+say, that he would not have had many followers, and been honoured and
+loved by them? Protagoras of Abdera, and Prodicus of Ceos, and a host
+of others, have only to whisper to their contemporaries: ‘You will
+never be able to manage either your own house or your own State until
+you appoint us to be your ministers of education’—and this ingenious
+device of theirs has such an effect in making men love them that their
+companions all but carry them about on their shoulders. And is it
+conceivable that the contemporaries of Homer, or again of Hesiod, would
+have allowed either of them to go about as rhapsodists, if they had
+really been able to make mankind virtuous? Would they not have been as
+unwilling to part with them as with gold, and have compelled them to
+stay at home with them? Or, if the master would not stay, then the
+disciples would have followed him about everywhere, until they had got
+education enough?
+
+Yes, Socrates, that, I think, is quite true.
+
+Then must we not infer that all these poetical individuals, beginning
+with Homer, are only imitators; they copy images of virtue and the
+like, but the truth they never reach? The poet is like a painter who,
+as we have already observed, will make a likeness of a cobbler though
+he understands nothing of cobbling; and his picture is good enough for
+those who know no more than he does, and judge only by colours and
+figures.
+
+Quite so.
+
+In like manner the poet with his words and phrases may be said to lay
+on the colours of the several arts, himself understanding their nature
+only enough to imitate them; and other people, who are as ignorant as
+he is, and judge only from his words, imagine that if he speaks of
+cobbling, or of military tactics, or of anything else, in metre and
+harmony and rhythm, he speaks very well—such is the sweet influence
+which melody and rhythm by nature have. And I think that you must have
+observed again and again what a poor appearance the tales of poets make
+when stripped of the colours which music puts upon them, and recited in
+simple prose.
+
+Yes, he said.
+
+They are like faces which were never really beautiful, but only
+blooming; and now the bloom of youth has passed away from them?
+
+Exactly.
+
+Here is another point: The imitator or maker of the image knows nothing
+of true existence; he knows appearances only. Am I not right?
+
+Yes.
+
+Then let us have a clear understanding, and not be satisfied with half
+an explanation.
+
+Proceed.
+
+Of the painter we say that he will paint reins, and he will paint a
+bit?
+
+Yes.
+
+And the worker in leather and brass will make them?
+
+Certainly.
+
+But does the painter know the right form of the bit and reins? Nay,
+hardly even the workers in brass and leather who make them; only the
+horseman who knows how to use them—he knows their right form.
+
+Most true.
+
+And may we not say the same of all things?
+
+What?
+
+That there are three arts which are concerned with all things: one
+which uses, another which makes, a third which imitates them?
+
+Yes.
+
+And the excellence or beauty or truth of every structure, animate or
+inanimate, and of every action of man, is relative to the use for which
+nature or the artist has intended them.
+
+True.
+
+Then the user of them must have the greatest experience of them, and he
+must indicate to the maker the good or bad qualities which develop
+themselves in use; for example, the flute-player will tell the
+flute-maker which of his flutes is satisfactory to the performer; he
+will tell him how he ought to make them, and the other will attend to
+his instructions?
+
+Of course.
+
+The one knows and therefore speaks with authority about the goodness
+and badness of flutes, while the other, confiding in him, will do what
+he is told by him?
+
+True.
+
+The instrument is the same, but about the excellence or badness of it
+the maker will only attain to a correct belief; and this he will gain
+from him who knows, by talking to him and being compelled to hear what
+he has to say, whereas the user will have knowledge?
+
+True.
+
+But will the imitator have either? Will he know from use whether or no
+his drawing is correct or beautiful? or will he have right opinion from
+being compelled to associate with another who knows and gives him
+instructions about what he should draw?
+
+Neither.
+
+Then he will no more have true opinion than he will have knowledge
+about the goodness or badness of his imitations?
+
+I suppose not.
+
+The imitative artist will be in a brilliant state of intelligence about
+his own creations?
+
+Nay, very much the reverse.
+
+And still he will go on imitating without knowing what makes a thing
+good or bad, and may be expected therefore to imitate only that which
+appears to be good to the ignorant multitude?
+
+Just so.
+
+Thus far then we are pretty well agreed that the imitator has no
+knowledge worth mentioning of what he imitates. Imitation is only a
+kind of play or sport, and the tragic poets, whether they write in
+Iambic or in Heroic verse, are imitators in the highest degree?
+
+Very true.
+
+And now tell me, I conjure you, has not imitation been shown by us to
+be concerned with that which is thrice removed from the truth?
+
+Certainly.
+
+And what is the faculty in man to which imitation is addressed?
+
+What do you mean?
+
+I will explain: The body which is large when seen near, appears small
+when seen at a distance?
+
+True.
+
+And the same object appears straight when looked at out of the water,
+and crooked when in the water; and the concave becomes convex, owing to
+the illusion about colours to which the sight is liable. Thus every
+sort of confusion is revealed within us; and this is that weakness of
+the human mind on which the art of conjuring and of deceiving by light
+and shadow and other ingenious devices imposes, having an effect upon
+us like magic.
+
+True.
+
+And the arts of measuring and numbering and weighing come to the rescue
+of the human understanding—there is the beauty of them—and the apparent
+greater or less, or more or heavier, no longer have the mastery over
+us, but give way before calculation and measure and weight?
+
+Most true.
+
+And this, surely, must be the work of the calculating and rational
+principle in the soul?
+
+To be sure.
+
+And when this principle measures and certifies that some things are
+equal, or that some are greater or less than others, there occurs an
+apparent contradiction?
+
+True.
+
+But were we not saying that such a contradiction is impossible—the same
+faculty cannot have contrary opinions at the same time about the same
+thing?
+
+Very true.
+
+Then that part of the soul which has an opinion contrary to measure is
+not the same with that which has an opinion in accordance with measure?
+
+True.
+
+And the better part of the soul is likely to be that which trusts to
+measure and calculation?
+
+Certainly.
+
+And that which is opposed to them is one of the inferior principles of
+the soul?
+
+No doubt.
+
+This was the conclusion at which I was seeking to arrive when I said
+that painting or drawing, and imitation in general, when doing their
+own proper work, are far removed from truth, and the companions and
+friends and associates of a principle within us which is equally
+removed from reason, and that they have no true or healthy aim.
+
+Exactly.
+
+The imitative art is an inferior who marries an inferior, and has
+inferior offspring.
+
+Very true.
+
+And is this confined to the sight only, or does it extend to the
+hearing also, relating in fact to what we term poetry?
+
+Probably the same would be true of poetry.
+
+Do not rely, I said, on a probability derived from the analogy of
+painting; but let us examine further and see whether the faculty with
+which poetical imitation is concerned is good or bad.
+
+By all means.
+
+We may state the question thus:—Imitation imitates the actions of men,
+whether voluntary or involuntary, on which, as they imagine, a good or
+bad result has ensued, and they rejoice or sorrow accordingly. Is there
+anything more?
+
+No, there is nothing else.
+
+But in all this variety of circumstances is the man at unity with
+himself—or rather, as in the instance of sight there was confusion and
+opposition in his opinions about the same things, so here also is there
+not strife and inconsistency in his life? Though I need hardly raise
+the question again, for I remember that all this has been already
+admitted; and the soul has been acknowledged by us to be full of these
+and ten thousand similar oppositions occurring at the same moment?
+
+And we were right, he said.
+
+Yes, I said, thus far we were right; but there was an omission which
+must now be supplied.
+
+What was the omission?
+
+Were we not saying that a good man, who has the misfortune to lose his
+son or anything else which is most dear to him, will bear the loss with
+more equanimity than another?
+
+Yes.
+
+But will he have no sorrow, or shall we say that although he cannot
+help sorrowing, he will moderate his sorrow?
+
+The latter, he said, is the truer statement.
+
+Tell me: will he be more likely to struggle and hold out against his
+sorrow when he is seen by his equals, or when he is alone?
+
+It will make a great difference whether he is seen or not.
+
+When he is by himself he will not mind saying or doing many things
+which he would be ashamed of any one hearing or seeing him do?
+
+True.
+
+There is a principle of law and reason in him which bids him resist, as
+well as a feeling of his misfortune which is forcing him to indulge his
+sorrow?
+
+True.
+
+But when a man is drawn in two opposite directions, to and from the
+same object, this, as we affirm, necessarily implies two distinct
+principles in him?
+
+Certainly.
+
+One of them is ready to follow the guidance of the law?
+
+How do you mean?
+
+The law would say that to be patient under suffering is best, and that
+we should not give way to impatience, as there is no knowing whether
+such things are good or evil; and nothing is gained by impatience;
+also, because no human thing is of serious importance, and grief stands
+in the way of that which at the moment is most required.
+
+What is most required? he asked.
+
+That we should take counsel about what has happened, and when the dice
+have been thrown order our affairs in the way which reason deems best;
+not, like children who have had a fall, keeping hold of the part struck
+and wasting time in setting up a howl, but always accustoming the soul
+forthwith to apply a remedy, raising up that which is sickly and
+fallen, banishing the cry of sorrow by the healing art.
+
+Yes, he said, that is the true way of meeting the attacks of fortune.
+
+Yes, I said; and the higher principle is ready to follow this
+suggestion of reason?
+
+Clearly.
+
+And the other principle, which inclines us to recollection of our
+troubles and to lamentation, and can never have enough of them, we may
+call irrational, useless, and cowardly?
+
+Indeed, we may.
+
+And does not the latter—I mean the rebellious principle—furnish a great
+variety of materials for imitation? Whereas the wise and calm
+temperament, being always nearly equable, is not easy to imitate or to
+appreciate when imitated, especially at a public festival when a
+promiscuous crowd is assembled in a theatre. For the feeling
+represented is one to which they are strangers.
+
+Certainly.
+
+Then the imitative poet who aims at being popular is not by nature
+made, nor is his art intended, to please or to affect the rational
+principle in the soul; but he will prefer the passionate and fitful
+temper, which is easily imitated?
+
+Clearly.
+
+And now we may fairly take him and place him by the side of the
+painter, for he is like him in two ways: first, inasmuch as his
+creations have an inferior degree of truth—in this, I say, he is like
+him; and he is also like him in being concerned with an inferior part
+of the soul; and therefore we shall be right in refusing to admit him
+into a well-ordered State, because he awakens and nourishes and
+strengthens the feelings and impairs the reason. As in a city when the
+evil are permitted to have authority and the good are put out of the
+way, so in the soul of man, as we maintain, the imitative poet implants
+an evil constitution, for he indulges the irrational nature which has
+no discernment of greater and less, but thinks the same thing at one
+time great and at another small—he is a manufacturer of images and is
+very far removed from the truth.
+
+Exactly.
+
+But we have not yet brought forward the heaviest count in our
+accusation:—the power which poetry has of harming even the good (and
+there are very few who are not harmed), is surely an awful thing?
+
+Yes, certainly, if the effect is what you say.
+
+Hear and judge: The best of us, as I conceive, when we listen to a
+passage of Homer, or one of the tragedians, in which he represents some
+pitiful hero who is drawling out his sorrows in a long oration, or
+weeping, and smiting his breast—the best of us, you know, delight in
+giving way to sympathy, and are in raptures at the excellence of the
+poet who stirs our feelings most.
+
+Yes, of course I know.
+
+But when any sorrow of our own happens to us, then you may observe that
+we pride ourselves on the opposite quality—we would fain be quiet and
+patient; this is the manly part, and the other which delighted us in
+the recitation is now deemed to be the part of a woman.
+
+Very true, he said.
+
+Now can we be right in praising and admiring another who is doing that
+which any one of us would abominate and be ashamed of in his own
+person?
+
+No, he said, that is certainly not reasonable.
+
+Nay, I said, quite reasonable from one point of view.
+
+What point of view?
+
+If you consider, I said, that when in misfortune we feel a natural
+hunger and desire to relieve our sorrow by weeping and lamentation, and
+that this feeling which is kept under control in our own calamities is
+satisfied and delighted by the poets;—the better nature in each of us,
+not having been sufficiently trained by reason or habit, allows the
+sympathetic element to break loose because the sorrow is another’s; and
+the spectator fancies that there can be no disgrace to himself in
+praising and pitying any one who comes telling him what a good man he
+is, and making a fuss about his troubles; he thinks that the pleasure
+is a gain, and why should he be supercilious and lose this and the poem
+too? Few persons ever reflect, as I should imagine, that from the evil
+of other men something of evil is communicated to themselves. And so
+the feeling of sorrow which has gathered strength at the sight of the
+misfortunes of others is with difficulty repressed in our own.
+
+How very true!
+
+And does not the same hold also of the ridiculous? There are jests
+which you would be ashamed to make yourself, and yet on the comic
+stage, or indeed in private, when you hear them, you are greatly amused
+by them, and are not at all disgusted at their unseemliness;—the case
+of pity is repeated;—there is a principle in human nature which is
+disposed to raise a laugh, and this which you once restrained by
+reason, because you were afraid of being thought a buffoon, is now let
+out again; and having stimulated the risible faculty at the theatre,
+you are betrayed unconsciously to yourself into playing the comic poet
+at home.
+
+Quite true, he said.
+
+And the same may be said of lust and anger and all the other
+affections, of desire and pain and pleasure, which are held to be
+inseparable from every action—in all of them poetry feeds and waters
+the passions instead of drying them up; she lets them rule, although
+they ought to be controlled, if mankind are ever to increase in
+happiness and virtue.
+
+I cannot deny it.
+
+Therefore, Glaucon, I said, whenever you meet with any of the eulogists
+of Homer declaring that he has been the educator of Hellas, and that he
+is profitable for education and for the ordering of human things, and
+that you should take him up again and again and get to know him and
+regulate your whole life according to him, we may love and honour those
+who say these things—they are excellent people, as far as their lights
+extend; and we are ready to acknowledge that Homer is the greatest of
+poets and first of tragedy writers; but we must remain firm in our
+conviction that hymns to the gods and praises of famous men are the
+only poetry which ought to be admitted into our State. For if you go
+beyond this and allow the honeyed muse to enter, either in epic or
+lyric verse, not law and the reason of mankind, which by common consent
+have ever been deemed best, but pleasure and pain will be the rulers in
+our State.
+
+That is most true, he said.
+
+And now since we have reverted to the subject of poetry, let this our
+defence serve to show the reasonableness of our former judgment in
+sending away out of our State an art having the tendencies which we
+have described; for reason constrained us. But that she may not impute
+to us any harshness or want of politeness, let us tell her that there
+is an ancient quarrel between philosophy and poetry; of which there are
+many proofs, such as the saying of ‘the yelping hound howling at her
+lord,’ or of one ‘mighty in the vain talk of fools,’ and ‘the mob of
+sages circumventing Zeus,’ and the ‘subtle thinkers who are beggars
+after all’; and there are innumerable other signs of ancient enmity
+between them. Notwithstanding this, let us assure our sweet friend and
+the sister arts of imitation, that if she will only prove her title to
+exist in a well-ordered State we shall be delighted to receive her—we
+are very conscious of her charms; but we may not on that account betray
+the truth. I dare say, Glaucon, that you are as much charmed by her as
+I am, especially when she appears in Homer?
+
+Yes, indeed, I am greatly charmed.
+
+Shall I propose, then, that she be allowed to return from exile, but
+upon this condition only—that she make a defence of herself in lyrical
+or some other metre?
+
+Certainly.
+
+And we may further grant to those of her defenders who are lovers of
+poetry and yet not poets the permission to speak in prose on her
+behalf: let them show not only that she is pleasant but also useful to
+States and to human life, and we will listen in a kindly spirit; for if
+this can be proved we shall surely be the gainers—I mean, if there is a
+use in poetry as well as a delight?
+
+Certainly, he said, we shall be the gainers.
+
+If her defence fails, then, my dear friend, like other persons who are
+enamoured of something, but put a restraint upon themselves when they
+think their desires are opposed to their interests, so too must we
+after the manner of lovers give her up, though not without a struggle.
+We too are inspired by that love of poetry which the education of noble
+States has implanted in us, and therefore we would have her appear at
+her best and truest; but so long as she is unable to make good her
+defence, this argument of ours shall be a charm to us, which we will
+repeat to ourselves while we listen to her strains; that we may not
+fall away into the childish love of her which captivates the many. At
+all events we are well aware that poetry being such as we have
+described is not to be regarded seriously as attaining to the truth;
+and he who listens to her, fearing for the safety of the city which is
+within him, should be on his guard against her seductions and make our
+words his law.
+
+Yes, he said, I quite agree with you.
+
+Yes, I said, my dear Glaucon, for great is the issue at stake, greater
+than appears, whether a man is to be good or bad. And what will any one
+be profited if under the influence of honour or money or power, aye, or
+under the excitement of poetry, he neglect justice and virtue?
+
+Yes, he said; I have been convinced by the argument, as I believe that
+any one else would have been.
+
+And yet no mention has been made of the greatest prizes and rewards
+which await virtue.
+
+What, are there any greater still? If there are, they must be of an
+inconceivable greatness.
+
+Why, I said, what was ever great in a short time? The whole period of
+three score years and ten is surely but a little thing in comparison
+with eternity?
+
+Say rather ‘nothing,’ he replied.
+
+And should an immortal being seriously think of this little space
+rather than of the whole?
+
+Of the whole, certainly. But why do you ask?
+
+Are you not aware, I said, that the soul of man is immortal and
+imperishable?
+
+He looked at me in astonishment, and said: No, by heaven: And are you
+really prepared to maintain this?
+
+Yes, I said, I ought to be, and you too—there is no difficulty in
+proving it.
+
+I see a great difficulty; but I should like to hear you state this
+argument of which you make so light.
+
+Listen then.
+
+I am attending.
+
+There is a thing which you call good and another which you call evil?
+
+Yes, he replied.
+
+Would you agree with me in thinking that the corrupting and destroying
+element is the evil, and the saving and improving element the good?
+
+Yes.
+
+And you admit that every thing has a good and also an evil; as
+ophthalmia is the evil of the eyes and disease of the whole body; as
+mildew is of corn, and rot of timber, or rust of copper and iron: in
+everything, or in almost everything, there is an inherent evil and
+disease?
+
+Yes, he said.
+
+And anything which is infected by any of these evils is made evil, and
+at last wholly dissolves and dies?
+
+True.
+
+The vice and evil which is inherent in each is the destruction of each;
+and if this does not destroy them there is nothing else that will; for
+good certainly will not destroy them, nor again, that which is neither
+good nor evil.
+
+Certainly not.
+
+If, then, we find any nature which having this inherent corruption
+cannot be dissolved or destroyed, we may be certain that of such a
+nature there is no destruction?
+
+That may be assumed.
+
+Well, I said, and is there no evil which corrupts the soul?
+
+Yes, he said, there are all the evils which we were just now passing in
+review: unrighteousness, intemperance, cowardice, ignorance.
+
+But does any of these dissolve or destroy her?—and here do not let us
+fall into the error of supposing that the unjust and foolish man, when
+he is detected, perishes through his own injustice, which is an evil of
+the soul. Take the analogy of the body: The evil of the body is a
+disease which wastes and reduces and annihilates the body; and all the
+things of which we were just now speaking come to annihilation through
+their own corruption attaching to them and inhering in them and so
+destroying them. Is not this true?
+
+Yes.
+
+Consider the soul in like manner. Does the injustice or other evil
+which exists in the soul waste and consume her? Do they by attaching to
+the soul and inhering in her at last bring her to death, and so
+separate her from the body?
+
+Certainly not.
+
+And yet, I said, it is unreasonable to suppose that anything can perish
+from without through affection of external evil which could not be
+destroyed from within by a corruption of its own?
+
+It is, he replied.
+
+Consider, I said, Glaucon, that even the badness of food, whether
+staleness, decomposition, or any other bad quality, when confined to
+the actual food, is not supposed to destroy the body; although, if the
+badness of food communicates corruption to the body, then we should say
+that the body has been destroyed by a corruption of itself, which is
+disease, brought on by this; but that the body, being one thing, can be
+destroyed by the badness of food, which is another, and which does not
+engender any natural infection—this we shall absolutely deny?
+
+Very true.
+
+And, on the same principle, unless some bodily evil can produce an evil
+of the soul, we must not suppose that the soul, which is one thing, can
+be dissolved by any merely external evil which belongs to another?
+
+Yes, he said, there is reason in that.
+
+Either, then, let us refute this conclusion, or, while it remains
+unrefuted, let us never say that fever, or any other disease, or the
+knife put to the throat, or even the cutting up of the whole body into
+the minutest pieces, can destroy the soul, until she herself is proved
+to become more unholy or unrighteous in consequence of these things
+being done to the body; but that the soul, or anything else if not
+destroyed by an internal evil, can be destroyed by an external one, is
+not to be affirmed by any man.
+
+And surely, he replied, no one will ever prove that the souls of men
+become more unjust in consequence of death.
+
+But if some one who would rather not admit the immortality of the soul
+boldly denies this, and says that the dying do really become more evil
+and unrighteous, then, if the speaker is right, I suppose that
+injustice, like disease, must be assumed to be fatal to the unjust, and
+that those who take this disorder die by the natural inherent power of
+destruction which evil has, and which kills them sooner or later, but
+in quite another way from that in which, at present, the wicked receive
+death at the hands of others as the penalty of their deeds?
+
+Nay, he said, in that case injustice, if fatal to the unjust, will not
+be so very terrible to him, for he will be delivered from evil. But I
+rather suspect the opposite to be the truth, and that injustice which,
+if it have the power, will murder others, keeps the murderer alive—aye,
+and well awake too; so far removed is her dwelling-place from being a
+house of death.
+
+True, I said; if the inherent natural vice or evil of the soul is
+unable to kill or destroy her, hardly will that which is appointed to
+be the destruction of some other body, destroy a soul or anything else
+except that of which it was appointed to be the destruction.
+
+Yes, that can hardly be.
+
+But the soul which cannot be destroyed by an evil, whether inherent or
+external, must exist for ever, and if existing for ever, must be
+immortal?
+
+Certainly.
+
+That is the conclusion, I said; and, if a true conclusion, then the
+souls must always be the same, for if none be destroyed they will not
+diminish in number. Neither will they increase, for the increase of the
+immortal natures must come from something mortal, and all things would
+thus end in immortality.
+
+Very true.
+
+But this we cannot believe—reason will not allow us—any more than we
+can believe the soul, in her truest nature, to be full of variety and
+difference and dissimilarity.
+
+What do you mean? he said.
+
+The soul, I said, being, as is now proven, immortal, must be the
+fairest of compositions and cannot be compounded of many elements?
+
+Certainly not.
+
+Her immortality is demonstrated by the previous argument, and there are
+many other proofs; but to see her as she really is, not as we now
+behold her, marred by communion with the body and other miseries, you
+must contemplate her with the eye of reason, in her original purity;
+and then her beauty will be revealed, and justice and injustice and all
+the things which we have described will be manifested more clearly.
+Thus far, we have spoken the truth concerning her as she appears at
+present, but we must remember also that we have seen her only in a
+condition which may be compared to that of the sea-god Glaucus, whose
+original image can hardly be discerned because his natural members are
+broken off and crushed and damaged by the waves in all sorts of ways,
+and incrustations have grown over them of seaweed and shells and
+stones, so that he is more like some monster than he is to his own
+natural form. And the soul which we behold is in a similar condition,
+disfigured by ten thousand ills. But not there, Glaucon, not there must
+we look.
+
+Where then?
+
+At her love of wisdom. Let us see whom she affects, and what society
+and converse she seeks in virtue of her near kindred with the immortal
+and eternal and divine; also how different she would become if wholly
+following this superior principle, and borne by a divine impulse out of
+the ocean in which she now is, and disengaged from the stones and
+shells and things of earth and rock which in wild variety spring up
+around her because she feeds upon earth, and is overgrown by the good
+things of this life as they are termed: then you would see her as she
+is, and know whether she have one shape only or many, or what her
+nature is. Of her affections and of the forms which she takes in this
+present life I think that we have now said enough.
+
+True, he replied.
+
+And thus, I said, we have fulfilled the conditions of the argument; we
+have not introduced the rewards and glories of justice, which, as you
+were saying, are to be found in Homer and Hesiod; but justice in her
+own nature has been shown to be best for the soul in her own nature.
+Let a man do what is just, whether he have the ring of Gyges or not,
+and even if in addition to the ring of Gyges he put on the helmet of
+Hades.
+
+Very true.
+
+And now, Glaucon, there will be no harm in further enumerating how many
+and how great are the rewards which justice and the other virtues
+procure to the soul from gods and men, both in life and after death.
+
+Certainly not, he said.
+
+Will you repay me, then, what you borrowed in the argument?
+
+What did I borrow?
+
+The assumption that the just man should appear unjust and the unjust
+just: for you were of opinion that even if the true state of the case
+could not possibly escape the eyes of gods and men, still this
+admission ought to be made for the sake of the argument, in order that
+pure justice might be weighed against pure injustice. Do you remember?
+
+I should be much to blame if I had forgotten.
+
+Then, as the cause is decided, I demand on behalf of justice that the
+estimation in which she is held by gods and men and which we
+acknowledge to be her due should now be restored to her by us; since
+she has been shown to confer reality, and not to deceive those who
+truly possess her, let what has been taken from her be given back, that
+so she may win that palm of appearance which is hers also, and which
+she gives to her own.
+
+The demand, he said, is just.
+
+In the first place, I said—and this is the first thing which you will
+have to give back—the nature both of the just and unjust is truly known
+to the gods.
+
+Granted.
+
+And if they are both known to them, one must be the friend and the
+other the enemy of the gods, as we admitted from the beginning?
+
+True.
+
+And the friend of the gods may be supposed to receive from them all
+things at their best, excepting only such evil as is the necessary
+consequence of former sins?
+
+Certainly.
+
+Then this must be our notion of the just man, that even when he is in
+poverty or sickness, or any other seeming misfortune, all things will
+in the end work together for good to him in life and death: for the
+gods have a care of any one whose desire is to become just and to be
+like God, as far as man can attain the divine likeness, by the pursuit
+of virtue?
+
+Yes, he said; if he is like God he will surely not be neglected by him.
+
+And of the unjust may not the opposite be supposed?
+
+Certainly.
+
+Such, then, are the palms of victory which the gods give the just?
+
+That is my conviction.
+
+And what do they receive of men? Look at things as they really are, and
+you will see that the clever unjust are in the case of runners, who run
+well from the starting-place to the goal but not back again from the
+goal: they go off at a great pace, but in the end only look foolish,
+slinking away with their ears draggling on their shoulders, and without
+a crown; but the true runner comes to the finish and receives the prize
+and is crowned. And this is the way with the just; he who endures to
+the end of every action and occasion of his entire life has a good
+report and carries off the prize which men have to bestow.
+
+True.
+
+And now you must allow me to repeat of the just the blessings which you
+were attributing to the fortunate unjust. I shall say of them, what you
+were saying of the others, that as they grow older, they become rulers
+in their own city if they care to be; they marry whom they like and
+give in marriage to whom they will; all that you said of the others I
+now say of these. And, on the other hand, of the unjust I say that the
+greater number, even though they escape in their youth, are found out
+at last and look foolish at the end of their course, and when they come
+to be old and miserable are flouted alike by stranger and citizen; they
+are beaten and then come those things unfit for ears polite, as you
+truly term them; they will be racked and have their eyes burned out, as
+you were saying. And you may suppose that I have repeated the remainder
+of your tale of horrors. But will you let me assume, without reciting
+them, that these things are true?
+
+Certainly, he said, what you say is true.
+
+These, then, are the prizes and rewards and gifts which are bestowed
+upon the just by gods and men in this present life, in addition to the
+other good things which justice of herself provides.
+
+Yes, he said; and they are fair and lasting.
+
+And yet, I said, all these are as nothing either in number or greatness
+in comparison with those other recompenses which await both just and
+unjust after death. And you ought to hear them, and then both just and
+unjust will have received from us a full payment of the debt which the
+argument owes to them.
+
+Speak, he said; there are few things which I would more gladly hear.
+
+Well, I said, I will tell you a tale; not one of the tales which
+Odysseus tells to the hero Alcinous, yet this too is a tale of a hero,
+Er the son of Armenius, a Pamphylian by birth. He was slain in battle,
+and ten days afterwards, when the bodies of the dead were taken up
+already in a state of corruption, his body was found unaffected by
+decay, and carried away home to be buried. And on the twelfth day, as
+he was lying on the funeral pile, he returned to life and told them
+what he had seen in the other world. He said that when his soul left
+the body he went on a journey with a great company, and that they came
+to a mysterious place at which there were two openings in the earth;
+they were near together, and over against them were two other openings
+in the heaven above. In the intermediate space there were judges
+seated, who commanded the just, after they had given judgment on them
+and had bound their sentences in front of them, to ascend by the
+heavenly way on the right hand; and in like manner the unjust were
+bidden by them to descend by the lower way on the left hand; these also
+bore the symbols of their deeds, but fastened on their backs. He drew
+near, and they told him that he was to be the messenger who would carry
+the report of the other world to men, and they bade him hear and see
+all that was to be heard and seen in that place. Then he beheld and saw
+on one side the souls departing at either opening of heaven and earth
+when sentence had been given on them; and at the two other openings
+other souls, some ascending out of the earth dusty and worn with
+travel, some descending out of heaven clean and bright. And arriving
+ever and anon they seemed to have come from a long journey, and they
+went forth with gladness into the meadow, where they encamped as at a
+festival; and those who knew one another embraced and conversed, the
+souls which came from earth curiously enquiring about the things above,
+and the souls which came from heaven about the things beneath. And they
+told one another of what had happened by the way, those from below
+weeping and sorrowing at the remembrance of the things which they had
+endured and seen in their journey beneath the earth (now the journey
+lasted a thousand years), while those from above were describing
+heavenly delights and visions of inconceivable beauty. The story,
+Glaucon, would take too long to tell; but the sum was this:—He said
+that for every wrong which they had done to any one they suffered
+tenfold; or once in a hundred years—such being reckoned to be the
+length of man’s life, and the penalty being thus paid ten times in a
+thousand years. If, for example, there were any who had been the cause
+of many deaths, or had betrayed or enslaved cities or armies, or been
+guilty of any other evil behaviour, for each and all of their offences
+they received punishment ten times over, and the rewards of beneficence
+and justice and holiness were in the same proportion. I need hardly
+repeat what he said concerning young children dying almost as soon as
+they were born. Of piety and impiety to gods and parents, and of
+murderers, there were retributions other and greater far which he
+described. He mentioned that he was present when one of the spirits
+asked another, ‘Where is Ardiaeus the Great?’ (Now this Ardiaeus lived
+a thousand years before the time of Er: he had been the tyrant of some
+city of Pamphylia, and had murdered his aged father and his elder
+brother, and was said to have committed many other abominable crimes.)
+The answer of the other spirit was: ‘He comes not hither and will never
+come. And this,’ said he, ‘was one of the dreadful sights which we
+ourselves witnessed. We were at the mouth of the cavern, and, having
+completed all our experiences, were about to reascend, when of a sudden
+Ardiaeus appeared and several others, most of whom were tyrants; and
+there were also besides the tyrants private individuals who had been
+great criminals: they were just, as they fancied, about to return into
+the upper world, but the mouth, instead of admitting them, gave a roar,
+whenever any of these incurable sinners or some one who had not been
+sufficiently punished tried to ascend; and then wild men of fiery
+aspect, who were standing by and heard the sound, seized and carried
+them off; and Ardiaeus and others they bound head and foot and hand,
+and threw them down and flayed them with scourges, and dragged them
+along the road at the side, carding them on thorns like wool, and
+declaring to the passers-by what were their crimes, and that they were
+being taken away to be cast into hell.’ And of all the many terrors
+which they had endured, he said that there was none like the terror
+which each of them felt at that moment, lest they should hear the
+voice; and when there was silence, one by one they ascended with
+exceeding joy. These, said Er, were the penalties and retributions, and
+there were blessings as great.
+
+Now when the spirits which were in the meadow had tarried seven days,
+on the eighth they were obliged to proceed on their journey, and, on
+the fourth day after, he said that they came to a place where they
+could see from above a line of light, straight as a column, extending
+right through the whole heaven and through the earth, in colour
+resembling the rainbow, only brighter and purer; another day’s journey
+brought them to the place, and there, in the midst of the light, they
+saw the ends of the chains of heaven let down from above: for this
+light is the belt of heaven, and holds together the circle of the
+universe, like the under-girders of a trireme. From these ends is
+extended the spindle of Necessity, on which all the revolutions turn.
+The shaft and hook of this spindle are made of steel, and the whorl is
+made partly of steel and also partly of other materials. Now the whorl
+is in form like the whorl used on earth; and the description of it
+implied that there is one large hollow whorl which is quite scooped
+out, and into this is fitted another lesser one, and another, and
+another, and four others, making eight in all, like vessels which fit
+into one another; the whorls show their edges on the upper side, and on
+their lower side all together form one continuous whorl. This is
+pierced by the spindle, which is driven home through the centre of the
+eighth. The first and outermost whorl has the rim broadest, and the
+seven inner whorls are narrower, in the following proportions—the sixth
+is next to the first in size, the fourth next to the sixth; then comes
+the eighth; the seventh is fifth, the fifth is sixth, the third is
+seventh, last and eighth comes the second. The largest (or fixed stars)
+is spangled, and the seventh (or sun) is brightest; the eighth (or
+moon) coloured by the reflected light of the seventh; the second and
+fifth (Saturn and Mercury) are in colour like one another, and yellower
+than the preceding; the third (Venus) has the whitest light; the fourth
+(Mars) is reddish; the sixth (Jupiter) is in whiteness second. Now the
+whole spindle has the same motion; but, as the whole revolves in one
+direction, the seven inner circles move slowly in the other, and of
+these the swiftest is the eighth; next in swiftness are the seventh,
+sixth, and fifth, which move together; third in swiftness appeared to
+move according to the law of this reversed motion the fourth; the third
+appeared fourth and the second fifth. The spindle turns on the knees of
+Necessity; and on the upper surface of each circle is a siren, who goes
+round with them, hymning a single tone or note. The eight together form
+one harmony; and round about, at equal intervals, there is another
+band, three in number, each sitting upon her throne: these are the
+Fates, daughters of Necessity, who are clothed in white robes and have
+chaplets upon their heads, Lachesis and Clotho and Atropos, who
+accompany with their voices the harmony of the sirens—Lachesis singing
+of the past, Clotho of the present, Atropos of the future; Clotho from
+time to time assisting with a touch of her right hand the revolution of
+the outer circle of the whorl or spindle, and Atropos with her left
+hand touching and guiding the inner ones, and Lachesis laying hold of
+either in turn, first with one hand and then with the other.
+
+When Er and the spirits arrived, their duty was to go at once to
+Lachesis; but first of all there came a prophet who arranged them in
+order; then he took from the knees of Lachesis lots and samples of
+lives, and having mounted a high pulpit, spoke as follows: ‘Hear the
+word of Lachesis, the daughter of Necessity. Mortal souls, behold a new
+cycle of life and mortality. Your genius will not be allotted to you,
+but you will choose your genius; and let him who draws the first lot
+have the first choice, and the life which he chooses shall be his
+destiny. Virtue is free, and as a man honours or dishonours her he will
+have more or less of her; the responsibility is with the chooser—God is
+justified.’ When the Interpreter had thus spoken he scattered lots
+indifferently among them all, and each of them took up the lot which
+fell near him, all but Er himself (he was not allowed), and each as he
+took his lot perceived the number which he had obtained. Then the
+Interpreter placed on the ground before them the samples of lives; and
+there were many more lives than the souls present, and they were of all
+sorts. There were lives of every animal and of man in every condition.
+And there were tyrannies among them, some lasting out the tyrant’s
+life, others which broke off in the middle and came to an end in
+poverty and exile and beggary; and there were lives of famous men, some
+who were famous for their form and beauty as well as for their strength
+and success in games, or, again, for their birth and the qualities of
+their ancestors; and some who were the reverse of famous for the
+opposite qualities. And of women likewise; there was not, however, any
+definite character in them, because the soul, when choosing a new life,
+must of necessity become different. But there was every other quality,
+and the all mingled with one another, and also with elements of wealth
+and poverty, and disease and health; and there were mean states also.
+And here, my dear Glaucon, is the supreme peril of our human state; and
+therefore the utmost care should be taken. Let each one of us leave
+every other kind of knowledge and seek and follow one thing only, if
+peradventure he may be able to learn and may find some one who will
+make him able to learn and discern between good and evil, and so to
+choose always and everywhere the better life as he has opportunity. He
+should consider the bearing of all these things which have been
+mentioned severally and collectively upon virtue; he should know what
+the effect of beauty is when combined with poverty or wealth in a
+particular soul, and what are the good and evil consequences of noble
+and humble birth, of private and public station, of strength and
+weakness, of cleverness and dullness, and of all the natural and
+acquired gifts of the soul, and the operation of them when conjoined;
+he will then look at the nature of the soul, and from the consideration
+of all these qualities he will be able to determine which is the better
+and which is the worse; and so he will choose, giving the name of evil
+to the life which will make his soul more unjust, and good to the life
+which will make his soul more just; all else he will disregard. For we
+have seen and know that this is the best choice both in life and after
+death. A man must take with him into the world below an adamantine
+faith in truth and right, that there too he may be undazzled by the
+desire of wealth or the other allurements of evil, lest, coming upon
+tyrannies and similar villainies, he do irremediable wrongs to others
+and suffer yet worse himself; but let him know how to choose the mean
+and avoid the extremes on either side, as far as possible, not only in
+this life but in all that which is to come. For this is the way of
+happiness.
+
+And according to the report of the messenger from the other world this
+was what the prophet said at the time: ‘Even for the last comer, if he
+chooses wisely and will live diligently, there is appointed a happy and
+not undesirable existence. Let not him who chooses first be careless,
+and let not the last despair.’ And when he had spoken, he who had the
+first choice came forward and in a moment chose the greatest tyranny;
+his mind having been darkened by folly and sensuality, he had not
+thought out the whole matter before he chose, and did not at first
+sight perceive that he was fated, among other evils, to devour his own
+children. But when he had time to reflect, and saw what was in the lot,
+he began to beat his breast and lament over his choice, forgetting the
+proclamation of the prophet; for, instead of throwing the blame of his
+misfortune on himself, he accused chance and the gods, and everything
+rather than himself. Now he was one of those who came from heaven, and
+in a former life had dwelt in a well-ordered State, but his virtue was
+a matter of habit only, and he had no philosophy. And it was true of
+others who were similarly overtaken, that the greater number of them
+came from heaven and therefore they had never been schooled by trial,
+whereas the pilgrims who came from earth having themselves suffered and
+seen others suffer, were not in a hurry to choose. And owing to this
+inexperience of theirs, and also because the lot was a chance, many of
+the souls exchanged a good destiny for an evil or an evil for a good.
+For if a man had always on his arrival in this world dedicated himself
+from the first to sound philosophy, and had been moderately fortunate
+in the number of the lot, he might, as the messenger reported, be happy
+here, and also his journey to another life and return to this, instead
+of being rough and underground, would be smooth and heavenly. Most
+curious, he said, was the spectacle—sad and laughable and strange; for
+the choice of the souls was in most cases based on their experience of
+a previous life. There he saw the soul which had once been Orpheus
+choosing the life of a swan out of enmity to the race of women, hating
+to be born of a woman because they had been his murderers; he beheld
+also the soul of Thamyras choosing the life of a nightingale; birds, on
+the other hand, like the swan and other musicians, wanting to be men.
+The soul which obtained the twentieth lot chose the life of a lion, and
+this was the soul of Ajax the son of Telamon, who would not be a man,
+remembering the injustice which was done him in the judgment about the
+arms. The next was Agamemnon, who took the life of an eagle, because,
+like Ajax, he hated human nature by reason of his sufferings. About the
+middle came the lot of Atalanta; she, seeing the great fame of an
+athlete, was unable to resist the temptation: and after her there
+followed the soul of Epeus the son of Panopeus passing into the nature
+of a woman cunning in the arts; and far away among the last who chose,
+the soul of the jester Thersites was putting on the form of a monkey.
+There came also the soul of Odysseus having yet to make a choice, and
+his lot happened to be the last of them all. Now the recollection of
+former toils had disenchanted him of ambition, and he went about for a
+considerable time in search of the life of a private man who had no
+cares; he had some difficulty in finding this, which was lying about
+and had been neglected by everybody else; and when he saw it, he said
+that he would have done the same had his lot been first instead of
+last, and that he was delighted to have it. And not only did men pass
+into animals, but I must also mention that there were animals tame and
+wild who changed into one another and into corresponding human
+natures—the good into the gentle and the evil into the savage, in all
+sorts of combinations.
+
+All the souls had now chosen their lives, and they went in the order of
+their choice to Lachesis, who sent with them the genius whom they had
+severally chosen, to be the guardian of their lives and the fulfiller
+of the choice: this genius led the souls first to Clotho, and drew them
+within the revolution of the spindle impelled by her hand, thus
+ratifying the destiny of each; and then, when they were fastened to
+this, carried them to Atropos, who spun the threads and made them
+irreversible, whence without turning round they passed beneath the
+throne of Necessity; and when they had all passed, they marched on in a
+scorching heat to the plain of Forgetfulness, which was a barren waste
+destitute of trees and verdure; and then towards evening they encamped
+by the river of Unmindfulness, whose water no vessel can hold; of this
+they were all obliged to drink a certain quantity, and those who were
+not saved by wisdom drank more than was necessary; and each one as he
+drank forgot all things. Now after they had gone to rest, about the
+middle of the night there was a thunderstorm and earthquake, and then
+in an instant they were driven upwards in all manner of ways to their
+birth, like stars shooting. He himself was hindered from drinking the
+water. But in what manner or by what means he returned to the body he
+could not say; only, in the morning, awaking suddenly, he found himself
+lying on the pyre.
+
+And thus, Glaucon, the tale has been saved and has not perished, and
+will save us if we are obedient to the word spoken; and we shall pass
+safely over the river of Forgetfulness and our soul will not be
+defiled. Wherefore my counsel is, that we hold fast ever to the
+heavenly way and follow after justice and virtue always, considering
+that the soul is immortal and able to endure every sort of good and
+every sort of evil. Thus shall we live dear to one another and to the
+gods, both while remaining here and when, like conquerors in the games
+who go round to gather gifts, we receive our reward. And it shall be
+well with us both in this life and in the pilgrimage of a thousand
+years which we have been describing.
+
+
+
+
+
+        
+            *** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE REPUBLIC ***
+        
+
+    
+
+Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
+be renamed.
+
+Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
+law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
+so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United
+States without permission and without paying copyright
+royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part
+of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project
+Gutenbergâ„¢ electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERGâ„¢
+concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark,
+and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following
+the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use
+of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for
+copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very
+easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation
+of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project
+Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away—you may
+do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected
+by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark
+license, especially commercial redistribution.
+
+
+START: FULL LICENSE
+
+THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
+
+PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
+
+To protect the Project Gutenbergâ„¢ mission of promoting the free
+distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
+(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project
+Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full
+Project Gutenbergâ„¢ License available with this file or online at
+www.gutenberg.org/license.
+
+Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenbergâ„¢
+electronic works
+
+1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenbergâ„¢
+electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
+and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
+(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
+the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or
+destroy all copies of Project Gutenbergâ„¢ electronic works in your
+possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a
+Project Gutenbergâ„¢ electronic work and you do not agree to be bound
+by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person
+or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
+
+1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be
+used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
+agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
+things that you can do with most Project Gutenbergâ„¢ electronic works
+even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
+paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
+Gutenbergâ„¢ electronic works if you follow the terms of this
+agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenbergâ„¢
+electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
+
+1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the
+Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection
+of Project Gutenbergâ„¢ electronic works. Nearly all the individual
+works in the collection are in the public domain in the United
+States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the
+United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
+claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
+displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
+all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
+that you will support the Project Gutenbergâ„¢ mission of promoting
+free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenbergâ„¢
+works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the
+Project Gutenbergâ„¢ name associated with the work. You can easily
+comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the
+same format with its attached full Project Gutenbergâ„¢ License when
+you share it without charge with others.
+
+1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
+what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are
+in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States,
+check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this
+agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
+distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
+other Project Gutenbergâ„¢ work. The Foundation makes no
+representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
+country other than the United States.
+
+1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
+
+1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other
+immediate access to, the full Project Gutenbergâ„¢ License must appear
+prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenbergâ„¢ work (any work
+on which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or with which the
+phrase “Project Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed,
+performed, viewed, copied or distributed:
+
+    This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most
+    other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
+    whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
+    of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online
+    at www.gutenberg.org. If you
+    are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws
+    of the country where you are located before using this eBook.
+  
+1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenbergâ„¢ electronic work is
+derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
+contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
+copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in
+the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
+redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase “Project
+Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply
+either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or
+obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenbergâ„¢
+trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenbergâ„¢ electronic work is posted
+with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
+must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
+additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
+will be linked to the Project Gutenbergâ„¢ License for all works
+posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the
+beginning of this work.
+
+1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenbergâ„¢
+License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
+work or any other work associated with Project Gutenbergâ„¢.
+
+1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
+electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
+prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
+active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
+Gutenbergâ„¢ License.
+
+1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
+compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
+any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access
+to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenbergâ„¢ work in a format
+other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in the official
+version posted on the official Project Gutenbergâ„¢ website
+(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
+to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means
+of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original “Plain
+Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must include the
+full Project Gutenbergâ„¢ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
+
+1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
+performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenbergâ„¢ works
+unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
+
+1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
+access to or distributing Project Gutenbergâ„¢ electronic works
+provided that:
+
+    • You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
+        the use of Project Gutenbergâ„¢ works calculated using the method
+        you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed
+        to the owner of the Project Gutenbergâ„¢ trademark, but he has
+        agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project
+        Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid
+        within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are
+        legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty
+        payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project
+        Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in
+        Section 4, “Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg
+        Literary Archive Foundation.”
+    
+    • You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
+        you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
+        does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenbergâ„¢
+        License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
+        copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue
+        all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenbergâ„¢
+        works.
+    
+    • You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of
+        any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
+        electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
+        receipt of the work.
+    
+    • You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
+        distribution of Project Gutenbergâ„¢ works.
+    
+
+1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project
+Gutenbergâ„¢ electronic work or group of works on different terms than
+are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing
+from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of
+the Project Gutenbergâ„¢ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set
+forth in Section 3 below.
+
+1.F.
+
+1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
+effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
+works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project
+Gutenbergâ„¢ collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenbergâ„¢
+electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may
+contain “Defects,” such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate
+or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
+intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or
+other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
+cannot be read by your equipment.
+
+1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the “Right
+of Replacement or Refund” described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
+Gutenbergâ„¢ trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
+Gutenbergâ„¢ electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
+liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
+fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
+LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
+PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
+TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
+LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
+INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
+DAMAGE.
+
+1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
+defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
+receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
+written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
+received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium
+with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you
+with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in
+lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person
+or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
+opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If
+the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing
+without further opportunities to fix the problem.
+
+1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
+in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO
+OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT
+LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
+
+1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
+warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
+damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement
+violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the
+agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or
+limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or
+unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the
+remaining provisions.
+
+1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
+trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
+providing copies of Project Gutenbergâ„¢ electronic works in
+accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the
+production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenbergâ„¢
+electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses,
+including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of
+the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this
+or any Project Gutenbergâ„¢ work, (b) alteration, modification, or
+additions or deletions to any Project Gutenbergâ„¢ work, and (c) any
+Defect you cause.
+
+Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenbergâ„¢
+
+Project Gutenbergâ„¢ is synonymous with the free distribution of
+electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
+computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
+exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
+from people in all walks of life.
+
+Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
+assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg™’s
+goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenbergâ„¢ collection will
+remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
+Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
+and permanent future for Project Gutenbergâ„¢ and future
+generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see
+Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.
+
+Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
+
+The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit
+501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
+state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
+Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal tax identification
+number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by
+U.S. federal laws and your state’s laws.
+
+The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500 West,
+Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up
+to date contact information can be found at the Foundation’s website
+and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact
+
+Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
+Literary Archive Foundation
+
+Project Gutenbergâ„¢ depends upon and cannot survive without widespread
+public support and donations to carry out its mission of
+increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
+freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest
+array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
+($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
+status with the IRS.
+
+The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
+charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
+States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
+considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
+with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
+where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
+DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular state
+visit www.gutenberg.org/donate.
+
+While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
+have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
+against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
+approach us with offers to donate.
+
+International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
+any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
+outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
+
+Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
+methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
+ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
+donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.
+
+Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenbergâ„¢ electronic works
+
+Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
+Gutenbergâ„¢ concept of a library of electronic works that could be
+freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
+distributed Project Gutenbergâ„¢ eBooks with only a loose network of
+volunteer support.
+
+Project Gutenbergâ„¢ eBooks are often created from several printed
+editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
+the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
+necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
+edition.
+
+Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
+facility: www.gutenberg.org.
+
+This website includes information about Project Gutenbergâ„¢,
+including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
+Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
+subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
+
+
-- 
GitLab