Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit ba40d194 authored by External User dhorsman's avatar External User dhorsman
Browse files

added risks to proposal outline

parent 20e523a0
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -1303,6 +1303,85 @@ Complete deep-\zx compiler stack with open\\
\end{center}
\e
\paragraph{Critical risks for implementation}
\label{sec:crit-risks-impl}
\REM{Describe any critical risks, relating to project implementation, that
the stated project's objectives may not be achieved. Detail any risk
mitigation measures.\textbf{Please provide a table with critical risks
identified and mitigating actions (template provided).}
}
The project is overall quite high-risk, in the sense that what we
propose is in the most part entirely novel, and might fail. The
rewards for success would be correspondingly great. However, we have
designed the project to survive the failure of many (or even most) of
its tasks and still deliver value.
We mix low and high risk activities. Success in low
risk activities (\ref{task:trans1}, \ref{task:basic-opt}, \ref{task:ECC},
%\ref{task:axioms}, THIS IS NOT REAALY LOW RISK
\ref{task:circuit-model}, \ref{task:mbqc-model})
will still deliver significant progress towards our overall objective.
\oldt{\ref{wp:theory} is the most critical; here we mitigate the risk by
(i) developing experience on easier objectives before addressing more
demanding ones and (ii) consulting our board of advisors to foresee
problems. Due to its high dependence on other tasks, we consider
\ref{wp:usefulstuff} to be highest risk.}\TODOb{This doesn't seem quite up-to-date, also see below}
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{|p{0.25\textwidth}|c|c|p{0.4\textwidth}|}
\textbf{Description of risk}
& \textbf{Likelihood}
& \textbf{WPs involved}
& \textbf{Proposed mitigation measures}\\\hline
%
Can't hire suitable post-docs&
Medium&
All&
While we have already identified several suitable candidates for each
role, the investigators also collectively supervise a large body of PhD
students and post-docs who could be channelled to the project.
\\\hline
%
NQIT or Grenoble machine info unavailable or not detailed enough&
Low&
\ref{wp:usefulstuff}&
\oldt{(i) We have members of the consortium from NQIT, and letters of
support from DiCarlo who agrees to help. (ii) We can approach other
members of our board of advisors, or other friendly
experimentalists. (iii) We can target an more abstract model of the
machine} \\\hline
%
Some desired technique or algorithm isn't found&
High&
All&
All tasks where this is a risk have been structured as a collection of
related goals; if some part doesn't succeed then the finished system
will be will have fewer features, or worse performance. However it's
very unlikely that an entire task will fail in a way that jeopardises
the project. \\\hline
%
Software integration issues&
Medium&
All&
(i) We will establish a common API in \ref{del:earlyapi} to allow
loose coupling of the software components (ii) We appoint the most
experienced software developer in the consortium (Valiron) to act as ``integration tzar'' and ensure
the global design is good. (iii) As noted above, we will integrate
often and deliver new features more than once a year.
\\\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\newpage
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment